Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction to ANSYS
Meshing
Geometry Requirements
Meshing
g Methods
Tetrahedrons
Patch Conforming
Patch Independent (ICEM CFD Tetra)
Swept Mesh
Automatic
MultiZone
CFX-Mesh
Workshop 3.1
Combining Sweep and Tetrahedral Methods for a Multibody Part
Inflating Tetrahedral and Sweep Methods
Advantages
An arbitrary volume can always be filled with tetrahedra
Can be generated quickly,
quickly automatically
automatically, and for
complicated geometry
Can be easily combined with curvature and proximity
size functions to automatically refine the mesh in critical regions
Can be combined with inflation to refine the mesh near solid walls
(boundary layer resolution)
Disadvantages
Element and node counts are higher than for a hex mesh with a
similar mesh density
Generally not possible to align the cells with a flow direction
Not well suited for thin solids or annuli due to non-isotropy
of geometry and nature of element
Common Parameters
Minimum and Maximum Sizes
Face and Body Sizes
Advanced Size Functions (Curvature and/or Proximity)
Growth Rate (gradual variation for CFD, avoid sudden jumps)
Smoothing (helps achieve a more uniformly sized mesh)
Statistics
Mesh Metrics
Resolution of
Circular Hole
Geometry with a single source and target face can be swept with a
bias in the sweep direction
(F
(Faces h
have b
been merged
d either
i h iin CAD or with
i h VT)
Thin Model Sweeps cannot be inflated
ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary Release 12.0
2010 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. 3-17 March 2010
Meshing Methods for 3D Geometries