Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The residents of the Valley are facing chronic shortage of water and the situation is degrading
day by day.The condition during dry season is more critical.The total demand of water supply
is not fulfilled by KUKL and the private tankers. Due to the deficit of water,severe effects are
on human health,economic activities and the surrounding environment. Moreover,the
population is increasing at the rate of 4.78% per year is concerned issue ( CBS,2011). So,the
government of Nepal had been looking for an alternative source /way to address the problem
since 1973.In the year 1988,Binnie and Partners of the United Kingdom found a solution to
bring water from nearby Melamchi Valley which is about 50 km northeast of Kathmandu
Valley.Initial enviornment assessment was carried out in 1990 by Stanley and Association of
Canada and later in 1992, a full feasibility study was carried out by Australian company
Snowy Mountain Engineering Corporation. After the analysis, Melamchi river was found the
best alternative to supply water to Kathmandu valley.
However, the report is of 2001; monthly WTP must have been increased. According to UNDP
report in 2013, Nepals per capita gross national income rose by 101% over 19802012 to
$1,137; the remittance growth rate increased by 17% during the same period; and Nepals
GDP at purchasing power parity increased from $27.4 billion (1999) to $40.5 billion (2012).
Increase in household income directly attributes to the purchasing power of water supply.
Thus, it can be assumed that due to price escalation and inflation the WTP has been
increased. Currently, households depending on tankers generally pay NRs 200-250 for 1000
litre, which is far expensive than the minimum tariff set by KUKL domestic house
connections in Kathmandu Valley (NRs 100 for 10000 litre). Also, consumers generally did
not rely on the water quality from these alternative sources and purify the water in home
itself. This implies that people are likely to opt for household connections if the availability
and quality of the water is ensured.
The total project cost is US$ 317.3 million (NRs 33951 million). As of June 30, 2013, $166
million of the original $317.3 million had been disbursed, including $64.26 million by the
Asian Development Bank.The analyses indicate an economic internal rate of return of
approximately 13.5 percent. Since the current monthly tariff (minimum) of water set by KUKL
is NRs 100, the MWSP seems highly expensive. So, to pay back the loan from donors the
government will increase the tariff rate. Also, water cannot be taken as a free gift of nature in
the context of heavy investment required its treatment, quality control, distribution and pipeline
expansion (Unofficial source from KUKL).
SMEC (1992) estimated Rs 38 as the per m 3 cost of Melamchi water in 1992. When the rate is
inflated taking into account he consumer price index of Kathmandu valley, it increases to Rs
65.6 in 2000 and further high to Rs. 82.3 per m 3 in 2005 (Tiwari,2008). This shows that
unless water tariff is increased significantly it is difficult to sustain water services in
Kathmandu valley. However, charging water tariff at high rate is difficult nowadays due to
water becoming a political commodity. Therefore, a gradual approach of increasing tariff will
be seen in future.