EDF2171, Assignment 1, Peer Feedback Form

Title of digital resource reviewed: Skill and task presentation Ch 14

URL: http://presentingskillsandtask.weebly.com/

Group members: Sarah King and Ben Rosewall

Name or Std No. of person completing this peer feedback:

Schenelle Bronkhorst
Lychheng Poch

Overall Feedback including guidance for improvement:

Visual: Provide an overall comment on the visual impact of site:

Visual aspect of this groups website was of a pleasing standard. It is easy to read and
navigate through the website. It is kept simple

Content: Overall comment on the content of the site (including the appropriateness of the
writing style of any text):

Some images and text are a little small compared to the writing associated with it. Style and
font of the majority of text is appropriate and easy to read. Some text was too bulked up and
did not have enough spaces between the paragraphs and made it difficult to see where one
paragraph stated and the other finished. Spaces between paragraphs could do with more
attention. Because of the spacing issue between paragraphs, it made the bulk of the writing
over whelming as there was a lot of text in one big block.

There was some confusion as to what some of the videos were trying to convey. Although
there were dot points underneath the video on focus points, there was no reminder or
explanation as to what it was that you were supposed to be looking for, For example the
implications page showed 2 videos, one of demonstration and one for in game skills. The first
video for demonstration did not provide me with the information as to what bad
demonstration looks like, what good demonstration looks like or what the video was
supposed to be about. There was no references made to the page title, which was
implications. How is the video related to implications?

Stopping the video and adding a voice over for explanations could really help with this
section. It shouldnt be more than 30sec each time, just something to keep in mind whilst
some of the videos are long and you forget the point.

Navigation: Did you come across any instances where you couldnt answer one of these
questions:
Where am I?
Where can I go?
How will I get there?
How can I get back to where I once was?
Comment:
Navigation throughout the system was fluid and easy to decifer. It was easy to know where I
was within the website, where I wanted to go, how I could get there and if I clicked something
wrong, it was easy to find my way back.

Overall rating: The following rating will give some guidance as to how the resource is
progressing, please give it your due consideration. Remember that this site is not yet meant to
be complete but you can still rate it on aspects of content and design.

My overall rating of this site is (please highlight):

Excellent / Good / Satisfactory / Poor / Very poor

We have rated the website work so far as Good. Some areas of improvement include ensuring
images and text within images are the same size font as the rest of the page to make it easier
for readers to read. There is some parts of the website that is really wordy and should be
broken into more clear paragraphs. Layout needs some adjusting, and re-purposing videos
with clearer dot points needs attention, however the overall progress of the website is making
good progress.
 Universal design
The digital resource utilised informed ICT strategies to appear inviting, interactive or
engaging for the target audience. Scan the list below and rate as many of these elements as
you find appropriate.

1 = Excellent, 2 = Developing, 3 = Needs Attention

1. Maintained a standard page layout and navigation method throughout the web site. 123

2. Use headings, lists and constant structure. 123

3. Avoid the unnecessary use of icons, graphics and photographs. 123

4. Use plain backgrounds and simple layouts to improve the readability of text. 123

5. Ensure that foreground and background color combinations provide sufficient 123
contrast .
6. Include textual as well as graphical navigation aids. 123

7. Ensure that dynamic content is accessible or provide an alternative presentation or 123

page.
8. On each page, is it clear: I know where I am; where I can go; how will I get there; 123
how I can get back?
9. Minimize the number of hyperlinks that appear in a single line of text. 123

10. Provide meaningful and descriptive text for hyperlinks, don't use shorthand. 123

11. Minimize the file size and number of images you display on any one page. 123

12. Provide descriptive passages about speakers and events being shown through 123
video clips.
13. Give a written description of any critical information that is contained in 123
audio files contained on your website.

Content:
1. The theoretical background piece was well structured with clear sub-headings and 123
good paragraph structure, one key idea per paragraph.
2. The theoretical background piece provided adequate referencing and followed the 123
APA style.
3. The theoretical background piece provided substantial depth to the topic area 123
adding to the insights and understandings within existing unit materials.
4. The theoretical background piece provided critical insights that question or 123
challenge assumptions/practices. Contentions were highlighted.
5. The writing/speaking used across the digital resource was of a high quality 123
professional standard.
6. The digital resource clearly translated the topic area content/ideas into a practical 123
application.
7. The digital resource provided a good level of professional knowledge, that should 123
enhance learning about the topic for target audience. Yes/No
8. The digital resource had a good flow, sequence of ideas and realistic outcomes. 123

9. The resource had ways that learning outcomes could be clarified, measured or 123
demonstrated.