Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anyone who watches auditions regularly will tell you: 10 percent or less
(some even say 1 percent)of the actors they see, look like theyre
having a good time. Surprised? Theyll also say that the actors who seem
to truly enjoy auditioning are more likely to be considered and cast. So,
lets recognize what an audition really is: a job interview. If you were
interviewing applicants for a position of great responsibility, would you
be inclined to hire those who looked unhappy? Would you hire the
applicants who looked most desperate to get the job? Or would you be
drawn to those who seemed the most happy with themselves and
enthusiastic about possibly being hired? I think actors often look
unhappy (this includes looking serious, somber, grim, and totally
miserable) because theyre treating auditions as ordeals they must
endure in the hope of getting hired to do some real creative work. I
believe the only way to change this is to treat the audition process itself
as a creative project, with skills and habits you can learn and get better
at.
Define whats in your control and what isnt, and forget about what isnt.
Show business is insane and unfair, always has been, always will be.
Heres an exercise: make a two-column list, with one side labelled Can
Control and one labelled Cant Control. Write down everything you can
think of that has to do with auditioning on each column. Then circle
everything on the Control side that you regularly do, and circle
everything on the Cant Control side that you regularly worry about or
otherwise lose energy to. Any surprises? Your goal is to recycle the
energy you spend on the Cant Control side onto the Control side. Doing
this exercise from time to time, and taking constructive action based on
your results, can positively transform your audition experiences.
This may seem obvious, but do you have an acting technique that works
for you? Do you have a concrete way to tackle a script? Is your voice in
shape? Is your body trained and at your service? Do you know what roles
you want to be going out for? Do you have an idea of how others, such
as casting directors, see you? Do you have an ever-evolving list of your
most favourite plays, films, directors, and companies? Do you practice
regularly? Do you practice auditioning ? The more you work on the
various skills of your craft, the more you will enjoy exercising those skills.
Youll be more likely to see auditions as opportunities to share your
creativity and to perform, and as a result youll have a better time in the
audition room.
It may be their audition room, but its your audition. Are you welcoming
people to your performance? Or are you gritting your teeth and bracing
yourself? Are you treating casting directors as valued colleagues, or
more like the firing squad? Are you hurling yourself through the door or
are you walking in and pleasantly taking the stage? Are you smiling or
are you grimacing? Are you warmly thanking them or are you running
out of the room? I teach a whole class on this skill, but heres the bottom
line: if you habitually host your auditions positively and graciously, you
are more likely to have a better time yourself.
Never make one audition mean everything.
I once told a friend of mine, who was up for the role of her dreams,
that if she didnt get the part, then I wanted her to be in a production I
was directing. Later. she told me that knowing that made her relax in the
final callback then she did, in fact, get the role of her dreams. Obviously
you cant guarantee that theres another role waiting for you whenever
you audition, but you can plan your life so that you are excited about
what you have going on while youre auditioning. That can mean classes
youre taking, trips or events youre planning, or creating your own
projects. The most attractive thing in the audition room is an actor who
looks like he or she has somewhere interesting to go next. That kind of
actor gives off an air of youd better grab me while you can, not please
give me this part its the only thing in my life.
A first audition is like a first coffee date: Hello, how are you? Heres how
this part hits me a taste of what I could be like in this role. The problem
is too many actors show up for this first date with an engagement ring
they put way too much pressure on themselves (and on their auditors)
for the first audition to go perfectly instead of recognizing each step of
the audition dance. Instead of trying to deliver a perfect performance, let
your first audition be a sample of the sensibility you would bring to the
role, and possibly the kind of receptivity you would have to direction and
feedback. Then, if they happen, let each subsequent callback build on
your first audition by digging a little deeper into your work, and getting a
bit more detailed. As nerve-wracking as it can be, you will give better
auditions and have more fun if you focus specifically on each stage of
the audition process rather than fret over the whole or the outcome.
Are you more focused in the morning? What should you do to be your
best at a 3 p.m. audition? What colours look best on you? Do you have
clothes and shoes you look and feel great in? Do you need to eat protein
before an audition? Should you avoid sugar? How can you be hydrated
but not have to run to the bathroom right before you go in the room?
Systematically identifying and practicing details that make you your best
is in your control. Itll pay off in increased energy, concentration, and
enjoyment.
Recognize success.
The wonderful actor Peter Maloney recently spoke to the students at the
Atlantic Acting School . He said, If they dont cast me, I want it to be
their fault, not mine. As a teacher, I love hearing when former students
get jobs, but perhaps the kind of email or call I love even more is when
an actor says: I just had a great audition. I was fully prepared. I took care
of everything. I was at ease coming into the room. I read or did my
monologue and had fun working in the moment. And I made a point of
giving them a sincere thank you and making a confident exit. I had so
much fun, and Im glad I went regardless of whether I am called back or
cast. That is someone I know who has fallen in love with the auditioning
process, and who is enjoying their success right now.
* * * * *
11. Fidgeting
We all have fidgets, mannerisms we do unconsciously. Monologue work
tends
to put your fidgets under the magnifying glass because you are the only
thing
happening in the room. Fidgets can include: shifting weight from side to
side;
beating out the rhythm of the lines with arms or head; thrusting the
head and also
upper body forward so that alignment is pulled off and the voice suffers;
fussy
and/or repetitive hand gestures; blinking. Fidgeting is distracting and
instantly
takes the audience out of the piece. Fidgeting can be worked on
however, and I
have seen some incredibly fidgety actors transform themselves into
focused,
purposeful, riveting performers by working patiently with their fidgeting
habits.
Solution: Know that every body movement read is apparent to your
auditors, and that every movement needs to be either a choice or a full
expression of a spontaneous impulse (if it is less than full it becomes a
fidget).
Having purposeful, fidget-free staging for a monologue helps immensely.
Work
with movement and acting teachers, work with partners, to ground
yourself and
practice both stillness AND the full discharge of your movement
impulses. For
those who can stand it: have a partner videotape you from a side view
while you
act your monologue fully. When you watch it, watch it without the sound,
and you
will quickly see your fidgets, and when you are using your body
purposefully and
powerfully.
People say hes the same in every movie, but frankly, thats bullshit. Yes,
hes been successful in some similar roles, but hes starred in a vast
amount of movies and television shows. Hes made more than 115
appearances on the big and small screen in many diverse roles. If you
only know him as Jerry from Fargo, try seeing him in ER or Edmond.
Here are some simple, some inspiring, some thought provoking quotes
from Macy:
Quite often, people who are going through great tragedy are quite
placid on the outside. I find that so much more moving
Bill Macy:
The whole thing about your emotions is, Grotowski found this out, if you
perform an action, it will have an emotional reaction, you couldnt stop it
if you tried. Your emotions will come out. You cannot bring them forth
and you cannot hide them, they will come out. And theres never been a
scene that is about being sad. There are scenes about making a bond,
thats something you can do, but being sad, youre gonna fake it, youre
just gonna be pretending. What the audience needs to know is that
youre making a bond or youre getting a promise, or that youre laying
down the law. These are things that are within your will, thats what
counts. And Ill go further. Actors are emotional people, the question
always, should actors be emotional people? You are emotional people,
And heres the thing, you are sufficient. You dont have to improve
yourself. First of all, youre not gonna. In your study of acting, youre not
gonna become better people. You are sufficient, youre enough, youve
got the goods, youre completely emotional enough. What we need from
you is your bravery, your will. If you do it right, the journey of the
character is strangely similar to the journey of the actor. In other words,
the fear that the character feels is so similar to the fear that you feel. At
some point, you have to stop saying, Im wrong to feel this way, I should
be feeling something different. The character should be feeling a certain
thing. Nah, if youre feeling it, its real.
FOUR: WARM UP
If you can, do a quick warm up before you start (obviously not in view of
the panel). So before they bring you in, have a good stretch, do some
spinal rolls, have a few good deep breaths through your mouth to slow
down your heart beat and make yourself more comfortable. Warm your
mouth up with a couple of tongue twisters to prevent yourself from
getting tongue-tied in the audition.
SEVEN: READ
Spend the time that you have with the script reading it over and over,
dont work out how youre going to say the lines, just read it over and
over until youre comfortable with it. Until you just have a feel for it and
the words are easy with you. This will help you live in the moment when
the audition comes.
EIGHT: RESEARCH
If you know what show they are doing, read the play in advance. Most
scripts are available through Amazon, Alibris or the Drama Bookshop in
New York. While they might not have you read from the script, you will
be prepared if they do!
- Aristotle
The voice of the performer, coupled with the music and the words,
creates an effect in the audience that cannot be topped. The singing
actor has something special, the ability to move without a call to the
intellect of the audience. Their audience responds unconsciously,
truthfully and with full emotion. The filtering, editing effect of the brain
does not have a chance to destroy the moment.
The main tool here, once the direction of the piece is ascertained, is
finding the analogous circumstances by using an As-If. This will give
your body a great sense of what it means to play that Essential Action
and all the ways that you might try to get your action accomplished.
Working to improvise or play with the analogous circumstances will
provide you with a truthful bed rock for the song.
The ability to distill your characters task down to the lowest common
denominator (the simplest form) is the real test. After that, live truthfully
and the song will fly.
Mamet and Macy got together with a group of drama students from New
York University and held what they described as a Practical Aesthetics
workshop. So exciting was what they explored, that a book was
subsequently published; A Practical Handbook for The Actor, and the
Atlantic Theatre Company was formed with Practical Aesthetics at its
foundation. Atlantic has since become one of the most successful and
critically acclaimed theatre companies in New York.
Well, the most important thing to say about it is that its a modern and
pragmatic approach to actor training. It doesnt throw the baby out with
the bathwater though, since it is founded on the work of key theatre
practitioners (such as Stanislavski and Meisner), yet moves dynamically
forward.
Acting is about action then, and as such its the actors actions that
construct the dynamics of the character as perceived by the audience.
A Practical Aesthetics Acting Class helps the actor find key goals to
pursue within each and every scene, with the complete freedom to be
natural and truthful every time.
Since the voice and body are the actors instruments, a Practical
Aesthetics student will learn simple and effective techniques to optimise
these instruments. To encourage a state of readiness and flexibility.
The body and its muscles, including those affecting breathing and clarity
of speech will be lightly stretched and relaxed tension in mind and
body can be the enemy of even the best actors.
Likewise, expect a Practical Aesthetics Class to give you some
fundamental exercises to warm the larynx, and some verbal gymnastics
to loosen the jaw, tongue and lips.
Since its said that only seven percent of our communication comes
solely from the words we choose, the remaining ninety three percent is
greatly influenced by vocal nuances of tone, pitch and rhythm as well as
body language.
Repetition Technique/Exercise
When the most wonderfully electric scenes are carried out by fine actors
on the stage and screen, they are fresh, alive and full of energy. Thats
usually because the actors are reacting off of each other. This avoids
the notion of deadly theatre where a play is exhaustingly rehearsed in
the same manner and tone, and the actors become automatons and
leave the audience bored and unengaged.
Acting is re-acting, and the Repetition Exercise is an invaluable process
to practice that skill.
Script Analysis
The Wants
Having established what the character is literally doing, you then move
on to defining what they actually want over the period of the scene.
However, its important for the want to be based on the other person
in the scene. And so, it becomes about wanting something from the
other. Using the last of the above literal situations, an example might be
the girlfriend wants the boyfriend to swallow his pride.
The choice of essential actions can be vast, but the Practical Aesthetics
approach dictates that an essential action is only valid when it meets all
of nine criteria set out below:
1) It must be in line with the playwrights intentions
2) It must not be an errand
3) It must have a cap
4) It mustnt be emotionally or physically manipulative
5) It mustnt predetermine an emotional state
6) It must have its test in the other person
7) It must be specific
8) It must be physically capable of being done
9) It must be fun
Its not important to explain these here, but it is important to know that
this checklist forces the actors to get to the crux of what they want to
achieve, and gives them focus and a sense of purpose in the scene.
Remember, your scene partner has identified their wants and essential
actions and potential tactics to affect you too. Thus, the game is on; let
the playing begin.
The As-If
In rehearsal, the Practical Aesthetics Actor will take the essential action
and personalise it to mean something to them. So if the essential action
is to get a loved one to take a chance, they might say its as if I was
convincing my brother to get over his ex, and ask out the girl next door.
The key is, it must mean something important to you, and it must be
plausible enough for you to invest your energy in it.
This gives the actor the basis for trying out different tactics with a scene
partner using improvisation, without initially concerning themselves with
the actual text of the play.
The object of this exercise is for the different tactics to become habitual,
and the actual text of the scene can be introduced later, now those
tactical muscles have been flexed.
With all the above preparation, analysis and practice put in, the Practical
Aesthetics actor can embark on any given performance with the
confidence of knowing what they are setting out to achieve, and the
freedom and flexibility to act, and react to, what is actually happening in
that specific and unique moment in time, with whoever is on stage with
them.
Practical Aesthetics avoids the trap of the Method Actor: self absorption
and self analysis. By taking the attention away from you and onto the
other, you truly become liberated to act and live in the moment. Youre
no longer trapped inside your head, no two performances will ever be
identical, and the magic of storytelling casts its spell on the audience.
Like an athlete though, the Practical Aesthetics actor has to work and
train hard. The approach is not complex, its not mystical, and it doesnt
require psychological introspection. Its capacity to help you grow as an
actor is limited only by your courage of determination, commitment and
application.
As any good Practical Aesthetics teacher will tell you, great acting skills
are about hard work and application its not a question of simply
talent or being gifted. A Practical Aesthetics Acting Class will give
the student the tools and techniques required to gather information from
the script, apply some key criteria that means something to them, and
carry out specific actions in a scene with a free-flowing, unrehearsed
manner.
In summary, Practical Aesthetics Acting Classes equip the actor with
practicable tools designed to give the actor freedom of choice over what
to do rather than worrying about how to be.
3) It must have its test in the other person (takes the focus off you and
makes you much more interesting)
4) It must have a physical cap (a sign that you have achieved the
essential action transformed into a physical essence)
They usually start with the words to get someone to. Some
practitioners exchange the someone for a more relationship specific
word, and some remove it all together, so to get someone to share their
terrible secret can become to get a loved one to share their terrible
secret or simply share your terrible secret. I like the relationship
context, it helps you to find an analogous connection to it through an As
If.
The Essential Action offers the actor a way of taking the essence of what
the character is doing and turning it into something that he or she can
do too.
So you read the scene and you reckon the characters essential action is
to bring someone down a peg or two. Its a lovely fun thing to do in a
scene and it fully engages the actor in the psychophysical task of trying
to get their scene partner to down a peg or two. By offering the actor a
way of coming into line with the character, we create the illusion of
character. The actor always has something to do on stage, the essential
action gives them that something to do, they move beyond the words,
they move beyond the printed scene into a relationship that triangulates
the playwrights words, the actions of themselves and their scene
partner and the imagination of the audience. When all these work
together, when you begin working off the other actor, using your
essential action and the words of the playwright, you enter flow and so
do the audience.
We call this THE WANT. (and you wont find it in the Practical Handbook
for the Actor because it was added after that book was published)
Sometimes its known as an:
Objective
Desire
Need
Goal
Target
Characters want things for themselves, but they usually want them from
other people. David Mamet says The characters got to want something
specific. No matter what they say, theyre after something, theyre
seeking a goal, theyve got an objective. As Mamet says:
People may or may not say what they mean, but they always say
something designed to get what they want.
The essential part of the WANT question is what does the character
WANT the other character to DO.Your character wants the other
character to do something. Your actions on stage must aim to glean a
response from the other actor to parallel the drive the character feels to
achieve something from one of the other characters, occasionally
themselves. This can range from my character wants the other character
pay them attention, to lend them money, to do their dirty work.
Its important to keep it very simple and write (in order to identify it, to
articulate it) it in physically achievable terms. See how I was able to
write the WANT in THREE words each time. Try to keep it minimal. I
sometimes change the tense to first person so pay me attention, lend
me money or do my dirty work thinking from the perspective of the
character, but as a recent anonymous commenter pointed out its
probably better to have the WANT in the 3rd Person.
The WANT compels the character to action. Having a strong WANT will
give you a very big clue as to how to construct an effective ESSENTIAL
ACTION. Using a strong want to create a strong ESSENTIAL ACTION will
compel YOU to action.
By answering this question with the DO, it makes the WANT something
tangible. However, remember that the WANT is something that the
fictional character desires, something that drives them, their motivating
force.
The reason that other actors look silly asking Whats my motivation for
this scene is that the motivation is provided by the playwright for the
character alone. You will never have the same desire as the character in
the play. The WANT is not yours, it is a target for the character and
although the audience may be aware of it through the writing of the
script, your job is to find a strong and fun ESSENTIAL ACTION that aims
to capture it. In the pursuit of that action, you will create become
compelling and come to life, you will begin to live truthfully.
Your characters desire is the reason that they are in the scene in the
first place. All characters have a WANT. Your job is to discover the most
practical WANT for the scene and find the strongest universal ESSENTIAL
ACTION for the scene.
WANT offers a way to help you to bring the character to life by bringing
yourself to life with something concrete to do, but it is not your want and
so the essential action is what converts it into something simple and
truthful for you to do. Others cant understand how simply this works.
Life is goal and action, so it is in the scene, without goal and action there
is pretense and entropy.
Sloppy Repetition
Meisner believed actors do not listen. They are so focused on what they
have to do that they rarely listen and connect with their partners truely. I
would go one further and suggest this is not a problem for actors, this is
a problem for the human race. Yesterday I had an experience on the
telephone and it made me think about how we do not listen. We gloss
over, we fill in the blanks, we presume, but we dont listen
ME: No.
Now how was this boy going to sell me something if he hadnt listened to
see if I was Mr Jones or not? He wasnt listening, he was too focused on
his task to actually care about the one person that could help him do his
job better. It is the same for the actor.
Until now, Ive resisted writing about the repetition exercise or game.
Personally, I think talking about it dilutes it somewhat. Yet, theres no
better exercise for the actor that teaches them to listen, pay attention to
their partner, see what changes in their partner and educates them in
how to connect with their partner, whether their partner is connected to
them or not.
To me, one of the big problems with students as they get better at the
exercise is that they no longer focus on being precise about the
repetition. In other words, they sort of gloss over the cracks, presuming,
reading, fortune telling the response, and not allowing the moment to be
true.
REPEAT WHAT YOU HEAR is one of the basic tenets of the exercise, yet
people want to lead, they want to abuse, control, bully, compete with
the other person. Just repeat what you hear with your own perspective.
Repetition becomes fake when you begin to try to take control. Do you
see? Its not ABOUT YOU. Its about the OTHER person.
When you take control of the repetition, you are getting sloppy, you are
no longer truly PAYING ATTENTION TO YOUR PARTNER. You make
assumption and presumptions. You can afford to neither.
How many times do we hear the same old predictable calls made when
someone does something that you recognise. You say ah yes, thats
this, before you even look to see what it truly is. You must be on the
ball, thats what being in the moment is about, but you must also be
exact, you must be precise, you must learn to see the difference
between disagreement and surprise (for instance).
Challenge yourself to take your time next time you are up doing
repetition. Challenge yourself to say what it is, not what you have gotten
used to saying. When I was training, I remember that one of my
classmates would also use youre stuck in your head or youre in your
head whenever she couldnt think of anything else to say. She was
learning to lie and this exercise is about revealing the truth.
Repetition helps you to build the skills to deal with this new spontaneous
and immediate style of performance.
Repetition is simple. Say something truthful about the other person and
then that person repeats from their perspective and continue to repeat
what you hear until something happens that makes you change. For
example:
Youre unsure
Im unsure
Youre unsure
Im unsure
Youre unsure
Im unsure
Youre unsure
Im unsure
Youre unsure
Im unsure
Youre unsure
Im unsure
Etc etc
Simply put: if you see the person fidgeting and biting their lip, you may
believe they are nervous, then say it and continue to repeat (until one of
you sees some new change occuring).
Youre unsure
Im unsure
Youre unsure
Im unsure (you see them bite their lip)
Youre nervous
Im nervous
Youre nervous
Im nervous
Youre nerbus (you hear them err)
You made a mistake
I made a mistake (they go red)
Youre embarrassed
Im embarrassed
Youre embarrassed
Im embarrassed
Youre embarrassed
Im embarrassed
As David Mamet says Invent Nothing, Deny Nothing. This means that
you do NOT need to change anything on purpose but if you see a change
in your repetition partner, then say it, dont deny it. Remember
its Invent Nothing, Deny Nothing.
This game has no winner, its not a competition. When you make a
mistake or get stuck for words just attempt to keep going, your worst
mistakes are gifts to your fellow repetition practitioner that will keep the
game going.
Simply say what you see regardless of social politeness. Meisner used to
say Fuck Polite. He doesnt mean be rude, he simply means that if you
are an actor, you must be open to live truthfully under a wide range of
imaginary circumstances and scenarios. For this reason, the actor must
be unrestricted by social niceties in order to prepare to do this. Its not
about being mean to each other, its about being open enough to say
what you see and respond to it.
Over time your repetition skills are integrated into your scene work.
From herein its just practise. So what are you waiting for? Get
practising!
Thats harder than it seem. Our beliefs become hardwired into us,
literally part of who we are.
And this is the simple part. Say aloud what the other actor is doing
psychologically. (This requires some knowledge of the repetition
exercise)
Youre distracted.
Say it aloud again, but this time, like you want to discourage them from
being unsettled (they cant swallow the bitter pill unless they are calm
again)
Youve acknowledged what they are really doing right now. Not what
they are saying, but what they are doing, not what they are pretending
to do, but what they are actually doing.
Now we force that decision through both your response to what they are
doing, and your next line.
Then the other actor sees the HUGGING from their perspective, perhaps
they find it patronising and deflect it.
Then you see the deflection, and perhaps you quickly focus them.
FOCUS Call About Their Behaviour FOCUS Line from the Script.
This goes back and forth from the beginning of the scene until the end. A
continued cycle of acknowledging with a response and letting that
response affect the lines, and then your scene partner does the same
thing. Like the infinity symbol
Ill be honest, it doesnt even feel like acting. It is acknowledging whats
happening in the present moment. Its having an opinion on that which
comes from your Task/Mindset and making sure that your
opinion/response/tactic is pushed through into the lines.
Once youve mastered this level of the technique, you simply do the call
part in your head which is great, because the audience see a
physiological response in you before the line comes out something that
is always incredibly difficult to achieve through purely acting.
Thanks to Ian Watt for pointing out the hard/soft or light/dark qualities
that some actors need to get out of a rut. Rather than thinking in
intangible forms like soft and hard, or light and dark, I offer these very
tangible adverb qualities to use instead:
Suggestively
Gently
Boldly
Mischievously
Hesitantly
Sincerely
Confidently
Eagerly
Scornfully
Disgustedly
Carefully
Shamefully
Casually
There are many more, please choose carefully as some move you too
powerfully towards playing a state.
So when people ask what I teach, I say I teach pragmatism. I want the
actor to know HOW to get better, without getting lost in the ether of
creativity, feeling, emotion, and etc etc blah blah blah. This pragmatism
comes from Practical Aesthetics, which as my new friend Mark Coleman
says is repackaged Meisner or repackaged Stanislavski. Well I partly
agree its a lot of things brought together into something unique that
works, and something that works ALL the time, rather than just when the
muse strikes or the crow flies.
What I teach are very simply techniques, they work pretty much straight
the way. Depending upon the student, they may take some time, or one
student may take longer to understand something than another, or a
younger student may be less inhibited, or an older student may have a
sharper mind for scene analysis. I dont teach a system. I teach an
approach: a way of thinking about acting, a philosophy of acting which
believes that it should be simple and fun.
Im teaching common sense. Im teaching tools that can be picked up
and used immediately. Its true that you will need to use the tools for
many years before you gain complete mastery, but you will gain
mastery. You will have control and you will know how to use them to get
the results that you want.
The First Read Through Undisturbed, reading it all the way through in a
quiet environment. Not so cosy that the senses are dulled. It needs to be
read with the acting brain switched firmly on.
Technical Read Through - This time, as you read it through, make little
notes in the script indicating words phrases, references etc. that you do
not understand. Dont be vain and foolish and ignore them. They will
come back to haunt and embarrass you if you dont comprehend their
meaning fully.
Learning Read Through -This time you should read the play through with
a dictionary and the Internet to hand. As you reach each of the words,
phrases look them up to ensure you understand their meaning.
My Part Read Through Only read your parts of the play through. Use
this to grasp the part your character plays in the story of the script.
Other POV Read Through Read through noting all the things that are
said by other characters, your own character or the playwright about the
role you are playing.
Circumstantial Read Through - The final stage, used for gleaning the
External Imaginary Circumstances and listing them for helpful use during
rehearsals. The actor that does their preparation in advance of
rehearsals has a head start.
The lessons of the stage: are often devastating and almost beyond
bearing David Mamet
Where you stumble, there you shall find your treasure. Joseph
Campbell
(This one is for Carly Jane McGrath) Fail. Fail again. Fail
Better. Samuel Beckett
People may or may not say what they mean but they always say
something designed to get what they want. David Mamet
Study, find all the good teachers and study with them, get involved in
acting to act, not to be famous or for the money. Do plays. Its not worth
it if you are just in it for the money. You have to love it. Philip Seymour
Hoffman
FOR MY STUDENTS: Its not enough to have talent. You have to have a
talent for your talent. Stella Adler
FOR MARK COLEMAN: I wish the stage were as narrow as the wire of
tightrope dancer, so that no incompetent would dare step onto it.
Goethe
Quotes arent just cool things to say to people, theyre great for
reminding you of important truisms about acting and the stage. I love
having them around, they act as reminders to me. Hope you enjoyed.
The ideas of the great playwrights are almost always larger than the
experiences of even the best actors. Stella Adler
How do I pick the right tactic? After youve selected your target, goal or
objective, then you will know what kinds of tactics you might play. If
youre goal is to Knock Someone Off their High Horse you might choose
DERIDE, INSULT, MOCK, TEASE, LOWER, KICK, or UNDERMINE as tactics.
Again, they are immediately playable, but not all tactics suit all
situations. Some, like PUNCH, SLAP, SPANK or KISS sound very physical,
but they are not meant to be literally performed. These tactics given you
a sense of the quality of the tactic, without you have to overtly perform
this action.
Tactics need to change. Its too easy to get locked into similar or the
same tactic, so you should have a reserve ready. Some actors add
tactics to the sides of their scripts and that can work quite nicely, but it
tends to mean they set in concrete their tactics and their reactions very
early on. Ideally, you should be able to play any tactic that you believe
will work within the given circumstances.
Im just going to focus on a portion, but to me, its the portion that really
counts. I dont doubt the rest is valuable, but this is what Im going to
blog about today:
HAMLET:
Speak the speech, I pray you, as I pronounced it to
you, trippingly on the tongue: but if you mouth it,
as many of your players do, I had as lief the
town-crier spoke my lines. Nor do not saw the air
too much with your hand, thus, but use all gently;
for in the very torrent, tempest, and, as I may say,
the whirlwind of passion, you must acquire and beget
a temperance that may give it smoothness. O, it
offends me to the soul to hear a robustious
periwig-pated fellow tear a passion to tatters, to
very rags, to split the ears of the groundlings, who
for the most part are capable of nothing but
inexplicable dumbshows and noise: I would have such
a fellow whipped for oerdoing Termagant; it
out-herods Herod: pray you, avoid it.
FIRST PLAYER:
I warrant your honour.
HAMLET:
Be not too tame neither, but let your own discretion
be your tutor: suit the action to the word, the
word to the action; with this special observance, oerstep not
the modesty of nature: for any thing so overdone is
from the purpose of playing, whose end, both at the
first and now, was and is, to hold, as twere, the
mirror up to nature; to show virtue her own feature,
scorn her own image, and the very age and body of
the time his form and pressure. Now this overdone,
or come tardy off, though it make the unskilful
laugh, cannot but make the judicious grieve; the
censure of the which one must in your allowance
oerweigh a whole theatre of others. O, there be
players that I have seen play, and heard others
praise, and that highly, not to speak it profanely,
that, neither having the accent of Christians nor
the gait of Christian, pagan, nor man, have so
strutted and bellowed that I have thought some of
natures journeymen had made men and not made them
well, they imitated humanity so abominably.
Shakespeare/Hamlet tell us to speak the lines trippingly - thats with a
general swiftness, not to labour over them. He insists that it is
performed as I pronounced it to you. Its easy to think that hes asking
them to repeat it as he has said it (in other words: hes a bad director
giving line readings) but instead, see it as Shakespeare saying As I have
written it for you (I can hear Mamet saying Just say the f*cking lines!).
But if you mouth it - if you mouth the lines if you simply go through
the motions, as many actors do, Id rather anyone (even the Town Crier)
shout the lines out, cos that would be better than simply mouthing the
lines. This is an anti-dote to people who think Mamets instructions to
speak up and just the say the lines means just mouthing the lines.
Dont be so naive and simplistic about it, theres much more.
I noticed the subject of corpsing was raised in Marks blog recently. The
practical solution was for the actor to focus on their essential action and
it got me thinking about other banana skins which can trip up an actor in
the serious matter of comedy acting.
Especially on long runs, the actor runs the risk of showing the
audience something funny is about to happen. The actor knows what is
coming next, anticipates the joke and the riotous laughter to follow. The
audience picks up on the signal and the potentially side-splitting
moment the writer has crafted is reduced in the process. Comedy is
devious. It often depends on surprise and misleading the audience.
Summary
Coquelin once wrote that the actor must read the play carefully over
many times, until he has grasped the intention of the author. Too many
actors are willing to accept their first impression of the script, and then
rush off to highlight their lines in pink. But without the tools to discover
the intention of the author who can blame them? It doesnt matter how
many times you read a play as a story, if you dont understand how the
play is made, youre off to a losing start.
Only after going to the Atlantic Theater Companys Acting School did I
have anything like a set of tools that could be used for professionally
reading a script. At Atlantic, we were taught to use some simple
Aristotelian ideas to disect a script and come to a solid understanding of
it so that we could figure out our characters part in the script.
Id like to offer you these tools in an easily accessible format and talk
you through them. My advanced students wont find this particularly
new, but might find the explanation interesting. When I pick up a script, I
read it once through for pleasure I published a guide to read
throughs in a past blog. From then on, Im looking at the script as a tool
of work, so I ask the question:
Q Whos Story is it? In other words, who is the protagonist? Over the
years many people have described the protagonist in different ways, but
I would define it as the character that undergoes the most change in the
course of the events of the play/film.
Then I do something of the same for the antagonist, and lastly for my
character to see how I fit into the overall story. (If Im not in the lead role
or the antagonist).
I use these exact same questions when Im writing a play to ensure that
the characters have clear driving needs, conflicts and journeys. The
clarity it provides to me as a writer is astonishing. This is the clarity it
offers the actor too. Yet, I fear, many are still willing to pick up the script
and start talking, as if the words were all there was there.
Is this all there is to know? No. Of course not. BUT, if this IS all you did,
youd still be better off than the people who only read the script through
or immediately get their highlighter out and starting counting the
number of lines theyve got in the script. These questions unlock the
script, and help you start approaching the role. Whether youre an actor,
director or writer, these questions each help you gain clarity.
Much of our training, the curriculum and even individual outcomes for
qualifications demand that were able to get into character or sustain
character. I remember long ago at college, one of the criteria to be
marked on was can effectively step in and out of character. Well,
whatever that means, Id like to take the opportunity to describe how I
believe you can get into character, or at least have that feeling.
The times that you have felt in character, you were not the character.
No one can be, its well meaning nonsense. During these times, you
made a connection to the text that allowed you to perform the actions of
the character in such a way that you felt it working right. In other words,
you were not the character, but you were doing something very similar
to the character. You were performing their actions.
I agree, you may have felt in character. I understand, Ive felt it too. But
I wasnt and sadly, neither were you. What happened is that you
performed these actions consistently and repeatedly and they werent
the types of actions or tactics that you would do yourself, so that you felt
removed from yourself. Add to this that you became so immersed in
what you were doing that your SELF consciousness didnt prevent you
from you enjoying acting the role. Furthermore, you were so immersed in
it, that you felt that everything you were doing WAS the character. Well,
it was, but it was you doing the characters actions without fear, self
consciousness it was you truly focused. Have you ever been to the
cinema/movie theater, watched a film and found yourself really sucked
into the film and then you think oh yeah, Im at the movies. Well,
thats whats happening to you on stage: your focus, concentration and
attention was so powerfully drawn that you had a brand new experience.
Under these conditions, you felt highly successful and surprised. You
named it being in character because you didnt know what else to call
it.
BUT but.. you cry: what about all these actors saying it takes ages to
get out of character? and havent I felt that feeling where its hard to
shake the character off? Yes. Yes! I know that feeling too, but it wasnt
you inhabiting the character. It was the characteristics of the character
inhabiting YOU.
Spooky? No, no, read what I wrote. It wasnt the character inhabiting
you, it was the habitual characteristics of the character being inside you.
What does this mean then? It means that if you perform the same
repeated psychophysical actions repeatedly, you will eventually
habituate those actions and any associated feelings. You will then find it
a little difficult to shake them off immediately. Some of the residual
connection between action and feeling will remain. Thats why you
struggle to shake off the character. I remember in University my friend
playing Carol in Oleanna. She came home and was horrible to everyone,
then she said oh sorry, Im just struggling to get out of character.
Everyone laughed, but the theatre students took it very seriously. When
we examine that situation, she had been rehearsing the final act of
Oleanna, where Carols actions (her tactics) are very negative,
challenging, confronting, insulting and attacking. If she spent all day
performing those, no doubt she habituated those tactics and any
associated feelings.
But what are the needs? How do you establish them? Well, it is often
produced through the conflicts the character meets and the obstacles
they attempt to overcome. However, if youre unsure about how to even
start with needs, they are personal and basic. If you like, they are
what Marshall Rosenberg calls Present Needs. They drive the character
throughout the play, and without identifying it you fail to make an
effective bridge to the character through the script.
What kinds of needs are there? Rosenberg splits them into the following
sections:
Learning to Act
I get a lot of people asking me if I can help them learn to act. For an
acting coach, thats a tricky one. Why ? I hear you ask. Because surely if
Im good at my job, the answer is yes. Also, arent I always saying
ANYONE can learn to act. Yes its true, I do feel anyone could learn to
act. To me, living truthfully, which is the first half of Meisners famous
quote is possible for all of us. Its the second part that takes the gift. How
do you connect your truthfulness to the work of someone else? Thats a
tough one and its the very thing that separates all of our acting
techniques from each other.
Before I can teach anyone to act, they need to want it. Not just think
they want it, but really want it. It needs to drive the hottest spike of pain
through their skull to think of, or to see themselves doing anything else.
Not an adolescent crush on acting, not the thought that you could be in
the movies, but a gnawing pain in your very being that will not shut the
fuck up until you act. If you have that as a starting point, perhaps you
could learn to act.
But WANT is not enough. In the past, I heard a lot of people tell me they
want to act, they want to write, they want to direct etc etc. I say fine,
because I know they wont make it. How do I know? Because want is not
enough. The actions you take towards you goal signal your intent, not
your words of desire. If you want to act, show me with your actions.
Well, you think, Im reading your bloody blog arent I? Isnt that action?
Well, its a start. Well, I want to come to class, is that a start? Sure, but
what else are you doing? My favourite people in the world are those who
just do what they need to do, regardless of all else. The people I admire,
didnt let ANYTHING get in their way, not money, not education, not
disability, not ANYTHING. They get out and do. Life is action, or it is
stillness. There is beauty in stillness. Those who appreciate stillness
have a calm like no other people. BUT inaction isnt stillness, its action
tempered by fear.
Stop making excuses, there are always plenty of them and youll never
run out.
TWO: Work through your script and use a highlighter pen (I like pink or
orange, yellow can fade quickly) and this will focus you on what you
have to learn.
THREE: The first step is the old cover and peek, cover and peek. Say
your line, then cover with a cue card (or some other type of card) and
see if you can repeat. Once you remember the line, move onto the next
line, then go back and do all of the lines. So 1st line, then 2nd line, then
1st and 2nd line together, 3rd line, 1st, 2nd and 3rd line together. Etc.
SIX: If youre struggling to learn any line, do you fully understand it?
Ensure that you really do understand it and then focus on the most
important words of the sentence or paragraph. Connect the important
words.
SEVEN: Learn the sense. Spend time on difficult chunks of text looking at
how the writer develops the sense through the words.
EIGHT: One method that people use is to write or type out their
lines. This is great for literally writing the lines into your head. So, if you
have a monologue, try writing the lines out, a few times and youll find
theyve entered your head. BUT make sure that you dont develop an
internal rhythm for the words while you do it, which would fix their
delivery in a fixed pattern.
NINE: Try writing out just the first letter of each word in difficult
sentences, use them as triggers. T W O J T F L O E W I D S U T A T. You
could also use the first word of each sentence to develop further triggers
for the structure of your words.
TEN: Sing the lines to yourself on the way to rehearsal. Singing distracts
you from rhythms you may have developed. Change the song as often
as possible to keep it fresh.
Once you know your lines, try distracting yourself with exercising such
as press or push-ups and squat thrusts to physically challenge yourself
and your concentration.
Now, the next time someone denigrates your profession with the single
worse question they could possibly ask an actor how do you learn all
those lines?, you can tell them.
CONDITION 4: Knowing that the activity is doable and that I have skills
that are adequate to the task.
All of these conditions chime with me. As you work your way through, I
think that you will recognise yourself, and those moments when you felt
that you were in character. These are times when you felt at one with
the character, well, you werent. The character isnt real. You are real,
and you were mid-Flow.
You cant escape it, the voice and speech are truly essential to the actor.
Whether you are focused mainly on voice like a radio actor or
commercial voice over talent, whether youre working in the theatre
where you need to fill a huge room with an individual, powerful, but
subtle voice or a television or film actor who has the boom floating
above their head: your voice and speech are the tools of your trade.
For this reason, you need to take excellent care of your voice. Voice is
distinctively yours no one has a voice like you, not even close family
members. Our voice often reveals a huge amount about us. But your
speech style, as I am often ribbed for, is entirely habitual. You learn it,
and you can change it through habitual practice. Speech also reveals a
great deal about us and people often can get very emotional during
investigations into their voice and speech. Thats why voice and speech
teachers should be particularly sensitive to this. Not all are, in my
experience and opinion.
You may tell the story of the play through your body, but the central
method of communicating the playwrights ideas is through their words
coupled with your actions. Since this is such a primary skill
requirement, then voice and speech plays a central part in actor
training. The actor simply must have voice and speech within their
control and under their command.
Lets look at the voice some more. The word voice in this context
usually refers to the sound is makes, the tone of the sound. To grasp the
voice, you need to understand it. The voice has 3 distinct sections:
The Excitor
The Vibrator
Reasonator
The excitor is what causes the sound, it is the power behind it, in this
case, it is the breath. The power comes through the nose or mouth as
breath, down into the lungs and out as the EXCITOR.
The resonator in the human body comes in three different forms: the
pharynx, the mouth and the nose the cavities help to create the sound
resonation.
We just finished discovering the three parts of the voice: the excitor, the
vibrator and finally the resonator(s). Its possible to explore the 3
resonator cavaties personally. Try this:
Close your lips, gently lower the soft palate and continue to make an M
sound Thats one resonator.
Close the mouth and use the pharynx and nose to continue to make the
NG sound the like the end of the word SONG Thats another
resonator.
Dont be confused, its a matter of practice like any other physical skill.
You cant expect to learn to juggle in a few minutes, it takes hours of
practice, but once youve got it, youve got it.
Normally we dont think about our in-breath and out-breath too much
unless we experience pain. We breathe in slowly, we breath out quite
quickly. BUT THIS IS THE OPPOSITE OF THE BREATH PATTERN NEEDED
FOR ACTORS.
From our first breath to our last, breathing is an instrinsic part of each
and every part of our lives. The breath is both instinctive and expressive.
It is a vital part of our physical functioning as a human being, but also an
essential part of our emotive capacity to express ourselves.
There are two types of breath: the inhale and the exhale (or the in-
breath and the out-breath). Breathing in prepares us, it fills us with the
oxygen which is vital to both, thought and to the fight or flight instinct.
The out-breath is how we communicate, it is the expressive breath. We
inspire on the in-breath and we express on the out.
Acting begins with the words. When we begin to act, we have a set of
words that is given to us from the author. We must then find a way to
animate them. And most people choose to animate them solely on the
basis of their literal meaning.
Every wondered why your arms flap around like T-Rex when you're
acting? It's because your entire gestural system isn't powered by what
you're saying. It is there to support your verbal communication, but it
cannot work from the words alone.
So why don't our arms flap around in real life? And how to do we get
back to bringing those words fully to life with our entire communicating
self?
The answer is simple. We must uncover the INTENTION. Everything
comes from our INTENTION - including the words we speak and our
gestures.
The improviser unwittingly has this on their side. Break up with someone
- their intention is clear. Their thoughts, actions, feelings, gestures,
words, action, etc all fall We must discover the intention of our
characters and force it to dominate our thoughts, our actions, and our
vocality - the way we speak.
Without the intention, we are forced to impersonate the most superficial
elements of being human and our hands flap around like a movie
dinosaur.
In this version of the exercise, two students come up and sit on the
bench and they chat. Often its uncomfortable. Sometimes its awkward.
Sometimes its funny. Sometimes, they feel like they have to perform
something. But that is not the aim. The aim of the exercise is to have
two people chat in front of a group of others. To establish a benchmark.
But all they have to do is talk, chat, have a conversation, get to know
the other person, interact with the other person.
When finally we have a park bench pair who do just that, we can
establish what truthful acting is. I ask the class to describe what they
see. They usually say something like:
Comfortable
At Ease
Natural
Fun
Relaxed
Funny
Enjoyable
Real
There are the reference points to associate with truthful acting. We will
use them as a benchmark and we will come back to them time
and again when we are teaching acting, or doing repetition. Its easy to
say okay, but how does this feel compared to our benchmark? It gives us
a shared reference for the acting that we aim to produce at this studio,
on stage and on screen.
If a character says Ive got no fucking clue. You dont emphasis the
F word. It isnt the important keyword in the sentence.
It is the lack of a clue that is key to this sentence, the F bomb is for
colour and emphasis.
TWO: Aggression
The difference is very important. I once wrote a play filled with colourful
description, but the director didnt control the actors use of the swear
words, and the play didnt work because instead of description, it
sounded so aggressive. But I see it weekly, so its something that we can
all be careful of.
If you get the wrong emphasis, you start to bring an intention which
takes the scene in a direction you shouldn't go. It becomes too much
about those words and not about the other keywordsin each sentence.
Self Test:
2. Youre a cocksucker.
4. Piss off!
Thats the logic. But personally, I think its bullshit. And it doesnt really
help actors, or if it does, it isnt psychologically healthy - and perhaps its
unnecessary.
The acting teacher Uta Hagen suggested that instead we find ourselves
in the character, we use personal substitutions for incidents in these
characters lives. She suggests that trying to appreciate Blanche DuBois
from her own position was impossible, she was down to earth and
Dubois wasnt in her realm of experience. I admire this admission that
actors cannot realistically hope to find the character in themselves. Its a
very positive realisation.
Hagen suggests we substitute something that has a similar essence and
then accept them within the fictional circumstances. So, if in the scene,
a character calls her character a bitch, but she isnt offended by that
word, she imagines someone calling her another game, and using her
imagination accepts that, and acts from that. She substitutes the thing
in the scene for something familiar and personal. Her substitution helps
you believe in the imaginary situation.
If you are playing a scene where the mother of two children is begging
for forgiveness for murdering them - you do not have a life experience to
cover this. So, I would suggest you start from begging for forgiveness.
Whats that like to you? Who would you have to beg forgiveness from?
What would you have to do to have to beg forgiveness from your
husband, your mother, your wife, your best friend? This will activate you,
not to believe in the imaginary, but to behave in a way that is in line
with the essence of the characters psychological actions.
You are playing Hamlet, he cannot decide whether to kill Claudius or not.
You may or may not have this experience, but we dont need your
experience. What we need is for you to be waying up a difficult decision,
or persuading something to do the right thing. Dont seek for a rea
experience to parallel this, you may not have one. Instead, imagine.
Imagine that you are waying up a difficult decision. Observe your
behaviour. Now bring this to the scene with Hamlet.
You are Clarice Starling, you are entering the facility where Hannibal
Lector is kept. You are driven by needing to belong, and you are being
given a chance to belong to the FBI. If you succeed in this mission, you
may belong soon. When you are arrive, you are treated like dirt, you
leered at by prisoners and you are toyed with by Lector. You want
respect in the scene. You certainly dont have these life experiences. But
can you imagine trying to impress someone? Bring this to the scene. Try
to get their respect like you would try in your in substitution.
The technique that we teach to our full and part time acting students at
ACS includes a fairly robust system for analysing story, script and
scene.
First, read the scene through a few times, it matters that you are familiar
with the text.
Next, dig around in what we call the given circumstances, but we might
also call the context of the scene, or simply, facts about the scene and
its characters. Dont embellish, dont get obsessed with something they
say or do, keep it to just irrefutable facts. At this stage, were not that
interested in your interpretation - so just keep it real. Theres a man, hes
40, hes looking in the window, hes wearing a suit, hes got a mobile
phone, he calls his wife. Etc. Keep it very factual. Dont infer something
from what is said or done. Keep it factual.
Next, I want to know whats driving the character in the scene? What do
they want? Or more specific, what do they want the other character or
characters to do? Or more specifically, as a verb, what do they want
them to do? Never settle for understand, know, see, realise, etc. Always
dig deeper than this. When they understand, what will they do, as a
verb. This creates a really strong understanding of what the whole
scene is about for that character. A helpful cheat is to imagine the
perfect ending for the scene and how the other character fits into that.
So now you know whats driving them. Lets imagine the reality of the
situation they find themselves in. They might want the criminal to
confess, but hes pretending the murderer was someone else. So thats
what we might call the reality or the obstacle they face.
Now imagine how they go about trying to get what they want, when
confronted by this reality. What tools or tactics do they use to achieve
this goal?
Finally look at the journey through the scene, from where to where does
the character travel in the scene? From anger to sadness? From
knowledge to loss? From hope to victory? This will help you understand
the journey YOU have to take when you represent that character in the
scene.
If you found this blog post helpful, please consider sharing it with
someone else.
The magic of acting is the illusion that we are who we say we are. The
characters. The methods to do this are many, some work, some dont
and the greater problem is discovering which is which.
Acting is just like magic. The audience get their pleasure from being
fooled. They know the magic isnt real, but they enjoy it nonetheless.
The actor is a creator of illusions. They may be fascinated by how we do
it, but their delight is in being fooled, not in how we fool them.
In 2006, Forrest Whitaker won just about every award on the planet for
his portrayal of Idi Amin in The Last King of Scotland. I do not decry that
achievement, it is outstanding. Part of his preparation was learning
Swahili. The role requires that there are some lines spoken in Swahili
with a distinct East African accent. I admire this, language acquisition is
tough enough.
But I question the necessity. The audience did not come to see a man
speak Swahili with an East African accent. The audience came to be
entertained. Swahili is just part of the magic of the character. The
audience are excited by the illusion of the character. The illusion that the
character speaks fluent Swahili. But they do not need or require the
actor to speak fluent Swahili to enjoy this.
The magician is a highly skilled performer who uses techniques that
create the illusion of magic. The audience are excited by the illusion of
the magic. The illusion that the magician has done something that
cannot be explained. But they do not require that the magician can
actually make the coin disappear. They just need to believe it.
Forrest Whitaker does an immense job in that role. But he didnt need to
learn Swahili. And his success encourages other actors to waste their
time as wizards, trying to do real magic, when the audience will just as
easily enjoy being fooled by a few words spoken convincingly. There is
no need to be a wizard.
Maybe he does it to help himself, not the audience. Maybe its part of
transformation into the character. Maybe. And maybe the magician
needs to believe they are a wizard to do magic, to convince themselves
they are capable of real magic, not just illusion. Maybe.
Next, the actor should imagine this same situation for about ten
seconds, speaking to himself in his head and then begin the monologue,
still imagining the son, and letting his imagination, his words and his
feelings mingle.
The technique that we teach to our full and part time acting students at
ACS includes a fairly robust system for analysing story, script and
scene.
First, read the scene through a few times, it matters that you are familiar
with the text.
Next, dig around in what we call the given circumstances, but we might
also call the context of the scene, or simply, facts about the scene and
its characters. Dont embellish, dont get obsessed with something they
say or do, keep it to just irrefutable facts. At this stage, were not that
interested in your interpretation - so just keep it real. Theres a man, hes
40, hes looking in the window, hes wearing a suit, hes got a mobile
phone, he calls his wife. Etc. Keep it very factual. Dont infer something
from what is said or done. Keep it factual.
Next, I want to know whats driving the character in the scene? What do
they want? Or more specific, what do they want the other character or
characters to do? Or more specifically, as a verb, what do they want
them to do? Never settle for understand, know, see, realise, etc. Always
dig deeper than this. When they understand, what will they do, as a
verb. This creates a really strong understanding of what the whole
scene is about for that character. A helpful cheat is to imagine the
perfect ending for the scene and how the other character fits into that.
So now you know whats driving them. Lets imagine the reality of the
situation they find themselves in. They might want the criminal to
confess, but hes pretending the murderer was someone else. So thats
what we might call the reality or the obstacle they face.
Now imagine how they go about trying to get what they want, when
confronted by this reality. What tools or tactics do they use to achieve
this goal?
Finally look at the journey through the scene, from where to where does
the character travel in the scene? From anger to sadness? From
knowledge to loss? From hope to victory? This will help you understand
the journey YOU have to take when you represent that character in the
scene.