Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E-mail: tony_lijin@yahoo.com,azami.zaharim@gmail.com,ksopian@eng.ukm.my
Abstract:- Photovoltaic solar cell generate electric by receiving sun light or solar irradiance. But solar cell
recieved heat from solar irradiance as well and this will reduced the efficiency of the solar cell. The heat trap at
the solar photovoltaic panel become waste energy. The solution for this was by adding a cooling system to the
photovoltaic panel. The purpose of this paper was to cool the solar cell in order to increase its electrical
efficiency and also to produce heat energy in the form of hot air. Hot air can be used for drying applications. A
single pass PVT with rectangle tunnel absorber has been developed. The rectangle tunnel acted as an absorber
and was located at the back side of a standard photovoltaic panel. The dimension of the photovoltaic panel was
120 cm X 53 cm. The size of the rectangle tunnel was 27 units of tunnel bar with the size of 1.2cm X 2.5cm X
120 cm (width X tall X length) and 12 units with 1.2cm X 2.5cm X 105.3cm (width X tall X length). The
rectangle tunnel was connected in parallel. The PVT collector has been tested using a solar simulator. Results:
Electrical efficiency increased when the solar cell was cool by air flow. Solar photovoltaic thermal collector
with rectangle tunnel absorber has better electrical and thermal efficiency compared to solar collector without
rectangle tunnel absorber. Photovoltaic, thermal and combined photovoltaic thermal efficiency of 10.02 %,
54.70 %, 64.72 % at solar irradiance of 817.4 W/m2, mass flow rate of 0.0287 kg/s at ambiant temperature of
25 oC respectively has been obtained. Conclusions: The hybrid photovoltaic and thermal with rectangle tunnel
as heat absorber shows higher performance compared to conventional PV/T system.
= AVav (1)
ImVm
el = X 100 % (3)
AcS
Fig. 3: Solar Photovoltaic thermal air collector
Air flow out
Blowe
Cp(To - (4)
th = Ti ) X 100 %
PVT solar ApS
collector
5 Error Analysis The error for mass flow rate was 0.0052 kg/s for
Every apparatus have their limitation of precise example (75452) X 10-4 kg/s. Error for electrical
when collecting datas. This makes the apparatus efficiency around 4.04 % to 4.43 % and for thermal
have their own error and this error will affect the efficiency was around 0.28 % to 0.49 %. Error for
result of calculation. An equation to calculate error thermal efficiency was lower then electrical
was needed when the equation contain 2 values or efficiency and its because the mass flow rate used
above with error. Deferentiation can be used to in thermal calculation had smaller error compare to
calculate error equation. current and voltage used in electrical.
For mass flow rates equation, which was 80
density of air X area of air flow X air velocity.
) 70
Density of air can be excluded from error equation C
o(
s 60
because its a constant value. Equation to calculate ,Te
r 50
error for mass flow rate was shown below: u
t
ar 40
e
p
(5) m
Te
30
l 20
a WithoutTunnel
n
e
P 10 WithTunnel
0
For electrical efficiency, which was current 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08
surface area X solar irradiance. All this values was Fig. 7: Comparison of panels temperature
calculated by apparatus and so had errors.
2.50
(6)
2.00
(7)
)
A 1.50
I(,
t
n
e
rr
(8) u 1.00
C
0.50
WithoutTunnel
For thermal efficiency equation, spesific heat WithTunnel
for air, Cp was a constant value and not determine 0.00
using any apparatus. Thus, Cp can be ignore when 0.00 5.00 10.00
Voltage,V(V)
15.00 20.00
with tunnel have power maximum of 22.45 W and 0.04 kg/s. For collector with tunnel, thermal
collector without tunnel has only 20.66 W. efficiency reached steady stage after 0.07 kg/s of
From Figure 7 and Figure 8 can be noticed that mass flow rate. From Figure 7 and figure 10 above,
photovoltaic cells that have lower temperature can the thermal efficiency can increase about 30% if
archived higher open circuit voltage (Voc), short temperature of photovoltaic module drops about
circuit current (Isc), and also power maximum (Pm). 20oC.
This result shows that lower temperature of 90
0
collector with tunnel shows better efficiency in 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
References:
[1] Kemmoku, Y., Egami, T., Hiramatsu, M.,
Miyazaki, Y., Araki, K. Modelling of module
temperature of a concentrator PV system.
http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/
app/solar/research/Syracuse/pdf/19thEUPVSE
C_5BV-2-40.pdf
[2] Charalambous, P. G., Maidment, G. G.,
Kalogirou, S. A. & Yiakoumetti, K. 2007.
Photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) collectors: A
review. Applied Thermal Engineering 27: 275-
286.
[3] Grag, H. P. 1982. Treatise on solar energy.
Chicester: John Wiley & Sons.
[4] Jayaraman, K.S. & Gupta, D.K. 1995. Drying
of fruits and vegetables, Handbook of
industrial drying, Marcel Dekker Inc: 643-690.
[5] Amir, J. E., Grandegger, K., Esper, A.,
Sumarsono, M., Djaya, C. & Muhlbauer, W.
1991. Development of a multi-purpose solar
tunnel dryer for use in humid tropics. Renew.
Energy 1 (2):167 176.
[6] Sopian K, Yigit KS, Liu HT, Kakac S,
Veziroglu TN. Performance analysis of
photovoltaic thermal air heaters. Energy