Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hubert O. Thompson
BROTHERS & THOMPSON, P.C.
155 N. Michigan Avenue
Suite 200
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 372 2909
hthompson@brothersthompson.com
Attorney No. 35496
Cases
Statutes
i
This amici curiae memorandum is brought on behalf of 34 Faith leaders in the Chicago area.
1
Chicago, IL 60619 Chicago, IL 60621
Chatham Community Englewood community
2
Chicago, IL 60612 Chicago, IL 60644
Garfield Park community South Austin community
These faith leaders represent African American and Hispanic congregations in communities
throughout the City of Chicago and have come together to support the Board of Education of the City
of Chicago (CPS) in this action seeking to end the States discriminatory funding of CPS schools.
Amici are some of the foremost faith leaders in the City of Chicago. Their congregations
range in size from as few as 150 congregants to over 7,000. These congregations serve African
American and Hispanic children who attend CPS schools, and each congregation is impacted when
CPS schools do not receive funding on an equal basis to that of schools in other parts of the State.
State enforced racial segregation was the moral issue of the day in 1954. In a remarkably
short opinion in the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, et al., 347 U.S. 483 (1954), a
unanimous United States Supreme Court repudiated the so-called separate but equal doctrine.
3
The Court held that, Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Id. at 495. Now,
school funding is one of the paramount moral issues affecting African American and Hispanic school
children. It is both a moral issue and a civil rights issue. When the State of Illinois makes the
decision to discriminate against CPS schools in funding, it makes an immoral decision. Thus, the
funding inequities that CPS highlights in this litigation not only violate the Illinois Civil Rights Act
These amici and their congregations have striven mightily to fill the gap where CPS services
are not available due to a lack of funding for important programs. While their efforts are
commendable, they are no substitute for the States resources. Among other things, the amici have
striven to provide the following in the absence of CPS being able to do so due to a lack of State
funding:
! Sports leagues;
! Adopt-a-School programs;
4
! Programs focusing on first generation college students;
! Entrepreneurial programs;
! Computer training;
! Job readiness programs that directly hire teen-age school children in areas such as
In some instances amici partner with their respective local schools to provide these services.
However, the vast majority of students in amicis communities would greatly benefit from, but
cannot receive the services and programming in their schools as a result of the States funding
scheme.
These amici are deeply concerned about the immediate and adverse impact that the
discriminatory system of funding CPS schools due to inequitable funding of the Chicago Teachers
Pension Fund has and will continue to have on the children in their communities. Without adequate
funding on a non-discriminatory basis, the African American and Hispanic children in these
communities will not have the tools to compete in college or vocational schools with children from
communities outside of Chicago. If inadequate State funding of CPS schools results in a shortening
of the school year, which may be required, not only will these children be educationally
disadvantaged, they will also be denied the relative safety of the classroom and be subjected to the
uncertain dangers of the street. Their parents will have to decide between leaving their children at
home alone or reducing their paychecks or using vacation time to stay at home with their children.
5
In Chicago, the public schools act as much more than merely centers of learning. For
example, for the large number of children who are on free or reduced price meals, the public school
is the one place where they are guaranteed to receive a nutritious breakfast or lunch. In the absence
of adequate funding from the State, CPS schools will lose critical resources that are needed to
provide social services, support for students with disabilities and support for the cultural arts such
as band, music and other academically enriching programs that engage and motivate the children of
these communities. Among other things, adequate and non-discriminatory State funding is needed
to provide more technological support, i.e., more computers and high speed internet access in the
classrooms, and for basic requirements such as repairing and maintaining crumbling physical
structures.
For the foregoing reasons, the amici seek to be heard in support of CPS motion for a
preliminary injunction.
II. THE REMEDY THAT CPS SEEKS IS WELL-WITHIN THE POWER OF THIS
COURT TO GRANT.
The Illinois Civil Rights Act (ICRA) provides that no unit of government shall utilize
criteria or methods of administration that have the effect of subjecting individuals to discrimination
because of their race, color, national origin, or gender... 740 ILCS 23/5(a)(2). ICRA was patterned
on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits race and national origin discrimination
in federally assisted programs. See 93d Ill. Gen. Assemb., H. Deb., April 3, 2003, at 146 (statements
of Rep. Fritchey) ([T]his Bill will create a parallel state remedy to ... the federal cases that were
brought under Section 601 of the Civil Rights Act.); Ill. Native Am. Bar Ass'n, 368 Ill.App.3d 321,
327 (1st Dist. 2006) (stating that statements of a bill's sponsor matter when determining legislative
6
intent and reviewing Representative Fritchey's comments about ICRA). Since the facts clearly show
that the States education funding formula has the effect of discriminating against CPS students, 90%
of whom are African American and Hispanic, there is no doubt that the State is violating ICRA. The
question then arises, whether the Court has the power to impose the remedy that CPS is requesting.
In their Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Motion), CPS and the individual plaintiffs seek
an order of court directing the State to allocate its educational funding dollars in a manner that does
not discriminate against the African American and Hispanic school children of CPS. See e.g.,
Motion at p. 14 (Plaintiffs ask only that Defendants be required to allocate public education funding
in a non-discriminatory [manner].). Illinois legal precedent establishes that a grant of this remedy
ICRA empowers the court to grant any permanent or preliminary negative or mandatory
injunction, temporary restraining order, or other order when a violation of its provisions is found.
740 ILCS 23/5(b). In similar circumstances, courts in this State have not hesitated to enter
preliminary injunctions concerning the application of State funds or those of other units of
government. For example in Seyller v. County of Kane, et al., 408 Ill.App.3d 982, 946 N.E.2d 924
(2nd Dist. 2011), the Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the Circuit Courts entry of a mandatory
injunction requiring the Kane County Clerk of the Circuit Court to utilize certain special funds to
pay personnel costs of her office. Id. at 931-932. In Illinois Hospital Association v. Illinois
Department of Public Aid, 576 F. Supp. 360 (N.D.Ill. 1983), an Illinois federal court went even
further by entering a preliminary injunction requiring the Illinois Department of Public Aid to pay
moneys to the hospital plaintiffs even though the State legislature had not appropriated the necessary
7
funds, where Illinois was failing to meet its obligations under the Medicaid program that the State
had voluntarily joined. Finally, in Central Austin Neighborhood Association v. City of Chicago,
2013 Ill. App. 123041, the Illinois Appellate Court reversed the Circuit Courts dismissal of a
complaint brought under ICRA against the City of Chicago. In that action, plaintiffs alleged that the
City was discriminating against certain minority neighborhoods based on the systematic disparity
in response times to 911 calls. The Circuit Court dismissed the complaint on the grounds, inter alia,
that the court could not grant the relief requested. The Appellate Court rejected the lower courts
rationale explicitly holding that the court had the power to order the City to devise the necessary
These cases demonstrate that the Court in this instance is empowered to provide the
injunctive relief CPS and the individual plaintiffs seek in this case.
III. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the Court should enter a preliminary injunction ordering the State
of Illinois to distribute funds in a manner that does not discriminate against the predominantly
African American and Hispanic students of the City of Chicago public schools.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________________
Hubert O. Thompson
Hubert O. Thompson
BROTHERS & THOMPSON, P.C.
Counsel for Amici Curiae, Chicago Area Faith Leaders
155 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 200
Chicago, IL 60601
8
(312) 372-2909
hthompson@brothersthompson.com