Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Frame
Connect Deliver
Implement Improve
Chapter 1
Introducing service
operations management
Chapter objectives
This chapter is about how to understand the role of service operations man-
agement and its contribution to organiational success.
What are services?
What is service?
What is service operations management?
Why is service operations management important?
1.1
Introduction
We all come into contact with service operations and experience their services every
single day. We are customers or users of a wide range of commercial and public services,
such as childcare services, hospitals, shops, schools, holiday firms, restaurants, television
and the internet. Furthermore, many of us are responsible for providing services not only
as part of our jobs, in organisations such as those above, but also as part of daily life for
our friends and families; providing cooking, cleaning and taxi services, organising
holidays and providing emotional support services for example.
It is important to note at the start of this book that service operations covers a far
broader field than these everyday services that we buy or receive or the personal
services that we provide to each other. They include the services organisations provide to
each other such as procurement or consulting services; services inside organisations
(internal services) such as information technology (IT) or human relations (HR) support;
public services provided by governments (social services, police services or fire and
rescue services); and the many and diverse services provided by not-for-profit and
voluntary organisations such as faith organi- sations or international aid organisations
(see next section).
The principles we describe in this book apply to all these types of organisations, indeed
any organisation that uses resources in order to provide some form of service. In this book
we give a detailed coverage of service operations issues and we provide many tools and
frame- works that managers can use to understand, assess and improve the performance
of their operations. While the development of operations management as a discipline has
its roots in production management,1 this text concentrates on operations issues in service
organisa- tions. However, many of the concepts are equally relevant to manufacturing
organisations
Chapter 1 Introducing service operations management 5
because all manufacturing companies provide services, such as after-sales service and
customer training, and internal services such as HR or IT support.
Every single organisation is involved in service and so a knowledge and understanding
of service operations management can make a real difference to their success. In this
introduc- tory chapter we want to explain its role in delivering organisational success. But
first we will introduce some key concepts, starting with what we mean by services.
1.2.1 Customers
6 Part 1 Introduction
OPERATION
INPUTS
materials equipment customers staf technology facilities
OUTCOMES
PROCESS
products benefits emotions judgements intentions
EXPERIENCE
CUSTOMER
Service received
cal innovation and lifelong learning. It has three pillars supporting the mission statement. The first pillar is
service their number one priority taking care of patients. The second pillar is education and nurturing
the next generations of care-givers, doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, etc. The third pillar is undertaking
clinical research to expand its knowledge and skills in medical science.
The hospital has defined its quality commitment as best outcome, best experience for its patients.
Best experience is about the way it serves its patients and their families by providing quality healthcare
with com- passion, respect and integrity. Best outcome is about treating the patients medical condition as
well as they can to achieve the best health benefits for the patient. Lawrence Lim was the Chief
Executive who introduced this commitment. He explained:
We want to provide the best outcome by providing the best clinical care. I know people do not wish
to come to a hospital, but if they have to, we want to provide them with the best experience possible.
This idea was derived and drawn up by the doctors and administrators together and provides a com-
mon purpose, mindset and language that permeate the whole hospital. There are three key principles
underlying this:
assure best outcomes and benefit for the patient (i.e. clinical quality)
create seamless service (i.e. operational quality)
delight with personalised care (i.e. service quality).
We created a Quality Council comprising doctors and administrators that came together to chart the
strategies and programmes for quality in the hospital. They discussed clinical quality, which has to do
with getting doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, etc. to produce the best outcome and health benefits for
the patient. We also talked about operational quality; that is how we moved a patient around and how we
could organise our services around the patient. These activities mainly concerned operational processes,
which we then engineered to create a seamless service for the patient. We were also concerned with
what we called service quality, which was about the patients experience; building a relationship with the
patients and showing that we cared. From the patients perspective all these three types of quality, i.e.
clinical, operational and service, are intertwined, but we needed to ensure that our staff were focused on
all of them too.
We worked with all the different people in the hospital to try to get everybody to think how they
could improve the service. We got them to think about communication skills, even grooming, dress
and body language. SGH is a government hospital and peoples concept of government hospitals was
that they are bureaucratic, officious and slow to respond. I told my staff, lets surprise the patient!
1.3.3 Products, services and value
Most, if not all, organisations provide a combination of products
(things) and services (activities). A manufacturer of washing
machines or cars not only makes the machine they also provide
sales services, and after-sales services such as servicing and
repairs. Service organisations such as restaurants manufacture food
and the restaurant would be of little value without it. Con-
sultants provide tangible reports, but their main value is their
diagnostic and advice services.
Many product-based organisations recognise the value provided by
their add-on services. Indeed IBM (see Case Example 1.2) has
capitalised on its service provision to create its Global Services
division, recognising that only a small part of its value was in
hardware and software. Indeed, many product-based organisations see
service as a means of differentiating them- selves from the
competition. Amazon, initially a bookseller and now a global
retailer, gained an advantage over traditional booksellers by
allowing customers to buy online, store their de- livery address and
credit card details to allow one-click future purchases, receive
suggestions and read reviews, all from their laptop or phone,
wherever they might be.
The movement towards thinking in terms of the complete product-
service offering, and changing product-based organisations
business models to market and deliver this, is often referred to as
servitisation.
One could argue that product versus service is now an old
fashioned distinction and the boundaries between them are blurred.
What is more important to customers, the product or the service? What
is a product? Is Amazon a product or a service organisation? The
critical point is not the relative amount of product versus service
that an organisation delivers, or whether it sees itself as a product
producer or service provider, but where the value is for the customer.
Take the example of a car. From a car manufacturers point of view a
vast amount of value (cost) is tied up in the product and paid for by
the customer (value-in-exchange).9 But from most customers point of
view, its value is in its use (value-in-use).10 Having a car allows us
to go where we want, when we want, in relative comfort, listening to
what we want to listen to.
Value is created in the experience and the outcomes (in
particular the benefits) at the point(s) of consumption.11
Importantly, the customer is the ultimate judge of value. Value is
perceived by the customer over the time we keep the car and we hope
that its value-in-use is at least as good as the price we had to pay
for it; though we may often not realise this until the car breaks
down. We will return to the notion of value in Section 1.5 and
Chapter 3.
One important corollary to this is that the customer has a
significant role in value creation in services. How we use and
maintain the car has an impact on how we value it. How well the
staff co-operate with the firm of consultants may well affect their
ability to do their job. How well we explain our symptoms to our
doctor will not only help them but aid our recovery. The role the
customer plays in service delivery is referred to as co-production.
IBM is widely regarded as a successful global serv-
ice company providing its business customers with solutions to their problems. In 2010 IBM had a turn- over of ov
In 2007 Global Services was split into two reporting Source: Pearson Education Ltd/Imagestate/John Foxx Collections
70,000
60,000
Global Services
50,000
40,000
$m
20,000
Software
10,000
0
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Figure 1.2 IBM Turnover ($ millions) 19932010: Global Services, Systems &
Technology and Software
divisions: Global Business Services (GBS) and Global Technology Services (GTS). GBS provides profes-
sional services (consulting) and application outsourcing services whereas GTS focuses on infrastructure
services (computer installation and maintenance services) and business process services.
Brian Sellwood was the general manager of IBM Global Services responsible for delivery, operations
and applications management services across Europe, Africa and the Middle East. He described the
importance of services:
In todays computing industry it is very difficult to differentiate one supplier from another in terms of their
hardware and software. The product itself is no longer, or very rarely, a differentiator. Its what you can
offer the customer around that product, and thats invariably service, services such as project
management, applica- tion implementation, fixing a fault with a machine, how you manage and perform
that service. Its about what you do with that product, how you manage that relationship, how you treat
the customer, how you respond to their problems and the solutions you can offer your customers to
make their businesses stronger and better.
This approach is considerably different to that 15 years ago when IBM was renowned as a product-
based company specialising in developing and selling computer hardware and software. It was also
making a loss. IBM then set about creating an organisation that was focused on its services and the
needs of its customers and not on the companys products. Brian Sellwood explained:
We were not into services; we were a hardware/software product company. The first step was to start
un- derstanding what the customer wanted; what they wanted to buy and how they wanted to see it
packaged. Having undertaken some market analysis we decided to start very simply with what we
had, and package it better, rather than build a whole new set of new services. Over time we realised
that what we had was not quite what the customers wanted to buy; they wanted value-add. That
meant we had to change and re- define our portfolio. We had to listen to what our customers were
asking for and at the same time observe what the competition were doing and try to see where there
were gaps in their portfolios and opportunities for us. And this has been a continuous process ever
since. This continual refinement of what we are offer- ing to the customer has played a key role in
stimulating our growth over the last ten years.
In the early stages we found that customers were looking for help but had not always been able to
express that need because there was not always someone willing to listen. In fact there was no shortage
of opportu- nities for us to go and advise customers on how to make better use of their installed
equipment. We found customers wanted almost anything and our challenge was to respond
appropriately. No two customers were the same and so the challenge was to be able to offer the
customers solutions to their specific problems rather than saying we have this solution and that will fit
your business. From that beginning we were able, slowly, to add more services, eventually developing a
business consulting capability where we could advise on how to use and manage applications more
effectively, how to install and help customers install applications, and advise customers on process
engineering, supply chain development and business transformation.
1.3.4 Co-production
One of the most important, intriguing and challenging aspects of
managing service opera- tions (certainly when compared to
manufacturing operations) is that many, though not all, service
operations process customers. (Other service operations process things
belonging to the customer.) These are sometimes referred to as customer
processing operations. The theme park cannot physically give you the
rides unless you turn up, the doctor cannot give you an injection
unless you are physically in the same place. This means that the
customers experi- ence is an intrinsic part of the operations
process (see Figure 1.1). As a result, the customer sees much of the
process and, in many cases, plays a key role in the process itself as
well as receiving the service thus service is a two-way flow. We will
develop this idea in Chapter 4.
It is important to note that customers may not see and/or
experience the whole of the process; they will only be involved in
the front office (the overlapping section in Figure 1.1). The
back office contains tasks that are carried out usually unseen by
the customers, such as cooking the food in restaurants, or baggage
handling at an airport (see Chapter 7).
The part played by customers in the service process is referred to
as co-production (or co- creation). (This was an idea that emerged
over 40 years ago describing the way citizens could get more involved
in public sector services.12) We all play a part in many services. We
take ourselves around the supermarket shelves, pick the items, take
them to the checkout, sometimes scan them ourselves, then pack them
and transport them to the car. (Alternatively we could reduce our
input and go for home delivery and let the supermarket pick, pack and
deliver our goods, though we still have to get involved in ticking the
boxes on the order form.) When we visit the doctor with an ail- ment
we are needed to describe the symptoms to them and discuss alternative
treatments.
In a restaurant or on a train, for example, we also provide
services to other customers. In the restaurant we help provide the
ambiance, the gentle buzz of conversation around the room, and our
adherence to a formal or informal dress code which helps set the
scene (the servicescape). In a train, we keep other seats free of
our luggage so that others can sit down, and we refrain from noisy
or unruly behaviour. So, besides managing materials, technology,
people and processes, service operations managers also have to
manage the customer as a resource too (see Chapter 11).13
This overlap of the process and the customers experience,
together with the direct in- volvement of the customer in many
services, makes the job of a service operations manager particularly
challenging, exciting and, at times, frustrating (see Chapter 2).
1.6 Summary
What is service?
A service is an activity a process or set of steps (unlike a
product which is a thing) which involves the treatment of a
customer (or user) or something belonging to them, where the
customer is also involved, and performs some role (co-production),
in the serv- ice process.
From the operations point of view, the service provided is the
service process and its out- puts which have been designed,
created and enacted by the operation using its many input
resources, including the customer, where the customer also takes
some part in the service process.
From the customers perspective, the service received is the
customers experience of the service provided and their
interaction with it, perceptions of it, and response to it, which
results in outcomes such as products, benefits, emotions,
judgements and intentions.
Johnston, Robert (2005), Service Operations Management: From the Roots Up,
International Journal of Operations and Production Management 25 (12)
12981308
Johnston, Robert and Xiangyu Kong (2011), The Customer Experience:
A Road Map for Improvement, Managing Service Quality 21 (1) 524
Lusch, Robert F., Stephen L. Vargo and Matthew OBrien (2007),
Competing through Service: Insights from Service Dominant Logic,
Journal of Retailing 83 (1) 218
Neu, Wayne A. and Stephen W. Brown (2005), Forming Successful Business-
to-Business Services in Goods-Dominant Firms, Journal of Service
Research 8 (1) 317
Sampson, Scott E. and Craig M. Froehle (2006), Foundations and
Implications of a Proposed Unified Services Theory, Production and
Operations Management 15 (2) 329343
Shaw, Colin, Qaalfa Dibeehi and Steven Walden (2010), Customer
Experience: Future Trends and Insights, Palgrave Macmillan
Slack, Nigel, Stuart Chambers and Robert Johnston (2010), Operations
Management, 6th edi- tion, FT Prentice Hall, Harlow
Vargo, Stephen L. and Robert F. Lusch (2004), Evolving to a New
Dominant Logic of Market- ing, Journal of Marketing 68 (January) 1
17.
Wong, Amy (2004) The Role of Emotions in Service Encounters, Managing Service
Quality
14 (5) 365376
19
Chapter 1 Introducing service operations management
Notes