Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Observation Notebook
1. Students will be able to identify the direct object noun clause, the subject noun clause
and the object of preposition noun clause.
2. Students will be able to produce sentences with the noun clause.
The first question that T focuses on is When did Steve Jobs introduce the Mac?
T asks, Do you know when?
Ss shake their head and answer No.
According to Sss reaction, T guides, No guesses? Nobody studied computer
history?
Ss still shake their head.
10:10 T answers the question by herself, I looked it up. Its on January 24th, 1984.
T underlines the noun clause and analyses the structure of the sentence on the
board. We have a Wh- question coming after a subject and a verb. So from our list of
three noun clauses, which one is it?
S. V.
I discovered when SJ introduced the Mac.
S. V. + D.O.
I discovered when SJ introduced the Mac.
10:20 T turns to the second question, Alright, here is another sentence. What was Steve
Jobs first computer called?
Ss keep silent.
T asks again, Do you have any idea? Its not Mac. No guesses?
Ss still shake their heads.
T sits down in front of the computer and says, Ill show you!
Ss raise their head and look at the screen.
T adjusts the screen, Can you see the name? L-I-S-A. Lisa!
Ss laugh and the class atmosphere starts to be active.
T shows her surprise, Oh, my gosh! Thats me! Wow! Do you think I forget the
name? No, I dont forget my name. So I want to check out more information about it.
Can you guess how much the Lisa computer cost in 1983?
One of Ss doesnt catch up the question and asks for repetition.
T repeats the question again.
Ss guess, $6,000? $10,000?
T nods and answers, Almost $10,000 in 1983! So today, that will be about
$23,000 for one computer.
Ss are surprised about the high price.
T explains the word and analyses the structure of the sentence, marking the
important point on the board. Find out is a verb. Out looks like a preposition, but
find out together makes one verb-a phrasal verb. Find out means discover some
information, so find and find out have different meaning. Thats why its a phrasal
verb, no preposition.
According to Example 1&2, T elicites the rule from these examples. (Be sure to
omit helping verb do, does, or did in a noun clause.)
10:30 T makes a comprehension check and examines Sss the former knowledge that St
learned about the simple past. I take out did, but I didnt change this verb(cost). Why
not?
A S answers, Cost, cost, cost. They are the same.
T gives the positive feedback and explains, Yeah! Cost, cost, cost. Sometimes we
change the verb, if it is a verb that will be come ed, for example. But sometimes we
dont.
10:35 T presents Ss with a new example and writes it on the board (Example 3).
T compares this sentence with the former example (The direct object noun clause)
and asks, Do you remember which form this is? That one is the direct object. How about
this one?
S answers, Subject.
T nods and analyses the structure of the sentence on the board.
T writes another example on the board (Example 4) and highlights every word part.
According to Example 3&4, T figures out the rule from the example. (When the
noun clause is a subject, use a singular main verb.)
10:40 T gives a new example and writes it on the board (Example 5).
T gives the direction to Ss about this type of noun clauses. Here we have the word
about. This noun clause comes after the preposition about, so this one we call object
of preposition.
T summarizes that there are three types of noun clauses. (Direct Object; Subject;
Object of Prep.)
10:45 T asks Ss to look at the information in the handout and reads, When who or what
is the subject, do not change the word order.
Ss look puzzled.
T explains this point with an example (Example 6).
T asks Ss to find out the difference between the question and the noun clause.
Ss answer in chorus, No difference.
T nods and repeats the rule again. So When the question word is the subject: who
or what, no change.
T writes another example (Example 7) one the board and analyses their structure.
S. V.
Who is absent?
S. V.
I wonder who is absent.
10:50 To make sure slower Ss can also catch up with, T gives an another oral example
and repeat the rule a third time. Same with what. What happened last night? Can you
tell me what happened last night? No change. So what or who as a subject, do not change
anything from the question to the noun clause. Understand?
Ss respond in chorus, Yes.
T gives the positive feedback, Excellent!
10:52 T asks Ss to do some exercise (about the noun clause) in the textbook. (Fill in the
blanks according to the tape)
10:55 T checks answers.
10:58 T gives Ss homework.
Class ends.
What did you learn about teaching or learning from this lesson as it relates to the
theory you have studied in your TESOL classes? Include at least one reference (with
an in-text citation) to support your response. (250-500 words)
In this observation, I focused on the procedures and techniques for teaching grammar.
This is a 500-Level Grammar class, which is for low advanced students. The students in
this class were from different countries, such as Korea, Japan, China and Saudi Arabia. I
wanted to see how the teacher helped the students master the noun clause.
In terms of the technique for teaching grammar, Lisa combined the inductive approach
with the deductive approach to teach the grammar. According to Harmer (1999), in an
inductive approach, students are presented with examples, rather than rules, then they
figure out the generalization from the examples (p.49). It is evident that the rules
discovered by self are likely to be more memorable and impressive. In Lisas class, she
gave students Example 1&2 to help them derive the understanding of the rule (omit
helping verb do, does, or did in a noun clause). I learned that it is worthwhile to spend
some time in inducing students to generalize some rules by themselves. Furthermore,
grammar was also taught deductively in her class. At 10:45, Lisa presented a rule (When
who or what is the subject, do not change the word order), which was followed by
Example 6&7. She explained how the rule can be applied through the two examples, so
that students mastered the rule quickly. In fact, it seems possible that some rules can be
explained more digestibly than induced from multiple examples.
Harmer, Jeremy. (1999). How to Teach Grammar. Charlbury: Pearson Education Limited.