Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ramsey Hardin
The Russian people are patient and hardy. They survived 300 years of the Tartar yoke, 300
years of Romanov oppression, all of the Five Year Plans, and the difficulties of the present war.
Introduction
World War II has no more tragic story than that of the siege of Leningrad, a tragedy that
might have been avoided but for the hubris of Adolf Hitler and the incompetence of Joseph
Stalin. Though the two formed a short-lived non-aggression pact in August, 1939, Stalin
admitted that he expected to be forced into war with Germany. Hitlers attack on the Soviet
Union across the poorly defended Polish border in 1941 should not have been surprising, yet
there was little military planning for Leningrads defense in spite of its pivotal position as both a
focus of Socialism and Russian national identity as well as a military-industrial center. Stalin
failed to establish cooperation between military commanders and Communist Party officials or to
stockpile of food resources and medical supplies. Rather than immediately aiding Leningrad or
creating evacuation routes, the Soviet leaders diverted reinforcements to Moscow and sent
untrained and unarmed soldiers into battle. Party officials, under Stalins orders, arrested and
executed those who were suspected of opposition to his regime. As a result, through three brutal
winters of unending cold and minimal rations, the citys citizens slowly died of starvation and
disease. After the war, strict censorship of the details of Leningrads suffering during the Siege
served the propaganda efforts rather than accurate historical documentation. Leningrads citizens
became heroic symbols of a national triumph over Nazism rather than victims of wartime
1
V. A. Inostrantsev in The Siege of Leningrad: 900 Days of Terror. David M. Glantz,
disaster. The recent opening of government archives, the publication of siege diaries, and
interviews with survivors and Red Army veterans has created a more realistic portrayal of the
Taken By Surprise
When German Chancellor Adolf Hitler launched the invasion of the Soviet Union with
Operation Barbarossa, he selected the city of Peter and Lenin as a priority objective. Built by
Peter the Great at the mouth of the Neva River on forty-two delta islands and named St.
Petersburg, the citys vital geographic location provided access to the Baltic Sea. It was not only
the northwest gateway to Russia, but it was also a symbol of the Russian Revolution. In 1895, V.
I. Lenin founded the Union for the Struggle of the Working Class in St. Petersburg and
introduced Marxist Socialism to citys workers movements. The city was a focal point of
revolution including the Kronshtadt Mutiny on November 8, 1904, and Bloody Sunday, January
9, 1905. In 1924, the citys workers renamed it Leningrad to honor their leader. In the 1930s,
Stalin used the city to consolidate his power as he arranged the assassination of Communist Party
Secretary Sergei M. Kirov, and followed with purges of those who might oppose his rule. In
selecting Leningrad as a target for destruction, Hitler sent an intimidating message to every
Russian about his plans for the Soviet Union. He described the Slavs an inferior race and ordered
that the city be starved into submission. Leningrads economy was highly mobilized and
militarized. Hitler intended to neutralize its importance as a center for the Soviet Baltic Fleet
and destroy its many factories. In March, 1941, he defined his goals:
never been and never will be our comrade. It is a struggle for annihilation. Soviet
Hardin 4
officials represent a grave danger because they have clearly proven through their
previous subversive and seditious work that they reject all European culture,
Despite the warning signs at the start of Operation Barbarossa, the Soviet Union was
unprepared for the German invasion. Because of the emphasis on expanded military production
in Leningrad, goods and services for the civilian population had been sacrificed. According to
Richard Bidlack, this made stockpiling food and other resources difficult even though the city
was experienced in preparing for and waging war.3 Joining with Finnish troops, German forces
encircled Leningrad beginning on September 8, 1941. The siege lasted for 872 days. Shelling,
air attacks, disease, and starvation took the lives of 1.6 to 2 million civilians blockaded within
the city according to Russian authorities. Bidlack believes that the death toll was much higher,
but that Stalin deliberately revised the numbers to hide the mismanagement of the crisis.4 Of the
citys population of 3,300,000, approximately 300,000 survived. All of the survivors received the
Medal in the Defense of Leningrad for their service. According to William Lubbeck, a soldier
with German Army Group North, once German forces encircled Leningrad and destroyed its
2
Hitler, Adolf, Der Fhrer an das deutsche Volk 22. Juni 1941, in Philipp Bouhler, trans. and
ed. Der grodeutsche Freiheitskampf. Reden Adolf Hitlers, vol. 3 (Munich: Franz Eher, 1942),
Leningrad, in The Carl Beck Papers in Russian and East European Studies
(Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Center for Russian and East European Studies, 1991), 4.
4
Ibid. Foreword, in Cynthia Simmons, and Nina Perlina. Writing the Siege of
main supply of food in early bombing campaigns, the German military command expected the
city to fall within a matter of months: "Hitler ordered us not to enter the city to avoid losses in
street battles, where tanks were unable to take part. Our German troops, in fact, quite
comfortably and easily, expected that the coming famine and cold would force the city to
surrender.5 Other German officers, such as Dr. Werner Koeppen, Reich minister for the
occupied territories of the east, wrote of the damage to Leningrad only two weeks into the siege:
Already it is impossible to get bread, sugar, or meat in the city. Leningrad is to be shut inshot
to piecesand starved out.6 The capture of Leningrad satisfied three strategic goals in the
Occupy the former capital of Russia and symbolic capital of the Russian Revolution.
Neutralize its military importance as a main base of the Soviet Baltic Fleet.
The shelling and terror inflicted by the Germans began suddenly for the people of
Leningrad. Michael Jones interviewed Russian signals operator Mikhail Neishtadt who was
dismayed as he read a telegram from the Soviet Unions Defense Minister Marshal Timoshenko:
I could not believe the words. Our supreme commander could not comprehend what was
happening. The telegram read, Prepare our troops for warbut do not engage. Under no
circumstances must our troops retaliate. 7 Another Russian soldier and siege survivor, Daniil
5
William Lubbeck, and David Hurt. At Leningrad's Gates: The Story of a Soldier with Army
Group North. (Barnsley, UK: Pen & Sword Military, 2007), 45.
6
Werner Koeppen, Letter, September 22, 1941, accessed October 25, 2014,
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=6860.
7
Mikhail Neishtadt, Interview, quoted in Michael Jones, Leningrad: State of Siege.
Hardin 6
Granin, was also shaken by the events: The blockade was sudden and unexpected, as much as
the war itself was unexpected for the country. There were no reserves of fuel, no food... Then one
after another catastrophic event started to occur, power supplies were stopped, there was no
water, no sewerage system operating, no central heating in place.8 The first indication of
impending doom was an August 21, 1941 report in the main newspaper that German armies
might try to take Leningrad. By August 29, the last railroad line out of Leningrad had been
destroyed. Ironically, according to Simmons, while millions of skilled workers, women, and
children were left trapped inside the siege ring, thousands of former criminals, army deserters,
White Army officers, kulaks, and illegal immigrants were sent to various locations east of the
Urals.9
Vyacheslav Molotov, Foreign Minister of the Soviet Union who had initially signed a
non-aggression pact with Hitler in 1939, announced the attack on the radio, calling on the
Russian people for support. Diarist Elena Skriabina remembered his speech as halting and
breathless.10 Only as he spoke did she realize the looming oppression ahead as he compared
Hitler to Napoleon:
Diaries,
xxix.
10
Elena Skribiana, Siege and Survival: The Odyssey of a Leningrader, trans.
This is not the first time that our people have had to deal with an attack of
an arrogant foe. At the time of Napoleon's invasion of Russia our people's reply
was war for the fatherland, and Napoleon suffered defeat and met his doom. It will
be the same with Hitler, who in his arrogance has proclaimed a new crusade
against our country. The Red Army and our whole people will again wage
victorious war for the fatherland, for our country, for honor, for liberty. 11
Zhukovs Orders
confessing to his military commanders, Leningrad may be lost.12 Stalin ordered him to save
Leningrad by any means. If the city fell, 11% of the national economy, the wealth of the
Hermitage Museum, and the palaces of the Russian tsars would be in enemy hands. German
forces could unite with the motivated Finnish forces, drive through Northern Russia and attack
Moscow, which might well win the war for Germany. However, Glantz maintains that Stalins
interference in the organization of the citys defense as the Germans approached hindered the
ground troops.13 He also argues that Stalin saw plots everywhere, especially when his generals
retreated.
11
Vyacheslav Molotov, The Nazi Invasion of Russia." The History Place - Great
http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/molotov.htm.
12
Georgy K Zhukov, The Memoirs of Marshal Zhukov. (London: Jonathan Cape, LTD,
1971), 56.
13
Glantz, 37.
Hardin 8
On September 10, 1941, Zhukov became commander of the Leningrad front and had
three key tasks. Since 460,000 refugees from the Nazi-occupied provinces had flooded
Leningrad and its suburbs, shortages of food and munitions were critical. Zhukov had to stop the
offensive before it entered Leningrad proper, protect the fleeing civilians, and reorganize the
joint command and civilian resistance to prepare for a lengthy siege. According to Glantz, his
actions were immediate and decisive.14 He executed inadequate officers, strengthened the siege
perimeter, and organized a special armed regiment to shoot anyone who retreated from the
perimeter. Next, he ordered the laying of dense minefields and the deployment of artillery
batteries in all critical directions. He also redeployed fifty thousand sailors from the Baltic Fleet
for additional infantry and reinforcements. He addressed Leningrads citizens in a letter to the
Leningrad Pravda, calling on their memories of prior wartime experience: "The moment has
come to put your Bolshevik qualities to work, to get ready to defend Leningrad without wasting
words. We have to see that nobody is just an onlooker, and carry out in the least possible time the
same kind of mobilization of the workers that was done in 1918 and 1919. The enemy is at the
gate. It is a question of life and death."15 Ironically, the next day, Stalin ordered reinforcement
attacks and counterattacks to harass and exhaust the German and Finnish forces on the siege
14
Ibid., 45.
15
Georgy Zhukov, August 21, 1941 letter to Leningrad Pravda, quoted in Geoffrey Roberts,
Stalins General: The Life of Marshal Zhukov. (New York: Random House, 2012),
193.
Hardin 9
perimeter to the north and south. These counteroffensives stopped the enemy forces after they
had penetrated the defense lines near the seaport of Leningrad. Throughout Zhukovs Leningrad
command, Stalin diverted his troops and his attention. He insisted Zhukov frequently return to
Moscow to oversee other operations and direct Moscow defense efforts. Geoffrey Roberts
characterizes the relationship between Stalin and Zhukov as cooperative rather than friendly.
Throughout his adult life, Zhukov had venerated Stalin, even in the years after his first disgrace.
He was in awe of Stalin, who was the dominant figure in their relationship, yet the
imbalance in their personal relationship did not preclude the two men from forming a creative
and productive partnership that was to lead the Red Army to the brink of complete catastrophe
before leading it to the greatest victory in military history. 16 According to Salisbury, Stalin
maintained veto power over battle plans and staff, elevating his favorite officers and eliminating
any that he perceived as a threat.17 In spite of Stalins interference, Zhukovs unceasing efforts
stopped the German offensive in its tracks. Unfortunately, the fierce battle was transformed into
a deadly siege.
Though the Soviet command had several months to assist Leningrads citizens, the lack
of preparation caused misery. Lisa Kirschenbaum states that Leningraders endured sufferings
Memories, and Monuments. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 88.
Hardin 10
that citizens survived through mutual assistance, creative lawbreaking, self-distraction, and
fatalism.19 Bitter temperatures of forty below and frozen pipes forced people to use small stoves
called burzhuiki which frequently caused rapidly spreading fires. With the citys electricity
destroyed by German shelling, the streets were dark both day and night during the dreary winter
months. Snowdrifts filled the streets, covering the bodies of the dead. Major Lozak, a staff
"In those days there was something in a man's face which told you that he
would die within the next twenty-four hours. I remember how I'd walk every day
from my house to the center of the city. Many a time I saw a man suddenly
collapse on the snow. There was nothing I could do. One just walked on. And, on
the way back, I would see a vague human form covered with snow on the spot
The quest for bread and any other food was a major part of the daily routine. Children
were at greater risk of starvation and developmental problems during this time. Anastasia
Pershkina, who was eleven years old during the siege, remembered drawing pictures of food and
moaning from hunger during the night. She frequently stood on bread lines:
People wrapped themselves in pieces of cloth. All you could see were the
tips of noses sharp from hunger. In the deep silence people stood and patiently
waited for their priceless pieces of bread. They baked the bread in enormous
19
V. M. Kovalchuk, A. I. Rupasov, and A. N. Christokov. Leningrad During the Great Patriotic
ovens. The crusts fell over and fell off in crumbs. The workers treated me to the
crusts. I dont remember how many crusts I ate. The smell of that bread has
The quest for food brought out the best and worst in Leningraders. Initially,
affluent residents bought whatever they could as long as retail stores were operational,
especially canned foods that would last a long time. The steady withdrawals of funds sent
the banks into a crisis, so the government began rationing and limited savings withdrawals
to 200 rubles per month.22 The implementation of strict regulations did not prevent some
Leningraders from taking advantage of their fellow citizens. Food salesmen exchanged
loaves of bread for expensive clothing or family heirlooms. Reid reports that those in
charge of food inventories stole for families or sale on the black market while Army
paymasters lost track of large sums of money.23 People with a food related job became
sought-after friends who accepted bribes, offers of assistance, or sexual favors. Glantz
points out that food warehouses were looted regularly, so the sale of food at flea markets
became illegal. Only a shortage of police officers prevented frequent arrests.24 The
21
Anastasiya Pershkina, The Siege of Leningrad: A Life of Hunger,
http://sputniknews.com/voiceofrussia/2013_01_19/The-siege-of-Leningrad-A-life-of-hunger/
Documentary History from the Soviet Archives (New Haven: Yale University Press,
2012), 73.
23
Anna Reid. Leningrad: The Epic Siege of World War II, 1941-1944. (New York:
shortage of police also increased more serious criminal behavior. Some of the most
common crimes were ration card theft and forgery, murder for ration cards and other
possessions, and concealment of bodies so that ration cards could continue to be used.
There were also cases of animals killed and used for food as well as cannibalism,
Though some people immediately began to hoard food, others went into denial,
arguing that the city had enough supplies and that the war would end quickly. Gradually,
however, many residents became convinced that no amount of effort would help them
survive. The constant sirens, falling bombs, and pervasive danger created a sense of
fatalism. They had to spend a lot of time in bomb shelters, and many lost their jobs as
businesses closed down. With no engrossing job and constant malnutrition, they became
The city had been under siege for four months before Leningrads political leaders
focused on the emergency needs of the people. Bidlack notes that the authorities began to
manufacture power generators, open public baths, laundries, heating stations, and health
clinics. These measures did not help the majority of people, however, since food
The most effective means of helping people survive was evacuation. By the end of
January, the ice on Lake Lagoda would allow heavy transport trucks. City officials arranged the
departure of more than 500,000 non-working adults and children over the Road of Life. Others
left on their own, pulling sleds or traveling in horse-drawn wagons. Food was also brought into
the city across the ice and more than one million people were able to escape. Young women
25
V. M. Kovalchuk, 16.
26
Bidlack, Leningrad Blockade, 168.
Hardin 13
drove food trucks without adequate sleep or food. To stay awake, they tied pots and pans to the
truck bumpers for extra noise.27 It was a perilous trip. Granin reports that one young boy had a
harrowing experience during evacuation: I got on a train with my brother at the Finland railway
station to take us to Lake Ladoga. And when we got off the train, there were crowds all sitting
down, all covered with ice, ice pools everywhere. No trucks came to take us across Lake Ladoga;
there was a shortage of them. Under the ice in a puddle, in a hole, in a crater there was a frozen
Several factors gave siege victims a reason to remain hopeful. Teamwork on collective
projects gave Leningraders a meaningful way to pass the time between jobs or to avoid
depression when any hope was remote. James Clapperton conducted interviews with blockade
survivors who expressed nostalgia for the feelings of closeness that arose from shared suffering.29
They dug trenches around the city, cleaned the city to prevent epidemics, defused incendiary
Cultural activities also gave citizens a more optimistic outlook. During the siege, Dmitri
Shostakovich not only worked guarding city rooftops and extinguishing fires, but he also
composed Seventh Symphony dedicated to the heroism of his city. The Leningrad premiere, on
August 9, 1942, was performed by starving musicians and broadcast over loudspeakers at the
front to defy the Nazis and hearten Russian troops. Abroad, it provided moral redemption for
27
Simmons, 80.
28
Daniil Aleksandrovich Granin, First-hand Accounts of the Ordeal, (Barnsley,
http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.ohiostate.edu/stable/40179922
Hardin 14
Stalin and the Soviet regime. According to Moynahan, Shostakovich described his music as not
merely a cry against the Nazis but also against Stalinism: A requiem for a noble city beset by
Finally, Leningraders knew that surrender was not an option for them. Hitler had
announced that he intended to erase the city from the face of the earth. He had promised to leave
the populace to die in the event of a German victory. In fact, Hitler was so convinced that his
military machine would easily defeat the Russians that he had invitations printed for a
celebration at the Astoria Hotel in Leningrad for the evening of August 9, 1942. Shostakovich
chose this night for the premiere of his symphony to counter Nazi arrogance.
In January 1943, Red Army soldiers broke through the German line, rupturing the
blockade and creating a more efficient supply route along the shores of Lake Ladoga. Early in
1944, Soviet forces approached Leningrad, forcing the Germans to retreat southward from the
city on January 27. The siege was over. A giant Soviet offensive to sweep the USSR clean of its
invaders began in May. The aftermath of the siege presented many questions. What was most
arrogant belief in Nazi dominance was the igniting factor, but Stalin willfully refused to prepare
for an invasion, despite countless warnings. Thousands of young conscripts in the People's Levy,
were thrown into the front-line with no training. Party officials failed to store food, protect the
city, or evacuate Leningrad until too late. Their negligence caused millions of deaths, radically
30
Brian Moynahan, Leningrad: Siege and Symphony, (New York: Atlantic
changed the city and its population, and altered historic traditions in Russian society. The role of
women during the siege was critical since they were responsible for the survival of their families.
Siege survivor Nadezhda Mandelshtam was typical of many women who remained in
Leningrad, left alone to preserve some level of normalcy in the midst of chaos. She was most
afraid when she learned that the Badaevsky food warehouses had been burned. A system of food
rationing was launched to stretch the citys meager supplies. People who did not work received
125 grams of bread, and children received 150 grams. With her husband and other male relatives
called to the front to fight, her main worry was finding enough food for her family. At the
market, she tried to exchange her possessions for food products to save her children from
starvation. Death surrounded her constantly: The Germans bombed Leningrad daily, at the
same time every morning and evening. Many people died of hunger. Walking in the yard with
the children, I saw the janitors go into the apartments and then bring down the dead into the yard
to pile them in stacks on the ground. Later, a truck would come to take them away to the
Piskarevskoe cemetery.31 Her family survived by walking to nearby villages to dig for potatoes
or frozen cabbage leaves for soup. She also joined with relatives to share food and collect
drinking water.
Elena Kochinas Blockade Diary, showed how the role of women extended beyond the
home at a cost of familial relationships. Though she was a member of a scientific institute and
had a young daughter, she teamed with other women to assemble anti-tank ditches for the citys
defense and to work in peat bogs to provide fuel for warmth and cooking. Women also replaced
31
Nadezhda Mandelshtam. Hope Against Hope; a Memoir. (New York: Atheneum, 1970),
72.
Hardin 16
men in the munitions factories. Her husband, a designer, was exempted from the draft to work in
the city. He was ill suited to the adaptations necessary for survival, becoming increasingly
depressed and irrational, sneaking extra food from the family supply, and stealing from a food
warehouse. As his mental condition rapidly deteriorated, Elena assumed all the organizational
functions that allowed the family to survive the siege. She ate pine needles, grass, and anxiously
Women not only managed the family, but also served as soldiers on the front lines.
According to Adamovich and Granin, 17,000 young women and girls from Leningrad fought in
womens units as regular soldiers.32 Soldiers received larger food rations, so the women would
pass extra food to their families. John Erickson points out that Russian women participated as
soldiers in an unprecedented way during World War II. The official stance of the Soviet
government was that any person who entered the armed forces ceased to be man or woman and
became simply soldier.33 Blockade survivors, many of whom were women, proved resilient
and resourceful.
Michael Jones believes that the entire story of Leningrads suffering will never truly be
known. In fact, Russian authorities censored the mortality rate in warfare and in the city. No
photo with more than three dead people was published in newspapers. Instead, the government
focused on the symbolic significance of the Leningrad defense and the courage of those under
32
Ales Adamovich, and Daniil Aleksandrovich Granin. Leningrad under Siege:
First-hand
Accounts of the Ordeal. Barnsley, South Yorkshire: Pen & Sword Military, 2007, 105.
33
John Erickson, Soviet Women at War, in John Garrard, ed., World War II and the
siege as examples of Soviet strength. Party propaganda portrayed support of the war as support
of the Communist Party. Bedlack notes that the state used the victory in the war and the
defense of Leningrad to try to legitimize its existence and its one party system.34 Recent access
to Soviet-era archives in Russia, a variety of diaries and memoirs, and periodicals printed in
blockaded areas provide greater insight into the military strategies, political blunders, and living
conditions in Leningrad during the siege. Bidlack points out that the Kremlin was well informed
on developments in the blockade zone. 35 Dispatches from Stalin reveal his lack of interest in the
fate of Leningrad citizens as he details plans for saving the army and destroying ships and
munitions factories before the Germans can reach them. The authorities were informed of mass
starvation and cannibalism more than two months before they allotted resources to the Ladoga
ice road for civilian evacuation. Though Leningrad might have been supplied by repairing
railroads, Stalin opted to commit a half million Soviet troops to encircling Nazi forces in the
Ukrainian heartland. In addition, according to Glantz, Soviet military commanders and national
officials treated the Leningrad political leaders dismissively. The Leningrad Party Organization
had additional difficulties as it lost many members to mobilization at the front and was unable to
replace them. As Soviet problems mounted, pro-German sentiment increased. Many Russians
prepared themselves for life under enemy occupation, but there were no records of major
defeatist comments, instances of looting and rioting rose significantly. Other acts of civil
disobedience were small industrial strikes for increased food. Generally, hatred of the enemy was
Reconstructing Stories
The Siege of Leningrad was not militarily decisive. The siege did not destroy the city,
nor did the denial of an easy victory stop the Germans from continuing their invasion of Russia.
Yet, reconstructing the stories of its victims and preserving personal histories are important
challenges in accurate accounts of the siege and its victims. The statistics alone are staggering.
Six times more lives were lost in the defense of this single city than the entire United States
World War II death toll.36 Yet it is in the tiny details of diarists that one can understand the
strength of the victims of the Siege of Leningrad: a child draws bread since he has none to eat, a
woman cheerfully picks pine needles for a snack, a starving couple makes soup from wallpaper
pasteand all feel some comfort from their triumph over hunger. They survived without the
bare essentials of life, and those that were able to adapt to their harsh circumstances, to use small
victories to inspire them, are remembered best through their personal stories of courage.
36
Glantz, 180.
Hardin 19
Bibliography
First-hand
Military, 2007.
Barber, John, and Andrei Dzeniskevich, Life and Death in Besieged Leningrad, 1941
44.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/91/world/politics/09/siege.html.
http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.ohiostate.edu/stable/25677098.
Bidlack, Richard. 2000. "The Political Mood in Leningrad during the First Year of the Soviet-
Studies, No. 902, (Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Center for Russian and East
European Studies,1991), 4.
University Press,
2012.
Bown, William. 1993. "Lingering legacy of the siege of Leningrad". New Scientist. 139
(1884).
Erickson, John. Soviet Women at War. In World War II and the Soviet People, edited
by John
Stevenson and Max Hayward. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World,
1967.
Glantz, David M. The Siege of Leningrad: 900 Days of Terror. London: Brown
Gour, Leon. The Siege of Leningrad. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1962.
Military, 2006.
Hitler, Adolf, Der Fhrer an das deutsche Volk 22. Juni 1941, in Philipp Bouhler (ed.), Der
Hardin 21
grodeutsche Freiheitskampf. Reden Adolf Hitlers, vol. 3 (Munich: Franz Eher, 1942),
archive/hitler4.htm
Ivanov, V. A. Leningrads Prisoners and the Battle for Leningrad. Russian Studies in
Jones, Michael. Leningrad: State of Siege. New York: Basic Books, 2008.
Kochan, Lionel, and John L. H. Keep. The Making of Modern Russia: from Kiev Rus'
to
the Collapse of the Soviet Union. 3rd ed. London: Penguin Books, 1997.
Translated by
Kohdikel, Anna. Memoir of the Leningrad Blockade. accessed October 20, 2014
http://www.scientificpsychic.com/etc/anna/Anna-Khodikel-en.html.
America, 2006.
Mandelshtam, Nadezhda. Hope Against Hope; a Memoir. New York: Atheneum, 1970.
Molotov, Vyacheslav. The Nazi Invasion of Russia." The History Place - Great
October 3, 2014).
Monthly Press,
2013.
Norris, Kelsey. You are first and foremost a woman: Womens Experience During the Siege
of Leningrad, Yale Historical Review vol 2 issue 2 fall, 2012. 7-21 accessed
October
20, 2014.
http://www.yale.edu/yalehistoricalreview/Fall%202012/YHR%20F2012%20Web.pdf
Overy, R. J. Russia's War: Blood Upon the Snow. New York: TV Books, 1997.
http://sputniknews.com/voiceofrussia/2013_01_19/The-siege-of-Leningrad-A-life-of-
Reid, Anna. Leningrad: The Epic Siege of World War II, 1941-1944. New York:
Roberts, Geoffrey. Stalins General: The Life of Marshal Zhukov. New York:
Random House,
2012.
Salisbury, Harrison E. The 900 Days: The Siege of Leningrad. (1st ed.) New York:
Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich; A History of Nazi
Germany.
Norman
Simmons, Cynthia, and Nina Perlina. Writing the Siege of Leningrad: Women's
Diaries,
2002.
Zhukov, Georgy K. The Memoirs of Marshal Zhukov. London: Jonathan Cape, LTD,
1971.