Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jennifer Lui
Psych 159
3/14/17
Abstract
Peace has taken a stronghold in todays society in efforts to resolve the chaos and
political issues that have recently arisen. In this project, I have focused on efforts to creating
peace and how prominent peace leaders have used their leadership in effective ways, particularly
courage, in which the leader encourages other people; humility, in which they demonstrate a
compelling humility, shun public adulation and are never boastful. When successful, they tend to
apportion credit to other people; hardiness factor: they draw positive energy from painful
experiences in their life; sense of humor: humor can be used to relieve the strain; Personal
integrity: being congruent and true to ones values, and also the ability to cope with personal
I decided to focus on the Dalai Lama, Gandhi, and Nelson Mandela, who are prominent
leaders in he peacekeeping world. What these three leaders share in common is their common
aim for a peaceful world through peaceful means, and exhibiting great leadership and appeal to
the masses through the psychosocial aspects of leadership. For example one book about Gandhi
states that his characteristics embody three levels of leadership. One way is through modal
Another way is through end values such as order (security), liberty, equality, justice and
community (Dhiman, 2015). Overall, in order to have effectiveness and promote positive peace,
one must observe the great leaders to support a reduction in violence and war.
LEADERSHIP !3
Introduction
Peace building leaders have relational skills which help sustain interconnections among
people. They are skillful mediators and possess the necessary mediation skills to turn conflicts
into opportunities. They have wisdom skills which increase understanding, such as imagination,
judgment, innovation, paradoxical problem-solving. They are also equipped with elicit skills
which motivate people to act, such as involving others, building coalition, facilitating, coaching,
nurturing talent, and empowering leadership. They are also equipped with great communication
When there are many leaders, there is the potential of leaders with different, incompatible
definitions of peace, so it is important to support and acknowledge leaders who exhibit positive
peace rather than those who attempt to bring resolution through violent methods. According to
Dhiman, good leadership includes ethics, which generally consists of the examination of right,
wrong, good, evil, virtue, duty, obligation, and many other important factors. It is emphasized
that traits such as honesty, integrity, and credibility are associated with the perception of an
effective leader and are important predictors of leadership effectiveness. Ethical leaders are
altruistic, honest, trustworthy, and principled decision makers who care about the well-being of
their followers and the needs of the broader society (Dhiman, 2015).
among positive leaders and reviewing the psychosocial aspect of the major peace leaders,
particularly focusing on Gandhi, the Dalai Lama, and Nelson Mandela. My research articles in
my overview folder go into great detail explaining the benefits of positive leadership, and how to
distinguish between a good and bad leader. One video, a TED talk, describes how good leaders
LEADERSHIP !4
make those around them feel safe, which is greatly applicable to this subject. I will then be going
over solutions that these leaders have created, or are in the progress of being created, that have
been created by these three leaders to decrease the amount of violence, thus bringing more peace
Research Materials
There is much research about the effects of leadership and peacebuilding. One article by
Fry (2003) details spiritual leadership, and bringing about peace through spiritual means. The
Dalai Lama is one example of a famous spiritual leader who follows these spiritual guidelines.
One article focuses greatly on this aspect of spirituality and leadership. There are great emotional
and psychological benefits from separating love, or care and concern for others, from need,
which is the essence of giving and receiving unconditionally. Both medicine and the field of
positive psychology have begun to study and confirm that love has the power to overcome the
destructive influence of the four main groups of destructive emotions fearincluding anxiety,
worry, and apprehension; angerincluding, hostility, resentment, envy, jealousy, and hatred;
sense of failureincluding such things as discouragement, depressed moods, and various guilt
and conceit. All of these destructive emotions stem from fear of losing something one values or
not getting something one believes he/she deserves. Love then forms the basis for overcoming
and removing fear and is the basis for all healing emotions. Focusing on care and concern for
both self and others, independent of ones own needs, drives out fears and worries, anger and
jealousies, failures and guilt, and provides the foundation for well-being and the experience of
LEADERSHIP !5
joy, peace, and serenity. It also produces loyalty and commitment to the individuals and social
The main issues that I cover in this project concerns differentiating between positive,
effective leaders and negative, non-effective leaders. There is much research that goes into depth
about what good leadership versus negative leadership entails. One article states that to
differentiate these two leaders, we must look at the three pillars in the ethics of leadership: The
first is the moral character of the leader, second is the ethical values embedded in the leaders
vision, articulation and program which followers either embrace or reject, and third is the
morality of the processes of social ethical choice and action that leaders and followers engage in
and collectively pursue (Bass & Steidlmeier, 2006). These ethical dimensions of leadership have
followers. When leaders are more morally mature, those they lead display higher moral
reasoning. The article covers the difference between authentic transformational leadership
(positive) and pseudotransformational leadership (negative) in which the difference lies in the
values for which they are idealized (Bass & Steidlmeier, 2006). For example, the authentic leader
calls for universal brotherhood, whereas the pseudotransformational leader highlights fictitious
"we-they" differences in values and argues that "we" have inherently good values and "they" do
not. The authors sum up the importance of the values held by a transformational leader in
determining his or her actions. The observed behavior might seem the same, but according to the
authors, only if the underlying values are morally uplifting could the individual be considered a
transformative leader. While the authors originally argued that transformational leaders could
wear the black hats of villains or the white hats of heroes depending on their values, now
LEADERSHIP !6
only those who wear white hats are seen as truly transformational. Those in black hats are now
seen as pseudotransformational. That is, while they may be transformational, they are inauthentic
as transformational leaders. The authors coin this type of leader as false messiahs, as they hold
Website
The website for this project will cover leadership and peacemaking in an organized
format. Firstly, the main homepage will give an overview of the concept behind leaders and
peace building, and gives great articles describing the overview of peace building leadership. The
article by Reychler and Stellamans is an excellent overview of peace building leadership. The
website then continues on to list the major peace leaders, in I which have included Gandhi, the
Dalai Lama, and Nelson Mandela as well as an overview on each leader. The spiritual ideology
article by Fry (2003) is a good read into the Dalai Lamas methods of peacekeeping and
leadership. Another excellent media source is the NPR news segment describing Nelson Mandela
and his significant legacy. The website also includes a page with several solutions of these three
leaders in their efforts to creating and maintaining peace. One example is the Dalai Lamas Atlas
of Emotions website, an interactive site that is meant to help the world become more self-aware
of their emotions, thus promoting more peace. In the Additional Resources tab, I include an
insightful TED video describes in detail the Nobel Peace Prize, something I found very
interesting and educational. The tab also includes other media videos and sites to refer to for
additional information about the three leaders, as well as other information and media about
peace building and leadership. This website aims to portray great effects of positive leadership,
Conclusion
To reiterate, it is important to distinguish between the positive role models and the
negative examples. The positive leaders such as Nelson Mandela and Gandhi became such icons
of peace building leadership that people tend to believe that you really need saints to overcome
conflict. This opinion stands in contrast with what these people say about themselves: they refer
to their humble backgrounds and say that the situations rather than their will forced them to take
on a leadership role. Those with ideals and values that promote positive peace are the leaders that
we should strive to follow and model our own leadership skills after. When the world can
distinguish between the positive and the negative leaders in peacemaking, this newfound
References
Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (2006). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational
Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The leadership quarterly, 14(6),
693-727.
Reychler, L., & Stellamans, A. (2005). Researching peace building leadership. Centrum voor
Dhiman, S. (2016). Gandhi and leadership: New horizons in exemplary leadership. Springer.