Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Katihanna Homki , Per H. Nielsen , Arumugam Sathasivan & Erik L. J. Bohe (2003) Life cycle assessment
and environmental improvement of residential and drinking water supply systems in Hanoi, Vietnam, International Journal of
Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 10:1, 27-42, DOI: 10.1080/13504500309469783
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the Content) contained
in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the
Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and
should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for
any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever
or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of
the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Int. J. Sustain. Dm. World Ktnl. 10 (2003) 27-42
Key words: Life cycle assessment, drinking water supply, water supply, bottled water, environment,
Downloaded by [University of Ulster Library] at 01:40 25 November 2014
eco-design, Vietnam
SUMMARY
In many Asian cities the public water supply is characterised by low pressure, frequent
interruptions and occasional contamination. Hence, private households have to store
water and increase pressure individually to ensure an uninterrupted supply at sufficient
pressure and water for drinking has to be boiled or supplied separately in bottles. In this
study the present water supply system in Hanoi and a number of modification options
were analysed from an environmental point of view through life cycle assessment (LCA)
in order to identify the most sustainable solutions for future water supply. It was found
that the boiling of water for drinking was the largest source of impacts in the present
system. Impacts could be reduced significantly if the public supply network was improved
and private pumping and storage could be avoided and if the water could be used
directly for drinking. It was also found that impacts could be reduced if consumers used
bottled water for drinking instead of boiling tap water. Finally, it was demonstrated that
even if drinking water cannot be supplied directly through the public network, a reliable
public water supply at high pressure is environmentally advantageous. Sensitivityanalyses
revealed that the conclusions of this study are likely to be applicable to other cities with
similar water supply systems.
INTRODUCTION
In many urban settings in Asia the quality of other facilities to ensure uninterrupted water
water supplied from the public water supply flow at sufficient pressure. However, drinking
network does not meet drinking water quality water treatment, private pumping and storage
standards. Therefore, water is treated in many of water requires pumps, pipes and tanks, as well
households before drinking, for example by as energy. The production, transportation, use
boiling. In many cases the water pressure in the and disposal of these items use resources (e.g.
public pipeline is also insufficient for the different coal, iron, and oil) and cause emissions (e.g.
uses in the household and the water flow is often COY,NO,, and SO,), which contribute to various
interrupted. Hence, many households are environmental impacts (e.g. global warming and
equipped with water storage tanks, pumps, and acidification).
Correspondence: Per H. Nielsen, Hjortholms Alle 13, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark. e-mail: pn@lca.dk
27
Wuter supj9ly systems in Hanoi Ilomuki et al.
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a method for and 3) identification of the most sustainable
evaluating the effects that a product or system water supply options in various cases.
has on the environment over the entire period The environmental assessment followed
of its life, i.e from extraction and processing of principles presented in Wenzel et al. (1997) that
the raw materials, through the manufacturing, comply with the general principles of I S 0 14040
packaging, use, re-use, and maintenance pro- (ISO, 1997). Inventory and impact assessment
cesses, to the recycling or disposal as waste at the calculations were performed with the SimaPro
end of the cycle (Curran, 1996; Graedel, 1998; 4.0 LCA software package. In inventory analysis,
Molina et al., 1998;Weidema, 1997;Wenzel et al., emissions and resource consumption (exchanges
1997). with the environment) were analysed and quan-
Many LCA studies have been published about tified for all significant processes in the water
electrochemical products, food products, pack- supply systems life cycle. The total exchanges
aging, furniture, etc. over the last decade (UNEP, (Q) of each substance (i) was calculated as:
1999; EEA, 1998), but only a few studies have
been published on public water systems (Lundin,
Downloaded by [University of Ulster Library] at 01:40 25 November 2014
Table 1 Main characteristics of water supply Concepts 1, 2, and 3. All quantities per functional unit
-, not relevant
treated before consumption. According to in the city, a rough assumption was made: 80% of
interviews done with local households, the most metals in storage tank, pumps, and pipes in a
common treatment method is boiling. In this house are recycled.
concept, it was assumed that all the households The public part of the water supply network
boil their water. Households boil water three included water pipes (ranging from 32 to 600 mm
times per day for 8 min each time. Energy sources i.d.) in various materials (ductile iron, PVC
for boiling are electricity (50% of households), (polyvinyl chloride), or HDPE (high density
liquefied petroleum gas (LPG, 35%), and coal polyethylene) ) . The public pipes are mostly laid
briquettes burnt in bucket stoves (15%). underground and it was assumed that they are
The structure of the water supply system is not recycled after the end of their useful life
shown in Figure 1 and the life cycle flow diagram because: 1) they can be difficult to access and 2)
is shown in Figure 2. A list of applied items is they are usually seriously degraded by corrosion.
shown in the parts list in Table 2. The household The physical water loss in the public water supply
installations consist of a pump, masonry storage network was assumed to be 45% (HWSP, 1999).
tank at ground level, storage tank at the top of the
Downloaded by [University of Ulster Library] at 01:40 25 November 2014
Storage tank
- Masonry: 2 m?, Steel: 1 m:' ,
Hot dip galvanized steel pipe
-Total length: 12 m
, I
Private pump I
I
- Output: 250 w I
I
I
-- - - ---- Booster pump - Electricty use: 0.42 kWh/m' I I
I I -Electricity use: 0.06 kWh/m' I
I I r----:
I I Ground level I Three-
I I Transmission line Distribution line storage tank I storey
I
1 Water
I
I
1 - / / - Volume: 2 m ' I
I
house
Figure 1 Structure of the reference water supply system. (All units in the figure were included in the study except
water treatment plant and house)
Extraction of .
sand
I I I
Extraction of ) Production of
copper copper
Use of
>
1 1 I I - water supply system
Extraction of ) Production of ) Production of )
chromium + stainless steel steel tank Assembly of -Public pumping
household - - electricity
water supply
Extraction of
-
Production of
cast iron
7 Production of
P"mP
) system
- Private pumping
- electricity
nickel - Boiling of drinking water
r Extraction of
iron ore >
Production of
steel
- cod1
-electricity
- LPG'
Extraction of Production of
oil LPG'
1 I I I I I
Extraction of ) Production of
coal coal briquettes Production and
, I 1 I assembly ofpublic I
)
Damming water Production of
for hydropower electricity'
gure 2 Life cycle flow diagram of Concept 1, boiling ofwater for drinking. (All processes except those shown in broken line boxes were included in the study
quified petroleum gas
though the electricity production has been shown only in one line, electricity consumption was included in all relevant procesess
aw material extraction, material production, and manufacturing processes for pipes and pumps in public network were included in the study but are not shown
Water supply systems in Hanoi Ilomaki ~t al.
Matm'nl Numhw of
production Process Total UllllS p w
Relevant included Manufacturing included uieight Lzjefetz71w' funrtaonnl
in conrep1 Itmi Material in model processvs in model (kg) (years) unzf
Pipes in public Ductile iron, Yes Production of iron Yes 100 40 0.75
pipeline PVC, HDPE Production of PVC resin Yes
(per house) Production of HDPE resin Yes
Centrifugal casting Yes
Extrusion Yes
Pumps in public Cast iron, Yes Production of iron and steel Yes 1060 10 7 x 10.'
network Steel, copper Centrifugal casting Yes
Water tower Steel Yes Rolling steel Yes 500 ton 40 2 . 4 lo4'
~
Concrete No - No -
Water bottle PET Yes Injection forming Yes 0.85 0.2.5" 120
Blow moulding Yes
I 1
Use of
water supply system --4 ' Disposal in
landfill
I
I
assrmhly of - Public pumping
household - electricity
water wpply
system' -Private pumping Recycling I
- electricty
public water
supply network'
Figure 3 Life cycle flow diagram of Concept 2, use of bottled drinking water. (All processes except those shown in
broken line boxes were included in the study)
'See Figure 2
that pressure can be increased, the physical loss All significant transportation processes were
is reduced and private pumping and storage can included in the study (see Table 3).
be avoided. System boundaries and basic data
are shown in Figure 4 and Table 2. To increase
the pressure and ensure uninterrupted water Neglected processes
flow a high-capacity water tower ('7600 mS) was
assumed to be built. The types of pipes currently Manufacturing, transportation, use and disposal
applied in Hanoi are sufficient to resist the of spare parts, and other materials needed in
increased pressure and it was assumed that the maintenance of the system were considered
system is implemented gradually as the current insignificant due to their relatively low weight
system is rehabilitated and that only the and hence not included in the study.
engineering and management of the new system
is improved to meet the higher demands. Based
on dialogue with water supply consultants, the Impact categories
water loss after modification was assumed to be Four impact categories were included in the
25%. study: acidification, nutrient enrichment, global
warming, and photochemical ozone formation.
Use of
water supply system
- Public pumping
- electricity
t I
4
-- -------
- L--_____- landfill
Recycling
I
Disposal in I
I
1
Allocation
Allocation in the LCA model due to recycling of
materials used in storage tanks, pipes, water
bottles, etc. was avoided by system expansion
I
1
1I
production Of Production and
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
electricity'
assembly of Inventory analysis and impact assessment
public water
of the reference system
The inventory results for the reference system
(Concept 1) are shown in Table 4.The results
Figure 4 Life cycle flow diagram of Concept 3, potable
public supply. (All processes except those shown in show that large amounts of energy carriers are
broken line boxes were included in the study) consumed in the present system and considerable
'See Figure 2 amounts of metals are consumed even though
From 7b
1,2,3 Ductile iron pipe South Korea Hai Phong 3000 Ship
Hai Phong Hanoi 100 Truck
1, 2, 3 PVC pipe (for South Korea Hai Phong SO00 Ship
public pipeline) Hai Phong Hanoi 100 Truck
1,2, 3 HDPE pipe South Korea Hai Phong 3000 Ship
Hai Phong Hanoi 100 Truck
1 Coal dust Quang Ninh Hanoi 160 Truck
1 LPG bottles' Vung Tao Hanoi 1700 Truck
2 PET resin for South Korea Ho Chi Minh 4700 Ship
Water bottles City
2 Water bottle HCMC: Hai Duong 1800 Truck
2 Bottled water Hai Duong Hanoi 60 Truck
quite a high recycling rate for the private part of Water pumping in houses and in the public
the supply system was applied. Furthermore, large network was found to contribute equally to all
amounts of polluting substances are emitted to impact categories. The reason is that electricity
water, land, and especially air. consumption for pumping the water from the
The impact assessment of Concept 1 (see public treatment plant through the city to the
Figure 5 ) showed that boiling of water for user is of the same order as that for pumping the
drinking is the most significant source of all water from ground level to roof level in a private
analysed environmental impacts, representing house.
40-80% of the total contribution. The large The environmental impacts associated with
contribution from boiling water is a result oE 1 ) producing, transporting and recycling installa-
-
water's high heat capacity (4.2 KJ.("C l)-'); 2) tions in the water supply system (public and
the applied sources of energy; and 3) inefficient private) were of the same order as pumping for
small-scale boiling practices in private all impact categories, except acidification. The
households. Contributions to photochemical main sources of acidification were production of
ozone formation from boiling were especially cast iron pipes, which are used to a large extent
high because large amounts ofVOCs are emitted in the public part of the network, and production
during incomplete combustion of coal in the of bricks for.the masonry tanks which are used in
bucket stoves. An assessment on energy use almost all houses as a part of the private system.
demonstrated that boiling of water for drinking Contributions to environmental impacts from
consumed about 50% of total energy (results recycling and transportation processes were
not shown). generally small: less than 1% and 5%,respectively.
Table 4 Selected exchanges with the environment for Concepts I, 2, and 3 per
functional unit
Resources
Chromium 2.3 2.3 1.2
Coal 2.1 1.1 0.35
Copper 0.79 0.79 0.070
Crude oil 1200 520 160
Iron 55 55 44
Lignite 22 16 4.8
Nickel 6.1 6.1 6.1
Water (process and cooling) 2.5 3.0 1.2
Zinc 3.2 3.2 0
Emissions to air
co 10 7.5 5.6
Downloaded by [University of Ulster Library] at 01:40 25 November 2014
In order to identify means to reduce the Concept 1 is modified into Concept 2 or 3. The
environmental impacts associated with the water main reasons are that: 1 ) energy consumption
supply, a number of modifications at both from bottle production, water treatment,
conceptual and detailed level were analysed and bottling, and transportation in Concept 2 is lower
compared with the existing system. than energy consumption from water boiling in
Concept 1;2) energy consumption for pumping
drinking water from the public treatment plant
Modifications at the conceptual level directly to the consumers tap in Concept 3 is
Analyses at the conceptual level covered Concept lower than energy consumption for delivering
1 (reference), Concept 2 (drinking water the water in bottles (Concept 2 ) ; and 3)
supplied in bottles) and Concept 3 (public significantly less raw materials are used for the
network supplies of potable water). The inventory private part of the water supply system when
results are shown in Table 4.A comparison of private pumping and storage is avoided in
environmental exchanges of the three concepts Concept 3.
showed that resources and energy can be saved Results of the environmental impact assess-
and emissions to environment reduced if ment of the three concepts are shown in Table 5
Global warming
Boiling of water
for drinking
49%
u Nutrient enrichment
Water pumping
Boiling of water
for drinking
57%
L .,
Water pumping (public.netwqrk)
_. Installations
Downloaded by [University of Ulster Library] at 01:40 25 November 2014
Boiling of water
for drinking
83%
Figure 5 Breakdown of contributions to various environmental impact potentials for Concept 1. Installations include
manufacture, transportation and recycling of pipes, pumps (private and public), and storage tanks
Table 5 Environmental impact potentials for Concepts 1 , 2 and 3. (All quantities are per functional unit)
~~
Environmental
impact mtegov Unit Conwpt 1 Concept 2 Concqbt 3
~~
and Figure 6. As expected from the inventory, it Modifications at the detail level
was found that Concept 1 clearly has a larger Analyses at the detailed level covered energy
contribution to all studied environmental impact sources for boiling the water and three different
categories than Concepts 2 and 3. Contributions sources of energy (electricity, LPG and coal)
to the studied environmental impacts would were assessed in order to identify the most
be reduced by 4 0 4 0 % if Concept 2 was environmentallyfriendly solution within Concept
implemented and 80-90% if Concept 3 was 1. The assessment included only the boiling
implemented. process and the results are shown in Figure 7
I I
Global warming
Acidification
Nutrient
enrichment
Photochemical I
ozone formation
I
Downloaded by [University of Ulster Library] at 01:40 25 November 2014
I I I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100 (%)
0 Concept 1 (Boiling)
Concept 2 (Bottled water)
IConcept 3 (Potable public supply)
Figure 6 Relative contributions to environmental impact potentials for the three concepts for residential water
supply
Global warming
Acidification
Nutrient
enrichment
Photochemical
ozone formation
I
I I I I I 1
0 100 200 300 400 500 (%)
Figure 7 Relative contributions to environmental impact potentials for various energy sources for boiling ofwater for
drinking. (LPG: liquefied petroleum gas)
in terms of relative environmental impact modified Concept 1 (boiling with LPG) and
potentials. It was observed that boiling water Concepts 2 and 3 was made. In this comparison
using LPG contributed less to the studied only processes directly related to drinking water
environmental impacts whereas using coal were taken into account, namely boiling with
contributed more than the present mix. LPG (Concept I ) , water treatment, bottle
Contributions to environmental impacts would washing, bottling, etc. (Concept 2) and pumping
be reduced by 50-70% if all households used drinking water from public treatment works to
LPG as the energy carrier instead of the present the user (Concept 1 and 3 ) . The drinking water
mix, and contributions would increase by 70- constitutes 0.8% of the total water supply to
300% if all households used coal briquettes. households (see Table 1 ) and this fraction of the
Environmental impacts would remain almost water supply installations was allocated to
unchanged (global warming and acidification drinking water. The results are shown in Figure
potentials) or be reduced by 40-70% (nutrient 8. It was found that Concepts 2 and 3 contribute
enrichment and photochemical ozone formation significantly less to all impact categories than
potential) if electricity was used as the energy Concept 1, even with LPG as the energy source.
Downloaded by [University of Ulster Library] at 01:40 25 November 2014
Global warming
Acidification
Nutrient
enrichment u
Photochemical I
ozone formation U
I I I I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100 (%)
Downloaded by [University of Ulster Library] at 01:40 25 November 2014
Figure 8 Relative contributions to environmental impact potentials for three concepts (drinking water only)
Global warming
Acidification
Nutrient enrichment
i
Photochemical
Ozone formation
Chromium
Copper
Iron
I
I I I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100 (76)
Reference system
Revised system
Figure 9 Relative contributions to environmental impact potentials and consumption of selected metals for reference
system (private pumping and storage are required) and revised system (private pumping and storage are not required
due to the increased pressure in public network)
Hanoi and avariety of assumptions and estimates Europe is generally higher than in Vietnam and
have been made to accomplish the calculations. emission control is generally more restrictive,
In order to evaluate the strength of the results the same processes in Vietnam would probably
and analyse to what extent they could be applied cause more emissions per produced unit and
under different conditions a sensitivityassessment the emissions and resource consumption
of the significant parameters, which are subject recorded in this study are probably on the low
to most uncertainty and/or variation has been side. Since Concept 3 depends on fewer materials
performed. and processes than Concepts 1 and 2, the
conclusions regarding this concepts advantages
would probably be stronger if local data had
Electricity mix been applied. It is difficult to assess how the
Large amounts of electricity are consumed for application of local data could influence the
water supply and the applied electricity mix is results, and it is therefore stressed that only
important for the results of this study. In order large differences in environmental impacts (>
to analyse whether the conclusionswould change 25%) have been interpreted asvalid in this study.
Downloaded by [University of Ulster Library] at 01:40 25 November 2014
boiling of water for drinking. The second largest solution for water supply in Hanoi would be to
source is electricity used for pumping of water improve the water supply system and supply water
from the public supplier to the consumer during and drinking water at high pressure, quality and
the use phase. Contributions from public reliability and hence avoid private pumping,
pumping and private pumping are similar. storage and boiling. The second best solution
Production processes related to water supply would be to maintain the present supply system
installations are the third largest source of but avoid boiling of water by supplying drinking
environmental impacts, but are also the main water in bottles. The third best solution would
source of material consumption. Contributions be to switch to LPG as energy source for boiling
to environmental impacts from transportation of drinking water.
and material recycling processes are relatively Finally, it was demonstrated that even if
small. drinking water cannot be supplied directly
In order to identify more sustainable solutions through the public network, it will be environ-
for water supply in Hanoi a number of modifi- mentally advantageous to improve the public
cations to the supply system at the conceptual supply system by increasing pressure, improving
Downloaded by [University of Ulster Library] at 01:40 25 November 2014
and at the detailed levels were analysed and reliability of supply and avoiding private pumping
assessed. Assessment of two modifications at the and storage. Sensitivity analyses revealed that
conceptual level showed that resource con- the conclusions of this study are likely to be also
sumption and environmental impacts could be applicable in other cities with similar water supply
reduced significantly if: 1) drinking water was systems.
supplied in bottles as a replacement to boiling,
or 2) the public water supply network was
improved and drinking water was supplied
directly through the public network, avoiding
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
private pumping, storage and boiling. The authors would like to thank the Institute for
Assessments at the detailed level showed that Environmental Science and Technology, Hanoi
significant savings could also be achieved if University of Technology,Vietnam, which hosted
households in Hanoi used LPG as energy source parts of this study and supported the data
for boiling instead of the present mix of energy collection. The authors would also like to thank
sources (coal briquettes, LPG and electricity). the Vietnam Cleaner Production Centre and
Further studies are required before conclusions Hanoi Water Supply Programme and all other
related to electricity as energy source for boiling organisations and private persons who gave
can be made. support during data collection. The study was
Environmental comparison of the studied financed by the European Commission and
modification options showed that the best Danida, Denmark.
REFERENCES
Curran,M.A. (1996).EnvironmentalLife-qrkAssessmmt. Graedel, T.E. ( 1998). Streamlined Lzfp--cyrkAssu.wmmt.
(USA McGraw-Hill) (NewJersey:Prentice Hall, Inc.)
Dennison, F.J., Azapagic,A., Clift, R. and Colbourne, Heijungs, R., Guinee, J.B., Huppes, G. el al. (1992).
J.S. (1999). Life cycle assessment: comparing EnvironmentalLife Cycle Assessment of Products.
strategic options for the mains infrastructure,Part I Guide, I1 Backgrounds. NOH report 9266 and
I. Water Science Technology,39, 315-19 9267. (Leiden:Centre of Environmental Science)
EEA (1998).Life Cycle Assessment ( L a ) - A Guide to HWSP (1999). Non-Revenue Water Identijcation Pilot
Approaches, Experiences and Information Sources, Programm. Study 2. Hanoi Water Supply Pro-
EnvironmentalIssues Series, no. 6. (Copenhagen: gramme, Phase IV.Internal report
European Environment Agency) Ilomaki, K. (2001). Environmental Optimization of
EM (2001).Official Enrrrgy Statisticsfrom the US Govern- Rccsidential Water Supply: A Case .study in Hanoi,
wzent. Countly Analysis Brief 2001 Vietnam. Energy Vietnam. Thesis. Asian Institute of Technology,
Information Administration, www.eia.doe.gov Thailand
I S 0 ( 1997). Environmental Management - Lije Cycle UNEP (1999). Towards the Global Usr o/ I,@ Cyck
Assessment - Principles and Framework. International Assessment. (Paris : United Nations)
Standard I S 0 14140:1997. International Organi- USDOE (1999). Enera and Environmental Projilr of the
zation for Standardization US Metalcasting Industly. (USA US Department of
Lundin, M., Bengtsson, M. and Molander, S. (2000). Energy, Office of Industrial Technologies)
Life Cycle Assessment of wastewater systems: van Tilburg, J., Nieuwlaar, E. and Geerts, J, (1997).
Influence of system boundaries and scale on Environmental Analysis for Choosing Betwren a Sin&
calculated environmental loads. Environmental orDualDomestic Water Supply. In 5th SETAC Europe
Science 6'Technology, 34, 180-6 LCA Case Studies Symposium. (Brussels: SETAC
Molina, A., Kusiaka, A. and Sanchez,J. (eds) (1998). Europe)
Handbook of Lye Cycle En@ne&ng - Concyepts, Models VNCPC (2000). CkanerProduction Assessment. Vietnam
and Ilbchnologirs. (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Cleaner Production Centre. Hanoi
Publishers) Wallen, E. (1999). Livscykelanalys ov Dricksvtitten -
Nguyen, T.L. (2000). Formal and informal sector en Studie av ett Vattenverk i Goteborg. Teknisk
linkages in waste recycling: a case study of Miljoplanerign. Chalmers University of Tech-
household solid waste management of Dong Da nology. Goteborg, Sweden (in Swedish)
Downloaded by [University of Ulster Library] at 01:40 25 November 2014
District in Hanoi, Vietnam. Thesis. Asian Institute Weidema, B.P. (1997). Environmrntal Assrssment clf
of Technology, Thailand Products - a Textbook on Lye Cyclr Assessmmt.
Nielsen, P.H. and Wenzel, H. (2002). Integration of (Helsinki: Finnish Association of Graduate
environmental aspects in product development: a Engineers)
stepwise procedure based on quantitative life cycle Weidema, B.P., Frees, N. and Nielsen, A. (1999).
assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 39-49 Marginal production technologies for life cycle
NRMRL (2000). Greenhouse Gases from Small-scale inventories. International Journal (f Lare Cyrlr
Combustion device,^ i n Developing Countrie.5. Phase Assessment, 4, 48-56
IIA. Household Stoves in India. United States Weidema, B. (2001). Avoiding co-product allocation
Environmental Protection Agency. Research and in life-cycle assessment.Journal oflndustriallkology,
Development. National RiskManagement Research 4,ll-33
Laboratory Wenzel, H., Hauschild, M. and Alting, L. (1997).
OECD/IEA (2000). Energy Statistics of Non-OE(3 Environmental Assessment of Products. Volume 1.
Countries 1997-1 998. IEA Statistics. (France: Methodology, tools and case studies i n product
International Energy Agency) development. (London: Chapman Hall)
Phan, D.T. (1999). Development of a strategy for White, F.M. (1999). Fluid Merhanics, 4th edn. (Singa-
municipal solid waste disposal: a case study of pore: McGraw-Hill)
Hanoi city, Vietnam. Thesis. Asian Institute of World Bank (2001). World Development Indicators 2001.
Technology, Thailand (World Bank)