OSAS

ENTERPRISE
Stage 1: Design Package

Group Members:

Chia Zim Chen

Quah Weng Leong

Chang Xin Xiong

Ezrah Apoi Roland

1
 Table of contents

1.0 Cover Page 1

2.0 Table of contents 2

3.0 List of tables and figures 3

3.0 Introduction 4

4.0 Template of drawings

4.1 Template of 2D drawings 5-12

4.2 Template of 3D drawings 13-14

5.0 Specification of Mars Rover

5.1 Specification of materials 15

5.2 Specification of tools 15

6.0 Construction of project 16-18

7.0 Risk Management Plan 19-21

8.0 Tender Evaluation Criteria 22-26

9.0 Reference lists 27

2
 List of Tables and Figures

Item Description Page number

Diagram 4.1.1 Front view 5
Diagram 4.1.2 Top view 6
Diagram 4.1.3 Bottom view 7
Diagram 4.1.4 Back view 8
Diagram 4.1.5 Left side view 9
Diagram 4.1.6 Right side view 10
Diagram 4.1.7 Wheel 11
Diagram 4.1.8 Axle 12
Diagram 4.2.1 3D view 13
Diagram 4.2.2 Exploded 3D view 14
Table 5.1 Materials to construct Mars Rover 15
Table 5.2 Tools to construct Mars Rover 15
Figure 6.1 Figure of the Axle and Wheels attached 18
Figure 6.2 Figure of the Shape of the Axle 18
Table 6.1 Dimensions of the parts of Mars Rover 16
Table 6.2 Axles dimensions of Mars Rover 17
Table 6.3 Wheels and assembly of the axles 18

3
3.0 Introduction

This document presents a design of a Mars Lander which comprises of its

specifications and construction methods. With this document, contractors are
expected to be successful in assemble the Mars Lander with flawless quality as
expected by our client, EMPACT.

4
4.0 Template of Drawings (MasterSketchup, 2012)
4.1 Template of 2D drawings
Diagram 4.1.1 Front view

5
Diagram 4.1.2 Top view

6
Diagram 4.1.3 Bottom view

7
Diagram 4.1.4 Back view

8
Diagram 4.1.5 Left side view

9
Diagram 4.1.6 Right side view

10
Diagram 4.1.7 Wheel

11
Diagram 4.1.8 Axle

12
4.2 Templates of 3D drawings

Diagram 4.2.1 3D view

13
Diagram 4.2.2 Exploded 3D view

14
5.0 Specification of Mars Rover

Table 5.1 below comprises of all the materials required to construct Mars
Rover while Table 5.2 comprises of all the tools needed in constructing the Mars
Rover.
Table 5.1 Materials to construct Mars Rover

Raw Material
No Item Order Source Function Cost/Unit Quantity Subtotal
Description
Polystyrene For body of the Mars
1 Non-recycle item www.taobao.com $ 2.00 1 $ 2.00
ball(Hollow) Rover(15cm x 1).
For the wheel of the Mars
2 Polystyrene Non-recycle item www.taobao.com $ 0.13 8 $ 1.04
ball Rover (4cm x 1).

For the axle of the Mars

Recycled
3 Metal rod Recycle item Rover and the clamp for the $ -
materials
cargo.

To stick the polystyrene balls

4 Hot glue Non-recycle item Supersave (hollow) together and make a $ 1.00 3 $ 3.00
cap to hold the wheel.

Stick in the hole where your

cargo is inserted, which
prevent cargo from falling of
5 Rubber Recycle item 8 $ -
the Mars Rover during the
impact and act as tyre for the
wheel.

Perspex Use as windows for the cargo

7 Non-recycle item Supersave $ 5.00 2 $ 10.00
to be visible

Total Cost
$ 16.04

Table 5.2 Tools to construct the Mars Rover

Raw Materials
No Item Order Source Function Cost/Unit Quantity Subtotal
Description
Non-recycle
1 Hot glue gun Supersave For apply hot glue $ 12.00 1 $ 12.00
material
Welding Non-recycle To combine the iron rod
2 Chia Zim Chen
Machine material together
3

5
6
7
Total cost $ 12.00
Subtotal for
$ 28.24
both

15
6.0 Construction of project

Drawings in 2.0 provide all the dimensions of the Mars Rover that would be
constructed. Detailed instructions in constructing the Mars Rover are found in the
below sections.

Precise measurements must be carried out throughout the construction of the Mars
Rover.

The body of the Mars Rover

The body should be completed with accuracy, precision and care as it is the utmost
important part of the vehicle. The table below shows the dimensions of each
important parts of the Mars Rover with their respective quantities along with their
drawing references.

Table 6.1 Dimensions of the parts of the Mars Rover.

Name of part Quantity Dimensions(mm) Drawing

references
Hole A (Front Face) 1 29 Diagram 4.1.1
Hole B (Top Face) 1 35 Diagram 4.1.2
Hole C (Back Face) 1 65 Diagram 4.1.4
Hole D (Left Face) 1 35 Diagram 4.1.5
Hole E (Right Face) 1 35 Diagram 4.1.6

Procedure
The centre of the biggest polystyrene sphere (hollow) is marked for 6 different sides:
front, top, back, left, right, bottom. A circle with a radius of (29mm) is drawn with a
compass on the bigger polystyrene ball as a front face. The circle drawn at the centre
is then cut with a penknife. Repeat the same steps as above for the circular hole with a
radius of (65mm) for the back face of the sphere and (35mm) for the left, right and top
of the sphere. Besides, a layer of rubber has to be stick on the edge of the hole for the
hole of front face and back face.

16
Axles
Table 6.2 below provides the dimensions of the parts, quantity and drawing reference.

Table 6.2 Axle dimensions of the Mars Rover.

Name of part Quantity Dimensions Drawing reference

Axle 4 200 x 1 Diagram 4.1.8

Procedure
The iron rods are then cut into the specified lengths and welded together into the iron rod
structure using a welding iron as shown in the picture below, (Figure 6.1 and 6.2).

PICTURES

Figure 6.1 Figure 6.2

17
Wheels and assembly of the axles

Table 6.3 below provides the dimensions of parts, quantity, and drawing references.
Table 6.3 Wheels and assembly of the axles
Name of part Quantity Dimensions Drawing reference
Tyres 8 4 Diagram 4.1.7

Procedure
Two smaller polystyrene balls which are used as the wheels are then attached to the
iron rod structure, one on each end, and the iron rod structure will act as the axle. This
step is then repeated three more times to produce a total of four axles. The axles are
then poked into the body.

18
7.0 Risk management Plan

Safety plan for the project

(Design stage)
Risk Matrix
Risk Hazard Likelihood Severity (Low, Moderate, Mitigation Residual Risk
High , Extreme)
The prototype is The design of Unlikely to happen May cause Moderate Designer should Small details
unbalanced and the prototype is as the designers are spillage of double check the prototype may be
unable to not very specific when the load design and get missed out when
function symmetrical. designing the and the is feedback from being checked.
properly. prototype. unable to other members.
land safely.

The prototype is Unsuitable Likely to happen as Damage to High Designers Replacement

unable to materials are suitable materials the should come up materials may not
withstand the specified. might be prototype with suitable be obtainable.
impact and will unavailable and are will lead to replacement
be damaged. hard to be obtained. damage to materials in case
the load the specified
thus materials are
defeating unable to be
the purpose obtained.
of the
prototype.

Late submission Late Likely to happen as The overall Moderate Designers Design may be full
will delay the submission of members are also design is should work of errors and not
other team design and busy with not agreed together to up to standards.
members work. drawings. assignments from with the produce quality
other units other work on time.
members
and may
cause
conflict.

19
(Construction stage) (Colchin Automotive, 2017)
Risk Matrix
(Low,
Risk Hazard Likelihood Severity Moderate, Mitigation Residual Risk
High ,
Extreme)

May injure
the Check the
Unlikely to happen The tools may
Harm the contractor condition of
Faulty tools as tools used are Extreme break under stress
contractors. and may tools before
new. while being used.
lead to using them.
death.

Likely to happen as Communication

there may be Prototype Designer should barriers between
The prototypes
Unclear misunderstanding cannot be be present when the members as
cannot be built Low
instructions. between the built true to the prototype is some members
correctly.
designers and the design. built. may not be fluent
contractors. in english.

The
The contractors
Very unlikely to purpose of
Incorrect should confirm Materials may be
Cannot function happen as the the
materials used High the materials confused with
ideally. desired materials prototype
in construction. specified with something else.
are specified. cannot be
the designers.
achieved.

Injured
Contractors
contractors
Contractors do Unlikely to happen should not be
causes
not wear due to the rules that allowed to start There maybe not
Injure the prolonged
proper safety ensure proper wear High construction enough safety gear
contractors construction
gear during are used when without for everyone.
stage due to
construction. construction. wearing proper
lack of
safety gear.
manpower.

20
(Testing stage)

Risk Hazard Likelihood Severity Risk Mitigation Residual

Matrix Risk
( Low,
Moderate,
High ,
Extreme)

The Loose Unlikely to High, High Testers Double

prototype parts on happen due because the should checking
may fall the to the fact testing to check the the
apart prototype. that the not be able prototype in prototype
during design of to meet the case there for flaws
testing. the criteria and are any may cause
prototype is ultimately loose parts delays and
secure. fail. before the is very time
testing consuming.
period.

Might Strong Unlikely to Moderate, Moderate Have the

affect the wind. happen due prototype testing
way the to the may fall conducted -
prototype testing awkwardly in a hall or
falls. being done and may be enclosed
in an damaged area.
enclosed also
area. causing
failure.

The car Very light Likely Moderate, High Design the More
might lose weight. because of the car in such materials
control the heavy prototype a way that used will
and is load and may not be the light cause higher
unable to the high able to stay weight is cost of the
withstand impact. on the used as an rover.
the track. advantage.
impact. Or use
more
materials to
increase the
weight.

21
8.0 Tender Evaluation Criteria (Tony Zemaitis Associates Ltd, 2017)

This is the section which our company, Osas Enterprise evaluate the tender.
We will identify which bid offers the best value based on the criteria written below.
Whoever tender which fulfil our requirement will be chosen as our contractor.

1) Understanding the design

It is very crucial for the applicants to understand the design of our Mars Rover so that
it can be built correctly. Thus we Osas Enterprise take this criterion as our main
choosing option.

Tender 1 Tender 2 Tender 3

Analysing of the design:-

Unable to explain and

analyse the design
(0 points)
Able to explain and
analyse the procedure ( ) out of 30 ( ) out of 30 ( ) out of 30
only
(10 points)
Able to explain and
analyse the procedure,
constructing materials
(20 points)
Able to explain and
analyse the procedure,
constructing materials
and working methods
(30 points)

22
 Provide suggestions in
improving the design:-

Fail to come out with

any suggestions
(0 points)
Provide one or two ( ) out of 10 ( ) out of 10 ( ) out of 10
suggestion(s) regarding
the improvement of the
design
(5 points)
Provide more than two
constructive
suggestions
(10 points)

2) Communication

Communication between the contractors and client is important in every professional

field. Good communication is compulsory in the cooperation between Osas Enterprise
and contractors.

Tender 1 Tender 2 Tender 3

Reply message and email:-

Never reply messages

and email
(0 points)
Reply messages and
emails within one days ( ) out of 15 ( ) out of 15 ( ) out of 15
(5 points)
Reply messages and
emails within 10 hours

23
 (10 points)
Always reply message
and emails within one
hour
(15 points)

3) Cost management

Osas Enterprise expects the applicants to save and reduce the cost to the minimum as
possible. We expect a low budget construction from each of the applicants as to let
our company highly benefited and profited.

Tender 1 Tender 2 Tender 3

Cost-saving suggestions:-

No cost-saving plan
(0 points)
Suggest a cost-saving ( ) out of 10 ( ) out of 10 ( ) out of 10
plan
(5 points)
Suggest more than one
cost-saving plan
(10 points)

4) Punctuality

Meetings between client and contractors are always held to discuss about the progress
of the project. Contractors must always be punctual to the meetings.

Tender 1 Tender 2 Tender 3

Attends to meetings :-

Absent to meetings /
Late to meetings

24
 without any reasons
(0 points)
Absent to meetings /
( ) out of 10 ( ) out of 10 ( ) out of 10
Late to meetings with
reasonable reasons
(5points)
Arrive meetings venue
on time for every
meetings
(10 points)

5) Experience

Osas Enterprise is looking for applicants who are experience in leading or organising
activities or events which is related to our projects. Applicant who is more experience
has the priority to be chosen as our contractor.

Tender 1 Tender 2 Tender 3

Organised events and activities
as:-

President / Vice
president (15 points) ( ) out of 15 ( ) out of 15 ( ) out of 15
Secretary / Treasurer
(10 points)
Committee Member (5
points)

25
Tender Evaluation Matrix

Criteria Tender 1 Tender 2 Tender 3

( ) out of 90 ( ) out of 90 ( ) out of 90

Understanding the design

( ) out of 90 ( ) out of 90 ( ) out of 90

Communication

( ) out of 90 ( ) out of 90 ( ) out of 90

Cost management

( ) out of 90 ( ) out of 90 ( ) out of 90

Punctuality

( ) out of 90 ( ) out of 90 ( ) out of 90

Experience

26
9.0 Reference lists
Colchin Automotive. (2017). Crumple zones: what they are and how they work.
Retrieved from: http://colchinautomotive.com/crumple-zones-what-they-are-
and-how-they-work

Tony Zemaitis Associates Ltd. (2017). Understanding tender evaluation criteria.

Retrieved from:http://www.zemaitis-uk.com/tender-evaluation-criteria/

MasterSketchup. (2012, March 19). Sketchup Tutorial For Beginners - Part One.
Retrieved from:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsHRGDvN4sM

27