Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EDUC 460
Vincent Basile
Critical Reflection: Why Science Education?
In todays world, education is essential for modern progression in all aspects of human
life, particularly science education. The world focuses on the further innovation of technology
and scientific discovery; however, to allow for this to occur, intensive scientific knowledge and
processes are to be known. Alas, scientific knowledge can be seen difficult to accumulate in
todays society and can be intimidating to some. As science teachers, I believe it is very
important to teach students about the facts discovered in the fields of science, but, more
importantly, teach students how to apply their knowledge to develop new processes to obtain
even newer knowledge for themselves. Enter the scientific method, or scientific methods rather.
The scientific method has been put into place as the foundation of science education for decades
in the United States public school system; however, in the mind of this writer, not efficiently
taught or utilized.
The scientific method has been taught to have distinct, sequential steps: (1) Make an
Observation (2) Create a Hypothesis (3) Test the Hypothesis (4) Analyze Results / Repeat
Experiment (5) Make a Conclusion. As a student who has learned this same framework of the
scientific method, it has been found that this particular framework is (1) not the most effective
model (2) leaves out important steps. By having a very rigid framework, I believe that this limits
a students creativity in the field of science as well as providing a very narrow view of what
scientists actually do in real world applications. For example, why does there only have to be one
hypothesis tested at a time? In my college experience, my professors profusely states that testing
what are called alternative hypotheses during an experiment was essential to good science;
however, in my high school experience, testing more than one hypothesis at time was considered
a crime against good science. Based on my knowledge base in both science and teaching so
far, I can see a potential argument in the face that maybe public school students cannot handle
such an academic task at their educational levels. I completely disagree with this statement.
By assuming a students level of knowledge, it does not mean that the same level of a
students curiosity can be assumed as well. In using this level of curiosity, I believe that a greater
level of critical thinking can be obtained by a student if given the opportunity to by the teacher.
In my future as a public school science teacher, I plan to accomplish this by teaching a more
effective scientific method to my students by incorporating the use of alternative hypotheses and
giving examples of how this particular model of the scientific method is useful by real world
examples. If this is accomplished, I believe that students that choose to progress further in their
academics will find the model more useful than the previous one in both their studies and
A students knowledge base is important for how the student determines what to do with
time that they are given in this world. Whether it be in science, art, social studies, or
mathematics, a students knowledge base reflects their interests in the most direct way
imaginable. By giving students the opportunity to learn new knowledge from multiple fields of
academia, the student is given more choices in how to perceive and construct their personal goals
in life. For science education, this idea holds true as well. As a bit of a reality check, it is safe to
infer that not every student that crosses my path within a public science classroom will enjoy the
aspect of science, and this I completely understand; however, it does not mean that I must not try
to appeal to every student about science that comes in my classroom either. As a public school
teacher, I must do my very best to convince my students that science if more of a useful tool than
anything else. Sure, some students will find it boring, while the other students find it fascinating;
but, this is not the true purpose of science education. As a science teacher, I need to convey to
my students that the facts and processes of science can be utilized in many ways, even in subjects
By teaching students the power of inquiry, I believe that they have one of the most
powerful, personal tools that they could ever use in life. For example, a student that has an
questions about how a companys stock has gone down in a particular fiscal year. As can be
seen, business is not necessarily the same field as science; however, the processes and ideals
found within science education can still be applied. My goal as a science teacher is not to have
my students be able to memorize formulas and pronounce known facts upon command, but to
invoke a sense of curiosity and inquiry to help them discover things that they may not have
known about on their own. For any career, this mode of thinking is essential, and, by having the
students having this mode of thinking, I can inexplicitly helping my students achieve their
personal goals in life without the direct pressure of choosing a science-based career.
describe my motives as a teacher to be one that this not intimidating and uninviting in regards to
standard conversation between teacher and student; however, I plan to also make it clear that I
encourage my students to follow their dreams despite what others may think, and that they have
my full confidence in achieving those dreams if they are willing to put in the work to do so. For
high school (the grade level that I plan to teach at), I believe that these motives are very
important to convey to students on a personal level because of the fact that some students feel
that they have no one rooting for them. In my personal high school experience, I felt at time
that I was the same way, and wished to have someone rooting for me inside of the school. I do
not want students to enter my classroom thinking that I am not on their side in whatever
endeavors that they are trying to achieve because of the fact that they do not deserve that
treatment from anybody and they are already probably getting that treatment from someone in
Science education is very important thing for any person around the world, and can be
utilized in a variety of ways in regards to both academic and non-academic careers; however, the
goal of science education has be somewhat skewed in the last few decades in this writers
opinion. The lack of adaptation of the scientific method to modern scientific processes as well as
the personal motives behind some current pubic school science teachers can be found to be
disturbing to say the least, but it does not mean that something cannot be done about it. As a
future public school science teacher, I plan to use the knowledge that I have obtained throughout
my college career to teacher future generations of students that there is more than one approach
to science and creativity is encouraged. I plan to show my future students that scientific thinking
can be used in more than just scientific situations throughout their life, so that they can treat
science more like a tool than just a academic subject. Finally, I plan to show my students that
their personal goals are important to me, whether they are science oriented or not, and that I will
do my best to help them reach their goals within my power as public school science teacher. In
the end, I believe adaptation, transparency, and honesty are the best policies as a public school
science teacher in todays society, and I plan to be attributed to these traits among the