ZP>nNO~PFM>FoOC CESSNA 150/LYCOMING O-320-E2D LIMITED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RUSSELL E. ERB sjor, USAF Projec ight ‘Test Engineer JEAN M, FERNAND Lt Col, USAF Project Pilot DTIC QUALITY INSPECTED @ October 1996 FINAL REPORT. Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICS USAF ACADEMY UNITED STATES AIR FORCE &pt 90202661‘This Technical Report (Cessna 150/Lycoming 0-320-E2D Limited Performance Evaluation) was submitted by the Department of Aeronautics, United States Air Force Academy, Colorado, 80840-6222. Approved for Public Release. Distribution Unlimited. 2 Wee tk kB, Department of Aeronautics Department of Acronautics M Maul Fowanh Litenant Cotonel, USAF Project Pilot Department of AeronauticsREPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE coun no o7ov188 san Toilets tn abe tan Ss. T AGENCY USE ONLY (leave blank] |i. REPORT DATE REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED, October 1996 Final_3 Jul 95 - 16 May 96 aE AND SUBTITLE &ROTHORST 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Cessna 150/Lycoming 0-320-E20 Limited Performance Evaluation Erb, Russell E. Fernand, Jean M. 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S] AND ADDRESSTEST T-PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Department of Aeronautics 2354 Fairchild Or., Suite 6H22 United States Air Force Academy, CO 80840-6222 5. SPONSORING /MONTORING AGENCY NAMETS) AND AODRESSTES) 10. SPONSORING [MONITORING Ti. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Tia, OISTRIBUTION TAVATABIITY STATEMENT Tab, DISTRIBUTION CODE 94th Flying Training Squadron AGENCY REPORT NUMBER United States Air Force Academy, CO 80840 Distribution is approved for public release. TE ABSTRACT (Maximum 200007) a This report presents the results of a limited performance evaluation of the USAF Acadeny Cadet Competition Flying Team Cessna 150. Each aircraft was fitted with a Lycoming 0-320-E2D engine of 150 horsepower. The general objective of this evaluation was to determine the modified Cessna 150 performance characteristics for purposes of generating flight manual performance charts. Flight test data were reduced and used to develop a computer model of the aircraft using the Reciprocating Engine and Propeller Modeling Program (RPK). This computer model was then used to create performance charts and tabulated data for the flight regimes tested for inclusion in the next update of the Flight Manual. No changes to existing Flight Manual performance speeds were recommended. Additional testing was recomended to investigate any performance differences between airframes and to further validate the performance charts presented in this report. SUBIECT TEAMS TS. NOMBER OF PAGES Cessna_150 fuel flow takeoff GPs 0-320-E20 rate of climb modeling TE: PRICE CODE performance rate of descent Pitot-stati TT SECURTTY CLASSTICATION ] 16 SECURITY CLASSIFICATION [19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION [70, UNMITATION OF ABSTRACT OF Reront OF This PAGE OF ABSTRACT UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED TEN TSCDOT IT SSOD Standard Form—————— — —— — — PREFACE This report presents the results of the limited performance evaluation of the United States Air Force ‘Academy Cadet Competition Flying Team Cessna 150s. In each aircraf, the original Continental 0-200 engine was replaced with a Lycoming 0-320-E2D engine, This testing was conducted to generate new performance data for inclusion in the aircraft flight manual. This test was accomplished by the Department of Aeronautics for the 94th Flying ‘Training Squadron (FTS). The 94th FTS provided the aircraft and flight time, The Department of ‘Aeronautics provided the flight test aircrew. Sincere appreciation is expressed to Captain Gerald Peaslee of the 94th FTS and Dale Zawacki and his maintenance crew of UNC Aviation Services for their support in scheduling and maintenance of the aircraft‘This page intentionally left blank.Le ee EXECUTIVE This report presents the results of a limited performance evaluation of the USAF Academy Cadet Competition Flying Team (CCFT) Cessna 150. Each aircraft was fitted with a Lycoming 0-320-E2D engine ‘of 150 horsepower in place of the production Continental 0-200 of 100 horsepower. This program consisted of 24 flights totalling 41.0 flight hours during the period of 3 July 1995 to 16 May 1996, ‘The general objective of this evaluation was to determine the modified Cessna 150 performance characteristics for purposes of generating flight manual performance charts. Arcas included were pitot-static calibration, and cruise, climb, descent, and takeoff performance, All objectives were met Flight test data were reduced and used to develop a computer model of the aircraft using the Reciprocating, Engine and Propeller Modeling Program (RPM). This ‘computer model was then used to create performance SUMMARY charts and tabulated data for the flight regimes tested for inclusion in the next update of the Flight Manual. Cruise and climb data, including airspeeds, climb rates, engine settings, and fuel flow rates were satisfactorily modeled. Pitot-static corrections, descent data, and takeoff data were reduced and presented using traditional methods. [No changes to existing Flight Manual performance speeds were recommended. Additional testing was recommended to investigate any performance differences between airframes and to further validate the performance charts presented in this report ‘The performance of the CCFT Cessna 150 was satisfactorily characterized, Further testing should address the recommendations of this report, and the results of this testing should be incorporated in the Flight Manual‘This page intentionally let blank.TABLE OF CON Bage No, PREFACE. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS xi LIST OF TABLES, ~w INTRODUCTION. 1 Background 1 ‘Test Objective. 1 1 ‘Test Item Description TEST AND EVALUATION, General Cruise Performance. Test Objectives. Test Procedures. ‘Test Results . Flight Test Data Reduction.. RPM Model Generation. Predicted Aircraft Performance... Pitot-Static Calibration ‘Test Objectives ‘Test Procedures GPS Speed Course Method... GPS Ground Speed Method. Test Results... Climb Performance. ‘Test Objectives. ‘Test Procedures Test Results. Descent Performance. ‘Test Objectives. Test Procedures. Test Results‘Takeoff Performance: B Test Objectives so sonnei TS Test Procedures . 13 Test Results 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. REFERENCES, . v7 APPENDIX A - TEST DATA, 19 APPENDIX B - FLIGHT MANUAL INPUTS, — 103 APPENDIX C - AIRCRAFT MODELING. 47 Matching RPM Model to Flight Test Data 18 Propeller Model Adjustment. us Engine Model Adjustment 118. Fuel Flow Adjustment. : 7 es 19 Full Throttle Modeling... seoennreee 120 Rate of Climb Adjustment, 120 Aireraft Model File C150150.ACF .... vo . sonnei DT Engine Model File LO320A.ENG. eis: Propeller Model File C150150.PRP..... senna . soon BA APPENDIX D - FLIGHT TEST TECHNIQUE AND DATA REDUCTION DETAILED DESCRIPTION, 138 Cruise Performance ...snn soon so soon 136 Test Procedures 136 Data Reduction Methods sensei IST Data Presentation ssn sont sone 139 ‘Truc Airspood and RPM at Non-Standard Conditions. 139 Fuel Flow at Non-Standard Conditions. seonninnininnnsnnnnsinnnnnnsenes 40 Range and Endurance at Non-Standard Conditions Mi Pitot-Statie Calibration . soon FD ‘Test Procedures Mi GPS Speed Course Method ML Data Reduction Methods, fei GPS Ground Speed Method. 7 Ms Data Reduction Methods, 14s Climb Performance. “7 Test Procedures “47 Data Reduction Methods... . “7 Data Presentation 17 villDescent Performance Test Procedures: Data Reduction Methods Data Presentation ‘Takeoff Performance Test Procedures. Data Reduction Methods Data Presentation... LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS. 148 148 48 150 150 150 150 182 158‘This page intentionally left blankFigure 1 AL a aM as 46 ar ay Alo Al An Als Ald Als Als AIT Als Aly A20 7 An a2 23 Ans Aas A26 ant LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Title Cessna 150 General Arrangement APPENDIX A Engine Horsepower Determination Methods Comparison Drag Polar Curve Fit NSS7TH Drag Results Compared to Aircraft Drag Polar. NSS7AW Drag Results Compared to Aircraft Drag Polar 'NSS7SH Drag Results Compared to Aircraft Drag Polar... Brake Horsepower Requited Curve Fit NSS7TH Brake Honpover Required Results Compared to Aiea Brake Horsepower Required... NSSTAW Brake Horsepower eq Results Compared to Aira rake Horsepnner Required. a 7 . 'NSSTSH Brake Horsepower Require Results Compared t Aicraf Brake Horsepower Required... 7 Brake specie Fuel Consumption Results. Specific Air Range Results... Specific Endurance Results, Cruise Airspeed Performance Cruise RPM Performance Cruise Fuel Flow Performance, se Dual Constant Airspeed Cruise Range Performance. Dual Constant Airspeed Cruise Range Performance With 45 Minute Reserve. Dual Constant Airspeed Cruise Endurance Performance, Dual Constant Airspeed Cruise Endurance Performance With 45 Minute Reserve... Solo Constant Airspeed Cruise Range Performance. Solo Constant Airspeed Cruise Range Performance With 45 Minute Reserve. ‘Solo Constant Airspeed Cruise Endurance Performance ‘Solo Constant Airspeed Cruise Endurance Performance With 45 Minute Reserve. Aircraft Brake Horsepower Required and Available. Aircraft Thrust Horsepower Required and Available. Aircraft Thrust Requited and Available. Airspeed Pitot-Static Position Correction, 20 20 21 21 2 2 2B 23 24 24 2s 25 26 21 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 od 32 32 33AmB A29 30 a3 32 Ast Ags A36 37 A38 439 Ago ASL Ag Ag AM Ass ASG AaT Ags As Aso ASI Asa Asa Ast a co 3 cs cs 6 Altitude Pitot-Static Position Correction : 3 Airspeed Pitot-Static Position Correction, NSS7SH. 34 Standard Day Rate of Climb Performance (Indicated Airspeed) 34 Standard Day Rate of Climb Performance (Calibrated Airspeed)... sone BS Test Day Rate of Climb Matching, “ 35 ‘Test Day Rate of Climb Matching, sonnei 36 ‘Nonstandard Day Rate of Climb Performance at 65 KIAS 36 ‘Nonstandard Day Time and Fuel to Climb at 65 KIAS .. 37 Nonstandard Day Distance to Climb at 65 KIAS 37 Nonstandard Day Rate of Climb Performance at 80 KIAS 38 ‘Nonstandard Day Time and Fuel to Climb at 80 KIAS 38 ‘Nonstandard Day Distance to Climb at 80 KIAS sone 39 Idle Descent Drag Polar Curve Fit seen 39 Idle Descent Drag Polar .u.snnssnsnnonn 40 Idle Descent Penetration Chart... a) Tale Descent Polar Chart by Indicated Airspeed 41 Idle Descent Polar Chart by True Airspeed 4 ‘Nonstandard Day Idle Rate of Descent Performance at 65 KIAS. Nonstandard Day Time and Fuel to Descend at Idle at 65 KIAS.... Nonstandard Day Distance to Descend at Idle at 65 KIAS Nonstandard Day Tdle Rate of Descent Performance at 107 KIAS, 2250 RPM ...nssnn43 Nonstandard Day Time and Fuel to Descend at 107 KIAS, 2250 RPM rn 44 Nonstandard Day Distance to Descend at 107 KIAS, 2250 RPM. 44 Standardized Takeoff Ground Roll Performance Mean Takeoff Ground Run ‘Takeoff 95th Percentile Dispersion. 46 ‘Takeoff 99th Percentile Dispersion. 46 APPENDIX C RPM Engine Model For Lycoming 0-320-E2D ... . sonnei EDD RPM Propeller Model For McCauley TM7458/1C172; Thrust Coefficient nnn 122 RPM Propeller Model For McCauley TM7458/1C172; Torque Coefficient 2 ‘RPM Propeller Model For McCauley TM7458/1C172; Power Coefficient 13 RPM Propeller Model For McCauley TM7458/1C172; Propeller Efficiency 123 RPM Model RPM Matching seve ADo cs 9 cw cu DI 2 D3 D4 Ds D6 D7 ps RPM Model Manifold Pressure Matching RPM Model Fuel Flow Matching (in gaV/) RPM Model Fuel Flow Matching (in percent) ‘RPM Model Full Throttle Manifold Pressure Matching Slipstream Eifects on Rate of Climb APPENDIX D Determining Fuel Burn Amount for Cruise Test Points. GPS Spoed Course Distance Arcs GPS Speed Course Wind Drift Error. 7 Determining Leg Length for GPS Speed Course Test Points. Ground Speed Variation in a Turn. GPS Ground Speed Method Vector Diagram Finding Test Day Rate of Climb Finding Test Day Rate of Descent. 124 12s 12s 126 126 154 154 155 135 156 156 137 157‘This page intentionally left blank.LIST OF TABLES Table Tile Page No. 1 Range and Endurance Scenarios. 6 2 Climb Speed Comparison (in KIAS (KCAS)) 1.0.00 10 3 Maximum Performance Climb Results. 10 APPENDIX A Al Tabulated Cruise Data by Indicated Airspeed... oe 47 A2 ——Tabulated Cruise Data by RPM. n A3.——- Maximum Range Airspeed 101 ‘Ad Range Results by Airspeed. 101 APPENDIX D D1 _ GPS Ground Speed Method Example Data o ce 145 w‘This page intentionally left blank.INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND ‘This test program was requested by the 94th Flying Training Squadron (FTS) to collect flight ‘manual performance data for the Cessna 150 flown by the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) Cadet Competition Flying Team (CCFT). The Air Force ‘Academy airfield elevation is 6572 feet. To improve performance for operating from the high elevation airfield at the Air Force Academy, the original 100 HP Continental 0-200 engine was replaced with a 150 HP Lycoming 0-320-E2D engine. As a result, the ‘manufacturer's flight manual performance data were no longer applicable. ‘The primary operational requirement for this test ‘was determining engine fuel consumption, ‘These data were necessary for determining range and endurance for flight planning, These data were also necessary for CCFT competitions, where fuel burn must be predicted within 10 percent for certain events ‘These tests were conducted by members of the USAFA Department of Aeronautics. Aircraft scheduling and maintenance was performed by the 94th FTS. This program consisted of 24 flights totalling 41.0 flight hours during the period of 3 July 1995 to 16 May 1996, Primary flight testing was conducted in the local area around the Air Force Academy. Additional flight testing to verify results at lower altitudes was accomplished between the Air Force Academy and Hays, Kansas. TEST OBJECTIVE ‘The general objective of this evaluation was t0 determine the modified Cessna 150 performance characteristics for purposes of generating flight manual performance charts, Areas included were pitotstatic calibration, and cruise, climb, descent, and takeoft performance. All objectives were met TEST ITEM DESCRIPTION ‘The Cessna 150, as operated by the USAFA CFT, is a two-place general aviation airplane. A thrce-view drawing of the aircraft is shown in Figure 1. It is powered by one normally aspirated, carburcted, 4-cylinder, 150 horsepower Lycoming 0-320-E2D engine driving a MacCauley TM7458/IC172_fixed- pitch propeller. The high wing has an area is 160 square fect and an aspect ratio is 7.0. ‘The maximum takeoff gross weight was 1760 Ibs. The flight control system is a reversible flight control system. Each Cessna 150 operated by the USAFA CCFT is ‘considered representative of the other two. These Cessna 1505 are not considered production representative of unmodified Cessna 150s. Reference T has a more complete description of the CCFT Cessna 150,Figure 1 Cessna 150 General ArrangementTEST AND EVALUATION GENERAL Pitotstatic calibrations and takeoff, cruise, climb and descent performance tests were conducted Production instrumentation was used for measuring airspeed, altitude, outside air temperature (OAT), and RPM, A manifold pressure guage was added for flight test in place of the VOR 2 head. A fuel flow/used indicator was installed for use in normal operations. Time was recorded using a digital wristwatch and a Hewlett Packard 48SX calculator. Position was determined from a Garmin GPS 55 handheld Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. No additional calibration of instruments was accomplished beyond normal Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) requirements. Flight testing was accomplished in the USAFA local flying areas at pressure altitudes of 8,000 to 12,000 feet. Additional data were collected at lower altitudes near La Junta, CO (6,000 feet), Hays, KS 6,000 feet), and on routes between USAFA, CO and Hays, KS (4,500 - 7,500 feet), Flight test data were used to create and verify a computer model of the Cessna 150 aircraft, engine, and propeller using the Reciprocating Engine and Propeller Modeling Program (RPM). (Reference 2) This computer model was used to expand standardized data {o create the flight manual data. Details of the constriction of the aircraR model are contained in ‘Appendix C. CRUISE PERFORMANCE Test Objectives: ‘The test objectives for cruise performance were: 1, Determine power settings, fuel flow, range, and ‘endurance as functions of airspeed and altitude. 2. Determine power required and power available asa function of airspeed 3. Determine the aircraft drag polar. 4. Determine airspeeds for maximum range and for maximum endurance. 5. Create charts and tabulated data for Flight ‘Manual cruise data Test Procedures: Cruise data were collected using steady state trim shots at constant pressure altitude (PA) and airspeeds of 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100 knots. Trim shots were also recorded at the airspeed for full throttle. Data recorded included the indicated altitude (1), indicated airspeed (V), outside air temperature (OAT), manifold pressure (MAP), engine RPM, start and end time, initial fuel used and final fuel used, Fuel used was measured by a Hoskins FTIOIA Fuel Totalizer. Fuel used was reported to the nearest tenth of a gallon. This indicator normally displayed fuel flow, which varied too much to be usable for this test. This variation arose primarily from the actual variation in fuel flow as the carburetor float opened and closed the fuel inlet valve to the carburetor bowl Fucl used could be read by pressing a button on the indicator, After displaying the fuel used for a few seconds, the display would revert to fuel flow. To improve the accuracy of the fuel used measurement, the flight test engineer pressed the ‘button on the indicator each time the display reverted to fucl flow. This resulted in a reasonably constant display of fuel used. Timing for each test point was begun or ended as the tenths digit changed. Test points were flown long enough to burn exactly 0.5 gallons. Further information on fuel measurement can be found in Appendix D. Cruise data were reduced usirig the Pw ~ Vie ‘method and other cruise data reduction methods shown, in Appendix D. Test Results: Flight Test Data Reduct Cruise data were collected as described above. Additionally, MAP and RPM data were used fromPitot-static test points. These data increased the amount of data available for determining drag and power required, but did not include fuel flow data ‘The drag and power required were determined using engine horsepower and propeller efficiency. The engine horsepower was determined from MAP, RPM, hh, and OAT, using the engine chart as described in Appendix C. Propeller efficiency was determined from RPM and true airspeed (V), using the propelier chart as described in Appendix C. NSS7TH was the only aircraft to have a MAP gauge installed, and not for all flights. On flights when a MAP gauge was not available, engine horsepower was determined using the propeller power coefficient. Figure Al compares the horsepower calculated by each method for test points where a MAP gauge was available, Ideally, all points would lie on the line with a slope of 1:1. The match between the two methods is satisfactory, especially considering that the propeller model is fairly simple, with only inputs of blade shape, diameter, and pitch. ‘The drag polar was determined by a linear least squares curve fit to the drag coefficient (Co) versus the ‘square of the lift coefficient (C,), as shown in Figure A2. This technique assumed a drag polar of the form G b, + KC? ‘with no linear C, term, The aircraft drag polar was = 042696 + 0.068861 C,? While this drag polar reports more significant figures than can be justified from the flight test data, this drag polar is reported as the drag polar used in the RAL ‘model. Given the aspect ratio of 7.0, this drag. polar indicates an Oswald's efficiency factor of 0.66. The parasite drag coefficient is also higher than normally seen for general aviation aircraft. This difference is suspected to be caused by separation drag from the rear window. This separation is suspected again later when explaining the climb results. Figure A3 compares the drag results from aircraft NSSTTH, the primary test aircraft, with the drag polar. These data are in agreement with the drag polar. Drag data from two flights in NSS7AW are shown in Figure ‘A4, again with good agreement. Drag data from NSSISH were not originally in good agreement with the drag polar. After applying a different postion correction to the NSS7SH dala, as suggested from the Pitot-static tess, the agreement was improved to an acceptable level, as shown in Figure AS, Additional testing should be conducted to verify the validity of the drag polar forall three aircraft. (Ri)! The brake horsepower required by a lincar least squares curve fit to the product of standardized brake horsepower and standardized equivalent airspeed BHP,.V,.) versus standardized equivalent airspeed raised to the fourth power (Vie) a8 shown in Figure ‘AG, This technique also assumes a drag polar of the form shown earlier and a negligible change in the propeller efficiency between the test data point and the standardized data point. Using this curve fit, the brake horsepower required was calculated, as shown in Figure A7 through Figure A9. These figures also show that the brake horsepower required results from each aircraft agree with the brake horsepower required curve jn the same manner as the drag results with the drag polar Figure A10 shows the fuel consumption results as brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) plotted against brake horsepower. BSFC is normally considered as a constant with respect to brake horsepower. Thus, Figure A10 shows BSFC results for all cruise points, from pressure altitudes of 3,000 to 9,000 feet. The fairings are derived from RPM model data at cruise conditions at altitudes from sea level to 15,000 feet. According to the RPM model, the BSFC for a given brake horsepower will change slightly with altitude. However, all of these fairings are well within the boundaries of the scatter of the data, and are therefore considered reasonable, Figure A11 shows the results for specific air range (SAR) for all cruise data collected at all altitudes Specific air range can be expressed as - te Cav BSFC Cy Wwe * Numerals preceded by an “R” in parentheses at the end ofa paragraph correspond tothe recommendation ‘numbers tabulated in the Conclusions and Recommendations section of this reportIf the propeller eficieney (n,) and the BSFC are considered constant with altitude for a given equivalent airspeed, then SAR should be independant of altitude. i ig to the RPM model, propeller in constant, but BSFC will vary ighty, as shown in Figure Al0. Thus, the firings derived from RPM model data at crise conditions at altitudes from sea level to 15,000 feet show a vari similiar to the variation seen in the BSFC data. Again, al ofthe SAR fairings are within the boundaries ofthe scatter of the data, and are therefore considered reasonable. Figure Al2 shows the results for specific endurance (SE) for all cruise data collected at all altitudes. Specific endurance can be expressed as ; % clos) at BSFC Cp wh We Since density appears explicitly in this equation, SE will be a function of altitude. Figure AI2 does not attempt to break out the SE data by altitude, as the variation with altitude, shown by the fairings from RPM data, is smaller than the scatter of the data. Any adjustments to improve the fit of SE data would be accomplished by improving the fit ofthe fuel flow data, which also affects BSFC. If the modeling of the fucl flow data is satisfactory, then the modeling of SE and BSFC will be satisfactory. Again, all ofthe SE fairings are within the boundaries of the scatter of the data, and are therefore considered reasonable. RPM Model Generation. ‘A. computer model of the performance of the craft was generated using the Reciprocating Engine and Propeller Modeling Program (RPM). The airframe ‘was modeled using the drag polar derived from flight test data. The engine model and propeller model were adjusted until a satisfactory fit was obtained with flight test MAP, RPM, and fuel flow data. The process of this adjustment and the resulting model data files are described in detail in Appendix C. Predicted Aircraft Performance. ‘The RPM model was used to create performance charts similar to those seen in the Flight Manual for a ‘general aviation aircraft, Figure A13 shows the cruise true airspeed as a function of density altitude and power setting, To use this chart, start with the OAT, {go straight up to the pressure altitude, go straight across to the power setting, then straight down to read the true airspeed. For the example shown: OAT: 40°F Pressure Altitude: 8,000 feet Power Setting: 60% True Airspeed: 102 KTAS Figure Al4 relates RPM to power setting as a function of density altitude, To use this chart, start with the OAT, go straight up to the pressure altitude, go straight across to the power setting, then straight down to read the RPM. For the example shown: oat. 40°F Pressure Altitude: 8,000 feet Power Setting 60% RPM: 2345 ‘Appendix D shows that true airspeed and RPM remain the same for an aircraft in cruise flight at the same density altitude, power setting, and weight. ‘Thus, the density altitude can be used to account for non- standard conditions. Figure AIS shows the cruise fuel flow as a function of pressure altitude, power setting, and OAT. To use this chart, start with the pressure altitude, go straight across to the power setting, then straight down to the zero temperature deviation line, Follow the ‘guidelines (up for OAT above standard, down for OAT below standard) by the amount of temperature deviation from the standard temperature for the pressure altitude, Then go straight down to read the fuel flow, For the example shown: Pressure Altitude: 8,000 feet Power Setting: 60% OAT: Std +60° F Fuel Flow: 8.6 gil/nr “Appendix D discusses the correction to fuel flow for ‘non-standard temperatures. Table Al tabulates the cruise performance for various altitudes, airspeeds, and temperatures. Values for manifold pressure, percent power, RPM, truc airspeed, and fucl flow are given for cach fight condition. This table was reproduced on 5x8” cardsfor the fight crows for flight planning purposes, without the manifold pressure and percent power information. Power settings above 75 percent were flagged. Cards were produced with data at each 1000 feet of altitude. Cards were also produced corresponding to Visual Flight Rules (VFR) hemispheric altitudes (each 1000 feet + 500 feet) Images of these cards are shown in Appendix B, Table A2 shows the same information as Table AL, except that data is arranged by RPM, not indicated airspeed. This format is similar to that used in Cessna Flight Manuals, Figure A16 through Figure A23 show the range and endurance for cruise at a constant indicated airspeed. Data are shown for dual and solo flight Both conditions assume takeoff at maximum gross weight. Takeoff at less than maximum gross weight (with the same amount of fuel) would result in longer range and endurance. Table I details the assumptions for the dual and solo scenarios ‘Table 1 RANGE AND ENDURANCE SCENARIOS Te ee Empty Weight 1249 Ibs 1249 ibs ‘Aircrew. 2 (340 Ibs) 1 (170 tbs) Baggage 15 Ibs 113 Ibs Unusable Fuel 3 gal 3 gal ‘Useable Fuel 23 gal 35 gal ‘Startup, Taxi, 2 gal 2 gal Takeoff, and Climb Fuel Climb Distance 10am TO am ‘Climb Time min 8 min ‘The range and endurance charts were created using the RPM model. After setting the aircraft weight and useable fuel, the fuel consumption was computed in 10 minute time intervals. Between each interval, the aircraft and engine were retrimmed to account for reduction in drag arising from the reduction in weight. ‘This process was continued until all of the useable fuel was consumed. Figure Al6 through Figure A23 include the climb distance and climb time shown in Table 1. No distance or time for descent were included in these charts, To use the range charts, start with the OAT, go straight up tothe pressure altitude, go straight across to the indicated airspeed, then straight down to the 2er0 temperature deviation line. Follow the guidelines (up for OAT above standard, down for OAT below standard) by the amount of temperature deviation from the standard temperature for the pressure altitude ‘Then go straight down to read the range. For the ‘example shown: Oar: 80°F Std + 35°F Pressure Altitude: 4,000 feet Indicated Airspeed: 80 KIAS Range 35 “Appendix D explains the corrections to range for non~ standard conditions To use the endurance charts, start with the pressure altitude, go straight across to the indicated airspeed, then straight down to the zero temperature deviation line. Follow the guidelines (up for OAT above standard, down for OAT below standard) by the amount of temperature deviation from the standard temperature for the pressure altitude, ‘Then go straight down to read the endurance. For the example shown: Pressure Altitude: 4,000 feet Indicated Airspeed: 80 KIAS OAT: Sid +35°F Endurance: 3.7 hr Appendix D discusses the correction to endurance for non-standard temperatures. Figure A24 shows the brake horsepower required and available at altitudes from sea level to 15,000 feet This figure was created using the RPM model. To determine other performance parameters, propeller efficiency was applied to the curves of Figure A24 to calculate thrust horsepower required and available, shown in Figure A2S. From this char, thrust required and available were calculated, shown in Figure A26. Table A3 shows the airspeed for maximum range as determined by three methods at sea level and 10,000 feet. Assuming constant propeller efficiency and BSFC, maximum range for a propeller driven aircraft ‘occurs at the airspeed for maximum L/D. (Reference 5) Thus, the airspeed for maximum range would be found at the minimum of the thrust required curve(Figure A26) or at the tangent from the origin to the thrust horsepower required curve (Figure A25). This ‘method gives an indicated airspeed of 6 KIAS. Using the SAR. shown in Figure All, the SAR is a maximum at 73 KIAS at sea level and 68 KIAS at 10,000 feet. ‘These values of SAR are for maximum gross weight at a given standardized airspeed. As the weight decreases, the standardized airspeed corresponding to a constant indicated airspeed will increase, Increasing standardized airspeed from the airspeed for maximum SAR will reduce the SAR. Therefore, for an overall maximum range, the indicated airspeed would be less than the values indicated on this chart. Additionally, changes in propeller efficiency or BSFC as weight decreased ‘would change the values of SAR. According to the range charts (Figure AJ6 and Figure A20), the maximum range occurs at 65 KIAS for both dual and solo flight. ‘The range at 56 KIAS is riot shown in Figure Al6 since it was less than the ‘maximum, but the range at 56 KIAS was only 8 to Il nautical miles less than the range at 65 KIAS, depending on altitude, Assuming an approximate range of 300 nautical miles, this difference would be 3 to 4 percent. At 73 KIAS, Figure A16 suggests the difference in range to be 0 to 5 nautical miles shorter than the range at 65 KIAS, This difference would be under 2 percent. Thus, each method results in an airspeed giving a range within 4 percent of the other ‘methods. Since this method used to create Figure Al6 accounts for the changes in weight during cruise, 65 KIAS was probably the most accurate airspeed for maximum range, even though the change in range is ‘very small with airspeed around 65 KIAS. Therefore, 65 KIAS was chosen as the airspeed for maximum range. Flying at maximum range airspeed is typically too slow for operational considerations. Table A4 shows the effect on range of flying at higher speeds at typical cruise altitudes of $,000 and 10,000 feet. Reference 6 suggests that the airspeed for maximizing airspeed per amount of fuel burned, and thus the most efficient ‘cruise speed considering time and fuel use, is found at the tangent from the origin to the thrust required line. Figure A26 shows this airspeed to be 85 KCAS. This airspeed corresponds to 86.5 KIAS. However, for ease of reading the range charts and operational simplicity (the airspeed indicator has a mark at 85 KIAS), this airspeed was investigated at 85 KIAS. Flying at 85 KIAS increases the airspeed by 20 KIAS, with only a 10 to 20 percent reduction in range. Table Ad also shows range performance for the typical operational technique practiced at the 94th FTS. Flight time has an operational cost since the ‘maximum flight time allowable per day is limited, thus limiting the total range available per "day. ‘Additionally, flight time has a monetary cost in per diem payments for TDY aircrew. Since fuel cost is typically. negligible compared to the cost associated with flight time, flights are typically conducted at ‘maximum airspeed, either at 75 percent power or full throttle if 75 percent power isnot attainable. At 5,000 feet density altitude, 75 percent power yields an indicated airspeed of 105 KIAS and a 34 to 40 percent reduction in range. At 10,000 feet density altitude, full thyottle yields 90 KIAS and a 23 to 25 percent reduction in range. ‘The airspeed for maximum endurance can also be dotermined three ways: the minimum power required, the maximum specific endurance, and the largest calculated endurance from the RPM model. In each of these cases (Figure A12, Figure A18, Figure A22, and Figure A25) the maximum endurance airspeed is shown to be the minimum speed tested, or 50 KIAS. Although slightly more endurance would probably be possible at a slower speed, $0 KIAS is the minimum practical endurance speed for holding, considering the Flight Manual reported stall speed of 47 KIAS. Flight data, such as RPM, fuel flow, fuel used, indicated airspeed, true airspeed, range, and endurance should be collected on 94th FTS deployments and CFT practice and competition flights and compared to the performance data presented in this report for further verification of these performance data. (R2) PITOT-STATIC CALIBRATION ‘The test objectives for Pitot-static calibration were: 1. Complete a calibration of the production Pitot- static system. 2. Verify Pitot-static corrections given in the Flight Manual.GPS Speed Course Methos This Pitot-static calibration method was an adaptation of the traditional ground speed course ‘method (Reference 3). Instead of using landmarks 10 determine distance, GPS distance-to-go readings were ‘used, These distance-to-go readings were based on a ‘waypoint at least 30 nm away. This waypoint was cchosen such that the heading directly toward or away from the waypoint would be approximately pperpindicular to the wind. The aircraft was flown on a heading directly toward and away from the waypoint with no wind drift correction, For each airspeed tested, the time to fly four nautical miles (ground distance) was recorded in each direction, Additionally, h., V., OAT, MAP, RPM, and fuel used were recorded. “The true airspeed was assumed to be equal to the average ‘ground speed for runs toward and away from the waypoint. From this true airspeed the position correction was determined, For this testing, airspeed and altitude instrument errors were assumed t0 be negligible. A more complete description of this technique and the data reduction are shown in “Appendix D. GPS Ground Speed Method, ‘The GPS ground speed method was developed at the USAF Test Pilot School (USAF TPS), and became known to the test team during the flight test phase of this project (Reference 4). Additional Pitotstatic testing was completed 10 compare the relative positon errors of different CCFT aircraft, and at the request of USAF TPS for further development ofthis method. In this method, the aircraft true airspeed was estimated based on indicated airspeed, estimated position correction, pressure altitude, and outside air temperature. Starting on a heading with an expected headwind or tailwind, a slow turn was initiated. The turn was continued until the GPS ground speed ‘matched the calculated true airspeed. At this point the aircraft should be heading perpindicular to the wind. ‘The aircraft was then turned 180 degrees to confirm the same ground speed. These headings were then used for the data collection, ‘The aircraft was flown at the aim airspeed and altitude on the crosswind heading. The primary data collected were V,, heading, GPS ground speed, and GPS track angle. “Additionally, h, OAT, MAP, RPM, and fuel used were collected. The primary data were recorded multiple times for approximately one minute to detect any variations from outside effects such as wind gradients. The same data were collected for the same flight conditions on the opposite heading. The true airspeed was determined by multiplying the GPS ‘ground speed by the cosine of the angle difference between the heading angle and the GPS track angle (le. the drift’ angle). For this testing, airspeed and altitude instrument errors were assumed (o be negligible. A more complete description of ‘this ‘method and the data reduction are shown in Appendix D. Test Results: Figure A27 shows the flight test derived position correction curve compared with the flight test data and the Flight Manual position correction curve. The flight test derived curve seems reasonable, as it follows the ‘general trend of the Flight Manual curve. The flight fest data shown in this figure were all collected in NSS7TH. Pitotstatic data were collected in this aircraft on flights 1, 5,6, 7, 10, 22, and 23. The flight 1 data are not shown as they’ were significantly different from all later flights and did not pass the reasonableness test. On flight 1, Pitot-satic data were collected using the GPS Speed Course method, but with legs only one nautical mile in length. Prior to flight 5, the test team decided that legs of at Icast four nautical miles in length were necessary to reduce possible errors to an acceptable level. (See Appendix D) Pitotstatic data was collected using the GPS ‘Speed Course method on flights $, 7, and 10. The data shown for flight 5 have a similar slope to the final position correction curve, but were displaced down from the curve by two to four knots. These data were weighted less heavily than the rest, since the leg times implied that the legs were not being flown perpindicular to the wind, Thus, the data was suspected to have been corrupted by wind effects, Staring with flight 7, more care was taken to ensure that legs were flown perpindicular to the wind, ‘The data from fights 7 and 10 agreed well, and were used to create the position correction curve. The leg times showed that wind effects were minimal for these Aighs.No Pitot-static data points had been collected to this time at 50 KIAS, so these were picked up on flights 22 and 23, ‘These data were collected using the ‘GPS Ground Speed method, which had become known to the test team by this point. These two data points agreed very well with the slope implied by the previous data points at 60 and 70 KIAS. Further confidence was gained in the flight test derived position correction curve when drag polar data and power required data fell into the shapes expected from theory. Using prior position correction curves, such as the curves used based on flight 1 or flight 5 data, the drag polar and power required data did not follow the generally lincar trend seen in Figure A2 and Figure A6, When the final position correction was ‘sed, the data lined up as shown in these figures with no further compensation, The CCFT normally plans its competition navigation legs at 90 KIAS. At this airspeed, the flight test derived position correction is only one knot different from the Flight Manual position correction, well within the scatter of the data. The negative value also correlates with historical experience by the CCFT of secing “higher than expected headwinds” in practioe ‘and competition. Failure to correct for the Pitot-tatic position error would result in the aircraft flying slower than was planned for. Additionally, most cross country flights by the 94 FTS are flown at full throtle or 75 percent power, whichever is lower. In this range of airspeeds, the ‘light test and Flight Manual position corrections are within a knot of each other. However, at low airspeeds, the flight test position correction is ‘bout 6 knots higher than the Flight manual position correction. This will result in a conservative error, with the aircraft on the proper approach indicated sirspeod actually lying at a higher calibrated airspeed than predicted by the flight manual. Since operations at the 94 FTS have been successful over the years, there is no reason to change the Flight Manual takcoff ‘or approach speeds Figure A28 shows the altitude position correction ‘curve at sea level from flight test and the Flight ‘Manual. These curves were derived from the airspeed ‘position correction curve, using the equation from Reference 3: AP, °B = hi (cas* ins) While this correction varies slightly with altitude, the small values of 430 feet are not operationally significant, and can be ignored for normal operations. All preceding Pitot-static data were collected on NSS7TH. Additional investigation was conducted to ‘determine if noticeable differences existed in the Pitot- static errors between the three CCFT aircraft. One test point was flown using the GPS Ground Speed method in NSS7AW, but was rejected for excessive wind error. However, all drag polar and cruise data collected in NSSTAW (Figure A4 and Figure A8) matched the data of NSS7TH within the experimental scatter using the ‘same position correction curve, Therefore, the flight test derived position correction curve was considered vvalid for both NSS7TH and NSSTAW. ‘The flight test derived position correction curve id not work as well for NSS7SH. Figure A29 shows the curve along with Pitot-static data collected in NSS7SH. These data were collected using the GPS Ground Speed method. While the flight test data do not match the curve, the data do have the same basic shape, For NSS7SH, an acceptable postion correction could be found by subtracting 4 knots from the flight test derived position correction curve, as shown in Figure A29. ‘This finding correlates with operational experience that NSS7SH flying side by side with either of the two other aircraft would show a higher indicated airspeed. Investigate the Pitot-static position corrections for NSS7SH and NSS7AW. (R3) ‘The test team found the GPS Ground Speed ‘method to be superior to the GPS Speed Course method in both test efficiency and data quality. Test points could be accomplished much faster using the GPS Ground Speed method, and did not require maintaining a stable airspeed as long as in the GPS Speed Course method. Since the legs were shorter, it ‘was easier to avoid local air disturbances such as ‘thermals or upslope winds. Since the method includes ‘a technique for approximating a crosswind heading, ‘wind effects from incorrect winds aloft forecasts are minimized. Additionally, the data can be evaluated by inspection for wind effects such as not being on a crosswind heading or wind gradients. GPS Speed Course data required calculations to determine effects of not being on crosswind heading, and did not indicate wind gradients in any way.CLIMB PERFORMANCE Test iectives: ‘The test objectives for climb performance were: 1. Determine maximum rate of climb at full throttle. 2. Determine the airspeed for maximum rate of limb at fall throttle, 3. Determine rate of climb as a function of airspeed at full throttle, 4. Determine best angle of climb at full throttle, 5. Determine the airspeed for best angle of climb at full throttle. case the entire line fora given altitude is multiplied by the same factor regardless of airspeed. However, this determination cannot be performed on a rate of climb cchart plotted against indicated airspeed, The shape of the curve changes since the conversion from calibrated to indicated airspeed is non-linear and dependent upon airspeed. The best angle of climb airspeeds were found using the chart plotted against calibrated airspeed, and these calibrated airspeeds were converted to indicated airspeeds and plotted on Figure A30, The flight test derived climb speeds compare to the Flight Manual climb speeds as shown in Table 2. In converting between indicated and calibrated airspeed, the flight test derived Pitotstatic position correction was used for flight test data, and the Flight Manual correction was used for Flight Manual data, ‘The resulting rates and angles of climb are shown in Table 3. 6. Determine time to climb, distance to climb, and Table 2 a (CLIMB SPEED COMPARISON (IN KIAS (KCAS)) 17. Create charts for Flight Manual climb data. San Ene 7 Flight | Flight | Flight | Flight ‘Test Procedures: Attitude |_Test_| Manual | Test__| Manual Clis is - Sea Level | 54 (60) | 56 (56) _| 71(72) | 68 (66) limb FIT (etence 3). Full Thats consant Lid000.n [50.88 T soo 1 596) Lez 6) airspeed climbe were conducted at 50, 60, 6, 70, 80, and 90 KIAS. For each test point, (wo climbs were Table 3 flown on opposite headings perpendicular to the wind. ‘Times were recorded every 100 feet of pressure altitude MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE CLIMB RESULTS sing the time function of the Hewlett Packard 48SX (Standard Day, Standard Weight) calculator. Climb data were reduced as shown in “Appendix D. Best Angle Best Rate “speed | Angle | Airspeed | Rate Test Results: Attitude |_clAs) | (ea) | cetas) | vin) ‘Test Results: fds | CCAS) fe) LS) | isis) | Sealevel| 86 [75 | os | 865 Figure A30 and Figure A31 show the standard day {_10,000 ft 56 26 65. 330. rate of climb performance in terms of indicated and calibrated airspeed. Each figure shows lines indicating the best rate of climb airspeed and best angle of climb ‘airspeed as they vary with altitude, While the values in indicated airspeed are more useful operationally, the values in calibrated airspeed are shown to justify the best angle of climb airspeed. The best angle of climb airspeed can be found at the tangent line from the origin to the rate of climb curve. This determination can be done on a rate of climb chart plotted against calibrated, equivalent, or true airspeed, since in each 10 Comparing climb speeds in calibrated airspeed, the fight test results for best angle of climb are 2 to 4 Iknots faster than recommended in the Flight Manual. Flight test best rate airspeeds are 3 to 6 knots faster than recommended in the Flight Manual. Flying at the Flight Manual recommended speed for best angle will result ina climb angle of 7.2 degrees at sea level for a 0.3 degree (4 percent) loss of climb angle. The Flight ‘Manual recommended speed for best rate will result in arate of climb of 850 fU/min at sea level for a 15 fminess than 2 percent) loss of climb rate. These differences are small enough that no changes in the Flight Manual are warranted. ‘Climb data is also presented for a cruise climb at 80 KIAS, which increases distance flown at a small loss of climb rate (2 percent at sea level, increasing to 26 percent at 10,000 feet) for situations where the ‘maximum rate of climb is not required. Additionally, climbing at 80 KIAS improves the pilot's forward visibility by lowering the pitch angle. ‘The climb data were analyzed using the RPM ‘model. Since the RPM model will simulate non~ standard ric conditions, it was assumed that if the model could be made to match the flight test data at several non-standard conditions, then the model would tbe considered good and valid for any atmospheric conditions. Figure A32 shows climb data for two flight ‘conditions, one at 8,000 fect and one at 12,000 feet pressure altitude and temperatures close to standard day temperatures. The RPM model was adjusted to ‘losely match the 8,000 foot data, and then compared ‘to the 12,000 foot data. The fairings in Figure A32 represent the RPM model prediction. ‘The RPM model data were considered to be in reasonable agreement with the 12,000 foot data. Figure A33 shows climb data for two flight conditions, one at 6,000 feet and one at 8,000 feet pressure altitudes and temperatures significantly above standard day temperatures. Climb data from the same RPM model is shown to be in reasonably good ‘agreement with the flight test data. The maximum deviation from the flight test data is $0 fV/min, which is ‘only 1/2 a division on a Vertical Velocity Indicator (WV). The RPM model produced a valid representation of the aircraft climb performance. To get the RPM model data to match the climb data, two additional compensations were made within the computer program. The first was to account for expanding pressure contours on non-standard days. On a hotter than standard day, 1000 fect of pressure altitude is greater than 1000 feet of tapeline altitude. Therefore, a rate of climb expressed in terms of pressure altitude will be less than the same rate of climb expressed in terms of tapeline altitude. This compensation was merely an application of a principle ‘normally used in climb data reduction. u ‘The second compensation was to account for an apparent increase in aircraft drag in climbs over that seen in enuse flight. This difference in drag was more noticeable at low speeds and less noticeable at high speeds, This result was hypothesized to be a result of the interaction of the slipstream and the separation drag from the cockpit rear window. The steeply sloping rear window is known to cause separated flow and thus increase the aircraft drag. Additionally, this window is fully engulfed in the propeller slipstream. ‘At low speeds, the difference between the induced velocity ofthe propeller at full power and cruise power is the greatest, reducing to no difference at maximum airspeed. Therefore, the slipstream velocity aver the rear window would be much higher in a slow speed climb than in cruise flight at the same airspeed. A relationship was developed and applied to the model data to account for this extra drag. This relationship and the method for accounting for non-standard day pressure altitude variations are further described in Appendix C. Because the sawtooth climbs were relatively short compared to the amount of fuel burned, fuel used during the climb was not recorded. The fuel flows were calculated by the RPM model using the same fuel flow calculation method from cruise flight as a function of engine MAP and RPM. Figure A34 through Figure A39 show rate of climb, fuel flow, time to climb, fuel to climb, and distance to climb at 65 KIAS and 80 KIAS. These ccharts are also submitted for Flight Manual inputs in Appendix B. These charts represent the RPM model and will give values for non-standard conditions. To determine rate of climb, enter the bottom left side of the chart at the appropriate OAT, go up to the pressure altitude, across to the rate of climb line, and straight down to read the rate of climb, ‘The variation of fuel flow with non-standard temperature and pressure are almost identical to the rate of climb variation, so both of these values are plotted on the same chart. For the ‘example shown in Figure A34: OAT: 80°F Pressure Altitude: 6,000 feet Rate of Climb: 450 Vmin Fuel flow is found using the same procedure with the fuel flow line.To determine time to climb, fuel to climb, or distance to climb, the chart must be used twice. Enter with the initial OAT, go up to the initial pressure altitude, over to the appropriate line, and straight down to read the value, Repeat this process with the final conditions. The difference between the two values will be the time, fuel, or distance expected to be seen in the climb. For the example shown in Figure A35: Start OAT: Start Pressure Altitude: 6,000 feet Start Time: End OAT: End Pressure Altitude: End Time: ‘Time to Climb: nmin Fuel to climb and distance to climb are found using the same procedure with the appropriate line. There is a substantial difference between the variation of time, fuel, and distance to climb and the variation of rate of climb with non-standard conditions. ‘Thus, these are plotied on separate charts. However, the difference in the variation of time and fuel to climb and the variation of distance to climb with non- standard conditions is small; on the order af 5 percent. To reduce the number of charts in the pilot's checklist, the time, fuel, and distance to climb are presented on the same chart in the Flight Manual inputs in Appendix B. This is consistent with the data presentation format used by some general avaiation ‘manufacturers, ‘The climb data presented were based on results from NSS7TH. The CCFT suspects that differences ‘ay exist between the climb performance of the three aircraft. Further testing should determine if differences exist in the climb performance af the three CCFT aircraft. (R4) DESCENT PERFORMANCE ‘Test Objectives: ‘The test objectives for descent performance were: 1, Determine the best no wind glide ratio with throttle idle. 2 2. Determine airspeed for best glide ratio with throttle idle. 3. Determine the minimum sink rate with throttle idle 4. Determine airspeed for minimum sink rate with throttle ile. 5. Determine time to descend, distance to descend, and fuel to descend at the best glide ratio airspeed as a function of altitude. 6. Determine time to descend, distance to descend, and fuel to descend at maximum structural cruising speed (Vso - top of green arc on airspeed indicator) as a function of altitude, 7. Create charts for Flight Manual descent data, Test Procedures: Descent data were collected using the sawtooth descent FIT (Reference 3). Idle power constant airspeed descents were conducted at 50, 60, 65, 70, 80, ‘and 90 KIAS. Descents were also flown at 107 KIAS and 2250 RPM to simulate enroute descents. For each test point, two descents were flown on opposite Ineadings perpendicular to the wind. Times were recorded every 100 feet of pressure altitude using the time function of the Hewlett Packard 48SX calculator. Descent data were reduced using the methods Aeseribed in Appendix D. Test Resul Descents were analyzed by considering the aircraft asa glider, ic. counting any windmilling drag from the propeller against the airframe, and finding a drag polar which would represent the descent performance. ‘This drag polar was determined by fitting a straight line to values of the drag coefficient plotted against the square of the lift coefficient, as was done for cruise data. This curve fit is shown in Figure A40. ‘The resulting drag polar is shown in Figure Ad1. For reference, these figures also show the cruise drag polar. ‘The idle descent drag polar is unusual in that it is less than the cruise flight drag polar. Generally a windmilling drag polar is greater than the cruise drag polar due to the additional drag from the windmilling propeller. However, in this case it was suspected that the reduction in separation drag over the cockpit rearft from the reduced slipstream velocity was larger than any increase in drag arising from the twindmlling propeller. ‘The fact that both drag polars have the same parasite drag coefficient was suspected to be strictly coincidental. Aircraft without a rear ‘window like the Cessna 150, and thus without the separation drag, would see a different relationship between the cruise and idle descent drag polars. ‘The idle descent drag polar was Cp = 0.0427 + 0.08770, Using this drag polar, the descent performance for the aircraft was analyzed. Figure A¢2 shows the penetration chart (LID vs. Indicated Airspeed). The ‘maximum glide ratio was 11 at 50 KIAS. At the Flight Manual recommended glide speed of 65 KIAS, the glide ratio was 10.5, or a reduction of 5 percent. Either airspeed should be operationally acceptable. ‘The Flight Manual speed has the advantage of being the same as the climb speed, and thus one less airspeed for the pilot to remember, Figure A43 shows the polar chart (Rate of Descent va Indicated Airspeed). Figure A44 shows the same data presented against true airspeed. These charts show a small variation in rate of descent with altitude. ‘The minimum sink rate at sea level is $30 ft/min at $0 KIAS, Theory states that the minimum sink rate should occur at a slower airspeed than the best glide ratio, The true minimum sink rate probably occurs at a slower speed than 50 KIAS, and possibly the minimum sink rate is at just above the stall speed, and not at the minimum of the power required curve. For the airspeeds tested, the minimum sink rate occured at 50 ‘Figure A4O through Figure A$4 also show values for a penetration descent at Vis (107 KIAS) and 2250 RPM, The tachometer was placarded to avoid descending in the range of 1850 - 2250 RPM. Idle RPM would be below this range, and the descent rate would be too high for a normal penetration descent. Flying at fall throtile and 107 KIAS would overspeed the engine at high altitudes and have too slow of descent rate. An RPM of 2250 was chosen as being casy to remember, and the top end of the caution range. ‘AC, of 0.28 and a Cy of 0.022 were used to predict descent performance for this flight condition, as shown by the two labeled data points on Figure AS1. The resulting descent rate of 900 ftmin is probably still too B high for penetration descent in operational conditions. Investigate descents at 107 KIAS and RPM greater than 2250 to find the optimum throttle setting fora penetration descent. (RS) Fuel burn was not measured during the descents because of the short duration of the descents. By observing the fluctuating fuel flow indications, the test ‘team estimated a fuel flow of 15 gal/hr for idle descents, and a fuel flow of 5.5 gal/hr for descents at 107 KIAS and 2250 RPM. Figure A4S through Figure A47 show the descent performance at idle power and 65 KIAS for non- standard conditions. Figure A48 through Figure ASO show the same data for descents at 107 KIAS and 2250 RPM, These charts are also submitted for Flight ‘Manual inputs in Appendix B. These charts are used in the same manner as the corresponding climb charts In this case, the variation of distance with non- standard conditions was sufficiently different from that of time and fuel that distance is presented as a separate chart, TAKEOFF PERFORMANCE Test Objecti ‘The test objectives for takeoff performance were: 1, Determine takeoff ground roll using the Flight Manual takeoff procedure. 2. Create chars for Flight Manual takeoff data. Test Procedures: Takeoff data were collected using the Flight ‘Manual procedure. This procedure consisted of Maintain directional control by use of nosewheel steering. Hold the elevator slightly aft of neutral to keep weight off the se gear and hold aileron into the wind. ‘At 50 KIAS, raise the nose smoothly to takeoff attitude. Maintain this attitude and allow the aircraft to fly off the ground which will occur between 50 and 60 knots, (Reference 1)All takeofis were done with flaps fully retracted. ‘The fuel mixture was leaned at fields above 5000 feet elevation. Below 5000 feet elevation, takeoffs were done with the mixture at full rich. Pressure altitude, outside air temperature, fuel used, wind direction and wind velocity were recorded prior to takeoff, ‘The time from brake release to liftoff ‘and the liftoff airspeed were recorded during the ‘takeoff If available, runway lights were used to estimate the takeoff distance. ‘The data were reduced ‘and corrected to a common liftff speed to determine takeoff distance, These distances were standardized to produce a chart for predicting takeoff distance by the ‘methods shown in Appendix D. Test Results: ‘Twenty four takeoffs were accomplished at pressure altitudes ranging from 1490 to 6780 feet. The Flight Manual procedure specifies a rotation airspeed, not a liftoff airspeed. The liftoff airspeeds varied from 52 to 65 KIAS, with an average of 57 KIAS. All takeoff data were standardized to a liftoff airspeed of STKIAS, zero wind, standard weight of 1760 pounds, and sea level density. These results are shown in Figure AS1. This chart was also included in the Flight ‘Manual inputs in Appendix B. ‘The mean ground roll distance was 1000 fect at a ‘mean liftoff airspeed of 57 KIAS. The 95 percent confidence interval for ground roll distance (one-tailed test; shorter ground rolls are not an operational concern) was bounded at 1165 feet. The 99 percent confidence interval for ground roll distance was ‘bounded at 1234 feet. The 95 percent confidence interval (Qwo-tailed test) for liftoff airspeed was ‘bounded at 51 KIAS and 63 KIAS. Using the methods shown in Appendix D, the mean ground roll distance was expanded for non- standard conditions as shown in Figure AS2. This 4 chart is of the same form used by several general aviation manufacturers. ‘To use this chart, enter at the field OAT. Go up to the current field pressure altitude. Go across to the Weight Reference Line, From here, follow the guidelines down until reaching the vertical line for the takeoff weight. Go across to the Wind Reference Line. Follow the guidelines to the wind ‘component down the runway (down for headwinds, up for tailwinds). Go across to the right side to read the ‘mean takeoff ground roll in feet. For the example shown: 80°F 6,500 feet 1600 Ibs 10 knots 1170 feet Figure AS3 and Figure AS4 are included to show the effects of dispersion on ground roll distance. ‘These figures show how much additional distance should be added to find the distance atthe limit of the 95 percent and 99 percent confidence intervals. Only the effects of weight and density altitude are shown, A headwind will always shorten the takeoff rol, and takeoffs should not be attempted in anything above a very small tailwind, To use these charts, enter with the takeoff ‘weight, go up to the appropriate density altitude, and to the left to read the dispersion distance. Add this distance to the mean takeoff ground roll to get the ‘maximum expected ground roll, Note that normally Figure AS3 and Figure AS4 would not be needed by the operational pilot. ‘Additional runway length allowed for stopping after an engine failure on the runway will normally greatly ‘exceed the additional distance from dispersionCONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Performance data were collected on the USAF ‘Academy Cadet Competition Flying Team (CCFT) Cessna 150 in the areas of cruise, Pitot-satics, climb, descent, and takeoff. These data were used to develop ‘a computer model of the aircraft using the Reciprocating Engine and Propeller Modeling Program (RPM), This computer model was then used to create performance charts and tabulated data for the ‘operational flight envelope for inclusion in the next update of the Flight Manual, All test objectives were met. Cruise fight was characterized by the aircraft drag. polar, Co = 0.042696 + 0.068861 Cy” derived from flight test. Based on limited flights in ‘wo of the aircraft, drag and power required data for all three aircraft were in satisfactory agreement. 1. Additional testing should be conducted to verify the validity of the drag polar for all three aircraft. (Page 4 The fuel flow data was modeled with satisfactory agreement with the flight test data. Tabulated cruise data were created on 5x8" cards for flight planning purposes, with power setings above 75 percent ‘flagged. ‘The maximum range airspeed was 65 KIAS. An airspeed of 85 KIAS gave the maximum airspeed per pound of fuel burned, with a reduction in range of 10, to 20 percent. Typical 94 FTS operational procedures of flying at maximum speed resulted in a reduction in range of 23 to 40 percent The maximum endurance for airspeeds tested occurred at 50 KIAS, the minimum, airspeed tested. 2 Flight data, such as RPM, fuel flow, fuet ‘used, indicated airspeed, irue alrspeed, range, and endurance should be collected on 94th FTS deployments and CCFT practice ‘and competition flights and compared to the * Page numbers in parentheses refer to the page ‘number in the Test and Evaluation section of this report where the recommendation is made. 15 ‘performance data presented in this report for further verification of these performance data. (Page 7) ‘The Pitot-static position correction curve was derived from flight test using the GPS Speed Course and GPS Ground Speed methods. The flight test derived curve followed the general trend of the Flight Manual curve. At airspeeds normally seen during competition or cross country flight, the flight test derived curve was within one knot of the Flight Manual curve. At low speeds, the flight test curve is about 6 knots higher than the Flight Manual curve, resulting in higher calibrated airspeeds at Flight Manual takeoff and approach speeds. Based on good operational experience, there is no reason to change the Flight Manual takeoff and approach speeds. ‘The flight test derived position correction curve ‘was considered valid for NSS7TH and NSS7AW. An acceptable position correction curve for N5S7SH could be found by subtracting 4 knots from the flight test derived position correction curve. 3. Investigate the Pitot-tatic position corrections for NSS7SH and NSS7AW. (Page 9) Climb data were analyzed using the RPM model to match flight test data at several non-standard conditions. ‘The model was then considered valid at all flight conditions. The flight test results for best angle of climb airspeed and best rate of climb airspeed were {in good agreement with the Flight Manual, and do not warrant any changes to the Flight Manual airspeeds. ‘The maximum rate of climb was 865 fVmin at sca level and 330 fY'min at 10,000 feet. The maximum angle of climb was 7.5 degrees at sea level and 2.6 degrees at 10,000 feet. Climb charts are presented for maximum rate of climb at 65 KIAS and for cruise climb at 80 KIAS, The climb data presented were based on results from NSS7TH. The CCFT suspects that differences may exist between the climb performance of the three aircraft. 4. Further testing should determine if differences exist in the climb performance of the three CCFT aircraft. (Page 12)Descent data were analyzed by considering the aircraft as a glider, counting the windmilling drag of the propeller against the airframe, The idle descent drag polar was Co = 0.0827 + 0.0877 C,? Which led to the curious conclusion that the idle descent drag was less than the cruise drag. This was suspected to result from the interaction between the slipstream and separation drag from the cockpit rear window. The maximum glide ratio was 1 at 50 KIAS, and 10.5 atthe Flight Manual recommended glide speed of 65 KIAS. This small difference docs not warrant a change tothe Flight Manual, since 65 KIAS is easier to remember as the same airspeed for best rate of climb. The minimum sink rte for the airspeeds tested ‘was 530 f/min at 50 KIAS, Descent performance was also investigated for a penetration descent at 107 KIAS (Vio) and 2250 RPM. ‘At these conditions, the lift coefficient was 0.28 and 16 the drag coefficient was 0.022. The resulting descent rate of 900 fV/min is probably still too high for a penetration descent in operational conditions, 5. Investigate descents at 107 KIAS and RPM greater than 2250 to find the optimum throule setting for a penetration descent (Page 13) Takeoff data were standardized to zero wind, standard weight of 1760 pounds, and sea level density. ‘The mean ground roll distance was 978 feet at a mean liftoff airspeed of 57 KIAS. The 95 percent confidence interval for ground roll distance was bounded at 1140 feet. The 99 percent confidence interval for ground roll distance was bounded at 1208 feet. The 95 percent ‘confidence interval for liftoff airspeed was bounded at 51 KIAS and 63 KIAS. ‘The performance of the CCFT Cessna 150 was satisfactorily characterized. Further testing should address the recommendations of this report, and the results of this testing should be incorporated in the Flight Manual.REFERENCES 1, Operating Instruction $1-150, 94th FS, USAF Academy, Colorado, 15 September 1993. 2, Bib, Russell E,, Reciprocating Engine and Propeller Modeling Program, computer software, Erb Engineering, Arlington Texas, yet to be published. 3. Payne, James M., Flight Test HandBook, JP Aviation, USAF Academy, Colorado, 1989, 4, Bailey, William D., Captain, USAF, et al, Investigation of Using Global Positioning System for Air Data ‘Sjstem Calibration of General Aviation Aircraft (HAVE PACER 1)), AFFTC-TR:95-76, AFFIC, Edwards AFB, California, January 1996, ‘5. Anderson, John D., Jt, Introdction to Flight, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1989. 6. Carson, B. H., Fuel Efficiency of Small Aircraft, AIAA-80-1847, AIAA Aircraft Systems Meeting, Anaheim, CA, 4-6 August 1980. 7. von Mises, Richard, Theory of Flight, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1959. a‘This page intentionally left blank. 18APPENDIX A TEST DATADrag Coefficient, Co 0.13 0.12 0.114 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 Er tyembe on pope cen Taras © 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Test Brake Horsepower From MAP/RPM Figure Al Engine Horsepower Determination Methods Comparison nai: yooming O00 220 ‘Propte: Meco THTASANCIT2 Sco Ue Wee ieee Sevnese ore Pape uP C, = 0.042696 + 0.068861 C,? 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Lift Coefficient Squared, C,’ Figure A2. Drag Polar Curve Fit 20Drag Coefficient, Cp Drag Coefficient, Co USAFA CoAT Conena sok nH70H ot4 see otc Dem bane Pugh Test 0.12 8 0.10 0.06 0.04 C, = 0.042696 + 0.068861 C,? 0.02 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Lift Coefficient, C, Figure A3_NSS7TH Drag Results Compared to Aircraft Drag Polar USAFACoFT Conan eso NsE7AW pe Propet cee wo a ee =z. 0.12 0.10 0.08 < Ce) 142696 + 0.068861 C,? 0.02 0.00 + 0.0 02 04 o6 08 1.0 Lift Coefficient, C. Figure A$ NSSTAW Drag Results Compared to Aircraft Drag Polar aseen ona ay anew ou, | RS a SN Monte 0.12 S 0.10 H 3B 0.08 & 0.08 i 2 ; 5 0.04 . Cy = 0.042696 + 0.068861 C,? 0.02 Co eee 0.0 02 04 06 08 1.0 Lift Coefficient, C. Figure AS_NSS7SH Drag Results Compared to Aircraft Drag Polar Engine: Lycoming OSIEESD Propel, Mecauly TaTASNCI72 16000 are hat OFF Bemba: gneve Wage peo Pape uP 8000 6000 BHP,,Viw = 7.950E-05 Vy‘ + 1714 BHP .Viw (hp*knots) o 28 o 40000000 80000000 120000000 160000000 Viw‘ (knots) Figure A6 Brake Horsepower Required Curve Fit 2‘UsArA corr canna aNSONP NEST ose Propet ‘rg: coming iotucey Tanesuicsr2 arene Or neo 430 Sem ane anne . F120 2110 ig 100 ‘Standardized Brake Horsepower, Be py jo 6800 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Standardized Equivalent Airspeed, Vw (KEAS) Figure AT NSS7TH Brake Horsepower Required Results Compared to Aircraft Brake Horsepower Required sgn: eon SES Papa ata nasser 130 Sesh OFF teu Fiz Sea ier a 110 % 100 Standardized Brake Horsepower, 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Standardized Equivalent Airspeed, Viv (KEAS) Figure A8_NSS7AW Brake Horsepower Required Results Compared to Aircraft Brake Horsepower Requiredroe: yoming SE repeat cay NHN Eavhene OFF eu ‘ice Peat Tet BI 3 8 ‘Standardized Brake Horsepower, BHI g sg aa 60 = 260 70 = 80) | 90 = 100) 110) = 120) ‘Standardized Equivalent Airspeed, Viw (KEAS) Figure A9_NSS7SH Brake Horsepower Required Results Compared to Aircraft Brake Horsepower Required ‘eae cone Ose Tar, Mec Tatars Saban: Poe Tse Fling Bee RPA oa eecee eo & Brake Specie Fuel Consumption, BSFC (hpfbine eeee She ek & su jsansiyiany 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Brake Horsepower, BHP (hp) Figure A10 Brake Specific Fuel Consumption Results| ryrine tyeomng S00 ‘Neptr Mecuy TDUNESTE exon Or eu 16 Saas rer Fig Beate ert Specific Alr Range, SAR (nmigal) sR Re oN FO @ 50 60 70 80 90 100 = 110120 Standardized Equivalent Airspeed, Vw (KEAS) Figure All Specific Air Range Results rane tyconna 03000 psi cca TATA ‘are et OF fase ure 0.25 Si Sao ont teat ‘aig Bane: Pw ode! Specific Endurance, SE (hrigal) e se s 8 Se sc a 8 2 3 8 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Standardized Equivalent Airspeed, Viv (KEAS) Figure Al2 Specific Endurance Results 25in: tyomin Pr: ny TOURED Sum: Use ‘ate neoe oohaee Orr ise uP 0 20 40 60 80 100 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Outside Alr Temperature, OAT (F) True Airspeed, V (KTAS) Figure A13 Cruise Airspeed Performance 0 20 40 60 80 100 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500 2700 Outside Air Temperature, OAT ("F) RPM Figure Al4 Cruise RPM Performance 26Pressure Altitude (ft) Temperature Deviation from ‘Standard CF) & Se ee BB erect 18000 Seen wes tones wm, a RpeesBubs Bpessssss s8sssssss sssssess s é So8o0 0 12 3 4 § 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Fuel Flow (gal/hr) Figure A1S Cruise Fuel Flow Performance leghe: tyeonng OS80E29 repel ccainy UNE? Fula Baro: 2m eg wae ee SE Sore 200 0 $0 100 EB Fxgq Outside Air Temperature, $5 Eg OAT CF) ai 53a 00 200 «250 300350 Dual Range (nm) Figure A16. Dual Constant Airspeed Cruise Range Performancepine trong 526820 Propet Mey THTAAENT? Sines. an Niger Sete hw 150 200 250 300 Dual Range with 45 min reserve (nm) Figure A17 Dual Constant Airspeed Cruise Range Performance With 45 Minute Reserve Argh: emi 0530420 Pope uconany TAUDENGTE Ful at ae 2g a eae ‘Bootie aaa Sinn rt 200 Smee ere Sieve baie 14000 42000 40000 8000 6000 4000 + 2000 0: Pressure Altitude (ft) 0.0 05 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5.0 Dual Endurance (hr) Figure A18 Dual Constant Airspeed Cruise Endurance Performance 28rae yong 0220620 Hope Mccey HTLSEIENE Pala Fieger) weenie SECTS Sea rat 2 a hoe OFF Flee ur ae 00 05 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 46 Dual Endurance with 45 min reserve (hr) Figure A19 Dual Constant Airspeed Cruise Endurance Performance With 45 Minute Reserve Apne: tyoming 0508620 Pople chose TTEERTENE ont aa: =o Silene Serr ac Comore 2 Smee ee Sie te . 50 © EB ay 108,80 ramets, SBE 9 OAT ("F) i 80 Hi sponcsjessspeinepeeey 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Solo Range (nm) ‘Figure A20 Solo Constant Airspeed Cruise Range Performance 29sentence mee BETS atone ae Ee RRS esi 250 300 350 400 450 500 ‘Solo Range with 45 min reserve (nm) Figure A21 Solo Constant Airspeed Cruise Range Performance With 45 Minute Reserve en eepoenen mp ASST SI ene et Ee =. She 14000 © meme 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 Pressure Altitude (ft) Temperature Deviation from o 41 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Solo Endurance (hr) Figure A22 Solo Constant Airspeed Cruise Endurance Performance 30LIAACCET cara ann igh: song 0528229 Haplan Mecouey HTUOUIETD an Sa otc eee Sove“nowe erat ten ectine om ru Sb me amime 14000 2 pHene Pressure Altitude (ft) Temnperature Deviation from Of 2s 426 6 yo ‘Solo Endurance with 45 min reserve (hr) Figure A23 Solo Constant Airspeed Cruise Endurance Performance With 45 Minute Reserve LUSAFA cor Comma tonsa rane: ycoming B80 ‘Propet: Maca THTAGOTZ etare: Uenes ‘Wale 7e0ibe Cae OFF Pipe UP 160 ‘Sm Bane Ro od gs Brake Horsepower, BHP 3 8 8 ° o 20 40 60 80 100 120 True Airspeed, V (KTAS) Figure A24 Aircraft Brake Horsepower Required and Available 31one: ycomng SES Tr Mecniey nouuierT Caveat ore ao 140 SEE ences 120 a = ¥. 100 5 80 2 5 eo z 3 40 - 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 True Airspeed, V (KTAS) Figure A25 Aircraft Thrust Horsepower Required and Available rane: teem Sasso Peper, Mccain TARR te see ape re Some or mee 600 Es ° 20 40 60 80 100 120 True Airspeed, V (KTAS) Figure A26 Aircraft Thrust Required and Available 32Airspeed Position Correction, AV,. (knots) Altitude Position Correction, AH. (ft) 3 bbbhbonaaen ss 14 10 -20 30 40 rome tems SSeS ep cca TaTURNNCATA lane sFeome’ Pape uP | Serena Flight Test rae 2 rate Pa? © Rene Flight Manual ° ep py 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Indicated Airspeed, V; (KIAS) Figure A27 Airspeed Pitot-Static Position Correction xg: Lyaming 200820, paar, cay TaN ‘lone tho be Page Sinden ct abate: rep Tet light Test Flight Manial Fe pp 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Indicated Airspeed, V, (KIAS) Figure A28 Altitude Pitot-Static Position Correction 33Airspeed Position Correction, AVpe (knots) Rate of Climb, ROC (ft/min) rg: tyaming Sas E8 roe Mecaey TAAUNCI72 Wor iste Pape oP Beat gerne 10 [NSSTTH, NSETAW ona oe bob 10 2 14 4 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Indicated Airspeed, Vi (KIAS) Figure A29 Airspeed Pitot-Static Position Correction, NSS7SH ra: tyoming anes ot 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Indicated Airspeed, V, (KIAS) Figure A30 Standard Day Rate of Climb Performance (Indicated Airspeed) 4Rate of Climb, ROC (ft/min) Eins yrange oes tet ue Senpnn Bandar Deira Rew Mod 900 Best Rate of Climb Alrspeed. Best Angle of (Climb Airspeed. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Calibrated Airspeed, Ve (KCAS) Figure A31 Standard Day Rate of Climb Performance (Calibrated Airspeed) At: tyoming ee ‘atl Mecuany nasancrr2 iia Use ‘egae tous ene uot oF Wiguttaason eae 500 450 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 45 560 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Indicated Airspeed, V, (KIAS) Figure A32 Test Day Rate of Climb Matching 35oe ison SS tc cua naewerrs soe es otc Taner Stier Sage ts retro Debate rg ating Bal: RP Moca 500 450 eect: 400 an 350 “——_: 300 7 250 Tae : 200 3 twonart 150 100 Rate of Climb, ROC (ftimin) g sg 45° 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 8 90 Indicated Airspeed, V, (KIAS) Figure A33 Test Day Rate of Climb Matching. ree: anny OD ‘Reptier Mccusey TOUSANCHPA Sie Uae pe ire carina oe Peru rope AS Battle mre ee 0 20 40 60 80 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Outside Alr Temperature (F) Rate of Climb (fumin) and Fuel Flow (galhr"100) Figure A34. Nonstandard Day Rate of Climb Performance at 65 KIAS 36joe: \yeoming Oana Prope Mecoy TaNASANCIT2 a: Uwe Wiaoae eee rs etree: pat mocnt 0 2 40 60 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Outside Alr Temperature (F) “Time (min) and Fue! (gal"t0) Figure A35. Nonstandard Day Time and Fuel to Climb at 65 KIAS ‘rape: tyoomng ees up: Muy Tanase: Soite Ue ape ieee Sirens sone Set ae: moat oe 0 20 40 69 8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Outside Air Temperature (*F) Distance (nm) Figure A36. Nonstandard Day Distance to Climb at 65 KIAS 37ron: igeoming ES rept, Mec TATA. Knee! sons Dea: raat 0 20 40 60 80 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 (Outside Alr Temperature CF) Rate of Climb (fin) and Fuel Flow (galhr“100) Figure A37 Nonstandard Day Rate of Climb Performance at 80 KIAS ore eamrg oe "ptr, Mecaey TaTUEONEITE Fe veer) egueone eee OF four Ringo ws De eoce: aruatat 0 20 40 60 8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 (Outside Alr Temperature (*F) “Time (min) and Fuel (gal*t0) Figure A38. Nonstandard Day Time and Fuel to Climb at 80 KIAS 38gr: tyooning OED peae cca Tueswte172 SoS soem Spent sores Seta: wnat 0 20 40 60 8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Outside Air Temperature (°F) Time (min), Distance (nm) and Fuel (gal"10) Figure A39. Nonstandard Day Distance to Climb at 80 KIAS Kegs tyomine Ser ted sere Senta oF Bee uP Sea Saree ripe Tot 0.10 Cruise Drag Polar é Go = 0.042696 + 0.088861 C,* $0.08 £ 6 s 0.06 g . escent Drag Polar 3 Cp = 0.0427 + 0.0477 6? 5 .04 0.02 0.00 ee 0.0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 1.0 Lift Coefficient Squared, C.” Figure AO Idle Descent Drag Polar Curve Fit 39pnw teaming CS 0.12 2 3 Cruise Drag Polar o = 0.042696 + 0.068861 C,? 0.08 : £ 3 0.08 z . 3 Idle Descent Drag Polar 0.04 p= 0.0427 + 0.0477 6? 8 8 -~ 407 KIAS, 2250 RPM. 0.0 01 0.2 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 1.0 Lift Coefficient, C, Figure A41 Idle Descent Drag Polar se peeps AS LEE men se Ey ae BRE SR 12 10 4107 KIAS, 2250 RPM Lift to Drag Rati ° apy 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Indicated Airspeed, Vi (KIAS) Figure A42 Idle Descent Penetration Chart 40sen yma EE eng a ES me ° Sh. rae = = -500 é 407 Kins, 250 RPM 8 ; 2-100 ¢ Sea Level _ 3 grt500 3 fo -2500 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Indicated Airspeed, Vi (KIAS) Figure At Idle Descent Polar Char by Indicated Airspeed ee yee REESE, ent rrr Ed Sr SE —— 0 = E 500 = 8 Q-1000 2 sea Level 3 +500 & : 3 [> ~2500 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 True Airspeed, V (KTAS) Figure At dl Descent Polar Char by Tre Airspeed aepim: een tes Pept, Maa Tuc ‘inoue eras ina te ere rh ot 0 20 40 60 80 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Outside Alr Temperature (*F) Rata of Descent (fimin) and Fuel Flow (galhr*100) Figure A45 Nonstandard Day Idle Rate of Descent Performance at 65 KIAS ape teoning OSS Foe wendy rramicr Some a ne Foden Sarena rae 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Outside Air Temperature (°F) Time (ein) and Fuel (gal"t0) Figure A46 Nonstandard Day Time and Fuel to Descend at Idle at 65 KIAS 2rine rama OS Bip cca Truc: ‘iors: Ure Wemoen ieee reas eee te Epes 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 (Outside Alr Temperature (°F) Distance (am) Figure A47 Nonstandard Day Distance to Descend at Idle at 65 KIAS pe geming ae ‘pee ecu Tarsencsr2 See te ‘nage ee etic err fee poetry ‘evan so Ra ree ip et a 0 20 40 60 80 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 (Outside Air Temperature (*F) Rate of Descent (A/min) and Fuel Flow (gal/he+100) Figure A48 Nonstandard Day Idle Rate of Descent Performance at 107 KIAS, 2250 RPM aSg: troming aS TT Pen Meter nearer ete’ see Pome ‘pnt foros ‘in a eae ie ot 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Outside Air Temperature (*F) Time (rin) and Fuel (gal10) Figure A49 Nonstandard Day Time and Fuel to Descend at 107 KIAS, 2250 RPM. 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Outside Air Temperature (*F) Distance (nm) Figure ASO Nonstandard Day Distance to Descend at 107 KIAS, 2250 RPM 44Se Caressa | SStetveine hoe (Beer tnt Sbiae OFF Poe oe Sa ae rg Tet oon 0 conte int OAS . | to Fl ale ye ad jaa ij z 1 il y F irs i ae ° | 0 200» 400» 600-800 1000» 1200 Standardized Ground Roll Distance (ft) Figure AS1 Standardized Takeoff Ground Roll Performance UsArA CFT conse 130304 ‘Emin: Lycomng OPED Proper: MeCauny THTASQHCITZ Mizar: Ueaned above S900RMSL Carb OFF {Une Airspeed 37 KAS Pape UF Det Basis Gh Tot 0 50 100 1700 1500 1300 0 10 20 Outside Air Temperature, Gross Weight, W (Ibs) Wind (knots) OAT (°F) Figure AS2 Mean Takeoff Ground Run 45 1400 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 Mean Takeoff Ground Run (ft)95th Percentile Dispersion Distance (ft) 99th Percentile Dispersion Distance (ft) 600 g 3 600 500 400 300 200 100 ° 1200 Sse Erkeeneeees ey ine 1300 1400 4500 4600 © 1700 1800 Gross Weight, W (Ibs) Figure AS3 Takcoff 95th Percentile Dispersion Ss Ben Sci mane caer 4300 1400 4500 1600 © 1700-1800 Gross Weight, W (Ibs) Figure AS4 Takeoff 99th Percentile Dispersion 46oF wx | za] oy | os | os | z * wz | za | os | os | os | x s ez _| zo} vs | o | eo | w 3 oe [ar yes |e isot_] 08 6 08 z | va | rs | o | zo | te ie = ve | oe | os | oo | oc | se s ry ze | eo | os | cz | ou | oe. 9. se or |-e6r| zo] | voet | ov ca oF vw | esr | 59 | io | oo | mF o 3 o& | so} vz | so | voc | & » ry ss_| viz | cz | 05 | oo | os s 36, a a os ‘Cor a | cz | vs | os | coz | oo 2 & gor | sos | toe | ox ae cs zzv_| on | so | oe 2 wz | va] sy | a | os | az | vor wz | ver] os | os | to] az | vor e_| vo} is | os | so] oz | cov we ‘cesar | zs} 9] eco | oe ver x z | sa | vs | a | us| te | sa ie ve |e | os | oo | cu | ce | co z_| ver_| os | ce | co | ce _| oo se. ‘oy —[-ser-] 292] arat|— 8c rer or w | oo | 99 | is | os | co | ser a o | zz | vz | so | soi | o | soe a vs | siz | cz | oo | owe | cs | cuz zs to} sez] ee | os | -soiz [es] ce es eo | sz] co | o | cuz) w | se a a | es vez | | ove se oa oovz_| 10 _| sox a ee Sur | nae_| ores Br | nea | ane (S.9h3 Or (th a8e Toa T0) an sey BIO -WPHARD —TLIOURSPLNLImeQaWN oqFedong PRONE seamed — SaLOSLT NSM = pau] Som ‘ea-OzE-O Burmosk]—courug OS 1/0S1 BUSI L499 VASA (0g 30 1 28eg) GAHASUIV GALVOIGNI AG V.LV BSINYO GAL INV. Iv ame, ”oS ere ar ear ae 5 = ¥ sy | a | an | & | ra & | oa | a 3 = > sy | is | sou | ce | ba | vo | a s @ e ty | so | oa | te | tar s_| tou_| oe 2 rs s +e] eu] ce] sar | eet] 2 = is o os | x | wo | ve | za a | ou | oe ° © 2 es | & | da} s | oe vt | oat | se a = a ss _| ec _| oe | ce_| ver ex_| ooo | oe ee rs SL |e | slo] wer 2a] ost | ar oF ir oF eo | oo | aoc | o | soe go | roe | oe 2 > = so | % | ou | & | ew we | ae | i e os su | is | oe | os | cer s_| ca | is = 5 a] ear] esee | soe aie | 2 2 se | ut | soc | ma | ove aoe | te | tye for | su | soe | fe | cee oz | & to | ee Es i |e 1 5 = = z a 3 5 @ & & > ~ e = = e +3 i rs Es s = ze 1 TE 8 * E E 2 % = Bs ou = ee ie SL or 1 | ear on o * = | za | = s 4 & | 6a | & rs s so 9 ra wor & a 0 0 & 6 18 ra vor Ora For Trail 8 an sity HO wear IOWASHUNRL emo ond ROW FT IER —-SaLOSLL_-IBIOM ‘am ‘aza-o7e-0 Burwoasy | :oufug aH OS1/051 BHD LADD VaVSN (o£ 30 7 o8¢a) GaadSWIV GALVOIGNI A VLVC ASIN GALVINGVL TvageL 4BsR eIRRe s z oust 3 z viok os | os Zz zo, oe ooh zs | 6s a 8 1 teat es | cg o rs zu ss | 99 a a se eau ts | 6 ve ot se Seok oo | ee se. oF w ‘eer eo | ee ve vo | ie w a & 5, vs. 6 8 01 99 221 su Sasjee BSBSRRK SSS B82R2895|5 595/888 Hes BsSQeeeossoe [eeslseeefervalene sseressaalean Receeseasaaiaan oa | os vs | ss | eos oa | is zs_|_6s_| oes ‘oer | zs es) a] coor za | ¥s ss | so | wot ver | 9s ts | o | ous sa_| 6s oo | zz | ww wer] 29 9 | 92 | arer zs | 99 zo | oo | ster vor | vz zz | ve | 066 ez | re ez | ce | vue. ea so] es] sie ow o ss | os | soz a[srsgiaeealsanaan ssiseg weg (oc 30 ¢ 98eg) GaadSUIY GALVOIGNI AG V.LVC ASINYD GaLVINEVL Iv o1geL, BSBA LLB sAseec8Siggggeessases| 9 adO WHA TLIDUSS PLL mean saT|edoug pours] aX e-026-0 Sumo]% e var] iy] as] ar 8 4s ow | zy | os | on a 9 oa | sy | o | zo a ‘0 ou | ov | co | sou co ra rer [os | 29 | est a zu ea | zs | um | cx 9 x sa} vs | a | oa te a eo | rs | x | 606 se ver | os | ca | sus oe % ow | so | oe | cx +8 z voz | oz | is | scic 68 ra sz | oz | se | vz zor waz) ve | _oor “1 eu cy 3 o rs 9 ue eevslaaeeeesisagaieeualaaes| BERRY S Hoss ASE SAaselenRglaaagl 9 ou ser ys | ce | sea zsh zs_| | cea zr ‘09 || eset 08 4 vo | so | soo se zz oz | os | one 6 zz oz | v6 | roe 8. we eo] 68 | pace ave, ge | vo | sow om eo | on | zz lS SSRIRSE CASS aRRAASeelRasgassalaaagl + Biagveloesisaaapansianessesassalaaael iF PROW WEY an sda — ARH GED TLIOTS PLL Aomneoy aqfedorg ssiseg weg SqLOSLT 3u3M TA C7a-07E-O Summooky = caurdug, MH Os N51 UD L400 VAY. (0€ 30 » 98e4) GaadSUIV GALVOIGNI AG V.LVG ASINYD GALVINGVL Tv 1geL 50Reegaed S8aleasaeregieasa| sx Q[s Bess as a[RRRR RBsSITMESATRRK gseeakee sesso siege geresessal 3 Shab Ses RRAaSRRA|BL IBS SYR SHAS AR 28sieeuaieesalaseslessieaggl R a xz z r x io ez ez 38 Te 0 9 z ze uw * ve se rs ae el | cer 7 cd roy w | oe we oo. o& | ze 2, 902. ws_| so 09] Se 9 6s HS elseajaae ‘SvOr onan an sie dO FH AD TLIOURSPUNL Smee 2}2d01g PROW Ady ‘sIseq Be saLooLt WPA power] coun ‘dza-076-0 Surmooky]—courdu dH OST/OST PUSS29 LID0 VAVSN. (o€ 0 ¢ 98ed) GAadSWIV GALVOIGNI AG VLVC 3SINEO GaLvINEVL Tomes, stralss5ql sage S8lgseuseraisesal g & raaajaers|eceal REBIPTIHBAAHRa) RGSS Us avs as sl g[e2ejaae cian aan agalse siaaeslensalaasal SISRIRATLRRS HH SRA[SE RATA RS G|RSRA (Owe) 4 00 Tosi 4.09 SRBLLB GIRS e SIPS Sigg vaeesgins es an ssdeig adO 3H GED TLIOVRS HLL meOW aI FPdoug PRON dy ‘siseq weg sqLosLT WEP ‘pouesy “arta 7a-02£-0 Sunmook] urdu i OS /0sT Puss39 LI VavSn. (0£ 30 9 28ed) CatadSwIV GALVOIGNI A VIVC ASIN GALVINVL Tv ae. 258/3559 PASSA ARARILI|SSE AS H/H RRA) Saeco sega ssiessgiee sageeeseuse sls Sieg vaier sess g| SaBVshle Ss olsBa/8 segs scLeo/Bsso) Bas SAA|K BB oss a/So|ass serselsssg| sek Baise salsa ARRAlR Boa ees BARBARA BkslaeshRAnRRRnlegsse aasalsaael gBRSEaT 2 7 1.0) or Ths Be dn sdey AIO HAD TLIOUSSPLNL Semen 321}edo1g PRON WEY ‘seqeeq — SOLE SIMA = pout] Comp, Aza-0ZE-0 Sunwooky coud, dH OST/0ST #US529 L490 VASA, (0¢J0 1 98eg) GHadSUIV GALVOIGNI Ad VLVC aSINYO GaLVINaVL TvageLws pa] a ci ow sv | oo | sat | te sy | es | om | o | ca | zy | os oe » sy | vo | za | ic wy | oo jouw] ce | za} uw | ao oF 8 zv | s9 | ocr | ce ey | wo | coo] wz | eu | ov | o ie $8 ey | ez eat [ve ey | | om | re) su | os | oo ce 8 bs | oz | coo | oe rs | a | com | cc | cue | zs | x se 9 es | se | vos | oc es | w | oe | ow | eu | vs | x az 4 os | va | zoe | w on e ov st 03] ee | aziz | sr 7 32 o 8 vo | cs | uz} os o 2 ® a oz | ws | wee | ss 8 *8 s ca sz_| zor _| coz | 0 03, 05, os 6. eo | zor | are | 99 a ‘cor 9 ‘or oor] eu | sioz_ | oe u et SL. ol sy] ss] oar te oe re oe or sy | os | ss | oc oe wl z x” oy | co | sa | te ie ze | ie oe 6 zy | 9 | ie | ze a oy | so ie 3. ey || soa] ve os |e oe 8 rs | se | oi | oe st ws | a cf 3 zs | a | voor | oe a vs | oe a oe os | co | cco | wv o» zs | ee. se 6s | a | wie | a To | ¥ 7 08 yo | a | iz | oF * so | 3 * so oz | ws | oo | so 8 be | oe. 3 08 ez | io | wz | 9 S. oz | a es $8 eo] oor | are] eo eo) vor | vere [oa | see | ca [cor | exe |—so ‘or ee | zu | ese | a | sve | oe | om | mse | oe | zve | oo | oo | ue | se sor | Ga zu} ru | sie | so ob SHOR ‘Syor] Ser ORD FRC an sd AO FH GID —ZLIDTARSPLINL Mone eredog PRONE Sseqmed = SqLOSLT HSM pou cama ‘ATH-0ZE-0 BuMOoK] dH OS1/0$1 09899 L499 VAVSN (0¢ 30 g 28¢g) GaadSwIV GALVOIGNI AG VLC ASIN GELVINGVL, TEL, ‘ourgug, 4EBSBRol eeesiaaee RRG1B5H S/S Sess yser assay EEBSSRASSISLS BE sasais sssale. alsaeslaaaasaaaieeaae vanaslaaes isaggleesaiaae ss siaaeg| 3 9[s2 9 cle he 81888 o/8 Be SBsRRL GBB B 5) RIGATMARSARRRKIL TRAE WSSS HRA) gieesaecasaananaiesaas ses sanass| ow ao a Seo] eran an ssdety a0 WOH BED TLIOURSPLANL me OIFOMOg PRONE ‘seed §— SOS WIP PTT za-0ze-0 Sucoky — suBua HL OS1/0ST #US829 L190 VASA (o£ 30 6 28ed) GaddSWIV GALWOIGNI A VVC BSINNO GALWINGVL Iv age, 55SSasslesrelesso| R eeesseee| Baelvasaasaal eesnsiyanaaanal SEBLL CS SRRES SSRs SRLNBISR) seegieeselasee88egagl BoB 2VeRRIAHRHRBSRR eSBs dan HH| Sasaseeresssl gk 8 2583s RaltaSslRBSses|eR R33 588! Has Br nae are oat so8 an ssdeu HO FHA — TLIDTRSHUNL KomeQoW orForg PROWL seamed — SaLOSL WE pou] oD aca-oze-o Buwook] sug dH OST/OST PUS539 L990 WAYS. (0€ 30 01 98ed) CaadSUIV GALVOIGNI Ad VLW BSINYD GALVINAVL Tv ome, 56= E Sea] eT a a ee ow 8 oe ws | vor | o | co | oy | os | so | ” ry ie zw | wu | oc | eo | os } op | sor | 0 4 3 ze. co | cor | ic | vo | vs | so | zu} ve ss i ve | cir | ce | sor | es | oo | cut | ze 08 wm se ez | sor | ve | cor | ss | iz | om | ve ° me ra a | wor | ue | oor | zs | ve | so | of on zw Wy oo_|_zwet_|_o | eu | oo | x | tor | oe st 98 ca ‘so | ae | ey [ear | ve [ee [too [ar 8 16 o oo | siz | ow | so | oo | ue | to | Fy 98 8 ve | coz | cs | zo | vz | ze | zz} zs 6 cob 9, os_| oxzz | os | toe | ze | os | coz | os Ey Sb 2 sor] -seez [90 [viz | _re_[_10s_[-srez_| v9 oor, Cas oF s ca 7 ca or s oe 3 z 3 e Ea : a ie 9 oe cy ca e B Ea ze 9 ie £9 oe. ss. OL o ee 2 we 7 j a se aw ss on ve ° LZ z SL ry * on 6 » 3 ee ee se 98 ci ve 7 or oF % * 0 » a 3 8 3 6 zs is 8 os. rs 16. ss ss 56. yor 9 9 ca ob, mn ZL Br Hee Hee. Tod 402 (1.0 an PRON WEY ‘sIeGeEC — SAL OSLT ssdeyy ase gO SH QED TLIOUSSPLNL Ameo -aqedord pours] ‘aaTXT, Gza-07E-0 Surmook] —sourug, HOS T/0S I #08899 L190 VASA. (oc yo 11 98eq) GaadSWIV GALVOIGNI Ad VLVd aSINYO CALVING. Tver,a or sp | zo | sea | so sy | 99 | out te | so zy | w_| cos se_| 991 er | st] sear rs | ae | coo es | ze | eso zs | vo | coz ro} te] nie oo | 96 | coz ve | sos | voce es_| oo | vor a LS BSS Skee es 9/8 Ses sesresess| Seqleaassanaslessesass SS RS BRKS eau sSsgalseeneses| Bees eieassladaaleegagiyassladaa R[egaseanalsasalcs5as|eenalsaaal Ssleaegersaase esiaaggeresaays P88sgisseeieseny glee | T svn To.90) 3-09) os) Gan) sonny dn ssdey dO OH GED TLIDTRSPLWL OMEW =IFedo1g PRONE SIEM — SLOSLT NTE pou] om, Oca-07E-O Fomenk] | au (0€ 30 71 *8ed) GaadSUIV GALVOIGNI AG VLVA ASINYD GALWINEVL Tv age. 58Baal 8 qSeaulsSsgaseensses Vovdl gagsieevalaaeeseaggers saa e ggseeesesna|siegssieenessna| gepere RS SRlsERR Ses a/SSess9exAX5eH3| Slslaaesenaaisaaaesesiensalsaaal gleosessaninaeel g]a8 29/9 maa) Toa 0 an ssdoty BIO WOH AED — TLIO TRS PLN SomeQoW cared PRONWa sseqeeG = — SOLE WEP = poe] sam dza-0ZE-0 BuwODhT HL OS1/0ST 808829 L499 VavSA (€ 30 ¢1 28eg) GaadSUlV GALVOIGNI A WLC aSINYO GALWINGVL Iv eL, 39ear Fa TB ar w sy | @ | an | c oy | = loa | & a | is | am | ic > se | o | ro | oe t | 2 | oo | & | 9 | an | a e ze | 2 | te | te ay | tz | soo | ie sy _| 6 | wa | oe = ee] aL est} a os [ at] rest |S os] ee] aie] 6 oF vs | oo | Soe | oe zs | a | ae | i zs | a | om | o ° +3 | v2 | ccc | o vs | & | oe | & 33 | te | iam | a is | @ | ue | © es | i | coe | o ss_| oo | om | o s Ts] 8s | wee | or zo] is | oie} ar za] —06 | sate] oF oF ss | o | ue | & fo | os | see | is we | ve | ez | os 2 sz | a | onc | 52 | im | owe | as sz | &% | ime | os o | ton vo | oo | oe | vo | oo | soe | io va | mo_| on | ss_| Wao eee [ae a wor] ose ear sr] | et |e Tr] Psu] 6 or sy | @ | oo | c sy | @ | a | a ty | oo | su | te > 8 sy | i | oo | vw | @ |i | & te | | oa | a & ze |_| cou | te sr | o_| cot | te és | | un | te 3 a a as] —we | eer | Se os [ a] oat 96 8 ts | a | ze | oe ts | a | soo | a zs | a | om | o 2 es | | se | o ve | te | ow | 53 | 02 | come | ce a vs | w | ise | & ts | os | tw | o ss | we | om | & & ta} es | ace] oF ts] 1] este] oF zo] 8a | erie | oo | us | se | & rs | ss | ae | is te | ve | iz | os 2 sz | a | ioe | os vt | on | cae | os vt | a | ci | & | oo vo | ior | coz | $6 vo_| so_| toe | oo co | on _| sic | 3 _| Gao ze—[-zi— eee _| er ze—[ on —[-yese_[ or cn aor} con Heo [evr wa ae Bao evi na Pore Had [Sit [masons avn] vor | tena Oa so Tusa oa ae an ssde HO FHA — ZLIOLASPUNL Smee aoqodong POWAY “SSA MEG — SqLOSLI OM pou] AIA aca-ace-o Suwiooy auido EL OS 051 ¥USS=9 LID9 Vavsn (of 30 91 Seg) GHAdSUIV GALVOIGNI A@ VLVC ASINYO GALVINGVL Tv age|S 1 ws TE oF E oF ey | io ze sy | 09 ie oy | a oc x ay | so ze oy | x z os | ie 6 sy | 6 se. os | 2 = vs | 99 ze, ss. rs) eL Se zs a ve es] an cs oe es | u & ys | se oe ss | sc 2 os | io e gs | 6 e ws | a & a os | so a oo | i vo | zo o. se 9] 06 oF vo |e 9 so [8 w oe so | +6 oe oo | o oz | ie o so sz | 6 3 sz | as s oz | 3 8 ca oo_| so 2, oo | 19 so_| oo oo 6. tr | 9s 1e ‘or | ss ie oy | os | uso [oe oF zy | ie ay | 6 oe ey | ss oe x ay | 99 ze ey | o ie os | 2 oe 5 sy _| 60 se os | oo ze s_| 99 ze. ss | ve ws [in ve es [OL 8 es | a vs | oe = ss | a = so os | 08 e os | a % ws | uw gz ou ss_| v0 a oo | oo Ww vs | ie ov. sh co] er oF vo | 7 so | Se w 08 so | 46 ra so | 2 o oz | 0 » s sz | 36 Fy sz | 98 6 sz | 6 s os so_| eo Zo. va | io 19 vo | 6s. s $6 ‘=o_|_eo1_|_visc_| 69. ‘s6_[—o0 22 ‘¥6—[ vor 2 oor] 002, fas [evn | wa | anee [ aw | nd | Svan | wae | ane He5 | Sein ee ‘Svor | sora | (THs Towel sae dn soy a0 HID TLIDIASPLAL SIE TIPOLd PRON Way “s1seq eT SqLOSLT 3M pou] MKT, Qza-0ZE-O Surmooky =— suru i 0S1/0sT Puss29 LINO VavSA (0€ 39 $1 93eq) GaadSUIV GALVSIGNI Ad VLVC BSINYO GALWINGV.L Tv a1geL 6W]e) ea oe & S © ow sv | vo | sor | ce 3 © o a » ev | oo | cco | ve 9 a ze 8 a> | cz | ios | se 2 ve be ve. ss ey | a [eco ie aL 9 sr 08 bs | se | tee | oe oo = au ra so vs | so | coz | cd or w 4 oe es | os | siz | @ » a e SL zo | ss | tec | o 8 » a» 8 eo | oo | zaz | cs 8 3 1s se zz | so | use | 65 eo 3 s os so_| on | zaz | oo 21 2 x9. $8 a a s we o oy | an o a wz 4 sy | oo | ize | ce a ee oe zy | ez _| zoo | se im ve. a ss oy | a [owe |~se | rer_| os) si] cist | —o€ | esr | Se 8 bs | te | zoe | oc | ou | zs | cx | vac | oe a | so | ae 3 vs | se [az | w | ca | os | co | coe | o we | on | ce on vs | oo | zie | w | ou | os | oo | zaz | o oo | zuz | st wo _| ve [oe |e | ver | ze) 2s | coe | or te | eae | a oF so | os | exc | es | zo | oo | us | uz | zs se | ez | is so gz | vor | ve | os | zoe | oz | zor | coz | os oor | coz | os oe so | ox | oz | oo | viz | so | vo | oz | 0 sor_| exe | 9 38. OL, oor IT ‘Svor a | Ta Th s.08 (ORDER an deg AHO PHAM —ZLIDI/RS HUN omeDaINaTPdong PRONE SPAM — sao ANTM = pour] aT, za-0zE-0 Surwonky — :auidug 4H OS Jost wus899 LAD9 VASA (0¢ 30 91 980d) GaadSWIV GALVOIGNI A VLG SIN GaLVTNEVL TvageL ew]e par] w e oy |S oF oy | zo | oa | ze 19 ie sy | 0 x sy | so | oa | ce 9 az os | v9 8 os | | sos | ve. ©. & rs_| 29 ss. vs [sl] sss | Se L 3 es] er 8 vs | sx | soz] uc LZ a ss | 0 os | ze | ex | o e « ws | a ou oo | vo | vez | ow so a. vo | ce st va|—v6—[-c0ec ar 0 9] 88 8 ot | 96 | vee | is ¥6 4 i | s wz | sor } ovez | us 6 3 wz | 05 ga_|_on_| soz _| to rot a zo_| zor 8. ‘oy | us| aoe | ce % te 3 oF sy | 2 | wa] zw 7 ie s » sy | so | ise | ze 2 ie o 3 ov | om | sos | ce ©. ss. ry ss ts[ 92] sost|— se a ve 1 J es | ox | so | ve L st 3 os | ia | eooz | oc 08 e a a ss | oo | wiz | o va a. z se €9) 0s [eae] or 8 oy [eat oF eo | ss | zzz] is 8 os | om se 8 8 oe eo 2 $6, SD ae ‘Sor Wate 1.0 F.0 Wald or LOPOFR 4 dn sdeg dO FEHR] TLIOURSHLAL Ome eTTPdord PRON Way ‘sequeq = SaTOSLI WNBA pou] coma, aea-0e-O Sunuosk] coud, HT OS1/0ST FUSS99 D9 VaVSN (0¢30 (1 98ed) GaadSWIV GALVOIGNI Ad VLVC ASIN GaLvINEVL IIRL, 6oF] ear |e oF sy | 99 | sr | te ri sy | a | sei | te uy sy | sx | soz | ay. os | ez | ex0z | Ze os zs | se | iz | oF zs ss | w | az] o ss ss | 26 | vz | es vo | is | -oeez| or rr) vz | a | ew | ss ve ez | so | sez | 09 cr Sgalgzsressaessasugressgl Bolsgeebea/sSagiessevess Elsacs|svasanaalesss|s te | a | soe | a e & © e se | s_| ioe | se s se e = s us| 18] one] ee er a TE oo zs | o | se | o a o 2 & 2 ss | @ | oc | & es 2 Fy ia a es | s_| occ | & 2s = os * si Co 8 o Ey oo ez | so | ove | os = oo * 2 oo_| eu_| swe | eo 3 so. 5 os oy] | oat | re = 35 or 8 sr | o | root | ve = 8 B > we | i | eo | oe © 2 * & ey |__| foe | oe = a = ‘05-0300 | 6 rr rr = oe zs | ve | oi | o | oo | es | oo | soe | oc te | boc | oe = ss | | az | & | ou | ss | oe | ce] o s | te | ou es | co | sue | » | oa | os | te | me! & s_| wie | s So] os] ese] os | rar [ya] se] once] oF ve | eee | oF oF zt | om | ewe | ss | oo | ez | ion | ome | oo o | exc | s | 0.0) 6L ‘80h 4 FOR oe 90h | bose 8 es 6 (4.02) EH 3 cE Sor wa aa an sie OHA —LIOLAS UNL IMD “ypodong PRONG SBeaeea — saosLt NOM peu] aE, ‘azeoze-o Sumo] Souda dH OS1/0ST #5839 L199 VAVSN (0¢ Jo 07 *8ed) GaadSUIV GALVOIGNI AG VLVG ASINYD GaLWINEVL TvaIgeLageanalsaaal SaaegaressalsSgigssaeseg| ages sans sa asses sa5/as29) gesssaexrsesasesseeses geaseeaasaaaaassenssans egesssreieesnlseseseseses Slazgeesaisaeelssakeeesisaes| (Tiss Pavir ra B OER (oa 50 an sdmy JO JH GED TLIOURSHLALL Ameo -eNIedONd PROW Way ‘siseg eeq SqosLT WBE pours] TXT, QTE-07E-O Sumo — cours, HL OS/OsT #uS829 L190 VaVSA (oe 30 17 98¢d) GaAdSWIV GALVOIGNI Ad VLVC aSINWO GaLVINGVL TV WeL, 67By] | ame] eS ae ee Ty] 9] oar |e ow sy | so | coe | se | oss | zy | uo | con | ve zy | oo | oer | ve * zy | ee | vse | oe | oss | oy | ze | ue | se ey | ox | eur | se os ey | w | toz| ve | oss | ov | ox | co | ce os | sx | tz | se ss. vs_|—ea[vsiz [ee] oor | rs |e | -stiz | ee zs |e | ele |e 3 es | 92 | voz] w | eo | cs | so | ai] w ys | ce | ziz| o 3 os | os | cox] & | uo | os | o | zz] o vs | a | oz | o ou vo_| so | vez | w | eu | oo | v6 | coz | o os | ze | sz | & st Za | cor [seve] es [ows | zo) 08 | oeez ] 15 ‘9 | 28 |trez | — 08 8 ve | on | ose | us | oor | vz | vor | omz | os zor | coz | so 3 wo_| wz | 9 6 3s ) es | oF | | oe |e ve o 9 se | est | zy | 99 | to | oe e » aw se |usi | ovy | we | sor] se me oe “ a | os | 6 | ox | ome | o se. s os | te | -eeiz | ee [-vor_| rs) 02 ra E oe es | so | oz | w | wo | cs | ve » & so ss | os | wz | o | co | os | oe a a on os | ss | oz | ow» | eu | oo | os oe o. st 39 | 68 98 08 oF 8 vz | so 8 3 9, 6 a ‘Swor 2d 1.007 an ste sO FHA —_TLIOIRSPLALL Ine oqIedou PROW ee SAME §=— SOME WPM = pou] “aM Ce-O7E-O Suro] -ourBug 4H OS1/0ST #uss99 L190 VAVSN (0¢30 7z 98g) GAaaSUIV CALVOIGNI Ad VLVG ASINNO GALVINAVL Iv amgeL 68sexesal 5 gale yaaa sal sipaerkcseaizalsssenissgl dsajessreesalesieeceriass Slagle saseaagises san aisael glasieeaaisadalseseagaiaagl 3 gjegieeesiaaes|sckeeseuises| (Sadr an sdety IO FH AED TLIOURSPLINL Somegony :s91Iedord PRON AGY ‘sieaved = SqOSLT WM — power] sau, qza-07E-0 Surmeok] uri (0¢ 30 ¢¢ 98ea) CHAdSMIV GALVOIGNI AG VLVC 3SINYO GaLVINGVL Tv agen|S | be] oe Te] ar Be) wer] ow wy | ce | vor | oe we | | | se w | sor | se x sy | x | ee | uc sy | x | ioe | 6 z_| sie | se 8 ey | a | oie |e os [a | woe |e ‘ot | seaz |e rs | va | teiz | o bs | zw | iz] o te | oz | oe ° es | ow | wz] a vs | 9 | co | wv so | voz | o 9 zs | zw | oz | zs | os | soz | w eo |x| o ou co | w_| ocz | ow zo_| 6 | wz | oy v6_| coz | _o» st_| 0.0) 69 | ear | ome | es a a 65 | lez | 15 | Ge) vor s 2 eo = = = cy ve or eo se 2 = 9 e * we = e 9 iv = os a 8. aw ue on x ss. or cy ie or 08 ci oe a @ a o ° 16 w oe s | 99 aw ou 6. wy $6. | os o, st tor) esse) — 25 ‘96 | voez | — 08 8 sz_| co | is_| ss 3 Had | Sv | wae] ane Svin | nae | oem, ‘Syor_] oP (Ose) 4 001 1 owas 308 LORDEFC an sdeug AHO THAD —TLIOT/ASPLNL SIME saIFEdoNg PRONG seGHe = SaLOSLT WBMES am Aca-OZE-O Suu] :sursug HOS Us #45899 L190 VASA, (0¢ 30 7 28¢4) CHadSUIV GALVOIGNI AG VLVG ASIN GALVINGVL Iwate, 70n SaRRssalesssressgl Balagsgecsejglssgaersgl salsegecesalsasseleesa) Eisele sanasaaisye vanessa sjas|ssanaanals|s sania nal g[seeessiasesizeessiases ala sleyealsgaalaieee sianaa eye aie vbr SD = waa an sdeyy IO FH QTE TLIOUSS PLN AomeDoW “soTTedodd PPOW Way SIseq BIG smoot HPA pouery aT Q7H-07E-0 Summoshy] = ssurdug, dH OS1/0S1 81559 L390 VASA. (0¢30 sz 98ed) Gaa4SMIV CALVOIGNI AG VLVG BSINED GALVINGVL TRL,dH OSUOSI 05599 LADD VaVSN (0¢ 30 92 28¢d) GaddSUIV GALVOIGNI AG VLVG ASIN GALVINGVL Tv agen a oF |] ee oF wy | ue [ez] a | csv | ov | w | cae | oe sy | o | woz | se se ey | x | soz} uw | ze | oe | se | woz] us ey | ex | zoe | oc os sy | ie | onz | cc | vcr | os | ex | oz | ce os | ow | woz | s. s_| se] sexe |~or [rer |—es [va | viz | or zs [ee] esie | 6c 8 vs | 05 | exe | | on | ss | o | oz | ss | oe | oz | w ° ss | ve | sxc | o | vos | os | a | cuz | os | te | coz | on yo | 6 | oz | o | i | vo | ve | vez | co | 6 | oz | st [7 BS a Z| tor [cove | 5 J no v3 ra oo = oF zy | oe | voor | oe 2 % 3 se » sy | se | one | ve ” % e 6 sy_| 0 | osiz | oe. 8 a a a ss. ¥s[—se—[-eizz_|— or Cy ee cy cy J ys | o | cc | 2 7 8 w so vs | os | az | o is » os o on eo | os | vive | 6. o 33. a se OZ] or | rose |— es Zor ws [sa | 69 | oor | te] —is | ex | oe | Gon so_| ooozs TD, wD Swor 20) 3 oor BHO FH —TLIOT RSL KommeQoW —oIIedorg PROW Wadd sIseq Be SqLosLt | PM power] aT A7a-0ZE-O Suwooky —courdug, nwe ee BRET Eo se 7 % er | ot | wor | se @ |e} x |i] is | 2 & > os | st | ce | a | ie} & | im] is | z = e zs | ee | ou | s_| tz |v | en es | ox se s 3a] eae | or [sie |e par [ss 3 oe ts | @ | se | & co | ee | | on | os | so o 2 low 9 co ‘91ez ov 6 Onze a zsh 09 ee ow on Go |_| ee | & se_| ise | @ | on] so | se ES Si_| co [Para Te S| ear] en] os 7 or cr | @ | eee | w | ae] = | mm] os | @ © * as | wz | soc | o | om | os | a | we] & | mm] is | & % ts | a |e | oe | om] es | w | em | oe | om | es | wo s s +s] aie} ant os [te] ete |r [on | ss] on 7 8 os | a | ac | o [in| cs | m | oi] » | on | cs | ve o 2 oo | te | exc | w | sr] oo | os | me | & | es | oo | oe o o so | we | cae | © |e | so | so | ex | » | os] so | os a Es ae] ne | woe | se on | er] a] or | oe | or os | 7 % sy | w | coc | s | sm | os | w | cor] se | om] os | o * > og | a | ome | cc jam | os | x | ome] s& | en} ts | o 3 e ts | a _| toe | co | su] cs | x | em | ce | sud zs | oe sc s ts] ae} wie |e ert | vs] te] one |e] avr | ss] oc ra oo ss | o | cc | w | cs | os | se | mie | o | on | cs | oo Fd 2 ss | i | oc | w | os | os | @ | xz | & | os | os | wo > au ss_| oc | ome | & | cox | vo | se | toe | & | oe | vo | a > s gic ere[oee eo freee ome 1s soto as a ts a © 3 cr | o | oc | s | or | or | w | or | we | sm | os | so & > cy | wz | ae | se | om | os | uw | on] x | rm] ts | o © a ts | a | owe | | cu | ts | ot | oom | oe | S| cs | se s tsar ere} ae ost | ps | oe | moe ae | ar | rs | er rr o ss | o | ae| w [en | os | | oe] o | os | cs | 2 = 2 ss | o | oe | o | csv | os | ow | toe] & | vs | os | a o> a vs | % |eac| o [eu | ss | eo | a | & | os | vo | i 5 SL oS A oF oe Tas aa Taree Dae se Tavira Taree Dan ned [evi | nat anem Seo] oY Oar Wa a0 Tsai T8 an ssdepy HO FeH GED TLIOTRSSPLALL mmego —aqTedong PRON WH ‘sea — SGOT WEA poe] aN aca-ové-0 Summonk] aura dH OST/OST P4889) LI90 VAVSN. (o¢ 30 12 28ea) GaadSWIV GALVOIGNI A@ VVC 3SIMI GALWINGVL TEL,ecg) segsersl eesaana] ¢ts\aan5| wo ca ew rd & e oo e ro w a » 6 » = @ 3 ae z 9 4 “ ra 3 ze rs | oo oe 9 8 vs |e 7 we 16 os | oo a 6 6 os | 66 s o9_| os o a % = so 9 a ir « a 9 a L a se ra a 19 e. BL ee. a J oF ve oF 8 0 a eo @ os | 96 | co | o ¥6 > a > 6s o 96. o er = = ca % ww | uw joc] oe ou * 2 ay | a | oz] a st a me * os | zm | wz | oe oo ae ee ue es [oa [ase |r 8 oF es [ee | suc |e ss | is | oe | o es | az | 7 a w es | ss | exc | o ee | oz | 6 ” so_| om | cw | os es_| ae | or ry o Zor zs BvD a 191 3.09 PROW Way an :sdoa 430 HATED TLIDVSSPLWLL meDW — eTPPdONg csiseg weg saloot 3WSPM pu] KT G7a-02¢-0 Surmook] = :courdug HOS T/0ST #US839 L499 VAVSN (o£ 30 $2 o8¢d) GaadSUIV GALVOIGNI AG VLVC ASIN GALVINVL Tage.= rr Tse ae OE es = ¥ a | gz | a ve | a | gow | oe rs | oe = > a | oe | te zs | a | oe | i zs | st x & |os so_| sezz | es | to | fz |e rs | er & s_| Go ss_[ ua ece_|_ ss_| ea [ wee [i ss—[-¥e oF a3 09591 is} ene | ae os] we] ar] v3] = o a | one | a os | tz | sox | oe ts | 2 =e > a | se | ts | aw | ze] a zs | PS & z_| cz | te cs | m | wz | +s | rs = ia] ise] sss | ie | or S| = 8 t3_| vee | oe es | @ | az | o ss |e > = we ome ie a 73] = or tz | az | ue os | oz | exe | oe ts | ® B > a | ame | ts | se | ome | ur 3] a ee % te _| coz |_ oe es | ci | Suz | oe és | a a s ae wre | ir ssa | esl | or 33 |e cS oe oe | toc | a | @ | sz | o> as | * 2 ve_| soz | oe zie iliels ts | os 3% ou ve] woe} a cs] ve] ear | se Ts] or i | sez | se os | @ | ow | x ts | & = > a | one | a ts | wm | ee | oe zs | & © % oo_| tz | te zs | a | oz | | rs s 7 oF See aie |e $3 -[ 18 ca 7 aw | az | o ts | uw | ce | & as | 3 i 2 ts_| ece_| & to_|_ts_| zoe | ta_| os o | én] ow Barra Laem Da | ras Teer Tne aa Tas Lor ma Panes Daw] ovr (Sas or {owaErA wad T an tea 4HO. HGR — LIOVASYLNLSomepeW madond POWAY sReEeEG TOL WIPE] ANON azar0z6-0 Suwenk] sus dH OST/OST 8uss99 LADO VAVSN (o£ 30 67 28g) CaadSUIV GALVOIGNI Ad VLVG BSINYD GaLVINGVL Iv 1eL Bo | ) aa) «| on | os Te |e ver os | aw | oz | » os | x | ez | c | sm | os sez | ec | cv rs | zw | siz | o vs | is | azz | or | on | ts zz | oc | ev es ez | w | on | es woz |__| sv I a, ee e ec on o, 6 aeaaal esleaaal sana ie] 88jsers] salsece aaa [e BsSSkkb] Sgsere] slgeeslalsexel Jesgeseciessiaseeleskasedsisaes| Dr I Dr Ot) 3 or Tose 5.08 [RDF dn dey AYO 3182 GED TLIOURSHLALL AomedoW aaqTedorg PROW Wide “siseq Bed SqLOSLT uM pouwyy aT GUH-OTE-O Furmooky] = courdug dH OST/051 PUS829 LID VAVSN (0€ 3 of 98ed) GHadSUIV GALVOIGNI A V.LVC aSINY GALVINEVL Tyee.Be =e ws |» |e pen pcs |e te] oer = zs | | wm | | oa | vs | oo ze | ro sc os} a] ul] s lua] oes | a z& | os z vo | | ex | w | ve | vo | oo w | cor » zo) va] sa] a | car | 22] se vor or ve | ow | zw | cs | vz] cz | oo zz s os | 6 | o | o& | tz] oo | oo oz ” eo | on | vu | oo | oz | ss | on id e Tor} vor [gor | vz] vz] oor [vor ‘oF oF zu | on | zu | ce | ose | ou | oo v9 8 va | on | an | os | sz | cer | on ow. vob aaceeuevasale| seeeese Sagreualenaals| (v4.0 LOWRER A PRONG ‘sBeq eed an dey BO THAD §—TLIDURS PLL AommegoyN— saTFedotd Sqroset wSem pou] am Ara-076-0 SuMMODKT LOST/OSI PU5599 LADD VAVSN (230 1 28d) WAU AM VLVC BSINY GALVINGVL Tv ONeL, “suru 1ssagees gageesg| 101 01 01 vb su sSealsBqlnae E8sgsgaersgl 201 ou su BBAS5SsR SRR] gasgkeg a(S Sk eigesnae a gsaesrese sarenaeesael a 066) 3.001 ‘Svbr Too 505 ow Gus) 005 PRONG “sBeq med ee = zw | ws | co uw | 9 | se aw | x | ne eo | w | os ve | cs | os ss _| | oo yor | cor [oz cor | oor | eu | zu | oe au | ou |e ae a ey | o | oo | o zs | u | @ | ve ss | w | w | « ro} | eo] or vo | co | ow | o vz | ve | ve | as zo_| 6 | o | v0 ee | vor | sor] —1z yor | er | oor | oe vi | on | on | zzi_| au | ous} oot Heo svi | svn | onoe. Teh s08 an ssdoyy sqosLt aWaPM (7 30 7 98ed) Wad Ad VLVG ASINYO GALWINEVL Tv oreeL, peu aT, ‘OS 1/0ST ®US529 L399 VaVSA TLIOTRSHLL SIME oI FPdONg ‘d7a-07£-O Surmooky 18ws Za Ls, es, a | Ts | on os | 19 oc | ou | es | v9 | © | ic ss | 0 eu ys | zw x jmjalalae|s vo | oz so es | a ec | va | co | vw | w | w so_| ea 99 |e | fe [6s | ve | os | a a | or zz | oe zs | oe | sz | oo | o oz | 3 ri ez | v6 ws | siz] te | so | os eo | ss oz vo_| os. so_| oz oor_| ron s_| on ee | vor cy 701 ‘eor[ sot vue | eo a szt | oot oz | mu eo ver | sib Te | | err rs | 39 ce | om ss | zw we | vo oo | cc_| oes Zo | 98 or 00" ez | oe zs | eo oz | v6 es | oie eo | os so_| ez oor) sor ex [ve cu | cov eo | use ver | vit oe | rz Sgeleasgyaags| serressssaa| 7D | svn] anee Waid To an seta AIO JH BED TLIDTRSPLALL OMEN PRON WEY “SSeEeE §— _sqOSLL BEM =— pow] aT dea-026-0 Surmoaky HL OS1/0ST #U8520 L190 VavSN (eyo ¢ 98ea) Wad AG VVC ASIN GALVINGVL, ty o1eeL, ”a sy | os = | on oe sy | 9 | zw | oc | om ey | a ce | co ry zs | a | so | se | cm zs_| se se_| oot & ss | w | x | e | om ws | ae | eer or reco |e _| ver to | ee o | eet ” eo | o | w | os | so zo | +6 is | zoe 3 sz | o | os | os | viz oz | 6 oo _| zz 9 ze_| eo | eo | 2 | vz 33) cor a] ez tor) —e9 ve | vor [cor] oz | one 77 oo sor | sor | cor | ox | a | ose a eo | vi | on | se ou] vu | cu | 68 | rez 6 B2x/855 9/838 dn ssdeiy 410 FH GED TLIOTASPLLL Ome s>T}>dONg PRON dy ssiseg Beg SqosLt W8EM Powe] compa ATH-O7E-O Sunsosk]——sauug i OS1/051 #Us899 L399 VaVSN (6730 ¥ 98ed) Wad AG VLVC BSINID GALVINVL vee,a gagiesa Is gsezieesg) 3 28sasaseeea 8 BRxBEsUSIRH] BRc/BReWRSRA sgreasagsaaa| gerieaases BR 81 seeseaesasal esesaases an sd IO HAND —_TLIOT/RSHLNL &INEDPW. “LOS Ost #1889 L400 VavEA (73 5 8a) Wau AB VLVG BSIMEO GALVINGVL tyre,sy | oo | ow | & ev | os | wo | of se | ola | & ts | 6 | io | ce es | x | o | ogee rages [recedes zs |@ | a | tase [ez] zo | @ | oo | » so | | » | » eo | ve | os | is eee |e | te lisa zz | 6 | v6 | o foe] Bicol | erage] ig a a ze | cor | zor_| 69 ze | on | vor | we zor | so | oo | ox so | ms | oo | to vu | en | on | oo sasneee gBsveisas |seesiaaee|aan SRasseIEBR BL SBE sEss Sor Toh s08 Tos 05 an sey PRONE SseEmeG — sqLOSLT WBBM AIO TH GED TLIDTRSPLINL Some Power] cam dH OS1/0s1 #0829 JLID0 VASA (9730 9 98ea) Wad Ad VLVC ASIN GALVINGVL zy age, Cta-07¢-0 Burm09k] 2gages s5geee le sessgersal is 3 3 Zu alaaaiesas|asael 8 ssesersa[e8siagsgress sangeaa. SBN3EEIRSRISRA|BKS URSA eo dn soe 30 FH GED TLIOURSPLALL Sameaow, —emTedord PROW Way “seq BIE SqrOoLL TUBAL power] “aTOXTN Q2H-07E-O Sunmosky] —-urBug HL OST/OST PUSS LID VavSA. (790 1 s8ed) WaY AG VVC BSINO GALVINGVL tv oeL,ve fa |o |e loud | ws | » | o oy | wm | oo | = |e] [eal os | mo | oe | a os | | wo | x uz | | se [eal os | & | oo | oe sar] oa cs ss |e | a | o & | te | w |e] eo | w@ | c | o to | a | = | & s | 1 | o& | tu | 6s | te | o | i ou | os | os | s w_| s& | os | cz ez | o& | ss | o 6L cor 96 19 cor 8 0 vee 06 ‘vor oor ao (9.8) oe | ot | on | sr | | a | ez} ce | om | wo | ey se |u| so | eu | so | co | see | co | on | oo | te Oo5e wfloe]e@leale|wl] » | co | = | w | wo |e |e |ea}os | a} | x os | a | o | te s | | & | oa} vs | x | o | ys] ie] are ee] | oat | es | ee] ae és | oo | a | w | | o> | ea] ss | « | | o ss | = | eo | o se | &@ | o | so | cz | o | o | os wile |e 1s s_| we |e | viz | co | os | & | ve ‘OF 6 so vor CS 8 ae +e ‘or Tor 89 (9.6) e ‘208 408 OL eoF 0b ee eee oot ‘80h ‘sob sk (4.8) se|ou | on | a cu | fo | oo | ave fon | eu | ou | ve coon Has Sear avn ae Sr oer anak awn [nad Pa | oor Pa seu? 1 .8¢) 5.001 Tz) 5.08, ~O 3) 509 dn sdeyy dIO OH GED TLIDTARSPLNLL MED sRTIPdoIg PRON WEY SEM §— ONL EM poe] aM azaroce-o Bumueok] oufug dH OS1/0S1 #uss29 LI99 WAWSN (9730 8 98ta) Wad AD VLVG ASIN GALVINGVL women,lasseless Siasaeeae BNBHegs sR] w]e sy | o | oF | o | om oo | eo | o | 0 | cc | on u | 2 zs | ua | zw | | ve w | se Fe a ve |e eo | o | oo | » | co eo | oe | ve | zw | ss | ce we | ss so | o | we | io | oo. es _| os. Zs | vor zor] 69 yor sor | om | u | ve cob eu] on | so | ove, ggxeen zo o ue eo | e0 ry 8 65. lgxsleasssae jaxcienes|saa Be RRR sa 2 BYIGS NAIA a Svin | Swi LOPOER 85 dn dey — 7H aE TLIOLASPLNL Ome seIPdoLg sqro9ct NBA comp ‘AZA-0ZE-0 SimM09] MH OS1A51 Rl LADO WAV (220 6 98ea) WAI AG VLVC BSINI GALVINEVL women,