Professional Documents
Culture Documents
> A judicially reconstituted title has the same validity and legal effect as the original thereof, and isnt
subject to the reservation that it shall be without prejudice to any party whose right or interest in the
property was duly noted in the original at the time of loss or destruction but which entry or notation
hasnt been
made on the reconstituted title
> The limitation that reconstitution of title should be limited to the certificate as it stood at the time of
its loss or destruction has reference only to changes which alter or affect title of the registered owner
and not to mere liens and other encumbrances
RECONSTITUTION DENOTES
RESTORATION OF THE LOST TITLE
IN ITS ORIGINAL FORM AND
CONDITION
> Purpose is to have it reproduced, after observing the procedure prescribed by law in the same
form they where when the loss or destruction occurred
> The fact that the title to the land was lost doesnt mean that the lot ceased to be a registered land
before the reconstitution of its title
> As the subject land didnt cease to be titled, it cannot be acquired by acquisitive prescription
> Reconstitution is proper only when it is satisfactorily shown that the title sought to be reconstituted
is lost or no longer available
> Where the petition for reconstitution wasnt to restore a lost registered certificate of title but to re-
register and issue a new certificate in the names of petitioner and her deceased husband, in lieu of
one originally registered in the names of other persons, the petition should be denied without
prejudice to the right of the
parties to take the necessary action under Section 51 and 53 of PD1529
> Republic Act 26 provides for special procedure for the reconstitution of torrens certificate of title
that are missing and not fictitious titles which are existing. Where a certificate of title over a parcel of
land was reconstituted judicially and later it was found that there existed a previous certificate of title
covering the same land in the name of another person, the court ruled that the existence of the prior
title ipso facto nullified the reconstitution proceedings
SOURCES OF RECONSTITUTION
ORIGINAL CERTIFICATES OF TITLE
1. The owners duplicate certificate of title
2. The co-owners, mortgagees, or lessees duplicate certificate of title
3. A certified copy of the certificate of title, previously issued by the RD or by a legal custodian
thereof
4. An authenticated copy of the decree of registration or patent, as the case may be, pursuant to
which the original certificate of title was issued
5. A document, on file with the RD, by which the property, the description of which is given in said
document, is mortgaged, leased, or encumbered, or an authenticated copy of said document
showing that its original has been registered
6. Any other document which, in the judgment of the court is sufficient and proper basis for
reconstituting the lost or destroyed certificate of title
REQUIREMENTS OF NOTICE BY
PUBLICATION, POSTING AND
MAILING
1. To be published twice, at the expense of the petitioner, in successive issues of the Official Gazette
2. To be posted on the main entrance of the provincial building and of the municipal building of the
municipality or city in which the land is situated
3. Copy of the notice to be sent by registered mail or otherwise, at the expense of the petitioner, to
every person named therein whose address is known, within 30 days prior the date of hearing
> The jurisdiction of the court is hedged in the forewalls of the petition and the published notice of
hearing which define the subject matter of the petition.