You are on page 1of 876

Stan J.

Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 598-2200
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com

STAN J. CATERBONE COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD TO DATE


April 4, 2017
_____________________________________

COMPONENTS OF THE RECORD

1. Social Security Disability File Benefits awarded for symptoms and


illnesses as the result of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control in August of 2009
2. Psychiatric and Mental Health Records
3. The Case File for the August 2015 Polygraph
4. The Case File for the Abuse Complaints of 1991 and 2007 to the Citizens
Commission For Human Rights, which resulted in the DETERMINATION OF
PSYCHIATRIC ABUSES.

FINDING OF FACTS

A. There were a total of 4 Section 303 Court Hearings since 2006 and there was
never any medications or OUTPATIENT TREATMENT PLANS ever ORDERED BY
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE, OR THE COURT. The Section 303 COURT
ORDERS, by law, must be filed in the Lancaster County Courthouse
Prothonotary Office.

B. The first PSYCHIATRIC COMMITMENT was to the BURDETTE TOMLIN


HOSPITAL in Cape May County, New Jersey The commitment lasted only 4
hours, and was a result of a fabricated suicide allegation made to the Stone
Harbor Police Department.

C. In September of 1987 the PSYCHIATRIC COMITMENT to then Saint Joseph


Hospital, now Lancaster Regional Medical Center was the direct result of a
fabricated CONDITION OF BAIL, which when discovered lead to the
IMMEDIATE DISCHARGE, again with no OUTPATIENT TREATMENT PLAN or
MEDICATIONS.

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 1 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

D. In February of 2005 there was a again another fabricated SUICIDE


ALLEGATION, made by a patron of the Alley Kat that resulted in the false
imprisonment at 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA for approximately 2
hours by the Southern Regional Police Department, again resulted in NO
PSYCHIATRIC COMMITMENT.

E. The next PSYCHIATRIC COMMITMENT was in April of 2006 by the Southern


Regional Police to the Lancaster General Hospital, that resulted in the
Discharge from my Pro Se Representation at the Section 303 Hearing, again
with no OUTPATIENT TREATMENT PLAN or MEDICATIONS.

F. The next PSYCHIATRIC COMMITMENTS were all the result of FABRICATIONS


BY DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER OF THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT TO FAIRMOUNT HOSPITAL IN PHILADELPHIA April of 2015;
July of 2015, and February of 2016. Again with no OUTPATIENT TREATMENT
PLAN or MEDICATIONS.

G. The 2010 OUTPATIENT TREATMENT PLAN of COUNSELING ONLY, for 3 months


was a VOLUNTARY TREATMENT PLAN that was coerced after 3 Psychiatric
Nurses forced medication by needle to the buttox, and then medication for
the next several days in FARIMOUNT HOSPITAL. No MEDICATIONS WERE
TAKEN AFTER THE INITAL PRESCRIPTION FROM THE HOSPITAL WAS
FINISHED, WHICH ONLY LASTED A FEW WEEKS.

H. RECORDS AND MY OWN MEMORY CLARIFIES THAT THE LANCASTER CITY


POLICE DEPARTMENT ENGAGED IN THE VERY SAME TACTICS AGAINST MY
FATHER, SAMUEL CATERBONE, JR. IN THE 1960'S, WHICH RESULTED IN BOTH
PSYCHIATRIC COMMITMENTS AND ELECTO-SHOCK TREATMENTS, A CLASSIC
MKULTRA PROGRAM TECHNIQUE FOR BRAIN WASHING.

I. The VOLUNTARY decision on my part to take PSYCHIATRIC MEDICATIONS


AND OUTPATIENT TREATMENT by Lancaster Psychiatrist Dr. Alber Shulz, who
in 1986 was a client of mine at Financial Management Group, Ltd., who also
treated my brother Sammy Caterbone, was THE DIRECT RESULT OF
REPEATED REQUEST BY MY MOTHER, YOLANDA RODA CATERBONE WHICH I
MADE IN ORDER TO OBTAIN FINANCIAL BACKING, WORK, AND INCOME. MY
FINANCIAL RECORD AND WORK HISTORY RECORD PROVES THIS.

______________________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-598-2200

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 2 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered,
defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with
allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa.
(ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992).
Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law
enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We
utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some
communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced
Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact
List. How long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my
Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?

ACTIVE COURT CASES


J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals -
COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 17-01233 Chapter 11 Appeal for 17-10615; Case No.
17-0867 Preliminary Injunction from Middle District; Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States,
et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-
02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751
PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal Case No.
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015;
1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472 INJUNCTION re
Pain Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case No. 16-10157

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 3 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200
MARCH 21, 2017

STAN J CATERBONE & ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP


INTERNET LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS

7 SOCIAL MEDIA SITES

23 NEW LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS, March 13, 2017

84 INTERNET LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS, February 14,


2014

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and
publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud
within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the
truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public
corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications
are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a
member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County
and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture
from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 4 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

STAN J. CATERBONE & ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP


SOCIAL MEDIA SITES
_________________________

1. STAN J. CATERBONE'S WEBSITE www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

2. STAN J. CATERBONE'S YOUTUBE CHANNEL -


https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWqz_swlj5dsEvufnsJjRSQ

3. STAN J. CATERBONE'S TWITTER PAGE - https://twitter.com/SCaterbone

4. STAN J. CATERBONE'S SCRIBD PAGE FOR DOCUMENTS -


https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone

5. STAN J. CATERBONE'S LINKDIN PAGE - https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?


id=429457751&trk=nav_responsive_tab_profile_pic

6. STAN J. CATERBONE'S AUDIO RECORDINGS ON YOURLISTEN.COM


http://yourlisten.com/Stan.Caterbone

7. STAN J. CATERBONE'S AUDIO RECORDINGS ON SOUNDCLOUD -


https://soundcloud.com/stan-caterbone?
utm_source=soundcloud&utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=twitter

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 5 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

23 NEW LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS

1. Case No. 17-cv-867-EGS Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief


MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT TITLED LETTER TO HUNTINGTON BANK ANDREW
GRIMMIT re Liquidation Offer March 21, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/342581480/Case-No-17-cv-867-EGS-Preliminary-
Injunction-for-Emergency-Relief-MOTION-TO-FILE-EXHIBIT-TITLED-LETTER-TO-
HUNTINGTON-BANK-ANDREW-GRIMMIT-re-Liquidati

2. LETTER to HIGH INDUSTRIES re MARRIOTT BAR THREATS, HARASSMENT,


THEFT OF MONIES March 13, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/341731227/Letter-to-High-
Industries-Re-MARRIOTT-HOTEL-BAR-Threats-Harassment-Theft-of-
Monies-March-13-2017

3. FEDERAL PRIVATE CRIMINAL NOTARIZED COMPLAINT Filed in U.S.


EASTERN DISTRICT COURT March 12, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/341681228/FEDERAL-PRIVATE-
CRIMINAL-NOTARIZED-COMPLAINT-Filed-in-U-S-EASTERN-DISTRICT-
COURT-March-12-2017

4. History of the Internet - DARPA and Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media
Group March 12, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/341681178/History-of-the-Internet-
DARPA-and-Stan-J-Caterbone-and-Advanced-Media-Group-March-12-2017

5. WIKILEAKS CIA DATA DUMP re 100 NAMED TARGETED INDIVIDUALS OF


MIND CONTROL
https://www.scribd.com/document/341681162/TARGETED-INDIVIDUAL-
TESTIMONIES-AND-LISTS-Our-Selected-Witnesses-by-WIKILEAKS-March-
10-2017

6. CHAPTER 11 CASE No. 10615 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO JUDGE RICHARD


FEHLINGS ORDER OF FEBRUARY 28, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/341519915/Chapter-11-17-
10615REF-NOTICE-OF-APPEAL-TO-U-S-DISTRICT-COURT-FOR-THE-
EASTERN-DISTICT-OF-PENNSYLVANIA-OF-JUDGE-RICHARD-FEHLINGS-
ORDER-of-February-28

7. 02101-NT-000214-2016 ORDER BY LANCASTER COUNTY COMMON PLEAS


JUDGE MERRIS SPAHN GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION
https://www.scribd.com/document/341298288/STAN-J-CATERBONE-MJ-
02101-NT-0001214-2016-re-NOISE-TOO-LOUD-ORDER-by-JUDGE-
MERRILL-SPAHN-IN-FORMA-PAUPERIS-GRANTED-APPEAL-DOCKETED-
February-22-201

8. STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP INVOICES AND


STATEMENTS OF MARCH 8, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/341298279/Advanced-Media-Group-
INVOICES-and-STATEMENTS-for-March-8-2017

9. NOTARIZED ENOUGH IS ENOUGH DECLARATION BY STAN J. CATERBONE


MARCH 5, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/341018022/NOTARIZED-ENOUGH-

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 6 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

IS-ENOUGH-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-on-March-2-2017-and-Case-No-CI-16-
08472-EMERGENCY-INJUNCTION-FOR-PAIN-MEDICATIONS-March-5-2017

10.LETTER TO MATHEW HAVERSTICK, ATTORNEY FOR SCOTT MARTIN re


MARTINE v. LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF MARK REESE FOR
IMPEACHMENT https://www.scribd.com/document/340996107/Stan-J-
Caterbone-LETTER-to-Matthew-H-Haverstick-re-MARTIN-v-Reese-CI-17-
04626-March-5-2017

11.STAN J. CATERBONE NEW CASE IN U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT IN


EASTERN DISTRICT CASE No. 17-867 CATERBONE v. NSA, et.al.,
PRELIMINARY INJUCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF
https://www.scribd.com/document/340923402/STAN-J-CATERBONE-
NEW-CASE-Case-No-17-cv-00867-EGS-Preliminary-Injunction-for-
EMERGENCY-RELIEF-in-U-S-EASTERN-District-of-Pennsylvania-March-4-20

12.KATHLEEN KANE APPEAL CASE IN SUPERIOR COURT OPINION OF


MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF MARCH 2, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340823932/Superior-Court-of-
Pennsylvania-Case-No-3575-EDA-2016-MONTGOMERY-COUNTY-OPINION-
AND-STAN-J-CATERBONE-AMICUS-March-2-2017

13.STAN J. CATERBONE LETTER TO PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS re


ANTI-STALKING PROPOSED LEGISLATION OF MARCH 3, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340823930/STAN-J-CATERBONE-
LETTER-TO-THE-PENNSYLVANIA-STATE-LEGISLATORS-March-3-2017

14.STAN J. CATERBONE NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT FOR LANCASTER COUNTY


COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CASE CI-17-00206 SAVAGE v. Dave Brown re
LAMBERT BOOK
https://www.scribd.com/document/340736354/LANCASTER-COUNTY-
COURT-OF-COMMON-PLEAS-Cases-No-CI-17-00206-SAVAGE-v-BROWN-et-
al-re-AFFIDAVIT-of-ENOUGH-IS-ENOUGH-March-2-2017

15.NOTORIZED DECLARATION TITLED ENOUGH IS ENOUGH BY STAN J.


CATERBONE ON MARCH 1, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340618722/ENOUGH-is-ENOUGH-by-
Stan-J-Caterbone-on-March-1-2017

16.LETTER TO TARGETED INDIVIDUAL ABBE EDISON OF PITTSBURG, PA re


ADVISE ON COUNTER TECHNIQUES
https://www.scribd.com/document/340479872/LETTER-TO-ABBE-
EDISON-February-27-2017

17.CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY CASE No. 17-10615 MOTION FOR


RECONSIDERATION OF JUDGE RICHARD FEHLINGS DISMISSAL OF
FEBRUARY 26, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340479838/Chapter-11-17-
10615REF-MOTION-FOR-RECONSIDERATION-OF-JUDGE-FEHLINGS-
ORDER-OF-FEBRUARY-16-2017-February-26-2017

18.PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE COMPLAINT No. 055746172-


0101 re GEICO COMPLAINT FOR ACCIDENT OF FEBRUARY 28, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340354393/PENNSYLVANIA-

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 7 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

DEPARTMENT-OF-INSURANCE-COMPLAINT-re-STAN-J-CATERBONE-GEICO-
CLAIM-NUMBER-055746172-0101-030-with-AFFIDAVIT-February-25-2017

19.STAN J. CATERBONE LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CASE


No. CI-08-13373 PREACIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS MASON PFLUMM et.al.,
February 25, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340354387/Lancaster-County-Court-
Case-No-08-CI-13373-re-PRAECIPE-TO-ADD-DEFENDANTS-February-25-
2017

20.PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE COMPLAINT No. 055746172-


0101 re GEICO COMPLAINT FOR ACCIDENT OF FEBRUARY 28, 2017 WITH
NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT
https://www.scribd.com/document/340278864/PENNSYLVANIA-
DEPARTMENT-OF-INSURANCE-COMPLAINT-re-STAN-J-CATERBONE-GEICO-
CLAIM-NUMBER-055746172-0101-030-with-NOTARIZED-AFFIDAVIT-
February-25-20

21.STAN J. CATERBONE NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT FOR LANCASTER COUNTY


COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CASE CI-17-00206 SAVAGE v. Dave Brown re
REQUEST FOR APPEARANCE AND AMICUS BRIEF
https://www.scribd.com/document/339729747/STAMPED-VERSION-
LANCASTER-COUNTY-COURT-OF-COMMON-PLEAS-Cases-No-CI-17-00206-
SAVAGE-v-BROWN-et-al-REQUEST-FOR-APPEARANCE-and-AMICUS-BRIEF-
Febr

22.STAN J. CATERBONE LETTER TO PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS re


ANTI-STALKING PROPOSED LEGISLATION OF FEBRUARY 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/339421116/STAN-J-CATERBONE-
LETTER-TO-THE-PENNSYLVANIA-STATE-LEGISLATORS-February-15-2017

23.STAN J. CATERBONE'S PHOTO INVENTORY OF 1250 FREMONT STREET


HOME, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA OF FEBRUARY 14, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/339337180/STAN-J-CATERBONE-
1250-FREMONT-STREET-LANCASTER-PA-INVENTORY-February-14-2017

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 8 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

84 INTERNET LINKS OF EVIDENCE OF ALL CLAIMS

. ERIC COHEN AND ROBERT BERUBE, Federal Public Defender for Esteban Santiago, Ft.
Lauderdale Shooter, INVOICE AND FEE SCHEDULE January 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337072519/ERIC-COHEN-Federal-Public-
Defender-for-Esteban-Santiago-Ft-Lauderdale-Shooter-INVOICE-AND-FEE-
SCHEDULE-January-20-2017

. STAN CATERBONE NAMED AMICUS FOR KATHLEEN KANE Superior Court of


Pennsylvania Case No. 3575 EDA 2016 FRIDAY JANUARY 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337120127/STAN-CATERBONE-NAMED-
AMICUS-FOR-KATHLEEN-KANE-Superior-Court-of-Pennsylvania-Case-No-3575-EDA-
2016-FRIDAY-JANUARY-20-2017

. WHISTLEBLOWERS KAREN STEWART AND STAN CATERBONE A Candid Discussion of


Electronic Harassment Protocols, January 11, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336256943/WHISTLEBLOWERS-KAREN-
STEWART-AND-STAN-CATERBONE-A-Candid-Discussion-of-Electronic-Harassment-
Protocols-January-11-2017

.The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking Program


https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/surreptitious-reincarnation-cointelpro-cops-
program-stan-caterbone

. Video: Media Blacks Out Edward Snowdens Talk On COINTELPRO & History Of Mass
Surveillance
http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-media-blacks-out-edward-snowdens-talk-
on-cointelpro-history-of-mass-surveillance/224222/

. Letters: Snowden deserves pardon by John and Bonnie Raines, Philadelphia of the
Citizens Commission to Investigate the FBI in 1971
http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20170119_Letters__Snowden_deserves_pa
rdon.html

. Legal Implications of the Soviet Microwave Bombardment of the U.S. Embassy


https://www.scribd.com/document/336787302/Legal-Implications-of-the-1959-
Soviet-Microwave-Bombardment-of-the-U-S-Embassy-January-17-2017

THE COMPUTER HACKER WANTS THIS FREE SPACE


SO HAVE AT IT - ASSHOLE

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 9 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

. Congressman Robert Walker Pleading July 7 1991 Important


https://www.scribd.com/document/270267368/Congressman-Robert-Walker-
Pleading-July-7-1991-Important

. That time the CIA was convinced a self-proclaimed psychic had paranormal abilities
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/01/19/that-time-
the-cia-was-convinced-a-self-proclaimed-psychic-had-paranormal-abilities/?
postshare=8421484844095309&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.b487b6ae00e7

. Obama's most enduring legacy may be the establishment of the modern US


surveillance state
http://www.businessinsider.com/obamas-most-enduring-legacy-the-modern-us-
surveillance-state-2017-1

. The Extortion of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pa by COINTELPRO PROGRAMS


January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336832214/The-Extortion-of-220-Stone-Hill-
Road-Conestoga-Pa-by-COINTELPRO-PROGRAMS-January-17-2017

. AMG LEGAL SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE Mastered on April 16, 1991 at Commadore Inc.,
January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787897/AMG-LEGAL-SYSTEMS-
PROTOTYPE-Mastered-on-April-16-1991-at-Commadore-Inc-January-17-2017

. Stan J. Caterbone, Controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., 1993 to 1998 January 17,
2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787739/Stan-J-Caterbone-Controller-of-
Pflumm-Contractors-Inc-1993-to-1998-January-17-2017

14. Sam Lombardo and Raolph Mazzochi Charlotte Street Proposal by Advanced Media
Group and Stan J. Caterbone January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787416/Sam-Lombardo-and-Raolph-Mazzochi-
Charlotte-Street-Proposal-by-Advanced-Media-Group-and-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-
17-2017

15. B2B Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16, 2017


https://www.scribd.com/document/336787303/B2B-Consulting-From-1999-to-2002-
January-16-2017

16. 1999 Excelsior Place Business Plan by Stan J. Caterbone January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336719627/1999-Excelsior-Place-Business-Plan-
by-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-16-2017

17. Stan J. Caterbone AIM MUTUAL FUNDS Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16,
2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336738750/Stan-J-Caterbone-AIM-MUTUAL-
FUNDS-Consulting-From-1999-to-2002-January-16-2017

18. Pro Financial Group Brochure and Eastern Regional Free Agent Camp by Stan J.
Caterbone January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336704842/Pro-Financial-Group-Brochure-and-
Eastern-Regional-Free-Agent-Camp-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-16-2017

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 10 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

19. STAN J. CATERBONE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP JOINT VENTURE WITH DALE HIGH
January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637179/56-STAN-J-CATERBONE-ADVANCED-
MEDIA-GROUP-JOINT-VENTURE-WITH-DALE-HIGH-January-15-2017

20. Institutional Investors Mortgage Banking Business Development of 1987 January


15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637178/58-Institutional-Investors-Mortgage-
Banking-Business-Development-of-1987-January-15-2017

21. 1987 JOINT VENTURE - Tony Bongiovi, Power Station Studios, and Flatbush Films
with Stan J. Caterbone January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637176/55-1987-JOINT-VENTURE-Tony-
Bongiovi-Power-Station-Studios-and-Flatbush-Films-with-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-
15-2017

22. STAN J. CATERBONE'S Financial Management Group, Ltd., Anti-Trust Litigation File
of October 17, 2015
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637173/57-STAN-J-CATERBONE-S-Financial-
Management-Group-Ltd-Anti-Trust-Litigation-File-of-October-17-2015

23. FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence


Agencies November 12, 2016
https://www.scribd.com/document/329761557/FALSE-IMPRISONMENT-AND-ILLEGAL-
INTERROGATIONS-by-U-S-Intelligence-Agencies-and-U-S-Sponsored-Mind-Control-
EVIDENCE-November-2-2016

24. Letter REQUEST for COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to
President Obama, November 15, 2016

25. Stan J. Caterbone and Conflicts With the Trump Administration - Monday November
14, 2016 | False Claims Act | Military

26. STAN J. CATERBONE and the DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE Documents and Evidence of
Conspiracy to .... Saturday November 12, 2016

27. Feds Probe Fulton Bank and 3 Other Subsidiary Banks of Fulton Financial With Stan
J. Caterbone Civil Actions and Mind Control Research of Monday November 9, 2016 |

28. Robert Gates

29. Letter to James Comey, Director of FBI Re Cointelpro Used to Obstruct Justice
Monday November 28, 2016 | Federal Bureau Of Investigation | Central Intelligence
Agency

30. VITALLY IMPORTANT - LETTER and DOCUMENT to Cappello & Noel, LLP of Santa
Barbara, CA Friday November 25, 2016

31. Report of Douglas F Gansler/Kathleen Kane on Misuse of Commonwealth Email


Systems November 22, 2016 Published by ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP |

32. Pro Se Legal Representation In The United States | Motion In United States Law

33. Lancaster Mayor Rick Gray Says There is Room for Improvement in Police

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 11 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

34. Communication - CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Bureau, et.al., November 22,
2016 | Central Intelligence Agency

35. Chapter 12 - ROHYPNOL AND SATELLITE and Chapter 11 - NEIGHBORS FROM HELL,
from Satellite Terrorism in America, by Dr. John Hall Copyright 2009

36. | J. Edgar Hoover | Federal Bureau Of Investigation

37. JIM GUERIN, FOUNDER OF ISC, FAREWELL LETTER OF 1989 December 26, 2016 |
Justice | Government

38. CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON Candidate for JUDGESHIP and His 1987 EFFORT FOR MY
GUARDIANSHIP Friday December 16, 2016

39. ANOTHER LANCASTER COVER-UP THE SALE OF THE MASONIC HALL IN THE CITY OF
LANCASTER, by The Advanced Media Group, December 15, 2016 | Fraternal Service
Organizations

40. Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com TOTALS and MONTHLY


From May of 2016 to January 2017 - January 10, 2017

41. My Friend and Colleague Soleilmavis Liu of China a Victim of Mind Control Living in
China Who Started Peacepink- August 28, 2016

42. TD Ameritrade TRADEKEEPER PROFIT-LOSS FOR 2004 TRADES and 2017 FULTON
STOCK January 9, 2017

43. POLICE INCIDENT REPORTS OF PHYSICAL ASSAULTS FOR STAN J. CATERBONE 2005
TO 2016 January 6, 2017

44. Judiciaries

45. UPDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS re CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Department


US District Court Case 08-cv-08982 December 28, 2016

46. Section 504 Of The Rehabilitation Act | Rehabilitation Act Of 1973

47. UPDATED - EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as Targeted


Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and Related Hearings and Lectures,
December 27, 2016

48. Torture

49. Stan J. Caterbone on Twitter: "I'm reading FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL
INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence... on @Scribd! https://t.co/T3D9nIYvMt
#ReadMore"

50. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 re PRAECIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS
COMEY AND TRUMP REMOVE OBAMA January 23, 2017

51. INVOICE AND Letter to James Comey, Director of FBI Re Pro Se Billings Invoice
Wednesday November 30, 2016

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 12 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

52. Kathy Harrison (KATHLEEN HARRISON NAMED IN SAVAGE SUIT v. Dave Brown)
Email Re Bi Polar March 10, 2005

53. The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking


Program - Lancaster City Police Strategic Plan, August 24, 2016

54. LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Cases No. CI-17-00210 and CI-17-
00206 BOWMAN and SAVAGE v. BROWN, et.al.,

55. REQUEST FOR APPEARANCE and AMICUS BRIEF January 25, 2017.pdf | Amicus
Curiae | National Security Agency

56. Family of Karlie Hall files suit against Millersville University, others; calls death
preventable January 25, 2017 | Law Reference | Government

57. Stan J. Caterbone Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Filled in Forms January 27, 2017

58. U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT ISSUANCE LETTER FOR NEW CASE NO. 17-10615-ref To
Judge Fehling Friday January 27, 2017

59. Stan J. Caterbone Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case No. 17-10615 Judge Fehling Filed On
January 27, 2017 - CASE FILE | Plea | Defamation

60. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 EXHIBIT re THE DONALD TRUMP
PRESIDENCY and STAN J. CATERBONE as of January 28, 2017 - electronically filed |
Federal Bureau Of Investigation | Nasa

61. ACCIDENT REPORT NO. 1701-029468 LANCASTER CITY POLICE OFFICER REPPERT
SATURDAY JANUARY 28, 2017

62. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 PRAECIPE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
January 29, 2017 - FILED ELECTRONICALLY January 29, 2017

63. Stewart Baker - Wikipedia

64. 16-cv-2513 Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief in Middle District NOTICE
OF APPEAL TO USCA THIRD CIRCUIT January 26, 2017 | Defamation

65. Homeowners Rehab Application File of June 8, 2015 - COINTELPRO EXTORTION


MODEL RESULTS January 30, 2017

66. Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se, U.S.C.A. Third Circuit BRIEF STATEMENT OF JUDICIAL
MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY of February 1, 2017

67. PLAINTIFF Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY


RELIEF EASTERN DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA With IFP and Civil Cover Sheet - on
February 2, 2017

68. Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 17-10615REF SUBMITTALS FOR FEBRUARY 3 - February


2, 2017

69. Jeremy Scahill on Donald Trump and the Military-Industrial Complex - Truthdig
In an interview with acTVism, the investigative journalist also discusses the

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 13 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone's COMPLETE MENTAL HEALTH RECORD

70. significance of the Ramstein Air Base in Germany. - 2017/02/02

71. Pennsylvania State Police Liquor Control Enforcement Formal Complaint AGAINST
DOWNTOWN LANCASTER BARS, August 12, 2016 | Lawsuit | United States Courts Of
Appeals

72. Case No. CI-16-08472 EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR PAIN MEDICATIONS -


Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas September 21, 2016 - CRIMINAL ACT OF
TORTURE |

73. Torture LAW and the United States - Wikipedia by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP, February 4, 2017

74. CI-16-08472 DOCKET SHEET February 3, 2017 and Torture LAW and the United
States - Wikipedia by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, February 4,
2017

75. LIP News - CORRUPTION IN THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND LNP -
February 4, 2017

76. LETTER to Andrew Wallet re Britney Spears Conservatorship February 4, 2017

78. 16-Cv-2513 Preliminary Injunction for EMERGENCY RELIEF in Middle District ORDER
by JUDGE KANE TRANSFER to EASTERN DISTRICT PHIL January 31, 2017

79. Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board LETTER Re 2016-788 (Asworth) 2016-789


(Reinaker) February 2, 2017

80. Chapter 11 17-10615ref REORGANIZATION PLAN February 7, 2017 | Bankruptcy |


Chapter

81. Chapter 11 17-10615REF STAN J. CATERBONE CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN


and DISCLOSURE STATEMENT February 7, 2017

82. Third Circuit Senior Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, who is President Donald
Trump’s older sister, decided this week to go inactive on the bench, relinquishing
her staff and chambers despite being scheduled to hear cases this year.

83. STAN J. CATERBONE June 18, 2008 US District Court Case 08-02982 CATERBONE v.
Lancaster City Police Bureau, et.al., CASE FILE | Complaint

84.STAN J. CATERBONE MJ-02101-NT-0000470-2017 DUTIES AT STOP SIGN - MOTION


TO DISMISS February 12, 2017

COVER PAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH RECORD Page 14 of 14 Tuesday April 4, 2017
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com

December 14, 2015

ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION OF MENTAL ILLNESS DIAGNOSIS


AND SYMPTOMS
___________________________________________

How can a person be managing 9 different court cases in 4 different courts


with electronic filing privileges, without ever missing a court deadline; all the while
being hacked, harassed, threatened, etc, while also being a targeted individual be
suffering from ANY type of mental disease or defect?

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania


14-02259 MOVANT in the Lisa Michelle Lambert Appeal
15-02984 Petition for Habeus Corpus

Third Circuit Court of Appeals


15-3400 APPELLANT in the Lisa Michelle Lambert Motion for Summary Judgment
Appeal

Pennsylvania Superior Court


1561 MDA 2015 Appeal of the Preliminary Emergency Injunction
1915 MDA 2015 Appeal of the Private Criminal Complaint

Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas


08-03373 CATERBONE v. Duke Street Library, et. al.,
15-10167 CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film Commission
15-06985 Preliminary Emergency Injunction
CP-36-MD-1108-2015 Private Criminal Complaint re Mental Health Warrant of July
9, 2015 v. Fairmont Behavioral Health, Chief of Police Keith Sadler, Detective
Clark Bearinger, Chief Medical Officer and Psychiatrist Silvia Gratz, MD.

CURRENT STATE-OF-AFFAIRS

I have been living at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania since


August of 2006, and alone since August. In 2010 my brother had relocated my
Mother from Florida, and we both took care of her until her death on June 29, 2011.
I currently own the home, which is the very same home that I was raised. There is
no mortgage and it is jointly owned with my 3 brothers, Steve, Phil, and Mike. Steve
and Phil reside in Carlisle Pennsylvania and Mike and his family in Plantation, Florida.
The home is currently in the best condition it has been in for at least 30 years.

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page111of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

I had personally restored many aspects of the home this past year. I have
been paying for ALL expenses, insurances, taxes, and capital improvements since
2010, and had even paid back taxes for several years before that, all on a meager
monthly disability benefit. I currently have some $50,000.00 in savings, and I did
receive some $10,000 in inheritance in 2011. The remainder of the funds are from
the $21,000 in back social security benefits I received in 2009, and some $10,000
from the sale of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga Pennsylvania. The balance of funds
were savings from my social security disability benefits. In May my Credit Score was
708, as reported by CreditKarma. In the past year I have had extensive dental work
performed, had a flu vaccine, and had a physical with a Primary Care Physician. See
Photos and Credit Report

THE ISC COVER-UP OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER!

How the fabricated the mental illness record, it was manufactured! (the
ISC/Ferranti merger was only announced on September 21, 1987 and completed in
December of 1987) that is why all the criminal charges were not dismissed until
march of 1988!

By law the 303 Certificate MUST be filed in the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas. A few months ago I wanted to make sure it was not forged to include
outpatient treatment. 1st the Prothonotary's Office told me that I could not view it,
then when I proved that the law states that I can, they said that it was still not filed
and they were waiting to receive it, 2 months after it was executed. Now you know
why, the 303 Certificate in 2010 did have 90 days of outpatient therapy, talk
therapy, no medications!

In September of 1987 when ALL the arrests were DISMISSED; "They" told me
that a condition of my bail was that I had to be ADMITTED to the St. Joseph Hospital
Psychiatric Unit. After a week I LEARNED that it was a total fabrication and was
immediately discharged.

In August of 1987, Jim Warner called the Stone Harbor Police Department and
told them that "I had a gun and was going to the beach to kill myself" (documented
on the Burdette Tomilson medical report). They held me for 6 hours and had to
release me. The previous months Jim Warner, Mary Lynn Diapolo, and Jere Sullivan
were calling Psychiatrist Al Shulz and telling them fabrications about me. The Mental
Health Warrants served in 2006, 2009, 2010, and 2015 were all predicated on the
Mental Health Warrants of 1987 as being legitimate and factual. See Press Release
with Executive Summary.

Valuation of Litigation and Claims in Federal and State Courts

The value of the litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S.
Bankruptcy Case No. 05-23059. The following EXHIBIT titled Chapter 11
Reorganization Plan for Case No. 05-23059 Filed January 12, 2010, November 27,
2015 was not completed when it was filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page222of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

After careful review I have since recovered documentation and evidence that
can substantiate that the $50,000,000 valuation on the APPELLANT'S litigation is a
low estimate. For example, in the Original and Authentic Documentation of 1987
the Court will see a document called the HARSCO Pension Plan Proposal of
$144,000,000. HARSCO was a Harrisburg based corporation. In 1987 Michael
Dipaolo was an auditor for KPMG Maine Hurdman, a Big Eight accounting firm. He
was also a personal friend of mine whose wife, Mary Lynn, was hired as an executive
assistant at Financial Management Group, Ltd., Mike Dipaolo referred the pension
plan to me in order to bid on the management of that pension plan. The Court will
see the bidding documents from several management firms that were requested to
provide disclosures to me in order to secure the management of the pension plan.
That project alone would have generated some $900,000 in management fees to me
on an annual basis, of which I had a fee sharing agreement with Mike Dipaolo that
would have generated at least $250,000 per year in annual income. The following
outlines income and equity owned and claimed by me, not by Financial Management
Group, Ltd., I had an agreement for sharing approximately 10% back into the firm of
Financial Management Group, Ltd., which was negotiated by Robert Kauffman and
myself.
In the July of 1987, after the meeting with ISC executive Larry Resch of June
23, I and Tony Bongiovi had a meeting on the Wildwood Boardwalk, namely the
portion that Tony Bongiovi owned. I was already named in the operating budget of
the movie to receive $200,000, not including the Managing Limited Partner Fee of
the investors, as outlined in the original documents which the Court can confirm. On
that night, Tony Bongiovi had made a verbal disclosure to me that he wanted me to
manage the business affairs of every project that Tony was then involved in and
promised that I would share in the profits of every said project. In addition to the
Digital Movie, Tony was involved in a number of other projects including but not
limited to the pier of Wildwood in which Tony wanted to open an open-air concert
venue, similar to that of the Steel Pier in Atlantic City. Tony also had a project in
which he was recreating the flight of Amelia Earhart; the recording artists and band
that was secured and under management for the past year or so called French
Lick; the comic act of the Wid; the video editing suite at power station built by
engineer Ed Evans; and of course the recording studio itself Power Station Studios,
now operating as Avatar Studios of New York. I can only guesstimate that those
revenues and future revenues would be worth almost the full $50,000,000 today had
many of those projects been successful. The Court is reminded at the track record
and resume of both the myself and Tony Bongiovi.

On March 2nd of 1987 real estate developer Owen Kugal that outlines the fees
to the APPELLANT for the securing of financing his real estate portfolio, that fee is
stated at $433,592. I had also secured financing for Noris Boyd, of Boyd Wilson and
owner of the Olde Hickory property on the Oregon Pike. The financing package was
for a refinance agreement of $5,000,000.000 which would have generated at least a
$75,000.00 fee for the APPELLANT.
In May of 1987, I and attorney Randy Grespin, of Life Underwriters of
Harrisburg (Owned and Operated by Tony Pascotti and representing Tony Pascotti)
flew in the APPELLANT'S plane to Atlanta for a scheduled meeting with Bill Koegler of
the Planners Securities Group, a regional Broker Dealer. The APPELLANT had
negotiated a merger of Financial Management Group, Ltd., and Planners Securities
Group which contained a clause granting Financial Management Group, Ltd., a 10%
ownership position, which was worth approximately $1,800,000.

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page333of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

The deal was consummated by a vote of the FMG Board of Directors in May of
1987. The Court will see a document titled Financial Analysis of FMG in June of
1987 which values the shares of FMG at approximately $17.00. I was owned some
50,000 shares, which puts a fair market value of approximately $850,000.00 in his
FMG stock holdings.
The real estate holdings that I owned or had under agreement is outlined in
the Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan.

Targeted Individual, TI and Victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control


Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public
allegations of fraud within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough
to drive an ordinary person to suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J.
Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or "remotely viewed". This was
verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and never written,
spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert
in the Laurie Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing
through an email. That was the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was
researched, but that was the extent of the topic. Remote Viewers may have
attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way without success.

In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of
mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of
directed energy devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency
electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This assault was no coincidence in
that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court,
or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This assault
began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy.
The main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J.
Caterbone is connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope
recording artist Sheryl Crow of Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3
years trying to validate and confirm this person without success. Most U.S.
intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached Executive Summary.

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
http://www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com/

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page444of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

CHAPTER
DIVIDER

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGH Page 5 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Reported as of May 17, 2015

Stanley Caterbone's Credit Report

Provided by

Overview

Your Credit Score Account Mix


Credit Cards 2

Real Estate 1

Auto 0

703 Student 0
300 Good 850
Other Loans 0

Total Accounts: 3

Personal Information

Names Reported
See something wrong?
STANLEY J CATERBONE
STANJ CATERBONE Find out how to update personal information.

Addresses Reported
Employer Reported Date Reported

1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER, PA ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPLTD Aug 1, 1999
17603
PAINT RENOVATION Sep 1, 1978
220 STONE HILL RD
CONESTOGA, PA
17516

615 WYNCROFT LN
LANCASTER, PA
17603

Credit Karma estimates your Approval Odds by comparing your credit pro le with data about other members who were approved for this product. Though
Approval Odds do not guarantee approval, they can show you which products may be a better t for you.

Accounts

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page
Page15
655of
of
of385
109
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

!" ! ! #$
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan Caterbone
Founder and Director at Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,
Scaterbone@Live.com

Summary
I, Stanley J. Caterbone, Targeted Individual or TI, residing at: 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania,
17603, do hereby state that I am at least 18 years of age, that I am a citizen or a legal resident of the United
States of America, that I am of sound mind, and that I am the person whose signature follows on this Affidavit.
The purpose of this document is (1) to advise Congress as well as state and local officials of organized stalking
and electronic and mind manipulation torture being committed against me and (2) to request a state, local, or
Congressional investigation and hearing on the use of remotely-operated directed energy attacks and mind
control technologies on Americans in this country. Our Government is responsible for protecting its citizens
from elements that covertly harass, torment, murder, and cause victims to commit suicide through organized
stalking and remote electronic torture. Yet, unbiased research indicates that certain elements of Government
either engage in these activities or protect those who perform them. I seek the complete dismantling of any
officially-sanctioned covert Government torture programs, the passage of legislation specifically outlawing that
high-tech torture, and the full prosecution of any person, regardless of his rank or position, who has violated
my civil rights and my most basic human rights. The assaults on my mind and body have been occurring for 24
year(s).

Experience
Disabled at SSA
December 2005 - Present (10 years)
Awarded Social Security Disability Benefits from the Social Security Administration in August of 2009, and
collected benefits from April of 2008, for all related symptoms and illnesses relating to U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control and COINTELPRO. Officially and formally declared DISABLED on December 1, 2005.

Pro Se Litigant at Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


May 2005 - Present (10 years 7 months)
In 2005 Stan J. Caterbone, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current
litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States
Third District Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
These litigation's include violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference
of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital
Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along
with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page
Page16
766of
of
of385
109
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,
17,Page1
2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa
and Iraq. This litigation dates back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited
by ISC executives for professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of RICO Civil
Complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit
Court of Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.

Founding Director at Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,


February 2005 - Present (10 years 10 months)
In 2005 Stan J. Caterbone began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed
as "FULT" on the NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a full
service financial firm, Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic vision for
his company and the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering efforts in dealing
with Fulton Financial. Stan J. Caterbone has been in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of
Directors with regards to various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank acquisition and
the subprime failures. Stan J. Caterbone believes that Fulton Financial needs management to become more
aggressive in it's strategic planning and the performance it expects from its management team in order to
increase shareholder value. Expanding the footprint of the regional bank has not yielded an increase to the
bottom line that is consistent with the expectations of shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local
banking institutions acquired by larger regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will
see in it's local marketplace as well as in it's regional footprint.

Founder and Director at Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,


January 1995 - Present (20 years 11 months)
In 1995 I began doing consulting work to various companies while at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as
Controller. I was billing my time out under our KAL company. I had named KAL after Keegan, Abby
and Lizzy. I used the company to manage and account for all of the Real Estate Activities of Pflumm
Contractors. Most of my work was computerizing the accounting and information technologies of the
companies. The most extensive work was for Dana Chryst and the Jay Group. I had spent several months
analyzing the various departments and the logistics of the company for my design of a hybrid system of
both the IBM Mainframe and personal computer stations. I believe it was the IBM 3400, at that time IBM
was just beginning to accommodate the demand and it was still not deployed in many companies. The
goal was to provide real-time information systems on a company-wide basis. I had earlier developed and
deployed such a system for American Helix and High Industries at the American Helix facility. I had used
a DB3 program and had every department operating on a real-time basis. The customer service department
could provide customers with updates in a matter of minutes. I also did work for a paraplegic and set up
a system using software that helped her use a computer with voice controlled computer system. I also did
troubleshooting work on both hardware and software systems for various clients. Other companies included
Lancaster Container, B2B Communications, Galo Rosa Restaurant, Mazzi Restaurant, Lancaster Dispensing

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page
Page17
877of
of
of385
109
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,
17,Page2
2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Company (1980's), Phil Caterbone, D.O. Family Practices, and the Estate of Thomas Caterbone, James
Doran and Home Inspection Services, Companies were billed an hourly rate of at least $35.00.

President and Founder at Power PRoductions I


January 1987 - Present (28 years 11 months)
Power Station Studios of New York retained me as executive producer of a motion picture project.
The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format; the first of its kind. We had
originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept for the Power Station Digital Movie
System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and marketing formula of the DOLBY technology
trademark. We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording industry
featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead
patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station Studios was the brainchild of Tony
Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station
Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were responsible for developing Bon
Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper,
Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station Studios
had produced the original Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was released for
distribution and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time. Tony Bongiovi was also active in
working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We had developed and authored a Joint Venture
Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the Digital Movie and its related technologies to the
marketplace.

Founding President at Advanced Media Group, Ltd


February 1998 - May 2005 (7 years 4 months)
In 2004 I embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment industries with an emphasis on
assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and royalties in the fight against electronic
piracy. We have attempted to assist in developing new business models to address the convergence of
physical and electronic mediums; as it displaces royalties and revenues for those creating, promoting, and
delivering a range of entertainment content via wireless networks. In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array
of marketing and communication tools for wholesalers of the AIM Investment Group and managed several
communication programs for several of the company wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa
Rica. We also began a Day Trading project that lasted until 2004 with success. In 1999 I developed a
comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery, known as the Excelsior Building on
E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan was developed in conjunction with the Comprehensive
Economic Development Plan for the Revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster
Convention Center for the former Watt & Shand building. In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research,
and implementation of strategies to counter the effects of the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer
technologies. We attended the U.S. Sponsored Y2K symposium and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page
Page18
988of
of
of385
109
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,
17,Page3
2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
by the Senate Y2K Subcommittee and Senator William Bennett. In 1998 I had began to administer the
charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit organization promoting education and awareness for
mental illness and suicide prevention. We had provided funding for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster
County, Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Prevention Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other
charitable organizations. In 1998 I performed Consulting Services in Financial Accounting and Information
Technologies.

Owner, Operator at Day trader and AMG Auctions, an eBay Auction Company
March 2002 - December 2004 (2 years 10 months)
I had studied at least two major books for Daytrading and was a full-time daytrader for at least 2 years. I used
an TD/Ameritrade trading platform and had traded over 700 transactions in that time period. An average day
was from before 8:00am, for the premarket trading and after 6:00pm for the after market trades of 4-6pm.
I had used several computer monitors for the charting and analysis. Although I lost approximately a few
thousand dollars over that time period, I developed a knowledgbase of the mechanics of the market-at-large.
The following is an excerpt from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission: " Day traders rapidly buy
and sell stocks throughout the day in the hope that their stocks will continue climbing or falling in value for
the seconds to minutes they own the stock, allowing them to lock in quick profits. Day traders usually buy
on borrowed money, hoping that they will reap higher profits through leverage, but running the risk of higher
losses too. While day trading is neither illegal nor is it unethical, it can be highly risky. Most individual
investors do not have the wealth, the time, or the temperament to make money and to sustain the devastating
losses that day trading can bring."

Executive Vice President, Secretary, and Founding Partner of FMG, President of FMG Advisory at
Financial Management Group, Ltd., FMG Advisory, Inc.,
August 1986 - November 1998 (12 years 4 months)
I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services organization comprised
of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a stock purchase program for
where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new firm. FMG had financial planners,
investment managers, accountants, attorneys, Realtors, liability insurance services, tax preparers, and estate
planners operating out of our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had 24 people on staff,
had approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess
of $50 million under management, and our advisers were generating almost $4 million of commissions,
which did not include the fees from the other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm
and were valued at about $3 to $4 million.

Controller at Pflumm Contractors, Inc.


June 1993 - February 1998 (4 years 9 months)
I were retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for saving the company
from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the company was facing
extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We were responsible for implementing

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page10
19
99 of
of 126
109
330
385
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,
17,Page4
2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and procedures, human resource policies and
procedures, marketing strategies, performance measurement reporting, and negotiate for the payment of
unpaid contracts. The bonding company was especially problematic, since it was the lifeline to continue
work and bidding for public contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County demanded a complete accounting of
the operations in order to stave off a default on the notes and loans it was holding. We essentially revamped
the entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its previous
years, and record revenues.

Founding President at Advanced Media Group Ltd


March 1989 - May 1992 (3 years 3 months)
I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic companies that had the
capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with commercial companies, government agencies,
educational institutions, and foreign companies. I performed services and contracts for the Department
of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards & Technology (NIST), Department of Defense,
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central
Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond
Buyers, and a host of others. I also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing
various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the
premier provider of mapping software and applications for the internet and is often used in delivering maps
and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix,
the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly. We had brokered a deal and the executives from
Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to discuss the deal and perform due diligence of the
manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield Industrial Park.

Ambassador at People to People International (PTPI)


February 1991 - November 1991 (10 months)
In 1991 I were elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador Program, which was
founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to To give specialists
from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively communicate with peers,
The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face scientific, technical, and professional exchanges
throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F. Kennedy, the State Department established a
nonprofit private foundation to administer the program. We were scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and
Eastern Europe to discuss printing and publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the
world.

Founder, President at FMG Mortgage Banking


January 1987 - November 1988 (1 year 11 months)
I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a major banking firm
in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100 million dollars. Our terms
and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations from developers across the country.

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page11
20
10
10of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,
17,Page5
2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital that include both debt and equity.
Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity funding through private placements, and debt funding
through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood, California to
secure financing of their post production Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North Carolina. We had
secured refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the midst of replacing
the current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and discussions with
Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were quickly seeking
commitments for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a number of other prominent
local developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty
Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We were constantly told that our
financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.

Independant Financial Planning Firm at S.J. Caterbone Associates


January 1985 - August 1986 (1 year 8 months)
Financial Planning Firm affiliated with Independent Broker Dealer, FSC Corporation of Atlanta Ga,. Served
as Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International Association of Financial Planners
and was introduced to FSC by Washington, D.C. based Alexandra Armstrong after I had her speak in
Lancaster Pennsylvania to a host of professionals.

Financial Planner at IDS/American Express


March 1982 - January 1985 (2 years 11 months)
Building Financial Planning Practice

Certifications
Certified Contract Advisor, National Football League Players Association
NFLPA/RPFPC Former Players, Chicago Chapter March 1985 to March 1986

Education
Millersville University of Pennsylvania
Bachelor's degree, Business Administration and Management, General, 1976 - 1980

Skills & Expertise


Microsoft Office
Microsoft Excel
Social Media
Microsoft Word
PowerPoint
Management
Team Building
Project Management
Entrepreneurship

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page12
21
11
11of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,
17,Page6
2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Information Management
Legal Research
Legal Writing
Computer Proficiency
Securities Offerings
Film Production
Digital Strategy
MK ULTRA
Mind Control Experience
Telepathy

Languages
English

Projects
Escaping The Unix Tarpit
May 1991 to June 1991
Members:Stan Caterbone
In 1990 I was requested to be a monthly contributor to one of the leading industry publications for the CD-
ROM industry by Linda Helgerson of Helgerson and Associates. Linda was a sort of watchdog for CD-ROM
professionals based in Washington, D.C. This was my first article. I was workplace-mobbed and fell victim
to another round of assaults soon after. http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/gpage3.html http://
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/gpage3.html

Publications
Third Circuit Court of Appeals
Third Circuit Court of Appeals
Authors: Stan Caterbone
I appeared as a pro se litigant and overturned Federal Judge Mary McLaughlin of the Eastern District Court.
This was on of several appeals I have won as a pro se litigant in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
Amicus for the Petition of Habeus Corpus of Lisa Michelle Lambert
Clerk of Courts for the U.S. District Court for Eastern Pennsylvania June 23, 2015
Authors: Stan Caterbone
My Amicus was recorded on June 23, 2015. AND NOW comes before the said court Stanley J. Caterbone,
appearing Pro Se, and Advanced Media Group, as Movant, to file an Amicus in the above captioned case.
The Movant has an interest in this case as a corroborating witness to the prosecutorial misconduct that
was found in this court before the Honorable Stewart Dalzell in 1997. The Movant has made several
personal attempts to bring his evidence to the courts. In November of 1997 the Movant had solicited the
counsel of Ms. Christina Rainville and her firm Schnader & Harrison of Philadelphia. The Movant had
arranged and delivered a letter and evidence of his own prosecutorial misconduct by the Lancaster County
District Attorney and local authorities at Ms. Rainvilles request. Ms. Rainville then returned a letter to

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page13
22
12
12of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,
17,Page7
2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
the Movant that explained that Schnader & Harrison had made the decision that she could no longer accept
any additional clients from Lancaster County. At that time Ms. Rainville was already involved the Darrell
McCrakken case of Lancaster County. In December of 1997 the Movant hand delivered a CD-ROM to
the chambers of the Honorable Judge Stewart Dalzall that contained evidence of the same. This amicus
provides a voice for the movants as well as providing another perspective and opinion that should benefit the
courts; the parties; and the public-at-large. The matters presented in this amicus have a direct relevancy in the
disposition of this case as it does in the opinion and ORDER of the Honorable Paul S. Diamond on May 22,
2014.
Invitation From President Bill Clinton to the Global Initiative of 2006
Stan J. Caterbone July 7, 2015
Authors: Stan Caterbone
I had submitted an essay to qualify for the conference. Visit https://www.clintonfoundation.org/ to learn
more about his foundation and it's mission and work.

Volunteer Experience
Outreach Director at Tom's Projct Hope
April 1998 - Present (17 years 8 months)
To provide public service organizations engaged in the issues of mental illness an opportunity to introduce
the educational video Numbers Dont lie to its respective organizations for use in the field, and to
contribute to the solutions and challenges confronting the mentally ill. The production was developed for
school curriculums and has been very helpful to all persons intervening and interacting with those afflicted
with this disease. The Texas Department of Health has already procured the rights for Numbers Dont lie#
and is introduced the video to schools. The video was disseminated to organizations throughout Lancaster
County.

Outreach Comittee at Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance


June 2009 - Present (6 years 6 months)
FFCHS Mission Statement Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance (FFCHS) is a human
rights organization that identifies and networks with victims of organized stalking and remote electronic
assaults, educates society about covert harassment issues, and advocates for citizens victimized by covert
criminal elements. In support of the mission statement, FFCHS establishes the following goals: (1) provide
supportive services and promote self-help to remote-delivered electronic and group stalking victims for,
although not limited to, unemployment, homelessness, workplace mobbing, psychological tactics, staged
accidents, and vandalism; (2) network nationwide and worldwide with similar organizations, public benefit
and charitable organizations, and health and community development agencies for the benefit of remote-
delivered electronic and group stalking victims; and (3) promote the care and well-being of organized stalking
and remote electronic assault victims who have few resources or avenues for a safe environment.

Construction Laborer at Habitat for Humanity International

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page14
23
13
13of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,
17,Page8
2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
May 1998 - Present (17 years 7 months)
At Habitat for Humanity, we build. We build because we believe that everyone, everywhere, should have a
healthy, affordable place to call home. More than building homes, we build communities, we build hope and
we build the opportunity for families to help themselves. Your donation will help families break the cycle
of poverty and build long-term financial security. With an affordable, stable home, families have more to
spend on food, medicine, child care, education and other essentials. Your support can help us do more in all
the many ways that Habitat builds. Thanks to you, Habitat is transforming the lives of more than 5 million
people around the world!

Organizations
Bill Clinton's Global Initiative
no
September 2006 to Present

Courses

Independent Coursework

Certified Financial Planner

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page15
24
14
14of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,
17,Page9
2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan Caterbone
Founder and Director at Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,
Scaterbone@Live.com

Contact Stan on LinkedIn

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page16
25
15
15of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December Page10
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,
17,2015
2015
am
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Become an HR Hero! - Learn the Recruiting Skills You Need to Hire Today's Top Talent. View Now!

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page17
26
16
16of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

1 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page18
27
17
17of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

2 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page19
28
18
18of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

3 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page20
29
19
19of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

4 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page21
30
20
20of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

5 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page22
31
21
21of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

6 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page23
32
22
22of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

7 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page24
33
23
23of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

8 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page25
34
24
24of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

9 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page26
35
25
25of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

10 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page27
36
26
26of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

11 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page28
37
27
27of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

12 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page29
38
28
28of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

13 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page30
39
29
29of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

14 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page31
40
30
30of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

15 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page32
41
31
31of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

16 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page33
42
32
32of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

17 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page34
43
33
33of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

18 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page35
44
34
34of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

19 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page36
45
35
35of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

20 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page37
46
36
36of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

21 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page38
47
37
37of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

22 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page39
48
38
38of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

23 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page40
49
39
39of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

24 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page41
50
40
40of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

25 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page42
51
41
41of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

26 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page43
52
42
42of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

27 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page44
53
43
43of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

28 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page45
54
44
44of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

29 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
Contacts | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/contacts/#?sortOrder=last_name&
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Advanced

Home Profile My Network Jobs Interests Business Services Try Premium for free

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page46
55
45
45of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

30 of 31 11/23/2015 6:19 AM
5100.51. Preservation of rights

!"
# $ # # % % #
# # # # &#
' #
# # !" ( ) # * )+',-./0, 1
) # 2 * * $ $ ' # " 3
) '
45 "
) 6 7 # / #
# # 7 !"
# * 8 .# # !"
+ 9 / #

!" 2 /-:+0 ;,( "'+16 0: +0( ( -,)',( ,0,-:<


=,+2/0" >+-+""7,0' . 11 2 > # - 7 " # ?1 *
2 @ ) 1 7 - : '
7 # > # - 3 :# *
# ' # *
* # * # % #
# # A * # * &# *
* *

# * 2 " 1 2 ! " ( ) #
, ( 2 * ! " ' ( ) # + *
2 "# ) # * ' 2 "# ) # * ) ) #
2 *' ) # ) 2 1 ) # *2 ' #
# * $ # *
# * * B * # * * ) (
7 * ( ' * 8 7 : # * 1 *587: + * 1 * C
# 8 8 ) + 8 = +
" ) * 2 * ? ")@ D . ( 8 # ,B
" # + & ' ")*
") B #

$ % & # $ $ #
.

!" #
+ 7 : # #
# # ! " ) -

' !" #
" . * ,B .# , 6 " * 1 *
2 1 ) # # # ' A#
) , ( 2 - ( 1
( 1 ) ) = E" #

' ( ' C 2 A > * $


# # = #
7 > + 1 ) # * ) 1 ?' 45 "# 2 > @*
' " 2 ) * '
F0# ( 9 1 F # * * *

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page47
56
46
46of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
# # # #

' ) + 7 : # # # 6+1* * #
2 # ) * * + 7 : # : -
- # . # #
# # # 1 ) *
* = . #
' 3 : # * - * 2+* D G 7
( &# = > ' 1 ) # ' 3 : #
# .7 +" 4 # #
2) # #
)# 3 : # # B D
7 (

' * ' ( 2 # ) * * *
# # # *
7 " * # # * # #
# * * # *
# = H *
H 4 # * #

' ' + 7 : # 2 2 )
+ 2 * # 2 ( ( , G '
# I' # # #
# * ' ) + $ $
* * B # # G *# 2 3 8
6 * " ( $ #
= # # " ! , ,# # #
#

' + 7 : # A
C $ 0 "' ?0 # " E ' @ and the
Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, or DARPA of the Department of Defense $ #
I, ! B' 2 J 0 "' # I( ")J*
# )($-/7 # ' *
# # *
#

' ( # + 7 : # * 1 * G !"
# # )($-/79 *
C =
# * * # # *

# # K ( ( * 0+"+* 0 #
" E ' ?0 "'@* ( ( * ' ( + - 2 A
+ ?(+-2+@* ( 7 + * ) + * ?) +@* .7* 7 *
+72* ) ) # * + . . .# * 1 ) * ,BB * '
) # 5- " * - -* ( 9 : " *
# * 7 L# 7 L#
#
8 # = > #
+ > B* # # * -- ( E " ) *
+ > B 6+/ # = B #
. * 7 #
)($-/7 )($( '
# $ # 7 )

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page48
57
47
47of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
' (+ 2 " " # 0 < B # #
# A ' % C
= * 2
" ( 7 " ?2"(7"@* # #
(/1.< =
&# # #
# # " * : * : * + * 2)
2 = A 2 " " #
' . * # 7
' 2 " " # # # *
. 3 * # 2 " " # # % . #
" * ( - * ) 1 # * ' > * 7 * ' - * " = *
' 2 " " # # " # '
I" = J # # # " # '
' .
M= # 3 N # 2 "/0< #
( 7 C ' # #
* ' . #
# # ( 7 2"(7"
* ' * (/1.< #
C ' C 2 " ( 7 " ' * (N(
# *

' (+ 87: 7 . * #
A > # ' B = A DH D
/# &#
# =
# &# ' # * 87:* # &# # #
* # # 87: 7 . = :
" # > *) # # 8 " #
0 ) = # 0 . /
> # ) 0
. = &# 0 < ) =
# # # * # /
6# * > # * 7 " # ' 8 : # ? - H
/# @* ( + , - = #
#

' () # 8 7 : # *1 ?87:@ ,B # N 2
2 87: + * 1 * # 87:
=
# # &#
87: * * # * * *
# * B * # #
&# 1 * 4 * B
2 * = B D #
* # D4 *
# = &# # . (
# # DH D4

' (# , - 8 + ) * 8 + )
2 8 # % # #
?" = 2 O 7 4* @ )#
# # =
# * * #
# 81* )81 =81 7
/ - # )81 * 3) =
# &# 7 7 (
( 7 &# = ) + 0 8 1 #
Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page49
58
48
48of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
2 + : ! * 2 0812+ #
* ) 081 ' = 2 # $
# # &# #
+ # * # = #
# # = # G
* > = 1
) * # *
# ' # * : . *
( ) * # # =
# #

' (# N 2 ) 2 )
+ 8 2 * # H 4
= 8 2 * 7
+ B + = ()% A # 7
, - E ) ) 7 +
#
= # % * *
# * * B * * * ' *
# # G B # #
.# . 0 . 8 2

$ % ' ( ' (# ("5+ ,B #


#

$ % ' ++ ' (' "3 ) 2 -


*
1 ) #

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
Caterbone
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Argument
Arguments
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page50
59
49
49of
of
of126
109
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Monday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
14,
15,2015
17, 2015
am
MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL: Modern torture and Control Mechan... http://www.riksavisen.no/microwave-mind-control-modern-torture-and-c...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page110
100
100
51 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

1 of 16 12/15/2015 8:21 AM
MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL: Modern torture and Control Mechan... http://www.riksavisen.no/microwave-mind-control-modern-torture-and-c...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page111
101
101
52 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

2 of 16 12/15/2015 8:21 AM
MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL: Modern torture and Control Mechan... http://www.riksavisen.no/microwave-mind-control-modern-torture-and-c...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page112
102
102
53 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

3 of 16 12/15/2015 8:21 AM
MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL: Modern torture and Control Mechan... http://www.riksavisen.no/microwave-mind-control-modern-torture-and-c...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page113
103
103
54 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

4 of 16 12/15/2015 8:21 AM
MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL: Modern torture and Control Mechan... http://www.riksavisen.no/microwave-mind-control-modern-torture-and-c...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Share 17 Like 17 Send Tweet

0 Comments Sort by

Add a comment...

Facebook Comments Plugin

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page114
104
104
55 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

5 of 16 12/15/2015 8:21 AM
Bipolar disorder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipolar_disorder
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Bipolar disorder
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bipolar disorder, also known as bipolar affective disorder or manic depression, is a mental disorder characterized by periods of elevated mood and periods
of depression.[1][2] The elevated mood is significant and is known as mania or hypomania depending on the severity or whether there is psychosis. During mania Bipolar disorder
an individual feels or acts abnormally happy, energetic, or irritable.[1] They often make poorly thought out decisions with little regard to the consequences. The
need for sleep is usually reduced.[2] During periods of depression there may be crying, poor eye contact with others, and a negative outlook on life.[1] The risk of
suicide among those with the disorder is high at greater than 6% over 20 years, while self harm occurs in 3040%.[1] Other mental health issues such as anxiety
disorder and substance use disorder are commonly associated.[1]

The cause is not clearly understood, but both genetic and environmental factors play a role.[1] Many genes of small effect contribute to risk.[1][3] Environmental
factors include long term stress and a history of childhood abuse.[1] It is divided into bipolar I disorder if there is at least one manic episode and bipolar II
disorder if there are at least one hypomanic episode and one major depressive episode. In those with less severe symptoms of a prolonged duration the condition
cyclothymic disorder may be present. If due to drugs or medical problems it is classified separately.[2] Other conditions that may present in a similar manner
include substance use disorder, personality disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and schizophrenia as well as a number of medical conditions.[1]

Treatment commonly includes psychotherapy and medications such as mood stabilizers or antipsychotics. Examples of mood stabilizers that are commonly used
include lithium and anticonvulsants. Treatment in hospital against a person's wishes may be required at times as people may be a risk to themselves or others yet
refuse treatment. Severe behavioral problems may be managed with short term benzodiazepines or antipsychotics. In periods of mania it is recommended that
antidepressants be stopped. If antidepressants are used for periods of depression they should be used with a mood stabilizer. Electroconvulsive therapy may be Bipolar disorder is characterized by transitions
helpful in those who do not respond to other treatments. If treatments are stopped it is recommended that this be done slowly. Many people have social, between depression and mania
financial, or work-related problems due to the disorder. These difficulties occur a quarter to a third of the time on average. The risk of death from natural causes
Classification and external resources
such as heart disease is twice that of the general population. This is due to poor lifestyle choices and the side effects from medications.[1]
Specialty Psychiatry
About 3% of people in the United States have bipolar disorder at some point in their life.[4] Lower rates of around 1% are found in other countries. The most
ICD-10 F31 (http://apps.who.int/classifications
common age at which symptoms begin is 25.[1] Rates appear to be similar in males as females.[5] The economic costs of the disorder has been estimated at $45
/icd10/browse/2015/en#/F31)
billion for the United States in 1991.[6] A large proportion of this was related to a higher number of missed work days, estimated at 50 per year.[6] People with
bipolar disorder often face problems with social stigma.[1] ICD-9-CM 296.0 (http://www.icd9data.com
/getICD9Code.ashx?icd9=296.0),
296.1 (http://www.icd9data.com
/getICD9Code.ashx?icd9=296.1),
Contents 296.4 (http://www.icd9data.com
/getICD9Code.ashx?icd9=296.4),
1 Signs and symptoms
296.5 (http://www.icd9data.com
1.1 Manic episodes
/getICD9Code.ashx?icd9=296.5),
1.2 Hypomanic episodes
296.6 (http://www.icd9data.com
1.3 Depressive episodes
1.4 Mixed affective episodes /getICD9Code.ashx?icd9=296.6),
1.5 Associated features 296.7 (http://www.icd9data.com
1.6 Comorbid conditions /getICD9Code.ashx?icd9=296.7),
2 Causes 296.8 (http://www.icd9data.com
2.1 Genetic /getICD9Code.ashx?icd9=296.8)
2.2 Physiological OMIM 125480 (http://omim.org/entry/125480)
2.3 Environmental
309200 (https://omim.org/entry
2.4 Neurological
/309200)
2.5 Neuroendocrinological
3 Prevention DiseasesDB 7812
4 Diagnosis (http://www.diseasesdatabase.com
4.1 Bipolar spectrum /ddb7812.htm)
4.2 Criteria and subtypes
MedlinePlus 000926 (http://www.nlm.nih.gov
4.3 Differential diagnosis
/medlineplus/ency/article/000926.htm)
5 Management
5.1 Psychosocial eMedicine med/229 (http://www.emedicine.com
5.2 Medication /med/topic229.htm)
5.3 Alternative medicine
Patient UK Bipolar disorder (http://patient.info
6 Prognosis
6.1 Functioning /doctor/bipolar-disorder)
6.2 Recovery and recurrence MeSH D001714 (https://www.nlm.nih.gov
6.3 Suicide /cgi/mesh/2015/MB_cgi?field=uid&
7 Epidemiology term=D001714)
8 History
9 Society and culture
10 Specific populations
10.1 Children
10.2 Elderly
11 See also
12 Notes
13 References
14 Further reading
15 External links

Signs and symptoms


Mania is the defining feature of bipolar disorder,[7] and can occur with different levels of severity. With milder levels of mania, known as hypomania, individuals appear energetic, excitable, and may be highly
productive.[8] As mania worsens, individuals begin to exhibit erratic and impulsive behavior, often making poor decisions due to unrealistic ideas about the future, and sleep very little.[8] At the most severe level,
manic individuals can experience very distorted beliefs about the world known as psychosis.[8] A depressive episode commonly follows an episode of mania.[8] The biological mechanisms responsible for switching
from a manic or hypomanic episode to a depressive episode or vice versa remain poorly understood.[9]

Manic episodes

Mania is a distinct period of at least one week of elevated or irritable mood, which can take the form of euphoria, and exhibit three or more of the following behaviors (four if irritable): speak in a rapid,
uninterruptible manner, are easily distracted, have racing thoughts, display an increase in goal-oriented activities or feel agitated, or exhibit behaviors characterized as impulsive or high-risk such as hypersexuality
or excessive money spending.[7] To meet the definition for a manic episode, these behaviors must impair the individual's ability to socialize or work.[7][8] If untreated, a manic episode usually lasts three to six
months.[10]

People with mania may also experience a decreased need for sleep, speak excessively in addition to speaking rapidly, and may have impaired judgment.[8][11] Manic individuals often have issues with substance
abuse due to a combination of thrill-seeking and poor judgment.[12] At more extreme levels, a person in a manic state can experience psychosis, or a break with reality, a state in which thinking is affected along
with mood.[8] They may feel out of control or unstoppable, or as if they have been "chosen" and are on a special mission, or have other grandiose or delusional ideas.[13] Approximately 50% of those with bipolar

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page115
105
105
56 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

1 of 8 12/15/2015 8:29 AM
Bipolar disorder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipolar_disorder
5100.51. Preservation of rights
disorder experience delusions or hallucinations.[14] This may lead to violent behaviors and hospitalization in an inpatient psychiatric hospital.[8][11] The severity of manic symptoms can be measured by rating scales
such as the Young Mania Rating Scale.[11][15]

The onset of a manic (or depressive) episode is often foreshadowed by sleep disturbances.[16] Mood changes, psychomotor and appetite changes, and an increase in anxiety can also occur up to three weeks before a
manic episode develops.[17]

Hypomanic episodes

Hypomania is a milder form of mania defined as at least four days of the same criteria as mania,[8] but does not cause a significant decrease in the individual's ability to socialize or work, lacks psychotic features
(i.e., delusions or hallucinations), and does not require psychiatric hospitalization.[7] Overall functioning may actually increase during episodes of hypomania and is thought to serve as a defense mechanism against
depression.[18] Hypomanic episodes rarely progress to true manic episodes.[18] Some hypomanic people show increased creativity[8] while others are irritable or demonstrate poor judgment. Hypomanic people
generally have increased energy and increased activity levels.

Hypomania may feel good to the person who experiences it.[8] Thus, even when family and friends recognize mood swings, the individual will often deny that anything is wrong.[19] What might be called a
"hypomanic event", if not accompanied by depressive episodes, is often not deemed as problematic, unless the mood changes are uncontrollable, volatile or mercurial.[18] Most commonly, symptoms continue for a
few weeks to a few months.[20]

Depressive episodes

Signs and symptoms of the depressive phase of bipolar disorder include persistent feelings of sadness, anxiety, guilt, anger, isolation, or hopelessness;[21] disturbances in sleep and appetite; fatigue and loss of
interest in usually enjoyable activities; problems concentrating; loneliness, self-loathing, apathy or indifference; depersonalization; loss of interest in sexual activity; shyness or social anxiety; irritability, chronic
pain (with or without a known cause); lack of motivation; and morbid suicidal thoughts.[21] In severe cases, the individual may become psychotic, a condition also known as severe bipolar depression with psychotic
features. These symptoms include delusions or, less commonly, hallucinations, which are usually frightening and/or intimidating. A major depressive episode persists for at least two weeks, and may continue for
over six months if left untreated.[22]

The earlier the age of onset, the more likely the first few episodes are to be depressive.[23] Because a bipolar diagnosis requires a manic or hypomanic episode, many patients are initially diagnosed and treated as
having major depression.[24]

Mixed affective episodes

In the context of bipolar disorder, a mixed state is a condition during which symptoms of both mania and depression occur at the same time.[25] Individuals experiencing a mixed state may have manic symptoms
such as grandiose thoughts while at the same time experiencing depressive symptoms such as excessive guilt or feeling suicidal.[25] Mixed states are considered to be high-risk for suicidal behavior since depressive
emotions such as hopelessness are often paired with mood swings or difficulties with impulse control.[25] Anxiety disorder occurs more frequently as a comorbidity in mixed bipolar episodes than in non mixed
bipolar depression or mania.[25] Substance abuse (including alcohol) also follows this trend.[25]

Associated features

Associated features are clinical phenomena that often accompany the disorder but are not part of the diagnostic criteria. In adults with the condition, bipolar disorder is often accompanied by changes in cognitive
processes and abilities. These include reduced attentional and executive capabilities and impaired memory. How the individual processes the world also depends on the phase of the disorder, with differential
characteristics between the manic, hypomanic and depressive states.[17] Some studies have found a significant association between bipolar disorder and creativity.[26] Those with bipolar disorder may have difficulty
in maintaining relationships.[27] There are several common childhood precursors seen in children who later receive a diagnosis of bipolar disorder; these disorders include mood abnormalities, full major depressive
episodes, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).[28]

Comorbid conditions

The diagnosis of bipolar disorder can be complicated by coexisting (comorbid) psychiatric conditions including the following: obsessive-compulsive disorder, substance abuse, eating disorders, attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder, social phobia, premenstrual syndrome (including premenstrual dysphoric disorder), or panic disorder.[12][14][21][29] A careful longitudinal analysis of symptoms and episodes, enriched if
possible by discussions with friends and family members, is crucial to establishing a treatment plan where these comorbidities exist.[30]

Causes
The causes of bipolar disorder likely vary between individuals and the exact mechanism underlying the disorder remains unclear.[31] Genetic influences are believed to account for 6080% of the risk of developing
the disorder indicating a strong hereditary component.[14] The overall heritability of the bipolar spectrum has been estimated at 0.71.[32] Twin studies have been limited by relatively small sample sizes but have
indicated a substantial genetic contribution, as well as environmental influence. For bipolar disorder type I, the (probandwise) concordance rates in modern studies have been consistently estimated at around 40% in
identical twins (same genes), compared to about 5% in fraternal twins.[7][33] A combination of bipolar I, II and cyclothymia produced concordance rates of 42% vs. 11%, with a relatively lower ratio for bipolar II
that likely reflects heterogeneity. There is overlap with unipolar depression and if this is also counted in the co-twin the concordance with bipolar disorder rises to 67% in monozygotic twins and 19% in
dizygotic.[34] The relatively low concordance between dizygotic twins brought up together suggests that shared family environmental effects are limited, although the ability to detect them has been limited by small
sample sizes.[32]

Genetic

Genetic studies have suggested that many chromosomal regions and candidate genes are related to bipolar disorder susceptibility with each gene exerting a mild to moderate effect.[14] The risk of bipolar disorder is
nearly ten-fold higher in first degree-relatives of those affected with bipolar disorder when compared to the general population; similarly, the risk of major depressive disorder is three times higher in relatives of
those with bipolar disorder when compared to the general population.[7]

Although the first genetic linkage finding for mania was in 1969,[35] the linkage studies have been inconsistent.[7] The largest and most recent genome-wide association study failed to find any particular locus that
exerts a large effect reinforcing the idea that no single gene is responsible for bipolar disorder in most cases.[36]

Findings point strongly to heterogeneity, with different genes being implicated in different families.[37] Robust and replicable genome-wide significant associations showed several common single nucleotide
polymorphisms, including variants within the genes CACNA1C, ODZ4, and NCAN.[14][36]

Advanced paternal age has been linked to a somewhat increased chance of bipolar disorder in offspring, consistent with a hypothesis of increased new genetic mutations.[38]

Physiological

Abnormalities in the structure and/or function of certain brain circuits could underlie bipolar. Meta-analyses of structural MRI studies in bipolar disorder report an increase in the volume of the lateral ventricles,
globus pallidus and increase in the rates of deep white matter hyperintensities.[39][40][41] Functional MRI findings suggest that abnormal modulation between ventral prefrontal and limbic regions, especially the
amygdala, are likely contribute to poor emotional regulation and mood symptoms.[42]

According to the "kindling" hypothesis, when people who are genetically predisposed toward bipolar disorder experience stressful events, the stress threshold at which mood changes occur becomes progressively
lower, until the episodes eventually start (and recur) spontaneously. There is evidence supporting an association between early-life stress and dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA axis)
leading to its over activation, which may play a role in the pathogenesis of bipolar disorder.[43][44]

Other brain components which have been proposed to play a role are the mitochondria[31] and a sodium ATPase pump.[45] Circadian rhythms and melatonin activity also seem to be altered.[46]

Environmental

Evidence suggests that environmental factors play a significant role in the development and course of bipolar disorder, and that individual psychosocial variables may interact with genetic dispositions.[47] There is
fairly consistent evidence from prospective studies that recent life events and interpersonal relationships contribute to the likelihood of onsets and recurrences of bipolar mood episodes, as they do for onsets and
recurrences of unipolar depression.[48] There have been repeated findings that 3050% of adults diagnosed with bipolar disorder report traumatic/abusive experiences in childhood, which is associated on average

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page116
106
106
57 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

2 of 8 12/15/2015 8:29 AM
Bipolar disorder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipolar_disorder
5100.51. Preservation of rights
with earlier onset, a higher rate of suicide attempts, and more co-occurring disorders such as PTSD.[49] The total number of reported stressful events in childhood
is higher in those with an adult diagnosis of bipolar spectrum disorder compared to those without, particularly events stemming from a harsh environment rather
than from the child's own behavior.[50]

Neurological

Less commonly bipolar disorder or a bipolar-like disorder may occur as a result of or in association with a neurological condition or injury. Such conditions and
injuries include (but are not limited to) stroke, traumatic brain injury, HIV infection, multiple sclerosis, porphyria, and rarely temporal lobe epilepsy.[51]

Neuroendocrinological

Dopamine, a known neurotransmitter responsible for mood cycling, has been shown to have increased transmission during the manic phase.[9][52] The dopamine
hypothesis states that the increase in dopamine results in secondary homeostatic down regulation of key systems and receptors such as an increase in dopamine Brain imaging studies have revealed differences in
mediated G protein-coupled receptors. This results in decreased dopamine transmission characteristic of the depressive phase.[9] The depressive phase ends with the volume of various brain regions between BD
homeostatic up regulation potentially restarting the cycle over again.[53] patients and healthy control subjects

Glutamate is significantly increased within the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during the manic phase of bipolar disorder, and returns to normal levels once the
phase is over.[54] The increase in GABA is possibly caused by a disturbance in early development causing a disturbance of cell migration and the formation of normal lamination, the layering of brain structures
commonly associated with the cerebral cortex.[55]

Prevention
Prevention of bipolar has focused on stress (such as childhood adversity or highly conflictual families) which, although not a diagnostically specific causal agent for bipolar, does place genetically and biologically
vulnerable individuals at risk for a more pernicious course of illness.[56] There has been debate regarding the causal relationship between usage of cannabis and bipolar disorder.[57]

Diagnosis
Bipolar disorder often goes unrecognized and is commonly diagnosed during adolescence or early adulthood.[58] The disorder can be difficult to distinguish from unipolar depression and the mean delay in
diagnosis is 510 years after symptoms begin.[59] Diagnosis of bipolar disorder takes several factors into account and considers the self-reported experiences of the symptomatic individual, behavior abnormalities
reported by family members, friends or co-workers, and observable signs of illness as assessed by a psychiatrist, nurse, social worker, clinical psychologist or other health professional. Assessment is usually done
on an outpatient basis; admission to an inpatient facility is considered if there is a risk to oneself or others. The most widely used criteria for diagnosing bipolar disorder are from the American Psychiatric
Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the current version being DSM-IV-TR, and the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related
Health Problems, currently the ICD-10. The latter criteria are typically used in Europe and other regions while the DSM criteria are used in the USA and other regions, as well as prevailing in research studies. The
DSM-V, published in 2013, included further and more accurate sub-typing.[60]

An initial assessment may include a physical exam by a physician. Although there are no biological tests that are diagnostic of bipolar disorder,[36] tests may be carried out to exclude medical illnesses with clinical
presentations similar to that of bipolar disorder such as hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, metabolic disturbance, a chronic disease, or an infection such as HIV or syphilis.[58] An EEG may be used to exclude a
seizure disorder such as epilepsy, and a CT scan of the head may be used to exclude brain lesions.[58] Investigations are not generally repeated for a relapse unless there is a specific medical indication.

Several rating scales for the screening and evaluation of bipolar disorder exist, such as the Bipolar spectrum diagnostic scale.[61] The use of evaluation scales can not substitute a full clinical interview but they serve
to systematize the recollection of symptoms.[61] On the other hand, instruments for the screening of bipolar disorder have low sensitivity and limited diagnostic validity.[61]

Bipolar spectrum

Bipolar spectrum disorders (BSD) include the following four disorders: bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, cyclothymic disorder, and bipolar disorder not otherwise specified.[58] These disorders typically involve
depressive symptoms or episodes that alternate with elevated mood states or with mixed episodes that feature symptoms of both depressive and elevated mood states.[62] The concept of the bipolar spectrum is
similar to that of Emil Kraepelin's original concept of manic depressive illness.[63]

Unipolar hypomania without accompanying depression has been noted in the medical literature.[64] There is speculation as to whether this condition may occur with greater frequency in the general, untreated
population; successful social function of these potentially high-achieving individuals may lead to being labeled as normal, rather than as individuals with substantial dysregulation.

Criteria and subtypes

There is no clear consensus as to how many types of bipolar disorder exist.[65] In DSM-IV-TR and ICD-10, bipolar disorder is conceptualized as a spectrum of disorders occurring on a continuum. The DSM-IV-TR
lists three specific subtypes and one for non-specified:[66][67]

Bipolar I disorder: At least one manic episode is necessary to make the diagnosis;[68] depressive episodes are common in bipolar disorder I, but are unnecessary for the diagnosis.[7]
Bipolar II disorder: No manic episodes, but one or more hypomanic episodes and one or more major depressive episode.[68] Hypomanic episodes do not go to the full extremes of mania (i.e., do not usually
cause severe social or occupational impairment, and are without psychosis), and this can make bipolar II more difficult to diagnose, since the hypomanic episodes may simply appear as a period of
successful high productivity and is reported less frequently than a distressing, crippling depression.
Cyclothymia: A history of hypomanic episodes with periods of depression that do not meet criteria for major depressive episodes.[69] There is a low-grade cycling of mood which appears to the observer as
a personality trait and interferes with functioning.
Bipolar disorder NOS (not otherwise specified): This is a catchall category, diagnosed when the disorder does not fall within a specific subtype.[70] Bipolar NOS can still significantly impair and adversely
affect the quality of life of the patient.

The bipolar I and II categories have specifiers that indicate the presentation and course of the disorder. For example, the "with full interepisode recovery" specifier applies if there was full remission between the two
most recent episodes.[71]

Rapid cycling

Most people who meet criteria for bipolar disorder experience a number of episodes, on average 0.4 to 0.7 per year, lasting three to six months.[72] Rapid cycling, however, is a course specifier that may be applied
to any of the above subtypes. It is defined as having four or more mood disturbance episodes within a one-year span and is found in a significant proportion of individuals with bipolar disorder.[21] These episodes
are separated from each other by a remission (partial or full) for at least two months or a switch in mood polarity (i.e., from a depressive episode to a manic episode or vice versa).[7] The definition of rapid cycling
most frequently cited in the literature (including the DSM) is that of Dunner and Fieve: at least four major depressive, manic, hypomanic or mixed episodes are required to have occurred during a 12-month
period.[73] Ultra-rapid (days) and ultra-ultra rapid or ultradian (within a day) cycling have also been described.[74] The literature examining the pharmacological treatment of rapid cycling is sparse and there is no
clear consensus with respect to its optimal pharmacological management.[75]

Differential diagnosis

There are several other mental disorders with symptoms similar to those seen in bipolar disorder. These disorders include schizophrenia, major depressive disorder,[76] attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
(ADHD), and certain personality disorders, such as borderline personality disorder.[77][78][79]

It has been noted that the bipolar disorder diagnosis is officially characterized in historical terms such that, technically, anyone with a history of (hypo)mania and depression has bipolar disorder whatever their
current or future functioning and vulnerability. This has been described as "an ethical and methodological issue", as it means no one can be considered as being recovered (only "in remission") from bipolar disorder
according to the official criteria. This is considered especially problematic given that brief hypomanic episodes are widespread among people generally and not necessarily associated with dysfunction.[17]

Management
There are a number of pharmacological and psychotherapeutic techniques used to treat bipolar disorder. Individuals may use self-help and pursue recovery.

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page117
107
107
58 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

3 of 8 12/15/2015 8:29 AM
Bipolar disorder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipolar_disorder
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Hospitalization may be required especially with the manic episodes present in bipolar I. This can be voluntary or (if mental health legislation allows and varying state-to-state regulations in the USA) involuntary
(called civil or involuntary commitment). Long-term inpatient stays are now less common due to deinstitutionalization, although these can still occur.[80] Following (or in lieu of) a hospital admission, support
services available can include drop-in centers, visits from members of a community mental health team or an Assertive Community Treatment team, supported employment and patient-led support groups, intensive
outpatient programs. These are sometimes referred to as partial-inpatient programs.[81]

Psychosocial

Psychotherapy is aimed at alleviating core symptoms, recognizing episode triggers, reducing negative expressed emotion in relationships, recognizing prodromal symptoms before full-blown recurrence, and,
practicing the factors that lead to maintenance of remission.[82][83][84] Cognitive behavioral therapy, family-focused therapy, and psychoeducation have the most evidence for efficacy in regard to relapse prevention,
while interpersonal and social rhythm therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy appear the most effective in regard to residual depressive symptoms. Most studies have been based only on bipolar I, however, and
treatment during the acute phase can be a particular challenge.[85] Some clinicians emphasize the need to talk with individuals experiencing mania, to develop a therapeutic alliance in support of recovery.[86]

Medication

A number of medications are used to treat bipolar disorder.[48] The medication with the best evidence is lithium, which is effective in treating acute manic
episodes and preventing relapses; lithium is also an effective treatment for bipolar depression.[87] Lithium reduces the risk of suicide, self-harm, and death in
people with bipolar disorder.[88] It is unclear if ketamine is useful in bipolar as of 2015.[89]

Four anticonvulsants are used in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Carbamazepine effectively treats manic episodes, with some evidence it has greater benefit in
rapid-cycling bipolar disorder, or those with more psychotic symptoms or a more schizoaffective clinical picture. It is less effective in preventing relapse than
lithium or valproate.[90][91] Carbamazepine became a popular treatment option for bipolar in the late 1980s and early 1990s, but was displaced by sodium
valproate in the 1990s. Since then, valproate has become a commonly prescribed treatment, and is effective in treating manic episodes.[92] Lamotrigine has some
efficacy in treating bipolar depression, and this benefit is greatest in more severe depression.[93] It has also been shown to have some benefit in preventing further
episodes, though there are concerns about the studies done, and is of no benefit in rapid cycling disorder.[94] The effectiveness of topiramate is unknown.[95]
Depending on the severity of the case, anticonvulsants may be used in combination with lithium or on their own.[96]

Antipsychotic medications are effective for short-term treatment of bipolar manic episodes and appear to be superior to lithium and anticonvulsants for this
purpose.[48] However, other medications such as lithium are preferred for long-term use.[48] Olanzapine is effective in preventing relapses, although the evidence Lithium carbonate is one of many treatments for
bipolar disorder.
is not as solid as for lithium.[97] Antidepressants have not been found to be of any benefit over that found with mood stabilizers.[98]

Short courses of benzodiazepines may be used in addition to other medications until mood stabilizing become effective.[99]

Alternative medicine

There is some evidence that the addition of omega 3 fatty acids may have beneficial effects on depressive symptoms, although studies have been scarce and of variable quality.[100]

Prognosis
For many individuals with bipolar disorder a good prognosis results from good treatment, which, in turn, results from an accurate diagnosis. Of the various forms of bipolar disorder, rapid cycling bipolar disorder is
associated with the worst prognosis.[21] Because bipolar disorder can have a high rate of both under-diagnosis and misdiagnosis,[23] it is often difficult for individuals with the condition to receive timely and
competent treatment.

Bipolar disorder can be a severely disabling medical condition. However, many individuals with bipolar disorder can live full and satisfying lives. Quite often, medication is needed to enable this. Persons with
bipolar disorder may have periods of normal or near normal functioning between episodes.[101]

Functioning

Functioning varies over time along a spectrum from good to fair to poor. During periods of major depression or mania (in BPI), functioning was on average poor, with depression being more persistently associated
with disability than mania. Functioning between episodes was on average good more or less normal. Subthreshold symptoms were generally still substantially impairing, however, except for hypomania (below or
above threshold) which was associated with improved functioning.[102]

Recovery and recurrence

A naturalistic study from first admission for mania or mixed episode (representing the hospitalized and therefore most severe cases) found that 50% achieved syndromal recovery (no longer meeting criteria for the
diagnosis) within six weeks and 98% within two years. Within two years, 72% achieved symptomatic recovery (no symptoms at all) and 43% achieved functional recovery (regaining of prior occupational and
residential status). However, 40% went on to experience a new episode of mania or depression within 2 years of syndromal recovery, and 19% switched phases without recovery.[103]

Symptoms preceding a relapse (prodromal), specially those related to mania, can be reliably identified by people with bipolar disorder.[104] There have been intents to teach patients coping strategies when noticing
such symptoms with encouraging results.[105]

Suicide

Bipolar disorder can cause suicidal ideation that leads to suicidal attempts. Individuals whose bipolar disorder begins with a depressive or mixed affective episode seem to have a poorer prognosis and an increased
risk of suicide.[76] One out of two people with bipolar disorder attempt suicide at least once during their lifetime and many attempts are successfully completed.[14] The annual average suicide rate is 0.4%, which is
1020 times that of the general population.[106] The standardized mortality ratio from suicide in bipolar disorder is between 18 and 25.[107] The lifetime risk of suicide has been estimated to be as high as 20% in
those with bipolar disorder.[7]

Epidemiology
Bipolar disorder is the sixth leading cause of disability worldwide and has a lifetime prevalence of about 3% in the general population.[4][108] However, a
reanalysis of data from the National Epidemiological Catchment Area survey in the United States suggested that 0.8% of the population experience a manic
episode at least once (the diagnostic threshold for bipolar I) and a further 0.5% have a hypomanic episode (the diagnostic threshold for bipolar II or cyclothymia).
Including sub-threshold diagnostic criteria, such as one or two symptoms over a short time-period, an additional 5.1% of the population, adding up to a total of
6.4%, were classified as having a bipolar spectrum disorder.[109] A more recent analysis of data from a second US National Comorbidity Survey found that 1%
met lifetime prevalence criteria for bipolar I, 1.1% for bipolar II, and 2.4% for subthreshold symptoms.[110]

There are conceptual and methodological limitations and variations in the findings. Prevalence studies of bipolar disorder are typically carried out by lay
Burden of bipolar disorder around the world:
interviewers who follow fully structured/fixed interview schemes; responses to single items from such interviews may suffer limited validity. In addition,
disability-adjusted life years per
diagnoses (and therefore estimates of prevalence) vary depending on whether a categorical or spectrum approach is used. This consideration has led to concerns
100,000 inhabitants in 2004.
about the potential for both underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis.[111]
<180 205-210
The incidence of bipolar disorder is similar in men and women[112] as well as across different cultures and ethnic groups. A 2000 study by the World Health 180-185 210-215
Organization found that prevalence and incidence of bipolar disorder are very similar across the world. Age-standardized prevalence per 100,000 ranged from
185-190 215-220
421.0 in South Asia to 481.7 in Africa and Europe for men and from 450.3 in Africa and Europe to 491.6 in Oceania for women. However, severity may differ
widely across the globe. Disability-adjusted life year rates, for example, appear to be higher in developing countries, where medical coverage may be poorer and 190-195 220-225
medication less available.[113] Within the United States, Asian Americans have significantly lower rates than their African and European American 195-200 225-230
counterparts.[114] 200-205 >230

Late adolescence and early adulthood are peak years for the onset of bipolar disorder.[115][116] One study also found that in 10% of bipolar cases, the onset of
mania had happened after the patient had turned 50.[117]

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page118
108
108
59 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

4 of 8 12/15/2015 8:29 AM
Bipolar disorder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipolar_disorder
5100.51. Preservation of rights
History
Variations in moods and energy levels have been observed as part of the human experience since throughout history. The words "melancholia" (an old word for depression)
and "mania" originated in Ancient Greek. The word melancholia is derived from melas/, meaning "black", and chole/, meaning "bile" or "gall",[118] indicative of
the term's origins in pre-Hippocratic humoral theories. Within the humoral theories, mania was viewed as arising from an excess of yellow bile, or a mixture of black and
yellow bile. The linguistic origins of mania, however, are not so clear-cut. Several etymologies are proposed by the Roman physician Caelius Aurelianus, including the
Greek word ania, meaning "to produce great mental anguish", and manos, meaning "relaxed" or "loose", which would contextually approximate to an excessive relaxing of
the mind or soul.[119] There are at least five other candidates, and part of the confusion surrounding the exact etymology of the word mania is its varied usage in the
pre-Hippocratic poetry and mythologies.[119]

In the early 1800s, French psychiatrist Jean-tienne Dominique Esquirol's lypemania, one of his affective monomanias, was the first elaboration on what was to become
modern depression.[120] The basis of the current conceptualisation of manicdepressive illness can be traced back to the 1850s; on January 31, 1854, Jules Baillarger
described to the French Imperial Academy of Medicine a biphasic mental illness causing recurrent oscillations between mania and depression, which he termed folie
double forme ("dual-form insanity").[121] Two weeks later, on February 14, 1854, Jean-Pierre Falret presented a description to the Academy on what was essentially the
same disorder, and designated folie circulaire ("circular insanity") by him.[122]

These concepts were developed by the German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin (18561926), who, using Kahlbaum's concept of cyclothymia,[123] categorized and studied the
natural course of untreated bipolar patients. He coined the term manic depressive psychosis, after noting that periods of acute illness, manic or depressive, were generally
punctuated by relatively symptom-free intervals where the patient was able to function normally.[124]

German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin The term "manicdepressive reaction" appeared in the first American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic Manual in 1952, influenced by the legacy of Adolf Meyer.[125]
first distinguished between manic Subclassifying this into 'unipolar' and 'bipolar' disorder was first proposed by German psychiatrists Karl Kleist and Karl Leonhard in the 1950s and, since the DSM-III,
depressive illness and "dementia Major Depressive Disorder has been regarded as a separate condition to Bipolar Disorder. Subtypes of 'Bipolar II' and 'rapid cycling' have been included since the DSM-IV,
praecox" (now known as based on work from the 1970s by David L. Dunner, Elliot S. Gershon, Frederick K. Goodwin, Ronald R. Fieve and Joseph L. Fleiss.[126][127][128]
schizophrenia) in the late 19th century

Society and culture


There are widespread problems with social stigma, stereotypes, and prejudice against individuals with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder.[129]

Kay Redfield Jamison, a clinical psychologist and Professor of Psychiatry at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, profiled her own bipolar disorder in her
memoir An Unquiet Mind (1995).[130] In his autobiography Manicdotes: There's Madness in His Method (2008) Chris Joseph describes his struggle between the creative
dynamism which allowed the creation of his multimillion-pound advertising agency Hook Advertising, and the money-squandering dark despair of his bipolar illness.[131]

Several dramatic works have portrayed characters with traits suggestive of the diagnosis that has been the subject of discussion by psychiatrists and film experts alike. A
notable example is Mr. Jones (1993), in which Mr. Jones (Richard Gere) swings from a manic episode into a depressive phase and back again, spending time in a psychiatric
hospital and displaying many of the features of the syndrome.[132] In The Mosquito Coast (1986), Allie Fox (Harrison Ford) displays some features including recklessness,
grandiosity, increased goal-directed activity and mood lability, as well as some paranoia.[133] Psychiatrists have suggested that Willy Loman, the main character in Arthur
Miller's classic play Death of a Salesman, suffers from bipolar disorder,[134] though that specific term for the condition did not exist when the play was written.

TV specials, for example the BBC's Stephen Fry: The Secret Life of the Manic Depressive,[135] MTV's True Life: I'm Bipolar, talk shows, and public radio shows, and the
greater willingness of public figures to discuss their own bipolar disorder, have focused on psychiatric conditions, thereby, raising public awareness.

On April 7, 2009, the nighttime drama 90210 on the CW network, aired a special episode where the character Silver was diagnosed with bipolar disorder.[136] Stacey Slater,
a character from the BBC soap EastEnders, has been diagnosed with the disorder. The storyline was developed as part of the BBC's Headroom campaign.[137] The Channel 4
Singer Rosemary Clooney's public
soap Brookside had earlier featured a story about bipolar disorder when the character Jimmy Corkhill was diagnosed with the condition.[138] 2011 Showtime's political
revelation of bipolar disorder in 1977
thriller drama Homeland protagonist Carrie Mathison is bipolar, which she has kept secret since her school days.[139] In April 2014, ABC premiered a medical drama, Black made her an early celebrity
Box, in which the main character, a world-renowned neuroscientist, is bipolar.[140] spokeswoman for mental illness

Specific populations
Children

In the 1920s, Emil Kraepelin noted that manic episodes are rare before puberty.[141] In general, bipolar disorder in children was not recognized in the first half of
the twentieth century. This issue diminished with an increased following of the DSM criteria in the last part of the twentieth century.[141][142]

While in adults the course of bipolar disorder is characterized by discrete episodes of depression and mania with no clear symptomatology between them, in
children and adolescents very fast mood changes or even chronic symptoms are the norm.[143] Pediatric bipolar disorder is commonly characterized by outbursts
of anger, irritability and psychosis, rather than euphoric mania, which is more likely to be seen in adults.[141][143] Early onset bipolar disorder is more likely to
manifest as depression rather than mania or hypomania.[144]

The diagnosis of childhood bipolar disorder is controversial,[143] although it is not under discussion that the typical symptoms of bipolar disorder have negative
consequences for minors suffering them.[141] The debate is mainly centered on whether what is called bipolar disorder in children refers to the same disorder as
when diagnosing adults,[141] and the related question of whether the criteria for diagnosis for adults are useful and accurate when applied to children.[143]
Regarding diagnosis of children, some experts recommend following the DSM criteria.[143] Others believe that these criteria do not correctly separate children
with bipolar disorder from other problems such as ADHD, and emphasize fast mood cycles.[143] Still others argue that what accurately differentiates children with Lithium is the only medication approved by the
bipolar disorder is irritability.[143] The practice parameters of the AACAP encourage the first strategy.[141][143] American children and adolescents diagnosed with FDA for treating mania in children.
bipolar disorder in community hospitals increased 4-fold reaching rates of up to 40% in 10 years around the beginning of the 21st century, while in outpatient
clinics it doubled reaching 6%.[143] Studies using DSM criteria show that up to 1% of youth may have bipolar disorder.[141]

Treatment involves medication and psychotherapy.[143] Drug prescription usually consists in mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics.[143] Among the former, lithium is the only compound approved by the
FDA for children.[141] Psychological treatment combines normally education on the disease, group therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy.[143] Chronic medication is often needed.[143]

Current research directions for bipolar disorder in children include optimizing treatments, increasing the knowledge of the genetic and neurobiological basis of the pediatric disorder and improving diagnostic
criteria.[143] Some treatment research suggests that psychosocial interventions that involve the family, psychoeducation, and skills building (through therapies such as CBT, DBT, and IPSRT) can benefit in a
pharmocotherapy.[145] Unfortunately, the literature and research on the effects of psychosocial therapy on BPSD is scarce, making it difficult to determine the efficacy of various therapies.[145] The DSM-V has
proposed a new diagnosis which is considered to cover some presentations currently thought of as childhood-onset bipolar.[146]

Elderly

There is a relative lack of knowledge about bipolar disorder in late life. There is evidence that it becomes less prevalent with age but nevertheless accounts for a similar percentage of psychiatric admissions; that
older bipolar patients had first experienced symptoms at a later age; that later onset of mania is associated with more neurologic impairment; that substance abuse is considerably less common in older groups; and
that there is probably a greater degree of variation in presentation and course, for instance individuals may develop new-onset mania associated with vascular changes, or become manic only after recurrent
depressive episodes, or may have been diagnosed with bipolar disorder at an early age and still meet criteria. There is also some weak and not conclusive evidence that mania is less intense and there is a higher
prevalence of mixed episodes, although there may be a reduced response to treatment. Overall, there are likely more similarities than differences from younger adults.[147][148] In the elderly, recognition and
treatment of bipolar disorder may be complicated by the presence of dementia or the side effects of medications being taken for other conditions.[149]

See also
Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page119
109
109
60 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

5 of 8 12/15/2015 8:29 AM
Bipolar disorder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipolar_disorder
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Bipolar disorders research
Bipolar Disorders (journal)

Notes
1. Anderson, IM; Haddad, PM; Scott, J (Dec 27, 2012). "Bipolar disorder.". BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 345: 37. Segurado R, Detera-Wadleigh SD, Levinson DF, Lewis CM, Gill M, Nurnberger JI, Craddock N, DePaulo
e8508. doi:10.1136/bmj.e8508. PMID 23271744. JR, Baron M, Gershon ES, Ekholm J, Cichon S, Turecki G, Claes S, Kelsoe JR, Schofield PR, Badenhop
2. American Psychiatry Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). RF, Morissette J, Coon H, Blackwood D, McInnes LA, Foroud T, Edenberg HJ, Reich T, Rice JP, Goate A,
Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing. pp. 123154. ISBN 0890425558. McInnis MG, McMahon FJ, Badner JA, Goldin LR, Bennett P, Willour VL, Zandi PP, Liu J, Gilliam C, Juo
3. Goodwin, Guy M. "Bipolar disorder". Medicine 40 (11): 596598. doi:10.1016/j.mpmed.2012.08.011. SH, Berrettini WH, Yoshikawa T, Peltonen L, Lnnqvist J, Nthen MM, Schumacher J, Windemuth C,
4. Schmitt A, Malchow B, Hasan A, Falkai P (February 2014). "The impact of environmental factors in severe Rietschel M, Propping P, Maier W, Alda M, Grof P, Rouleau GA, Del-Favero J, Van Broeckhoven C,
psychiatric disorders". Front Neurosci 8 (19). doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00019. PMC 3920481. Mendlewicz J, Adolfsson R, Spence MA, Luebbert H, Adams LJ, Donald JA, Mitchell PB, Barden N, Shink
PMID 24574956. E, Byerley W, Muir W, Visscher PM, Macgregor S, Gurling H, Kalsi G, McQuillin A, Escamilla MA, Reus
5. Diflorio, A; Jones, I (2010). "Is sex important? Gender differences in bipolar disorder.". International VI, Leon P, Freimer NB, Ewald H, Kruse TA, Mors O, Radhakrishna U, Blouin JL, Antonarakis SE, Akarsu
review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England) 22 (5): 43752. doi:10.3109/09540261.2010.514601. N (2003). "Genome Scan Meta-Analysis of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder, Part III: Bipolar Disorder".
PMID 21047158. The American Journal of Human Genetics 73 (1): 4962. doi:10.1086/376547. PMC 1180589.
6. Hirschfeld, RM; Vornik, LA (Jun 2005). "Bipolar disordercosts and comorbidity.". The American journal PMID 12802785.
of managed care 11 (3 Suppl): S8590. PMID 16097719. 38. Frans EM, Sandin S, Reichenberg A, Lichtenstein P, Lngstrm N, Hultman CM (2008). "Advancing
7. Barnett JH, Smoller JW (2009). "The genetics of bipolar disorder". Neuroscience 164 (1): 33143. Paternal Age and Bipolar Disorder". Archives of General Psychiatry 65 (9): 10341040.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.080. PMC 3637882. PMID 19358880. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.9.1034. PMID 18762589.
8. Beentjes TA, Goossens PJ, Poslawsky IE (October 2012). "Caregiver burden in bipolar hypomania and 39. Kempton MJ, Geddes JR, Ettinger U, Williams SC, Grasby PM (2008). "Meta-analysis, Database, and
mania: a systematic review". Perspect Psychiatr Care 48 (4): 18797. Meta-regression of 98 Structural Imaging Studies in Bipolar Disorder". Archives of General Psychiatry 65
doi:10.1111/j.1744-6163.2012.00328.x. PMID 23005586. (9): 10171032. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.9.1017. PMID 18762588.
9. Salvadore G, Quiroz JA, Machado-Vieira R, Henter ID, Manji HK, Zarate CA (November 2010). "The 40. Arnone D, Cavanagh J, Gerber D, Lawrie SM, Ebmeier KP, McIntosh AM (2009). "Magnetic resonance
neurobiology of the switch process in bipolar disorder: a review". J Clin Psychiatry 71 (11): 14881501. imaging studies in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: Meta-analysis". The British Journal of Psychiatry
doi:10.4088/JCP.09r05259gre. PMC 3000635. PMID 20492846. 195 (3): 194201. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059717. PMID 19721106.
10. Titmarsh S (MayJune 2013). "Characteristics and duration of mania: implications for continuation 41. "Bipolar MRI Database". Bipolar Disorder Neuroimaging Database (BiND).
treatment". Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry 17 (3): 267. doi:10.1002/pnp.283. 42. Strakowski SM, Adler CM, Almeida J, Altshuler LL, Blumberg HP, Chang KD, DelBello MP, Frangou S,
11. Tarr GP, Glue P, Herbison P (November 2011). "Comparative efficacy and acceptability of mood stabilizer McIntosh A, Phillips ML, Sussman JE, Townsend JD (2012). "The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar
and second generation antipsychotic monotherapy for acute maniaa systematic review and disorder: A consensus model". Bipolar Disorders 14 (4): 313325. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01022.x.
meta-analysis". J Affect Disord 134 (13): 149. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.11.009. PMID 21145595. PMID 22631617.
12. Post RM, Kalivas P (March 2013). "Bipolar disorder and substance misuse: pathological and therapeutic 43. Bender RE, Alloy LB (April 2011). "Life stress and kindling in bipolar disorder: review of the evidence and
implications of their comorbidity and cross-sensitisation". Br J Psychiatry 202 (3): 1726. integration with emerging biopsychosocial theories". Clin Psychol Rev 31 (3): 38398.
doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.112.116855. PMID 23457180. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.01.004. PMC 3072804. PMID 21334286.
13. Knowles R, McCarthy-Jones S, Rowse G (June 2011). "Grandiose delusions: a review and theoretical 44. Lee HJ, Son GH, Geum D (September 2013). "Circadian Rhythm Hypotheses of Mixed Features,
integration of cognitive and affective perspectives". Clin Psychol Rev 31 (4): 68496. Antidepressant Treatment Resistance, and Manic Switching in Bipolar Disorder". Psychiatry Investig 10
doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.02.009. PMID 21482326. (3): 22532. doi:10.4306/pi.2013.10.3.225. PMC 3843013. PMID 24302944.
14. Kerner B (February 2014). "Genetics of bipolar disorder". Appl Clin Genet 7: 3342. 45. Brown & Basso 2004, p. 16.
doi:10.2147/tacg.s39297. PMC 3966627. PMID 24683306. 46. Dallaspezia S, Benedetti F (December 2009). "Melatonin, circadian rhythms, and the clock genes in bipolar
15. Furukawa TA (2010). "Assessment of mood: Guides for clinicians". Journal of Psychosomatic Research 68 disorder". Curr Psychiatry Rep 11 (6): 48893. doi:10.1007/s11920-009-0074-1. PMID 19909672.
(6): 581589. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.05.003. PMID 20488276. 47. Serretti A, Mandelli L (2008). "The genetics of bipolar disorder: Genome 'hot regions,' genes, new potential
16. McKenna BS, Eyler LT (November 2012). "Overlapping prefrontal systems involved in cognitive and candidates and future directions". Molecular Psychiatry 13 (8): 742771. doi:10.1038/mp.2008.29.
emotional processing in euthymic bipolar disorder and following sleep deprivation: a review of functional PMID 18332878.
neuroimaging studies". Clin Psychol Rev 32 (7): 65063. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.07.003. PMC 3922056. 48. Geddes JR, Miklowitz DJ (May 11, 2013). "Treatment of bipolar disorder". Lancet 381 (9878): 167282.
PMID 22926687. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60857-0. PMID 23663953.
17. Mansell W, Pedley R (Mar 2008). "The ascent into mania: a review of psychological processes associated 49. Brietzke E, Kauer Sant'anna M, Jackowski A, Grassi-Oliveira R, Bucker J, Zugman A, Mansur RB, Bressan
with the development of manic symptoms.". Clinical Psychology Review 28 (3): 494520. RA (December 2012). "Impact of childhood stress on psychopathology" (PDF). Rev Bras Psiquiatr 34 (4):
doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2007.07.010. PMID 17825463. 4808. doi:10.1016/j.rbp.2012.04.009. PMID 23429820.
18. Bowins B (2007). "Cognitive regulatory control therapies". Am J Psychother 67 (3): 21536. 50. Miklowitz DJ, Chang KD (2008). "Prevention of bipolar disorder in at-risk children: Theoretical
PMID 24236353. assumptions and empirical foundations". Development and Psychopathology 20 (3): 881897.
19. "Bipolar Disorder: NIH Publication No. 95-3679". U.S. National Institutes of Health. September 1995. doi:10.1017/S0954579408000424. PMC 2504732. PMID 18606036.
Archived from the original on 2008-04-29. 51. Murray ED, Buttner N, Price BH. (2012) Depression and Psychosis in Neurological Practice. In: Neurology
20. "Bipolar II Disorder Symptoms and Signs". Web M.D. Retrieved 2010-12-06. in Clinical Practice, 6th Edition. Bradley WG, Daroff RB, Fenichel GM, Jankovic J (eds.) Butterworth
21. Muneer A (June 2013). "Treatment of the depressive phase of bipolar affective disorder: a review". J Pak Heinemann. April 12, 2012. ISBN 1437704344 | ISBN 978-1437704341
Med Assoc 63 (6): 7639. PMID 23901682. 52. Lahera G, Freund N, Siz-Ruiz J (JanuaryMarch 2013). "Salience and dysregulation of the dopaminergic
22. "APA Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: Comprehensive Guidelines and system" (PDF). Rev Psquiatr Salud Ment 6 (1): 4551. doi:10.1016/j.rpsm.2012.05.003. PMID 23084802.
Guideline Watches" 1. 2006. doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890423363.50051. ISBN 978-0-89042-336-3. 53. Berk M, Dodd S, Kauer-Sant'anna M, Malhi GS, Bourin M, Kapczinski F, Norman T (2007). "Dopamine
|chapter= ignored (help) dysregulation syndrome: implications for a dopamine hypothesis of bipolar disorder". Acta Psychiatr
23. Bowden CL (January 2001). "Strategies to reduce misdiagnosis of bipolar depression". Psychiatr Serv 52 Scanda Suppl 116 (Supplement s434): 4149. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01058.x. PMID 17688462.
(1): 515. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.1.51. PMID 11141528. 54. Michael N, Erfurth A, Ohrmann P, Gssling M, Arolt V, Heindel W, Pfleiderer B (2003). "Acute mania is
24. Muzina DJ, Kemp DE, McIntyre RS (OctoberDecember 2007). "Differentiating bipolar disorders from accompanied by elevated glutamate/glutamine levels within the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex".
major depressive disorders: treatment implications". Ann Clin Psychiatry 19 (4): 30512. Psychopharmacology 168 (3): 344346. doi:10.1007/s00213-003-1440-z. PMID 12684737.
doi:10.1080/10401230701653591. PMID 18058287. 55. Benes FM, Berretta S (2001). "GABAergic interneurons: implications for understanding schizophrenia and
25. Swann AC, Lafer B, Perugi G, Frye MA, Bauer M, Bahk WM, Scott J, Ha K, Suppes T (January 2013). bipolar disorder". Neuropsychopharmacology 25 (1): 127. doi:10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00225-1.
"Bipolar mixed states: an international society for bipolar disorders task force report of symptom structure, PMID 11377916.
course of illness, and diagnosis". Am J Psychiatry 170 (1): 3142. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12030301. 56. Miklowitz DJ, Chang KD (Summer 2008). "Prevention of bipolar disorder in at-risk children: theoretical
PMID 23223893. assumptions and empirical foundations.". Development and Psychopathology 20 (3): 88197.
26. Srivastava S, Ketter TA (December 2010). "The link between bipolar disorders and creativity: evidence doi:10.1017/s0954579408000424. PMC 2504732. PMID 18606036.
from personality and temperament studies.". Current psychiatry reports 12 (6): 52230. 57. Khan MA, Akella S (December 2009). "Cannabis-Induced Bipolar Disorder with Psychotic Features: A
doi:10.1007/s11920-010-0159-x. PMID 20936438. Case Report". Psychiatry (Edgmont) 6 (12): 448. PMC 2811144. PMID 20104292.
27. Goodwin & Jamison 2007, p. 338. 58. Price AL, Marzani-Nissen GR (March 2012). "Bipolar disorders: a review". Am Fam Physician 85 (5):
28. Reinhardt MC, Reinhardt CA (MarchApril 2013). "Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, comorbidities, 48393. PMID 22534227.
and risk situations". J Pediatr (Rio J) 89 (2): 12430. doi:10.1016/j.jped.2013.03.015. PMID 23642421. 59. Phillips ML, Kupfer DJ (May 2013). "Bipolar disorder diagnosis: challenges and future directions". Lancet
29. Cirillo PC, Passos RB, Bevilaqua MC, Lpez JR, Nardi AE (December 2012). "Bipolar disorder and 381 (9878): 166371. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60989-7. PMID 23663952.
Premenstrual Syndrome or Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder comorbidity: a systematic review". Rev Bras 60. Perugi, G.; Ghaemi, S. N.; Akiskal, H. (2006). "Bipolar Psychopharmacotherapy": 193.
Psiquiatr 34 (4): 46779. doi:10.1016/j.rbp.2012.04.010. PMID 23429819. doi:10.1002/0470017953.ch11. ISBN 9780470017951. |chapter= ignored (help)
30. Sagman D and Tohen M (2009). "Comorbidity in Bipolar Disorder: The Complexity of Diagnosis and 61. Picardi A (2009). "Rating scales in bipolar disorder". Current Opinion in Psychiatry 22 (1): 4249.
Treatment". Psychiatric Times. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e328315a4d2. PMID 19122534.
31. Nierenberg AA, Kansky C, Brennan BP, Shelton RC, Perlis R, Iosifescu DV (January 2013). 62. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (Text Revision). American Psychiatric
"Mitochondrial modulators for bipolar disorder: a pathophysiologically informed paradigm for new drug Association. p. 2000.
development". Aust N Z J Psychiatry 47 (1): 2642. doi:10.1177/0004867412449303. PMID 22711881. 63. Korn ML. "Across the Bipolar Spectrum: From Practice to Research". Medscape.
32. Edvardsen J, Torgersen S, Rysamb E, Lygren S, Skre I, Onstad S, Oien PA (2008). "Heritability of bipolar 64. Beesdo K, Hfler M, Leibenluft E, Lieb R, Bauer M, Pfennig A (September 2009). "Mood episodes and
spectrum disorders. Unity or heterogeneity?". Journal of Affective Disorders 106 (3): 229240. mood disorders: patterns of incidence and conversion in the first three decades of life". Bipolar Disord 11
doi:10.1016/j.jad.2007.07.001. PMID 17692389. (6): 63749. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00738.x. PMC 2796427. PMID 19689506.
33. Kiesepp T, Partonen T, Haukka J, Kaprio J, Lnnqvist J (2004). "High Concordance of Bipolar I Disorder 65. Akiskal HS, Benazzi F (2006). "The DSM-IV and ICD-10 categories of recurrent [major] depressive and
in a Nationwide Sample of Twins". American Journal of Psychiatry 161 (10): 18141821. bipolar II disorders: Evidence that they lie on a dimensional spectrum". Journal of Affective Disorders 92
doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.10.1814. PMID 15465978. (1): 4554. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2005.12.035. PMID 16488021.
34. McGuffin P, Rijsdijk F, Andrew M, Sham P, Katz R, Cardno A (2003). "The Heritability of Bipolar 66. DSM-IV 2000.
Affective Disorder and the Genetic Relationship to Unipolar Depression". Archives of General Psychiatry 67. "Bipolar Disorder". BehaveNet.
60 (5): 497502. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.5.497. PMID 12742871. 68. Renk K, White R, Lauer BA, McSwiggan M, Puff J, Lowell A (February 2014). "Bipolar Disorder in
35. Reich T, Clayton PJ, Winokur G (1969). "Family history studies: V. The genetics of mania". The American Children". Psychiatry J 2014 (928685): 119. doi:10.1155/2014/928685. PMC 3994906. PMID 24800202.
Journal of Psychiatry 125 (10): 13581369. doi:10.1176/ajp.125.10.1358. PMID 5304735. 69. Van Meter AR, Youngstrom EA, Findling RL (June 2012). "Cyclothymic disorder: a critical review". Clin
36. Craddock N, Sklar P (May 2013). "Genetics of bipolar disorder". Lancet 381 (9878): 165462. Psychol Rev 32 (4): 22943. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.001. PMID 22459786.
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60855-7. PMID 23663951. 70. Towbin K, Axelson D, Leibenluft E, Birmaher B (May 2013). "Differentiating bipolar disorder-not
otherwise specified and severe mood dysregulation". J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 52 (5): 46681.
doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.02.006. PMC 3697010. PMID 23622848.
71. "Longitudinal Course Specifiers for Mood Disorders". BehaveNet.
72. Angst J, Sellaro R (2000). "Historical perspectives and natural history of bipolar disorder". Biological
Psychiatry 48 (6): 445457. doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00909-4. PMID 11018218.

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page120
110
110
61 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

6 of 8 12/15/2015 8:29 AM
Bipolar disorder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipolar_disorder
5100.51. Preservation of rights
73. Bauer M, Beaulieu S, Dunner DL, Lafer B, Kupka R (February 2008). "Rapid cycling bipolar disorder 108. Boland EM, Alloy LB (February 2013). "Sleep disturbance and cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder:
diagnostic concepts". Bipolar Disorders 10 (1 Pt 2): 15362. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00560.x. toward an integrated examination of disorder maintenance and functional impairment". Clin Psychol Rev 33
PMID 18199234. (1): 3344. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.10.001. PMC 3534911. PMID 23123569.
74. Tillman R, Geller B (2003). "Definitions of Rapid, Ultrarapid, and Ultradian Cycling and of Episode 109. Judd LL, Akiskal HS (2003). "The prevalence and disability of bipolar spectrum disorders in the US
Duration in Pediatric and Adult Bipolar Disorders: A Proposal to Distinguish Episodes from Cycles". population: Re-analysis of the ECA database taking into account subthreshold cases". Journal of Affective
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology 13 (3): 267271. Disorders 73 (12): 123131. doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00332-4. PMID 12507745.
doi:10.1089/104454603322572598. PMID 14642014. 110. Merikangas KR, Akiskal HS, Angst J, Greenberg PE, Hirschfeld RM, Petukhova M, Kessler RC (2007).
75. Fountoulakis KN, Kontis D, Gonda X, Yatham LN (March 2013). "A systematic review of the evidence on "Lifetime and 12-Month Prevalence of Bipolar Spectrum Disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey
the treatment of rapid cycling bipolar disorder". Bipolar Disord 15 (2): 11537. doi:10.1111/bdi.12045. Replication". Archives of General Psychiatry 64 (5): 543552. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.5.543.
PMID 23437958. PMC 1931566. PMID 17485606.
76. Baldessarini RJ, Faedda GL, Offidani E, Vzquez GH, Marangoni C, Serra G, Tondo L (May 2013). 111. Phelps J (2006). "Bipolar Disorder: Particle or Wave? DSM Categories or Spectrum Dimensions?".
"Antidepressant-associated mood-switching and transition from unipolar major depression to bipolar Psychiatric Times.
disorder: a review". J Affect Disord 148 (1): 12935. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.10.033. PMID 23219059. 112. Farren CK, Hill KP, Weiss RD (December 2012). "Bipolar disorder and alcohol use disorder: a review".
77. Sood AB, Razdan A, Weller EB, Weller RA (2005). "How to differentiate bipolar disorder from attention Curr Psychiatry Rep 14 (6): 65966. doi:10.1007/s11920-012-0320-9. PMC 3730445. PMID 22983943.
deficit hyperactivity disorder and other common psychiatric disorders: A guide for clinicians". Current 113. Ayuso-Mateos, Jose Luis. "Global burden of bipolar disorder in the year 2000" (PDF). World Health
psychiatry reports 7 (2): 98103. doi:10.1007/s11920-005-0005-8. PMID 15802085. Organization. Retrieved December 9, 2012.
78. Magill CA (2004). "The boundary between borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder: Current 114. Kurasaki, Karen S. (2002). Asian American Mental Health: Assessment Theories and Methods. pp. 1415.
concepts and challenges". Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie 49 (8): 115. Christie KA, Burke JD, Regier DA, Rae DS, Boyd JH, Locke BZ (1988). "Epidemiologic evidence for early
551556. PMID 15453104. onset of mental disorders and higher risk of drug abuse in young adults". The American Journal of
79. Bassett D (2012). "Borderline personality disorder and bipolar affective disorder. Spectra or spectre? A Psychiatry 145 (8): 971975. doi:10.1176/ajp.145.8.971. PMID 3394882.
review". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 46 (4): 327339. 116. Goodwin & Jamison 2007, p. 1945.
doi:10.1177/0004867411435289. PMID 22508593. 117. Monczor M (2010). "Bipolar disorder in the elderly". Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina) 21 (92): 275283.
80. Becker T, Kilian R (2006). "Psychiatric services for people with severe mental illness across western PMID 21188315.
Europe: What can be generalized from current knowledge about differences in provision, costs and 118. Liddell & Scott 1980.
outcomes of mental health care?". Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 113 (429): 916. 119. Angst J, Marneros A (December 2001). "Bipolarity from ancient to modern times: conception, birth and
doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00711.x. PMID 16445476. rebirth". J Affect Disord 67 (13): 319. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00429-3. PMID 11869749.
81. McGurk SR, Mueser KT, Feldman K, Wolfe R, Pascaris A (2007). "Cognitive Training for Supported 120. Borch-Jacobsen M (October 2010). "Which came first, the condition or the drug?". London Review of Books
Employment: 23 Year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial". American Journal of Psychiatry 164 32 (19): 3133. "at the beginning of the 19th century with Esquirols affective monomanias (notably
(3): 437441. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.164.3.437. PMID 17329468. lypemania, the first elaboration of what was to become our modern depression)"
82. Lam et al., 1999; Miklowitz & Goldstein, 1997; Frank, 2005. 121. Pichot P (2004). "Circular insanity, 150 years on". Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine (in French)
83. Leahy & Johnson 2003. 188 (2): 275284. PMID 15506718..
84. Basco & Rush 2005. 122. Sedler MJ (1983). "Falret's discovery: The origin of the concept of bipolar affective illness. Translated by
85. Zaretsky AE, Rizvi S, Parikh SV (2007). "How well do psychosocial interventions work in bipolar M. J. Sedler and Eric C. Dessain". The American Journal of Psychiatry 140 (9): 11271133.
disorder?". Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie 52 (1): 1421. doi:10.1176/ajp.140.9.1127. PMID 6351641.
PMID 17444074. 123. Millon 1996, p. 290.
86. Havens LL, Ghaemi SN (2005). "Existential despair and bipolar disorder: The therapeutic alliance as a 124. Kraepelin, Emil (1921) Manicdepressive Insanity and Paranoia ISBN 0-405-07441-7
mood stabilizer". American journal of psychotherapy 59 (2): 137147. PMID 16170918. 125. Goodwin & Jamison 2007, Chapter 1.
87. Brown KM, Tracy DK (June 2013). "Lithium: the pharmacodynamic actions of the amazing ion". Ther Adv 126. Bipolar Depression: Molecular Neurobiology, Clinical Diagnosis and Pharmacotherapy
Psychopharmacol 3 (3): 16376. doi:10.1177/2045125312471963. PMC 3805456. PMID 24167688. (http://books.google.com/books?id=6-IfJ6dYy2cC&source=gbs_navlinks_s) Carlos A. Zarate Jr., Husseini
88. Cipriani A, Hawton K, Stockton S, Geddes JR (2013). "Lithium in the prevention of suicide in mood K. Manji, Springer Science & Business Media, 16 Apr 2009
disorders: updated systematic review and meta-analysis". BMJ 346: f3646. doi:10.1136/bmj.f3646. 127. The course of bipolar disorder (http://apt.rcpsych.org/content/16/5/318.full) Kate E. A. Saunders and Guy
PMID 23814104. M. Goodwin, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2010) 16: 318-328 doi:10.1192/apt.bp.107.004903
89. McCloud, TL; Caddy, C; Jochim, J; Rendell, JM; Diamond, PR; Shuttleworth, C; Brett, D; Amit, BH; (https://dx.doi.org/10.1192%2Fapt.bp.107.004903)
McShane, R; Hamadi, L; Hawton, K; Cipriani, A (29 September 2015). "Ketamine and other glutamate 128. DAVID L.DUNNER Interviewed by Thomas A. Ban (http://d.plnk.co/ACNP/50th/Transcripts
receptor modulators for depression in bipolar disorder in adults.". The Cochrane database of systematic /David%20Dunner%20by%20Thomas%20A.%20Ban.doc) for the ANCP, Waikoloa, Hawaii, December 13,
reviews 9: CD011611. PMID 26415966. 2001
90. Post RM, Ketter TA, Uhde T, Ballenger JC (2007). "Thirty years of clinical experience with carbamazepine 129. Elgie R. Morselli PL (FebMar 2007). "Social functioning in bipolar patients: the perception and
in the treatment of bipolar illness: Principles and practice". CNS Drugs 21 (1): 4771. perspective of patients, relatives and advocacy organizations a review". Bipolar disorders 9 (12):
doi:10.2165/00023210-200721010-00005. PMID 17190529. 14457. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00339.x. PMID 17391357.
91. Rapoport SI, Basselin M, Kim HW, Rao JS (October 2009). "Bipolar disorder and mechanisms of action of 130. Jamison 1995.
mood stabilizers". Brain Res Rev 61 (2): 185209. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.06.003. PMC 2757443. 131. Joseph 2008.
PMID 19555719. 132. Robinson 2003, pp. 7881.
92. Macritchie K, Geddes JR, Scott J, Haslam D, de Lima M, Goodwin G (2003). Reid, Keith, ed. "Cochrane 133. Robinson 2003, pp. 8485.
Database of Systematic Reviews". Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (1): CD004052. 134. McKinley, Jesse (February 28, 1999). "Get That Man Some Prozac; If the Dramatic Tension Is All in His
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004052. PMID 12535506. |chapter= ignored (help) Head". The New York Times. Retrieved 3 March 2012.
93. Geddes JR, Calabrese JR, Goodwin GM (2008). "Lamotrigine for treatment of bipolar depression: 135. "The Secret Life of the Manic Depressive". BBC. 2006. Retrieved February 20, 2007.
Independent meta-analysis and meta-regression of individual patient data from five randomised trials". The 136. "Child and Adolescent Bipolar Foundation special 90210 website". CABF. 2009. Archived from the original
British Journal of Psychiatry 194 (1): 49. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.048504. PMID 19118318. on 3 July 2009. Retrieved April 7, 2009.
94. van der Loos ML, Klling P, Knoppert-van der Klein EA, Nolen WA (2007). "Lamotrigine in the treatment 137. "EastEnders' Stacey faces bipolar disorder". BBC Press Office. May 14, 2009. Retrieved May 28, 2009.
of bipolar disorder, a review". Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie 49 (2): 95103. PMID 17290338. 138. Tinniswood, Rachael (May 14, 2003). "The Brookie boys who shone at soap awards show". Liverpool Echo
95. Vasudev K, Macritchie K, Geddes J, Watson S, Young A (2006). Young, Allan H, ed. "Cochrane Database (Mirror Group Newspapers). Retrieved April 26, 2014.
of Systematic Reviews". Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (1): CD003384. 139. "Pilot". Homeland. Season 1. Episode 1. October 2, 2011. Showtime. Check |episodelink= value
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003384.pub2. PMID 16437453. |chapter= ignored (help) (help)
96. Barker 2003, pp. 28485. 140. "Catherine Black by Kelly Reilly - Black Box - abc.com". ABC. Retrieved May 22, 2014.
97. Cipriani A, Rendell JM, Geddes J (2009). Cipriani, Andrea, ed. "Cochrane Database of Systematic 141. McClellan J, Kowatch R, Findling RL (2007). "Practice Parameter for the Assessment and Treatment of
Reviews". Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (1): CD004367. Children and Adolescents with Bipolar Disorder". Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004367.pub2. PMID 19160237. |chapter= ignored (help) Psychiatry 46 (1): 107125. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000242240.69678.c4. PMID 17195735.
98. El-Mallakh RS, Elmaadawi AZ, Loganathan M, Lohano K, Gao Y (July 2010). "Bipolar disorder: an 142. Anthony, J.; Scott, P. (1960). "Manicdepressive Psychosis in Childhood". Journal of Child Psychology and
update". Postgraduate Medicine 122 (4): 2431. doi:10.3810/pgm.2010.07.2172. PMID 20675968. Psychiatry 1: 53. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1960.tb01979.x.
99. "Benzodiazepines for Bipolar Disorder". WebMD.com. Retrieved 13 February 2013. 143. Leibenluft E, Rich BA (2008). "Pediatric Bipolar Disorder". Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 4:
100. Montgomery P, Richardson AJ (Apr 16, 2008). Montgomery, Paul, ed. "Omega-3 fatty acids for bipolar 163187. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.4.022007.141216. PMID 17716034.
disorder". The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2): CD005169. 144. Cosgrove VE, Roybal D, Chang KD (April 2013). "Bipolar depression in pediatric populations:
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005169.pub2. PMID 18425912. epidemiology and management". Paediatr Drugs 15 (2): 8391. doi:10.1007/s40272-013-0022-8.
101. Bergen 1999. PMID 23529869.
102. Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Schettler PJ, Endicott J, Leon AC, Solomon DA, Coryell W, Maser JD, Keller MB 145. Fristad, MA; MacPherson, HA (2014). "Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for child and adolescent
(Dec 2005). "Psychosocial disability in the course of bipolar I and II disorders: a prospective, comparative, bipolar spectrum disorders.". Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for
longitudinal study.". Archives of General Psychiatry 62 (12): 132230. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.12.1322. the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
PMID 16330720. 43 (3): 33955. PMID 23927375.
103. Tohen M, Zarate CA, Hennen J, Khalsa HM, Strakowski SM, Gebre-Medhin P, Salvatore P, Baldessarini RJ 146. DSM-5 Childhood and Adolescent Disorders Work Group (2010-01-28). "Proposed change: ...to the Mood
(2003). "The McLean-Harvard First-Episode Mania Study: Prediction of recovery and first recurrence". The Disorders Section of DSM-V" (PDF). American Psychiatric Association. Retrieved 2012-02-18.
American Journal of Psychiatry 160 (12): 20992107. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.12.2099. PMID 14638578. "APA Announces Draft Diagnostic Criteria for DSM-5" (PDF) (Press release). American Psychiatric
104. Jackson A, Cavanagh J, Scott J (2003). "A systematic review of manic and depressive prodromes". Journal Association. 10 February 2010. Retrieved 2012-02-18.
of Affective Disorders 74 (3): 209217. doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00266-5. PMID 12738039. 147. Vasudev A, Thomas A (July 2010). " 'Bipolar disorder' in the elderly: what's in a name?". Maturitas 66 (3):
105. Lam D, Wong G (2005). "Prodromes, coping strategies and psychological interventions in bipolar 2315. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.02.013. PMID 20307944.
disorders". Clinical Psychology Review 25 (8): 10281042. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.06.005. 148. Depp CA, Jeste DV (2004). "Bipolar disorder in older adults: A critical review". Bipolar Disorders 6 (5):
PMID 16125292. 343367. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2004.00139.x. PMID 15383127.
106. Sadock, Kaplan & Sadock 2007, p. 388. 149. Trinh NH, Forester B (2007). "Bipolar Disorder in the Elderly: Differential Diagnosis and Treatment".
107. Roger S. McIntyre, MD, Joanna K. Soczynska, and Jakub Konarski. "Bipolar Disorder: Defining Remission Psychiatric Times 24 (14).
and Selecting Treatment". Psychiatric Times, October 2006, Vol. XXIII, No. 11.

References
Barker, P., ed. (2003). Psychiatric and mental health nursing: the craft and caring. London: Arnold. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric
Basco, Monica Ramrez (2005). The bipolar workbook: tools for controlling your mood swings. Guilford Association. 1994. ISBN 978-0-89042-061-4. OCLC 29953039.
Press. ISBN 978-1-59385-162-0. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV (4th, text revision ed.).
Basco, Monica Ramirez; Rush, A. John (2005). Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Bipolar Disorder Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. 2000. ISBN 978-0-89042-025-6.
(Second ed.). New York: The Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1-59385-168-2. OCLC 300306925. OCLC 742067027.
Bergen, M. (1999). Riding the Roller Coaster: Living with Mood Disorders. Wood Lake Publishing. Joseph, Chris (2008). Manicdotes: There's Madness in His Method. London: Austin & Macauley.
ISBN 978-1-896836-31-7. ISBN 978-1-905609-07-9. Amazon review.
Brown, Malcomb R.; Basso, Michael R. (2004). Focus on Bipolar Disorder Research. Nova Science Goodwin, F. K.; Jamison, K. R. (2007). Manicdepressive illness: bipolar disorders and recurrent
Publishers. ISBN 978-1-59454-059-2. depression (2nd. ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-513579-4. OCLC 70929267.

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page121
111
111
62 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

7 of 8 12/15/2015 8:29 AM
Bipolar disorder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipolar_disorder
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Jamison, Kay Redfield (1995). An Unquiet Mind: A Memoir of Moods and Madness. New York: Knopf. Millon, Theordore (1996). Disorders of Personality: DSM-IV-TM and Beyond. New York: John Wiley and
ISBN 978-0-330-34651-1. Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-01186-6.
Leahy, Robert L.; Johnson, Sheri L. (2003). Psychological Treatment of Bipolar Disorder. New York: The Robinson, D. J. (2003). Reel Psychiatry: Movie Portrayals of Psychiatric Conditions. Port Huron,
Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1-57230-924-1. OCLC 52714775. Michigan: Rapid Psychler Press. ISBN 978-1-894328-07-4.
Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert (1980). A Greek-English Lexicon (Abridged ed.). Oxford University Sadock, Benjamin J.; Kaplan, Harold I.; Sadock, Virginia A. (2007). Kaplan & Sadock's synopsis of
Press. ISBN 978-0-19-910207-5. psychiatry: behavioral sciences/clinical ... ISBN 978-0-7817-7327-0.
Yatham, Lakshmi (2010). Bipolar Disorder. New York: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-72198-8.

Further reading
Healy, David (2011). Mania: A Short History of Bipolar Disorder. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-1421403977.
Mondimore, Francis Mark (2014). Bipolar Disorder: A Guide for Patients and Families (3rd. ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-1421412061.

External links
Bipolar Disorder (https://www.dmoz.org/Health/Mental_Health/Disorders/Mood/Bipolar_Disorder) at DMOZ
Bipolar Disorder overview (http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/bipolar-disorder/complete-index.shtml) from the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health website
NICE Bipolar Disorder clinical guidelines (http://www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/CG38) from the U.K. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence website

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bipolar_disorder&oldid=690982077"

Categories: Bipolar disorder Mood disorders Psychiatric diagnosis Depression (psychology)

This page was last modified on 16 November 2015, at 22:44.


Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered
trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page122
112
112
63 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

8 of 8 12/15/2015 8:29 AM
Paranoid schizophrenia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoid_schizophrenia
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Paranoid schizophrenia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Paranoid schizophrenia, also called schizophrenia, paranoid type is a sub-type of schizophrenia as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders, DSM-IV code 295.30.[1] It is the most common type of schizophrenia.[2][3] Schizophrenia is defined as a chronic mental illness in which a person loses Paranoid schizophrenia
touch with reality (psychosis)."[4] Schizophrenia is divided into subtypes based on the predominant symptomatology at the time of evaluation."[5] The clinical Classification and external resources
picture is dominated by relatively stable, often persecutory, delusions, usually accompanied by hallucinations, particularly of the auditory variety (hearing voices),
Specialty psychiatry
and perceptual disturbances. These symptoms can have a huge effect on functioning and can negatively affect a persons quality of life. Paranoid schizophrenia is a
lifelong illness, but with proper treatment, a person suffering from the illness can live a higher quality of life.[4] ICD-10 F20.0 (http://apps.who.int
/classifications/icd10/browse
Although paranoid schizophrenia is defined by those two symptoms, it is also defined by a lack of certain symptoms (negative symptoms). The following /2015/en#/F20.0)
symptoms are not prominent: disorganized speech, disorganized or catatonic behavior, or flat or inappropriate affect."[5] Those symptoms are present in another
ICD-9-CM 295.3 (http://www.icd9data.com
form of schizophrenia, disorganized-type schizophrenia. The criteria for diagnosing paranoid schizophrenia must be present from at least one to six months.[5] This
/getICD9Code.ashx?icd9=295.3)
helps to differentiate schizophrenia from other illnesses, such as bipolar disorder.[5] It also ensures that the illness is chronic and not acute, and will not go away in
time. MeSH D012563 (https://www.nlm.nih.gov
/cgi/mesh/2015/MB_cgi?field=uid&
Paranoid schizophrenia is defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, but it was dropped from the 5th Edition. The term=D012563)
American Psychiatric Association chose to eliminate schizophrenia subtypes because they had limited diagnostic stability, low reliability, and poor validity."[6]
The symptoms and lack of symptoms that were being used to categorize the different subtypes of schizophrenia were not concrete enough to be able to be
diagnosed. The APA also believed that the subtypes of schizophrenia should be removed because they did not appear to help with providing better targeted
treatment, or predicting treatment response."[6] Targeted treatment and treatment response vary from patient to patient, depending on his or her symptoms. It is
more beneficial, therefore, to look at the severity of the symptoms when considering treatment options.

Contents
1 Symptoms
2 Diagnosis A work of outsider art made by a person with
3 Prevention paranoid schizophrenia.
4 Treatment
5 History
6 See also
7 References
8 Further reading
9 External links

Symptoms
Paranoid schizophrenia manifests itself in an array of symptoms. Common symptoms for paranoid schizophrenia include auditory hallucinations (hearing voices) and paranoid delusions (believing everyone is out
to cause you harm).[4] However, two of the symptoms separate this form of schizophrenia from other forms.

One criterion for separating paranoid schizophrenia from other types is delusion. A delusion is a belief that is held strong even when the evidence shows otherwise. Some common delusions associated with
paranoid schizophrenia include, believing that the government is monitoring every move you make, or that a co-worker is poisoning your lunch."[4] In all but rare cases, these beliefs are irrational, and can cause
the person holding them to behave abnormally. Another frequent type of delusion is a delusion of grandeur, or the fixed, false belief that one possesses superior qualities such as genius, fame, omnipotence, or
wealth."[7] Common ones include, the belief that you can fly, that you're famous, or that you have a relationship with a famous person."[4]

Another criterion present in patients with paranoid schizophrenia is auditory hallucinations, in which the person hears voices or sounds that are not really present. The patient will sometimes hear multiple voices
and the voices can either be talking to the patient or to one another.[4] These voices that the patient hears can influence them to behave in a particular manner. Researchers at the Mayo Foundation for Medical
Education and Research provide the following description: They [the voices] may make ongoing criticisms of what youre thinking or doing, or make cruel comments about your real or imagined faults. Voices
may also command you to do things that can be harmful to yourself or to others."[4] A patient exhibiting these auditory hallucinations may be observed talking to himself because the person believes that the voices
are actually present.

Early diagnosis is important for the successful treatment of schizophrenia.

Diagnosis
The DSM-IV criteria for the diagnosis of schizophrenia require the presence of symptoms for certain periods of time in order to successfully diagnose a person with schizophrenia. A person must exhibit two or
more core symptoms for a minimum of one month, such as delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, grossly disorganized or catatonic behavior, or negative symptoms. There also must be significant
impairment for the person at work, with academic performance, interpersonal relationships, and the ability to take care of oneself. These symptoms must continue for a minimum of six months with the first
symptoms continuing for at least one month. Paranoid schizophrenia is differentiated by the presence of hallucinations and delusions involving the perception of persecution or grandiosity in one's beliefs about the
world.

People with paranoid schizophrenia are often more articulate or "normal" seeming than other schizophrenics, such as hebephrenia-afflicted individuals.[8] The diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia is given with the
presence of bizarre delusions or hallucinations that defy the natural laws of basic logical thought processes, or thought disorders and withdrawal due to these thoughts and delusions.[9] The paranoid subset of
schizophrenia tends to have a better prognosis than other subtypes (hebephrenic and simple in particular) as the intellect and personality are relatively preserved, thus enabling a greater degree of cognitive and
interpersonal functioning.

With the removal of the subtypes of schizophrenia in DSM-V, paranoid schizophrenia will no longer be used as a diagnostic category. If a person is exhibiting symptoms of schizophrenia, including symptoms of
paranoid type, they will simply be diagnosed with schizophrenia and will be treated with antipsychotics based on their individual symptoms.

Prevention
According to the Mayo Clinic, it is best to start receiving treatment for paranoid schizophrenia as early as possible and to maintain the treatment throughout life.[10] Continuing treatment will help keep the serious
symptoms under control and allow the person to lead a more fulfilling life. One cannot reduce the risk of developing paranoid schizophrenia. This illness is typically unpreventable.

It has a strong hereditary component with a first degree parent or sibling. There is some possibility that there are environmental influences including "prenatal exposure to a viral infection, low oxygen levels during
birth (from prolonged labor or premature birth), exposure to a virus during infancy, early parental loss or separation, and physical or sexual abuse in childhood".[11] Eliminating any of these factors could help
reduce an individual's future risk of developing paranoid schizophrenia.

Treatment
Paranoid schizophrenia is a sickness that requires constant treatment and neuroleptics to allow a person to have a relatively stable and normal lifestyle.[12] In order to be successfully treated, a schizophrenic person
should seek help from family or primary care doctors, psychiatrists, psychotherapists, pharmacists, family members, case workers, psychiatric nurses or social workers,[12] provided he or she is not unable to do so,
due to many schizophrenics' inability to accept their condition. The main options that are offered for the treatment of paranoid schizophrenia are the following: neuroleptics, psychotherapy, hospitalization, ECT, and
vocational skills training.[12]

There are many different types of disorders that have similar symptoms to paranoid schizophrenia, and doctors diagnosing patients can sometimes make mistakes. There are tests that psychiatrists perform to try to
get a correct diagnosis. They include "psychiatric evaluation, in which the doctor or psychiatrist will ask a series of questions about the patient's symptoms, psychiatric history, and family history of mental health

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page123
113
113
64 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

1 of 2 12/15/2015 8:32 AM
Paranoid schizophrenia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoid_schizophrenia
5100.51. Preservation of rights
problems; medical history and exam, in which the doctor will ask about one's personal and family health history and will also perform a complete physical examination to check for medical issues that could be
causing or contributing to the problem; laboratory tests in which the doctor will order simple blood and urine tests can rule out other medical causes of symptoms".[11] There are side effects associated with taking
antipsychotics to try to improve the quality of life for those living with paranoid schizophrenia. Neuroleptics can cause high blood pressure and high cholesterol.[12] Many people who take these neuroleptics exhibit
weight gain and have a higher risk of developing diabetes.[12]

History
Since the early 1800s, schizophrenia has been recognized as a psychological disorder. It was first described in 1883, by Emil Kraepelin as dementia praecox, or the premature deterioration of the brain. It was
believed to be untreatable and unstoppable. At this time, very few people were diagnosed with dementia praecox due to the small range of symptoms recognized specifically as signs of this disorder. Years later,
Eugen Bleuler coined the phrase schizophrenia, which literally means "split mind".

Bleuler thought that the disorder caused a person to no longer be able to fully function mentally due to a lack of mental associations between thought, language, emotions, memory and problem solving, due to the
splitting of their mind.[8] Eventually, the broad diagnosis of schizophrenia was narrowed down to a set of specific types of symptoms that were necessary in order to diagnosis the disorder, and was also split into
several different types: paranoid, disorganized, and catatonic (each with their own specific symptoms), along with undifferentiated and residual schizophrenia, which are a combination or very few residual
symptoms of schizophrenia.

During World War II the Nazi party attempted to eradicate schizophrenia by sterilization and killing psychiatric patients.[13]

As of 2013, with the publication of the new DSM-5, the different subtypes of schizophrenia are no longer specified or differentiated from schizophrenia in the manual. Instead, schizophrenia is viewed as one
mental disorder with an array of different symptoms. Treatment for people suffering from schizophrenia is decided upon based on the types of symptoms that are exhibited in each individual case.[14]

See also
Catatonia
Disorganized schizophrenia
Daniel Paul Schreber, a case of "dementia praecox".

References
1. DSM-IV
2. Varcarolis, Elizabeth. "Psychiatric nursing care plans" 2006
3. "Schizophrenia". University of Michigan Department of Psychiatry. Retrieved 2013-06-24.
4. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (2013). Paranoid Schizophrenia. Mayo Clinic. Retrieved from http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/paranoid-schizophrenia/DS00862/DSECTION=symptoms
5. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. DSM-IV Criteria for Schizophrenia. DNA Learning Center. Retrieved from http://www.dnalc.org/view/899-DSM-IV-Criteria-for-Schizophrenia.html
6. Grohol, John M. (2013). DSM-V changes: schizophrenia and psychotic disorders. Psych Central. Retrieved from http://pro.psychcentral.com/2013/dsm-5-changes-schizophrenia-psychotic-disorders/004336.html#
7. Grohol, John M. (2012). Delusion of grandeur. Psych Central. Retrieved from http://psychcentral.com/encyclopedia/2008/delusion-of-grandeur/
8. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2008). Abnormal Psychology. (4th ed., pp. 375-418). New York, NW: McGraw-Hill.
9. Torgersen, S. (2012). Paranoid schizophrenia, paranoid psychoses, and personality disorders. Journal for the Norwegian Medicine Association. New York, NY. 132 (7), 851-852.
10. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (2013). Paranoid Schizophrenia. Mayo Clinic. Retrieved from http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/paranoid-schizophrenia/DS00862/DSECTION=Prevention
11. Smith, M., Segal J. (2013). Schizophrenia signs, symptoms, and causes. http://www.helpguide.org/mental/schizophrenia_symptom.htm#causes
12. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (2013). Paranoid Schizophrenia. Mayo Clinic. Retrieved from http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/paranoid-schizophrenia/DS00862/DSECTION=Treatment
13. Psychiatric Genocide: Nazi Attempts to Eradicate Schizophrenia, Schizophr Bull. 2010 January; 36(1): 2632. by E. Fuller Torrey and Robert H. Yolken (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2800142/)
14. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, D.C.

Further reading
Case, Jenifer R. & Case, Donn T. Milestones and Avenues: A Story of Loss and Recovery: A biographical account of living with paranoid schizophrenia (2006)
Kraepelin, Emil Paranoidal Forms of Dementia praecox [Paranoid Schizophrenia] (HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRY) (1906)
Miller, Carolyn Straight From the Heart: A Mother Battles Paranoid Schizophrenia, and a Girl Struggles to Grow Up (2006)
Parker, James N. & Parker, Philip M. Paranoid Schizophrenia: A Medical Dictionary, Bibliography, and Annotated Research Guide to Internet References (2004)
Podsobinski, Larry (2007). In The Grip of Paranoid Schizophrenia: One Man's Metamorphosis Through Psychosis. Lulu. ISBN 1430322314.
Zucker, Luise J. Ego Structure in Paranoid Schizophrenia: A New Method of Evaluating Projective Material (1958)

External links
Patient UK - Schizophrenia (http://www.patient.co.uk/health/Schizophrenia.htm)
Paranoid Schizophrenia ICD-10 (http://www.schizophrenia.com/szparanoid.htm)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paranoid_schizophrenia&oldid=694831213"

Categories: Abnormal psychology Schizophrenia

This page was last modified on 11 December 2015, at 21:32.


Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered
trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page124
114
114
65 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

2 of 2 12/15/2015 8:32 AM
Delusional disorder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusional_disorder
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Delusional disorder
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Delusional disorder is a psychiatric condition in which the patients present with delusions, but with no accompanying prominent hallucinations, thought disorder,
mood disorder, or significant flattening of affect.[1][2] Delusions are a specific symptom of psychosis. Delusions can be bizarre or non-bizarre in content.[2] Delusional disorder
Non-bizarre delusions are fixed false beliefs that involve situations that could potentially occur in real life; examples include being followed or poisoned.[3] Apart Classification and external resources
from their delusions, people with delusional disorder may continue to socialize and function in a normal manner and their behaviour does not generally seem odd
Specialty psychiatry
or bizarre.[4] However, the preoccupation with delusional ideas can be disruptive to their overall lives.[4] For the diagnosis to be made, auditory and visual
hallucinations cannot be prominent, though olfactory or tactile hallucinations related to the content of the delusion may be present.[2] ICD-10 F22.0 (http://apps.who.int
/classifications/icd10/browse
To be diagnosed with a delusional disorder, the delusion(s) cannot be due to the effects of a drug, medication, or general medical condition, and delusional disorder /2015/en#/F22.0)
cannot be diagnosed in an individual previously properly diagnosed with schizophrenia. A person with delusional disorder may be high functioning in daily life,
ICD-9-CM 297.1 (http://www.icd9data.com
and this disorder bears no relation to one's IQ.[5] According to German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin, patients with delusional disorder remain coherent, sensible and
/getICD9Code.ashx?icd9=297.1)
reasonable.[6] The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) defines six subtypes of the disorder characterized as erotomanic (believes that
someone is in love with them), grandiose (believes that they are the greatest, strongest, fastest, richest, and/or most intelligent person ever), jealous (believes that eMedicine article/292991
the love partner is cheating on them), persecutory (delusions that the person or someone to whom the person is close is being malevolently treated in some way), (http://emedicine.medscape.com
somatic (believes that they have a disease or medical condition), and mixed, i.e., having features of more than one subtype.[2] Delusions also occur as symptoms of /article/292991-overview)
many other mental disorders, especially the other psychotic disorders.
MeSH D010259 (https://www.nlm.nih.gov
The DSM-IV, and psychologists, generally agree that personal beliefs should be evaluated with great respect to cultural and religious differences, since some /cgi/mesh/2015/MB_cgi?field=uid&
cultures have widely accepted beliefs that may be considered delusional in other cultures.[7] term=D010259)

Contents
1 Classification
2 Signs and symptoms
3 Causes
4 Diagnosis
5 Treatment
6 Epidemiology
7 In Popular Culture
8 See also
9 References
10 Further reading

Classification
Diagnosis of a specific type of delusional disorder can sometimes be made based on the content of the delusions. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) enumerates seven types:

Erotomanic type (erotomania): delusion that another person, often a prominent figure, is in love with the individual. The individual may breach the law as he/she tries to obsessively make contact with the
desired person.
Grandiose type: delusion of inflated worth, power, knowledge, identity or believes himself/herself to be a famous person, claiming the actual person is an impostor or an impersonator.
Jealous type: delusion that the individual's sexual partner is unfaithful when it is untrue. The patient may follow the partner, check text messages, emails, phone calls etc. in an attempt to find "evidence" of
the infidelity.
Persecutory type: This delusion is a common subtype. It includes the belief that the person (or someone to whom the person is close) is being malevolently treated in some way. The patient may believe
that he/she has been drugged, spied upon, harassed and so on and may seek "justice" by making police reports, taking court action or even acting violently.
Somatic type: delusions that the person has some physical defect or general medical condition
Mixed type: delusions with characteristics of more than one of the above types but with no one theme predominating.
Unspecified type: delusions that cannot be clearly determined or characterized in any of the categories in the specific types.[8]

Signs and symptoms


The following can indicate a delusion:[9]

1. The patient expresses an idea or belief with unusual persistence or force.


2. That idea appears to have an undue influence on the patient's life, and the way of life is often altered to an inexplicable extent.
3. Despite his/her profound conviction, there is often a quality of secretiveness or suspicion when the patient is questioned about it.
4. The individual tends to be humorless and oversensitive, especially about the belief.
5. There is a quality of centrality: no matter how unlikely it is that these strange things are happening to him, the patient accepts them relatively unquestioningly.
6. An attempt to contradict the belief is likely to arouse an inappropriately strong emotional reaction, often with irritability and hostility.
7. The belief is, at the least, unlikely, and out of keeping with the patient's social, cultural and religious background.
8. The patient is emotionally over-invested in the idea and it overwhelms other elements of their psyche.
9. The delusion, if acted out, often leads to behaviors which are abnormal and/or out of character, although perhaps understandable in the light of the delusional beliefs.
10. Individuals who know the patient observe that the belief and behavior are uncharacteristic and alien.

Additional features of delusional disorder include the following:[9]

1. It is a primary disorder.
2. It is a stable disorder characterized by the presence of delusions to which the patient clings with extraordinary tenacity.
3. The illness is chronic and frequently lifelong.
4. The delusions are logically constructed and internally consistent.
5. The delusions do not interfere with general logical reasoning (although within the delusional system the logic is perverted) and there is usually no general disturbance of behavior. If disturbed behavior does
occur, it is directly related to the delusional beliefs.
6. The individual experiences a heightened sense of self-reference. Events which, to others, are nonsignificant are of enormous significance to him or her, and the atmosphere surrounding the delusions is
highly charged.

Causes
The cause of delusional disorder is unknown,[3] but genetic, biochemical and environmental factors may play a significant role in its development.[10] Some people with delusional disorders may have an imbalance
in neurotransmitters, the chemicals that send and receive messages to the brain.[11] There does seem to be some familial component, and social isolation, immigration (generally for persecutory reasons),[3] drug
abuse, excessive stress,[12] being married, being employed, low socioeconomic status, celibacy among men, and widowhood among women may also be risk factors.[13] Delusional disorder is currently thought to
be on the same spectrum or dimension as schizophrenia, but people with delusional disorder, in general, may have less symptomatology and functional disability.[14]

Diagnosis
Differential diagnosis includes ruling out other causes such as drug-induced conditions, dementia, infections, metabolic disorders, and endocrine disorders.[3] Other psychiatric disorders must then be ruled out. In
delusional disorder, mood symptoms tend to be brief or absent, and unlike schizophrenia, delusions are non-bizarre and hallucinations are minimal or absent.[3]

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page125
115
115
66 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

1 of 2 12/15/2015 8:34 AM
Delusional disorder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusional_disorder
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Interviews are important tools to obtain information about the patient's life situation and past history to help make a diagnosis. Clinicians generally review earlier medical records to gather a full history. Clinicians
also try to interview the patient's immediate family, as this can be helpful in determining the presence of delusions. The mental status examination is used to assess the patient's current mental condition.[15]

A psychological questionnaire used in the diagnosis of the delusional disorder is the Peters Delusion Inventory (PDI) which focuses on identifying and understanding delusional thinking. However, this
questionnaire is more likely used in research than in clinical practice.[15]

In terms of diagnosing a non-bizarre delusion as a delusion, ample support should be provided through fact checking. In case of non-bizarre delusions, Psych Central[16] notes, "All of these situations could be true
or possible, but the person suffering from this disorder knows them not to be (e.g., through fact-checking, third-person confirmation, etc.). "

Treatment
A challenge in the treatment of delusional disorders is that most patients have limited insight, and do not acknowledge that there is a problem.[3] Most patients are treated as out-patients, although hospitalization
may be required in some cases if there is a risk of harm to self or others.[3] Individual psychotherapy is recommended rather than group psychotherapy, as patients are often quite suspicious and sensitive.[3]
Antipsychotics are not well tested in delusional disorder, but they do not seem to work very well, and often have no effect on the core delusional belief.[3] Antipsychotics may be more useful in managing agitation
that can accompany delusional disorder.[3]

Psychotherapy for patients with delusional disorder can include cognitive therapy which is conducted with the use of empathy. During the process, the therapist can ask hypothetical questions in a form of
therapeutic Socratic questioning.[17] This therapy has been mostly studied in patients with the persecutory type. The combination of pharmacotherapy with cognitive therapy integrates treating the possible
underlying biological problems and decreasing the symptoms with psychotherapy as well. Psychotherapy has been said to be the most useful form of treatment because of the trust formed in a patient and therapist
relationship.[18] The therapist is there for support and must not show any signs implying that the patient is mentally ill.[18]

Supportive therapy has also been shown to be helpful. Its goal is to facilitate treatment adherence and provide education about the illness and its treatment.

Furthermore, providing social skills training has helped many persons. It can promote interpersonal competence as well as confidence and comfort when interacting with those individuals perceived as a threat.[19]

Insight-oriented therapy is rarely indicated or contraindicated; yet there are reports of successful treatment.[19] Its goals are to develop therapeutic alliance, containment of projected feelings of hatred, impotence,
and badness; measured interpretation as well as the development of a sense of creative doubt in the internal perception of the world. The latter requires empathy with the patient's defensive position.[19]

Epidemiology
Delusional disorders are uncommon in psychiatric practice, though this may be an underestimation due to the fact that those afflicted lack insight and thus avoid psychiatric assessment. The prevalence of this
condition stands at about 24 to 30 cases per 100,000 people while 0.7 to 3.0 new cases per 100,000 people are reported every year. Delusional disorder accounts for 1-2% of admissions to inpatient mental health
facilities.[2][20] The incidence of first admissions for delusional disorder is lower, from 0.001-0.003%.[21]

Delusional disorder tends to appear in middle to late adult life, and for the most part first admissions to hospital for delusional disorder occur between age 33 and 55.[3] It is more common in women than men, and
immigrants seem to be at higher risk.[3]

In Popular Culture
In 2010 psychological thriller Shutter Island, directed by Martin Scorsese and starring Leonardo DiCaprio, delusional disorder is accurately portrayed, along with other disorders.[22][23]

See also
Monothematic delusions
Paranoia

References
1. Semple.David."Oxford Hand Book of Psychiatry" Oxford Press. 2005. p 230 13. Shivani Chopra, MD; Chief Editor; et al. "Delusional Disorder - Epidemiology - Patient demographics".
2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (5th ed., Retrieved 2013-04-15.
text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. 14. Stephan Heckers, Deanna M. Barch, Juan Bustillo, Wolfgang Gaebel, Raquel Gur, Dolores Malaspina,
3. Hales E and Yudofsky JA, eds, The American Psychiatric Press Textbook of Psychiatry, Washington, DC: Michael J. Owen, Susan Schultz, Rajiv Tandon, Ming Tsuang, Jim Van Os, William T. Carpenter. Structure
American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., 2003 of the psychotic disorders classification in DSM 5. Schizophrenia Research. 2013.
4. Winokur, George."Comprehensive Psychiatry-Delusional Disorder"American Psychiatric Association. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.04.039 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.schres.2013.04.039). PMID 23707641.
1977. p 513 15. "Delusional Disorders:Treatment". Retrieved 2010-08-06.
5. Winokur, G (1977). "Delusional Disorder (Paranoia)". Comprehensive Psychiatry 18 (6): 513. 16. "Delusional Disorder Symptoms". Retrieved 2015-03-04.
6. Winokur, G (1977). "Delusional Disorder (Paranoia)". Comprehensive Psychiatry 18 (6): 511521. 17. "Treatments". Retrieved 2010-08-06.
doi:10.1016/s0010-440x(97)90001-8. 18. Grohol, John. "Delusional Disorder Treatment". Psych Central. Retrieved 24 November 2011.
7. Shivani Chopra. "Delusional Disorder". eMedicine. 19. Shivani Chopra, MD; Chief Editor. "Delusional Disorder - Treatment & Management - Psychotherapy".
8. http://www.health.am/psy/delusional-disorder Delusional Disorder. Retrieved 7 August 2012 Medscape reference. Retrieved 2013-04-15.
9. Munro, Alistair (1999). Delusional disorder: paranoia and related illnesses. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge 20. Crowe, R. R., & Roy, M. A. (2008). Delusional disorders. In S. H. Fatemi & P. J. Clayton (Eds.), The
University Press. ISBN 0-521-58180-X. Medical Basis of Psychiatry (pp. 125-131). New York, USA: Humana Press.
10. "Causes of Delusional Disorder". Retrieved 2010-08-06. 21. "Demography of paranoid psychosis (delusional disorder): a review and comparison with schizophrenia and
11. Kay DWK. "Assessment of familial risks in the functional psychoses and their application in genetic affective illness.". Arch Gen Psychiatry 39 (8): 890902. Aug 1982.
counseling. Br J Pschychiatry." 1978. p385-390 doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290080012003. PMID 7103678.
12. Karakus,Gonca."Delusional Parasitosis: Clinical Features, Diagnosis and Treatment"American Psychiatric 22. https://shutterislandpsychproject.wordpress.com/2012/02/23/psychology-in-the-media-shutter-island-part-i/
Association. 2010.p396 23. http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/opus/issues/2010/spring/shutter_island

Further reading
Munro, A. (1999) Delusional Disorder: Paranoia and Related Illnesses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-58180-X.
Sims, A. (1995) Symptoms in the mind: An introduction to descriptive psychopathology. Edinburgh: Elsevier Science Ltd. ISBN 0-7020-2627-1.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Delusional_disorder&oldid=694621861"

Categories: Delusional disorders Psychosis Paranoia Psychopathology Psychiatric diagnosis

This page was last modified on 10 December 2015, at 12:16.


Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered
trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.
StanJ.J.
J.
J.
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Health
Health
Health
Health
Health
Argument
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page126
116
116
67 of
of
of
of385
126
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
15,2015
17, 2015
am

2 of 2 12/15/2015 8:34 AM
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 1 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 117
117 of
of 330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December17,
17,2015
2015

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGH Page 68 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 2 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page 118
118
69 ofof
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
Advanced Media Group Page 2 of 10 09/07/2007
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 3 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page 119
119
70 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
17,
30, 2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 4 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page 120
120
71 ofof
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
Advanced Media Group Page 4 of 10 09/07/2007
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 5 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page 121
121
72 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 6 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J. J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page 122
122
73 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Friday December
December
December17,
December 17,
30, 2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 7 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page 123
123
74 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
17,
30, 2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 8 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
J. Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Caterbone Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page 124
124
75 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 30,17,
17,2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 9 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 125
Law Suit v. LGH 125ofof
76 of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Friday December
December
December
December 17,
17,2015
30, 2016 2015
am

Advanced Media Group Page 9 of 10 09/07/2007


5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 10 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 126
Law Suit v. LGH 126
77 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Friday December
December
December
December 17,
17,2015
30, 2016 2015
am

Advanced Media Group Page 10 of 10 09/07/2007


5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 11 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH
Page
Page 127
127ofof
78 of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 12 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH
Page
Page 128
128
79 ofof
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 13 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page 129
80
129ofof
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 14 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page 130
81
130ofof
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 15 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan J.Caterbone
StanJ.J.
J. CaterboneMental
Caterbone
Caterbone MentalHealth
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health Law Suit v. LGH
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page 82 ofof
Page 131
131 of385
330
330 Friday December
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday, 30, 2016
December
December
December17, am
17,2015
2015
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 16 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
ArgumentsPage
Page 132
132 of
of 330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December17,
17,2015
2015

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGH Page 83 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 17 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.Caterbone
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page 133
133
84 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
17,
30, 2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 18 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanStanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page 134
134
85 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
FridayDecember
December
December17,
December 17,2015
30, 2015am
2016
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 19 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
J. Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Caterbone Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page 135
135
86 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 30,17,
17,2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 20 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. LGH Page
Page 136
136
87 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Friday December
December
December17,
December 17,2015
30, 2015am
2016
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 21 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan Stan
J.Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page 137
137
88 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
FridayDecember
December17,
December17,2015
2015
30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 22 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page 138
138
89 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
17,
30, 2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 23 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan J. Caterbone
Stan
Stan
StanJ.J. Mental
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Health
Mental
Mental
Mental HealthLaw
Health
Health Suit v. LGH Page
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page 90
139of
Page 139 of385
of 330
330 Friday December
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December30,
December17, 2016
2015am
17,2015
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 24 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page 140
140
91 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 25 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanStanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. LGH Page
Page 141
141
92 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December17,
Friday December 17,2015
30, 2015am
2016
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 26 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

StanStan
Stan
Stan
J. J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page 142
142
93 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
FridayDecember
December17,
December17,2015
30,2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 27 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanStanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page 143
143
94 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
FridayDecember
December
December17,
December 17,2015
30, 2015am
2016
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 28 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanStanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page 144
144
95 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Friday December
December
December17,
December 17,2015
30, 2015am
2016
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 29 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
StanStan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. LGH Page
Page 145
145
96 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
FridayDecember
December
December17,
December 17,2015
30, 2015 am
2016
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 30 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Caterbone Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health Arguments
Health Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGH Page
Page
Page 146
146
97 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Friday December
December
December
December 30,17,
17,2015
2016 2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 31 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. LGH Page
Page 147
147
98 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Friday December
December
December17,
December 17,2015
30, 2015am
2016
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 32 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page 148
148
99 ofof
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
17,
30, 2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 33 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

StanStan
Stan
Stan
J. J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page100
Suit v. LGHPage 149
149of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
FridayDecember
December
December17,
December 17,2015
30, 2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 34 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan Stan
J.Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone MentalMental
Mental
Mental
HealthHealth
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit Page
Page 101
v. LGHPage 150
150of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday 17,
17,
December 2015
2015
30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record
Page 35 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J. Caterbone J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Mental Mental
Mental
Mental
Health LawHealth
Health
Health
Suit v.Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Page
Page 102
LGHPage 151
151of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday 17,
17,2015
2015
December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health RecordPage 36 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health Health
Health
Health
Law Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. Page
Page 103
LGHPage 152
152of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday 17,
17,2015
December2015
30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 37 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Page
Page 104
Suit v. LGHPage 153
153of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
17,
30, 2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 38 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
StanStan
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 105
Suit v. LGHPage 154
154of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
FridayDecember
December
December17,
December 17,2015
30, 2015am
2016
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 39 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.
J. J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
HealthLaw
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 106
Suit v. LGHPage 155
155of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30,17,
2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 40 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J. J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 107
Suit v. LGHPage 156
156of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Friday December
December
December17,
December 17,2016
30, 2015
2015am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 41 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Page
Page 108
Suit v. LGHPage 157
157of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30,17,
2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 42 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Mental Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 109
Suit v. LGHPage 158
158of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30,17,
2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 43 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 159
159 of
of 330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December17,
17,2015
2015
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 110 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 44 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
J. Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Caterbone Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 111
Suit v. LGHPage 160
160of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Friday December
December
December
December 30,17,
17,2015
2016 2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health RecordPage 45 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan J.Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health Health
Health
Health
Law Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit v. Page
Page 112
LGHPage 161
161of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday 17,
17,2015
December 2015
30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 46 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J. J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 113
Suit v. LGHPage 162
162of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday, December
December30,
Friday December 17,
17,2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 47 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan Stan
J.Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone MentalMental
Mental
Mental
HealthHealth
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit Page
Page 114
v. LGHPage 163
163of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday 17,
17,
December 2015
2015
30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 48 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 115
Suit v. LGHPage 164
164of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 30,17,
17,2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 49 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
J. Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Page
Page 116
Suit v. LGHPage 165
165of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 30,17,
17,2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 50 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.Caterbone
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 117
Suit v. LGHPage 166
166of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
17,
30, 2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 51 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Caterbone Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 118
Suit v. LGHPage 167
167of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 30,17,
17,2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 52 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

StanStan
Stan
Stan
J. J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit Page
Page 119
v. LGHPage 168
168of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
FridayDecember
December17,
December17,2015
30,2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 53 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
J. Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Caterbone Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 120
Suit v. LGHPage 169
169of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 30,17,
17,2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 54 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 170
170 of
of 330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December17,
17,2015
2015
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 121 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 55 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Page
Page 122
Suit v. LGHPage 171
171of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
17,
30, 2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 56 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Page
Page 123
Suit v. LGHPage 172
172of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30,17,
2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 57 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.Caterbone
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Page
Page 124
Suit v. LGHPage 173
173of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
17,
30, 2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 58 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 125
Suit v. LGHPage 174
174of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
Friday December
December
December30,
December 17,
17,2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 59 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

StanStan
Stan
Stan
J. J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health Law Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Suit Page
Page126
v. LGHPage 175
175of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
FridayDecember
December17,
December17,2015
30,2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 60 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanStanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 127
Suit v. LGHPage 176
176of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
FridayDecember
December
December17,
December 17,2015
30, 2015am
2016
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 61 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 128
Suit v. LGHPage 177
177of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
17,
30, 2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 62 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

StanStan
Stan
Stan
J. J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental HealthHealth
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit Page
Page 129
v. LGHPage 178
178of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
FridayDecember
December17,
December17,2015
30, 2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 63 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
Stan
Stan J.J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health
Health LawArguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 130
Suit v. LGHPage 179
179of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
FridayDecember
December
December30,
December 17,
17,
2015
2015
2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 64 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 180
180 of
of 330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December17,
17,2015
2015

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 131 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 65 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 181
181 of
of 330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December17,
17,2015
2015

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 132 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 66 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 182
182 of
of 330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December17,
17,2015
2015
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 133 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 67 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 183
183 of
of 330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December17,
17,2015
2015

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 134 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 68 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental Health
Health
Health Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 184
184 of
of 330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December17,
17,2015
2015
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 135 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 69 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015
Finding of Facts Resulting in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Page 47

Feb 18, 2005 Plaintiff sends the following letter to the Chief of Police of the Southern Regional Police Department:

February 18, 2005


Stan Caterbone
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516

Chief John A. Fiorill


Southern Regional Police Department
3284 Main Street
P.O. Box 254
Conestoga, PA 17516

Dear Chief Fiorill:

I am very disappointed in the way that our meeting had ended. I will be filing complaints
With the appropriate authorities concerning the threats and abuse by Officer Busser.
Remember you had requested that meeting. And as you stated, I do not believe anything
that you say, well Sir, that is certainly your choice, however I have never provided
anything but the truth to you or any member of your department.

The burden of proof to my allegations falls within your jurisdiction. If you are telling me
that I have to prove every allegation when I report a crime, I just dont know how that is
possible. But you are the Chief of the department, so I guess I will have to protect my
person and property in any manner that deems appropriate.

I apologize for becoming loud and frustrated, however when you tell me that I am lying
and I am most certainly telling the truth; and then you and Mr. Busser yell that I am nuts
and to get out of here; and that no one will respond to any of my calls to your office,
well we have a very serious problem.

You both have challenged my integrity, my truthfulness, credibility, and my sanity.


And Mr Busser pulling out his night stick and holding it up to hit me, that is more than
enough for me.

I get the picture loud and clear. I hope that you do as well.

Respectfully,
Stan J. Caterbone
Cc: Donald Totaro, Lancaster County District Attorney

Feb 19, 2005 Plaintiff files the following complaint with the The Internet Fraud Complaint Center (IFCC) after the incident of Kerry
Egan calling 911 to file a false report of plaintiff sending an email stating to kill himself.

Saturday, February 19, 2005


Stan Caterbone
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, 17516

The Internet Fraud Complaint Center (IFCC) is a partnership between the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).

February 19, 2005 7:26 am

At approximately 5:00 am this morning the Conestoga Police entered my home and
accused me of sending an email to Kerry Egan threatening to kill myself. The officer
verbally and physically abused me because I did not know what he was talking about
and he kept interrogating me and handcuffed me because I said that I was not on
the internet after 10:00 pm on February 18, the evening before.
The officer told me that I sent an email to Kerry Egan and she called 911 at
approximately 5:00 am this morning. I told the officer that I did I fell asleep at

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page136
185
185of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 70 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015
Finding of Facts Resulting in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Page 48

approximately 1:00 am and did not awake until the officer arrived at my house.
The officer was quite abusive and tried to accuse me of lunging at him, when in fact
he was throwing me around. Pam Pflumm, who previously filed trespass charges against me, and whom I was to have
no contact with, illegally entered my home with the officer, via a key which I
had kept on the deck. Before they entered my home, I called 911 and requested that the Pennsylvania
State Police come to my aid because of the verbal and physical threats that I
received earlier in the day from Officer Busser and Chief of Police Fiorill of the
Southern Regional Police Department. After they had left, I took a shower and almost collapsed from exhaustion and
trauma. I got dressed and went to the emergency room of Regional Hospital, former
Saint Joseph Hospital. Dr. Laird attended to my concerns.

Feb 20, 2005 Plaintiff calls Southern Regional Police Department and Humane League to file formal complaint of Cruelty to Animals.
Both refused to investigate or file any reports. Complaint phoned in to the Humane League on Feb 20, 2005 As
described to a Letter To The Editor, Gil Smart

While I was away for a family emergency, I had someone let my two cats out after being inside for a few days, which I
have always done in the past. I returned after being in South Florida for one week. Upon driving toward my driveway,
my one cat was anxiously awaiting my arriveal. However, my second cat was not there. This was immediate cause for
concern, since being mother and son, they had always stuck together. After a few days I knew that my cat was either
abducted or was harmed. No way would he be around and not come home.

The other evening I went over to my suspect neighbors home, whom I know often has been mischevious toward my
property in the past, and asked him if he saw my cat. He went on to tell me how big my cat is and how he is the "king of
the neighborhood". I found this conversation to be typical bull.... He said "don't worry it will show up soon!"

Last evening I found my dead cat lying by my pond with a possom chewing on its ear. I examined the body and found
that it's neck had been broken with no other signs of any other wounds.

I called the Humane Shelter and talked to a Cruelty Officer who said" There is nothhing we can do if you did not see
anyone physically harm the animal"

Is this the way it is? You have to prove a crime before they will investigate? Sounds alittle backwards to me, but then
again I often forget where I am at.

Feb 21, 2005 Plaintiff sends letter to Fulton Bank regarding the death of Thomas Caterbone and the alleged indiscretions and
illegalities of the activities of Fulton Bank.

Monday, February 21, 2005

Project Hope
Mr. Stan Caterbone
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516

Mr. Scott Smith


Fulton Financial Corporation
One Penn Square
P.O. Box 4887
Lancaster, PA 17604

Dear Mr. Smith:

The reason I had called you on Friday morning was to discuss an outstanding issue with you. I am not threatening you
or coming to you as an adversary, but rather just trying to understand how your institution can be so cold and rude to
my family. On Thursday I visited the Manor Branch to discuss the account for Tom's Project Hope, our non-profit
foundation which advocates awareness for suicide prevention, with a focus for teenagers. Of course this foundation was
founded after the suicide of my youngest brother, Tom, in 1996.

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page137
186
186of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 71 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page138
187
187of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 72 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page139
188
188of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 73 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page140
189
189of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 74 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 141
Suit v. LGHPage 190
190of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 75 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 142
Suit v. LGHPage 191
191of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 76 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 143
Suit v. LGHPage 192
192of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 77 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 144
Suit v. LGHPage 193
193of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 78 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 145
Suit v. LGHPage 194
194of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 79 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 146
Suit v. LGHPage 195
195of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 80 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 147
Suit v. LGHPage 196
196of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 81 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 148
Suit v. LGHPage 197
197of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 82 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 149
Suit v. LGHPage 198
198of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 83 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 150
Suit v. LGHPage 199
199of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 84 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 151
Suit v. LGHPage 200
200of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 85 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.
Stan J.J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthLaw
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments Page
Page 152
Suit v. LGHPage 201
201of
of
of385
330
330 Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,December
December
December
Friday December 17,
30, 17,
2015
20162015
am
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 86 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Bir t h Con t r ol Pa t ch La w su it Ca sh Adva n ce D iscr im ina t ion La w suit Pa r k in son s D ise a se Cla im s
Side effect s lawsuit . Free Why wait ? 24- 48 Hour Processing Read allegat ions against Best Buy NJ law firm seasoned in illnesses
Consult at ions: 1- 800- 856- 6405. Fees as low as 3.0% $500 in nat ional class act ion lawsuit result ing from j obsit e hazards.
$500,000

Hom es | Cars | Jobs | Cust om er Care Cent er Lancast erOnline Keyword Go

Hom e
News W om e n sue M ille r sville cops in 'st r e a k e r ' fla p
By Janet Kelley
Sport s Lancast er New Era
Business
Published: Feb 23, 2006 1: 19 PM EST
Ent er t ainm ent
Technology LAN CASTER COUN TY, PA - Three wom en have filed a federal
Subscribe t o
lawsuit against Millersville Borough Police, accusing t wo of it s
Healt h policem en of an incident which t hey claim left t hem Hom e Delivery
Weat her t errified...scared and hum iliat ed.
Art icle Tools
Archives I n short , t hey
Lin k t o Th is Ar t icle
en Espaol claim , t heir civil
right s were Print er Friendly Form at
Services violat ed. Order a Reprint
Classifieds Em ail This Art icle
Talkback Dana Skubon, Most Em ailed Art icles
Susan Bim ler and
eEdit ions Relat ed Art icles
Kendra Klahr,
Cars who share a More News
hom e in Ads by Goooooogle
Real Est at e
Millersville,
Apart m ent s accused police
Shopping Sgt . Mark Peifer
and Officer Brian
Com m unit y
Tat ara of illegally
Visit Lancast er ent ering t heir
Personals hom e and t heir bedroom around 3 a.m . on Sept . 3, 2005.
Feat ures Saying he was looking for a st reaker, Peifer asked t he
Celebrat ions wom en t o t urn around and show him t heir but t ocks, so he could com pare it wit h a suspect
Obit uaries he had seen earlier in t he evening, according t o t he lawsuit filed last m ont h.
Special Police Chief John D. Rochat , who was also nam ed as a defendant in t he lawsuit for
Sect ions em ploying t he officers, referred all quest ions t o t he boroughs solicit or, Jam es Young.
Colum ns
I nt erest s Advert isem ent
Advert isem ent
Fult on Opera House
Ornam ent
Art and Glass Works
12 X 12 Chim ney
$ 2 2 .0 0
Brush
St erm er Brot hers
STONEWALL JACKSON
$ 5 9 .6 9
MOUSE PAD
Bat t le Field Dry Goods
$ 7 .9 5

Young declined com m ent , saying he would have a response t o t he allegat ions in court . J.
Dwight Yoder, t he at t orney for t he wom en, also could not be reached for com m ent .

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page153
202
202of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
1 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 87 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

According t o t he lawsuit , Skubon and her room m at es had fallen asleep around 11: 30 p.m .
on Sept . 2, 2005 in a second floor bedroom .

At som e point , around 3 a.m ., Skubon said she was awakened by a sound and looked
down t he st airs t o see t wo uniform ed policem en st anding inside t he doorway.

The m en ident ified t hem selves as police and ordered Skubon t o com e down, according t o
docum ent s.

But Skubon said she was fright ened, according t o t he lawsuit , and went back t o t he
bedroom , shut t he door and crawled back in bed.

Wit hin m inut es, t he officers cam e upst airs, opened t he bedroom door and shone t heir
flashlight s in t he wom ens faces, ordering t hem int o t he living room .
Cust om er
Service Confused and scared, t he wom en com plied, according t o t he lawsuit .
Subscribe
Peifer t hen t old t hem t o get ident ificat ion, which t hey did.
Care Cent er
Place an Ad Bim ler and Klahr are st udent s at Millersville Universit y, according t o docum ent s, while
Adver t ising Skubon works as a surgery t ech clerk at a local hospit al.

Cont act Us When Skubon produced hospit al ident ificat ion inst ead of a drivers license, she said Peifer
Sit e followed her back int o her bedroom , accusing her of st reaking in t he neighborhood.
Sit e Map
The policem an pressured her, Skubon claim s, saying, Tell m e it was you, dont lie t o
Keyword I ndex m e. I know it was you, according t o t he lawsuit .
RSS Feeds
Need a Skubon responded by saying she didnt know what he was t alking about , according t o
docum ent s, t o which Peifer t old her, I f you like, I will read you your Miranda right s.
Websit e?
Ext rem ely fright ened, Skubon began t o cry. Peifer t old her t o ret urn t o t he living room
wit h t he ot her wom en, checking t heir drivers license num bers over t he police radio.

Then, according t o t he lawsuit , Peifer asked t he wom en t o st and up and t urn around so he
could observe t heir but t ocks.

Peifer said he saw a girl out side in a G- st ring and he t hought he would know her from
behind...Peifer t hen proceeded t o observe all t hree ( wom ens) but t ocks and com m ent ed
how Skubons shape was different from t he ot hers.

Peifer t hen st at ed t hat he was going t o check t he com m unit y pool and if t here was any
dam age t o t he pool he would com e back and slap handcuffs on Skubon and arrest her.

The policem en t hen left t he wom ens hom e. The episode last ed about 45 m inut es,
according t o t he lawsuit .

Court docum ent s offer no explanat ion as t o why t he policem en would have allegedly gone
t o t he wom ens hom e or why t hey ent ered t he residence.

The lawsuit claim s t he policem en violat ed t he wom ens civil right s by illegally ent ering
t heir hom e and t heir bedroom wit hout a search warrant .

The wom en seek com pensat ory and punit ive dam ages, as well as at t orneys fees and court
cost s, for t he officers out rageous conduct , which t hey say left t hem dist ressed, scared
and hum iliat ed. They added t hat t hey were t errified and felt com plet ely violat ed.

Peifer, a 26- year vet eran of t he police depart m ent , was nam ed Officer of t he Year in
1995. Tat ara was recognized in 2004 as one of t he count ys Top Gun police officers for a
high num ber of drunken driving arrest s.

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page154
203
203of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
2 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 88 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Recent TalkBack com m ent s about t his art icle


Com m ent on t his art icle

ann LOL, I wonder if t hese cops arent a lit t le em barrassed.


02- 23- 2006

euryt opic Som ewhere, Clancy Wiggum is sm iling.


02- 23- 2006

P. Floyd QUOTE( e u r yt opic @ Fe b 2 3 2 0 0 6 , 0 2 :3 8 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 3 2 8 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 23- 2006 Som ewhere, Clancy Wiggum is sm iling.

your post was funny before i read t he art icle eury, aft er, it was
hilarious. t hese guys have t he police work t hat rivals t he keyst one
kops.

NonaYabiznis That 's j ust a bizarre st ory. What could t hey have been t hinking?
02- 23- 2006

fort hepeople I f t he but t ocks fit s...........you m ust acquit ! !


02- 23- 2006

RonHarper Am azing what t he cops will do t o prove som et hing! I t 's not like it
02- 23- 2006 was t he crim e of t he cent ury!

rh

lit t ledut chboy A "rear end" line up.....


02- 23- 2006
Hay Ron ..... we could be brot hers.....?

runut z I f you get a but t print , will it hold up in court ?


02- 23- 2006

ann I am curious, erum ..was t he observat ion m ade wit h but t s


02- 23- 2006 covered or uncovered?

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page155
204
204of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
3 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 89 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

P. Floyd it s like m s balbricker in porky's. " it had a m ole on it , i'd ident ify it
02- 23- 2006 anywhere"

Lorax I t am azes m e t hat gest apo t act ics are so funny. The officers
02- 23- 2006 involved in t his incident should be fired. This is Am erica isn't it ?

j ackooboy Th e k e y t o t h is ca se w ill be w h y t h e police e n t e r e d t h e


02- 23- 2006 house ... also, why did t he girl who was " scared" go back t o bed?! I f
she didn't t hink t hey t ruly were t he police wouldn't you have called
911 if t wo st range m en were in your house. I f you didn't have a
phone on t he second floor, you cert ainly would t ry t o escape and
not go back t o bed.

Perhaps it was t his wom an who was st reaking, not like it 's t hat big
of a deal, but her act ions do not m ake sense. Also, for t he
hum iliat ion, if t he officers m ade t he wom en st rip, yes t hat 's across
t he line, but having t hem line up wit h t heir clot hes on t o see if t hey
could t ell who's but t was t he purput rat or is not over t he line, a lit t le
odd, but not over t he line.

cyberscribbler Years ago during finals week, t he st udent s would relieve t ension
02- 23- 2006 wit h Naked relays down George St . t o Biem esderfer St adium . The
cops m ust 've been pining for t he good old days, m issed t hem t har'
st reakers.

PedroHead Dam m , why didn't I ever t hink of t his when in college. Dress up like
02- 23- 2006 a cop and ent er wom en's apart m ent s and do a but t check. Think of
all t he * ss I would have seen!

JohnQPublic Hm m m , t hey've got MySpace account s:


02- 23- 2006
Kendra's MySpace

Dana's MySpace

Misser Millersville Police chief t o Officers Seym our and But z: " Sorry boys,
02- 23- 2006 but t he Boro Solicit or says t his set t lem ent 's com ing out of your
paychecks! "

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page156
205
205of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
4 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 90 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

JohnQPublic Looks like Dana's not 21 according t o her profile..... sham e sham e,
02- 23- 2006 at least drink a real beer if you're going t o break t he law.

MYSTRE2ME SHE WAS SO SCARED SHE WENT BACK TO


02- 23- 2006 BED...PLLLEASSSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEE...WHAT WERE THEY SMOKI NG
OR DRI NKI NG.....OH POOR, POOR COLLEGE COEDS....MOM AND
DAD'S MONEY DOWN THE DRAI N....

Dim Bulb QUOTE( M YSTRE2 M E @ Fe b 2 3 2 0 0 6 , 0 4 :5 2 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 4 0 3 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 23- 2006 SHE WAS SO SCARED SHE WENT BACK TO BED..

I f you were her, what do you t hink you would have done ? Sounds
like t hey were t ruly fright ened by t he po- po.

Mrs. JARiggs I t hink t hat is a lit t le st range! ! ! !


02- 23- 2006

bet heball This is what I 'm t hinking;


02- 23- 2006 1) College kids t end t o do st upid t hings,
2) College cops t end t o cat ch college kids doing st upid t hings,
3) Flirt acious College girls st and a bet t er chance of leniency from
College cops,
4) College girls who have who have been let off m ult iple t im es by
t he sam e College cop t end t o t hink t hey can do anyt hing and rely
on t heir " buddy" t o get t hem out of t rouble,
5) College ( any) cops t end t o have big egos and don't like feeling
disrespect ed,
6) Disrespect ed College cops som et im es feel t he need t o reassert
t heir aut horit y
7) A fam iliar College cop face t hat 's already let you get away wit h
m urder over and over again, even at 2: 00 am , t ends t o elicit a
" what ever" response from College girls,
8) See it em # 5,
9) College cops who t hink t hey have t he " goods" on College girls
t end t o t hink t hey can get away wit h anyt hing because t he College
girl doesn't want t o get in t rouble,
10) College cops didn't ant icipat e College girls out rage at a forced
burlesque show would hit t he papers,
11) Massive sm ear cam paign against College girls will m ake
headlines in t he next few days

Just a t heory

BuffaloBill Millersville Borough Police aren't exact ly 'cam pus cops'.


02- 23- 2006

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page157
206
206of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 91 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

j ackooboy My t hought s exact ly Buffalo, but nice crout ique.


02- 23- 2006

why? did anyone not ice t he post er behind t he girls on t he left in t he


02- 23- 2006 second pict ure? m et hinks t hey m ay have done som e st upid t hings
aft er get t ing t he ingredient s from t hat ! st ill- don't go hide in your
bed if you're afraid of t he cops. if you're afraid, call t he st at ion and
verify t hat t he cops are real. if you're afraid because you m ay have
done som et hing st upid and don't want t o get in t rouble for it , t ough
noogies. your problem . i don't know about t he officers in t his case,
t hough. what really happened? guess we'll find out sooner or lat er.

BuffaloBill I t hought I saw Ron Harper in t he background of t hat one pic. Ron
02- 23- 2006 is t hat you at a kegger?

P. Floyd I t hink dana's m yspace account was delet ed.


02- 23- 2006 hm m m ....underage.....pict ures wit h elicit beverages...big news
st ory.

bet heball QUOTE( Bu ffa loBill @ Fe b 2 3 2 0 0 6 , 0 9 :0 7 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 4 7 7 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 23- 2006 Millersville Borough Police aren't exact ly 'cam pus cops'.

My apologies, please re- read m y post ignoring t he word " College"

The_Crow QUOTE( w h y? @ Fe b 2 3 2 0 0 6 , 0 9 :1 9 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 4 8 1 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 23- 2006 did anyone not ice t he post er behind t he girls on t he left in t he
second pict ure?

Yeah, I used t o own t hat one.

RonHarper
02- 23- 2006
QUOTE( Bu ffa loBill @ Fe b 2 3 2 0 0 6 , 1 0 :2 1 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 4 8 2 [ / sn a pba ck ]

I t hought I saw Ron Harper in t he background of t hat one pic. Ron


is t hat you at a kegger?

When I went t o MU for a sem est er and 1/ 2 in 1983, I didn't go t o


t hem !

rh

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page158
207
207of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
6 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 92 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

BuffaloBill Must have been t he hair!


02- 23- 2006

bet heball Sweet Jesus, t hat looks like t he chick I woke up next t o Sunday
02- 23- 2006 m orning, henceforce I shall forever abst ain.

crazy nana 6 I t hink t hat t his seem s a lit t le fishy...


02- 23- 2006

holm er Congrat 's t o all of you.


02- 24- 2006 None of you have t he presum pt ion of innocence. None. Which
m akes you all look m ight y silly and
in fact st upid. Too over t he t op. Frankly, t his is j ust plain t oo
ridulous t o believe.
An em ployer guilt y for em ployees?
cs

RonHarper QUOTE( h olm e r @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 4 :1 1 AM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 5 3 8 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006 Congrat 's t o all of you.
None of you have t he presum pt ion of innocence. None. Which
m akes you all look m ight y silly and
in fact st upid. Too over t he t op. Frankly, t his is j ust plain t oo
ridulous t o believe.
An em ployer guilt y for em ployees?
cs

Act ually I MHO it sounds t oo ridiculous not t o be believable. I m ean,


why are you going int o som eone's house wit hout perm ission? Unless
som eone's life is in danger or you are chasing a m urder, t he 4t h
am endm ent prot ect s you from such " act ivit ies" by t he police.
Believe it or not , you are not required t o open a door t o a cop or let
him in - save som e life t hreat ening issue - which t his was not .

I will t ell you right now - a cop bet t er have a real good reason for
pounding on m y door at 3 AM. Som ebody bet t er be dead or nearly
dead or need som e serious help.

As you said t hough, t here is probably m ore t o t his st ory and by t he


looks of t his t hread, it will be int erest ing. Their at t orney is a good
guy BTW.

BTW, I rem em ber get t ing st opped by a Millersville Cop 20+ years
ago for speeding at 12 pm . He asked if I knew what t he speed lim it
was - 25 m ph - and how fast I was going? " I don't know 45 or 50" .
He showed com passion! I was never living t here but had not hing
but good experiences wit h t he cops t here.

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page159
208
208of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
7 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 93 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

BeingReal QUOTE( Ron H a r pe r @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 5 :2 7 AM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 5 4 4 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006
I will t ell you right now - a cop bet t er have a real good reason for
pounding on m y door at 3 AM. Som ebody bet t er be dead or nearly
dead or need som e serious help.

And for m aking m e show him m y but t ocks!

t wat son3 QUOTE( Be in gRe a l @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 9 :4 6 AM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 5 8 3 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006
And for m aking m e show him m y but t ocks!

I don't know about BeingReal but I am pret t y sure t hat t he cops


don't want t o see Ron's but t ocks.

Dogglebee I 'm j ust shocked t he Millersville cops t ook t im e out of t heir busy
02- 24- 2006 schedules of t icket ing MU st udent s' cars for t his.

RonHarper QUOTE( t w a t son 3 @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 1 1 :1 7 AM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 5 9 0 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006
I don't know about BeingReal but I am pret t y sure t hat t he cops
don't want t o see Ron's but t ocks.

You know Tom , t hat we can agree on!

Can you im agine t he poor girl who had com m ent ary on her but t ?
I t 's pret t y funny but not if it were m y daught er

rh

TwpGuy Does anyone know what t he cops were t hinking? Had t hey t hought
02- 24- 2006 a m ore serious crim e had t aken place?

What kind of person flashes som eone anyhow....?

crushonyou Jackooboy I have t o say I really disagree wit h you on what you
02- 24- 2006 t hink is over t he line. Police officers, cam pus or borough are
supposed t o be a sign of securit y not harassm ent . I t hink it is very
inappropriat e for a m ale figure of aut horit y t o have t hree young
fem ales st and t o " exam ine" t heir but t ocks whet her t here was a
st reaker or not . I am sure t hese fem ales were very affect ed by t his
event . I know t hat if t his would have happened t o m e when I was in
college I would not appreciat ed an older m an looking at m y

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page160
209
209of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
8 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 94 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

but t ocks and com m ent ing on it . And furt herm ore if som et hing
would have happened t o t hese fem ales aft er t his incident , would
t hey have felt com fort able calling t he police for help in any sit uat ion
aft er being violat ed by t hem ? Good t o know t hat m y t ax dollars are
paying for old police officers t o violat e young fem ales t rying t o get
an educat ion!

Buddy I have a quest ion:


02- 24- 2006
I t sounds like t he police j ust walked int o t heir hom e. Are t hey
allowed t o do t hat ?

BeingReal QUOTE( cr u sh on you @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 1 1 :0 0 AM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 0 0 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006 Jackooboy I have t o say I really disagree wit h you on what you
t hink is over t he line. Police officers, cam pus or borough are
supposed t o be a sign of securit y not harassm ent . I t hink it is
very inappropriat e for a m ale figure of aut horit y t o have t hree
young fem ales st and t o " exam ine" t heir but t ocks whet her t here
was a st reaker or not . I am sure t hese fem ales were very affect ed
by t his event . I know t hat if t his would have happened t o m e
when I was in college I would not appreciat ed an older m an
looking at m y but t ocks and com m ent ing on it . And furt herm ore if
som et hing would have happened t o t hese fem ales aft er t his
incident , would t hey have felt com fort able calling t he police for
help in any sit uat ion aft er being violat ed by t hem ? Good t o know
t hat m y t ax dollars are paying for old police officers t o violat e
young fem ales t rying t o get an educat ion!

I have t o agree wit h t he gist of your point s. I always t hought t hat


fem ale exam inat ions were t o be handled by fem ale cops. Som et hing
about t his j ust doesn't sound right , but I also t hink we don't have
enough inform at ion from t his art icle t o really m ake a full
det erm inat ion. For exam ple, t here doesn't seem t o be m uch
inform at ion provided about t he alleged st reaking incident t hat
supposedly sparked t his sit uat ion. Didn't t he police officer see t he
person's hair color? Was t here vandalism involved in t he st reaking
incident ? What m ade t hem pick t his part icular house? Were ot hers
checked as well? Too m any unasked quest ions relat e t o t his art icle,
which is result ing in a cert ain am ount of speculat ion.

And, Ron, you can relax because I would pass...I see enough but t s
every day during diaper changes!

Dim Bulb QUOTE( Tw pGu y @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 1 0 :3 9 AM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 5 9 6 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006
What kind of person flashes som eone anyhow....?

That st alkerperson t hat you j ust put on ignore ?

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page161
210
210of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
9 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 95 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

crushonyou Very good point beingreal it is a lot easier t o est ablish a " st reaker"
02- 24- 2006 by ot her charact erist ics such as hair color, height , weight et c. Not
j ust by exam ining but t ocks and com m ent ing on t hem . I t seem s
very odd t o m e t hat t he only way t hese cops could t ell if it was
t hese girls st reaking was by t heir but t ocks. These com m ent s about
" m y space" and drinking, let s be real who didn't drink when t hey
were in college? I know I did.

TwpGuy QUOTE( D im Bu lb @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 1 1 :2 7 AM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 0 5 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006

That st alkerperson t hat you j ust put on ignore ?

I act ually put him on ignore. The whole st alking t hing was a lit t le
creepy.

DavidAKI Peifer said he saw a girl out side in a G- st ring and he t hought he
02- 24- 2006 would know her from behind...

There are som e holes in t his account .

1. Did he radio int o dispat ch on his eyewit ness account ?


2. Did he pursue t he eyewit nessed st reaker like t hey do in t he show
cops.
3. Did he report anyt hing t o his com m and in order t o est ablish a
court order
before ent ering t he apart m ent ? We are t alking about college kids,
not Bonnie, and Clyde here.
4. Did t he police voice log recorder record t he act ual event as it was
happenning t o cooberat e t he officers eyewit ness account of t he
incident t hat should have been proceeded wit h an act ual pursuit ,
and possible arrest .
5. what was t he t im e of t he act ual occurence claim ed vs t he t im e of
visit at ion t o t he young ladies apart m ent ?
Many quest ions not answered. Quit e confusing.

Buddy Great Quest ions, DavidAKI


02- 24- 2006

NonaYabiznis Perhaps it 's a t hin t echnicalit y, but are you act ually st reaking if you
02- 24- 2006 are wearing a g- st ring?

RonHarper QUOTE( N on a Ya bizn is @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 1 :0 5 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 1 9 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006 Perhaps it 's a t h in t echnicalit y, but are you act ually st reaking if
you are wearing a g- st ring?

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page162
211
211of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
10 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 96 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

I t hink you m ight have cracked open t he plaint iff's case wit h t hat
one

BeingReal I can t ell t hat t hese people are going t o be t he but t of som e serious
02- 24- 2006 j okes!

rot t iem om I f I wasn't an MU grad and form er Millersville resident ( while


02- 24- 2006 at t ending MU) , I 'd t hink t his st ory was absurd. But sadly, I can
easily see t he cops behaving like t his.

And t he girls? t sk. t sk. Back in m y day ( egads, when did I st art
saying t hat ?) , m yspace didn't exist . But really girls, have som e
com m on sense and delet e your account s before you file a federal
lawsuit .

solit ary QUOTE( D im Bu lb @ Fe b 2 3 2 0 0 6 , 0 7 :5 6 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 4 5 3 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006
I f you were her, what do you t hink you would have done ? Sounds
like t hey were t ruly fright ened by t he po- po.

Run or fight . That 's about it . Go back t o bed? Only if it was t o pick
up t he 30- 06, a baseball bat or t he ever cliched golf club. Maybe a
phot o of Micheal Jackson or Sm it hgall in a swim suit . That m ight be
considered unlawful use of let hal force. Eit her one of t hose would
probably st op Freddy in his t racks.
QUOTE( cr u sh on you @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 1 1 :0 0 AM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 0 0 [ / sn a pba ck ]

Jackooboy I have t o say I really disagree wit h you on what you


t hink is over t he line. Police officers, cam pus or borough are
supposed t o be a sign of securit y not harassm ent .

Supposed t o be...
QUOTE( cr u sh on you @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 1 1 :0 0 AM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 0 0 [ / sn a pba ck ]

I t hink it is very inappropriat e for a m ale figure of aut horit y t o


have t hree young fem ales st and t o " exam ine" t heir but t ocks
whet her t here was a st reaker or not . I am sure t hese fem ales
were very affect ed by t his event . I know t hat if t his would have
happened t o m e when I was in college I got st oI would not
appreciat ed an older m an looking at m y but t ocks and com m ent ing
on it .

I got st opped for speeding in MI . The fem ale cop had no problem
frisking m e. I f it was for t he fact t hat I hadn't seen it com ing, it
could have been funny. My girlfriend was wit h m e, but I should
have asked t he out on a dat e. She let m e go aft er m aking m e pour
out m y beer. My unopened, in t he back seat in a cooler beer.
QUOTE( cr u sh on you @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 1 1 :0 0 AM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 0 0 [ / sn a pba ck ]

And furt herm ore if som et hing would have happened t o t hese

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page163
212
212of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
11 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 97 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

fem ales aft er t his incident , would t hey have felt com fort able
calling t he police for help in any sit uat ion aft er being violat ed by
t hem ? Good t o know t hat m y t ax dollars are paying for old police
officers t o violat e young fem ales t rying t o get an educat ion!

Unfort unat ely, I can't say t hat I 'd feel com fort able calling t he cops
for any reason. The only reason t hat I would is because m ost of t he
t im e you'd spend t im e in t he slam m er if you do it yourself.

All in all, t he st ory's t oo weird t o dism iss out of hand. On t he


ot herhand, it 's t oo weird t o j ust accept st raight away eit her. More
info please. Transcript s of police radio would be a good st art , Ron,
can you get t hose?

JohnQPublic QUOTE( r ot t ie m om @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 1 2 :3 5 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 2 5 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006
And t he girls? t sk. t sk. Back in m y day ( egads, when did I st art
saying t hat ?) , m yspace didn't exist . But really girls, have som e
com m on sense and delet e your account s before you file a federal
lawsuit .

Looks like t hey did short ly aft er t he addresses were post ed. I 'm
sure t hat if t hey want ed t o t hey could subpoena t he old account s.
There was anot her phot o of Dana holding what looked like a Colt
45, t he beer, not t he gun. Should have saved all t he phot os.

solit ary QUOTE( Joh n QPu blic @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 1 :1 3 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 3 3 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006

Looks like t hey did short ly aft er t he addresses were post ed. I 'm
sure t hat if t hey want ed t o t hey could subpoena t he old account s.
There was anot her phot o of Dana holding what looked like a Colt
45, t he beer, not t he gun. Should have saved all t he phot os.

At least you were on t op of it , m onday m orning quart erback.

Myspace, exposing personalit ies since 1996.


Anyone have a FaceBook account ? Any goodies in t here?

RonHarper QUOTE( solit a r y @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 1 :4 6 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 2 9 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006
Transcript s of police radio would be a good st art , Ron, can you get
t hose?

Not a public record in Pennsylvania. I n discover, t he girls should be


able t o get t hem .

rot t iem om ... " in m y day" what a hoot !

I have heard good t hings of t he police cheif in Millersville BTW.

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page164
213
213of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
12 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 98 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

rh

P. Floyd QUOTE( solit a r y @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 1 :1 6 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 3 6 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006
At least you were on t op of it , m onday m orning quart erback.

Myspace, exposing personalit ies since 1996.


Anyone have a FaceBook account ? Any goodies in t here?

i believe t o look at som eone's facebook profile you need t o have


gone t o t hat school. t hat is t he way it seem s, in facebook you can
only see if som eone is a m em ber, t o see t heir profile you have t o be
t heir " friend" or go t o t heir school

t wat son3 As a st aunch defender of cops, I really have t o wonder what t hese
02- 24- 2006 guys were t hinking. I f t he fact s in t he st ory are correct , t hese guys
really put cops in a bad light .
Please rem em ber t hat police m isconduct only represent s a sm all
port ion of t he officers, m ost of whom are t rying t o do a good j ob.

Arby Can't wait for t he court case. " Do you swear t o t ell t he t rut h and
02- 24- 2006 not hing BUT t he t rut h?"

JohnQPublic Well, I went t hrough m y cache and found a few m ore. I didn't look
02- 24- 2006 at all t heir pics cause t hat would be creepy so I don't have all t hem .

I 'll adm it I did m y fair share of drinking in college, but aft er t he


whole people- ident ified- as- riot ers- on- video t hing at Penn St at e we
didn't t ake t oo m any phot os of part ies.

Dim Bulb QUOTE( t w a t son 3 @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 1 :4 1 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 4 4 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006 As a st aunch defender of cops, I really have t o wonder what t hese
guys were t hinking. I f t he fact s in t he st ory are correct , t hese
guys really put cops in a bad light .
Please rem em ber t hat police m isconduct only represent s a sm all
port ion of t he officers, m ost of whom are t rying t o do a good j ob.

I f correct , t hen it looks like t he girls have a st rong case. The art icle

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page165
214
214of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
13 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 99 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

did not m ent ion t he am ount of dam ages being sought in t his
Federal case. Maybe t hey com e up wit h a num ber at a lat er dat e ?

solit ary QUOTE( P. Floyd @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 1 :3 2 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 4 1 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006

i believe t o look at som eone's facebook profile you need t o have


gone t o t hat school. t hat is t he way it seem s, in facebook you can
only see if som eone is a m em ber, t o see t heir profile you have t o
be t heir " friend" or go t o t heir school

I don't know. I don't have an account , but t here's got t o be


som eone here who does.

QUOTE( t w a t son 3 @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 1 :4 1 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 4 4 [ / sn a pba ck ]

As a st aunch defender of cops, I really have t o wonder what t hese


guys were t hinking. I f t he fact s in t he st ory are correct , t hese
guys really put cops in a bad light .
Please rem em ber t hat police m isconduct only represent s a sm all
port ion of t he officers, m ost of whom are t rying t o do a good j ob.

There are plent y who t ry t o do a good j ob, but t here's far t oo m any
who are j ust egot ist ical j ackasses. You and I could argue t he som e,
m any, m ost all day. There's not enough oversight of cops, I don't
t hink t here ever could be enough. I 'm not t aking sides at t his point
in t im e. I really wish I could say 'A police office would never do...'
but t hat 's not t he case.

Ham m er I don` t know.I f I was going t o lose m y j ob over looking at a few


02- 24- 2006 but t s,I t hink I would have found som e nice but t s t o look at That ` s
as unat t ract ive a bunch of co- eds as I ` ve ever seen

lboot h Just an observat ion......


02- 24- 2006
Are you aware t hat neit her Dana nor Kendra are Millersville
st udent s... only one of t he girls is a st udent ..soooo I don't
underst and why everyone is writ ing as if t hey are part y girl
st udent s. They were assault ed by a police officer and if t hey were
drinking t he cops would have not iced and som et hing would have
been done about and if t hey were st reaking do you really t hink t hey
would have filed a law suit , m aking it public record so t hat everyone
could get a hold of it ? They would have t ried t o cover it up and not
m ake a big deal about - especially so t heir parent s wouldn't find
out . Please ....people are digging way t o deep int o t his.

Dim Bulb QUOTE( solit a r y @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 2 :1 2 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 5 8 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006 There's not enough oversight of cops, I don't t hink t here ever
could be enough.

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page166
215
215of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
14 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 100 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

i t hink t hat t hey should m ount cam eras on t heir hat s, like som e
have m ount ed in t heir pat rol unit s. Could be a good source of
revenue. The on- cop- cam era video of t his episode would have been
great .

JohnQPublic Wonder of t he st reakers knew t his guy:


02- 24- 2006
ht t p: / / www.nbcolym pics.com / t orinot racker/ 5131225/ det ail.ht m l

solit ary QUOTE( lboot h @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 2 :5 0 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 7 0 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006 Just an observat ion......

Are you aware t hat neit her Dana nor Kendra are Millersville
st udent s... only one of t he girls is a st udent ..soooo I don't
underst and why everyone is writ ing as if t hey are part y girl
st udent s. They were assault ed by a police officer and if t hey were
drinking t he cops would have not iced and som et hing would have
been done about and if t hey were st reaking do you really t hink
t hey would have filed a law suit , m aking it public record so t hat
everyone could get a hold of it ? They would have t ried t o cover it
up and not m ake a big deal about - especially so t heir parent s
wouldn't find out . Please ....people are digging way t o deep int o
t his.

Just an observat ion, if t hey said t he cop slapped t hem at a drunk


check point , I don't t hink we'd be digging t his deep. Since it 's so
bizarre, t hat 's why we're all looking.
As far as t he part y girl t hing, you don't have t o go t o school t o
becom e a part y girl.
Hell, you don't even need t wo firing brain cells t o rub t oget her, look
at Paris Hilt on.

MllersvilleAlum QUOTE( lboot h @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 2 :5 0 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 7 0 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006 Just an observat ion......

Are you aware t hat neit her Dana nor Kendra are Millersville
st udent s... only one of t he girls is a st udent ..soooo I don't
underst and why everyone is writ ing as if t hey are part y girl
st udent s. They were assault ed by a police officer and if t hey were
drinking t he cops would have not iced and som et hing would have
been done about and if t hey were st reaking do you really t hink
t hey would have filed a law suit , m aking it public record so t hat
everyone could get a hold of it ? They would have t ried t o cover it
up and not m ake a big deal about - especially so t heir parent s
wouldn't find out . Please ....people are digging way t o deep int o
t his.

Just because t hey aren't st udent s doesn't m ean anyt hing. I 'm a
recent grad ( in t he last 5 years) and from m y experience t he kids
who st ay around aft er t hey graduat ed, or never at t ended, are t he

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page167
216
216of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
15 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 101 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

wilder ones who are t here j ust for t he college at m osphere of


part ying and carrying on. The one guy was on t he police force for
26 years and t his is his first incident ? Please...sounds like som eone
lit erally got caught wit h t heir pant s down and is now t rying t o cast a
different light on t he sit uat ion t o save som e face.

Dim Bulb QUOTE( M lle r sville Alu m @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 3 :4 6 PM )


02- 24- 2006 [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 8 9 [ / sn a pba ck ]

The one guy was on t he police force for 26 years and t his is his
first incident ? Please...

The art icle did not m ent ion his incident record.

BeingReal QUOTE( Joh n QPu blic @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 3 :3 2 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 8 2 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006 Wonder of t he st reakers knew t his guy:

ht t p: / / www.nbcolym pics.com / t orinot racker/ 5131225/ det ail.ht m l

That is j ust nast y!

Dim Bulb QUOTE( Be in gRe a l @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 4 :1 4 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 9 8 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006
That is j ust nast y!

What does t hat guy's MySpace look like ??

m assagem am a QUOTE( Be in gRe a l @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 4 :1 4 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 9 8 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006
That is j ust nast y!

WHOA.....t hat 's beyond nast y! I t will be int erest ing t o find out , { I f
we ever will} what really went on.

crushonyou Som et hing t ells m e t his cops incident record isn't very clean. Cops
02- 24- 2006 don't usually st art illegally ent ering people's house aft er 26 years
on t he force. why now? I t hink t his cop has been doing it for a long
t im e and j ust has got t en away wit h it . I adm ire t he fem ales for
st anding up for t hem selves.

crushonyou Good point lboot h. Som et hing t ells m e if you were drinking and or
02- 24- 2006 st reaking and t he cops were at your house. You would have been in
a lot of t rouble especially t he girls t hat are underage. And if t hese
cops are t he t ype of cops t o illegally com e int o your house
som et hing t ells m e t hey wouldn't be let t ing people off for underage
drinking. Especially t he cop wit h t he record for high arrest s wit h
drinking. I f t he girls were st reaking or drinking t hey would be t rying

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page168
217
217of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
16 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
Lancaster Online.com: News : Women sue Millersville cops in 'stre... http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/20938
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 102 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

t o cover it up not file a lawsuit so t hat everyone would know about


it .
I m2004- 2006t hese
ean read Lancast
comer Newspapers
m ent s look at all t he accusat ions t hey
PO Box 1328, Lancast er PA 17608, ( 717) 291- 8811
have already had t o t ake. People invading t heir privacy even m ore,
Term s of Service Privacy Policy
looking up all t heir phot os and account s online. Som et hing t ells m e
if you're guilt y you would keep quiet about it and j ust be happy t hat
you got away wit h it .

Dim Bulb QUOTE( Joh n QPu blic @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 1 :5 1 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 4 8 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006

I 'll adm it I did m y fair share of drinking in college...

ht t p: / / www.songm eanings.net / lyric.php?lid= 13154

andy__1000 QUOTE( r ot t ie m om @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 1 2 :3 5 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 2 5 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006 I But really girls, have som e com m on sense and delet e your
account s before you file a federal lawsuit .

But Mom , it 's t he int ernet age!

andy__1000 QUOTE( Joh n QPu blic @ Fe b 2 4 2 0 0 6 , 0 1 :5 1 PM ) [ sn a pba ck ] 1 6 9 6 4 8 [ / sn a pba ck ]


02- 24- 2006 Well, I went t hrough m y cache and found a few m ore. I didn't
look at all t heir pics cause t hat would be creepy so I don't have all
t hem .

I 'll adm it I did m y fair share of drinking in college, but aft er t he


whole people- ident ified- as- riot ers- on- video t hing at Penn St at e
we didn't t ake t oo m any phot os of part ies.

Curiousit y forces m e t o ask....do you know t hese girls personally?


Or was it a google search?

crushonyou JohnQPublic why do you have so m any pict ures? Definit ely creepy. I
02- 24- 2006 t hink t hese girls should be t aking a rest raining order out on you.

why? i drank in college, and t here were som e pict ures, but who in t heir
02- 24- 2006 right m ind would put t he pics online if t hey were underage? really,
now.

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page169
218
218of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
17 of 17 2/26/2006 6:07 PM
!"#$! % &

5100.51. Preservation of rights


Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 103 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

!"! #$ % &

! !

" # $ $ % $ &

% ' % $ ( ) ( * % + # %
% $ % $ " '
& ' $ % $ , & % % $ % -
$ .$ % $ $& & ' %
( / % 0% ( $ %' % $
.$ % 1 % ' $% %' % $ - & ' $%
( % " $ % % $ & $ .$ $%
( $ % 2 ' $ % '3 % % (
* ( 4 * % % 5 $ ' %
&

( % ' ' $ . ' %& &$


$% $ ' ( ( # '
% ' & # %( % # % '
% # $ & % 6 $ 7 (
2 , % ' 4 $ ' % $ $%
( %( 8 9 ( $% ( % % ' $% (
& % : $ ' (

' % % $& & $ ' $


' % $ % $ $ 3 % '$ %
$& % % $ # ( % $
# % $ & #; # %% '
% % %% $&

$( $ # % % & $

' & # % % % $ %( $ $ $
% % 7 %' $ $ ( $ $ % $

< % = $ ( $ %% $ ' ( %
, ( 4! , & % (
4! $ % > $ $& ( % ' ( $ %

$ ' % % 66? 2 , ? " @


! ! % ( / % ' % % .$ % # % % &
( $ % % & %&

" ' $ % # $ $ % $ $ & A

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page170
219
219
1 of
of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am

$ # $ ! $ '(
!"#$! % &

5100.51. Preservation of rights


Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 104 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015
2 ? &

"%( % % B $

& $

%( % % $ %

CC &% C $ !
& # C &
C2 ? &
( % C C2 ? &
$ $& C %( % % $

+ % 2 ? & % "%( % % B $ ( & % % % % % $& % % % D1: %$


$& EF 7 G %$ % $% ' 2 H? , 9 , E'2? % %
$ ' I( 2 $ " % J 7 6 $% DD G ) $ % % % $ $ % $ $
% % % $% $ % = $& $ F $ / $ $
$ & $ % $ # $ $ % $ &$ F $ $ .$ $ ? $ %
$ $ $ $ $ $ .$ "%( % % B $ & % *
$ & ( % $ ? 9 9 ? $ %9 ? % %? $ ? ( ;) F
7 '2? 2 % 8

! " !
#
$" % &'(% ) )

' * ) +,-. /
/ ' 0 1 ( 2
3 #" #3 4
/ )

+ 7$ #D 0 $ % ? & $ % B &$

' () *+ *,
! 1K

- & &. / 0! & , 1 +


/ ,. " !"! *,
LD@K

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page171
220
220
2 of
of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am

# $ ! $ '(
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 105 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page172
221
221
3 of
of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 1 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 106 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page173
222
222
4 of
of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 2 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 107 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page174
223
223
5 of
of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 3 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 108 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page175
224
224
6 of
of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 4 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 109 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page176
225
225
7 of
of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 5 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 110 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page177
226
226
8 of
of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 6 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 111 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page178
227
227
9 of
of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 7 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 112 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page179
228
228
10 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 8 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 113 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page180
229
229
11 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 9 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 114 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page181
230
230
12 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 10 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 115 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page182
231
231
13 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 11 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 116 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page183
232
232
14 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 12 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 117 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page184
233
233
15 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 13 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 118 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page185
234
234
16 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 14 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 119 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page186
235
235
17 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 15 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 120 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page187
236
236
18 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 16 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 121 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page188
237
237
19 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 17 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 122 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page189
238
238
20 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 18 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 123 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page190
239
239
21 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 19 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 124 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page191
240
240
22 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 20 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 125 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page192
241
241
23 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 21 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 126 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page193
242
242
24 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 22 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 127 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page194
243
243
25 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 23 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 128 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page195
244
244
26 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 24 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 129 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page196
245
245
27 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 25 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 130 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page197
246
246
28 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 26 of 30
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 131 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

9
% &
9
: &
+ ;
9%
!
" 9
#

$ 9 - % & $
% &
#
'(
% ) *

#
+
* &
,
-
. / ! " #
$ %
0 . 1

" 23
!
, &/ 4 #)
56678 & 4 $ $ & - - 4 - & /* &
* / 7 <=9 #7>4 & 74 & 29
& / ?

/ $ ?: & 4
& * & - - & / - ?

&

: * * - & / & ?

& ' (

# @ &- - && / * &


* 4 / 4 & & & 4 4 & & < #
::: &# :A>? : & & &-
- & / ?

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page198
247
247
29 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 27 of 30
! !" " # !$
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 132 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015
# &- * 4 & 4
& / A9 4 & $ ?
& BC * 23DD- & &
& & & &- & ?#
- /& & &1 < ?2C>1
4 / 4 & 4 E / <5?7C>1
& & & 4 & $$ E & & - <2?7C>1 ?
" - & / & & &1 & <D?8C>4
- <D? C>4 <D?5C> & <D?5C>? &
* & &* - & & & &
& ?
" 4 4 & $$ 4 & &
- - & * / & & 4 *
/ & ?
& - & - ? & 4
4/ 4 & / 4 - &?
0 / / 4 & 4 F & 4 / & 4 &
- - && / * & ?: & 4
* - * &4 & & *
/ 8 3= ?
* 4 * 4 & &
& < >4 -
&& / * & ?

, &< & / & > - * * && & /


& 2DC ? 1
& & / 4 & 4
& 4 & && 4 && 4 /
4 && - E 1 & $$ 4 4
- /4 & 4 & 4 & & - 4
& & 4 & & * /4 & E" 1* /
/ 4* / 4 4 F & 4 & 4
& & & 4 & 4 & & 4 /
& ?
/1 : / / - & * / &-
& / & / & 1 & 4 & $ - 4
/ & / - 9G & 4
/ & / 4 /
& & &- & 4 4 &
? 4 & & & * *
&? # & 4 &
&? * 4 && & - && /
& ?% & 9 / & - &
* & ? & &
?

)&

* - & / - &* & E &&


* * 7D & 5DD /? ) * ? - &*
& - / 4 & * & & 4
& & 4 & & ?

& & 4 - ?
! - / < 4 > & &
- & / * - & & &?

- ,

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page199
248
248
30 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 28 of 30
! ! !" " # !$
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 133 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

! """

!
" #
$ %

& '
(
! ! ) '
' # *

( & +
* ,
-

) .
!
/
)
-

( ! 0
1 % % 2 3 4 % 4
$ 1

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page200
249
249
31 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 29 of 30
!" #$
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 134 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

! # $ # %&
& ' ' (%
# ) ! && !

! 2& 3) !& , 4 + 5!
, # ! #6 1
$ &7& $ $ &
* # ! # $ #
+ , ! # " " *& - '
1# , ,
+ .& / & &+ / && 0 ! ,, * 1 , # !
!' !, ' $ ! !

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page201
250
250
32 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am
Page No. 30 of 30
!" #$
! "## $ $ % # #& '() ' %*+,-./0-)1 ' ) %!'

5100.51. Preservation of rights


Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 135 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

! "# $% & "


' ( ) # * +,- . . # $

/ 0 1 2 # -3 -,3, 4567

5 1 2 -3 # -,3, ,85-+533 !,9,,


& : 5( 5# $% &
5( ;
5 0

! ! " " ! "" ! #

$ # % &% '#
! # % !

( ) "" ! # #
"

1 2 # -3 -,3, -59, / 0 $ 5

! " #$ % % & "


% " '
((
% $ # ) %) $ $ *
+,,-
((
* " . $ # %/ 0 %* . %& #
. +, # +,1, ) 2
((
2 2 %
((
%) 3,+/ $ % $ % %
4 " 5! / 2 )) $ $ 6% 2 )
) 2 2 7' % 8
9 5 .4 :". % !; 4 %: . <:* : % '

. 8 # / = . %) > :4 . %;
:<!;< 6 " 3# +,1, ) 5 ) 2 ) 2
#$ 2 ) 7? ) %
2 ) %$ ) !
. )% 2 $ " #
'

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page202
251
251
33 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am

0 *( .#(0#(+0+ 2",3
! "## $ $ % # #& '() ' %*+,-./0-)1 ' ) %!'

5100.51. Preservation of rights


Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 136 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015
. # $ % ) #) ) ?
%

*
+ $ #"
!!! #"
!!! #" ! "
" ,,!!! , #"-
!!! ' ,
!!! ! ,
!!! ! ," ' , *
!!! # # , #"

2 5 * +
$ #" ' "# ./0
# "# 1( 2 ! 3! # '
' # ! & 4 '5 1&
" # & 6 # +' 7 2 8 # ..93 : ' # ! ' ' # "#
# ! # ' ! ' ! ! # " # ;" "# #" ( # < # #
! '# # # # " # " " # # ( # # ' ' =# # #
# '" # # # "# # ' =# + $ #" '
> " ' #! ' # 5 ) ! 5 # 5 #
:" ( 2 ! ' & ?

& 5 @# ' ' 1 & 3 " " '


" % ' * # = # '# A A # A # A # ' #
# " B ' +'' B " # ' A " A " " '
# ' # ' # )+ C >& C "
"" " # # & 4
./0A ! " ' ! " & #
D ': " , # 5 # + 5 # ' A A
' A ; # ' A A ' ! ' # # '

5 37 # -,3, 3+5-75+6 !,9,,


& : 5# $% &
5( ;
5 0

" ! #

& 5$)

' # ' )& ++

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
F ! 2# # ' # ;
$

F ! 2# . G # # " ! ) $ #

%. . ) < +,- . ' %/ & = < 0


) < % ' # -3 -,3, #2'
9HG/I

Stan
Stan
302 J.
Stan
Stan Mental
J.
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
HealthMental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page203
252
252
34 of
of
of34
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30,
April2016
17,
8,
17,2015
2010
2015
am

( *( .#(0#(+0+ 2",3
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 137 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page204
253
253
1 of
of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 138 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page205
254
254
2 of
of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 139 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page206
255
255
3 of
of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 140 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page207
256
256
4 of
of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 141 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page208
257
257
5 of
of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 142 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page209
258
258
6 of
of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 143 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page210
259
259
7 of
of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 144 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page211
260
260
8 of
of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 145 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page212
261
261
9 of
of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 146 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page213
262
262
10 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 147 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page214
263
263
11 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 148 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page215
264
264
12 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 149 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page216
265
265
13 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 150 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page217
266
266
14 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 151 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page218
267
267
15 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 152 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page219
268
268
16 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 153 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page220
269
269
17 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 154 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page221
270
270
18 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 155 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page222
271
271
19 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 156 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page223
272
272
20 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 157 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page224
273
273
21 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 158 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page225
274
274
22 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 159 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page226
275
275
23 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 160 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page227
276
276
24 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 161 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page228
277
277
25 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 162 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page229
278
278
26 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 163 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page230
279
279
27 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 164 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page231
280
280
28 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 165 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page232
281
281
29 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 166 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page233
282
282
30 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 167 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page234
283
283
31 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 168 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page235
284
284
32 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 169 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page236
285
285
33 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 170 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page237
286
286
34 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 171 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page238
287
287
35 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 172 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page239
288
288
36 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 173 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
LGHJ.J.
Stan
Stan July
J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
2009 302Mental
Mental
Mental
Mental
Warrant
Health
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page
Page240
289
289
37 of
of
of37
385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 174 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page241
290
290of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 175 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page242
291
291of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 176 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page243
292
292of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 177 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page244
293
293of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 178 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page245
294
294of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 179 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page246
295
295of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Record Page 180 of 214 Thursday, December 17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page247
296
296of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.1 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.181
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page248
297
297of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.2 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.182
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page249
298
298of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.3 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.183
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page250
299
299of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.4 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.184
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page251
300
300of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.5 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.185
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page252
301
301of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.6 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.186
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page253
302
302of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.7 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.187
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page254
303
303of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.8 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.188
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page255
304
304of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.9 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.189
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page256
305
305of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.10Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.190
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page257
306
306of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.11Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.191
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page258
307
307of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.12Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.192
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page259
308
308of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.13Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.193
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page260
309
309of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.14Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.194
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page261
310
310of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.15Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.195
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page262
311
311of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.1 Caterbone
Stan of 4 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.196
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page263
312
312of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.2 Caterbone
Stan of 4 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.197
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page264
313
313of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.3 Caterbone
Stan of 4 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.198
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page265
314
314of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.4 Caterbone
Stan of 4 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.199
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page266
315
315of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.1 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.200
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page267
316
316of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.2 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.201
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page268
317
317of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.3 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.202
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page269
318
318of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.4 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.203
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page270
319
319of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.5 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.204
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page271
320
320of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.6 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.205
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page272
321
321of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.7 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.206
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page273
322
322of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.8 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.207
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page274
323
323of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.9 Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.208
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page275
324
324of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.10Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.209
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page276
325
325of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.11Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.210
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page277
326
326of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.12Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.211
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page278
327
327of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.13Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.212
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page279
328
328of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.14Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.213
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page280
329
329of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
PageJ.15Caterbone
Stan of 15 Mental Health Record Stan
PageJ.214
Caterbone
of 214 Thursday,
Thursday,
December
October 15,
17, 2015

Stan
Stan
StanJ.J.
Stan J.
J.Caterbone
Caterbone
Caterbone
CaterboneMental
Mental
Mental
MentalHealth
Health
Health
HealthArguments
Arguments
Arguments
Law Suit v. LGHPage
Page
Page281
330
330of
of
of385
330
330 Friday
Thursday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
December
December
December
December
30, 2016
17,
17,2015
2015
am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

CHAPTER
DIVIDER

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 282 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 283 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

CHAPTER
DIVIDER

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 284 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
MENTAL HEALTH PROCEDURES ACT
7111. Confidentiality of Records.

(a) All documents concerning persons in treatment shall be kept confidential and, without the person's
written consent, may not be released or their contents disclosed to anyone except:

1. those engaged in providing treatment for the person;

2. the county administrator, pursuant to section 110 [ 7110 of this title];

3. a court in the course of legal proceedings authorized by this act; and

4. pursuant to Federal rules, statutes and regulations governing disclosure of patient information
where treatment is undertaken in a Federal agency.

In no event, however, shall privileged communications, whether written or oral, be disclosed to anyone
without such written consent. This shall not restrict the collection and analysis of clinical or statistical data
by the department, the county administrator or the facility so long as the use and dissemination of such
data does not identify individual patients. Nothing herein shall be construed to conflict with section 8 of
the act of April 14, 1972 (P.L. 221, No. 63), known as the "Pennsylvania Drug and Alcohol Abuse Act." [71
P.S. 1690.108]

(b) This section shall not restrict judges of the courts of common pleas, mental health review officers and
county mental health and mental retardation administrators from disclosing information to the
Pennsylvania State Police or the Pennsylvania State Police from disclosing information to any person, in
accordance with the provisions of 18 Pa.C.S. 6105(c)(4) (relating to persons not to possess, use,
manufacture, control, sell or transfer firearms.)

[Note: This section has been suspended insofar as inconsistent with the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary
Enforcement by Pa.R.D.E. 601.]

CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

WE, the people of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, grateful to Almighty God for
the blessings of civil and religious liberty, and humbly invoking His guidance, do ordain and
establish this Constitution.

Article 1

DECLARATION OF RIGHTS

That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government
may be recognized and unalterably established, WE DECLARE THAT -

Inherent Rights of Mankind

Section 1.
All men are born equally free and independent, and have certain inherent and indefeasible rights, among
which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing and protecting
property and reputation, and of pursuing their own happiness.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 285 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
CHAPTER 5100. MENTAL HEALTH PROCEDURES
GENERAL PROVISIONS

5100.32. Nonconsensual release of information.


(a) Records concerning persons receiving or having received treatment shall be kept confidential and
shall not be released nor their content disclosed without the consent of a person given under 5100.34
(relating to consensual release to third parties), except that relevant portions or summaries may be
released or copied as follows:

(1) To those actively engaged in treating the individual, or to persons at other facilities, including
professional treatment staff of State Correctional Institutions and county prisons, when the person is being
referred to that facility and a summary or portion of the record is necessary to provide for continuity of
proper care and treatment.

(2) To third party payors, both those operated and financed in whole or in part by any governmental
agency and their agents or intermediaries, or those who are identified as payor or copayor for services and
who require information to verify that services were actually provided. Information to be released without
consent or court order under this subsection is limited to the staff names, the dates, types and costs of
therapies or services, and a short description of the general purpose of each treatment session or service.

(3) To reviewers and inspectors, including the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Hospitals
(JCAH) and Commonwealth licensure or certification, when necessary to obtain certification as an eligible
provider of services.

(4) To those participating in PSRO or Utilization Reviews.

(5) To the administrator, under his duties under applicable statutes and regulations.

(6) To a court or mental health review officer, in the course of legal proceedings authorized by the act
or this chapter.

(7) In response to a court order, when production of the documents is ordered by a court under
5100.35(b) (relating to release to courts).

(8) To appropriate Departmental personnel 5100.38 (relating to child or patient abuse).

(9) In response to an emergency medical situation when release of information is necessary to prevent
serious risk of bodily harm or death. Only specific information pertinent to the relief of the emergency may
be released on a nonconsensual basis.

(10) To parents or guardians and others when necessary to obtain consent to medical treatment.

(11) To attorneys assigned to represent the subject of a commitment hearing.

(b) Current patients or clients or the parents of patients under the age of 14 shall be notified of the
specific conditions under which information may be released without their consent.

(c) Information made available under this section shall be limited to that information relevant and
necessary to the purpose for which the information is sought. The information may not, without the
patients consent, be released to additional persons or entities, or used for additional purposes. Requests
for information and the action taken should be recorded in the patients records.
Notes of Decisions
Duty to Report

Mental healthcare workers do not have an affirmative duty to investigate and report possible crimes
involving their patients. Hennessy v. Santiago, 708 A.2d 1269 (Pa. Super. 1998).

Release
Stan of Information
J. Caterbone in Response
Mental Health tov.Medical
Law Suit LGHPageEmergency
286 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Regulations which provide for the nonconsensual release of confidential information when release is
necessary to prevent harm or death in response to medical emergency may include situations wherein a
psychiatric patients threats to harm a third party are disclosed. Ms. B. v. Montgomery County Emergency
Service, 799 F.Supp. 534 (E.D. Pa. 1992), affirmed, 989 F.2d 488 (3d Cir. Pa. 1993); cert. denied, 510 U.
S. 860, 126 L. Ed. 2d 133, 114 S. Ct. 174 (1993).
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 3800.20 (relating to confidentiality of records); 55 Pa. Code
5100.4 (relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5100.31 (relating to scope and policy); 55 Pa. Code 5100.34
(relating to consensual release to third parties); 55 Pa. Code 5100.90a (relating to State mental
hospital admission of involuntarily committed individualsstatement of policy); 55 Pa. Code 5200.41
(relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code
5210.26 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa.
Code 5221.52 (relating to notice of confidentiality and nondiscrimination); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.26
(relating to confidentiality).

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 287 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
CHAPTER 5100. MENTAL HEALTH PROCEDURES
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec.

5100.1. Legal base.


5100.2. Definitions.
5100.3. Statement of policy.
5100.4. Scope.
TREATMENT

5100.11. Adequate treatment.


5100.12. Treatment facilities.
5100.13. Responsibility for formulation and review of treatment plan.
5100.14. Appeal.
5100.15. Contents of treatment plan.
5100.16. Review and periodic reexamination.
MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW OFFICER AND PROCEEDINGS

5100.21. Proceedings.
5100.22. Consultation and education.
5100.23. Written application, petitions, statements and certifications.
CONFIDENTIALITY OF MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS

5100.31. Scope and policy.


5100.32. Nonconsensual release of information.
5100.33. Patients access to records and control over release of records.
5100.34. Consensual release to third parties.
5100.35. Release to courts.
5100.36. Departmental access to records and data collection.
5100.37. Records relating to drug and alcohol abuse or dependence.
5100.38. Child or patient abuse.
5100.39. Release of records.
FORMS

5100.41. Forms.
PATIENT RIGHTS

5100.51. Preservation of rights.


5100.52. Statement of principle.
5100.53. Bill of rights for patients.
5100.54. Manual of rights for persons in treatment.
5100.55. Notification of rights.
5100.56. Existing regulations.
CONTINUITY OF CARE

5100.61. Continuity of care.


Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 288 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
VOLUNTARY TREATMENT

5100.71. Voluntary examination and treatment.


5100.72. Applications.
5100.73. Explanation and consent to inpatient treatment.
5100.74. Notice to parents regarding voluntary inpatient treatment of minors.
5100.75. Physical examination and formulation of individualized treatment plan.
5100.76. Notice of withdrawal.
5100.77. Discharge from voluntary inpatient treatment.
5100.78. Transfer of persons in voluntary treatment.
INVOLUNTARY TREATMENT

5100.81. Involuntary examination and treatment.


5100.82. Jurisdiction and venue of legal proceedings.
5100.83. Generally.
5100.84. Persons who may be subject to involuntary emergency examination and treatment.
5100.85. Standards.
5100.86. Involuntary emergency examination and treatment not to exceed 120 hours.
5100.87. Extended involuntary emergency treatment not to exceed 20 days.
5100.88. Court-ordered involuntary treatment not to exceed 90 days.
5100.89. Additional periods of court-ordered involuntary treatment not to exceed 180 days.
5100.90. Transfers of persons in involuntary treatment.
5100.90a. State mental hospital admission of involuntarily committed individualsstatement of policy.
PERSONS CHARGED WITH A CRIME OR UNDER SENTENCE

5100.91. General.
5100.92. Voluntary examination and treatment of a person charged with a crime or serving a sentence.
5100.93. Costs of treatment.
Authority
The provisions of this Chapter 5100 issued under sections 107116 of the Mental Health Procedures Act (50
P. S. 71077116); and the Mental Health and Mental Retardation Act of 1996 (50 P. S. 4101 4704),
unless otherwise noted.
Source
The provisions of this Chapter 5100 adopted January 26, 1979, effective January 27, 1979, 9 Pa.B. 315;
amended October 12, 1979, effective October 13, 1979, 9 Pa.B. 3460.
Cross References
This chapter cited in 55 Pa. Code 1151.31 (relating to participation requirements); 55 Pa. Code 5300.1
(relating to accreditation); 55 Pa. Code 5300.2 (relating to not Nationally accredited or certified); and 55 Pa.
Code 5320.22 (relating to governing body).

GENERAL PROVISIONS

5100.1. Legal base.


The legal base for this chapter is section 112 of the Mental Health Procedures Act (50 P. S. 7112), section
201 of the Mental Health and Mental Retardation Act of 1966 (50 P. S. 4201), and section 1021 of the Public
Welfare Code (62 P. S. 1021).

5100.2. Definitions.
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 289 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the
context clearly indicates otherwise:

ActThe Mental Health Procedures Act (50 P. S. 71017503).

AdministratorThe person appointed to carry out the duties specified in section 305 of the Mental Health and
Mental Retardation Act of 1966 (50 P. S. 4305).

AgencyAn instrumentality of the United States, its departments and agencies, including the Veterans
Administration.

Approved facilityA facility as defined by section 103 of the act (50 P. S. 7103) which meets the standards
of this chapter and other applicable Department regulations or obtains an exemption in writing from the
Department under section 105 of the act (50 P. S. 7105).

Behavorial consentA demonstrated willingness by the patient to remain voluntarily in the facility based
upon a general understanding of the nature of the usual treatment, possible restraints upon free activity, and
daily life within the facility. A general understanding may be shown by a finding that a person in treatment has
participated in scheduled activities and does not protest continued participation.

County of residenceThe county wherein the person had a legal residence prior to being admitted or
committed to an approved facility for treatment.

Designated facilityThe approved facility named by the county administrator as a provider of one or more
specific services. A facility so designated, either on a general basis or on a case by case basis must be identified
in the county annual plan. The administrator shall address the publics need to know where and how they can
obtain services under the act.

DirectorThe administrative head of a facility, including a superintendent or his designee.

Director of treatment teamA physician or licensed clinical psychologist designated by the facility director to
assure that each patient receives treatment under the act and this chapter and that the facilitys treatment
responsibility to the patient, as defined in this chapter, the Mental Health/Mental Retardation Act of 1966 and
the act, are discharged. The director of the treatment team is responsible for implementing and reviewing the
individualized treatment plan, for participating in the coordination of service delivery between other service
providers, and for insuring that the unique skills and knowledge of each team member are utilized. The director
of the treatment team is responsible for encouraging the person in treatment to become increasingly involved in
decisions regarding the treatment planning process.

Expert in the field of mental healthA mental health professional whose training, experience and
demonstrated achievements clearly exceed the minimum standards required for recognition as a professional in
his discipline, and whose broad-based skills and knowledge in his specific areas of specialty are recognized by
the members of his profession to be at the highest level.

Health professional in mental healthA person who by years of education, training, and experience in mental
health settings has achieved professional recognition and standing as defined by their respective discipline,
including, but not limited to medicine, social work, psychology, nursing, occupational therapy, recreational
therapy, and vocational rehabilitation; and who has obtained if applicable, licensure, registration, or
certification.

Inpatient treatmentAll treatment that requires full-time or part-time residence in a facility as defined in
section 103 of the act (50 P. S. 7103).

Involuntary
Stan emergency
J. Caterbone examinationThe
Mental Health physical and
Law Suit v. LGHPage 290 mental
of 385 evaluation by a physician of an individual
Friday December 30, 2016 am
taken to a facility under section 302 of the act (50 P. S. 7302). 5100.51. Preservation of rights

Involutary emergency treatmentThe treatment provided to an individual taken to a facility under section 302
of the act (50 P. S. 7302). Such treatment in the absence of the individuals consent, shall be limited to that
treatment which is necessary to protect the life or health, or both, of the individual or to control behavior by the
individual which is likely to result in physical injury to others.

Least restrictive alternateThe least restrictive placement or status available and appropriate to meet the
needs of the patient and includes both restrictions on personal liberty and the proximity of the treatment facility
to the persons natural environment. This concept stresses the importance of helping each person in need of
services to seek those services voluntarily. The degree of restriction or the degree of separation from the natural
environment is dependent upon both the severity of the persons dysfunction and his strengths and resources to
function in that environment. The range of treatment alternatives, stemming from the patients natural
environment, through supportive services to 24-hour hospitalization, must be considered in light of the persons
capability of handling daily tasks and stress and the need, if any, for varying degrees of support or supervision.

Licensed clinical psychologistA psychologist licensed under the act of March 23, 1972 (P. L. 136, No. 52)
(63 P. S. 12011215) who holds a doctoral degree from an accredited university and is duly trained and
experienced in the delivery of direct preventive assessment and therapeutic intervention services to individuals
whose growth, adjustment, or functioning is actually impaired or is demonstrably at risk of impairment.

Mental illnessThose disorders listed in the applicable APA Diagnostic and Statistical Manual; provided
however, that mental retardation, alcoholism, drug dependence and senility do not, in and of themselves,
constitute mental illness. The presence of these conditions however, does not preclude mental illness.

Mental Health and Mental Retardation Act of 1966The act of October 20, 1966 (P. L. 96, No. 3) (50 P. S.
41014704).

Peace officerAny person who by virtue of his office of public employment is vested by law with a duty to
maintain public order, to make arrests for offenses, whether that duty extends to all offenses or is limited to
specific offenses, or any person on active State duty under section 311 of The Military Code of 1949 (51 P. S.
1-311). Prison wardens and guards shall be considered peace officers for purposes of the act.

PhysicianA person licensed to practice medicine or osteopathy in this Commonwealth.

Preliminary evaluationThe initial assessment or evaluation of the physical and mental condition of an
individual; it may be conducted without substantiation by formal testing procedures. The evaluation includes an
assessment of the persons specific physical, psychological, developmental, familial, educational or vocational,
social, and environmental needs in order to determine the adequacy, of the persons logic, judgment, insight,
and self control to responsibly meet his needs.

Qualified mental health personnelA person employed in the fields of mental health care, treatment or
rehabilitation whose experience, training, and supervision is commensurate with his assigned tasks and who has
not yet met the criteria of his own profession for recognition as a health professional. Such persons shall work in
programs which are under the direction of mental health professionals.

Treatment planAn individualized plan of treatment as defined in section 107 of the act (50 P. S. 7107),
which imposes the least restrictive alternative consistent with affording the person adequate and appropriate
treatment for his condition.

Treatment teamAn interdisciplinary team of at least three persons appointed by the facility director,
composed of mental health professionals, health professionals and other persons who may be relevant to the
patients treatment. At least one member of the team shall be a physician. The treatment team shall formulate
and review an individualized treatment plan for every person who is in treatment under the act. The treatment
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 291 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51.
team shall consult with appropriate professionals regarding the inclusion in the treatment Preservation
plan of specific of rights
modalities not within the training or experience of the members of the treatment team.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.71 (relating to voluntary examination and treatment).

5100.3. Statement of policy.


(a) The act establishes procedures for the treatment of mentally ill persons. The procedures are to be applied
consistently with the principles of due process to make voluntary and involuntary treatment available where the
need is great and where the absence of treatment could result in serious harm to the mentally ill person or to
others. The act and the Mental Health and Mental Retardation Act of 1966, set forth the Commonwealths
policy and procedures regarding the provision of mental health services. This chapter implements and
supplements the act and the Mental Health and Mental Retardation Act of 1966, and are to be read together with
the applicable provisions of the act and the Mental Health and Mental Retardation Act of 1966.
(b) It is the policy of the Commonwealth to seek to assure that adequate treatment is available with the least
restrictions necessary to meet each clients needs. While this policy remains a shared responsibility between
State, county, and facility personnel, the accountability for recommending the transfer to the least restrictive
alternatives available remains a responsibility of those directing treatment. Adequate treatment provided in an
individuals own community or as close as possible to his own home shall be preferred.
(c) Persons who are mentally retarded, senile, alcoholic or drug dependent shall be afforded mental health
examination or treatment if they are also diagnosed as mentally ill, or if there is a reasonable probability that
upon examination such diagnosis will be established.
(d) Persons in treatment under the act shall be afforded necessary diagnostic or treatment procedures as defined
in their treatment plan for conditions of mental retardation, senility, alcohol, or drug abuse when it is determined
that the absence of such procedures will be detrimental to the progress of the person accomplishing the goals of
treatment.

5100.4. Scope.
(a) This chapter applies to all involuntary treatment of mentally ill persons, whether inpatient or outpatient, and
for all voluntary inpatient treatment of mentally ill persons.
(b) Persons 70 years of age or older who have been continuously hospitalized in a State-operated facility for at
least 10 years and who are chronically disabled shall not be subject to the procedures of the act.
(1) The Department extends the protections of 5100.11, 5100.135100.16, 5100.315100.39 and
5100.515100.56 to these persons.
(2) The Department may continue to provide all necessary treatment to such persons regardless of their ability
to freely give rational informed consent except when such a person protests treatment or residence at a State
operated facility.
(3) Persons described in this subsection may become subject to involuntary treatment when the person
protests and criteria for involuntary treatment are met.

TREATMENT

5100.11. Adequate treatment.


(a) Adequate treatment provided by an approved facility shall be designed on an individual basis under the
relevant statutes, regulations, and professional standards to promote the recovery from mental illness.
(b) Treatment provided on an inpatient, outpatient or partial hospitalization basis shall
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 292 of 385
reflect the needs of the
Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51.
individual both independently and in light of the community resources, family or friends Preservation
available to lendof rights
support and assistance to the person while in treatment. These resources shall be considered in determining the
adequacy of the least restrictive setting appropriate to his treatment.
(c) The adequacy of an individuals treatment may also be reviewed through mechanisms of peer review and
utilization review.
(d) Involuntary treatment, voluntary outpatient treatment funded at least in part with public moneys or
voluntary inpatient treatment is not adequate treatment unless it is provided in or at an approved facility or by an
agency of the United States.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.4 (relating to scope); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.22 (relating to
governing body).

5100.12. Treatment facilities.


(a) The Department, through the Deputy Secretary of Mental Health, will approve facilities under section 105
of the act (50 P. S. 7105). Designation of appropriate approved facilities within the county shall be made by
the county administrator for those patients using mental health/mental retardation (MH/MR) funds. All other
patients may use any approved facility.
(b) All mental health facilities providing or planning to provide involuntary treatment or voluntary treatment
shall be approved annually by the Department by application to the Deputy Secretary of Mental Health.
(c) Inpatient facilities treating persons who are either enrolled in or who are about to be enrolled in a county
mental health program shall notify the appropriate administrator of the proposed discharge plan as early as
possible. The facility shall encourage interagency cooperation in developing predischarge planning.
(d) Chapters 4210 and 5300 (relating to description of services and service areas; and private psychiatric
hospital) shall be interpreted consistently with this chapter.
(e) Facilities requesting an exemption from approval standards shall submit a written request to the Deputy
Secretary of Mental Health. Each request shall state the compelling reasons why an exemption should be
granted and the duration of such exemption.
(f) The administrator shall publicly designate which approved facilities are available to provide involuntary
emergency examinations, involuntary treatment or voluntary treatment funded in whole or in part by MH/MR
funds.

5100.13. Responsibility for formulation and review of treatment plan.


(a) The director of the treatment team shall assure that staff trained and experienced in the use of the modalities
proposed in the treatment plan participate in its development, implementation and review.
(b) The director of the treatment team shall be responsible for:
(1) Insuring that the person in treatment is encouraged to become increasingly involved in the treatment
planning process.
(2) Implementing and reviewing the individualized treatment plan and participating in the coordination of
service delivery with other service providers.
(3) Insuring that the unique skills and knowledge of each team member are utilized and that specialty
consultants are utilized when needed.
(c) Although a treatment team must be under the direction of either a physician or a licensed clinical
psychologist, specific treatment modalities may be under the direction of other mental health professionals when
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 293 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
they are specifically trained to administer or direct such modalities. 5100.51. Preservation of rights

Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.4 (relating to scope); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.22 (relating to
governing body).

5100.14. Appeal.
(a) Each facility shall have a clearly defined appeal system through which any patient who wishes to voice
objections concerning his treatment shall be heard and have objections determined.
(b) Each facility shall monitor the appeal system to see that it works properly and records shall be maintained
for review for certification and licensure and for Departmental review in order to investigate any complaint.
(c) All patients shall be advised of such system and be encouraged to use it when they believe their treatment
plan is not necessary or appropriate to their needs.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.4 (relating to scope).

5100.15. Contents of treatment plan.


(a) A comprehensive individualized plan of treatment shall:
(1) Be formulated to the extent feasible, with the consultation of the patient. When appropriate to the patients
age, or with the patients consent, his family, personal guardian, or appropriate other persons should be
consulted about the plan.
(2) Be based upon diagnostic evaluation which includes examination of the medical, psychological, social,
cultural, behavorial, familial, educational, vocational, and developmental aspects of the patients situation.
(3) Set forth treatment objectives and prescribe an integrated program of therapies, activities, experiences,
and appropriate education designed to meet these objectives.
(4) Result from the collaborative recommendation of the patients interdisciplinary treatment team.
(5) Be maintained and updated with progress notes, and be retained in the patients medical record on a form
developed by the facility and approved by the Deputy Secretary of Mental Health, as part of the licensing
approval process.
(b) The treatment plan shall indicate what less restrictive alternatives were considered and why they were not
utilized. If the plan provides for restraints, the basis for the necessity for such restraints must be stated in the
plan under Chapter 13 (relating to use of restraints in treating patients/residents).
(c) Individual treatment plans shall be written in terms easily explainable to the lay person and a copy of the
current treatment plan shall be available for review by the person in treatment.
(d) When the most appropriate form of treatment for the individual is not available or is too expensive to be
feasible, that fact shall be noted on the treatment plan form.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.4 (relating to scope); and 55 Pa. Code 5100.75 (relating to
physical examination and formulation of individualized treatment plan).

5100.16. Review and periodic reexamination.


(a) At least once every 30 days, every person in treatment under the act shall have his treatment plan reviewed.
This review shall be based upon section 108(a) of the act (50 P. S. 7108(a)). A report of the review and
findings shall be summarized
Stan J. Caterbone in Law
Mental Health the patients clinical record.
Suit v. LGHPage 294 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
(b) The decisions and redisposition required by section 108(b) of the act, based upon such reexamination and
review, shall be recorded in the patients clinical record as either a progress note or in any other appropriate
form acceptable to the agencys records committee.
(c) Such record shall include information required by section 108(c) of the act.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.4 (relating to scope); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.52 (relating to review
and periodic reexamination).

MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW OFFICER AND PROCEEDINGS

5100.21. Proceedings.
(a) The county administrator shall inform the Deputy Secretary of Mental Health of the appointment of mental
health review officers. If no review officer is appointed, then the administrator should inform the Department of
the judge who hears and determines commitments under the act. The Department will inform the mental health
review officers and courts of new policies, procedures, and interpretations relating to the act and the provision
of mental health services and will make available training to aid them in carrying out their duties.
(b) A mental health review officer, unless specifically authorized by the court having jurisdiction over the
person, shall not reduce the conditions of security of a person committed under section 401 of the act (50 P. S.
7401).
(c) The administrators office shall assist petitioners with the preparation of the commitment petitions,
applications, and request for certification for persons not already subject to involuntary treatment.
(d) The administrator shall designate representatives to issue warrants for involuntary emergency
commitments.
(e) The administrator shall coordinate, when designated by the court, all hearings and file all applications and
certifications under the act.
(f) Notwithstanding any other provision of the act, no judge or mental health review officer shall specify to the
treatment team the adoption of any treatment technique, modality, or drug therapy.

5100.22. Consultation and education.


The administrator shall, in discharging his duties under the Mental Health and Mental Retardation Act of 1966,
provide the court or mental health review officer with:
(1) Education and training regarding principles and practices of mental health services.
(2) Administrative consultation regarding the nature and availability of approved and designated mental
health facilities and services.
(3) Case consultation if so ordered by the court or mental health review officer.

5100.23. Written application, petitions, statements and certifications.


(a) Written application, petitions, statements and certifications required under this chapter shall be made upon
forms issued or approved by the Department.
(b) The forms listed in 5100.41 (relating to forms) have been issued by the Department, and their use is
mandated. No substitute for such forms is permitted without prior written authorization of the Deputy Secretary
of Mental Health.
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 295 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
(c) Other forms required under this chapter may be developed by the administrator or the facility, but are
subject to the approval of the Department.
(d) Unsworn falsificationall statements written under all applications, petitions and certifications required
under the act on Departmentally issued or approved forms MH 781, 783, 784, 785, 786 and 787, shall contain
the following noticeold forms may be utilized until the supply is exhausted:
ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY PROVIDES ANY FALSE INFORMATION WHEN COMPLETING
THIS FORM MAY BE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION.
(e) When a person is admitted for voluntary treatment and only when no part of his treatment is provided with
public funds, the new voluntary admission Form MH-788 may be used. This form will be identical to Form
MH-781 with the exception that the notice concerning the penalty for giving false information will be deleted.
Until form MH-788 is printed and distributed, existing Form MH-781 may be utilized for this group of persons.
Each facility may make the necessary deletion on Form MH-781 to conform with section 110(c) of the act (50 P.
S. 7110(c)).
(f) Submission to county administrator:
(1) Except as set forth in paragraphs (2)(5), Forms MH 781, 783, 784, 785, 786 and 787, shall be provided
to the administrator under section 110 of the act (50 P. S. 7110).
(2) No Form MH-788 need be provided to the administrator on behalf of a patient admitted for voluntary
treatment when reimbursement for treatment provided the patient will not include public monies. This shall not
affect in any way the applicability to such patients of the rights and procedures afforded voluntary patients by
the act and this chapter. For admission to a State facility forms must be provided to the administrator.
(3) The administrator shall review all applications, petitions, statements and certifications provided to the
administrators office to determine whether the services needed are available and to assure a continuity of care.
(4) The administrator may designate a place other than his office for filing of the forms mentioned in this
section.
(5) Mental health facilities shall file such statistical reports of activities and services required by the act and
the Mental Health and Mental Retardation Act of 1966 as the Department from time to time may require, so
long as the data does not identify individual patients.

CONFIDENTIALITY OF MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS

5100.31. Scope and policy.


(a) This chapter applies to records of persons seeking, receiving or having received mental health services from
any facility as defined in section 103 of the act (50 P. S. 7103).
(b) Persons seeking or receiving services from a mental health facility are entitled to do so with the expectation
that information about them will be treated with respect and confidentiality by those providing services.
Confidentiality between providers of services and their clients is necessary to develop the trust and confidence
important for therapeutic intervention. While full confidentiality cannot be guaranteed to everyone as a result of
Federal and State statutes which require disclosure of information for specific purposes, it remains incumbent
upon service providers to inform each current client/patient of the specific limits upon confidentiality which
affect his treatment when these limits become applicable. When facilities are required by Federal or State
statutes or by order of a court to release information regarding a discharged patient, a good faith effort shall be
made to notify the person by certified mail to the last known address.
(c) As used in this chapter, records includes, but is not limited to, all written clinical information,
observations and reports or fiscal documents, relating to a prospective, present or past, client or patient, which
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 296 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51.
are required or authorized to be prepared by the act or by the Mental Health and Mental Preservation
Retardation Act ofof rights
1966. This includes any central file of client/patient records and reports which are required to be maintained by
the Departments regulations or other statutes and regulations regarding service content for mental health
programs. Every therapist who reports objective findings must carefully consider the impact of placing in the
records statements made privately in therapy sessions.
(d) Nothing in this chapter shall limit the facilitys obligation to attempt to obtain social history and other
records necessary to properly treat an involuntarily committed patient, or to obtain information on financial
resources or insurance coverage necessary to determine the liability for services rendered.
(e) This section applies to all records regarding present or former patients of mental health facilities, including
records relating to services provided under previous mental health acts.
(f) Records of a person receiving mental health services are the property of the hospital or facility in which the
person is or has received services. The person who is or was receiving services shall exercise control over the
release of information contained in his record except as limited by 5100.32 (relating to nonconsensual release
of information), and be provided with access to the records except to the limitations under 5100.33 (relating
to patients access to records and control over release of records).
(g) The presence or absence of a person currently involuntarily committed at a mental health facility is not to
be considered a record within the meaning of subsection (c) and such information may be released at the
discretion of the director of a facility in response to legitimate inquiries from governmental agencies or when it
is clearly in the patients best interest to do so.
(h) No document which was a public record prior to the persons treatment shall become confidential by its
inclusion in the facilitys records.
(i) When information and observations regarding clients or patients are not made part of a record, there
remains a duty and obligation for staff to respect the patients privacy and confidentiality by acting ethically and
responsibly in using or discussing such information.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 3800.20 (relating to confidentiality of records); 55 Pa. Code 5100.4
(relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5100.33 (relating to patients access to records and control over release of
records); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5210.26 (relating to
records); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5221.52 (relating to
notice of confidentiality and nondiscrimination); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.26 (relating to confidentiality).

5100.32. Nonconsensual release of information.


(a) Records concerning persons receiving or having received treatment shall be kept confidential and shall not
be released nor their content disclosed without the consent of a person given under 5100.34 (relating to
consensual release to third parties), except that relevant portions or summaries may be released or copied as
follows:
(1) To those actively engaged in treating the individual, or to persons at other facilities, including professional
treatment staff of State Correctional Institutions and county prisons, when the person is being referred to that
facility and a summary or portion of the record is necessary to provide for continuity of proper care and
treatment.
(2) To third party payors, both those operated and financed in whole or in part by any governmental agency
and their agents or intermediaries, or those who are identified as payor or copayor for services and who require
information to verify that services were actually provided. Information to be released without consent or court
order under this subsection is limited to the staff names, the dates, types and costs of therapies or services, and a
short description of the general purpose of each treatment session or service.
(3) To reviewers and inspectors, including the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH)
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 297 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51.
and Commonwealth licensure or certification, when necessary to obtain certification Preservation
as an eligible of of
provider rights
services.
(4) To those participating in PSRO or Utilization Reviews.
(5) To the administrator, under his duties under applicable statutes and regulations.
(6) To a court or mental health review officer, in the course of legal proceedings authorized by the act or this
chapter.
(7) In response to a court order, when production of the documents is ordered by a court under 5100.35(b)
(relating to release to courts).
(8) To appropriate Departmental personnel 5100.38 (relating to child or patient abuse).
(9) In response to an emergency medical situation when release of information is necessary to prevent serious
risk of bodily harm or death. Only specific information pertinent to the relief of the emergency may be released
on a nonconsensual basis.
(10) To parents or guardians and others when necessary to obtain consent to medical treatment.
(11) To attorneys assigned to represent the subject of a commitment hearing.
(b) Current patients or clients or the parents of patients under the age of 14 shall be notified of the specific
conditions under which information may be released without their consent.
(c) Information made available under this section shall be limited to that information relevant and necessary to
the purpose for which the information is sought. The information may not, without the patients consent, be
released to additional persons or entities, or used for additional purposes. Requests for information and the
action taken should be recorded in the patients records.
Notes of Decisions
Duty to Report
Mental healthcare workers do not have an affirmative duty to investigate and report possible crimes involving
their patients. Hennessy v. Santiago, 708 A.2d 1269 (Pa. Super. 1998).
Release of Information in Response to Medical Emergency
Regulations which provide for the nonconsensual release of confidential information when release is
necessary to prevent harm or death in response to medical emergency may include situations wherein a
psychiatric patients threats to harm a third party are disclosed. Ms. B. v. Montgomery County Emergency
Service, 799 F.Supp. 534 (E.D. Pa. 1992), affirmed, 989 F.2d 488 (3d Cir. Pa. 1993); cert. denied, 510 U. S.
860, 126 L. Ed. 2d 133, 114 S. Ct. 174 (1993).
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 3800.20 (relating to confidentiality of records); 55 Pa. Code 5100.4
(relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5100.31 (relating to scope and policy); 55 Pa. Code 5100.34 (relating to
consensual release to third parties); 55 Pa. Code 5100.90a (relating to State mental hospital admission of
involuntarily committed individualsstatement of policy); 55 Pa. Code 5200.41 (relating to records); 55 Pa.
Code 5200.47 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5210.26 (relating to records); 55 Pa.
Code 5210.56 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5221.52 (relating to notice of
confidentiality and nondiscrimination); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.26 (relating to confidentiality).

5100.33. Patients access to records and control over release of records.


(a) When a client/patient, 14 years of age or older, understands the nature of documents to be released and the
purpose of releasing them, he shall control release of his records. For a client who lacks this understanding, any
person
Stan J. chosen by the
Caterbone patient
Mental mayLaw
Health exercise
Suit v.this right if 298
LGHPage found by the director to be acting
of 385 inDecember
Friday the patients
30,best
2016 am
5100.51.
interest. In the event that the client/patient is deceased, control over release of records may bePreservation
exercised byofthe
rights
clients/patients chosen executor, administrator or other personal representative of his estate, or, if there is no
chosen personal representative, by a person otherwise empowered by court order to exercise control over the
records. In the event that the client/patient is less than 14 years of age or has been adjudicated legally
incompetent, control over release of the clients/patients records may be exercised by a parent or guardian of
the client/patient respectively.
(b) The term access when used in this section refers to physical examination of the record, but does not
include nor imply physical possession of the records themselves or a copy thereof except as provided in this
chapter.
(c) A person who has received or is receiving treatment may request access to his record, and shall be denied
such access to limited portions of the record only:
(1) Upon documentation by the treatment team leader, it is determined by the director that disclosure of
specific information concerning treatment will constitute a substantial detriment to the patients treatment.
(2) When disclosure of specific information will reveal the identity of persons or breach the trust or
confidentiality of persons who have provided information upon an agreement to maintain their confidentiality.
(d) A patient may obtain access to his records through the facility, or in the case of those records kept by the
county administrator, through the physician or mental health professional designated by the administrator. Any
third parties who are granted access to records may discuss this information with the patient only insofar as
necessary to represent the patient in legal proceedings or other matters for which records have been released.
Discussion of records with patients should be part of the therapeutic process and is not to be undertaken by other
than mental health professionals.
(e) The limitations in subsection (c) are applicable to parents, guardians, and others who may control access
over records as described in subsection (a) except that the possibility of substantial detriment to the parent,
guardian, or other person may also be considered.
(f) If a person wishes to enter a written reaction qualifying or rebutting information in their records which they
believe to be erroneous or misleading, they shall have the right to prepare such statement for inclusion as part of
their record. The patients written reaction shall accompany all released records.
(g) The director of the treatment team or the facility director may require that a mental health professional, who
is a member of the treatment team, and who has reviewed the record in advance, be present when the patient or
other person examines the record to aid in the interpretation of documents in the record. If the records pertain to
a former patient, an appropriate mental health professional may be designated by the facility director.
(h) Access to presentence reports, which may be part of the persons records, is governed Pa.R.Crim.P. No.
1404 (relating to disclosure of reports), and the patient may have access to these records only upon order of the
sentencing judge. Any conditions of confidentiality imposed by the sentencing judge must be complied with.
Similarily, parole and probation reports shall be released or access to them given only in accordance with 37 Pa.
Code Part II (relating to Board of Probation and Parole).
(i) If a person is denied access to all or part of his record, this fact and the basis for the denial shall be noted in
the persons record.
(j) When records or information have been forwarded from one agency to another agency, the receiving agency
may not refuse the client or patient access to the records received except in accordance with subsection (c).
Records received from other agencies become part of the client/patients active record and are subject to the
controls exercised over them by the client, patient, or those with authority over records as defined in 5100.31
(relating to scope and policy).
Notes of Decisions
Patient access to whatever record was made of commitment hearing, in the form it exists, is a minimal
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 299 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
requirement to comport with procedural due process. In re S.O., 492 A.2d 727 (Pa. Super.
5100.51. Preservation of rights
1985).
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 3800.20 (relating to confidentiality of records); 55 Pa. Code 5100.4
(relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5100.31 (relating to scope and policy); 55 Pa. Code 5100.34 (relating to
consensual release to third parties); 55 Pa. Code 5200.41 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47
(relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5210.26 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56
(relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5221.52 (relating to notice of confidentiality and
nondiscrimination); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.26 (relating to confidentiality).

5100.34. Consensual release to third parties.


(a) Access to records, as defined in 5100.33(b) (relating to patients access to records and control over
release of records) will be granted to persons other than the patient upon written consent of the client/patient.
With the consent, copies of excerpts or a summary of a record may be provided to specific persons at the
discretion of the director. If copies of excerpts or summaries are provided, a charge may be made against the
patient or person receiving the record for the cost of making the copies. The facility may require payment for the
copies in advance.
(b) When a patient designates a third party as either a payor or copayor for mental health services, this
designation carries with it his consent to release information to representatives of that payor which is necessary
to establish reimbursement eligibility. Unless otherwise consented to by the patient, information released to the
third-party payors shall be limited to that necessary to establish the claims for which reimbursement is sought.
(c) Clients, patients, or other persons consenting to release of records are to be informed of their right, subject
to 5100.33 to inspect material to be released.
(d) When records are released or disclosed under 5100.32 (relating to nonconsenual release of information)
or subsections (a) and (b) the written or oral disclosure shall be accompanied by a written statement which reads
as follows:
This information has been disclosed to you from records whose confidentiality is protected by State statute.
State regulations limit your right to make any further disclosure of this information without prior written consent
of the person to whom it pertains.
(e) The limitation in subsection (d) does not prohibit the re-release of information in accordance with
5100.32.
(f) Each facility shall prepare a form for use in the voluntary release of records which shall meet the following
requirements:
(1) A time limit on its validity which shows starting and ending dates.
(2) Identification of the agency or person to whom the records are to be released.
(3) A statement of the specific purposes for which the released records are to be used.
(4) A statement identifying the specific relevant and timely information to be released.
(5) A place for the signature of the client/patient or parent or guardian and the date, following a statement that
the person understands the nature of his release.
(6) A place for the signature of a staff person obtaining the consent of the client/patient or parent or guardian
and the date.
(7) A place to record a verbal consent to release of information given by a person physically unable to provide
a signature and a place for the signatures of two responsible persons who witnessed that the person understood
the nature of the release and freely gave his verbal consent.
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 300 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
(8) Indication that the consent is revocable at the written request of the person giving consent, or oral request
as in paragraph (7).
(g) A mental health facility receiving a request for information from a governmental agency may accept that
agencys release of information form if signed by the patient/client or the person legally responsible for the
control of information unless the patient has specifically expressed opposition to that agency receiving
information.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 3800.20 (relating to confidentiality of records); 55 Pa. Code 5100.4
(relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5100.32 (relating to nonconsensual release of information); 55 Pa. Code
5200.41 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code
5210.26 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code
5221.52 (relating to notice of confidentiality and nondiscrimination); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.26 (relating to
confidentiality).

5100.35. Release to courts.


(a) Each facility director shall designate one or more persons as a records officer, who shall maintain the
confidentiality of client/patient records in accordance with this chapter.
(b) Records shall comply with the following:
(1) Whenever a client/patients records are subpoenaed or otherwise made subject to discovery proceedings in
a court proceeding, other than proceedings authorized by the act, and the patient/client has not consented or does
not consent to release of the records, no records should be released in the absence of an additional order of
court.
(2) The records officer, or his designee, is to inform the court either in writing or in person that, under statute
and regulations, the records are confidential and cannot be released without an order of the court. Neither the
records officer nor the facility director has any further duty to oppose a subpoena beyond stating to the the court
that the records are confidential and cannot be released without an order of the court; however, nothing in this
section shall be construed as authorizing such a court order.
(3) If it is known that a patient has a current attorney of record for the given proceedings, that attorney shall
be informed of the request of subpoena, if not already served with a copy, and shall be expected to represent and
protect the client/patients interests in the confidentiality of the records. The person whose record has been
subpoenaed shall be notified of such action if they are currently receiving services and their whereabouts are
known, unless served with a copy of the subpoena. Those currently in treatment shall also be advised that they
may wish to obtain an attorney to represent their interests. In the case of persons no longer receiving services,
the facility shall send this notification by certified mail to the last known address.
(c) If a present or former patient sues a person or organization providing services subject to the act in
connection with said patients care, custody, evaluation or treatment, or in connection with an incident related
thereto, defense counsel for said service provider shall have such access to the present or former patients
records as such counsel deems necessary in preparing a defense. Counsel receiving such records shall maintain
their confidentiality and shall limit the disclosure of the contents thereof to those items they deem necessary to
allow counsel to prepare and present a proper defense.
(d) All employes of a facility shall be informed of the rules and regulations regarding confidentiality of records
and shall also be informed that violation of them could potentially subject them to civil or criminal liability.
Training for employes regarding confidentiality remains the responsibility of the facility director.
Notes of Decisions
Release Appropriate
Information
Stan in defendants
J. Caterbone treatment
Mental Health records
Law Suit which had
v. LGHPage been
301 of 385the subject of earlierFriday
newspaper articles
December 30,and had
2016 am
been discussed without objection in deposition was a rational and admissible source 5100.51. Preservation
for the jury of rights
to consider in
determining the harm caused to plaintiffs reputation which was brought about by the emotional and mental
stress under which defendant wrote articles with underlying hatred for plaintiff and plaintiffs pursuit of
prosecution of defendant for wiretapping. It was beyond argument that defendants mental and emotional
problems had become so familiar in the public domain that the additional notice of certain medical records had
no impact and was harmless evidence in this case. Sprague v. Walter, 656 A.2d 890 (Pa. Super. 1995).
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 3800.20 (relating to confidentiality of records); 55 Pa. Code 5100.4
(relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5100.32 (relating to nonconsensual release of information); 55 Pa. Code
5200.41 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code
5210.26 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code
5221.52 (relating to notice of confidentiality and nondiscrimination); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.26 (relating to
confidentiality).

5100.36. Departmental access to records and data collection.


(a) Notwithstanding any part of this chapter to the contrary, employes of the Department shall not be denied
access to any patient records where such access is necessary and appropriate for the employes proper
performance of his duties. The facility director shall make such decision, and shall be responsible for limiting
access to those portions which are relevant to the request.
(b) Any conflict as to access by an employe to patient records at State hospitals shall be resolved by the
Regional Commissioner of Mental Health.
(c) Collection and analysis of clinical or statistical data by the Department, the administrator, or the facility for
administrative or research purposes may be undertaken as long as the report or paper prepared from the data
does not identify any individual patient without his consent.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 3800.20 (relating to confidentiality of records); 55 Pa. Code 5100.4
(relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5200.41 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other
applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5210.26 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating to other
applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5221.52 (relating to notice of confidentiality and nondiscrimination); and
55 Pa. Code 5320.26 (relating to confidentiality).

5100.37. Records relating to drug and alcohol abuse or dependence.


Whenever information in a patients records relates to drug or alcohol abuse or dependency, as defined in 71 P.
S. 1690.102, those specific portions of the patients records are subject to the confidentiality provisions of
section 8(c) of the Pennsylvania Drug and Alcohol Abuse Control Act (71 P. S. 1690.108(c)), and the
regulations promulgated thereunder, 4 Pa. Code 255.5 (relating to projects and coordinating bodies:
disclosure of client-oriented information).
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 3800.20 (relating to confidentiality of records); 55 Pa. Code 5100.4
(relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5200.41 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other
applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5210.26 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating to other
applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5221.52 (relating to notice of confidentiality and nondiscrimination); and
55 Pa. Code 5320.26 (relating to confidentiality).

5100.38. Child or patient abuse.


Nothing in this chapter shall conflict with the mandatory statutory or regulatory requirements of reporting
suspected or discovered child abuse or patient abuse. Whenever a conflict exists between the reporting
requirements of the Child Protective Services Act (11 P. S. 22012224), and the confidentiality of mental
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 302 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
health records, the reporting requirements shall govern. 5100.51. Preservation of rights

Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 3800.20 (relating to confidentiality of records); 55 Pa. Code 5100.4
(relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5100.32 (relating to nonconsensual release of information); 55 Pa. Code
5200.41 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code
5210.26 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code
5221.52 (relating to notice of confidentiality and nondiscrimination); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.26 (relating to
confidentiality).

5100.39. Release of records.


Under 42 Pa.C.S. 87218725 (relating to availability of otherwise confidential information), records
which are otherwise confidential may be made available to certain investigating bodies upon order of a judge of
the Commonwealth Court.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 3800.20 (relating to confidentiality of records); 55 Pa. Code 5100.4
(relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5200.41 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other
applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5210.26 (relating to records); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating to other
applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5221.52 (relating to notice of confidentiality and nondiscrimination); and
55 Pa. Code 5320.26 (relating to confidentiality).

FORMS

5100.41. Forms.
(a) Reference. All references to article or section numbers in the title of the forms issued by the Department
refer to articles or section numbers of the act.
(b) Forms. Forms adopted by the Department as published in prior regulations may be amended to conform
with the act by pen and ink changes until new forms are available:
MH 781. Consent for Voluntary Inpatient Treatment (Article II).
MH 781-A. Initial Evaluation.
MH 781-B. Explanation of Voluntary Admission Rights (Adult).
MH 781-C. Explanation of Voluntary Admission Rights (Minor between 14 and 18 years of age).
MH 781-D. Explanation of Voluntary Admission Rights (Minor under 14 years of age.
MH 781-E. Notification of Admission of Child (For parents or guardians of minor 14-18 years old).
MH 781-F. Request to Withdraw from Treatment.
MH 781-X. Request for Voluntary Admission of Person Charged with Crime or Serving Sentence.
MH 781-Y. Consent for Voluntary In-patient Treatment of Person Charged With Crime or Serving Sentence.
MH 781-Z. Explanation of Admission of Person Charged With Crime or Serving Sentence.
MH 782. Patients Bill of Rights.
MH 783. Application for Involuntary Emergency Examination and Treatment.
MH 783-A. Explanation of Rights under Emergency Involuntary Treatment.
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 303 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
MH 783-B. Explanation of Warrant.
MH 784. Application for Extended Involuntary Treatment (section 303).
MH 784-A. Notice of Intent to File or Petition for Extended Involuntary Treatment and Explanation of
Rights.
MH 785. Petition for Involuntary Treatment.
MH 785-A. Notice of Intent to File a Petition for Extended Involuntary Treatment and Explanation of Rights.
MH 785-B. Notice of a Hearing on Petition for Involuntary Treatment and Explanation of Rights.
MH 786. Petition for Involuntary TreatmentThrough the Criminal Justice System.
MH 786-A. Notice of Intent to File a Petition for (Extended) Involuntary Treatment at a Mental Health
Facility and Explanation of Rights.
MH 787. Petition for Commitment for Involuntary Treatment After Finding of Incompetence to Stand Trial
Where Severe Mental Disability is Not Present.
MH/MR 50. Patient Consent to Transfer.
(c) Forms amended in this chapter include:
MH-781-X
MH-788
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.23 (relating to written application, petitions, statements and
certifications).

PATIENT RIGHTS

5100.51. Preservation of rights.


Persons subject to treatment under this chapter shall retain all civil rights that have not been specifically
curtailed by separate judicial or administrative determination by the appropriate legal authority.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.4 (relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other
applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code
5320.22 (relating to governing body); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.45 (relating to staff orientation and training).

5100.52. Statement of principle.


(a) Facilities. Upon voluntary or involuntary admission to an inpatient facility, each patient shall be given a
copy of the summary statement of the Bill of Rights, contained in 5100.53 (relating to bill of rights for
patients), Form MH-782, or the patient rights pamphlet (PWPE # 605), published by the Department entitled
You Have a Right to be Treated with Dignity and Respect. Appended to each of these documents shall be the
names, addresses, and telephone numbers of legal and other available advocacy services. Assistance in
contacting a legal or other advocate shall be provided by the facility to each patient upon request. The rights
contained therein shall be explained to the extent feasible to persons who cannot read or understand them.
Within 72 hours of admission, the Manual of Rights, set forth in 5100.54 (relating to manual of rights for
persons in treatment), or the Patient Rights Handbook (PWPE # 606), entitled Your Rights Are Assured, shall be
made available or given to each patient, and the rights contained therein shall be explained to the extent feasible
Stan
to J. Caterbone
persons Mental
who cannot Health
read Law Suit v.
or understand LGHPage
them. 304 of 385
Additionally, Friday December
a copy of either the Manual 30,the
of Rights or 2016 am
Patient Rights Handbook (PWPE # 606) entitled Your Rights Are Assured, shall be 5100.51. Preservation
made available of rights
for each
patient access in each patient living area.
(b) Current patients. All current patients shall be given a copy of either the Manual of Rights, or Patient Rights
Handbook entitled Your Rights Are Assured (PWPE # 606), as in subsection (a). Existing supplies of previously
printed forms and manuals may be utilized.
(c) Manual of rights. Upon request, a complete copy of the Manual of Rights shall be made available to the
family, guardian, attorney, and other interested parties.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.4 (relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other
applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code
5320.22 (relating to governing body); 55 Pa. Code 5320.33 (relating to resident/provider contract;
information on resident rights); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.45 (relating to staff orientation and training).

5100.53. Bill of rights for patients.


The following is the bill of rights for patients:

BILL OF RIGHTS

YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO BE TREATED WITH DIGNITY AND


RESPECT

YOU SHALL RETAIN ALL CIVIL RIGHTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN
SPECIFICALLY CURTAILED BY ORDER OF COURT

You have the right to unrestricted and private communication inside and outside this facility including the
following rights:
a. To a peaceful assembly and to join with other patients to organize a body of or participate in patient
government when patient government has been determined to be feasible by the facility.
b. To be assisted by any advocate of your choice in the assertion of your rights and to see a lawyer in private at
any time.
c. To make complaints and to have your complaints heard and adjudicated promptly.
d. To receive visitors of your own choice at reasonable hours unless your treatment team has determined in
advance that a visitor or visitors would seriously interfere with your or others treatment or welfare.
e. To receive and send unopened letters and to have outgoing letters stamped and mailed. Incoming mail may
be examined for good reason in your presence for contraband. Contraband means specific property which entails
a threat to your health and welfare or to the hospital community.
f. To have access to telephone designated for patient use.
2. You have the right to practice the religion of your choice or to abstain from religious practices.
3. You have the right to keep and to use personal possessions, unless it has been determined that specific
personal property is contraband. The reasons for imposing any limitation and its scope must be clearly defined,
recorded and explained to you. You have the right to sell any personal article you made and keep the proceeds
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 305 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
from its sale. 5100.51. Preservation of rights

4. You have the right to handle your personal affairs including making contracts, holding a drivers license or
professional license, marrying, or obtaining a divorce and writing a will.
5. You have the right to participate in the development and review of your treatment plan.
6. You have the right to receive treatment in the least restrictive setting within the facility necessary to
accomplish the treatment goals.
7. You have the right to be discharged from the facility as soon as you no longer need care and treatment.
8. You have the right not to be subjected to any harsh or unusual treatment.
9. If you have been involuntarily committed in accordance with civil court proceedings, and you are not
receiving treatment, and you are not dangerous to yourself or others, and you can survive safely in the
community, you have the right to be discharged from the facility.
10. You have a right to be paid for any work you do which benefits the operation and maintenance of the
facility in accordance with existing Federal wage and hour regulations.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.4 (relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5100.52 (relating to statement
of principle); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating
to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5320.22 (relating to governing body); and 55 Pa. Code
5320.45 (relating to staff orientation and training).

5100.54. Manual of rights for persons in treatment.


The following is the manual of rights for persons in treatment:
Article I: The Right to Communicate

Statement of Principle

1. Right to Information
2. Right to Assistance
3. Right to an Attorney
4. Right to Have Visitors
5. Right to Send and Receive Letters
6. Right to Use Telephones
Article II: The Right of Religious Freedom

Statement of Principle

1. Right to Refuse Medication


2. Right to Diets Based on Religious or Ethical Consideration
3. Right to Abstain from Religious Practices
Article III: The Right to Handle Your Personal Affairs
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 306 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
Article IV: The Right to a Humane Physical and Psychological Environment
Article V: The Right to Treatment

Statement of Principle

1. Individualized Treatment Plan


2. Discharge
Article VI: Permissible, Restricted and Prohibited Treatment Procedures

Statement of Principle

1. Permissible Procedures
2. Restricted Procedures
3. Prohibited Procedures
Article VII: Grievance and Appeal Procedures

Statement of Principle

1. Grievance Procedures
2. First Level Appeal
3. Second Level Appeal

ARTICLE I
THE RIGHT TO COMMUNICATE

Statement of Principle.

(a) Every patient has the right and shall be encouraged to communicate freely and privately with others within
the facility and in the community at large, as described below. This is based upon the firm belief that meaningful
communications are essential to a successful course of treatment. These rights may be suspended or restricted
for a limited period by the treating physician only when reasonable cause exists to believe that failure to suspend
communications will result in a substantial risk of serious and immediate harm to the patient or others, or that a
crime is being committed. The physician shall fully explain any suspensions or restrictions of these rights to the
patient and document the reasons for the restriction in the patients record. Suspension or restrictions shall be
reviewed and documented every 48 hours until the risk of serious and immediate harm is reduced.
(b) Every patient shall have the right to make complaints and offer suggestions to the director, or his designee,
regarding the operation of the facility, and may meet with other patients to discuss their concerns with facility
administrators. Complaints and suggestions shall be heard and decided promptly.
1. Right to Information.
(a) Every patient has the right to be informed of his rights and responsibilities while in treatment, and those
house rules and regulations of the facility which affect his treatment.
(b) Every patient has the right to be informed of diagnostic and treatment procedures, their risks and their
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 307 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51.
costs, that are available to him and which would aid in his recovery from mental illness. Preservation
Patients have theof rights
right
to be informed of the reasons and factors involved in recommending a procedure of choice.
(c) Every patient has the right to be informed of the nature of material about to be released to others (or
obtained) when he is requested to sign a release of information.
2. Right to Assistance.
(a) Every patient shall have the right to the assistance of an independent person not a member of his treatment
team to resolve a problem raised by the patient.
(b) Each non-State facility shall designate one or more persons either on a volunteer or staff basis as needed to
help patients in this manner.
(c) State facilities shall designate one or more staff to aid patients, and these persons shall be accessible during
regular working hours.
(d) Every State facility shall advise and educate all patients about the availability and services of this program.
(e) These persons will be responsible for assisting or supporting the patient in meeting with the appropriate
person to discuss the problem and possible solution. They shall maintain a confidential file of requests for
service and subsequent actions taken. The file shall be open to review only by the facility director or the
patients Attorney and shall be filed with the patients clinical record upon discharge. They have no authority to
directly resolve problems but may report his or her findings directly to the facility director.
3. Right to an Attorney.
(a) Every patient has the right to retain an attorney of his choice to assist the patient in asserting his rights to
treatment or release or to aid the patient in any other matter.
(b) The facility will provide patients with referral information and other non-monetary assistance to enable
patients to implement this right. The names, addresses and telephone numbers of legal services and other
available advocates in this area shall be given to all patients.
(c) Every patient has the right to see or telephone his attorney in private at any reasonable time, regardless of
visiting hours.
4. Right to Have Visitors.
(a) Every patient has the right to receive visitors of his own choice daily, within established visiting hours, in a
setting of reasonable privacy conducive to free and open conversation unless a visitor or visitors are determined
to seriously interfere with a patients treatment or welfare.
(b) Established visiting hours shall attempt to meet the needs of individual patients and visitors, and may be
waived to the extent feasible to accommodate special circumstances or the needs of individual patients.
5. Right to Send and Receive Letters.
(a) Every patient has the right to send unopened mail. Reasonable amounts of such mail shall be stamped free
of charge if sufficient personal funds are not available.
(b) Writing materials shall be made available to patients on a daily basis and an opportunity provided for
writing letters and other communications. Reasonable assistance shall be provided upon request, if feasible.
(c) Incoming mail may be opened only when there is reason to suspect it contains contraband, and in the
presence of the patient unless dangerous or infeasible in the light of the patients condition. Contraband is
specific property, the possession or use of which is illegal or entails a substantial threat to the health and welfare
of the patient or the hospital community.
(d) Whenever mail is opened on suspicion of contraband, an identification of the person opening the mail, a
statement of the facts constituting good cause, and the results of the opening including disposition shall be noted
in the patients record.
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 308 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
(e) A patients mail, whether incoming or outgoing, shall not be read under any circumstances, unless at the
patients request.
6. Right to Use Telephones.
(a) Every patient has the right to make telephone calls at his own expense, at reasonable times, using
telephones designated for patient or public use. The facility shall take steps to provide sufficient telephones.
(b) In cases of personal emergency, when alternative methods of communication are impractical, every patient
shall have the right to make reasonable local and long distance phone calls, free of charge. These calls shall be
subject to reimbursement if the patient has sufficient funds to pay for the call. The director of the facility, or his
delegate, shall determine what constitutes personal emergency.

ARTICLE II
THE RIGHT TO RELIGIOUS
FREEDOM

Statement of Principle.

Every patient has the right to follow and practice his religion. Substantiated ethical convictions held
independently of a belief in any religion shall be accorded the same respect as religious belief. The facilty shall
provide reasonable assistance to enable a patient to effect this right.
The exercise of these rights may be limited only if it poses a serious threat to the freedom or welfare of others,
or a serious danger to the patient.
1. Right to Refuse Medication.
Any patient who holds a substantiated belief in the power of spiritual healing shall not be compelled to take
medication, provided the patient is intellectually capable of understanding the impact of such refusal and of
deciding to refuse medication.
2. Right to Diets Based on Religious Considerations.
The patients right to independently comply with his or her dietary regimen shall not be interfered with by the
facility unless unfeasible or unless there is serious danger to a persons health.
3. Right to Abstain from Religious Practices.
No patient shall be required to be pressured directly or indirectly to participate in religious practices. No patient
shall be compelled to accept visitation from a clergyman or minister of any religion.

ARTICLE III
THE RIGHT TO HANDLE
YOUR PERSONAL AFFAIRS

Statement of Principle.

Every patient retains all civil rights not specifically curtailed by an order of a court or other body empowered to
take such action.
(a) Every patient has the right to handle his personal affairs. Admission or commitment to a mental health
facility does not by itself, prevent a patient from holding a drivers license or professional license, from
marrying or obtaining a divorce, from voting or writing a will, or exercising other civil and personal rights; nor
is the patient guaranteed the ability to exercise any of these rights.
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 309 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
(b) Every patient has the right to purchase, keep, and use personal possessions. This right may be limited only
when the possession or use of specific property is illegal or creates a substantial threat to the health or welfare of
the patient or others. The reasons for imposing any limitations on the exercise of this right and the scope of such
limitation shall be clearly explained to the patient and placed in the patients record.
(c) Every patient has the right to sell or retain any product or crop he makes, or grows on facility property.
Money received from these activities shall not be used to pay the costs of any patients care and treatment.
(d) A patient shall not be deemed incompetent to manage his own affairs solely by reason of admission or
commitment to a mental health facility.
A court finding of incompetency may not be extended beyond the specific scope of the court order.

ARTICLE IV
RIGHT TO A HUMANE PHYSICAL
AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT

Statement of Principle.

Every patient has the right to reside and be treated in a setting which preserves and promotes his physical and
psychological dignity.
(a) Every patient has the right to be treated humanely and with consideration by all staff members. Any grossly
negligent or intentional conduct of staff which causes or may cause emotional or physical harm to a patient is a
violation of this right.
(b) Every patient has the right to assistance in developing a physical appearance which promotes a positive self
image. This includes the following:
(1) The right to keep and wear his own clothing, unless there are reasonable grounds to believe such clothing
or specific items constitute a substantial threat to the health or safety of the patient or others.
(2) Clothing provided by the facility shall be neat, clean, appropriate to the season and to the extent possible,
consistent with the patients personal preference. This clothing shall enable the patient to make a customary
appearance within the community.
(3) The right to purchase, keep, and use customary cosmetic, hygiene, and grooming articles or services
unless there are reasonable grounds to believe specific articles constitute a substantial threat to the health or
safety of the patient or others.
(4) Basic customary cosmetic, hygiene, and grooming articles or services shall be provided by the facility for
patients who need them but cannot afford them. Patients shall be given reasonable assistance as needed in
utilizing cosmetic, hygiene, and grooming articles and services.
(c) Every residential patient shall be furnished with a comfortable bed and bedding, adequate change of linen, a
closet or locker for personal belongings, and a bedside cabinet. Every patient, at his or her own risk, shall be
allowed to keep and display appropriate personal belongings and to add personal touches to his room or living
area.
(d) Every patient has the right to a nutritionally adequate diet and every patient has the right to eat or to be fed
under supervision, in the dining room or area in the relaxed atmosphere, and to use normal eating implements,
unless contra-indicated by the patients conduct or course of treatment.
(e) Every patient has the right to bathroom facilities which provide privacy for personal hygiene and meet
Departmental standards for health, safety, and cleanliness.
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 310 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
(f) Every patient has the right to therapeutic and daily living activities held in settings that approximate
noninstitutional living. Dining, recreational, vocational, and other activities shall where possible and appropriate
be conducted on a basis which provides interaction between male and female patients.

ARTICLE V
RIGHT TO TREATMENT

Statement of Principle.

Every patient has the right to receive treatment designed to aid and promote his recovery from mental illness.
This treatment shall, whenever possible, be in or near the patients home community, and shall be in the least
restrictive setting available to provide adequate treatment or to meet the conditions of security imposed by a
court.
1. Individual Treatment Plan.
(a) Every patient has the right to an individualized treatment plan, appropriate to his needs, setting forth the
objectives, goals, activities, experiences, and therapies designed to promote recovery.
(b) The plan shall be developed within 72 hours of admission or commitment. It shall be revised whenever
necessary and reviewed at least every 30 days.
(c) Every patient has the right to participate to the extent feasible in the development of his treatment plan. The
plan shall be written in terms understandable by lay persons and shall be explained to the patient. A copy of the
treatment plan shall be made available for the patients review.
2. Discharge.
Every patient has the right to be discharged as soon as care and treatment is no longer necessary. Every patient
has the right to all of the available treatment modalties appropriate to his or her needs which promote recovery
and discharge. Treatment shall also include the appropriate post-discharge rehabilitative services available in the
community.

ARTICLE VI
PERMISSIBLE SPECIALIZED AND
PROHIBITED TREATMENT PROCEDURES

Statement of Principle.

Every patient shall only receive approved treatment procedures in accordance with Departmental regulations.
This treatment shall be described in his individual treatment plan and shall be explained to the patient.
1. Permissible Procedures.
(a) All patients may in an emergency, be required to accept the minimal sufficient diagnostic procedures and
treatment necessary to alleviate the emergency.
(b) Patients committed pursuant to sections 303, 304 or 305 of the act (50 P. S. 4303, 4304, and 4305),
may also be required to accept routine medical, psychiatric, psychological, and educational programs
conforming to departmental regulations and the patients individualized treatment plan.
(c) Any patient committed for examination by court may be required to accept the minimal diagnostic
procedures necessary to determine the patients mental condition.
(d) Any patient in treatment on a voluntary basis may agree to participate in any and all approved treatment
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 311 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51.
methods as described in his individualized treatment plan. Any voluntary patient may Preservation
also refuse of rights
to participate
in any aspect of his individualized treatment plan and may request a review of the proposed treatment. Refusal
to accept a reviewed and approved treatment may be cause for discharge.
2. Specialized Procedures.
(a) No patient shall be subject to the withholding of privileges, nor to any system of rewards, except as part of
an individualized treatment plan.
(b) Electro-convulsive or other therapy, experimental treatments involving any risk to the patient, or aversion
therapy shall not be prescribed unless:
(1) The patients treatment team has documented in the patients record that all reasonable and less intensive
treatment modalities have been considered; that the treatment represents the most effective therapy for the
patient at that time; and that the patient has been given a full explanation of the nature and duration of the
proposed treatment and why the treatment team is recommending the treatment; and that the patient has been
told that he or she has the right to accept or refuse the proposed treatment and that if he consents, has the right to
revoke his consent for any reason at any time prior to or between treatments.
(2) The treatment was recommended by qualified staff members trained and experienced in the treatment
procedure and has been approved by the facility administrator if an M.D. or, if not, by the clinical director after
review by the appropriate committee.
(3) The patient has given written informed consent to the specific proposed treatment. In the alternative, oral
informed consent is sufficient where that consent is witnessed by two persons not part of the patients treatment
team. In either case, such consent shall be limited to a specified number of maximum treatments over a specific
period of time and shall be revocable at any time before or between treatments. Such withdrawal of consent may
be immediately effective.
(4) If a patients treatment team determines that the patient could benefit from one of those specified
treatments but also believes that the patient does not have the capacity to give informed consent to the treatment,
a court order shall be obtained authorizing the recommended treatment before such treatment may be
administered to the patient.
(c) No patient shall be subject to chemical, physical, or psychological restraints, including seclusion, other than
in accordance to the Departments regulations applicable to State Mental Health Facilities or, in case of
community facilities, the policy and procedures for seclusion and restraint approved by its medical staff and
governing body. A copy of the applicable regulations shall be made available to patients upon request.
(d) No patient shall be the subject of any research, unless conducted in strict compliance with Federal
regulations on the protection of human subjects. Patients considered for research approved by the facility shall
receive and understand a full explanation of the nature of the research, the expected benefit, and the potential
risk involved. Copies of the Federal regulations shall be made available to patients involved in, or considering
becoming involved in, research or their advocates. Patient research conducted in State facilities or funded by
State monies requires prior approval of the Deputy Secretary of Mental Health.
3. Prohibited Procedures.
Psychosurgery, removal of organs for the purpose of transplantation, and sterilization, shall not be performed at
a State-operated mental hospital.

ARTICLE VII
GRIEVANCE AND APPEAL
PROCEDURES

Statement of Principle.
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 312 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
To insure that these rights are safeguarded and that disputes concerning their rights and others are resolved
promptly and fairly, patients must have the right to lodge grievances and appeals when informal methods of
resolving disputes are unsuccessful. Each facility shall have a grievance and appeal system in effect. Every
patient shall be informed of the grievance and appeal system and shall be encouraged to utilize it when informal
methods of resolving complaints are unsuccessful.
1. Grievance Procedure.
(a) Any patient, or those helping him, may initiate a complaint orally or in writing, concerning the exercise of
these rights or the quality of services and treatment at the facility. The complaint shall be presented as soon as
possible to the treatment team leader or other appropriate person.
(b) Every patient shall have the right to the assistance of an independent person and witnesses in presenting his
complaint.
(c) The treatment team leader, administrative supervisor, or their designees receiving the complaint shall
investigate the complaint and make every effort to resolve it. Based upon this investigation, a decision shall be
rendered in writing as soon as possible but within 48 hours after the filing of the complaint. Complaints shall be
decided by persons not directly involved in the circumstances leading to the grievance.
(d) The patient shall be given a copy of the complaint and final decision and a copy shall be filed in the
patients record.
2. First Level Appeal.
(a) Any patient, or those helping him, may appeal the grievance decision within 10 working days of the
decision. State-operated facilities shall follow the procedures set forth in this part. Non-State operated facilities
shall have in effect a fair and impartial appeal procedure, which shall be reviewed by the county administrator.
(b) In a State-operated facility, standing Rights Review Committee composed equally of facility staff and
persons from the community not affiliated with the facility shall hear the appeal and render a written decision
within 10 working days of the date of the appeal. Staff members shall be appointed by the facility director. Until
such time as the committee is in effect, the appeal shall be heard by a hearing examiner appointed by the
regional deputy secretary. If the grievance requires immediate action, the appeal shall be heard and decided as
soon as possible.
(c) The patient shall be given prompt notice of the date set for the appeal and shall be informed of his right to
be represented by counsel.
(d) Hearings shall be informal, without strict adherence to the rules of evidence. A sufficient record of the
hearing shall be made.
(e) A copy of the decision shall be given to the patient, the facility director, and filed in the patients chart.
3. Second Level Appeal.
(a) Any patient in a State facility, those helping him, or the facility director, may appeal the decision of the
hearing examiner or Rights Review Committee within 10 working days of the decision. The appeal must set
forth the specific objections to the decision.
(b) The Secretary of Public Welfare shall establish a standing Rights Appeal Committee composed equally of
Department and community personnel. Within 5 working days of receipt of a second level request, the
Committee shall review the decision of the Rights Review Committee and may seek any additional information
it deems necessary.
(c) The patient shall be given prompt notice of the date set for the appeal and shall be informed of his or her
right to be represented by counsel.
(d) Reviews shall be informal. A sufficient record of the hearing shall be made.
(e) The
Stan Committee
J. Caterbone shallHealth
Mental submitLaw
a recommendation
Suit v. LGHPageto313
theofSecretary
385 of Public Welfare within
Friday 10 working
December days
30, 2016 am
5100.51.
of its receipt of the second level appeal request. The Secretary will review the findings Preservation of rights
and recommendations by
the Committee and will issue a decision.
(f) Nothing in this section shall be construed as precluding a patient from instituting appropriate legal
proceedings.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.4 (relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5100.52 (relating to statement
of principle); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating
to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5320.22 (relating to governing body); and 55 Pa. Code
5320.45 (relating to staff orientation and training).

5100.55. Notification of rights.


Upon receipt of a person for treatment the facility shall advise the individual of his rights, and obtain when
feasible a written acknowledgement by the person that his rights affecting their treatment were explained. In the
event that conditions prevent such acknowledgement or understanding, the process of notification shall be
recorded by the person designated and confirmed by a witness.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.4 (relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other
applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code
5320.22 (relating to governing body); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.45 (relating to staff orientation and training).

5100.56. Existing regulations.


(a) Existing regulations regarding treatment facilities and procedures continue in force to guide facilities and
providers in protecting the rights of persons in treatment.
(b) It shall be the responsibility of the administrator in utilizing facilities to assure that procedures for affecting
and protecting the rights of persons in treatment are developed and followed.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.4 (relating to scope); 55 Pa. Code 5200.47 (relating to other
applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code 5210.56 (relating to other applicable regulations); 55 Pa. Code
5320.22 (relating to governing body); and 55 Pa. Code 5320.45 (relating to staff orientation and training).

CONTINUITY OF CARE

5100.61. Continuity of care.


(a) When a person in treatment under the act moves into or out of a State-operated mental health facility, the
county administrator responsible for the persons continuity of care shall take such actions to ensure that the
person receives available services as needed. In taking such actions, the administrator shall consider the
persons plans to utilize private resources.
(b) Whenever a person is considered for discharge from treatment at a State facility, the director shall take
steps to assure that the appropriate county administrators office is involved in predischarge planning before the
discharge. The degree of involvement by the county may be based upon the persons plans to utilize private
resources.
(c) Upon discharge, the county administrator receiving the referral shall take the necessary steps to arrange for
the available mental health treatment services as defined in application statutes.
(d) When a person referred for service refuses to cooperate with the county administrator after discharge, such
person shall be evaluated for alternative services before the case can be closed. Such evaluations should be as
clinically thoroughMental
Stan J. Caterbone as possible.
HealthThere should
Law Suit be documentation
v. LGHPage 314 of 385of repeated efforts at reinvolving
Friday the 30,
December person
2016inam
5100.51.
voluntary treatment if treatment has been recommended and of the decisions regarding Preservation ofof
the appropriateness rights
commitment proceedings.

VOLUNTARY TREATMENT

5100.71. Voluntary examination and treatment.


(a) Persons 14 years of age or older may seek voluntary inpatient treatment if they substantially understand the
nature of such treatment and the treatment setting. Parents or guardians who decide to seek voluntary inpatient
treatment for persons under 14 years of age may do so only in accordance with the act and applications
regulations.
(b) The test of a persons substantial understanding for inpatient treatment is met if the person gives consent to
the information and explanations outlined in section 203 of the act (50 P. S. 4203).
(c) Behavorial consent, as defined in 5100.2 (relating to definitions) shall be sufficient consent for persons
presently receiving treatment at a facility to remain at that facility and to participate in treatment which is
explained to him. Behavioral consent shall be documented under 5100.73 (relating to explanation and consent
to inpatient treatment). Behavorial consent shall not be relied upon for admission to or transfer from a facility.

5100.72. Applications.
(a) Written application for voluntary inpatient treatment shall be made upon Form MH-781, issued by the
Department.
(b) A State-operated facility shall not accept an application for voluntary inpatient treatment for persons not
currently in the facility unless:
(1) There is concurrence on an individual case basis given by the administrator.
(2) There is a preexisting agreement of waiver approved by the Deputy Secretary of Mental Health between
the State facility and the Administrator which designates that facility as the only provider of inpatient services of
the county program.
(3) There is a preexisting letter of agreement approved by the Deputy Secretary of Mental Health between the
State facility and the Administrator which designates the State facility as:
(i) A substitute provider of inpatient services on a temporary basis when an emergency need arises and there
are no other appropriate approved facilities available; or
(ii) A provider of specialized forensic inpatient services when a need for security arises.
(4) Such letter of agreement shall define the nature of security to be available and the responsibilities of both
the State facility and the administrator.
(c) When application is made to an approved facility, the director of the facility shall:
(1) Be responsible for insuring that a preliminary evaluation of the applicant is conducted in order to establish
the necessity and appropriateness of outpatient services or partial hospitalization or inpatient hospitalization
service for the individual applicant. The preliminary evaluation shall be done in the least restrictive setting
possible. The results of the preliminary evaluation shall be set forth on Form MH-781-A issued by the
Department.
(2) Promptly notify the administrator if the applicants treatment will involve mental health/mental
retardation (MH/MR) funding.
(d) When application is made to the administrator:
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 315 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
(1) The administrator shall designate an approved facility which shall conduct a preliminary evaluation of the
applicant in order to establish the necessity and appropriateness of outpatient services or partial hospitalization
service or inpatient hospitalization for the individual applicant.
(2) The designated facility shall immediately upon its completion of the preliminary evaluation, notify the
administrator of its finding and recommendations.
(3) Upon receipt of the report, the administrator shall review the report and when necessary, designate an
approved appropriate facility for the recommended treatment of the individual applicant.

5100.73. Explanation and consent to inpatient treatment.


(a) In order to assure that a person substantially understands the nature of voluntary inpatient treatment, an
explanation shall be made to him of the findings of the preliminary evaluation and the proposed treatment and
goals. An explanation of planned diagnostic and treatment procedures, including the medications, restraints or
restrictions which may be utilized shall be given in terms understandable by the person seeking services.
(b) Each applicant shall be provided with a copy of the Patients Bill of Rights. Form MH-782 or the Patients
Rights Pamphlet, PWPE #605 entitled You Have a Right To Be Treated With Dignity and Respect. Consent
shall be obtained by use of Form MH-781 B, C or D.
(c) In the event that the consent of the applicant is given but cannot be obtained in writing, a statement on a
form approved by the Department documenting that the applicant acknowledged the explanation given indicated
his or her consent shall be signed by the person presenting the information and at least one witness. This
statement shall be made part of the patients record.
(d) Staff of a facility, in arranging to convert a persons legal status from involuntary treatment under civil
commitment to voluntary treatment under Article II of the act (50 P. S. 72017207), shall explain to the
patient that he, by converting to voluntary status, is agreeing to remain in treatment for 72 hours after giving
proper notice of his intent to withdraw from treatment. A patients refusal to agree to remaining in treatment for
this 72-hour period may be considered as sufficient grounds to deny the conversion and seek a new
commitment. The conversion process for persons in involuntary treatment who are under criminal jurisdiction
shall be arranged in accordance with the steps outlined in section 407 of the act (50 P. S. 7407), and this
chapter.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.71 (relating to voluntary examination and treatment).

5100.74. Notice to parents regarding voluntary inpatient treatment of minors.


(a) A notice to parents, guardian, or person standing in loco parentis of the patient age 14 to 18 of acceptance
for treatment shall be given by telephone when possible, and also by delivery of Form MH-781 issued by the
Department. The notice shall include an explanation of the proposed treatment and the right to be heard upon
the filing of an objection.
(b) Whenever the director of the facility is unable to determine the whereabouts of the parents, guardian, or
person standing in loco parentis, he shall take such action as he deems appropriate, including notifying
appropriate child welfare agencies.
(c) In the event that a parent, guardian, or person standing in loco parentis objects to the voluntary examination
and treatment, he may file an objection in writing with the director of the facility or the administrator, who shall
arrange for a hearing under the act.

5100.75. Physical examination and formulation of individualized treatment plan.


(a) Upon completion of the preliminary evaluation and acceptance of a person for voluntary inpatient
examination or treatment, the facility shall provide or arrange for a physical examination immediately, unless
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 316 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. to
one has immediately been conducted as part of the preliminary evaluation that is acceptable Preservation
the facility.of rights
(b) A preliminary treatment plan, based upon the preliminary examination, may be used initially and shall be
revised under 5100.15 (relating to contents of treatment plan), at the earliest opportunity.

5100.76. Notice of withdrawal.


(a) Upon request to any clinical employe of the treating facility, a person 14 years of age or older seeking
release from voluntary treatment shall be immediately provided with Form MH-781-F issued by the
Department. Unless otherwise indicated in the patients record, the treatment team leader shall be notified of
each request to withdraw. An adequate supply of Form MH781-F shall be available in all treatment and living
areas of the facility.
(b) The person receiving a signed Form MH 781-F from a patient shall immediately examine the patients
record to determine whether the patient has previously agreed to remain in treatment for a specified period not
to exceed 72 hours after having given written notice of intent to withdraw from involuntary treatment. If no such
consent has been given, the patient may immediately withdraw from treatment unless an application for
emergency involuntary treatment is executed under section 302 of the act (50 P. S. 7302), and the patient is
advised accordingly.
(c) If consent to remain in treatment had been given, the person examining the record shall notify the patient
and a member of the treatment team or their designee, who shall be available at all times. The treating facility
may delay release of such person for a period not exceeding that specified if the treatment team or its designee
has reason to believe that:
(1) The individual is severely mentally disabled and a petition for involuntary treatment under section 302 of
the act (50 P. S. 7302), is to be filed before the end of the specified time period; or
(2) Immediate release would be medically dangerous to the health of the individual.
(d) The patient need not be released until determinations in subsections (b) and (c) can be rationally made and
until the treatment team leader or designee has had an opportunity to talk with the patient.
(e) When release of an individual from voluntary treatment is delayed, the individual shall be informed of the
circumstances justifying the delay for the specified period of time. The circumstances shall also be set forth in
writing and made part of the patients record. Treatment shall be provided during this period only with consent
or as necessary to treat an emergency.
(f) Rules relating to delayed release apply to release of persons under the age of 14 who are admitted under a
delayed release admission.
(g) The director of the facility shall notify the administrator of the withdrawal of any publicly funded person
from voluntary treatment as soon as possible after receiving notice from the person of his intent to withdraw
from treatment. The director of a State medical health facility shall designate staff to make a continuity of care
referral to the appropriate administrator and to participate in the development of follow-up plans for persons
withdrawing from involuntary treatment.
(h) A person who is a voluntary admission from a prison or jail shall not be discharged upon his request. If the
facility concurs with the persons request to withdraw from treatment:
(1) Nonemergency or nonconsensual treatment shall be suspended.
(2) The person may be detained for the reasonable time necessary for the correctional facility to arrange for
the persons transportation. Normally, transportation should be arranged and completed within 72 hours of the
request to withdraw from treatment.
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 13.8 (relating to seclusion).
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 317 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
5100.77. Discharge from voluntary inpatient treatment.
(a) In the event that the treatment team determines that continued voluntary inpatient treatment is not indicated,
the treatment team shall discharge the patient with an appropriate post-discharge plan. If public funds are or will
be involved, the director shall notify the administrator as early as feasible of the discharge plan. All persons
being discharged from a State operated mental health facility shall be referred to the administrator per section
116 of the act (50 P. S. 7116).
(b) In the event that any patient in voluntary inpatient treatment is unwilling to accept or cooperate with his
individualized treatment plan, the treatment team shall advise the director of the facility of such fact. The
director of the facility or designee shall review the circumstances including the availabilities of reasonable
alternative treatment plans, and determine whether discharge is appropriate.
(c) When the director of the facility determines that the unwillingness of the patient to accept or cooperate with
the individualized treatment plan, or reasonable alternative treatment plans, makes continued voluntary inpatient
treatment inappropriate, he or she shall advise the patient of the voluntary nature of the treatment and the
patients right to withdraw.
(d) In the event that the patient continues to fail to accept or cooperate with the individualized treatment plan
or reasonable alternative treatment plan, and fails to withdraw from voluntary inpatient treatment, the director of
the facility shall advise the patient, and if public funds are involved, the Administrator, of his determination that
discharge or commitment may be appropriate.

5100.78. Transfer of persons in voluntary treatment.


(a) A transfer initiated by the patient in voluntary treatment, his family, a facility director, or county
administrator, under the act shall only be to approved facilities and with use of Form MH-60.
(b) Each person 14 years of age or older, or the parent, guardian, or person standing in loco parentis of a
person under 14 years of age who is in voluntary treatment and is considered for transfer from one facility to
another, shall be informed about the prospective treatment setting and modalities before giving written consent.
For a person 14 to 17 years of age, notice of the proposed transfer shall be sent to the persons parents indicating
their right to object by requesting a hearing. When the transfer will result either in placing the person in a more
restrictive setting, or in placing greater restrictions upon the person, these facts shall be explicitly explained to
the person and his parents prior to obtaining a consent. Written consent shall be obtained prior to the release of
any records for the purpose of planning or effecting a transfer.
(c) All necessary actions required to effect a voluntary transfer remain the responsibility of the patient in
voluntary treatment, or his relatives, or both, and the releasing and accepting facilities unless there are
requirements or conditions for authorization imposed by a county administrator or by order of court.
(d) Transfers of persons in voluntary treatment from State operated mental health facilities to another State
may be arranged by the patient or his relatives, or both, by discharge and admission procedures of the respective
facilities, or if necessary, a transfer may be made through the Interstate Compact Officer after consent has been
obtained under subsection (b).
(e) Except for persons admitted to voluntary treatment under section 401 of the act (50 P. S. 7401), transfers
of persons in voluntary treatment to State operated mental health facilities from another State through the
patients own resources or through the Interstate Compact may be made after the consent in subsection (b) has
been obtained.
(f) For purposes of this section and 5100.90 (relating to transfer of persons in involuntary treatment), a State
mental hospital or private psychiatric hospital shall be considered a single facility, except that those distinct
parts of State mental hospitals designated as either forensic units or intermediate care units shall be considered a
distinct facility.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 318 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
INVOLUNTARY TREATMENT

5100.81. Involuntary examination and treatment.


(a) A person may be subject to an involuntary examination only at facilities approved and designated for that
purpose by the administrator.
(b) No facility shall be designated unless it has an approved plan to comply with section 302(c)(2) of the act
(50 P. S. 7302(c)(2)), and this chapter. The plan shall be jointly developed by the administrator and facility
director, utilizing available county resources.
(c) The administrator, at least on an annual basis, shall advise the public, through notice in one newspaper of
general circulation in the county, of the facilities he has designated to provide involuntary emergency
examination and treatment.

5100.82. Jurisdiction and venue of legal proceedings.


(a) A court ordering involuntary treatment may retain jurisdiction over subsequent proceedings. If jurisdiction
is initially exercised by the court of the county in which the person is, jurisdiction shall be transferred to the
county of the persons most current residence except in cases committed under section 401 of the act (50 P. S.
7401). For persons committed under section 401 of the act, jurisdiction shall be transferred to the court
having jurisdiction over the persons criminal status. Security provisions for a person committed under section
401 of the act may be reduced only by the court with jurisdiction over the persons criminal status.
(b) Hearings may be held at facilities in all cases. In light of the difficulties involved in transporting patients
and staff, and the impact upon patient care, every effort shall be made to hold hearings at the facility.
(c) Records of hearings shall be confidential as part of the patients records.

5100.83. Generally.
(a) A person may be subject to an involuntary examination only at facilities approved and designated for that
purpose by the administrator.
(b) No facility shall be designated unless it has an approved plan to comply with section 302(c)(2) of the act
(50 P. S. 7302(c)). The plan shall be jointly developed by the administrator and facility director, utilizing
available county resources.
(c) The administrator, at least on an annual basis, shall advise the public, through notice in one newspaper of
general circulation in the county, of the facilities he has designated to provide involuntary emergency
examination and treatment.

5100.84. Persons who may be subject to involuntary emergency examination and treatment.
(a) Persons 14 through 17 years of age may be subject to involuntary emergency examination and treatment
only in an approved mental health facility capable of providing a treatment program appropriate to the person.
Persons 5 through 13 years of age may be subject to involuntary emergency examination and treatment only in
an approved mental health facility capable of providing a treatment program appropriate to the child. Persons
from birth through 4 years of age may be subject to involuntary emergency examination and treatment only in a
mental health facility capable of providing a treatment program appropriate to the child. Should no such facility
exist within the county of residence, the nearest appropriate facility shall be designated by the county
administrator. Longer term involuntary treatment for the age groups listed in this section, must be conducted by
agencies with age appropriate programs which are approved by the Department and designated by the county
administrator when public monies are utilized for treatment.
(b) Persons 18 years of age and older may be subject to involuntary emergency examination at an approved
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 319 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51.may
facility designated for such purpose by the administrator. Involuntary emergency treatment Preservation of rights
be provided at
the examining facility or any other designated and approved facility appropriate to the persons needs. Travel
arrangements between the examining facility and the treating facility shall be arranged as needed as soon as
possible to permit transportation appropriate to the persons needs.
(c) The determination of whether the standards of clear and present danger are met should always include a
consideration of the persons probable behavior if adequate treatment is not provided on either an emergency or
subsequent basis.
(d) The standards of clear and present danger may be met when a person has made a threat of harm to self or
others; has made a threat to commit suicide; or has made a threat to commit an act of mutilation and has
committed acts in furtherance of any such threats.
(e) Examining physicans should consider the probability that the person would be unable without care,
supervision, and the continued assistance of others, to satisfy his need for nourishment, personal or medical
care, shelter or self-protection, and safety in accordance with section 301(b)(2)(i) of the act (50 P. S. 7301(b)
(2)(i)).
(f) When the petition for commitment filed under section 301(b)(2)(i) alleges that a person poses a clear and
present danger to himself, clinical or other testimony may be considered which demonstrates that the persons
judgment and insight is so severely impaired that he or she is engaging in uncontrollable behavior which is so
grossly irrational or grossly inappropriate to the situation that such behavior prevents him from satisfying his
need for reasonable nourishment, personal care, medical care, shelter or self-protection and safety, and that
serious physical debilitation, serious bodily injury or death may occur within 30 days unless adequate treatment
is provided on an involuntary basis.
(g) An attempt under sections 301(b)(2)(ii) and (iii) of the act (50 P. S. 7301(b)(2)(ii) and (iii)), occurs:
(1) When a person clearly articulates or demonstrates an intention to commit suicide or mutilate himself and
has committed an overt action in furtherance of the intended action; or
(2) When the person has actually performed such acts.
Notes of Decisions
Jury Instructions
Although the court did not charge the jury on these regulations which specify that a suicide attempt consists of
an intent to commit suicide and an overt act in furtherance of the intended action, there was no error because 50
P. S. 7301 fully and accurately conveyed the applicable law. Mertz v. Temple University Hospital, 29 Phila.
467 (1995).
Suicide
The writing of suicide notes can be considered an overt act in furtherance of a suicide. Mertz v. Temple
University Hospital, 29 Phila. 467 (1995).
A psychiatrist who discharged a patient brought to a hospitals psychiatric emergency room for involuntary
commitment under the Mental Health Procedures Act (50 P. S. 71017503), was held liable to three
minors injured when the patient blew up a row house while committing suicide. Mertz v. Temple University
Hospital, 29 Phila. 467 (1995).

5100.85. Standards.
The standards of section 301 of the act (50 P. S. 7301), for determination of severe mental disability and
present danger are to be applied so as to determine whether emergency commitment is necessary under section
302 of the act (50 P. S. 7302), or whether a court-ordered commitment under section 304(c) of the act (50 P.
S. 7304(c)), is appropriate:
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 320 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
(1) The application of the standards in section 301 of the act, for emergency commitment, including the
requirement of overt behavior, shall be based at least upon the following factors:
(i) There is a definite need for mental health intervention without delay to assist a person on an emergency
basis;
(ii) The clear and present danger is so imminent that mental health intervention without delay is required to
prevent injury or harm from occurring;
(iii) There is reasonable probability that if intervention is unduly delayed the severity of the clear and
present danger will increase; or
(iv) There is reasonable probability that the person, with his presently available supports, cannot continue to
adequately meet his own needs if mental health intervention is unduly delayed.
(2) The application for the standards under section 301 of the act for a court-ordered commitment, including
the requirement of overt behavior under section 304(c) of the act (50 P. S. 7304(c)), shall be based upon the
following factors, among others:
(i) There is no emergency basis and mental health intervention may be delayed;
(ii) The clear and present danger is not so imminent that intervention without delay is necessary to protect
life and limb;
(iii) There is reasonable probability that the severity of the clear and present danger is sufficiently low that
emergency intervention without delay is unnecessary; or
(iv) There is reasonable probability that the person can continue to meet his needs; however, marginally, by
utilizing his presently available supports until a hearing under section 304 of the act (50 P. S. 7304), can be
conducted.

5100.86. Involuntary emergency examination and treatment not to exceed 120 hours.
(a) Written applications, warrants, and written statements made under section 302 of the act (50 P. S. 7302),
shall be made on Form MH-783 issued by the Department.
(b) A State-operated facility shall not accept an application for involuntary emergency examination and
treatment unless there is a preexisting agreement of waiver approved by the Deputy Secretary of Mental Health,
between the State facility and the administrator which designates the State facility as the only provider of
inpatient services in the county program; or, there is a preexisting letter of agreement approved by the regional
commissioner of mental health, between the State facility and the administrator which designates the State
facility as:
(1) A substitute provider of inpatient services when an emergency need arises and there are no other
appropriate and approved facilities available; or
(2) A provider of specialized forensic inpatient services when a need for security arises. Such letters of
agreement shall define the nature of security to be available and the responsibilities of both the State facility and
the Administrator for specific services including aftercare planning and referral.
(c) Any person authorized under section 302 of the act to take a person to a treatment facility for involuntary
emergency examination and treatment shall explain to the person in need of such examination and treatment the
nature and purpose of the action to be undertaken.
(d) The escorting individual shall make every effort to use the least force necessary and shall act to the extent
possible in a courteous manner toward such individual giving attention to the dignity of the person.
Transportation to and from a facility remains the ultimate responsibility of the administrator.
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 321 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
(e) Upon arrival at a facility previously designated as a provider of emergency examinations. Form MH-783
shall be completed and Form MH-783-B shall be given to the person subject to the examination. The person
shall be informed of his right to counsel and be advised that if he cannot afford counsel, counsel can be
provided.
(f) If the examining physician determines that the person is not severely mentally disabled or not in need of
immediate treatment, the administrator shall be notified of the results of the examination and shall assure that
the person is provided with transportation to an appropriate location within the community, as he may request.
(g) If the person is determined to be severely mentally disabled and in need of immediate treatment:
(1) The examining physician shall make certain that the person has received a copy of forms MH-782, Bill of
Rights, and MH-783-A, Explanation of Rights Under Involuntary Emergency Commitment.
(2) The facility shall notify the administrator, if applicable, that:
(i) No warrant has been issued and there is reasonable probability that a previous application, based upon
the same behavior, had been sought;
(ii) A bed is needed at another facility; or
(iii) Public funding will be involved.
(3) When the examining facility recommends emergency involuntary treatment and has no bed available, the
administrator in designating a facility for treatment, shall also authorize transportation between facilities.
(h) The administrator shall designate an appropriate treatment facility which may be the examining facility or,
if no bed is available there, the nearest appropriate facility which is capable of immediately providing such
treatment. If county OMH funding is not involved, the patients choice of facilities is to be respected whenever
an appropriate bed is available.
(i) The involuntary emergency treatment of the individual, or the arrangement of such, shall be initiated
immediately but shall be limited to:
(1) Conducting a physical examination.
(2) Performing diagnostic evaluations of the individuals mental health.
(3) Providing that necessary treatment required to protect the health and safety of the individual and others.
As a first priority, the treating physician shall seek to respond to the emergency condition necessitating
commitment unless the individual consents to additional treatment.
(j) Examination preliminaries.
(1) The facility shall deliver Forms MH-782, and MH-783-A to each person to be examined and shall inform
him or her of the purpose and nature of the examination.
(2) The person shall be requested to furnish the names of up to three parties whom he may want notified and
kept informed of his status. The parties may, at the request of the patient, be informed of any major change in
the persons status, including transfer, escape, major change in medical condition or discharge.
(3) The person shall be informed of his right to counsel.
(4) Reasonable use of the telephone shall mean at least three completed phone calls. If assistance is required,
the facility shall assist the individual in completing phone calls. The cost of any toll calls shall be borne by the
person in need of treatment, although actual payment shall not be a precondition to the persons use of the
telephone.
(5) J.The
Stan treating Mental
Caterbone facilityHealth
shall immediately undertake322
Law Suit v. LGHPage to obtain
of 385 information regarding what
Friday steps should
December be am
30, 2016
taken to assure that the health and safety needs of any dependents of the person are safeguarded
5100.51. Preservation of rights
and that his
personal property and premises are secured.
(6) The facility shall immediately communicate the information obtained to the office or person designated by
the administrator.
(7) Before any facility is designated as the provider of involuntary emergency examination and treatment, the
administrator shall have specified in writing the procedures to be followed by his office and those facilities to be
designated in carrying out of the responsibilities of section 302(c)(2) of the act (50 P. S. 7302(c)(2)). These
procedures must specify what types of reasonable actions shall be taken, how quickly they shall be taken, and
who is responsible for them. Such procedures shall be based on the availability of resources within the
community.
(8) The administrators office shall coordinate and record any action taken in each case. At least annually the
administrator and each approved facility shall review and consider needed amendments to the procedures.
(k) Reasonable steps to assure that the health and safety needs of a persons dependents are met and the
property is secure.
(1) The actions of a facility director or county administrator taken under section 302(c)(2) of the act should be
well defined, and reflective of local resources.
(2) Because of community differences, no one Statewide plan can serve all possible contingencies. The act
comtemplates that reasonable efforts be taken to assure protection of persons dependents and property. The
efforts must, as a minimum include a documented assessment of the patients need for protective services. This
would mean that those initially working with a patient would attempt to determine what is needed by talking
with the patient or his family or friends. Once the information is gathered, it should be transmitted to the person
responsible for implementation of protective services or if incomplete, this fact should be transmitted to those
responsible for a more thorough assessment. The act does not contemplate that mental health professionals will
actually provide all needed services for all patients but relies upon professional linkage referral and follow-up to
assure that the needed protections are in fact, provided and maintained. The implementation of protective
services requires community organization efforts by the county administrators office in developing interagency
liaison on continuing basis.
(3) Each mental health administrative unit should develop its own plan which addresses the most typical or
usual contingencies. State in the plan that deviations will be handled on a case-by-case basis. The most essential
element in meeting the requirement of this section is for the county administrator to have a well-developed local
plan which shows the involvement of all possible resources, such as local health, welfare, housing agencies, and
protective services determines which individuals, or agencies are responsible for particular activities and when
they are to be involved. The plan should show initial procedures for involving the patients family, legally
responsible relatives, or friends designated by the patient. Agencies should be utilized only as necessary. The
plan should define the communication flow and the specific duties and responsibilities for action of the mental
health provider agencies, the administrators office, and protective agencies. The plan should also indicate
general provisions for the resolution of problems and how exceptional cases will be provided for.
(4) Once a referral is made and the information is conveyed to the appropriate agencies, the only remaining
responsibility for the administrator is the periodic follow up necessary to demonstrate that the protection
continues to be made available to the patient in need.
(5) Plans developed under this section should be reviewed at least annually by the participating agencies and
will be subject to review and approval by the office of Mental Health.
Notes of Decisions
Under the terms of the Mental Health and Mental Retardation Act of 1966 and the Mental Health Procedures
Act, when a court orders treatment at a designated State mental hospital, the designated facility must admit the
patient for treatment; at that time, the facility is without recourse to deny admission. In re Bishop, 717 A.2d
1114 (Pa.
Stan J. Cmwlth.Mental
Caterbone 1998).Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 323 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
5100.87. Extended involuntary emergency treatment not to exceed 20 days.
(a) Within 72 hours after initiation of emergency involuntary treatment, the treating facility shall reassess the
mental condition of the individual receiving treatment and shall determine whether the need for involuntary
emergency treatment is likely to extend beyond the initial 120 hours.
(b) Extended involuntary emergency treatment may include inpatient, partial hospitalization, outpatient or a
combination of treatment modalities. In determining whether to extend the emergency involuntary treatment, the
treatment team shall consider:
(1) The need for involuntary commitment.
(2) The optimal modality or setting for continued treatment.
(c) If the facility determines that extended emergency involuntary treatment is necessary, the facility shall:
(1) Immediately notify the person that an application for extended involuntary treatment will be filed and that
the court will appoint an attorney to represent the person unless it appears that the person can afford and desires
to have private representation.
(2) Immediately deliver an application upon Form MH-784 to the court or Mental Health Review Officer
through the administrators office. Alternatively, any responsible person who has been involved in the
emergency commitment process may act as petitioner. Applications need not be filed with or docketed by the
prothonotary where the court so approves. If necessary, the court will appoint counsel for the patient.
(3) Immediately deliver an application upon Form MH-784 to the person subject to the proceedings and
notify the parties identified by the person.
(d) Informal conference. The treatment facility shall present to the judge or mental health review officer all
information it considers reliable and relevant to the determination as to whether the person is severely mentally
disabled and in need of emergency treatment. The conference shall be informal, but conducted with decorum.
Relevant information includes:
(1) Evidence of a persons conduct upon which a determination of mental disability may be based. If the
alleged conduct constituting clear and present danger has occurred within 30 days relevant conduct prior to the
30 day period may be presented:
(2) The reasons why extended involuntary treatment is considered necessary.
(3) A description of the treatment to be provided.
(4) An explanation of the adequacy and appropriateness of such treatment for the individual, including why
such treatment poses the least restrictive alternative for the individual.
(5) Any other relevant information even if it would be normally excluded under rules of evidence may be
offered to the judge or mental health review officer who will review such information if he or she believes it is
reliable. Only in rare instances need a stenographic record be taken of the proceedings required under this
section.
(e) Certification for extended emergency involuntary treatment.
(1) Certification for extended emergency involuntary treatment shall be made in writing on Form MH-784,
issued by the Department.
(2) A certification filed and served shall remain in effect notwithstanding a petition for review of the
certification, unless otherwise ordered by the court.
(3) Descriptions of proposed treatment shall be considered advisory only and shall be changed by the
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 324 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
treatment team as the patients condition warrants. 5100.51. Preservation of rights

(f) The opportunity for a person on involuntary inpatient status to receive treatment in an approved less
restrictive program such as involuntary partial hospitalization or outpatient services may be accomplished
through a transfer under section 306 of the act (50 P. S. 7306). A commitment certification does not become
void when a transfer from one program to another is executed.
(g) If the facility determines that extended emergency involuntary treatment is not necessary, it shall either
accept the person for voluntary inpatient treatment or discharge the person and facilitate the persons obtaining:
(1) Voluntary treatment at the facility best equipped to meet his needs.
(2) Report the persons change of status and follow-up recommendations by referral for continuity of care to
the county administrator, or both.
Notes of Decisions
Although the MH784 form documenting certification had been completed only in abbreviated manner, that
was adequate to fulfill the intent of the statute and the demands of the pertinent regulations. In Re: S.O., 492
A.2d 727 (Pa. Super. 1985).
Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.88 (relating to court-ordered involuntary treatment not to exceed 90
days); 55 Pa. Code 5100.89 (relating to additional periods of court-ordered involuntary treatment not to
exceed 180 days).

5100.88. Court-ordered involuntary treatment not to exceed 90 days.


(a) A petition for court-ordered treatment under section 304 of the act (50 P. S. 7304), shall not be filed for a
person held for involuntary emergency examination and treatment under section 302 of the act (50 P. S.
7302), without first proceeding under section 303 of the act (50 P. S. 7303).
(b) Initiation of court-ordered involuntary treatment for persons already subject to involuntary treatment.
(1) The director of the facility, the county administrator, or any responsible person with knowledge of the
patients mental condition may serve as petitioner.
(2) If the director of the facility determines that continuing involuntary treatment is not needed, he shall notify
the county administrator or other appropriate person of this decision or a change in status 10 days before the
expiration of the involuntary treatment previously authorized.
(3) If the director of the treating facility determines that continued involuntary treatment of a person already
subject to involuntary treatment is necessary, he shall notify the administrator of such fact by filing Form MH-
785.
(4) The petition for court-ordered involuntary treatment for persons already subject to involuntary treatment
shall be filed not less than 5 days prior to the expiration of the involuntary treatment previously authorized. The
petition shall be sufficient if it represents that the conduct originally established to subject the person to
involuntary treatment did in fact occur and that the persons condition continues to evidence a clear and present
danger to himself or others. It shall not be necessary to show the recurrence of the dangerous conduct, either
harmful or debilitating, within the past 30 days.
(5) The petitioner shall immediately notify the person of the intent to file a petition for court-ordered
involuntary treatment with the court of common pleas by delivering to such person Form MH-785-A issued by
the Department. The director of the facility may assist the petitioner in notifying the person in treatment of the
intent to file a petition and in serving the papers. The material given to the person shall include an explanation
of the nature of the proceedings and the persons right to counsel under 5100.87(c)(1) (relating to extended
involuntary emergency treatment not to exceed 20 days), and the right to the services of an expert in mental
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 325 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
health. 5100.51. Preservation of rights

(c) Initiation of court-ordered involuntary treatment for persons not presently subject to involuntary treatment.
(1) A petition for court-ordered involuntary treatment for a person not already in involuntary treatment shall
be made upon Form MH-785 issued by the Department. If the petition is filed by the director of a facility or the
administrator for a person already in voluntary treatment, it shall state the name of an examining physician and
the substance of his opinion regarding the mental condition of the person. In all other cases, the petition shall
state the name of an examining physician, if any, and the substance of his opinion regarding the mental
condition of the person.
(2) If a decision to file a petition for court-ordered involuntary treatment is made by the director of a facility
for a person already in voluntary treatment, the director shall immediately notify the administrator, if the
decision to file is made by the administrator for a person in voluntary treatment, the administrator shall
immediately notify the director of the facility. In either case, the director shall notify the person in voluntary
treatment of the decision to file a petition for court-ordered involuntary treatment by delivering to such person a
copy of Form MH-786-A issued by the Department.
(3) The notice given to a person not already in involuntary treatment referred to in section 304(c)(4) of the act
(50 P. S. 7304(c)(4)) advising him of the right to counsel and the assistance of an expert in the field of mental
health may be provided by the use of Form MH-785-B.
(d) Duration of court-ordered involuntary treatment except for those under criminal jurisdiction:
(1) For persons committed for a period not to exceed 90 days, a person subject to court-ordered involuntary
treatment shall be discharged whenever the director of the facility concludes that the person is no longer in need
of continued inpatient treatment. A person may be transferred under section 306 of the act (50 P. S. 7306)
from inpatient treatment to outpatient or partial hospitalization services and remain subject to involuntary
commitment.
(2) A person may be committed for treatment in an approved facility under this section as inpatient,
outpatient, or combination of such treatment as the director of the facility shall determine under sections 304(f)
and 306 of the act (50 P. S. 7304(f) and 7306).
(3) For persons committed under section 304(g)(2) of the act (50 P. S. 7304(g)(2)), the facility shall require
the treatment team to report every 90 days whether the person is or continues to be in need of treatment. This
report shall be reviewed by the director of the facility and forwarded to the committing court. If the treatment
team finds that the person is no longer in need of treatment, they shall recommend to the director of the facility
that the person be discharged. Whenever the director of a facility plans to discharge a patient committed under
section 304(g)(2) of the act prior to the termination of a court-ordered period of involuntary treatment or
whenever the director of a facility plans to release such a person at the expiration of court-ordered treatment, the
director of the facility shall, at least 10 days prior to the discharge or expiration of the existing commitment,
petition the court for the conditional or unconditional release of the person. The director shall give copies of the
request for release to the person of residence and the district attorney. Notice of such action shall be given if
appropriate to the sending jail or correctional facility.

5100.89. Additional periods of court-ordered involuntary treatment not to exceed 180 days.
(a) When it is determined that additional periods of court-ordered involuntary treatment will be sought, the
proceedings in 5100.87 (relating to extended involuntary emergency treatment not to exceed 20 days), shall
be followed:
(b) An application for an additional period of court-ordered involuntary treatment shall be filed not less than 10
days prior to the termination of the court-ordered involuntary treatment period. With all such filings, the director
shall have notified the appropriate administrator prior to the time of filing the proposed plan.
(c) Occurrence of specific conduct constituting clear and present danger under section 301 of the act (50 P. S.
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 326 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
7301), is not required to demonstrate the need for continuing involuntary treatment.
(d) Relevant factors in determining the need for continued involuntary treatment include, among others, the
following:
(1) The persons willingness to participate in voluntary treatment.
(2) The continuing presence of the condition for which the individual has been receiving treatment.
(3) Any dangerous or debilitating conduct during the most recent period of treatment.
(4) The availability of outpatient placement and the likehood that the patient will take advantage of such
treatment.
(5) The availability of community resources and supports to assist the person in a less restrictive setting.
(e) When an application is made for an additional period of court-ordered involuntary treatment for persons
under criminal jurisdiction, notice shall be sent to the warden or superintendent of the correctional facility to
which the person otherwise would be returned.

5100.90. Transfers of persons in involuntary treatment.


(a) When the treatment team or director of a facility, or both, determine that a transfer of a person in
involuntary treatment is appropriate, they shall notify the county administrator of the planned transfer, setting
out the reasons for the transfer which shall then be reviewed by the county administrator to determine whether
the appropriate services are available and to arrange for continuity of care if the person is referred from a State
mental health facility.
(b) Where a transfer of a person in involuntary treatment will involve a transfer to another county, the county
administrator of the receiving county will be notified, and shall review the transfer as in subsection (a).
(c) Transfers of persons in involuntary treatment may only be made to an approved facility during the term of
any given commitment unless there is a court order prohibiting such an action.
(d) A patients transfer from inpatient to partial hospitalization or outpatient facilities or programs, or from a
partial program to an outpatient program, does not affect the original involuntary commitment order. Where a
patients transfer will result in greater restraints being placed upon the patient, the transfer shall occur only after
a hearing when it is determined that the transfer is necessary and supportive to the patients treatment plan.
(e) For purposes of this section, an entire State hospital or private psychiatric hospital shall be considered to be
one facility, except for those distinct parts designated as either forensic units or intermediate care units.
(f) Transfers within the mental health system of persons admitted or committed from a prison or correctional
facility shall not be effected without approval of the court having criminal jurisdiction over the person.
(g) Except in an emergency, persons in treatment under section 304(g)(2) of the act (50 P. S. 7304(g)(2)),
may be transferred if prior notice has been given to and no objection has been received with 20 days from the
judge and district attorney from the committing court.
(h) In an emergency and on a temporary basis, persons in treatment under section 304(g)(2) of the act, may
only be transferred for acute medical treatment when life or health would be in immediate danger without such
transfer. When such transfers are accomplished, the court and district attorney of the committing court must be
notified. The expected duration of such transfer, security measures, and reasons for transfer should be described
in the notice.
(i) Transfers of persons in treatment under section 304(g)(2) to a more secure facility in order to protect the
person or others from life threatening behavior must be ordered by the court.
(j) Interstate
Stan transfers
J. Caterbone Mentalof Health
personsLaw
on Suit
involuntary commitment
v. LGHPage status shall be coordinated
327 of 385 Friday by the Departments
December 30, 2016 am
Office of Interstate Compact. 5100.51. Preservation of rights

Cross References
This section cited in 55 Pa. Code 5100.78 (relating to transfer of persons in involuntary treatment).

5100.90a. State mental hospital admission of involuntarily committed individualsstatement of


policy.
(a) To manage treatment resources more effectively and assure adequate Medical Assistance reimbursement to
community general and private psychiatric hospitals for days of active treatment provided to Medical Assistance
eligible persons with mental illness, appropriate action shall be taken by the affected parties. The following
policy and procedures should be followed:
(1) Community general and private psychiatric hospital staff should notify via telephone appropriate county
MH/MR staffcounty administrator or designated agencyupon Medical Assistance patients admission to the
community general or private psychiatric hospital. This information may be released to county administrators
under 5100.32(a)(5) (relating to nonconsensual release of information).
(2) Immediately upon determination of the need for long-term psychiatric care, a referral package should be
sent to the admissions unit of the State mental hospital (SMH) so it is received at least 2 days prior to the date of
the scheduled commitment hearing. The County MH/MR Administrator or their designated agency should be
notified by the community general or private psychiatric hospital of the patients need for long-term psychiatric
care. The items to be included in the referral package accompanying a patient on admission to a State hospital
under sections 304306 of the Mental Health Procedures Act (50 P. S. 73047306) include:
(i) Signed and completed 304/305/306 commitment papers.
(ii) Psychiatric assessment.
(iii) Medical assessment.
(iv) Current medications.
(v) Laboratory and X-ray results.
(vi) Consultants reports.
(vii) Social history with special emphasis on family assessment and discharge resources.
(viii) Psychological assessmentsif available.
(ix) BSU activity.
(x) Assessments from other clinical disciplines involved in the patients treatment.
(3) The SMH admissions staff and the staff of the community general or private psychiatric hospital will
agree upon the date that the patient will be admitted to the State hospital. The SMH admissions staff shall notify
the community general or private psychiatric hospital of the agreed upon date of admission prior to the patients
scheduled hearing date.
(4) The community general or private psychiatric hospital staff shall notify the hearing officer of the date of
availability of a SMH bed.
(5) The hearing officer shall conduct the hearing in a timely fashion in accordance with the timeframes
required by the Mental Health Procedures Act of 1976. A commitment order should contain the agreed upon
admission date to the SMH.
(6) The community general or private psychiatric hospital staff shall maintain appropriate documentation of
the continuance of active treatment in the medical record until the patient is transferred to the SMH. Refer to
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 328 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51.
1101.51 (d) and (e) (relating to ongoing responsibilities of providers) for the description Preservation of rights
of appropriate
documentation of the continuance of active treatment.
(7) If the SMH bed is unavailable on the scheduled date of transfer, the SMH is responsible for contacting
other State hospital facilitieswithin a 75-mile radiusto obtain a bed for the patient. If no bed is available in
the surrounding SMHs, the initial SMH shall contact the next nearest SMH facility until a bed is found. SMH
admissions staff may not deny access to a patient when a bed is available, except if, for clinical reasons, the
clinical director deems the admission inappropriate. The area director is responsible for reviewing and
monitoring denial of access to other State mental health facilities when a bed is available.
(8) The SMH will include in their Letter of Agreement with the county MH/MR program, the methodology
used for referring patients to another SMH when a bed is not available. It is the intent of the Office of Mental
Health to assure, whenever feasible, that the patients treatment be in or near the patients home community.
(b) Medical Assistance should be able to reimburse the community general or private psychiatric facility for
the eligible days that the Medical Assistance eligible patient is in the facility when the policy and procedures in
subsection (a) are followed to include the following:
(1) The specific date of admission to the SMH appropriately documented on the court commitment.
(2) The continuance of active treatment adequately documented in the patients medical record.
(3) The actual transfer of the patient to the SMH occurs on the date documented on the court commitment.
Source
The provisions of this 5100.90a adopted November 18, 1988, effective retroactively to November 9, 1988,
18 Pa.B. 5168.

PERSONS CHARGED WITH A CRIME OR UNDER SENTENCE

5100.91. General.
(a) Any person subject to examination and treatment under section 401(a) of the act (50 P. S. 7401(a)), may
be subject to involuntary treatment under Article III of the act (50 P. S. 7301-7306), or may apply for
voluntary treatment under 5100.92 (relating to voluntary examination and treatment of a person charged with
a crime or serving a sentence).
(b) Whenever a person subject to treatment under section 401(a) of the act is made subject to inpatient
examination or treatment, he shall be transferred by the authority having jurisdiction to a designated approved
facility after proceedings have been completed in accordance with the appropriate section of this chapter.
(c) Any person who is subject to inpatient examination or treatment and who remains subject to a criminal
detainer or sentence, or who is under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, shall be returned to the custody of
that authority upon their discharge from treatment.
(d) Any person subject to inpatient examination and treatment shall be subject to any provisions of security
imposed by the criminal juvenile court having jurisdiction, provided that the facility to which the person is being
committed is capable of providing the security. If the facility is unable to provide the ordered security, the
director of the facility shall immediately notify the court issuing the order.

5100.92. Voluntary examination and treatment of a person charged with a crime or serving a sentence.
(a) Whenever a person in criminal detention, whether in lieu of bail or when serving a sentence, believes he is
in need of treatment and substantially understands the nature of voluntary treatment, he may submit himself to
examination and treatment.
(b) Prior to voluntary admission, at least one physician, preferably a psychiatrist where the person is in
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 329 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation
criminal detention, shall certify in writing the necessity for such treatment. This certification shall containofatrights
least the following information:
(1) A statement that the person substantially understands the nature of inpatient treatment, including the
nature of his mental illness or condition, and the requirement for continued security if admitted to a mental
health facility.
(2) A statement that the patient is so mentally ill as to require inpatient hospitalization and an explanation
why outpatient management in the penal institution population by way of psychotherapy with or without
medication will not be sufficient.
(3) A description of the persons condition, symptoms, clinical history, and diagnosis.
(c) The correctional facility shall secure a written acceptance of the person for inpatient treatment from a
mental health facility. This written acceptance shall contain at least the following information:
(1) A statement that the inpatient mental health facility is willing and able to accept the person for treatment.
(2) A description of the security which the inpatient mental health facility is able to provide.
(d) The superintendent or warden of the correctional facility where the person is detained shall prepare a
statement concerning the reasons for seeking treatment.
(e) The persons written voluntary admission request, the physicians certification, the statement of the
superintendent of the correctional facility regarding security needs, and the written acceptance from the mental
health facility shall be forwarded to the president judge of the court of common pleas, in the county where the
person was charged or sentenced.
(f) The documents listed in subsections (b) through (e) shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested
to:
(1) The judge in the court which sentenced the person. If it is determined the sentencing judge is no longer on
the bench, the information shall be sent to the president judge.
(2) The district attorney of the sentencing county.
(3) The county administrator of the sentencing county.
(g) The County Administrator of the county of the persons legal residence, if different from the persons
county of sentence, shall receive notification by the correctional facility that the person has requested voluntary
admission to a mental health facility. This notification shall include the name of the proposed mental health
facility and the name of the judge of the county of sentence to whom the voluntary request has been submitted.
(h) Upon receipt of the request for voluntary admission, the district attorney of the county of sentence may,
within 14 days have a physician conduct an independent examination of the applicant or file a motion contesting
the need for treatment.
(i) The Department will not participate in the costs of examination, transportation, or hearings incurred at the
request of the distict attorney.
(j) The court of common pleas for the judicial district in which the person is charged or sentenced shall have
jurisdiction for purposes related to section 407 of the act (50 P. S. 7407). Where possible, the sentencing
judge shall preside.
(k) Upon receipt of the request for voluntary examination and treatment, and upon review of the request, and
its attendant reports, and following any hearing on the matter the court shall either approve or disapprove the
request.
(1) J.InCaterbone
Stan the event Mental
the court approves
Health the request
Law Suit for voluntary
v. LGHPage admission to a mentalFriday
330 of 385 healthDecember
facility, the
30,court
2016 am
5100.51.
shall also indicate whether the conditions of security presented by the inpatient mental healthPreservation
facility are of rights
appropriate. If the court believes a greater or lesser degree of security is appropriate, it shall so direct.
(l) The Department has designated Farview State Hospital as the Commonwealths maximum security
psychiatric facility. The Department has also designated Warren State Hospital, Mayview State Hospital,
Norristown State Hospital, and Philadelphia State Hospital as having medium security forensic units for male
patients. The general wards of State hospitals and most approved community mental health facilities can only
provide the same degree of security as they do for civilly committed patients. Regarding placement for women,
or questions regarding the appropriate level of secure placement for males, the regional mental health for the
region in which the person is located should be contacted.
(m) Whenever the court approves the request of the person charged with crime or undergoing sentence, the
receiving mental health facility, when space is available, shall accept the person and immediately proceed to
examine the person and develop a detailed treatment plan.
(1) In the event the receiving facility determines that the person is unwilling to agree upon or participate in a
treatment plan, or is unwilling to accept the security provisions imposed by the court, the mental health facility
is to make arrangements with the correctional institutes from which the person was transferred, to effect the
persons immediate return to the correctional facility. The court authorizing the voluntary admission, the district
attorney, and the county administrator of the county of residence, if different from the county of sentence, are to
be sent notifications of this action by the mental health facility.
(2) If, at the time of the initial examination, or anytime thereafter, the mental health facility is of the opinion
that the patient requires more security than the facility can offer and the patient will not consent to his transfer to
a more secure facility the sending correctional authority shall be contacted immediately in order to return the
patient to the sending facility. Alternatively, the mental health facility may initiate a petition for involuntary
treatment to a facility with greater security. All costs involved in the transportation shall be billed to the
correctional facility.
(3) In the event the receiving mental health facility is able to accept the person and a treatment plan is agreed
upon with the person, treatment shall begin immediately.
(4) The receiving mental health facility shall notify the persons county of residence, if different from the
county where person was charged or sentenced, of the persons voluntary admission. The county administrator
is the person to whom the notification is to be sent.
(n) The treatment plan shall include a written agreement with the patient that, upon notice to withdraw from
treatment, he may be held at the facility for a reasonable time until arrangements can be made for transportation
by the county jail or State correctional institution.
(1) In the event the person gives notice to withdraw and it appears that the standards for involuntary treatment
can be met, proceedings may be initiated under sections 302 and 304 of the act (50 P. S. 7302 or 7304).
(i) During the pendency of any petitions filed under section 304 of the act, the mental health facility shall
have the authority to detain the person regardless of the provision of section 203 of the act, provided that the
hearing under section 304 of the act, is conducted within 7 days of the time the person gives notice of his intent
to withdraw from treatment.
(ii) If no hearing is held within 7 days subsequent to the filing of a petition under section 304 of the act, the
person shall be returned to, and by the correctional institution where he was originally detained.
(o) A report of the persons mental condition shall be made by the mental health facility to the court within 30
days of the persons transfer to the facility. The report shall set forth the specific grounds as to why continued
treatment at a mental health facility is necessary. After the initial report the mental health facility shall thereafter
report to the court every 180 days.
(1) Copies of the report to the court shall be sent to the county administrator of the county of residence if
Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 331 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
different from the county where the person was charged or sentenced. 5100.51. Preservation of rights

(p) At any time when the mental health facility finds that continued voluntary treatment is no longer necessary
the person shall be discharged and returned to the correctional facility.
(q) Transporting the person to and from the county jail or State correctional institution for admission or
discharge to or from a mental health facility shall be the responsibility of the county jail or State correctional
institution where the person was originally detained.
(r) Liability for treatment of an individual admitted to a State mental health facility shall be assessed pursuant
to section 505 of the Mental Health/Mental Retardation Act of 1966 (50 P. S. 4505), and section 408 of the
act (50 P. S. 7408).
(s) Voluntary admission proceedings shall not be used for the purpose of conducting an inpatient evaluation or
for a period of observation in connection with any proceedings with reference to a criminal act.
(t) Voluntary admission to a facility of a person charged with crime or undergoing sentence shall be in
accordance with Forms MH-781-X in Appendix A and Forms MH-781-Y and MH-781-Z.
(u) Unauthorized absence from a mental health facility while under voluntary status.
(1) For those patients who have escaped from a hospital who were admitted on a voluntary status under this
section no discharge is to be effected without the following specific actions being taken:
(i) As soon as it has been determined that a patient has left the hospital without authorization, at least the
following are to be notified:
(A) Local and State police. The police authorities are to be advised that even though the patient was on a
voluntary basis, the subject is to be apprehended and returned to the hospital since the escaped patient was
admitted from a county jail or State correctional institution while awaiting trial on pending charges or while
serving a sentence.
(B) Responsible person.
(C) The institution or agency having authority over the criminal status, such as, correctional institution,
county jail, probation or parole departments, and the like.
(D) The court and district attorneys office of the county with criminal jurisdiction, and the like, where
criminal charges are pending or where sentence was imposed.
(E) The county administrator of the county of residence, if different from the county where the person was
charged or sentenced.
(F) The Office of Interstate Services and Records Unit of the Office of Mental Health.
(ii) In the event that the patient has escaped and does not return or is not returned by others after 72 hours,
the penal institution or agency from which the person was admitted on a voluntary status is to be notified right
away that the hospital is discharging the subject from the rolls, and the authority over the case is being officially
returned to the agency or institution. In the notification of the discharge, the hospital should:
(A) Advise the receiving institution or agency that the subjects mental status has not been known during
the period of escape and that following apprehension new commitment procedures would have to be initiated
pursuant to the provisions of the act should the individual appear to require hospitalization.
(B) Send notices relating to the discharge and transfer of authority to those listed in subsection (u)(1)(i)
(A)(F).
(iii) All notices relating to the discharge and turning the case back to the penal authorities are to be sent by
certified
Stan mail, return
J. Caterbone receipt
Mental requested.
Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 332 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights
(iv) If the patient is returned to the hospital from escape status prior to discharge:
(A) The hospital is to notify all concerned in subsection (u)(1)(i)(A)(F).
(B) The patient is to be evaluated to determine:
(I) Whether the patient should continue on voluntary status.
(II) Whether procedures for involuntary commitment pursuant to the act would be appropriate.
(III) Whether the person should be returned to the penal institution.
(IV) Under any of these options, the mental health facility is to be certain to keep the parties listed in
subsection (u)(1)(i)(A)(F) advised.
(V) In the event the hospital elects to have the person returned to the penal institution, that institution is
to be advised of the number of days the person was on unauthorized absence.

5100.93. Costs of treatment.


(a) The Commonwealth will pay for costs, payments, or expenditures in excess of $120 per day which are
made on behalf of any person who is a resident of a county located within this Commonwealth and who receives
treatment and for whom liability is imposed on a county pursuant to section 505(a) of the Mental Health and
Mental Retardation Act of 1966 (50 P. S. 4505(a)).
(b) The county of residence shall be liable for all costs, payments, or expenditures, up to and including $120
per day, which are made on behalf of any person who receives treatment and for whom liability is imposed
under section 505(a) of the Mental Health/Mental Retardation Act of 1966.
(c) The county of sentence shall be liable for all costs, payments, or expenditures which are made on behalf of
any person who receives observation or examination and for whom liability is imposed under section 505(b) of
the Mental Health/Mental Retardation Act of 1966 (50 P. S. 4505(b)).
(d) In the event a residency cannot be determined to be in a county within this Commonwealth by the court that
convicted or sentenced the person, all liability for treatment shall be the responsibility of the Commonwealth.
(e) For the purposes of determining liability, the county wherein in the person had a legal residence prior to
being committed or admitted for treatment will be considered the county of residence. The determination of a
persons county of residence for purposes of this section shall be made by the courts that convicted or sentenced
the person.
(f) All patients for whom liability can be imposed under section 505(a) of the Mental Health and Mental
Retardation Act of 1966 (50 P. S. 4505(a)), and who receive treatment or examination subsequent to January
24, 1979 are subject to the provisions of subsections (a)(d).

No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.

This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different
browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 333 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

CHAPTER
DIVIDER

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 334 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
Lancaster County and LGH reach agreement on treatment of mentally ill ... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/lancaster-county-and-lgh-reach-agree...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 335 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

1 of 5 12/30/2016 9:36 AM
Lancaster County and LGH reach agreement on treatment of mentally ill ... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/lancaster-county-and-lgh-reach-agree...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 336 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

2 of 5 12/30/2016 9:36 AM
Lancaster County and LGH reach agreement on treatment of mentally ill ... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/lancaster-county-and-lgh-reach-agree...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 337 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

3 of 5 12/30/2016 9:36 AM
Lancaster County and LGH reach agreement on treatment of mentally ill ... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/lancaster-county-and-lgh-reach-agree...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 338 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

4 of 5 12/30/2016 9:36 AM
Lancaster County considers transition plan to curb mentally ill inmate po... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/lancaster-county-considers-transition-p...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 339 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

1 of 4 12/30/2016 9:39 AM
Lancaster County considers transition plan to curb mentally ill inmate po... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/lancaster-county-considers-transition-p...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 340 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

2 of 4 12/30/2016 9:39 AM
Lancaster County considers transition plan to curb mentally ill inmate po... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/lancaster-county-considers-transition-p...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 341 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

3 of 4 12/30/2016 9:39 AM
Who's in jail? Lancaster County Prison population by gender, race, age,... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/who-s-in-jail-lancaster-county-prison-...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 342 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

1 of 9 12/30/2016 9:40 AM
Who's in jail? Lancaster County Prison population by gender, race, age,... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/who-s-in-jail-lancaster-county-prison-...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 343 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

2 of 9 12/30/2016 9:40 AM
Who's in jail? Lancaster County Prison population by gender, race, age,... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/who-s-in-jail-lancaster-county-prison-...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 344 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

3 of 9 12/30/2016 9:40 AM
Who's in jail? Lancaster County Prison population by gender, race, age,... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/who-s-in-jail-lancaster-county-prison-...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 345 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

4 of 9 12/30/2016 9:40 AM
Who's in jail? Lancaster County Prison population by gender, race, age,... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/who-s-in-jail-lancaster-county-prison-...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 346 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

5 of 9 12/30/2016 9:40 AM
Who's in jail? Lancaster County Prison population by gender, race, age,... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/who-s-in-jail-lancaster-county-prison-...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 347 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

6 of 9 12/30/2016 9:40 AM
Who's in jail? Lancaster County Prison population by gender, race, age,... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/who-s-in-jail-lancaster-county-prison-...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 348 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

7 of 9 12/30/2016 9:40 AM
LG Health may nearly triple size of inpatient psychiatric program | Loca... http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/lg-health-may-nearly-triple-size-of...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 349 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

1 of 4 12/30/2016 9:40 AM
LG Health may nearly triple size of inpatient psychiatric program | Loca... http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/lg-health-may-nearly-triple-size-of...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 350 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

2 of 4 12/30/2016 9:40 AM
LG Health may nearly triple size of inpatient psychiatric program | Loca... http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/lg-health-may-nearly-triple-size-of...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 351 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

3 of 4 12/30/2016 9:40 AM
LG Health may nearly triple size of inpatient psychiatric program | Loca... http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/lg-health-may-nearly-triple-size-of...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Uber Official Website Work When You Want


with Uber.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 352 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

4 of 4 12/30/2016 9:40 AM
Reducing the stigma around mental illness | Opinion | lancasteronline.com http://lancasteronline.com/opinion/reducing-the-stigma-around-mental-il...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 353 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

1 of 4 12/30/2016 9:41 AM
Reducing the stigma around mental illness | Opinion | lancasteronline.com http://lancasteronline.com/opinion/reducing-the-stigma-around-mental-il...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 354 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

2 of 4 12/30/2016 9:41 AM
Reducing the stigma around mental illness | Opinion | lancasteronline.com http://lancasteronline.com/opinion/reducing-the-stigma-around-mental-il...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 355 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

3 of 4 12/30/2016 9:41 AM
Ponessa adds partial hospitalization for children with mental health needs... http://lancasteronline.com/business/local_business/ponessa-adds-partial-...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 356 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

1 of 3 12/30/2016 9:42 AM
Ponessa adds partial hospitalization for children with mental health needs... http://lancasteronline.com/business/local_business/ponessa-adds-partial-...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 357 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

2 of 3 12/30/2016 9:42 AM
Neighbors, LG Health discuss traffic, parking impacts of planned behavi... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/neighbors-lg-health-discuss-traffic-par...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 358 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

1 of 6 12/30/2016 9:43 AM
Neighbors, LG Health discuss traffic, parking impacts of planned behavi... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/neighbors-lg-health-discuss-traffic-par...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 359 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

2 of 6 12/30/2016 9:43 AM
Neighbors, LG Health discuss traffic, parking impacts of planned behavi... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/neighbors-lg-health-discuss-traffic-par...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 360 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

3 of 6 12/30/2016 9:43 AM
Neighbors, LG Health discuss traffic, parking impacts of planned behavi... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/neighbors-lg-health-discuss-traffic-par...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 361 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

4 of 6 12/30/2016 9:43 AM
Neighbors, LG Health discuss traffic, parking impacts of planned behavi... http://lancasteronline.com/insider/neighbors-lg-health-discuss-traffic-par...
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 362 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am

5 of 6 12/30/2016 9:43 AM
5100.51. Preservation of rights

CHAPTER
DIVIDER

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 363 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am
5100.51. Preservation of rights

In Contravention of Conventional Wisdom


CIA no touch torture makes sense
out of mind control allegations
By Cheryl Welsh
January 2008

Cheryl Welsh was invited to speak about mind control allegations at a recent
workshop on ethics and interrogations by the workshop director, Jean Maria Arrigo PhD.
Dr. Arrigo commented on this article:

In CIA No Touch Torture Makes Sense Out of Mind Control Allegations,


Cheryl Welsh provides a valuable overview of methods common to
neuroweapons research and torture interrogation. Her essay is informed by
the multitude of self-identified, experimental targets of neuroweapons
researchers whom she represents. Scholars and journalists who are only able
to track neuroweapons research and interrogation methods through
government documents have biased the consensus reality in favor of
government authorities who deceive the public. We owe thanks to Cheryl
Welsh and her colleagues for their pioneering efforts to penetrate government
deception through the phenomenology of self-identified victims of
neuroweapons.

Jean Maria Arrigo, PhD, is an independent social psychologist and oral historian whose
work gives moral voice to military and intelligence professionals. See, for example,
Arrigo, J.M & Wagner, R. (2007). Torture Is for Amateurs: A Meeting of Psychologists
and Military Interrogators. [Special issue]. Peace and Conflict, 11 (4).

Dedicated to the courageous and kind-hearted


Peggy Fagan of Houston, Texas,
who is enduring the new scientific version of torture.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 364 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 1
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Table of contents
Introduction

I. A university professor uncovers CIA no touch torture

II. The beginnings of CIA no touch torture and how it spread

III. What is no touch torture?

IV. An example of no touch torture

V. The long history of U.S. torture

VI. CIA Cold War neuroscience-based mind control research

VII. CIA Cold War nonlethal weapons research

VIII. Why CIA no touch torture has been so successful

IX. All three programs are state tools for neutralizing the enemy
without killing; for intelligence operations and counterinsurgency
warfare

X. Mind control allegations by a Korean War POW, (prisoner of war),


a Soviet political prisoner and Abu Ghraib detainees

XI. The banal and bizarre techniques of no touch torture

XII. The three key behavioral components of no touch torture

XIII. Torture as a kind of total theater

XIV. A comparison of no touch torture to mind control allegations

XV. The phenomenology of the torture situation

XVI. Comparing no touch torture techniques of sensory disorientation


and self inflicted pain to mind control allegations

XVII. Conclusions: what everyone can agree on

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 365 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 2
5100.51. Preservation of rights

Introduction
After the horrific pictures of prisoners being tortured at Abu Ghraib were displayed in front pages of
newspapers around the world, the United States maintained that the U.S. government does not
torture; Abu Ghraib was about a few bad officers. Evidence now proves that CIA no touch torture
and worse were ordered by the executive branch and approved by top military officers. Surprisingly
this scandal has much in common with another national security issue, neuroweapons, commonly
referred to as mind control.

The field of neuroethics should begin now, according to bioethicist Dr. Jonathan Moreno in his 2006
book Mind Wars, Brain Research and National Defense. The influential book was reviewed in
Nature and JAMA (Journal of American Medical Association). Most neuroscientists agree that
advanced neuroweapons are over a half century away but the ethics of the new weapons need more
planning than occurred for the atomic bomb. Moreno began the first chapter of his book describing
the growing numbers of allegations of illegal government mind control targeting. He immediately
dismissed them as conspiracy theory nut cases. A 2007 Washington Post Magazine article,
Thought Wars followed suit. So why should anyone read further given these credible and highly
respected expert opinions?

Much of what the public should know about the issue has gone unreported or uninvestigated. For
example, after over a half century of classified research, not one publicly known neurological weapon
has been deployed. This raises more questions than it answers. Putting aside the major and
undebated points of the consensus position, the mind control allegations do sound crazy and on this
singular point, most people, including experts and news reporters refuse any closer examination.
Clearly, understanding why the mind control allegations sound so crazy would have significant
consequences.

Two analogies help clarify the major problems for the mind control issue, secrecy and the lack of a
thorough, impartial investigation;

Excerpt of a 1970s congressional hearing uncovering illegal CIA activities; [Senator Frank]
Church, ... persisted in blaming the plots [assassinations] on the CIA. The agency, he said, was
a rogue elephant on a rampage. For proof, he pointed to the lack of documentary evidence
that any president had ever approved an assassination. Former CIA director Richard Helms
countered that it was absurd to expect to find such evidence. I cant imagine anybody wanting
something in writing saying I have just charged Mr. Jones to go out and shoot Mr. Smith, he
testified. The Agency, he insisted, had simply carried out the wishes of the executive.

Even today, experts dont understand how the U.S. secrecy system works. Similar to the torture
scandal, until there is a national security scandal about neuroscience weapons, the public will
remain uninformed about a serious public issue.

During a dairymans strike in 19th century New England, when there was suspicion of milk
being watered down, Henry David Thoreau wrote; Sometimes circumstantial evidence can be
quite convincing; like when you find a trout in the milk. Mind Wars and the Washington Post
Magazine article examined the growing numbers of crazy sounding mind control allegations.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 366 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 3
5100.51. Preservation of rights
But unlike Thoreaus account, the publications only reported the convincing circumstantial
evidence of finding a trout in the milk and dismissed the suspicions without a fair or
impartial investigation. As a result, the mind control allegations made no sense.

Update: In the 2008 book The Commission, the Uncensored History of the 9-11 Investigation,
Philip Shenon explained that explicit, very classified kill orders are now put in writing. On page
254 Shenon wrote: MONs [memorandum of notification] were top-secret orders prepared by the
White House to authorize covert operations abroad by the CIA. ... there was an explicit, if highly
secret, order given by Clinton to the CIA in late 1998 to kill bin Laden.

I. A university professor uncovers CIA no touch


torture
University of Wisconsin professor Alfred McCoy wrote the 2006 book, A Question of Torture, CIA
Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Its a compelling account of McCoys search
for understanding the CIAs no touch torture techniques used in the war on terror and the Iraq
War. McCoy shows how information extracted by coercion is worthless and makes the case for a
legal approach, long and successfully used by the U.S. Marines and the F.B.I. McCoy documents
why CIA no touch torture is a revolutionary psychological approach and is the first new scientific
innovation after centuries of torture. Interrogators had found that mere physical pain, no matter
how extreme, often produced heightened resistance. Of course, the old brutal forms of physical
torture are still around, for example torture in Argentina in the 1970s described in the classic,
Prisoner Without a Name, Cell without a Number by Jacobo Timerman.

McCoy pieced together what no touch torture is and how it was spread globally. The CIAs new no
touch torture works by attacking and destroying the basis of personal identity. McCoy found that
the techniques were bizarre, simple, even banal and yet devastatingly effective. McCoy discovered
that the techniques had been scientifically proven in decades of CIA cold war research. Evidence of
several government manuals helped prove that the techniques were disseminated from Vietnam
through Iran to Central America.

No touch torture techniques sound strangely similar to mind control allegations. A comparison of
no touch torture to mind control allegations raised the possibility that mind control allegations
could be based on the well researched psychological theory for no touch torture. Torture victims
exhibit symptoms similar to psychotic processes and organic disorders and experts say this is not
mental illness but an outcome of the psychological component of torture. Psychotherapist Otto
Doerr-Zegers, who has treated Chilean victims tortured under General Augusto Pinochet stated;
The psychological component of torture becomes a kind of total theater, a constructed unreality of
lies and inversion, in a plot that ends inexorably with the victims self-betrayal and destruction. ...
This is similar to the technique of street theater that mind control victims described in the
Washington Post Magazine article. As torture victims are not mentally ill, mind control victims
would not be mentally ill but rather have undergone and are undergoing a traumatic situation
comparable to torture, such as the alleged illegal targeting with government mind control weapons.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 367 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 4
5100.51. Preservation of rights
The UCDavis Center for the Study of Human Rights in the Americas (CSHRA) and the UCDavis
Center for Mind and Brain (CMB) further explain what psychological torture is and its effects on
torture victims.

[CSHRA and CMB] have initiated a collaboration to investigate theneurobiology of


psychological torture. ...Psychological torture (henceforthPT) is a set of practices that are
used worldwide to inflict pain or suffering without resorting to direct physical violence.
PT includes the use of sleep deprivation, sensory disorientation, forced self-induced pain,
solitary confinement, mock execution, severe humiliation, mind-altering drugs and
threats of violenceas well as the exploitation of personal or cultural phobias.

The psychiatric sequelae of PT are severe. They include delirium, psychosis, regression,
self-mutilation, cognitive impairment, and anxiety disorders, including post-traumatic
stress disorder. Neuroscience research on these and related mental disorders continues
to establish their neurobiological underpinnings, thus challenging the popular view that
PT is not physical, not serious, and perhaps not even torture at all.

The CSHRA and the CMB launched their collaborative efforts by holding The First
UCDavis Workshop on the Neurobiology of Psychological Torture. The goal of this
workshop was to bring together researchers and practitioners from different specialties
and research groups in order to set off a unified, long-term, research program on the
ways in which PT affects the human central nervous system in an effort to understand it
in relation to the more traditional forms of physical torture, and to establish clearly
articulated ethical, legal, and medical descriptions of this set of practices. It is expected
that these descriptions will help treat, document, and deter PT.

Supplemented by studies on the social, historical, and ethical ramifications of PT, the
presentations made at The First UCDavis Workshop on the Neurobiology of
Psychological Torture have been bound into The Trauma of Psychological Torture, a
volume to be published by Praeger on June 30, 2008.

Please note that numerous torture experts, including CSHRA and CMB have completely shunned
suggestions to investigate mind control allegations or to consider the issue. But this information may
be helpful to the therapists of TIs (targeted individuals of mind control) who are coping with mind
control targeting.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 368 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 5
5100.51. Preservation of rights

II. The beginnings of CIA no touch torture and how it


spread
The science of psychological torture began because of fears of Russian brainwashing of defendants in
the 1940s Moscow show trials and the Korean War POW (prisoners of war) brainwashing scare in
the 1950s. The 2005 book, World as Laboratory, Experiments with Mice, Mazes, and Men by
Rebecca Lemov described government psychological research for determining whether the
Communists had developed new techniques of brainwashing. Almost all [scientists] who were
assigned to study the phenomenon of POW collaboration ended up in short order working for the
CIA via one of its various cut-outs, conduits, and false fronts, such as the Society for the
Investigation of Human Ecology, the Geschickter Fund for Medical Research, and the Scientific
Engineering Institute, or in one of its own laboratories. (Lemov, 219) McCoy described the research
behind no touch torture and how it spread globally;

From 1950 to 1962, the CIA became involved in torture through a massive mind-control
effort, with psychological warfare and secret research into human consciousness that
reached a cost of a billion dollars annually, a veritable Manhattan Project of the mind. ...
If we trace a narrative thread through a maze of hundreds of experiments, the CIA
research moved through two distinct phases, first an in-house exploration of exotic
techniques such as hypnosis and hallucinogenic drugs, and, a later focus on behavioral
experimentation by contract researchers, several of the most brilliant behavioral
scientists of their generation ...

While this Agency drug testing led nowhere, CIA-funded behavioral experiments,
outsourced to the countrys leading universities, Harvard, Princeton, Yale, etc., produced
three key findings that contributed to the discovery of a new form of torture that was
psychological, not physical, ... perhaps best described as no-touch torture. (McCoy
outline, 2)

Across the span of three continents and four decades, there is a striking similarity in U.S.
torture techniques, both their conceptual design and specific techniques, from the CIAs
1963 Kubark interrogation manual, to the Agencys 1983 Honduras training handbook,
all the way to General Ricardo Sanchezs 2003 orders for interrogation in Iraq. ...
Guantanamo perfected the three-phase psychological paradigm by attacking cultural
identity and individual psyche. (McCoy outline, 14)

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 369 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 6
5100.51. Preservation of rights

III. What is no touch torture?


McCoy explained what no touch torture is;

The CIAs psychological paradigm for no touch torture fused two new methods,
sensory disorientation and self-inflicted pain, whose combination, in theory, would
cause victims to feel responsible for their own suffering and thus capitulate more readily
to their torturers. Refined through years of practice, sensory disorientation relies on a
mix of sensory overload and sensory deprivation via banal procedures, isolation then
intense interrogation, heat and cold, light and dark, noise and silence, for a systematic
attack on all human stimuli. The fusion of these two techniques, sensory disorientation
and self-inflicted pain, creates a synergy of physical and psychological trauma whose sum
is a hammer-blow to the existential platforms of personal identity. (McCoy outline, 4-5)
In 2004, the Red Cross reported: The construction of such a system. ... cannot be
considered other than an intentional system of cruel, unusual and degrading treatment
and a form of torture. (McCoy outline, 9)

IV. An example of no touch torture


Democracy Nows Amy Goodman interviewed journalist Jane Mayer about her August 8, 2007 New
Yorker article, The Black Sites: A Rare Look Inside the C.I.A.s Secret Interrogation Program.
Mayer described detainee Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his experience with no touch torture;

There, he [Khalid Sheikh Mohammed] was subjected to a kind of a weird routine that
someone described to me as kind of Clockwork Orange sort of thing, where he was put in
goggles that blacked out the light and earmuffs of some sort that blocked out sound and
deprived of any normal routine, such as meals or anything that would allow him to know
what time of day it was or really have any kind of marker in his existence. And its a
program thats developed of sort of psychological terror, in a way, to kind of make people
feel that they are completely dependent on other people, have no control over their lives,
and its something that, the technique, that really comes out of the KGB days, way back in
the Cold War. And apparently its something the CIA has put a lot of research into over
time.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 370 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 7
5100.51. Preservation of rights

V. The long history of U.S. torture


The history of CIA torture runs parallel to CIA neuroscience-based mind control research and also
CIA nonlethal weapons research. This is important because mind control allegations include
descriptions of techniques that sound like all three CIA programs. It is possible that the related cold
war CIA no touch torture, nonlethal weapons and neuroscience-based mind control programs have
co-mingled for intelligence purposes. Pulitzer Prize winning New York Times reporter and author
Tim Weiner wrote the 2007 book Legacy of Ashes, History of the CIA. Weiner described the CIA
torture programs and the U.S. secret detention centers around the world. This is a brief excerpt of
the extensive programs;

The project dated back to 1948, when Richard Helms and his [American intelligence]
officers in Germany realized they were being defrauded ... The agency had set up
clandestine prisons to wring confessions out of suspected double agents. One was in
Germany, another in Japan. The third, and the biggest, was in the Panama Canal Zone.
Like Guantanamo, ... It was anything goes. ... (Weiner, 64-5)

Senior CIA officers, including Helms, destroyed almost all the records of these programs
in fear they might become public. (Weiner, 66)

The agency, as Cheney said that morning, went over to the dark side. On Monday,
September 17, President Bush issued a fourteen-page top secret directive to Tenet and
the CIA, ordering the agency to hunt, capture, imprison, and interrogate suspects around
the world. It set new limits on what the agency could do. It was the foundation for a
system of secret prisons where CIA officers and contractors used techniques that
included torture. One CIA contractor was convicted of beating an Afghan prison to death.
This was not the role of a civilian intelligence service in a democratic society. But it is
clearly what the White House wanted the CIA to do. ...

[The CIA] had participated in the torture of captured enemy combatants before,
beginning in 1967, under the Phoenix program in Vietnam. ...

Under Bushs order, the CIA began to function as a global military police, throwing
hundreds of suspects into secret jails in Afghanistan, Thailand, Poland, and inside the
American military prison in Guantanamo, Cuba. It handed hundreds more prisoners off
to the intelligence services in Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan, and Syria for interrogations.
(Weiner, 482)

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 371 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 8
5100.51. Preservation of rights

VI. CIA Cold War neuroscience-based mind control


research
Some CIA neuroscience-based mind control research is known to have continued into the 1970s and
is still classified today. A January 29, 1979 Washington Post article entitled Book Disputes CIA
Chief on Mind-Control Efforts: Work Went on Into 1970s, Author Says, reported;

Despite assurances last year from Central Intelligence Director Stansfield Turner that the
CIAs mind-control program was phased out over a decade ago, the intelligence agency
has come up with new documents indicating that the work went on into the 1970s,
according to a new book. John Marks, the author of the book, said the CIA mind-control
researchers did apparently drop their much publicized MK-ULTRA drug-testing
program. But they replaced it, according to Marks, with another super secret behavioral-
control project under the agencys Office of Research and Development.

The ORD program used a cover organization set up in the 1960s outside Boston headed
by Dr. Edwin Land, the founder of Polaroid, who acted as a figurehead, said Marks in
his book. The project investigated such research as genetic engineering, development of
new strains of bacteria, and mind control. The book identifies the Massachusetts
proprietary organization headed by Land as the Scientific Engineering Institute. The
CIA-funded institute was originally set up as a radar and technical research company in
the 1950s and shifted over to mind-control experiments in the 1960s with the exception
of a few scattered programs. According to Marks, however, the ORD program was a full-
scale one and just as secret as the earlier MK-ULTRA project.

In a March 14, 1987, Nation magazine editorial, Louis Slesin, editor of the trade publication,
Microwave News, wrote; Experts agree that nonionizing electromagnetic radiation (NIER) can
affect behavior, but the question is whether the radiation can be harnessed and used on people at a
distance. With its MKULTRA program the CIA began looking for the answer in the early 1950s.
Slesin described that in the 1979 book, Search for the Manchurian Candidate, The CIA and Mind
Control by John Marks, Marks filed a freedom of information act (foia) request. The CIA replied
that it had a roomful of files on electromagnetic and related techniques to alter behavior and
stimulate the brain. But, [the agency] refused to release the papers, and they remain classified.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 372 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 9
5100.51. Preservation of rights

VII. CIA Cold War nonlethal weapons research


Nonlethal weapons are another outcome of CIA behavior control research. Steven Aftergood wrote
about the initial stages of nonlethal weapons in the September/October 1994 Bulletin of the Atomic
Scientists; Details about programs to develop so called non-lethal weapons are slowly emerging
from the U.S. governments secret black budget. ... The concept of non-lethal weapons is not new;
the term appears in heavily censored CIA documents dating from the 1960s. Dr. Barbara Hatch-
Rosenberg described nonlethal weapons on page 45,

Non-lethal weapons may violate treaties

Development of many of the proposed weapons described on these pages has been
undertaken by NATO, the United States, and probably other nations as well. Most of the
weapons could be considered pre-lethal rather than non-lethal. They would actually
provide a continuum of effects ranging from mild to lethal, with varying degrees of
controllability. Serious questions arise about the legality of these expensive and highly
classified development programs. Four international treaties are particularly relevant ...
The Certain Conventional Weapons Convention (also known as the Inhumane Weapons
Convention).

Many of the non-lethal weapons under consideration utilize infrasound or


electromagnetic energy (including lasers, microwave or radio-frequency radiation, or
visible light pulsed at brain-wave frequency) for their effects. These weapons are said to
cause temporary or permanent blinding, interference with mental processes,
modification of behavior and emotional response, seizures, severe pain, dizziness, nausea
and diarrhea, or disruption of internal organ functions in various other ways. In addition,
the use of high-power microwaves to melt down electronic systems would incidentally
cook every person in the vicinity.

Typically, the biological effects of these weapons depend on a number of variables that,
theoretically, could be tuned to control the severity of the effects. However, the precision
of control is questionable. The use of such weapons for law enforcement might constitute
severe bodily punishment without due process. In warfare, the use of these weapons in a
non-lethal mode would be analogous to the use of riot control agents in the Vietnam War,
a practice now outlawed by the CWC. Regardless of the level of injury inflicted, the use of
many non-lethal weapons is likely to violate international humanitarian law on the basis
of superfluous suffering and/or indiscriminate effects.

In addition, under the Certain Conventional Weapons Convention, international


discussions are now under way that may lead to the development of specific new
protocols covering electromagnetic weapons; a report is expected sometime next year.
The current surge of interest in electromagnetic and similar technologies makes the
adoption of a protocol explicitly outlawing the use of these dehumanizing weapons an
urgent matter.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 373 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 10
5100.51. Preservation of rights

VIII. Why CIA no touch torture has been so successful


McCoy explained;

CIA Paradigm: In its clandestine journey across continents and decades, this distinctly
American form of psychological torture would prove elusive, resilient, adaptable and
devastatingly destructive, attributes that have allowed it to persist up to the present and
into the future. ...

1. Elusive: Unlike its physical variant, psychological torture lacks clear signs of abuse
and easily eludes detection, greatly complicating any investigation, prosecution, or
attempt at prohibition.

2. Resilient: Psychological torture is shrouded in a scientific patina that appeals to


policy makers and avoids the obvious physical brutality unpalatable to the modern
public.

3. Adaptable: In forty years since its discovery, the Agencys psychological paradigm
has proved surprisingly adaptable, with each sustained application producing
innovations. ...

4. Destructive: Although seemingly less brutal than physical methods, the CIAs no
touch torture actually leaves searing psychological scars. Victims often need long
treatment to recover from a trauma many experts consider more crippling than
physical pain. (A Question of Torture, 12)

These characteristics also apply to nonlethal weapons and neuroscience-based mind control. All
three are emerging state tools of the future and can neutralize the enemy by controlling the behavior
of the enemy. A 2005 book entitled, Torture, Does it Make Us Safer? Is It Ever OK? was co-
published with Human Rights Watch. Some general reasons for why governments use torture as a
state tool include the following. Governments torture because it is a way to obtain coerced
confessions. The confessions can be used for propaganda purposes. Torture serves a variety of state
purposes: to terrorize certain elements of the population, to instill a climate of fear in the public
more generally, and to break key leaders and members of these groups, uncovering their networks.
Other purposes of torture are to obtain intelligence by any means, annihilate subversives and
eliminate the enemy.

Counterinsurgency warfare is taking place in Iraq and major newspapers have reported on the many
detainees that have consistently alleged being subjected to no touch torture techniques. As
reported in the September 16th, 2007 Sacramento Bee, General David Petraeus co-wrote the
Counterinsurgency Field Manuel-U.S. Army Field Manual on Tactics, Intelligence, Host Nation
Forces, Airpower, which Newsweek said, is highly touted as the basis upon which the surge of U.S.
forces this year would be organized.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 374 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 11
5100.51. Preservation of rights
The book Torture, also included a description of counterinsurgency warfare, in which torture was a
principal weapon and was developed during the French experience in Indochina and Algeria.

[The] genesis of this new kind of warfare is the idea that the enemy takes the form of an
invisible political organization hidden among the civilian population. One can know its
leaders and its structure only by waging a war of information: by arresting masses of
civilian suspects, interrogating them, and, if necessary, torturing them. ... In the modern
era, ... the science of torture and similar abusive treatment has developed to break the
physical and mental resistance of subjects before they expire or go mad and thus become
useless as sources of information. ... Torture is still about domination.

IX. All three programs are state tools for neutralizing


the enemy without killing; for intelligence operations and
counterinsurgency warfare
By comparing mind control allegations to no touch torture techniques and the very classified
nonlethal weapons program, the purpose of the bizarre sounding mind control allegations begins to
make sense. Neuroweapons include the CIAs still classified neuroscience-based mind control
research, no touch torture and nonlethal weapons. All three are emerging state tools of the future
that can reliably neutralize the enemy psychologically or without killing. The old, politically
unacceptable methods of brutal physical torture and killing wont be eliminated but surreptitious,
scientifically proven, alternative methods are available to achieve an even greater national security
advantage. All are ideal for counterinsurgency warfare, psychological operations and intelligence
operations. The characteristics of no touch torture, nonlethal weapons and neuroscience-based
mind control make them more inhumane than the atomic bomb.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 375 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 12
5100.51. Preservation of rights

X. Mind control allegations by a Korean War POW,


(prisoner of war), a Soviet political prisoner and Abu
Ghraib detainees
Three relevant examples out of the numerous available provide a general overview of the decades of
mind control allegations and weapons. The details are compelling and rarely reported by
mainstream press and illustrate why a comparison of no touch torture to mind control allegations
is so applicable. The examples share the same Cold War history with CIA no touch torture,
neuroscience-based mind control and nonlethal weapons programs.

1. The 1984 BBC TV documentary Opening Pandoras Box described EMR [electromagnetic
radiation] remote mind control developments and a claim of mind control by a Korean POW;

In the 1950s, intelligence agencies were interested in changing mental states. The
theory is that brain waves can be tuned to a different EMR frequency and can
change moods and character. ... A CIA memo stated that they were looking for
behavior control to enhance consciousness.

The Soviets had realized the same thing. Dr. Ross Adey, famous EMR researcher at
Loma Linda Veterans Hospital, examined the Lida machine, from the Soviet Union.
It was described as a machine to rearrange consciousness. The Russians claimed
to use it for treatment of emotional disorders in the 1950s. Dr. Adey stated that the
Lida machine is now obsolete. It used coiled wire inside ear muffs which acted like
an antenna and emitted 1/10 sec pulses of EMR. Dr. Adey demonstrated that
excited animals rapidly quiet down when exposed to the Lida EMR frequencies.
There was one account that the Lida machine was used during the Korean war for
brainwashing American Prisoners.

2. An interview of an alleged Russian victim, Andre Slepucha, was reported in a 1998 ZDF
German TV documentary. He described what seems to be the first reported victim of some type
of microwave hearing. Slepucha stated;

In November 1954 I came into contact with what today is referred to as


Psychotronic Treatment for the first time. Back then they took me out of the
concentration camp where, under Stalin, I had been imprisoned as a political
prisoner, and brought me into an isolation cell in the KGB prison which was located
in the Lubyanka. After an approximately two week long continuous occupation of
the cell I suddenly experienced in the morning strong sounds in the head, very
strong acoustic and visual hallucinations.

On the CNN news broadcast, Special Assignment by Chuck DeCaro, Weapons of War, Is there
an RF Gap? November 1985, Dr. Bill van Bise, electrical engineer, conducted a demonstration
of Soviet scientific data and schematics for beaming a magnetic field into the brain to cause
visual hallucinations. The demonstration on reporter Chuck DeCaro was successful. Dr. van
Bise stated, In three weeks, I could put together a device that would take care of a whole

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 376 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 13
5100.51. Preservation of rights

town. A December 13, 1976, Federal Times article, Microwave Weapons Study by Soviets
Cited described the alleged Russian capability of microwave hearing;

The Defense Intelligence Agency has released a report on heavy Communist


research on microwaves, including their use as weapons. Microwaves are used in
radar, television and microwave ovens. They can cause disorientation and possibly
heart attacks in humans. Another biological effect with possible anti-personnel uses
is microwave hearing. Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be
originating intracranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation at
very low average power densities, the report said. According to the study,
Communist work in this area has great potential for development into a system for
disorienting or disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic
personnel.

3. Jon Ronson, author of the New York Times reviewed book, The Men Who Stare at Goats
wrote about alleged mind control experiments on Iraqi detainees. In an interview on April 14,
2005 at the Politics and Prose book store in Washington DC., Ronson discussed his book.
(Tape available from Cspan, Book TV at www.booktv.org. Videotape # 186334)

And from the former detainees from Guantanamo Bay that Ive interviewed it
seems exactly the same things are going on there. I said to a man called Jamal al-
Harith how do you feel, you know how did you feel at Guantanamo Bay and he said
felt like a laboratory rat. And he said, I felt they were trying stuff out on me. ...

And one example is with Barney the purple dinosaur. When it was announced a
year ago that they were rounding up prisoners of war in Iraq and blasting them
with Barney the purple dinosaur, it was treated as a funny story, because, by all the
major news networks in America, you know... the torture wasnt that bad. ... It was
disseminated as funny because who wants to replace a funny story with, as Eric
[Olson] once said to me, with one thats not fun. ...

I was given seven photographs of a detainee who had just been given the Barney
treatment as they called it. It was 48 hours of Barney with flashing strobe lights
inside a shipping container in the desert heat. ...

... The current chief of staff of the Army is a man called General Pete Shoemaker. ...
Hes well known to have an interest in these paranormal esoteric military pursuits.
... So now is the time when I know that these ideas go to the very top [levels of the
military].

One of the things you spoke of, the one that I have knowledge of is the frequencies.
You can follow a trail of patents like footprints in the snow and the patents
sometimes vanish into the world of military classification. And theres many
patents bought up by a man called Dr. Oliver Lowry. ...

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 377 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 14
5100.51. Preservation of rights
So we know that these patents have been bought up by the military. ... And the
detainees of Guantanamo Ive spoken to speak of being blasted withfrequencies, put
inside music, high and low frequencies, masked with music.

...I think theres no doubt theyre experimenting with this stuff. To add to that
controversial suggestion. I think theres a good chance that even though theyre
trying this stuff out, its not necessarily true that it works. A lot of this stuff doesnt
work. This may or may not work. I dont know.

XI. The banal and bizarre techniques of no touch


torture
Psychological techniques used at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and secret prisons have included
extremes of the following; manipulation of time, loud music, strobe lights, odd sounds, hooding, ear
muffs, heat and cold, light and dark, isolation and intensive interrogation and most importantly,
creative combinations of all these methods which otherwise might seem, individually, banal if not
benign. As McCoy explains;

After a visit from the Guantanamo chief General Miller in September 2003, the U.S.
commander for Iraq, General Ricardo Sanchez, issued orders for sophisticated
psychological torture. As I read from those orders, please listen for the combined sensory
disorientation, self-inflicted pain, and attacking Arab cultural sensitivities.

Environmental Manipulation: Altering the environment to create moderate discomfort


(e.g. adjusting temperatures or introducing an unpleasant smell) ...

Sleep Adjustment: Adjusting the sleeping times of the detainee (e.g. reversing the
sleeping cycles from night to day).

Isolation: Isolating the detainee from other detainees. ... 30 days.

Presence of Military Working Dogs: Exploits Arab fear of dogs while maintaining security
during interrogations ...

Yelling, Loud Music, and Light Control: Used to create fear, disorient detainee and
prolong capture shock. Volume controlled to prevent injury ...

Stress Positions: Use of physical posturing (sitting, standing, kneeling, prone, etc.)
(McCoy outline, 9)

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 378 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 15
5100.51. Preservation of rights

XII. The three key behavioral components of no touch


torture
McCoy described the principles underlying no touch torture;

Through covert trial and error, the CIA, in collaboration with university researchers,
slowly identified three key behavioral components integral to its emerging techniques for
psychological torture.

Discovery #1 Sensory deprivation In the early 1950s ...Dr. Donald Hebb found that he
could induce a state akin to psychosis in just 48 hours. ...after just two to three days of
such isolation [sitting in a cubicle ..with goggles, gloves and ear muffs on.] the subjects
very identity had begun to disintegrate.

Discovery #2 Self-inflicted pain ...Albert Biderman, Irving L. Janis, Harold Wolff, and
Lawrence Hinkle, advised the agency about the role of self-inflicted pain in Communist
interrogation. ...During the 1950s as well, two eminent neurologists at Cornell Medical
Center working for the CIA found that the KGBs most devastating torture technique
involved, not crude physical beatings, but simply forcing the victim to stand for days at a
time, while the legs swelled, the skin erupted in suppurating lesions, the kidneys shut
down, hallucinations began.

Discovery #3 Anyone can torture ...Finally, a young Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram,
...conducted his famed obedience experiments, asking ordinary New Haven citizens to
torture on command and discovering that, in contravention of conventional wisdom,
anyone could be trained to torture. ...[Milgram] did controversial research under a
government grant showing that almost any individual is capable of torture, a critical
finding for the agency as it prepared to disseminate its method worldwide. (McCoy
outline, 4, Question of Torture, 32-33)

By the projects end in the late 1960s, this torture research had involved three of the 100
most eminent psychologists of the 20th century-Hebb, Milgram, and Janis, as well as
several presidents of the American Psychiatric Association and the American
Psychological Association. (A Question of Torture, 33)

That notorious photo of a hooded Iraqi on a box, arms extended and wires to his hands,
exposes this covert method. The hood is for sensory deprivation, and the arms are
extended for self-inflicted pain. ... Although seemingly less brutal than physical methods,
no-touch torture leaves deep psychological scars on both victims and interrogators. One
British journalist who observed this methods use in Northern Ireland called sensory
deprivation the worst form of torture because it provokes more anxiety among the
interrogatees than more traditional tortures, leaves no visible scars and, therefore, is
harder to prove, and produces longer lasting effects. (Question of Torture, 8-9)

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 379 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 16
5100.51. Preservation of rights
McCoy explained how CIA no touch torture changes its victims;

Insights from the treatment of Chilean victims tortured under General Augusto Pinochet
s regime offer a point of entry into this complex question. Psychotherapist Otto Doerr-
Zegers found that victims suffer a mistrust bordering on paranoia, and a loss of interest
that greatly surpasses anything observed in anxiety disorders. The subject does not
only react to torture with a tiredness of days, weeks, or months, but remains a tired
human being, relatively uninterested and unable to concentrate.

These findings led him to a revealing question: What in torture makes possible a change
of such nature that it appears similar to psychotic processes and to disorders of organic
origin? (Question of Torture, 10-11)

XIII. Torture as a kind of total theater


Doerr-Zegers explained that techniques of torture work by creating deception, distrust, fear,
disorientation, a kind of total theater that leaves the victim disoriented and emotionally and
psychological damaged. The similarity of the explanation below to street theater found in mind
control allegations is remarkable;

As Doerr-Zegers describes it, the psychological component of torture becomes a kind of


total theater, a constructed unreality of lies and inversion, in a plot that ends inexorably
with the victims self-betrayal and destruction.

To make their artifice of false charges, fabricated news, and mock executions convincing,
interrogators often become inspired thespians. The torture chamber itself thus has the
theatricality of a set with special lighting, sound effects, props, and backdrop, all
designed with a perverse stagecraft to evoke an aura of fear. Both stage and cell construct
their own kind of temporality. While the play both expands and collapses time to carry
the audience forward toward denouement, the prison distorts time to disorientate and
then entrap the victim. As the torturer manipulates circumstances to maximize
confusion, the victim feels prior schemas of the self and the world ... shattered and
becomes receptive to the torturers construction of reality.

Under the peculiar conditions of psychological torture, victims, isolated from others,
form emotional ties to their tormentors that make them responsive to a perverse play
in which they are both audience and actor, subject and objectin a script that often
leaves them not just disoriented but emotionally and psychologically damaged, in some
cases for the rest of their lives. (A Question of Torture, 10)

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 380 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 17
5100.51. Preservation of rights

XIV. A comparison of no touch torture to mind


control allegations
The Washington Post Magazine article included interviews of several TIs, or targeted individuals of
mind control, as some call themselves. Highly acclaimed author Gloria Naylor is most recognized for
her novel Women of Brewster Place, starring Oprah in a 1980s TV mini-series. Naylor wrote the
novel 1996, about her personal experience of mind control targeting and street theater. The article
also included an example of drug-induced paranoia for comparison;

Like Girard, Naylor describes what she calls street theater, incidents that might be
dismissed by others as coincidental, but which Naylor believes were set up. She noticed
suspicious cars driving by her isolated vacation home. On an airplane, fellow passengers
mimicked her every movement, like mimes on a street.

Voices similar to those in Girards case followed, taunting voices cursing her, telling her
she was stupid, that she couldnt write. Expletive-laced language filled her head. ...

Naylor is not the first writer to describe such a personal descent. Evelyn Waugh, one of
the great novelists of the 20th century, details similar experiences in The Ordeal of
Gilbert Pinfold. Waughs book, published in 1957, has eerie similarities to Naylors.
Embarking on a recuperative cruise, Pinfold begins to hear voices on the ship that he
believes are part of a wireless system capable of broadcasting into his head; he believes
the instigator recruited fellow passengers to act as operatives; and he describes
performances put on by passengers directed at him yet meant to look innocuous to
others.

Waugh wrote his book several years after recovering from a similar episode and realizing
that the voices and paranoia were the result of drug-induced hallucinations.

The psychological terror and mistrust bordering on paranoia of torture victims is remarkably similar
to the mind control alleged by Naylor and the drug-induced paranoia of Waugh. The street theater
described by most TIs also appears similar to the paranoia of mental illness and most people think
street theater sounds crazy.

The addendum of Naylors novel 1996 included this description of some of the most commonly
reported mind control symptoms;

Victims are subjected to various kinds of harassment and torture, twenty-four hours a
day, seven days a week, for years on end. Most believe that some type of technology can
remotely track, target, and control every nerve in their bodies. Heart and respiration rate
can speed up and slow down, and stomach and bowel functions are regulated. Illnesses
and all types of pain can turn on and off in an instant. Microwave burns are reported.

Sleep deprivation is common and dreams are manipulated. Victims say, They [whoever
is targeting them] can see through my eyes, what I see. Sometimes victims describe
seeing the images of projected holograms. Thoughts can be read. Most victims describe a

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 381 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 18
5100.51. Preservation of rights
phenomenon they call street theater. For example, people around the victim have
repeated verbatim, the victims immediate thoughts, or harassive and personalized
statements are repeated by strangers wherever the victim may go.

Emotions can be manipulated. Microwave hearing, known to be an unclassified military


capability of creating voices in the head, is regularly reported. Implanted thoughts and
visions are common, with repetitive themes that can include pedophilia, homophobia
and degradation. Victims say it is like having a radio or TV in your head. Less frequently,
remote and abusive sexual manipulation is reported. Almost all victims say repetitive
behavior control techniques are used and include negative, stimulus-response or
feedback loops.

The counterintuitive and bizarre torture techniques are discernible within the mind control
allegations. The mind control techniques seem to be psychological techniques to disorient the victim
and cause him to feel completely controlled, dependent and at the mercy of his torturers. Similar to
the kind of total theater for torture, street theater is almost certainly a part of the process of
breaking ones personality to gain behavior control over that person.

XV. The phenomenology of the torture situation


What in torture makes possible a change of such nature that it appears similar to psychotic
processes and to disorders of organic origin? Doerr-Zegers found the answer lies in the
psychological, not physical, phenomenology of the torture situation;

1. an asymmetry of power;
2. the anonymity of the torturer to the victim;
3. the double bind of either enduring or betraying others;
4. the systematic falsehood of trumped-up charges, artificial lighting, cunning
deceptions, and mock executions;
5. confinement in distinctive spaces signifying displacement, trapping, narrowness
and destruction; and
6. a temporality characterized by some unpredictability and much circularity, having
no end. ...

Thus, much of the pain from all forms of torture is psychological, not physical, based
upon denying victims any power over their lives. In sum, the torturer strives through
insult and disqualification, by means of threats ... to break all the victims possible
existential platforms. Through this asymmetry, the torturer eventually achieves
complete power and reduces the victims to a condition of total or near total
defenselessness. (Question of Torture, 10-11)

In torture, a torture situation is created according to Doerr-Zegers. In mind control allegations,


there is a similar phenomenology of a mind control situation. TIs describe this as an electronic
prison. Doerr-Zegers described the torture technique, 1) an asymmetry of power. In torture, the
torturer has complete power and the victim is completely powerless. Similarly, TIs are targeted

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 382 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 19
5100.51. Preservation of rights
remotely and are completely powerless to stop the targeting. Doerr-Zegers described the torture
technique, 2) the anonymity of the torturer to the victim. Torture victims do not know their torturer
and similarly, there is the anonymity of the remote targeting in the mind control situation.

Most TIs described street theater or seemingly staged events which matches 3), 4) and 6). Doerr-
Zegers described torture technique, 5) confinement in distinctive spaces signifying displacement,
trapping, narrowness and destruction. Although TIs are not physically imprisoned, most victims
describe the experience as very debilitating and compare it to mental rape, an electronic prison, or
total destruction of the quality of their lives. Mind control poses a severe restriction on their former
lives. Doerr-Zegers technique 6) a temporality characterized by some unpredictability and much
circularity, having no end is also similar to sensory deprivation in mind control allegations. TIs
routinely report the simple but extremely repetitive and negative, stimulus-response and feedback
loops of their environment.

XVI. Comparing no touch torture techniques of


sensory disorientation and self inflicted pain to mind
control allegations
The psychological effects achieved by torture and alleged mind control are similar. Mind control
targeting tactics described by most TIs seem to contain the underlying no touch torture techniques
of sensory disorientation and self inflicted pain. For comparison, here is McCoys description;

To summarize, the CIAs psychological paradigm fused two new methods, sensory
disorientation and self-inflicted pain, whose combination, in theory, would cause
victims to feel responsible for their own suffering and thus capitulate more readily to
their torturers ... The fusion of these two techniques, sensory disorientation and self-
inflicted pain, creates a synergy of physical and psychological trauma whose sum is a
hammer-blow to the existential platforms of personal identity. (McCoy outline, 5)

The intended effect of sensory disorientation for torture would be similar for mind control; to create
an environment of radical uncertainty to enhance the break down of the persons will and
personality. Most alleged cases of mind control describe the considerable repetition of seemingly
innocuous and banal stimuli in the TIs environment, as if engineered by computer. The addendum
of Naylors book included this description; Almost all victims say repetitive behavior control
techniques are used and include negative, stimulus-response or feedback loops. For comparison,
here is McCoys description;

The CIAs sensory disorientation became a total assault on all senses and sensibilities,
auditory, visual, tactile, temporal, temperature, and survival. Refined through years of
practice, sensory disorientation relies on a mix of sensory overload and sensory
deprivation via banal procedures, isolation then intense interrogation, heat and cold,
light and dark, noise and silence, for a systematic attack on all human stimuli. (McCoy
outline, 4-5)

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 383 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 20
5100.51. Preservation of rights
McCoy described the photos of the hooded detainee with the arms extended for self-inflicted pain.
The torturer forces the prisoner to stand with arms extended and the prisoner has no control over
his situation. The prisoner still has a sense of guilt at causing his own pain by his extended arms.
This intended effect of self inflicted pain for torture seems to be similar to mind control. TIs who are
remotely targeted with physical pain cannot escape. Although TIs go to extremes in trying to escape
the physical targeting, they are unsuccessful. The psychological trauma is inflicted by the sense of
causing ones own pain. Many TIs report that the targeting causes TIs to become isolated from
friends, families and in many cases TIs are unable to work. This common reaction to targeting seems
to be a type of self-inflicted psychological pain.

Carole Sterlings description of targeting is also found in the addendum of Naylors book and seems
to illustrate the techniques of sensory disorientation and self-inflicted pain. It is a typical TI
description;

In 1997, Carole Sterling wrote a letter to the editor of the Star Beacon. She described her
alleged targeting with EMR weapons technologies that within months, led to her suicide.

Dear Star Beacon, I am writing about something that happened to me which goes back to
December 1995. I went to a conference in Nevada. The day following the last night at the
conference, I noticed that I had an injection mark on the base of my spine which was
sore. Then the nightmare started three days after my return to Washington, D.C. ... It
totally scrambled my brain, leaving me unable to think properly, simply functioning on
sheer shock and horror, with total incomprehension of what was going on. It actually was
debilitating. The room felt like a torture chamber. This forced me out of my home. I
believe that the technology used, be it some type of a frequency assault, some sort of
directed energy, in addition to whatever was injected in me, has caused damage to my
brain. [I have] been living with this debilitating and excruciating pain for the last eight
months so far.

TIs describe both psychological and physical targeting similar to torture. It seems logical to surmise
that the successful psychological theories of no touch torture would cross over to more technically
based remote, advanced mind control programs. This becomes a significant step forward in
understanding the mind control issue. The mind control allegations are the secret in plain sight.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 384 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 21
5100.51. Preservation of rights

XVII. Conclusions: what everyone can agree on


Hard questions need to be asked of the experts. Who now controls the neuroscience weapons
research and how advanced is it? As a result of U.S. secrecy, an educated guess is all that is possible.
The public deployment of advanced remote neuroscience weapons will be a world changing event,
affecting the lives of this generation and the next. The weapons involve national security, science,
history, U.S. politics and geopolitics. Most importantly the weapons encompass human nature, good
and evil and suffering. Most people are in agreement about one fact: unlike the atomic bomb, there
has been a total lack of public input for neuroscience weapons and policy even though the research
began in the 1950s and is still classified. Again, this raises more questions than it answers.

This article will be published in March 2008. See www.huntergatheress.com A special thank you to editor, Joan DArc for
her encouragement and suggestions.

Stan J. Caterbone Mental Health Law Suit v. LGHPage 385 of 385 Friday December 30, 2016 am 22
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 1 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 2 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 3 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 4 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 5 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 6 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 7 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 8 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 9 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 10 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 11 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 12 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 13 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 14 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 15 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 16 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 17 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 18 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 19 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 20 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 21 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 22 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 23 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 24 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 25 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 26 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 27 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 28 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 29 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 30 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

3 BLANK PAGES MISSING

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 34 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 35 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 36 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 37 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 38 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 39 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 40 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 41 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 42 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 43 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 44 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 45 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 46 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 47 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 48 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 49 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 50 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 51 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 52 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 53 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 54 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 55 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 56 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 57 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 58 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 59 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 60 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 61 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 62 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 63 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 64 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 65 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 66 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 67 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 68 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 69 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 70 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 71 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 72 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 73 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 74 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 75 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 76 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 77 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 78 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 79 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 80 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 81 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 82 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 83 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 84 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 85 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 86 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 87 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 88 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 89 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 90 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 91 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 92 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 93 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 94 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 95 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 96 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 97 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 98 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 99 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 100 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 101 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 102 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 103 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 104 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 105 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 106 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 107 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 108 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 109 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 110 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 111 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 112 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 113 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 114 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 115 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 116 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 117 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 118 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 119 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 120 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 121 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 122 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 123 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 124 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 125 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 126 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 127 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 128 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 129 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 130 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 131 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 132 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 133 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 134 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 135 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 136 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 137 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 138 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 139 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 140 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 141 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 142 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 143 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 144 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 145 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 146 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 147 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 148 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 149 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 150 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 151 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 152 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 153 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 154 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 155 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 156 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 157 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 158 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 159 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 160 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 161 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 162 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 163 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 164 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 165 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 166 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 167 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 168 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 169 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 170 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 171 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 172 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 173 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 174 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 175 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 176 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 177 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 178 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 179 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 180 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 181 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 182 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 183 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 184 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 185 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 186 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 187 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 188 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 189 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 190 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 191 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 192 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 193 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 194 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 195 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 196 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 197 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 198 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 199 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 200 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 201 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 202 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 203 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 204 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 205 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 206 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 207 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 208 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 209 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 210 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 211 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 212 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 213 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 214 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 215 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 216 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, AWARDED BENEFITS AS A VICTIM OF U.S. SPONSROED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY APPLCATION Page 217 of 217 Friday March 31, 2017
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
717-459-7588 Fax

August 11, 2015

Complaint No. SR1-2637592483

Epic Card
P.O. Box 245998
San Antonio, TX 78224

Re: Bonnie Lee and Polygraph Solutions, LLC.,

1. I had chosen a one issue test and Bonnie Lee kept changing the terminology
of my question - dealing with telepathy. Ms. Lee looked up the term on her
smart phone and gave me definitions that were not consistent with the
technology, I had to provide me own definition on the fly without any
documents and write it down for her on her tablet for the test. My polygraph
question was "Am I a Victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control?" - I have the
Social Security Disability Benefits to prove that I am.
2. As usual, there had to be some form of uninfluenced, typical of Targeted
Individuals and Federal Whistleblowers.
3. Ms. Miller failed to inform me yesterday that she only accepts cash the day of
the polygraph test; I luckily read it on her website. It was buried on a 3
long screen text message.
4. As usual my Apple I-phone GPS was again hacked and lead me in the wrong
direction to the middle of a development some miles away, fortunately I had
prepared for this and had Ms. Lee provide me with verbal instructions the day
before.
5. Again, as they did on my way to Carlisle, I was again given the
electromagnetic attacks that produce an intense need to sleep while driving.
6. When I arrived early in the pre-test interview she tried to talk me out of
continuing on with the test; I had to almost threaten legal action due to the
fact that I had paid a $300.00 credit card deposit the day before the test.
Maybe she does this to avoid taxes?
7. The entire process lasted from 1:50pm until 4:30pm and was exhausting. She
admitted that she performed more than the usual 3 chart test. I had actually
fallen asleep for a few seconds due to the electromagnetic sleep attack, and
fought myself during the entire process not to fall asleep. She gave me no
breaks; I finally had to request a bathroom break before the last chart.
8. I had to sit motionless for almost an hour and a half and she barked at me for
the slightest movement; which does not seem to be normal.
9. She had tailored the profile questions to include any hint of behavior for my
entire lifespan.
10. During the profile interview I had warned her that the only way that I would
fail would be due to either her machinery or her conduct.
11. SHE GUARANTEED ME THAT IF I TOLD THE TRUTH I WOULD PASS THE
TEST; SHE FLAT OUT LIED TO ME! I TOLD THE TRUTH DURING THE ENTIRE
PROCESS!
12. Bonnie Miller had 2 books in the corner of her office titled Brain Mapping
and one on Interrogation Techniques. These 2 books are directly related to
my victimization of electromagnetic weapons.
13. During the profile session regarding personal integrity she had asked do you
have any bad behavior within the past 55 years.
14. I had asked her if she would release the results to third parties and she said
that was alright however she said she would have to include all my answers
regarding the profile of my personal information. I kept questioning why she
would not just release the report she released to me and she would not budge
on her position.

Respectfully,

Stan J. Caterbone
Polygraph Solutions LLC
257 W. Uwchlan Ave
Downingtown, PA 19335

Date: 8-6-2015

Client: Mr. Stanley Caterbone

Dear Mr.Caterbone,

At your request, I conducted a Forensic Psycho Physiological Truth Verification


Examination on you Mr. Canterbone. This examination was conducted to determine your
truthfulness regarding the 3 relevant questions listed below re: mind control.

POLYGRAPH TEST CONSENT:

The examination was conducted in accordance with State and Federal laws concerning
the use of the polygraph. Prior to the examination you signed a consent form assuring all
concerned that you were aware of your rights concerning the polygraph, and that you were taking
the examination voluntarily. At the conclusion and same day of the examination you were given
the results of the test. During the polygraph pre-interview and test, you were well treated, and
remained of your own free will, knowing you could stop the procedure and leave at any time.

AGREEMENT TO COOPERATION:

You signed an Agreement of Cooperation form that stated any deliberate attempts to try
to alter your physiology for the assessment were counter-productive, a sign of deception, and
grounds for the examiner to report the results as same.

CONSENT TO SHARE INFORMATION:

You signed a consent form permitting me to give all information and the results of the
test with no one.

INTERVIEW INFORMATION:

You were properly identified, and you reported no disabilities or medical conditions that
would adversely affect your physiology or your ability to take the Polygraph Examination.

ADMISSIONS PRIOR TO TEST:

You believe the US government is conducting mind control including Synthetic Telepathy
your definition of Synthetic Telepathy is Technology developed by various government
agencies that target individuals with voice communications 1-way or 2-way by way of a
technological source
POLYGRAPH EVALUATION:

A Forensic examination, consisting of 3 charts of an Integrated Zone Comparison


Technique was administered and scored. (Single-Issue test.) The Relevant questions listed
below, were among all of the Polygraph Examination questions.

QUESTIONS:

R1. Are you a victim of US sponsored mind control?


ANSWER (YES) RESULT: (DI) Deception Indicated

R2. RE: US sponsored mind control, are you a victim of it?


ANSWER (YES) RESULT: (DI) Deception Indicated

R3. Are you being truthful today that you are a victim of US mind control?
ANSWER (YES) RESULT: (DI) Deception Indicated

REMARKS:

The Lafayette Computerized LX-4000 Polygraph System was utilized for the
examination. This instrument indicates and records on a moving chart relative changes in
physiology, including blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory changes, electro dermal responses,
and countermeasure indicators. This instrument has internal scoring algorism systems.

POLYSCORE SCORING SYSTEM:

The Polyscore Scoring algorithm 5.0 designed by Johns Hopkins University Applied
Physics Laboratory, indicated (DI) Deception Indicated, that the possibility that this data was
produced by a Deceptive Subject/Examinee is greater than 99%.

The Objective Scoring algorithm (OSS3) indicated (DI) Deception Indicated. Based on
the published research the likelihood that this polygraph data was produced by a Deceptive
Subject/Examinee is 99% or greater.

The Horizontal Scoring algorism, was used to manually score these charts. A passing test
requires a score of (plus) 13 or higher for truthfulness, a failing score requires a score of (minus)
-13 or lower. This Subject/Examinees score was minus -14, indicating (DI) Deception
Indicated.

CONCLUSION:

It is my professional opinion, after careful analysis of this Examinees Polygraph


charts/tests, based on the reactions to the formulated test questions, that this examinee is not
considered to be truthful.
This examination was performed by:

Bonnie (Barbara) Lee, President


Forensic Psycho-physiologist
polygraphsolutions.com
(610)324-1058
P
LANCASTER PA 17603-6812
1250 FREMONT ST
AMG
STAN CATERBONE
Carrier -- Leave if No Response
SHIP
TO:
Electronic Rate Approved #038555749

PO BOX 245998
EPIC CARD
SAN ANTONIO TX 78224-5998

PRIORITY MAIL 2-DAY


9405 5036 9930 0120 3153 11

usps.com
US POSTAGE
$5.25
08/12/15

Legal Flat Rt Env


USPS TRACKING #

1 lb 0 oz

9405 5036 9930 0120 3153 11 0052 5001 0077 8224

Click-N-Ship
Commercial Base Pricing
Mailed from 17603
Expected Delivery Date: 08/14/15
B100

062S0000000314
0006

Cut on dotted line.

Instructions Click-N-Ship Label Record


1. Each Click-N-Ship label is unique. Labels are to be USPS TRACKING # :
used as printed and used only once. DO NOT PHOTO
COPY OR ALTER LABEL. 9405 5036 9930 0120 3153 11
Priority Mail Postage: $5.25
Trans. #: 344928754
2. Place your label so it does not wrap around the edge of Print Date: 08/11/2015 Total $5.25
the package. Ship Date: 08/12/2015
Expected
Delivery Date: 08/14/2015
3. Adhere your label to the package. A self-adhesive label
is recommended. If tape or glue is used, DO NOT TAPE
OVER BARCODE. Be sure all edges are secure. From: STAN CATERBONE
AMG
4. To mail your package with PC Postage, you 1250 FREMONT ST
may schedule a Package Pickup online, hand to LANCASTER PA 17603-6812
your letter carrier, take to a Post Office, or
drop in a USPS collection box.
To: EPIC CARD
5. Mail your package on the "Ship Date" you PO BOX 245998
selected when creating this label. SAN ANTONIO TX 78224-5998

* Commercial Base Pricing Priority Mail rates apply. There is no fee for USPS
Tracking service on Priority Mail service with use of this electronic rate shipping
label. Refunds for unused postage paid labels can be requested online 30 days from
the print date.

Thank you for shipping with the United States Postal Service!
Check the status of your shipment on the USPS Tracking page at usps.com
June 7, 2015

Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

Social Security Administration


P.O. Box 4550
Wilkes Barre, PA 18767-4550

Claim No. XXX-XX-0959 A-

Re: Disability Update Report of June 5, 2015

To Whom It May Concern:

Attached are supporting documents for the above. The following is a list of the
attached items for your considerations and review:

1. Fairmont Behaviorial Systems/Hospital Medical and 302 Report


2. Lancaster General Hospital Illegal No Trespass Notice
3. Targeted Individual Summary and Notarized Affidavit
4. Accumulated Illegal No Trespass Notices
5. 24 Criminal Charges Dismissed 1987 to 2007

Thank you for your considerations.

Stanley J. Caterbone

cc: file
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,
&
STAN J. CATERBONE
Federal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)
Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
and Directed Energy Devices or Weapons With Organized Stalking
See Attached Affidavit of September 16, 2010

I have been a Targeted Individual, TI, and Victim since 1987. In 1987 I blew the whistle on
an international defense contractor, International Signal & Control, ISC, who was selling arms to
Iraq via South Africa and was convicted of a $1 Billion dollar Fraud. They were founded and
headquartered in my hometown of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I was a shareholder and was solicited
to help finance some of their operations. ISC was a Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor
and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies since it's beginnings in the early 1970's.
One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade,
Maryland.

My father was part of U.S. Navy experiments in the 1940's and experienced synthetic
telepathy in the 1970's and 1980's. My brother was in the U.S. Air Force and a victim of the LSD
experiments in the late 1960's.

Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. As far back as the late 1980's I knew that my mind was being read, or "remotely
viewed". In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and electromagnetic weapons. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously
with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, of CATERBONE v. Lancaster County
Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.

Stan J. Caterbone
Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance (FFCHS)
Post Office Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209

October 10, 2010

Glenn A. Fine, Inspector General

Office of the Inspector General


U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Room 4706
Washington, D.C. 20530

Subject: A Demand for an Investigation of the FBI

Dear Mr. Fine:

Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance (FFCHS) represents nearly one-thousand U. S.
citizens and residents, all of whom are victims of organized stalking, electronic stalking, or mind
manipulation carried out remotely by unseen assailants using unseen weapons. FFCHS is only one
of several organizations composed of those targeted individuals (TIs). Attached to this demand
letter are also affidavits of victims concerning their torture.

Most of the victims have recurred to the FBI and other law enforcement entities, sometimes
repeatedly, to file complaints concerning their assault; yet, the FBI has consistently refused to
properly investigate the victims claims. Refusal to look into those crimes makes the FBI guilty of
misconduct and dereliction of duty by not providing protection to American citizens on American
soil. Moreover, it makes the FBI accomplices of the assailants. The FBIs unwillingness to intervene
dangerously undermines the American citizenrys faith in the national government.

TIs suffer relentless attacks by high-tech directed energy weaponry that the U. S. military, the U.
S. intelligence community, and law enforcement are known to possess. Some of those targets
daily endure involuntary neurological intervention that includes synthetic telepathy and mind
reading. Many TIs believe that elements of the executive branch either commit those assaults or
aid and protect those who do so. Victims of those attacks experience mentally and physically
debilitating effects. Some of those effects follow.

-- Continual voice-to-skull (V2K) hearing and auditory torture with intense, loud,
electronic-sounding noise.
-- Visual distortions and blurred vision.
-- Manipulation of will, emotions, feelings, and perceptions.
-- Forced speech, involuntary body movements.
-- Mind reading, mining of memories, and neurological interrogations.
-- Induced multiple personalities, transmission of specific commands into the subconscious, and
compulsory execution of these commands.
-- Debilitation of mental acuity: inability to concentrate and disruption of ability to think rationally
and independently.
-- Loss of memory and knowledge.
-- Imposition of altered states that targeted individuals have never experienced before such as
narcotic intoxication and obsessive desires.
-- Manipulation of sleep patterns: sleep deprivation or uncontrollable sleep.
-- Cramps, seizures, and muscle spasms.
--Excruciating artificial pain in any part of the body.
-- Induced heart attacks, cancer, and other serious medical conditions.

Those electronic and neurological attacks are often accompanied by on-site organized stalking,
wiretapping, phone tampering, computer tampering, mail tampering, vehicle tampering,
workplace mobbing, vandalism, illegal entries, and break-ins.

The failure of the FBI, along with federal, state and local law enforcement, to protect victims of
electronic and neurological assault results in the following violations of those victims basic civil
and human rights.

Denial of victims of equal protection under the laws and the right of due processunder Section 1 of
the Fourteenth Amendment, also known as the Incorporation Doctrine. The Supreme Court has
found that each of these incorporated rights is "deeply rooted in the nation's history" and
"fundamental" to the concept of "ordered liberty" represented by the due process clause [Palko v.
Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 58 S. Ct. 149, 82 L. Ed. 288 [1937]. Subjection of victims to cruel and
unusual punishment and the tortuous invasion of privacy by the endless snooping" [See Galella v.
Onassis, 353 F. Supp. 196, 227-28, Page 2 (S.D.N.Y. 1972]. And subjection to organized stalking
and stealth technologies utilized to conduct myriad intrusions upon our person [See United States
of America v. Lawrence Maynard, (08-3030), p. 32 (U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C., August 6, 2010)
where the court found that U. S. Governments prolonged GPS tracking of Jones indeed violates
the intrusions every police practice the Supreme Court has deemed a search under
Katz].Deprivation of victims right to privacy, as well as the privacy of thought, as interpreted by
the U.S. Supreme Court through our Bill of Rights, the 1st Amendment (Privacy of Beliefs), 3rd
Amendment (Privacy of the Home), 14th Amendment, as well as our 4th Amendment (Right
Against Search and Seizure).

Please note that even the courts recognize that the stealth technologies exist and are in the
hands of law enforcements. In Kyllo v. United States [(99-8508) 533 U.S. 27 (2001) 190 F.3d
1041], the Supreme Court found that the use of an Agema Thermovision 210 thermal imager to
scan Kyllos home was a violation of the 4th Amendment and his privacy rights. The Court also
noted that: The ability to see through walls and other opaque barriers is a clear, and scientifically
feasible, goal of law enforcement research and development. The National Law Enforcement and
Corrections Technology Center, a program within the United States Department of Justice,
features on its Internet Website projects that include a Radar-Based Through-the-Wall
Surveillance System, Handheld Ultrasound Through the Wall Surveillance, and a Radar Flashlight
that will enable law officers to detect individuals through interior building walls
(nlectec.org/tech/proj, visited May 3, 2001).

Some devices may emit low levels of radiation that travel through-the-wall, but others, such as
more sophisticated thermal imaging devices, are entirely passive, or off-the-wall as the dissent
puts it [FN3].

By means of this correspondence, FFCHS petitions, and demands, that the Department of Justice
(1) conduct an investigation of the FBI to determine why it refuses to identify, locate, and arrest
the electronic assailants and (2) instruct the FBI to cooperate in investigating the cases regarding
victims of electronic stalking. Thank you for your attention to this urgent and distressing matter.
Sincerely yours,

Derrick C. Robinson President, FFCHS


And other board members
P.O. Box 9022

Cincinnati, OH 45209

Email: info@freedomfchs.com Voicemail: 1-800-571-5618

Fax: 1-866-433-4170 Website: www.freedomfchs.com

Pennsylvania Counseling Services - Lancaster City


40 Pearl Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.pacounseling.com

June 2, 2010

Dear Ms. Erin:

I am writing this letter to you on behalf of Stan Caterbone, who is a targeted individual, one of many
thousands in this country and worldwide who are victims of organized stalking and directed energy
weapons (DEW) assaults. DEW's are advanced surveillance, harassment and mind-invasive technologies
that provide access to the human mind and body for rogue elements of government, business, and
some individuals. Because the technologies are not widely known in society, people often believe that
when they hear voices in their mind that are not their own that they must be delusional. This is not
always the case. Because they are classified, most people do not realize that technologies exist today
that can remotely read and influence human thought, manipulate limbs and inner organs, cause
extreme pain, and/or influence human emotion. Because of congressional hearings in the 70s and
whistleblower accounts, weve learned that there has been secret, ongoing government research and
development of these technologies since the '50's, for almost 60 years.

However, this society remains mostly unaware that not only individual, but mind control on a mass scale
is occurring even as we speak. Therefore, many in this country are suffering greatly in ways they do not
understand, nor do those around them.

Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance (FFCHS) is one of the few organizations that is trying
to bridge this gap and is in the process of helping those who have found that they are victims of
advanced technologies that are preying on the minds and bodies of innocent Americans across this
country and the globe.
I believe Stan is one of the fortunate ones to have realized the truth of his situation and now the
struggle for him and others becomes finding a means of protection and relief. We have been in
emotional support of him and many others who face this same struggle today; one that our entire
society will one day grapple with hopefully sooner, rather than later. As his therapist, we appreciate
whatever support and guidance you can provide for him at this time.

Feel free to contact me at anytime if you have any questions or comments about how you may be of
help to Stan in assuring his emotional and mental well-being.

Peace and Liberty,

Derrick Robinson, President

Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance

www.freedomfchs.com

Phone: 513-344-4113

Email: derrickcrobinson@gmail.com
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mi... http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123

On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of


Mind Invasive Technology
By Carole Smith

Global Research, October 18, 2007


Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003.

"We have failed to comprehend that the result of the technology that originated in the years of the arms race
between the Soviet Union and the West, has resulted in using satellite technology not only for surveillance and
communication systems but also to lock on to human beings, manipulating brain frequencies by directing laser
beams, neural-particle beams, electro-magnetic radiation, sonar waves, radiofrequency radiation (RFR), soliton
waves, torsion fields and by use of these or other energy fields which form the areas of study for astro-physics.
Since the operations are characterised by secrecy, it seems inevitable that the methods that we do know about,
that is, the exploitation of the ionosphere, our natural shield, are already outdated as we begin to grasp the
implications of their use." [Excerpt]

For those of us who were trained in a psychoanalytical approach to the patient which was characterised as patient
centred, and which acknowledged that the effort to understand the world of the other person entailed an awareness
that the treatment was essentially one of mutuality and trust, the American Psychiatry Associations Diagnostic
Criteria for Schizotypal personality was always a cause for alarm. The Third Edition (1987) of Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) required that there be at least four of the characteristics set out for a
diagnosis of schizophrenia, and an approved selection of four could be: magical thinking, telepathy or sixth sense;
limited social contact; odd speech; and over-sensitivity to criticism. By 1994, the required number of qualifying
characteristics were reduced to two or more, including, say, hallucinations and negative symptoms such as
affective flattening, or disorganised or incoherent speech or only one if the delusions were bizarre or the
hallucination consisted of a voice keeping up a running commentary on the persons behaviour or thoughts. The next
edition of the DSM is not due until the year 2010.

In place of a process of a labelling which brought alienation and often detention, sectioning, and mind altering
anti-psychotic medication, many psychoanalysts and psychotherapists felt that even in severe cases of schizoid
withdrawal we were not necessarily wasting our time in attempting to restore health by the difficult work of
unravelling experiences in order to make sense of an illness. In this way, psychoanalysis has been, in its most
radical form, a critic of a society, which failed to exercise imaginative empathy when passing judgement on people.
The work of Harry Stack Sullivan, Frieda Fromm-Reichmann, Harold Searles or R.D. Laing - all trained as
psychiatrists and all of them rebels against the standard procedures provided a way of working with people very
different from the psychiatric model, which seemed to encourage a society to repress its sickness by making a
clearly split off group the carriers of it. A psychiatrist in a mental hospital once joked to me, with some truth, when
I commented on the number of carrier bags carried by many of the medicated patients around the hospital grounds,
that they assessed the progress of the patient in terms of the reduction of the number of carrier bags. It is too often
difficult to believe, however, when hearing the history of a life, that the schizophrenic was not suffering the effects
of having been made, consciously and unconsciously, the carefully concealed carrier of the ills of the family.

For someone who felt his mind was going to pieces, to be put into the stressful situation of the psychiatric
examination, even when the psychiatrist acquitted himself with kindness, the situation of the assessment procedure
itself, can be an effective way to drive someone crazy, or more crazy. (Laing, 1985, p 17). But if the accounting of
bizarre experiences more or less guaranteed you a new label or a trip to the psychiatric ward, there is even more
reason for a new group of people to be outraged about how their symptoms are being diagnosed. A doubly cruel
sentence is being imposed on people who are the victims of the most appalling abuse by scientific-military
experiments, and a totally uncomprehending society is indifferent to their evidence. For the development of a new
class of weaponry now has the capability of entering the brain and mind and body of another person by
technological means.

Harnessing neuroscience to military capability, this technology is the result of decades of research and
experimentation, most particularly in the Soviet Union and the United States. (Welsh, 1997, 2000) We have failed
to comprehend that the result of the technology that originated in the years of the arms race between the Soviet
Union and the West, has resulted in using satellite technology not only for surveillance and communication systems
but also to lock on to human beings, manipulating brain frequencies by directing laser beams, neural-particle
beams, electro-magnetic radiation, sonar waves, radiofrequency radiation (RFR), soliton waves, torsion fields and
by use of these or other energy fields which form the areas of study for astro-physics. Since the operations are
characterised by secrecy, it seems inevitable that the methods that we do know about, that is, the exploitation of
the ionosphere, our natural shield, are already outdated as we begin to grasp the implications of their use. The
patents deriving from Bernard J. Eastlunds work provide the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the

1 of 11 9/24/2010 9:25 PM
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mi... http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123

Earths atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is
employed, in a manner far more precise and better controlled than accomplished by the prior art, the detonation of
nuclear devices at various yields and various altitudes. (ref High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project,
HAARP).

Some patents, now owned by Raytheon, describe how to make nuclear sized explosions without radiation and
describe power beam systems, electromagnetic pulses and over-the-horizon detection systems. A more disturbing
use is the system developed for manipulating and disturbing the human mental process using pulsed radio
frequency radiation (RFR), and their use as a device for causing negative effects on human health and thinking. The
victim, the innocent civilian target is locked on to, and unable to evade the menace by moving around. The beam is
administered from space. The Haarp facility as military technology could be used to broadcast global mind-control,
as a system for manipulating and disturbing the human mental process using pulsed radio frequency (RFR). The
super-powerful radio waves are beamed to the ionosphere, heating those areas, thereby lifting them. The
electromagnetic waves bounce back to the earth and penetrate human tissue.

Dr Igor Smirnov, of the Institute of Psycho-Correction in Moscow, says: It is easily conceivable that some Russian
Satan, or lets say Iranian or any other Satan, as long as he owns the appropriate means and finances, can
inject himself into every conceivable computer network, into every conceivable radio or television broadcast, with
relative technological ease, even without disconnecting cablesand intercept the radio waves in the ether and
modulate every conceivable suggestion into it. This is why such technology is rightfully feared.(German TV
documentary, 1998).

If we were concerned before about diagnostic criteria being imposed according to the classification of recognizable
symptoms, we have reason now to submit them to even harsher scrutiny. The development over the last decades
since the Cold War arms race has included as a major strategic category, psycho-electronic weaponry, the ultimate
aim of which is to enter the brain and mind. Unannounced, undebated and largely unacknowledged by scientists or
by the governments who employ them technology to enter and control minds from a distance has been unleashed
upon us. The only witnesses who are speaking about this terrible technology with its appalling implications for the
future, are the victims themselves and those who are given the task of diagnosing mental illness are attempting to
silence them by classifying their evidence and accounts as the symptoms of schizophrenia, while the dispensers of
psychic mutilation and programmed pain continue with their work, aided and unopposed.

If it was always crucial, under the threat of psychiatric sectioning, to carefully screen out any sign of confused
speech, negativity, coldness, suspicion, bizarre thoughts, sixth sense, telepathy, premonitions, but above all the
sense that others can feel my feelings, and that someone seemed to be keeping up a running commentary on your
thoughts and behaviour, then reporting these to a psychiatrist, or anyone else for that matter who was not of a
mind to believe that such things as mind-control could exist, would be the end of your claim to sanity and probably
your freedom. For one of the salient characteristics of mind-control is the running commentary, which replicates so
exactly, and surely not without design, the symptoms of schizophrenia. Part of the effort is to remind the victim that
they are constantly under control or surveillance. Programmes vary, but common forms of reminders are electronic
prods and nudges, body noises, twinges and cramps to all parts of the body, increasing heart beats, applying
pressures to internal organs all with a personally codified system of comments on thoughts and events, designed
to create stress, panic and desperation. This is mind control at its most benign. There is reason to fear the use of
beamed energy to deliver lethal assaults on humans, including cardiac arrest, and bleeding in the brain.

It is the government system of secrecy, which has facilitated this appalling prospect. There have been warning
voices. the government secrecy system as a whole is among the most poisonous legacies of the Cold War the
Cold War secrecy (which) also mandate(s) Active Deceptiona security manual for special access programs
authorizing contractors to employ cover stories to disguise their activities. The only condition is that cover stories
must be believable. (Aftergood & Rosenberg, 1994; Bulletin of Atomic Scientist). Paranoia has been aided and
abetted by government intelligence agencies.

In the United Kingdom the fortifications against any disturbing glimmer of awareness of such actual or potential
outrages against human rights and social and political abuses seem to be cast in concrete. Complete with
crenellations, ramparts and parapets, the stronghold of nescience reigns supreme. To borrow Her Majesty the
Queens recent observation: There are forces at work of which we are not aware. One cannot say that there is no
British Intelligence on the matter, as it is quite unfeasible that the existence of the technology is not classified
information. Indeed it is a widely held belief that the women protesting against the presence of cruise missiles at
Greenham Common were victims of electro-magnetic radiation at gigahertz frequency by directed energy weapons,
and that their symptoms, including cancer, were consistent with such radiation effects as reported by Dr Robert
Becker who has been a constantly warning voice against the perils of electro-magnetic radiation. The work of Allen
Frey suggests that we should consider radiation effects as a grave hazard producing increased permeability of the
blood-brain barrier, and weakening crucial defenses of the central nervous system against toxins. (Becker, 1985, p.
286). Dr Becker has written about nuclear magnetic resonance as a familiar tool in medecine known as magnetic
resonance imaging or MRI. Calcium efflux is the result of cyclotronic resonance which latter can be explained thus:
If a charged particle or ion is exposed to a steady magnetic field in space, it will begin to go into a circular or orbital,
motion at right angles to the applied magnetic field.The speed with which it orbits will be determined by the ratio
between the charge and the mass of the particle and by the strength of the magnetic field. (Becker, 1990,p.235)

2 of 11 9/24/2010 9:25 PM
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mi... http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123

The implications of this for wide scale aggression by using a combination of radar based energy and the use of
nuclear resonating are beyond the scope of the writer, but appear to be worth the very serious consideration of
physicists in assessing how they might be used against human beings.

Amongst medical circles, however, it has so far not been possible for the writer to find a neuroscientist, neurologist
or a psychiatrist, nor for that matter, a general medical practitioner, who acknowledges even the potential for
technological manipulation of the nervous system as a problem requiring their professional interest. There has been
exactly this response from some of Englands most eminent practitioners of the legal profession, not surprisingly,
because the information about such technology is not made available to them. They would refer anyone attempting
to communicate mind- harassment as a psychiatric problem, ignoring the crime that is being committed.

The aim here is not to attempt a comprehensive history and development of the technology of mind control. These
very considerable tasks - which have to be done under circumstances of the most extreme difficulty - have been
addressed with clarity and courage by others, who live with constant harm and threats, not least of all
contemptuous labelling. Their work can be readily accessed on the internet references given at the end of this
paper. For a well-researched outline of the historical development of electro-magnetic technology the reader should
refer to the timeline of dates and electromagnetic weapon development by Cheryl Welsh, president of Citizens
against Human Rights Abuse. (Welsh 1997; 2001). There are at least one and a half thousand people worldwide who
state they are being targeted. Mojmir Babacek, now domiciled in his native Czech Republic, after eight years of
residence in the United States in the eighties, has made a painstakingly meticulous review of the technology, and
continues his research. (Babacek 1998, 2002)

We are concerned here with reinforcing in the strongest possible terms:

i) The need for such abuses to human rights and the threats to democracy to be called to consciousness, and without
further delay.

ii) To analyse the reasons why people might defend themselves from becoming conscious of the existence of such
threats.

iii) To address the urgent need for intelligence, imagination, and information - not to mention compassion - in
dealing with the victims of persecution from this technology, and

iv) To alert a sleeping society, to the imminent threats to their freedom from the threat from fascist and covert
operations who have in all probability gained control of potentially lethal weaponry of the type we are describing.

It is necessary to emphasise that at present there is not even the means for victims to gain medical attention for
the effects of radiation from this targeting. Denied the respect of credulity of being used as human guinea pigs,
driven to suicide by the breakdown of their lives, they are treated as insane at best regarded as sad cases.
Since the presence of a permanent other in ones mind and body is by definition an act of the most intolerable
cruelty, people who are forced to bear it but who refuse to be broken by it, have no other option than to turn
themselves into activists, their lives consumed by the battle against such atrocities, their energies directed to
alerting and informing the public of things they dont want to hear or understand about evil forces at work in their
society.
It is necessary, at this point, to briefly outline a few one might say the precious few attempts by public servants
to verify the existence and dangers inherent in this field:

In January 1998, an annual public meeting of the French National Bioethics Committee was held in Paris. Its
chairman, Jean-Pierre Changeux, a neuroscientist at the Institut Pasteur in Paris, told the meeting that
advances in cerebral imaging make the scope for invasion of privacy immense. Although the equipment
needed is still highly specialized, it will become commonplace and capable of being used at a distance. That
will open the way for abuses such as invasion of personal liberty, control of behaviour and brainwashing.
These are far from being science-fiction concernsand constitute a serious risk to society. (Nature. Vol
391, 1998.
In January 1999, the European Parliament passed a resolution where it calls for an international convention
introducing a global ban on all development and deployment of weapons which might enable any form of
manipulation of human beings. It is our conviction that this ban can not be implemented without the global
pressure of the informed general public on the governments. Our major objective is to get across to the
general public the real threat which these weapons represent for human rights and democracy and to apply
pressure on the governments and parliaments around the world to enact legislature which would prohibit the
use of these devices to both government and private organisations as well as individuals. (Plenary
sessions/Europarliament, 1999)
In October 2001, Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich introduced a bill to the House of Representatives which, it
was hoped would be extremely important in the fight to expose and stop psycho-electronic mind control
experimentation on involuntary, non-consensual citizens. The Bill was referred to the Committee on Science,
and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services and International Relations. In the original bill a ban
was sought on exotic weapons including electronic, psychotronic or information weapons, chemtrails,

3 of 11 9/24/2010 9:25 PM
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mi... http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123

particle beams, plasmas, electromagnetic radiation, extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency
(ULF) energy radiation, or mind control technologies. Despite the inclusion of a prohibition of the basing of
weapons in space, and the use of weapons to destroy objects or damage objects in space, there is no
mention in the revised bill of any of the aforementioned mind-invasive weaponry, nor of the use of satellite
or radar or other energy based technology for deploying or developing technology designed for deployment
against the minds of human beings. (Space Preservation Act, 2002)

In reviewing the development of the art of mind-invasive technology there are a few outstanding achievements to
note:

In 1969 Dr Jose Delgado, a Yale psychologist, published a book: Physical Control of the Mind: Towards a
Psychocivilized Society. In essence, he displayed in practical demonstrations how, by means of electrical
stimulation of the brain which had been mapped out in its relations between different points and activities, functions
and sensations, - by means of electrical stimulation, how the rhythm of breathing and heartbeat could be
changed, as well as the function of most of the viscera, and gall bladder secretion. Frowning, opening and closing
of eyes and mouth, chewing, yawning, sleep, dizziness, epileptic seizures in healthy persons were induced. The
intensity of feelings could be controlled by turning the knob, which controlled the intensity of the electric current. He
states at the end of his book the hope that the new power will remain limited to scientists or some charitable elite
for the benefit of a psychocivilized society.

In the 1980s the neuromagnetometer was developed which functions as an antenna and could monitor the
patterns emerging from the brain. (In the seventies the scientists had discovered that electromagnetic pulses
enabled the brain to be stimulated through the skull and other tissues, so there was no more need to implant
electrodes in the brain). The antenna, combined with the computer, could localize the points in the brain where the
brain events occur. The whole product is called the magnetoencephalograph.

In January 2000 the Lockheed Martin neuroengineer Dr John D. Norseen, was quoted (US News and World Report,
2000) as hoping to turn the electrohypnomentalaphone, a mind reading machine, into science fact. Dr Norseen,
a former Navy pilot, claims his interest in the brain stemmed from reading a Soviet book in the 1980s claiming that
research on the mind would revolutionize the military and society at large. By a process of deciphering the brains
electrical activity, electromagnetic pulsations would trigger the release of the brains own transmitters to fight off
disease, enhance learning, or alter the minds visual images, creating a synthetic reality. By this process of
BioFusion, (Lockheed Martin, 2000) information is placed in a database, and a composite model of the brain is
created. By viewing a brain scan recorded by (functional) magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) machine, scientists
can tell what the person was doing at the time of recording say reading or writing, or recognise emotions from
love to hate. If this research pans out, says Norseen, you can begin to manipulate what someone is thinking even
before they know it. But Norseen says he is agnostic on the moral ramifications, that hes not a mad scientist
just a dedicated one. The ethics dont concern me, he says, but they should concern someone else.

The next big thing looks like being something which we might refer to as a neurocomputer but it need not
resemble a laptop it may be reducible to whatever size is convenient for use, such as a small mobile phone.
Arising from a break-through and exploitation of PSI-phenomena, it may be modelled on the nervous-psychic
activity of the brain that is, as an unbalanced, unstable system of neurotransmitters and interacting neurones, the
work having been derived from the creation of a copy of a living brain accessed by chance, and ESP and worked
on by design.

On receiving a communication from the writer on the feasibility of a machine being on the horizon which, based on
the project of collecting electromagnetic waves emanating from the brain and transmitting them into another brain
that would read a persons thoughts, or using the same procedure in order to impose somebody elses thoughts on
another brain and in this way direct his actions there was an unequivocal answer from IBM at executive level that
there was no existing technology to create such a computer in the foreseeable future. This is at some variance with
the locating of a patent numbered 03951134 on the Internet pages of IBM Intellectual Property Network for a
device, described in the patent, as capable of picking up at a distance the brain waves of a person, process them by
computer and emit correcting waves which will change the original brain waves. Similar letters addressed to each of
the four top executives of Apple Inc., in four individual letters marked for their personal attention, produced
absolutely no response. This included the ex- Vice President of the United States, Mr Al Gore, newly elected to the
Board of Directors of Apple.

Enough people have been sufficiently concerned by the reports of victims of mind control abuse to organise The
Geneva Forum, in 2002, held as a joint initiative of the Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva; the United Nations
Institute for Disarmament Research; the International Committee of the Red cross, and the Human Rights Watch
(USA), and Citizens against Human Rights Abuses (CAHRA); and the Programme for Strategic and International
Security Studies, which was represented by the Professor and Senior Lecturer from the Department of Peace
Studies at the University of Bradford.

In England, on May 25, 1995, the Guardian newspaper in the U.K. carried an article based on a report by Nic Lewer,
the peace researcher from Bradford University, which listed more than 30 different lines of research into new age
weaponssome of the research sounds even less rational. There are, according to Lewer, plans for pulsed

4 of 11 9/24/2010 9:25 PM
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mi... http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123

microwave beams to destroy enemy electronics, and separate plans for very-low-frequency sound beams to induce
vomiting, bowel spasm, epileptic seizures and also crumble masonry. Further, the article states, There are plans
for mind control with the use of 'psycho-correction messages transmitted by subliminal audio and visual stimuli.
There is also a plan for psychotronic weapons apparently the projection of consciousness to other locations and
another to use holographic projection to disseminate propaganda and misinformation. (Welsh, Timeline). Apart
from this notable exception it is difficult to locate any public statement of the problem in the United Kingdom.

Unfortunately, the problem of credulity does not necessarily cease with frequent mention, as in the United States, in
spite of the number of reported cases, there is still not sufficient public will to make strenuous protest against what
is not only already happening, but against what will develop if left unchecked. It appears that the administration
believes that it is necessary and justifiable, in the interests of national security, to make experimental human
sacrifices, to have regrettable casualties, for there to be collateral damage, to suffer losses in place of strife or war.
This is, of course, totally incompatible with any claims to be a democratic nation which respects the values of human
life and democracy, and such an administration which tutors its servants in the ways of such barbaric tortures must
be completely condemned as uncivilised and hypocritical.

Disbelief as a Defence Mechanism

In the face of widespread disbelief about mind-control, it seems worth analysing the basis of the mechanisms
employed to maintain disbelief:

i) In the sixties, Soviet dissidents received a significant measure of sympathy and indignant protest from western
democracies on account of their treatment, most notedly the abuse of psychiatric methods of torture to which they
were subjected. It is noteworthy that we seem to be able to access credulity, express feelings of indignant support
when we can identify with victims, who share and support our own value system, and who, in this particular
historical case, reinforced our own values, since they were protesting against a political system which also
threatened us at that time. Psychologically, it is equally important to observe that support from a safe distance, and
the benefits to the psyche of attacking a split-off bad father, the soviet authorities in this case, presents no threat
to ones internal system; indeed it relieves internal pressures. On the other hand, recognizing and denouncing a
similar offence makes very much greater psychic demands of us when it brings us into conflict with our own
environment, our own security, our own reality. The defence against disillusion serves to suppress paranoia that
our father figure, the president, the prime minister, our governments - might not be what they would like to be
seen to be.

ii) The need to deposit destructive envy and bad feelings elsewhere, on account of the inability of the ego to
acknowledge ownership of them - reinforces the usefulness of persons or groups, which will serve to contain those,
disowned, projected feelings which arouse paranoid anxieties. The concepts of mind-invasion strike at the very
heart of paranoid anxiety, causing considerable efforts to dislodge them from the psyche. The unconscious
identification of madness with dirt or excrement is an important aspect of anal aggression, triggering projective
identification as a defence.

iii) To lay oneself open to believing that a person is undergoing the experience of being invaded mentally and
physically by an unseen manipulator requires very great efforts in the self to manage dread.

iv) The defence against the unknown finds expression in the split between theory and practice; between the scientist
as innovator and the society who can make the moral decisions about his inventions; between fact and science
fiction, the latter of which can present preposterous challenges to the imagination without undue threat, because it
serves to reinforce a separation from the real.

v) Identification with the aggressor. Sadistic fantasies, unconscious and conscious, being transferred on to the
aggressor and identified with, aid the repression of fear of passivity, or a dread of punishment. This mechanism acts
to deny credulity to the victim who represents weakness. This is a common feature of satanic sects.

vi) The liberal humanist tradition which denies the worst destructive capacities of man in the effort to sustain the
belief in the great continuity of cultural and scientific tradition; the fear, in ones own past development, of not being
ongoing, can produce the psychic effect of reversal into the opposite to shield against aggressive feelings. This
becomes then the exaggerated celebration of the new as the affirmation of human genius which will ultimately be
for the good of mankind, and which opposes warning voices about scientific advances as being pessimistic,
unenlightened, unprogressive and Luddite. Strict adherence to this liberal position can act as overcompensation for
a fear of envious spoiling of good possessions, i.e. cultural and intellectual goods.

vii) Denial by displacement is also employed to ignore the harmful aspects of technology. What may be harmful for
the freedom and good of society can be masked and concealed by the distribution of new and entertaining novelties.
The technology, which puts a camera down your gut for medical purposes, is also used to limit your freedom by
surveillance. The purveyors of innovative technology come up with all sorts of new gadgets, which divert, entertain
and feed the acquisitive needs of insatiable shoppers, and bolster the economy. The theme of Everythings up to
date in Kansas City only takes on a downside when individual experience exploding breast implants, say takes

5 of 11 9/24/2010 9:25 PM
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mi... http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123

the gilt off the gingerbread. Out of every innovation for evil (i.e. designed for harming and destroying) some good
(i.e. public diversion or entertainment) can be promoted for profit or crowd-pleasing.

viii) Nasa is sending a spacecraft to Mars, or so we are told. They plan to trundle across the Martian surface
searching for signs of water and life. We do not hear dissenting voices about its feasibility.

Why is it that, when a person accounts that their mind is being disrupted and they are being persecuted by an
unseen method of invasive technology, that we cannot bring ourselves to believe them? Could it be that the horror
involved in the empathic identification required brings the shutters down? Conversely, the shared experience of the
blasting of objects into space brings with it the possibilities of shared potency or the relief that resonates in the
unconscious of a massive projection or evacuation a shared experience which is blessed in the name of mans
scientific genius.

ix) The desire not to be taken in, not to be taken for a fool, provides one of the most powerful and common
defence mechanism against credulity.

Power, Paranoia and Unhealthy Governments

The ability to be the bearer and container of great power without succumbing to the pressures of latent narcissistic
psychoses is an important matter too little considered. The effect of holding power and the expectation and the need
to be seen as capable of sustaining it, if not exercising it, encourages omnipotence of thought. In the wake of this, a
narcissistic overevaluation of the subjects own mental processes may set in. In the effort to hold himself together
as the possessor, container and executor of power, he (or indeed, she) may also, undergo a process of splitting
which allows him, along with others, to bear enthralled witness of himself in this illustrious role. This may mean that
the seat of authority is vacated, at least at times. The splitting process between the experiencing ego and the
perceiving ego allows the powerful leader to alternate his perception of himself inside and outside, sometimes
beside, himself. With the reinforcement of himself from others as his own narcissistic object, reality testing is
constrained. In this last respect, he has much in common with the other powerful figure of the age, the movie star.
or by those, in Freuds words, who are ruined by success.

In a world, which is facing increasing disillusion about the gulf between the public platforms on which governments
are elected, and the contingencies and pragmatics of retaining defence strategies and economic investments, the
role of military and intelligence departments, with their respective tools of domination and covert infiltration, is
increasingly alarming. Unaccountable to the public, protected from exposure and prosecution by their immunity,
licensed to lie as well as to kill, it is in the hands of these agents that very grave threats to human rights and
freedom lies. Empowered to carry out aggression through classified weapon experimentation which is undetectable,
these men and women are also open to corruption from lucrative offers of financial reward from powerful and
sinister groups who can utilize their skills, privileged knowledge and expertise for frankly criminal and fascist
purposes.

Our information about the psychological profiles of those who are employed to practice surveillance on others is
limited, but it is not difficult to imagine the effects on the personality that would ensue with the persistent practice of
such an occupation, so constantly exposed to the perversions. One gains little snatches of insight here and there. In
his book on CIA mind control research (Marks, 1988), John Marks quotes a CIA colleagues joke (always revealing
for personality characteristics): If you could find the natural radio frequency of a persons sphincter, you could
make him run out of the room real fast. (One wonders if the same amusement is derived from the ability to apply,
say infra-sound above 130 decibels, which is said to cause stoppage of the heart, according to one victim/activist
from his readings of a report for the Russian Parliament.)

Left to themselves, these servants of the state may well feel exempt from the process of moral self-scrutiny, but
the work must be dehumanising for the predator as well as the prey. It is probably true that the need to control
their agents in the field was an incentive to develop the methods in use today. It is also an effectively brutalising
training for persecuting others. Meanwhile the object, the prey, in a bid for not only for survival but also in a
desperate effort to warn his or her fellows about what is going on, attempts to turn himself into a quantum
physicist, a political researcher, a legal sleuth, an activist, a neurologist, a psychologist, a physiologist his own
doctor, since he cannot know what effects this freakish treatment might have on his body, let alone his mind. There
are always new methods to try out which might prove useful in the search to find ways of disabling and destroying
opponents air injected into brains and lungs, lasers to strike down or blind, particle beams, sonar waves, or
whatever combination of energies to direct, or destabilise or control.

Science and Scepticism

Scientists can be bought, not just by governments, but also by sinister and secret societies. Universities can be
funded by governments to develop technology for unacceptably inhumane uses. The same people who deliver the
weapons - perhaps respected scientists and academics - may cite the acceptable side of scientific discoveries, which
have been developed by experimenting on unacknowledged, unfortunate people. In a cleaned up form, they are
then possibly celebrated as a break-through in the understanding of the natural laws of the universe. It is not
implausible that having delivered the technical means for destruction, the innovator and thinker goes on, wearing a

6 of 11 9/24/2010 9:25 PM
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mi... http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123

different hat, to receive his (or her) Nobel Prize. There are scientists who have refused to continue to do work when
they were approached by CIA and Soviet representatives. These are the real heroes of science.

In the power struggle, much lies at stake in being the first to gain control of ultimate mind-reading and
mind-controlling technology. Like the nuclear bomb, common ownership would seem by any sane calculations to
cancel out the advantage of possession, but there is always a race to be the first to possess the latest ultimate
means of mass destruction. The most desirable form is one that can be directed at others without contaminating
oneself in the process - one that can be undetected and neatly, economically and strategically delivered. We should
be foolish to rule out secret organisations, seeing threat only from undemocratic countries and known terrorist
groups.

As consumers in a world which is increasingly one in which shopping is the main leisure activity, we should concern
ourselves to becoming alert to the ways in which human welfare may have been sacrificed to produce an awesome
new gadget. It may be the cause for celebration for the innovator, but brought about as the result of plugging in or
dialling up the living neuronal processes of an enforced experimentee. If we are concerned not to eat boiled eggs
laid by battery hens, we might not regard it morally irrelevant to scrutinise the large corporations producing
electronically innovative software. We might also be wary about the origins of the sort of bland enticements of
dating agencies who propose finding your ideal partner by matching up brain frequencies and bio-rhythms.

We do not know enough about the background of such technology, nor how to evaluate it ethically. We do not know
about its effects on the future, because we are not properly informed. If governments persist in concealing the
extent of their weapon capability in the interests of defence, they are also leaving their citizens disempowered of
the right to protest against their deployment. More alarmingly, they are leaving their citizens exposed to their
deployment by ruthless organisations whose concerns are exactly the opposite of democracy and human rights.

Back in the United Kingdom

Meanwhile, back in England, the Director of the Oxford Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Professor Colin
Blakemore, also the elective Chief Executive of the Medical Research Council writes to the author that he ... knows
of no technology (not even in the wildest speculations of neuroscientists) for scanning and collecting neuronal data
at a distance. (Blakemore, 2003, ) This certitude is at distinct variance with the fears of other scientists in Russia
and the United States, and not least of all with the fears of the French neuroscientist, Jean-Pierre Changeux of the
French National Bioethics Committee already quoted (see page 5). It is also very much at odds with the writing of
Dr Michael Persinger from the Behavioural Neuroscience Laboratory at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario,
Canada. His article On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of
Algorithms (1995), he describes the ways that individual differences among human brains can be overcome and
comes to a conclusion about the technological possibilities of influencing a major part of the approximately six billion
people on this planet without mediation through classical sensory modalities but by generating electromagnetic
induction of fundamental algorithms in the atmosphere. Dr Persingers work is referred to by Captain John Tyler
whose work for the American Air Force and Aerospace programmes likens the human nervous system to a radio
receiver. (1990)

Very recently the leading weekly cultural BBC radio review had as one of its guests, the eminent astro-physicist and
astronomer royal, Sir Martin Rees, who has recently published a book, Our Final Century, in which he makes a
sober and reasoned case for the fifty-fifty chance that millions of people, probably in a third-world country could be
wiped out in the near future through biotechnology and bio-terrorism by error or malign release. He spoke of
this devastation as possibly coming from small groups or cults, based in the United States. few individuals with
the right technology to cause absolute mayhem. He also said that in this century, human nature is no longer a
fixed commodity, that perhaps we should contemplate the possibility that humans would even have implants in the
brain.

The other guests on this programme were both concerned with Shakespeare, one a theatre producer and the other
a writer on Shakespeare, while his remaining guest was a young woman who had a website called Spiked, the
current theme of which was Panic Attack, that is to say, Attack on Panic. This guest vigorously opposed what she felt
was the pessimism of Sir Martin, regarding his ideas as essentially eroding trust, and inducing panic. This reaction
seems to typify one way of dealing with threat and anxiety, and demonstrates the difficulty that a warning voice,
even from a man of the academic distinction of Martin Rees, has in alerting people to that which they do not want
to hear. This flight reaction was reinforced by the presenter who summed up the mornings discussion at the end of
the programme with the words: We have a moral! Less panic, more Shakespeare!

The New Barbarism

Since access to a mind-reading machine will enable the operator to access the ideas of another person, we should
prepare ourselves for a new world order in which ideas will be, as it were, up for grabs. We need not doubt that the
contents of anothers mind will be scooped up, scooped out, sorted through as if the event was a jumble sale. The
legal profession would therefore be well advised to consider the laws on Intellectual Property very judiciously in
order to acquit themselves with any degree of authenticity. We should accustom ourselves to the prospect of

7 of 11 9/24/2010 9:25 PM
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mi... http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123

recognizing our work coming out of the mouth of another. The prospect of wide-scale fraud, and someone posturing
in your stolen clothes will not be a pretty sight. The term personal mind enhancement is slipping in through the
back door, to borrow a term used by the Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics, and it is being
done through technologically-induced mental co-ercion mind raping and looting. In place of, or in addition to,
cocaine, we may expect to see mind-enhanced performances on live television.

The brave new science of neuropsychiatry and brain mapping hopes to find very soon, with the fMRI scanner - this
brand new toy that scientists have got their hands on - the blob for love and the blob for guilt, (BBC Radio 4:
All in the Mind, 5 March, 2003). Soon we will be able to order a brain scan for anyone whose behaviour strikes us as
odd or bizarre, and the vicissitudes of a life need no longer trouble us in our diagnostic assessments. In his recent
Reith Lectures for the BBC (2003), Professor Ramachandran, the celebrated neuroscientist from the La Hoya
Institute in San Diego, California, has demonstrated for us many fascinating things that the brain can do. He has
talked to us about personality disorders and shown that some patients, who have suffered brain damage from head
injury, do not have the capacity to recognise their mothers. Others feel that they are dead. And indeed he has found
brain lesions in these people. In what seems to be an enormous but effortless leap, the self-styled kid in a candy
store is now hoping to prove that all schizophrenics, have damage to the right hemisphere of the brain, which
results in the inability to distinguish between fantasy (sic) and reality. Since Professor Ramachandran speaks of
schizophrenia in the same breath as denial of illness, or agnosia, it is not clear, and it would be interesting to know,
whether the person with the head injury has been aware or unaware of the head injury. Also does the patient derive
comfort and a better chance at reality testing when he is told of the lesion? Does he feel better when he has
received the diagnosis? And what should the psychoanalysts and the psychiatrists, - feel about all those years of
treating people of whose head injuries they were absolutely unaware? Was this gross negligence? Were we
absolutely deluded in perceiving recovery in a sizeable number of them?

It is, however, lamentable that a neuroscientist with a professed interest in understanding schizophrenia should
seek to provide light relief to his audience by making jokes about schizophrenics being people who are convinced
that the CIA has implanted devices in their brain to control their thoughts and actions, or that aliens are controlling
them. (Reith Lecture, No 5, 2003).

There is a new desire for concretisation. The search for meaning has been replaced by the need for hard proof. If
it doesnt light up or add up it doesnt have validity. The physician of the mind has become a surgeon. He found a
lump as big as a grapefruit!

Facing up to the Dread and Fear of the Uncanny

Freud believed that an exploration of the uncanny would be a major direction of exploration of the mind in this
century. The fear of the uncanny has been with us for a very long time. The evil eye, or the terrifying double, or
intruder, is a familiar theme in literature, notably of Joseph Conrad in The Secret Sharer, and Maupassants short
story, Le Horla. Freuds analysis of the uncanny led him back to the old animistic conception of the universe: it
seems as if each one of us has been through a phase of individual development corresponding to the animistic phase
in primitive men, that none of us has passed through it without preserving certain residues and traces of it which
are still capable of manifesting themselves, and that everything which now strikes us as uncanny fulfils the
condition of touching those residues of animistic mental activity within us and bringing them to expression. (Freud:
1919. p.362)

The separation of birth, and the childhood fear of spooks in the night, also leave their traces in each and every one
of us. The individual experience of being alone in ones mind the solitary fate of man which has never been
questioned before, and upon which the whole history of civilised nurture is based - is now assaulted head-on. Since
growing up is largely synonymous with acceptance of ones aloneness, the effort to assuage it is the basis for
compassion and protection of others; it is the matrix for the greatest good, that of ordinary human kindness, and is
at the heart of the communicating power of great art. Even if we must all live and die alone, we can at least share
this knowledge in acts of tenderness which atone for our lonely state. In times of loss and mental breakdown, the
starkness of this aloneness is all too clear. The best of social and group constructiveness is an effort to allay the
psychotic anxieties that lie at the base of every one of us, and which may be provoked under extreme enough
conditions.

The calculated and technological entry into another persons mind is an act of monumental barbarism which
obliterates perhaps with the twiddling of a dial the history and civilisation of mans mental development. It is
more than an abuse of human rights, it is the destruction of meaning. For any one who is forced into the hell of
living with an unseen mental rapist, the effort to stay sane is beyond the scope of tolerable endurance. The
imaginative capacity of the ordinary mind cannot encompass the horror of it. We have attempted to come to terms
with the experiments of the Nazis in concentration camps. We now have the prospect of systematic control
authorised by men who issue instructions through satellite communications for the destruction of societies while
they are driving new Jaguars and Mercedes, and going to the opera.

This is essentially about humiliation, and disempowerment. It is a manifestation of rage acted out by those who fear
impotence with such dread, that their whole effort is directed into the emasculation and destruction of the terrifying
rival of their unconscious fantasies. In this apocalypse of the mind the punitive figure wells up as if out of the bowels
of the opera stage, and this phantasmagoria is acted out on a global scale. These men may be mad enough to

8 of 11 9/24/2010 9:25 PM
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mi... http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123

believe they are creating a psychocivilised world order. For anyone who has studied damaged children, it is more
resonant of the re-enactment from the unconscious, reinforced by a life devoid of the capacity for empathic
identification, of the obscenities of the abused and abusing child in the savage nursery. Other people -which were to
them like Action Man toys to be dismembered, or Barbie Dolls to be obscenely defiled - become as meaningless in
their humanity as pixillated dots on a screen.

Although forced entry into a mind is by definition obscene, an abbreviated assessment of the effects that
mind-invaded people describe testifies to the perverted nature of the experiments. Bizarre noises are emitted
from the body, a body known well enough by its owner to recognise the noises as extrinsic; air is pumped in and out
of orifices as if by a bicycle pump. Gradually the repertoire is augmented - twinges and spasms to the eyes, nose,
lips, strange tics, pains in the head, ringing in the ears, obstructions in the throat, pressure on the bowel and
bladder causing incontinence; tingling in the fingers, feet, pressures on the heart, on breathing, dizziness, eye
problems leading to cataracts; running eyes, running nose; speeding up of heart beats and the raising of pressure in
the heart and chest; breathing and chest complaints leading to bronchitis and deterioration of the lungs; agonizing
migraines; being woken up at night, sometimes with terrifying jolts ; insomnia; intolerable levels of stress from the
loss of ones privacy. This collection of assorted symptoms is a challenge to any medical practitioner to diagnose.

There are, more seriously, if the afore-going is characterised as non-lethal, the potential lethal effects since the
capability of ultrasound and infra-sound to cause cardiac arrest, and brain lesions, paralysis and blindness, as well
as blinding by laser beam, or inducing asphyxia by altering the frequencies which control breathing in the brain,
epileptic seizure all these and others may be at the fingertips of those who are developing them. And those who
do choose to use them may be sitting with the weapon, which resembles, say, a compact mobile telephone, on the
restaurant table next to the bottle of wine, or beside them at the swimming pool.

Finally if the victims at this point in the new history of this mind-control, cannot yet prove their abuse, it must be
asserted that, faced with the available information about technological development it is certainly not possible for
those seeking to evade such claims to disprove them. To wait until the effects become widespread will be too late.

For these and other reasons which this paper has attempted to address, we would call for an
acknowledgement of such technology at a national and international level. Politicians, scientists and
neurologists, neuroscientists, physicists and the legal profession should, without further delay, demand public
debate on the existence and deployment of psychotronic technology; and for the declassification of
information about such devices which abuse helpless people, and threaten democratic freedom.
Victims accounts of abuse should be admitted to public account, and the use of psycho-electronic weapons
should be made illegal and criminal,
The medical profession should be helped to recognise the symptoms of mind-control and psychotronic abuse,
and intelligence about their deployment should be declassified so that this abuse can be seen to be what it is,
and not interpreted automatically as an indication of mental illness.

If, in the present confusion and insecurity about the search for evidence of weapons of mass destruction, we
conclude that failure to locate them - whatever the truth of the matter encourages us to be generally complacent,
then we shall be colluding with very dark forces at work if we conclude that a course of extreme vigilance signifies
paranoia. For there may well be other weapons of mass destruction being developed and not so far from home;
weapons which, being even more difficult to locate, are developed invisibly, unobstructed, unheeded in our midst,
using human beings as test-beds. Like ESP, the methods being used on humans have not been detectable using
conventional detection equipment. It is likely that the signals being used are part of a physics not known to
scientists without the highest level of security clearance. To ignore the evidence of victims is to deny, perhaps with
catastrophic results, the only evidence which might otherwise lead the defenders of freedom to becoming alert to
the development of a fearful new methods of destruction. Manipulating terrorist groups and governments alike,
these sinister and covert forces may well be very thankful for the professional derision of the victims, and for public
ignorance.

References

Laing, R.D. (1985) : Wisdom, Madness and Folly: The Making of a Psychiatrist. Macmillan, 1985

Welsh, Cheryl (1997): Timeline of Important Dates in the History of Electromagnetic Technology and Mind Control,
at:
www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/timeline.htm

Welsh, Cheryl (2001):Electromagnetic Weapons: As powerful as the Atomic Bomb, President Citizens Against
Human Rights Abuse, CAHRA Home Page: U.S. Human Rights Abuse Report: www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh
/emr13.htm

Begich, Dr N. and Manning, J.: 1995 Angels Dont Play this HAARP, Advances in Tesla Technology, Earthpulse Press.

9 of 11 9/24/2010 9:25 PM
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mi... http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123

ZDF TV: Secret Russia: Moscow The Zombies of the Red Czars, Script to be published in Resonance, No. 35

Aftergood, Steven and Rosenberg, Barbara: The Soft Kill Fallacy, in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Sept/Oct
1994.

Becker, Dr Robert: 1985,The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, William Morrow, N.Y.

Babacek, Mojmir: International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of The Human Nervous System:
http://mindcontrolforums.com/babacek.htm and go to: Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous System

Is it Feasible to Manipulate the Human Brain at a Distance?


www.aisjca-mft.org/braindist.htm

Psychoelectronic Threat to Democracy


http://mindcontrolforums.com/babacek.htm

Nature: Advances in Neuroscience May Threaten Human Rights, Vol, 391, Jan. 22, 1998, p. 316; (ref Jean- Pierre
Changeux)

Space Preservation Act: Bill H.R.2977 and HR 3616 IH in 107th Congress 2nd Session: see:
www.raven1.net/govptron.htm

Sessions European Parliament:


www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm?redirected=1

Click at Plenary Sessions, scroll down to Reports by A4 number, click, choose 1999 and fill in oo5 to A4

Delgado, Jose M.R: 1969. Physical Control of the Mind: Towards a Psychocivilized Society, Vol. 41, World
Perspectives, Harper Row, N.Y.

US News & World Report: Lockheed Martin Aeronautics/ Dr John Norseen; Report January 3/10 2000, P.67

Freud, Sigmund: 1919: Art and Literature: The Uncanny. Penguin,


Also Those Wrecked by Success.

Marks, John: 1988 :The CIA and Mind Control the Search for the Manchurian Candidate, ISBN 0-440-20137-3

Persinger, M.A. On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of
Fundamental Algorythms; In Perception and Motor Skills, June, 1995, vol. 80, p. 791 799

Tyler, J.Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low Intensity Conflict, in Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology,
ed. Lt. Col. J. Dean, USAF, Air University Press, Centre For Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education, Maxwell
Air Force base, Alabama, June, 1986.

Rees, Martin Our Final Century: 2003, Heinemann.

Conrad, Joseph: The Secret Sharer, 1910. Signet Classic.

Maupassant, Guy de: Le Horla, 1886. Livre de Poche.

Carole Smith is a British psychoanalyst. In recent years she has been openly critical of government use of intrusive
technology on non-consenting citizens for the development of methods of state control. Carole Smith
E-mail: rockpool@dircon.co.uk

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for
Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will
not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.

To become a Member of Global Research

The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not
modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including
commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political,
economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for
research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission
from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

10 of 11 9/24/2010 9:25 PM
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mi... http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123

Copyright Carole Smith, Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003., 2007

The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123

Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca


Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia Copyright 2005-2007

11 of 11 9/24/2010 9:25 PM
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST


STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
March 14, 2010
Work-In-Progress

Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.

1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of


2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.
14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice
15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.

Dated: March 29, 2010


http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
mailto: amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigator


Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE LITIGATOR


24 CRIMINAL CHARGES DISMISS/WITHDRAWN/NOT-GUILTY
1987 TO 2007

1. 09/01/1987 Cc2706 Terroristic Threats - M1 Quashed / Dismis / Demur Sus


2. 09/03/1987 Cc2902-1 Unlawful Restraint - M1 Quashed / Dismis / Demur Sus
3. 09/03/1987 Cc3304a2 Criminal Mischief - F3 Nolle Prossed / Withdrawn
4. 09/03/1987 Cc3502 Burglary - F1 Quashed / Dismis / Demur Sus
5. 09/03/1987 Cc3701al Robbery - F1 Quashed /Dismis /Demur Sus
6. 09/03/1987 Cc3921a Theft By Unlwf Taking Or Dispo F3 Nolle Prossed / Withdrawn
6. 09/03/1987 Cc3933a1 Unlawful Use Of Computer - F3 Nolle Prossed /Withdrawn
7. 09/03/1987 Cc3933a2 Unlawful Use Of Computer - F3 Quashed / Disnis / Demur Sus
8. 12/05/2006 1 18 5503 A2 Disorderly Conduct-Unreasonable Noise - Withdrawn (Lower Court)
9. 12/05/2006 1 18 3926 A4 Theft Of Services-Acquisition Of Services Withdrawn (Lower Court)
10. 12/05/2006 1 18 2709 A7 Harassment - Comm. Repeatedly In Another Manner Withdrawn (Lower Court)
11. 01/23/2007 1 285-21d No Parking Or Stopping Permitted Withdrawn (Lower Court)
12. 01/23/2007 1 285-30a Meter Violation Withdrawn (Lower Court)
14. 01/23/2007 1 18 6501 A1 Scatter Rubbish Upon Land/Stream Etc Dismissed (Lower Court)
15. 01/23/2007 1 285-21d No Parking Or Stopping Permitted Withdrawn (Lower Court)
16. 01/23/2007 1 285-30a Meter Violation Withdrawn (Lower Court)
17. 01/18/2007 1 75 1543 A Driv While Oper Priv Susp Or Revoked Not Guilty
18. 01/18/2007 1 75 1786 F Oper Veh W/O Req'd Financ Resp Not Guilty
19. 04/30/2007 1 18 5503 A4/ Disorder Conduct Hazardous/Physi Off Not Guilty
20. 04/30/2007 2 18 5507 A / Obstruction Highways Not Guilty
21. 04/30/2007 3/ 18 2709 A3 Harassment - Course Of Conduct W/No Legitimate Purpose Nolle Prossed
22. 04/30/2007 1 75 3111 A / Disregard Traffic Control Device Not Guilty Nolle Prossed
23. 05/10/2007 M2 18 5104 Resist Arrest/Other Law Enforce 08/04/2006 K4775120
24. 05/10/2007 3 M1 18 908 A Make Repairs/Sell/Etc Offens Weap 08/04/2006 K4775120 Nolle Prossed
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com

Morayma Rivera, Disability Examiner


SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Office of Medical and Vocational Expertise
Post Office Box 17786
Baltimore, Me 21235-7786

Case Number: 0514869

May IS, 2009

Dear Morayma:

Per our conversation yesterday, May 14, 2009 enclosed is the required form for my
above mentioned claim. As you will see I tried to provide you and the Social
Security Administration with as much documentation as possible. Attached are
several letters and research documents which prove my claim. You may also visit
my website for more information. You will also find attached an invoice for my
claim.

As we discussed, I will await the appointment date and time with the local
psychiatrist for m~ evaluation. As you stated, this should come within the next two
weeks via U.S. fj~t class mail.

I look forward to my evaluation.

(Jf). (ffi,.)
tan J. catJone
Advanced Media Group
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 1 of 55 05.15.2009


Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 1 of 55 05.18.2009
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Office of Medical and
Vocational Expertise
Post Office Box 17786
Baltimore, Me 21235-7786
DATE: May 7, 2009

STANLEY JOSEPH CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET

LANCASTER PA 17603

Case Number: 0514869

We need to talk to you about your claim for Social Security disability
benefits.

Please call me as soon as possible, using my toll free number at:


1 800-582-6041 Extension: 57905.

You should call Monday through Friday between the hours of 6:30 AM to 03:00 PM.

Failure to call within 10 calendar days from the date of this letter may result
in a determination being made based on the evidence in file.

Thank you for your cooperation.

MORAYMA RIVERA
Disability Examiner

D2013/mrl16

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 2 of 55 05.18.2009


RQID:L~~~~~C646~~~ SITE:V4~ DR:S
SSN:200460959 DOCTYPE:~075 RF:D CS:7df4

111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111"" 111111111111111111111111 1111


STANLEY JOSEPH CATERBONE 20090507500039
1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER PA 17603
DATE: May 7, 2009

Claimant: STANLEY JOSEPH


CATERBONE
SSN: XXX-XX-0959

SSA CLAIMANT INFORMATION COVER SHEET

INSERT THIS PAGE INTO THE W7NDOW ENVELOPE PROVIDED W7TH THE ADDRESS

BELOW SHOWING.

THIS PAGE MUST BE ON TOP OF YOUR REPORT.

V40 OMVE/FDDS
PO BOX 8744
LONDON KY 40742-9981

PLEASE NOTE:

You must complete and return the attached form(s) to the address shown
above.
If you would like, you may fax your completed form(s) to 1-866-560-4945.
BE SURE TO PUT THIS PAGE ON TOP OF THE DOCUMENT YOU ARE FAXING.

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 3 of 55 05.18.2009


1111111 11111 111111111111111 dill 11111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
20090507500039

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION


Office of Medical and
Vocational Expertise
Post Office Box 17786
Baltimore, Me 21235-7786
DATE: May 7, 2009

STANLEY JOSEPH CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET

LANCASTER PA 17603

Case Number: 0514869

Your Social Security Disability case has been sent to the Office of Medical and
Vocational Expertise in Baltimore, Maryland for medical development and
evaluation. After reviewing your case, we find that we need more information
about your daily activities and/or your allegations of pain. Please attempt to
answer all the questions on the enclosed form(s) in as much detail as possible
and avoid single word answers. The information you provide will help our agency
evaluate how your medical condition affects your daily activities.

The form(s) should be returned within 10 calendar days from the date of this
letter, in the self-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided. Failure to do so
may result in a determination being made based on the evidence in file.

If you have any questions, please call me toll free at:


1-800-582-6041 on extension: 57905.

You should call Monday through Friday between the hours of 6:30 AM to 03:00 PM.

TO ENSURE PROMPT SERVICE, PLEASE RETURN THE COVER SHEET AND THIS LETTER WITH THE
ATTACHED FORM.

Thank you for your cooperation.

MORAYMA RIVERA
Disability Examiner

Enclosures:
Adult Function Report
Return Envelope
D2103/mr116

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 4 of 55 05.18.2009


FUNCTION REPORT - ADULT - Form SSA-3373-BK

READ ALL OF THIS INFORMATION BEFORE

YOU BEGIN COMPLETING THIS FORM

IF YOU NEED HELP


If you need help with this fonn, complete as much of it as you can and call the phone number
provided on the letter sent with the fonn, or contact the'person who asked you to complete the
fonn. If you need the address or phone number for the office that provided the fonn, you can get it
by calling Social Security at 1-800-772-1213.

~
HOW TO COMPLETE THIS FORM
_=
=.
- The infonnation that you give us on this fonn will be used by the office that makes the disability
decision on your disability claim. You can help them by completing as much of the fonn as you
can.
-=
~

It is important that you tell us about your activities and abilities. i::l
Print or type.
DO NOT LEAVE ANSWERS BLANK. If you do not know the answer or the answer -_
is "none" or "does not apply," please write "don't know" or "none" or "does not apply."
Do not ask a doctor or hospital to complete this fonn.
Be sure to explain an answer if the question asks for an explanation, or if you
think you need to explain an answer.
If more space is needed to answer any questions, use the "REMARKS" section on
Page 8, and show the number of the question being answered.

REMEMBER TO GIVE US THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PERSON

COMPLETING TmS FORM ON PAGE 8

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 5 of 55 05.18.2009


Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Statements

The Social Security Administration is authorized to collect the infonnation on this fonn under sections
205(a), 1631(d)(1) and 1631(e)(1) ofthe Social Security Act. The infonnation on this fonn is needed by
Social Security to make a decision on the named claimant's claim. While giving us the infonnation on this
fonn is voluntary, failure to provide all or part ofthe requested infonnation could prevent an accurate or
timely decision on the named claimant's claim. Although the infonnation you furnish is almost never used
. for any purpose other than making a determination-about the claimant's disability, such infonnation may
be disclosed by the Social Security Administration as follows: (1) to enable a third party or agency to
assist Social Security in establishing rights to Social Security benefits and/or coverage;(2) to comply with
Federal Laws requiring the release ofinformation from Social Security records (e.g., to the General
Accounting Office and the Department of Veterans Affairs); and (3) to facilitate statistical research and
such activities necCssary to assure the integrity and improvement ofthe Social Security programs (e.g., to
the Bureau ofthe Census and private concerns under contract to Social Security).

We may also use the infonnation you give us when we match records by computer. Matching programs
compare our records with those ofother Federal, State, or local government agencies. Many agencies
may use matching programs to find or prove that a person qualifies for benefits paid by the Federal
government. The law allows us to do this even ifyou do not agree to it. Explanations about these and
other reasons why infonnation you provide us may be used or given out are available in Social Security
offices.

Paperwork Reduction Act Statement - This infonnation collection meets the requirements of44 U.S.C.
3507, as amended by Section 2 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. You do not need to answer
these questions .un1ess we display a valid Office of Management and Budget control number. We estimate
that it will take about 30 minutes to read the instructions, gather the facts, and answer the questions.
SEND THE COMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFICE THAT REQUESTED IT. If you do not have
fhataddress, you maycaU Social Security at 1-800-772-1213. You may send comments on our time
estimate above to: SSA, 1338 Annex Building, Baltimore, MD 21235-0001. Send only comments
reliding to our time estimate to this iUId~ss, not the completed form.

PLEASE REMOVE THIS SHEET BEFORE RETURNING

THE COMPLETED FORM.

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 6 of 55 05.18.2009


SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
- Fonn AIJproved
OMS No. 0960-0681
FUNcnoN REPORT .. ADULT
How your Hlnesses, injuries. or conditions limit your activities
~~--~----~~ ~~==~~~~~

SECTION A - GENERAL INFORMATION


1. NAME OF DISABLED PERSON {FitSt,MiddIe. Last} 2. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER

4. YOUR DAY11IE TELEPHONE NUMBER {If there is no tBl6phontJ number where you can be reschBd,
pIBas8 give us s daytime number where ... can lesve s trl8SSSgs for you.} .

(
AtaaCode
) o Your Number o Message Number
5. a. Where do you live? (Check 0fIIJ.)

I]Ii1OOse 0 Apartment o Boarding House o Nursing Home

o Shelter 0 Grcq> Home o OIher (Whst?} _ _ _-_,:_'.. '. _ _ _ _ _ __


'~_

b. With whom do you live? (Check one.)

"""' ~ 0 WIth Family 0 YJith Frfends


o Other {Describe relationship.} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
SECTION B -INFORMATION ABOUT DAILY ACTIVITIES

6. , Describe what you do from the time you wake up until going to bed.
SEe .fA"e 11

Form S8A-3373-8K (9-2004) ef (09-2()04.) . Page 1


Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 7 of 55 05.1~.2Q09
. !',. , .

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 7 of 55 05.18.2009


7. Do you take care of anyone else such as a wifelhusband, children, grandchildren,
parents, friend, other? .
Dves liNO
If "VES," for whom do you care, and what do you do for them?

8. 00 you take care of pets or other animals? Dves rz(No


If "VES," wh~t do you do for them? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

9. Does anyone help you care for other people or animals? Dves ~o; i

. If "VES," who helps, and what do they do to help?


-------------------------1

10. WPJat were you able to do before you~ illnesses, injuries, or condition~ that you Can't do now? ..:::::-
j//l(t/~ 7J/z;1/&.#-rS e:-A-VS tI/I1,;,;..~ a;v;4467Vr/~I'-~
~wv liN ~ tn:..rl;,fz., /?G~/~ry /
11. Do the illnesses, injuries, or conditions affect our sleep? ~ D No
.lf71~~? I~m-M~b-:I~ unr ~
~C;1:::-;l. tJ AJ tJ~CA-f /u-- ; e:-M;<" jI~t:I" c~
/AJ,(...(" /-ft..,lU :5~.4 ~~.
12. PERSONAL CARE (Check here .lSi if NO PROBLEM with personal care.)
a. Explain how your illnesses, injuries, or conditions affect your ability to:
Dress
---------------------------------------------1
Bathe _________________________________________
1

Care for hair


------------------------------------
Shave
------~-------------------------------
Feed self_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Use the toilet


-------------------------------------~

CXher?________________________________________________

Form SSA-3373-BK (9-2004) af (09-2004) Page 2


Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 8 of 55 05.18.2009
b. Do you need any special reminders to take care of personal Dyes ,IZf No
needs and grooming?
If "YES." what type of help or reminders are needed?
--------------------------------

c. Do you need help or reminders taking medicine? Dyes E1No


If "YES," what kind of help do you need?
------------------------------~--------

13. MEALS
a. Do you prepare your own meals? IfYes 0 No
If "Yes," what kind of food do you prepare? (For example. sandwiches. frozen dinners, or complete
meals with several courses). ___________________________________________

An&nges in cooking habits since the Hlness, injuries, or conditions began?

b. If "No; explain why you cannot or do not prepare meals. _________________--'-_

14. HOUSE AND YARD WORK


a. List household chores, both indoors and outdoors, that you are able~o. (For example,
cleaning. laundry, household repairs, ironing. mowing. etc.) ___....:~-s-._~___.,;;;L
___________

b. H~ much time s it take you, and how ~en do YOU. do each of these things?
A. IJ V E lC~ E,r {;;n;L ttl'.(t::- ",,"';l1:t1Jt!., ,f)0

Ihv ~ ,<1A-t,L./ I~-+t /~.

c. Do you need help or encouragement doing these things?


If "YES," what help is needed?
-------------------------------------~---

Fonn SSA-3373-BK {9-2004} af (09-2004) Page 3

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 9 of 55 05.18.2009


.~.

d. If you don't do house or yard work, explain why not.


-------------------------------

15. GETTING AROUND


a. How often do you go outside? _....:!oo[)~(:.....::i:.....'1:.....t-~~tt:..---------------------------
If you don't go out at all, explain why not.
-----------------------------------

b. When going out, how do you travel? (Check all that apply.)
o Walk g(Drive a car 0 Ride in a car if Ride a bicycle

_use public transportation 0 Other (Explain) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

c. When going out, can you go out alone? 0 NO .s Yes i


If "NO," explain why you can't go out alone. ---------------------------------11

d. Do you drive? iii Yes ONo


If you don't drive, explain why not.
---------------------------------~

16. SHOPPING
a. If you do any shopping. do you shop: (Check all that apply.)

&!lIn stores 0 By phone By mail o By computer

b. Describe what you shop for. () IVL- ..... 4 J ~"- J3As/~

N~s - d:=,-Jlkll~ .d~ C"hl"; ~"

c. How often do you shop and how long does it take? _-=/I;....-.;~;;..."'_~.:.._..___7/~----J,at---f;4-J---~"""./:.....--'r-~--r(.;...;;;:.....----l
;;'tJ ~A... '~of. . (~.

17. MONEY
a. Are you able to:

Pay bills
ONo Handle a savings account DNo
Count change DNo Use a checkbook/money orders oNo;
Explain all nNO" answers. __________________________________

Form SSA3373-BK (9-2004) ef (09-2004) Page 4

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 10 of 55 05.18.2009


b. Has your ability to handle money changed since the illnesses, aYes 0 No
injuries, or conditions began? I
If AVES," explain how the ability to handle money has changed. _ _ A~~_~__,_~
___e_r____
,,

18. HOBBIES AND INTERESTS


a. What are y ur ~bbies and i[lte~ests? (For e,xample, readinf/, watching TV, se~ing, play!ng sporJs,
etc.) "" rio( ....,A-17..
~~J i) , Itt' /l.<Jt:i"A:.I''''''' h~/'
~t/.
J.
J
7

b. How often and how well do you do these things?

c. Describe any cha'1ges in se activities since the iIInes es, injuries, or conditions began.
/. trt-.t 77 #fA yo k../i) ~N c- "- O~/ 9--..+t1 AJC7J
J
7

19. SOCIAL ACTIVl1"IES


a. Do you spend time with others? (In person, on the phone, on the computer, etc.) 0 Ves m No

,t't;-.R'r /..i e /Vt//..coA/,e


If "VES," describe the kinds ofthings you do with others.

O~ I~JMt::;:7vT/;.!ot../I-,'~ ~ fl:1':;TIVt:-.::... ., ~vb<-(./.


J

How often do you do these things?


-------------------------------------
b. List the places you go on a reg.ular basis. (For example, church, community center, sports events,
socia/groups, etc.) (!J+r.,...(.(!.J../- C;l/~ S"v...... ""Ay .

Do you need to be reminded to go places? DVes


How often do you go and how much do you take part?
------------------------------

Do you need someone to accompany you? Dves DNo

J
/Sot.. ~tJtA.J
I
Fonn SSA-337a-BK (9-2004) af (09-2004) Page 5

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 11 of 55 05.18.2009


c. Do you have any problems getting along with family, friends, neighbors, eYes [B1\Jo
or others?
If -;;;XPlain. ~&/-L J
AJabH t!.J.v S 7>r--rZ:..

4iJ?."J(, )!~/J.& I~(, ~.......


-,
.-vA.",

d. Describe any changes in social activities since the illnesses, injuries, or qpn9"tions began. ___
;tfp ~t: L~o (. /h7()~ - FKT7l/;sMe' p..f44,*.1 H/!b;A/1

SECTION C - INFORMATION ABOUT ABILITIES

20. a. Check any of the following items that your illnesses, injuries, or conditions affect:
o Ufting o Walking o Stair Climbing o Understanding
o Squatting o Sitting o Seeing o Following Instructions
o Bending o Kneeling D Memory q Using Hands
o Standing o Talking .If Completing Tasks iD"Getting Along With Others
o Reaching o Hearing II Concentration
Please explain how your illnesses, injuries, or conditions affect each of the items YQu checked. (For
example, you can only lift [hOW many pounds], or you can only walk [hOW far])

07tfzA..S .
b. Are you: [l}AIght Handed? 0 Left Handed? / II
c. How far can you walk before needing to stop and rest? _A_.IJ_...v.;;....".t__---..:T:...~_.Iu"..t
_ __ (;: __'-Ltt"---JI...,;/;.....(.;:...rl",,---,,-_ .
If you have to rest, how long bef()re you can resume walking? '"""'l 1
-------------------------- !


d. For how long can you pay attention? ,4 ?tJA./(, r; 4-a e-
e. Do you finish what you start? (For example, a conversation, [].:ftrs 0 No
chores, reading, watching a movie)
1. How well do you follow written instructions? (For example, a recipe) _______________

t!~ U/t:1A
g. How well do you follow spoken instructions? _-,0"",,' _~_---.~.----=w
___t::"l..-L-
_______________

Form SSA-3373-BK (9-2004) at (09-2004) Page 6

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 12 of 55 05.18.2009


h. How well do you get along with authority figures? (For example, police, bosses, landlords or
teachers) ~;(fit,t:::"A1 ~( tJCl..,l." LC zfh::;t /C.uow dv("t;;,~ ~
, ~4 ~/lc..r ~ ,i ~- ,;..;;c.kr- t,.t;:-r r~ 6e-r
~+I 14; ,+vl'~#" ~/~~r -W~'" ~r ~/~~/lktf
i. Have you ever been fired or laid off from a job because of problems getting ~es D No
along with other people? /' .. (j) ~ Gll
If "VES," please explain. h ;(. (!./.;r.4 ()v1 I I 9 7 - I 'i 9/- 19'? J'
iN

(!)~ (P L To . CZ> &t~cA- /;z:::~~ v"f1.,C64 dl'-ll'A ~v~

k. How well do you handle changes in routine?

I. Have you noticed any unusual behavior or fears? Dves

If "VES," please explain. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

21. Do you use any of the following? (Check all that apply.)
[ ] Crutches [ ] Cane D Hearing Aid
[]Walker D Brace/Splint [ ] Glasses/Contact Lenses
D Wheelchair D Artificial Limb D Artificial Voice Box
D Other (Explain)

---------------------------------------------------
Which of these were prescribed by a doctor? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _...;....._ _ _ _ _ _ __

When was it prescribed? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

When do you need to use these aids? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Fonn SSA-3373-BK (9-2004) af (09-2004) Page 7

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 13 of 55 05.18.2009


-

SEcnON D .. REMARKS
Use this secdon for any added Infonnation you did not ahow In earlier parts of this form. When ypu
are clone With this section (or If you dldn' have anything to add), be sunt to complet. the fields at 'the
bottom of this page.

----------------------------------~----------------------------~

Name of person completing this Date {month, day, year)


-sr~Le- 1'1-4- . I #l1l0?
Address (Hum and Street)
/ :; 57J )(e'IIu 4/ f :5-r.
City .

:1~~~
Form SSA-3373-BK (9-2004) Page 8

Stanley). Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 14 of 55 _ _ _ __ 05.15.2009


Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 14 of 55 05.18.2009
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION


Office of Medical and Vocational Expertise
Post Office Box 17786
Baltimore, Me 21235-7786

Case Number: 0514869

Answer to Question No. 10; The following is an email that I sent to a friend to
describe the pain and torture:

Subject: WHO IS DOING THIS TO ME?

Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 03:19:47 -0400


On May 16, 2008, at 1:59 PM, Stan Caterbone wrote:

May 16, 2008

Tome,

I know that I am the victim of this technology that both Neurobotics claims and that
Carole Smith has researched regarding invasive mind control. I have some of my
research posted on my research blog
www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com .

The peering into one's thoughts and ideas I can live with, however the pain and
torture of some of this technology is very hurtful and painful. I am trying
desperately to find the source and the means of how they deploy this on me. I try
to change my location when they use it, but that does not stop it. I was told that
the perps can isolate a person with radar and satellite, so it is hard or impossible for
me to avoid.

I know sometime tonight or tomorrow they will hit me again. They usually need to
alternate the pain and pleasure so that it reaches its full impact. You know, kind of
like making sure there is always a spectrum of highs and lows. I believe they use a
technique of using the telepathy (Sheryl Crow telepathically communicating with me
while she is physically with Brett Stabley and Dave Pflumm; which are always
predators toward me) to enga'ge me in hostile and harassing conversation along with
some sort or electromagnetic energy isolated on me.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. This is one of the main problems I have with
writing briefs and filing court documents. They will use this to interfere with my
focus and to confuse me while the hackers change my documents and briefs. It is
very challenging, but at least I am litigating, which is the important thing.

tanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 15 of 55 05.15.2009

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 15 of 55 05.18.2009


Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
-----~--------- .. ~~~ ... -----.-----~----- ---

In addition they have used the technology of cuasing excrusiating pain, usally in my back
and my mouth. They seam to be able to either cuase the pain and amplify it or amplify
some existing discomfort and/or pain.

tanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 16 of 55 05.15.2009

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 16 of 55 05.18.2009


/I. Ae~i /J1J"&lA4~r:r/;r,n ~<. ,;4". ,d"'y
.;<$. tt.J~ AI~J
(J. ,l)4i:/'A--4. e- ~"" ~ i3~b4'( hH r
p. ,AAt/IV"Y/ ;/0 (JJc u.-fo41r3 .

g; 17l-+vcz:.. TO 6?~ ~V#~. &teJA.-7/.


t,,/II ~IJ<.~ &.t. T7'1e,,;/e ." A... 77J /11'<-4 bt-Ivu .. c. - C/..." v?#<.~;,
,to l*'t A- M/f.t../ ,,-<. rt> (?f th-.t.tr:M.
L,:"Ie.
> /. U,u( (J~ jl;'(,-'f?- ~e"; &~~" ~
a J. ~ "'lC..Joy~,; .4-IY~(;1:rfI/VI~,,;, ~~
It/b4ftfhr//5~IJ" /- ;tI;:Sc~~#//' V/./~r
/v/5t..IC (J/XG~ /le~' ~/t...-h:'r7~ ~/5t'-rC:.
/It:7 ~J.,NJ
I-: E"tf"fT ~~AJc:....;/ A-7 &""M.vA/,e >7 #c-n <t!
Sr. ~~e ."....-<- ~ ~e
II., /I1.;if #J;i- V/.5 $~ 4<- a/'~
7. ~i:: ~ LVA-;eeW.
'J. T~t y~~ / ~~4. A/~
/(. /Vrnwt /1/{;:7..;./ .
fit /114/ h 2?~ ~ /JI,u.-~I'v'#,i.t'-d'* ~,A~
,/l. j7 ~ ;~~.4c../c #cz,--j';"';;'~J CI~

/.~" w~~.
I. .. '~R7f /.v
, .

~ t?i~v~/c.A'fl"..J ~
0-

lAS't!hrt-A ~ 4.lt/~~~ /f,G'7n';""'-; ~rzvt4"~


u .. A4.4-'.t~r; ;-t... h-;~~/,.(.dVe-
Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 17 of 55 05.18.2009
/II. ~~ Mt;-;v~/ ' ""Vi.;.TI_~J:."~" ~
~~(, ~'ht.+rCt:.;G3,4L
/. i tz; "fl. en I-~
~. ~I/;fIIv~ ~",:. ~J"?
3. ;t~.;""~,,, /II,JI!:J'/~/e;-,7 ..
~ ;!,Ac.-/G /I"''"L/N7.; .... 1 Ib ~
~~, .~~/~M'~

,
t>. "'-MH"'- &.... 4.47-~ .
.~. '~""""r j./",..dA,;J~/~,.;,,~/
~,,~ ~/~ry
7. IV!~(/S ~~~ff 1iA.- !3<Jd/C.

. \ ~ .
.
:'t.
'.
Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 18 of 55 05.15.2009
Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 18 of 55 05.18.2009
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
mailto: amgroupOl@msn.com
Blog: http://advancedmediagroup. wordpress.coml
Research Blog: www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com
Video Biography at: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=advancedmediagroup

Stanley J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

December 3, 2007

R. Scott Smith
Chairman, President
And Chief Executive Officer
Fulton Financial Corporation
One Penn Square
P.O. Box 4887
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604

Re: Black Budget Identities of the United States Government regarding Covert Activates & Mind Control
Rufus Fulton, Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer & Department of Defense
Caterbone v. Fulton Bank litigation
Federal False Claims Act Complaint re International Signal & Control (ISe) of Lancaster, PA

Dear Mr. Smith:

I would like to bring to your attention a very dire matter that severely implicates Fulton Bank and
Fulton Financial Corporation. I would like to bring to your attention the Rufus Fulton interview of November
21, 2007 broadcast on WGAL TV 8 News at 6. This interview disclosed National Security information for the
first time regarding his work for the Department of Defense and the Kennedy Administration.

I am suggesting that his classified work with the Department of Defense and his present influence
concerning National Security matters is a dire conflict of interest concerning my litigation against Fulton Bank
that needs to be investigated by outside agencies and or authorities.

I have serious questions regarding the Defense Intelligence Agency and the possible collusion with
your institution. You have to understand that in July of 2005 while I was visiting a museum on a military
base in Austin Texas, I was detained by 2 agents for the Defense Intelligence Agency and questioned about
my Federal case 02-5588 Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et aI., which Fulton Bank is a defendant,
and my whereabouts as well as my destination.

They required me to verify where I was staying, and called my brother Phil's Doctors office in Austin,
whom I was staying with, and caused his staff problems by getting them alarmed about the situation. They
were not very nice and I left them with the question "We are all on the same team, aren't we?

They left me be on my way after reviewing my documents and my Federal civil complaint, which
included information about ISC and my allegations and Federal False Claims Act; and demanding that I do
not visit any more military bases. To my knowledge I have had no physical contact since.

Advanced Media Group Page 1 of2 December 3, 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 19 of 55 05.18.2009


The problem is the involvement of the Department of Defense r Mr. Rufus Fulton's past affiliation and
possible influencer my allegations and civil complaints against Fulton Bank r and my telepathic abilities and
remote viewing 1

For some time I have been trying to identify groups and or agencies that may have remotely trained
me. I have written to and personally visited the office of Senator Arlen Specte~r the Federal Bureau of
Investigation 3 , the Senate Select Committee for Intelligence4 , and corresponded with the Defense Advanced
for Research Projects Agency5r and the Central Intelligence Agency6 with the hopes of finding some answers.
However they have proved fruitless.

See the attached research document dated ThursdaYr November 29, 2007, titled "THE SHADOW
GOVERNMENT; ITS IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS", by Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D?; it is a report that
identifies organizations, agencies, and companies that are directly involved with mental telepathy and
remote viewing, most of which operate under the direction and funding of the Department of Defense. I
have just recently discovered this document on Friday, November 30, 2007 and found it most disturbing
after having to watch the Rufus Fulton interview the prior week. Pay particular attention to the items in
red highlight.

Your Board of Directors and the Securities and Exchange Commission should be and will be alerted to
this discovery. I wish you would reconsider your letter of November 14, 2007 and your position no to meet
with me personally to discuss some of these issues. I believe it will be in your best interest to stay ahead of
this information. A civil and criminal conspiracy allegation that involves this information will have dire
consequences to your major stakeholders and your shareholders.

As a courtesy I will promise to give you until the end of this week, December 7, 2007 to review this
material and perform any due diligence that you seem worthy; and communicate a response. After that
time, I will take it upon myself to disclose this information as it pertains to Fulton Bank and Fulton Financial
Corporation to the Securities and Exchange Commission, and others that will help protect my interests and
the interests of the Advanced Media Group and my litigation v. Fulton Bank.

Copy to file
Deliver to Stephanie Carfley, Barley Snyder, LLC

I See attached research document titled On the Need for New Criteria of DiagnOSis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology
By Carole Smith Global Research, October 18, 2007; Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003,
2 See attached letter dated July 12, 2007 from Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group to Senator Arlen Specter of the Senate judiciary
Committee. Senator Ar1en Specter was viSited on May 17, 2006.
3 See the attached letter dated July 16, 2007 from Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
The meeting at the FBI Philadelphia Field Office took place on October 24, 2007, and the FBI Harrisburg Field Office was visited on May
17,2006.
4 The Senate Select Intelligence Committee office was visited on May 17,2006
5 See attached email dated February 26, 2007 regarding mental telepathy and mind control to the Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency (DARPA),
6 See the attached email confirmation from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA),

7 See the attached research document dated Thursday, November 29, 2007, titled "THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT: ITS IDENTIFICATION
AND ANALYSIS", by Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D"

Advanced Media Group Page 2 of2 December 3, 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 20 of 55 05.18.2009


The calculated and technological entry into another person's mind is an act of monumental
barbarism which obliterates- perhaps with the twiddling of a dial - the history and civilisation
of man's mental development. It is more than an abuse of human rights,
it is the destruction of meaning.

For anyone who is forced into the hell of living with an unseen mental rapist, the effort to stay
sane is beyond the scope of tolerable endurance. The imaginative capacity of the ordinary
mind cannot encompass the horror of it.

We have attempted to come to terms with the experiments of the Nazis in concentration
camps. We now have the prospect of systematic control authorised by men who issue
instructions through satellite communications for the destruction of societies while they are
driving new Jaguars and Mercedes, and going to the opera.
By Carol Smith
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology
Global Research
October 18, 2007

On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis


in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology

By Carole Smith
Global Research, October 18, 2007
Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003.

"We have failed to comprehend that the result of the technology that originated in the years of the arms
race between the Soviet Union and the West, has resulted in using satellite technology not only for
surveillance and communication systems but also to lock on to human beings, manipulating brain
frequencies by directing laser beams, neural-particle beams, electro-magnetic radiation, sonar waves,
radiofrequency radiation (RFR), soliton waves, torsion fields and by use of these or other energy fields
which form the areas of study for astro-physics. Since the operations are characterised by secrecy, it
seems inevitable that the methods that we do know about, that is, the exploitation of the ionosphere, our
natural shield, are already outdated as we begin to grasp the implications of their use." [Excerpt]

For those of us who were trained in a psychoanalytical approach to the patient which was characterised as
patient centred, and which acknowledged that the effort to understand the world of the other person
entailed an awareness that the treatment was essentially one of mutuality and trust, the American
Psychiatry Association's Diagnostic Criteria for Schizotypal personality was always a cause for alarm. The
Third Edition (1987) of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) required that there be
at least four of the characteristics set out for a diagnosis of schizophrenia, and an approved selection of
four could be: magical thinking, telepathy or sixth sense; limited social contact; odd speech; and over
sensitivity to criticism. By 1994, the required number of qualifying characteristics were reduced to two or
more, including, say, hallucinations and 'negative' symptoms such as affective flattening, or disorganised
or incoherent speech - or only one if the delusions were bizarre or the hallucination consisted of a voice
keeping up a running commentary on the person's behaviour or thoughts. The next edition of the DSM is
not due until the year 2010.

In place of a process of a labelling which brought alienation and often detention, sectioning, and mind
altering anti-psychotic medication, many psychoanalysts and psychotherapists felt that even in severe
cases of schizoid withdrawal we were not necessarily wasting our time in attempting to restore health by
the difficult work of unravelling experiences in order to make sense of an illness. In this way,
psychoanalysis has been, in its most radical form, a critic of a society, which failed to exercise imaginative
empathy when passing judgement on people. The work of Harry Stack Sullivan, Frieda Fromm-Reichmann,
Harold Searles or R.D. Laing all trained as psychiatrists and all of them rebels against the standard
procedures - provided a way of working with people very different from the psychiatric model, which
seemed to encourage a society to repress its sickness by making a clearly split off group the carriers of it.
A psychiatrist in a mental hospital once joked to me, with some truth, when I commented on the number
of carrier bags carried by many of the medicated patients around the hospital grounds, that they assessed
By Carole Smith of Global Research Page 1 of 13 October 18, 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 21 of 55 05.18.2009


the progress of the patient in terms of the reduction of the number of carrier bags. It is too often difficult
to believe, however, when hearing the history of a life, that the "schizophrenic" was not suffering the
effects of having been made, consciously and unconsciously, the carefully concealed carrier of the ills of
the family.

For someone who felt his mind was going to pieces, to be put into the stressful situation of the psychiatric
examination, even when the psychiatrist acquitted himself with kindness, the situation of the assessment
procedure itself, can be 'an effective way to drive someone crazy, or more crazy.' (Laing, 1985, p 17).
But if the accounting of bizarre experiences more or less guaranteed you a new label or a trip to the
psychiatric ward, there is even more reason for a new group of people to be outraged about how their
symptoms are being diagnosed. A doubly cruel sentence is being imposed on people who are the victims
of the most appalling abuse by scientific-military experiments, and a totally uncomprehending society is
indifferent to their evidence. For the development of a new class of weaponry now has the capability of
entering the brain and mind and body of another person by technological means.

Harnessing neuroscience to military capability, this technology is the result of decades of research and
experimentation, most particularly in the Soviet Union and the United States. (Welsh, 1997, 2000) We
have failed to comprehend that the result of the technology that originated in the years of the arms race
between the Soviet Union and the West, has resulted in using satellite technology not only for surveillance
and communication systems but also to lock on to human beings, manipulating brain frequencies by
directing laser beams, neural-particle beams, electro-magnetiC radiation, sonar waves, radiofrequency
radiation (RFR), soliton waves, torsion fields and by use of these or other energy fields which form the
areas of study for astro-physics. Since the operations are characterised by secrecy, it seems inevitable
that the methods that we do know about, that is, the exploitation of the ionosphere, our natural shield,
are already outdated as we begin to grasp the implications of their use. The patents deriving from Bernard
J. Eastlund's work provide the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth's atmosphere at
strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in
a manner far more precise and better controlled than accomplished by the prior art, the detonation of
nuclear devices at various yields and various altitudes. (ref High Frequency Active Auroral Research
Project, HAARP).

Some patents, now owned by Raytheon, describe how to make "nuclear sized explosions without
radiation" and describe power beam systems, electromagnetic pulses and over-the-horizon detection
systems. A more disturbing use is the system developed for manipulating and disturbing the human
mental process using pulsed radio frequency radiation (RFR), and their use as a device for causing
negative effects on human health and thinking. The victim, the innocent civilian target is locked on to, and
unable to evade the menace by moving around. The beam is administered from space. The Haarp facility
as military technology could be used to broadcast global mind-control, as a system for manipulating and
disturbing the human mental process using pulsed radio frequency (RFR). The super-powerful radio waves
are beamed to the ionosphere, heating those areas, thereby lifting them. The electromagnetic waves
bounce back to the earth and penetrate human tissue.

Dr Igor Smirnov, of the Institute of Psycho-Correction in Moscow, says: "It is easily conceivable that some
Russian 'Satan', or let's say Iranian or any other 'Satan', as long as he owns the appropriate means and
finances, can inject himself into every conceivable computer network, into every conceivable radio or
television broadcast, with relative technological ease, even without disconnecting cables ...and intercept the
radio waves in the ether and modulate every conceivable suggestion into it. This is why such technology is
rightfully feared."(German TV documentary, 1998).

If we were concerned before about diagnostic criteria being imposed according to the classification of
recognizable symptoms, we have reason now to submit them to even harsher scrutiny. The development
over the last decades since the Cold War arms race has included as a major strategic category, psycho
electroniC weaponry, the ultimate aim of which is to enter the brain and mind. Unannounced, undebated
and largely unacknowledged by scientists or by the governments who employ them - technology to enter
and control minds from a distance has been unleashed upon us. The only witnesses who are speaking
about this terrible technology with its appalling implications for the future, are the victims themselves
and those who are given the task of diagnosing mental illness are attempting to silence them by
classifying their evidence and accounts as the symptoms of schizophrenia, while the dispensers of psychic
mutilation and programmed pain continue with their work, aided and unopposed.
By Carole Smith of Global Research Page 2 of 13 Odober 18, 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 22 of 55 05.18.2009


If it was always crucial, under the threat of psychiatric sectioning, to carefully screen out any sign of
confused speech, negativity, coldness, suspicion, bizarre thoughts, sixth sense, telepathy, premonitions,
but above all the sense that "others can feel my feelings, and that someone seemed to be keeping up a
running commentary on your thoughts and behaviour," then reporting these to a psychiatrist, or anyone
else for that matter who was not of a mind to believe that such things as mind-control could exist, would
be the end of your claim to sanity and probably your freedom. For one of the salient characteristics of
mind-control is the running commentary, which replicates so exactly, and surely not without design, the
symptoms of schizophrenia. Part of the effort is to remind the victim that they are constantly under
control or surveillance. Programmes vary, but common forms of reminders are electronic prods and
nudges, body noises, twinges and cramps to all parts of the body, increasing heart beats, applying
pressures to internal organs - all with a personally codified system of comments on thoughts and events,
designed to create stress, panic and desperation. This is mind control at its most benign. There is reason
to fear the use of beamed energy to deliver lethal assaults on humans, including cardiac arrest, and
bleeding in the brain.

It is the government system of secrecy, which has facilitated this appalling prospect. There have been
warning voices. " ...the government secrecy system as a whole is among the most poisonous legacies of
the Cold War ...the Cold War secrecy (which) also mandate(s) Active Deception ...a security manual for
special access programs authorizing contractors to employ 'cover stories to disguise their activities. The
only condition is that cover stories must be believable." (Aftergood & Rosenberg, 1994; Bulletin of Atomic
Scientist). Paranoia has been aided and abetted by government intelligence agencies.

In the United Kingdom the fortifications against any disturbing glimmer of awareness of such actual or
potential outrages against human rights and social and political abuses seem to be cast in concrete.
Complete with crenellations, ramparts and parapets, the stronghold of nescience reigns supreme. To
borrow Her Majesty the Queen's recent observation: "There are forces at work of which we are not
aware." One cannot say that there is no British Intelligence on the matter, as it is quite unfeasible that
the existence of the technology is not classified information. Indeed it is a widely held belief that the
women protesting against the presence of cruise missiles at Greenham Common were victims of electro
magnetic radiation at gigahertz frequency by directed energy weapons, and that their symptoms,
including cancer, were consistent with such radiation effects as reported by Dr Robert Becker who has
been a constantly warning voice against the perils of electro-magnetic radiation. The work of Allen Frey
suggests that we should consider radiation effects as a grave hazard producing increased permeability of
the blood-brain barrier, and weakening crucial defenses of the central nervous system against toxins.
(Becker, 1985, p. 286). Dr Becker has written about nuclear magnetic resonance as a familiar tool in
medecine known as magnetic resonance imaging or MRI. Calcium efflux is the result of cyclotronic
resonance which latter can be explained thus: If a charged particle or ion is exposed to a steady magnetic
field in space, it will begin to go into a circular or orbital, motion at right angles to the applied magnetic
field.The speed with which it orbits will be determined by the ratio between the charge and the mass of
the particle and by the strength of the magnetic field. (Becker, 1990,p.235) The implications of this for
wide scale aggression by using a combination of radar based energy and the use of nuclear resonating are
beyond the scope of the writer, but appear to be worth the very serious consideration of physicists in
assessing how they might be used against human beings.

Amongst medical circles, however, it has so far not been possible for the writer to find a neuroscientist,
neurologist or a psychiatrist, nor for that matter, a general medical practitioner, who acknowledges even
the potential for technological manipulation of the nervous system as a problem requiring their
professional interest. There has been exactly this response from some of England's most eminent
practitioners of the legal profession, not surprisingly, because the information about such technology is
not made available to them. They would refer anyone attempting to communicate mind- harassment as a
psychiatric problem, ignoring the crime that is being committed.

The aim here is not to attempt a comprehensive history and development of the technology of mind
control. These very considerable tasks - which have to be done under circumstances of the most extreme
difficulty - have been addressed with clarity and courage by others, who live with constant harm and
threats, not least of all contemptuous labelling. Their work can be readily accessed on the internet
references given at the end of this paper. For a well-researched outline of the historical development of
electro-magnetic technology the reader should refer to the timeline of dates and electromagnetic weapon
development by Cheryl Welsh, president of Citizens against Human Rights Abuse. (Welsh 1997; 2001).
By Carole Smith of Global Research Page 3 of 13 October 18. 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 23 of 55 05.18.2009


There are at least one and a half thousand people worldwide who state they are being targeted. Mojmir
Babacek, now domiciled in his native Czech Republic, after eight years of residence in the United States in
the eighties, has made a painstakingly meticulous review of the technology, and continues his research.
(Babacek 1998, 2002)

We are concerned here with reinforcing in the strongest possible terms:

i) The need for such abuses to human rights and the threats to democracy to be called to consciousness,
and without further delay.

ii) To analyse the reasons why people might defend themselves from becoming conscious of the existence
of such threats.

iii) To address the urgent need for intelligence, imagination, and information - not to mention
compassion - in dealing with the victims of persecution from this technology, and

iv) To alert a sleeping society, to the imminent threats to their freedom from the threat from fascist and
covert operations who have in all probability gained control of potentially lethal weaponry of the type we
are describing.

It is necessary to emphasise that at present there is not even the means for victims to gain medical
attention for the effects of radiation from this targeting. Denied the respect of credulity of being used as
human guinea pigs, driven to suicide by the breakdown of their lives, they are treated as insane - at best
regarded as 'sad cases'. Since the presence of a permanent 'other' in one's mind and body is by definition
an act of the most intolerable cruelty, people who are forced to bear it but who refuse to be broken by it,
have no other option than to turn themselves into activists, their lives consumed by the battle against
such atrocities, their energies directed to alerting and informing the public of things they don't want to
hear or understand about evil forces at work in their society.
It is necessary, at this pOint, to briefly outline a few - one might say the precious few - attempts by public
servants to verify the existence and dangers inherent in this field:

In January 1998, an annual public meeting of the French National Bioethics Committee was held in
Paris. Its chairman, Jean-Pierre Changeux, a neuroscientist at the Institut Pasteur in Paris, told the
meeting that "advances in cerebral imaging make the scope for invasion of privacy immense.
Although the equipment needed is still highly specialized, it will become commonplace and capable
of being used at a distance. That will open the way for abuses such as invasion of personal liberty,
control of behaviour and brainwashing. These are far from being science-fiction concerns...and
constitute "a serious risk to society." ("Nature." Vol 391, 1998.
In January 1999, the European Parliament passed a resolution where it calls" for an international
convention introdUcing a global ban on all development and deployment of weapons which might
enable any form of manipulation of human beings. It is our conviction that this ban can not be
implemented without the global pressure of the informed general public on the governments. Our
major objective is to get across to the general public the real threat which these weapons
represent for human rights and democracy and to apply pressure on the governments and
parliaments around the world to enact legislature which would prohibit the use of these devices to
both government and private organisations as well as individuals." (Plenary
sessions/Europarliament, 1999)
In October 2001, Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich introduced a bill to the House of
Representatives which, it was hoped would be extremely important in the fight to expose and stop
psycho-electronic mind control experimentation on involuntary, non-consensual citizens. The Bill
was referred to the Committee on SCience, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services
and International Relations. In the original bill a ban was sought on 'exotic weapons' including
electronic, psychotronic or information weapons, chemtrails, particle beams, plasmas,
electromagnetic radiation, extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy
radiation, or mind control technologies. Despite the inclusion of a prohibition of the basing of
weapons in space, and the use of weapons to destroy objects or damage objects in space, there is

By Carole Smith of Global Research Page 4 of13 October 18.2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 24 of 55 05.18.2009


no mention in the revised bill of any of the aforementioned mind-invasive weaponry, nor of the use
of satellite or radar or other energy based technology for deploying or developing technology
designed for deployment against the minds of human beings. (Space Preservation Act, 2002)

In reviewing the development of the art of mind-invasive technology- there are a few outstanding
achievements to note:

In 1969 Dr Jose Delgado, a Yale psychologist, published a book: "Physical Control of the Mind: Towards a
Psychocivilized Society". In essence, he displayed in practical demonstrations how, by means of electrical
stimulation of the brain which had been mapped out in its relations between different points and activities,
functions and sensations, by means of electrical stimulation, how the rhythm of breathing and
heartbeat could be changed, as well as the function of most of the viscera, and gall bladder secretion.
Frowning, opening and closing of eyes and mouth, chewing, yawning, sleep, dizziness, epileptic seizures in
healthy persons were induced. The intensity of feelings could be controlled by turning the knob, which
controlled the intensity of the electric current. He states at the end of his book the hope that the new
power will remain limited to scientists or some charitable elite for the benefit of a "psychocivilized SOCiety."

In the 1980's the neuromagnetometer was developed which functions as an antenna and could monitor
the patterns emerging from the brain. (In the seventies the scientists had discovered that electromagnetic
pulses enabled the brain to be stimulated through the skull and other tissues, so there was no more need
to implant electrodes in the brain). The antenna, combined with the computer, could localize the points in
the brain where the brain events occur. The whole product is called the magnetoencephalograph.

In January 2000 the Lockheed Martin neuroengineer Dr John D. Norseen, was quoted (US News and World
Report, 2000) as hoping to turn the electrohypnomentalaphone, a mind reading machine, into science
fact. Dr Norseen, a former Navy pilot, claims his interest in the brain stemmed from reading a Soviet book
in the 1980's claiming that research on the mind would revolutionize the military and society at large. By
a process of deciphering the brain's electrical activity, electromagnetic pulsations would trigger the release
of the brain's own transmitters to fight off disease, enhance learning, or alter the mind's visual images,
creating a 'synthetic reality'. By this process of BioFusion, (Lockheed Martin, 2000) information is placed
in a database, and a composite model of the brain is created. By viewing a brain scan recorded by
(functional) magnetiC resonance imaging (fMRI) machine, scientists can tell what the person was doing at
the time of recording - say reading or writing, or recognise emotions from love to hate. "If this research
pans out", says Norseen, "you can begin to manipulate what someone is thinking even before they know
it." But Norseen says he is 'agnostic' on the moral ramifications, that he's not a mad scientist - just a
dedicated one. "The ethics don't concern me," he says, "but they should concern someone else."

The next big thing looks like being something which we might refer to as a neurocomputer but it need
not resemble a laptop - it may be reducible to whatever size is convenient for use, such as a small mobile
phone. Arising from a break-through and exploitation of PSI-phenomena, it may be modelled on the
nervous-psychic activity of the brain - that is, as an unbalanced, unstable system of neurotransmitters
and interacting neurones, the work having been derived from the creation of a copy of a living brain
accessed by chance, and ESP and worked on by design.

On receiving a communication from the writer on the feasibility of a machine being on the horizon which,
based on the project of collecting electromagnetic waves emanating from the brain and transmitting them
into another brain that would read a person's thoughts, or using the same procedure in order to impose
somebody else's thoughts on another brain and in this way direct his actions - there was an unequivocal
answer from IBM at executive level that there was no existing technology to create such a computer in the
foreseeable future. This is at some variance with the locating of a patent numbered 03951134 on the
Internet pages of IBM Intellectual Property Network for a device, described in the patent, as capable of
picking up at a distance the brain waves of a person, process them by computer and emit correcting
waves which will change the original brain waves. Similar letters addressed to each of the four top
executives of Apple Inc., in four individual letters marked for their personal attention, produced absolutely
no response. This included the ex- Vice President of the United States, Mr AI Gore, newly elected to the
Board of Directors of Apple.

By Carole Smith of Global Research Page 5 of13 October 18. 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 25 of 55 05.18.2009


Enough people have been sufficiently concerned by the reports of victims of mind control abuse to
organise The Geneva Forum, in 2002, held as a joint initiative of the Quaker United Nations Office,
Geneva; the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research; the International Committee of the Red
cross, and the Human Rights Watch (USA), and Citizens against Human Rights Abuses (CAHRA); and the
Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies, which was represented by the Professor and
Senior Lecturer from the Department of Peace Studies at the University of Bradford.

In England, on May 25, 1995, the Guardian newspaper in the U.K. carried an article based on a report by
Nic Lewer, the peace researcher from Bradford University, which listed "more than 30 different lines of
research into 'new age weapons'..."some of the research sounds even less rational. There are, according to
Lewer, plans for 'pulsed microwave beams' to destroy enemy electronics, and separate plans for very-Iow
frequency sound beams to induce vomiting, bowel spasm, epileptic seizures and also crumble masonry."
Further, the article states, "There are plans for 'mind control' with the use of 'psycho-correction messages'
transmitted by subliminal audio and visual stimuli. There is also a plan for 'psychotronic weapons'
apparently the projection of consciousness to other locations - and another to use holographic projection
to disseminate propaganda and misinformation." (Welsh, Timeline). Apart from this notable exception it is
difficult to locate any public statement of the problem in the United Kingdom.

Unfortunately, the problem of credulity does not necessarily cease with frequent mention, as in the United
States, in spite of the number of reported cases, there is still not sufficient public will to make strenuous
protest against what is not only already happening, but against what will develop if left unchecked. It
appears that the administration believes that it is necessary and justifiable, in the interests of national
security, to make experimental human sacrifices, to have regrettable casualties, for there to be collateral
damage, to suffer losses in place of strife or war. This is, of course, totally incompatible with any claims
to be a democratic nation which respects the values of human life and democracy, and such an
administration which tutors its servants in the ways of such barbaric tortures must be completely
condemned as uncivilised and hypocritical.

Disbelief as a Defence Mechanism

In the face of widespread disbelief about mind-control, it seems worth analysing the basis of the
mechanisms employed to maintain disbelief:

i) In the sixties, Soviet dissidents received a significant measure of sympathy and indignant protest from
western democracies on account of their treatment, most notedly the abuse of psychiatric methods of
torture to which they were SUbjected. It is noteworthy that we seem to be able to access credulity,
express feelings of indignant support when we can identify with victims, who share and support our own
value system, and who, in this particular historical case, reinforced our own values, since they were
protesting against a political system which also threatened us at that time. Psychologically, it is equally
important to observe that support from a safe distance, and the benefits to the psyche of attacking a split
off 'bad father', the soviet authorities in this case, presents no threat to one's internal system; indeed it
relieves internal pressures. On the other hand, recognizing and denouncing a similar offence makes very
much greater psychic demands of us when it brings us into conflict with our own environment, our own
security, our own reality. The defence against disillusion serves to suppress paranoia that our father
figure, the preSident, the prime minister, our governments - might not be what they would like to be seen
to be.

ii) The need to deposit destructive envy and bad feelings elsewhere, on account of the inability of the ego
to acknowledge ownership of them - reinforces the usefulness of persons or groups, which will serve to
contain those, disowned, projected feelings which arouse paranoid anxieties. The concepts of mind
invasion strike at the very heart of paranoid anxiety, causing considerable efforts to dislodge them from
the psyche. The unconscious identification of madness with dirt or excrement is an important aspect of
anal aggression, triggering projective identification as a defence.

iii) To lay oneself open to believing that a person is undergoing the experience of being invaded mentally
and physically by an unseen manipulator requires very great efforts in the self to manage dread.

By Carole Smith of Global Research Page6of13 October 18. 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 26 of 55 05.18.2009


iv) The defence against the unknown finds expression in the split between theory and practice; between
the scientist as innovator and the society who can make the moral decisions about his inventions;
between fact and science fiction, the latter of which can present preposterous challenges to the
imagination without undue threat, because it serves to reinforce a separation from the real.

v) Identification with the aggressor. Sadistic fantaSies, unconscious and conscious, being transferred on to
the aggressor and identified with, aid the repression of fear of passivity, or a dread of punishment. This
mechanism acts to deny credulity to the victim who represents weakness. This is a common feature of
satanic sects.

vi) The liberal humanist tradition which denies the worst destructive capacities of man in the effort to
sustain the belief in the great continuity of cultural and scientific tradition; the fear, in one's own past
development, of not being 'ongoing', can produce the psychic effect of reversal into the opposite to shield
against aggressive feelings. This becomes then the exaggerated celebration of the 'new' as the affirmation
of human genius which will ultimately be for the good of mankind, and which opposes warning voices
about scientific advances as being peSSimistic, unenlightened, unprogressive and Luddite. Strict
adherence to this liberal position can act as overcompensation for a fear of envious spOiling of good
posseSSions, i.e. cultural and intellectual goods.

vii) penial by displacement is also employed to ignore the harmful aspects of technology. What may be
harmful for the freedom and good of society can be masked and concealed by the distribution of new and
entertaining novelties. The technology, which puts a camera down your gut for medical purposes, is also
used to limit your freedom by surveillance. The purveyors of innovative technology come up with all sorts
of new gadgets, which divert, entertain and feed the acquisitive needs of insatiable shoppers, and bolster
the economy. The theme of "Everything's up to date in Kansas City" only takes on a downside when
individual experience - exploding breast implants, say - takes the gilt off the gingerbread. Out of every
innovation for evil (i.e. designed for harming and destroying) some 'good' (i.e. public diversion or
entertainment) can be promoted for profit or crowd-pleasing.

viii) Nasa is sending a spacecraft to Mars, or so we are told. They plan to trundle across the Martian
surface searching for signs of water and life. We do not hear dissenting voices about its feasibility.

Why is it that, when a person accounts that their mind is being disrupted and they are being persecuted
by an unseen method of invasive technology, that we cannot bring ourselves to believe them? Could it be
that the horror involved in the empathic identification required brings the shutters down? Conversely, the
shared experience of the blasting of objects into space brings with it the possibilities of shared potency or
the relief that resonates in the unconscious of a massive prOjection or evacuation - a shared experience
which is blessed in the name of man's scientific genius.

ix) The desire 'not to be taken in', not to be taken for a fool, provides one of the most powerful and
common defence mechanism against credulity.

Power, Paranoia and Unhealthy Governments

The ability to be the bearer and container of great power without succumbing to the pressures of latent
narcissistic psychoses is an important matter too little considered. The effect of holding power and the
expectation and the need to be seen as capable of sustaining it, if not exercising it, encourages
omnipotence of thought. In the wake of this, a narcissistic overevaluation of the subject's own mental
processes may set in. In the effort to hold himself together as the possessor, container and executor of
power, he (or indeed, she) may also, undergo a process of splitting which allows him, along with others,
to bear enthralled witness of himself in this illustrious role. This may mean that the seat of authority is
vacated, at least at times. The splitting process between the experiencing ego and the perceiving ego
allows the powerful leader to alternate his perception of himself inside and outSide, sometimes beside,
himself. With the reinforcement of himself from others as his own narcissistic object, reality testing is
constrained. In this last respect, he has much in common with the other powerful figure of the age, the
movie star. or by those, in Freud's words, who are "ruined by success."

By Carole Smith of Global Research Page 7 of 13 October 18, 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 27 of 55 05.18.2009


In a world, which is facing increasing disillusion about the gulf between the public platforms on which
governments are elected, and the contingencies and pragmatics of retaining defence strategies and
economic investments, the role of military and intelligence departments, with their respective tools of
domination and covert infiltration, is increasingly alarming. Unaccountable to the public, protected from
exposure and prosecution by their immunity, licensed to lie as well as to kill, it is in the hands of these
agents that very grave threats to human rights and freedom lies. Empowered to carry out aggression
through classified weapon experimentation which is undetectable, these men and women are also open to
corruption from lucrative offers of financial reward from powerful and sinister groups who can utilize their
skills, privileged knowledge and expertise for frankly criminal and fascist purposes.

Our information about the psychological profiles of those who are employed to practice surveillance on
others is limited, but it is not difficult to imagine the effects on the personality that would ensue with the
perSistent practice of such an occupation, so constantly exposed to the perversions. One gains little
snatches of insight here and there. In his book on CIA mind control research (Marks, 1988), John Marks
quotes a CIA colleague's joke (always revealing for personality characteristics): "If you could find the
natural radio frequency of a person's sphincter, you could make him run out of the room real fast." (One
wonders if the same amusement is derived from the ability to apply, say infra-sound above 130 decibels,
which is said to cause stoppage of the heart, according to one victim/activist from his readings of a report
for the Russian Parliament.)

left to themselves, these servants of the state may well feel exempt from the process of moral self
scrutiny, but the work must be dehumanising for the predator as well as the prey. It is probably true that
the need to control their agents in the field was an incentive to develop the methods in use today. It is
also an effectively brutalising training for persecuting others. Meanwhile the object, the prey, in a bid for
not only for survival but also in a desperate effort to warn his or her fellows about what is going on,
attempts to turn himself into a quantum phYSicist, a political researcher, a legal sleuth, an activist, a
neurologist, a psychologist, a physiologist his own doctor, since he cannot know what effects this
freakish treatment might have on his body, let alone his mind. There are always new methods to try out
which might prove useful in the search to find ways of disabling and destroying opponents air injected
into brains and lungs, lasers to strike down or blind, particle beams, sonar waves, or whatever
combination of energies to direct, or destabilise or control.

Science and Scepticism

Scientists can be bought, not just by governments, but also by sinister and secret societies. Universities
can be funded by governments to develop technology for unacceptably inhumane uses. The same people
who deliver the weapons - perhaps respected scientists and academics - may cite the acceptable side of
scientific discoveries, which have been developed by experimenting on unacknowledged, unfortunate
people. In a cleaned up form, they are then possibly celebrated as a break-through in the understanding
of the natural laws of the universe. It is not implausible that having delivered the technical means for
destruction, the innovator and thinker goes on, wearing a different hat, to receive his (or her) Nobel Prize.
There are scientists who have refused to continue to do work when they were approached by CIA and
Soviet representatives. These are the real heroes of SCience.

In the power struggle, much lies at stake in being the first to gain control of ultimate mind-reading and
mind-controlling technology. Like the nuclear bomb, common ownership would seem by any sane
calculations to cancel out the advantage of possession, but there is always a race to be the first to possess
the latest ultimate means of mass destruction. The most desirable form is one that can be directed at
others without contaminating oneself in the process - one that can be undetected and neatly, economically
and strategically delivered. We should be foolish to rule out secret organisations, seeing threat only from
undemocratic countries and known terrorist groups.

As consumers in a world which is increasingly one in which shopping is the main leisure activity, we should
concern ourselves to becoming alert to the ways in which human welfare may have been sacrificed to
produce an awesome new gadget. It may be the cause for celebration for the 'innovator', but brought
about as the result of plugging in or dialling up the living neuronal processes of an enforced
experimentee. If we are concerned not to eat boiled eggs laid by battery hens, we might not regard it
morally irrelevant to scrutinise the large corporations producing electronically innovative 'software.' We

By Carole Smith of Global Research Page 8 of13 October 18. 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 28 of 55 05.18.2009


might also be wary about the origins of the sort of bland enticements of dating agencies who propose
finding your ideal partner by matching up brain frequencies and 'bio-rhythms'.

We do not know enough about the background of such technology, nor how to evaluate it ethically. We do
not know about its effects on the future, because we are not properly informed. If governments persist in
concealing the extent of their weapon capability in the interests of defence, they are also leaving their
citizens disempowered of the right to protest against their deployment. More alarmingly, they are leaving
their citizens exposed to their deployment by ruthless organisations whose concerns are exactly the
opposite of democracy and human rights.

Back in the United Kingdom

Meanwhile, back in England, the Director of the Oxford Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Professor Colin
Blakemore, also the elective Chief Executive of the Medical Research Council writes to the author that he
" ... knows of no technology (not even in the wildest speculations of neuroscientists) for scanning and
collecting 'neuronal data' at a distance." (Blakemore, 2003, ) This certitude is at distinct variance with the
fears of other scientists in Russia and the United States, and not least of all with the fears of the French
neuroscientist, Jean-Pierre Changeux of the French National Bioethics Committee already quoted (see
page 5). It is also very much at odds with the writing of Dr Michael Persinger from the Behavioural
Neuroscience Laboratory at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. His article "On the
Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Algorithms" (1995),
he describes the ways that individual differences among human brains can be overcome and comes to a
conclusion about the technological possibilities of influencing a major part of the approximately six billion
people on this planet without mediation through classical sensory modalities but by generating
electromagnetic induction of fundamental algorithms in the atmosphere. Dr Persinger's work is referred to
by Captain John Tyler whose work for the American Air Force and Aerospace programmes likens the
human nervous system to a radio receiver. (1990)

Very recently the leading weekly cultural BBC radio review had as one of its guests, the eminent astro
physicist and astronomer royal, Sir Martin Rees, who has recently published a book, "Our Final Century",
in which he makes a sober and reasoned case for the fifty-fifty chance that millions of people, probably in
a 'third-world country' could be wiped out in the near future through biotechnology and bio-terrorism
"by error or malign release." He spoke of this devastation as possibly coming from small groups or cults,
based in the United States. " ...few individuals with the right technology to cause absolute mayhem." He
also said that in this century, human nature is no longer a fixed commodity, that perhaps we should
contemplate the possibility that humans would even have implants in the brain.

The other guests on this programme were both concerned with Shakespeare, one a theatre producer and
the other a writer on Shakespeare, while his remaining guest was a young woman who had a website
called "Spiked", the current theme of which was Panic Attack, that is to say, Attack on Panic. This guest
vigorously opposed what she felt was the pessimism of Sir Martin, regarding his ideas as essentially
eroding trust, and inducing panic. This reaction seems to typify one way of dealing with threat and
anxiety, and demonstrates the difficulty that a warning voice, even from a man of the academic
distinction of Martin Rees, has in alerting people to that which they do not want to hear. This flight
reaction was reinforced by the presenter who summed up the morning's discussion at the end of the
programme with the words: "We have a moral! Less panic, more Shakespeare!"

The New Barbarism

Since access to a mind-reading machine will enable the operator to access the ideas of another person, we
should prepare ourselves for a new world order in which ideas will be, as it were, up for grabs. We need
not doubt that the contents of anothers mind will be scooped up, scooped out, sorted through as if the
event was a jumble sale. The legal profession would therefore be well advised to consider the laws on
Intellectual Property very judiciously in order to acquit themselves with any degree of authenticity. We
should accustom ourselves to the prospect of recognizing our work coming out of the mouth of another.
The prospect of wide-scale fraud, and someone posturing in your stolen clothes will not be a pretty sight.
The term "personal mind enhancement" is slipping in through the back door, to borrow a term used by
the Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics, and it is being done through

By Carole Smith of Global Research Page 9 of 13 October 18. 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 29 of 55 05.18.2009


technologically-induced mental co-ercion - mind raping and looting. In place of, or in addition to, cocaine,
we may expect to see 'mind-enhanced' performances on "live" television.

The brave new science of neuropsychiatry and brain mapping hopes to find very soon, with the fMRI
scanner - this "brand new toy that scientists have got their hands on" - "the blob for love" and "the blob
for guilt", (BBC Radio 4: All in the Mind,S March, 2003). Soon we will be able to order a brain scan for
anyone whose behaviour strikes us as odd or bizarre, and the vicissitudes of a life need no longer trouble
us in our diagnostic assessments. In his recent Reith Lectures for the BBC (2003), Professor
Ramachandran, the celebrated neuroscientist from the La Hoya Institute in San Diego, California, has
demonstrated for us many fascinating things that the brain can do. He has talked to us about personality
disorders and shown that some patients, who have suffered brain damage from head injury, do not have
the capacity to recognise their mothers. Others feel that they are dead. And indeed he has found brain
lesions in these people. In what seems to be an enormous but effortless leap, the self-styled "kid in a
candy store" is now hoping to prove that all schizophrenics, have damage to the right hemisphere of the
brain, which results in the inability to distinguish between fantasy (sic) and reality. Since Professor
Ramachandran speaks of schizophrenia in the same breath as denial of illness, or agnosia, it is not clear,
and it would be interesting to know, whether the person with the head injury has been aware or unaware
of the head injury. Also does the patient derive comfort and a better chance at reality testing when he is
told of the lesion? Does he feel better when he has received the diagnosis? And what should the
psychoanalysts - and the psychiatrists, - feel about all those years of treating people of whose head
injuries they were absolutely unaware? Was this gross negligence? Were we absolutely deluded in
perceiving recovery in a sizeable number of them?

It is, however, lamentable that a neuroscientist with a professed interest in understanding schizophrenia
should seek to provide light relief to his audience by making jokes about schizophrenics being people who
are "convinced that the CIA has implanted devices in their brain to control their thoughts and actions, or
that aliens are controlling them." (Reith Lecture, No 5, 2003).

There is a new desire for concretisation. The search for meaning has been replaced by the need for hard
proof. If it doesn't light up or add up it doesn't have validity. The physician of the mind has become a
surgeon. "He found a lump as big as a grapefruit!"

Facing up to the Dread and Fear of the Uncanny

Freud believed that an exploration of the uncanny would be a major direction of exploration of the mind in
this century. The fear of the uncanny has been with us for a very long time. The evil eye, or the terrifying
double, or intruder, is a familiar theme in literature, notably of Joseph Conrad in The Secret Sharer, and
Maupassant's short story, Le Horla. Freud's analysis of the uncanny led him back to the old animistic
conception of the universe: " ...it seems as if each one of us has been through a phase of individual
development corresponding to the animistic phase in primitive men, that none of us has passed through it
without preserving certain residues and traces of it which are still capable of manifesting themselves, and
that everything which now strikes us as 'uncanny' fulfils the condition of touching those residues of
animistic mental activity within us and bringing them to expression." (Freud: 1919. p.362)

The separation of birth, and the childhood fear of 'spooks in the night', also leave their traces in each and
every one of us. The individual experience of being alone in one's mind - the solitary fate of man which
has never been questioned before, and upon which the whole history of civilised nurture is based - is now
assaulted head-on. Since growing up is largely synonymous with acceptance of one's aloneness, the
effort to assuage it is the basis for compassion and protection of others; it is the matrix for the greatest
good, that of ordinary human kindness, and is at the heart of the communicating power of great art. Even
if we must all live and die alone, we can at least share this knowledge in acts of tenderness which atone
for our lonely state. In times of loss and mental breakdown, the starkness of this aloneness is all too
clear. The best of social and group constructiveness is an effort to allay the psychotic anxieties that lie at
the base of every one of us, and which may be provoked under extreme enough conditions.

The calculated and technological entry into another person's mind is an act of monumental barbarism
which obliterates- perhaps with the twiddling of a dial - the history and civilisation of man's mental
development. It is more than an abuse of human rights, it is the destruction of meaning. For anyone who

By Carole Smith of Global Research Page 10 of 13 October 18, 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 30 of 55 05.18.2009


is forced into the hell of living with an unseen mental rapist, the effort to stay sane is beyond the scope of
tolerable endurance. The imaginative capacity of the ordinary mind cannot encompass the horror of it.
We have attempted to come to terms with the experiments of the Nazis in concentration camps. We now
have the prospect of systematic control authorised by men who issue instructions through satellite
communications for the destruction of societies while they are driving new Jaguars and Mercedes, and
going to the opera.

This is essentially about humiliation, and disempowerment. It is a manifestation of rage acted out by
those who fear impotence with such dread, that their whole effort is directed into the emasculation and
destruction of the terrifying rival of their unconscious fantasies. In this apocalypse of the mind the punitive
figure wells up as if out of the bowels of the opera stage, and this phantasmagoria is acted out on a
global scale. These men may be mad enough to believe they are creating a 'psychocivilised world order".
For anyone who has studied damaged children, it is more resonant of the re-enactment from the
unconscious, reinforced by a life devoid of the capacity for empathic identification, of the obscenities of
the abused and abusing child in the savage nursery. Other people -which were to them like Action Man
toys to be dismembered, or Barbie Dolls to be obscenely defiled - become as meaningless in their
humanity as pixillated dots on a screen.

Although forced entry into a mind is by definition obscene, an abbreviated assessment of the effects that
mind-invaded people describe testifies to the perverted nature of the experiments. Bizarre noises are
emitted from the body, a body known well enough by its owner to recognise the noises as extrinsic; air is
pumped in and out of orifices as if by a bicycle pump. Gradually the repertoire is augmented - twinges and
spasms to the eyes, nose, lips, strange tics, pains in the head, ringing in the ears, obstructions in the
throat, pressure on the bowel and bladder causing incontinence; tingling in the fingers, feet, pressures on
the heart, on breathing, dizziness, eye problems leading to cataracts; running eyes, running nose;
speeding up of heart beats and the raising of pressure in the heart and chest; breathing and chest
complaints leading to bronchitis and deterioration of the lungs; agonizing migraines; being woken up at
night, sometimes with terrifying jolts; insomnia; intolerable levels of stress from the loss of one's privacy.
This collection of assorted symptoms is a challenge to any medical practitioner to diagnose.

There are, more seriously, if the afore-going is characterised as non-lethal, the potential lethal effects
since the capability of ultrasound and infra-sound to cause cardiac arrest, and brain lesions, paralysis and
blindness, as well as blinding by laser beam, or inducing asphyxia by altering the frequencies which
control breathing in the brain, epileptic seizure - all these and others may be at the fingertips of those
who are developing them. And those who do choose to use them may be sitting with the weapon, which
resembles, say, a compact mobile telephone, on the restaurant table next to the bottle of wine, or beside
them at the swimming pool.

Finally - if the victims at this point in the new history of this mind-control, cannot yet prove their abuse, it
must be asserted that, faced with the available information about technological development - it is
certainly not possible for those seeking to evade such claims to disprove them. To wait until the effects
become widespread will be too late.

For these and other reasons which this paper has attempted to address, we would call for an
acknowledgement of such technology at a national and international level. Politicians, scientists and
neurologists, neuroscientists, physicists and the legal profession should, without further delay,
demand public debate on the existence and deployment of psychotronic technology; and for the
declassification of information about such devices which abuse helpless people, and threaten
democratic freedom.
Victims' accounts of abuse should be admitted to public account, and the use of psycho-electronic
weapons should be made illegal and criminal,
The medical profeSSion should be helped to recognise the symptoms of mind-control and
psychotronic abuse, and intelligence about their deployment should be declassified so that this
abuse can be seen to be what it is, and not interpreted automatically as an indication of mental
illness.

If, in the present confusion and insecurity about the search for evidence of weapons of mass destruction,
we conclude that failure to locate them - whatever the truth of the matter -encourages us to be generally
By Carole Smith of Global Research Page 11 of13 October 18, 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 31 of 55 05.18.2009


complacent, then we shall be colluding with very dark forces at work if we conclude that a course of
extreme vigilance signifies paranoia. For there may well be other weapons of mass destruction being
developed and not so far from home; weapons which, being even more difficult to locate, are developed
invisibly, unobstructed, unheeded in our midst, using human beings as test-beds. Like ESP, the methods
being used on humans have not been detectable using conventional detection equipment. It is likely that
the signals being used are part of a physics not known to scientists without the highest level of security
clearance. To ignore the evidence of victims is to deny, perhaps with catastrophic results, the only
evidence which might otherwise lead the defenders of freedom to becoming alert to the development of a
fearful new methods of destruction. Manipulating terrorist groups and governments alike, these sinister
and covert forces may well be very thankful for the professional derision of the victims, and for public
ignorance.

References

Laing, R.D. (1985): Wisdom, Madness and Folly: The Making of a Psychiatrist. Macmillan, 1985

Welsh, Cheryl (1997): Timeline of Important Dates in the History of Electromagnetic Technology and Mind
Control, at: www.dcn.davis.ca.us/...welsh/timeline.htm

Welsh, Cheryl (2001):Electromagnetic Weapons: As powerful as the Atomic Bomb, President Citizens
Against Human Rights Abuse, CAHRA Home Page: U.S. Human Rights Abuse Report:
www.dcn.davis.ca.us/...welsh/emr13.htm

Begich, Dr N. and Manning, J.: 1995 Angels Don't Play this HAARP, Advances in Tesla Technology,
Earthpulse Press.

ZDF TV: "Secret Russia: Moscow - The Zombies of the Red Czars", Script to be published in Resonance,
No. 35

Aftergood, Steven and Rosenberg, Barbara: "The Soft Kill Fallacy", in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,
Sept/Oct 1994.

Becker, Dr Robert: 1985,The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, William Morrow,
N.Y.

Babacek, Mojmir: International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of The Human Nervous System:
http://mindcontrolforums.com/babacek.htm and go to: Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous System

"Is it Feasible to Manipulate the Human Brain at a Distance?"


www.aisjca-mft.org/braindist.htm

"Psychoelectronic Threat to Democracy"


http://mindcontrolforums.com/babacek.htm

Nature: "Advances in Neuroscience May Threaten Human Rights", Vol, 391, Jan. 22, 1998, p. 316; (ref
Jean- Pierre Changeux)

Space Preservation Act: Bill H.R.2977 and HR 3616 IH in 107th Congress 2nd Session: see:
www.raven1.net/govptron.htm

Sessions European Parliament:


www.euroDarl.eu.intlhome/defaulten.htm?redirected=l

Click at Plenary Sessions, scroll down to Reports by A4 number, click, choose 1999 and fill in 005 to A4

Delgado, Jose M.R: 1969. "Physical Control of the Mind: Towards a Psychocivilized Society", Vol. 41,
World Perspectives, Harper Row, N.Y.
By Carole Smith of Global Research Page 12 of 13 October 18. 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 32 of 55 05.18.2009


US News & World Report: Lockheed Martin Aeronautics/ Dr John Norseen; Report January 3/10 2000,
P.67

Freud, Sigmund: 1919: Art and Literature; " The Uncanny". Penguin,
Also "Those Wrecked by Success."

Marks, John: 1988 : The CIA and Mind Control - the Search for the Manchurian Candidate, ISBN 0-440
20137-3

Persinger, M.A. "On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction
of Fundamental Algorythms"; In Perception and Motor Skills, June, 1995, vol. 80, p. 791 799

Tyler, J."Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low Intensity Conflict," in "Low Intensity Conflict and Modern
Technology", ed. Lt. Col. J. Dean, USAF, Air University Press, Centre For Aerospace Doctrine, Research
and Education, Maxwell Air Force base, Alabama, June, 1986.

Rees, Martin Our Final Century: 2003, Heinemann.

Conrad, Joseph: The Secret Sharer, 1910. Signet Classic.

Maupassant, Guy de: Le Horla, 1886. Livre de Poche.

Carole Smith is a British psychoanalyst. In recent years she has been openly critical of government use of
intrusive technology on non-consenting citizens for the development of methods of state control. Carole
Smith
E-mail: rockpool@d;rcon.co.uk

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not
necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization.

To become a Member of Global Research

The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as
long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For
publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact:
crgeditor@yahoo.com

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the
provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social
issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes
other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

Copyright Carole Smith, Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003., 2007


The uri address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123

Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca


Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia Copyright 2005-2007

By Carole Smith of Global Research Page 13 of 13 October 18. 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 33 of 55 05.18.2009


Hotmail Email of December 1, 2007

Subject: Covert U.s. Government Parasychology Projects - Black Budget Programs"

From: Stan Caterbone (amgroupOl0msn.com)


Sent: Sat 12/01/0710:48.AM
To: john(!lsplziriassociates.com

Icc: SenatoOipecterOSpecter.Senate.gov (senatorJPe(terOspectet .senate.goy); sectDr9OpoIke.Q).lancaster.pa.us


(sectDr90poIk:e.Q).lancaster.pa.us); sec:tor8OpOIk:e.co.lancaster.pe.us (~Ice.CO.lancaster.peI.uS); Rodrtgues,
Tommye (rtghtonOlObellsouth.net); Resean::h (researchOgac).gov); Ralph (ralpttJnazzocchIOaol.com); Pftumm, faml
(pelmSUOaol.com); pbroganOcft;yoflancasterpa.com (pbroganOct.yoftancasterpa.com); OwIngs, Usa
Ilsa_owingsOJudldary...-ep.senate.gov); Hast, DIanne (nxfal1l!lStOrodanast.com)i Munton, Christine
(anunionOtravelers.com); Longer, janice (jIongeresqOaol.com): Kauft'man, Bob (robert.kauft'manOaxa-advlsors.com);
infoOjudidalwatdl.org (lnfoOjudidalwatch.org)i huggens, &til (stusongsOyahoo.com); Garofolo, John
(jOhn.garofoioOnl5t.gov); gannstrongOpasen.gov (gannstrongOpasen.gIOV); Bhtc5, Government
(contDetogeOoge.gov); FBI, f1eId omce (pbiladelphlaOfbl.gov); Ben (benOdaddyJustICe.com); ft1endsOfoxnews.com;
newsletterObllloreilly.com; samIornbIIrdoObenecon.com; webt'rIasterOIlve8live.chtah.com; dchkennettOdgw.net;
ckovalyOlaverylaw.com; tom.tlllettOmall.house.gov; jdmmfOaol.com; jbuckwelterOlnpnews.com;
mhalcOsupemet.com; pwengerOfuItonbitnk.com; scarfleyObBr1ey.comi nlkoIoITOeddancaster.com; tnfoOadupe.org;
InfoObioodhoundsinc.com; cvrOrkglaw.com: ssblrkOco.sante-blrbara.ca.us; bethgOtt;anywalker.com;
ureypOco./ancaster.peI.us; sheilywOkxxa.com; ndcaoIeyOhlgh.net; rpIotktnOmcgulrewcods.com;
matla..J)lakoudasOsp.senate.gov; Ibur1cholderOthewgnnel.com; beyyerddOaol.com;
wengerrOco.lancaster.peI.us; sunnewsOlnpnews.com; inteillettersOlnpnews.com; neweralettersOlnpnews.com

John,

Here IS the arttde I told you about last evening. Pay parttcular attention to the red highlights. These
are Items which I think have something to do with training me to be telepathic and remote viewing 'of.
my mind. You have to understand that In July of 2005 (July 27, 2005) while I was visiting a museum'
on a military base In Austin Texas, I was detained by 2 agents for the Defense Intelligence Agency and
questioned about my Federal case 02-5588 catemone v. Lancaster County Prison, et al., and my
whereabouts and my destlnatfon.

They required me to verify where I was staying, and called my brother Phil's Doctors offtce In Austin,
whom I was staying with, and caused his staff problems by getting them alanned about the situation.
They were not very nice and I left: them with the question "We are all on the same team, aren't we?

They left me be on my way after reviewing my documents and my Federal dvll complaint, which
Induded Infonnatlon about ISC and my allegations and Federal False Oalms M.

I have been trying to Identify these groups listed below for quite sometime and just happened to
locate this article yesterday, November 30, 2007. Now at least I know where to go to find some
answers. I suspect there have been quite amount of $dollars spent on my situation.

fnJ/t-v' dt#
-'~::wCvember 29. 2007
THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT: ITS IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS

by

Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D.

This Is a summary report on those elements of that dandestine organizational network, (which we
shall label the s....w Goermnent), which serves as a kind Of "parallel government" to the offidal

Dacamber 1. 2007

Stanley], Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 34 of 55 05.15.2009


Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 34 of 55 05.18.2009
elected and appointed government of this country (USA). It includes t .....,se elements known to the
author with sufficient certainty that they can be positively identified, and their known or
reliably reported functions described. It is distinctly possible that there are other elements,
(particularly in the realms of the "Black Budget" and "Special Operations",) which have eluded our
study, and are not named here.

Just as with the official government, the Shadow Government has functional branches. However,
unlike the official government, the purpose of the none-executive branches of the Shadow Government
is simply to distribute various functions, but not to achieve a system of checks and balances, as was
supposed to happen constitutionally between the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the
U.S. Government. That is because the Shadow Government is a creature of a powerful elite, who need
not fear being dominated by an instrument of their own creation.

In the Shadow Government five branches may be identified. These branches are: the Executive
Branch, the Intelligence Branch, the War Department, the Weapons Industry Branch, and the FinanCial
Department.

The reporting lines of the Intelligence Branch and the War Department to the Executive Branch are
straightforward and obvious. Intelligence exists to provide the Executive Branch with suffiCient
necessary information to make adequately informed policy decisions. The War Department exists to
provide coercive force to carry out Executive policy decisions which could meet with public resistance.
The Special Operations units within the Intelligence Branch and War Department exist to carry out
policy directives requiring covert action and official denlablllty.

The Weapons Industry Branch reports to the Executive Branch most often indirectly, through the War
Department and/or the Intelligence Branch (for Black Budget weapons systems).

The Financial Department theoretically reports to the Executive Branch for fiscal policy
implementation, but de facto also reports directly to the international power brokers who have created
the Shadow Government. The Financial Department serves at times directly as their instrument of
fiscal pOlicy Implementation.

An analysis of the overall purposes of these five branches suggests that the overall purpose of the
Shadow Government is to exercise covert control by: 1) collecting comprehensive institutional and
personal Information, 2) by establishing national and International policy independently of the
established Government, 3) by developing high-tech arms and equipment, and, with these,
establishing small, specialized, highly-mobile, elite military units to effect these covert policies, when
need arises, without having to rely on the official (and "unreliable") Armed Services, (whose
subservience to the Shadow Government is reasonably suspect), 4) by developing an armed capability
to repel any threat to the status quo, (including the uncertain ontOlogical, social, and economic
Impacts of any revelation of the reality of UFO and extraterrestrial presence) through the development
of a Star Wars/BMOO ground and space-based surveillance and SOl weapons network,S) by denying
information compromising to the Shadow Government from all those outside "need-to-know"
policymaking levels, and 6) by exercising control on the money supply, availability of credit, and the
worth of money, through policy decisions made outside of the official Government.

All of these mechanisms of control serve to preserve or advance the agenda of an International group
of pivotal power and influence brokers. That agenda is, according to Senator Barry Goldwater, that
"national boundaries should be obliterated and one world rule established." [With No Apologies,
Berkley Books, New York [[date unknown]].]

These power brokers' most visible unifying instrumentality is the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR), (which promotes the transition of Earth from a cluster of Nation-States to one
global government), [Chairman: Peter G. Peterson; headquarters: 58 E. 68th Street, New York, NY
10021]. [Ct. In Control, Kerrville, TX: Fund to Restore an Educated Electorate, 1993.] However, one
must not underestimate the influence of the Trilateral Commission (TC), (which coordinates economic
initiatives of the Group of Seven with other "developed countries" vis-a-vis the "underdeveloped
world",) [Chairman: Paul Volcker; headquarters: 345 E. 46th Street, New York, NY 10017]. Neither
should one misjudge the power of the secretive Bllderberg Group (BG), (which concentrates on the

Advanced Media Group Page 2 of9 December 1, 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 35 of 55 05.18.2009


military and strategic considerations of powerful West European and Nu, ch American power brokers),
[chair rotates, former Chair: Prince Bernhard of Holland; headquarters unknown: annual meetings
rotate, but originally were held at the Hotel de Bilderberg, Oosterbeck, Holland].

David Rockefeller is the Chairman Emeritus of both the CFR and the TC, and certainly

influences, through proxy representatives (such as Lloyd Bentsen), the Bilderberg Group. [Cf. Holly

Sklar, ed., Trllaterallsm: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management; Boston:

South End Press, 1981.]

What follows is a succinct identification and description of the constituent agencies in each of the five

branches of the Shadow Government.

EXECUTIVE BRANCH

(This branch contains the effective policymaking and controlling structures behind the veil of apparent,
democratic governmental structures):

a) Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) (includes George Bush, Bill Clinton, all modern CIA Directors,
most modem Joint Chiefs of Staff, most modem cabinet and top Executive Branch appointed
officeholders, etc.);

b) Tri-Lateral Commission (David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, John D. Rockefeller, Alan Greenspan,
Zbignew Brzezinski, Anthony Lake, John Glenn, David Packard, David Gergen, Diane Feinstein, Jimmy
Carter, Adm. William Crowe, etc.;

c) The Bilderberg Group (Prince Hans-Adam of Liechtenstein, Prince Bernhard of Netherlands, Bill
Clinton, Lloyd Bentsen, etc.);

d) National Security Council (NCS), (the military and intelligence policymaking and control group for
national and international security, which reports directly to the President), its secret 5412 Committee
(which directs black [covert] operations), and its PI-40 Subcommittee (aka MJ-12: which exercises
policy direction and control of the UFO Cover-Up);

e) Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS)'s Spedal Operations compartment, (the operations directorate which
implements the orders of the NSC's 5412 Committee, utilizing the U.S. Special Forces Command);

f) National Program Office (NPO), (which operates the Continuity of Government Project (COG), an
ongoing secret project to maintain command, control, communication and intelligence executive
centers during an extreme National Emergency by operating dandestine, secure, underground cities
staffed by surrogates for above-ground national leaders]); and,

h) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)'s black projects compartment, (which operates
federal preventive-detention camps [often located on military bases or federal Bureau of Land
Management lands], secure underground shelters for the elite during cataclysms, etc.).

INTELLIGENCE BRANCH

(Serves functions of domestic and international surveillance and of secret police/enforcers):

a) National Security Agency (NSA), (monitors and screens all telephone, telegraph, computer modem,
radiO, televiSion, cellular, microwave, and satellite communications, and electromagnetic fields "of
interest" around the world, and orchestrates information-control and cover-up activities related to UFO
secrecy and surveillance of extraterrestrial operations), Fort Meade, MD;

b) National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), (controls and collects information from global spy satellites,
monitors UFO traffic entering and leaving Earth's atmosphere, coordinates firing of energy-beam
weapons from orbiting Star Wars satellites at selected human ground and airborne targets and
selectively at extraterrestrial craft), Pentagon basement and Dulles-Airport area, VA;

c) National Reconnaissance Organization (NRO) (aka MJ-TF), (the military/intelligence operations arm

Advanced Media Group Page 30f9 December 1. 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 36 of 55 05.18.2009


of the PI-40 Subcommittee, conducts surveillance, interdiction, capturE: dnd confiscation of UFOs and
their extraterrestrial occupants for intelligence and "International Security" purposes; surveilles and
"interacts" with close-encounter experiencers, including occasional physically and sexually assaultive
mind-control kidnappings disguised as "Alien abductions" for psychological warfare and
disinformational purposes), headquarters unknown, probably compartmented and dispersed among
various elite Delta Force Special Operations units, such as the USAF Blue light at Hurlburt Field, Mary
Esther, FL and Beale Air Force Base, Marysville, CA;

d) Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), (commands, often controls, and sometimes


coordinates, the gathering of secret overseas information gathered by spies (HUMINT),
electronic surveillance (SIGINT), and other means; carries out covert unconstitutional
paramilitary counterinsurgency operations and preemptive political pacification projects in
violation of international law, as well as counter-intelligence sting operations against
foreign agents; engages in domestic surveillance, and manipulation of the U.S. political
process, "in the National interest" in direct violation of its congressional charter; operates
proprietary "false-front" companies for profit; conducts a major share of international
transshipment of illegal drugs, using National Security cover and immunity; and cooperates
with NSA's UFO cover-up operations), Langley, VA, and worldwide branches;

e) Federal Bureau of Investigation, Counter-Intelligence Division, (the branch which investigates,


survellles and neutralizes foreign Intelligence agents operating within the U.S., and cooperates with
the National Reconnaissance Organization in the surveillance of those involved in close encounters with
UFOs and extraterrestrials);

f) Department of Energy Intelligence (DOE-INTEL), (which conducts internal security checks and
external security threat countermeasures, often through its contract civilian instrumentality, the
Wackenhut Corporation);

g) NSA's Central Security Service, and CIA's Special Security Office, (which respectively spy on the
spies, and conduct special operations which cannot be entrusted to line intelligence officers), Ft.
Meade, MD and Langley, VA;

h) U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) (whose assignments include
psychological and psychotronic warfare (PSYOPS), parapsychological intelligence (PSYINT),
and electromagnetic intelligence (ELMINT), Ft. Meade, MDi

i) U.S. Navy Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), which gathers intelligence affecting naval operations,
and has a compartmented unit involved in UFO and USO [Unidentified Submerged Objects] information
gathering;

j) U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI), (which gathers intelligence affecting
aerospace operations, and has a compartmented unit involved in investigating UFO slghtings,
extraterrestrial contact reports, as well as lAC [Identified Alien Craft] surveillance, and coordination
with NRO interdiction operations), Bolling Air Force Base, MD;

k) Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), (which coordinates the intelligence data gathered
from the various Armed Services intelligence branches (Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force,
Coast Guard and Special Forces), and provides counter-threat measures, which include
providing security at ultra-classified installations by the deployment of U.S. "Thought
Police", who conduct surveillance, by remote-viewing and other parapsychological
measures, against penetrations and scanning by foreign or civilian remote-viewers
[clairvoyants/out-of-body seers]), Pentagon, VA, Fort Meade, MD, and the entire astral
plane;

I) NASA Intelligence, (which gathers intelligence data relating to space flights, sabotage threats,
astronaut and reconnaissance satellite encounters with UFOs and Star ViSitors, and coordinates the
transfer of Star Visitor technology to U.S. and allies' aerospace operations);

m) Air Force Special Security Service (which is an NSA/USAF jOint intelligence operations unit dealing

Advanced Media Group Page4of9 Oec:ember 1, 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 37 of 55 05.18.2009


with possible threats to aerospace operations from foreign powel';), terrestrial or otherwise);

n) Defense Industry Security Command (DISCO), (which conducts Intelligence operations within and
on behalf of the civilian defense contractor corporations engaged In classified research, development,
and production);

0) Defense Investigative Service (DIS), (which conducts investigations into people and
situations deemed a possible threat to any operation of the Department of Defense);

p) Naval Investigative Service (NIS), (which conducts investigations against threats to Naval
operations);

q) Air Force Electronic Security Command, (which conducts surveillance and interdiction of threats to
the security of Air Force electronic transmissions and telemetry, and to the integrity of electronic
counter-measure (ECM) warfare equipment; r) Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Intelligence, (which
conducts surveillance and interdiction of drug smuggling operations, unless exempted under "National
Security" waivers);

s) Federal Police Agency Intelligence, (which coordinates Intelligence relating to threats against federal
property and personnel);

t) Defense Electronic Security Command, (which coordinates intelligence surveillance and


countermeasures against threats to the integrity of military electronic eqUipment and electronic
battlefield operations), Fort Worth, TX.

u) Project Deep Water (the ongoing effects of the compromised personnel, sources and methods
resulting from the secret importation of Hitler's own Nazi Intelligence chief, Gen. Reinhard Gehlen, to
redesign the U.S.'s Intelligence apparatus);

v) Project Paperclip (the ongoing results of the secret importation of Nazi weapons and aerospace/UFO
scientists into U.S. secret military research and development bases);

w) (Undoubtedly, more clandestine units exist, not Identified at this time.)

WAR DEPARTMENT

(High-Technology Weapons Development and Covert Special Forces/Special Operations Units


Deployment) :

a) CIA's Directorate for Science and Technology, (which gathers information with promise
for scientific and technological developments which present a superiority advantage for, or
a threat against, the National Security, [also contains the "Weird Desk", which centrally
processes intelligence about UFOs and Star Visitors and their interaction with Earth],
current Deputy Director of Central Intelligence for Science and Technology is Ron Pandolfi);

b) StrategiC Defense Initiative OffIce (SDIO)/ Ballistic Missile [sic] Defense Organization (BMDO),
(which coordinates research, development and deployment of Star Wars electromagnetic-pulse, killer
laser, particle-beam, plasmoid, and other advanced-technology aerospace weapons;

c) Department of Energy (DOE) (which, besides its cover-story of researching cleaner-burning coal and
gasoline and more solar power, is principally Involved in research and development of: more
specialized nuclear weapons; plus compact, self-sustaining, fUSion-powered, particle and wave
weapons, including electromagnetiC pulse, gravltational/antlgravltational, laser, neutral particle-beam
and plasm old applied weapons research; high-energy invisibility "cloaking" technology, etc.);

d) Lawrence Uvermore National laboratOries (LLNL)/Sandia National laboratories-West (SNL-W),


(which are involved in nuclear warhead "refinements", development of new trans-uranic elements for
weapons and energy applications, development of anti-matter weapons (the Teller Bomb: 10,000
times the force of a hydrogen bomb), laser/maser technology applications, and, reportedly, successful

Advanced Media Group Page 5 of9 December 1, 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 38 of 55 05.18.2009


teleportatlon experiments, among other projects, at this kussian-nicknamed "City of
Death"),Uvermore, CA;

e) Idaho National Engineering Laboratories (INEL), (which houses numerous underground facilities in
an immense desert installations complex larger than Rhode Island, has security provided by its own
secret Navy Base, is involved in nuclear, high-energy electromagnetic, and other research, and
includes Argonne National Laboratory, West), Arco, 10;

f) Sandia National Laboratories (SNL)/Phillips Air Force Laboratory, (which are sequestered on Kirtland
Air Force Base/Sandia Military Reservation, and conduct the translation of theoretical and experimental
nuclear and Star Wars weapons research done at Los Alamos and Lawrence Uvermore National
laboratories Into practical, working weapons), Albuquerque, NM;

g) Tonopah Test Range (SNL's DOE weapons-testing facility for operationally testing Star Wars
weapons in realistic target situations, and is adjacent to classified stealth and cloaked aerospace craft
and U.S.-UFO bases at the Groom Lake [USAF/DOE/CIA] Base [Area 51] and Papoose Lake Base [5
4]), Nevada Test Site/Nellis AFB Range, Tonopah, NV;

h) Haystack USAF Laboratory, Haystack Buttes, Edwards AFB, CA, (a 30-levels deep, extreme-security
facility reportedly engaged In Star Visitor technology retro-engineering;

i) Los Alamos National Laboratories (LANL), (which is the premiere research lab for nuclear, subatomic
particle, high magnetic field, exo-metallurglcal, exo-biologlcal and other back-engineered
extraterrestrial technologies research), Los Alamos County, NM;

j) Area 51 (Groom Lake [USAF/DOE/CIA] Base), and S[Site]-4 (Papoose Lake Base), ultra-secure
"nonexistent" deployment bases where extremely classified aerospace vehicles are tested and
operationally flown, Including the Aurora [Mach-S] spyplane, the Black Manta [TR-3A] stealthy fighter
follow-on to the F-U7A, the Pumpkinseed hyperspeed unmanned aerospace reconnaissance vehicle,
and several variants of antigravltatlonal craft (U.S.-UFOs), including the "Christmas Tree Ornament"
(glowing orange orb) and the "Firefly" (strobing, flitting, blUish-white lit airframe);

k) U.S. Special Forces Command, Hurlburt Field, Mary Esther, FI, along with its Western U.S.
Headquarters, Special Forces Command, Beale AFB, Marysville, CA, coordinating: 1) U.S. Army Delta
Forces (Green Berets); 2) U.S. Navy SEALS (Black Berets), Coronado, CA; and 3) USAF Blue Ught
(Red Berets) Strike Force;

I) Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), (which coordinates the application
of latest scientific findings to the development of new generations of weapons); (now called
ARPA);

m) the Jason Group (elite weapons-application scientists, developing cuttlng-edge-sclence weapons for
DARPA/ARPA, and operating under the cover of the Mitre Corporation);

0) Aquarius Group (UFO technology-application scientiSts, reportedly working under the guidance of
the Dolphin SOCiety, an elite group of scientists privy to extremely classified science and technology
findings);

p) Defense Science Board, (which serves as the Defense Department's intermediary between weapons
needs and the physical sciences);

q) Defense Nuclear Agency (DNA) (currently concentrating on fUSion-powered, high-energy particle


beam, X-ray laser, and EM forcefield weapons development and deployment);

r) U.S. Space Command, (Space War Headquarters for operating "the next war, which will be fought
and won in space"), jOintly coordinated through Peterson AFB, Schreiver AFB, Cheyenne Mountain AFS,
Colorado Springs, and Buckley AFB, Aurora, CO;

Advanced Media Group Page6of9 December 1.2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 39 of 55 05.18.2009


s.l) North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), (operating the nuclear-survivable space

surveillance and war command center deep inside Cheyenne Mountain), Colorado Springs, CO;

s.2) Naval Space Command, the secret lead agency in dealing with the mounting of and operating of

space-based warfare "assets" to deal with any perceived threat from space;

t) Air Force Office of Space Systems, (which coordinates the development of future technology for

operating and fighting in space);

u) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (which operates covert space-defense,

research aabout extraterrestrial lifeforms, and space-weapons compartments, in addition to manned

Shuttle and unmanned scientific satellite launches);

v) NASA's Ames Research center, (which conducts the SEn (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence)

Project, Exobiology (Star Visitor life forms) Division, and "Human Factors" (PSY-Warfare) Division),

Sunnyvale, CA;

w) Project Cold Empire (SOl weapons research-classified);

x) Project Snowbird (creating pseudo-UFOs, used as disinformation);

y) Project Aquarius (UFO research-classified);

x) Project MIlSTAR (development and deployment of WW III [space war] command, control,

communication and intelligence satellites);

z) Project Tacit Rainbow (stealth drones/pseudo-UFO's);

aa) Project Timberwind (nuclear-powered spacecraft);

bb) Project Code EVA (space-walk-based technology);

ee) Project Cobra Mist (SOl energy-beam (plasmold?) weapon research); and

dd) Project Cold Witness (SOl weapons-classified), etc.

WEAPONS INDUSTRY BRANCH


("private" [black project] weapons and covert operations contractors):

a) AT&T (Sandia Labs, Bell Labs, etc. - Star Wars weapons research and NSA telephone/satellite
communications interception facilitation); (Sandia Weapons Lab has now reportedly being taken over
by Batelle Memorial Institute, a proprietary with reported Intelligence connections);

b) Stanford Research Institute, Inc. (SRI), (an Intelligence contractor involved in


psychotronic, parapsychological and PSY-WAR research);

c) RAND Corporation (CIA-front involved in Intelligence projects, weapons development, and


underground bases development);

d) Edgerton, Germhausen & Greer Corporation (EG&G), (NSNOOE-contractor Involved in Star Wars
weapons development, fUSion applications, and security for Area 51 (U.S. UFO-technology aerospace
vehicles base) and nuclear installations, etc.);

e) Wackenhut Corporation (NSNCINDOE cut-out contractor) involved in contract security operations


for Top Secret Ultra and Black Budget surface and underground military reservations, such as Area S-4
(U.S. UFO base), NV and Sandia National Labs, (Star Wars weapons testing facility), NM), and,
reportedly, "dirty jobs" for CIA and Defense Intelligence agencies;

Advanced Media Group Page 7 019 December 1, 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 40 of 55 05.18.2009


f) Bechtel Corporation (CIA's "ditch-digger" for covert projects and off-the-books underground bases);

g) United Nuclear Corporation (military nuclear applications);

h) Walsh Construction Company (on the CIA projects dole);

i) Aerojet (Genstar Corp.):{ makes DSP-l Star Wars battle satellites for the NRO);

j) Reynolds Electronics Engineering (on CWDoD dole);

k) Lear Aircraft Company (Black Budget technology);

I) Northrop Corporation (makes U.S. antigravity craft, back-engineered from Star Visitor technology,

ear lancaster, CA);

m) Hughes Aircraft (classified projects compartment);

n) Lockheed-Martin Corporation (Black Budget aerospace projects);

o} McDonnell-Douglas Corporation {Black Budget aerospace projects};

p) BDM Corporation (CIA contractor, involved in UFO back-engineering and psychotronic projects,

etc.);

q) General Electric Corporation (electronic warfare and weapons systems); and

r) PSI-TECH Corporation (involved in military/Intelligence-applications of research into

psychotronics, parapsychology, remote viewing, and contacting extraterrestrial


consciousness);

s) Science Applications International Corp. (SAle); "black projects" contractor, reportedly including

psychic warfare.

FINANCIAL DEPARTMENT

(Extra-Constitutional funding):

a) Federal Reserve System (cartel of private banks overseen by elite superwealthy finanCiers, such as
the Rockefellers, Mellons, DuPonts, Rothschilds, etc., which dictates to the Government the flow of
money, worth of money, and the interest rates the government and citizens must pay);

b) CIA self-financing {the operation and/or control of much of the international drug trade in heroin,
cocaine and marijuana, as well as "front" bUSiness enterprises, as a source of cash for off-the-books
covert operations, and the purchase of exotic munitions and strategic bribe funds};

c) Department of Justice self-financing (the use of confiscated cash and valuables from "targets of
investigation" to finance "special projects");

d) Special Forces self-finanCing (the self-use of confiscated "booty" from covert military operations to
fund other clandestine operations).

What conclusions can be drawn from this preliminary analysis of the structure, functions and
operations of the Shadow Government?

Foremost, the Shadow Government is a very large, well-organized, skillfully camouflaged, parallel
power structure. History suggests that it has served its masters well, and that its predilection for
operating out of sight and notoriety, if not in an outright clandestine fashion, is exactly how its
masters want it to function -- not drawing attention to itself, manipulating power behind the scenes,

Advanced Media Group Page 8 of9 December 1, 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 41 of 55 05.18.2009


and accomplishing by covert operations what cannot lawfully or politicallY be accomplished out in the
open.

What should be the attitude of the informed citizen to the Shadow Government?
Since it thrives in the dark, we should shine the light of full disclosure on it. Citizens can
demand: the end of the Congressional practice of allowing "Black Budget" items; the end of
unpublished secret Executive Orders and National Security Directives; the end of the
practice of indefinitely- sustained Presidential Declarations of National Emergency (as is
currently in place); the end of Federal Reserve Notes and the return to the gold standard to
back the dollar; the end to governmental domestic spying on its own citizens; and extremely
severe reduction (on the order of 90 oJb) in the number, staffing and scope of the endlessly
proliferating Intelligence agencies, which are an anachronism since the Cold War ended;
and an end to CIA and DEA collusion in allowing a continuing stream of drugs to pour into
this country.

We founded this Country (USA); it's time to take it back.

- Richard l. Boylan, Ph.D.

Dr. Richard Boylan is a behavioral scientist, university instructor, certified clinical hypnotherapist, and

researcher into extraterrestrial-human encounters.

Richard Boylan, Ph.D., LLC,

Post Office Box 1009, Diamond Springs California 95619, United States of America.

Phone: (530) 621-2674 (PDT)

E-mail: drboylan@sbcglobal.net

WEBSITE: htW:/lwww.drboylan.com

You are invited to join his UFOFacts internet reports-and-ET/UFO/Experiencers

chat list; moderated by Dr. Boylan: (subscribe at: http://Qroup;;.yahoo.com!aroup/ufofacts); or

join DrRichBoylanReports (his reports-only!) list at:

bltQ.;LI_9LQ\J~'l@h 00, comLg[ouQL9 rrich boyla n r~Qf:t;;

Posted by Stewart at

f
:/;'
a(i!i
,-
; . ,
<'
' Y'
, ,

nced edia Group


terbone
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Visit Our Blog For Journey of a Whistleblower
Visit Our Blog For Research Into ESP - Mental Telepathy & The U.s. Governments Activities
Visit Our Video Biography

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publidy discredited Since
1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal fit Control, Pic. of
Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud In 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to
defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose
public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malidous attacks on our person, our property, and our
business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of proteCting our rights to
continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wiSh to be removed from our Contact
Ust. Number 7.

Advanced Media Group Page9of9 Oecember 1. 2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 42 of 55 05.18.2009


amgrouD01@msn.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

Stan Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

July 16, 2007

Federal Bureau of Investigations


J. Edger Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
Philadelphia, PA

Re: Important Matters

Dear Sir or Madam:

First of all, I received a personal letter from Senator Arlen Specter on July 11, 2007. It
was held in the mail system or was stolen for almost a full 30 days. I have had so many
complaints regarding the same that I filed a complaint with the United States Postal Inspector
(See Attached). They had written me but I never did receive the follow-up to the investigation
as the letter promise. I am attaching a copy of the letter with the hopes that you could follow
up and make certain that my complaint is not being subverted.

If you are not aware, I have a Federal Whistle-Blowing and Federal False Claims Act case
that I need to file against the United States Attorney General, as required by law. This case
involves the former Department of Defense contractor International Signal & Control, Pic, (ISC)
formerly of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, I also have an unprecedented case of
obstruction of justice that surrounds that case, and I am evaluating the merits of waiting until
your subcommittee finds a resolution to U.S. Attorney General controversy before I file my
action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. I am certain
that any filing before would only be subject to further misconduct. My cases now before the
United States District Courts and the various Courts of the Commonwealth have been subject to
an unprecedented array of judicial misconduct. However, I realize that you do not have the
authority or the jurisdiction to intervene, so I am told.

For approximately I.
'have"had th!e ,ability. to <communlcate
telepathically. .1IjaYE!spe this' abllltythrQ~QhevarloustnfeIUgen~~
agendes dec/ass. .... rnellts. , ;g>.rinected2a pers,on (Sheryl
Crowl that Is co when I am
litigating ciV11.andCfim mproroised.
I. do notknow'flOwl wledge ,and or
consent. lneed,:tos elp in that isconneGtedtome
subjects me to a brutal.arraYQfmen2 ,'V~.betltt'letl1attheyare
being usedasa medlum;1f{)f" this purpose. yJS$uesin a
Court of Law, and thlsISr'l0ta},gQodtlme2for ....'sabl urse.10svery
suspect considering my FeOeraLFalseClaimsAetatieg

Unfortunatelw I have.had perSoRal\ld~aOI'l9s.II'A'jthtQe ,epartrnentt1fAdvaneed;Research


Projects (DARPAlthat dates backto;1.990~h~n~,had .......,.. .2 .......... with. the National Institute of
Standards and Technology and DAR.PA.. lkliow. thattheystl..ld,y and research paranormal

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 1 of 36 07/16/2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 43 of 55 05.18.2009


activities and
knowledge
Intelli",'~r~rl"""A(
ISC, a
agents
issues .......,... "......., dropon~hjs
type of com nUlllcc:ttlC)n.. ue!;tloln()l'1fnat:ter"$retated to and other
foreignaff~i tnef'ft is always the
possibility for sornet)ne~td

In the past few weeks I have downloaded a declassified document dump from the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) that contained hundreds of bibliographies from the Soviet Union
dating as far back as the 1930's regarding this subject. It appears that they have more
knowledge and expertise than the United States. This brings me to a disclosure that mayor
may not be concerning. Over the past several months I have had two contacts and intimate
conversation with an 80-year-old Russian immigrant regarding my problem. She seemed to be
knowledgeable of the subject matter and made several disclosures, which mayor not be true.
She said that she was a Psychologist with a Doctorate degree and a former employee of the
Pennsylvania State University System. She also disclosed that her former husband was
imprisoned and tortured by the KGB.

I look forward to your response.

, y, . ( ) ()it'V
tanJ. ca~ne
cc: USPS Certified Mail
Enclosures Letter of June 15, 2007
May 24, 2007 - Letter from United States Postal Inspection Service
February 26, 2007 - Email to DARPA
April 12, 2007 - Email Confirmation from CIA
2002 - CIA Declassified Document
July 10, 2007 - Email from The GAO

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 2 of 36 07/1612007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 44 of 55 05.18.2009


amaI"QUoOl@msn.a>m
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.a>m

Stan Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

July 16, 2007

Federal Bureau of Investigations


J. Edger Hoover Building

I.' '\
935 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

PlililL I

Re: Important Matters

Dear Sir or Madam:

First of all, I received a personal letter from Senator Arlen Specter on July II, 2007. It
was held in the mail system or was stolen for almost a full 30 days. I have had so many
complaints regarding the same that I filed a complaint with the United States Postal Inspector
(See Attached). They had wlitten me but I never did receive the follow-up to the Investigation
as the letter promise. I am attaching a copy of the letter with the hopes that you could follow
up and make certain that my complaint is not being subverted.

If you are not aware, I have a Federal Whistle-Blowing and Federal False Claims Act case
that I need to file against the United States Attorney General, as required by law. This case
involves the former Department of Defense contractor International Signal &. Control, PIc, (ISC)
formerly of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, I also have an unprecedented case of
obstruction of justice that surrounds that case, and I am evaluating the merits of waiting until
your subcommittee finds a resolution to U.S. Attorney General controversy before I file my
action in the United States Distlict Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. I am certain
that any filing before would only be subject to further misconduct. My cases now before the
United States Distlict Courts and the various Courts of the Commonwealth have been subject to
an unprecedented array of judicial misconduct. However, I realize that you do not have the
authority or the jurisdiction to intervene, so I am told.

For
telepath1ca
agencies c:lel:ta~;Slfl
Crow) that -Is:
litigating "
I,donot

UnfortunateiYiI"" h-ave,ha~~ ~t"'_flflg$";~Wlttl;'~Ji J"ep(),rttn~nt.Adval1Ce(:rReseinl:h


Projects (DARPA1Jhclt 'cfateS,back~i;~~~~ ~,.j)ifCI .-::.ctl$\Nlth the: National Institute of
Standards and:' Technology" and DARPA: lktltiw:,tli:at ~~<~',_80d'(esear-di,paranor:mal

THE ADVANCED MEOlA GROUP Pagel 0'36 0711612007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 45 of 55 05.15.2009

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 45 of 55 05.18.2009


July 12, 2007
Senator Arlen Specter
Page 2

trained without my knowledge and or consent. I need to seek help in trying to disconnect. The
person that is connected to me subjects me to a brutal array of mental and psychological abuse.
I firmly believe that they are being used as a medium for this purpose. I have waited 20 years
to resolve my issues in a Court of Law, and this is not a good time for this ability to assert itself,
and of course it is very suspect considering my Federal False Claims Act allegations.

Unfortunately, I have had personal "dealings" with the Department of Advanced Research
Projects (DARPA) that dates back to 1990 when I had contracts with the National Institute of
Standards and Technology and DARPA. I know that they study and research paranormal
activities and technologies, including remote channeling. My Whistle-Blowing activities and my
knowledge of the fraud within ISC back in 1987, has put me in direct scrutiny of the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA) due to their relationships with
ISC, and of course my very public condemnation of the fraud.

In the past few weeks I have downloaded a declassified document dump from the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) that contained hundreds of bibliographies from the Soviet Union
dating as far back as the 1930's regarding this subject. It appears that they have more
knowledge and expertise than the United States. This brings me to a disclosure that mayor
may not be concerning. Over the past several months I have had two contacts and intimate
conversation with an 80-year-old Russian immigrant regarding my problem. She seemed to be
knowledgeable of the subject matter and made several disclosures, which mayor not be true.
She said that she was a Psychologist with a Doctorate degree and a former employee of the
Pennsylvania State University System. She also disclosed that her former husband was
imprisoned and tortured by the KGB.

I will copy Senator Diane Feinstein of California with this letter. The fact that she serves
on the Judiciary Committee with you and the fact that she is also on the Senate Select
Intelligence Committee might help me find a solution to this problem. I would hope that you
both might be able to help me find someone that can help me disconnect from this other
telepathic person, while at the same time taking any making certain there are no National
Security issues.

In another matter, I also will enclose a copy of an email from the Government Accounting
Office (GAO) pertaining a document that I am trying to locate that was sent to me in 1987 from
the GAO. I would appreCiate it if you could follow-up on this and make sure I am afforded the
FOIA for this document.

I look forward to your response.

1
cc: .1/ USPS Certified Mail
Enclosures Letter of June 15, 2007
May 24, 2007 - Letter from United States Postal Inspection Service
February 26, 2007 - Email to DARPA
April 12, 2007 - Email Confirmation from CIA
2002 - CIA Declassified Document
July 10, 2007 Email from The GAO

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 4 of 36 0711612007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 46 of 55 05.18.2009


amgroup01@msn.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

Stan Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

July 13, 2007

Lorita O'Leary

Abuse Case Documenter

Citizens Commission for Human Rights International

6616 Sunset Blvd.,

Hollywood, CA 90028

Re: email of July 10 2007

Dear Lorita:

I appreciate your response and the abuse case forms. I thought I would start

sending you documentation via United States Postal Service due to concerns of repeated

computer hacking and the lack of security on my email accounts. To get you started I thought I

should first deliver the original complaint that I sent you CCHR in 1992. If you will notice I

talked to an agent of CCHR at your headquarters on December 16, 1991 and followed up with

the enclosed abuse complaint form.

As you will notice, I am in litigation in United States District Court for the Eastern District

of Pennsylvania for a Federal False Claims Act or Whistle-Blowers complaint. The attached

complaint form will at least proved documentation for the first 4 years, as far as your

organization is concerned.

I will then continue to fill out the new form that will handle abuse from 1992 to today.

As you will learn, I have expertise in information technologies and I posses a large library of

documentation recorded on various mediums. I must to date have in excess of 20,000 pages

of documentation concerning these issues, so please do not hesitate to request explanations or

documentation in different formats.

I am also enclosing my resume, and suggest that you visit my website at:

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com for additional information that may be helpful. As you

have already noticed, I will continue to copy my contacts in my email list of different

correspondence. This is a very strategic action that helps me to disseminate the truth in an

effort to defend myself against the broad array of libel and slander that continues. I use this

tactic to try to keep law enforcement honest against future false arrests. I now have 27 criminal

charges that I have had withdrawn or overturned on appeals. Of course my perpetrators have

no alternative than to try to discredit me. I'm sure with your experience with Whistle-Blower

cases, you can recognize this quite easily.

I will' also enclose a few headlines from the Lancaster Newspapers concerning

International Signal & Control (ISC), Pic. Please keep in mind that my current litigation is

concerning to the current Bush Administration for several reasons. Current and former

Administration officials had direct ties to ISC. I will forward 3 ABC News Nightline episodes and

1 ABC News 20/20 episodes that investigated and reported on the ISC scandal. I will forward

these next week.

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 20 of 36 07/1612007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 47 of 55 05.18.2009


I look forward to your help.

cc:
Enclosures

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 21 of 36 07/1612007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 48 of 55 05.18.2009


IIJSIbf. Hotn"

amgroup01@Il1SI1.com Printed: Monday, February 26,200711:04 AM

Fram : Stan c:atmJone <amgroopOl@msn.com>


Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 11:03 AM
To : webmaster-dso@darpa.mil
Subject: Programs

'Attachment; WiredNews-ASpyMachineofDARPA_sOreams.pdf (0.03 MB)

I am looking for information of some of your programs regarding the Mind and Remote QlameIlng. See attad1ed.

I did some work on the "lIMIT' project with the National IsI:itute for Standards and Technologies. NIST back In 1990, as a
contractor (Advanced Media GroI4l). I was the Q)-ROM 111af'IUf'actln. I beIeve you were part of that rrojed.

Within the past 14 months I have bealme telepathiC, and I want to be assured your stalf has nothing to do with that activity.

I also have a Federal False Cairns Act complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of PeMsytvnania
06-cv-39SS, It will be amended In due time and refiled.

In July of 2005, I was detained by 2 DIA Agents in Austin, Texas, and questioned about another Federal CDITlplaint 05-2288.

I would lite some ITansparency and some answers inVolving your involvement.

pOl@msn.CDITl
www.amggltertalnmentgroup.com
Fax: (717) 427-1621
Advanced Media Group
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516

THE ADVANCED MEOlA GROUP Page 7 of 36 07/1612007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 49 of 55 05.15.2009


Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 49 of 55 05.18.2009
CCHR Abuse Case Interview Form {ver. 1.0}, Jan, 1, 1992

No Proof or Edit

Citizens Commission on Human Rights


6362 Hollywood Boulevard,
Suite B Los Angeles, CA 90028
Phone: {213} 467-4242 Fax: {213} 467-3720

ABUSE CASE INTERVIEW FORM

NAME: Stan J. Caterbone AGE: 33


ADDRESS: 615 Wyncroft Lane, Apt. 2
CITY: Lancaster STATE: PA ZIP: 17603
WORK PHONE: {717} 392-3682 'HOME PHONE: Same
FAX: {717} 392-0532
DATE: January 1, 1991
FORM FILLED OUT BY: Stan J. Caterbone

Brief summary of abuse {Drugs, Electric Shock Treatment, Psychiatric Rape, Confinement}:

Fabricated allegations of suicide, "going to the beach with a gun to kill himself", made by James Warner on August 12,
1987 to the Stone Harbor Police Department. Incarcerated and taken to the Burdette Tomlin Hospital in Stone Harbor,
New Jersey, on August 12, 1987 by Officer Steve O'Conner and Henry Stanford of the Stone Harbor Police Department,
and accompanied by Steve and Tom caterbone (brothers). Hospital officials refused to release me, and after several
hours, I was forced into signing a contract with the hospital that said "I, Stanley J. Caterbone will not take my life
tonight or anytime" as a requirement for my release. [SEE PAGES 40 TO 41 OF ROY GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF
EVENTS, DATED DECEMBER 20, 1991]

On September 9th, 1987, I was denied bail for again fabricated criminal charges of September 3, 1987, (all charges
dropped in March of 1988) unless I admitted myself into the Psychiatric Unit of St. Joseph Hospital in Lancaster, PA.
Offidals of the Lancaster County Prison, attorney Robert Byers, Mary Lynn DiPaolo, Dr. AI Shulz, Yolanda Caterbone
(Mother), and Michael Caterbone (brother) all collaborated that the only way bail would be allowed to be posted is by
admitting myself, voluntarily, into the Hospital. After learning that the requirment (hospitalization), for posting bail was
not required, I released myself from the hospital. During the five days of hospitalization, I was made to take lithium
several times per day. I was also denied any opportunity to communicate with any attorneys or representatives
regarding any of my legal affairs. [SEE PAGES 45 TO 46 OF ROY GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS, DATED
DECEMBER 20, 1991]

On June 7, 1991, I was again incarcerated and arrested on fabricated charges, again by the Stone Harbor Police, again
by Officer Henry Stanford, for driving while under the influence. During a sobriety test on the Sidewalk, I again asked
Officer Stanford what the charges were and he replied "It doesn't matter, it is my word against yours, -and we know
who they will believe, remember '87. When I passed two breathalizer tests (.08), Officer Stanford refused to release me
and I was placed in a holding cell. After several hours, an Officer Mclaughlin arrived from the Avalon Police Department,
with a warrent for my arrest, for outstanding warrents (fabricated traffic violations of August 14, 1987), which attorney
Byers had since said were dropped, and again placed under arrest. The two officers, McClaughlin (Avalon, NJ) and
Stanford (Stone Harbor, NJ) requested $340.00 for bail. I requested to go to my car for the cash, which was one block
away, and Officer McGlaughlin refused stating "you may have a gun in the car". I was taken to the cape May County
Prison, fingerprinted and improsoned until the next day. I posted bail the following day. [SEE PAGES 74 TO 75 OF ROY
GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS, DATED DECEMBER 20, 1991]

On September 3, 1987, I was arrested for burglarizing my own leased property, charged with stealing my own
property, charged with destroying my own property, charged with terrorizing my own employee, who I kissed goodbye,
and awaited for her safe return into my building, and charged with making an alleged bomb threat to my own place of
bUSiness, by the Manhiem Township Police Department, the Lancaster District Attorney, District Justice Murray Horton,
and District Justice Richard Reeser. [SEE PAGES 44 TO 45 OF ROY GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS, DATED
DECEMBER 20, 1991]

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 22 of 36 07/1612007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 50 of 55 05.18.2009


On December 4, 1987 at the annual shareholders meeting of Financial Management Group, Ltd., the company that I
had founded, Mr. Robert Kauffman conveniently arranged and hired armed security guards stand _at the entrance of the
meeting. This strategy was used for the sole purpose of purporting and supporting his fabricated allegations of criminal
misconduct and mental illness of myself, by suggesting that I was going to attend the meeting, which was perfectly
within my rights, as a 20% shareholder of Financial Management Group, Ud., the Executive Vice PreSident, and
Secretary, and President of FMG Advisory. Mr. Kauffman attempted to insinuate that I was contemplating attending the
meeting in order to cause violence. I did not attend the meeting, nor had any plans to do so. [SEE PAGES 53 OF ROY
GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS, DATED DECEMBER 20,1991]

In March of 1991, David D. Dering, the president of American Helix Technology Corporation, told all employees during a
special staff meeting, that I "was a runaway ex-convict that would end up in jail soon, and that I was "bad news". Mr.
Dering also spent approximately 20 minutes slandering my character, my reputation, and my bUSiness activities. Mr.
Dering was threatened by my disclosure of filing a civil Anti-Trust suit against American Helix and High Industries, its
parent company, for allegations of conspiracy to sabotage my bUSiness activities in 1987 with "Digital Technologies",
which resulted in the formation of American Helix, by persons which were involved in my business affairs in 1987, and
which was my business. (Scott Robertson, Robert Long, Norris Boyd, High Industries). [SEE PAGES 73 OF ROY
GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS, DATED DECEMBER 20,1991]

On July 6, 1987 in the first conversation with Dr. AI Shulz since 'November of 1986, Stan Caterbone learned that
numerous persons, including Mary Lynn DiPaolo and Jere Sullivan had personally called Dr. Shulz and fabricated
allegations of mental illness in the previous' days. Dr. AI Shulz also accused Stan Caterbone of suffering from "illusions
of grandure", and did not believe any of his extensive business dealings, specifically the "Digital" movie and its related
activities. [SEE PAGES 34 TO PAGES 35 OF ROY GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS, DATED DECEMBER 20, 1991]

On or about July 30, 1987 Stan Caterbone retained the services of Dr. Marshall Levine, a psychiatrist from Northfield,
NJ, to conduct an objective review of his mental state of mind, soley to discredit the fabricated allegations of mental
illness. Dr. Levine conducted a 2 hour interview at his home in Stone Harbor, NJ and requird Stan Caterbone to
complete the MMPI test. Stan Caterbone also paid Dr. Marshall Levine a $600 fee for the services. After submitting the
MMPI test, and not hearing from Dr. Levine, Stan Caterbone finally called Dr. Levine for the results. Dr. Levine had
disclosed that he had conducted telephone interviews with family members, without the consent or knowledge of Stan
Caterbone, and specifically not adhering to the original agreement of a complete objective and impartial review. Dr.
Levine prescribed Lithium drugs, and would not send any written communications regarding his findings or conclusions.
Stan Caterbone requested for a refund of all monies paid, however Dr. Marshall leVine refused. [SEE PAGES 39 TO
PAGES 40 OF ROY GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS, DATED DECEMBER 20, 1991]

It should be noted that I have never been convicted of any crime, before or after the above occurences. In fact, I have
never had any altercation with the law before the above inddents, except for a few speeding violations that dated back
to 1982.

Many other inddents described in detail in Roy Griffen's chronology of events of December 20, 1991.

When did the abuse occur?

See above.

List the names of the psychiatrists involved:

Name Office/Hospital Phone

Dr. AI Schulz St. Joseph Hospital (717) 291-8083

Dr. Marshall Levine Northfield, NJ forthcoming

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 23 of 36 07/16/2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 51 of 55 05.18.2009


List the names of any other people involved:

Name, Phone (All parties below have supported and or fabricated allegations of insanity, and or

psychiatric treatment)

Michael Hartlett, (717) 898-560-4499

Mary Lynn DiPaolo, (717) 569-0022

Michael DiPaolo, (717) 569-0022

Jere Sullivan, (703) 579-6143

James Warner, (717) 397-9968

Detective Sigler, (717) 569-6401

Robert Kauffman, (717) 569-560-8300

Detective Mathias, (717) 569-6401

Howard Eisler, (717) forthcoming

David Drubner, (203) 753-9292

Yolanda Caterbone, (717) 394-7710

Steven Caterbone, (305) 751-0352

Phillip Caterbone(717) forthcoming

Thomas Caterbone, (717) 299-5194

Robert Beyers, (717) 394-7204

David D. Dering, (717) 392-7840

Allon Lefever, (717) 293-4444

Scott Robertson, (717) 393-8082

Mr. & Mrs. Frank Roda, (717) 394-1160

Unda Murphy Berger, forthcoming

Karen Hickman, (717) forhtcoming

Michelle Hodge Miller, (213) 546-5124

Ronald Roda, (717) 299-5469

Wayne LandiS, (717) 843-9227

Art Kerst (717) 392-4797

Evelyn Sullivan, (717) 392-3221

Benjamin Roda, (717) 392-9999

Joseph Roda (717) 397-3791

Amy Hinterlighter, (215) 640-4852

Dan Moyer (717) 295-1200

Jack Mahn (609) 368-1551

Bob Walters forthcoming

Victor Makarowicz (717) 569-8296

Herb Fisher (717) 394-6463

Fred Martin (FBI) (717) 232-8686

Jeff Jamounou (717) 232-8000

Sen. Gib Armstrong forthcoming

Steven Hobday (717) 393-8637

Cristine Housner (717) 293-9293

District Justice Murray Horton forthcoming

District Justice Richard Reeser forthcoming

James Christian forthcoming

Lt. Madenspacher (717) 569-6401

Richard Hobday (717) 393-8637

Tim Hogentogler (717) 569-8057

John Baumgardner forthcoming

Daniel Berger (717) 872-1313

Alan Loss (717) 560-4499

Nancy Arment (717) 872-9355

Omar Landis (717) 859-5466

Peter Peneros (717)295-1200

John M. Wolf II 393-5601

Chuck Smith (717) 569-5341

Peter Wolfson (717) 299-6615, (717) 569-5341

Craig Russell (717) 293-9293

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 24 of 36 07/1612007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 52 of 55 05.18.2009


Rich Braverman (717) 295-1200

Dr. William Umiker (717) 394-9936


William Kogler (404) 951-0600

Claude Pea (404) 951-0600

Thomas Flannery forthcoming

Jay Curtis forthcoming

Mike Kawahara forthcoming

Benjamin Phister forthcoming

Mike Hess (717) 299-7382

Bruce Kline forhtcoming

John DePatto forhtcoming

Michael McDonald forthcoming

Lewis Schweller (609) 645-1111

Michael Orstein forthcoming

Mr. Tottaro, Asst. District Attorney (Lancaster) forthcoming

Marc Finegold (717) 392-7840

Pete Richter (717) 394-0547

Farmers Rrst Bank (717) 394-0547

Jill Carson (Fulton Bank) forthcoming

Norris Boyd (717) 569-0484 Cliff Weaver forthcoming

Ric Fox (717) 774-5244 Detective Bodan,

PA Attorney Generals Office forthcoming

Give the sequence of the abuse in detail from the beginning to end, providing the dates for all

occurrences and the names of the people involved in each occurrence.

See Roy Griffen's Chronology of December 20, 1991, pages 1 to 88.

Date Occurrence

See Roy Griffen's Chronology of December 20, 1991, pages 1 to 88

List out the specific harms resulting from the psychiatriC treatment which you are aware of:

Loss of professional and personal ruputation. Loss of income. Extreme sense of cuation when engaging in interpersonal

relationships. Extreme loss of respect among personal and professional peers. Complete and thourough mistrust for

psychiatric profession. Sense for the inadequate and abuse of psychiatric diagnosis, and familiarity and personal

experience of psychiatric abuse in order to support political, finandal, and or personal agendas and gains. Extreme loss

of dignity. Extreme loss of respect. Permanent psychological scares from experience. Extreme mental duress, stress,

and other related anxieties. Complete loss of faith of Psychiatric profession and related supporting systems, induding

law enforcement, judidal, and legislative, considering the pleas for help to resolve the criminal conspiracy in the early

stages of July, 1987.

Loss of Patent and intellectual property rights of Financial Management Group, Ltd., and Digital technologies, induding

the PSDMS (Power Station Digital Movie Sound).

Loss of Accumulated Business assets worth at least $2,500,000.

Do you have government connections personally or through family members? If so, what?

CCHR Abuse Case Interview Form (ver. 1.0), Jan, 1, 1992 Page 6 of S

-Federal contracts with the National Institute of Standards and Technology for CD-ROM manufacturing. Procurement for

same with the Defesnse Mapping Agency of the Department of Defense. Phillip Caterbone (brother), fellowship with

the National Institute of Health of Bethesda, Maryland (1990-1991). Samuel A. Caterbone (brother), military service,

USAF (1969-1971). Samuel Caterbone, Jr., (father), alleged assodation with the Central Intellegence Agency, CIA,

(disdosed by Dominic Roda, unde & Godfather, on November 17,1991, and by Midge Caterbone, aunt, on November

22, 1991. Both persons acknowledged the time period of 1974 to 1981 where the whereabouts of Sameul Caterbone

Jr. were unknown to all persons, induding all family members.

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 25 of 36 07116/2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 53 of 55 05.18.2009


Do you have family or friends who think you should undergo further psychiatric treatment?

See list. All persons have advocated the use of medication. Reasons were never disclosed. The persons would
especially disclose the belief for psychiatric treatment when I persued legal recourse for activities of 1987.

In all of the events, activities, and incidents described herein, No one, has ever stated any particular event or incident
to support the many allegations of mental illness. Any allegations, the suicide, financial bankruptcy, and others, have
always been proven to be fabricated, and I have always had sufficient evidence that they were fabricated. However,
to this day, I, have never had any opportunity to discuss all related affairs, contained herein, with the exception of the
4 hour meeting on September 29,1987, with the Pennsylvania Securities Commission. However, after that meeting, I
have not heard from the investigator, Mr. Howard Eisler, or any representative of the Pennsylvania Securities
Commission, until 2 months later, when I recieved a notice to put my complaint into writing.

In addition, during the preliminary hearing of the Criminal charges of September 3, 1987, my alleged attorney, Robert
Byers, refused to discuss any of my defenses, including that I was legally never terminated from the FMG, Ltd., Board
of directors, that I was an indiviual leaseholder of the building I allegedly burglarized, that all of the files taken were my
property, as well as others.

How do you feel about what psychiatry did to you?

Ruined my life, my businesses, my opportunity for income, and Virtually all relationships encountered prior to 1987.
Loss of all personal assets, including homes, monies, and business accomplishments. It is the single most reason for
the lack of any type of quality of life, which I presently am deprived, which will soon result in becoming homeless.

Have you contemplated taking any action against the psychiatrist or do -you want to take action? If
so, what?
Yes, civil suits to recover financial damages, personal and professional reputation, and punative damages for extreme
emotional and mental duress.

Any other comments or information you would like to provide?

This case is directly involved with a "Cover-Up" (criminal conspiracy) to supress my knowledge and allegations of
misconduct of Intemational Signal & Control (ISC), which I made public in May of 1987, and to ISC executive Larry
Resch on June 23, 1987, during a meeting at my office. I was a shareholder of ISC stock during that time. In addition,
Jere Sullivan and James Warner, both of whom personally fabricated allegations of isanity, were directly involved with
ISC. Jere Sullivan worked for United Chem Con, (Guerin company), and has been a business partner of Mr. Larry
Resch since 1987. James Wamer (Lancaster Solid Waste Management Authority) was working with attorny Steve
Spinello, of the law firm of Hartman, Underhill, & Brubaker, on the $50 million incinerator. Steven Spinello was also
negotiating the ISC merger with Ferranti International, of London, during the time inwhcih I made allegations of
misconduct regarding Mr. James Guerin, ISC, and United Chem Con. During this same tirne, Mr. James Warner made
repeated allegations of insanity, and also offiCially reported a fabricated allegation of suicide to authorities of the Stone
Harbor Police Department, of New Jeresy. Ferranti and ISC finally merged the following November, of 1987. In
September of 1987, I made allegations of fruad within ISC to Howard Eisler, an investigator with the Pennsyvania
Securities CommiSSion, during a 4 hour meeting in my home, 'that was solicited by the Pennsylvania Securities
Commission.

All allegations of insanity (surfacing in July of 1987 and continuing to present), conveniently discredited all of my
allegaitons of misconduct within ISC, its executives, and its operations, as well as my allegations of criminal conspiracy
and fruad by Robert Kauffman, Michael Hartlett, FMG, Ltd., executives, Commonwealth National Bank, as well as all
other related parties.

In 1989, Ferranti disclosed allegaitons of the "Billion Dollar Fraud" by James Guerin and ISC, by inflating the value of
ISC related contracts.

On October 31, 1991, ISC founder James Guerin, Larry Resch, and 17 others were indicted by a Philadelphia Federal
Grand Jury on charges of a "$ 1.14 Billion Fraud (Ferranti/ISC Merger of November, 1987)" and the illegal sales of
Arms to South Africa and Iraq. Mr. Guerin and Mr. Resch have since pleaded guilty to aU charges.

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 26 of 36 07116/2007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 54 of 55 05.18.2009


Thank you for filling out this survey. Please send it to us in the enclosed self addressed envelope.

As per my conversation with your representative on December 16, 1991, I would expect to receive a copy of your
findings, reports, and or conclusion of your investigation, for myself, as well as my legal representatives, and or their
agents.

Audio tapes of authentic recorded conversations of above inCidents, forthcoming. In addition, I possess the following
information assets, which, beyond a shadow of a doubt, collaborate, support, and prove all of the preceding:

Paper Documents
Audio Transcripts
Microfiche
VHS Video
CD-ROM
CD Audio
9- Track Tape
CD-ROM/CDTV Demo Discs
Full Color Photographs
News Articles
11,000
Appr. 18 Hours
9,079 Images
50 Hours
150 Megabytes (1 disc)
60 Minutes (1 disc)
2 Reels- P{v. 50400 Appr. 200

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 27 of 36 07/1612007

Stanley J. Caterbone Case No. 0514869 Page 55 of 55 05.18.2009


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200

MARCH 22, 2017

Ms. Lorita O'Leary or Case Manager


Citizens Commission for Human Rights
Lorita OLeary
Abuse Case Documenter
Citizens Commission for Human Rights International
6616 Sunset Blvd.,
Hollywood, CA 90028

Re: CASE UPDATE

Dear Lorita,

I would like to update my case file and file additional complaints. You will find a copy of my letter
to 2 Pennsylvania judges, the document is titled LETTER TO The Honorable Judge David Ashworth re
Case No. CI-16-08472 LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE March 22, 2017. I also
enclosed my previous complaint and your findings for your records since it has been more than 10 years.
You may contact me when you receive this at the above contact information.

Thank You for your help and interest.

Respectfully,

The first 33 pages is printed and the remaining 863 pages are on the CD-ROM

_______________________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly
discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within
International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a
$1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law
enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our
communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We
continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to
continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed
from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle
Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 1 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE

ACTIVE COURT CASES


J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT
OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION
TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-
3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-
49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR
HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-
0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-
1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472 INJUNCTION re Pain
Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case No. 16-10157

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 2 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200

MARCH 22, 2017

STAN J CATERBONE & ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP


INTERNET LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS

1. 7 SOCIAL MEDIA SITES

2. 23 NEW LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS, March 13, 2017

3. 84 INTERNET LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS, February 14,


2014

STAN J. CATERBONE & ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP


SOCIAL MEDIA SITES
_________________________

1. STAN J. CATERBONE'S WEBSITE www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

2. STAN J. CATERBONE'S YOUTUBE CHANNEL -


https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWqz_swlj5dsEvufnsJjRSQ

3. STAN J. CATERBONE'S TWITTER PAGE - https://twitter.com/SCaterbone

4. STAN J. CATERBONE'S SCRIBD PAGE FOR DOCUMENTS -


https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone

5. STAN J. CATERBONE'S LINKDIN PAGE - https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?


id=429457751&trk=nav_responsive_tab_profile_pic

6. STAN J. CATERBONE'S AUDIO RECORDINGS ON YOURLISTEN.COM


http://yourlisten.com/Stan.Caterbone

7. STAN J. CATERBONE'S AUDIO RECORDINGS ON SOUNDCLOUD -


https://soundcloud.com/stan-caterbone?
utm_source=soundcloud&utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=twitter

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 3 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE
23 NEW LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS

1. Case No. 17-cv-867-EGS Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief MOTION TO


FILE EXHIBIT TITLED LETTER TO HUNTINGTON BANK ANDREW GRIMMIT re
Liquidation Offer March 21, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/342581480/Case-No-17-cv-867-EGS-
Preliminary-Injunction-for-Emergency-Relief-MOTION-TO-FILE-EXHIBIT-TITLED-
LETTER-TO-HUNTINGTON-BANK-ANDREW-GRIMMIT-re-Liquidati

2. LETTER to HIGH INDUSTRIES re MARRIOTT BAR THREATS, HARASSMENT, THEFT


OF MONIES March 13, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/341731227/Letter-to-High-Industries-Re-
MARRIOTT-HOTEL-BAR-Threats-Harassment-Theft-of-Monies-March-13-2017

3. FEDERAL PRIVATE CRIMINAL NOTARIZED COMPLAINT Filed in U.S. EASTERN


DISTRICT COURT March 12, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/341681228/FEDERAL-PRIVATE-CRIMINAL-
NOTARIZED-COMPLAINT-Filed-in-U-S-EASTERN-DISTRICT-COURT-March-12-2017

4. History of the Internet - DARPA and Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group
March 12, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/341681178/History-of-the-
Internet-DARPA-and-Stan-J-Caterbone-and-Advanced-Media-Group-March-12-
2017

5. WIKILEAKS CIA DATA DUMP re 100 NAMED TARGETED INDIVIDUALS OF MIND


CONTROL https://www.scribd.com/document/341681162/TARGETED-
INDIVIDUAL-TESTIMONIES-AND-LISTS-Our-Selected-Witnesses-by-WIKILEAKS-
March-10-2017

6. CHAPTER 11 CASE No. 10615 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO JUDGE RICHARD FEHLINGS


ORDER OF FEBRUARY 28, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/341519915/Chapter-11-17-10615REF-
NOTICE-OF-APPEAL-TO-U-S-DISTRICT-COURT-FOR-THE-EASTERN-DISTICT-OF-
PENNSYLVANIA-OF-JUDGE-RICHARD-FEHLINGS-ORDER-of-February-28

7. 02101-NT-000214-2016 ORDER BY LANCASTER COUNTY COMMON PLEAS JUDGE


MERRIS SPAHN GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION
https://www.scribd.com/document/341298288/STAN-J-CATERBONE-MJ-02101-
NT-0001214-2016-re-NOISE-TOO-LOUD-ORDER-by-JUDGE-MERRILL-SPAHN-IN-
FORMA-PAUPERIS-GRANTED-APPEAL-DOCKETED-February-22-201

8. STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP INVOICES AND STATEMENTS


OF MARCH 8, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/341298279/Advanced-
Media-Group-INVOICES-and-STATEMENTS-for-March-8-2017

9. NOTARIZED ENOUGH IS ENOUGH DECLARATION BY STAN J. CATERBONE MARCH 5,


2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/341018022/NOTARIZED-ENOUGH-IS-
ENOUGH-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-on-March-2-2017-and-Case-No-CI-16-08472-
EMERGENCY-INJUNCTION-FOR-PAIN-MEDICATIONS-March-5-2017

10.LETTER TO MATHEW HAVERSTICK, ATTORNEY FOR SCOTT MARTIN re MARTINE v.


LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF MARK REESE FOR IMPEACHMENT
https://www.scribd.com/document/340996107/Stan-J-Caterbone-LETTER-to-
Matthew-H-Haverstick-re-MARTIN-v-Reese-CI-17-04626-March-5-2017

11.STAN J. CATERBONE NEW CASE IN U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT IN EASTERN


DISTRICT CASE No. 17-867 CATERBONE v. NSA, et.al., PRELIMINARY INJUCTION
UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 4 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE
FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF https://www.scribd.com/document/340923402/STAN-
J-CATERBONE-NEW-CASE-Case-No-17-cv-00867-EGS-Preliminary-Injunction-for-
EMERGENCY-RELIEF-in-U-S-EASTERN-District-of-Pennsylvania-March-4-20

12.KATHLEEN KANE APPEAL CASE IN SUPERIOR COURT OPINION OF MONTGOMERY


COUNTY COURT OF MARCH 2, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340823932/Superior-Court-of-Pennsylvania-
Case-No-3575-EDA-2016-MONTGOMERY-COUNTY-OPINION-AND-STAN-J-
CATERBONE-AMICUS-March-2-2017

13.STAN J. CATERBONE LETTER TO PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS re ANTI-


STALKING PROPOSED LEGISLATION OF MARCH 3, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340823930/STAN-J-CATERBONE-LETTER-TO-
THE-PENNSYLVANIA-STATE-LEGISLATORS-March-3-2017

14.STAN J. CATERBONE NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT FOR LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF


COMMON PLEAS CASE CI-17-00206 SAVAGE v. Dave Brown re LAMBERT BOOK
https://www.scribd.com/document/340736354/LANCASTER-COUNTY-COURT-OF-
COMMON-PLEAS-Cases-No-CI-17-00206-SAVAGE-v-BROWN-et-al-re-AFFIDAVIT-
of-ENOUGH-IS-ENOUGH-March-2-2017

15.NOTORIZED DECLARATION TITLED ENOUGH IS ENOUGH BY STAN J. CATERBONE


ON MARCH 1, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/340618722/ENOUGH-is-
ENOUGH-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-on-March-1-2017

16.LETTER TO TARGETED INDIVIDUAL ABBE EDISON OF PITTSBURG, PA re ADVISE


ON COUNTER TECHNIQUES
https://www.scribd.com/document/340479872/LETTER-TO-ABBE-EDISON-
February-27-2017

17.CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY CASE No. 17-10615 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION


OF JUDGE RICHARD FEHLINGS DISMISSAL OF FEBRUARY 26, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340479838/Chapter-11-17-10615REF-
MOTION-FOR-RECONSIDERATION-OF-JUDGE-FEHLINGS-ORDER-OF-FEBRUARY-16-
2017-February-26-2017

18.PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE COMPLAINT No. 055746172-0101 re


GEICO COMPLAINT FOR ACCIDENT OF FEBRUARY 28, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340354393/PENNSYLVANIA-DEPARTMENT-
OF-INSURANCE-COMPLAINT-re-STAN-J-CATERBONE-GEICO-CLAIM-NUMBER-
055746172-0101-030-with-AFFIDAVIT-February-25-2017

19.STAN J. CATERBONE LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CASE No. CI-
08-13373 PREACIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS MASON PFLUMM et.al., February 25,
2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/340354387/Lancaster-County-Court-
Case-No-08-CI-13373-re-PRAECIPE-TO-ADD-DEFENDANTS-February-25-2017

20.PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE COMPLAINT No. 055746172-0101 re


GEICO COMPLAINT FOR ACCIDENT OF FEBRUARY 28, 2017 WITH NOTARIZED
AFFIDAVIT https://www.scribd.com/document/340278864/PENNSYLVANIA-
DEPARTMENT-OF-INSURANCE-COMPLAINT-re-STAN-J-CATERBONE-GEICO-CLAIM-
NUMBER-055746172-0101-030-with-NOTARIZED-AFFIDAVIT-February-25-20

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 5 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE
21.STAN J. CATERBONE NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT FOR LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF
COMMON PLEAS CASE CI-17-00206 SAVAGE v. Dave Brown re REQUEST FOR
APPEARANCE AND AMICUS BRIEF
https://www.scribd.com/document/339729747/STAMPED-VERSION-LANCASTER-
COUNTY-COURT-OF-COMMON-PLEAS-Cases-No-CI-17-00206-SAVAGE-v-BROWN-
et-al-REQUEST-FOR-APPEARANCE-and-AMICUS-BRIEF-Febr

22.STAN J. CATERBONE LETTER TO PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS re ANTI-


STALKING PROPOSED LEGISLATION OF FEBRUARY 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/339421116/STAN-J-CATERBONE-LETTER-TO-
THE-PENNSYLVANIA-STATE-LEGISLATORS-February-15-2017

23.STAN J. CATERBONE'S PHOTO INVENTORY OF 1250 FREMONT STREET HOME,


LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA OF FEBRUARY 14, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/339337180/STAN-J-CATERBONE-1250-
FREMONT-STREET-LANCASTER-PA-INVENTORY-February-14-2017

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 6 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE
84 INTERNET LINKS OF EVIDENCE OF ALL CLAIMS

. ERIC COHEN AND ROBERT BERUBE, Federal Public Defender for Esteban Santiago, Ft.
Lauderdale Shooter, INVOICE AND FEE SCHEDULE January 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337072519/ERIC-COHEN-Federal-Public-Defender-
for-Esteban-Santiago-Ft-Lauderdale-Shooter-INVOICE-AND-FEE-SCHEDULE-January-20-
2017

. STAN CATERBONE NAMED AMICUS FOR KATHLEEN KANE Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case
No. 3575 EDA 2016 FRIDAY JANUARY 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337120127/STAN-CATERBONE-NAMED-AMICUS-FOR-
KATHLEEN-KANE-Superior-Court-of-Pennsylvania-Case-No-3575-EDA-2016-FRIDAY-
JANUARY-20-2017

. WHISTLEBLOWERS KAREN STEWART AND STAN CATERBONE A Candid Discussion of


Electronic Harassment Protocols, January 11, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336256943/WHISTLEBLOWERS-KAREN-STEWART-
AND-STAN-CATERBONE-A-Candid-Discussion-of-Electronic-Harassment-Protocols-January-
11-2017

.The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking Program


https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/surreptitious-reincarnation-cointelpro-cops-program-
stan-caterbone

. Video: Media Blacks Out Edward Snowdens Talk On COINTELPRO & History Of Mass
Surveillance
http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-media-blacks-out-edward-snowdens-talk-on-
cointelpro-history-of-mass-surveillance/224222/

. Letters: Snowden deserves pardon by John and Bonnie Raines, Philadelphia of the Citizens
Commission to Investigate the FBI in 1971
http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20170119_Letters__Snowden_deserves_pardon.ht
ml

. Legal Implications of the Soviet Microwave Bombardment of the U.S. Embassy


https://www.scribd.com/document/336787302/Legal-Implications-of-the-1959-Soviet-
Microwave-Bombardment-of-the-U-S-Embassy-January-17-2017

THE COMPUTER HACKER WANTS THIS FREE SPACE


SO HAVE AT IT - ASSHOLE

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 7 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE
. Congressman Robert Walker Pleading July 7 1991 Important
https://www.scribd.com/document/270267368/Congressman-Robert-Walker-Pleading-
July-7-1991-Important

. That time the CIA was convinced a self-proclaimed psychic had paranormal abilities
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/01/19/that-time-the-cia-
was-convinced-a-self-proclaimed-psychic-had-paranormal-abilities/?
postshare=8421484844095309&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.b487b6ae00e7

. Obama's most enduring legacy may be the establishment of the modern US surveillance state
http://www.businessinsider.com/obamas-most-enduring-legacy-the-modern-us-
surveillance-state-2017-1

. The Extortion of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pa by COINTELPRO PROGRAMS January 17,
2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336832214/The-Extortion-of-220-Stone-Hill-Road-
Conestoga-Pa-by-COINTELPRO-PROGRAMS-January-17-2017

. AMG LEGAL SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE Mastered on April 16, 1991 at Commadore Inc., January 17,
2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787897/AMG-LEGAL-SYSTEMS-PROTOTYPE-
Mastered-on-April-16-1991-at-Commadore-Inc-January-17-2017

. Stan J. Caterbone, Controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., 1993 to 1998 January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787739/Stan-J-Caterbone-Controller-of-Pflumm-
Contractors-Inc-1993-to-1998-January-17-2017

14. Sam Lombardo and Raolph Mazzochi Charlotte Street Proposal by Advanced Media Group
and Stan J. Caterbone January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787416/Sam-Lombardo-and-Raolph-Mazzochi-
Charlotte-Street-Proposal-by-Advanced-Media-Group-and-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-17-2017

15. B2B Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16, 2017


https://www.scribd.com/document/336787303/B2B-Consulting-From-1999-to-2002-January-
16-2017

16. 1999 Excelsior Place Business Plan by Stan J. Caterbone January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336719627/1999-Excelsior-Place-Business-Plan-by-Stan-
J-Caterbone-January-16-2017

17. Stan J. Caterbone AIM MUTUAL FUNDS Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336738750/Stan-J-Caterbone-AIM-MUTUAL-FUNDS-
Consulting-From-1999-to-2002-January-16-2017

18. Pro Financial Group Brochure and Eastern Regional Free Agent Camp by Stan J. Caterbone
January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336704842/Pro-Financial-Group-Brochure-and-Eastern-
Regional-Free-Agent-Camp-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-16-2017

19. STAN J. CATERBONE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP JOINT VENTURE WITH DALE HIGH January
15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637179/56-STAN-J-CATERBONE-ADVANCED-MEDIA-
GROUP-JOINT-VENTURE-WITH-DALE-HIGH-January-15-2017

20. Institutional Investors Mortgage Banking Business Development of 1987 January 15, 2017

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 8 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637178/58-Institutional-Investors-Mortgage-
Banking-Business-Development-of-1987-January-15-2017

21. 1987 JOINT VENTURE - Tony Bongiovi, Power Station Studios, and Flatbush Films with Stan
J. Caterbone January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637176/55-1987-JOINT-VENTURE-Tony-Bongiovi-
Power-Station-Studios-and-Flatbush-Films-with-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-15-2017

22. STAN J. CATERBONE'S Financial Management Group, Ltd., Anti-Trust Litigation File of
October 17, 2015
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637173/57-STAN-J-CATERBONE-S-Financial-
Management-Group-Ltd-Anti-Trust-Litigation-File-of-October-17-2015

23. FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence Agencies


November 12, 2016
https://www.scribd.com/document/329761557/FALSE-IMPRISONMENT-AND-ILLEGAL-
INTERROGATIONS-by-U-S-Intelligence-Agencies-and-U-S-Sponsored-Mind-Control-EVIDENCE-
November-2-2016

24. Letter REQUEST for COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to President
Obama, November 15, 2016

25. Stan J. Caterbone and Conflicts With the Trump Administration - Monday November 14,
2016 | False Claims Act | Military

26. STAN J. CATERBONE and the DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE Documents and Evidence of
Conspiracy to .... Saturday November 12, 2016

27. Feds Probe Fulton Bank and 3 Other Subsidiary Banks of Fulton Financial With Stan J.
Caterbone Civil Actions and Mind Control Research of Monday November 9, 2016 |

28. Robert Gates

29. Letter to James Comey, Director of FBI Re Cointelpro Used to Obstruct Justice Monday
November 28, 2016 | Federal Bureau Of Investigation | Central Intelligence Agency

30. VITALLY IMPORTANT - LETTER and DOCUMENT to Cappello & Noel, LLP of Santa Barbara,
CA Friday November 25, 2016

31. Report of Douglas F Gansler/Kathleen Kane on Misuse of Commonwealth Email Systems


November 22, 2016 Published by ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP |

32. Pro Se Legal Representation In The United States | Motion In United States Law

33. Lancaster Mayor Rick Gray Says There is Room for Improvement in Police
34. Communication - CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Bureau, et.al., November 22, 2016 |
Central Intelligence Agency

35. Chapter 12 - ROHYPNOL AND SATELLITE and Chapter 11 - NEIGHBORS FROM HELL, from
Satellite Terrorism in America, by Dr. John Hall Copyright 2009

36. | J. Edgar Hoover | Federal Bureau Of Investigation

37. JIM GUERIN, FOUNDER OF ISC, FAREWELL LETTER OF 1989 December 26, 2016 | Justice |
Government

38. CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON Candidate for JUDGESHIP and His 1987 EFFORT FOR MY
GUARDIANSHIP Friday December 16, 2016

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 9 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE

39. ANOTHER LANCASTER COVER-UP THE SALE OF THE MASONIC HALL IN THE CITY OF
LANCASTER, by The Advanced Media Group, December 15, 2016 | Fraternal Service
Organizations

40. Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com TOTALS and MONTHLY From


May of 2016 to January 2017 - January 10, 2017

41. My Friend and Colleague Soleilmavis Liu of China a Victim of Mind Control Living in China
Who Started Peacepink- August 28, 2016

42. TD Ameritrade TRADEKEEPER PROFIT-LOSS FOR 2004 TRADES and 2017 FULTON STOCK
January 9, 2017

43. POLICE INCIDENT REPORTS OF PHYSICAL ASSAULTS FOR STAN J. CATERBONE 2005 TO
2016 January 6, 2017

44. Judiciaries

45. UPDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS re CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Department US


District Court Case 08-cv-08982 December 28, 2016

46. Section 504 Of The Rehabilitation Act | Rehabilitation Act Of 1973

47. UPDATED - EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as Targeted Individuals of


U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and Related Hearings and Lectures, December 27, 2016

48. Torture

49. Stan J. Caterbone on Twitter: "I'm reading FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL
INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence... on @Scribd! https://t.co/T3D9nIYvMt #ReadMore"

50. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 re PRAECIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS COMEY
AND TRUMP REMOVE OBAMA January 23, 2017

51. INVOICE AND Letter to James Comey, Director of FBI Re Pro Se Billings Invoice Wednesday
November 30, 2016

52. Kathy Harrison (KATHLEEN HARRISON NAMED IN SAVAGE SUIT v. Dave Brown) Email Re Bi
Polar March 10, 2005

53. The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking Program -
Lancaster City Police Strategic Plan, August 24, 2016

54. LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Cases No. CI-17-00210 and CI-17-00206
BOWMAN and SAVAGE v. BROWN, et.al.,

55. REQUEST FOR APPEARANCE and AMICUS BRIEF January 25, 2017.pdf | Amicus Curiae |
National Security Agency

56. Family of Karlie Hall files suit against Millersville University, others; calls death preventable
January 25, 2017 | Law Reference | Government

57. Stan J. Caterbone Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Filled in Forms January 27, 2017

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 10 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE
58. U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT ISSUANCE LETTER FOR NEW CASE NO. 17-10615-ref To Judge
Fehling Friday January 27, 2017

59. Stan J. Caterbone Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case No. 17-10615 Judge Fehling Filed On
January 27, 2017 - CASE FILE | Plea | Defamation

60. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 EXHIBIT re THE DONALD TRUMP
PRESIDENCY and STAN J. CATERBONE as of January 28, 2017 - electronically filed | Federal
Bureau Of Investigation | Nasa

61. ACCIDENT REPORT NO. 1701-029468 LANCASTER CITY POLICE OFFICER REPPERT
SATURDAY JANUARY 28, 2017

62. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 PRAECIPE TO AMEND COMPLAINT January
29, 2017 - FILED ELECTRONICALLY January 29, 2017

63. Stewart Baker - Wikipedia

64. 16-cv-2513 Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief in Middle District NOTICE OF
APPEAL TO USCA THIRD CIRCUIT January 26, 2017 | Defamation

65. Homeowners Rehab Application File of June 8, 2015 - COINTELPRO EXTORTION MODEL
RESULTS January 30, 2017

66. Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se, U.S.C.A. Third Circuit BRIEF STATEMENT OF JUDICIAL
MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY of February 1, 2017

67. PLAINTIFF Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF
EASTERN DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA With IFP and Civil Cover Sheet - on February 2, 2017

68. Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 17-10615REF SUBMITTALS FOR FEBRUARY 3 - February 2,


2017

69. Jeremy Scahill on Donald Trump and the Military-Industrial Complex - Truthdig
In an interview with acTVism, the investigative journalist also discusses the
70. significance of the Ramstein Air Base in Germany. - 2017/02/02

71. Pennsylvania State Police Liquor Control Enforcement Formal Complaint AGAINST
DOWNTOWN LANCASTER BARS, August 12, 2016 | Lawsuit | United States Courts Of Appeals

72. Case No. CI-16-08472 EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR PAIN MEDICATIONS - Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas September 21, 2016 - CRIMINAL ACT OF TORTURE |

73. Torture LAW and the United States - Wikipedia by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP, February 4, 2017

74. CI-16-08472 DOCKET SHEET February 3, 2017 and Torture LAW and the United States -
Wikipedia by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, February 4, 2017

75. LIP News - CORRUPTION IN THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND LNP -
February 4, 2017

76. LETTER to Andrew Wallet re Britney Spears Conservatorship February 4, 2017

78. 16-Cv-2513 Preliminary Injunction for EMERGENCY RELIEF in Middle District ORDER by
JUDGE KANE TRANSFER to EASTERN DISTRICT PHIL January 31, 2017

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 11 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE

79. Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board LETTER Re 2016-788 (Asworth) 2016-789 (Reinaker)
February 2, 2017

80. Chapter 11 17-10615ref REORGANIZATION PLAN February 7, 2017 | Bankruptcy | Chapter

81. Chapter 11 17-10615REF STAN J. CATERBONE CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN and


DISCLOSURE STATEMENT February 7, 2017

82. Third Circuit Senior Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, who is President Donald Trump&rsquo;s
older sister, decided this week to go inactive on the bench, relinquishing her staff and
chambers despite being scheduled to hear cases this year.

83. STAN J. CATERBONE June 18, 2008 US District Court Case 08-02982 CATERBONE v.
Lancaster City Police Bureau, et.al., CASE FILE | Complaint

84.STAN J. CATERBONE MJ-02101-NT-0000470-2017 DUTIES AT STOP SIGN - MOTION TO


DISMISS February 12, 2017

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 12 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE

amgroup01@msn.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
Blog: http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/
Research Blog: www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com
Video Biography at: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=advancedmediagroup

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

January 4, 2008

Ms. Lorita O'Leary


Citizens Commission for Human Rights
Lorita OLeary
Abuse Case Documenter
Citizens Commission for Human Rights International
6616 Sunset Blvd.,
Hollywood, CA 90028

Re: 2008 CCHR Whisteblowers Psychiatric Abuse Complaint Form

Dear Lorita,

It has been a while since I have spoken to you. I am very busy with an extensive litigation schedule and
have not had the opportunity to complete my complaint for your organization.

If you notice, I have posted my 1st complaint with CCHR in 1992 on my website.

I have approached the County of Lancaster and had talks regarding the opportunity for mediation to
resolve some the conflicts between myself and others, including law enforcement. I have an upcoming
meeting scheduled with the Lancaster Mediation Center, of Lancaster. Hopefully this will provide me
with some much needed relief.

I am also actively litigating my complaint against the Lancaster General Hospital for the psychiatric
abuse during the 5-day evaluation on April 5 to April 10, 2006. Unfortunately, I have to also defend a
host of obstruction of justice violations and judicial misconduct at the same time.

It is quite time consuming when the Law Enforcement community-at-large helps to cover up this atrocious
scandal. I have been told in a recent visit to the Harrisburg Office of U.S. Senator Arlen Specter that
they are revisiting my allegations of judicial misconduct and obstruction of justice. I have been
communicating with Senator Specter since 1991 on these very same matters. Sometimes with issues as
complex and political as these, it takes time.

I have also amassed a great deal of research for my case. You can view it on my research blog at
www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com

I also need to update my research for that blog. I will send you notices when it is updated. I was
wondering if you are familiar with Cheryl Walsh of Mind Justice.org?

Below is an interesting article regarding a recent conference held in Vienna on December 5,


2007 for the eradication of the deadly weapons called cluster bombs. The conference attracted
130 countries and 575 people. There is a worldwide contingency trying to make the cluster bombs illegal
for countries to use in conflicts. So far, there have been as many as 100,000 civilian deaths due to the
cluster bombs.

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 13 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE
The company that I was a shareholder of and eventually began to blow the whistle for fraud was ISC. ISC
was a leader in the design and manufacturing of cluster bombs, and had eventually sold the
cluster bombs to South African through to Iraq.See 2003 Dossier Iraqgate. Israel was also
accused of using the cluster bombs against Lebanon in the Israeli Lebanon War in 2006.

Attached is an article about ISC and the Cluster Bombs when ABC News 20/20 aired a national broadcast
episode on exposing ISC and the sales of cluster bombs to Iraq. It aired on February 1, 1991 during the
Persian Gulf War. ISC and company executives were convicted in 1992 of export violations and a $1
Billion Dollar Fraud. The executive that I had the meeting with in 1997, Mr. Larry Resch, was finally
sentenced in 1997.

I had recently been able to archive the ISC related articles on my computer after several years of
computer hacking, and learned that they had convened a new grand jury as late as 1997 to further
investigate ISC.

I also recently learned that James Guerin, founder and CEO, had bank accounts at Fulton Bank, which is
one of the leading defendants in my federal civil actions in US District Court and the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals. (See the attached article)

I am also in talks with the Board of Directors of Fulton Financial Corporation (a $ billion dollar
enterprise) regarding my recent demands for the resignation R. Scott Smith, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer. Fulton is trying to determine the credibility of my accusations of negligence and
misconduct. I am also a shareholder of Fulton Financial, which is in the midst of the subprime meltdown.

Fulton Financial has lost 1/3 of their stock value in one year, and the current Board of Directors is under
pressure to return shareholder value to it's current shareholders. There are others that have called for the
CEO's resignation off the record.

I have written extensively about the subprime woes and how they have been affecting Fulton Financial
on the Yahoo Stock message board.

You can read about ISC on my website. If you click on the top 2 links at the top of the page, you can
view the news broadcasts of the indictments.

This is the link to the second broadcast from my website.

Hopefully, I will begin to draft my complaint in the 1st or 2nd quarter of 2008.

The following is the article titled Bomb: War's deadly legacy To ban the (cluster) bomb printed in the
Lancaster Newspapers Sunday News edition on Sunday, December 23, 2007 regarding the Vienna
Conference to Ban the Cluster Bomb; which was in large part designed my Lancaster-based ISC.

Well, there's an even greater right, and that's the right of life, liberty and to live crime-free."
Craig Stedman
Lancaster County District Attorney
January 3, 2008 Lancaster Intelligencer Journal
Advanced Media Group
Stan J. Caterbone
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Visit Our Blog For Journey of a Whistleblower
Visit Our Blog For Research Into ESP - Mental Telepathy & The U.S. Governments Activities
Visit Our Video Biography

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987
due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC
pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation
and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our
communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for
justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media
Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. Number 7.

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 14 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE
Some 575 people from more than 130 countries came to the table in Vienna, according to
Peachey, who represented the Mennonite Central Committee.

According to "Fatal Footprint," a report published last year by Handicap International, 98


percent of known cluster bomb victims are civilians.

The British-based organization estimated that the bombs have killed or injured more than
100,000 people worldwide.
Vienna Human Rights Conference
to Ban Cluster Bombs
December, 5 2007

Sunday News
December 23, 2007

Bomb: War's deadly legacy To ban the (cluster)


bomb
ISC Technologies, Inc., Cluster Bomb Patent of February 26, 1988
Americas big dirty secret
ISC, Advanced Media Group, and the Whistleblower

December 19, 2007 - US Congress Takes Action Against Cluster Bomb Deadly duds Area man says push to
eradicate munitions gaining ground.

By Jon Rutter, Sunday News Staff Writer, jrutter@lnpnews.com

A cluster bomb severely injured Salima Barakt after the middle-aged woman picked up a broom and
started sweeping the steps of her home in southern Lebanon last year.

Another anti-personnel device fatally wounded her countryman, Ahmad Mokaled, who was playing in a
park on his fifth birthday, in 1999.

Also that year, Sulikhan Asukhanova, a young girl who had been selling food at a market, lost her right
arm during a cluster munitions strike in Chechnya.

The lopsidedly civilian cluster bomb toll has mounted steadily since the United States began widespread
use of the weapons in the mid-1960s.

Lancaster resident Titus Peachey has worked for years to try to stop the carnage.

Now, says Peachey, who returned earlier this month from a cluster bomb conference in Austria, the world
might be getting somewhere.

Some 575 people from more than 130 countries came to the table in Vienna, according to Peachey, who
represented the Mennonite Central Committee.

The four-year-old Cluster Munition Coalition has scheduled upcoming conferences in Wellington, New
Zealand, and Dublin, Ireland, with the goal of adopting a treaty by the end of 2008.

Peachey said the ban aims to put international pressure on nations that do not support it.

The idea gained traction last year after Israeli forces carpeted southern Lebanon with some 3.5 million
cluster bombs after the announcement of a cease-fire.

While munitions makers claim that new-generation heat and shape sensing fuzes detonate bombs as
designed 99 percent of the time, opponents contend that the dud rate remains much higher in the field.
UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 15 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017
Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE

Key cluster bomb users and stockpilers such as the United States, Russia, China and the United Kingdom
oppose an overall ban.

Cluster bombs can blow up decades after they're sown, said Peachey, who became involved in programs
to clear unexploded ordnance and assist victims in southeast Asia more than two decades ago.

"I've walked past and around many, many of these things in Laos," he added, recalling villagers who too
often handle them nonchalantly.

"They kill long after they're dropped. There are still a lot of them in the ground."

The opposition movement grew out of an earlier campaign that culminated in a landmine ban in 1997.

Today, said Peachey, the MCC director of peace education, stockpiles of mines are falling. Even nations
that did not sign the treaty, such as the United States, have largely refrained from deploying new mines.
But cluster bombs remain a key military strategy. The multi-billion dollar cluster munitions industry is
going strong.

Millions of unexploded bomblets still lie scattered across Southeast Asia, Africa, Southeast Europe, Russia
and the Middle East.

Some of the projectiles can pierce armor. Opponents say they're deadlier overall than mines.

Cluster bomblets are typically packed by the hundreds into canisters designed to fly apart in midair. The
resulting spinning motion arms the bomblets on the way down and prepares them to detonate on impact.

But much can go wrong, Peachey said.

Fuzes can malfunction. Bomblets hang up in trees or brush and then explode when someone cuts the
vegetation.

While some of the duds are nearly impossible to activate, others remain on a hair trigger. Pick them up or
nudge them with a spade or a plow and they go off.

According to "Fatal Footprint," a report published last year by Handicap International, 98 percent of known
cluster bomb victims are civilians.

The British-based organization estimated that the bombs have killed or injured more than 100,000 people
worldwide.

Roughly 200 Laotians die by cluster bomb every year, according to Peachey, who said about 80 million
bomblets still litter the country. "In southern Lebanon, they think roughly 30 percent did not blow up."

At MCC headquarters in Akron, Peachey fingered a jagged metal shard about 3 inches long. "This is a
piece of shrapnel from a cluster bomb I found in Iraq," he said. "If it was flying at you ... ooooh."

Shrapnel did cut down Branislav Kapetanovic in 2000 as he was trying to disarm a cluster bomb at an
airport in Serbia. He addressed the Vienna conference from his wheelchair.

"He has two stumps for arms and he has no legs," Peachey said.

Also attending was Raed Mokaled, the father of the 5-year-old boy who died after he picked up a cluster
bomb in Nabatieh, Lebanon.

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 16 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE
Peachey said a disproportionate percentage of cluster bomb victims are young boys, who are apt to play
with the artifacts they find.

"There were a lot of sad stories," he said.

Long active in public advocacy and education about cluster bombs, MCC recently sponsored a local tour of
cluster bomb speakers, including two people each from Laos and Lebanon.

In Vienna, the group joined Human Rights Watch and other civil society organizations in urging the world
to stop making, selling, stockpiling and transporting cluster bombs.

Norway and Belgium have banned investments in banks that finance bomb makers.

Belgium was the first country to adopt a comprehensive ban on cluster bombs, in 2006.

If enough countries sign, Peachey said, "then there's a very negative stigma attached to using [cluster
bombs]. Manufacturers pay attention to these international meetings."

Brian Grace, a spokesman for Alliant Techsystems Inc., said in an e-mail that his company does not make
any weapons covered by the proposed treaty.

Cluster bomb opponents claim that the Minnesota-based company is one of more than a dozen arms
merchants that produce, or have produced, key cluster bomb components.

Last week, meanwhile, Congress adopted an omnibus appropriations package that would limit American
cluster bomb sales.

Provisions from a bill by Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., would prohibit the export of munitions that do not
meet the 1-percent "dud rate" threshold, according to McGovern spokesman Michael Mershon.
Peachey said much of the success of the worldwide anti-cluster bomb effort hinges on how broadly the
proposed treaty defines the weapons. An unqualified ban remains a distant goal.

Until then, the cleanup of the explosives continues the old-fashioned way, with metal detectors and
probes.

The work is slow and risky, said Peachey, who added that many people in cluster bomb zones must
cultivate their land whether it has been cleared or not.

"The world has become more and more horrified" by the spectacle," Peachey said.

UPDATE AND COMPLAINT TO CCHR Page 17 of 17 Wednesday March 22, 2017


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
What is CCHR? http://www.cchr.org/about-us/what-is-cchr.html

1-800-869-2247 Order CCHRInt.org Language Contact

SEARCH

ABOUT US VIDEOS TRUTH ABOUT PSYCHIATRY ALTERNATIVES TAKE ACTION ORDER

The Citizens Commission on


Human Rights was originally
formed in 1969 as a global
watchdog committed to
investigating and exposing human
rights violations in the field of
mental health. From its
headquarters in Los Angeles,
CCHR coordinates activities
amongst its chapters around the
world.

HOME ABOUT US WHAT IS CCHR? Next

SUBSCRIBE WHAT IS THE CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN


TO CCHR NEWS
RIGHTS?
The Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) is a nonprofit mental health watchdog,
responsible for helping to enact more than 150 laws protecting individuals from abusive or
coercive practices. CCHR has long fought to restore basic inalienable human rights to the
FREE INFORMATION KIT field of mental health, including, but not limited to, full informed consent regarding the
AND DVD
medical legitimacy of psychiatric diagnosis, the risks of psychiatric treatments, the right to
all available medical alternatives and the right to refuse any treatment considered harmful.

CCHR was co-founded in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and Professor of Psychiatry
Emeritus Dr. Thomas Szasz at a time when patients were being warehoused in institutions
and stripped of all constitutional, civil and human rights.

CCHR functions solely as a mental health watchdog, working alongside many medical

Restoring Human Rights and


professionals including doctors, scientists, nurses and those few psychiatrists who have
Dignity to the Field of Mental taken a stance against the biological/drug model of disease that is continually promoted
Health
by the psychiatric/pharmaceutical industry as a way to sell drugs. It is a nonpolitical,
Order a Free nonreligious, nonprofit organization dedicated solely to eradicating mental health abuse
Citizens Commission on and enacting patient and consumer protections. CCHRs Board of Advisers, called
Human Rights Information Kit
Commissioners, include doctors, scientists, psychologists, lawyers, legislators, educators,
business professionals, artists and civil and human rights representatives.

People frequently ask if CCHR is of the opinion that no one should ever take psychiatric
drugs, but this website is not dedicated to opinion. It is dedicated to providing information
About Us that a multibillion dollar psycho/pharmaceutical industry does not want people to see or to
know. The real question therefore is this: Do people have a right to have all the information
What is CCHR?
about (A) the known risks of the drugs and/or treatment from unbiased, nonconflicted
Accomplishments
medical review, (B) the medical validity of the diagnosis for which drugs are being
Message from the President
prescribed, (C) all nondrug options (essentially informed consent) and (D) the right to
Board of Advisors
refuse any treatment they consider harmful.
Leadership
CCHR has worked for more than forty years for full informed consent in the field of mental
CCHR Financials
health, and the right to all the information regarding psychiatric diagnoses and treatment,
Mental Health Declaration
not just the information coming from those with a vested interest in keeping the public in
Psychiatry: An Industry of
the dark.
Death Museum
CCHR Global Locator It is in this spirit that we present you with videos, blogs, news, medical experts and
information designed to arm you with facts.

CCHR As a nonprofit organization, it is through public donations that we are able to continue our
CHAPTERS WORLDWIDE

1 of 2 11/6/2015 12:42 AM
CCHR4 decades of accomplishments http://www.cchr.org/about-us/cchr-accomplishments.html

1-800-869-2247 Order CCHRInt.org Language Contact

SEARCH

ABOUT US VIDEOS TRUTH ABOUT PSYCHIATRY ALTERNATIVES TAKE ACTION ORDER

For more than forty years, CCHR


has carried the torch for human
rights in the field of mental health,
earning numerous recognitions
from government bodies,
legislatures and community
organizations worldwide.

HOME ABOUT US ACCOMPLISHMENTS Prev Next

SUBSCRIBE ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THE


TO CCHR NEWS
CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Bringing Psychiatry to Justice for More than Four Decades
The Citizens Commision Commission on Human Rights has been on the front lines of
mental health reform since 1969. Acknowledged by the Special Rapporteur to the United
FREE INFORMATION KIT
AND DVD Nations Human Rights Commission as responsible for many great reforms that protect
people from psychiatric abuse, CCHR has documented thousands of individual cases that
demonstrate psychiatric drugs and often-brutal psychiatric practices create insanity and
cause violence.

Over the course of more than four decades, CCHR's work has helped to save the lives of
millions and prevented needless suffering for millions more. Many countries have now
mandated informed consent for psychiatric treatment and the right to legal representation,
advocacy, recourse and compensation for patients. In some countries, the use of
Restoring Human Rights and
Dignity to the Field of Mental psychosurgery and electroshock on children is banned.
Health
And with hundreds of chapters in 34 countries, CCHR members are active worldwide
Order a Free
Citizens Commission on organizing marches, public hearings, exhibits, and other actions to raise public awareness
Human Rights Information Kit about the criminality rampant within psychiatry.

What follows, then, is a brief summary of CCHRs many accomplishments:

Legal Rights & Informed Consent

In the early 1970s, CCHRs investigations led to government inquiries into state
About Us
psychiatric facilities in California, Illinois, Hawaii, Michigan and Missouri, thanks to
What is CCHR?
the abuses CCHR had uncovered against patients. This resulted in hospital
Accomplishments administrators and psychiatrists being dismissed, criminal and grand jury
Message from the President investigations being held, and closure of major psychiatric units due to the abuses.
Board of Advisors In 1976, due to CCHRs efforts, the first law to protect patients against enforced

Leadership electroshock and psychosurgery was passed in California, providing informed consent
and banning their use on children under the age of twelve. This became a model
CCHR Financials
law, adopted in substance by legislatures across the United States and in other
Mental Health Declaration
countries. In Texas, psychiatrists must also ensure that autopsy reports are done on
Psychiatry: An Industry of
any deaths within fourteen days of ECT administration.
Death Museum
In Italy, the birthplace of ECT, the Piemonte regional parliament responded to CCHRs
CCHR Global Locator
evidence by unanimously voting to ban the use of ECT on children, the elderly and
pregnant women.
CCHR In the 1990s, CCHR helped uncover and expose the fact that up to 150 restraint
CHAPTERS WORLDWIDE

1 of 4 11/6/2015 12:43 AM
CCHR4 decades of accomplishments http://www.cchr.org/about-us/cchr-accomplishments.html

deaths occur each year in the US alone, with nearly ten percent of these being
children, some as young as six. Federal regulations were passed in 1999 that
prohibited the use of physical and chemical (mind-altering drugs) restraints to coerce
or discipline patients, ordered a national reporting system and cut government
funding for any facility that did not comply.
click here In the 1980s/early 1990s, CCHR spearheaded a campaign to expose and ban Deep
Sleep Treatment (DST) at Chelmsford Private Psychiatric Hospital in Sydney,
Australia. The treatment involved knocking the patient unconscious for three weeks
with a cocktail of psychiatric drugs and electroshocking them daily, without their
consent. It killed 48 people. CCHR achieved its ban under the Mental Health Act and
it is a criminal offense for psychiatrists to administer it. CCHR also obtained the
countrys highest level of government inquiry into DST and mental health, leading to
significant reforms.

Protecting Childrens Rights

Working with journalists, CCHR helped investigate and subsequently expose the fact
that numerous school shooters had been under the influence of psychiatric drugs
documented to cause violence, suicide and mania, resulting in state hearings
investigating this issue and national press coverage on the link between senseless
acts of violence and psychiatric drugs.
CCHR also documented numerous cases of parents being coerced/pressured or forced
to give their children psychiatric drugs as a condition of attending school, including
parents charged with medical neglect for refusing to give their child a drug
documented to cause suicide and violence. By working with parents, doctors and
numerous civil and human rights advocates, this issue was exposed in the national
media, was brought before state and federal legislators and resulted in the 2004
passage of the prohibition on forcing parents to put their children on psychiatric
drugs.
The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child responded to reports from
CCHR Finland, Australia and Denmark, expressing concerns that ADHD and ADD are
being misdiagnosed and therefore psychostimulant drugs are being over-prescribed,
despite growing evidence of the harmful effects of these drugs. The Committee
recommended, other forms of management and treatment be used as much as
possible to address these behavioral disorders.
In 1991, largely due to CCHRs efforts, the FDA held hearings into the antidepressant
drug Prozac, where dozens of consumers testified that the drug had turned people
with no previous history of psychosis, suicidal and homicidal. Due to the vested
interests of the voting FDA board members, no action was taken to protect the public
until nearly thirteen years later when CCHRs more than ten-year campaign to expose
the dangers of these drugs came to fruition, and the FDA (under pressure from
Congress) finally issued the agencies strongest warning that antidepressants can
cause suicidal thoughts and actions in those 18 years of age and younger. This was
later extended to age 24.
In 2007, working with whistleblowers, parents and consumer groups, CCHR helped
secure language in the FDA reform bill that makes it mandatory for all
pharmaceutical ads to advise patients to report drug adverse reactions directly to the
FDA. Following the first ads being published, the number of Adverse Drug Reports
increased by thirty-three percent.

Human Rights Secured

CCHR photographed and then exposed secret psychiatric slave labor camps in
South Africa where tens of thousands of Africans were incarcerated in the 1970s and
80s, against their will, in disused mining compounds, were drugged and subjected to
painful electroshock without anaesthetics. The apartheid government responded in
1976 by banning the photographing or dissemination of any information about
psychiatric institutions, at which point CCHR obtained a World Health Organization
investigation that substantiated CCHRs allegations. When apartheid ended, CCHR
presented oral and written testimony to South Africas Truth and Reconciliation
Commission investigating apartheid crimes and obtained a national government

2 of 4 11/6/2015 12:43 AM
CCHR4 decades of accomplishments http://www.cchr.org/about-us/cchr-accomplishments.html

inquiry into psychiatric racism. The government repealed the ban on disclosing
information about psychiatric abuse.
CCHR in Germany conducted comprehensive research that established conclusively
that Germanys leading psychiatrists provided the theory as well as the scientific
justification for the Nazi government to destroy life unworthy of living. Euthanasia
was first piloted in psychiatric institutions before being exported to the concentration
camps. Many Nazi psychiatrists escaped justice at the Nuremberg Trials and
continued practicing after the war. In 1995 CCHR published the acclaimed book
Psychiatrists: The Men Behind Hitler. Four years later, the German Psychiatric
Association issued a report affirming that psychiatrists were active in and primarily
responsible for the different euthanasia organizations. They guided and directed the
different euthanasia campaigns. They observed and controlled the selection of
those to be killed.
CCHR extensively researched ethnic cleansing in Bosnia and Kosovo, reporting its
findings to the UN War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague and the Council of Europe. It
discovered that psychiatric ideas of racial hygiene and eugenics were behind the
conflict, in particular the works of Jovan Rakovi, founder of the Social Democratic
Party and Radovan Karadi, wartime leaderboth psychiatrists. In 1999, members
of the Council of Europe issued a resolution that recognized psychiatrists as the
architects of the ethnic cleansing and encouraged Council members to study the
material that has been put together and researched by the French chapter of the
Citizens Commission on Human Rights. When Karadi was captured in 2008, it was
widely reported that Karadis ethnic cleansing stemmed from his psychiatric
background.
Along with officials and members of the Italian Parliament, CCHR Italy inspected
concentration camp-like conditions in the countrys psychiatric asylums. Staff had
pocketed government funds while patients were left naked and starving. The
government responded to the evidence, issuing a resolution that ordered the closure
of the ninety-seven asylums. The abused and neglected inmates were transferred to
humane homes, many taught to read, write and care for themselves for the first time
in thirty years. CCHR was presented with a mayoral medal for its humanitarian
efforts.

Exposing Criminal Psychiatric Abuse

CCHR has campaigned for uncompromising execution of justice for mental health
practitioners who rape or sexually abuse their patients, but hide behind their roles as
therapists to mitigate their crimes. In protecting patients from sexual abuse and fraud the
following are a sample of safeguards achieved:

At least twenty-five statutes have been enacted defining sex crimes committed by
psychiatrists and psychologists in the United States, Australia, Germany, Sweden and
Israel. The laws label therapist-patient sex as sexual assault or rape. Hundreds of
psychiatrists and psychologists have been convicted and jailed.
CCHRs investigations led to a major private psychiatric hospital chain in the US being
investigated by fourteen federal and state investigations for fraud and patient abuse.
Before closing, the hospital chain paid out over $1 billion in criminal and civil fines.
Laws were subsequently passed outlawing the practice of using bounty hunters for
locating individuals with good insurance in order to involuntarily institutionalize them
in psychiatric facilities and milk their insurance dry.
Numerous other private, for-profit psychiatric hospitals were subsequently
investigated. By 2003, state and federal authorities had eighty percent of the US
private psychiatric hospital market under criminal investigation, which resulted in
$2.1 billion in criminal and civil fines.

Prev Next

Message from the President

Site Navigation
ABOUT US TRUTH ABOUT PSYCHIATRY CCHR PUBLICATIONS

3 of 4 11/6/2015 12:43 AM
Mental Health Declaration of Human Rights http://www.cchr.org/about-us/mental-health-declaration-of-human-rights...

1-800-869-2247 Order CCHRInt.org Language Contact

SEARCH

ABOUT US VIDEOS TRUTH ABOUT PSYCHIATRY ALTERNATIVES TAKE ACTION ORDER

Under the banner of the Mental


Health Declaration of Human
Rights, tens of thousands of
people around the globe have
joined CCHR and taken to the
streets to protest psychiatric
drugging and other inhumane
mental health practices.

HOME ABOUT US MENTAL HEALTH DECLARATION Prev Next

SUBSCRIBE MENTAL HEALTH DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


TO CCHR NEWS
by Citizens Commission on Human Rights

All human rights organizations set forth codes by which they align their purposes and
activities. The Mental Health Declaration of Human Rights articulates the guiding principles
of CCHR and the standards against which human rights violations by psychiatry are
FREE INFORMATION KIT
AND DVD relentlessly investigated and exposed.

A. The right to full informed consent, including:

1. The scientific/medical test confirming any alleged diagnoses of psychiatric disorder


and the right to refute any psychiatric diagnoses of mental illness that cannot be
medically confirmed.

2. Full disclosure of all documented risks of any proposed drug or treatment.

Restoring Human Rights and


3. The right to be informed of all available medical treatments which do not include
Dignity to the Field of Mental
Health the administration of a psychiatric drug or treatment.

Order a Free 4. The right to refuse any treatment the patient considers harmful.
Citizens Commission on
Human Rights Information Kit B. No person shall be given psychiatric or psychological treatment against his or her will.

C. No person, man, woman or child, may be denied his or her personal liberty by reason of
mental illness, so-called, without a fair jury trial by laymen and with proper legal
representation.

About Us D. No person shall be admitted to or held in a psychiatric institution, hospital or facility


What is CCHR? because of their political, religious or cultural beliefs and practices.

Accomplishments
E. Any patient has:
Message from the President
1. The right to be treated with dignity as a human being.
Board of Advisors
Leadership 2. The right to hospital amenities without distinction as to race, color, sex, language,
CCHR Financials religion, political opinion, social origin or status by right of birth or property.

Mental Health Declaration 3. The right to have a thorough, physical and clinical examination by a competent
Psychiatry: An Industry of registered general practitioner of ones choice, to ensure that ones mental condition
Death Museum
is not caused by any undetected and untreated physical illness, injury or defect and
CCHR Global Locator the right to seek a second medical opinion of ones choice.

4. The right to fully equipped medical facilities and appropriately trained medical staff
CCHR
CHAPTERS WORLDWIDE in hospitals, so that competent physical, clinical examinations can be performed.

1 of 3 11/6/2015 12:45 AM
Mental Health Declaration of Human Rights http://www.cchr.org/about-us/mental-health-declaration-of-human-rights...

5. The right to choose the kind or type of therapy to be employed, and the right to
discuss this with a general practitioner, healer or minister of ones choice.

6. The right to have all the side effects of any offered treatment made clear and
understandable to the patient, in written form and in the patients native language.

click here 7. The right to accept or refuse treatment but in particular, the right to refuse
sterilization, electroshock treatment, insulin shock, lobotomy (or any other
psychosurgical brain operation), aversion therapy, narcotherapy, deep sleep therapy
and any drugs producing unwanted side effects.

8. The right to make official complaints, without reprisal, to an independent board


which is composed of nonpsychiatric personnel, lawyers and lay people. Complaints
may encompass any torturous, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
received while under psychiatric care.

9. The right to have private counsel with a legal advisor and to take legal action.

10. The right to discharge oneself at any time and to be discharged without
restriction, having committed no offense.

11. The right to manage ones own property and affairs with a legal advisor, if
necessary, or if deemed incompetent by a court of law, to have a State appointed
executor to manage such until one is adjudicated competent. Such executor is
accountable to the patients next of kin, or legal advisor or guardian.

12. The right to see and possess ones hospital records and to take legal action with
regard to any false information contained therein which may be damaging to ones
reputation.

13. The right to take criminal action, with the full assistance of law enforcement
agents, against any psychiatrist, psychologist or hospital staff for any abuse, false
imprisonment, assault from treatment, sexual abuse or rape, or any violation of
mental health or other law. And the right to a mental health law that does not
indemnify or modify the penalties for criminal, abusive or negligent treatment of
patients committed by any psychiatrist, psychologist or hospital staff.

14. The right to sue psychiatrists, their associations and colleges, the institution, or
staff for unlawful detention, false reports or damaging treatment.

15. The right to work or to refuse to work, and the right to receive just compensation
on a pay scale comparable to union or state/national wages for similar work, for any
work performed while hospitalized.

16. The right to education or training so as to enable one to earn a living when
discharged, and the right of choice over what kind of education or training is
received.

17. The right to receive visitors and a minister of ones own faith.

18. The right to make and receive telephone calls and the right to privacy with
regard to all personal correspondence to and from anyone.

19. The right to freely associate or not with any group or person in a psychiatric
institution, hospital or facility.

20. The right to a safe environment without having in the environment, persons
placed there for criminal reasons.

21. The right to be with others of ones own age group.

22. The right to wear personal clothing, to have personal effects and to have a
secure place in which to keep them.

23. The right to daily physical exercise in the open.

24. The right to a proper diet and nutrition and to three meals a day.

25. The right to hygienic conditions and nonovercrowded facilities, and to sufficient,

2 of 3 11/6/2015 12:45 AM
CCHR's Leadership http://www.cchr.org/about-us/what-is-cchr/leadership.html

1-800-869-2247 Order CCHRInt.org Language Contact

SEARCH

ABOUT US VIDEOS TRUTH ABOUT PSYCHIATRY ALTERNATIVES TAKE ACTION ORDER

HOME ABOUT US CCHR'S LEADERSHIP Prev Next

SUBSCRIBE CCHR'S LEADERSHIP


TO CCHR NEWS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Isadore Chait, Board Member


Joyce Gaines, Board Member
Michael Baybak, Board Member
FREE INFORMATION KIT
Fran Andrews, Board Member
AND DVD
Jan Eastgate, Board Member

LEADERSHIP

Fran Andrews, Executive Director


Marla Filidei, Deputy Executive Director
Jan Eastgate, International President
Bruce Wiseman, National President

Restoring Human Rights and Anne Guerrero, Director of Human Resources


Dignity to the Field of Mental Ben Reinhart, Director of Promotion and Marketing
Health
Serenity Macdonald, Treasurer
Order a Free Amber Schmiedeke, Director of Operations
Citizens Commission on Samantha Garcia, Director of Public Outreach
Human Rights Information Kit
Steve Wagner, Public Advocacy Secretary
Carla Moxon, Public Activities Secretary

Prev Next

CCHR Financials

About Us
What is CCHR?
Accomplishments
Message from the President
Board of Advisors

Leadership
CCHR Financials
Mental Health Declaration
Psychiatry: An Industry of
Death Museum
CCHR Global Locator

CCHR
CHAPTERS WORLDWIDE

click here

Site Navigation
ABOUT US TRUTH ABOUT PSYCHIATRY CCHR PUBLICATIONS

CCHR GLOBAL LOCATOR ALTERNATIVES ORDER

VIDEOS TAKE ACTION

1 of 2 11/6/2015 12:46 AM
CCHR, Board of Advisors http://www.cchr.org/about-us/cchr-board-of-advisors.html

1-800-869-2247 Order CCHRInt.org Language Contact

SEARCH

ABOUT US VIDEOS TRUTH ABOUT PSYCHIATRY ALTERNATIVES TAKE ACTION ORDER

Amongst other duties, The


Citizens Commission on Human
Rights board of advisors provides
expertise from its members
professions, including testimony
before state and federal hearings
in the name of civil rights and the
eradication of psychiatric abuse.

HOME ABOUT US BOARD OF ADVISORS Prev Next

SUBSCRIBE CCHR BOARD OF ADVISORS


TO CCHR NEWS
The Citizens Commission on Human Rights board of advisors, called
Commissioners, includes doctors, lawyers, educators, celebrities,
business professionals and civil and human rights representatives.

FREE INFORMATION KIT Their duties include advising CCHR in their professional capacity, on
AND DVD issues relating to CCHR's activities. They also include, but are not
limited to:

Media interviews, being a spokesperson on issues the


Prof. Thomas Szasz Commissioner is well versed in relating to psychiatry and its
Co-founder of CCHR
abuses,
Making representations, visiting or writing to members of Congress, parliaments,
national and state legislatures about issues CCHR is concerned with,
Restoring Human Rights and Advising on any legislative issues CCHR should be involved in,
Dignity to the Field of Mental
Acting as a panel member in a Public Hearing that CCHR may hold into a particular
Health
aspect of psychiatric abuse,
Order a Free Lending their name to CCHRs publications, campaigns, or providing quotes for these
Citizens Commission on
Human Rights Information Kit or for press releases,
Sending any research or articles of interest to CCHR that can be distributed to
officials, groups or CCHR Chapters,
As medical professionals or researchers, evaluating research or studies such as
clinical trials of psychiatric drugs that can then be distributed broadly or publicized,
As many physicians, including primary physicians and pediatricians today prescribe
About Us
strong and dangerous psychiatric drugs, helping CCHR to educate them that real
What is CCHR?
medical analysis and treatment is needed; for example, testing for heavy metal
Accomplishments
exposure, food allergies as well as nonphysically intrusive methods such as diet,
Message from the President nutrition and exercise, and to remind them that preservation of civil liberties, human
Board of Advisors dignity, informed consent and personal choice are critical in all medical practice,
Leadership As attorneys, advising other attorneys on or filing civil complaints against

CCHR Financials psychiatrists that have abused patients and how such suits can be filed against
psychiatric associations or colleges that trained the offending psychiatrist,
Mental Health Declaration
Educating doctors on the lack of science behind psychiatric diagnoses and the
Psychiatry: An Industry of
Death Museum damage caused by psychiatric treatment,

CCHR Global Locator Assisting with or advising on fundraising, and


Proposing and inviting other professionals to become CCHR Commissioners.

CCHR
CHAPTERS WORLDWIDE

1 of 2 11/6/2015 12:48 AM
CCHR: get the truth psychs dont want you to know http://www.cchr.org/about-us/message-from-the-president.html

1-800-869-2247 Order CCHRInt.org Language Contact

SEARCH

ABOUT US VIDEOS TRUTH ABOUT PSYCHIATRY ALTERNATIVES TAKE ACTION ORDER

In addition to combating mental


health abuses throughout the
world, CCHR International
provides educational resources for
citizens of all nations, including its
on-site Psychiatry: An Industry of
Death Museuman in-depth tour
which lays bare the destruction
wrought by psychiatrists upon
every sector of society.

HOME ABOUT US MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT Prev 1 2 Next

SUBSCRIBE MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT


TO CCHR NEWS
Most people today have difficulty understanding the destructive
impact psychiatry has on communities around the world.

For far too many, the lesson is learned only after a psychiatrist has
FREE INFORMATION KIT destroyed some part of their life.
AND DVD
The destruction might come in the form of the death of their child
due to long-term usage of a stimulant drug, prescribed for an
invented psychiatric disorder called Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Jan Eastgate Disorder (ADHD). It could be the loss of a loved one at the hand of
President CCHR a gun-toting teenager prescribed a violence-inducing psychiatric
drug and/or one who had undergone death education or anger
management classes (as was the case in the Columbine school massacre in 1999). Perhaps
Restoring Human Rights and it is the death of an elderly mother or father from electroshock treatment or an
Dignity to the Field of Mental
antipsychotic drug prescribed at a nursing home. It could be a child labeled mentally ill
Health
early in school, prescribed addictive, psychotropic drugs more potent than cocaine, who
Order a Free later becomes a hard-core street-drug addict because he could not tell the difference
Citizens Commission on
between a street drug and those prescribed to him.
Human Rights Information Kit
At CCHR, we work continuously to educate you on the truth about psychiatry, providing
information that psychiatrists would prefer you didnt have. For example, in 2008, Dr. Nada
Stotland, the president of the American Psychiatric Association, acknowledged that CCHR
influences our legislatures, our Food and Drug Administration, our schools, and our media
About Us as a moving force behind the unwarranted black box warnings on the potentially lethal
What is CCHR? effects of psychiatric drugs. Note that in Dr. Stotlands opinion, warning children,

Accomplishments adolescents and young adults that could become suicidal while taking antidepressantsa
fact the drug regulatory agencies the world over have determined is vital informationis
Message from the
President unwarranted.

Through CCHRs Work


Only by providing all the facts about the risks of psychiatric treatment can we possibly
Board of Advisors reduce the number of victims who unfortunately learn this truth through personal tragedy.
Leadership
A Complete Lack of Science
CCHR Financials
Mental Health Declaration One of the most important things to know about psychiatry is the complete lack of science

Psychiatry: An Industry of supporting its system of diagnosis or its treatments. Take, for example, the psychiatric
Death Museum billing bible, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM-IV. Not
CCHR Global Locator one of the 374 disorders described therein has ever been proven to exist by observable
pathology or objective tests. Instead, a panel of psychiatrists arbitrarily defined symptoms

1 of 2 11/6/2015 12:50 AM
CCHR: get the truth psychs dont want you to know http://www.cchr.org/about-us/message-from-the-president.html

CCHR of each mental disorder and then literally voted on their suitability
CHAPTERS WORLDWIDE
for inclusion in the DSM. By this system, if a newly defined mental
disorder loses the vote, it fails to make it into the DSM. The system
is subjective and ambiguous; its terminology is ill-defined or
altogether undefined.

In spite of such serious and fundamental flaws, this system is


click here
widely accepted as the benchmark for both judging human
behavior and determining treatments in courts, prisons and
schools. In many countries, the DSM forms the basis of mental
health services billings to insurance companies and bogus mental health screening.

By medicalizing everyday problems, psychiatry has fraudulently labeled millions as


mentally ill, and either forced or convinced them to adopt prescription psychotropic drugs
as a routine part of their lives. As a result, psychotropic drug consumption has escalated
with 100 million people worldwide now taking these drugs, 20 million of whom are children.

CCHR remains dedicated to exposing the scientific myths and hype with which psychiatry
has managed to surround its diagnostic system and treatments. We work with medical
doctors and other professionals that see it as their duty to ensure that government policy
and regulations provide the strongest warnings about psychiatric treatments.

Our work aligns with the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which
reads, in part:

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or


punishment,
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal
protection of the law,
and
Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their
children.

Psychiatrists violate these Articles on a daily basis.

Through psychiatrists false diagnoses, stigmatizing labels, easy-seizure involuntary


commitment laws, brutal, depersonalizing treatments all over the world, thousands
needlessly fall into their coercive system every day. It is a system that exemplifies human
rights abuse and denies individuals their inherent rights.

Each year thousands of psychiatric victims or their families contact CCHR to report
incidents of psychiatric harm. And its a litany of maltreatment: sexual abuse, brutal
institutional treatment and conditions, hospital fraud, false imprisonment, patient deaths
and even murder.

Prev 1 2 Next

Through CCHRs Work

Site Navigation
ABOUT US TRUTH ABOUT PSYCHIATRY CCHR PUBLICATIONS

CCHR GLOBAL LOCATOR ALTERNATIVES ORDER

VIDEOS TAKE ACTION

1995-2015 Citizens Commission on Human Rights International. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy

2 of 2 11/6/2015 12:50 AM
Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 1 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 2 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 3 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 4 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 5 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 6 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 7 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 8 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 9 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 10 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 11 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 12 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 13 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 14 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 15 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 16 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 17 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 18 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 19 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 20 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 21 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 22 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 23 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 24 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 25 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 26 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 27 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 28 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 29 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 30 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 31 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 32 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 33 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 34 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 35 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 36 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 37 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 38 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 39 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 40 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 41 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 42 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 43 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 44 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 45 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 46 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 47 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 48 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 49 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 50 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 51 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 52 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 53 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 54 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 55 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 56 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 57 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 58 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 59 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 60 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 61 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 62 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 63 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 64 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 65 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 66 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 67 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 68 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 69 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 70 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 71 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 72 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 73 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 74 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 75 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 76 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 77 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 78 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 79 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 80 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 81 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 82 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 83 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 84 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 85 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 86 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 87 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 88 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 89 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 90 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 91 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 92 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 93 of 94 09/14/2009


Citizens Commission for Human Rights Psyciatric Abuse Complaint of August 4, 2009

Advanced Media Group Page 94 of 94 09/14/2009

You might also like