Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Viscosity is a fluid property that measures the resistance of a fluid to flow and can simply
be thought of as the thickness of a fluid. Fluids that have a high viscosity, such as honey or
molasses, have a high resistance to flow while fluids with a low viscosity, such as a gas, flow
easily. The resistance to deformation within a fluid can be expressed as both absolute (or
dynamic) viscosity, [Ns/m2], and kinematic viscosity, [m2/s].
The drag force on an immersed body is in the direction of the flow; thus it works to retard
the motion of a body through a fluid. The diagram below is a schematic of a sphere of radius a
falling freely in a fluid. The weight of the sphere is
W b gV
Fv = 3dsv (2)
The purpose of this experiment is to use one of the oldest and easiest ways to measure
viscosity: we will simply see how fast a sphere falls through a fluid. The measurement involves
determining the velocity of the falling sphere. This is accomplished by dropping each sphere
through a measured distance of fluid and measuring how long it takes to traverse the distance.
Thus, you know distance and time, so you also know velocity, which is distance divided by time.
Additionally, you will have to measure the mass and diameter of the sphere.
1 d 2 S F g
VT
18
Given that, Fv = 3dsvT. Net force=0, the sphere has constant velocity
(3)
Where
d = diameter of sphere
For the last part of this exercise, we will use the Ladenburg correction for the terminal velocity:
d
vT v 1 2.4 s
D
(4)
where v is the observed terminal velocity, and D is the diameter of the infinitely long container.
Procedure
Refer to the Lab Manual PHY242 Experiment 5:- Measurement of Viscosity for the
complete procedure and information on materials used in this lab. All steps were followed as
shown in the Lab Manual with the only deviation of using a different sphere for exercise 2,
whose measurements were: diameter = 9.37 0.1 mm and mass = 1.0 0.05 g.
of 9.48 0.01 mm
19.04 0.01 mm
25.36 0.01 mm
Sample Calculations, graphs and tables are shown in the appendix
From Figure 1. And table 1. the viscosity of the shampoo used was determined to be 7835.7 50.2
centipoise (cP) and the literature value is just below 5000 cP and so the experimental error is
56.7%.
In the second experiment the temperature dependence on viscosity was determined and analyzed.
Using equation (3) and by measuring the terminal velocity of sphere 4 dropped into the shampoo, the
viscosities at different temperatures was measured. This is shown in table 2. This is shown to be inverse
relationship so that it agrees with the theory.
The last exercise of the experiment deals with the dependence of viscosity on the length
of the cylinder that contains the fluid. Using equation (4) he observed terminal velocities was
compared to the actual and the results are shown in table 3. From the table it can be seen that
finiteness of the container is also an inverse relationship to the terminal velocity as well as the
viscosity of the fluid.
Discussion
The experiment involved 3 different exercises which all related to the determination of
the relationships of the viscosity of the fluid. For the first part of the experiment, three different
spheres with diameters of of 9.48 0.01 mm, 19.04 0.01 mm and 25.36 0.01 mm were
dropped in the shampoo and the terminal velocity of them were calculated and was graphed. For
the first part of the experiment, three different spheres with diameters of of 9.48 0.01 mm,
19.04 0.01 mm and 25.36 0.01 mm were dropped in the shampoo. The density of the
shampoo was found to be 1.0357 0.0064 g/ml and the spheres dropped into it were made of a
material whose density was 2.1786 0.0137 g/cm 3. Table 1. Shows the terminal velocities of the
different spheres. and Figure 1. Shows the relationship between the terminal velocity vs the sq.
diameter of the spheres and this helps to determine the viscosity of the shampoo, which was
found to be 7835.7 50.2 centipoise (cP) and the literature value varies across different
companies of the shampoo producers and on an average is just below 5000 cP, which gives a
deviation of 56.7 % from the literature value.
In the second part of the experiment the relationship between the viscosity ad temperature
was determined. Looking at table 2. It is clear that the relationship was inverse and this agrees
with the phenomenon by which liquid viscosity tends to decrease (or, alternatively,
its fluidity tends to increase) as its temperature increases. The affects of increasing or decreasing
the temperature also can be analyzed using table 1. For example, as the temperature is decreased,
the heat is taken away from a fluid, its particles slow down and come closer together which
causes the fluid to contract (volume to decrease). This causes the density to increase (D=M/V if
V gets smaller, M/V gets bigger) and Viscosity will also be affected, as particles slow down and
come closer together, it gets harder for them to move past each other. Therefore, viscosity
increases. Also Increasing Temperature as heat is added to a fluid, its particles speed up and
spread out. This causes the fluid to expand (its volume increases). This causes the density to
decrease (D=M/V if V gets bigger, M/V gets smaller) and Viscosity will also be affected, as
particles speed up and move apart, it gets easier for them to move past each other. Therefore,
viscosity decreases.
In the last part of the experiment, the dependence of viscosity on the length of the
cylinder that contains the fluid. Several approximations have been suggested for the finite
containers, one of which is Ladenburg correction for terminal velocity which we will be using
for the purpose of this exercise. Table 3. Shows the observed terminal velocities from exercises 1
and was compared to the actual velocities. From the above table, it can be concluded that the
finiteness of the container plays a crucial role in the terminal velocity and thereby the viscosity
of the fluid. The high percent deviation in the terminal velocity explains the big percent deviation
in the measurement of the viscosity of the shampoo from exercise 1 as discussed before.
In conclusion the experiment was not as successful as expected. The experimental error
was 57% which shows that many errors occurred during the experiment.
Sources of Error
During the course of the experiment we encountered many different errors as the
deviation was calculated to be 57%. This clearly shows that many errors took place during the
experiment. For example, it could be accounted due to the approximation made for the observed
terminal velocity of the spheres and the actual velocities was not taken into consideration except
for comparing the both which can be seen in table (3). Also the cylinder that contained fluid was
not taken into account as there could have been an error while measuring the values. Even
though the spheres were dropping approximately the same distance from the top of the fluid,
there could be deviations as to the difference of distances that each sphere was dropped and this
couldve lead to the deviations.
Appendix
m
=
V
4 3 4 3
V = r = ( 0.952cm )
3 3
3
V =3.614 c m
7.9 g
=
3.614 c m3
=2.1859 g/c m3
( m 2 V 2
=
m )( )
+
V
( 0.005 2 0.05 2
=2.1859
19.04 )( )
+
7.9
3
=0.0138 g/c m
49.9 cm
vt =
11.240.1
t
v =4.479 cm/ s
g ( s )
Slope=
18
=78.357 Poise
=7835.7 centipoise
(
2
m 2 vt 2
=
m )( )( )
+ t +
v
Vt=8.0078 cm/s
7835.75000
Error= x 100
5000
Error=56.7
4
Terminal Velocity (cm/s)
3
Reference
1. Physics Lab Manual, Electrostatic charge University of Toronto Mississauga,
2016
2. http://www.americanlaboratory.com/913-Technical-Articles/778-Measurement-of-Viscosity-in-a-
Vertical-Falling-Ball-Viscometer/
3. http://www.qclabequipment.com/VISCOSITY.html
4. https://www.slideshare.net/KrunalParmar4/viscosity-measurement-43704393
5. http://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/1.4948314