You are on page 1of 938

( . .

~oo:co<:"omo:~c.D~~tt
IL T --~~ IL
'
'!6
t!C. . (' O(' (' . (' c,t ('
:)@IJ\l ~'QI ~COGO>'lO'l'fi'IIOJI.O ,O>'fl~l::j:UJ'>:>'>ctC: .

ou oxp~~ ~e:~c.n&~.t B.L. (Rang.), ).S.D.


(Yale), LL.D. (Utrecht) of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister-at-
Law.
Jll ~ . ~~tB.A., B.L. ,
"" oxp~ ~.G~~ B.A., Barrister-at-Law.
<f11 ~ ~B.A., B.L.
~u ~ ~ B.A., B.L.
Gu oxp~ ~o.:>S:~ B.A., B.L.

c.c. c: C:" oc c C: c:e ' ~


:)e~\1 'l'>l~:tfU'>iOOO)Cf>:>']O~:~J'>:I)l,G']&Gm'>C~!!OC
. ('
"\J'>:>'>'lc: 11
:)I ,sc~e:mS oxr=w~ ~~ ~e:~~. B.L.
(Rang.), J.S.D. (Yale~ LL.D. (Utrecht) of Lincoln'
Inn, Barri1te1-at-LarD.
1 ;sc~e:mS oxr=w~ ~ ~~ooS . B.A~,. B.L.
\"' ~c~e:mS axp:~ ~ ~ B.A., B.L.
9' ;M~e:mS ~Gt~P ~t B.Sc., B~L., Advocate.
~ G9k&r.r.>:Y.)()')t M.A., Ph.D., 'D.Litt., of Lincoln lnll

Barrister-at-LarD.
c;. ~~~~.B.A., Bamntt-at-u., 1.c.s. (Retd.).
?' ~ B.A., B~L., Advocate.
Ill

LAW OFF.ICERS OF THE UNION OF BURMA DURING


THE YEAR 1966

Attorney-General
U BA SEIN, B.S~ .. B.L., Advocate.

Legal R~membrancer

U KYAWTHOUNG, Bar-at-Law.

Assistant Attorney-General
U BA KYAW, B.A .. B.L., Advocate .

law Officer to tbe States


U TtN 0HN, B.A. (Hons.). B.L.. LL.B. (Lond.). Bar-at-Law.

Government Advo.:ates
U ToE MAUNG, B.A . B.L .. Advocate.
U BA KYJNE. B.Sc., B.L .. Advocate, up to 8th October
1966.
U BA PE, B.A., B.L.. Advocate, up to roth October
1966.
U BA PE. B.Sc., B.L. Advocate, up to 23rd April 1966.
U HL" THIN, B.A .. B.L., Advocate.
U TUN LWIN, B.A ., B.L., Advocate.
U TUN NYo, B.A . B.L.. Advocate, up to 30th July 1966.
U KHIN MAUNG, Advocate.
MR . S. K . GHOSH, B.A .. B.L.. Advocate.
U Mvo KHtN, M.A. (Cantab.). Bar-at-Law. up to
r 1 th November 1966.
DAw MYA THAN Nu. B.A . &.L.... Advocate.
U HNIT, B.A . B.L., Advocate.
U KHIN SEJN, Advocate. up to 2 rst May 1966.
U MYA SHEIN, B.A . B.L.. Advocate.
U BA THAN, B.A . B.L. . Advocate.

'. '.
i:v

U Myo HroN LYNN, M .Com., LL.B. lLond.\.


DOCfORANDUS (Utrecht), Bar-otLaw.
. u- WrN PE, B.A., B.L., A~voeate.
U ZIN, Advocate.
U KYAW GAUNC, B.A ., B.L., Advocate.

Lepl Draftsmea
U LuN PE, B.A., B.L., Advocate.
DAw AYE Kn, B.A., BL., Advocate.
u SEIN WIN HLAIN<l, B.A., B.L.
Assistant Legal Dnfbmen
U HLA THOUNC, B.SC., B.L., Dip. in Law (Lohd ),
Ajdvocate.
u SAN SHIN, B.A., B.L.
LepJ Researeh Ofticer
U THEIN HAN, B.A., B.L., Advocate.
v

LIST OF CASES REPORTED

CHIEF COURT OF BURMA

Ah Too v. The Uinion ol Burma


B. Ladasaria v. U Kyi
Babu Bhagwandas v. Messrs. A. Aboo Backer & Co.
Daw Hla Yin and one v. U Maung Sein and two others
- - Khin Kyi, widow of U Ba v. Daw. Ma Ma
(deceased) and one
- - Myat May & Co. v. Sein Tun and Pe Than and
two others
- - Obn Khiri v. .Y Kyin Sein
- - Saw Nyun v. Ma Hla Kyin
Ghanshamdas Bil~sroy v. Madanlal Saraf and three
others
H. T. Ahuja and others v. P. C. Ghosh (deceased)
represented . by his wife Daw Hla Yin and
daughter J.R
and seven others v. P. C. Ghosh
(deceased) and two others
In the Matter of Ramniranjan Lhila
the Estate of . U Kyaw Gaung
(deceased)
]. Sang Ning v. U Ya Lik
Ko Aye v. Ma Khin Saw Win and four others
-Than v. Daw Saw Mya
VI

Let, Hpwa v. The Union of Burma

Ma Dorothy v. U Han ::>?


- Myint Kyi v. U Kyaw and another ~~o
- Than and one v. Mathews Joseph J ?e
- Than Kyi and six others v. Daw Ge ~~(;
Maung Thee Myaing (a) Lon Yun (a) Kaung Tha v.
The Union of Burma oo-
---Tin Nyo v. The Union of Burma JJ
- -.- Khet v. Ma Yin J'2
Mariappa Chettiar and two others v. Shri Vrajlal
Narandas Desai and four others
Mlessrs. Bhodia Brothers v. Faizar Rahman Chowdhury
and three others
---William Jacks & Co., Ltd. v. Yangon Palladium
and five others ?J
Mingala Thukha Rice Mill Co., ltd. v. U Than Sein by
its managing partner Tan Ku Aun . ...
~r. B. Ghosh v. R. R. Dey , .
Oung Sein Chit v. The Additional Commissioner of
Income tax, Burma, Rangoon 000

People's Bank No. 1t v. Chen Sin Siu and ten others


P. Yan Soo (a) Maung Thaung Nyun v. The Union of
Burma
Ramniranjan Lhila v. Ramnorranjandas Mahabir Prased
Firm
Ratanlal v. N.A.P.L Firm by Ma Aung .Kyi an~ one ...

. State Agricultural Marketing Board v. Aung Trading Co.


--Commercial Bank v. Thibaw Commerd;ll Sy.ndi-
cate Ltd. and one
- - - - - - - - - v. U Po Dan and six others ...
The Bank of Q~ttinad Ltd. v. The Income-tax Assess-
ment, Collection and Inspection Board, Rangoon

- - - - - Communication v. Khin Co.
vii
~t"
The Bank of Communication v. Khyn Company
J~~
U Akyit Kaw v. Daw Ngwe Thein
J'P
- Aung Myint v. U HOe J?C>
---Thein v. U Than Htut and one JC>O
-Aye Maung v. Ba Tun and one JC><;
-Jamal v. Ma Bi J""
-Kyauk Sein v. The Additional Commissioner of
Income-tax, Burm.l o:>c;J
-Kyin Kha and one v. U Sein Paw ~G
-Maung Maung and two others v. Ma Talokma $n
- .- Mye v. Ko Tun Yin and one Je?
-Pe and two others v. Sao Kham noG
-Po Daung v. People's Bank No. 19 np
- Pyu and one v. U Ngwe Tun and one ~0
-Tun Min and one v. People's Bank No. 22
"JG
- Union of Burma v. Maung Ba Mai ~00
-------v. Maung Ba Shwe oo\>G
- - - - -- - v. Maung Tin Scin oo~e
- - - - - - v. U Tin Aye =>\>~G
V. E. RM. AR. Chettyar v. U Mya Shwe ~G,r
Zakaria Khan (deceased) by his L/R Mr. Mohamed
Khan and two others v. The Official Liquidator.
Chief Court Buildings. Rangoon

'.
VIII

oq:>
~'2'2
00~:)

oq~

oc;e
00~~

oo~e

ooG?
GJ
ooG~
~O?
GG
:00'2?
?JO
'2<1
O~?

O?GG
?J<t
oo~e

o~G
~0

?J'2
ix
r
.,IIJ~

o'li-:>
0:)0~

00

O?Oe
orie
ooeo
ooe7
ofi
~ofi
ofi~
o?e~

0~0

~00

07<;
::>?eo
eo
~eo

??J
??fi
e~
O<fOJ
??e
.:1 3C~
bcfc
fcbc
ufoe
Cea
Cf6c
bee
0o~
0cbe
eeoc
oobc
Cotl
~sc
tJ otl
slJc
ueJG

CCC

ocfc

rcc
uoq
ooc
ctlu
r .~ c
4\C~iy,C::?~ll:::UJ?f Xl

t
.,"'J">P
~ c
tj~<XI')C"Xlf~~C
c~r.:~ oc ( c
~f'"'"""'f
-RS) t<?c ~~?CG_l)OC:
c c
eoo
~C' C'Q~
c::. C'
~G<XlXD
C
L
s1n~cc ~c
T
OC'
\. J
C'
<:u:x:oc:
L OCf?~
~ C . c
C f.:C'
tl~CO')C~~t~~C ~': G~'JCG!J:IX~:
OC' C' C' OC
.... ?Go
~ C' C'S,C OC' ( 0 ) C' "''
tj~CO')C"i:~~'iCC ())')~~(\)? it~ !J:I~QOI ~: ?'l?
r.: (' (' ~~ 0('. (' (' 0 C' 0 C'
tl~<XI')C~or""~c Cl<m<."lft~=~~ '~ a:roc: eJG
~ (' c r.:~.. 0('. {0 (' (') " Q
tl~CO')C~C:tr':>~CC \e:ro~?C>O:>?C t<? e:oo:lf:Ot i>
0(' ""'
e?J
~ C' c f.:C oc c 0 OC'OC' '
tle;roco:>c~otli?~cc 1<? e:oHc OJOe
~ C' C' ~C OC'o (' 0 "' 0
tl~GCOX~~tli?~CC t<? e::~l 9 e: OCf?'
r.: ('
C'~f.:C' 0(' (' . (' C' (' ( "~") 0 .11. ('
tj~COXmt~?~C ~<? ~fQJC9C OQI e:~c eJo
0
tl(l)
('[5("li:Gii?C :OC (.)rr.J.s: C' C' ('~
L J LT OJ JJ
0 c (' C'~ (' 0 (' C' ('~
ororJ:
.. JK.
;;JCG(.)X ::.c
J
tlro~: ~?=:
L Jtl. -iT 0 e?e
0 C' 0 C' 0 ('
:t~:C\)'XOO);:o:xpoo:>: ~<? e:oooc: ecrc;
(' ( "'") 0 C' ~ (' (' ~(' OC'
::r.>G~i:>c c;~, ~S tl~c;oox~
::7){0:1,)')
0 ~~cc
e<t'l
O)')~O)OC)tom >
- (' ('((')
'<? e=;;)Jtt'=
(' 0 ('
e~o

G~C'J
c-o
1<?c GQ?C~J~
c co (
GQI
"~")
GQ?c~:on-:e:
c- c c e
?7b
(' C' C" 0 C' OC'
QQCG?~ ftC: 2:;;JJ>~ 000
OC' C''l ('r.:(' C'~(' OC'(Q C')
GOf9CUI j T~ tl~G<XI?C~Ofli~C e:O)(O::O'JC: ?OO
(' (''"I (' r.: (' ('So~ 0('.
(.)QCeltUI jft!? tl~G<XI?Cmtli?~CC OJO
OC''I C'O 'l C' J ('--~~!i "'
GCJ900' QJOO:>:oo":>:u ? ~<: ;o"'""o'POJ'f"'JC:JO)WIOm:os ~ .... OJJe
c( "~") c cr,:c- c-~r:~ oc-
Q~O) GQI ldrYJf'J ~<z tl~G<XI')C"Xlfld?~CC e~c;
(' C' 0 . .. ~ :"1
ld~O)C ~<? ~~WCOI \) OJ?P
Y~::OfldO':
.
C'

C'
('

C' ~C'
('
'S C'
~CjU~Id
C' 0 C'
C' ('

'l 0
ot;cr<;
Q::o?=o:>t=oc:itS ~o:>!l:l"'l~'!l:lro etio
OC' 'I C' "''C''l
~:u;;:c;wt ? t<? c;ot q(l)() j :>J ?~
.
~~ ~s
'I ('
q
( (')
ro ~:::
(' 0 Q
eGG
r,...$;
~.,~m
(' ((')
o li!l:o
'I ....
J tc: 2,~:1::1",C' 0 ('
rioe
B o
"{0'.)-.x.IO:>~Of
c oc(
GOO?C:
<")'l
01 j
cr,:c-
~<? tl~GCO?C"((tli?~C
c...r;c oc
o~oe
xii

O<f~J
c;oo
o9~S
900
90~

9oe
9J c;
o9So
~7J
bJb
0J <t
9? J
@70
9?7
@Pfi
Xlll

GootSf::rxp::m:Sf CJOS:;m:bO??:Io1):~:cS& . . . .099?


IOootasStt ~:~~ . . . . . . . eeo
IO!o1)soos"~+ ~CXY.>Sffi+lo1)'sc ... . . . . . . . . . .. Gre
GootOOtiO~I GootG.T ~cx:nS~Io1),tC 999
10ootooS10uf ~CXY.>Sffitlo1);sc oooo
10ootooS+ ~<Xnffi+lo1);sc G99
Glo1)SooS~St9~cx:nSffitlo1),Sc G~
Glo1)Soob.:>f:t 10v:>S06t:~ or9
G~ootl09):i' ~CXY.>Sffi+lo1),tc or<z
GootooS~t~cx:nSffi+lo1),Sc . . . GGo
~ooS10~~?i'9 ~cxnSffitlo1);sc . . . oooG
Glo1)tootl097.>ti' ~a:n~1o1),Sc oJ~
10v:>S~~ ~cxnSffi+lo1);sc, G??
Gv:>ScouSt9 ~:~S~ j 09G?
"OOS06t:l.f ~IOcxnSffitlo1);sc ... ... 99e
. IO!o1)s06+:".8 01 J t9 ~CXY.>Sffitlo1)'sc ... ... Gcn
Goot06t:a;>t9 IO!o1)tSt~ 9~
Goot06t:Got9 ~:o:utO?~(10~~:10!: Goo
10oot~+t9 10~ " " " 000j
IOoob~:Gg:i' ~cxnS~oo~c Goc;
Gv:>SGootoott9 10v:>Ss7:~ .. ... .. .. .. .. oooo
Gv:>SGooS~~ ~cxnSffi+oo'-Sc 09?o
10v:>Sj.a#~ ~Gcx:nS~oo'be ~ 09?
10v:>S~+:~ J t9 ~a:n~'Sc .. .. .. .. .. 09?9
~v:>S~ ~CXY.>Sffi+oo~c : 09<>J
~v:>Sa;> ~ J T G~oo(c;S:~:oSro:~oot~~) oGo
10v:>Sa;>9(dJpooS"??t9Gv:>So3f:<~:~ ~ J o.fiJ
10v:>SoS:T Ei<~:a:nffitoo;sc(~~) Geo

'.
XIV
~4a?~~~
~>
~~~t= 01 J ;~ ~<X>?E?too,Sc . . . . . .. 9G~
~~::o:8 01 J ;~ ~IC;<X>?Effitoo,Sc . . ~e
~~::of:~C;s:;~ CJ<?(~a) <Jo:>t:'lt .. .. .. .. .. .. ooJO
~~o:>t=~t= 01 ? ;~ ~:<i>S~ 01 J .. . .. . .. . .. . . .. o9eo
~C;ooto:>f:~~t~ ~<X>?Effitoo~c . . . . . . . . . .. . Ge9
G~::ot=G.st~ ~<X>?E?too,Sc . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ~J
GooCo.)G~t:;9 ~G00?8?too;M . o9oG
Gootd3:;~ ~<X>?E?too,Sc oT
G~d3f:oo+;~ ~G<X>?E?too,Sc ~eo
~~.oo8 01 J ;~ ~G<X>?E~oo,Sc . oG?
G~OOf~ 01 J 'f' ~OO?t?too,tc ~J
~~~s;~:;~ ~cmSffitoo,Sc . . . . . oJ<fO
G~~C;s;I:G~t~ ~<X>?E?oo,Sc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9Ge
G~S'ff:Goot;~ ~G<X>?E?too,tc ooJO
G~S'ft=G,S Ol J +~ ~G<X>?Effioo,Sc oGG
GootG:.mtiS:;~ MGcmtffioo,Sc .. .. .. ... 9?J
GootG:.mtoot 01 J t~ ~GOO?t?too,tc oczo
GootGtmb~oot:(G~ Goot~,:~tf~ ~oo01 j 0~0~
'ltO?t o.)~:f>05~~ ~:St .. .. .. . .. ' .. .. .. 0 ?9
~;'ltqp(o5)c:&m;~ G~t: " ' "' ' ~ ' '' ' " ' "' 9??
w=~:d3oSv~~oS;9 'ltort~r. ~O')oSSi)oSGooS~CJS:~ . . . . o~J
~'lt=(t)ooS:t~ ~ont l.ScnS: Ol ? Geo
IC;w~~01 J ;9 ~OY.>Sffioo;sc . . . .. . . .. ... ~JO
~~a:noSot;~ ot:.y.>:oo~oSaS:or~~ om
GOGo:>G:.mt'f'9 ~Goo:>E?+oo;tc ~

::o~c:v:~ao5(S~s;~tooG'l3t GB;~C!Jb~ c~ ? t9 s;~~~<?JGOO(oS)~t= o flo


ocb . . . . . . ~~ s~ r ~ ~~=i
boc ?Stct'l!g~,-sooo~ ~~sc:.c+=i
o6Gc . . . . . . r ~ =~=~~ ~ r ~~~:i
bob . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ~~~ SC:i
roc ... ~. . ... ... ~=~& "C0(9<'C'C :&,~l9.
=~!A ~~ :~~ "ioo~f~ ~+g@"i
oCoc r ~ :~s-o:i ~~)~solk c.c.o&, s@co~:i
bboc .. . . . r ~ =F-=i ~~~solk c.c.o&, ~~&co~:i
c6Gc .. ... ... c ~ o:b~gJ:~:gb:c.bg~&co~:i
~6 ;>~tmJOgcm~~ g~~sJW~:~
r~6 .. . . .. . .. ... r ~ =~ 3c:w~:i r 19 gsl'co~=i
oo6 :cdbcbc.c.o ~~~:i
Gb(c ... . . . . : ... ... ... ;>3tmffi0~~~ si-:c.ooeo:i
6o6 . . . . . .. ?~tm~~~ ~+=~gas~
66oc : 93tmJO~~s+#c9:ps~
oeoc. ... ... ~cfuce 'i ,3R ~ r ~ =t/83CW~ ~~)=f8=g83CW~ .
o6Gc .. . .. . .. . . .. G . ~ 18m 'i IW~ s+=8m a:~ ~a: .
co6 !o:b~:i.30&> s~ ~3CS
coc . . . . so~eo~=ts>~ 3a:~+w~=c.ce~ ~+1~ (~)sow
eli'c .. . . .. .. . .. . gc.oc.c:i:~ g+ r ~ gc.&c.e.s I (~)sow
l)bc .. 93tmffi0~~ ~+:~3'1'~ ~~)g:c.e.s
6CGc ... ... ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ff~
cifc .. ~ .. .. =~i 3+=~i~
coc ~~~~ !~sro~ ~~W.~~~ =i=cc:cc
'
GrGc rl9 (crsoks~so~~~ ~:cc.c~cc~:c.ce~
~~:ti3w'>+~~~~~~cc
xvi

~00

~)0?

'2J?
::>~~e
:::>J O?
::>~GG
::>~'{0
::>o.Go
::>eJ
::>eG
::>oGG
~)::>'2

::>~'2'7
::> J 0'{
~JO
)00

::>J ~~
~J7
::>j~O

::>~o::>

::>oGe
'2J '2
::>0.7~

::>~o~
xvii

JO<f
0?0?
::>t>oe
::>t>t>O
::>~00

JOfi
7?J
::>OO?
::>??~
J ::>::>
::>ooo

('
~~~c;'l:~:

'l?(i
ooe::>
ooe7
::>00::>
oGoe
::>ooti
~?J
::>0::>::>
O?Cf::>
J oti
JJO
::>?::>7
oGoG
7Cf 0
2A
Cc~~o:!
~ba: !P~&>1c~ &:!8->sofu,~<:.o:!&:~ ~i:~ ~ If> :!&~~:~
:i~s-oc~o 3C:uneccc g9~U~:g
;>3~~!~ c\,3coo~S2~ ~+jc.e&~.:g
tPC:tcclc:~ ~~~:~b::g
.
XIX
~:~
INDEX

. f~c~oxp:;=
CHIEF COURT OF BURMA

Acts; ~-
BURMA CARRIAGE OF GooDS BY SEA ACT.
----COMPANIES ACT.
---INCOME- TAX ACT.
---INSOLVENCY ACT.
- - - - STAMP ACT.
BURMESE CUSTOMARY LAW.
CHIN SPECIAL DIVISION (EXTENSION OF
LAWS)ACT. -
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
---CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CONTRACT ACT.
COURT FEES ACT.
EASEMENT ACT.
EVIDENCE ACT.
GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT.
LAND AND REVENUE ACT.
LIMITATION ACT.
MONEY LENDERS ACT.
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT.
PARTNERSHIP ACT.
PENAL CODE.
PROVIDENT FuNDS ACT.
PuBLIC PROPERTY PROTECTION ACT.
RANGOON CITY CIVIL COURT ACT
- -- INSOLVENCY ACT.
XX

SJ1LS TAX ACT.


SPECIFIC REUFF ACT.
SuccESSION AcT
.TRANSFER .OF PROPERTY ACT.
UNioN JuoiCIARY AcT.
URBAN ~ENT CONTROL Act.
WRIT OF CeJRIORARl.

. ABATEMENT Of APPEALS -Code of Civil Procedure 0. 22 R.


2 and 4 -applicability to appeal - Abatement of appeal - no
abatemenl though !he legal repre senlative of' the d~eased
appellanl not brought on the record if the right of appeal
survives to the surviving appellants- application of rhe test
whether the respondents could sue the surviving. appellants
in the Trial Coun in .the absence of the deceas~d appellanl.

MARIAPPA CHEUIAR AND TWO OTHERS 1;). SHRI


VRAJLAL NARANDAS DESAI AND fOUR OTHERS 780

AcT or: Goo oR Y1s MAJOR -Carriage of Gunnies by Sea -loss of


the gunnies - Suit for compensation- whether the written
contract of agreemenr is enforceable in law- Act of God as
defence- whether 1he agreement is void under s. 23 or 56 of
the Contract Act.

THE STATE 1\GRICULTURAL MARKETING


BOARD '1?. AUNG TRADING CO. 262

ADVERSE PossESSION - Suit for ejectment- plea that pennission was


given by the owner to construct permanent buildihgs -
Easements Act - a sufficient defence against the ejectment
-Suit for ejectment -plea of adverse possession constitution
of adverse possession- physical exclusive. ~pen and hostile
with intention to hold for himself as owner.

U PE AND rwo OTHERS '0. SAO PO KHAM tav HIS


AGENT DAW TIN MAY. SAO TUN PHA (MINOR)
BY HIS FRIEND SAW PO KHAMI 816

F-
al':'iJoS
AMENDMENT OF WRITTEN STATEMENT - City Civil Court Act, s.25
- amendment of written. statement.

MA DOROTHY 'll U HAN 13

APPEAL AGAINST AN ORDER OF DETENTION IN THE BORSTAl ScHOOL


- Whether the appeallies to the Court of Sessions.

LET HPWA '\?. THE UNION OF BURMA II

APPLICATION FOR SucCESSION CERTIFICATE- Grant of succession certifi-


cate- a temporary arrangement-enablfng the grantee to realize
the assets - nominee to receive gratuity from Goverment -
whether he/she gets an absolute title' to it - Whether such
momination a testamentary disposition under Bumiese buddhist
Law - different from life insurance and provident funds -
separate living whether ruptures fllial relations. .

KO AYE 'tl. MA KHIN SAW WIN AND FOUROTHERS 1350

APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE AN EXPARTE DECREE - running of time


meaning of substituted service.

MR. 8 GHOSH t>. _R.R. DEY 244

APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE EXPARTE DECREE- Summons


duly served on the wife- onus to establish sufficient grounds .
for non- appearance running of time where the defendant is
duly served with summotlS.

U AUNG MYINT v. ~ HOE . 278

ARREST BEFORE JuDGEMENT- Code of civil Procedure 0.38, Rule 1


-arrest before judgment- whether an agent can be arrested
before judgment in a soit against his principat

V.E.RM.AR. CHETTYAR '{?. U MYA SHWE 569

BONA FIDE REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMISES .foR CoNSTRUCTION 'BUILD-


ING - Urban Rent Control Act. 1960- land in possesion of
Receiver- sale of land by the original owner- whether the
buyer obtained good title over the land wheth~r the trans-
feree can claim rent from the occupant of the premises -
XX 'II

. . : ~,.,
bona fide requirement of the premises construction of
building. .

U AKYIT KAW 'Q. DAW NGWE THEIN '271

BURMA COMPANIES ACT - Wifiding up of company - Burma Col)l


panies Act,s. 235 - inquiry into the conduct and acts of di
rectors-surrender and forreiture of .shares encails reduction
of capital can, do with t~e sanction of the Coun -com-
mission of acts of misfeasance .- assessment of compensa-
tion on the loss suffered by the Company - neither wrong
nor unreasonable - acts . 4lf directors do not call for ben-
efits of s.281 Bwma Companies Act. .

ZAKARJAKHAN . .by bis L/R MR. MoHAt." o KHAN


AND TWO OTHERS '?1. THE . OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR.
CHIEF COURT BUILDING RANGOON 304

BURMA INCOME- TAX ACT Specific Relief Act, S. 45 jurisdiction


of the Court limited toca~es . of.clear breach,.9f duty to do
or forbear from doing - Burma Income ~x Act, s. 30.
proviso 4 -exercise of discretion by the Jncom-tax Assesss-
ment, Collection and inspection Board -correctness not to
be challenged - party not to be directed has to exercise the
discretion.

THE DANK OF CHETTINAD UMITEO \'.THE


INCOME - TAX ASSESSMENT. CO.LLECTION
AND INSPECTION BOARD, RANGOON 806

BURMA INCOME - TAX Aci -Certiorari- application for a writ of


The Bunna Income- tax Act.,s.23 exercise' of revisional
power by the Additional Commissioner of Income -
tax merging..of tbe appellate orde.r. of the Appellate Assistant
Commissioner . and that o(the assessment order of the
.Jncome-ta~ Offic~r-1~ be questioned . only under s. 33A -
proviso to s . 33 . subject to. .t~e ~ubstantive pan of the .
section.

OUNG . SEIN CHJT i7. JHE ADDITIONAL COM


MISSIONER .OF INCOME- 'rAX. BURMA. RAN-
GOON . goo F
. .'
~':<ijoS
OuRMA INCOME - T.~x. s 66 {2) - the best of judgment assessment-
Inc9me of the assessee trom undisclosed sources- construc-
tion of the President Ctnema - rehance: .on valuatiop .of.
assessors and other reports in nUlking the assessment- whether..
it can be said the assessments were made perversely or in
the absence of evidence - estimated irtcome used up jn the
construction lor that year itself - Burma Income- tax
Act.s. 37 - burden of proof.

U KYAUK SEIN 11.THE ADDitiONAL COMMIS..


SIONER OF INCOME- TAX BURMA 1142

Bu~Mr.SF. Buoou~r SPOuSES - impleading tlie wife cts ~ pacty de~


fendant - loan taken for the benefit of the joint family
business- liability of the wife tor the ..debt contracted by
the husblfnd.

STATE COMMERCIAL BANK ~. U PO DAN


AND SIX OTHERS 252

llu~MESf. CuSTOMARY LAW -Succession - application by the grand


children of the father of adoptee-application by the younger
sister of the adoptee- propinquity ofthe relationship of the
rival applicants to the adoptee.

MAUNG KHET ANI> TWO OTHERS '0 MA YIN 27

CHIN SPECIAL OtviSION(Ex rF.t-ISION OF LAws)Law- Suit for recovery ~>f


share capital- a receipt granted acknowledging the receipt
of money- no stipulation regarding the time for payment -
Article 120 of the limitation Act- Chins Special Divisions
(Extension of Laws) Act- Notitication No.23 of .the ct,in
Affairs Council - granting of relief on the principles of
justice, equity and good conscience. .

J. SANG NING '0. U YA UK . 776

CIVIL PROCEDURE Cooe - application to set, aside an ex-parte decree


in a summary suit under 0. 31 of the C:P.C;- decree against
a dead person - nothing to set aside.

BABU BHAGWANDAS ~ MESSRS A ABOO


28 BACKER AND CO..
XX iv
alt:<ijoS Q>?Eij<"Pt'.)
CODE OF CiviL PRoceDURE- dismissal order for default of appear-
ance whether the Court should proceed under 0 17,
R.2C.P.C

RATANLAL 11 M.A.P.L. FIRM BY MA AUNG KYI


AND ONE. 248

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 0 Vl , Rule 17 - amendment of plaint


under pennission for- whether permissible.

MESSRS. WILLIAM JACKS A~ CO. Lro. '13.


YANGON PALLADIUM AND FIVE OTHERS..

CoDE OF CIVIL PROCt'DURE, 0. VI Rule 17 - amendment of


pleadings - at any stage of the proceedings - whether pro
posed amendments to be underlined in red i~k - principles
for guidance in allowing amendments.

THE BANK OF COMMUNICAYIONS ~- KHJN


COMPANY 811

Cooe oF C1v1L PROCEDURE ORDER VIII, Rule I -whether the detend


ant bound to present wrinen statement -'fanning of prelimj~
nary issue.

DAW SAW NYUN tl MA HLA KYIN 760

CODE OF Clvn. PRocEI!>URE ORDER XXI, Rule 29- stay of execution-


suit by land lord against tenant for recovery of arrears of
rent- suit by tenant for recovery of money given as security
- application for stay of .execution by tenant.

DAW OHN KHIN 'tl U KYIN SEIN

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ORDER 21. RuLe 4Q- EXECUTION OF DECR~E


- application for imprisonment of the judgment debtor -
0. 21. R. 40 C. P. Code and Proviso to s.5 I CJ,.C-wh.e.n
the Court has power order imprjsonment

U . AUNG THEIN '\?. U THAN HTUT AND ONE 281


~~:~~
CoDE OF CtvtL PROCCDURE 0.26 Rule 5- issue of conunission for
examination of witness residing abroad- whether evidence
relavant and essential for the proper decision of the suit-
whether application is 'bona fide.

MA THAN ANO ONE ~ MATHEWS JOSEPH. 239

CODE oF CtvtL PROCF.DURE , 0 .33 R.6- application to dispauper- 0.33


R. 2 (I)- obtaining leave to sue as pauper under- duty-to
show that all the property consists of the items set out and
valued in the schedule to the petition - fraudulent suppression
in the disclosure of assets - dismissal of the petition.

U PO DAUNG 'U. PEOPLES' BANK NO.I9 821

CoDE OF" CtvtL PROCEDUltE , 0 .38 R. 5 and 6- test for furnishing


security or in default attachment before judgement in a
promissory note suit

DAW MYAT MAY AND CO. 1l SElN TUN AND


PE THAN CO. AND TWO OTHERS 7

CooE OFCtvtt PROCEDURE CoDE,0.41 Rule 27- additional eviden<:e-


admission after the appreciation of evidence on record to
enable to pronounce judgment or for any substantial cause-
whether it can be exercised before the appeal is heard on
merits.

DAW HLA YIN AND ONE " U MAUNG SEIN AND


TWO OTHERS. S39

CoDE or Ctvtt PROCEDURE, ORDER 41 Rule 31 - Judgment of the I"


appellate Court - what it should contain.

U AYE MAlJliiG '11 U BA TUN AND ONE 284

CODE c.r Ctvtt PROCEDURE S.24 - transfer of suits and execution


proceedings.

u MAUNG MAUNG ANOTWO OTHERS 1).MA TALOK


MA ~
XX VI

CoNTRACT ACl:- Suit for specific perfonnance of Contract - oral


contract between the parties-whether the contract has been
proved - whether the appellate Court is justified in
disagreeing with the finding of the.trial Court-intention of
the party detennining factor-whether or not time was the
essence of the contract-whether the suit is time- barred.

U JAMA 11 MA BI . 288

CONTRACT ACT - Suit for Recovery of loan on a promissory not -


debt barred by Limitation-acknowledgment of the loan with
a promise to pay- whether the document is a pro-note or
an. acknowledgment of the debt- a promise to pay a barred
debt comes under s. 25 sub-s (3) of the contract Act whether
to be stamped under No. 5 (c) of schedule I of the Bunna
Stamp Act as amended by Act No. 28 of 1957 whether
admissible in evidence.

THE BANK OF COMMUNICATION 1l KHYN


COMPANY 255

CouRT FEES AcT,s.5- reference py Registrar of the Original Side-


No. II of Schedule I of the Court fees Act- complete assets
!lnd properties of the deFea~ed to. be shown in the Annex-
ure A-S . 191 (I) of the tourt Fees Act- applicant to file a
valuation of the property, in the fom1 set forth in the Third
Scnedule- Rule 4 of the; Rules of Procedure in the Grant
of Letters of Administration of the Rules and Order of the
High (chief) Court- aftid~vit of valuation and affidavit or
certificate of valuation of immovable property to accompany
the application.
JN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF U KYAW
GAUNG ,_ DAW NYUNT. 769

CouRT FEES ACT,- Transfer of Property Act,s 53 -a representatiye


suit for declaration that a deed of gift is not binding
upon the plaintiffs - ..-nether a suit for mere declaration is
maintainable -whether Court fees is payable under s. 7 (iv)
(c) of the Col!rt Fees Act- suit by creditors burden of proof
fraud on the creditors- shifting of the burden to the debtor.

1-J.T AHUJA AND SEVEN OTHERS 'p.. P.C.GHOSH


(decea$ed) AND TWO OTHERS . 22R
a3+:'tirl5
CouRT fEES Acr, Article 17 Clause vt of Schedule II -suit for
ejectment of a licensee -plaintiff at liberty to put his own
valuation - erroneous framing of issue ground for revision.

U PYU 1\ND ONE 1l U NGWE TUN AND ONE. 51

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE S .33 Penal Code s.420 conviction


under- fine or in default to suffer imprisonment - Code of
Criminal Procedure s .33 - imprisonment in default of pay -
ment of fine not to exceed one-fourth of the period of
imprisonment which magistrarte is competent to pass
Penal Code. s. 65 imprisonment in default of payment of
fine not to exceed -one~fourth' of the tenn of imprisonment
for the offence.

THE UNION OF BURMA ~ MAUNG BA SHAWE. 1136

CRIMINAL PRoceDURE Cooe PENAL CoDE s.325-Trial of warrant ~


as summons case - whether irregularity curable bp s. 537
Criminal Procedure Code - enhancement of sentence.

THE UNION OF BURMA ,, MAUNG TrN SEIN. 1139

CUSTODY OF A MfNOR SON Guardian and Word Act, s. 25- appJica


tion by mother for custody of her minor soh-minor too
young to be capable of forming an intelligent opinion of
or expressing his vei~- insanity of father- applicant's financial
means to .look . after the child- application . not unfit and
incapable of retaining the custody of the child.

MA MYINT KYI ll U KYAW AND ANOtHER SS I

ExecUTION OF CONSENT- decree Money - Lender's Act, 1945- carry


ing on ~oney lending business after the enforcement of the
Act but ceasing after a certain period - whether a money
- lender within the meaning of the Act- carrying on the
business of money - !_ending after expiry of mo~ey- lending
certificate - whether to be regarded as a mo!1ey-lender as
defined in S.2(6)- s.9 of the Money -lenders Act- Prohibiting
Court from passing any order.on the application of a money-
lender for execution of a decree - registration ot" money -
28 lender to be in force- whether relief can be granted. when
XX viii
~':~aS
licence ~xpires before. making any. order.

B. LADASARIA ,,. U KYI 535

EviDENCE Acr-s. l45and 155 (3)- witness unworthy of credit-


falsity .of statement proved by contradictory statement - by
examination of Investigating Officer or admission of. the
witness .statement as exhibit.
. .
P. YAN SQO tA) MAVNG THAUNG NYUN 'U.
THE UNION OF BURMA. 43

FRAUDULENT TRANSFER- Suit for declaration that the . tfimsf~r of ~


bouse was void against the creditors - presumption of :fraud
in case of a voluntary settlement- transferor largely indebted
.at the rime of settlement- transferee tt> show go.od faith as
weJI as payment of consideration - whether a gratuitous
consideration such as natural love and affection is a "valuable"
consideration.

U . TUN MIN AND. ONE "t'- PEOPLES' BANK N0.22,


RANGOON . 826

(NSOI.VENCY BUJtMA INSOLVENCY Acr S. 4(2)- placing h.is claim by


a c-laimant before the insolv.ency Court-determi11ation of the
question.- whether . its decision is final and binding between
the partie~ - whether the .claimant can re-agitate the mer-Its
of his claim by bringing a regular suit-whether the remedy
lies if by way of appeal under s.75. Bunna Insolvency Act-
grant Of leave to appeal - under whether the Court can
exercise in favour of a creditor - competency of appeal
under s.4 and 75(3) of the Bunna Insolvency Act avoidance
of transfers under s.53, Bunna Insolvency Act-grossly inad-
equate consideration in the transfer of the house in question
- whether the tiansf'!r was bona fide- bona fide transfer on
account of pressore 6f a creditor- absence of collusion and
of kitowledge of the embar.rassing circumstances of the
debtor- whether the transfer ftaudulent within the meaning
of s. 53.
MESSRS. BHODIA BROTHE-RS '" FAIZAR
&AltMAN CHOWDHURY AND 'THREE OTHERS . 784
2d~:~o5
INTEREST- Suit for recovery of money being the value of bags of
. groundnuts - no agreement or evidence of usage of trade to
justify the award of interest- whether the provisions of the
interest Act are appljcable - whether interest is payable
under s. 61 of the sales of Goods Act.

UNION OF BURMA '0. U. TIN AYE 1356 .

LANQ AND R.EVENU ACT - SS 46 - 48 Mortgage by Deposit of title


- deeds - sale of one the mortgaged properties by the
revenue authorities for arrears of sale tax due.

PEOPLES' BANK 1'{0.11 'It CHEN SIN SIU ANI;>


TEN OTHERS 36

LEssEE's DUTY To PAY RENT WITHOUT OEMAHf> FROM THE l.asoR.


-Suit for Recovery of Rent from tenant- Urban Rent Control
Act, 1960 - Transfer of Property Act- notic- no provision to
give- Transrfer of Property Act, s. 108 (l) to pay rent-
duty of lessee.

U MYE '0 KO TUN YIN AND ONE 297

LIMITATION ACT , - Suit for recovery of possession of a house site-


infructuous sale deed- evidence of possession of the site as
purchaser not as lictnsee - adverse possession from the
date of invalid sale- Limitation Act, Article 144.

MA THAN KYI AND SIX OTHERS "U DAW GE 556

MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND ARREST - Suit for recovery of damages


for malicious prosecution and arrests -passing of a cheque
which was dishonoured - prosecution for cheating whether
reasonable or probable cause for- acceptance of cheque
and creditiing it into accounts. relating to all contracts-
cheque found useless - apprehension that fraud had beer
practised- prosecution in a criminal court -whether answerable
in a suit for damages for malicious prosecution -competent
legal advice on disclosure of true and relevant facts-whether
a valid protection against action for malicious prosecution.

RAMNIRANJAN LHILA 11 RAMNIRANJANDAS


MAHABIR PRASAD FIRM . 561

'.
.
XXX
~~:~oS GY:l~oS,-::
MoNEY LENDERS Acr, I 945 - Suit for recovery of .money due on
promissory note- application for dismissa of suit before
the conclusion o( the trial -Money lenders Act (194 5)- fram-
ing of several issues- neither expedient nor wise to dismiss
suit on one issue.

GHANSHAMDAS BILASROY ANB THRF.E OTIIJ::Rs U


MAQANLAL SARAF 1128

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS Acr s. 4- promissory note- intention of the


parties.

KO THAN ~ DAW SAW MYA . 234

PARlNERSIIIP ACT- Suit for recovery of Money due on accounts


taken-balance sheet prepared by qualified accountant -failure
to point out its incorrectness - no proof of irregularity
of erroneousness- whether sufficient to attach. liability on
the defendant.

H.T. AHUJA AND OTHERS 'o. P.C GHOSH (deceased)


represented by his wife DAw HLA YIN AND DAUGHTER 223

PENAL CooE, s. 376- sentenced to undergo 4 years' rigorous impris-


onment and to suffer 20 lashes of whipping- whether appeal
lies to the Court of Session or to the Chief Court.

AH TOO V. THE UNION OF BURMA .

PENAL CooE - framing of charge under s.450 - additional charge


under s. 326 possible.

MAUNG THEE MYAING (a) LON YUN (a)


KAUJ'iG THA '!'- THE UNION OF BURMA . 18

Pusuc P-ROPERTY pROTECTION Acr, s. (6)(!)- while committing theft


of petrol belonging to the People's Oil Industry - arrest
of accused - legality or other- wise of the arrest- whether it
c~n affect the question the accused is or is not guilty of
the offence charged - whether the conviction is vitiated.

UNION OF BURMA ~. MAUNG BA MAl. 300


xxxi
~':~oS - ~~
~ANGOON INSOLVENCY Acr, s. 9 (e)- commission of an act of insol
vency by the debtor under - Rangoon lnsovency Act, s. II
(b} - order of adjudication under - burden to show that the
Court has jurisdiction to entertain the petition -definition of
" ordinarily resided" - proof that the debtor nonnaUy or
usually ate, drank and slept at the place - requirement by
law pf clear and unequivocal evidence to adjudicate a
person insolvent-proof that the property in question is a
dwelling - house Pr.oof that it belonged to the respondent
during the requisite period of time.

IN THE MATfER Of RAMNIRAJAN LHILA '0


DAW THAN 763

RIGHT Of PRIVATE OEfENcr - reasonable apprehension of grieVOus


hurt being caused deceased nashinc forwards holding a
torch.

MAUNG TIN NYO '0 THE UNION OF BURMA 22

STAY OF EXECUTION -application by the unsuccessful claimant tiding


a suit under 0 . 21, R. 6;J C.P.C

U KYIN KHA AJlD ONE 12 U SEIN PAW S6

SuiT FOR RECOVERY OF DAMAGES FOR LOSS PADDY - occurence of loss


in a collision - a moving v~ssel running down a stationary
vt:Ssel -applicability of doctrine of res ipsa loquitor- burden
on the part ofthe moving vessel to show no negligence on
her part - judgment of a criminal Court- whether relevant
and binding on a civil Court -liberty of a thrid party to sue
the owner of either vessel.

MINGALA THUKA RJCE MILL CO., Lm. BY lST


MANAGING PARTNER TAN KU AUN 1) U THAN
SEIN . 794

UNION Juou.:IARY Acr, s. 6- construction of will -plain and unarr.-


biguous language - whether it shall ~eive its literal con-
struction use ofambiguous words -duty of Court to ascertain
the intention of the testaor- consideration of surrounding
circumstance, testator's family relationship, testator's use of
words in a praticular sense - construction settled - duty of
XXX ii
ai~:~
Court to carr-y out the expressed in~ntioa of the testator -
whether .tbe Jaw favours lntesteoc)'eltlter wholly or 98!1Jal~

DAW KHJN KYl widow of U Ba (deceased) AND


ONE 'Q DAW MA MA . :541

UNION JUDICIARY Act s IS- cause of action - not arising -


wholly within the locat jurisdiction of the Court - leave to
sue- the very foundation for exercise of jurisdiction - leave
to sue whether a fonnal matter of procedure -suit based on
contract.

STATE COMMERCIAL BANK 1:l THIBAW COM _


MERCIAL SYNDICATE Lro. AND ONE 1311
ij
s.,
rv
!:B ~ ~~ CCl (C) CCl C
S :J C
~ t> C ..Qoo ...000 fl cO ::l ~ ~
8fl --s, m-uJ
~ ~ ....., Fcl e<.)
s ija., ..<.J e Jno ()') 0"1 0... 0 00
e rnCC) CC)
fB, re.. re.. re.. ee e ~ ell ~ (.,)
..8 s ~ lo ,l.& ~ ~ ~ ~ c1 t
o.., 0"1 (,) fl ..CO V"'
<il"' ew m
~ij ~ ~~ ~ ~.., ~.., ..e s;:s 8;:s oo,
~ c u
~ i g ~ ~ 8 :q ~ rue 1
o S., v ~ ~ v
r.:! ~ 0 0 ..g0"1 u (.) C'> fl 8 O"'C 0"1 0"1 _fL ij ij ::" ~ el tJ ij a 0 11 I X" t
~ \S fl -.o ru v = o ~ u .-v ee ..e ..e ..e ~ fl S., S, 0"1 ..oo ..8 S.., ~ ..SO 3
1.. k ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ 0"1 ~: 0 "' fB, ~ ~ fr C1J ~ .. ~ C1J . 3., ~
s j' .g' 8,
~.., c ru ~ !) 'l ::: ~ ij ij G) c: " c lo s s !) e
~ fl C ::l v'l ~o f) G> v v 0"1 fl 0"1 V"'
041 0
...g" m s., ()Q en cV'l = (.)\1 :.t0 <.1() 8C., (01
v (,) C> V"' ~ ru .. CQD '(') ... .-..o ec. = ......., II S., 3 8o fl S,
i.i = ~ .So ~ (3cl ~ e tJ ~ -g ~ . ~ g:' ~ ~ .., ~ ~ ru ru., ~ ~ ij
\1 r*-1 (.) ~ ~ ...... ~ V"' l-l () \)"1 ij \)'I I X" ~ ~ ~ a.., ~
3-, O'l L3 ~ ... () f) \:S ~C ~ ruC ::l CV ~ <.1 <.1 CiJ ru .
ru
c
_.gn-o ...8o
M~
v C->
()
=
-v"'
. = j,~ .,c.>
m~ \1 () ru V"' c
() ~ .,
T. &~ =.,
.. c -r.
fl ~ tJe-,o-. c.>c u
(.) . - .., ij .. ~ Q) a.., II ij fl
rB"' = e Q ~ ru fl~ 1,
= ~ :J ij ,.8 _j ru ij ::l c ~ S, ::l ij ~
fl V"' 3, .-co c :J "" () '" V"' 3,rg'
u=ru ru 8o n-o fl V"' ru w ~ ru ru l\)J
cc et>uruc= c
flfl ~.., O ' > = C f l ()~
~~ CS1

~
...
B~
::t:
--P.ij ~~~V"'
~ ~ a.., ij
Oro g cu -<
(,)
cf) s,
/
X ...., ~ ro
~ ~ =
8 .
3.., m
~ *
l3-,x
~~
--
""
.
XXXIV

.'P@0~01Jo?:n
'P<f:x>cfJ@:n
'ltor-i@Lc;roS oo'P=~~:~rf> 2 oG311
(" (" .t"
~=s-tc;o:n~m2 oc;3u
' C,:C'. ('
"l\P'~eG>aot~~roeoc;3u

"{0~~@3:cSc;'l:( ~c;'l:c;ol'~"t=<ije"YS )~oSeoco3n


roe"YS;rf>( ~c;'l:c;oT@~3coS:'l8~) (o.n~)~oSeoc;311
c-,""...c:.oc-. oc-r;: c- c-
rooo......, ......~,cc~c~l~oc;'l:~roeoc;3 u
coC~nt:ro4)'):~oSeoc;3u
~~t:' t :x>~4)')<ijcSrod>y~~oS2oc;3 (Negotiable
Instruments Act}lt
~oS~:cn-Sco~C>t@:'tP:rooSGt: ;~:2oc;3u
'I 0 . 0 ('
0 I OOf0~00$~002010311

o8~togoSor~@:cSc;,p~oS2o"3n
~:~::x>oSo.n 3 9~oS 2 o"3"
. C' ('
:l)OOIO:l:>OI~0020Cf311

:nnci3o?oS4)'):~o:n:~~<c:'l:~oSeo"3:11.
:n~G>cSO(cS4:~o-Seoc;3u
~4)'):~4)'),9 :nooc;on:(@8on<ijOS):noSeoc;31 ~ec;e 'i"
~oooS~.t~@~ c;~,~~s.tcocn-S:noSeof03u
:J;lc;~c;~aaoSIS~=<ij~=o.ns9~t. 11
(' .
~<;;~onroa~:J;lro2oc;3u
('

c: (' (" (" ('


:n~ooc;cvns;~roeo~;;3n
~ c C' c C' c o.;- <"
~c;'l:t:.:;:c;~;of~=~=;<;. (H()')cam~~Ol?~;;'P 3droeoc;;3u
("
3dO(O:l:>cn:co~c;C3:~roeoco3n
(" r- ("
C' OC' C' <" .tlf _('
:qooo;:~~:;c; :qowcy:<il'l~~: ~meo10311
(' 0 0 (' ('. (' ('
~.e~G y;4>t O?~ll"i?~t='tf'= of~:onma~s~ :nro 2oG3u
~e G
(" "
~ y;>t :x>:4)'):Cija:>'):c;'1:2oc;;3n
(' (' . C' 0(' c C' (' ('
~e G~ ~'f'4>1 ~"tJ'=tS: ::DCT.>Ol)>CGOY.> Of~~~WO?c;'):
('
:nmeoco3n
u:~l~tso~~~c.osocw~:s~ ~ec
~oecococA> :?~<fe>ocboe~~e 5tfi2 c.ccll+$c
~9:~leee;$Cbec $2cc:GCO~<fl~ :?&::?:, I:;?J~!bg~l:~bc.G
toe~ :~~ec$2a::Loc-A: ~fl:,:$C~=~ro:~4>::?oo~ - . :~gee~
!bg~'@~<:Pcw~:S~ - g~e go;ft.oec 3~ ofc ~Aec~coeooo
:c.cot)ecx:>o c~o2s.oecsocc:~co:$C~rocw - ::?J~::?c.c.o~
tb~~sob:>:c~Asole:cJ!?C ~+!~oc !bso~:?c.osocw~
:S~:Lo r <fe>ocboe~oo~cc.oe~~2 -:~D,:$C~:~ro:~+::?c.o~
c.cc~:t.<o~:b~c-6~oc !bglfegb:g:~ ~so~=~~c.c.o~
sobcc ~ (e) (c) ra A!$b:~~IWe:c.bc.o- e ~:~J:?o:J{Woc
~ orc C>Ae.t: <:tSc.oeooo I:C.CO~&f!OOOC~OCSt.JOCSOCC:~co:sc~roc-c.o

uc.IWM
,J
clW~.bfeecc.occ:ec.o:<X!~rocw
,J 3 0 ,J ,J ,J
;;:lcclOl~g
';,'- :.1..:; 1bee
~o2cJ,sccc~~:c.bc.o - ::?bs.o&b~ ~~c.ccAh $Ccc~soro
&x:.<.c~cc ~:ciA!oe u,.~tble~:?f!lo - rG ~geE; :c.cne
f!OOO ~o2socc:gco:sceC\X.c.o - sole~&CGC~C'C b->sccc~~
: :>~&>bc.oc.b~c.oro
,J~ ,J ,J
c.oc~~;;:lccec.oro~~cc
';,'- &
,J
&>~ccb
":>'- v

:!c.oeE::~oee ~:ciA!~ :~~b(J3J}JO .U3t.!f3Q) sccc~:?&;~c.o


:~=~cs>~!oe-(\)C,(,(,)$2cc~soro ~&CGC~cc ~:ciA!oe
-gllec-esc~o $2cc~g-qe~&~cc S06)~9:~~+ tAa tA
c),:g~:c.bc.o be (e )c .c~o2:sc+ . IOC t~ec:~~IWe:c..bc.o
~ (c) a8 e~oc~o2s.oegeee - :~:?~=~scsolb ~e
~LeeE::~~ccJe c.o~&cc.c~cc :c.U,&:?ot_O ~:!og~ -
:9:>o~ooee
.) .) .) ~cc:c.cox.oeoooA
..) 3 -- ..) o6 f'ICO
.l ~o2cntto~~e
3- .--..)

- ~Se~:c.bc.o !b~b3~=~!c.o $2ccle:gc.b~~so~re .bee


gl/ec4 ?~o - rG ~gec:c.co*>f'l!)o ~~c~o2s.o~cc:gc.o:$C~roc.c.o
e,9s<:>!Ac.e SDie:!PC
A XXX
. r=1l~~8 ~t~~:~~.~- ~~~~.~ s ~ =~fuo~lk~ - ~~
(ofc)~~ (c). :~~e&~~~2~ec ~:!?w:sc<Pcocco -:~~~ ...
e:~b:(-5. sv~~asro. sa~~t~=:r-oo~ c.o~:gb:c.b bee' . oc
a~o. c~o~ :~~gl:~ e:~b:c.b ch~.~1w cJ,S~ ~cc:coo
=~~-sc.q - K~~:chc.o ~l;~b~to! ~s~ ~cc:coo:5&:~c.c>
~~~a~ -:.(ofc) ~~ec(~) :~~-e&c~o2CSJ~ ~cc:.~co:~<Pex>Uo
. i
. .. ~. ,;
0
.. . ~ L A~~~ -~' ~h~ .
. . n~ct:l}~ ~eel :~~f)~a~~3>o:
~lkco~~~cc ~SO<X;SOo ~~q;-c~~~cc;o~a
~cc:?~~~reb~ ~ -~~a_:---~ iu~soosv&~~~o -~~
:ceC!aC<'C ~<_'C:~~ -~~<!c:See& ~:~0=1l. - f5 8~o
,I
c~o2sPet: ~@~So.cc:~:~ ..:. ~a \f~S~t=~~gt;~ \lc:o~ .I
I
'
.. : . ~Jeffiaem~~- :~~~3~-~R J.O~=~.&o .- :~~a
.I
. .=~~=~ !b=~~: ~ce~o ~9:~&o. ~~pro .
. . - .~~a ~o:'{W~ ~9. ofc:; .~gt '?oSooe~ ~c~'02soe& ..
. , so~:~~:~@~ :- ~A ~ :1CJ~~!b~Jbsno lf>gco~ .
.:~ -=~~~~~~~ 3+~:~:~~~cc :
c8;~ecro1> -. :;?}~l3C.O: ~~~~~gpce':~~ ~pec.o
. ~:cn.i:~~:G<'S ~l>~s~. ro~ :~~a :~JlJseec lO~~~~g
~~~ ~l~F!~~e.e~}ec:de~~ec:~&,a:: ~:~c:Ql\ :- .
~~:&<P !b;~gl,;oo~w~ -~~~ :~~~~~ :
~f)~ ~cc!~~~ =~.~ . ~!)~o:~.e& l~ti
_!cc~eto: O~C ~~ .-~so~~ ~c~qcpe& sott:~Gtuc.c.o
. so~=!~ .
. . ,.
. ..
fo6c
u~~ ~ !b&>cce>socc
~oo::e>:ill.~co tiW~ec.o ?f:~:oo::sore:~f.b~bce ~&:~:~bee
sccc~sooe c.a:c.~c.)e> :~Loe>~~ec sor~~i:~~+ - :~)~
!blk:c.co~~cc sccc'~~ :oo:::~b~ CAS~ec
tbGe>~~c.otOC<.O :oo::socme>c.o~c.o ~J:5es:::~bce - :~~
:cia:~bce. c.cc:~~c.u!A 3=oo::!~ e.A:&,:~ec:3bc.G ~:c.co
R:oc.o~~CD - 6~ ~~0 Ce>OCSle&~CC:>SOCC - :JSe~:chc.o
:~cP~b ~3e>$Ccc~tbb ~Jccg~o:> ~:da:~&o scccl
:~ec ~&cbg&>~ ~ec~ec ~soccsoo ~9:!og&>so~co!w
fcoc
Jl~jA g~~~c.o~~~~g ~c.c:?IW'tce b~ 66c-6~0
c~ocsoecsocc:~ro:~CK\X.OO - ~;g:6 .~t~ lo~cc~~~~
~~JW!ce ~8~~~g ~._~~~~=+ :!J3~blS<>ro
sole:!~ .
() xx
..3
~
X
~ oe 5
...co ~ CC1 n ~ k!o n ~ .;So fE B [3cl..B ~ CO) () =:
~ ..& ~ ,.; ~ g, '1 (l')
..&
.&~ &, 6) ~..So i ~,8()
~ o, ; ~ UtY> _..., - ~ e cgl.B~ oe m.&
&~em n o..,
~ .. em fB..,S
ee ~ % ~ --0> () ri o8 g, f"B, CC1..Bo ~8 CCC! o.., e .
3, (c) :g O'l ~ ~ ru ~ n, ..3 c a.., CQD I
rn,
()
e.Q}t .... 1, s 2
(')') C'l ci'l ~
oG I~" mm
--s~
~.. ~?l,s a,s..,~ 3~c () ....,
n -~ 8 eec 1;, ~
C.S ~-- e":::e;o ~
~~ .-- ~ ~~ 4: en 1
~ '1 Q)
.& & .. ~.. ~ u ~ ...e (')') -+
(')')
~
"-' mm () .So
~ --g ! ~ m
e em -e., (;;) s s, s..,fB, l ~~
g, (;;) 8., ~
~ ) ""' fB, (')') s G)
0 ...,6;' ~ . ~::> ~,~~ .8
.. .!!>0
~ e.,~..S " -g s .=, e~~ I .. s.., EB
~~ . .. ~,S..,o ~I~:::! 8 ..e-o oQ)I C
s, l s.., .,
s.., -e-'l ~ a.,
(')') -t,., 0 e.&..e~
a.., ~ ~ ~ o ~ oe1 &l , () o e. ()
- Q)l
~fB~-l,cgJ (ll) ..
c; ~8~~
........... ...,..2 .. s.., (')') s..,
...., , ~~:o:..&--m
c s (')')
e, ~ ~ a,s "sea,
'-' 3 '~ ~ > .<; .. s ~ ~ I 3, ...(') e Q)~~
4M ~ -;3o~1 I~ I
.. ~, -s
(')') Q) ~
--0>
O'l OS ~ """ ~ <-
- Jo~..B
- _.., ~ ru~~
- ij

_..2o ~~~i~m .& - 1 oe cS, rus,~
_..,
eo 1! I -0 ()
oS ~ "i
...., @ 0 C0'11 8 8 U ..& _. (l')
..8 ~ ~ t1 (;;) g, c
eo s.., o -e-.., () ij
......, , em -t> c, -s ~
(')')
(..) ov c
s.., ..So
CC1 "&,

r I ~ ...C o(ll)
-strr~~~s~
UtY> "(:B., !.!> I . ._, .~
o8
...., ~,8 ~~ o8
0; ~ 0' f) ~, .B
..& .& ij () s j a.., ~ ~, () () ~ ..._....!!)

Q) s ~ ~ 3, I cSJ
~
-e-..,
~
(.!)
i ..s
a: -'\.)
.. ~o ~-s ki ~s,o-.@
ij '~~ 6) _g
..& e ~ ~ ...8o m..S '-" (3J -4- a:o -; ~ ij
== ru, s, ~ s, s.., 1 Cll O'l -:1M ::::1.>
.3o ~6'> cg ~ ..s
Jo ()'~)

'->
...., -'1..> ~
s
() -'1..> &
~ -'1..> 0 g,
-+ .
u
cofc
9
6oc
u:~J:c.co~clfu~
?lJ?to=t~ ~~:~cc , !bso8:?c:.<r!~ c,ccj:c.e::$C4>:~1Wec
~bee(~) (c) (f) c6c a~bc~o2~ec :b~~~oe3~ec - ::?
:c.cowclfu~
.) .:J .)
: J::>cWl~weobc.oAooro
~ .:J 0
w&edbe:.::>c.w~
j- ,:) .:> ~
0), ':~8~:~~
of6c
u:~J~!oc.w !bee
~:~goo~~cc ~~cc~] :c.cce.c~:~ S2cc~so&-occ
r bee . A.alfil58
3 0 :.:J.l
l~::>bGCJI.)Ge ch:>~oocc
:> .> 0 .) 0 .)
@cc:::>l.o&ll.'fu~
.) .) 0 0
:c;ccaec - r 8a,cb IC acbc~o2ooec:b~e~~Al:cc.o::'letc.o~c.occ :c,~lfu
' ' ..l ..) .) .}~ ~:::J.) :1.:> '
n58::>~
.) .)0
W6'>wawc.b~:>o
~- j - .}- .:> ~:&e&e.c
:;: C'OC.OC
0
oo~c.o~:be
.) .l- :.:1 II$ :&e&ec
)
aooo ~~ccsoo ?okb::?J:~c~ec ~~~:cbc.o !b:o~gec
~e~ro ?P~ ~:~SO" ?so~~ c;cce_:c.cogbJ~c,oe~ ~~e:llfto
o~s-u!Aoo s-ole:~~
x~xxx
~ <ll <ll X
<ll ..!>o . ~
C'>"l e., -
~j CC1,B ~ 0 1 ~J l
o <~~, cc ~ ..g l I')
g..,~ 8 emg ~ ~ ~~ 'i,<ll I
~ 6) ciu
0'1 v :J .
..<t ..M ~6> . u ~ -v
~ rn ~~~ C'>"larJ..g
t c ~ -o .. (J \:S
Ol!l 6) .... CC1
8 o3 l'n e a: s, .. O'Iru,
ru...ru, ~ a., . . v ~ ~ . ~() ...... ~ 8\)") .
&,1 80'1 a: 6) I .Jo~ a ~ ..;., ao~ ~ a 8, c.,
..eo ~ 6'1 a, . 8e> oe q a, ..,e 8o
m ~rt~ ~... a: 011 t ;:s ~ 8 ..... a:.,
~i ~ e ..
C'>"l ~()'I
C'>"l nn 8c., ~
a .. .ss., ~ ~ c., O'l m
C'>"l
H ..&~ru,~ ...e
.... ()
.. l'n
tl u .v, ;:s .. 0 8o n H
~g, C'>"l em a: ~ n
~ ~ru tl +'I e n g., 'a'
I.... ij
C'>"l a:@ CC)...., c ~ a ..a.
Mi
CCCI CCCI ..
~8., ,.8
~ ~.. l;:)J :::~ ~ Ci1~""5::~ ~~ ru
~ .. a: r:B...("B,tJ..vo ~
CCl C'>"l
n ~ .st.. n .. -u ~ v U'l " CIV
-<: oY6) tl .. ~ g M x;:; e " I U'l 8 .Jo j V 3, "1:"
ru. . (o)o') 0
G:
...e ~ aC'>"l~ ~~~, C'l " -Tl ru ~
lV'I f)
S., ....I ~
~ 8o ~ ~ c a,
~
cB @&:~..a. a .3o 1
~ C'>"l e ru,. ..& Q)
<- &1 a, o a:., s a...-:So B
..g e ,<;> M-+ ,. _., o " 0'1 ru -4: I
+'I
l
..e
() I
~ ~ e
oQl/ :' ru...
e :' e
;;
~
_., 0'1 .
~ :.e>
C'>"l C'l
.:nm
~ u
n c
n
v
.
...... on
~ .,......._
f)
~~e l. .~;?.Jk~1. ~i1
s
-4'0
....e, ~~~j "' 8 4 <- ....,o .n
s., e n ~
0'1 em ~ C'>"l_.,
0 m
.. \5, a ~ ~ 1!.~ 8&" cffi~~oS 8.....,.3
a.,...,a:o Ce> em 8 n;, C'}!C> ~" (C) 16) . so" a., a, ~ 0'1 .
o" .-a l.l I ~ sa: .. ..a.
~ a c tl
ru... c:2C>
~ ru,~ ..
Cll I
~~ -:e:"
<t ~ rt B I')
n ....,
c.,~..c , l.l
-<:o (C) S lv" C'>"l~ 0 l.l'l
rn ;: ~ "o<ll, 6'1
Ol!l . ~:: <t
11">
s8 a
O'l .... ..
--sm., ... .. ~cm(8)
~ e ~ ---
O'l <t'> "-'
c = v
a ~tl u~.tl ~ ::> ~ ru a
~ ..en '-<II,
~ ..2o"' ~
..
......, -vo o')'G'> an f ~ ~

0 0 tj;)
...:> <-
tj;) ('0) ....,0 la,
~
::>::>1.~~
.)0 .)~
~scoo~$(!~ ~ :!~5U'.C~5~~ u~) s~:~JU'~
II: ~)&>:b~t
bt ()c~ ~~b:{o~llo~o~c.b !b~ce~>) ~:c),t - ~~
c.ox.tt!bp:~~~ce~ :?&:~&:c.bc.osoovch - sofesbi:JSDA!e
u~o~ 5o:l!iot 5&~!e~:c.<:.o cv ~~bcMGSOt~
ccoCSJcc cJ,:s('(;e.soccso' - =s&!O<.(.O CSJ&et::dMb:~
w~~gTh~ gllec.e?<:.@~o~ - sh~ sh~C\) ~]~lee
:cooa;soooo~ec 'c;occsoo ~~:~ec ~cc:o~~AC.a: - =5
~gTh gltec.e?c.2~ofsOW :~c:.P!eoo; ~&a;~:~- ~Se
~:chc.o ~bb:?soec ~cc~ccllo lm>ec:~!:> ~9~b~cc:cooro:re~~e~
()l.AJ :iD(~)A ~'SO""A nG ~A II~ scJ.oe uc ~c.&ece ur
op, nc =~sob.J:C4so~ 5 o:c.bc.o: 5 !:> (&cc~) ~ac~
ue ~S5tsolhsoo ~~fe5bi ~~=~
&~ ~ (u) 0~ A~Oc~o2 soecg~cc~ ~ :~soelesoleso
:~ ~c-9crc ~~$(!cc~cc~~ceg:"Jec&$(!~ - :5l:coo
~
.)~
:...,.~
~o-,
. .oec& .> ~-~. w:@&>e
, A.l,c.o~:oo )":clMw
<t:J o o- ~cc
.)
":c8:5t :~&t!:CGOOe Aec- cr A~O c:"Jo2soecFCC~
- :~f.coos-oclro~ tb:o~sob:>c.e:t~g~ec - (w) vcr, A~O
c~o2sot:5~s-ocet?t~t - {o) o~ ~~ cf e~o ~~o2soec~~cc~
,,~e l):~ec ~~socosccc~ ~~i~gsofuc-w~e e
~a~~so~~e .~uc e~o :~soccec.h. - ~85gsofucw~e
c.9so~C4 ~:!~ .
HX
.:1
u~cc~ ~cc gruo ?f.>c&y,oc.Iro~~ue> - :~~en~
(OG('(")~<:.O&:c--6 ~rb s~ :><:.0 bc.ol,
.,) .,) .,) .,) .,)
. :).) eo.h cc cc:c.cccoc.Iro~ but>
"
- a~ .,)c(J c~nccoe.c:d!:,&:c-b:fb3~-
.) ~~:cmcoc.Iro~
: .):::.1 ,:,~
4>bob:>l(il
.) .) :,j
bue>
e
Cobcoc::>rO~e:C.OCC:(ile.c -
o e 6.)L .) ~
MJ C~o2coe.c:d!:,('c:c,b:~l!>3~
a .) .l
&vee
II~C'C~
~cc!bsoo ~~e.c - ::?:?k=!''tea &>~~!!~c.o ~&
ruvco$2cc~~ t~e.csccc~a - :!f'l~c.oglfecc ;?GO~~/,
-:?z:o~A :?!:o~fe~co~ bee a f'l~<'J lf&~~:cbc.o !b~b~ru
4>()1
.,:,j
rc~~~s~;;:ltc:fe~ i>J:loa;
..>~ ':J~ ' o lc~c~w3e>
..>::io
;;:lcc:fee>
':J~ o
.):)~:loa;
~fe:~5 ~~gb:vco.~ ~~.8~:fee> -v (')~bc~o2pe.c:cR,&:cG
fe:Go 8~ - :).l.~A ~~(e::)c,c.oe~.l-a:vbc.o cc~ac.occe.c.br,.a;
0 .>Oo .)00 .:> ()'"", _sw .' o .)
&o8~ $2cc:le~~Co ~a:~e.c -- :c&a :c&~gb /,!a;&
:G<Dfe:),...8e~ 5~~cw:fbc.ooo8:) <.erof'l;),...cc :<::2w~c.oa
0 .):..:J ,:) ... ~ 0 .) 0
~~~~ ~cc:~c.o&:C.Cie:~5~ - ::?~:cc~~~~~~~c.oe.c
5f&vccce~o2~ec :dA&:vefe:~3~ ~~+e G5tlc - A~b! 8~:~:>
sole:~~ .
!! JX
-.
e 6"l n
~ ~ ro
~
lc)
..So
..
~

e .-go~" e ..B e ~ ~ .Ji '"S, n ~ 1 ; n f! ~ e ..!) ~
O'l ~ ~ O'l e _.8o ~ -13 ..!) c@, ~ ~ 8, 4 ,8
~ O'l J:) "' ~o e'l J,1 ...() 3,., oe' ..8
a8, (:B_, --B -0> @l ~ 6"l 1= <%
~ e :,; ~ -0>'l "' 8 _.8 O'l ~ j G' S C-'
e ..So ~ ruo f!" O'l 8 e f
O'l ru .] S, en o ~ v ~ ..2 {.) (:B, 1= u ..!) :::!><> c" ~ ~ ~
{.) I V'l u ...C 8 ~ \> "' vo -0>'l ~ ..!) = '-{)
V ~ 6)C _D\ .. ~ f -0>'1 ::!>O -0-'l
..!)
oa ~
3" 8 8 O'l ru_, =-0>'1 ee"..!)8'l ..e
-u
8"
3_, V ("Uc~
Ill(.) ,.2 8 ~ O'l ~o J:) ~ 3, 2, -0>'1 (.j ij ~ lc) ...C S , fB_, I ...8o <% S n
c2 -0>'1 oe' ij ~ ~o ~ ..e 61 ~ ~o ~ fB, S -0>'1 a!) n m ~ d? ~
'5 ij ..& ..8o -13 8 [:B, ~" ~ e, !..?. 3, ~" JJ ~ en ~ 8,., cg f!" .o,., C'l <.n
_g._ 2" ~ > ~ --B ij v ::e>o e "5 rg _.8 S,., 0 ~ O'l ~ 'Y.O I e ~
8_, 8, .en I P. ~a I .. S,., fl . 8-,soio -0>'18 -13 cV,o . 8,~ s o38 (B.,()~
.._, ~ c ~ & O'l eo..!) R ...c 8 .. u ~ ~ 0 .."
0 e;:; ~ ee . .,..o m .. ~ ;:s ~" .o, ~ ~" ::e>o1 o .o... .,& -0>'1 ~ y ~
"t" ._ ..o ~ ~ ~ O'l CSJ ~" ~ ~ ~o 8 e ..eo lc) ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 8-,
e J ~ O'l ~ ..s. e O'l.:; cfu ~'l It 0 3, j ij
X., 2 ;:5 '-{)
(Scl ~ n !'?" 8 ::> ~ n {.)') !'?" ..2 ~ c c" rB"~ 2" He
(.) m~ og ~...,.,.....c 8oc, ;;;...> <:
v .,
oQ)/ \.<.,; J
"
~ 8
..vo
..
=-13.. ~r<J~ct)
8 ~0 -'1.)
;:o;o CSJ ~ 8
e <--
vu ~ =()
f.B, (.) c... a,., o... ,
J
()~ ~....., ~ s,.,~~~ I O'l , , 0">,., -&,~ ~ ~ ij
t ..&,~ ~ ~ ij -B ~ -s,~ ~ ~ ~ jo ~ ~ a ~ ~
8 o9 ..8 R S,., fl ..8 --s: ;::o;o ~ j! -o" ~ g m 3,., a C"
f.B,.,::> ~ ;:sru SA:~ 0"'~..!).ru e" ~~co..,
"fl ~ . . c -v ()") ,, OQ) c . ::l r-\1 -v ..o '-{)
c2 ~... n u <:> ..., CY> 6"l J
en It ..vo L3 c o v
0'1 ,..(,J (.) 0 "' v ro ij ~ 1.) ;:s .= ~ ..
<J80'> ~8 mo8
eo e ci) So ..B ~ ~.., s.., s.., ~ a,., ;:s '"S.., ~" n,., ~.., ..8 ~ ~
c- , ~ en 8 S, It -<::
i ru u 11: n u I"U'1 ..o v
6"l 8 8"> .-0 ~ C v ,_,. v 0'>
..V ~ I ~ (g "> O'l .& ~"> .tJ 8.., ~ X, S,., o9, y, ~
() ~ () ~
~
0 ...
~, tl
u &8-,x
-
~ ::
-
..8o 8 s s I(
:) ~
~
c~ cr;
...
c:
ag ~
6) ~ ec>~ ..8o CCl fi ij .~;(C)~
'$) 8 ~ 2 =~ ~8...b, s
.] -8 b8, e~ '"..8 (C)
'" o~ en s~e.;s . s anW1~2o
s~ o~ ~~ mcm 8 -+o ()f) <n ~ 8.-, r.~ ~ q:,
(;) Q>.@ s ~-s 0'> 0'1 0'1 <n 0'> CCJ- ...Qi
f) 6)
.. ..8o
8 ruo

= 3..8 ;~ ~~ . o.-, 3.., c~
..B. cm..:o.o"""loiC .
..S ~cfuo

'8
[B.,
~ .$ ..X~ -8.. ~~ ~
,.6)6)80 o~ ~ (3) .. e ~...8o
8 8., 6) 8'/j 8 ~ 8 ...o8., . s~~ ~..z
..So~ ~ ~ <n fBn::I!>OaD em
u 6) 6) o8
('If)
-srg
0 6) 6) 3.., -8 7" ..8o 0'> 3o ~~
.. ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ f.B,
~ \5 .. -+'> (.) ~oq:o~ 1 Of) .-v
~ oe' rgJ
~~
s
-8 0'1 ~ I
~
.o., v~ w~
--2 ~ e ~-s
~~ ("B;, !, 1M s 8 ~ 0 v 8.-,
l" v .. .
.-oo ~ ;o ~ ~ ;o
.... .Q), ..B. e s =1,~sEB
ru ~o~ C) . o.-, e> ,..8, 8 6'> C'> ...!>
.,e tvo-f'l',-v e ,..;,;...~. em:> ~ ~ I -.a ~ '.
f?\1 ~o I Oil re.. f.B,<-. (C) ~C3lft,s, .... 1
Lvd o, e ....., .0'1 ~~ .S~ 7.$o ._. 8o'' &
fB, ~~~@ . 0'1 s ~ I]') ~
:) f)
..~ ~..8o 8o~ m 8,~ ~ --a ~ --& .f) . ruo
<n V(l
..........
~
s em 8o,
~)
~ 2s~~ 0'1 ...e ~ u
C'l -.._..;
e.-,~ c.>" s, So ~. ru o
a ~~
--s.. fB,
q;,
'"
<n ~ "' I ~ "" ..e -x ~ oe
ey, ,..a. m .-e c.-,- c H',l
e ~ .. ~ (.) f) .-u (8J oe' ~ !:"
I ~ rgJ B (;B, ~o .
m 0
sBo
~ ~
u ~ ~
f)
~ 3 s -~~ s '" \:5 <-
.4'0 lcl(C) -eo~ 2 Bo , ..8o
e -sS ~-eo~ ~cr~
~..,g-R <n e, e~ ~ ::> & ,.-...
0 0 (.) : ~ .-vo::> ..
<:::., e j;B.., 4: I c It ~
8, 6 ~ 2 0'1 0') 6)
u 0') o-; ~ .--- 8., 8 0 8.-, 3 ~,
-;00 .2 6) = (lt') ~
0'>~~
b8q:, m ~ g.,~ :ts
0 .. ~ ~ u e e~cmm ~ ~ ~
t ~0 v (\)() CCl ::l 8, ~ oe ., V')ffi)~
0~ I ~ ~ ~
~eo
em . 3.., .. e, .-vo e - <n
~~~ ~ e <n f)
s ):
e
j;B, ~ e
lc)~s e~ ~ ~. fB, . an
-eo~
....__..
..eo em
<n
&>ecms
~o .,.So o~
J~. t2 ~
csa 3,~ --&. 8
. .. <n 'g ::g<n (3) c& c.-,~ ij
..Go~~ ::,.t) I
fB, 3., ..& ()f) ..8., '"''It
..f.O

0
s
&
-.(')
~ 0 8-,
0 cv ~
.....,
~ ~
w
)> .
... ~

8 8
~
a
~ 3, &>
eo ij c.>o
~ e f) . . . . . .~ s...so
0 0 H 0"1 ~.., 0"1
W1
~.., ..3......,~["&, Co ]
'0"1 l"J Jo S.., a f) -t..,l ~.., ~. gl) .s ..&> s f) g..,
.. 0"1 ..3o c.>o eo8 ~~ _:_, ~, J} ..
I ~
0"1 .. c 3 c.., ~ ij s.., ij g ~.., .& .
Q) 0"1 Q)
8 c
. CC') C"' Oi> ,~ 8 s:t>
~0 &,~ 0 -> a., 8 ~- CCJ ()<') Q'l
if'
...... ..a.. s.., ., ..3o ij 4:.., ru &, w 0 ~~~~
~g., ,.2~ c c..,u.,a ~
. ~ .s~ s ~tR"lo .. u .
= (ij) c 0"1 : r'()..,L8J 0"1~ V .
.,.. 9 ...Q ~'! ~.., 3 ..3o t g..,~
0"1 :: s P."&, ~uCCGeru,
.J') n- .-<;: ij _q ~.., ~ 0"1
L~ ov .. (:B., ij
ruo ~ .
.
~
s..,
It
. s.. j.., n.., ~ e
.. . ~
"'\.)
. 3e ij Q>.- ..., re .
f) -.()
~
~ ea:&;. ~
~.., ~ .ij ~~ ~
Jle.., ... c2o.., ,.. ..g ....... 011> ~ ..e. .s . ....... (8) kl . &Jx (ij) ~ . J1
~ ... (.) 0"1 ;:s ~ .. >~ 0 C:O::~
....., " <.CJ
.
~ ~ '. ; 8 .f) f) 0"1 '.
~ ~- v~ u (.) 'fl ' &, s . ~ LJ!J ~o ~
_.11!1.1 U>!'C"'
0 ;'\) anr."~~ao
~~
... 3, ~ ~ (:B,~ \:S ~ e"'~.. 8
ij ': ,z' OQi
.. S
Je ..co 8~ . c
cs.. .. C3J 8 8 1~ij ..
. ,..!.!.... ..
ij <..;. C"' $. 0"1 &, ' S..,
. ,fl'": ~ m~ S ~I'. .
LCJ ' ...... .-.W") . -<', C U .
e . .. oe ::l .v .
()~\ ....u-.:
an g :. G'l . e-Jeo
. ru , .. '3'
L\:j 1. "'s.., ~
~ . a; . ..
~ !:"~ &I I.Q> j
' . J::!
IC:.'l. . C"'
f) c.., O"'
fl
~ .

ru
lu"'

0"1
..
3..,
.:v.o. ....
::o~
J..:...
45 I ;:s u ~m 1 ::o 8
-:So ~ !i~ . .
m ......, ~ 8 0"1
f) vo
..00 \.~
M ~
...,., &I _q " " ~ m a;. ~ 8
... ~0"1 .
ca: e ..
~ . &'I a., . &'I] . .
(ij) ~0 eo m ij Be oe,j 2 J::! co 0
0"1 - ~., --g e ..&
.."' !t C'lfB, )14:
r ..@t
0 .. -.()
.. 0
~ ~
~
~ 0
-8
~
~
. ~~ ,,
<-
. ~. <:
ol~:l1:c.bco lu&~e.c ee.c(.('Ce>oe.c~4-b::>ce::>fil - :::>~b@coo&
.> o ' L .J o .J ..> .J:..J .J::J ~ ... .J
olfeoec
.) .)
co"eo:@&:c.beo::>~co~::>\.e
0 u ltJ
.) .) .)~ :Q&:c.bc.ocooE>c.b .) ::>11e
.)0
~:\)e>:?b~:c.bcos-ooi>c.b ~:&,so~ - ::?J~:~&:c.bc.os-ooe:~c.b
::>.:>C51\.e ~&:.:>&::>co
... ..) ..) ec.ocooe~
.:;;- w~bre::>fi1
0 ..) ..)~
- :::>eJ:c..b:.aJlewru
.)~ ~.>
~6)le.c~e.ce&e.c
.>:.:! .l,.ibre::>fi1
'(;"" .) .)~ fee.c0C'Ce~oe.cA
.)\,. .) c,~... - cr>GoA
.)- col.o
.)
....)b:oe~:~: 2~ .)
'Gec.oruco&co&
) .)- .) .)
5~~
.)
l1:cooc.oclfue>
.)
co:2:~co
0 v
cd3o
.> o
<AC~)....occcc..4>@4>
o.> .>
4>~cr>&cc~:c.bro <AC~c.lroeocc
- .>o.>- .> .>
4-b ::>oe&e.c cob:~e.c be.c 0c6 fH:o:booftoc.ooE>c.b - : ::>eJ~
.> .> o .> .> .> .> :::Jo
c.b cd~c .,:)... @~C'C'Cc.o
.):J rue.c ore j
..) oree.c: ~ <AC~:c..coc.oAc.occ
.) .J
4-b ::>a
.J .)
~(loe.c ~c~o2:c.bc.o- :~)c.bso&~:c.rocpd&~soc.b~c..ru
Cc::l156)l~
0
::> ce::>fi1
.)~ ..)
cc:::>oAe&e.c
.)~ ... .:;
5ceoree.c
..) ~
:&,~e.c0C'C~occ
. .)
::>oe&e.c
.) - :::>eJa:Cc: 0.
.) ::J' Goca:>ve.clbre::>8 .) :> ~
cci~Ao&e.c:4>ooec
' .() .) .) 0
-:::>~::>l.:od)l.t.P2: ::>.~C2 .l,:be~.~b@:c.bro o6;l: ::>eJ:Cc: va4>c.o ... A
.>t.J..>O :..JJ .JOO 0"' ~ 0 J:J .J~ ..> .>
::>eJ~6)lobwc,ca)c,ec ccco::>o:tcecc-8:&,
- : .)~.):,).) .:>
IG:f01:6::>ec
~v a::J
Cdcc
..)
c..o:>ve.cX~ce~ ~glle:~:c.bco - ::?J~fu~3~:?ce~S c.o:~c.o
cul/)o
.) 0
vcc~eeocccc..4>(l)4>
0 .) .)
- ::>ol'le&e.c
.)
c.ob:t\,e.c
0
- "4-Acofucc~:c.bw
..)0.)
CCC
u:::>eJ.l. ... 4>6:ceo~@::>u:~4>c.ot~t\,le8
3:::::10""..) .) .) .,) .) ..> ~
-
::?~~b~& co:~ !b~b(j.Jcue.ccplee.c~CCcc 0C'C~:~b~e.c
cp&e.c~:c.bw - (c )GAsoc~o2cpe.c~c.o9so~~:e:c~~:3~bi:<bc.o.
s-ole:~~
~A (X
GGfc
1i:~)ga:~ ~b~c.o ~oc.o~socb~~'~=~3~
~<pro:~ ~~~~~ !bgb;l~ -ba:cc :~4> 1cr !~a:
:~~1Cu6:chc.o - (c) c0 !'l~0:*'~!4>6:chc.o - :~:ceo~~
4>b:o~c.obo
:J .)-
:o~:c.e:2 lij<D~ 8~b:3,a:
o S".l:.:J o
c.<.o~:>:>~
.;, ..>o
. c.A8e~bwc
e e
GCC~4-b'"b
0~ 0
Aco:~:chc.owwc.c"&cchl,:::>~u
. . ..) ~:~:cfu8~fi)fe::>cb~
.) ~ .,)~ :s . ~\o7 .)
oo~).,:c.U,:;:;J&o:~:d,c.o
. 0 ~'- . :>~~:Gcx:> :ce:M>:!'lbo
- : .)~0 6- j .)
:>owl'!
.) 0
bA gco~ sole~\,~ :~roco 6c SQAa:svc.c&~} -:~:c.co
wc.ffi:>~
~ ~0
3.l.b:o~A~e :cfu8~bwc
0
fi)Je:"'"l~roroel
0 ~" "$""
Go:c.JA:CC~O
0 ~
:~:chc.o
GCC~IL:c.co
o :ce:t"ml"bo
o ~ ~
c.oAc.oAih6bc.oc
oY o 6 ~
wle:>b<11
~ o
w::>~:cbc.o
~o
Gl.oc
u:&,A ~bc,~:cJ~soro
Go~::>ce:>hl
o .l .l:J
c.oolle:l\:cbc.o
~
- :::>~oa:A-..
~::.b o" ~ ~
4>b<~~~5~
~ .~bce::>Ol
., .:~:J
~~:c& ::?~ ~:~:~&:chc.ocpoech:?~e =:?~s-ec~~
:~:chc.o:?~SO<~~ :?~e~ec ~~:~co:$C<D co&<:h~l> - :~b
c.}"~)=~~~~~ !b:?o~loec ~cP::?cPecGCC~soc,ro~0:>
-::>et<D~cbb:>oe&ec
;, :1.:~ :1.3 .) GCCcob:.l..ec
0 ~0
.)::>lrobe5~:c,eci>!'!GCC-4-~'~a:
0 .) :1 .)
~:c,co~ !~cp&cc::cbc.o w:~c.o:~ ~ - ~cc<~~:l)
loa:wc,co~a:
.)
lo~coo&oll!wk
0 ' .) ..> ~
:b~:>b<!l:chc.o
~ 0
- :::>~::>1.\::>c.o
.J::J .) .)
~~~8 ?,o~~ce:? :~~a::~ro:S24> $Ccc:cco~A~cc wc:n2
-t:?!Jlk~INso:~ c.9:c.):cee~~<D c:.8~~ ~:~~~ce~
S2ccgTh:~:c.bc.o ~?:?t - :9:cco:r:-5 ?,o:c.IA:~w:~~
socccpo ~~=:?fr.~&::?c.o 1i:?ce:?coc:')02 ~ :gb~gco~
sore:!~
xi viii
~':<ttoS
. O>'f>!li<"I1J~a}:y5w oo ~o:i:o~ .4al()1f

oo'f>:li~~o?:y5!i oo ..-;~w~oaoSro~ ~aa:o~@t: .,. V"' ~m~


wucd>~ oo'P'~&y t;ot~~ ~~~ ~O?SS:-
Y~Ii :>:> oat ~oiro~ ~OtH .

<n~:~nt~~o?:y5~ $? ~'l ~yoScxn:t;O.)') ~~.f.o? ~Ojl~o~:


~1~m~~'l' ~S:- oo~~nt~~c?:v5~
$? ~'l' ~Vd>(O:>.n~~.t. - ~OK~o~~:T.)Q)l~O{i><)S:>oa
m&q~2i ~:3~(000'5 - ~~o1~ro~~~ ~;(0~ ~m~~t
~~~II

2=~~ ol G .~ .tsc~cnS Oj?!:O,!!;~!OoSc;q::naSt


@~L 0 J?e

O)'f'!I,J<"11J~o?:y81,J eJ ~'l O>'f->:8.:9~ oolom ::ng.:o~


>m:20"3
3';)'1 ~c;,:J?cS~oS: w@LU?~~t~ - ~oloro~g_oS"i?~~:lf'
:)'dQ)c;::"~@~ oS~'PoS"?So?S~"tr:~O?d> - QG>oo.n
otoo~:"~soS @:l('tfl=@~t:- ~~~'tr:~sdJ'P~
ci~S:<ijoS'tfl:~m ~aJ~w:>:~ - "<noSoJc;:<noS@,"?cSV
-~c: (' c: c: c: 0 c: c: ,.$._."('
G>:O~-'-"''t1'<;: 3d"?J2!~Q"1J'XY't":o? <ij~C:Cijm~:~U(v "'-:,aS

c;olom~oS o.?:~:::Jd~t~ ')O~'ft"~G: O?oSo~'rt


"~<;t; l"?cS:o ~:o~ - <;;olo~~o? ;ooSrod.icxn:~
t::Jn:~~ ~onS :o1Jt:~ w~n? ::Jd8mcxn:~ G>e:o:>:q~t:J f -3
~~Q),,~'T-'9 ::Jd.,~:coS ~~t:<ijoS~:o~~ <;;olom:Dg_:yn:
2B+=~~
_<X?oSooS'l+ 'lSi,~~: *~:u~ ~,s ~~iSu

:>oGo

O?'{J:~CY.?J~a?:?5~ e.J ::g'l olmo (")'~ ooS:uOS~ OO'{J:~oqf:


::g~~ ~~=~GY.)=;~ t'ls~s~~ oo'P:~::g.i?tW~1 8 s~~oS
'ir=~o?S: ~:oS'lS: .... oo'P:~c.;ont:~:u2l :uoSxn
~~:~ OO'{J!~'"9J~a?=<?~~ eJ (o) (o) cas ~oi:oS ~ot-.
C Q 'L9 CJ1 C'Q C::C C c-oc
t?p:n~coo2:::r.n: wonotro Cl(e3:oo>2: ~r:;> &'t.~o;-c

~::no;su

?OO

Gld?tCI:f ol j ,~ Q3T~~c.;ro:( c;S:~ O?'{J:Ot


rqoSGY.>:CI:fo$ Gld?t o?@:)

4A
$2cc~ce~ ba:: (o) ~G ~~~c~o2 :b~:)>'-~eo=sc~o
-:~)~:d>:v) :cfu~~kccs-occ sccc?sei)>CC.O~ ~eoc&~ce:s
~~:clh~gc.ccs-occ $Ccc~::?cc.o~ 5&cb?se~ ~Ka::ro~ - ::?
:c.oosod&~ ~bl~g~ce:s ?fc&?sea::ro~ becl..c c~o2:$(!4>
~ '4>6ec:~='>!We:cbc.o
~v .:> o J - ~eeS:d,c.o
o ' bec:cfu r(, ='>~
.) C'lc
~~ocM2 ~~socc:<%-~ -1.-c ~o2:~4> ~~ t~ec:{:o~ltoe:cbc.o :
no~lhle
.>0 :.:J .
:?~1 ~ggce:? c&~ec -=s=s&te=~~ tc.ogeu:$(!.,glu
ba:::9:>~1We:cbc.o '::?so&>solh !b:~:b~so"s-oro~:cbco
5&c&~a:: - soles-uS~ ~ 5c ~~o2:$(!4> 'S t~re:{:o
~IW~:cbc.o .,. ~:?:?~~:~ ~w~:~:~ so&ec&>:~ c.ccA
eecng.b:~e.cSCcc:c.oo&-re :s&e~o - ~s e~<> c~o2s-oec
::?J:~~~~:<;2&o - :~::?c:.c.o~~~:?ce~ c&?sere d'~ec
4-b:oe~c.oalebwc
.) J 0 6
s~ exec
&
5~c.owro~
.) 0
- ~~S:cbco
o-, .bb:o~le
5'
. bwE::o1o~ec
0 6,) 1..
- wlewS<Xb
,) ,) ,)
I 5c c~o2:~4> 1c '4-eec:eo:'>ltoe:c.bco
~ ';;,~ v ,) 0 ,)
-. ~oc
u::?:?!
le:{'cec c.cca~esofe:!c-5:vJec :s&:~~R.o6:chco ?f;co:x.c;
~ . - cGc e~b:{:o~R.o e:chc.o - :s!le stl =sl:o~soa
;:2~:ce:ccax..e.cro 5-s.bec~e&>a::
- ~e ter,...,.~:J~oc\ob<D ko
~ :J 0 ~ 0 .>OJ 0
~:;)
.~:*c.O:~e:cbco ''m!lo*b -:- ~ec.a.:>Gec !bceso~J.O~re
&~Coe S2cc~~ r ~" C C~o2:$(! I (}c 'bec:{:o~R.o
.e.:cbc.o
.
- :oeJ:c,oo<.Od&~
J~ .)
9b:o~coCo:f'lbo:cc.omcro
..) ;) ..) & -
lo'4>eec
0 ..>0
!b:oe~:ill~"' llz!eec c.cce~soAie:i) lo~ect~:be~gJ:~
e:~b:c.6 - ::sJ~~:cbc.o ~~:O:>~J:cc.o S<DOC-<X> ~:~J~en:s'
~:4-eet> 5~JLl.">r......,.,,sn . :-v~~;:lc.o:vS~-cGc ecc\:lo51to ft:cbc.o
_:, .:>O- ;;5 'O""S''~~ ~:>~~ :>o- 3 . .:>
3Ufe:!P2
655c ~8~b~ ~9 !e:~lc!) &!)so~
=~~~=tee ~:s!:> (~F~f'so'Bec) ~ce:!cc:!ccf'
n:~~~b~c:.o~ A~kccl ~~:ill
SOO :~<@J~~~8~~~g tbb~s-oro ?fC4o2 ~:~eec - ~
~b~c:.o~ g.>Je<.o)-0~
tbeCOC C!)oc:SC-9 1cf 'be :{o~fWe:c.bc.o
u~t~~A !l~~ ~~b ~C.O~ solec.os-o~tec:.cc
- soeoe ~Co :\A~C CCC!)~~ I bee f6 e~b CMCS>e
~8cccs-occ:c.]:~ .... :3~i>~e ?,o'bCS2ccsoA!e ~&
c&~:'J CCC!):c.o:>sodfu~ bCuG C!)02:$2~ 1cf '!g~:{o
~IW e:cbc.o - ~~~ 1bec!)o2 :$29 1cf tgec:{o~ltof':c.bc.o
cs
orr
11~6 ~ ~8~:~~!) be cc =~
1of 'bec:{oltoe:c.bc.o-~oe ~o:~C ~9(6) ~c :$2+
1cf !yg_ec:{x>~!We:chc.o !b:o!)le:3c.b!)~c.o~<\:l~ ?f>:cJl,:~3o
c:.cc!):3&:o!).~a<:.C~Lo~C, (6) be :sc+ 1cf '!fte:{x>~ltoe:c.b<a
~~~t~ 3kce&> lo$2cc!~soleec $(!re gce~!b3ee3l beoc
c~c!:~+ 'S tge:{o~ltoe:c.bc.o - ~f' ~ :3~:C.OO!:c.w
ooc:')o2 !b_si~b ?f>~8cccsocc $2cctF:3<:.<.0:') 3eoo&~ec
sore=!~
8 8 8
~ ~ ~
--
C f\ -+e> f) OIV ~ oe' ,.e .,8 8 ;eo ij OIV _. Q>
ij 8 ij 8 ij ::l
oe e ~ .en d:l
~ ~~ '"S 8 3.., f)
~~ 0")~~0 3... ~0~ o8 ~
s ~en ru... ;:s c... ()") CC1 0...
~...a. .. ..e -a :::!) {C) ru :i., ~ t c... ~3 -4:8 ~ 3.., ...8.
o8 .. ~., Cl,)'l O'l C .., j
.., ....... ..a... V'> ~
~3 ,.e cS" ~ -~ ~..
en~ CC1
.. 4:o +o ij
~
" 4:0
.,.., "~ ru... ~
.......
3
(.)
m ~ __.
&'> 0 ()") ~
8 ~ . ~ &l
.:!)o
ij _g 8 ..~ ~ .a:o
\)">
V, ~ c 8. . ~ _ Jl 4:0 rn ~ a rn \:)') ......,
806" ~'-0...., """ " ..oo -0 ()I) u . .. u ..o ~ ee>
4: ...e., .()') ~ .. 8 .. s v I -+ .o (S..,
CCl -1.) rn., !]. . ~ ;:s 3... ~ -.J
-1.) J3 c
-v
:o:!>o
kl oeC
em an - -u
rn
...e
" !d an ::, 8_ =-- j;B.., .o.., ~ .. a:o <-
S 01V e., ij ~'l d:l ~O ~ 8 . u :::" e -;1"1 ~. _.
M"
.. ()') . &l ['B.., ..... m
..., e .en I I:O _.., ()') O'l :. -a v en ru.., ..;:) J) ('B.., ru
..~I ru...
... . ...., .& .. .an .. (Q)) fB.., O'l ij ...., .. . .a. 0 ~ .. s., u ClV
s ~
--... I O... ...,
8 en ru.. a:"f)..!>
t:Sl 8 ij
-4: .....
m ..,~"
!) .
v
0 ~ -<10 -4:
~,_.
ru c.ru....,
r:u c
.1
()")
c .. o:> eo en...., lV'I'<i'l fl ~
" ..
... <- -1.) ()<) 0 ..3o ..&, 1 C 0
(.)o .. ;:!Do \)">
oe.;n a:o .....
""' o.., .v e 3- ru ... (,) :)
(Q))
(')").......,. .... 4:~ 8-," 3 e ~ 8.~ c ~i ru ..,.,
_.. ~e... u x .:n
u
.. .......- 0... ..8o .. s~J.......,. .rn ,.. ~ <- ru Jo ":) toe..., " .... t)
- ...
3.., CiD
0.., -.J l V'l 0... ,
ruo ..e-o
O'l
v <-
0" ..._..
..2o ..~ CVJ "
') kl . - ~ - ..S ~ d:l ~ LvJ c v (31 "
T
I ..s
Qj .. ..2o I
..:!)oC ()")
= ij -v8-,1 ~ -2
....., s s... ~., ' ~ ~ e .e ~ ~ .." s..,~;; s.,
n ee () lc1
ee"?i ..v .2 :. ..s ~ ~
ij c.., .....
0...
n; s, c 5 ~ -;& o e .i'l. ~ ~
~f1(. Cl.n..v ~ ~ _, ~" ..8 ..8o " c -4: ...., V'> a: ...., S., e ~,
en ..Bo c... t;.., ij ij .-?. a ctn
s :l~a: 8m ..eo ..3o em
~ j 3 em
~ ~ rn rn
s... -~ -4:t~ ..sS... M ~ ...e~, ~ ~!'!"-
<- ;;;..) " &I ..;; o... "UO... S, "ij 8 a
~"
..a oq:, c .. ~..,. - j.., .. ~ !d !1--eom
3~ ~8 ~-amoE;, o(')") .... 8 I _.,.., 3 ij I ..-:so<- ..a ..2 "_...,~ ...VO
0... c., ru g 3 ..!> ..e-o 8 g .. .~ ~ ~ . <:$, ~
C'l " "
..-.o oe, e P. 8 riloo c ....,
~~ ruo O'l . f) ~
~ .-.o t ~ v ..q;o
0 3, I 0 (>.., O'l ..QO
~ 3... rn..8o .. ~~ e. OIV u \.CJ
e oe' ec rn ::> ij .,...., V'>
:o4: O
0 V'l " Q)
an~
(')") \5
~ 2
~ ..
~~ oE;,
O'l CI.Y> ..8o rn
.. .en ij :a ('B.,
,;:!DO C'l
~ ..s ,.8 , ~ j; ~
1
.-eo 'ij ...e
~ ~'l ~
e
I I

() &
s
-n ~
~ <-
() G) ....0g..,.
~~~t:o~A -?t:ooso'S~~ ~:~ee
~:dAoo.x:.ec ool!<;rol\ ~cc:ooo:~9gee ~eo cGc A~b :9:>~100
A:c~oo - ~tl)A ~tl :~~:~o 8o:~ :~o
bm G6c A~b t:~!:>s-cco bee Gel e~b :9:>~1toA:c;J.,oo - :~
.,)obJ~.I.oe
~! 3
"'b:oo~:@--!J..._
~'-""""'
- r El~o2:Ci!9 J
.) . IV~ .&.eec:oo51Coe:cb<.O
.3 0
eeoc (2~1tolc~ ~~~gsofuee:~b)
~gw:bo~t~!~gl\ tl2sw~~l ~t(:~:tcc:!ccA
. ~l).?g so&ec:~b) ~gw:bo~t~!~gl\ :g:tcc:tcc
ue .
~t<XiGO ~b-s-o~3soroo~o ~~toee :~~&lee - :~Sllro
'ro ?f:&,sole:!c5 Loc~o2:rooo ~fu<:bl):{-cec ~c.ec
~~~ce ~gso?f ~cc:~ro~ - . ~~e ~@ tbec(f) cM2 s
:~tt<J~ t~=9:>~1Coe:c.boo - ~~:~.b.o ~g~~&:.ec
-:~)~cec;o&5:!1bo :~c.c:~&o C ~~<'~a.: ~t. t<J~ t8e:9:>~1We:<:boo
ocfc ~ Losoce:~
~9(~sa:>c.c<:.OC.)Cc.o )svc.c:b!!lsoo:~o:tcc:& swo?~t
it~Ot.le 3t ~!~lma:u~p reuOSJadi~)~. ~2:~ 6~
.bee :{o~e:rooo - ~e ~-~8~o~~ec ~l~ec c,cc~so~le
~:~e:chool~e - :~~:lcooo c~:wap(\nJOSJ3d) sofoee8o
~o!R:.oJoe - :~j:g)le:~3oo~ro~ ?p:~&o~3Lo~ec
~~ :Mbtz~~~L~ t(6) t ~t 6~ ~:9:>g1We:choo
~~~t~esoro ~~)!!)~~ - :3J:~~o !i)!le!ao
~soiAG<D so~=!~
!!!' !
- ~~
0
~~8~oel'oec
0.) ..}
~r ~cbc~o2wec
~ .)
:&~:cbc.o

11~.1.w"b
<D3 .;)
-:g):cJ!~ ~b:g&~c.o~:~:dA~b$2cc:oo:>lkb~suc.c.o~ ~ec
=!g:>:$2&o :w:::tgo:~&o c~o2:~4> o5 '!t?ec:~~lto~:cbc.o
r8 1 f soAecc~o2soecg.~c.c.o~:"b~!ro~~ - :~:voosodN~
!"b:voo'!e=!~:~&.o - ~~~:cbc.o ~l!:o~!Coo :~~*lA
:~fe:~ ~~cc:~w:~c.o ~dh:?&o~~:~~:?&.o
S2cc:~"bo~~A ~~c1:C<'C~11~~ -c c~o2:~4> 106 'hec=~~IWe:cbw
cue
n:&,solhec:~cJ~ec !b
~t~soro ?f>~&,ec~&> nsolh:~~ c =~" c6 'hec:{x>~lto~:cbc.o
ullcc
~~~tlJA ?tl :gso4)so8 soc.b~~o ~~~ec=~~roec
~fros-oAih c.oos-o:~ ~cc::?cY>ec ~cc:'~J:.uec!~!~=;?~=~t
- ::?:c.oo'!e:!go:S2&o - c c~o2:$2+ o~ t~ec:{x>~IC.o e:cbc.o
ll:;?):~:b~ec ~~ c.obC<'C~~eC~OC soro~~CCc.G ~fu
cb~"bt:cbc.o - :3Mcbso2-cc.rosoiO[o~ :dA:,ole~3~ ~UD:c!A
:~:cbc..o gfrol~:g)c.4>:,o~:c.G:oo~ ~~soRu~3 ~bee ~LID
:~:chc..o-c.cc~AC.CC~fu?cc:gc.o!oc.c.oo:~ sccc:3~ofe:~~
?so~~ =$2~og~ec ~~soRuLobsu~sc~ ?f.>'!g:c.c.o - :3
soch~cbsofu:~?f.>:cbCQ~Aec gfro~:Gc.o .loblJa :g)&:b~ec
-:;s:cJ!~ ~&S2cc~cc &:b~ec:~e~ bee (c)f c~o2:~9
~~c~gec:~~IC.o~:cbw - :gJ!re~ ?P'!gec ~:~oo~ {o)sa~b
c~o2s-oec:b~:?bt :cbc.o~3VCX>~S2l - &.~sccc:voo:c.t~
ln?cc~cc:re~~<=~<~ bee (c)f .c~oC!:$291 ()c 'hec:{x>~IWe:cbc.o
v~sol}:,~ solh:~l:"C
~~:~oS
~8:~:co.,co:xnd3t~ co~aoS'lt ~o;?&~:ro 'ltO?t@~~
00"(':~~=~. oa~t>t: - o3t~ coeo?<SaoS'lt:Jnon~ ~~
Of~:c8~:~~ G8::T.Y.>::J?8cxS+:'lt CYY.>O~~o:cxn:~::>.n oi~:
,~ G>O<Xij2=@~~~:19@: ~:S~'l~t:>:;JoS~ ~oSf''l'
8:~8:lct8 ~l'S- Of~:c8.t:~@S a,.~O::>.:>~ ~~@:~:.
~:GG>CY.>?~ Of~:c8+:~ OY.>OtO?'ox?:t: ~ ~~II

oo'P=~o:n~a?=~~.t. <;01 '~:eoco3 07 ,~ '~:eoco3 oe - ~o;?&


:>=?'\'' G.t"oS~:~,:~S: - ~o,?&<n'P:~$1) G~~ctB=
co~S: ~~&oo'P:~coo.:&;S: ~:co~~.~co~S: - oo~:~
o:n~a?:~St.' pi ct~=eoco3 o7 ~'11 ~~&~ oroo~oSS:
~Lli?&!ffd? ~qJoS~craoS :>:<t"'lt '"-t"oS~:~<t:~cxn:S:
~::>36: - o3~-t0:ro~o191oS ~:f''lt d3t3 @loot ~~
!lBl"?68:~~6: - '"~co.tooe:~'l ~aa.tcooJco9J?roSoo8:~-
(' 0 (' (' <'r,: (' ~'
oo'P:~o:nc:.or: ~~.,. <pi t~=eoco3 oe oac~s'J,:CXY.>:::>.:>e;:

~coC\)')oSco::>.:>0 ~cofP8:;JoS@S::u~or ~~~ ~~t8 -


sa~~~ o?oSo1~EsoS'l''"~~oo2::Jn: at.cxn:olro co~cot
~) ro~oof:~::>.:>~ ~~::>.:>~$!) roSooS:~ot @~S:n

co3T:naaS t9 cocwb~~'P:::>.:>'J:~ ( c;t:S~'l oo2:oo~:


~~~t~cocw3~) f>l'/9

oo'P:~o:n~a?:~S+. <;o1 _,~:eoco3 oo - ~Sc-:>:oa8 co't::u~ .


~o,?&<n"('.=~~cooT oo'P:>~oS~oaoS :Jn~&co~:E: .
~:~'"'t, eotto?m'P:~ roo5~8cxn:~ ~~t.;JVoS~t~
d3toroS ~ora?- ~UJ?&oo'P:~~. ~~rolf @+~~v
48 06 oS~~:S: - ~~& oo'P:&~.\'1\'l oo'P:G>~o5~oaoS
gc.<:e~A ~:~:d,~o cc!~ c.cc:~so"S~ rbe.cc~o2
~~:ch~o ~18fm :~$2cc~:~~ecb:*ec- :~):c.oo
~ A:~so8~sorosoa! ~=~~e.c :c.ec~o:~g):~
e:~b:c.b &~olo ~~e.c!~e.c~bo:c.oos,ncro - :~:cropcl&~
.b\,:o~c.o~
3 .:>
:Abo:c.oomc..co
.:> 6 --
- (c) C~o2:;:;19
':J'- rc6 '4-ee.c:~;)fWA:chco
.:>0 .:>
n:3M~3o~ec!~e.c ~=~~<J>f'JAe.c r~ccsoo ~h.n,
:~COCAt so&o~~socc - :~~~1?8 00(9~~ ~ccga;~
A:~S2ccc.9:c~~e.c - :5':coocsxJ&~!bl~8:~~~<D !e.c
cc~rpcc goosocA'~ - if c~o2:~~
rd '!~a:c1Jo2:So~fWA~chco
cocc .
~~~t?;ef'J S't~ ln~~so~!b
c.J,~ - :~~ :3 :coo:GCC~ sore:~ c.cc~
~&b sofeso&cc~soa:: goo~ sccc~A -We ~:Jcr->
e.ctb.so&>soi~lo ~4-~=~~&ecco~l: - =ss.(:;s~~
:J&e.c~c~o2:chco be.cvwc.ec Ac&:5'~s~re:?ilso?f>
~&ch&b. :&,~feso&cc~socc grosoc-~ - =sJ5'tl'nb =~
soleso& cc~so goosoob l.f c~o2:~ c6 t~ec:9:>~1W8:chco
vffc G LO :re~-
. g!soc'b-cA!c.lixbQ~ ?+ c trl :c.m~,teLogco~CA
~~~t?;ea
~t~ lil~c:ciWsocM.t cJ,&fsO c.cc~:coosocJOO~ !b=~~f'JG(C
c.-9so~C<l> sore=t~
8 8 8
-B -B
~
-?.G:
..2. So em n e JJ~ ~ ~ eoo. ~ ~0 ~ ~ ~
" s..,
...Q>o f?.., :J ~ c;.., oO'l .., M
s.., ,!!)O'l Sc:!::l ~ ~ M
~ a..,o.0 (,) ~ ~ ru ~em ,.a. ~o V ,.S. ~,
rt.>o e u L8o ..2. I C 011> O'l - 8 ~
-So --8 ~ fBo .. .. ~ ..!> n M ..C ~ s~o
~..,
Jj 0 0 (.) ~ (.)') ... O'l G:o 6)
rJ B n ~ ..3o -&oo ..!>o
~..,
..!> UfJ I G: o0'"
~ ~ O'l S .. ..!>
~..,
oeO'l '() to- ~, ~
~.., ..c n.., >' '() m
eo
~..,
~0 n~J! B 8 1 cg ~,~.., ~ a~ ~,~ m e..,
3 @~.., ~ ~ -?. 6) e~e O'l
.. ~ I 011>~
e
-4 '":; [:B..,
O'l C O'l
em A:
o..,~ w v6> ~ ~ Q --8 O'l~ ...
..
8o-1J ~~ (";! v 0')
8..,~o . m~ ~ 2o CQD ..--.. n" L8ct ~o CClru
CCl r.. CVl I e.., ~ -:!!:1 o,vmal> +.o, G: ~o .EB
~.., = o.., CVl e .. ':i>' e.., 00 ~ e ~ ee -;0''l .,.,
6) 3.., -:!!:1 o.., e..,@ ~ '"5 ::!1> &1 O'l ~0 {:B, (,)
,..cblo 1 {) s;lo ~0~
l"l'l ~~ I t> --e- . 6) + ::3 ~ ::..._
~ ~ 0 O'l -;0' O'l ..c8Bna ~ ..3o~
o,
u + ~ e ~ ~0 8
_.,.,...._.. s,
.-e 3 e.., B G:o --8 e rt.>'l n
(,)
~ e,~.., kl ..0
C1 ~ S ~w, c..,o. o ..8
~..,
-1.) ~~~
~cB 4>0~ (,)~g.., ~
n 88.., !>t L;Jd -&- 6)

s 3 8.., ~o O'l , : rt.>'l ~ ...,~ ~ ~
MrO -4-
e
-- s, c
O'l -B ~ --o o. t. 8 .o, m!..8o..O:
s e .o, ~,~
0 ~o 6) O'l s.., ~.., U ~, ~
c .. ........ 0'1
~I ,.!) ..V a~~ru,s 6)
'-"'
~' ~. c oe ~o --o ~, v ~0 6) t)
(l') (/ v ..!> :-G- ~ O'lor> 0 8 ~ I&
:;; .., (U') ~ _ . , ~.., \Yl 0 . (,)
~ 8.., ::> o9 V ~
C:l CAY> ..CO U v, 2
M M...!J S O'l~ rue ...e:o
n ~ ~ aS,
~..,~ s~ M
e8 J.. x. J! ij ~ ~ ~.., .
0 .. ""
e :8 cCl ~r G: ~. C'l ,.!)o U ()') c
() ~ v
,oo9 V. emrn, .....eo,
;:s
.. ..3o . M l ~ g, ~ ..3o g, r., ..
u u
0
(jO)
'-0 g 0
G)
u '-0 1
::3 u N ~
~ ~
t viii

F
eli

8 8
-?. ~ -?.
4: c ~ 4: ~
.,e ~ .,e m..H 8 .,8e~go ... oe, ...
~ 8, ,.!) f)@J"(3;l ~-g S,..," .. ~ c!!
I
e JJ.. @..
0 ~ C C'l " -?. ~ .,..3o~8.., 8,
., : 81')~ o, ruo <-(C) ., CC1 .,~
~ ~ ., .] ij f) ..ao c!!s 9 0>e ~ O'l
CCl 8()')
()-}
O'l 0 =rn, eo ::l :=c& ~ u fB, -+o
e 8~ ~'l~ ~
.,s ~ e CSJv ~ Q') 8 ~ !'!"' g, ~ O'l
Cl) ::I
()-}a. . ~
~. .
: Q')f) ., ,.!) .,g.., e ~ ~0~ ~ m ., ., :=c& Ito
8, ::!10
., c ~ ~"> I ~ 'i it ()')
mn s
0"> o8-e @"J8~J 9o6'" .-e
~
o8.... .,
..s. e ~- ~,4; ... ..!!> ~o8-g -!':" m ~ 8... .. a, ()-} ()-} ..a.,
.. (;; v
\,)">
......... ..0:
..!!> .... m
~
(C) ::I ~.., O'l M 7:.., "..S8~~~..,c
.... )oiiC8, .. EB
-r ..co u n...
ig
M .-!> -vo ., c ~ ..0~ m em~ (J
CCl -+o l,
.. ::s[ e8, ()-} = O'l" u
o-,8 O'l ~~
CCl
~. . ~~ s., c, .. (3;l 0 0
..2o ~o ::l o u ru...
., 8 ..So ,.8 ~o ~ ; ~
ru...
., CVl ~" Q') ........ g ... ()-} ., 8 ~ .-6
m S R .:n 0 CJ'l M O'l
:.: "' \:S I n.!) ()-}
1 l..c ~ j" cE (Q)) ..co 9 ..2o
... ~t

()')
- ~ l.:n
.-e u
:::
c P." ..0 -g Cl
okl cth
J.., ~ oe\,) (/) s .. c...
.-e ~ ~~ m ~ 8,~ I O'l~ C'l .......
m ~ .. ~
ea, _.,.., 8 g., 0 c!!
()')
...... o I s,n ~ ., ij i ~ ~ 4:0 8 ~ ~ ~
s ~ ~ J e l,
()') ce, ~ ..2o ~0 g 9, ~
a, ~
...o-o 0
~
()') ij I _. em r.B, Co
0
~ ~
""
M cg ..& ., 9
em~
o-,.,..g ~ C'l f:!o e... P." ~ _...., -., f
~
~ .. c ..
.,3.., . . ..c..g. ...So I ~
4: ,.!) CJ'l ~ 8 j) oe,
- ~cmi ~
1 S~ ~0
em P." , ..e fB .. .& ruo
&J~ 4: c!!o ee0 ~.& M I ~....,.., 8
_...,,.!) ~" ~o 9 em .. t.l~ .. CC) c!! .&
.+o ..e: ~ ij .. ..!!> ()-} i., = u e, ~ e~ ""
o-, M G) 2., ..3o ~ ~ ~" c, i3o (:B.., QJ S, -i,

(I') CO)
~ e
<- -v 0 0
~ <- (it)
lS,., -
\) X
... -
cfoc
(l)hJe
.):.:J; :>lfu~:CCC!eWC.OO:!eC'C~WC'C
~ 0 .:> .J
:CCQecc..uc.oo~eccc~wcc
~ .:>
:.Oecewc.ooe>
y- ~ :c;..e.cwlew&>
.J .)- .
~<:c:o~A
.J
:'>cc:m><DOlec
.) .l ~
3hl:~c.o~c.owlew&>
..}:,J .) .:> .:>
- :o~9e>l(c.ole&oa
.J::.l t).) ... .) .J4>roec
tec 3<Jiecp&cc~cpcc ac.e>:~c.o:~c.o - :~~bw:~~oo~~~
~.e 5tJ~ A~b:~)OC'Ci>Gb -sofecp&> ~C'C~'f>C'C O:C~:~c.o!~C.O
sore:Ete
n :)g:c.@e:lltue.c
.) 0
mcccc:c.o~
0
- ~8A
.>:::1
~8che.c:~c@!>e.c
.>:::1 ,) ~
w!ehl~c..oecc!>wcc
.) :..J.> .)
vcc~:w:chc..o C:Ccc:~eJ:o~(A)c-CWle.c ~~4>oc.bce - c..o&1A
,) .) .)~ .) :;:::) :. .-> ,)
c..o&1
,)
:&:,:Ac..oc.@ollew
. ,) .) .
vee~~ tewcc :) .{>:&:,e.c c,A:&:,vc..oCN
.)0 ,) .)
.) .) .) .) .) .) .)
-~oA~o:c.bc..o bee. Gc At.b c~o2we.cecc~wcc~C>:>o:::>e1w~
. .
-: ~eJ:c.OOhlCAl~
. ,)~ :..J.> e>ch~cc:g!>
.) - ~(,
:>o:
,) .)
:>clW~ - .)~oA :>o:c.bc..o
.)
be.cGc e~.cC>c~o2weceece>wcc
.) ..) .J .
c..oAw(\):>c..obc..oA:vcc:ll},ec
.) .) .) .) 0
- : ::>eJ:c.oohlCAl!>awb ~cc:~:g~wAw(\)::>c..obc..oA:vcc:lf/;,ec
.) ~ :..;.).) '~ .,) . .) ..) .) 0
-:~eJ::>b~:dbco@C)ll bee ~ac Aco 1
:@c..occe>c.b - :lWecl~coccccc.oP '
.,)~.) 0 .) ..)~ ;:) .,) 4:LJ.> 0 :;,: . . (S'
GoGc
u&:,A
0
00
0
4>b:~&::>c..oc.&wc:.Iro~
.) .) .) .)-
4-b:o~lhlc..oAecccec
. ,) :..;.) 0 . 0 ,)
c-cvc..o~:& - ~e~
0
~
0
c..occ:Aw:~@
.) ..) :,--
(\)(.(..()~Ieee
.)0
c,A4-b:~~
.) ,) .
~cc..o~:&
o'".) ::x.fDl~
..) ~
:Ol~bCC(\)ecfl1~ec
~o .l
:..:1
fu~bbwc
o o o
W::>.:cbc..o.
3o
- f C~OC:~4>.>
1cf ~Aec:oo51C.oA:chc..o
.:> o .>
- :==>eJ:c.oowc.IN~
3 ~ .>
4>bo&:,lhlbc..t>
.> .> :.:Jo
lobwc
o o o
sore=il2
lx ii

2="~: ol ::> , :ldOj?:O?'f>: ~@: (o) ol J


(:Do;?:~G>S:"'F~"' :Dcr52o"3' 'lolO?tl~V ~o()

'lR
()~~ ~~cec~~Cf'>~
(le!>) ~w~~ ~<' (~)SO<- ~9 ~:<'~1c~
II ::>OA ::>o:lfW<'
;;) .5
. .~&occ A~b ce~o2soe.c ~~~o ?ccgTh!o~ ccc~:o~~gle
so&e.c~soAsoro=!lSOg~e.c ~A ~ c.ax.ec~8<' ~&:~ !b
~lbsoo ~gTh!o~ - ~A ~=~soEl2~ ~~&,sole~ 80r
A~bc~o2~soceg~ec - ~A ~ :5~osog :b~e.c~8ec !bsofu
"tw - =s~lA :~sofu'!w:c.roso~~~ tb:c.c:~<Dscro!
fl;~SCA ~~~teo - :~sofu'!wA ~&liecroA - :~:c.ro
soclfue~ tb:o~solhsoo~~:~~g\\ ~~AGe - =:?:c.rosodfu~
!b:o~=~~g\\$Cro! ?f:~~:r>e~soeo ~SOAsoro:tlSOge~ec
I bee C8f_ A~bce>OC ~soceg~e-OCC A~b C~ocsoec ~~~0
u~@A ~@ ::?~~so~ ::?&:c..A be.cce~o2
so~=!P2
~~ -:DuS (c0)"m' ~:on: u1 ~ t~ :Y.>$P<O~~t:@:
(O?::).)~:~~:ou$<;'1:) 'l'O?~@~u
)li

c ..co c
ee O'l ee
[B., ~
~
kl ij ij ij ijru n n~' ..co S q: 8o ru ,.8. ~ (O)s~ssac
O'l O'l ee 2. e roo e ..
~o~o~ ~ n ~ "i ~t ..& s ~ m~ ..Co , -a_.j~u...So
.. "[B 110
1i. Qj. ~ ~ ~... ~ ~s 8 .. O'l,., s, vru,
v '" M i
S (..)'l
a ruo l=C=..oo () ..& roo ~ ~ ~~ ru.., ..s~ ~ ~
.. S.. -0 '"S'.. s ~ l.vos ~ em~ ...8o -c, o, c m a,., (')') ii v s,..& c m a
QIVOI!> eu~~~ n (.) @11eeS > f.B.., 8 () O'l s... ~
O'l ~ 4> v C"> ~ C'l --a 0
}~
S, O'l 8 ..2 c ru., ..., r6 ...8o 5O'l n~ 'wS,.ec..,
~o ~ Q: a') ..s ~ Ci1 a, s, ~ c.., ee .. ..& P. -!'1' o q: .-o ~ ft,ee 8
q: ~ ::!')o tl n -......O'l....!> rg ~o8 ~..!>[B~, .. ~ me
::;!lo 4!-'l 8, ~. g'l ~ g ..8o B ~""!';" n, '-+'l ..., &J nn 8 ~ g I ~~, 0'> 8 f1b~
n ~ 1')~,8 ..JL_..., O'l
I 0 .A: CC) V'l 1< ..C ~ .-(JO
() O'l ~ ~ :::) ~~em_. rJ1. s, ~ JP
8-,
s ~ GVl .,8 s c.!'> :! 0!.
O'l O'l M
CS1 ..() ~0 -.eo ~ ro cfu ~ fB, s cS ,.2. gdB
G')
8a.., s
~ .,8 CY.o ..3o .. ~.., -3 ~ ::!')o q: n, ~ c'l ..So ~ .s.. sJ ru A O'l .. ~~ ~
Co 0 V ruo
~ ,e s e 8 .. ~I
...e, !'r 1 c oew n .., v ~
~..8o_2 ~ ~ ::> 8.., ........ +o 6'l '..!>U_.,::>
&cl :!')~..8o eo :::!'>0 ..
:! 0 O'l v
.._, ~ O'l c.l ~ v 0 cQl1 O'l
=lk)V'l
s ~ s..,~ .-vo
ruon c .. cm':i;;"'
..e .....
...a
O'l
CQ1 i.i ~ C'>'l U I <"l'l =-- 8 S..,'"g ~ o_t () ~ Ci '
e..,o v;:) " roo .. ~
n ~ ~~ c 1 e1:!
g 8e g O'l~i. no..01!>' .
n @)~ n rl"
a. . ru
:::!')0 C
3 m 8 ..8o 5O'l n c ru ..-....e-o_. a
!-! m ~ o8 ..C O'l a'l 0"1 .... lO'>~ O'lem 0 0
l V'l ~ ~~ ~
..q:
0 O'l 0 oo ~ -'M () fl c.!'> :.00 :::!'>0 WJ ij ..
~ ij V -0>'l " ~ 4!- q: #\(')') S., I " C
e ..!> a_, I')
8 .3o
0 ..c ii ~ fB,
" ,.4;: 8 '> I ,_,
0 " ij 0 I ..00 (,)') ~
~ 8 -8o ~~ S...'O .....
0, Ql
u '' lJ ~ ..-
0, ~ -..() n 0"1
m ..vo ~ OA..I) 8,.....,
~ (:B'l~ I
8'l ~ _n_ cJ 8o ~ .. e
~oe 8'lk.lru c ... ~ o ~=~& ~ ~ O'l~
LvJ c ~..&s...~ M ~kl s
<"l'lO'l cmccmx..,s v o3 ~ .-(.) 0') kl s,
ruoV n O'l .. - <1"l 8') c.l ..Co .. u s ;; 8 .8.:8 ~ a-3
~ .. x w .. <:m.....,...,cth
..Co ~ 0, oe' v u s, ~ r;B, o, .. oei 8
~ ., ~ ~ '"&, I n'l~O ~ o8 o, Q
e::>
2 ..8o S..,
o"~cm not ~ oo 4!-'> o ~oe 13. s a.,.&
:::!'> '- V'l ..
em n
dh 0"> s cv
s -8. ~ 'l ..e Z' s.., ..8o em o... ~ 8-, ~ ~ ~0 -3 Q) >
e., , ~ :. <- o ~ rJ2, ~, En ...c ()") n, t (S ..eo c.l ~ ~ Qj. -8 . I

u
...:> 0
<-' ~
<-' ~
ls,><
~<
Z.5cc (h~:~A:~ &~so~~~&::;>b
~+&:cc~svcl,~Asos~ ) !A=.~o~~ ~ :~~~
~ t~~~
:ll!:b~:~&es; ~~&:~b r~ecc.otl~C-4-ccc.cd~ ~ ~1~&>:~
lf~A ~ !b~\,
&o~gG<'C~cc $2cc~:~uo~ - ::sJ~A ::s~kcc' . ~~
:sfu1~ ::?cP3~393o:chco - ~ ~:c.bco M~ro
&<.>~ ~)9~u;$2cc~~~g:so:cl,co ~rosno ~~ - ~~ ~38
:;>~:~cl,~'bu;:&, (~)(f) V8 A~O r(~~) (f) V8. A~n I (g)
(c)va A~O r(y) ~u; uG A~OCMC :'b~=:;>c.P ~:sa&o
- :~~~a :~cges;:o~ ~~cc:;>Lo~t ?f:&,:gc.oc.o
gThc.e ~t&~ :?&,gThc4~c.o - ::;>):;>!;?COA glfeGGf]~~
~soccsoo ~+~cc:c.b:(lg~B~ - ~~~:cl,co !\,~b~soro~~
~~!b:o~:illson &o:&,~es;~c.oe~~ S2cc:coogb:>soc.oe~
~~:lRo :seo100~ (~ SVt) uG A~Oc~ocsvt~'":~:~3o
u!&A
j&sJW:~ s.occ:gc.o:sc~=&,~~=~~=ffoec - ~"' ~ ~8:??F:?9
:;>&:c.roA G<'C~:J=:?~cfu - =:;>=cc~~A=:;>)o:!'>~ 3eo:sc&q
cA--su~~ sole=!~
CC1 (C) (C) (C)
fB, fB, fB., ~
4) ., C)

ij :::!)0 ij
J, m.&
o n
~ ~..,
0'1.-e n ::l
0'1
~~~J ..,.,.
~ u ~~ \)") 'So! () ~ 0'1,-e oO'I ..vo
e;8~ X.,,~ o- ~
.., c. e 0'1
4) ij ~ ll e r:SJ~~ s c i '
n ~ ~ ~
" I
~33-,~9
.. e -a ~ .&~ ..,~ ~CCJ~j
0'1 P. u
~
e +o...c fl -aeo 0'1 (C) e
~0'13-,0'1~~ 3-,
-2 C'l
50'1 t/oe
l
r*' . tJ em ,..!) '1U _., C) ~ eG !:B..,
s ~ ~ e +oS&l
l~ (]j-<><> ~ 0'1 C) e'l I~~~ ru
_., ~~8~
M I () emO'I"
~ 0'1 -2 (C)
I :o8 ~ l.lo c
n
s&l :)o~.. ,..!)
6'1 ~ !.,
8 ~ I 0 8 ~ ij - &l ~
fB, (.)') ij ,2 fB, ~ -eo G: .., (,) ij 0'1 ~ (.,) CC1 cS ij _.,emx;
ij "]'~ ij \)") ~ !!> s.., ~ fl ij (C) rtP.
~ .r
..<3 ,..!) C'l CO) (.,) ()') a.., I~ o-, ru
-+ ~ C'l (8) ..{3 ~ "" 8 = a-, c8 a.., ~ 0'1
..l ~ 1 em ~
f) ~ 8 ru 8.., H !1'l o;:;J -t"
ij ~ ~ C'l IJ ij ~0 ~ .........
e'l u o e &
,..!) s .._, ~ ~ fi
~ - ..n,., se . ..... , ,g.., ij I 0'1 8-,
:~ ~
1 ij~
0'1 ~ ~ e~1 <.n 0'1 ~.., & ij '"8,., em~ g em
~~~@ rn ._., Ql !1"
em . , s. ..8 Gil~ lc)ij ~ C'l
~ g ,.8
.. c
[B,~ ij ..~ ~ ee m Q)o G') ; j, '&, I
~
~ ~~~~1j
m ..CCl~cn.,
I C')rt)'l ~ I
=oi I
[B..,
..ss.., [B..,
~
(IV
-0'1-o
-
T
Ci1
~
CC1 ..e --s
e'lgs
_.,~ls~c@, l~ 8o
_., .. ~ ~.~~ru.u
1 -B1 ..s 0'1~~, l, a.,::' .. v
c, () a a. () s liD 0
0
_., ()<') C) 0'1 ~ s..,
8 s .. ~" [3) ~~
.....,.,:.: [B..,~~ ~e..s i> Oo
~ s -3-,CC>@ ~~~@
em x.., m s
cv .;)')
l n 5 e e w:
ij 0'11 C)
~(C) -?. ~l,c3J
ru~ o o-, .s
0 .,.8. cS ~ u C? re8. . ass ~c:
O'l''.*::l
em tem
c() 0'1 ()'),..!) ~ 01) v n em e B ..&-.o
(.) 0') -8'V\ ij 0'1 ~~~ (:B, ~ ~ oO'I 0 a,~

(";) u
..:> 0
:) :>
l-
g,x
~
. :::.
u -
lx viii

ee=>

r.: c c o c c c G c r;:c oc c r,:


~~~CXY.>CC\)<n'P:~'lc~'l: ~m2o~3<?31o1 -~~c:~~~l:>l1<;: ~~r:>

cn2:cn~:y8St: ~oS~~~~;~ rooS~'PoS'lc\?~ <n'P:


8~8:. - ~~oat ~o~~~o~S:x>~ ~~:x>~cn~o:>?OSS~:>E:
- 2oc;3 o-).)t')St: - ~ox~~=~
~onoSOKcxn:8:
cnt~~~cxn:~~ ~8: - ~~:x>~ ~S oot~t:~t
1:>1~~:>8 : (Y):))Iold}<n~: t:~t: - ~~~o? @t;ot
3~1ol~u:d> ~'ltd? uro&t:r:> r:>=oat :::x>~tJ?~it ~~tt-
0?~:~ ~o~'lF~~E ~=~= tS,,-,~ ~ ~o~~u .

F
:c4>sc"' - :~]&1~A~ccec ~Acpro~cc~~cc ~~cc:c.w
:?~9~ :~J:~oe:~~ !~.E~fo.~~c.cb:~ec ~elf>~~~ ~ro6'l
:cwpoopCA>~cc~cc bec(f) Gc a~b - :~J~bt:ill~co~<J
bec(u) (c) Gc a~b cr9tlc) c~o2~&gl\ ;>:?!CAta<l,:;cco~~
cocc
u~rwtoeA
:?fC.u'!oe ~+ (c.u) cG A~bcM2)0ec ::?:~c~~=SC~o -
;;JA ;;J~~:Ac.u:cc@10oThc.G - ::>eJrea:cbc.o :o&ec@.{. G
&"" e"".} .) .) l.. .) ,:) Jo . . .) ~
e<:c~~fse91~ bec9Thc.G ~~;?tA:oo:::d~~ - CfJWA ~W sccc
:~sccplh ~:~:l.,~ec~~ec:c.Jec wcoo2~ :b~9l:se) e:~b
:c6cl,~lW - :~:?tb c.u:c-6~ =?~:dh:b~~~ec:c.Jec
u:c~:?tl.,bec'?,o sccc@ c~o2s.uec~<:.@~o tc~o2s.uec ::?
:~~~:~~o - :~hl s.ule:~5 ~cc:cco:o~sn&ecc.Wec
c.A:~~~b::>~ ~:?~f.?ff :c.ec:c.&j~ - I c a~o ~o2s.uec
:l.,M~:Wl e:Al.,:cbcl,:>le()l1A\ -::>:glreolie GoCCAtoie::>cb~
.>::::::Ja::J .> .::;o:Jll.l .>:::Jo.> .> 1.. .>
~roj?p~~ c.u'?f>:?~~~ :?lro~~rosoo c.u:c6~~ - :3
leole
0 .)
w18A::>eJC.DOOo~
~ .>:::J.::;- .) t::>!>u:c~~~:cJ!,:;;l9:~~
.) y- .) ':,'- :::1 t::>!x.<:c::>A
.) .)
:~:cboo :~&ec !t G - ::?~9ThgThC@ !b:?~9~s.urosooe
<Jec:~ ~:~:~ ~~~=:?~~ - :~:~
!bl.,~@!o~~:&ec l.,ec g A~bc::>o2soec:l.,~:?bg:c.bc.o <l,:?cco::>$2
u:~!l&~ u:c~bp):~ c.w:c.oo~&usoro:cbc.o {o:?l~oe
~i$:~:c.bc.o c),~~~cc~c<Jec::?:?tt,A~:~Apcc
le:c.wcc::>b U:-.;;JAJ..,oo[,fe ccc)":Thca:>cct8ec cccc;;JA :>ffu
~.... ..) ~ 0 ~ ..)~ .) . ~- .)
j&:lUW~~cc~A -:gb~~~socc :~~ ~cc:re
cCCO 1CS0.toAGC.C::>CC ~CC~!C-@~0 lo~ec&:j&:lR:o ~<J
~chsoltleSDc!ec - 9 ~"~96 o~2soec ib~:?bt:cltc.o ~:?c.oo~sc
sole=!~
i-:1 !~ ~cc:.co:>:~c! ~:b~ec ~:~Jcs>ot>ch -
:~J~t:c.ro~~ :ffl~~b)OApro :c.ccc\~d.o~S2 -
=~13i=c.co~~ bee (a) ~3~c:!lo2soec~~ :oo:~scoo~~
- :~~t?r~:chco ~b~b ?sosole~c.oso~ ~=~~:chc.o
l.nS2cc~:oo:c\3coo~~ - :3l~bi:~~co~g bee (c)cc
I (f) ~ ~~bc~o2pec (ple:!c,5fuo~:b~ec) :b!lg:~
A3o&>-:313k:c.cosoclfu~ bee 9 As~c~o2pec~~ :oo:c\~~
l..c6c
IIG:!I)O
:~becc!lo2:~c.o:~fu:!lo~lko ~:!IG:!I,} :S2ro:b:!lsoF2~
:~:~<t ~~~ ~~~c:Bgb <t!)F:~ro:~ !b'"F
:~rocc Lc~so~ ->:.!JJ~=~~ bec:~c.o:~ro~e~~a:
-:?l~~:"&:!1:3le:~leec :J?~~~.co :c.cc1o~~cc:&,
S2cd~a: - :~~!l:~:~fP:Jg:> !rso~ ?su~~cc:~
""'~:~
. ~~ce>o2 :Ac.o*'~e
-~ . .
~:&,:'t&:c.cc:sb:%o
:oo:~~ c.ob:~~l}~! - :;?rpsoco:tp3o:&ec
cccc:c.D,ce>o2:C.Orooe
.:>
- ::>~e:>4>:~o&
.:t~' .,o ., ooc.occ c.8~ol.
.> ~- JO
!ecx:JA~2:~ ~:clA:~ ~:3~:~ :Gee~~
- vroo~Ab!bw:ceo'ca bec~:~~!Wsooec.b =~s.occ.ch
~A~ t~Ab~bt beccoo2 :~c.o:~e~co ~ec ~
?fso~:~c,5)Loc:m2:!c.o~u..o:!lgfeco - :.!:coo~~bec roc
~~b:~ccecb-:~co:~~e ~:&,:f'& :cc:-c:~b:~:c.c:d~
~~~
~~:g) -~co:~. U,!~~!b :!;2re:~fP 'ec~c.cb:*ec
-<f>CnA rs>l.n :3l3~:!re c.w~lj:~rp*sofb~~ct:~ro
cloA . c.cc~lt~ -l,:iec - :!!J.j&:liW leco~fe)co ~~"'"
c.+soiAC4 sore=!~
XXJ
::::>e1:::>eewcc
;JJ~o ~
),.., .J
0 (c) 51 :," (c) of ec~c~o2wec
..:> ..>
~ewoe
..>
~~ec :)~~:Uil:ecx:doec r:<:.~Ae:.;>e :::>oc,cccc.d~b - :::>oc,ccGGC
.) :_:) .)O .)0 .) .)
~b:G<Oe I::>O<ACGGC ::>CA~c.<:.OA :)(\) -
.) .)
::::>~!UX>GOclfu~
.)
..)~ ..)
WAGOC\) ecc~wcc
.) .) . ~bewoeg~ec-(c) 51 :)~ (c)
.) .) ..)
. .)
. of ec~ .)
c~o2wec
.) ~oewoeg~ec
..) .):)~~:Uil:eco:&ec
::J .)0 :c:.IA:ecc:Thec:::>oc,ccca:tb
., 0 .)
ole
u::>~<l>~f'l
,) 0.) ::J
~i~~&?~~!}t\,ec(o) cc A~~~o2~~ec ~<]~gb::S2<1>~
gb:c.w<~>$Ccc~:ccc:Jb:3'?f - ~f') ~=??~~cc ~~ (f) 5
A~~ C~o2s-oec ~~l:c,cc~~?5~C,f'l!l ~:?C<X>~sc - ~f'l
~~=~~:c.2:fb 5 &eecoJ~so~ ccc~:?oLo ~eo?:?t(,f')!3
- :::>..>~::>b<l>:clboo~<l>()l.ba:(c)
~)..> ., .) ..) ::J'
cc ecbc~o2wec(wfe:k50l
.) .) .) ..) ::J
ccooco~C\)) :b~gJ:~~so& (o) cc e~~c~o2~Pec <}glre<]b:::$2<~>~
. "5e ~ tb:oe~~<~>t'>co ~ccecgco
s-<?~ - =:?~<'l:~c.J~cccbso&~hl :~C\)!b:o~~ec -
:3Me:~&!t~g3:c.cc:c,ccp~ le~coco - t~a: c,cc~~[,fe
!b:~~CJ~C\)! ~~ec bec:~gco~c (c) (e) (c) cf6 e~b
c~o2 =~3Ropoi>cb (c)~ f'l~nc~o2pec :b~sofucc.o:sc3~~gl.'csc
rl~e ~ :~(\)~' c~o2:c.bco c,cc~e c,cc~ Co~I\C
~le=!~
~1o~ec :dkb:~:~c.Fec ?cc4>~s-olo~J.O~ - ~&,,SCf,
~&
o :clAc.b::>~::>c.G()l..ec
.>::J. .) ~(.0 5tec.o~ec ecl,ee::x@~~
::::::r .) o .) :::::1 .)
(.0(,(\)~b,
:J
- c.ofe:4><:,51)1
.) ~
1UD(6)
:,:)
~
<.t65 Acb:b:> 51Coc.oowx:h -
.) :J ..)
~A
0
~jou:.o !6~@:~b:lfu~ c.o&~~ru ~lfu!~!Co~A:d,&o
:ccofl - . ::>~ll.~oCA.O
J ::J~ .> .> o .> .> L .> .> o .>
3.b6:>b::>b::>cc::>;o:>c.oc..cc~:C4:>toob,
:~s-o~~SO"~~ ~UD~ru ~cc:ccoA - (c) lt<.t6 ASO:~~R.o~o~
al-~ :g~!&:!ccge-A~ (Le~) ~~re~~ ?' ~~eA
u~fl ~ :~~:c.:g~~o:chc.o
~~ecc~o2:cbc.oc..ccC<..Clbe-A!a - :~o:g!Co :c-+ec:geec
scccgect - :3~~~~:gcc:no~ ~ec:CCOA3C\) :c)S&
~ru -
:~su~cl,:* ~ccsul~~leoC<..Cso=>ru - ~~1e~:ccofl
Gr6c tg=t&gt-A~ ~ ?3tu,!a~~c.oo~scs
11)8JC~~
- :~~6,:c..&gco~14 6ec (c) Lc A~~c~o2s-oec :gccec:cl,c.oA
8~ ~re:t&?f. ~ ?s~tB$?c.oo:>~
u~ccA ~ecce& lo'?cc
:o~~ecw~ ~e-ec?f>&:!R.o: 3c..cc:> - :3:~~sucl,~:c.&
~ g6eccb:C4soiW :d):,&: !!C.o: p-c~so~ .,~'. ga:r co~ ?f>.?f>C4
6~cc sn~soc..cc~so&:C4 - (c) Lc fl~OCM2Soe :3ccec:d,c.oA
Clt &c.ot>~(~)c.otErflec
.s .) .).) .)
-~~~~:~3oj&sot>~ I!Je.E r:~ &jfusofu ~ ~1C:!>
ll~fl ~
ot~!Ac.e ple!P2
'nxxt
uf!> ?~kU'>!~ <1~c,ro~~
~ ~C(.()~!~ec (le~) ~l:t&~U'>~ ue~) :g~~U'>~
:::>oc:2
.) 0
!>~ :~cc:2
.) .)0 0
ILc.<.o
B
n5cc:oe>A:cec
.)
rp&u~a: $2cc~#o!ce ~:b~ c.cce>!c.o!A a:~J@e>rpck
&l:wa:
0
to:ccoA.
0
::>RU~e>ll5g::>~c.od,e>c.oc.o
.) ().) .)0.) .,-
5c.e!>cea:
.) .)
:1\:0lee
eJ.
~9:Th:lha::;::::l9
J o o ~
lijlu:ooA
~o
c.o\,o:c.e
J-o
- :::>~IH>oe<.o.l.bwc.&~
.l~O.l 3 .l .
~e>:~e>:l&>~ :~&~ :t~~~:~cc:~l0~ ~~a::ti> ?P:gc.o:~cc
:Tha:
0
;;:~cc:~w:c.cc:Thec
~ ~ 0
- wloA
.)
c.oGo::::>c.fO\o.a:
. l~ .) ~
c.cce>c.oG<\:>e>
.)
~ c.A:~~~~tb~ ~rp~ ~~~:~&e> sccc:uo~~!b
=~l~!b- ~~3t~~ ~rpccoe>
w . ~9:"&e>&:coorpdfu~ - =tbl~~a::~a: ~~c.o
so~=!~
lxJliv
~~:<iJoS
~o.:n=t~wy w~~~~e1 ~oo~@S~~O? ~:J~oSt.: :1fc5oSi:~w
94.sc;o:c;e~~ ~~@cS: - ~9~ wc;:);)3ro o.:n:~3::?:~:
~~~'liaS ~'l Bo.:n:t ~wtoo'lS @t~ScS: - ~m=t
~~~ ~oo~@S wSu

~::lnW9 c;oT&l~~'l' :p)WQ CO?:~''=~ qa?10&t:r cn"P=~v -


c;.,a@~G341: eo+>oS 3:~oa~ti:8: - ~d)c;:);)q+ O'Y.Io+
~~~ ~~c;~<mp:- ,_S::noS>a?:m ~c&.-:x, :o~
::nOO?:'tJ":di oot@(cS: - ~d)c;~~GOO?o5~CX>?:~: ~GoT
~>~~ ~~=~oS@q'o.:n ~cS: - ~=~=n9 "':qcS:
eo+;;~oSy~. ~:cS: - "':'lt:ao,eoSy w~~cS:y.>
eo~ @~o.nwoo ~~: 8:'P{go:>.:>.y.>o1 w:~ >~:~:
qt: - ~~9~: ooow::n~::Q<;'t9 oocScS:@Lt~ w@t.tcSn

~~::n"w~ro' ::ntO'Y.Ic;-t~cS-toS ::ncS~IL:ol:'l~ (~)


O?~~~~ood)( c;cS:~ ~oS>':>:::n~w~roi::ncSonc;, ~
.,oS ::n'31~oSO'Y.I(~) ::rn:cn: ~SoooS) +?w~~:(S)
~~::rn:S(S) :&~wd)(S) ::nci.> ~SoonS (~:>(.
::nciJ::nvcfJ p )o1 J o~J~

c;~roo:>"Sc;~&l(Y)':):diSG>r GcS:an~ ooio?=o? SG>r rooSc;'PnS


'l~'\' OO't':~~i c;_sG':lt:,t:>:>2i Oi~:'tJ":o? G't't:~t:
- "'PcS:~~~o~~: ooS~rooS~;;~q~cS: S w@S -
~<tits ooyoo~:c;;ofV" 'iioot>~=~='1+ V(oS "'0(~11
,
~e. :b~gJ:~ e:gb:dc.b~~J1m ~s-oroe~:3~~:c.bc.o t
!b~b?P~ becc~o2 :b~:3c~~:~&o- :~ ssxb~R.o ~&
1~~&~:~2) c),~()(.(.O ~bcc:~!AA - :~hle:~2)ro~!le~
c).,(Cccbe
.)
cccc:o...)....oTholeccmro:romw::>c.onc.oll
o .) -o.) ~ ..> ~ o ~ .)
- :::>eJ o ,
;):J beti
~a!c.o ACJ>ro:wc:f'~:?o:c.bc.o~~ec - ~~~:c.bc.o :~~1,
e:c:,:S~ ~t ~b<~:c&c,gs-u&, ~=g~~n-, ~~ec~!')es; 111resofu~
n::>9w~wtie~
..>O..> ..>
::>~<.o~
~3..>
cntiwc.b~::>o w:&e~ecmc.oc l.uwlec.o~:le
:5- ..) .l 0 0 .)
:J . ~cnccc.oo
;)- .) .)
~+cA>cccG cb:J: 5c.~ec scccs-oAres-ureso=~ w:~
~&ecAcx:>o-c&~&lec:cc: l&~c.obec (co) (c) . ooc e~~n
:~.~R.oe~:cbc.o - :3l~~:c.bc.o ll>~<~=o~gecsoc.b~~"' ?P:dAJ~
c~rc
~~~r.o~A ~*:o~ ~~S<:.<:esocc sccc~:~~~:cbc.o
w:~f'l:cbc.o .becc!')o2:c.bc.o - :~b&soll roS2cc~ =i~c.o&
~~~gro so?>soro~~C\) - :J):~~c.o9s-o" ?PI~ ~:~eec
,l,es; Cl cM2::! :l,~:coole:w:~ - c~o2:~9 ~cMC
:\,~:coo~:~:~ '!'-e csClc - ~~ct!')gec:o~ ~c.b~~C\) ~!')
s-ole:!PC
lxx vi
ai~:~oS
e</lco3~5~ ::>j {o) (ro) ~'l m'P:!~t: - co@yuoSw:~;;o:'l'
op'f>=8~~E ~~'t II
:::>ccee 3.9(\)]tlc),l...., we:cc~bA e~ec :c..cc:::>ccec
..> .> .> o o e .>:.I .>
- ob:c..we
.>
\#~
Rct)....:::x.c.rn>:c.cc:::>ccec
.) ~.) .}
- :::>~:>9c.o~le
_;)~.,)0.) :y.
w lkbec::>c.o<'lc.oA -
0 .) .)
:~]:c..8::;>2)ec cp~c.oso{)c.o:~ccec ~t:c.cc:gccec ~<.oAf,c
J:::>~:::>~ec:c.cc:::>ccec
.,) .,) .) ~~ccc.oo
S"'.) .,) :':>9:c.fu:4>::>oru
,) ,) .,) II.ID:::>ccec
li .)
coLoAcc (c) Gc ~~eccoo2::!4> ch~~:&,:~ccecAcoLoAcc ?~tc..e~
ofc
~~~A ~~~ec bee (w)Cc e~oc~o2s-oec
:ll}:,eco
0 ' ,)
- ~A
0
~
0
:::>~::>c..ce~::>c..co~ec~ochce
.)~,) ,) ..)
- 4-bwlbc..ce~
,) ,}-. J
e~ec59
.) (w)caG v Aco:oo:!!!Wc.ooi>ch
.) .) ..> - tAecch::>lewc.ce&ec
..>o .>o .) -
R'cc::)&:c..A
..) ,) - (c) hf. . AcOc~o2wec
.) .,) c.b::>J-wc.c:ce~
.>'?>",) ::>::>4>c..e~fil
,)0 .>:J
II~A
o ~VWUC
o ~\,c,o~:~
.> .> 0
~:ce~<DCD
')"' .>
cofu::>W
~- - .>o
W(\)Wce ),.~ec w~o:b~o@:~ - ~A ~:::>~ :>~wee :J9Aec
,) ,) 0 ..) .>:::::J ~ . 0 0 .>:::J ..)0 .,) ,) .>0-
e(il:::>~ec
..>:J ,)
- C5 AC()
,
C~OCC.Oec
,)
:b~o@@e:eb:ro
,~LJ .,)
d,.._,l,.~
:s'~~ar
c.ol.c.A m&lckccd)l,.
. .) - J-
rv-o.r' ccc.oo :>9:&,a; ~cc:::>~:o~c.oAc.occ
::J"""~~'S' .,) ,) ,) .>:::.1 ,) .,)
e:Ab:c..~eWAec
.> o .>o
- :::>~b:o~
..>~
5~a.x,(bocol.o
.>:.:1.> .>O.> o
m~ec:~ec
.}-~
c..wob.>l(il w:::>~:ce~ee:Ae<b
,) J 0 .>:::1 ,) .,) c..cc~oecru 0
Rcc::>~
~ ,)
,) 0 l.oc..~C'C'Chl .>0
~9:&,a; - ~tA ~t~s-<>(\) :~(\)~:~ :~~cc~ct ~f&
~~ccffil &c..c.c~ccew(\) c.o:c:D:;~ec~u: - :::>~b@c.o(il:~
0 .) ~ .) ~"" .>J ::::J.> :J
fi3!6:tc Coruc.2 ::>OCoW ll.ID),..AA ech:ce~CDCD eo:c.fu:::>e~
S"'' o ..> . .>o..> o ~ ooo .> .> o. ..>
c..cc~s-och~su~~o:chc.o - ~A ~:ffl~a:: tbsolh~o
. fi3c.occc.oo 59w~a:lffi 1\.ID~o:b~o@:Wl che~
~"'.,).,) ,),) 0.)0
s w~Aa: li.> .>:::::Ja::::l ,)~
:~~c..ce~:~oo w:~fue(..<1)UC c..cc~:~S.g~ c.oc!,o2 toc..c.o
. II.ID.bo:b~o@:WI
~ 3
~b:o~c.oAc.occe:Ab:c..be
.)~ e:::J .) .) .) .) ::>lfu:c..ooc.oclN~
.5 .) .
w:dlA~
..>0- c.oloA-Jv..
.,) 0~
l::>l.;e~-:::>~:c..oo""r~
,) .>0- ..>:::1 ...... .bl:oo:>cec.ooo1>eec
':)'''"~~ .s~ ,) ,) ..)0
~~tl8c..e1e~1iec"-C~A~oc~o2s-oa: :b~g:~e:~b:c..bc.b g~1ru
c.~!Ace ~fe:!P2
~!A XXI
:~bo:c.c.o- :?!~ :?t~"socc~Jec:~~ !\k&=:??f> ?P~c4>~4>
- ~ ~~c.4>~4> ~~:c.e:b~:c8:~ ~c~~ l).~:g.)~vce~c.4>
s-u~:3?f>ecglfeap - ~~ :~cfec c6sn&c.~~~ ::?c.occscb
:?&:?~:?~~ - ~~ ::?:coo~~ !b~:cfuec eosc~~:?C.O
:>&l1:>~ol1
.;) J .;)
- :cfuob:GW~aoollb
.;) 1.. .>
- :oe1lB8:>6c.oeo:~bo:c.c.o
J
.>::Jq.:; .:; 0 .F
~ccn ~~~Pee ~~ec - :3:coo~~ ~b":o~sobo:~bo:<.<p~c..co
~~~~~
~~ ~f'b~~ ~~bsoc6~-~C\) ~~sole1~~so~ - :?!~~"~
:?E~~:c6c.o tb:o~sobo t~~a=c.c.o ~+sore!"~so~ - =:?~~
~c.oro:@~o
.... ~ ,J
- 1-V--Ib:.bc.o
~ ....
::>c@~~~~:~cobo
.) ~ 0 J-
)"4-~cc
~~0
S2cc~a=c.c.o!b'~14Sb~. ~:g~g~ ~=~&o:i> ~~"=~
~~su~ =:?~~~:?~: ~~ac ~~~ ~:5ecc - =:?so=~
~soccsoo ~"g&'e~:c.bc.o !b:o~soeotg~:c.c.o ~~S"'~s-u~
ccG
u 3 ~s-occA g?rsocc
~=b~o~~ c.cc\;cc :b~o~~:sc3o sa.ccl~ec ~::?::?~<:&
&~~cc:iff' .- stlJA stl:~ec ~;\,~o~~:sc&o scccll
~e.c ?su=:?~=:?~c& ~c:~~~:b~:?~~sc ~cbo~~=~lo
-:;?J:s~t& lo~~cc:~~4>:c..coA:?C\)
- C:!OC~cbc.o c.ccc.cd~~c.f'l~
soc.o~~:Sotfu AmLOACC :cfuJ~J~:!og~~-~
~~s-uccro ::;>g~~ec a1w:C\)~wl'l ~ !f~J:~
. ~~~~"~ ~ ~gso=~ c.ocbcc
so4>1ru emLoAcc - &&Okc)y.>S~~~S'-'~::?Ie::?lecc'?f>
so~~!~
!!!A XXI
f)
--8$ 1 8
e -c e ..B
~ s, <.1"1~ @1 ~ 8"1 ~ ~ OS 8 ~ ,...._
_:(SJ ~ 1 (8J ~ 8~~ ~
..a s ~n o8 canruo ..
. ~
~ .. -v (,) H em CC1m ..3o
g~tl
6)
~ ..c
c:e,s ~ ~~~ .. 0')
s, tl cfu
<.1"1
~ A:S,~"'
0
~~ 3 ...s ,., 0
g!) .&...!> c.> ~ ~ I 8 {..,
50"1 s, emc">~ni< ::> ~~ ~f)~')&,
0"1 ... 1.) ~ 6) 0 \)'}
6
j n"' ...tlo
.-4-o
..So --vo ~
c6 J
"~9
3
s,8 ...... , v.. ...!>4;8ij ..
~~ ....., f) -&"> ~ &, 6) ij
m e o.... e -n \S ~ ~


c.........
~ 6"1
>
j:&,
s
v
......
g.., s
......... ~

~0
J-
..Bo .$>
......
e .8 rg tl
c.., fB., ct1
rB"c 3 s,
I
......
M

...s ~
IOio ::>
ij e .. 0"1
fB, okl 0"1 1"?1'1.-QO .............
o3 o~Se"t
~~ 63 ru
ru-c-cc s, Co~,~~
...... ~ L~~ ~ o.... j u c y,<.l"'tJ =-;to'>sem~~
~0~ .o-; 3, ...., A!-.()') ...,
VAool
CCJ CC1
3, ij I s lo ......
...s c:e, nc~
CCJ...Q0..1!)
B ...!>.. t: t: -c
8 8 ~ 0 ~
!.)')
1 ~ I
f>
\..C tf
I
~
~
"
fB, ~ fB, emJf~1,m en 8(')")
-c 8 r., e c &'l (C)
rss ~...s
.... '~aD.& ..
ru,...!>c.., ~CO) u~
................. Gn
aD 0"1
= 9,~ &~8 c 8')
m~emM ~0
0"1.-.- M~ I . (,)
&~::g e'l.2o~j ~-!,S
~ i~~~
a
~....., '\)
.. 0"1 .. s, ~
...e \:.' - I eo r..;.., i m1 1<
cC1 ru j .._.. 8 ~ ..3o
s,jC' m
....., 10"1 ...... ,
0"11.) 0"1
&> c
jl., - "
(,)(._ ::>
iJ"'l 0
g.., e.., .. ~
CU' (")t') ..Q_ ~ruB ~. . ~ -e>-coijo(')')
...e v
eem cm...s em 0 CS' -c Cii) ij
. a.;., 3') (')') ~ ij
m
t. , t<.lw
rn, n,.. 0, 0,
0
lo
0"1 0 """
....., ~o 1 em r.n ~ ~ -.: ijo c 'S ru fB.
...s I 0 ~ IYI 0"1 I s
...... ~ ...eoo quru
c ~ ;=
~~ <--c J
o9 ~ tl
e.., f)
...!> r3, 9, x ~
ij (')')
.. 6)~1 ~ 8-P. crnU .
eo~ 0 I M n
Tj t q:, ~ o(')')~ .~
8Q ~\)'I (')') c
~ o.... rv... ..& ~ 8, &o eo-4:
clt ~ , GS- 8, ...!>C.., o9ij ~ &'l ,..!)
_, ~ ~s CCJ::g o

o,o8 ~ ~ -u<.leoO'l oe +'l~ n


.. _., s,....., 0"1 .$> 3') g.., 3 Q;. ~~~ 3, 8 ~
...a.
~ ...!>
e ..Z ~ ~..

(;;)
0 ~
,!!.' 0 & -
CO) <-
~ <- a,~
~ )('
u!hft fh:ece.c ~l->woo
~-OJ
~cc~ ~c-bl:{ce.c ?f~~J?/sofucw~e ~ :Jsofucw~e
~we:'>b cccccolko -- :::>eJoeo1014>6:eo 5~:M(\):re~ 2~:<:.8~()1
~~.) .) l. .) .)::!.> ~.) 0.) 0.)0 .) .>::.:J
<i>bw~
.) .) 0 w:cw&4>~;~wbe.c
0 .) . -:c.coA
. :c.colOlwAe.ccce.cc~oc
~j ~ 0~
ln?ccsoc-b~rto:~&e.c ~~ 5 gsofu<-aJ. ~e be.c l.a A 3 l->:~
. cocc~c1
.) - .-::>f':o~~fue.c6c.oe.c
.>:::.1 .) ::,C.Oe.c4-oc.w
.)0 . .)
coc.JN~e.c~cclL
.) .) 0
4-occ.o
~ .
~b:o~rofuc.coe.c
.) ,.)
fullc~:c.e.c
Q '
- :::>eJ'9"'~
..> ~""""
lo~cc
0 .J
U\)~101
:.J
rocb~e.c
.)
~ccwch~coccGGCeJ.cc
,) .) .) .
:22Cro:>:>~:~lo~e.c:2wro
.) .) .)0 0
:c'e.c w~gco& - :~i'f:illioo~, be.c arc A~(\:~<pCCi>ro
~~~~bA- ~tb~~Cf>~!!W be~: G~ Al<\ Cf>CCi>ch - :~fh~b:>
so~:!~
XXXI
Y!
u:~soc.b~ltu!ouo1o~a:~:c.bro !bee
~ux~=~~oosorere~oo Goc ~~bcM2~cc~socc - :~Jfbeo
<.o~cc~o:l_Coa: .~Mrosolep&:~c.o Loc~o2 :~soccech c:),
s.ole~l~:chro - ::?J~b~:~:?oo_~~ ba:(r) roc ~~b:~soc-cec.b
~~~H~~ ~t~ lo~ccs.o&cclc~ :?~soc.ro~:?~:$2ro
glle~ - :~b~:.;?l) ~sofhcctc~ solWa::~a:s.obropl\
~cc:b'~~ - ::?J:?b~.=~:?oo~~ tba: cr) roc ~~b :~soccec.b
n::?l~ sc~b:o~soa::~a: ~g~s.ooe
furo ~+:~ch:~J::?c:.?a: c.cc~~solh:>so Lo~1o~ 3&~m
.?so=sJ?ie ~cc~ ~cc~s.oro ~~:>a::~:c.bro - :?~?ie~ :?~Se
<.o~cc!c.o!ltltu~ :?~:?~~~:~&a::c:J,a: - :3J~ro:~t
?f>~:c.ooec~m ~~:Loc.cP ~;:~:~P . - gbc.ccac ~cc
~Co:~fchr-> - :~)~bw:~~oo~~ tbm(r) . roc .~~b:fe]pcct>ch
N ~o~ ~o:~ec :?&s.ole:l~
(m) (f) aar ~~b:~socct>ch - =s=~s.ore s ~!li:i:Ge
.=c&m~so?fsoroe - =:?l~~tb :lle:lle(.(f 1roc ~~b :~ccec.b
snfe=!tl2
lxxx ii
~~:~aS ro~aS,_?
cpG':l.)~@3:?5~ ~o J (J) ~'1' ~Soo8w:~'1t<!:. - oc'C~Xo~oS
<W=IO-t(;>:J.Y.> ~~~~4i_:06 E ~~voSJa:l.)~uc~@8: - l;:l.)6l'1
.t:!O~<iJoS :>.?::l.)O~;o"~~' vnoaoS~: ~o:i:&GY.>:~~ ;,
.
~
li)
~
Cil
e
1e 1e e
~0 o8 8o s., C3J f) 8.., ~ g~8 ~ ..zcmS.,
~~@ ~ e C8J &'lru ~ v 01'1~
f) .. ~ l~ ~
fJ 1 ~ lgtf ~
f)~~ ~..c
(o) ...... (.)')
8.., e ..c
u ~ (,)") ..c .. -4'0 ~ . ij & -- ..c Cl
6> (,)")
"" ......,
oS~ &..,~&'I . . .Bo --v 8
. Oil
~ e. ~ ~ ~ em
0.., Oil
-:eo.., e ..a ~ ~ 6>rB.., ~
--v
0
s u
v 8 :>
\)') -4'0 Oil
tr os ~~ mlo8
......, --v
0
O"l
'I'
.B (._
se.
eo
......, .,...... 8Oil 0'> & & O"l
Ah (._ C)
.. ~ 8 (._ B ~ ,..-, (._ . ()
Oil Oil -....... .. ~ ~ f "t ()
l~J ...........
0 ..8o
~ e..,s ~ "'( em, lo "~ ~Oil
... 6> f) -.......
CC1 ~o.So~ Oil ... ~
...
Oil .o, o.., f! e ..& " .,...... ~
~ ....., ,01'1 ~ ~ --v Oil "' .e ij ~ rn.., .a-,~ .!..
f)
--v ....- ..&EB
~- s ij CC1 CCl Oil
......, ...!l [B.., ~~ CC1 s,.?, SrS~~' &~
f) fB, [B, CC1 3-,&
.Q;, ~ ~ ij f)
1 6>
Z' ~ m ) .. ~ eC) me ...8o..,oeC') ('B.., e.. --v0 [B,
e.., ... - ) ~ s,
"""""' ~oem O'l 6> )
s O"l ~ Cf, ...S (:B, (._ 6>
...... , .. 01'1) 0') CCl ruo n O"loe ,.-...
e.., 0'> ru
0')
..... , j .. 8 ~ o ..e "8 C"l~~
()
e-CC>
3' ~ &'I ~ () 8 ......, t oe, n Oil
c
6>
j .. rS Oil ......, () ru
;:s(JV."
. r.;:""lcm .........
C'l Oil ......, (J
8 8Oil ..e
0~ ......, tvl <J ~v, u ~
' O"l tJ ...._,
ee..,~oG:~ ~
o.
~ s.., ::g65
rVO jo ~ ...3o 0') ::g s f)...tr;U''n
m
...., kl
,..!)
ij r{3 m s eo ..aoo o 0 ~o v 1 _.. ~
Oil e-,m ::g.. ...000 Oil ro Q .. :>
(C)..s~ Gl Oil 0 ~_..,o9 --vooe ~o~ . s
..aoo e
[:B.., s., Lq)) &'I~ 0 ~ & ~ 0')'" C'> 0 > ()<)
~ ~ 0') em oe, ovOil """""' 0
I ~ t) ...c,
......, u o\)")em
ij P." &-~ cm em !r'
0 = 0') (.)'> m ..vo v o Oil . &-~
I Q)
Q)

~aS .Bo
kl .. ..
CCl
o(ll) , g.., ~ il
Oil 'c
e ~
r
0
O"l
&'I fE1 e. e a-. ::g
~,8.., o. o (o)
0 0 .B" e 8 ij ..v e eo
~.., 08 ..So 8., 0
o., s., 8 ruo m88o 3 ~O"l 0'1
8 3 = &'I ~0 =

0 0
-v -n -n G) ~
s-
L.. ~ &~
~ ~ E: -n ~
-n G)
8-,~ .
....
v - -
11~cc~ ~ccce&1 lo~cc~J :cn,~c.c.o~~cc&,.
ll:~b&~solN~~:ve ~:ta:ccc!?cb:c-R~Ju sfc ~~b :~socc.cb
II~C~~ - :~G~~J~G~~IWc-t :c-a:$2oc.o w:~
cbce:~clto~ - :~~b~:ill~oo~~~ lba: ere ~~b :~socc.ech
()5c
u~cc~ ~cc !bce&lo~ ce [cw
$Ccc:ro!?:~ :~~~gool~ c-8cJro.~(oo- :~:fSLJG ~lA
:~:ce~~e q;so*l\o ~hA ~~oc.co~- (w) 5oc A~o:~cc.cb
cooc
u~gool~$(!cc~ ~85g~e sofuc.c.o be
vv ~~o=~soec~ch - : 5 ~8 5 ggoo1~ bee coc: A~o :fel
SOCCi>cb ~C~CCG~CC~~~ ~fulea:~CC~A sacc~8~g
~eso~c.w:~&~ - :3'i'w:ill~co~~~ be 5oc ~~b:~socc.b
solh:!~
A1 X:XXI
C.CC~::>.l.ee&encolo~.
;)3 .) @e~J.ll 0 ~-
.) .:>3~ ~:Thwfeec cecc@e:~ec
.) . .) ~
~&
~v'
~sole~ ~~&~ccLo~~ec.o&~e.c - :~b:c:.c:~<:~&::$2oo
:~C\)~.>~s.ofeec:s~ec:c.ee fuco~~ . :&,cb:s=sc~
e.c~IOO:!os-oo - :~:~co~!&ec !b~bsofe~~cc ~~SO~
s.oleecsccc~co w~=c.oos-ow~w ~UD&:> =:?:~cod&ee
cl,!bsol=~ ~<hcccJsccc~~e ~&~ee - ~cc~ ecce&>
<~c.oaee Go~CC$0~~b~:~SOO~~] J!Nc.ccbe.c sfc 6~0
=@s-occec.b~cc~:~:c.a: &)~oosoe:!o::;>~ :c.a:&:~cc~
- :~eJUewleecc~wcc
.)~0 .:> ;)-
:~cfU1~<6lcbC.BJc
.) ~ .:>:.:J .) :Qcc~b
':,~ 0
~o(;Qlhl
~v.) ~
&;::;lockb.coc<'Cccoocc~
~'- .) ~
lowccee:dAcbcoc
0 J;- .)
cccc~b&:&lcc~
.) 0
- =:;>5bi:~5oo~]~ bee . 6~c 1 src 1 arc f'l~b :~socc~cb
ll~f'l ~:xUl~e.c
0 ~ 0 ;)-~
!b~g& :R):cl,&; s!=o~f'l st=o~~.ec ~~:~c.o~c.o s.ofe~gS
:hecc~ - ::?J:;>oct~~s.occ ibee rc ~~bc~o2~cc~~cc -
sole~gS:tLecc~ - =sJ~b:=~soo~)~ .bee src e~b:~soccec.b
n ~cc~ ~cc !b:o~ ~ec~
:~ .bet: sac ~"~~b~ccec.b ~eod,ct?oec ~~~~~:c.bco 1bec
sac ~~osoccecb n:;?):;>bt:c.&:;>oo~~ .bee sf.c ~~o:~s-occecb
c+sol8c.<. sole=!~
1\ XXXI.
,__
~
~- "i . ~
X
e
ie
G;J ij I ~ e e I ij <
e ~~ S,r3ots3: ~ e ~ - s, -
eo>S..,W" .. (SJ ~~
3 .. :'C3l .. s,~ M ~
n ~ 9,~ --..&~r3o..c ..c"8.., ~.8 ij..e- 8 .. ~
.. ....., ,.ac:
~ ~c2 n CCl <.)') n s~ g., ? ..2.
,.s ~~a~-o c:
.8. _., e0'1 ..e. e <.)') fB.., c: -o ~ ....~ ~ Ji ..
J
~ ;:s -4> ,.2..... ;:s ::> 3
e ~(:B-,0~~ I.- -o 0'1 ~ n 0'1 V'l 8 o.-,
~W"~ ;1~ ....., ~ceg-.J -o -.J is .. ~ ,.!)~ kl
a-,6oi e e ij ()')
--ij ~c: ;:s e.....,:!JcaJ
c: n o (:B., (:B., ~ s i '::::.,~
0'1 ~ .. ..e
- ru., (:B., ee~ ~~
~~ g, - - II g, ij ij
8, c& 4: 0 g., CC) G:o...S c ru - 1
m
_..., (C)~
... ......, g., oe ~ oe' CCl n CQ1 a2 ..& ~ .3
0'1
:s r.[,a..,
S., 8 .y, S e.-, ~ e.-,
eG ()') ') 8 ~ fB.-,9.&
- ,...,..... ..... ~ . ~i ' .
s
l, ~8 ()')
.-.a
~ ' fC')
()') 1J n 1
=B(')") CCl
fB.., em
g, ...s - . .~ . . .
s.., ..& ~ I .
()')
0
~ 0'1
..l
CCl
~ e _...,
a.., kl f1r
8 i.., ~.. s ~ -4> -4o'l

ij 8 ~ r3o
ee~ (Y') G: f) 8..,~ ...ao ~ ~
~
8 0'1~lJ2~~.., I -5 o;& 5.-, ~em CQ) CCl > ij fB.., a,
.. 0'1
a.., ~ r+o ~.., <S em ()') !) ..
e(8,} ~
e.., ~ cu ~ .. ~ ~ ..S
..e ..Vo I c: _.. ij e ...fl..
:.a ("),-,~_.., ~ ~1 g., .., ~ 1()t)
:! o.
CCl en ~ r+o ftt. 1 m 0'10~~.., ffu ..e
4!'1 rB'l 8 ~ CQ1 o n rn.., CSJ ()') i
:2 8 ()') c:S..,~!r m
...., ~~ ~.o..,Jk~
c.-, ;i, 4: s (C)~ 0 .. .... [.B.., ~~ a.., ~ X,
-
8.., r+o 8()') c2 ,r+o ~ ()') s.., ..8o I ()')
oe'(len
()') ijij ~ a.., ...s ..8
~~Wl()')m.Jl 0 ~ ..s. ::~ a., 0') -4> Jo
\:S ;_z II I ()') - ~~II e-;, ()') a2 ~ o9 g, ij ,.8.
o c.-,2 f)~=: 0 _..., .. S, ()') ru c2 dh
...oocmfB..,~V'Ie.-,
...ao ...
t) V'l
a2 goS 0') or.lo(C)...fl..c_...,g,
:: C)
f&ln" ~s e rg .....,
i8
f&, ~8
~..,j s~ c2 38 tJ (Q))
s.., ~ WJ ::s .x.., e ~
e.S~o&~B o()')
--c (')f) .... f) ~, 0')
I~ g..,
~..ei S.,4i~ e ~em~~ e em
. a.., ~ fB.., .:: .... ~ ~~~- .., ~('\)') 8 I . n" V'l " (:B.., Po"

(J
-o ~ G) s
-v -.\1 G>- &
G) (._ ()
a..,
~

..,
.
c.b~&c.ca,ee ~=~~soc-9~ - ~~6 ~:}~~) - :~:<:&
~:~ t~~c.o:~loA~ecA:t~ - 5cc ISS~ I sse A~~=~:soeei)c:b
8
neel)A ~eel :~fesoo loso~~]~A :uc:d},sofe~ga
~~=~~ ~:~ec ~~ee:~~ !~98 - :lJ~
~ =scJ~ec~ee:~ro~ !be.~ ~s sobc.osol\ . ?f>!~ec~cc
:d},&c-9<11~
.)
- .):)eeA ' :)ee
.J
.l.bewru
J y
:)~ :c.ec~Ac.CC
.J~ .J
lo:Th
0 0
sore.~s&.~ 5 1fuc.ru~ga A:RJ~ct~~ - =~lA =~~ 9 a
:~sOle soc.4>~:RJ:c.8~:~eec lo~ec:~c.o~:c.bc.o l&>ec.o~
soo.>c:b - :~~b~:c.&~oo~~ lbec A~O:~~eef>c.b
Gsc I 5sc
n!oc.c.o !bee ~c.ec~:c.&~oo
lo~ee~so~ ~~ gc ~eesoeeec ~=ru~co=!~ - ~tl'nf'l
~tl'nso&ecc,coec ~sole~)~ - :5~)~ ~~:~ee
lo~SJW~~ sc soeeec ~ee:ru~co:t~ - :lj~A~ee
&::hX>gtc - ~A ~~~ sc ~ee:ru~co:!~ ~ee&:~
A~&:f~gb; :~)~b~:c.&5oo~~ beccs~ A~b:~S?eeW,
11$'-'c~ - ::?J:?bi:c.&~oo~)~ 1bec cs~ .A~O:~soeewc:b
. ..
u:~)~o:1h>ec ~&>~ 6Gc .A~o :~soeeec:b ~ee
soJe:!PC
lxxx viii
. ffi~:~oS
~E: - @~3aSc;o:q" G>e:GY.>:'lot"

c;~8~1~:
::>n c;~8c;o1
-~ ~
~
B
1e 1e B . .i
: 8... ~ _.1_ ~
s.., ,. ij...a 8... Q) 8...
~~ 8 1!@ ~@
e.,g ~~
~@ l'l ~ rncS .. n@CSJ ~ ~ 4,o ..
...vo ~ -<: ~ . ...c .soe~
!'\)C)
a..,-s., 6) CQ)) ~ -eo.., o... w... @~ w... ~.;;
= G) C1Jo
o... -eo... :) : a ct :o w... (81 ..sliJ~:
,.&, ..\,) so... .. (.) ~ ov, -8o ~ ~ c
-e>') ........ :
...,) -'0 -e>') -'0 a... a .. ..ao~
0 ~
= c!M " cS ocu ') ...,)
CO) C"Yl
;; : _...,) i-s., G)
G")
a. . a...~ s ~.So~ ~ ij G")
.........
n fB..,:.n ~
...~ ~ 0.., I
C"Yl ....n.., ~ .. " ... -'0 ~~
..
8 );~~'-' u C"Yl +C"Yl .&c ~
'i-...,~ .s c:; ~~ -
~
0 CCJ a..,~_- , ~ CC1 ..s 8: n
.S,cmP." .(C)
i e.; [B.., ~ ~ ~
a ~ ci.nP."m . [B.., : ..co X, f.o/' ~ e 9 re
m n e.., ..s ..._,
~
.n.., ~ n 3... c;5, oe, ';: ..3o'CCc! 9C"Yl . ~~ jj4~
~
ee ~8cBc!M I I .. ec... g.,
..2o
(")')
o ... rn
~ ~ ~ - C"Yl m
o8 a... a... a... ij ~ 0... .. ..e rn.~
;; m m rn3...&3~
~. . o... . ~ CC1 .wo
.,e..., o ... e ~8 ~
_: e.., rn -e>') m 'ij ~.., + s. . c!M em
~ c!M CCC! -e>')
C"Yl
.. ~ n o..,
~ ~
s ~ ~ ~0~ S em a... .
rn.,. em oJ = e v...
()I') _. ~
(")') Ot'l (")') CC1
s ~em , C"Yl .1 ~ 'g" re...~~
0 oe, -eo... o... 0 "" .. C"Yl re...
.. cih c!M 8 s ~ o e ru...
!2" I I ru...~ 1o ~ .e
~ e... .. Q)
I
3 -s .. : s =:...,)
~ e a..,
F ~
8"c.J ij .. .&m ~ c... ()
...4)0 2o .. 8 ..e
C"Yl c ... c!M .& o8 ..... .&..e'()
, ~oe, CC1
a.., ~~ m
ha.....e
t.....,
n
~
o& Q) e ij ' _j l \ ...
o... l.lO ~ s, "t,
!! (:;')
C"Yl
s ~em"
CS1 s.., ~~ 8 ~ =s ~ ~ .....0 .. 0... ~
'-" 0... o8
a... P." a s. . e ~~ .o... 0 _..,I..
x
._ G) . ~ ~
s~..
0 \.) ...0 '-' -.()
_
-.()
0 ~ '--
...0 g.,~.
'-'
~
~ .-5
~
-s,. '.-5!;,) x
~ X
e e e e X
: :o3.., : .:Be, ., ~ 8.., ~ 1: 8-, Cinij~S., X
~ s .. C3J (";) .... (3J
-l) . o()')
~
.4-o :o [8J

o("')") ~ .. .. ~ CS1 ~ Ccl
()') ~- ..c ij -eo ..c CCl ~ a.., ~ ..c
C)
..e ~
0 C) () ()') .. em a,., ~.n (C) ~ \) 4>'1
::: :+o 1:
s., ..c4>'1 &l S.., ~..,
e- o8.-C: - ~ (; 5
~ ()')
50') = .s: ..()') ij :
...--- ()
() ij ~ s.., ij 8 ~ c.fu ()') ~
_...,~
m~ 8
(')(')
8 ~ (";) o8
....., ~
~~ ~ t~'-
_:; ~~ ()')em~
C)
I . ij
l
...e " O'l ........
... 0+0 a-.~ ~
()')C'l .. s
e . OC2 ..t>o o~ (") ~I ~ J)

f)
~(C)
u e..,
.. 1:
C)
i rr
..
.-5 ij
"~em
M
-
II
....., ~m~ ~
= e kl
c
;;;:.J
I ccn ~
5 ij :' ~ fB
. ~ f)
50') '-
.k! .c~ e &I
a, ~
~ ()') CCJ e ij
~~ ~ c 8 0 e.., Q ~ ....
0o8 ee : (J - o()')
~ ()') rn..,
s em....., ....
s..
:!)0 CCl ::g .... l s e. a~ ()')~
;\) ()') M a, o.., CC1 (C) ij ~ o8 ~ 8-,
~~ ....., ..8 em..& ~ CCl ~
.... I . (C) ..()') a,., ..eo ~ S..."
0') s.., .-So-s ~.., 5 :a 8 f) ~ s,tt
()')
fB,
-s..,O'l()')
(C)
a liD C) ~ em kl em
()') ..8 s.., o9 ().., s ~~~ 1 (C)....
&") tO">
()')
....
re.., ~ ().., .. ....., l
...e
ij C I . ~ -g 8co ~ (1 ..So~ . I
~ ~
...e m =..3o cgJ .... ()') ~
cth~ m ~ c s.., ..so 5. 8 ~ oe,
()')
: ~ ..&
(Y) . . .,eo.., ecm
...e . ij [B 8o 3.., . s, ~ -+o
ij (')') 5 ()') ~~ .. e
m 5 CC) .. "8'" 0':
....., CC): ~ @I . 0 ()')cj)e~
()') ~
e..,~ () 8 8.., = ~()') e s, s.., t~
l, 0 c 6l c ",.Z
g .. l'!r> em ~ )1
M e a,~ ~ ee -&e
0 .+oo8
()')....., M ~ a-. ~'l s
()')
: g, ~ ~ ij ~
-.n 0 (j;)
(;) -.n 0 ...0
'- _-.() -.n -.J 18-,
15

"ft .
I

"" -
~

01

-s 1B -2B 1 1B
8 f) e
~ e ~ s. . oe, --2 ..3o m .,& ~ ~ ..2. 8 s, s...
~@ !]->~@ c!? ~ &-> 'c @ @
t - ..so e ..s .<:: ~t&1 ()'l..c
f) ruo ..c
f)
cB~l.n CCl ()'l s l: fB.., g.., W'l ~ c!? l.n !o)t)
~ c:8 c ~ld! ~ eo O'l g a... c:
~ ..000-o ......... ~aa.....s~a: l
........ 0...
, 0
en 8 an- i
o2'2 f) 0'l~1 ~ ,.2. O'l ij ~
s. . G') G: ~. i... n :! ~ en m
~~c
~ coo~ ...e
1 .& ~ tl cn .. ij %.
!-:"'..!) . (if) -+
()'l n kl t!
O'l ........ .-..o ..!>
l..BC31 CS1rcl... es... ,:...,r. '2 o...B~ .....
)0 ~
.. c!? .- .
c ... oe, 8 -
~
fo
. CC1 f)
~ fB.., kl (3J OQ), ~
.,
l lB m8 3....1 .n.., - ~
rue -8o ....0 n... kl$-' ~s
.. Ql) ru n... fl CC1 ;C~
()'l leo&"> C'lr:-. -o , (it)~ &"> CC1 CCl ..
~ . . . \.4IJ ..c O'l ~
c8 ()o @ &->d
~
~) eo~ f) W1 ~..., ~ .... ,.sa...
e~8
()'l 1 [B..,
..3o Clf!l,
A o... 11" o()'l 8 a,
JiO'l ~ \S .. ~~ .8j=f n...
~~ /!le (8) s .& CC1
~ [B.., 3...'..2~ .... Gn 8 .S ~ ee . ..e
1
O'l .-..o ru 0'> ~
~ 8~ . ~ee
.s8 em kl e c... ~ ~ ~ O'l I~ ij O'l m J)
3 ., a...~~rr;.., I ....... n...
..Co
~o
?.>
I ai
O'lf"? '- ~ f) .&m 8c~A~
~ .
G( C t
om
o...,
~ lo)
can B ..e
a:
~ on... fB..,
t
.g' o+o ~- ~ I
.1
O'l
()
~ ..
o oe .. ,JifJ
...,
CC1 . O'l 0'> .. 2
o...c:8~...() u ij
~fB.., . =O'>O'l l G:
..s
ij
-.>
~j.., c!?
~
..
~ C:o
tl
..00 .1
= d!2
a...~
n CC1
&">
\l'l c:o O'l
....3... w
s... . 8 .. ~ .. ~ ..Co c () ~..cOS... a,
c ~ C) ""o o... c... oe .-:o c
~c...,,fB..,
~ -u..
..5 ij~% ""
o2.." ij~re...cm .. CC1 O'l.O
~ -f:'l. M ~ }l n" roo " &"> s ~

-Q. 8 ..()
u
0
(<) ~ , f;) &
s-X
f;) -<"l
'-' ~ ..() g;~
"" ._..X
. v ._
u~}>A ~Y :~:o~&et:C.<.Ott ~!c.o~A ~:~:~c.o
~l~b$2cc:~so~>socc. lo2ccSv solel~glc.o~ ~b:*ec -
~A ~ !b&lsolel~g~c.ol~ hl$b:*~ bee (c) l.()c A~b
:~~ICo~of)cb - ~t~A ~!~ logecAo:~ ~~ :cbc.opo!ocw
~cc:gJfe:~c.b~ ~{.o:JCO - . :~):~&::~ ~s-o~3~ b:~ec
~:&t&>b:~~- :~:~cl,o ~~lee ~:~f:~ccco~~~~
:fej~cc~
Agcoo~:&,:M~ca:>:') - :~)~~ bee Clo6 A~bct">o2
rCJc
IU~]~ro ~()~
~b@ec ~>soc-9~ ~roore~to a:~~c.oso~~ =A~A ~eo=t~=A~
!&>! ~:c.IOO:~soc:c~ ng>lele~ ~~~:d,c:O Clo6 A~b:~cci>C..b
u~Ue& ~t~ lo~cc!gbc.ot~ec~cc~~c:.o ~c.0!1;:d,c.o
o:~tt'ec ~~S:~roA - :5!~!1;CGC~cci'>c.m c), tgecbec
(co) scG &~b :{:o~fOOSOO.d, :~):o~t ~+~Ace& ~
:~:~3o ~:coo:~ce:g~~=~ - ~~~ btt ~6 A~b~.d,
oof
. u:~~&!oc.c.osofuec88
!ec:~:l,~:~fuu: - 3:>;~et::ArotOACC - <.t.o6 ~~b:~~cc.d,
. so~=!PC
- ~! xxxx,

--a
~ ~
e
ie
~
eg., .
c ~ ~ ~~ t ..a ~0 ..B. s~ ~ ...So ,.9 -&, 1-, ..8o ~ ~ ~ 8->
CY> .. r!:h 0') em'- 0 [3cl ~ 0~1 ~C) So. ij
~r> ._co; ' ..
8~ <Mo ru
1 v'~ o ~ o
le .. .. \1
t '
..c = 0 .. .-o ~ ....n... ![' 'V'> ....') ..c
~ <on ~ V'> c .. S em ~ ~ 41 c.n rue :S 1,--a ~~ ~ ee .:g cS ..c
..Bo ~c ~ :) f"P.') "&,.. 8 n~ .~ I C') s .., CY> oQ a') ..so.:s ij ~ T :8 ~
s c -.() ...&>') ~- ~ q; ~ ') ~ -+o ~ rue --o co;
(')')
~ ~ n & V'l I >' 0~ " 0
() s -?.<2, ~ e, 8-> X., ; ~ 4} "g:
-2 tc8 0'1 ~,.g.~~ CY> Qe,.,go .. ~eQ
L~ J -<5 ~
8-CcJ ~ :.2c') g " Jlij ~'-...
s ~~ e c.n ,-J~~ ~rt lcm o m ..... ~ ~Jtc
~ ~ G: cf3, 2., ~ '=" n" ~ l~ M c8 0'> ~ O'l ij
';0;- ~ oi, a: ..s fl
.-\.) ij .-4lo
J.0 fl--6-voc
..8o ~
e Q s') on J) e
CY> ........
s ~c..... c2, ~ @' m "1!o ..B (.) CCl lVI
~ (l~ > ~ c ~ ~ s EB .
& ~ fB,
-?.~ .-+M ..B
(')') G: -.() L- ..2 o a') ~ ..B -::~ ~
~ ~ ............. C'> vo8_.,.:> e e em ~ I -+ .ij em t~ --a -1:'
~ () ~ ~ . ~~ 0') lr
CCl g . <.1 0~ e ._ ~
e_.. ..~ i::S~ c').S~ eec oec (C) &
~ re~ :!~ ~ .so l'n --a n-> ~ oi, rEl.
tl ~ 0')
r;B') ..so !&) ~ ~ s ~ ~, 6')
t .S (.) m~ &, c ~ ' S ..8o a;,
~ O'J ~
.e~ ..&~ ~ ..soS>e ~em
~ ~ ~ .s oS e .. ~ 8 1 ij ~ ~, ~ ~~ c ~ (Y) ere,] ... :!"
C)
~ ~..& ~~ So~~ --J j ~ ~~ ~o.. 0~ f) m o-:., a, t~ (Y)~ 1
0 c eo rVO &o8 &l!r' ... ~,~
t() . ~oe, ~ . .:a ~ m e c ~ lo
....... ~ ~
-.vo os ~. ..e {:B, M--v ~ ;;{J CY> tJ ' ~ 0 .n O'l t ca
ij .. ij .... v c i- em CCl r"3i CY> r=-1
0 ~ c2 I.'S ~ r.') ;11
..e. ~
8 m
....., J, o ...!)
o 06 CCl ~ .. ~. , ., Lv J ....41, CY> g., J .. ~ e, .. ..
.10'1 cfu~ tJ
~ g~ t%J ~ re') .. 1 8. ~ ~ ., coa ~'E .S ..So~;;&,~ e
o. &, s. l, ...0 C ...&>
_, Ot'>
fB ~ I & I .
01) r.::-, em (Q)) " c C l.l~ C'l tJ ~,~..Be s, ~~ ~1 &
....,., M M .. .-QO oe ".!>0
.. \} ~ CCl
jj ~I 0 ~ ij e,f)~~nox,~
'j'
. ~8-> c oe, I O'l f'B;-. ~ ~, fB,
~ c ~ ~ : ~ ~~ 8o Qj. X, 8
~
~..Bo
c
~v-> CVJ
~ ~~ 10
t ..2c, ~ o,
~ & n -4'o
.. ::oB
tJ
em ~ ~0 .:!)o 8 ~A;_ --8
~a
S ~
re,.....,v~~\)
;; e, ..Bo n" V'l 0 .. c ~ CY> ~ .-oo
I tl)l) V'l dl (J'l \:5 41' I M O'l .;&, .. 8, fB, ~ ~

u 0
-<1 0
~
?! ,-n ~
{a
.. ~:
0 -
lxx.X.x iv

'P"aoS<Y.?J~a?:~5Q c;o7 . - oo'P:c:::>.l~oS3.J.~ ~~&aec: -


'P'o~o?:~&~ $j\>(o)(m )~'\~~c:<W:u2i ~3crS~X>oS
yoSttt: - I(OO~:m ~VoStt::>.l~ ~~3~t~ ooSX)dJC>XYJ
3<Y.)c;l'n oooS~~ ~~3cvSo?
X>oSyoSc:ttS I Q@ltcS -
ttc:>:~. ~:CC?oS '\' 3n:CC?oSt: ~,~:o? OiJl:oat~:r.n:
~2~t~ otll=oa,'\i ~O>~:ljl~lm Q~l:()?'9c:3"d
oot.O'Y.>:C:A>Qel ~lB~3aS d? ~voS::o~:11

'P~tX>oS~5Q c;o7 ~'lY~cotw:~'ltS: - ~~ro~"i'2lEP:~~


~ Q~ ~:ub8m~~oS--o~2c:ood:JqJ~~~ OO'f>:Q
c:8: O?'f>:~~'\~ ~ ~~"

c:cwb~o:?= (.osT} 2=c:3\)=aat= ,~ ~c:CX>?t~t~tcSc


(iijtcqjll:8aSJ) ' =>=>~e
..g ..g ..g
li li lj ie
e e e
m ij a ~o ij em ru ~ oe' g., jis-s,l'
i*gi,(as .()') C) ~ .. C)
g, a3.,(as ~B 1-,CSJ 0 !.)')
o(')') ~
ij~-"P.e
_, oe' ..c t ~.&
~C)
..
g ~ ruo :j"s.,~;
oS@
ij.&~~ . CC1 roo ~ ..g (')') :
emo(')') fB, ~ t~ ~}1-- eo !"Be (')') em -.() eo
C) ~ e~ ....,., ....,., ~.. 83., t<o
s,~ n"~~ c6) s .. o8 e 45 ~'- ..
~ : 8 0 ..e:o em li ~(:B,ru,.J.oo a .s a.., s
..c .()'ee) re., .. -.o
~') en ~ ..&, en 8 s, g.,'"
.. WJ(')')" ..e .. re., s ..&, <-o .... ec..s~s
(')') : g., c:!!
CCJ:'()
~~ 6)<-o m .en
~3.,~~ ........
....,., ~~~~~~~"
..G:o Po"~ e ~ en ~~ CC1
fB, [ cfu CS1
..s ~..
~
g
..
Lc1
:;,..srB t~
gs.,s.,(')')_.,
oo
..&, m s, o fB, re,
~ I ~ ~ . . . ._ C)
en j 1 ..3 em ~ (')')
0 ..s~b.-.o
~ a kfB,o8
&a;:~
3 & .. g.,(')')_, g ~ g'
en ~~il :l ~ 8o~ . ~
~ "g.,cm~ (')') (')') :'> I
Q) (')') en ..e
g ('e)') ~ ..I ~g
.. ~
..Sc; l em~
!2"
_, ij
on~.
m
....,
: i ~ ~ ~
.& ! .. e ~
..e
....., C1
a , .,
~ ~(:B.,
~ ~ .2o
s~r
..e Q) .. (')') 8 c-,
s ~Z'~1;,~
-il .t~-a eo ,g~ t ..s ~~
' l~,; ~CCl 0
k.. 8 Sn (')')
rug 8
@ e (')') : oel
..Bo ......... 0
o8 ~em~ { 1"\)G .. ,! fB,@ .......... 1l ~-
1"\)G
H I ~{:B.,~ ..So
g s,~ Po"~~
8 a eo~Cl
H
....,., I S., g
fB, e r8o ru .. s, ~ C'l I (')') ' f."
g., ~
(')') C'l
s.,e ~~ ::a(')')
..o-,1~eo ..
6)
t mt.c ~.n 1i;;&,
ru 3., S, B I ~~-.() 8 .. :,
CCl..cg grn.,..e ~Q)~ s
(')')
..._,
~
~C'l"O ::!)C) ij
B e , :'--s en~ '-"
soS s .. 8rn.,-.&~ .. i '"' t~!oS
~ 3.,~~ ~ on
g Qe J;; ag.,, ~
9,-& j 3., 8-, I

0
~ 0 (,!)
0 0
~ (i) <-
Js.,g-
""'
~~
Jxxxx vi
~~:~oS GY.>~f=>
l'lE~:BoS,SS: - oo"P=i~~ro ~s:~ ~ss'l~ro~o.>-S
c;~:l ~~::u2l eo~y:S~ ~'1 s~oSooS'l~~V? ::uoS~:1
~~?:~: ~[9t~cSu

~::uo53:y5~ <;J7 ~'1 "~oocSw:~'lcScS:- ~&~ ~=~


@lcS~~=~~:cS: !:lJo.:>oicS: - '0'~oS@:y5~ 9J~ ~'l
~o:i=<tJoS~:y~ ~a\PuS,~ ~oi= ~ocS - @~v ~~-:>oSn.

'PctooS~~O;l:y5~ 9~8 (J~ - oo"P:~~<;;OT Gt:~ ~CY.?it=~ d3~oS


.,s~~2l~a.t. - ~uS~tc;~cS:r c;S\~ ~S\'ls,~~:dX;cS:
:>:f''lt ~3~o:'l[j: - ooC3oS::uch :f'O'n oo'P:~~~
~ot=~.t. ~cS::u~ ~a-t.~voScS: - oo'P:ocS~St.i::u~ur
~~s ~~~cS - oo'P:~:Cijls~~,~ oooSro.oSj?:.,[g:
. oo'P:ocS~at. ~'1~, ~~yoS~cSu. 1
F~! '
I

~-

i 1 1 i~ .
ij~.t SJ~2Q)~ ~ mm..f:lo~ ~
s,
&,13"1
~ -+o (Y)
~~ .., .()') &l (q)) - )') f) \.Vel
: 0 a, .. 1 1i .: s, ~ a, ~~ f>_.g ..
~ . ~--E ..... ..c oe' ..6; ~o
tl ~ p:O "
~0 ...cC s tJ..e
...ao ruo 0'1 (.)') ('\)C) ...~o -u ~ S, ..3o I .., .,B.., S,
8.,
e ..... ..c c: ;...-o ;:v ~ "' ..3o .J5
..., ~~ ..c
(:B,~~ JZ&l ij ~ -2
C'6d cffi g.., ..s 8 f) ~ ~
liD ..vo 2~~~ .. .
'1 ~ eo &,_ a, fB, ~ )1~(.)')
c; s
0'1 ~g' ....,
.. 0'1 }
s.., C"UCI v.
&l \:S :!) c: ., . , .. ~ ..g ~
~ = I ,. ~- ij
m .-..JQ ~
..aCl't ; .....
~ ~ -+o c:o .....
O'l O'l
s ..2o~ -2 ~~
"' ..00 ,..., ... 00
3 s, ~ '
c 0"1 Q) .:ao 1= <-
(;') ~ 0,. e2
..... CC1 (\.)> .....
0'1 ~ f)')
3 ~4
..g '1 ~&,rn,~~ &J~..&i,~cj~
fB, O'l ~.,s ~a--!1:"
. Q 8o..S~o8
.&, g.., ~ ~ 2 CC1 ..3o s,..a ~
~,~ ~ I
~
~ .. ~ ~ e..,[,.8..e~ fB,
g ~~ L (')') ..&
e &,.g v. e.., s, .
m ...e ;:
~~c:, . ~ ...,~~ em .15 an g rn, ~ \5
0'1 ~ f)
.:ao ..~n~seo 0'1 ..., en ~ .. f) :!!)
m
...., ::>~0" 0'1
Scm \Y)cmanem ()') " ...., 2 - ~ o
.c? ~ ij fB,~ ..co 0'1 &l 0'1 ...e
~ 8 S o, ~ em .. CiS) I .,8o
g, ~ 3, "'5'1 ee
....,Q)g, l, ...., ..CO: f) ... ~
0'1 ~3J ,.& I 0'1 I
o, 0 0'1
s8 ~
e
0"1
~
tt
-8>'1 "'S!O
&
:R..,
em --8
8 ;
c,
ijo
l, ~..s~~~$&3
0'1 s, a, en ..e ::> 0'1
== ~I') 0'1 OQ) coa CCcl 0 .-vo ..
....., 8 g ~.., 0 ~ ~ O O'l fch c; 0'1 M ~ I
~gem I O'lij
em-e-, ~ ~ ...8o 0'1 ~ 5ili ,2f) ..
~ ( '\)C)
0'1 ..... ..Co f>
--g:: 8
;& I O'l .,;; B _i a,i,~a ~
0 f)
e len~,..& ~ c,
co c t:B-,-r2ems,~&
-reo
....... ~, ..
~ a,o,Bt em c, r.::::, cB a, ~ -2 ~ )')
0'1 8 en ...3o ~ ..3o n" (3.} ~ .:ao -;eo, \5 ..3o
0 0
<- 0 0 ~
<- ~ cor -'\.)
l~
<- .v 0 ~
s,x
~
\) .s.. .
...g ..g X
-
~ ~ ~ X
x
e )(
B
ie
B
~ s I ~ s, (QT) I 8 8.., (.) ~.... s, I) ij . s,; s.
(')') " .. e.., v u~ r-\1
c:s '8' .. c cv.o (8J ..1! 8 ~ S, .~ Lc cch@
0 ..
e'l
...gn --B m 0 L~d
S,w...c .. 0 Q) ~ IYl ..C.
(C) -a,~ OS s, 0 iJ {,)t) o"e8e"...c
CC1 ~ .,~s W'l 2 ~
[B., ~~..S - s--8,
f) . t ~ ~(
\v'l ;:s -9 : f) ,.8.
I~~ ij .. j ..~ ~
8 ..:()
O'le-:l -+<> em a> = ..,;)
,.sntl"
ls
Ct) s ~ (')') O'l ij ..,;) O'l
t --B B ~ -.o e ~ O'l m Qoolo
~
()
..& g.,~@~ ..e
l ~{..,~ 8
e a
...., m
...., C)t)
.., e e 1 8 ij
8f)~~ijlo~ ~ ~re
~oe, 8 ~
. ..&~ .. + .... ~ -~
01) O'l 01'1
e~ t a
Jo cc .em -v B- ~ s
.+o f) .. ~ O'l jo ..s ..s em ..3o 8
O'l ..& ~.., ,J). ~- ~ ()'l A e n., Oc.lO ::8 ~ . eo ..g ~~~
0 I f)
0
-+<> o9 I:S ~ s 8 s ~.oE;, Q)
+ ~_go O'l ~ a., e .. 8O'l cn
e .r=c ~..
. .. ...co v ~
()'l -<10
......,
..
O'l
+O'l
0'1 : ::> ij~~ 4J. o8
l....,
...co oe, 1 IYl f) ~ e a ~ ~~ 8
l' ..
0'1..& Q) s v ~ = 8 a,~-eo .. .-a
5
O'l ~I). (QT) .. ()'l .. cf)~
. an ~ e, 1
L8J 0
O'l ~0~
. oe, ~ ~..8 ~
.. -eoo ~
o8 f) () O'l
......, !.4 ..
8 t:J emr~:o..g CC1
;:s 0~-<10 ~ ~ e s O'l .. s, ~
()'l .. Cl.n 0 s,
&l ; !1'1 O'l
O'l ~~. ~ eo Sl
......, 8 e g ~~g.,~s,
~ ~ ~ Q) [B, [B, !1'1
(C) ..eo 8o ~o 8 .. eo Q ~ cJ
~..Bolo I ,..!> . ~ O'l
01)
o..,j.,m W _.8 f) I
-u 01\ ~
~v_.,.o .,!;. ('B, ...Co
e ..s...
: ~ 0 u O'lru ...C ij
+~
oc a:aem o, ~ oQ) (.)1)
,.vo ;!io n"' ~ ~jo-r C'l O'l
re,v ..stv., : ~
~
0
C"} A.) 0 0
0 c;;) 0 A.)
~ ~ -..()
'--'
~v
i' -3.., -3~ i
0 0 0
r="l 8., e s.,
8.,
'"~ca
. n-"l
i CCJ~ ~ in j.,
..2 ..8 en ~(SJ j ~~ ~ ~~
0 .. c., rU ..8
...--.. CCI &>~ C'UcJ S,. ~~
..c
!.)') f)
..a. 1
~0
~ ij
~ ~c:a
o O'l ....
cn .: C'UcJ
..a...
~- 6-l..C G:
U'l ~0 Ol "fB, (.) ..c .Be,~ e......,:..c
G: a., n-. = u m .. t.l'l . ~ ~ e C'ln~ !.l'l
..8 ~o-<}() 6'l em a: e.., -.n
.... 0 (";) .Be, ~Y-S~fl
e.,(';) (";) .
f)~
l
a '="' ~0
...
n-"l
.;;. cm e cm f?'l o
()I") ~ ~ f!'l I ~ s ... ~..SOc..,~ ~-.n
:) ~ . .-eo
\)') 8 ....., '""'"" (";)
.. \.q)J...,)
~c 0
.en : ~ en -
...8'0 (C) ~(J'ij...--.. c.....
<>'a "0 (C)
-eo..; a :::::: " e " e ..a a ... 0 ~~ ~ ~ ; C ru .
~ rn" a.., tal ~., .. . . . . . O'l
~ 8 2.- ~ ij t) -t"
(C) C'l =-> ~ ij ~
%1~ g.,ei e rn, rt,.. ~
s --s ~ ..2 q) .;;. q) 80 a.., fB, ~oe, A ~ q) .,8 S,
4:: --s ...e C'lc O'lC .,3 '8'".., !!tcm
c..... ...e ~ Y. C'>'>
~ ..
...
O'l
~
.. ~
0
o;Bo .8.,
m
....., ~ ee e ee -:!> o
CVJ fB, C'l ['B, " q)o
~ .. ru
.&
CiD
l
m
....., S,~ ; n ~~ .
lo
l, !!
o., .... 0! . . c
~.,
...e
n, ~0 f?'l . ~.., .. ~
(C) {')") - n-. rt)') o-. B .. m l,
J .Bo 0 x rJ>., c ,.. .Be, ..., en : I~ ~ '8.,
0 ~~.... :) ~-
rg-, c:&a ~ ~ s., en ij l, - c2 ~ ~ ,
..e..\ a.., e,.se ~ en
q).
(')') e'~ 8 fB,
a.., .. a., .... 0
~
e
.e. , ~. .tvr; ~,
...e r.:?.nrgM?nrum ro;; fB, e., rn,.
Jlo a., n CO'l
m.,
.... 8 g., ..8 oS(J rn, Bm e. 8 ~ .& '3, .. e
CICI), 0 ~ ..., ..3o ') ~eru-+oCQ1
o, ..voX n g n~to<i"'ens_,
(')') ~
G: 0 c dh ~ CCJ..C:: c: ~
6lfB,v .. .en
.1 rc>a..
. 0 ........... 8., 6'l 2.J -+<> :)
~.,~.,
jen g, ..c fB, ~., 1
~
.l6'l w en V'l
)(

.-\)
0 ~ ~
&X
0 c..... -i'l
0 ~ 0 0
~ 0 G) 0 s,>t
~
~,:.<ijo-5 . GY.>~o-5;-=>
"(>d}O?J~o?: ySe JJj {o)~:@3:~ CY?'o~:;~ ~tfh
~ax?&'P eoc;;3<?e '> (:>)~'ll !~o5ooc!t: - !~oS'f'
~O?J@oS:))?:~: e~E: - cpsooS~a}:<(~~ JJJ (:>)
"0'6~c;;:))? ot~:ynn:c;rib@9 CY?~~ ~:oochc;;'l:
~;Grli q~o53l'foS ( =>) dl a>~.0118 "~<tJoSS:
~~t:u

'!>eoaSO?J~o.?:\'5~ JJJ (j) - a:>1Z:D068: 3'.)@3&c;;o18:'W:8"


~~=~ 3'.)~~:4Y:l:@~:- oovoo~ c;;ol:~ ~~CY.>yO?~:
@t"?&(g: 4l~c;oo:~8 ~-ttn

'P@ooS01J~a}:<(S~ $f>n (::>) 3d'l c;~o5an:t: - 'P<tooS011~


cx}:<?5~ 7'"''"' (o)oaS @s;-:>i:an:c;::P).,oSci~oS ~'lS~8g9
:7ncrn~c;:>.:n ~:~8 c;c:spo5an:,S8:n

~=~.tc;cS 3'.)oS 2 o!03<(s~ 7 1 3d~S ~ - O?~&~:rooS"'PoS'l~Y


O?~&~:~~ O'Y.>(\)O?,~:c;oT ~:~~c;;m-S co~:c;;OO'Jt'liu

~:g'"cS 3'.)oSeoc;;3<(&~ 7 ($) (o) - 3dc;;o18 l)tc=~o? O?'f':~:~


3d0j(3d~~o1~ "'Pt:'ll~83~ ~~ ~:~c&.uT~ ~m~~
. c;;o:'l' oo'P:!~~ - 3'.)Go18o~~=o? O?'f':~:~~ 3d0j(31~ F
~
..2 ")
....
oc;,
ij ..8
....,
S Co ~ I 6"~
o2, S m ~ ~ ~ oe, ~ -=> s~ ..& S c
em n co ~ ...-.. n o em s;!1 ..
9 ..&
s &1 s .r fi ~ .,e."' ~ :: s
~c,., ~,
m ~fi & ~,., ~"~ :. ~~Me"~~'
. .3o
c .. 1 ru n ~ I I
"~~ ~
ee ..Bo~~ c,., 6 semco6 ~ ~
--se
3, .-;--~....,.,~
. . . . ..& f)
fB, ~ . ~ J c ru -1J !l" _.., -<> ...-..
..8 . ijc8 ~ tJ sM~ ~
j "~ ~S~,., 6"1 ~ e 6C1 ~CCl ~
8o Q)' ru, ~ s, C') fB,., ...(; ..........
...... Ci)) .... (.0') <.)'> -2 ~ ~ co ~, ij - ~ ~ ~og, 8 JJ'
0 n 8o C fB,.,"~ ~ co~ ,., S, oao
~
..
M ..S ()") .,2. co ......., .. s,ij-c>ru ~ ij
g, ~ ~ 3
oQ>>~Ci))C
m o2, c .. g
....M 6
.... 6"1 c f) [B., ~... ~ ru ~ ~ ~s S,Mii n
0"1 ~0 M ~ C CCl 6"1 Q
.:ao S,m l .. 6-iB .
n~
s,~ 3 I s, ~
..........
f) fB") em o...
e eoCSJ e c ClCI .B.
..
~"...C ~em~
3 coC!J Me ..
3Qo I ..2o .. ...,
<.)
......... ~~ <.nOM - "m eocfu~~
~ C L..
"I
...__,
..S M" j:B, ~c=:> 8...
So .. .s s .. ~ CC)I ~ 8&l~"~MS,.,
cnQ>..&~ OQ)
~ ..& 1 ~~ ij~ruo n,., M
~ S e t5 o...: ij 1
.. ~ '1 fl'')g~
~:C"~~cS, S, 0
-:!>o
.. ..80 .. S:, cn .. ~ .,
6o... 8~r~ ~
c .. s, j ... ~
~ ..e-o c, L.. ~ ~ ~ a... e
..8 ~~
..s ~~ m co~
...g n ..8 ::!l<> n ~ c.., "'S I -;8"'1 C'l 8 ....M ~ ~ s") ~ f.&rt
lv1 n ~~ oQ> cQl ~
M~ n ..S ~ n ~ g> 6 i1
m..Bo~ j ~ ~ , ij 0"1 (')'~
= n ~..&ci ..
C!J, ..2 8"1 ~ ~ CCl s, ...., c,.,
C"' n ~ o"~em n e ij
~ ij~ e ~ ~ c.., o... 8 ~ on 0')
ijCSJ~
~ ~ ~1:) .,&...2o (')f) ~ ..
ru
e 3~ o2 3,~ruc 0"1~
.. O"'
n ..8o .. , ~

~ c .-..o Jo em cfu ~ ~ s 8 I g ~ .., 3 .& J


.... cg1 " em P." S &r E~ (i ~ ~ ...c e
(.)") oQ) (.Jf) C')
"*'cr
O'l I!1.., I n") -t."~ ~ :l a"' ..,., s0"1 M
fB"' I

~ ~ ~
~
s
&
In c;;> ,
0 0 0 g..,
~~.
~~ 2 01
.z (')
e,., ~ .... .
f)
~
0"1 ~ ..8o e e ~ cal ..... .
S()().4o
~C"'~3 ~"&~ 0"1
e m il ~ 2 ~ a -g" ~, &J .: ~
s,..a ~.: =-j ~ e, :5 m ~ g " ~~ &'l
s o o, n" e ..& oru i! f'l
8
l~ ro~-vo
rue. fB-> ~ 8 ~ [:B, ..!!>
..3o o" ~
ru, m e ~ .- ~ ~ e e eo ..a s 01
Q) cm,sJ~us f) C'l
0"1 P'> ~ C'l u --
: u~ ~1~" ~ ~,~~
u =v 0"1 .-4>o "' ..co w c.> 0 4l " ~CC14 ~~;;i,
m C'l ~ g., -?.o ~, ~ v 8 0"1 0 Or> ..e-o 3" ..co
I'YI ........ ~ (4 ~ 0"1 Or> ...c ~ 0
:::!>0 ..8o C'l u f> 8 f) ~ 80 ~ '"Y.C f) .&
~0 " ()() ..&--g~ il ~ 8 .o,~ t'm 8 r,~ ee S ..!!>
s ~ ~"'..8 ~ ~ (')")~ ....")I)~ ...8
~ ~ , a:..S ....,
(._.
~~ a,~
- rue ru ..2o --es" - 0"1o ~
.. tl
0"1 8 ~ 8 cCi C"~ C"' ('?:""!
~, ..4) f) .... ct) .)
~0') ~..X, if)
I l"v" c n 3" ~ 0 .. (i')- ..!!>
..... ..ao
J..,
f)
p, ~ ,~:&
0'> > ~ 3cgJ 0'> 1 _JL C'l k ~ .0"1 0 fB OQ)
~ ~~ ~"1~1 ~
I) o., ~. ~: u(J~Jl ~C:'> t> ~ 0"1 B~ e o(")')_.,
v &o..c
_., (a,)") ., A>'>
~
........, Sw" sru L J g., B ~ ~o c:Cl ,F. a: ~ ~ f)
0"1..8 ..
~ ,/') '(') ~ __!) 0"1 0 .. ~ c c 0"1 ., CAD
(")'> 0"1
~~
..ij . I 0'>~
~
tm..-o
(")') 0"1_1) f)
~ cmrf 8~~
C"' r' f>v u 0"1
..,.,
.. ~ '!' H oe, ;.c
(")') ;:s,., tl (.)")
..1
6'l
ij m ~ ~m c-8" e ... ..g~ ~ w IJO ,.s. :t, e .. .
f) C IJO .-QO
an
0"1 0
~ e, c
rn, ~ ;:s, f)
(:B., 8 Or> ~ ..c
f.>')
S e ~'
., Ill
~ ,.c;, c 0'> (J .
(._.
e lOr
;:s,., 3,., 1 as OSmre,8
uo u I) ~--c~ ~~oe~~ ..., 1
J..
v ~ ~ f) e
a, c., f) ~ 0"1 e f"B->&J~" : ~ Q"t -],.,~ ~
f.B, ~ .. ~ f) ,, f'l OQ) ..!!> s
IiJi
8 Or> R Q; ~
.. 0"1 .... .,. I;) ~ 0"1 ~ ~ a., ~ ;:s
e 0"1
s 0 ..3o B oQ> ..
C'l'l 0"1 0"> ij
~~~~ ~c~ij~~
..a.
en~ ~ ~
J,. ~CSJP." S~
~ ()O o+o~ q; ~0 i.., 1:
n" ~ (112) ..co &1 ..!!>8_ ..B s., m ,.8.
m e CS C'l r 0'>..., 0"1..00 ~,..s!.... ~ c .. ~~lYl
__!)
&'10 ~v
::r ij v ~ f> _o cm
Or> M
~u1 n> ee ~ e ., 2 o
..... (')-'") cS ...,.,
2::? v c \V'l
4> .. ru \:S 0"1
I fB, -o
~~~t:B,~ ('Y) ,., 01") ,, I) f <.J ~ .. 0

u u u
(.!) (,) (.!) g
-.rJ (.!) -.r>
::> (,) 0
t
~

~
.~
,>

Q1

a as.., a
~ (C) .-4)o (J ....
~ }
ij s.., ij s.., a..,
l8 ~cuijS..,
~i' (J 10(1
OO>ru
..e. ~ .o.., c
)1 ()
~ij
()
~..,oS me,.; i' ij B ru
(C) '* s.., ~ fB, CCl () 0 ...c CCl
lc
B
()
~i _n__.,..,c ~~ -;41'.., (J')
fB, ~ ~ ~g'"" 8 .. ..3o rn.., B
tl ~
80') (C) &
..ij ~ M.~
...c ...., ...., ij 8o ::a CC1 ::..,~ "S..,
<.)") ......... ~ ~ c:
i ()
J....
o()')

..e
() u ~
.:' 9..,
~eo
~ c3Jf')t~ ..s-e
....,-.....;
l
..e
eel ~
' .., em~
COl .....,
~ -().., s
..
5 ~
.. )
rB..,grtcm~ fB, i' ij 'i'EB
~
Bo
() '--" '- ~(:B..,~g'l~ M~
.1 . -..,
~ .. () "'i' ) 0')
0 ij 5 CCJ- ..... @~ 0
ij ~
.o.., ..seCSJ.:..,::::: (C) ~ s,
~ ~
.....
.o.., )
.....
.o.., l m
t
..e 8 e.., ....
M ~
(C) ~ ....
cfug,4)og, ~~ ...., ..8 8
()') 8')
6') (C) ~()
..3o [B, ij X,~ I i '--" g,::S
liD $t, 8.., ..~~ ij e
Jo
0') ~ ~
0') 0 ~ ..00
fB, ru on.nS.., ..g eo
c ..e 8 6 ...000 0')
t () ~ ij ru
:..,...., o..,Ci)) ~
s ..e B ...., t~
-o o ' c
8
t~ ~
() ...c Cii)
~ IJ')
em
!Y'
...., .l CQD
....~~ ')t
!Y' "5
..
~
f)
() <.)")
g I ()")
..
5 M
...000 '- 0 I
0')
a~c:
~~V"> g.., .. '0' '*:..2o
ah ...--.. = ij CC1
0 u ~..a a..__. C.., 6')
t' (J
>< ';l!)o .. oS ..,
8.., 8 I ..So M
'--" 8
'"..'5 ........., ~.., ..9..,
~ ..
u u ()
-.o (;) () ~ -.o &
0 >(') G) ~ ~
~ N G) s,n
~ Co-'
......
v :-:
c iv
~.+:<ijoS ' v.>~oSt'J
. ~~:mGY.>: ~nSeoc:3)15~,~ :::~:::~ ::T.j"l il@~co8w:!'ISt: c:~:ooS:
mGY.>:~ ::QoSeoG3<?5"' G ol @~0t:~o5'ir:d? ~C"l11~ ~o5.y.>
G;;(Y.)8goS'lt o? ~:~o? y5~:~ ? ~')O?'f>:~~:~~;;oT ~~=Cijt~
oc .
l:l<ij~Cit

O . C' C' c~
<(rojt: sc~;;~nca:
(' ('

a1ct:~ro
_o (' o (' (' <' ....:C\. o ~ e .....~ _c _(' .c
w-t=~~: <P~y<PWOO'l.~et 'YC1Y.>O ror "'(.~<J?OO oryoo~u;
Q'l~'l" o1ro8 oi~=~cooT. ~8~83?~ ~~ - o?voS~.o;t:'
::g~2 <:>~<# ~=(X)?=~~ ~oS::go; Q'lo.tlff-l=t? ~oso
co::oo . ;n~:ro~:~:o? ~U'Y.)(0~3t . o1ro8~~ ~~ol~ (o1)
o?voS~8tQ'Pli~: ::gco;;9 ~"?18" c?~>'1~~<.:1? ~:oS: '
@t'8 ~t~tu :.

.... . :

o1o3t O~OCY,? ~o52u!03 - oeG<; ?tSr ::garO~~=~: ~co~-'1~8? . ..


2oco3<l5~ oo ::g'l 5t@Sootw:~'lt@8:- o1o3to-~ooi? ~oS
2oco3:J<I'l 3:>ar8~~=3:>UjiQ!O~~~v ~=~~~oS~.~ ~~-t.
~f:8:~ ~W::oo::g~ - ~ars~~~<>l?~~~~
~ (' (' .....'\. '~ (' (' . g c: ~ ,(' . _ ('r;::('
~:eoo~m~~ t)...,(~C\?o~~:coO??~O?~ ~=1311'~meQ)

~~ o1o3to~oo.?~ <t~:2oco33:>~5 J? (J) ~'1 voSOI?'lBS:-


- ~:eoS~rfJd?oo't':~:~:ro otco'roS8oS<.toS f:v BoSoS
CXY.>:t:ll

ot0(,'13oS0?'~:8co'l: 2oco3<r>5~ ~ (J) ~'l' @S5t ootw:~'ltt:.


@S3cvSu
e eo ~ (')
~ <
~ ~
e II: CC1 e ...0 2 e~ 6) oe/ 0 c II: 0
8 QJ oe ::!>0 .-oo
;;;o CC1 ..Bo 3.., ~0 cS ru..,
~~ ~0 (:B., ~ ~ kl ;:s n..,::o~~: ~ ~ ~.s ~
O'l .-e \S
wM ..Bo ~ .sru..,e ea.,
~ fB..,
01!) eo
~ .. e a: em . 8o ~ CJ 1 I 3..,~0C!> ..Be 6iiD ~0

~0 ...Bo fB.., a., cm [1c3 11:.., ::!>0 O'l OJ 8 oe a O..,
O'l !! (:B,
o.., e .o..,.
e
{) ~ {) 8.., 2 8.; ~
'Q) 'l 'l
m c81 :.: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ij ' a ~w
~;,o
ij _g., C'l .. ..n m ~ ~ o2
'if'~..,
~ {)
6)., ~., ~
...e- {) ~.., O'l t~ 3 ~~~g,g .. ~j{'
O'l ..8.~ ~ g..,ro., ., ~ ...ac,.-3o
C'l ~..8 ,.B. ~ ~ II:
110 t ..&l ~ 6') 9.., >. ~ .
CC1 ijm So O'l
Jas Pi)
lVcf c6) ~.., II: tJ
m .o.., s,., ~ ~ ') .. tJ 6'lee
m a., ~ g"' a ~ s.., s
fB.., QJ \S 8 ~ ~ I lt'l Q(!) C ..C :&~X.,
g.., (C) , (])) (')I') ""(/ (JI'l 6'> ,.o.o ru
::oil:,..--.. ~~..,0 ~ 2 . "" o O'l~ ~
<-
QJ ~<') a...!:> Pii O'l ~ CCI
~ ~ ~ II: .. c9o ~ ,.vo .. 6'1 8e O'l ,~...., ~
~ 2 8.., s~.., i:S CJ, O'l LJ~~~
O'l .ee., .__... .. a., a..,..., G) .. ..So 1 ~o
~ ~:t,< O'l O'l ~
...e ~em ~ro :t,0 ~ ~f>o1;"~"u roo
m O'l O'l := ~.., t;;'l a., 0 ~ (.)1
a~ I
sSo
~..,
.. O'l ~~(C)~ II:~
.., = "o 8 ti1 ~
()o u (:B., ....!> ~ Q)I~ O'l lt'l ~ {) n"
s ..2 ~
_.e,, ee !!I a.., QJ CC1
a_,ro{)C CQ>),...!).. ~
~0 ..co .-e {) ~ ,.,., "" .. <J O'l ~'l cc;) O'l . ~ I
O'l ~ ~ >;!) 6'1
0"1 3 ~., .. oe'
tJ
O'l ~
0 fP'...e- II: 8-,~ 1
.. cs8.., /S.., c%> ~ ~:
..Bo
O'l 0'1 6) .-u n.., a l..,~ cfucfu ..QO~ Q(!)
0 - ..,
2 ~ 011: ., ~~ o()'l
~.., a, s ~ 8 8 oe~oa
~ ...-.. e em 6) ~
c1 OC!)
~ ~ ltj
s..,~~ro'lo8 a., .-(.)
..,~..8 ..s
~..,
O'l
.. 6)
~
..8 ~ 88f) , ~.., ~ ..So fB, a, {) ..Go a, .:So' ~e.$
= ..8 ..&,
..C ,...!) ~
.., ::: CJ .-c/0 ..c ~ ru, O'l '-
s ~. {) e ...e- ~
e ki a8 ~.. ~~ ..vo
~ OJ ~ tJ'l
rcos 0
.,8 C'l II:
So A:
~o-v a..,smg,S..,s,n ~
~ Q) ~ o8 cmg..,se'l u~o g v ~:)em~
~ S&J O'l ,. <- ~ ~ (CO ..Qo
~.., ~.., ~ O'l <- 6'1 ;_;. 3 ~'l ~ 0 6'1 ~.., .O'l C)")
n,.,
()
'\) ()
.'\.) '\) u ~
() (;)
~ ....J
0 ~ () ,..:)

~
.:'1
v

7'
c vii
~':<ijoS ~~oS'"
::uc&.o.,~2()(03y5~ :>nt p-<O:l.)cnt;:G>~<ijcq~ ccn~~ ~::u
~0~~0~ - l;~<ijoSo?~. G>2:4Y.>:'lt:u

::uoS~;::u~2u~;3~5~ jG - ~37lij00(?~ ~~G>~ cnO~~ :l7'f'~cne:


roo-a <;~~o~~~= - ~::ud.nG>~~oS~~ ~i~:-tS
~~;u:it11

::uoS~;::u~ :;.loS2u<;3 ~5~ Ge - ~~,~ "v ogoS~-xl~,:<OG>'l.t


cn'P:~t : - ~<O'Pt:CY.><u_O <Olij?oS~:~:t: - ::uoSc;~~
:;.loS2u<03)>5~ G~ - toS:>.:>oS<O::ucnE@~t~~ ~8: - yro~:g
m.t.oaoSt: ~~8: - 37~~~:~ ooo~c;rg.,~'l' 3';)~~~<0')!
~ ~~~~

::uoS~;o.:>~:;.lo52UfD3~5~
8J - ~1{'4>0(\>0ct:o? <tJoSo3~:@: CY.>'\8:~8: .
~;u:'lt cn'P:8~Y - 3';)G('fD~i~ uoS::uoS::u~ c;~@<ijoSI(-l
~:H.'?oSwy,~8: @t~t'l.t cnS@S: ::u<O::>'n<>'(<ijO~cxn:
;>.)~ CY.><ij[OCY.>cn~:~~t: -::uoSc;::u~~oS2u~;3 8J ,~
~rr.a:ot ~ot - ~G['G>OCY.>cnoul ~G('9it~ uoS::uoS~~
~~~.,.$. r.:.. (" ("~ ~'-C.<" .....(\. (' (" ("
O?~"'~'l tl~~13=Y 3Xr.>~G>~~"'? G>~:m~:<ijm
~~: ::uoS~;::u~~oSeuCD3~5~ eJ3JE:<ijoS ~ m ::uoS<O::u~9
@tcxn: wcxn: - ~f4lO"?oJ?E8: 3<loS2u<03y5w :>:> ~4('~~
a?.~~ :;.l~S"?8c,:OJ8 37ij~:;.l<O'l:'~ ono'~:o? 37~'wc:s:
@~.oSc:[c.nE:ro;tS: - 2u"3 m :;.l~~ro: s9@tcxn:::u~ .
B ~~cn')Oo? ::uoS<Oo.:>~~o)2UI;3 y5w eJ m 8oSut<n:>:~cxn:

'.
c viii
~+~~oS
~cxn: - O?'P:>~~u

~~=or~sx?oSor.J @:o'"'l: (o.n~) ~o5 2 o~;.3~5G ~ (=>) ~'l~


~@Sco~w=~'l~~: @~3crSu
,-
~ ~ ~
6'l ~0 .-e
c8 ,..; 8,
s~..
[8) e ~ ~ e~ .~ ~ ~0 ~ ~ t ~ f) ~ ..2 ..So~ ~
m L3J [B., i., ~ c: L8J oS o ~ CC1 a" 0
., ~..,..
::> {) O'l 6'l (;r' O'l
()')
. _.2. f!
_:!l ~ ~'l ::> ~
~..s ..VO=> o:: "Q'l~ ~ ~ :'l -.1.
~ 2 ~ ~~ ~ f) CC1 ~ : ..
" . ..so
0 C'U<>OII) II
s" ., .,~..!> ~~ 8')
u:1 ~ O'l 0 ~_..., On O'l
1 s -st!lY> e ()') ~ s8
r~t~!.
m ~ S ~f ~
G 1,m- 1
l
fB
~T~
~ ~., ~
~
~
m1~t~~~
o.,
g.,~ r.') ~~ ~., ;:_
e-,~''{8011> S ..!>' .,., .. '"t') u .. ~ e..v ~ (,) ~,.,.....
1 (C) 'l O.' l _.& e : CX'l v Ci:) ::_, C'l o ~ 8 W '-~
-- ~ O'l tAn ~ ..... ~ ..so f.B., -e<'l ,e co ...c , ~ ec, v .
f) 8J ~ . I .0 . ., n') ~ 0') n., ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ . en 0 ~ g., .ru
c.g1 .~.- 1~ <- I rn ~ I ..&~~o n., ~ &,~~ -1;'1
ij ., 1 .. ::> 1 :l (,) :l ru o (,)
~~
~ I:S~ ~
.. R .. ~ ~
.. v ..,.. ~u ~ ~J _ 0
co:CC)\:S -
011) j1 O'l O'l e O'l 2 tal;.& ru~ 9., ::> ..S f"1J dtJ I . (,) ~
~
()') (8) e~ , ()')
" .....cn ~~ ...8 6'l f! (,) ()') ,. n v'l l V> O'l ,... ou
~ ()') I " CC1 .. QJ ~ (,) " 3J ~o S n S., ~ " 1J ::>
n~ .. ~ fl ~ ~ " -.1 s &, ., e~ I cfuV'l
~ ~ ~ ..B ~ n ~ ~ ~ .. ~ O'l g.,. ..$a ,.2. ee ~ rg

a.,j ~ ~')cox 0 ~ s a(;,. s 2-. ~C81cfu~eS ~ .~


~ ~ ~J ..So O'l t!! ~ ~ ,.&~ ,. ;,; ~'lfB.,..Bo i) H 0
\5 ., f) ~ ~ ~ 061 II ..& O'l e ij -7! ~ CO)
1 + j H :* I l ..8o ~ ;=~ ~ - ~., S ~
X.,..B u e I:S o
rt ..3o ...2:i ~e 8 c2 ...., ~ "' ~o ~ .. . 8
..e>o 6'l 'l
; ~ ij ij .: e ~ .1)
~., 0 ..3o ..e>o r8-, P. ::
..vo 0') f) 011) O'l \)') ()') 6'l
8-, ~ ~ X, ~o J, 0 O'l ~ ~ fl 8o CQi) c:5
fl ij O'l C'l O'l......,
o " "-:So~
~" s., ~.H, -<:.._,
~oov ~ ~ o ~ o n .. 0 ~ .. (,)')
() O'l 8 \:S 8 ..V O'l v ..!> (Ci ......, ::>
::> C: ::>
, C,., = t> O')~f \)f""\J\C:

0 ~ CO)
~
-g 'D
l~()
~ x'
ex
ffi+:~oS C!Y)I:ijcht?
c8~oS,~;?::l{:n::U~:~:"'P: .1\ ~~=' ::x)~~Oj?~ O?f~~=
~ ~~c-h~i ~@in

~~aac;aa "aoS@~:~&:::u?s ~at. - 'P@::uoS@:ct5~ 7e :n'l'


~CY.ij=gxnoSe<J?St~ ~~~~o~~ oo'P:8~8:n

:n~coaT v.>~.,cooo? - @L@~t'P<f?:6l&:a @:Sco'l:~oSeoco3<(~~


R (j) - 9":6l&:a 3:Sco'l:o.tro ~&' :v uuS~:co~=6lt
~a.,.<iJVoS t: - 'irorooo~:ro oo'P:ot .~cS9"=~0(oSt:
c;~cy.tco'l::n~:61 m otoS@.,CXY.>:~::u? ~.t:>:~oS;~
;o,_Oijtt: ~ ~~n ~a,.o? 9"='1~:& 3:8co'1:o.tro. ~voSt8
~Cij'fd)~8u
ij
f)
ij ij
<: ~ ~
8o ..e i
s~
Q)
ijijijea1 a~_;.&
~0 0~ a,., . a,., Q)
em...,., ...,,., ,.,., ~ f)
Cii) 1 " O'l f'B,., ~
~ I
~s f) f)
, fi
~~l
~o 1 ~ e ~ n~
rf) 1...8
s ~ ...s s ij Q)o t ~0 !t~
~g 8os,., s~
OI'J
s~ a .
i-t~J. So ~~I
OI'J
,.-.. em ij
eo
.........
8So 8
s,., ~ ~ a t ~ f) CC1,.e
a~ ,S,.,
e~ .... t, f) -=4::
oOI'J ..s a., a., rg .=, e o3 So
~f) f)o.t f) .:SO
S,.,~~ S,., ~w f) a., ;1~
~ S::l~ (")t') --c :i.,~$~
eo OI'J
~i ~
Co
ij." tBOI'J ~ 1,., I ~ ..,.,eo~ ~ ~:88'
..
:i,.,
~ .~t~
t

oOI'J
.. ~ s ~;~2
s S;
~ij a,., CC1 t~ -o OI'J ..,.,
..a 1S J ru~ c:!la.,
OI'J
..Bo an g., . em
OI'J
;go..& .
OI'J ,..!)
0 ; f!" (Ci ~ I l..,~
=m..
0
s ::an e.., ~:'
I <-
~
OI'J f) O'l~s
as ~ e .,.8 ij B
g~~ ij a,.,
f) <: 8 ,~
<: oO'l
eo
..,.,
~
t . "1
Q) ~
.. J' ~ a,.,~ ..
..
ru.
~.i~
..,., [B,., oe,
em .. ..&
ij
(C)
ij
~~~I~~ g !r'ml
" ~ ..
ij ~,..!)
-4:o9 ..,., f) I.,., l~!
o2
Q)o co s,., ~ O'l ..
ij l...., tg'l~
m
e'l
~ J 11 e ..~ c
OI'J ~,8. j
f)
eO'l .. e e t;a,., s
~.. f.B,., ~ .ru,., ~
i Q) G)
t~i ..,an
Q)
e'l rnJ
.. ::i-r
-o u
-.o ~
-.o u ~ et2. ~8-,n
--s><
....
~c;;'l:@:IO::l.Y.l O?i~~~='tf?= IOOO?t~oS~~e"r eoc;;::l<(:}~ f) (=>)3#~
~~coew=~qt@e: - (g~3~u

~ C' ---.".. (" . c- _<;" OC' _(" C'


~~;;'l~~:c;;::l.Y.l O(<fOie::='lfJ=;c; co;;:oocsm~~:~c-r ~meoco3<(3~

o (=>) ~=soS@3:9r:::8~~ 10~~t:- 3d~/toom65 ~84Y.l:


CO::l.Y.l 8::l.Y.l:~'tP:~ ().Y;)rrogoSc;;::l.Y.) o~~:'lr:@S@t: - @dill
~;;';>d) ~~;;':>d>n
CXlll
a3':CijoS ~oSt'J .
:n~b:A>~:~co: :noS20(;3 - :l:>~CioS'f 'fcf,~cnt~ ouS~oS
t: - ?t:;o'P:D';:~ ~~:>.>~? ouS~oSt: - ::g<'{'bm.~:'tr:
~(JuS'lt.J? :n~::grot : O'Y.>:~an::l)~~(;:l.Y.>::g<ijo$ ~(;oT .
(;oloSS:- :PC'f&~.t:noat::D~Oo~"P:(;~soS"e ~ioS
3C..S"P'l:l)~U? O(;o ::>.)~~::>.)~ - :x?:~:~ "P~Eti= ~~~~
:A>~t.J? 2o(;30? ~~:nro8: @""':cxn::l:l~~oat ;o'?'iGI'I~
CI~(;;Q!<ijCJS~ '1~'1, ~~II

~<'{'&:A>~:(;~: :DoS2o103y5~ c; {::>) co:TJ{:>):TJ'l c;;~:


l;o:~'li :D~t.vci,cxn:t:- 3'J~cnyGI'I~ ~'lE<iJoS:l:>~
:J;~~:~~cnroat :n~l~&o.%: :D:>.?:~t ~;t- 3'Jot&cn"P:
.<: (' -"- C:<' ... ('
<'0{'<O::ln<;C!I
C' ('
:DO(~O')"P:~c;;::lnc;c: :DV:l)c:3'JeCI ~01 OC!;::ln

"P@ooS~ ~'l'iloS - ~ocf,~~'lt~oSaat l;<i)an:co::l.n

. .
cxiv
-~,:<tlo-5
:nc;~:S:~::n~oT~-oo~@ ;x?:@o5~=@t~E ~@L~E -
~ on2GoT<j ~moS~_;o8:94J,oi8 <;t::>.:>~ :n~S
O'Y.>o'oo~:c;~t: ~~tJ?ocHt ~~~fn .

:r.~C)>O:l:>~: ~+l::r.~oS 2 o~3y5~ J~ - 1s(JoSGm 3.JoSc:::1:>~:o?


o?oSo?cS4>~c:oo:~: ~li - :n'l~ ~<l.4>2<jo-SooS:~;rq C:'}:
vd;E:- :>.:>rbc:::1:>~:~ ~:~8: - eoc:3o1~~:<ijd;<">11
:.-
1r>o?oS-t0~S: ~~~4>rm~ O?'f>:~oo'lo? 'l~c:~C:: ~ ~~
- ~cJ;'r @:ll>f':l:>~ ~~:8:'P?~ od):l:>~:l:>r_ ;x?:d;
<ijoS ~~~u

G:rh~~~ ~<ijtO~:o? :r.~G&@ O?'f>:~ox?~f: - ooo~@ md5~


<ijtO 4>Q<m00?'}0<ijLS~@S: - c;,')ft)~<ijlO~: G'}:cx?:cS:
c:eP9 ~~~,~~s~:~oS@oS~: ~~: - O?'f>:ot~
~~ - wro :r.~w~:o? G:rh~~-t ~<ij[0~:34GoT~ 34c:&
8::>.:>~ oo'riocS ~otu

2:G~~t ~1 J ,~ G~IGOJI ::idt(~) fGro~(~~T)


2:~Gl}(<;t:~ cf?oS~:otoS v~oS<Jrb<JoS (c:~T)
G~t~[!G~t) :>O~~r
cxv
~~=<ij~ ?"tJoS,,
(" (" ~ (' c-r:::c- (" (I (' .
:JtOCij_O~'tf'=ts: :qo~oec:e>'l~'tP=~meoG3 - :T.l8_u:>l:IG't'mG:x>:
(' ("~ <: (" ~ (" ('~(" ('
G::>.:Y.>O?GN!'tf'!'}S: c;c:v(.~ll O~~!'tf'!"( 3f0~[0~~~'\t
(' r;::c- (' ~c- -~. - ~ (' ('
c;C$'mCXY.>:ec: - G~CXY.>:~l:lun:<:n ~l:l:~ooqmG>m~

'oG>rht-:>OiJEGQ)E: - mGro:'tf':o?ro~: ~~SQ@tf'X'? <>t(:>n


"t~~t - m10ro:'tr:~ :qo~oc8-t:::>3&:~~'l' :u~c;O'>S
_ (' (" (' (' (' (' (' (' .
G'$'mooo~orcn ~oroo-:;nmrom:qo~oCXY.>:y:x>':> m10ro:
o
0?.<811
~: c-
~l:l::l.Y.>
c- cc-r:::c-
G<Y.Y.>c:'t'GOY.>c_:rr.~n:~G>ec:u
c- o

(' 0 Q O(C') C' (' C' 0


~~Q) 0\JO?~n?. ~ .,~:T.laoo~G"(XY'IO:=~ mGro:'tf':m~ \>oe

('. 0 (' (' (' () (' (' ' (" 0 ('


3fOCOt!~'}~ :Jf0CO't!&'\~'tr!:T.l('l)201;3<(3~ $1 - 3fOCO<t!&"[~3n!
(' (' (' (' 0 (' (' 1::::: ~(' ('
C\)C'Y)IO't'C'Y):T.lOGO!"[t C'Y)i~ ~Q)~:~:,-:>ec: -. 0?'t'!l:I"1J~<X?:
C' C' OOC' OOC' (' _Q
:T.l"[ ntJ~O?!"[~~O(OX(~C ~OX(tC- 0?6p!l:lo;?JS:0?!:T.l"[ OO<'Y1J~
c- c-~c- o cc- c- c- c- _c-r,: c- ~'
GCU0CflC'Y)eC!l:l~:~<;: G:>o':>Cf}(Y)~m'JI':> C\{!0 ~meoo:u~

U(OX(1C
OOC" OOC'
l:IOX(tC - 006p!~O')~C'Y)C!';J:Ur:t:T.l~1. ~4>:U~U(
C' ' ~f\. OC' cc- C'

OOC' ...J!OC'
OX(tC l:l"'t'tC II

103T&t:t: ol ~ ;~ 103T~:::>3,: ?J'l

(' 0(' (' (' QC' ~(' ('.


3fOco1=~r.tr=t<: :qow1:13c: &"[~'U'=. :T.lm2o103 - \l:m mGro:'tf':
!\ 0 _ ('
<81, ~O'ti!:T.lO(?m :T.)QC'Y)OO?!~ G>r;Q)'):q;~G:':> ~~cYl -
0 t.
.... s: (" 0 (" 0 ('
G>O')<{j~!
('

:':>
....t.
~
c- o .~:
c;c:oc.C8ll
o 9 oc-~c-
:T.l"1J[:G>:<p:~G>~'l':-tcec:n
cc- r

. 2:~1( ,~ G3TJ?t:O?t yl J =>j']O

c- c- c-
20Q)')Ij '}CCX(O?Go:q; oo'r:~OX(~
' 0
-
r;::;: CJ< c- c-
~l~tm:mG:'tf':
( Ch
ance
. ) (' (' ,J! 0 (' C' ~('
w1tness ~m<tJm'tP:"( :ucnt<;: rom&qec:n

Q (' ,C" Q Q

e="?~t= 19" e:co =>~ee

'.
u:~~)'blJsoe.c
!Cee
~:4>/,"~e-
S" .) .) ..l.IO~eewfe.)
wlbcce~l!llfll
.) .) ~ ~
1\8)&; W!:>~Ce a:!cc
0 .)~0 .)

~0 <>a:!~
.)
ec~A
0 ':J~
c.AWlee
:::::J 1:2c.ooo
:> 0 - ==>~~~
.)OO
:>~~lo~cc
.)00 .)

g~lJ ~~eec,cc~~c.~A:~A 1bee 6f A~(, :~:soccvc.b -


.:::>$lo&>l0l
.):::1.)
:)~@ee ~b:i$:ee:c.bc.oA
~ .) :t::j .)
- :::>~4>&:111W
.)~.) 0),~w~wC(>~
.) .)
:b~4>oe.c~Wleo
.) ~ ~ J"- ;:;~cc::>wA
.) c.oovch
. .) - :::>~lO'
.)~~
:CG:tt&e.c
'
~cc.c~cc ca:~~yA:~~:c.ec:~~o - ::?!gee~~ $fec.o
~c.o:$2~o :ce.c:~~c.o& - :g;5b~:ill~oo~~ 1bee c A~Oc~o2
:b~soill~~CG~)Ofucw:~~o c,cc~~~SJJCC ~~;c.fi,a; ~~~e cave

vcrc :>H<b:2
.)0.)0 0
::,~ (:e.c~::>~~::>e
.) .) .)
: 0c lk6ec
0

:b~:ce~<b<b
:J
c~o2 :c.Accob:>ec)
.;)
:>:::>
.)0
~GA~~c1:x.co~~8
.)~ .) ..> :.:1

u~AA
..)
4>11
..)
c.A::>~:c.cooc.owfea
"~ .) 3~ ....

becc~o2pec wo~o~ff>LO - : ~G(\)f c~o2:$24> ~~


c~n2<s>ec &~o~~Lo bee rc AOC~o2 ~cc:!c.S :da~OW.)
g~~~g~b~~ec ~:c.fi,:~ccg~ee&~~h"e !>~vc - :~
sb~:illJoo~Jl!l bee (G) l., A~oc~o2 pee &o~ni~Lo ~~~-9(:vc

vGGc oo:2
0 0
o4> :>c.o<b:2
.) j 0

n::?~ CCC~Ab:o~:~ec :ve.cS:>:c.bc.o


~c.w<el~A : 3 3c.ow:c-6~~ ?sosotere~ooc,cc~~ 3 g - :3 ~
4>oc.c.o
.) A.l .. &,cc~wcc
.3- ~
w~:c.bc.o
0
~:d.boo
.) ;)
::xflilo.<b~:c.6Aec
.)-~""' .)~ .)Q

-:3~:3 =3c.FsolnA:c.b~~ - ~~~:c.bc.o tb=~sobo:?+ bo2

lAX~
~~GG ~ (~t:>ol') 'fS G<.9G<.9To19)
'CRIMJNAL APPEAL

Btfure U Thtt Pe, J. tC.C.


1<)66
AH TOO (APPELLANT) Fb9
v.
THE UNION OF BURMA (RESPONDENT).

Penal Cork. s. 376-ient~d to undergo 4 years' rigorous imprison-nt and to


suffer zo lashes of whipping-whether appeall~s to the Cour.t of Session or to
the Chief Court.
Held : The words "sentence of imprisonment for a term exceeding four
yean" clearly connote that an appeal lies to this Court only when the sub-
:ttantive sentence of im'prisonment is m~re than 4 years. The section wiU haw
no application to a sentence of not more than 4 years' imprisonment although
Such a sentence is passed in COnjunction With SOme Other form Of punishment
like whipping or fine for the simple reason that w}ripping or fine ia not a eentence
of imprisonment.
Maung Tun Tha v. The State. I.L.B.R. (1<)0002), p. 57 ;
Khuda Bakhsh v. The Stau. A.l.R. (t9t8) La h., p. 384 ;
Kaijan v. The Stott, A.I.R. (1934) Oudh, p. 433 (z), referted to.

None for the appellant.


None for the respondent.

U THET PE, J.-The appellant Ah Too was convicted.


~nder seCtion 376 of the Penal Code and sentenced to
undergo 4 years' rigorous imprisonment and also to suffer
20 lashes under section 4 (a) of the Whipping Act by the
First Additional Special Power Magistrate, Kawkareik.
Criminal Appeal No. 179 of 1965.
t Appeal from the or~er of the JSt Additional Special Power Masisuate of
Kawkareik, dated the t3tb day of May 1965, passed in his C.R. Reg. Trial
No. roof C):6s.
J
c.c. On appeal to the Court of Session, Moulmein, the learned
16
Sessions judge took the view that the appeal lay to this
AH Too
v. Court, and not to the Court of Sessions. under proviso (b)
TM
UNION oF
to section 408 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and
BURMA. accordingly submitted the memorandum of appeal to this
Court.
Now, proviso (b) to section 4o8 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure reads:--
.. (b) when in any case ~n Assistant Sessions judge or a
Magistrate specially empowered under section 30 passes any
sentence of imprisonment for a term exceeding four years,
or any sentence of transportation. the appeal of all or any
of the accused convicted at such trial shall lie to the High
Court; ..

The words "sentence of imprisonment for a term exceed-


ing four years " clearly connote that an appeal lies to this
Court only when the substantive sentence of imprisonment
is more than 4 years. The section will have no applica-
tion to a sentence of not more than 4 years' imprisonment
although such a sentence is passed in conjunction with
some other form of punishment like whipping or fine for
the simple reason that whipping or fine is not a sentence
of imprisonme~t. The same view has been adopted in
Mg Tun Tha v. The State (1). Khuda Bakhsh v. The State (2)
and Kajjan v. The Stale (3). I therefore hold that the
present appeal will lie to the Court of Session, not to
this Court.
In the result. the appeal is transferred to the Court of
Session, Moulmein, for disposal and the Session judge is
directed to accept the appeal as having been instituted in
his Court on the date o~ which the memorandum of
appeal was presented in this Court.

(r) I.L.B.R. {1900-o~)'. p. 57 (:z) A.I.R. {r918) Lah p. 384


GT A.J.R. (19J4) Oudh., p. 4JJ (:z).
CIVIL REGULAR c.c.
~
Before U Kyaw Zan U, j. Ja,., .a8.
BABU BHAGWAND AS (PLAINTIFF)
v.
MESSRS. A. ABOO BACKER AND Co. (DEFENDANTS).*

Civil Procedure Code---<Jpplication to set aside an ex. parte decree in a summary


suit under 0. 37 of tlu C.P.C.-'-decree against a duld p"son-110thit~~:
to s(t aside.
Held : A decree against a firm in the name of the finn must be deem~
to be a decree agamst all the pytn~rs.. But the decree which had been passed
after the d~ath of both the p~s:tners of the defendant firm without bringing their
legal representatives on tJ:le ;record. must be regarded as a nullity and has no
e~:istence in law. When a decree is in fact no decree at all there is nothing to
be set aside and the present appli~tio~ to s~l aside will not ther~forelie.
Kesho Prasad Si,gh v. Shamnandan Rai, A.I:R. (1926) Pat. 504;
Ma Min Thin v. Maa"g Po Win.,-A.I.R. (1917) Lower Bunna ~~ ;
. Jadu Nandan Ram v. P.arsown Gi,ni"C Co. Ltd., A.I.R. (1930) All 636;
Lachihmon Singh v. Mt: Chatter Kaur, A.I.R. b927) Lah. 66j ;
S.A. Nathan v. S.R ..Samson, 9 Ran. 480 at 491 (F.B.), referred to.

!yfr. Rishi Ram for the plaintiff.


U Hla Pe (2) for the d~f~ndants...

U KYAW ZAN U. J.~is order relates to the applica-


tion of one M. I. Abdul Hamid dated the 4th December
I 964 which arose und~t the following circumstances : -
On I 3th October 1964 the plaintiff Babu Bhagwandas
sued the defendant Messr~. A. Aboo Backer: and Company
under the summary procedure provided by Order XXXVII
of the Code of Civil .frocedu~:e for recovery of K 54.800
due on a promissol)1 npte. On 19th October 1964 sum-
mons in the prescri~e&!orm was duly served on ~he. de-
fendant firm. Then' on 29th October I964 A. Mohamed
Ebrahim, a partner of the defendant firm, appeared and
filed an application for time to engage a laWy-er to defend
the suit. Time was gran~ed till 5th November I 964 but
no one appeared for the d~fendant firm on that date. The
Civii Regular No. so of 1964.

'. '.
c.c. proceedings were thereupon placed before the Court for
1966
orders and my predecessor passed a decree as prayed for
BHA~~As by the plaintiff with costs on uncontested scale on 9th
. M..;Rs. A. November 1964. Then on 4th December 1964 the present
AJJoo BAClCER applicant describing himself as the legal representative
ANo Co. of the partners of the defendant firm instituted the instant
application to set aside the ex parte decree passed against
the defendant firm and to grant him leave to defend the
suit. Various objections were raised by the plaintiff
against the application with the r~sult that the Court '
ordered an enquiry, in the course of-which it was brought
out that the defendant firm was originally constituted by
two p-artners, namely. A. Mohamed Ebrahim and
M. I. Omar by a registered deed of partnership dated the
7th Juy 1950 and that M. I. Omar died on 17th November
1962 and A. Mohamed Ebrahim expired on tth Novem-
ber I9~4
The only serious argument which has been submitted
on behalf of the plaintiff against the app1ication is that .
a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil
Proceaure, where a defendant can only appear and contest
the claim with the permission of the Court, is unlike a
suit of ordinary nature and that a decree passed thereon
cannot be set aside by reason of the absence of the defend-
ant. In a summary suit. m~re absence of the defendant
who has been duly served with summons in the prcscrihrd
form is of course no ground for setting aside a decr<'e. 1\ut
it cannot be disputed th.u the Court has the discrf.Jion t ~1
set aside su~h. a dCLTl't utHI~jl{ulc 4. ~rder X~XVI 1_ of tilt'
Code of Clv~:l Procedure 1f there exist special nrcums-
tances. However, before any .action under Rule 4. Order
XXXVII is contemplated it must in the first instance be
considered whether the present application to set aside
the decree will lie in the circumstances of the ~ase.
A firm unlike a corporation is not a legal entity and
has no existence in Jaw apart from its partners. It is noth-
ing but a name for the partners of which it consists c.c.
When a suit is brought against a firm the suit must be ~
regarded as having sued an the partners. It follows there- BHA~~AS
from that a decree against a firm in the name of the firm M -v.
ESSRS . A.
must be deemed to be a decree against all the partners A!looBA<:XER
In the present case, the result of the enquiry shows that AND Co.
at the time of the insti~ution of the suit one of the partners,
namely, M. I. Omar was already dead. But the plaintiff's
suit was not invalid In
view of the provisions of Rule 4,
Order XXX of the Code of Civil Procedure as the other
partner A. Mohamed Ebrahim was then still alive. How-
ever, when the Court passed the decree against the defend-
ant firm on 9th November 1964 none of the partners were
alive, the other partner, namely, A. Mohamed Ebrahim
having died on 4th November .1964. The decree which
had been passed in the present case after .t he death of both
the partners of the defendant firm without bringing their
legal representatives on the record must be regarded as
a nullity. The diary entry dated 6th November 1964
show that the Court was informed of the death of
A. Mohamed Ebrahim on 4th November 1964 and the
plaintiff must therefore be fully aware of his death before
the decree was recorded. It is settled law that a decree
passed against a dead person is null and void. Kesho
Prasad Singli v. Shamnandan Rai (1), Ma Min Thin v.
Maung Po Win (2). ]adu Nandan Ram v. Parsota11 Ginning
Co. Ltd. (3). La'hihman Singh v. Mt. Chattar Kaur (4).
In S. A. Nathan v. S. R. Samson (5) Page. C.J. has this to
say in connection with the decree against a dead person :-
"the executing Court can only execute a decree', and
if what purportS to be a decree has been passed by a Court
not duly constituted in accordance with Jaw such an adjudica-
tion is not a decree at all in the eye of the Jaw. Such a

(t) A.l.R. (19z6) Pat S04 (3) A.I.R. (1930) All 636.
(z) A.I.R. (1917) L 8 IJZ (4) A.I.R. (1927) Lah 663.
(S) 9 Ran 48o at :l91 (F.B.).
c.c. decree' in the strict sense of the term is a nullity, a mere .
16 nothing,' that need not be set aside and ,may be disregarded
BA.BU by any Court to which it is presented. So also is a decree
.BHACWANDAS
v. that has been passed against a dead person."
~.A.
~B~ At page 505 of the same report Carr, J. had also made
the following observation-
"Where a decree has been passed against a person after
hi.s death we might safely say that it is a nullity, but I
should myself prefer to avoid the use of the dangerous word
nullity, and to say simply that the decree is inexecutable
because it has been passed against nobody. and is therefore,
executable against nobody. If it is sought to execute . the
decree against the estate of the deceased person in the hands
of his legal-representatives it is open to those . representativ.es
to contest execution on the ground that they are strangers
to the suit, ?nd are, therefore. not bound by the decree; and
they can riglltly d;tiin\ . that the estate passed to them
at t.he moment of the deceased's death before the decree was
passed. and that, therefore, there is no. estate liable 10 be
seized in execution."

I am in respectful 3greement with their remarks and


hold that since the decree passed in the presellt case being
one against dead persons is a nullity and has no existence
in law. When a decree is in fact no decree at aJI there
is nothing to be set aside and the present applicatioo to
set aside will not therefore lie.
ln the result the application of M. I. Abdul HamiC.:
dated the 4th December 1964 is dismissed. In the cir-
cumstances ( f the case there will be no order as to costs.
CIVIL REGULAR

Befort U Tlut P~. J.

DAW MYAT MAY AND Co. (PLAINTIFFS) c.c.


t966
Y.
, 7~

SEIN TUN AND PE THAN Co. AND TWO O"J:"HERS


(DEfENDANTS).

CiiJil ProcttJure Code. 0. 38. R. s and 6-telt for furnishing ucurity or in default
attachment lkfore judgement ;, a promissory note suit.
1
Held: .The jurisdiction of the Coun to attach the defendanu' property
before the rights of the panies are finally adjudicated upon is extrlordinary
and urgent in nature. One useful test to ju~tify for adoption of such a courae
is whether the plaintiffs would suffer an irreparable injury unless the order
asked for is granted and tht the mischief or inconvenience which is likely to
arise in consequence of withholding the relief will be greater than that from
rrant~g it. .
The mere apprehension of the plaintiffs that their dues might remain unpaid
without any concrete evidence is not a ground for calling upon the defenoants
to furnish security much less to order the attachment before judgment.
Heldfurtlli!r : The words used in ~ule s, Order 38 of the Civil Procedu:e
Code' indicate that it applies to cases where the defendants a~e about to dispose
of their propenies not in cases of completed transctions.
Hari BakJuh v. Babula/ and anotlli!r, A.I.R. (1928) Lah., p. 7?%.
Betumarul Rai and othtrl v. Nabokutnar Singh a~rd other~, A.I.R. (1938)
Pat p. t6t. referred to.

U Ba Shun for the plaintiffs.

Mr. V. San C. Po for the defendants.

U THET PE, J.-


This is an application under Order 38.
rules 5 and 6 of the Civil Procedure Code to direct the
defendants to furnish security and in default to attach
before judgment three pieces of land with three modern ..
cottages and one three-storeyed pucca building standing
thereon valued at K 3.oo,ooo belonging to the defendants.
II Civil Regular Suit No. # of 1963.
0

c.c. The plaintiffs, who had sued the defendants for re-
1966
DAW MYI\1" covery of K 69.500 said to be due on a promissory note
MAy AND alleged that the defendants are not possessed of any pro-
Co.
v. perty other than those mentioned above which they had
SEIN TuN
AND given in mortgage to the State Commercial Bank and that
.P 'I'HAN Co. they had sold two acres out of eight acres from one item of
AND TWO
OTHERS. mortgaged lands which would go to show that they are
bent on disposing the properties with the permission of
the mortgagees and utilizing the proceeds for their own
benefit thereby would deprive the plaintiffs of the fruit
of the decree which they might eventually obtain in the
present suit.
.Jt is true that the defendants had mortgaged their pro-
perties with the State Commercial B~nk which had filed
a suit against them for recovery of K 1.42,036/67 in Civil
~egular Suit No. 24 of 1964 of this Court. The properties
are ad,-nittedly. on the own show~ng of the plaintiffs.
worth not less thaJJ K 3.oo.ooo which even after deducting
1
the mortgaged debt due to the State Commercial Bank is
more than sufficient to cover ~he claim of the plaintiffs.
The sale of two acres out of eight acres from one piece
of land by the defendants would not reduce the total value
of the properties to such an extent as to prejudice the
plaintiffs' claim.
The jurisdiction of the Court to attach the defendants'
property before the rights of the parties are finally adjudiT
cafed upon is extraordinary and urgent in nature. One
useful test to justify for adoption of such a course is
whether the pl:lintiffs would suffer an irreparab~ injury
unless the orde; asked for is granted and that the missl:lief
or inconvenience which is likely to arise in consequence
of withholding the relief will be greater than that from
granting it. The present application was made as early
as 30th October I 964 and it cannot~ at the time of hearing.
which took place on the 3rd January 1966, be serjously
contended by the plaintiffs that the defendants are in that c.c.
1966
period of more than one year contemplating to dispose
, ' .t he d'tsposa } o f t he1r
o f or negouatmg . properties
. ' and t hat DAW M.YAT
MAY ANo
there exists the real fear of a grave danger that the defend- c:..
ants are dishonesdy trying to cheat the probable fruits SEI~N;;uN
of the judgment. They could only stress about the sale Pe '1'ttAN Co.
by the defendants of tWo acres out of eight acres in one ~~~~~~
piece of la~d. which as pointed above is not likely to effect
the claim of the plaintiffs. The mere apprehension of the
plaintiffs that their dues might remain unpaid without
any concrete evidence is not a grotino for calling upon
the defendants to furnish security much less to order the
attachment before judgment.
Besities the words used in rule 5. Order 38 of the Civil
Procedure Code indicate that it applies to cases - where
the defendants are about to dispose of their properties
not in cases of completed transactions. It appears from
the reply of the State Commercial Bank in Civil Regular
No. 21 of 1964 of this Court that the defendants had paid
the sale proceeds of two acres of land amounting to
K ts.ooo on the 29th of january 1964 which was much
earlier than the date of this application namely. 30th
October 1964.
Thus it has been ruled in Hari Bakhsh v. Babu La/ and
another (1) that,
"Rute 5 contemplates attachment of property which the
defendant is about to dispose of or remove fro,m the juris.
diction of the Court and not of the property alre11dy disposed
of.''
In Bedanand Rai and others v. Nabokumar Singh,
Plaintiff and others (2) it was observed that,
" Before the provisions of R. 5 of 0. 38 could come into
play, the Court has to be satisfied that transfers were going
to be made by the defendant after the suit had been filed and
that such transfers were with the obj~t of obslructing the

(I) A.r.it. (&9s8) Lah., p . nz. (2) A.l.R. (1938) Pat, p. 161.

'.
00

c.c.
1966
plaintiff if he won the suit in executing the
decr,ee ; and
mere allegation~ to this effect are of no avail but the facts
DAW MYAT must be positively proved by satisfactory evidence."
MAY AND
Co.
" Even assuming that the defendants had sold two acres
~
SIDN out of eight acres in one piece of land after the institu.tion
PEA'!n~~o. of the suit it was done in. order to pay up part of the
oTHERS. mortgaged debt due to the St~te Commercial Bank. There
is nothing to suggest that the disposal w;:ts made with
intent to o1>struct or delay .the execution of any decree
that may be passed in favour of the plaintiffs. In 'this
connection it will be relevant to refer to the decision in
Nowroji Pudumjee Sirador v. The Deccan Bank Ltd. (3)
where it was held that,
" Merely because the defendant attempts to sell some of
his immoveable property, while proceedings against him are
pending, it does not follow that he is disposing of the pro-
p~rty with intent to obstruct ,or delay the execution of any
. decree that may be passed in the suit."

Lastly I would respectfully adopt, the observatiqn of


Lord Williams, J., in Dutga Das Das v. Nolin Chandra
Nandan and others (4) which reads,
"Finally neither injunction nor attachment ought to be
lightly granted. It would be a serious thing if persons In
possession were restrained from making use of the property
merely because a suit had been instituted about it. It is
only where i't is essential that property should be kept in its
existing condition pending suit, that the Court should
interfere."

In the result the application of the plaintiffs under


Order 38, rules 5 and 6 of the C~vil Procedure Code fails
and is dismissed. In the circumstances of the case there
wfli be ~o order as to costs.

(J)A.I.R. (1921) Born., p. 69. (4) A.I.R. (1934) Cal., p. 694 at 698.
CRIMINAL APPEAL

Before U Thet Pe, J.


tC.C.
LET HPWA (APPELLANT) 1966

v. Yan. 31

THE UNION OF BURMA (RESPONDENT).*

.Appeal against an order of detention i~ the Borstal School--whether the appeal


lies to the Court of Sessions. .
Held : The appeal against an order of detention in the Borstal School
by a District Magistrate lies to the Court of Scssi~ns, not to the Chief Court.
Marmg Tha E and another v. The State, 14 Ran . p. 143 referred to and
followed.

- for the appellant.

U Net (Government Advocate) for the respondent.

U THET PE, ].-This is an appeal by <?ne Let Hpwa,


who has been ordered to be detained in the Borstal School
for a period of five years by the District Magistrate, Pa-an.
The appeal against an order of detention in the Borstal
School by a District Magistrate lies to the Court of Ses-
sions, and not to this Court. In Maung Tha E and another '
v. The State (1), it has been held that:
"It is provided by s. 13 of the Prevention of Crime (Young
Offenders) Act that in respect of any order passed by a magis-
.tr'ate under Part II of the Act (which includes an order for
detention in a Borstal Scheol) an appeal shall lie to the Court
of Session ~ An order of detention in a Borstal School is not
a sentence of imprisonment, and against such an order for
any period passed by a magistrate there is a right of appeal

Criminal Appeal No. 206 of 1965.


t Appeal from the order of the District Magistrate of Pa-an, dated the 30th
day of April 1965, passed in Criminal Regular Trial No. 12 of 1965.
(1) 1 Ran., P L-+3
OJ
c.c. to the local Co~,trt d. Selsion. The only circumstance 111
1966 which the appeal against such an order will lie to the Hi&b
Lft HPWA Court is under proviso (b) to s. 4o8 of the Criminal Procedure
tl. Code when a co-accused, ~ho has been tried together with
Ttm UNJON the juvenile affected by the o-rder, has been sentenced to
OfBUaMA.
imprisonment for a term exceeding four years."

This appeal will therefore be transferred to the Court


of Sessions, Moulmein for disposal and the Sessions judge
i.s directed to accept the appeal as having been instituted
in his Court on the date on which the Memorandum of
Appeal was presertted in this Court. A copy of this order
will be sent to. the appellant for information.
CIVIL REVISION
Ik/DTt U Thet Pe, J.
MA DOROTHY (APPLICANT)
/ c.c.
v. Jg66

u HAN ,(.I~.ESPONDENT) . Ftb. 25

City Civil Court Act, s. zs-ammdment of written statmtent.


Held; The petitioner has by the. proposed amended written statement
Taised two additional p leas namely: (a) that the document filed as promissory-
note is in.fact a bond and (b) that the mortgage being a simple mortgage ia
'i nvalid for want of a registered deed. The construction of a docwnent whether
itis a promissory-note or a bond is a matter of law which can be raised at any
stage o~ the proceedings. It will not mvolve the reopening of the entice~
The tvo additional pleas put up by the petitioner can be decided on arguments
alone without adducing any further evidence.
The tower Court is di rected that the proposed amended written statement
of the petitioner be admitted.
Ma .Than Yin v. Tan Keat Khang (a) Tan Keit &in, (1951) B.L.R.,p. r6r
(H.C.);
Ma Thein Yin v. U Nyu11 and four others, (1953) B.L.R., p. 26o (H.C.),
distinguished.
Daw SmtJ '' Ramafi(Jthan Chettyar, (1955) n.L.R., p . 49 (H.C.);
K. La.:o:man Rao v. Bha'CJani Singh and anothn-, A.I.R. (1950) Hyder;~bad,
p . 43:
Allhil Rmrjan Das Gupia v. B .N. Biswas, A.I.R. (1950) Cal.,p. 472';
N~isingh Prasad Paul v. Steel Products Ltd., A.I.R. (1953) Cal., p. rs;
Secretary of State for ~ndia v. /. M. Loll, ( 1945) F. C.R. , p. 103;
Gujadhar Mahton v. Ambiha Prasad Te?:uari and others, A. I.R. (1925) (P.C.),
p. 169 at x?o, referred to.

U Ko Ko for the applicant.


U Ba Than (1) for the respondent.

U THET PE, J.-In Civil Regular Trial No.. 25 of 1964


.Gf.the City Civil Court, Rangoon, the respondent-pl~intiff
sued t he petitioner-defendant and three others for recovery
of K 29,900 said to be due on an equitable m ortgage. On
completion of necessary pleadings by the parties the suit
Civi I Revision No. 2-1 of 1965 against the order of the Chief Judge of tho
City Civil Cour:t of ltingoon in Civil Regular Trial No. 25 oJ 1964 dated the
A . 28th June 1<)65.

'. '. '.


c.c. went- to trial. After the respondent-plaintiff had closed
1966
his case the petitioner and her co-defendants proceeded
THY to examine their witnesses. Then the Court granted an
v. adjournment to examine one of the petitioner's vvitnesses
UHAN.
who was absent on the date fixed for hearing. At this
stage the petitioner applied for the amendment of her
wrinen statement which was however rejected by the
learned Chief Judge on the ground that it was belated and
that the proposed amendment, if allowed. would involve
the reopening of the entire case. The learned Judge
further remarked that the proposed amended written state-
ment had . not been filed with the application for amend-
ment. This last remark of the learned Judge appears to be
incorrect as the proposed amended written statement is
found on page 48of the trial proceedings.
It has been argued at the outset by the learned
Advocate for the respondent that this revision does not
Ji~ on the authority of Ma Than Yin v. Tan Keat Khang (a)
Tan Keit Sein .(I). It must however be at once pointed out
that this application is one under Section 25 of the City
Cfvil Court Ad and not under Section liS of the Code
of Civil Procedure. The powers of this Court under Sec-
tion 25 of the City Civil Court Act are much wider than
those exercisable under Section I I 5 of the Code of Civil
Procedure and the propriety or otherwise of an order
passed by the City Civil Court can be called into
question by this Court. Vide Daw Saw v. Ramanathan
Chettiai (2).
The sheet anchor of the respondent's argument against
the application is the decision in Ma Thein Tin v! U Nyan
and four others (3) where it was held that.
"leav~ to amend pleadings is a matter in the discretion
of the Court and the Court would ordinarily be justified .in
refusing to allow amendment to raise new issues especially

(1) (1951) B.L.R. p. 161 (H.C.). (2) (1955) B.L.R. p. 49, (H- C.).
(3) (1953) B.L.R. p . 26o, (H- C.).
when the parties .have closed their respective .cases. and .only .
arguments remain to be heard. The applicant c~nnot .be
..;9f6.
permitted to convert the original defence jnto. another of a MA Doao-
fundamentally different and inconsistent c})ara<:ter-.~ :. THY
v:
UHAN.
The facts occurring therein can easily be. distinguished
from those obtaining in the case under review. hi that
ciecision the proposed amended written state ":len~ . was re-
jectGP on the ground that it would bring about a 'com,plete
change of front in the defence. In the inst<:t~t case ':'Vhat
the petitioner proposes to do is to add furthergrounds of
defence over and above the defence set up .. i~. the original
written statement. The addiqon of new grounds by the
defendant in support of he.r case for rejection of the plain~
tiff's suit cannot be said to alter her case cpmple~ely . .
.. In ~ Laxman Roo v. Bhavani Singh and another (4)
.it has been decided that,
..
. "In a .case where it is not . likely to cause injuslice or
w'here. it docs not take the defendant by surprise and \~here
by the amendment a plaintiff is only allowed to rely upon
a new ground of relief. it would not amoun~ t.o an alteration
of the character of rhe suit or the introduction of a new
. case and therefore amendment of the plaint aan be allowed."

The same view has been expressed in Akhil Ranjan Das


Gupta v. B. N. Biswas (5). These decisions relate to cases
where the plaintiff has sought the amendment hut the
principle of law involved therein wilT apply mutatis
mutan.dis to the defendant asking for amendme~t:.
Then )n Nrisinyh Prasad Paul v. Steel Products itd. (6)
it has been laid down that,
"Amendment of a plaint and amendment . of a .written
st.atement are not necessarily governed by exactly .the same
principles. Some impottant general principles are certainly
common tQ both, such as the applicatio.n for amendment

(.~) A.I.R. (t9SOJ Hyderabad, p. 43 (5) A.l.R. (1950) Ca{. p.4;z.


(6) A.I.R. (1953) Cal., p. 5

'.
oG
whether of a plaint or a written statement must be bona fide

-
MA DORO-
THY
0.
and must also be (or the purpose of determining ' the real
controversy between the parties and where it is just. But
the rule that the plaintiff cannot be allowed to amend his
U HAN. plaint so as to alter materially or substitute his cause of
action or the nature of his claim has necessarily no counter-.
part in the law relating to amendment of t~e defe~ce or.
the written statement. Adding a new ground of defence
or substituting or altering a defence does not raise the same
problem as adding, altering or substituting a new cause of
action. Hence the Courts are inclined to be more liberal
iR allGwing ct.mendmcnt of defence than of plaint and ques-
tions of prejudice are less likely to operate with same. rigo~r
in the former than in the latter case."

The facts of this case however do not require that


should express my opinion as to whether that decision lays
down good law 9r not. It is however a clear instance
where courts are inclined to take a rather lenient view
of the applic~tion of amendment h.v a defendant.
Another objection to the propo~ed -amendment is that
it is rather belated and that it would involve reopening
of the whole case. It must however be borne in mind
that the words" any stage of the proceedings" in Rule 17.
Order 6 of the Civil Procedure Code clearly connote that
"the amendment can be m.ade at any stage of the proceed-
ings. Thus it has been s.aid in Secretary of State for Jndta
v. 1. M. Lall (7) and Gujadhar Mahton v. Ambika Prasad
Tewari and others (8) that an amendment"can be consider~
ed even in appeals before the Federal Court or the Privy
Council.
The petitioner has by the proposed amended written.
staternenf raised two ad9itional pleas namely (a) that the
document filed as. promissory-note is in fact a bond and
(b) that the .mortgage being a simple mortgage is invalid
for want of a registered deed. Now, the construction of
a document whether it is a promissory-note or a bond is a
(7) (1945) F<C.R. p. 103. (8) A.I.R. (19as) (p.c.,) p. r69 at 170.
I

matter of law which can be raised a~ any stage of the c.c.


l6
proceedings. It will not involve the reopening of the
entire case. The two additional pleas put up by the peti- MA 'l'HY
DoRo-

tioner can be deeded on arguments alone without adduc- UHAN. .,.


ing any further evidence.
For the .aforesaid reasons the order of the lower C9un
is hereby set aside and I direct that the proposed amend-
-ed written statement of the petitioner be adJ,llitted and
that the suit shall proceed according to law. The peti-
tioner-defendant shall however pay .K 51 as costs to the
respondent-plaintiff.

'.
00

CRIMINAL APPEAL
Before U Kyaw Zan U, J,
-;~ .
tC.C.
1966 M_AUNG. TflEE .MYAING (a) LON YUN (a) KAUNG THA
Feb. j. . ... (APPELLANT)
.::
v.
. .
THE ..VNION. OF BU~MA {RESPONDENT).
. . . . .. .
Petiai Code-]ram!'rigof charge under s: 450-additional.ha7ge und" r. :1~6 Possible.
Held ; The appellant was charged only under s. 450 of the Penal Code,
anq the leamcd.Gover':lment Advocate submitted tha~ he should have also.. been
charged 'Under s. 326 of the Pc~al Code for causing grie,ous hurt. It is not
unde(stood why he was. not cha rged under s. 453 and s. 326 ofthc.Pcnal Codt"s
for committing lurking house-trespass and for causing grievcus. hurt. There is
evidence to show thar he came up the house coveripg with a longyi to con~eal
.himself. In ord(lr tQ ~c.onstitute lurking hcu~e-trespass as defined ins. 443 of
t.he Pe.n al Cod~, the offender must take scme active means to conceal'
his presence. .
Sital v. T{le State; I.L.R. (1942) 17 Lucknow 513;
In re Natesa Mu.daliar, I.L.R . (1945).'1\'ladras 896;
Makhru Dr1~adh v.' 7'hr State, l.L.R. s Pat. 464, referred t~.

- for the _appellant.

U Hnit (Government Advocate) for the respondent.


) .
U.KYAW ZAN U,j.-This is an appeal against the con-
viction under section 450 of the Penal Code for committing
house trespass in order to the committing of an offence
punishable with transportation for life and sentence of
.five years' rigorous imprisonment passed hy the 3rd Addi-
tional Magistrate (Special Power) of T:woy in his Criminal
Regular ~rial No. 4 of 1965.

Criminal Appcnl No. 175 of 1965 .


t Appcnl from the orut' r of the 3rd Addl. (Speci;d Power) Magistrate o f
Tavor, dated the Rth dn y of April 1<)65 , passed in Criminal Regular Trial /';o. l
4 of r965. F-:
I
On the First Information Report lodged by Daw Ma Pu c.c.
Jg66
(PW 1), the appellant was sent up for trial under section
MAtiNG
458 of the Penal Code for committing lurking house-tres- THEE

pass by mg ' h t, havmg


' rna de preparauon
' 10r
& .
causmg h urt. LoNYUN
MYAINC(a)
(a)
Daw Ma Pu deposed the house was well lighted when KAuNc THA
the appeUant came up with a dashe and cut U In Si (P.W 2), THE " UN JON
. oF BuRMA-
her husband aged about 55 years. The ap~llant also cut
her daughter Ma Than Mya (PW 3) on her wrists. Accord- .
ing to U In Si, the appellant is distantly related to him.
His daughter was shampooing him when the occurrence
t~ok place. U ln Si said when he tried to s!latch the
dashe from the appellant he managed to get his exhibit
lonayi as well. There is no reason to disbeUeve t;he
evidence of Daw Ma Pu, U In Si and Ma Than Mya who
corroborated one another. According to the medical
ev1dence, U In Si received one incised wound on head
fracturing the skull, one incised wound on . right hand
cutting the bone and one incised wound on left hand. The
medical officer stated that Ma Than Mya's fingers are per-
manently disabled as the result of the dah cut wound
on her wrists. The injuries on both of them were un-
doubtedly grievous injuries.
The appellant was charged only under section 450 of
the Penal Code, and the learned Government Advocate
submitted that he should have also been charged under
section 3-26 of the Penal Code for causing grievous hurt.
I do not understand why he was not charged under sec-
tion 453 and section 326 of the Penat Code for committing
lurking house-trespass and for causing grievous hurt.
There is evidence to show that he came up the house
covering with a longyi to conceal himself. In order to
constitute lurking house-trespass as defined in section 443
of the PenaJ Code, the offender must take some active
means to conceal his presence. In Sital v. The Sta,te (r)
Where it was contended that t~e .conviction under section
(1) I.L.R. (194:l) 17 Lucknow_.S IJ.
)9 .

457 and also under section 380 of the Penal Code was
illegal it was held-
MAt!NO
THIIE " The offence of lurking house-trespass or house-breaking
MYAING (a)
LoN YVN (a) is committed whether the subsequent offence is committed
KAVN~; THA or not. The section looks merely to the object wi~h which
IJ.
TBEUNlON the house-trespass or house-breaking is committed ; it does
OF BtiRMA. not take into consideration the offence, if any, committed
thereafter. There is no reason( therefore, why Section 457
should be considered ~ bar to a conviction for the offence
committed after the house-tresE__~ or house-breaking."

Bennett, J. referred to section 235 (1), Criminal Procedure


Code, which provides inter alia that if in one series of
acts so connected together as to form the same transaction,
more offences than one are committed by the same person,
he may be charged with, and tried at one trial for, every
such offence and relied upon Illustration (b} to this sub-
section which reads :
"A commits house-breaking by day with intent to commit
adultery, and commits in ~he house so entered adultery with
B's wife. A may be separately charged with, and convicted
of, offences under sections 454 and 497 of the Penal Code."

See also In re Natesa Mudaliar (2). Both these authorities


declined to follow Makhru Dusadh v. The State (3) which
was decided earlier by the Patna High Court. I thought
of remanding the case .for retrial, but in view of the sent-
ence which has partly been undergone and which appears
to be reasonable, I have decided not to do so to avoid
further delay in the disposal of the case. I do not think
the appellant was prejudiced or the trial was not fair. He
was convicted and sentenced on 8th April 1965 .and I do
not propose now to order a retrial. I do not think it will
be quite proper to do so in the circumstances of the case.
According to the appellant there is enmity between
him and the complainant and her members of the family
(2) I.L.R. (1945) Mad 896. (3) I.L.R. s Pat 464.
J:>

as they had once given evidence against him in a criminal c.c.


J6
case in which he was convicted arid sentenced to imprison-
ment, but there is no j.ust cause to disbelieve them. He ~=
did not d:ny t~e long!i to l?e his though he denied the lJ,~AfuC:.<(J>
dashe. H1s solitary w1tn~. for the defence was not help- KAUNc THA
ful at all though he is related tO him. There is practically TH vUNION
no defence. In the circumstances the appeal is dismissed. or BuRMA.

'. '. '.


CRIMINAL APPEAL '
Before U Sein Thiim, :J.

tC.C. MAUNG TIN NYO (APPELLANT)


Jl)66
Feb.u, v.
THE UNION OF BURMA (RESPONDENT).*

Right of private dlfence-"easonable apprehension of grievous hurt being caused-


d~ceased rushing forwards holding a torch.

Held: The point that remains to be considered is whether the appellant


was in such a predicament as to cause reasonable apprehension on his part
that death or grievous hurt wou ld otherwise be the cons<.-quence if he had not
exercised hisrighti n the manner he did. It is clearly in evidence that as soon as
the deceased saw the appellant the former.rushcd forward holding a torch in his
hand. The deceased was in such an agitated frame of rnincl, besides being
inebriated that it coulsi safely be presumed that he didaim a blow atthe appellant
with the torch. As both of them were face to face with each Gther the part
of the body aimed ac by the. deceased could not be other than the front part
of the head of the appellaf!t. It is common knowledge that three-cell battery
flashlight is quite a heavy article about one foot in length and nearly two inches
in diameter with a .reflector made of heavy glass at the top measuring about
six inches in girth. In the circumstances it would be safe to infer that the
appellant reasonably anticipated grievous hurt at the moment when the deceased
trained his torch at him.
The State v. Hla Maung, B.L.R. (1946), p. so;
Maung Kyaw Zan v: The State, 9 L.B.R. 191;
Aung Bwint v. The State, R.L.R. (1947) p. so, referred to.

U Hla Nyun, U Tin Maung for the appellant.

U Ba Pe (Government Advocate) for the respondent.

U SEIN THINN, J.-It appears that on the 3rd Lazan


of Tabotwe, 13.25, B.E. (23-6-63) there was a ceremony
at the house of one Ko Nyan 5ein of Ywasaik village which
Criminal Appeal No. 94 of 1965.
t Appeal against the order of the Special Judge, Sagaing, dated the 1 sth June
1965, pas~ed i n Criminal Regu lar Trial N~. 14 of 1963 . F-91
J?

was attended by the villagers of the neighbouring villages. .c~


1
Among them were the appellant Tin .Nyo, a .resident of --
Pauk Sein village, and the deceased Saw Ngwe who be- MA~;o TIN
longed .t o Gwe-gyi village: At about la~p:l~ghting time THE tJmoN
while Maung Saw Maung (P\Y 1), broth~r of the deceased, oF BuRMA.
was on sentry 'duty at the village gate the deceas.~d went
past _the kin-post accompanied- by .two -poiicemen. The
deceased told Maung Saw M.~ung that, a Gwe-gyi folk held
out a dah at him. Maung Saw Maung. then .followed up
~he .decea~ed to the ~1ouse of Pauk ._ Aye .(PV{ 7) where the
decea_sed looked .for the fellow who threatened him with
a dah. Not finding him there the tWo policemen w~nt
aw~y but 't he deceased continued his se.arch and arrived
at the house of one Ko Htwe .acco.mpanied by Ko San
Maung, Ko Tin Hla (P'vV 2) and .Ko . K~ung Kyi (PW 9).
They found so111e persons on a. cot in .(ront of Ko Htwe's
hou-se. Seeing sorne one sitting on a bench inside the house
the deceased flashed his torth-lignt .towards him and dis-
covered that he was the appellant . Tin Nyo. What
actually took place after that was rather obscure from
the evidence obtaining on the r~~ord of .the trial Court.
But it can safely- be made out that the deceased on finding
the appellant rush~ into the _house and in a " melee "
that followed he sustained a stab wound resulting in hjs
death.

In the )ower Court the appellant set up .a two pronged


defence, one of alibi " and another of ?elf~efence.' The
trial j udge overruled the plea of " alibi ''. Regarding the
plea of self-d~fence the lower Court has nothing to say
except to tonvict the appellant under section 304 of the
Penal Code on the ground that he might have acted on
provocation given by the deceased. In the course of his
argument .before me the l~arned counsel for the appellant
. has aban-doned the plea of " alibi ", but strenuously con-
tB tended that the act of the appcl.l ant fell squarely within
J9

~-~6 the ambit of section 100 of the Penal Code. The follow-
-9- ing grounds were advanced in support of the plea: .
MAUNG TlN -.
NTo . (1) The deceased was a dangerous character with
"
THE UNtoN ~en-year jail term for murder to his credit.
oF BuRMA. (2) The decea~ed was inebriated at. the time of the
incident.
(3) The deceased was desperately jn quest of the
appellant bent on doing .harm.
(4) The d.eceased. when he went up to the appellant
was holding ~ thr.ee-cell battery torch-light which, if used
as a weapon of offence, could cause grievous hurt to the
person att~cked .
'(5) The ~eceased sustained only a single stab-wound
which was the result of a random blow given by the
appellant in his fear .and excitement.
I have no doubt that the facts and circumstances
stated above are not unwarranted by ~he evidence Qbtain-
ing on the record of the trial Court. But while these
facts ' by .themselves may be sufficient to establish right
of private defence it would .be necessary to further con-
sider if they could be said ..to have occasioned such a
reasonable apprehension of either death or grievous hurt
on the p~rt of the appellant as would justify causing death
; to the de~eased. No hard and fast rules could possibly
be fixed regarding the test to be applied in such cases
arid each case must be determined according to its own
merits. But some general principles have been laid down
of which the most famous is that of the eminent jurist
Mayne, quoted with reverent approval 'in The State v.
Hla Maung (1), to the effect. ~hat when the assault has
once assumed a dangerous form every allowance should
be made for one, who, with the i.nstinct of self-preserva-
tion :strong tipon him, pursues his defence a little further
than to a perfectly cool bystander would seem absolutely
(r ) R.L.R. (1946), p . so.
J~

necessary. Also it is a trite saying that when exercising . c.c.


966
. ht o f pnvate
t hc ng . def ence It
. Is
. . d'ffi
1 cuI t to expect t he -'
person to weigh "with golden scales" what maximum MAN~o TIN
amount of force is necessary_to keep within that right. T.H (/UNioN

In the present case the appellant gave only one single oF BURMA.
blow and a random one at that. He did not do anything
further but ran away as soon as he had the chance. No
doubt the blow was with a dagger. But considering the
fact that daggers are commonly used by the village folks
he could not be expected!, in a moment of peril, to refrain
from. employing the use of such a dangerous weapon.
Therefore the only point that remains to be considered
is whether the appellant was in such a predicament as to
cause reasonable apprehension on his part that death or
grievous hurt would otherwise be the consequence if he
had not exercised his right in the manner he di~. It is
clearly .in evidence th~t- as soon as the deceased saw the
appellant the fo;:mer rushed forward holding a torch in
his hand. The deceased was in such an agitated frame
of mind, besides being _inebriated that it could safely be
presumed that 'h e did aim a blow at the appellant with
the torch. As both of them were face to face with each
other the part of _the body aimed at by the deceased could
not ~e other than the front part of the head of the appel-
lant. It is common knowledge that a three-cell battery
flash light is quite t:1 heavy article about one foot in length
and nearly two inches in diameter with a reflectors inade
of heavy glass at the top measuring about six inches in
girth. In ~e circumstances it would he safe to infer that
the appellant reasonably anticipate grievous hurt at the
moment when the deceased trained his torch at him. In
the case of Mauny Kyaw Zan v. The State (2) where the
deceased rushed at the accused, armed with a heavy
weapon and showing every intention to assault the accused
it was held that the accused might reasonably anticipate
(z) 9 L.B..R. 191.
c.c. grievous. hurt if the deceased's blow fell on him and con
1966
sequently h'e had .a right to use his spear to defend himself
MAuN;o TtN against the blow, even. to causing deceased's death, and
TR "uNroN that his act was fully justified under. section 100 of the
oF BURMA. Penal Code. No doubt there is this difference that in the
case cited above the deceased was armed with a heavy
weapon whereas . in the present case before me the
deceased was holding a _threeceil battery torchlight. But
the difference :?eem hardly material in vjew of the fact
that the nature and the size of t:he artide which the
deceased was holding was such that, if 'usCd .as weapon of .
offence, under the circumstanc~s prev.ailing' in this case
it couid surely cause grieyous . hur.t to the .victim.
On .a careful' resume of all the f~cts and circumstances :
obtaining on tl~~-. record 6 f -~he 1~\~;~r. (;ou;~ I find. that at
least it is a matter' for dotibt ir' the ~-ppdtant. had exceeded
the right of private defence: :As-: poiri.te<i put in:. .the off
quoted ruling Aung Bwint.v ., .The-St~te (3) ' the test is not
whether the acc.1,1Sed has pl_"Qyed..beyond r.easonable doubt
that he comes .\vithin a~y ~xc~pti'on to the Penal Code,
but whether in setting l.lP his defence he has established
a reasonable doubt in. the case of the ,prosecu~io~ and has
thereby earned his right of an acquitt::1t. Applying this
principle to the present case J. am of opinion that the
appellant should be given the benefit of doubt. This
appeal is therefore allowed. The findi.ng and or~er passed
by the l<?wer Court will acconfiiigfy' be' set ~aside and the
ap.,pellant will be acqu'itted so far as this c~se is concerned.
Tile case is classified _as mi$taken-..
CIVIL SECOND APPEAL
Before U Sein thimr,J.

MAUNG KHET AND TWO OTHERS (APPELLANTS) tc.c.


J966
v. Feb. 8.
MA YIN (RES~ONDENT)

Succmion-applieati6n by the Jrrand children of the fa the; of adoptee-application


by the j>Ormger sister of the 'adDptt"e-propinquity of the relationship of tl1e
riool apPliWrts to the adoptee. ;
Held : The 11dopt~ left behind a near relative in the person of the
1'ellpon4ent who is no other thin hisown ' natu~l sist~r. The. appellants on
the other hand are the grand children of the deceased Paung Pone arid as such
the deeree of propinquity between them and the d~~d is re.moter than the
;~laii~nsh.ip be~ecn the ~spondent an<iher brother. 'I)lete is also an addi-
tional reason why the respondent ought to succeed.to the estate of her brother.
It appears 'that she had all along been living witli her brother and that she hnd
attended him in his illness. .The last funeral rites of the deceased were al~o
performed by her.
Maung Pan v. !Ja Hnyi, U.B.R., vol.II (189701) p. 104;
Ma Than v. Ma Stin, L.,B.,R., Vol. V (IC;c9-10) p. 89;
Ma San Hla Ma v. Kyaw Tun and two, I Cha~.Tu~'s L.C.,p. 2.79, referred to

U Mya Sein for the the appellants.

- for the respondent.

. U SEIN THINN,. J.-Simple as are the facts out of which


the present appeal arises a law point of considerable
.interest p~esent be(ore me. Tht: applicants are the grand-
children of one Paung Pone who, during his life time, had
~opted Maung Tin; brother of the respondent, as his
Kittima son. After the death of Paung Pone his adopted
-son M~un~ T~n inherited .his estate. Mal:Jng Tin remained
.a bachelor till his death a few years ago. . The question
Civil 2nd Appenl No. 36 of 1962. .
t Against the decree of the District Court of Taunggyi, in Civil Appeal.
No. 3 of 1Q6z, dated the 18th June 1962.

'.
JO
c.c. now arises as to who should succeed to his estate, the
JQ66
contest being l,)etween the _grand-children of the adopting
MAUN{! parent Paung Pone on one .side and the younger sister of
KH!!T AND
Two oTHERs the adoptee Maung Tm
on the other. . . .
MA YIN. One of the principles governing the rules of a~9ption
is clear in that the adopted child drops out of his own
family and loses all right of inheritance therein. In
Maung Pan v. Ma Hnyi (1) it was observed that an adoptee
drops even more completely than a dece<l:sed child out of
the original family, for the deceased may leave children.
a
of. his own who are admitted to certain share, which .
does not seem t~ be the case with the chiidren of the .
adoptee. It was also. held in the case of Ma Than y. .
Ma Sein (2) that" u,nd_e r Burmese Buddhist law the right of .
inheritance of anadopted ctlild are not limited to inher-
itance. from his or her adopted parents but extend to
inheritance from collaterals in the adoptive family. Thus
the law seems quite settled in so far as the right of inher-
itance of the adopted child is concerned. But not so
certain is the law when it comes to thequestion regarding
inheritance to the estate of the adoptee . .
On the basis of the incident of adoption that the
adopted child drops out from the original family more
completely than that of a deceased person it would appear
that on his death. his natural relatives would not be entitled
to any share in his estate on the ground that they have
~ecome, in tpe eye of law, total strangers to the deceased.
But the theory t}:lat .the adopted child completely drops
out of the original fa~ily is apparently founded on the
following considcr<ition which were explained . in Maung.
Pan 's case cited above inth~ following terms:
"The adopted ~hild drops out of his. own family and is
provided for in that <Jdopting him. The expectations and
arrangements of the :members. of the family he has left are
framed accordingly, _and it '_"ould be manifestly inequitable

(1) U. B.R .. Vol. II (1897-01~, p. 104. (z) L.B.R., Vol. V. (1909-Io), p. 89 . . f .'
Je

to let the child adopted into another family come back into c.c.
his own and disappoint the reasonable calculations for the 1966
future which have been made therein. The number of MAuNO
prospective co-parceners in the inheritance of the original !~~7~
family is reduced by adoption, and the adoptee cannot be o.
permitted to come back and, as it were, to be born again." MA YIN.

Thus the legal fiction by which the adopted child


becomes a stranger to his natural relatives is meant only
to safe guard the interest of the remaining members of the
family out of which the adoptee has been dropped and it
should not therefore be extended beyond- what 'Yas
originally intend~d for. In other words the adoptee should
not be .regarded as a stranger to his natural relatives for
the purpose of determining the question as to who should
inherit his estate, although for the reasons stated above he
should justifiably be regarded as a stranger for the purpose
of shutting out all his claims in his original family.
Again, the right of an adoptee to inherit. from the
collaterals in the adopted family is based on the considera-
tion that adoptee loses all rights of inheritance in his
natural family and it seems inequitable that he should
obtain in return only a limited right of inheritance in the
famjly into which he was adopted. It is also recognised
that such right on the part of the adoptee would not cause
hardship to the relatives of the adopting parents since they
are in no respect worse off than if a natural child has been
born. Thus it seems clear to me that neither the theory
that the adoptee drops out completely from the natural
family nor the recognition of his right to inherit from the
collaterals of the adopted family could be taken to mean
that for all purposes the adoptee must be identified with
the interest of the adopted family alone.
There is dearth of direct authority on the question
whether or not the relatives of .the adopting parents would
.OA be entitled to inherit on the death of the adoptee to the
exclusion of his natural relatives. No doubt in Ma San
t>O

<;.c. Hla Ma v. Kyaw Tun and two (3) it was ruled that the
1966
mother of an adopted child succeeds to his property to the
MAuNcNo
K HET A
exclusion
of his brothers or sisters by adoption. But in
Two oTHERS that case it was not contended that the brothers and sisters

MA "vJN. by adoption had no rights of inheritance from their


adopted brother. They were excluded merely because by
Buddhist Law a parent inherit before brothers and sisters.
The only reference. so far as I am aware, to such a question
i~ to be .found in " The Leading Cases of Buddhist Law "
by May Oung where the learned a:uthor after discussing
the right of an adopted child to inherit from his collaterals
in the adopted family has this to say at page 144, " Con-
versely, the relatives of the adopting parents would be
entitled to inherit on the death of the adopted chifd without
nearer heirs" (underline is mi~:te).
;.
The learned counsel for the appellants relying on this
excerpts contends that his clients are entitled to inherit
the estate of the deceased to the exclusion of the respondent
Ma Yin. But eveR applying this principle to the present
case before me I am of opinion that the appellants' case
must fai~. For the .rule cited above only says that relatives
of adopting parents would be entitled to inherit on the
death. of the adopted child provided the adopted child did
not teave behind nearer heirs . l:n the present case before
me, the adoptee left behjnd a near relative in the person
of the respondent Ma Yin who is no other than his own
natural sister. The appellants on the other hand are the
grand children of the deceased Paung Pone and as such
tAe decree of propinquity between them and the deceased
is remoter than the relationship between the respondent
and her brother. As pointed out by the learned Judge of
the lower appellate Court there is also an additional reason
why the respondent Ma Yin ought to succeed to the estate
of her brother. It appears that she had all along been
living. with her brother and that she had attended him in
(3) I Chan .1"un's L.C. p. 279
hi$ illness. The last funeral rites of the deceased were c.c.
1966
also per-formed by her. In the circumstances. I would
hold that the lower appellate Court is justified in holding K~;m!t,
that the respondent Ma Yin is entitled to succeed to the Two oTHas
estate of her brother Maung Tin. In the result this appeal MA "YrJo:.
fails and is hereby dismi~sed with costs. Advocate fee
fixed at one gold mohur.
CIVIL REGULAR SUIT

Before U Thet Pe, J.

c.c. MESSRS. \VILLIAM JACKS AND Co. LTD. (PLAINTIFF)


1966
v.
Jan. 28.
YANGON PALLADIUM AND FIVE OTHERS (DEFENDANTS) .

Civil Procedure Code 0. VI, Rule 17-amendment of plaint under-permission


for-whether permissible.
Held: The plaintiff's suit by its original plaint was one against the Yangon
Palladium firm and its partners, whereas the suit under the proposed amended
plaint would be one against the late Daw MaMa represented by her heirs and
legal rcprcscntatiyes. The original plaint dicl not contain any allegation thnt
t.h cclaim of the plaintiff was due by either Daw Ms Ma o1 he1 e::slatc. More-
over, Daw Ma Ma was never a partner of the Yangon Palladium firm
and therefore she cannot be brought on the record through her heirs and legal
representatives without changing the nature of the suit.
Mukhi Jeramdas Jethanand and others v. Tilmmal i\1ulchand and another,
A.I.R. (1935) S ind 194;
Firm Ahmed Moosa Brothers v. Firm Lillaram Takamdas, A.I.R. (1942)
Sind 93;
Shri Nath Seth v. Nand La/ and others, A.I.R. (19~8) Oudh 44;
K. Venkatasuryanarayana v. Akuthota Ramayya and another, A.I.R. (1921)
Mad. 98, referred to.

Mr. C. A. Soorma for the plaintiff.


U Maung Maung and U Hla Sein for the defendants.

U THET PE, J .-This is -an application for amendment


of plaint under Rule 17, Order VI of the Civil Procedure
Code.
The brief facts which have given rise to the present
application are th~se :-on the 24th of December 1963,
the plaintiffs, Messrs. William Jacks and Company Limited
sued the firm known as Yangon Palladium and 5 of its
f
Civi I Regula!' Suit No. 63 of 1963.
partners, Dew Mya Thein, Daw Nyunt Wai, U Mya Han, c.c.
1966
Daw Than Nu and U San Lwin for recovery of K 63 .575
MISSaS.
72 pyas due for works done in respect of the Palladium \VILLI AM
Cinema. Then on 28th February. 1964. the plaintiffs jACKS AND
C<>., LTO.
obtained leave to bring on the record the name of another o.
YANGON
partner. Daw Ma Ma Gyi. w ho was thought to he' deod P.\LLADIUM
AND PlY.
but was in fact alive, at the time of the institution of the OTHW.
suit, as a party-defendant. The partiesthereafter proceed-
ed with the trial of the suit. during the progress of which
the plaintiffs came to realise that their cla im could only
be recovered from the late Daw Ma Ma, the owner of
the Palladium Cinema, and not from The Yangon
iPalladium firm and its partners. It appeared that the late
ID.aw Ma Ma was survived by 8 children, namely. the 6
qriginal defendants, who were the partners of the Yangon
Palladium firm, and Daw Aye Myint and U Shwe B'aw.
The plaintiffs thereupon sought to amend the cause t itle
of the plaint by striking out the name of the Yangon
Palladium and adding the names of Daw Aye Myint and
U Shwe Baw respectively to and from the array of defend-
ants. The plaintifts further proposed to sue the defend-
ants as heirs and legal representatives of the late Daw
Ma Ma. This move of the plaintiffs was, of course.
stoutly resisted by Daw Aye Myint and U Shwe Baw on
the ground that the amendment would alter the nature
of the suit and that it would take away from them a
legal right which had accrued by lapse of time. The
other defendants, on the other hand, filed a joint petition
agreeing to a decree for K 55.88o being passed against
them as heirs and legal represE'ntatives of the late Daw
MaMa .
Now, it is clear that the . plaintiffs' suit by its original
plaint was one against the.. Yangon Palladium firm and its
partners, whereas the suit under the proposed amended
plaint would be one against the late Daw MaMa represent-
ed by her heirs and legal r.eprcscntatives. There can be no
c.c. room for. doubt that the nature of the suit would be
966 altere~ if the proposed amendment were to .be allowed.
MIISSIIS.
W!LLI.\M
The original plaint did not contain any aHegation that the-
]i\CKS AND claim of the plaintiffs was due by either Daw Ma Ma or
co., LTO.
her ..estare. No doubt 6 of the 8 heirs and legal representa-
"
YANCON tives 0f Daw MaMa are partners ofthe Yangon Palladium
PALLADIUM
AND FlY.! firm bUt that does not enable the plaintiffs to sue their
OTH1111.
mother Oaw Ma Ma who had nothing to do with the
partnership.
1n Mukhi ]eramdas ]ethanand and others v. Tikamaf
Mulchand and another (1) it was held that:-
.. Under Order J, Rule JO a person may be added as a
party to a suit in the following cases:
(1) When he ought to have been joined as plaintiff or
defendant, and not so joined, or (2) when without his
presence, 'lhe question in suit cannot be completely
decided.
Where by allowing a person to be impleaded as a party
th~ ru~tureof the suit win be altered the application should
not be allowed."

In Firm Ahmed Moosa Brothers v. Firm Lilar-am Tikamdos


(2) the amendment to change the suit against the firm to
one against an individual who happened to be a partner
of the firm was reje.cted as it would alter the nature of
the suit. In the .present case, the late Daw Ma Ma was
never a partner of the Yangon Palladium fir-m and I fa if
to see how she can be brought oR the record through her
heirs and legal representathes without changing the nature
of the suit. In Shri Nath Seth v. Nand La/ and others (3)
it has also been held that : -
"A party should not ~e added so as to change the nature
of the suit. But when no new question will be raised by
the addition of a person as a party and on the other hand.

(r) A. l.R. ( 19JS) Sind 194. (~) A. l.R. (1942) Sind 93


(3) A.I.R. (1948) Oudh H F-l
the addition of the person is necessary to avoid a multiplicity c.c.
of proceedings and to protect the rights of the . defendant 966
he should be impleaded. MissAS.
Wri.uAM
JACKS AND
See also K. Venkotosuryunorayona v. Akuthoto Romayya Co., LTo.
and another (4)- YANGON "
ln the result the application for amendment of plaint PALLADIUM
AND FJVE
fails and is dismissed with costs. Advocate's fees K 34 OTHERS

.08 (4) A.Ut. hta1) Mad. ,a.


CIVIL REGULAR
B~fore U Thet Pe, ].

c.c. PEOPLES' BANK No. I I (PLAINTIFF)


IC)66
jan. r.
v.
CHEN SIN SIU A~D TEN OTHERS (DEFENDANTS) .

M9rtgage by Deposit of tit/1'-deeds-snle of one tire mortgaged prop~rties by the


rwenue authoritil'sfor arrl!ars of srzle tax due.
lleld: Under s. 48 of the Land and Revenue Act the auction purchaser at
a revenue sale obtains the auction property free from encumbrances, if the sale
is conducted under s. 46 which relates to a s11le for 2rrears ofland revenue only.
The revenue sale is in respect of arrt'.ars of sales tax due and such sale cannot
therefore attract 'the provisions of section 46 to 48 of the I.and and Revenue Act.
R.M.V.V.Af. Ch~ttyar Firm v. M. Subrllmaniam and anolfzer, I.L.R. V
R~tn. 458, followed.
Abdur Ra11j Chowdry v. N.P.L.S.P. Chettyar Firm, VII Ran. 113;
Maung Mya Din v. K.P.A.P. Ch,tty'!r Firm (1940) R.L.R. 230, referred to.

U Saw Taik Leong for the plaintiff.

U Myint Soe for the defendants No. 7. 8 and 9

U THET PE, J.-This is a suit for recovery of


K 2,04,92626 due on a mortgage by deposit of title-deeds
or jn default for sale of the properties under mortgage by
Peoples' Bank No. I I (formerly the Bank of Communica-
tions) of No.. 666, Merchant Street, Rangoon,
It is the case of the plaintiffs that on the 30th of
August 1946, at Rangoon, Defendant Nos. I to 4, namely,
Chen Sin Siu, Kyon Hock Phan, Chen Choon Yone, Kung
Hsio Tao were given overdraft facilities to the e~tent of
K 30,ooo the defendant No. 5 Chen Lan Sheng to the
extent of K 9,000 on the per~onal guarantee of defendant
No. 6 Kung Tze Fun (a) Kyon Ah Kam ; that on the same
day the defendant Nos. .I to 6 created a mortgage by
Civil Regular Suit No. 81 of 1958.
deposit of title-deeds in respect of 6 items of properties,
namely:, (i) the house and site known as No. 32, Ady Road,
Rangoon ; (11..) t he house and tts
. freehold s1te
. k nown as BANK
PE:OPLES'
No. 11
No. 105. 23rd Street, Rangoon : (iii) the house and its v.
freehold site known as No. 6o8, Dalhousie Street, s,NcsH:' AND
Rangoon; (iv) the house and site at Dalla known as No. 40. TEN oTHERs.
Pyinmagon, Dalla; (v) the house and site at Kanoungto in
Kanoungto South Circle No. 40. Dalla Kwin ; and (vi). the
house and site at Seikkyi Ywa, Rangoon; that on 31st July
I958 the total amount of the principal sum and int~rest
due on the defendant Nos. I to 5 was found to be
K 2,04.92626" pyas, that the mortgaged properties were
sold by the revenue authorities for arrears of sales tax
. due by Foke Kyan Syndicate to which the defendant No. 6
belonged as a part~er, that at ~he auction sale held by the
revenue authorities the defendant No. 7 Miss Milan Lee
purchased item No. (iii} ofthe mot:tgaged properties which
was offered by defenda~t ' No. 8, U Kam1g .Tin and
defendant No.9, Miss Cfl:in Foon Yoon and was accepted
by the defendant No. ro, the State Commercial Bank as a
subsequent mortgage, that the defendant No. I r, Daw Mya
Sein purchased items No. (iv) and (v) and that defendant
No. 12, Ko Thaung Yi bought item No. (vi) of the
mortgC\ged properties with notice of the plaintiff's
mortgage. that the defendants ,Nos. 7, 8, I I and i2 bought
those properties subject. to the plaintiff's mortgage, that
the defendants had not repaid the mortgage loans in spite
of repeated demands and that they were entitled to the
usual mortgage decree -with costs and interests a t the
usual Court rate from the date of the suit until realisation.
It appeared that subseq~ent to the in~titution of the
suit defendants Nos. 8 and 9 paid off their mortgage debt
to defendant No. ro who were, therefore, struck off from
the .proceedings by my predecessor o~ rs~ August, 196r.
Only the defendants Nos. 7, 8 and 9 appeared and contested
the suit. The other defendants failed to put any
c.c. appearance in spite of due _service of summonses and the
' 966 suit against them .accordingly proceeded in their absence.
)?OPUS'
BANK No. , , The defendants Nos. 7. 8 and 9 submitted a joint
C::~ written statement by which they pleaded that item
StN S1U AND No. (iii) of the mortgaged properties was in fact purchased
TEN OTHfJIS .
free. of encumbrances by defendant No. 8 at an auction
sale held by the Collector of Rangoon in his Revenue
Proceedings No. R-E-33F of 1952-53. that the plaintiffs
were estopped from claiming any right to the property,
that the suit was barred by time and not maintainable in
its prese~t form.
On these pleadings my predecessor joined the following
issues:
1. Were mortgages of the properties described in
paragraph 5 of the plaint effected by the
defendants Nos. 1 to s and 6 in favour of the
plaintiff as alleged in the plaint?
2. Did the Collector of Rangoon have the power to
convey title, free from all encumbrances, to
the properties sold by him in the respec~ive
Revenue Recove~ Proceedings?
~ Did the plaintiff substantiate its claim to the
property before the CoJiector of Rangoon at
the time the aforesaid Revenue Proceedings
were held ; if the plaintiff failed to do so, does
this failure estop it from making any further
claim to the property?
4 Is the suit time barred?
5 Is the suit maintainable in law?
6. To what relief, if any. is the plaintiff entitled?

Issue No. 1

In view of the testimony of Mr. Paukeit (PW 1) arid !


!
U Kauk {PW 2) which had not in any way been challenged F-li
j
i
,

by the defendants there can be no room for doubt that c.c.


1966
the defendants Nos. I to 6 had created a mortgage by
PEoPUS'
deposit of title-deeds as alleged by the plaintiffs. In fact, BAKK No. x x
. ~

there was no serious dispute about the existence of the CHEN


SJN Sn1 AND
mortgi:lge at the time of hearing. The answer to this TEN oTHERS.

issue will therefore be in the affirmative.

Issue No.2
The Collector of Rangoon has, in his Revenue Proceed-
ings No. R-E-33/34 of 1952-53 auetioned and sold item
No. (iii) of the mortgaged properties, namely, the house
and its site known as No. 6oS, Dalhousie Street, Rangoon,
to defendant No. 8 for r~covery of arrears of sales tax
due by the defendant No. 6 in respect of sales of' Iiquors
and the question that poses for consideration is whether
the defendant No. 8 as the auction purchaser acquires the
. property free of encumbrances. Under section 48 of the
Land and Revenue Act the auction purchaser at a revenue 1
sale obtains the auction property free of encumbrances,
if the sale is conducted under section 46 which relates to
a sale for .arrears of l~nd revenue only. In the instant
case the arrears of sale tax due by the defendant No. 6
cannot by any stretch of imagination be said to be arrears
of land revenue and the $ale conduct for arrears of such
sales cannot therefore attract the provisions of sections 46
to 48 of the Land and Revenue Act. It has been argued_
by th~ learned Advocate for the defendant Nos. 7 to 9
that since section I I (3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1952, enacts
that the arrears of sales tax shall be recovered as arrears
of land revenue the auction sale made in the present case
should be held to be covered by the provisions of sectiom
46 to 48 of the Land and Revenue Act. The complete
JB answer to this argument is to be found in the decision in
c.c. R.M.V.V.M. : Chettyar Firm v. M. Subramaniam and
1966
another (1) where it was held at:
PEOPLES'
BANK No. n " . . section 194 of the City of Rangoon Municipa..
v. Act empowers the Corporation to recover the arrears of its
CHEN
StN Stu AND taxes and other dues ' as if they were arrears of land revenue,
TEN 0TitRS.
but that does not mean that sections 46 to 48 of the Burma
Land and Revenue Act apply to all Municipal sales, so as to
confer on the auction purchaser in every case a title free
from incumbrances. These sections can only apply where
the dues t~ the Municipality are in the nature of land revenue
or land rate in lieu of Capitation-tax." . . .

s;nce the words, " the arrears shall be recovered as arrears


of land revenue " occur in both section . I94 of the City of
Rangoon Municipal Act and in section I I (3) of the Sales
Tax Act, I952, the pr:inciple enunciated in the decision in
R:.M.V.V.M. Chettyar Firm v. M. Subramaniam and
another (r) will apply with equal force to a recovery
proceeding under the Sales Tax Act. See also. Abdur Raul
Chowdry v. N.P.L.S.P. Chettyar Firm (2) and Maung Mya
Din v. K.P.A.P.' Chettyar Firm (3) where it was ruled that:,
"The provisions of section 46 and the following sections
of the Land and Revenue Act are available only when the
revenue officer is seeking to recover arrears of land revenue
(or analogous tax) accruing in respect of the land against
which he is proceeding under those sections: that is to say,
when he sells land under section 47 he can do so only in the
attempt to recover arrears of land revenue accruing from
that very ~nd."
For. the aforesaid reasons the answer to the issue will be
in the negative.

Issue No. 3
This issue. has not been pressed at the time of hearing
by the defendants. It must be borne in mind that the
(r } i'.L.R. V Ran. 458. (z) VII Ran. I 13.
. (3) (1 940) R.L.R. ZJO.
plaintiffs were not partie.c; to revenue proceedings opened c.c.
1966
hy the Collector of Rangoon and I do not see how they
C3n be estopped f rom rna k .mg any c la1m
. to t h e property PJ!OT'LFS'
HANK No. 11

sold in that revenue proceeding. The answer to the issue c~~


will therefore he that the plaintiffs arc not estopped from StN StuANo
'!'liN OTHiiRS.
making any claim to the property.

Issue No. S

This issue wHl be taken up before Issue No. 4 regard-


ing limitation. It has hcen said on behalf of defendants
Nos. 7 to 9 that the instant suit is not maintainable in the
present form inasmuch as the plaintiffs should. in the
first instance. set aside the revenue sale made by the
Collector. This submission, with due respect, is mis-
concched. The plaintiffs are not interested to avoid the
revenue sale outright. What they have said in the present
suit is that the auction sale made by the Collector was
subject to their mortgage. Their contention is that not-
withstanding the sale their interest in the property is not
in any way affected. No authority has heen cited and
I can find none to show that a suit to avoid the revenue
sale '"ould he necessary before a mortgage could enforce
his mortgage. The ans\ver to the issue will therefore be
in the affirmative.

Issue No.4

Since the suit is not one for setting aside the revenue
sale but one to hold that the interest of the mortgage over
the mortgaged property is not affected by the revenue sale
Article 12 of the Limitation Act will have no application
vide M. Raj v. Nanak and others (4); Fazlar Rahim v.
[(horsed A/am and others (5) and Benarsi Das v .
.OA
(4) A.T.R. (1933) Lah. p. 10. (5) A. T. R. ! 117P ) Cut . 333
c.c . Mt. Bhawoni Kauer (6) The answer to the issue ts m th~
1966 neaative.
PEOPI..S'
BANK No. n In. the result t here Wl11 be the u sua}. preliminary
c.!'iN mortgage decree forK 2,0i.926;26 pyas with costs against
Sm sw .mo the defendants. The plaintiffs wiD be entitled to further
T EN" oTitas. interest at the Court tate from the date of suit to the date

of realization.

(b) A.I.R. ( 1942) Pat. 386.


CRIMINAL APPEAL
Before U KytnD Zon U, J.

P.. YAN 500 (a). MAUNG THAUNG NYUN (APPLICANT) t c.c.


966.
v. Felt. 3
Tt-IE UNION OF BURMA (RESPONDENT).

Evidmce A'f-s. r45 tltld 155 (3)-wimess IIIIIAIOitlly of credit- -falsity of si#U-
"""' ,tnHtl by conlratlidDTY statnnmt-by estnninatirm of lntJmigiMg"
0/ficn 01 IUlmimotr of the fllilniSS statemmt liS n:ftllit.
Heltl : The pro.ecution tried to show that be was JlOt worthy of any credit
as he bad made a contradictory statement to the pollee. hut it did not prov.e his
alleged statement to the police under s. rss (3) read wi1h s. 145 of the Evid~ e
Act. He had denied making such a statement. It was the duty of the ptoo!
secution to prove the falsity of his aUeged statement ifhe was to be contradicted.
It appears that the Trfal Coun did not correctty foflow the procedure laid
down in s. 14S of the Evidence Act.
Neither the police investigating officer was questioned nor any po{ti(ln of the
witness's alleged statement to him was exhibited. The Pubtic Prosecutor
failed to impeach his character under s. ISS (J) read with s. I~S of the E\'idence
Act.
D~ Kha Lay Ma v. The Union of Burma, (1962) B.L.R. 18o (C.C.);

Balak Ram and others v. Sta~. I.L.R. (1953) 2 All. 197;


Tlu State v. Jiwan Das, l.L.R. (1939) 20 Lab. 305, referred to.

Mr. T. P. Wan for the appellant.


U Hnit (Government Advocate) for the respondent,

0 KYAW ZANU. J.-The appe11ant was convicted under


section 302 (2) of the Penal Code for causing the death
of one J(o Hla Myint (a) U Tin, the husband of Ma Ohn
Mya (PW I) with a stick and sentenced to suffer 10 years'
rigorous imprisonment. The evidence for the prosecution
is rather meagre. The occurrence took place at about
Cri minal Appe,al No. 192 o f 1965.
t Against the order of the Add itional Sessions (Special} J udge o f Rangoon,
dated the z91h day of May 1965, passed in his Crim ina l Regular T rial No.4
of t964 .

'. '.
99
c.c. noon~ The appella!lt a~d the deceased were neighbours
1
966 and were in good terms bu.t the trouble. started when their
P.)YMAN Soo two small sons quarrelled. According to Ma Ohn Mya
(a 1 1\UNC
THAUNG (P\V 1) her son aged about 3 years was beaten by the son
NruN
" of the appellant and when her husband, the deceased,_
UN:OS:..oF 2bused and asked the boy why he had beaten his son the
BcRIIu. appellant came out of his house and asked the deceased
why he had abused his child. The deceased did not deny.
The appellant then went into his house and brought the
~xhibit stick. She _ said that while .the deceased was sitting
at .the entranc.e of his house the appellant s truck him with
the stick ~n .the head twice and gave a third blow on the
shoulder. ~er evidence that the appellant struck the
dec:eased three times is without any support. The learned
tri~ll judge made a note that the exhibit stick bore two
marks like dah-cut marks; Ma Ohn Mya, however. denied
that her husband. ~he deceased, was armed at the time .
. I. must ignore the evidence of Daw Khin Sein (PW 2) as
she is not a truthful witness as i.t is shown in her own
evidence. In Daw Kha Lay Ma v. The Union of Burma
(t) I held that "if a witness is proved to have made a
statement to the police, though unsworn, in distinct con-
flict with his evidence on oath, his testimony is negligible.
The principle is that the person who makes inconsistent
statements is unreliable and his evidence should be
ignored." lt was also held in that case .that " when a
person makes a statem~nt to the police and denies same
in the witness-box such statement is inadmissible either
in favour of or against him." The prosecution stands on
the evidence of Ma Ohn Mya, the widow of the deceased.
alone. Hct evidence is bias and very much exaggerated.
According to the medical evidence. the injuries on the
deceased could have been received as the result of one
blow with a stick though they could be received by two
blows also. With the exception of the injury on the
'f.
tr) (1962) B.L.R. rSo (C.C.).
c:c.
head fracturing the skull. the other injuries were mere 1966
abrasions. It is therefore very likely that he was given P. YAN Soo
only one blow on the head with a stick. There is evidence (a) MAUNC
THAUNC
also to show that when he was struck he fell on the NYUN
v.
ground. TH'
UNION Of
The app~llant denied that he struck the deceased with BURMA,
a stick. He deposed that when the deceased went into
the house he feared that he might bring a weapon so he
picked up the exhibit stick and when the deceased came
out with a doh _and cut him he defended himself with the
stick. He said when the deceased cut him twice someone
from behind struck the deceased with a stick. This story
might be true as it is supported by Maung Sein Ngwe
(DW 5) and Maung Win Aung (DW 4). Maung Win Aung
deposed that he saw the deceased cut the appellant with a
doh and the latter defended himself with a stick. The
prosecution tried to show that he was not worthy of any
credit as he had made a contradictory statement to the
police, but it did not prove his alleged statement to the
police under section 155 (3) read with section 145 of tb_e
Evidence Act. He had denied making such a statement.
It was the duty of the prosecution to prove the falsity of
his alleged statement if he was to be contradicted. It
appears that the trial Court did not correctly follow the
procedure laid down in section 145 of the Evidence Act.
ln Balak Ram and others v. State (2) it was pointed out that
the whole of the witness's statement before the police does
not become admissible in evidence, but only that pan of it
to which his attention has been called and that, therefore,
that part alone should be accepted or admitted into
evidence. It will be us~ful to quote the relevant portion
of the judgment for guidance.
" Only those portions of the statement as ha.ve been used
to contradict that witness will form part of the judicial re-
cord. The rest of the statement cannot be relied upon by
(z) I.L.R. (1953) 2 All. 197.
c.c. ,either side in determining the guilt or innocence of the
Jg66
accused and cannot be used by the Judge. Thus if it is desired
P. YAN Soo to con~radict a witness by any statement previously made
(a) MAVNG
THAUNG
b}' him the record should show clearly that the attention
NYuN . of the witness was drawn to that part of the previous state
0.
THE
.ment which was intended to be used to contradict him, that
UNION OF' he was given an opportunity to explain the apparent discre-
BURMA.
pancy between his present statement and that part of his
previous statement to which his attention was drawn that
his explanation, if any, was duly recorded. Such part of
his previous statement, if not already proved . . .. should
lbe subsequently by evidence which, in the case of a state~
ment recorded under section 162 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, will usualJy be the statement of the investigating
officer."

See also The State v. Jiwan Das (3) where it was held
that-
" when a witness .is confronted with a portion of his police
statement, which he repudiates. the police officer recording
his statement should be questioned specifically with regard
to that portion of the statement " and that the ' ' practice
of merely asking the police offiter perfunctorily whether a
particular document represents the .witness's statement as a
whole should be condemned'."

[n the insunt case. neither the police investigating


officer was questioned nor any portion of the witness's
alleged statement to him was exhibited. Hence the
evidence of Maung 'Win Aung (DW 4) stands as it is. The
learned Public Prosecutor failed to impeach his character
under section 155 (3) read with section 145 of the Evidence
Act. If he had successfully done so his evidence could not
haw girrn any support to the defence and would have be-
l onw worthless. The medical officer was of the opinion
that after the receipt of the injury on the head the deceased
would be incapacitated, that is to say, he would not be
able to defend 'himself and would be helpless. If this is
(3) L LR. ( 1939) zo Lab. 305.
so the appellant's defence that he acted in the exercise c.c.
of his right of private defence of the body must be true 966
looking at the dab .marks on the exhibit stick as pointed P(a)
. Y"'
" Soc
MAuNe
out by the learned trial judge. If the stick bore dah T!!Au,.;c
nYUN
marks he (appellant) must have been struck first by the tl.
nar
deceased. UNJON o ....
It is needless to p<>int out ~hat in a criminal case the suRMA.
burden is on the prosecution to prove the. guilt of the
accused beyond all re~nable doubts. In the instant
case, there is only the evidence of the widow of the
deceased that could be considered legally and I have point-
ed o~t that her evidence is not acceptable at all. On the
other hand the appellant has put up a reasonable defence
supported by evidence which cannot be sai4 .to be .false
or contradictory.
In the result. the conviction and sentence passed by
the trial Court against the appellant are set aside and he
is directed to be acquitted.

'. '. '.


CIVIL REVISION
Before U Tkt Pe, J.

u MAUNG MAUNG AND TWO OTHERS (APPLICANTS)


v.
c.c. MA TA:LOK MA {REsPONDENT)
966
Feb. :z6.
Civil P.rocedure Code's. 2.4-tramfer. of suits '!lid e:~ecrtiio.n proceedings.
lftld: The suit befo~erhe z.nd }udge is one for dcclar.ltion that the Court
auction sale being null and void did not pass title to the respondent
whereas the proceedings against the applicat)ts relate to the que.~tion of re.nt
due by them as tenant:s of the respondel\t. The question i nvolv~~ thereirl.llJ'C
not akin either inpointof law or in point of fad . Threeapplicationsare
therefore dismissed.
. A.T..K, P.L. Muthiq Che~/JI . v. L .A.R. Aruna Ch!!l~rn Clzetty, ?. ~.B.R.
1i9 at .133;
Maung Mo v. Po Min z L :B.R . .28t;
Marmg Ya v. Maung Lu Gyaw, (94~) . R.L.R7 sr.z (F. D.);'
G.M. Uajulu v. M. GOfJinda Nair, A.I.R. (1938) Mad. 745;
Vaman Vasudeo Chitalev v. Raglmnatl1 Ganesh Thal<ar: A.I.R. (1949}
Bom. :z.63;
O.S. Mohiyuddin Sahib v. Yusuf Abdul Razuh, (1951) B.L.R . 2.1 (H ..C.);
Ahamuat v. Kalu, A.f.R. (1915) Lower Burma, to, referred to.

U Khin Maung ( 4) for the applicant.

U Ba Than {I) for the respondent.

U THET PE, J .-Since this application and the Revision


Applications Nos. 52 and 53 .of 1965 have been, by
consent, heard together, the present order will form the.
common order for all the applications.
This application is filed by U Maung Maung while
Civil Revision Nos : 52 and 53 are initiated by U Kyaw
Myaing and U . Chit Maung respectively.. They are
Civil Rcvisicn Nos. 51-52-53 of 1965.
Ag3_inst the ord'!r of the Chief ]lidge, City Civil Court of ,nangoon in Civi r
M isc. Case Nos. 103-104-I05 of 1965 dated the 29th September 1965. f:l
admittedl}r-tenants .of the responden~ Ma Talok Ma, who c.c.
1966
had . obtained rent decrees against aJI of them. She had
. out execution
taken . prooeedings agamst
t hem and ha.d MAUNe
U MAUNO
.u~o
also sued, U Maung_Maung and U Kyaw ~ain~ for further Two :.THEJtS
.arrears of rent before the learned 3rd .an 4th Judges of MA TALOK
the City Civil Court. It transpired that so e six other MA.
persons instituted a suit against the responde and two
others before the learned 2nd Judge for deciara ion that
they were the real owners of the premises, which .the
present applicants are occupying as tenants, inasmuch a's
the Court auction sale from which tfte respondent de1ived
her title to the property was null and viod. The .
applicants thereupon moved the learned Chief Judge, .;b ut
without success, to transfer an the suits and execllJtlori
proceedings pending against them fr9m t~e files of ,the
3rd and 4th judges to the fiie of the 2nd judge.
The power of transfer under section 24 of the Civil
Procedure Code is a discretionary one, which must of
course be exercised under proper judicial principles.
Occasions may arise where transfer may be justified. on
ground of convenience to the parties. A .T.K.P.L. Muthia
Chetty v. L.A.R. Arunachalam Chetty (1). No such ground
of convenience to the parties or witnesses can exiSt in the
present case inasmuch as all the proceedings are pending
in the same Court although they may be in lhe files of
different judges. Transfer may sometimes be sanctioned
when a litigant is under a reasonable apprehension that
the trial .judge has a pecuniary or other interest sufficient
to create bias.. Maung Mo v. Po Min (2). There is no
suggestion by the applicants of .such an apprehension.
Then, the proceeding may rightly be transferred on growtd
of interest of justice if a party has obtained unfair
advantage by the mis-use of legal process in a particular
Court. Maung Ya v. Maung Lu Gyaw (3). The instant
(1) 7 L.B.R. 1a9 at 133 (a) a L.B.R. a81.
b) (1941) R.L.R. 512 F.B.
c.c; case is not one of this nature. Or else the transfer may
~ be necessary to avoid the possibility of conflicting decisions
u P.tAuNo by two Courts on the same question. G. M. Rojulu v.
MAUNC: AND .
"tWo arHEJts M.: Govindan Nair (4). Voman Vasud(;'o Cllitaley v .
M~-'ALoK Raghunath Ganesh Thakar (5) and 0. S. Mohiyuddin Sahib
MA. v-. Yusuf Abdul Rozak (6). The suit before the learqcd
2nd Judge is Qne for declaration that the Court auctjon
sale:llei~g nuU :afl(l void did not pass title to the respondent,
-w~reas the proceedings against the applicants relate to
the questioa of rent due by them as tenants of the
respondent. - The questions involved therein are not akin
ei~her in point of law or in point. of fact, BeSides, it must
be pointed out that the applicants as tenants are estopped
. ~nder section I 16 of the Evidence Act from denying the
title of the respondent, who is their landlady a.nd I fail to
see how. the question of title involved in the suit before
the .2nd Judge can have any relevance to the proceedings
pending against them.
Furthermore, the applic::ants as tenants are under a
statutory liability to pay the rent to the landlady in view
of the provisions of section 'Io8 (I) of the Transfer. of
Property Act, even though .the lessor may have no title to
the leased property. Ahamuat v. Kalu (7).
For the aforesaid reasons the applications fail and are
accordingly dismissed with costs. Advocate fees K 3i

(4) A.I.R. (1938) Madraa 74S (6) (1951) B.L.R. Z4 (H.C.).


(5) A. I.R. (1949) Bombay :t63. (7) A.I.R. (1915) Loer. Bunna 10.
CIVIL REVISION

Before U Tllet Pe, J.

u PYU AND ONE (APPLICANTS) tC.C .


,66
v. Frb. 16.
u NGWE TUN AND ONE (RESPONDENTS).

Court Pen Act. Article 17 Clauu VI nf Schedule 11-tvit for ejte"*"l of


licrmu-~11intiff 111 libnty to fmt ltir own Vllllllltiort-n701ftOW fre,;~ of
issue troultd fur revisi<-n.
Hefti: A auit fur ejectment against a lic;ensee is governed by Article 17,
Clau.' c (vi) of Schedule II of the Court Fees Act ..
Neither the HiJ(h Court nor the Chief Court had made any rulea undec
' 9 It therefore follows that s. 8 and 9 of the Act are inappliable to the suit
or the present nature. . In such a 5Uit the plaintiff ia at liberty to put his OWD
valuation on his plaint for the purpose of jurisdiction, although the Court can
refuse to accept such valuation if it finds that it is not boll4 fole or made with
improper motive, such as a deliberate design to gi.,e the Court ~ jurisdiction
"hich it has not.
Toe-tal Al,tttl (a) Salin oud Ollt v ..\faMt Ti11 (s96o) B.L.R. 97 (II.C.) ;
K l;,.,. Raj v. Durri R.L.R. ( r941) 49S (i-';8.), referred to.
ll ~/ l furlh!!r : It cannot be gainsaid th11t the framing of iaues ia one of the
most important aspects of a suit. It has a ''ita! bearing on the trial and deci~ion
nf the caac inasmuch as the parti6 will thereafter be guided by the i.a ues joined.
If the Court erroneously framed an i~ue which does not arise for the effectual
disposal of the suit, it must be regarded a~ having committfld a material irrcgu~
larity in the c:s:ercisc: of jurisdiction which must he amenable to the revision
pow~rs of this Court.
Prnmvlllulas v. Slulnlttrdas A.l.R. (r929) Nag. 347;
Venkubai v. IAIIJimum v~koha (t888) 12 Bom. 617 ;
Siuoprasad Ram v. Tricomdas COfJerji Bhoja (r9rs) 42 Cal. 926-27
I.e. 9' 1;
Banu-I and othtrs v. Ntruamlmal Dnt/ otlurs. A.I.R. (1921) Sind 159
(F.B.), referred to.

U Tin (Syriam). for the applicants.


U 'fin Maung for the respondent<>.

Civil Revision No. r of r965.


t Against the order of the Subdi\'i.~unal Colurt of Syriam in Civil Regular
L1B Suit Nu. t of 1964, dated r8 th November '96i
!JJ
c.c. U THET PE, J.-ln Civil Regular Suit :No. 2 of 1964.
966
of the Sub-divisional Court of. Syria~n, petitioners sued the
U PYV
AND ONJl respondents for ejectment from the premises known as.
tl.
U NcwE house No. 35. Alaungsithu Street, Thongwa, on the ground
TuN that the latter, who were their licensees, had failed to
4ND om.
vacate from the premises in spite of demands. The re-
spondents resisted petitioners' suit on various grounds
amongst whic:;h it was contended that the tri~l Court had
no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the suit inasmuch
as the subject-matter of the suit w~ worth more than
K 30,000. The learned Subdivisional Judge thereupon
framed a preliminary issue, namely. "What is the valu~
of the house and site for the purpose of jurisdiction?
and ordered an enquiry, although the petitioners submitted
that such an enquiry was irrelevant. Being aggrieved
with the order, petitioners instituted the present revision.
Now it has been ll;lled in Toe-wal Ahmed (a) Salin and'
one v. Maung Tin (1) that a suit for ejectment ag~inst a
licensee is governed by Article J7,. Clause (vi) of Schedule
II of the Court Fees Act which provicles as follows :
I 7 Plaint or memorandum of appeal in each of the follow-
ing suits:-

tvi) every other suit where it is not Twenty Kyats.
possible to estimate at a money-
value the subject-matter in dispute,
and which is not otherwise provid-
ed for by this Act."

As regards valuation of suit, we must look to the Suits


Valuation Act. Section 8 of the Ac~ relates to certain
suits in which court-fees are payable a.d valorem. Sec-
tion 9 deals with certain suits which do nof admit of being
satisfactorily valued and for which the High Court has
with the previous sanction of the Government made rules
(t) (tg6o) B.L.R. 94 <H.C.).
regarding valuation. Neither the High Court nor the c.c.
1966
Chief Court had made any rules under section 9 rt there-
U PYu
fore follows that sections 8 and 9 of the Act are inapplic- ANO ONK
able to the suit of the present nature. In such a suit the v.
u NCWP.
plaintiff is at liberty to put his own valuation on his plaint TltN
AND ONI~.
for the purpose of jurisdiction, although the Court can
refuse to accept such valuation if it finds that it is not
bona fide or made with improper motive, such as a delibe-
rate design to giv~ the Court a jurisdiction which it has
not. Thus in Khem Raj v. Durgi (2) it has been held
that-
"A suit for restitution of conjugal rights is one in which
the value of the subject-matter in dispute cannot be estimated
satisfactorily in terms of money : conseq_u ently it is a suit
which may he brought upon payment of the fixed fee of
ten rupees mentioned in .Art. 17 (vi). Schedule II, of the
Court-fees Act. In .such a suit the value as determinable
for the computation of court-fee and the value for the
purpose of jurisdiction are not necessarily the same. For
the purpose of framing ffis plaint, the plaintiff must, 5o far
as the case admits, insert therein a statement of the value
of the subject-matter of the suit for the purpose of jurisdic-
tion, which valuation determines the forum.
In a suit for restitution of conjugal rights the plaintiff
may. for the purpose of jurisdiction, put any value he likes
on the relief sought and thus determine the Court in which
the suit is to be instituted. provided that the valuation is
made bona fide and not in order to effect an improper
purpose."

The principle enunciated therein will apply with equal


force to the present case for ejectment of licensees which
also docs not admit of heing satisfactorily valued. Be-
sides. the copy of the sale deed filed by the petitioners
shows that the house was purchased hy them from the
respondents for a sum of K s.ooo and the valuation of
the suit at this amount must therefore he deemed to be
(:z) R.L.R. (t941) _.<}S (F.B.).
c.c. proper and reasonable. \Vhen the petJttoners had pro-
966
perly valued their suit in accordance the trial Court erred
u PYu
in fixing an issue regarding valuation and insisting upon
AND ONI

"
U Ncwm an enquiry which, in fact. is not necessary.
'1\IN
AND ONI!, It cannot be gainsaid that the framing of issues is one
of the most important aspects of a suit. It has a vital
hearing on the trial and decision of the case inasmuch
as the parties will thereafter be guided by the issues joined.
If the Court erroneously framed an issue which does not
aric;e for the effectual disposal of the suit, it must be re-
garded as having committed a material irregularity in the
exercise of jurisdiction which must be amenable to the
revision a) powers of this Court'. In Premsukhdas v.
Shankerdas (3) Jackson, A.J.C. has this to say-

" It has been contended on behalf of the plaintiff that


under Section J 15, Civil Procedure Code there can be no
revision of the order. It has. however, been held in Venkubai
v. I-11kshman Venkoba (4) that in any case where the Court,
having a mistaken and wrong apprehension of the questions
at issue, proceeds to determine an issue which does not reall)'
arise in the case and bases its decision of the c:asc on its
determination of that issue, it acts with material irregularity
in the exercise of its jurisdiction. The same view has been
taken in Sivaprasad Ram v. Tricomdas Coverji Bhoja {5) and
I am of opinion that revision of the order is possible."

In Banumal and others v. Newandmal and others (6) it has


been decided that framing of an issue on a point which
did not properly arise was a material irregularity in the
exercise of jurisdiction from which a revision lO the High
Court lay.

In the result the revision application s ucceeds and the


order of the learned Subdivisional Judge dated the 18th

(J} A.I.R. (19:&9) Nagpur 347 (5) h915) 4:1 . Cal. 926-27 I.C . 917.
(4) (a888) 12 Bom. 6r7. (6) A.I.R. ( 1921 ) Sind. 159 (F.R.)
f
Nov.ember 14 directing an enquiry over the issue regard- c.c.
966
ing valuation of the suit is hereby set aside and I direct that
UPYU
the suit shall proceed after framing proper and relvant AND ONil
issue. Petitioners are entitled to the costs of this applica- "
UNcw.
tion. Advocate fees K 34 'I'IN
ANDONI.

=-111

'.
CIVIL REVISION

Before U Thet Pe, J.

'c.c. u KYIN KHA AND ONE (APPLICANTS)


1966
Feb. 5 v.
u SEIN PAw (RESPONDENT)

Stay of execution-application by tire unluc~sful daimont filillfl a mit under


0 . zr, R. 63 C.P.C.
Htltl : It ia elementary principle of law that a sale in execution Conveya only
the right, title and interest of the judgment-debtor to the auction purchaser.
Since the unsuCcessful claimant in the proceedings under Rule s8, Order 21
of the Ci-iil Proc.e dure Code, who institutes a suit under Rule 63, Order 21 ia
not ajudgmentdebtor, or a person claiming under him, against whom executi~
ia taken, his right in the attached property will not be affected by the sale.
K.N.R.M. Cltettyar v. Ma Slrule Hla atul others 19+0 R.L.R. p. 749 ;
Mo1uimed Hajee Val~i Molulmed v. Vednath Sillflht~nd othm A.I.R. (1938)
Ran. 21 referred to.
H. S. Voadtiya v. Tire Vijaya Bank Ltd., A.I.R. (t9SI) Mad. p. (Jzr)
distinguished.

U Maung Maung Myint for the applicants.

U Than Maung for the respondent.

U THET PE, j .-In Civil Regular Suit No. 104 of 1 961


of the Rangooq City Civil Court the respondent U Sein
Paw obtained a decree against U Toe .for K ro,ooo, in the
execution of which the respondent attached the house
known as 28, Padamya Street, HJedan Quarter, Kamayut,
Rangoon. The present applicants U Kyin Kha and U Han
Sein thereupon sought to remove, but without success,
the attachment by a claim petition under Rule sB, Order 2 I.
of the Civil Procedure Code. They then filed a suit for
declaration against the respondent 'decreehoJder under
Rule 63, Order 2 I of the Civil Procedure Code and asked
Civil Revi~ion No. 47 of J96S
for stay of the e?(ecution proceedings that were pending ~-f6
9
against the judgment-debtor U Toe. The learned Chief --
Judge towh om- t h e1r
. . .
app11cat10n was rna deref used. to stay U A."''O
KYIN KHA
oNs .
. the execution. Hence this revision. u Slit~P,.w.
It is elementary prlnciple of law that a sale in execu-
tion conveys only the right, title and interest of the
judgment-debtor to the auction purchaser. - Since-. the
unsuccessful claimant in the proceedings under Rule 58,
Order -2 I of the Civil Procedure Code,_who institutes a
su'it under Rule 63, Order 21 is not a judgment-debtor, or
a person claiming under him, against whom execution is
taken, -his right in the attached property will not be
aft:ected by the sale. In K.N.R.M. Chettyar v. Ma Hla Saw
and: others (I), wqich follows the Bench decision of
Mohamed Hajee Valli Mohamed v. Vednath Singh and
others (2), it was held that:
" A claimant who has filed a declaratory suit with regard
to property which has been attached in execution proceed-
ings, to which he is not a party, cannot obtain a temporary
injunction staying the sale. Since the amendment of
Order 39. Rule r of the Civil Procedure Code by the High
Court a Court has no power to stay the sale at the instance
. o'f a third party. The sale of the property attached in the
execution proceedings cannot impair his interest in the
property, for only the right, title and interest of the judgment-
debtor are conveyed to the purchaser and if the claimant
succeeds in his suit, his own interests cannot be deemed to
be disposed of by the sale. The inherent p6wers of the
Court cannot be invoked either, for it is not necessary in
the ends of justice, or to prevent abuse of the process of the
Court to stay execution when the claimant's rights are not
affected by the sale."

I am not unmindful of the single Judge decision of


H. S. Vodayar v. The Vijaya Bank Ltd. (3) where it was
held that a sale in execution of a decree against the

-.A . (r) (19-40) R.L .R. p. 749- (z) A.LR. (1938) Ran., :u .
(J) A.l.R. (1951) Madras, P- 321.

'-
c .c. .judgment-debtor should be stayed .under section 151 of the
1966
Civil Procedure Code pending the <Jisposal of a suit under
uANn
KYIN KHA
oNt:
.
Order 21, Ru1~ 63 by a c1a1mant
. to the property. The .
u SE:'PAw. . reasons given by the learned Judge for adopting this view
which appear on page 3n are that :.
'.' A Court of justice, equity and good conscience must have
powers to pass such orders as may be neces~ary 'for t~e ends
of justice, 01 to prevent abuse of the process of the Court,
. under section 151, Civil Procedure Code. If, 'for instance, an
attach~d family heirloom, or elephant or gem .or pait:tti~g .
having :a great sentimental value for the claimant, is to be
sold while his claim suit against a claiin order is . pending,. it
may become impossible for the claimant to recover it, an<:f. .
ther~ will be great . injustice caused to the claimant if he
eventually succeeds in his suit. That will apply also to many
other cases."

With due tespect to the learned Judge, if a rare


heirloom or gem or . painting f~r which no substitute can
be found is involved, there is nothing to prevent the
exctuting Court under its inherent powers to take appro-
pria~e. steps in the interest of justice. But in a case
where immoveable property which cannot be . either
removed or ~iqde~ away is -in question it wiH not be
neces-Sary i n the interest of justice or to prevent abuse of
the process of the.Court to invoke the inherent' powers to
stay the execution when the sale would in no way affect
the right, title and interest of the claimant.
In . the result, the application for revision fails and is
dismissed wi~h cost's. Advocate fees K 34
.
:I
0~
Y'Z't-
c~
ua1oe:e:cbcodnro
.:>
r
0~
.:>
:1
.,~p,tf!J
~~
~~
~~
c.c:e8C.GU
16$)(1::>
t-:1
ul@:~b:>:2
O.l
:!=;;l~~f5~b:~e.cu
e ~ o
uwCoe.ce:cbcoe&e.c
~
IIS'~'>~CC c.cosolc~n u~:c.r~:cbcorfue.c
-128

'-
0.~
~ -:cec ~ llcot:.o~:oQ:c.c:oCexhl::> ~re:...$1 ::x.~=;J~~~:Jirc.oolro ~~
~ ~::::~ o ~ :t o ~ m ~ ::::J ~ o ~:..:~
':':! L ( )
l ___ 11 11 1 1
cccc:::>;:J IC.UI()~ Cl) :~OCG~
ro:axoecneG IOCCI)CI)~ c.o:I">CCCOOCC~
.) ~ l,; ~ 0 0~ ~
c.cc~
~ 0
n@ccrod:ehl
~ 0 ~
toto::>OOO:ro
1,; ~
ecc~
~
1~cc~
3'::1 0 :ol:t:c.~:b::>
~~ ~
::X.oec:c.r~re:k3hl
~0 ~ ~ ~
w:c.r~re~c.hl~
0 ~ ~ ::1
~~:b~
c ~co:Co~rc.o
~ ~~ .)
~ w:t'KOC.a:::>b l:hlahi@Abce& c.cc:too!ccac::lc.orexhl~ c.h:oox.aro
~ o -> ~ e~b:t~ .) ~::J~ ~ :~ ~ o
1 1
]~:coc.utea~ r
n r ::>~teco:::> 11
b :c.eccccc~ ()
1?
~
cc::c.coec:;'o
..>
::x.
~ 0~ ~ ~ l, ~
C.OI()~ ro =~~c.a~
l, ~
ro:cbcodnec
0
I::>Co:~COC.G
.)~
(=>) co/,a:;ecc:::>C.OCC
~ .)
tc.o:h'J~~~~6c.@o
~ 0
n i<;P , 11 , _1_ ,. ~ r n b
u:ccc.oo::>c.c.e~IC'la.>ro c.ocororo:cocoecnec wcccoo ::>~wteec:::>
.) ~ ~ l, .) 0 0 .)
~ ~ ~ ~ .)
11 ?cc:o~sc~b:c.a:~~
'::1 1 IP 9 1 ~ 1 1 '""J r ':':!
:ccc:;"CC:o~::>~ :cc:ecec.orocc:wu:~ w::>oecc~cc ::>~::>o~::>oecc:!>wcc:cccc
~ o.5- ~o ..> o ' .J .J ..> ~ ..> ~ ..> .J
:oc.oc.a
.)
(::>) .)col,ececc:!>wcc
.)
c.Mb:c.a:2oo.>eo~oo
.) .) .) 0
11 o:!>C.c.oe~ahl ..~bo~'!C:I
..>::1''..> .)0~
:ecce

ehla;coPeGG:f'JCOCC~
.)~ j- ~ .)
Co:C'
0 .)
XXX.GOO
0
I:JJCC~~OOIO
y~
ohl~oo:;:2c.oe:dx.o
.) 1,; .)~ 0
9 ,, 1 f!: ___ n I! r ( ) 11 1 n
::>c.o~ececo c.ot()~ ro =~~c.c~ cc:oe~wc.oteoo
~ ~
1:0~1c:;"~owtro::>owccec
0.) .) l, .) 0-.) .)
-:ocoee~
.)
tc.!, (=>) cohe.cecc::!>wcc
.) .)
1wreca:~c.occ:!> 11 .)@ccl:o~(.occo
00 0 ~ ~.)
:~l,ochl~cc lb:xw~ c.o2~ l:ccroc.cc:~do :xh'J~:o~
~ 0 ~ ~.) 0 ~ 0 ~ .) ~ .) ~ '\
, n r n , .. .r. e.
wc.oteoo:6C.OCC:!> ::>lfcote::>co flleax.ccooooeco~:o WI()~
(ro) :~G~
9 ..> .J .J ..> .J .JO l,; ..> o L ~
11 @cc:ahlx~=;J~cc~:c.co~w& tr,@cclocdu:ooM:::lwrec~ :c.ro~~~~:te
..> ..>:1.5 -::::J o~ .J L-5-6-o..>:.:l..> ..> o~ ..> l.
(.CCOCrot_OOJCc })cc:c.<cSP ~=jb 1ch:~?~:Lecotfce :c.ec:?b 1:Bso~
Mc.ob c.o&cco<a~ c.~:2:!;:!> :c.ec:x.ro:!>:~cc ,[,d,~=;J:c.ro:c.wa
..> ..> 0 .) ::::J0
:m...&s~
e:J~ ..> ..>O
o 11 1 rot'!") 1 11. ':':1 II 1 _l _ _ _
~C.O:c:;"c.cx.cnc.cc t:c.eccoc.cx.co~:ro:!> t()::>CG ::>~c:;'CC:a lc:;"c:;"OO cccc:c. t ~:c.ow
.) ~ 0 ~
.L .) .) 0 0.) .) 0
1
"
ecoro :>If::> 1t o II
l~::>c.ocoteoo:~~ ::>) ( r
c.o~eccoo.l(C 1: ~c.e ~:x } ~
j ~ 00 .)
' .5 b .) .) .) .) .)
c.ol\~!c.ob c.u8:ccoccoro
.) 0.) .) 0 .)
IS:ooM:I
~ 0 ~ l,;
e :c.ec. 8:w~~ce
0.)
,cbh:l:c.
~
r~:c.WG
11. rl ':':! 11 ot. n 1 11 0 1 t l 1
::>'l:c.occcc:;"sc.e Js-.-c::a lc:;"s-ce r::>cos ro ::>~c.o::>C:::>t'l t::>c.ec:!>:scc
~ o o ::>- e.> ..> o o..> ..> ..> ..> o ..> ..> ..> ..>0
: ~1cec.o~
1 _"L ,, ( ) ,. t)f'!:lf,"J' n 9 ( ) r
~:cc~CDC:.C IC.Ut."'~ SO :t'leC.oo l~osc:=:J~$01esooo CID so~ro
ecc~cucc
.)
11 ~ccro~ahloowreoo:~~ (::>) co~eccewcc ~'~rec.oCo
.) .) ~0 ~ .) .) .) .) j .) .)
t,.,) .)c.o;,~ecc~c.occ
\("'"' .)
~cce:~co::>to:::>b
.) ' .) .)0 ~
, ..>~hl:c.rowee.c
::3 0
c.!,wreecc~cc
y . .)
'i""l 1. o 1r 1 11 ~ ro ( ) 1 " ll:>:>kl'l~~
.)0 .X.
ccccs~:oo,
o ~ ::>c.ooececn 10 wcccoo ::>1::1()~ ro :oec.ao ro:
cbcoecnec
.) .) .) ,- .) .) l,; .) . 0 (p:>c.~cd
.) ~i.)
11 a?cco~e~o :C2roc.o:QS.::>\5elk@o ec!ccc.ul3::::>c.cee
.) .) .) f!tj 0 ~ .) .)
l,; .) 0
roc.ol:o .)w~b:~ro 0
h>:xQ:!>:dcoe
0 .) :;:j .)
~b::>~}!J;:;lc.oecewro
' .) ~ 0 ~~.... .)
W:::>Q:ccc~&>~
0 .) ~ 0
c Lo L"~
~00) :I"~()~
~tJ~:..:~
bro tJoctroe ~co:h'Jc.occ~cb
.) ~.)
1o::>ecto:::>b
.L 0 .)
lrt;&,:c.coecc.oc.co!lec
~0 .) -
-ecc~axc
.)
~ccc.cx.ro~ro~@~
.) .) 0 .)
hX2cc<hl:c.ro&::>oto
.) .J:.3
~~ro:llrc.o~hl
.) l, ~ .) .> ~ ~si"c
o0
"A statement which amounts to an admission and falls
within the purview of section 32 (3) is admissible even during
the declarant's lifetime under section 21 .(z).''

" But though the whole statement containing the admission


must be put in and considered. the Court is not bound to
believe or disbelieve the statement as a whole, and if there is

lB

'. . '.
..JOl1{10 ~t{l
3A';)![OlqSfi> pue lU3WOll1nS 3tll JO md ~UO OlAOlUOK( '3:>UOlp~AOl
~e1p JO lq:Jn atp UJ .Aew lJ a~:> -~1{} UJ a:>U~JA~ o~aq10
Yll
'29
0~ . ~ 0 ~

~CCGo:>")cmp:~:~;mo

cp eoromooo~
II. JL
(' .
~;:;!! (" 'I (" (" c ("
OO'{'I~~I:ilJlO l<::llmro? !;~?CI<:~?C C:~~

rooo.y~:>
0 C" (
~Olo:>'f>:"1
0)
t O!G!i
c-:?01~co J?
:.8
J
. ("
90)11 r: c c r.:c oc-c ,
. .)
e2GOO:>C~tjy~:>~CC S:~~CTAp:~
~

.. r:::! .-
cpe:noot!:J:qt~w r'2a-m~Jc:t:r'tj:ooJc
c .. c-.t~ .. 1:3'
L~J:.. ...r. .. r:::! ~-~
1::1c: mo-cr~ ~~~:WJ?."!D?S ""'{""1''
r:(' c: c c (' 0 (" ~ 0 I:! C' 0~ 0 (" . I:!
0 c:---GI::J?c;QJCD'c:; O')'PI~CIClCD~JO'CJ?. ~:t:j:C::? 9'):1JCD~~ rrtroec:fl::l"'ll
r.:: .. (" 0 0<" .ll I> (" oo <:. (" 0 ' (' '
~:~::~oogJro u'J::n?:c::n? ~<:mJ:~p~ ~t=wodtroe::ne ~w=-:r.~~~ wq~:n
'I 'T' <" <" r::::: C' (' \ OC" (' (' (' ('
O'X>II~~UI W~'{': m~Jill~fC:r..::J?C: 4].0ll~COOf11o12 ~~Jil rD:ilJCS
I:""J:t~ .- <",.,..L<? <" c <" !:""J: c r.::!!. '>(",.....~ ~ o c ~~C:
crC::J::x>e~<:v"tlictro !r.M)I,lc:J~~c. ~'X'o?d"ll":rD?a ~.....,:0 ... :~e: """'1:(
...~: 0 ~ .. 00 ... ,~ (' ~ (' r.: (' .0
~c::;ll tr.l<f.~l~ ~?~e:J:~c WloiOf:il~L:r":,c; <YXfl~e:JI!;~~ C:1:3~~
'('

0 c: c: ?roam
:;, c:ro::n <:.
~:.:.
6
c l<>:;>a::ucn ~:llc :DW:;>OCmrocc: ~:;,1:;, :ro::n
-w
(' _,
0 ('
IJ&. l
('
c.:,--.. w.--r, .
('
u.
('
T o " u.
'8
... t:.:;.
o 0 C: C" C' C' 0 C 0 C 0 C' ~ t: OC' ~ C"
ot~~~~ (;l:l~::>Jm~c. ro'P:~m~:;,J~:n2 ~'l:r..::l:c::n? CP:ilJm~3 "tme
(' 0 (' ('
c:t:n~e= c:9'i9:nen
0 ('
~tl):;JQA'"O:.:U340):")) II II
IL T l l>

(' 0 ~ " 0 ('


34tD~o:>ro::;J3:Jo:>m II 1134~:9 Gac;;s : :):o:>:GY?C II
ll T 6 L 11 T l. L

~ ( " (' t: t: 0 0(" ('


oo'P:~te! ::nuc~JICTJO')') Gloi')CCioi?C II 1134ll[O>O:>'Ptcq :;Q(I.)fY?::02
C' r C'
cc:~
1
<: ~<:.
~IC!U>::O
l:J 1.
GSX>:COOI
Tt..
C'G .,..
moL
3400rT>II[:::os;;>::O::n<n <;;CT>CJ::O C l Gro?
w IJ olo l::.~L 011 ..
C'' c- o C'

o C'ro o C' <: ~ C' .,.. C'


m9ro~1 oe;::>1J o 'Po:>:n 'P~orooxp:~e1:m1 9c: 34GOI 'P"roo:>
C C BC' C' I 0 C'
. C' (' C' C' C' . 0
on~ :)()~ 34:;11 ~dro~a:>: Go:>am:>l 34X>O CJ:5~c GCO:>e3m l"l :.~ m1:;,
L \ ( -1 .o~l :II o Jl l J ( J 1.1
C' OC' C'\ C'
<;;~,f I 3J\J~O>J~0:>~::0211
OC' C' C'Q 'l' <:. C' 0 0 .<:. ,_S r:: C' C' C'Q
ro-."U~~,n::oe; cope:coo1 c::~ oooo~a_q:e~Goo?"'ll?:tj>::o2n G;;?e:
COOl
'l'
Xl~
c
('
l
('
CClO:>O?CJO:>CI
0
...
OC'
"'
('
cc:o:>
1
(' 0
t
OC'
o:l\JGCO?Cma
C'
lJ
B ('.:::o~
c:,1
~
o
~
O?())t;;.SCOCO>
It T
OC''
...

..... r: c ( <
...- ~a~OJ ;~:;11>1 roeoo:>~u:>:il~~wro ~'i'"'"
~ ..) tJ T l JL J 1
c (" c: (' (' c
t ~elSe; ~to' '?C'oroe~:~~l!ro
<"~;:;!!
:>n
~c :ilJ~OOI<:=? ~e~~ ~til) ~oxu J~
C' ('
'lro
('

''I ~ qo c: c: r;::l! C'. oc- o


C:t~()ll c:,~-:'-"100~ I ~ <p='{'C'oroo:><pl~eJ~~ :T.XIt~ tr.IU,?~ll
II C2cctc.ooe~ :)Od:cec UXc
.') .) .) .>0. .')
Q
~C.Q~ l~:ckt~
~ ...&.. 0.>
:Xoo.>rexc::l~b:,
.> .> .> ;:j 0
II crcce:o~
.') . '
to(:) oo{.,a:;
0 .')
eccoox:c)
.) .
wre~c.c::l~ WC.ft~ ~~:h-'l&:chro C.OCX> cb CL><Cch r l~c.obru
..) .) ::3 .>o .') o:J .> . .) o'h 0
cw~ awc.4~to
.> o
11C2cctec.ol:o
.> o .>
w:~~~:2
o e
Cocrlcce~
.> .>
:xh,l~
.> ~ .>
,1:,ereec
.>\.
<.cc~ oo(c-hlro) :},g~2 u@cc d~l:)otcb:> a:@roeteec ccc~
.> ;jo o e .> .> .> 'i.> o o .> . .>"
te:xoch~cro :cecd:> cohx~:a u@ e::)Q ro~hft cf..C2cc:~c.o~
.J... .> . .> .> e .> ' .> '1 .> .> .> .)0
.J..
t6'>::">:2c~
e.> .
:c.ec:~~
e
=::)b
:> .>
CL>:)hxoWc.ft
.> o .) o .>o
:x:e u@cc~a..&ewc.co~
. .> :::::10'.> .>
k:...,Q:~c.o~
Q 5~ .> .>O
wchocro
.>
'"~:ad~ a:~.:oo.>,eo
...&.. e.> .> o
(c-Qro)
. .~o
:~::'):2
o
~~
e .>
( r.htro) b:X:6~:2
u@c:c:c.mtecobx;:c.cc:& t:@robhl{CccG @CCIO
~o .> .> o .> e o .> .) ::3.> .> \.
~~::xc::)aooc;4o'l,:~c.co~ 'to:ob Mc.e~ cocdPeec ~c:cGhl::)reec
.> .> \. .> .> o :J ~ .>o o :J.B .> .> :1 .>
4hl,obcoc.m~ c :ro:xo ,hl,o;;eG~ C c~h,lc.o:>::)C:C::)JO~OOc.ft4-rore
;,'J" .> e.l\. o.> .> .) . ~ :J .>\. o .>o
~~:)b u@ccbeco& :@cd.o@cc,ot; c.cc@c:oc.oooo u@cc~n
.J. .> :J " e .>
.> o .> .> o .>
-:1D.J..'"~:2c~
e.> .> \.
~rcoob~ tut'ICO c.cc~:c.cocoo '"~:2c~~ r~Gt;l:oreec n@ccteweo
O.) o e . .> .J... . e.> .> :J:l.> .> o .>.
tu:x~oo~:.}c.o~~ ttoo:dft:hJ&cl; :c.ecft@ :xx.u::)b u@cc
o .> ~ .> .)0 .> o o::l e .> .> .>
tc.mbecooo ewc.oo~
.>
o .> .>
-:lD:& o o .> o
w'Co@cckc.hl~e@e w(c~hlro) :hl@ec
~ :_jo oo
W1-:
u:~cc~:2u
.)0 e
nwooecbJ:c:bco
.) 0
n?a::t~~w
l.ll wog SCU "liTV sopUDtn8otj(J IMD~J'I.L "SA 1.1DJ4l IIO.IJ pii!H !D
Ol.9 "(8;) 19 "li"Tl J{lll(nW o.lp1WI('!111D){ u PDW.I4o8.4rCa
. 2a::xnli'wc.c
,.) ~ .) . .) .)
. "ot oc Mo il::oorc.uf'l:clxo
J~oR@a:o~::>bo~
'$'.).::1.) .J.o
wo~c.a:cocc
o .;, .J
l2a:ks:x:.coo
:, o .J
,d,~c.ax.w
o
o~ooobo
.l
olotdf!:~~
.JO.) e .l ~
O~s&,:d,co I :tl~h,.Lk J:@rofu O~C ~ ':,;Qt~:clxo I oR~...JJ~ s@C\X.~IC.rl'l
;,. Ol; J""' .:J o ~ 0-:3 -> :T'"".r...l.) ,
:::la:lolw
)""' r:>hlec~<Cot::I::>O(dow
.) ::J .) .l:l.> c.~wre:oc:l
.) ,) :1
wecc
0
o~s6~GYII
,) .)
nwrec.oi:Jah,
~ .) :l .
r
~tz
(~:cbco)
~:~C'I:d,c.o
olre:l',:cbc.oc.c.oe:>:>~
,) ,) -'0
~ c c c ,..s o _or C: o~ c c
<;;~-,c: Groprooo?:o:>e; 11 ~~~~ ~=~~c oxp=~~ o~l5j ~i()l
(." oo aroG.s()
oo:>ro (." '(."c (."
Grol?roro?~" oo~oo~o:> ::>4\0
(." 0 'Y'
rol Q:;>l tOG
(."
-,c:Qa
L I Tt4 :U .b I Jt. J f.;J h. !AI
<." <." Of,'l _Q r.:;::: C" <." <." C" C: C <."
G)()G:c>:qy~t:jll ~G~?~ U5'=~~2:()?:'J:D:;lJ~? oxp:<;lCII 0@15j ~i()l
-~ -- r c 'C<' c o oc c c ('
G:>mmO>?ro ?O 'JroGt~lj~ Cro~:>ro~?~'J U)~:J:l~~ ~C:<?::D<? ~::D<?UC
r;;:c <."
I::}()::De; II

rnm:~routOO:u~'=~
~-T LL
oo(ro) ,..so3~
~'-L

. " No Court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in


whiCh the .matter in issue is also directly and substantially
in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same
parties, . . litigating under the same title; where such
.s uit is pending in . . . any other Court in the Uruon of
Burma having jurisdiction to u.mt the relief claimed :

'. '.
1')0

Odco:"?'JtV~couu Jai Hind Inm Mart ,'J,, TulsiramBhagwandas (2)


Q ~~ o (' r.:;::.s.: , o (' (' .o Q (' ~ o C'
a>9cot:rrtro2:e:tetu' n ~~~ Odcom~:m-:>:a:,.:>:coo.n o9ccq:~uc

~tco:>:~: g))~~~
~Therefore. the principle underlying section 10 seems to
be that the policy of the Legislature is opposed to two Courts
with parallel jurisdiction proceeding simultaneously with two
suits when there is a possibility of the two Cour~ coming to
different conclusions and thereby resulting in conflict of deci-
sions. If that policy vnderlying section 10 is kept in mind.
then it would be easier to come to a decision with regard to
different cases that arise for decision:

(a) A.l.R. 1953 Dom. 117. F.


u:oo
.) ro
e reo
e ceo~
11 ~~c.c 1500 rfp ceo~ 11
11 ~~c.c 1500 rfp ceo~
II :oo 10 lCD CC.OOO It
"
" e e
CG~lG~
~!;~ {)ecocc:2 :h.lec:<hco
.> .> oo.::l
co
t':l
I
fo
S1
bu
Gu
:-:1 n:;~kz:; ~~~i ccc~re !f~co~:~ (l"-t~~:c.c~:~)
'>lre:~l&:cbco ,=~~co~S1fh.>jb fW ~bZ. JO~l;:~t~:cbco '?~e r~tlc t
urde .?'&:c loi~<Occ t~So l'l:cbco ~~e ~stlc
J. " 1L t 1~ . ~ 11
11 ..)S"cnc.cccow.c~a
..)- 1,;
uaxoro:CI<'lro:axoecoro
.) 0
(e:cbcoel!oro)
e e
ccccc~cb
e
r
5~
( :cPft~:<hw~l!oe.o) o L() <'>~~1c~
,, 11 ,... j_
~eCOWC'I:>O C'I:QliCO
.
o lre:&:d,coc.c.o5oo~
.3 .) .)0
81
C.Cc.cc.Aaxb
0 0 0
~;
u Ln
~JCOJ.G~
00

~or~~"'
o1 n
-~
4
cp<-&'):)):7,)11

'
'.
IICCCC
.)
V1
~~co~ m1o:&weft
:::Jo .) l..
::>&>Ae.ccoftce.c 1(o)coe.c
.) .)O .) .) .)
tAe.c
.)
wcccccflcocb
o e e e
SCCCI:l<.otD
.) o
(' b .)0~ cJ~)bJ)
:.Jo .)o
ot!O:de .)O~:obc<.o~
.)
1r0~ IG c<.o&fl CCCe>OOCCCC~
e o .) o
wdJe.G::>OCCAe.G
.) .) .) 0
fGo~COCCOCoOOOe.G
'$'.) :::1.:> .) .}
toe.c~~COftCe.G
.) .>
(01)coe.c
.) .)
lt'.)ICB II CCCC
.)
~C:emccft
:::Jo o
<.uxcc:Zcet;::>cro~Ae.c
o .) '0.) .) o
co::>em
.)
C2cccoAce.c
.) .:>
IAe.c
.)
1(o)coe.c
.:> .)
:CCro<.o:c.PflCC~C.UCC
.> .)
ccc~hl::>co
:.J.) A~::>CO
.) ...L.IG~ II CCCCeCe:::>I:J :,hlcco COCoA
.} \ 0 .) '"'J .} ::J .}
:C2roc;,cccc~C2cc:co:o~:cbl:Aroorocoro
.) .:> o .) :.J .)O .) .) .)
:,~&~roe.c
o e
wccccc.Amcb
o e e e
11 ~~fltoe.c :C2ro~~rod:>
.:> .:> o .)
11 coWA:Acc~cooce.c
.> e :>. .:>
(o)we.c
.) .)
lfle.G
.:>
C2cc
.)
ccccc.Acocb 11 l;fl:C2ro:Acc 11 1;A A:~l'l ::>&>co~ce.c 1( co::>em
.) \.)
e e e o .) e o .:>o .>
o) .)wee lAW
.) .>
UCCCCohl:CXOJ~ftW
.) .:>::J 8.) .} 0
II!>COI'
;y.)
IC.e.G I(o)coe.c
.) .)
ll'.)le.G .)C2cc:::>S
.)
COA~::>C.O IG~
.) ...L.
IICCCC~WCo
.) 0 y
co:c?Sce roC2cc:CCeCD~
.) \
elee.GCCC~COOCCC\)CIJcb~:c~d:cAC.C
.:>l.. .) .) .) 0 .)0
wC2cc~
0 .} ::::1
Xo~~
.:>o
tDW:,-:roe>CO
.:>
t:>ro:::>b
Yo .) .)
CCccro::>co::>CO
o .:> .:> ..L
IGe> .:>~.COACW
.)
I(\.)o) .)COW IAe.G.:>
cod~:hlocccoro
~ eh .) IIC2cc:ocorooroe.c
.) .} .) e:C2cok5ro
.) .} .}~1001~)1{1
.) l.. ee :.J
Mcooce.c
.) .}
1(o)coe.c
.} .}
IAe.G
.)
::>k:nw:::>b
.)0.} 0 .)
uC2ccl!J~w::>oe.cAe.c
.} 0.} .) ~0 .)::J
:,hlcc~AIC.o
.}
:::>Pero
.)
COOJ::>ecc~:::>b
0.}
:,~<.oACCC I(o)
:>-.;~
.}.) We.G IAe.G
.}.} .} II CCCCCOCCCC::>Cce!:l
.} .}00.}
crooA :CCroctJ6"l~e.Gtt:): ::>b uccccb:c~dbe~~ ttoorocoro :C2cccccc:::>b
r .:> o :s- .:> .:> .:> .) o ,.:> .:> .) .:> .>
ttcccckmcccceo~:2coccdu WCOIO())(OC\) w::>co::>co IG~ :,.wAce.c
.:> o .> \.:> ::J e .:> .:> .> .> o .:> .:> ...L. .:> .)
1(o) wee rfte.c
.:> .:> .:>
C2cc (C.hlbJ)
.:> :.Jo
c85ce lee~ r; .>cccc~::>~eeco&
:::J.:>oo .:>
w:x ~~Q
o .:> :::J :::J
:::>t;cw:2o~ro:::>S
.} e.> 0 .) l..
lee.cccc~c~o~
:::J.:>
0 .>01. 1:1;:; .}wd~:hl:1~:~~:e:cc .> ::::1
e1 l.. e .}M:::>c.~~
ohl:Acc ccc~:~~=~~
.:>:::1 e l..
/,:2ofro:::>b
e.:> o .:>
C2cccccccl'lmcb
.:> e e e
IG~ohl:dA~e>coe~
'S'::::l.:>::l .:> o
ccce:.:::>6
e.)
~~OOWAC.e.G I(o)
.> o .>
COW lfle.G
.:> .) .:>
I:JCO::>CO IS~ cccc:dAcce>cvcclffi
.:> .> ...L. .:> .> '::;
uC2cc~w& :::>c~e~e:oo:becof,coro ohle.ccce,wcc wolrec~c~cbc.w4
.:> o .) .) :::J :::J, o .> .:> .:>::J .:> o .:> e
'~wcbewco
:l"'.} .) cchorowro
o , .} .} cccctocd:eb~Oibe.c
.) o o .} .}:,~Aft
oo coJcece.cPucm
.} e
U,:~CeWdJ :::>C h."lee:oe>OOJCOC\) :CW:JCO:)CO IGel ohl4ee.c:c. rfl:~ro ~WCC
'S'~o .:> .:> :::::1 ' .:> .:> .> .:> ..L .) ::J <;':! .:>
l!l:JCO:)CO
Y.:> .:> ..L
ICe> WWCOCOCOOCCO
o.:> .:>
obb:lJPw..LICe> ucccch."leecc~WCC
.) .:> .) ::::J, .) a6Je.c
.)::J
:cPI'loc::>blcc::>tomw
.:> :.Jo .} 0 .} 0
COW
0
(~:~.hlro)
;:) :.:Jo
~cececruc.co
.:> ...JO
e .):,~ (c-F.!ro) cocncn.xco
.} .}
II CCC.CC.flcocb
"".Ol:' " :c. ffuccne>3>b: ]I lG~ I(&-~) 56:lJ lGe> Ae.G~JC.OJCOlee> ~ccsoo
rw reo
~
o Lo
~f:::>blh"Joo::>coro:c.bl:I'IOJ
.> .) ~:::::1.) .} 0 .)
:.J .} 0 OOWOCe.G I(o)we.c
.) .>
lflCC
.)
obco::>CO
.) .>
ICe>
.} ...L.
!'1~5<0,LC:>
IICCCCCeCOCo ohlcccco :xr:;;)e>:Jto~~
.) 0 .) .}~~b .) ~ .}0
wrowce
.> .:>
&ec:,~oeccu:~:::>b
.:> .) Y .>
c.kccccflcocb
e e e
u:::>ch."le;J;locrotJfle.G
.:> :::::1 :.:1.:>
tDcoAc.e.c
.:> o o .:>
coaToo~~
ol o
c
~c
J

~.,~~"
dl
eJ

oe~G ("
G:l)')(\)2:: Gt"Jo:>qC:
C" C" OC'
~O')?~?Q:)f:D2:
(" (" 'T'
GOI C\)'):l)~ll C'Q.tjC 9c:c;soo:xxY.>
C" .Q~C' C" ~<= c-

;sTm8~u 7j
(" 0 ("
~~:l:>?5J:D~ ~:n~:n2:11 ~~ 00~~ 00~~ ~a:>~<?:D2:
(" 0 (" 0 ' 0 ' ' ' ' (" 0\ ("

u1 o r.::;:: C' 'T' c C" C C" c (c) c o r.:;:: C" c' r,;:c
GJ?:G~?~ G31 O':>CO':>C~ ~ldl OOa:> ~ I OO?G~ OO~CC'.XId<.D?:OOCj~
.~ c c ot' c o c cc- oc c c- .,
<po"oo':> 'J)'J) u romc:ooGfCX?C~:n~:net oo~Jm:n2: ~cn;_G:n?oo:;um ~~~-
o " o G

"
G31mO:>?OXT.>;;m
(" ("
Gropm::u:))~
(" ' ("
n
0 .
CX(~~Jm~ OOJ:x>.,~
(' (" (" ~
?7 ;a>GmJ?(' r.:;::
(' ~.C"\~~r.:.
ei?Oq~tltr"G:D?G~?~
r.:;:: ("
OO:oo:>
('
('~ C" r.::;::~~r,".. (' (' C' (' C O('
. ~~e:i:'lqro:>elti~Go:>? :nmG:))Gp::n2: 'SJ?Gt~~Jmooro~3"
(" (' ' 'c:;:::r;::c- r,;:c- (' (" (' 0 c (' c. ('
~;;2::cm ~eli:Jc:tla>:))~ ~~o~m I[CO'iJ=;~ oou~a:>m~:n2"
C~ 0 (" C" (" OC' 0~ C 0 C' o C
mm<.DSI OOG:D:a>O':>~:;JJ(l):Dro~~ O':>'f>:c\{tJ :Da:>G:DO:l:ne O':>:D0':>2:
C" 0 r.:;:: C" C 0 (" OOC OC' C"f,~ C" C" r.:;:: C" A; c-
~(J;)~Gfe:l9JC <jC:~:n2: a*c:OiCOCti:'J 'J:qc:nmG:D~~:ne~~OC
o c r,;:c c
:l):))~~tja>:))2:11
-rr.::;:: c-r;:;::: (" (" 'T' (" (" 0 (" 0 (" (" r::: 0(;7
G31e!2:e:!2?<'C:m G31 O':>CO':>C~LOOiC1~ !T.ll.:j-:>:G::O? O':>'P::qtl
c c- c- c c o C'l c c ~ r,;:c
o.xooo:x~p::n2 G2:::ljlm G2:::ljl. ooq:n cqmorG;o:>c~Go:>?~~:tJa>-
c Q:n:nm
:n:nn (" o:>:>m: (') ro3:("
" ( ro a>:n:n (" 0 0 m':>:~:>o:>:;JG:n
(' ~:n:n:nm 0' ("
C C.:.IL IL (.;, C:..Ll o 6 C
~(" ') . .. _9 (' (" (" r.::;::A; (" (' ("
G~o:x>llf QG~~=~ Gmx:~?~G:mJCe:~9J '[romoc oo;;e:cm
C"
OC \ ') C'
aoGoo:~c~ul:n:nu
0
:nmmc
C" fs(' OC' C" 0 C' 'T' . (' c-
c:~cG:n?~~UmG? cc:oo:n:n G91 ox;ooc
C"
.if c .... T -6 ~ I c
('
6 t.:

~c ~~
C"

("((")
oom a> 1 ~?GmooL rommomO:>C
(" 0
L
('
J
("
t.
(" ') C\ :n:n1(' C\)('J)O)()o:>:nm
,(' (' C<>
J ---- -T 6 t>IOC~ C.:, c:, -l
o~c,r.::;:: c o c c- cr,;:.,~ c- o C"
:n~~e:~:n~:ne! ~~Jmoccr""''o:>~~:nen

c ~
U2:_-=>51~e!:
o. ~

("
"' ("
G()IO)O')?::r.>u:>;>m G0:>?9c: ~tfr :ne
("
~;4>-
(" OC' ("
(' ( -~ ) c
oerr ('

GCQ'Y.Y.)Id ~ldl rom('((') (" ("


~ I ::r.l?G(T,)~C~O')
T
C" C\
::r.lCOUCOO~:D C OOGO':>C

C"
J
CO\
::r.lOC!Dcnmct~G
C"
?Ct 0
II o:>mooc C Q
ll
Q Q 0
Q")(J)Id')OJO?m
L
C'
::r.lGI
L

mm

C"(C")
6
C"'
~ I OO")Id(l)
-6- JJ l T A T l
oc (" ' r.::::: (" 0 ("~ (" 0 (" (" c ~,..$J;;
~~qc GG9,?~')Ge1?C:~ i?lftlo:>2U GqiD~Jm,~ 00')......,.,~
.,..r.::;:: cr;:;::: c c- c c Q c o (c)
GSI e!2:e:!2:0C:m ~0':>? GO':>?'JC:~?: ~~:~C G~O':>? 01 ::r.lCI ~ ~ ro
~c c c cc c c c c o c C" C" cc
t:!r~rG'-':'Pqc O@r!S ~,a>~ 0@9\S ~;~roo:> ~fGCT.>-:>:D2: rocqu~.
c f.:~ C" __<: OC" o C" C" C" C r,::;::: C"
~:oo:Gy'J:x>Cj'-; G~O)') OO?G())~Gy(r.)ld~ op:G'Pmro~OX)'\'~Ge:l?C::
'T' ') C''\ 'l " (" 0 (" 0 ("~ (" Q 9 Q .<: 0 (' c
~o~Gol Gurm~ur ~ <ll;'J);q:n2:~ Plrt!:n2: u'P(J)~o~?o:>:n~oo~~'locro~c
(" (" 0 0 C" C"~ C" .C C" OC' C' C 0 C
cc:~c8XX)O':>
-. J 1.
j:omcco
'
:c.s?ro
T
0129::>
c. \ ~~a>
LJ
c;,.s:>muc:ooc
T l A
9c:ooO):n
.... G
C C"(C") 1 C" 'T' C" 0 C" 0 O.C'\A; OC" \ r,::;::: C"
:JdGI rom ~ I, OO?OO:>G81 O':>CGG~,~ 3't:~~o~~~ G;>cqc~e:l:D2: 11
-r c- c ..S?.,wc c ~o c c- c . c- c c ("'
GSI O)CGOOJ sc:"f""'"'tc~oq'P~C9C :I :DmGo:>~qcqc:l qc:~~
(" ("((') (' 0 (' (' C'\r.:::::.S Q c
roGI rom ~ 1 m?Gm~ oxp:ocromooo~e:l~ o:>?;o:>~:Gp: ~;;:m?:
(" 0 ....~ (' 0 o o , (" c (" cC") . '(' _<;: ~("
~:n 2 ~::o~~Jm~ mQrooo?:~:nen mGI ~m a> I!J:l?Gmc;l r::~t'-'').
ccc.cc.
n0 ..
!'lend,
..
.,
3'"~
o lo
~;xolc:J
3~~c
ll<.rococ.!Cu~
.)
<.cc~coce:xo
~ .J
::>Qcco~rco~~
.) :.l .)
'co~~ c.cc~:c.co:xo corer,
0 .)0 ,J .,) \.
coh' sob rc rogLoc.;.., IC Csvc il.c ~sjZ;C ~eccffl~cb :~~:~&:cbcoso<l.o>cb
,m~~ C}:fiW~t]rus-~~ ,t,cc 50~ "yo .fOCC.o>cb J.O(CC:,rb co&~c.~~~ t
II ( e )c~ ~collcc~~J ;oo..,cb I ~~e Csilc
II CJ.J,.<.O",...COC.'"""C.<.0"'" 1
11 "'~
_, cc:'"':;J l ,,_ b~ocr;
' a. ........ .... "'"' ._, o!.
.>o e
: e~ S"e>o~ o .> .>
..
?~
. (~:c.cowcfroo~b_ace:>h'l) :>b:~cc rc~
:> .:> .) .:>~ ~ :>0.-L
.)
ol.o~~ :JOC.R~X"~
d
C.COCOIC~
.} l,
oJre:r.:lec:cbco
.J , OJ
c.&~ c.<'C8:(.Q)~~ tbb~go~lom:&ce 1 bee 3 ftJO&IIOC)VU>
-:A :b~~:c.hc.oega:o~ ~~u!lac ~ ~~Pf g+tgca 1 ~. .~ ~ oc ~
~~~ ~ ~ r9fru ~ ~&,CIIa'l~ MobcD ,.~~JC.bw 1ifwtb !
.a-- saba.~ toe&~ !lu c9ac , 1
(:c.Pft&b~:c..oo~c.rC\)~) c Lo <"~1c~
r
?~
(:c.Pft&:c.oo~c..rC\)~) C Lo 5b~1c~
:X.ol;:~
~
~re:i )Cc:dKO ~~~:tOO:i :~Jbcbco 'J>'~"~=>JUI:><.~Lc~ _rlre@:d,co
GfuC.OG fb~lo~lo~w
.)
f":cl,c.o
ov
" , L:- II:
nwc.oe.cccoo:c.cowc.lroe>
.) ..)
" ,. II:
.)
11 .)ax.oe.ccc:c.cowc.lroe>
0.00

r.:s::
axp:~~Cj"' CDet~:l:lc:~~ot IS e:~:>:ro~: CD~~c:~~:Oe?~
c- c- r,:: ~ ' c e -.'>. c- c- ....~S: c- o
=>e'' c:!!T~cwm ~~:oC""..., c:8::&x,~:o8:~
c:l ~ tf": " .... C3 6 6 c:m~::5~:o~u c:,
c:!!T~m
-:;-.-
orii~:o1~

(" . .~: . ..rs 'T'C"".,.. .c c- o c-r,: c- c- c- c- c- ~
.toe mtq<n~' com cr"~ c:"3P~:>O? ~Dt'lP~w~ ~():::nmc;~r~=
c:;~T~:~ r,~ c- r;::::
.....9. ~ c- e o~ r;:c-
WJ?!~?: el?!f:>Cj:c:pmr 02? 1 axp:~~:~JlU e:~~:mr ~~t)()
o1 r c-
9X)IC'J)QI?:tn
tJ
~
o ~O:itCU>:xTl:Q!:OUO)?I
c- '
41 -1
c- -rC:~
<0!31 ... C:mi?O)C\)?0)
[;.--
c- o <;>e
_
J .,c-0 &.
c -'"')J A L O
r&
' c- oc:c- .S:. r,:: r;:c- ''L C"\ c- c-
~:Oe?d ~tiC: ~:5 ~l:l?!OXf>!~J?!~Ij() OIOC~:O?~J?!:0~2::1
0 C" r;:c- ''LC" r;:::: C"
qoxn~~ ~oo:>cp:~p:~[j() OIOCOO?e!GCI):02:tl
. o ~ e c- c- r;;:_c- c- c- c-
~~- oxp:~e~= e:oowx:x>~l ~~=~p: [j~~c:

[9:ct.,d; 3')fg:#:>:p~oS~ro:oe?u cl?~:oS;,JoS"l8 cosTc:w


'T' o o e r;:~ F.Ji.
to:>: cos1 c:~:ro ~:x>Q:3')tl() ()?;lJlv:t
c-
wcnc::a~p: c:~:():>:~:o~?
' c-
r;:::: C' C' C' C' 0 0 r,::~ C"
3')Ge~:>c:~;,JC'J)QJ-:>:3')9 cnc~p::o~u ~Qc:~!()?:l:lc: ~ro~o~'l
o C" C' 0 I:: C' C" ,. Q C' C OA; ~ C
~cro~: oreoGSCjS":>f!;lJffi~C:rD~ ()?;lJlU~JlU~::JI C:~!()':>:Cej?C!
"c- c- o.o r::c <" OC' r,: <" ....~,.,. r;: <"' c- ~r,:c-
CDC'J':>!~CI ~Q<O't:C?!l:lCf:x>~ ~C"'1t1~:0t::"'~ ~![jo:l~:02:ll ~C
(" (" 0 (' .,.. -.'>. (" 0 ' ....t;;. C" C" C"
()')<i'JlU;lJl0~20) C:OI G::D!:O~ ~f!W? ~Gf~::l:>~ 'frG::O?OO~:
c8~ro
, l L
c8:~CY)(,)L.~:n
, -it-[j fL c:sT&"7c:w'o3
~ l
~c:~TCO')!~
~
I c:3TC"".,..~.\t
1:1"' J to)
r,: _(: e '"!" O("OC"O !7:~ C"
c:sT r:::'"~ :::0-:Y.~!QJ?!O?I CC:SI C:::D!::D?! ~:::T.l'jC:::T.l tt.4?e:t:02:<f>
cn8~p:o:>e?n ~oTc:~< OOOOJ~"~:~ c:3Tc:~~:>: c:~:()')!
c- c- o' c- s -~ c- o c-r;:c c-
()?~J[OOJ[U~~:o~!1 :OmC>:O:J"'..C:CD')O)~CD?! "l:CY~ 4:i:O~tiC: C>O:::T.ly

o.?::oOr u2:-:>~ axp:~@3:m c:oTc:w:x>-:>roJ8 c:oTcorD:~ ~p:~


ood5~~c:&I>-..J...J.:o:&n
l l L '""'(\::)" C-..
oo:r.:c&,.,,
tl L
wroa:~8
k
ocwmm~~
iJ J - CJ -- -il - tr L
&8
- -,
(' 0~ 0 C" C'\ ....t;;.
QJ0)3')W~WJ?=~ Ul.OOJffi~:l)~ H

o C'\ e co c- c- o c- ., c- c- c-
:JO)U) QIWO)OO:O') CllClCQIO)~C O':lY~~f ~'].S
a;x.DOOO)C
u4 T
(' 0
ro:x;cn:ro
L
~ ~
c;rol')roCD-:>:c:nmcr

'T'
co:Jr
-,-
C"~
ro9c~c
IL
" J

CQ
A A
... L J
C"
..
_<:
Ol'):~ro,.:xrJO:l?!:'l"l(.ll?:':l'.

A. 1l l JJ -T -A- J J lf ti -u
~.,: oe;-:>5) c:~;-g: 2:c:w~c:w?t~ror ~oT~~:o~ qo'k~~
<" ~ C' .., c;- e ~ .o r;:c- co C' ' .., <"
mc~:'P3 G:JI ot~cme:m~:<J?:o? ro~oo:>cp:~rol.j~ co2i~:~o1:o2:u

C"O'lC"
m '):roGY~Q)')!OC~ C'
h
0
..\iC:Q:l):l)WI?:m ~ (' ~
CD:'l'>::l:!C! 0
c: Y UQOJ/f CD<O
G J' L
C"
?C o 0
CO:x> [3 U. lJ . "'l U 0
!Y.' ')
l .,
6 L ~
(' ~ c- r,~ c- .c
c ~.,..r,:_ J: ....\. r. o c- c-
t.:oe?~c:'l;> UJrort,?O?X~~<? o:l!j[CrCT.>I GOI ~We:! !DO;(oot OC\XJ'jf:O?
t:c: 1 (" r;:c- r,:: 0 r,;: C" (' C" (' ~
~Q>o::oe;u rour.;,oxp:;;,wp:::T.leo m0 -:>:~p:~ ti~mcn~~=~c;
r.: 0~ ~ C" ~~ C' .., ...~ .... !:. (" ' C'
~G:0?~-1!:02; eucos~q ~mJCUI:O~,~::JI G"3J?OX\):02?11 ~Qoxp:~
0 r;: C' (' c-r,: (' s ("C" 0 1: C" (' (" _,.$..!/.
wp:9 ~~~DI.::o~;,Jt~c U>C:~;,axp::;:wp~c; um..JJ\'~'
(' C" C" (' ..,~ 0
~:o:n O)')COO::n!<'T~!~"lmC\).5 !01 lH COo:x.!l?!:x>:O CJn~::l ~WU<:I
~ C" '[9
. J:
.(L C C.- _._. .. -6T " IL 4J e,.:- i--ll~ Al
,!G~wcco~ W:1Pwec~to::JS ,~bt:;J~~ore~e:)Q,o :Xo~eeoe.c ~4~e.c
.J J 0 \) J 0 J .:> ~.:>0 .:> 1.. .) .J
to:::>b
0 .)
,fb::Xc2ro
':5" .)' .)
loh>:dt=~l!c:c.@.ro
1.. 0 ......
a.~e.c:c.r~e:cbco lc.oolreJ.O]I!c:Cbco
.)...J
&-' .)
t;c@o
o
~hlcci;C'O~tteo u ..@ccijdxnecweco blrwe.c ~ro:2 ~ e:Cbco
.>~ o o o " .:> o .:> .:> oc o I) Yo e ::J
:c.IJe.c
~
:::~cohl:~
.> .> ::1
::::c.Q~a.hle~~
.> ~ .> :_j.
stc<.e!CCO
.> e
r~&4Coo-Xo
::> .> .J
C2cct=~.,Q
.) ~~~
IG~
~cncoo:; :Xo~e.cffi u2cca.Rwree.c cccdhocewe
0 0
.J .) ':)' .) .J~~b .) .) 0
ito:f,elhe.ccoc.ob ':r
-:J ,lP. ,11 .., b o on n _,_ " i" 1
~~'~ ~fl']J~ ~:&we.c l!fCCSC~'~ :~ccscco ~~y~c~:mco~cne.u ':? ro'f~
r,._hl;(e h.J~~&,a; c.~ree.cwee.c 11 o~~'l!Jt'l ::::6J:ca:2a. li::Kcowero
:)""~ 0 ..) 0 .) ~ ..>...J .) ~ 0
C.Uwrero
o .)
{2cc(edw~t=~ c.rw~cocc:flw:2<Pe>xru , d,nfJC2ccb<.~!ct:;J A:hl
.:> o .:> .:> .:> .:> .:> s:::J.:> ~ 6J
.4eocrru~ cocc:oo.;:CC@CIXW IWGoe.G~b:::>tt~co a.Re.c2cc~ ohl~c.ro
.) .) .) .J. .J .) .J .) .) .>::.:! .) .>::3
.rmhxo~ ,g(bc~hc.W!
.) ..__. oCvKrel~Coet:;
, II .)CCccbCO~too~iW
o .).) COO::ccc:phl:h\e
o .) .):::~ eh
~C.<ll:2a.::Xc22co ~'h.~fill2hl ecb:c.G:2a. 5cce~:X:Ccu~R ~c.rt'Je:c:lx.oeCna:;
.) .) .) .) :.:l.> .:J .) .) .) .) .J .) :1
ee~eccocos ~ecR ,<X!cc:t:;;ll:.c:2 olre:EO\&:cbco to:de~~ \kC2o
:> o ':>' .:> ~o e .:> e.J o o o
II CCcc :c.co4cco~ :CCro~hloccc@ cccc5cc'l!J:tce.c JGce~re:roro CoC.CCC.eG
.) .J J J :::IJ .) .) :.:.1 ':r .) l:l 0 .
OC.e.G~Wcb~t'l oc4~ec~cc'l!J::JQ:<'lccWr6'l w:b~ec~~CD 4co:tcec C.C'C~~hl~b
.) .) 0 .) :.:.1 .)~ .)0 .) 0 .) ..) 0 eJo
ohlcocc:t'ICJJ:CCGroC.CJJ
.:>~.:> ..) ..)
I:C2roc.cc~~~C2cc:4ocnrru
.) ..) ..) ..) .) ..)
:::o~4roe.c
..) ..)
2cc:dt=~
.)
c.wc.ec~cc::::~nec
:J .) .)
bee cc coo2:2~ .)
1cb ~P-ro:h>~rwP.:Chco
.)0 .)
ttc.co~:l',
0 .)
eebec uCCCC:c.coocc:tdcco~ ~hl:::>C.Q~xd9.t=~::J@:BCC<.Ur6'l .)~CO~CO
..) .) ..) .:>::3..) :::::1 ..) ..J .)..;J .:>0 ..) ~
io~io~
1.; 1..
wceo~:l',:cbco
.)'
w:b~e.c:)eec
0 ..)
cccc4coweo:tcec
..) J .) 0 0
c.cc~:hlllb ~hl:c.ec
eJo ..) ::3
'cocc:oo.>:CCGroc.w
.:> .:> .>
~~roeo
.> o
u2cce:c.cc:b~
.> \
~cx.u:EOltc:2
.> e...~o e .:>
~ccea.hl
'.:> ~
:QI!c:cbc.o
~
olrec.co~c.o(U:chco a..:2ch> wwre::>~ c.cc~:4~C2b
lkoco. .:>.:>
0 .:> .:>OO.:>.:>t> .:>.:>
112cc:c.w,h> cd~ro
.:> 0 0
( c) d ot;u::coc.ooooe
\. \ .) 0 0 .:>
:bt~ocoee:;&cncc
..) 0 .)
:o~.cd:b
.)0 .)O
;~~clse.c:f'lc.oooe
.) 0 .) ..)0
l ~&>eoG ,!Greru:Je::>c.t=~e>::>c.t'le>:2 UXX!cco::>rru~ce :ccro~~rurecn~ocb
o~ .:> ~o .:> .> .> e .> 1.. .:> .> .:> .:> .:> .:> .:>
ll!lc~o2cocc:oo.>:cca.roc.ru
:> .:> .> .:>
2t=~~~c~o2 ~~c.ELilec.cc~1QcncbWec
e .:> .:> ...__j ~.:>
ro:b~ec
o
~ero c.cc~:hli;b~.D:::>b
.5 eJo 0 ..) ..)
cccc:::>Q:::>~~mw~hl
.:>:::1 ..) ..)
::>&lerorocr:c.oh
..) .:> ~ ..) 0
:cecto:::>b
0 ..)
Qc.Q~&,
.J .J t;.)o t.,
::=:1 o uocccJO::>~@~:o:re C.U:b~ro~eec
o .J
c.cc~:hlb ~6bQ:::>~2cofloco
e3 .5...J.J:::!.=> .J .J
::>ooe&e.ccnmh
.:> o-
:c.ecto:::>b
o .:>
l,:hl~&xocc:P-ru:cceroc.w
O'J.:> .:> .> .:>
11 ccccoGhl:::>Q
.:> L .:> :::J .:> :::J
:::>~orow:f,
.:> ...)
w:b~ec~eec
0 ..)
c.cce>.:co:tce.c
.:> 0
~to:::>b
0 0 ..)
@cc::J~cohccccttCo
..) 0 0 ..)...J..) ..)
II OCC'CIOQ@Q :c. n,&:hlbe::JQcol,mcc UXX!cc,.Q:dfll!cwrob r.cco&a.\;
.:> ~.. ~b::.r eJ .:>~.:> - .s- .:> :r",j ..) o o o ..)
c.oc
foe
Btrl
r
~'<:
6oc
C2ccGhl c.aro :hle~GG 1:>hlC2cc~~~l'nf) ~ccGhl :@1Gcohl d~c.w
" _,::_j :_j " ,:_j, .)O " _,;j e '" :_j "
~{:Jcc:c.&1e~@ :c.e.cd:> cu:ll~cc:2 : xcn~~ro ~d:> uee.cc.cc~::>cc
_,::_j l," " ~ e " .:> :y " l, .:>
=~~~ 2>~~:2 ICCCC:ec I G~ cu:f:";1ec:chco f):cbco :>r,e oc.C2o :Xochle
,~... " :_j e " ..L 6.j .:>o o " o
uC2ccroe>COhl:re
.:> .:> ~ olXo~ ::>c. r.J~~ cb01~fu roC2ccG{:J ;~~ CDCOG n:>bl:c
.:> :::::1 o " .:>tl e o :> :_j e
c.[,:ez ...L
IGel oro:cbco efue.c

J::>bwC2cc01hl
.;, ~
:t'lCC C2cc[;b 5~00e> IGel . :b
.,~ o :> o .> ...L e
Q 2 11 1 r o 1 J. . _ 11 J_. 1 1lJ "
e 5o ~:_j: e cc:~cc~ C.f'IJICU:~ lee> ~:axo ~cne.c 1cot9ro:_j e:~~~G
:oob,
, ~:\;coc.e.c~
, i'Gwcccoo
'5'.J .:> ~~:crf)(.Ure:c.cocuc.ltoe>
.:> .:> ,)
cucco~
,) .:>
:2o~
6.)
11 C2ccrehl (:(,(2cc,o cubob wco~wro e
.:> o:_j .:> l,.:>o o" .:>
~e>e.c :c.o~~e.c C2cc:c.rowc.Fro~ :~~e.c C2ccGhl
" " .:>o " e
.:>;j :b c.cce>GbMcu
.:> .:>
~~~bl:2
:5 :_j e
C.~M
oo CUOOe.GOJ
, o liSC.~OCCC~bf'l
.:1 ~ ,:::~.:>
o ::>c::lo(uJIJ
:_j cn&e.cw~e.G
.:1 , ~oc(2e
o, :c:J
eJ
c.ro~<b~ C2ro~hl :ll~cc :2 :~c.coe~~ 2G::Jbo~ocro4hl &c.~coecm.
o.:> .:> ,:_j :::::1 e " " .:> "o .:>:_j o .:> e
cuc.4~
.) 0
ll::)c.~eJbwro
,) ~ .:> 0
cnv;tcc
, b'l
~owM
J .:> __,
oo ~~c.f.Ol~c.cceJ:c.tt:recce>
!l;cocc
':) .:>
:dehl:le
:J l, eG~e .:> J
Cb~c .:>~o:Xocuro
.:> .:>
~=~s
"
::f .:> JC2ccbl:2 :_j e f,cb~bo4e>
.:>o ::>cc::>IOeJ
J .:>1...
!;"e>:~c. hleJ 0
, :_j tcc.fte>o(i,co
, ,
ofi]ro
,._.
:C.CDI'I:>ro .:>
IGecuro wC2cc:4b:::JC.COeJ
'5'., 0 .:> .:> .:>
:C.e.Gftft 5~:de:~cu cubl:2 :>OOOI~e cb~c cudoco II !:>C.~~cooc :eee
oo " ~ :J e " .:> .:> o .:> ~ ' " .:>
bb]ccc.c:J~
Jw .:>
:_j rottcc:coc:recc~
C.ft:ll~cc:C
~ e
l:hlc.ro4hl
e3 J:_j ..)~Xft~ .:>
ec:c.oc
IOCUCo &e.c i<b:C.OCIO ohle.c :C.CCOi::.o:!b &cucc !C.CDG:Cn ro:ll~cc:C
1... .:>
o l, .:>~ .:> o " o o ~ e
:c.Pcuc.cn!J::Jro
s .:>
u_,:::JS
!) ~
ft:>~ft o~e
6.)0 .)
cb~c IOCo:ez ~
IG~ 0ro:cbco eme.c
11 C2ccrodeh1 C:.oC2cc
.:> 0 ...J .:>
,owbob
1., .:> 0
wco~curo eft~e.G :C.Oiftele.G C2cc:crocuclf:oe> ::>toe.c C2ccahl
0 .:> .) .:> .) JO .:> .:>~
:eCC
e
a::~bl:c Gft::>b cuorw:ez IGeJ ~G~e>(X, I,.W..., <2cc4eJ ::>ce::>IO~
;,:_j e " .:> ..L .) :::::1 o ~ .> " ,~,;
,CC'roM::l .:>
,:J M:ll ~cc:~
:::::1 6 l,
ree.c ccce>:tecce~
bl:~
:J e 1:hlh:xc:::>ro~
eJ .:> .:>l, AOOJ :J ~
.:> .:>~~bl: e
cc:cc~~e ::>Elocohl 5~:]1r:;1cc:2 :cPcuc.cne>~ro l!>d:> 2cc:es r c~ uC2cc
' o .:>...J\.:1 :J .:> :::::1 e S .:> Y " " ..L .J
ro~:cec :eecc~ ~WO!~e Cb~c ~{:Jcc cohlcocc :dehl:,e c.f,b1:2 1IG:re
.) ..> .)~ .) J.l . ~ L ~ e ~
cceJ ~roCb~e bblJc cfi'O~~ 1ceJ uC2ccre C2cc:coc~~:~chle> &cf,~o\',co
..) .:> ..L ..) 0 .:> , :_j 0 , .:>
:c:J1lJxroeJfte.G
eJ:.~b JO J~~:ez
..L!Gel 0~:cbco eme.c CUOI~b
J cblJc tC2ccbl:c
.J :_j 6
1cb~e>
ccw:~e> :Xoc.~O:::e:>ce IGce:Mcue b~ IG~ COI~e>::>ce:OIOe> MM~ IGeJ
.J ' e.:> '5' .> ..L .> .J .JI... .:> ..L
~ft ~=
~ 0
~~ 1(2ccbl:c
~- .) :> ~ 0
1be.ccureeehl
.)- 0 :.J
lt:dcu:ec
y :>
ICe> e:cbco
to.1,;
e~

uC2cc01hl
.:> J;j k&e.c
C2cce::>ec~
.:> \ .:> ..)
,ba; boc l'lcb
.:>
fGocHwe>t'!
1'5' .:>
WCCCCWN :oe>cobo coki.Jro :C.e.c~rcu:bJ ICeJ e:d:xo efue.c ICDO(bi=;J
o:> .)0 .J .) :> .) ~ ~ ~
:crocudroeJ
.>
cuto:ez IG~ ro:cbco eme.c
o ~ o
:~~
e
CDC.OG
o
l!)bl:2 :,brw:ez I Gel
:r:.J e .;, .;, -..L
Goc
~oli

(1) 1936 pat. 430.


0oc
olPe:l1:cbco
.)
~o:~ro:C23o
.) ..)0 ..)
l<ll lG C.COC.UlG~
e e ..> 1..
o oc
occ
,
. t
?~
(:c.Pt,ec:c.oopcJroo ibgceg)) C Lo g:c.ccLo
CCC
f cc
n~ccyccso~rc~c~m ~.rc-o ~ ~ ~'~b
~F.,d,l, ~'~h :~~r}, icJ~c.cc+~ ~m~~~~ogiWc..
cac
~clrooa;F ,;c.cuoost~~' rcgcxxo ~~~ceo }c.j~rcsoro ~c.rl'llcb~
IC.OO soc-lhJo sccc~mc.cc&cco ~~tGec jbf&rJI'w ~~.reo tko ~Gt&
JbFlr~~ cA~ccbt.bo ~d,fc.co~tSc JOgtccoccu ll~ffl
11 :~Cco~ewc..JJec
.. :J., S'~ ~ :.:J
.) .):.:J i:&,:xJJo e:.f.:t
tiMe !>ic! ftc.) h rr.:lcocc~cb 11X~10 ~:.:~
.) :.:J.,oc.cooooCJJJ
'31Jogl'wc.t ~'KF~'iS~rc.lgco;;~g ltc.o f~/~~ ftglu~~..,clt
(:cP(')
&be:crowclh>~ 4-b~ce~hl)
0 .)
:>cf)e~~rc.o~cf)e>
.>:..J .).) .)
.) .) J:h-l4co~cfte>
~.) .) Msob CC
r
?~ ~LOJ.~&
( &:croc.oc
.) lh>~4-b~~hl)
.) .) .:>:..J ~~~cf)4-Q .)
.)0 .)~ ~~croe~tthl
.) :..J s,~~
fo8o ~fb~ ~acbc.c
~~ce.JJooo.:>cb
~ l"..:J~
()lre:t,:dK.oGc.os~~l.
.,) ~ ~&
6cc
B

.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~cc
.il-:1 ~f ~cc f (bcmcco:&a:) ~ ~
~
of!!* 'L~
~b ff' ro# 'S'te C~tJc: cce~re F Col~~~~ ~a Csic: ~
u(e) oCc ~r;~~ ~ ~ Csic:
II
lt:)lQ.-.....:2 :h-IM~Ctcll
.)~ 0 f;':j 0
u~booj F~~ WeD
}':d~cekc~ ~l~~~:dx:o "fti' ~N ~~ ~cJ#!ce~
rcbCO ll~ce~b :sa~a::dcac~re~fe a_rc.le:~ :bo~ I~'
J.OM fl,lO~~~CC }cJ~~t~~ ~~~JWec ~ ~~
~~ ~j'a:ogo:ja:eo j!cxb~ w~ ~~
~i9F~Iftcc agce~.L~co-~~Madtco
(&be:c.ooc.oc.ltu~
.)
~bxe:>hl)
.).) .) ~
:>~orez::l
.)0 .) e
I
3'~
(~:c:.cxxoc.ltu~
.)
~bxe=>hl)
.) .)~ .)
a.ctbe6
.) .)
_r(o~ ~t>SU'; c.cosui.c~ ,Plr~
:;~~~
nlre:ltadtc.oc.c.oo:):)~
.) .) ..)0
o.cc
851
~cc
~;;rre~t!3 &ul~~~~ec~<hF<h c ~c:oc\"Ccn 'L~l~b r
(\)~Lo 1"~~ ~te Cstlc c.cc~re -jD Ccc ~;~soo.,J, ~e bs~ t
tt (
W) C O~;SoeSg~ '1t~ ~~~C
1::>~
,) Ccc ~ro
, ~:~coo.o>cb
~.b
l()~b
,) b~tJc
;; ub:h':IO::dx.o
.~ ,COO.;)cb ,)wcccb c 'oo'lilJ
C.OCCC<O IO~eG ::> rodoo~::>C.~!> :c.cc l:l~h:b:(! (r) ~ Cc:C.OOO.XJro~
I ..!. .>0 .> .> Y .>0 0 0 ,) .>
J:c.f?.>c.cn~ ~SeJCCI'I (C) so~ro tc:c.oosoc.fb:>oM ll,rr::i :~&:d,c.o
II ::xtro:2 :J:;;lhl5ob:~alll II WCoeG&be:C.OOC.OC.rCU~~bxe...hl
.) & l;"j 0 .) .) .) .) 3".:.1
g:>oe:>hlcoo.,~
~ ~ ::.];)
olrea~:cbc.oc.c.o~:>:>~-
;) ~ .)0
YSl
cfc
ffc
~.
~~
~
:,'
r~.rel~ ..
!~~c
cHc
(~:cbc.o~roes) ?~~cefSO,~coo~~~
o+
.)
(:dero:cbc.oeroes)
0
c 10 1,
:)(,~~:::>re::>ce~
.) .).)
.
OJ~

'\ r,::;: 0
UC:(ll~C:<i,~GOO?C:'lf ~OCGfiOt' G~':lCOOmtj':l:
(' (' 0 (' (' (' (' ('r.: (~tj
or,:
r) C:Cf>OXU?~:
(' r~
oe!i!i
C' 0 C' OC" '\ C::::. (' c-r,;:c-~ C' C 9 C' 0 0 C'~ C'
<:JC:~wqc uc:t!l:(C;oo?C:Go:~~l911>9J' ~r=c:~~g 2~c~ ootm~'lr (" (" ("

oo':l:m:>l c:.
9
::nx.s:c:m':lC(Y.)(.0&-1
0('
'lt moo~mro:roc:>~I'P
(' 0
o-:x; ?moe:::>.) rom~
'T'~ ~ 00 ('0(" 0 ('\ (;W?C?JC:COf?C

('
T
'\
1
(' 0 0 r,:;: (' 0('
-r 1 t.J AI
(" 'T'C' 0
.. L
('9
o
('
c..;, ... --
o\>
c
coro:n2n Zl"~c ~~=~e:~~cos ro~:cou 3 :D~ooxp:~ ~~:>ce:~m
) :.c

~
c' c
('
.rtc C'
c;;~?ccoro':l
c ~
.., .,.. 0 0
rom r<: C" 0 C' OC" 0 C' C"
c:oo:n1~c cc:oo.rtcmoocxx:c:s..,m C::P:>c:;,IID
C" ~CO?CC
<..:;
~ l
J .J t t o l...i I ~J . i. T t. cJ (" 0("

~r.: ) ~ ( or c) <'
~IJ'J~CCII
("'t! c- ~ 9 c- o c o C' c-
<; I ~t1![ ~~IS ~':: 'JC:~2 G~?C<f~:DC D'Xl(~cp:c'? Q>JC:Gf':lC
41
C" OC'
:P'): Q')C\:XJ:O?OOc:
t
c:;,1'T'ro':l :n::nm
C' 0 C'
c t cmac:ro:n::nn
o -l c.:.
C" 0
cc:o:>C\Xloxn
1
C'
. ,. 11 .. c.:.
o .-.c) c:11
c- ( :;J!Ui'S
::nco~?C
~c:. oC' o
:Jd'ciGQXGQ)l c- or,;:
"' ~:(gJ[m
Ci.X;O)')!PO)I
!P(.l)Q>mro:Q> Q>IC:G.S?C
c c-
c\ o -JI t. t.DI :t. - - -c o T. ,
C' \ C" 0~ C' 0 C' C'O
(X)O)C
""
oo m:c:ccooox:rn~mll>
~ T J
~ 11~c mw~:ro Q>IC:c:.s:>co:> 10m:>:
t J 111.- -- T t CS T 1.
r,:;: r,:;: c- c- c- <: <' o <: o r,;:c r: o c-
YJ?:u~:D':l~~?~l G:PX;;>JIDI G~?C~':l~<; ~~?Cq(m (ji~C:~CYXJ
("
GOO:D2:;11
0
roo.s:>m
" T
C' 9 OC'
c
C"
::n:ns:c:mx:nm
r-
C' C" C'
COM~a.sc ::n
0 OC"
ooro:n
c c.T- .417 ~.A . .. .... r c.
.s:n'):~: oo\
ro:c:ca er;
'"A; ~'j~G~')::;:
GOO?C::1 r.:c
'r,:;:c Gtj?tfC\:>::0~11 '"o"'" c-"
~m:;,1 ~f:G!}:D2 G!'li:D~OXUJm
'" ('
\uc:m:'=lc:o:ocC' c:.sooJ'=Iro':l:())
"\ ~ 0
c: ':lOOm?l OC" C' "' 0 OC'
mc:~ooc;mmrocro1m rom;,
C" -
-.- T-.- l l L l L l tJ ' t!
0 00 r,: C'OC" 0 [7 C' C' C" _<:: C' 9 C'
oo;p:~~Cf' ZJ?Gt~:emtfC:q{ :PG~:~mC\:>')GO):DCII <:JC :c:JGf?~ cj}C
C" G OC" C' 0 C' 0 C'\ C' C' 0 C" 0 9 ~
.rtc
J ~
::n:ns:c:Zl?CO)(\)::n:
T L c rom:;>c:ro:n::n
l c 11 u:>c::n cc:oo:n::):
L I l \. r:.
me: :::r.lro:>:
~

::0?: (' 0
:l)::nffiGO):l)~('
C (' ("~ ('
':l:ro::n: (' 0 (" ('
C::romO)
0 ('\
6 c "l o G~?COOm
c:. CCIOOG.S':lo::>ooc
l L T J l
('
00)::::1)211
C' C' 0 0 (' OC' 0 C' ') OC' 0
cos:~o:n:::o o:>:::OC::t.l?C!3:X.IC0::n<;'f'mG:::O?!T.I:;,I !7-XJGQCI C\:)(.,)I':>:!JJ?:
4 r ..01 c.:. c.C..1 ~1 ... .,-, 11 "' tJ
0 (" (' (' \ (" (' 0(" (' 0
!r.>U;f~OOCf>:q QJC:G~ ')C ~~?:~G'=I:m':lJ O)JC:Gf ?COO'=/~~
c-
~::n'):O:)
C" 0 OOC' OC" IC 9 C' 00 C' '\"
CO
o 1:.
m::niO'=I
tCi
~GO'=I
OjJ J
o:mmG())I
a
:l)O'lCIOCO)'):;,
00 Jt-1
())l G!P'):l)
:>:9G:D?G~1 G~~o3?:'P~ c::op:cp1 ~~~&,~ oo:U:uE
mc:pror':l:q:fcp<n9JC
(" 0
c- o


c
("
('
~:Gjj;g
('
c
'T'
c-
<';? ?
('
e:
9 cr;:;:9 c-
G~:q:')WO)~{g:C:f':lmt
("~(" ('
c-
(' ('
QJCOX?G:D':lOOXOOQ>Jm ~01 CD?Gro0l211 Q>JCD~c:OC ~f:~C:j~g ~:GfO[
9 (' ~~fR c c c o c o c (' o ('
~:2:~: ~tj~jj: ~:Gjj:DC <:JC:~f')(T.)~ Oj GOO?CQ>~~(T.)(T.)?
(' (' \ ('
G~oj:>m'loxu~:>:c:ro:n2"

C' ~ C' r;:: o c- c- 9 oc c- 9 <: c- c cr,:


~f:Gll"'"'f~Gtj~OXU?:D2c:Df:GOO?Cm 2jjc~gG~:>cmmtj':l:
0
OO::r.l?: ("
co.s:c:om 0 ('
roo:n':l:O)(\)'=Iu:>:~?
\
tr.lu:>Qmm:~l':l:Uc
0 (" '"w':lO').())
\
L c T ..01 1 L 6 ll J ll -- T " u . . J L
r o C" o C' C' C' \ C' C' r;:;:~
G~?~roro:n~ll <lff':lm Gloj')(T.)'jC"JX\)Gf:D2? ~~:Gjl~?: e1~~

G:n~:ro1mo:n::n<n
C. tJ
C'O
JJ
GOXl::::IJ~C"
C'O
c,-l 161
(' ~2?
C G::r.l?C(\) L
O~LQ _ (' ~
::::1)...c;<;e:o:n ('
UC\X)')(OO):l)::nJJ
1ILlL C:,

GC:O:'Jqc ooc:pof
C' c- 9
t;="<&~:
c- ( or,:
"it1 oo) m 'Xlr="j1~:PGro:>c:3
c _<: c- c- s c-
romJ':l::om
A

'.
ul.ob (;c tfuJb 1~t~ l.C~ (~)Gee # ICC~ (c)
::>oXQOO>Pec.oro
.).;l~,).)
t:~X~~:oPe
;:),) ,)
bJ:dx.oeroec
0
@ccdxJJc
.;l .)
c.cc~b::>&\;'~:~0:>
,) ,)
:)c.Qoccc...,Q:2:<c c.l,:d~X-e~b M5'~:~0:> u@cco~(}hl ::xx>d~de
s ~ ~_j e .>o .> .:l .> .:l .:l::.:J .> .> .>
1 _L __ 11 r11 o 1 ::1 I! ) o
ro:a:xoemec ctX'Cc.cc~:c.ccoocc:~m 11 cccc:co~ :~c. ~:c.ccoo
0 00.) .) .) .) 0
::>&:2co
.> e
co~ec:2:cd!db ~fcul5c.oc.oo~ ~@cc:c.ec@blccro <hc.obo
.> e .> .> .> 6- .> .> :.l .> .>
:c.ro:c.P~Ii-b~ :,~:.ecoed:o @cc~~:~&:> ...,.;J(}:Ibehl:~eec .~
-> Yoo .> \, .> .;lo ,) .) ~ 1.. .>::1.> o o
c.OO.,PeOO@
,) \.) t:~xbde
:r,) ,) to:cbcoeroec
o
:,C,Qoccc~~~~
.) ~
ooec:::>ixoc.~~:hle
o o .)0,) e-1
:OO<c~ ~,...,..oo Mt;~:~ broc.oPec.oC:o :croccooxc kle:dx.oro:<bco
~e"""' .> .) .> .J .> :.l. o
<2cc:>t;@ 11 cec.o&~~:dx.o :cec:d6l-cbe~ c.o:txocec!:> :C2a:.c.cc~
.> .) e Y '.> .> '.:l .> ;;, .> 0
ol OOL'""l r l : : J 1 11 r _r;r'"") L
e(}:coco C.(.t)O()(p cncccccoe1 ~OJ::Ie:c.e.c:~;;> ccccco:c.roc.os-(} ~OJ::>ecc c.o:oo
'' \.> .) .J .> l. .> .:l o .>o .:l .> e .>
11 C2ccro~G~:~rJe~b wPe~wc:e ~roc.orol!ld:> c.oC2e2cc:tM~::)eec
.:l .)::1 .J::::ho .:l .> l. .> .> ;:) .J .> t.; .>::.:l .:l
r
' c.~:c.ooe.cwc.oo~eccc~wccoo 1 1 1~ 1
rcoco~:c. ec ut:~s-~o ec.o:coorowc.oo~ec
.> .> .:lO Yo .>
1 o ~ ,.~1.:-oo- ro 1 n , _1_ __ ,
cc~c.occ c.cc~:>'1'c:nw:oo ~ ~ DUAl.; COO o11>x s-~:o1e ro:ox.oemec
.) .)0.) .) ,) .) j .;l .;l 0
_TIQ1 1r 1 o ( )
"LOSC~~ec ~ c
1 . , , _l _:::l , , 1
6:oc.c:>~::>e:xc.c3:>Ct'IO
0 .> .) .:l ~
O~ftCCJCCccrooexecOO>Cro~:>~:o~ ec 1o~
n.>60- .:l .)O.) .) .)O .>
:c.Pee:cbc.o

c.&:oreec
,)
c.cc~~C2cc~c.c{,:.hlccec
0 ,) 0.) 3"'.j. ,),)1:) 0 ,) ,)
e~reec@ ,):Xocb&nC2cc~{,
r ::J , 1 1 '""! r r;r':") l_ '""! r 1
C.ftCCCC:c.oocec.oc.o :>c.ec~:s-cca: ::>~ooa:.:c. wc.o cnccccACOft wccec
.J o- o ..> .>o e ..> .> e .) .:l o.> o
1 blrW l ~ r o 1 l ,
c.cc~ 1e~ecroo 1 oc.occc.o:oo c.occcoo o!c.oc.o:.:> ro:cocoeme.c
..1. \ .J oo .> .) .> .:l .> e o
11 o~o~GQ~~bewro PewroPecoe :@roc&:oPewoo l!)oc.e.c~:~cc@
.>6.)::.:1 .> .:l .J .> 6 ..> J .) Y .> .>o e
1
J~ '""! rr ~ 1 t> o r ] ':"":I 1 ':":l
oc ua:ccro~cc.cvc.oro s-coeeoo o~: ~~ a:ccxec~:s-cca:
0
J o .> o .> , , .> s .> .> ..> .>o e
eo@cc<h~c.oohl
.) ,)
::xX:o:oS
.;l::J ,) 0 .)
oFcooro:oiJobJ
.) .>::::b
c.ocrro~ec~cch.l~~oc.e~~b
.) j,) ~ ,) .)
;J ' 2 ~1.: f () -0 0
1 :::1 1 1 l ___ 11 r r;r 1 o 11
:-..c.o::o: .l
e o o co ou.~cccoo.)
o~Cllc.o:w oo a:ccc.oro:ox.c:x:mec o~c~:s-oo ecce~
.) o \.l oo .> .J
F. '::! 1
r;r':":) ., 1' ~ o. > 1 cb
'"~::>c.
J~<DCll::>':::>
_]_ _ ~o.co~
:a:rooccc 1610s-l' >: e::> co~ :c.a:;coro: co
o .l .> .> e.)C.> ., ..> \..> o o
eCne.c w:>c.e.c~:~cc;;l
,)
o" .Jo
~' ,,... rdhlbc.tt:wro:kl~ OOCGOCoc ~~t:lt;"~:~oo
~'""""'"' ,)::; ,) o :_j ,) ;:) .)
<2ccoo:>c.ec~:~cc@ ~b!;'@ c-c.ookl:ob u;;lcc~~o~ 10~ :xh.l~:cc~l'>
.:l o .J .>o o s .> e ..>~ .> )"' .> ..1. .> ::::1 o
, 1~ :o!J:OCU~C.~IOCC.O~ @ccocb~:oroe.c OC.Q~:d,.,.,J..::>OOCC IOQCC:C.oodo
noo~c.l'l~:~ .>::::.1,) .)0 .) ,) .) .) .;l ~ "'So..> .) .;l::.:J .;l
l.~w~@hl
.) .) :.:1
:::>c.w~t;
.;l ~ 0
' ~&x.o~coco~~
.j ,) .)
:c.PAoo~cc@ccro
.) .) ,)
.S,...~reecccc~~~~hl:::>ee.c
3'"'"'.>1:) v .)::.:1,)
' 1 1 1 __ '"") ':"":I 1~ J_ o
c.o::>c.omc.ooc.a:;~:s-a;a; ua:cc:c.cooo ::x. ] ~~ oco~:oroec C.(}~.c.w~
c5" .:lO .> o .) .>o e .> .> .> .) .>
t f ~e:~econ:a:vl'> c.l,cMoccc~:Loo:oeec :C2roc.cc~6~~ro ~Cll wbc.o
JG :>:~ eJGA:> ~ ~ .> r v ~ ,: .l , ..> ~ , , .> ,~ 1\
dc.o~klro
~ .> ~
c.A@l2cc:~oo~beec
.> -~...>::1..>
oklco uo~..;;:JMC\Xl'!c.kloccwco
.>~o .> '':)"-.)o_o_ ~ o ' o u0
t=~r
~~tJc ...JJ dkreccooecoc.o
e,3':.l ,) ,)
:xh.loohl::>O&ro:dxoemec
,) ~ ,)::;.) 0 0
~"ec u ;:)
~""'"'
~:>~~R
.>:.:1-
l.,(c
._
u~::x:e::>l=:l ~MJ:~:h.'l&:Av,_,...... .....l.,,.,,.~So 1~rnlcdo~ ,o&,~
,) ,):.:J o ,)o--:> 0'::3 ~ o'h ,) ",
~b Cf <Ufi> ~~~~ C3tlc: c.a:~fe fo fbc ~~~ ~~~ CsiJc +
u(e) c~c ~g~ ~~ f;3tlc:
l~~t; 0 0
to::>ID:::>~ft .,) .;) .;) .> .>0 .>0
::>C.c~~bc.~ t1 2
.> .,) .,) \0
.>01.,) ...L.trero~::>bi!:~e~&:oe~cb::>h:>~:::>~
n 9 9 9 J.... 9 n _1 _ ~-.' o _J. n
co:~ft :xoco~teoco
, ~1eec lta.;a;eoe< ?"~O".>C.IC.Oe>ftro
v
~ .,) .;) .;) .,) .:>0 .) \0 \ .,) .) .;) .>0
:fro:o 1eecaca
l. .)
bee t~Cb ftch:Qc.ccczcb ~:&:h"J~.b~d,
;;) .> &:1.> .> &:1 .>
<;pcccbt&,
v
~...doe~ co:ec**~ &be:c.coa.xJro~ ;&;,
o~'""'.:> .;)
100m
.;) ...L.
?bl:o~::>c.ft~
.. :.:J .)
&:c.c:owc.fro~u
.)
.)oc.t~eoc.t~ec.wwt~;e
.)
olre:d&:dK.o
.) " .) ~ .
n:~EFJlc~n n~m~be:c.rococ.r:."\:~~b:>oe~
.> .) .) .) 3'::1
11 ~oo::2M:~bfJ:2n II COOOed:bc.coCOC.
.) .)
.:>O o.> o.>:.:l o
fro~~.) b::>oe::>hl
.) .:>J
usca::~Cb
~(e) f ~X~~~~ ~e Cstlc ?.ric.ftffi:,~oo~ }'~~
u@cc..,J....... r()('O() l:o~I'IGC ~b:oe~oo~:,:,@(\}~l=:l
,) 'S'O"':> ,) 0 .)0 ,) ,) ,) ,) ,) ,):.:J
o----- x_h.l~
~ .>-::::::1 o u@ccC)bl:..J:l,..JJ:b:
~ ~;.:J~..:J .
6:c.l)~
~
~t:>:l=:l..~c.~
:~ Of""' ~ ow:d6
~reC\XOC.Iro~ c:c.rt'l:~~:>coo" IICCCCIC.~:XO c.OO?a:ec.~c.h.l ~a;ltll=:la; w:dt'l
., ' ;, ~- tj .).) \~ :J :J
:::::::1 .) !l 0
a::>cocc
~
c.a:..h!XD::>b
""'J,j -- .) ~ 0
:cc(U(.a::>:oe~"
oRu:clx.o .)@cc:~&:cbco
e-::1
.) .) :JJ.@~crci>co
.) .r:~,) .)
, . ~
'~ ,:a: ~
,coc.ax.CG::>eOO 1 "
If :>'IC:Ceot' l-nSC ~ 'l __ P_""l
(C::liWYO:O'l'coa;CC~
L~- - ' : l
la;JOIW!;..,'C
0 o J -Jo.;, .,o .,) , .,) o ~ .,)
~~rcso,!e !Fll l>~CX>:> ~~jC~ ~
a..cec.~a~~=J-kc.rMC---m":cLc.o:~
~\. =::). ~ :.r- 0 "7'""'-.30 ...
- - ---~-~
,)C.(IC.~~ccm!r.auec-
., ., .,*ln
.,. w;t....~l.-~
-r--., a~:lcu ~-., 0 .,
.l
noa ,~tccccute...A~_:l-"O:ce~.IJJ~JL..-.h.l&:dxoooo,;c),ot,e
J:r:-r~vu ~~ ~ ~ S:lO"~e:J ~ ~0
(&be:c.cocuc.!Eoo
.:>
~b:x:e;:,kl)
.J .:> .:>:.:!
:ro~~~~~~
ncub tlf
~
ro!n.~'~ ~
!~! (&:c.cocuc.lh:>~
.:>
~b:x:e~hl) obl~~c.~~
.:> .J .) :.:1 .) :.:1 0.:> --
F~ jCM~& ,~~ ylre:~
::;;:,oe .JJcoo~c:I,
~ hl~
nlrecl\:citcoc.coe;:,;:,~
;, ~ ~o
arc
o~:;,t:lcoF~
~ .>::l
IIJOOOft:dxo
I, ~
C2cc:ot:le:occo~
~ .>::l ,)
4>b:o~:c:e~aaoooo
,)
bcc:;J~c.cc~
.) ,) .) ::::1
'-:I
I =~~ ~d~:hlhloco w:ro:cwcc~wcc MbPoco
ccc.~0.) :hlecc~wcc
,) . o _,
o'J~b ~_, o'J, .)
1_ ~ 1.. v v . 0 '1. ,. l_ 0 J _,. -:-1 , 0 'i . ,
?~TlW!e.G:')<::e~<::eel~ IICLX/JS'COflCCW OCCO.KC IICCCCIOeO~CLXIJS'CO W !t
w 0 ~ ,) ,) 0 0 .) 0 ,) L. \ .)0.) ,) 0 ~
.:c:e~tto
. ~ ln 0
of-'OO~h.le~~ ~ _,:.:~ .:::::1\.) ::I
,) ,) :::=:1 co:we~ree~ee~m fbo~:oQecoR:1:e w:h"J~:cbco
e:J
~b:c:e~oo
_, _,
:,hi:C2~:an
.:l::l .:l .:l
. ww .:l:xooxftd~e~
.:l
:cr~:Q~~s~~.:~eo::Jb . .:l
e:J . :>o .:l .>'b~:c.P~cc
~axp<.CG~ u@cclooR:hlewro co:h"Jl:c:cbcocco~cboC,e 6:oc.Q~~?~
~ ,;) " 1.. ,;):.:~ &'J,,) - o::~ .) ,;)0 o -> :::::~ 0 ~
-0~
-. :c:e~oo oR:cw:C2~:2Pcoec h.:~w @cc:"ro~ w:1Pobl:2:c;;;l~IS~Ikii:o
~0 -> .>:::1 .> -> o -> o->:.3 e o::l o
uC2cc:coowcfro~
,;) .)
l:c:~~ ~bioooc:eohl iu~flCG~ w bl:l:hoc~~
0 ~ ,;) .) . J~ 0 .)0 0 ,;) ' j 0.)
11 @ccecoMe~fle.eeoa~coR:C:eobo:c:ee~o()
-> '.> .>o .> ::I .> e J
@ru~hl l:s.Jl!;w
.> .>~ o
~~R(C!fth"Jewru c~:o&:ow cncccc :CC!ro:cPP-@cc~a;coccOI~ :hlwcb~
'S' ~::IJ ~ . -> ,;) -> J " -> -> oh 0
:orud~
.).)0 J.)
0~h . )o!bJ:c:e~GO~flCCC ccao~
\.)
:C2~:2Pcoe.o
,;),)
ocr,";le~to 11COCo~
.)~0.)
~e.occce>&xn~
.)
oca;~wcru~b:c:e~a()
.) ,) ,;)
oR:cw:@~:2Pwe.o
.>:::1 .) ,)
bhlcceahl
.>::1 \.)::J
1 r> 1 1 r 1~ 1 1 o o -:-1 ' r
~c:>:sonro :::>~s ee.c:sooru ~=e.c~c:e~c:e~ft :ccruc.accc~ olfCIX.WO
.) .) ,;) ' .) J ,) :; ,;) ., ,) J
:oPee.o
,;) fGr;";lohl
'r~ .:: ::l
:c.Pft: .)flo::>~o
.) ' &:cchl ,;) ~ CC!cc:c.P~cc~a;wcco~
.) .) ,;) ,;) ::;'~ ...Qa;~cc .)
~e~oteo!hl
.)0 ,;) 0'1
4ooec:ohle.co.;cco~
,;) _,:_j .) .)
~o'tot;e.c~
,) ~
11 :oc. h:l~ 'bcc:c:ee~aacnre:b~
.) ::::1. ,;) .) ,;)
c.ccw 0
:irooec~cc'l.:\ft
&' ,;) ~ ,;)0
o'ceroolhle.c
,;) 0~ .)~!ko:ohl:ohl .)
.) ,;):..3 .>:.:1 wcccob~wccco ,;) ,;)
&:::oro
'r ,)
:ot)C:Ocoro
,;) ,)
oFrok'bhl:ce.cPcnl.ccrre
.) 0 .>:::.1 .
:@ruc.cc~M~CC!cce:c:e;<a:CC!~:2rwe.o
,;) .) .) .) \ .) .) .)
',, n ' . 2' 1 -:-~ ~" _, __ /! _ _ 1!
w~e.co wreco :ce o oc:ewc ::>ocnw ~M ecce: cc:coco :IXUft
o " .> .:l .> .> .:l
:;oo .:l .>0.> oe
w:Q~bcbcccoo.-~cb o~e ~c@o
u@cce;c.rowcfroo lbab:>~
e-:3 .) .)0 0 .) " ,) . ~.) .)
oc:e"hl:oc.Qe~ro~ftHiccftre~~e.o
,;) ::;'~ .) :::::1 .) l, .) ~b~c:e~a~cc4hl
.)~ 0
h>~e.c c.wcoclx>:dc
.) .)0 .) .) ,;)
cbil v v .
cc~ co:ecoc:e~c:e~t'l ~fl ws~ecoo
,.cc:o:
i!."cc:cbco ::>l)e :) ccos1] 1'1.,
o e _, .>O .> .> o .>0 o
-:-1 , 'T .l! dxo ,
uccccwruccruoo:
.) .) 0 ,) .)
:ce.c.)~:ooc.~~
0.)
c.wcohl:te
.) :::~ C.O:c.l~::lo::>ft~e.c
.) Jcode~:hlc~:c.h"J
,;) o'J :::J o ~":c.r~wPeruwc.rruo
.) , _, wee<~
.) .)
IL<> 1 ,, -:-1 l ,, o 111. 2 a
::JCC:::>eoft occococoJc;Ococ.s~oo ucccc:c:eooowco :c.oowc:e: J:S"W:
.:l -> .> .:l .:l ,_, o -> _, o o .:l e _, e
r r o o ~ 1 l_-:-! -:-1.1 an 1 T
1.)0 ,) .)
o~:o~fl::>~:w~c:e~ce~fl cc
.)
:c:e

coccfl:c:e~o<ll o :c.e.c:ccs: rwe.c (!)(-}e.G
,;) ,;) .) .) .) 0
v 1!: 11 .l .lr. ,, r .l. _ _
_l. __ ~'' J. 1'--:-!
::>coo~:cr~s-:x:l~JI:)CO:o
b ol;;'e:coco w:wJ cc:o;,cooccco
.) . ;:,- 0 0
..>
101ro:coco
.) .0
-:-~ , o a II -1 ,, , '=' b 1 , v ,. 1 5b
IICCCC:C.o::><::eO
.) 0 \
CC.OI~OCO OOCCOO IICCCC !S'CO:JCOCO
.)0 ,;)~

cb.ei!CCCCCC.SC.
, v , , . r -.. .) 0v 0 ,;)21 1 .) .)0.10 .) 2 n L 0 i!. ;1. , ,
cwcoooc:e w::J :GOCI'l~ o~co:cc:.:owc:e: soc.oc:e 1 :s-oo: Jcosoc.coo:ce~ :cceceece~
.> \ o .> O.> .> o .> o.> _, e .>
' r
,. o .., .1 o ,, b -:-~ ~L- '=~
'S' :l't
wco 0
:ece~c:e~c:ee~ft o cc:c.ccru:t'lW eo cccc:J :<::>coo t'l C ~e.G ucc:cc
,;) .) 0.) - ~ ,) '-l:l~
ncb"' }o " .) , .) ov .11 1~ 1 ~:::J:g~~~
.b:crfl WGooowro
~ .) .)
o
.)
ccc:ewro
\ ,;)
w:e.c~ce~c:ee~ft rcscoruft axc-::oe
0 .) 0 0 ,;) . ,;)0
0 1 -:-1 s, -:-1 1 1 . , ,. '"I
a.xns-
,;) ,;)
cccco
.) ,)
:oocft~ ncccccrooocc:set'le.c : :> :<OC~~ ccccwoecn co
0.) .) ". ) 0 .) .)0 .) 0.> 0 ,) .) ' ~l>c
I
ode
0~~

(" (" C""l (" 0 g :m ac:roc:cn(.li)('OO:::O:>


(" (" (" 0
co:n:~smrcot:::o:nn ~:
C.:.
(" ('' ('
1*
r.:: (" r.;,~ 0
lJ C lL ~
o:n:>amco::::o
C. Jl---r tl
(' ('
Jl
(' r.: (' r.: ('4 II..
Q (' r.;, ('
~
~ l
("
o~.
GXnJ2=t~=OOG~:oc:oo:>:t:N ~Qp:nr 'tt'trtC: ~t~t ~cOX?:tjOX)Q~ ornl~a5\S
ID~:::O-:>
C"
GO')')C\)sc;;c.u
C" 0 t. C'
SX>:q~.!!C
OC'Q
mm:niD:> Gro'?carr.mGmmot:::o:nn
C' C" C'"l C" ,4o.
'1. JT , L h. J L C:,A ~I T T c.:;.
~
OC" o
c
Qroa~m Gmo 0~
: [9(" C" OC'
~:::o:n:JXr.>c:
C'
QGroc;;roc;;oo:s-c C'O ~
OQ?CID: 0 ('
ro:::o:n wo~oo;~,a

.a. 1\. 11 "~"6 :R C!.. l. 6 A J I. L C.
(' ("
!X)~~:OC~QJ?: t1"'~01:::0~11 Q(O~G~Goo:m
r.;~~ "' (' r.: ('
G~?C~:r1qco
(" 0 \
c;;q::::o:>:~
0 ' (" (" (" (" (" 0 , 0(' ('
<i>:::O:> ID?QI')~1) S')~O)O)C ::l)('J)CP::l)~O)C:::OC: CO?::::O:n:"l? QO"lCOI(\)~~:n II
\J l A 6 6 o C., L 6.1 C
0 o C' C" C' r C' OC' C' C" C"
cm>~l?:m ()O)OC\)IC ~:C'DidO):;)I("t):;)t::l):::O!l?O)C: :.ID:ro!l?~:::OXYI?:
l. 1J L .ro JJ IL \! 1J U ~ l J ~L C.:. t.l
(" (" (' f,"'.J: r,:;: (' (' ., (' "L., =' .C'
:::0~ S')r1l~Y:OC~QJ?~ ~CP~?C: .?=>C5J:>~OI:::O~~ o:'Ctf"U :::O~II
..!:: 0 ~ -rr,:;: ('~ (' (' (" . ("
YG~~~GOO:~ ll~?~~~~IGf~: G:3t ~~~C;?OC:m OO~'X>~J~::::o~
<.DXffi (' ('
S')i.ltd:ax>.;:O:n~O>
(' ('' :n::::o:nmy ro[SC"
~:11 ID?GO!ID?OJ ~ (', ('
C\)(.)~:::0~
~ 4 c-- -~ tL " ~ c..:.J
c c
COC~?:G:::o?ro~: ID?YJ?::::O~ ~:~:
r t' oo
:::O?::::O?:tf"'OI:::O~II
r::.s: " t' c r,:r
!l?O>JC:eiD:::Ot
r
C'O r., (' (' o (' C" 0 C' (' (' C:
~ GQX~=r~t'~ :::o~ G:O:',\oc:~c:~ ~J2:tc: occ:cpmm? YG~~Gm:
c o C' ' r rr;::c- r.;,c <' C' oc- c c ('
'"t'ProO>y::l?l ~~YqJ) oc'"'Pml:lc:tj1D:::05:S')~m !l?~Gmptc:~ mJit=~t
r r o r r r;;:r 'c' .r,::cr;;:rr
cpc;;cpm:::o~n 'roca:m !);)~ !PO)J2=t~m?:tlq ~>c;;;;c,, 0c:tlqc;c:'
r..~h~tcomcom
c~e- r r c ,r.::c r;::;:: c c c T r.::C' L."
oo~;~:~l:lc:Ge_j?~c;c:t O;)~~~ot t oxp:YJOO~c~e>
\ '1 0 ~ 0 C' C' f. (' L,$'
C' ('
OC' C' ~
~UIII ~c;:~~ ~C'P\!()0') oxp:~~:m OO~Of:::O~yf2:~s t;fC\J2?
r r or c-r;::r o <' c C' r ., r , r
IDlG~:G>q'f O:iY!j!~J~o:>oC:CJt U(.l)()Jffi9f Y:::OSU'CJ? C9J')0XU:::O~ II
o o C' o c- c r.;,c r
~ , e _o
1:'
0~?5l OO~:qr;~COf~: e:~:GQ':>CO? m~O? :::O?Qft~:tl<? OOG:0::;9JC
o~ _r ~ coc., r
OCI
l:1
rr.IGCO':>O?!l?CO:>:!l? !l?IDl ~COGUt
Jl 6
' T
roc (' T
GUt C\JC.!!COIO:>:U
1> l G
II W~
(' ('
O:>mC>:::O~:;)u()')YI'): ~O)COO
(' ~ ,
1> lh.

0111 :l)COO)C
0
Qroa:m
(' 0(' ('
::J'.)Ioi~OOC GUt
'T'CO:>:
IJ JL 6 J -.[!; A ll. i .. tO
(' (' 0 (' (' (' (' C'"l~ 0 0"!_
C>:::O ?!l?O>Iffi::J'.)C\)0)0):::0:n
tJ L ~
~ :>:U:X:::::0:'n
J 4 t:-
loi(J)o:>Qioi.SOI
L JT w.
ffi'): OO:OioiClOKJ)
L II L
(' ' . . r. ~ (' (' ~ 0 (' (' f,"'..{ ('
c;;ropmro:::oe;:n ~~:m Q~:::oei ~~t=nr OjmJe=t~:!l?.,:tr; 1000..,:
(' (' ~ (' (' t (' 0 (' (' (' ~ (' ('
:::o:::::o:nm QO')~t('OOI'): .;)KXY}(l)')::::O::n<n ~W')CO)C(\').C !~Q)')CO
c;, -i. J u " -uJ --~ ~--" J J ~ "
r:(' 0('.
Ofli">,CC!n~
( ) --~
0 ~ GOO'XOOtrJ?~ OI~CP~')C: 0~"5\~:qc;;~e1:ro
(' , ' 0 /10 ~ (' 0 0 .~

C'f.': ('
~ftj:::O~II
" -...f. (' c r r.;, r o c-
O;)ffiJ2"t2-r.~:o:co::::o? ~p::::o~ :::O?Yf!l??:tiC: ~c
(' ('~('
~:rome1o ~:::o~~L:' c;:~~:cx.l: m
0 o ~ rs('c:<it:9t'1 (' o
~:::0').
o ~ r oo_9 ___ <' r r r o c c
m1DY :loll')::fiC OW~t?:::OCGO')?:::O:UIJ nuY')O;)'): C.;()C\)IC roy:
() 4J J C ~-...... ., l J1
Br
'T'C' r.:(' .,
l L \1
(" (' (' (' (' (' _0 51.
QOI 3 tl~t:Go:>? GQ?Go:>')0)')2 eo"O C>~:roy;~()')YJ?:~. ~~~~.:

68 (:)) ~&:! ~ ~ ~~~ J <~)


(~c
,
:I ''"~~~! ~i~~:~&:~<h~ ~~iWJb 'lN~
~ cc (\)j~ ~te Csllc c.cc~~re F uc so~~~~ ~~~ Csllc !
n(e) r~c .fOt,m:;~ll~ '!te Cs8c
u.')=>c.roo~~oro:2u
..)0.)
,, a.X.oa::ecbe:c.ooa.;c.fro~b~.JJ
..) .) ..) .)
:>:J
II b:x.o:2u II
CLXoc:c&:c.CXXL:c.ito~~b~..J:J
e.> e .) ..> .) ..> 3"~
g!oe~~soo.,d,
olret&:d,coc.C.Of):>:>~
.) .) .lO
.68

'.
. ~ 0 f:' 1~ OC' ...~ ,..G 0 0 ~. C' f:' ...,~ ~ ~
axp:~e:1:c'1l~t<"~J~~~~ nO.U~dl:itc;()O)"""'~ 9ff?=oc:
'C:
r' OC' C'
'fCCCO)')
( )
::>
C' f:' 'L . Of:'
~02C G::J)')O)()~:
C: C'
::J)~~I:ja:x;o:OO'):::x>~
' C' 0

~::oe?n , . .
... As at' present advised, I am, therefore, unable to fiitd that
the .dissolution of the mairiage takes away from the com-
plainant~ the right to lodge a complaint, and I, therefore,
decline to stay proceedings I do not,. however, record any
definite finding, as I think that in case of a conviction the
convicts may make it'aS one of their grounds of appeal that
the provisionS of Section 199. Criminal Procedure Code, have
not been complied with, ahd the matter will then be one for
the decision of the Appellate Court."
v
r
0':
.J
(~:cbc.o~&->es)
u ., 1_
Aecowcoo.->ca
. ~
Lee
no~:2 :~~~15~b:~a:::u
.)ee.:J o
nw~we:cbcoe&ec
.>
ode
J

'. '. '.


:I
ot>c
cbc
,,'~W~:> lU~JO!A ~U!AUedwo:>:>e JOJJ~l pue U!eJl ]0 S~:>UelSWn:>
-.rp .z~pun renp!A!PU! ~uo ..<q uope:>y!lu;>p! S!t{ uodn uosJ~d
B P!AUO:> Ol ~~s :lq:fnot{l :aou AI~SJ.M ptre u;:aJO SJ 11 ,.
-:>&>~
~
(c) ~ewf'lc.f'l~roL
.) .) . .) 0
uo~b
ref)(()~
~ 0
C.~:>IJ:c.co:o~GQW
~~ ~~
:C.CG!CG:!>:><.O:>C.~~
.) .)
to:cbcce&->ec
0
!J~bCeC.Q:!>
.) 0 ~
eoC2cc,ow~t'ICO~w&
.> l. .> 0 0.) 0
:>&,:rft~~wiJ:!>w
.) !) ~
ttwh>
0 '1. 0
uo~o;:ot:'lft
~0 .) '"]
c.~cc~
.>
or
:lr<"~wiJ~w
I!>' :::J c.cc~~~:c.Pewc.re~oroto
~ .) cbco~ruw
.) w,ew::>b
... ~ ~.)
.) c.~h.l::x:o~
1bhlo:1o:dA:1e
.> ::.:1 l. !J~:dA<.O~CC~
l. .> ~
C.fl:dA:Ce~
o 1::>tow~cc:fil .>
'I.O II ~A~CO
.>O .> e 1 eCe
:c.co:h>:C2COCt.Jreco
0 .) .)
w:f)(Oieo~wro
0 0.) l. .)0.)
C2cc:c.P~:ee&
.) 0
IC.CC~tebc.h.lococcw
.) 0 .) ~ .)
II ~CO~ c.fi:oiJee@cc~ en:c.r~~o@~&:;cc<" ~hlocb~:f)(OIOOfcoro
.> o .> :::lo .> o .> t. .> .> ~ ::.:1 .> e .J l. .> o .>
tu:c.rA:ee~ ucccc~~:e>ro:l-:coec:x.ft~ c.fi4lw:o&,a:;tW ~~Q~Pewwhro
o o .> .> o .> 3"...1 .> .>o ~ ~::.:J.>S .> o
ccccew~Peczffi uo~o~ohl<" c.;.,(2ccl;ft::xb~::>row ;& 10~ftW CJJ1ew
.) l. .>0 ~ .)0 .) '"] .) 0 .) .) .) ...... .)0 t.
.)2~:orew
-!:.:1 .) uewe2ccncc:h:~c.cccroc:cc~w
l. .) .) .) .) 0
W&,~ec
0 \
~~ecot!W
3'::3 ~.)
utccc:c.tte~o
.) .)
c.~:ccc:(',
0
~CC10
.) l,
.).,)
Coo:o~:,~:c.~e
:,ccrorocc~:dxo ~.) .
:lPwa:coccccco~
~
:@row:.ec:!>::X:O:x.ft:>
0.)0 .).)
Jb:@~:croo:cbco::>eco
.) .)
u@cc,obl3C'b:!>
~ l. 0
:xhJ~eccbcoCc~hlcoccccco
.) ::::1 .) .>::.:1 0c bw
wlealo
.) ~
ll:):c.f<"ccea.;cc
:y .)
e
. ,......IO~W:CG~OCOOC.~~
.) .) .
'N:cbcoe&-lro
0
o&,~e,clf7.
.) ';)"
u@~co<P..:2
.> .> Oe:J:(:;'J~~l5~b:hro
0
~c.@o c.cc~~:>c.c:e~IOCJJ'N
0 .>.> l,~O
OO.x.cb:~
~ 0W
n~cc:dc3CO:c.cow:fpec tf:c.w:c.rtW
:h>:>b3 e:l
.> e 1co:h.l~~l5~ !k@o
o ..J:Jt:o u@cc,obcccorocce:dxo
:J:jo ~ 1. .> ..>
bc.h.'le
.:> - :::l
C.CC~IO!JCC:O:>
\0 .) 0 .)
Wb~:C.@e :1rcuec~:~mcco:col;
~
I~CC~C~:d~c.orewcbcnCc
:y -- - . 0 3':.:1 0 ~ .)
::>euf'><OCCcccob
.> 0
:@ro!
.)
1o~ec :we::x:ox~e
.).1. ~ ~
b:l:dxoeoocclffi
0 ';)"
1t:>:c.roec
&:JJ::x.cc~X<"~
0 3".j .) .) :,~::>c.cce:>C.fte>
~ ~ ~
hJ~:df'I:X
1.)be. ~ ~........tt, nccccoo~
.> ~ ...... 0 ~ l. .>0
a::~ toCacc.o,Q
.; r...!::J
c.cc:oiJco~
.>:::J"\~
C 1o~h.lec &oc.~~
~.1. ~ .)
111o~ei.8l:n
l.O 0
:<2o...xft
.)
::>IJ:c.ec~~ fO~co:>oJ.,.;:;:lf'lec l!l:ro~c.oco~&:2 cc~a;=:w~oco:x.ft~
.> :::J "..> ~ .:> ..> <r'"S" :y ~ e :y ~ .)
l<.oft:>co@,eect!cc:b:>o.-:,e c.o:ec~::x:o:x.f'le ,_hl1J:> norCO<"JOCcccc
.) O.> e.> r... ..> .> :J:jo l.
C.;,::>IJee(2ccobJ11:l
.>:::lo .) ~ ~ tteo2" o
o ' .> w"&@~(2~~ .>
o&xx:>oc.ft~CO lecc:>bQ"
.> " ~ .> ~o~~
c.Pewcc~ec c.o:2cow:2<:e& 111nl)~ :@ro,;,@cc:c.ecooc :~1ecco
e o e l. o o .> .> ".> or...
fbc
c6c
c c o co o c ' o c -~ ~
C1?f- U>-:>~p: ~c;t~~ c;~'l~~~~ ~?Op.>YJ?:c:~ mro11l: ~.,.:
c- o rr c co c- ~ r,:;:: c -t" c c Ji. ~ <~:
ocror oxp:;) m_c;or 3~" o:>a~~n c;JJ!l:lG~?C::.c oo:>~~ O)CnJc _~ ~
~ l o - c .c i c . c c. ~ oc c:- c:cncmc::J~:
c.~~Ge:'l:oo?: (.,) G~xa>coc: ;~ eGoo?c-t 6t~'>~cc (li) oo~~c ~
~ro::S a5:~ro:>:~~
e:JI oL ' ao r.:.
n ~~oo~~
f. o~
T~'):OCCII
"Held: fn a case of circumstantial evidence, the failure of
one link destroys the chainso that it is of the utmost import-
ance to get on the record every piece of evidence which'
makes a chain.
Held further: Circumstantial evidence must be consistent
and c~nsistent only with the guilt of the accused, the incul-
patory facts must be incompatible with the innocence of the
accQsed and incapable of explanation UPQn any other reason-
able hypothesis ~han that of his guilt. . . '
Held further: An accused person owes no duty to anybody
and the burden of proving his guilt remains throughout the
trial with the prosecution who must prove such guilt beyond
all reasonable doubt."
11 c.otocdbc.coc.oc.lro~~bce--hl
.> .> .> .) 3"..:.1
r
0~
.>
l.bc
u6c
uR:~r:o:2
o ~ e~
:h.l~~~b:~u
o
uweoece:dx.oe&e.c
~
v v n, J~ ~ ~11
uoe~:
2u uwcoe.c:c.lea:::o.xoecoro
e .:> o

(e:cbcoe&ie.c)
0
r
'j"rf
(:cr~~:cbco~&-lcs) r
1r 11 _,_
flecomcoo,:,e
. ,)
o,) lre:&:cl,coc.c.o~::>3~
.) o .)O
~Ci!J , .~
0
, ~
. . . c....1
. 8:'.~11;., ~ '"6
eo
I ...,
- -e ....,
0
s ~ l!ID 8 6) 051 -~ aDoS 0 o8 81 (: (: v Q;D-v s 6) ~ c;;o 6) 6)

.s. ~ g "' .@.8 ~ ."' .r .t !l"' .&


-r !lot i.e Jr !l., ~ f.t r
~ ~~ c ~ e~~!~i[ ~ l .. ill,~~ s e ~ g,~ eJk
CID ~ G) ~ e CB-, ..s :e ..s .8 a s ~ e s ~ ~ .. B~ ~ .
::=!>0 :)
~
.t
0')
~~
s<n ::=!>0 ~ ~S 6)
~ 8 ~ ~~ =0 -vo
8 c -&-l i . ~ ~ ~ 1r ~ 8 -o s, a = (")-) -.() O'l II) 6)
_
()')

lt~~ T~tx~':il~rtutr'J;1~!!9
i~ i~~CCJ~ ~ ~t~-8o a ~ -8o ~~ ~ s ~ . l cfu 6) s, .J;
~ ~{[Jo[ f t t ~ ~ ~ j _[t!m i ~ . B -8o'
s,
~ ~ cffi ($' CUQ
re, ~ ~ a~ em 0'> s, 6)
& c 6)
1~ %9 ~~ ~, ;;s- 'B ~
r51 8/ ~ g-> o8 1> ~. e 3" ::&, m ~ = ~ -t 8 - -8o _, -&-la s,~ X., ro_ 'it:' :)
LW 6) O'l
-c
o 8
S, 0 o
~ o/ _ ~ v ~ "' P.
~l = [l}> 4:: =8 .. \:S
t ~\:S tJ ~
~(B., .. ""$ ~Jr
+ _ -8 ~w- ~
~~J~ 6) g g,
r31
~ =to ~ a., -:So ...o eo v ,.a ..t, 6) ..s --g., s, 2 -&-l ..c ~ t: s, ~ e
~ ~ + ~ =g; 1o ~ n-> 8/ 8 g., 9/ ~ -v
H ~ ~ s J. e lo ~ 6 g'l ti 'it:'
..g 6) O'l (: ~ ~ O'l ..8o -8 + V (B, 8, ..&, 8-, o8
8-, ~ R., 8 ~
~ G) g., ()') 2 ~ s 8
8,_. . e -vo e -~ ..!> 9 ..& ~
(:o -
..3o ~ =to + .. -&
! 6)
..a - ~~ e --g., m .: s., SP Cl (:
s
J}~g~~
- ~ 15 f ~J.Ir~ji !l"' _a,
~ ~ e ..., Ti&L~~~@i~-~1
~ 8' s, a g: li.. ~ ..s ::. ., _g 1!3.,
~ s, i fB-, ~~~ ~ cgl~ 6) ~ ~1 s, ..~ 8-, ..Bo.lk-g ~
6) o 0'> 6) 8.
c ..ao -
- .:g,~
~ -e a, o3 ~ ~ csl ~
9
-a ~ :) ~ 3 ~
t . m, B &
&, a., ~ ~ 8 s, &,.Jr ~ B ~. ~ ~J
~ ~~ ,.., s. i;l ..s ~ cJ-
.,., s. H ~ -s ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ -Bo 1l "ll ::B:. :t;. t
.,
I
....
.~
--
78

'. '. '.


~~~:)t:l:>oe!i;:~Q 'c.o;-~ ~:>:h1oc:<bco coo.:>cb c.occcb (~:~) .~~~~b 11oM!)
.);).> ':>.>::J o ->o ::,- e::J .) ., J OJ.> .) t..'
c.ob
..)
rr coo~ t<t~e C~:~tlc C.CC!'>COftre
.J ;; .., .,)
:)to ur~c COACCA:h1coo~J,
., o:b l()~e :1
.) b~:~llc +
u(e) srr ~t,a:;(}~:?~SOO~<b ~~~e CstJc
II :Kfl~:eo:2 :r,J~~(5~b:GeGII IIWOOecCcbe:c.cowcJro~~b:xe:>hl
.) .0 0 e::J 0 .) ' .) J J J:.:l
II :~o~(;:)C.eG~:2u II WOOeGCc:C.COCIJcJC\)~~b:>ce:>hl
.) .)0.) 6 .) .) .) .) J:.J
uwb
.) .
o
ro~LoloM:> .
ssvc +
fCc
~

-a r.:J,~_.g e o ]:
[,~~ 8~fl! . lli>~ .: e !r:[4l" s.
l' 8-,
,.e ~ t~"i
tm-?,.~. t~ ~eo
~ ~1 &,~ l ,.e -S %J O'l~ t~ ~ ~
. i . Jl . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. i -r ~ ~ s ~ 1 s ~ ..., i.&, -3 Q 9o
. ~ ,V/
~ l3o (B
3-, -8o ~
~ ~ ~ S g:, -R { -B. o8 ..s ~ ..&
t t ].~ o ~ T~
t
e s ~ . &. ~~
l
. _ c->
~ So a s j ie:n
~ ru S 8-,
..so t . 8 -o
+"~ ~ -e. ~/ -2-,
It\
s e <- ::&
lt;Y) ('3'1 ...Q) ><
8
'=
j c i
~ . ~ IV~ ~
t: ~
IV

~ +'I g'> ~'5' ~ ~ 'll{ . ..

8
~~~~~t~~~r&~-~L~~Jtt
~ 'i ~' ~ ~ a- s ~~ a., e ~ ~ l ~ ~
&~ 1s~La O'l g., <--' O'l g., G) { ()

e~tt~~~ 9<-Jt~4~ ~c:S~~~ ~~~ ~~~~r


~ s 8. V/ en ~ ~/ ,_, -8o 8. ~ 8 ~ ~ -8o O'l 0 ~ !B ., ~ ~ Q}

L~~%~l
f ..!)
8-, oS
~ATi~~T~
~ -So ~ e 83 ~
~J~1~
~ ~r : i (1>, 8-,
~~
2" -f)
~~~~~
eo ~ ~ ~ -8o
~ +'I O'l
,.& ~ rZl . O'l
~. -8 -:fl lj ~-;, ~ CD S 8

tii.f~ ~~~~Jll~ 4 ~it~ t1! ~flfl


JJLI~i~~~tt~~~ti~t.T~t J}~ JLiiJ
<- \j C_,
t e .+ O'l ~ en C_, ~ 8 o8 ~ ~ '"9. ~ ~. 8 ,X_ ~J
~.t~A-~~- - ~~J~M~r-~~ --~ --~~- Cl1an .,
..... Lt 5 I
~t~t ~
- ..0 ~ ~
-v
Cj!Zl f) <a!
--~ 5 ::tS
~l~~
!l' -e ~
Ii
~t~t~~~~fj~~~~J~~~~
cc -<> 3 a., ~ ~ .. ,. ~ C?. ..8
~~~j~f1
~ ~ ~ a(;, eo
~~
. a., a., G> G>

..!:> G)
itJ'~
em
G) (Y)
~ 3
9 1~lj~L'
(!;
a.,
(G)
C?.
l3 e s
- t~~i~i!~l.r*t~J~~
~
8 -3o ~
ceo
~ -g., e +
s ~
.. ~ [B.,
-3o .. -3o ::
~ 8 ~ ~ G) .. c
!2:J
[B., (Y)
CS1 ..B ..

.fl '" -t %'f: { ~ s~


~ C'l
~~.,B eo S o f> <=g j -3o.&! Co '--' G> m O
~ j 1rt~:tc!;m.-t ~~ (!'1 ;, ~[l~ti~
8 i]J ~ (Y)~
~~~~
e -oo CBd -oo
~~~j
...o-;
~t~~~~~a.,~~~+.e
=e ~ 8 ~ ~ -
-g~~~~!~ l(J')
-+-> ..!:> lB ...!J -c .... b2 a., G) G)

e a i,$~-il.ci-?. -s ~ a. s g., S. ~ 1 ~ s 1l 'i. 1 1::: s -lli:


1
[B., ~ a., ~'l ~ n" s i -3o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~') -3o ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-a
1 t
f;.%!,~11L ~~ t!.~ ~tf ~tTit. i ~tf; i, 1' j J
s-, _; ~. .~ ~ ~ ..e ~ ~ l ~ ~ 1iJ Q %] t Jk ~ ~ ~ a cf 1 o .8 ~ G)

=881 ~1 ~~~~~~a t~ W l i
r.::J'l 6n G) .:
~8 ;~-3om,
~ { LSJ -R ~ m~ ~ g:> g, oe
.t ..s~J.1
..
~~ o.,
e -So 1 -e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s., .. .. l]-> ~ .~ e ~ ..e n c rn1 oo.. ~ e
J 3-, rn., ~ G> -P. -3 ~~ n -3o- c - n 8 ~~JL SA. ~~C5l-t:>
~TJ~~ti1~t~~~tJ!~1~~~l~wt~~~l 0
., -1:'> -1:'> ..!:>
\j -vo -:!>
G) G) 0 / d.? G) (""51
8a., ~ ~ ~ ~n 8n" ~ m ..9.~ ~ ~ 8
+ 8-, CCl -3o
~ -t'> ~ ~ CCl
-c n-> 8
~ ~ ~ -& (Y)
~ .. k- G) e .:8 t?, -c ~ s Ltf 1;" [B.,
.
~~~~ .
~i.~~~ ~~t~~f-ilos~ i~~~~~i .
e s -w e 8 s
i s -+ s s ~ o ~ CCJ -8
* -eo s ~ &, ~ c:c1 ":@ ~ ~ ct -9
~c~l ~ t-g,- ,~ [ ~ ~ ~k ~ =g_,_: ~~ _S S, ~ rn,ci; _, l ~ S, ~
a, ~ =: ...!l
~ ~ ~ .2 ~ s (i) (i) (')") ~ ~ ..s ~ a~ ("31 ~
~ ~ 8 ~ ~ c:G1 .. _;:)
~ 0)0 v c !'- ~ ~ ~ ..
e 3(')")
c .. v-Oo ~ c-,~ ~~ &'ll~2!.1,.8 [8
r [B, tsfl ~ ts ~~-CoS
g, ~ 8 ~ ~ eo~ 8 1i ~, ~ Q ~ ~ ~ $' dh e 1~ Jk J! f J! Jl ~ ~ ~
~ -8 -g_, o8 ~ 8, ~ 8 t; ~ '"ti - $ 8 ~
ts ~ [B_, 8-, 8-, ry:; ~ c-, .-&<>

~~ r ~ ~~or ~ ~ l..a a! ~ ~ -a ~ f ~, -a -3o ~ g; c

~~ l'I
s . -&
lil f ~
'- rn-, rn-,
GO)
e
-
I t!
&'!
~ ..so el.i
J ~~ e ""i!i>
:::
-8 a, s rn, ~
i,* ~ i ~ it>~~ 1~ j,~~ t~
tih rn, . ii a., ~ -So e ~ e ~ ~ s ~ ~ ii ~ ~ ~ (')") c
~~ ;::t... ;n J

r8-, -?. ,g ~ e s ~ s s ::g~lrn,~


t ~ 8 ~ ~ ..s -a ~ v
~~ j_ t~ ~~i aom]-& a,~(')") ..s rn-, g,al, an~~ s, s, e
~-So~~ e 'X,,.c ~rn,~. s (')") ~ s: e-8o ~ .. J ~ ~ ~~[B, (G)

-) o -o c ,,. (')") u
~~-l~-3o[B,~~.
e ..
rn, c C'lo
So So
m geL~~~~8~18L-~r~
c,

o,.. OS ~
~
-=8 8 ~(..!)
liJ~~~
~
(')")
s - ..s s 8
GO)~
[B,-2 .. ~ ~
rn-, ~rn;l 4) e . -Z' u ~ (')") .. -& .. ~ '- e ..e ..2 ~ ~
1~~~~t~litT{~fL~a~ta tL~~
~~e~o,~~~oS~~tJ~s~iiEit
. O?
~ ro _ So~ o ~ [B, co C1 -+<> \)") o
osi~~~t
~ c oe CB1l..Di -oo l9'1 O?
c -a lv> .. -(')") ~ ~') .&1 ~ $ ii ~ ~ - g, ~ 8; -<0 -& ~ ~ -8o 00, [B, s [31
= (B,., ts-> 0 0? .. = (')?
ta., ~
~ ~
~ -3o
-~ ~ l'e' t c~ ~t i j, ~ -3o ~ ..e~ Cf.. ,~ ..e8 cg~ ~ r.ts ~(')") ii~ t~ i(')") ~g, ~r (')")
Cl')CCl f)
+>11'-
s ..,..... s. ,., I ~

~ :1
~
i -etCl'>+
1 11 r i ! . g '1 If 11r ~
ccc~ccc.o w:co:oC!I\!: :owcro~ ::>C.
.:> .> ~
~cc~b:c.O>:cO> ::>iCOCCCWft::>ce::>
..>:> O.:>.J
IC.O~ft
.,)
~b:cO>:CC!I
.) ..)
oH~en:~mro
.)
e<b:cO>:CC!I
.) .)
hJ{!;roiG3
0 ':)
C2cc:&lr13
..) . ':)
II C2cc:O>hl h:loccc~:cc~~oo:11rwft Fftto(/;(])hl ccccC2ft rC2ccec:c.oo
.) ~~ :J .) 0 :J .)
o<:~ .J~ .)
wc.ftu~ ccc~re
.) .) 0
xh:l~mccro
.) :=:! .)
IIO~::>i>eftWOO
.)0
o~IW :C2c:oWwrehl::>co
0 .) 0
:_j_,.) .) .) .)
mccccO>G
.) .)~ :lPf>J:::>I::'I~to:llrw
~' .l:::b
cccf,wc.co~(!lhl
.) .)~
(/;(!lhl .)......JO
.):J cMC!Ihloo IWIt.;O~~..ahl
0 _,:_j
rC2cc&:ccowc!ED~
.) .) cccoohl::>eo
\ :J.> :h:l4-~15~
EtJ 0
~c.C2o. ~&:ccowc!ED~
::> .)
II C2cco~:acoo c.Mbcem to<Ccc~eo:llrw h.> (o) G~eG r0r
.) .) \ .) .) .) 0 .)0
wf,w
.) C.O>c.ccrw~ ~hlcc:cc~orot'l
.)~ .) :1Pfl:::it;;bcb~
~ ..>:::1.)
ibM woo:H
~00 ..) ..) CCC~
.)COCC;W
.) :C2coecb:::>cb~
.) .) .) l:::>l::'l:w:::>cb~
.>:::1 .) ftto
0
CcC2ft
.)
II O~:cce;bft :::>~W~
0 .)......J.)
::>cce:~d:.ooro
..) .)0 .)
ffltcC2ft
0 .)
d:oro
..) 0
~cce({)W~
..) \
::>&wcoro
.) :_j .) .)
:C2co~E!wcccoo
.) 'S'..) .)
~:~r C.COCC.O CCC~~hl II O~::>Oft:li'wro ::>tocnl g~ec CCC~Co:::>Q
.)O~:ro
;) ..) :.J :::>rero
.,) .) .) .) l,; 0 ..)~
::>C.Co~tc
.) 0
Oto (1;1)
..) ::; \ .) 0
e
G~eG { .)G~eB 0
;flee
.) 0
:b~o(oof
..) .) 0
:w:h:lcob:ieo
Et:J.) :J .)~~
.(/;oh:l:h:l
.>:=:! ctj
owe
.)
co~ (c(2hl ~c.h:l~ffi "o~eoro'lC:lfl :::>Q:cco wbc:OW
.) :J .) :=:1 0 \.) :J ..>:::1 .) ..)
oh:.:~
_, .>
ecb:c.OJ oOCWOO ' o
nC2cce
_, ' _,:_]
ahl:CCO _,::>to..LIO~:h:lfleG
Ei':::J.>o o
w:cr~C.COC.CO fl &
:cttfl 0&C2hl:fl~
.) :J .)
&woo
0 \ 0
11 Ct!cce ::>oo4-:;, cucb~:c& :::>toC211]:fJb :h!coo h.Jf,
.) \ .)0 .) .) .) ,_J ..)
6 J .) 0 0
.)
oroec .5~ch:l:;,::::>Qhle>fl
:=:1 .) :::J:J ::>cero
.) eixoo::>fle.G
.) .) 0 c~c.rco~:ce.c:::>c~~ro
.) .) :=:1
nC2cco::J
.)
:2roe
.) \
c.Mbcem
.)
Coe2cc::>Pco;ce
.) .) .)
dwb:>ft
.) 0
a,;fle.cto
0 .)0 ' 0
~ch:l~c.cc~comfl
.) :=:1 .) .
::::>r;;w...,1Q
_,:::J:,"'v:._j :C2co:::>l::'l:c.oo
.) .):::J .):xro~Cc 0
c.oMoo
.) .)0
ICC'J!Jft
\ :J
::::>QPe::::>cbe>
.):::J .) oeccoo
.)
oh.>:crflec&> r:cc~orofl .>
:::>1::'1~::::>51
.> :::Jo _, ::3
:C2co4bPe:::>cb~
.> _, .J
11 :cc~m~ :::>Qre:::>cb~
:J _, :::1 _,
&;:c.P!'lccnc.co
0
O>'i)bPero
.)~.)
rC2ccl;'~:~cc:xfl~
.) .) .)
&:ccoc.oc.!ED~
.)
11 C2flo~b
.)
:c.O>:CO>
1 _,
euC2cc~ro:
o .> .>
11 rwfl rC2cc~ro:
.> .)
11 rcu IWCc:ccowc. .) .>O
Fro~ oW~l"lcd:o o
11 b'lCJfl :::>l::'l:c.coocroe>tc wMco
" :J ..>:::1 .) 0 .) .)0
m Qr. cb , ,. n ,, , C2 ,. g,, kJ
EC:Jfl :5:::1 e:5 ~ oer:p:n g:::c ftroco cp(.C)fj :_, c.og:: r:J:::JcnSO:Jro
~h WOJ:~~:rO>~ ~<:e:COOCOftCOCC CO~fl :C2cott r:::>l::'lte::::>Q ~bre
'5'o _, .> .> .> .> .> _, o .> :::lo .l ""J .>
:~cb~
.) ~
.)~Q:c.Pt=l:H:rO>e>
.) c.cceb lbweo
'5'.) ::::>ooro
.) 0 iJ, .)~cc:c.co:c.h:l~rtJ
:=:1.) ern
rcc~ft
\ 0
c:bc.o O>co

: .l::>ch"J~e.c
~
c.cc~ro::>e ~cccuc.cod:o
o .JO .> ~
rcu:c.PflC2cc~w
.J .>
c.ccePe:::>cbe
.)
eu:c.Pfl:C2ao
0 .)
~ tc.cc:::>:~:be.c
.) e::J ,o:::>bc.O>wcoe.c
!J.) .) "

ua?cc~
_,
~e.c &m
o o o'S
c.o
c~ec ,~[ .)cof,c.G wPec.C2Pwe c.cc~:~rtl@b 11 o~::>ro roeft :::>roro(/;cc fb
Co) .>0 ~ .) .) .) ..L .) ' '5'
VI
f)

~
t11i
a
G)
l
~,- ~-
s e :f ~ ;t H .f~ 1s ~ ~ qp~ tl !~ t~ . .t
> j, ~ -!l. .g. i. ~.aojJ ~:l~ 8 ..a, u .. $'<: $ 1
~ ~
9 8 ~ ~ ~ M II> ;~;"t' ~'W ~~; ~i 'i .;,m
G)
....~ ....- ~
l t> -oo
1 1 ..&. en Y
1 Lan fl S, ...8o a~ Jl' o
~~~~"t.,~l
~
tt ~ S, o,
J ~ ,~ _,CQ1 " o -flo
..- Q
t:zai-9 ..IJ,
e c 1l n. 8
}~~
~ 'i s~(')')
~ -a. ~g, s. +oe ""~ . . ~ no i (')
J.. ~J
5 ~
- =
1. { te j hl :t,~ ~~1~
~ e s,J
- - Ill-> "' - - -~- 8 ~
. .,.,~ 1.. J. l n
,g,
8 re,
olio $
... s
$
~ ~ 0
as, l8
['j
1! ~ 1;.. s t ti
$
&
1t~ ~ ....!)
~~J sq rm G) c -y ' 5 C\)'1 ()o
-eo o 'tj' '' - o V ..D
~
.15 ';)
~'~3 s ~s~~- ~tq'> ~-tis ~..!> cg ~ [ 1. ~,.-. . ..88 .J ..8~ ~.. w"'S
1
[~ ~ -, 1.. iJ.,.O 8 .. 1l .., - eli - $
111 .s ~ -8 15 .,.,
<ll -$. i!1,.8
0'> 0'>
~ i! s JJ~~-t i, 1' .t ~.
;#!, " J, n.. - 0 .,P. 00 L 0 .J_
~ ~.. w ..a, ~ ~ ~. t ~ ~~ ~ 8 Q

jl <!! ~~ ~ {. ~~-(! re, .f. s


""' '-0 o .li
x;9 !!~ '?,.e
~ -1::- ~ !1l
.&~ t~

"~
1-- ~ h~
::, d8 9..s .&.'l8l il!l'll" 9
~~
iJ.,
~ ,.." ~ ~ *
g, i -1:: 8
l,J"' Cl en en4! .S
....... ~ "" ., "'" "' "'
~ ~i .aii -(! .- ~I
8 ->!,
-3o ....
ffu l
t~
O>lm
.,.
l: ......, .E' .s; s ..
::!5 f,_ -41>
.1

1 'r ii..
4?"
.&
(')') (;
i ~~ ~J,r Hs..e
~ e .. ~ ~en -;8o
_.. r.:B-,
s., l'n
gG) (')
(')') - -a (B., .o-, "--'
'11 a
, G"> cifJ oc 8 G"> ~ S ., o~ ~ S G"> S -8 -vot c 8 ~~ G"> ~ru G">

~ ~t~~j ~ ~~$~~G)~ t ~-B. s 2 ~ ~ t-g


.. ..s G)
~ s., -s o-,-v ~ &, e ~ e . s.,-8o ~ B eo -c
b ~ rW g.,~ s ;: .. ~ ~ 1-> ~ ~ ~ l a., ~ru-,t~ ~ s ~t ~ ~ ~ s
d~l
il -y
e ~{ -~!~i~~~~~~~[~t~~~E~~~f~t
[B., ca v G)e etn~ 8 ~ c -a ~ s f1 ~~tn e o '].; -a s v G)

0'1
1
~ ~ ~ -& ~~~~~[B.,~ t ~citl =eo -8o \j-)qp ~ ~J>~ l . ~ &,
J, .1.
~ ~ ~.& So.&-Bo~s ~ .2 8 -f 5 J o9 S e . _g- s ... i ~ "':ill~ ~i
re., ~ . .., ~ V'l ..
a a s l' o8 C'l s .,e :.g ~ g., a., .... ~L.. e o ~ -&>'! G) ; L.. G)

j" .t 1l s !b s ~ ll. ef [B.,jo~ .& ~ ~. s ~ t ..- ~ .:s;;~ trn..sl[B.,. '


2" s g., ~ C'l
..s s., -a V'l
a., c!:1 \) sSP ~ H ~ -a O'l - 0

~ ~~~ ~ s ~ s ..so e ~~ ~ 0'1-Socgl...., c .. 0'1


T~--- ~- ~~lf~llla~i!tttiJ!itf~L~i~'i
~ So..s
12 ~ s s ..so !: ~ ~ r!1 o8 ~ -8o -s O'l s ..x ..s ~ fb, ~ 8 &, 8 ~
00
~ c G'l
S ~ O'l ..l"J i O':rl 0'1 8-, CCl C'l 8-,
r~ .:8c -&>'l.,e
-8 ...&, ~J ..a. S 0'1
., ~ s rm G) $' ~aj
. ~ rr -co~ ~ s.,+ . ~-So ~ ~ 1~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ G) G)
. ._. . ~ e., ~ P. $, ~ f1
.,e .. 0'1 [B., 0'1
= e -+oov
~ ~ ~ -v ..) t:
~ s ~ .$.o ~ ~- ~~ e ~ ~ i 75 ~
.-:>..So v (1},
'!, CBl ~ 1-> 0'1 G'l =8 - ~-So } ~ Vf},-& 8-, - &' ~
y 8 .. -8 -g ~ 8o "g [B., .. .0'1
~j ~ ~
c[ rW 8 ~~ ..8o(B.,
~ ~ c8 .. ..s ~ -So
~ ~ g., ~ n'l '"5 ~") -Qo og:, f ~ ..s ~ -g f ~ ~ ..8o ~ J;: s., :8 -
n'l '"5 8 ..8 So ~ o_ s, a (B., ~ ~ oS 45 -8o i)g -?. s ~ &. ~ ~ ~
~c~s.,~~og ~-?.B ~ e~ G') ~j_,j ee
= (B_, 8 ..s : Q'l .. C'O'l 0 ~ ~ ~ -t (B_, ~~ O'l V ~~8. ~ rg, V
CZ'l~ I)
..... re, ~ ~ .
s ., :fi,. &. (II, <n
I cncn 0
01
-l
n. ....,
.. 0
-e
881
II .,)coloo:ro:<bcocCcX.G
0
' ..
IIOS<:e<nt'l
~0
' -,
cocccc I>"
~:c.tt'ICCCOCC
c.uc.o:c. ' J_ "
r.l'lC\):roc.oecncc o &o"'
g ,.
oo~:ocn 1cb G co:~
gc.cc:oe!'eb"'
~.) ~ 0 0 .J.J 0 .) .J .J\
wfroowocnw:t
.> .)0 e.J. o
e o&:<!ecccc~cb:,~GQ:
l.. .J e
oeec :c.ec~:cbc.oe&ccu
l. .J:J .J o o
"c.otecoQ:(:e
.J .J ::I
uwl3 oc .... (e:cbc.oeeoe.c
.. o o .)O .>:J .) .) ~
.) 1\ o:>:>~c.f'li-blG::)(.~2hl
ro~Lo~~~~ ot
.,)
( :c.rft~:cbc.o~rocc) r ~ ~~tro~c.f'l~
~!)~ G>ocucc:2 :r.:l&:cbc.o
J .) 0 ~
"~ccru~01hl l:;ec~cc~:x>e&ie.c :.:,hlcc~
,) .> ::.:1 .) ~.) .)~ ~
oMwe~~
.)
hJC2cd:coMPe
0.) \.)
0101~ C wc:>c.me~
6.) .) .)
"::>hl:~~nroe.c .~bee (w) (c)
.)::.:1 ,)~.)
r
t'icoc~o2wec
.> .>
(axcn)
e
(tbb31Wc01hl,o~:be~ec)
.> e.> .>~..L
w~wro
.J .>
w:~ec:cbco
t;':j
II ll 1~ I 1 .1. ___ II I
(::mw01) :mec
.>.> O.>o
coru :o:x:oecna:
co ~ :c.eoo
u 11 newcc:~
.>
:J : ~11cc:(I)CO
oe
I
, 1101-i-:2
.> e
"
ucucoe.c:c. 1~: "
~, cb coecne.c
.) 0
f
( e:cbcoel'ne.c)

~:)~c~I:IO,~cco~C2hl
.JO .>~ ;) .:> ~
0~
.)
(:dt~:cbco~fuec) r LO ~~:JW_?Cft~
0~0
Y8l
.)0
Q~..):X:CD!>CChl
( e:cbc.oe<.'nro) :> :>~c ~~.)~ .) ~
t
=>':
.J
( :c.ibf?:cbc.o~~ec) r (? f'D5~e~~~~
.>
:X.o~s .):x.o:~::l
.)
ar:;-;ut..tchco
~\,~
ol.c
'. '.
"Cdcccvoeec.hlb
..) 0 :_j
::x.h:loXc:
.) ~ .)
~b:~~:fto~lv~hl
.) .):_j .) .)~
f,:~wc.e.co
.)
~<.occc.oo :,~ :c.Pt'lwi'e:c.roeGGe.c:>oooob :c.a:;:2 f ccowcc::>S :Jo<.o:roG
S'.> .) .) .J o.) .) \ 0 ..) ..) .)
:2
e
r :~~So
0-:j
laccwSoc.ceo
.> .> .>
IOWh:> a;wa:;b:ha:;
l...>o .> o
~~:h1~ol~o ot;~<do
.> ~
Clcc<.o3::JC<:eOtO<.oCu
.) .) .) 1.. .> 0
cd.oecro:chcoemec
.) 0
wOOC:COO
.) 0
IIOO::>~ret'l
.;)0 0
c.oc2cc
.)
b:o!J~~hl
0 .>:::1.) :_j
c.l,wreeGGeC
.) ..)
l.:):cPACCooxcd:>
y .) .)
~hlcce'J!Jt'l :..J:;Jc.oS::>c.ce~
.>::.:1 ,:_j 3':::1.> .)
ecweo
O \ 0
uC2ccoo
.) 0
b:cbt& .)<kboroJ.CJ
J
<kb::>~:ceMG
:_j .) .JO .)
l:.u:dftcce><.occ
0 J
bee
:J .,)
f :J1:\C ftGh:ro:,r<.o be.cwre'llJ!:>;
~ J.;,
ft!:>C.COO~"
y.)
ib:c h:lc,hlo c w:hJ~j50
~ ~ ~ ~
~CC
~
w~oc.reo tn<.uro &.ucce:cbco l:.u:oc.h1o]l;\..: :oiJ'cew&> w:doccococc
.) J 1.. .> o Y o .J ~ ~, .J:::Jo ..> .>
fc bJ cMoc.co t:lb!5ob:ha:; ::hlcct;ft :oQ:c.roe<Ge.c~C.OO:,
0 0 ..) ::> 0 .) :.:l 0 .J:::J .) 0 ' 0
oro
.)
:c.rf'lll~()b
\
:CC!cuc.cco
.) .)
~cooo
0.)
h-><2cc<.orof'lcol,
..) .) 0 0.)
ru:c.r~:Cbcoe~cc
0 0
;m
.)
15o:&w:dl"Jccococcbo c.cco~~c.h-locncccc
.)
0.)~.) 0.)
rtC2'ccoo~oro
..)..!..
too c.~cce
.) ' .)
)l;]ft:oQw3oc.reo
:_j .>:::1.> .)
w:c.rro?ccoa:;ro
0 .> .) 0
C2cceo:c.rl"l:h1&:cbco
.> 0 0-:j
. .)bHolSob:~0
,
Y6l
,,f4:>oeeoc.c
.)
(o;flc.cc.cc~fe
0 .)0 .)
t<!lc.co:~:&:h:l::>e:t:;,~~d:o~
y ~ O,j ~ :::::::~- ,j
:c.f'KC~c.c~c.c~ CJtw~b '?'&> rr ;o~.c.cl;(s-lb:>:~) 2ruc.c ~~~e bs!lc +
ul.c sokc~~l:oc.clDeoo~mcbco t~te Cstlc
, ,
u:xocnc.ou
56-.) -6-
0
II 1'10 10 ICO C.CO<Pt'lll
.> e e
r
~
.)
been instituted, in due time as provided in this sub-section,
if he is satisfied -that the failure so to give the. notice or
institute the claim, as the case may be. was due to sufficient
cause."

'- '-
n~:foo:g :~b~~b:ga::u u .:1wC.Oa::e:Cbccema::

n~1;:~0:>:2 :,~:r.J::>c~~:2u
.:~o .:~ e .:~ O.:h o
(e:cbcoemec) :):)~c~~Q~:)coo~C2hl
" ..) 0 ..) ~ ..) ..) ~
* :,t-
,)
(g:,:dxo~~e.G) 5Ce.GOCG50~
:Xos~
~
neaxc:2
.) 0
:~:clx.o
U'....
, 11 ]_
necow c.co.:>co
. .)
no o?:c.e.~c;l
.)0 .)~
~~~
.)
rc.ectx.G~o~
nbs ~.r~fWfb a~bac (f) u(l.cc) ~oc ~~~bg-ofb robllc (c)
IICCCCrurore~oo::
.) .) 0- .>0
cOOcoCC::lOOOQ
.) .)
~b~&erco~~
.) .):_j .) .)
C WGOC.CO~
.) .)
~~:('h1QOOes bee Gfd ~cbcocc.:;>cb
~ ~ ::::::1~ .) .)
r:ccrowcchles
.) .,) :J
ccc~eco[,Pe
\.) [,:~

;pcro~ :cros>cesoccoo~ ~:cb~&ro S>cJ~:cr~:sx:J~roLosocoro
CCCCO:)OCC:O~<llhla:;
II .) .) .):_j
c.ccbro ~obc.occ.,d,
crc
.) .)
:c.roro:<hcoeroro
0
cb..><liQCC
::3o
II oiooo~reccoc.o en@ccchl:c.P~cbwo CCC~C!JCOJ:)<lleCC~ c.oen~&
.:>oo .> .:> .:>::.J .:> .:> .:> o
rcbwcl2ccc.ucro~<li~CC~
.) .) .) .:>::.J
ohl:crooc<.ccc c{,:c r~cbwdn .,) 0
II ~bcoe>CCCW
:5" 0
':':1 1 w i!.._ r n r 11 l arnJ 1 ,,
ccccs-~: w:o.x.~w~ o~:o:ro ox:occ w:ocroe~a:; ccccoccoo:ree>
.,) 0 .) .) 0 1,; \ .) 0 .) .)
ohlcc~~~oc:J.,re ::lro&:re~hl:~b l2cc:c&& W::Ycro~ro II ree~~~rcowcoa:;
.>::3 0 .) .) tJ .) .) 0 .) 0 0
CD.>rec.o&,cc~WCC ccce~k@ccb:axc~ Oc~e>coloro~CCCC~ o&,c:b(co,.
.) .) 0.) .>::::::1.:>
.) .) .)
II t:)~[,c[,@cce:oocc~ wc.~~:hlbew@,ro ccccre~boc.~e lll.:lMb:cc:?~
Y.:> .:> ' .:> e'J .:> o .) .,) Yo.:> J
' wMhll2ccC2~ @ccro:cbcoe&ro
0
w .)corero c.cc~eeC2ccMro:llrco
(). .) '.) 0 ,.) :.:1.:> .) .,) 0 .
uo~h1C.O:cr~~ro
1,; .> :::::lo
(r) :4cc::~e::~c.fi5M
.) o .:> .:> .:>
1 r( ) 1 rs l - , ~ ] , n ,
C.C09::1::1'lf o~ c c.c.o~oo\' o~ :ccoc.l'l~ no~ :::l c~cce coterooc~e
.) .:6 .) .) .:>0 ..) \ . 0 .) .>0 .) 0 .)
::'&mwroccoro
e1 .) oCo~~e
.) .>o ccccro:dxoeroro
.) o orocbw@,
.) .) o ::'~ ~L
CCIGe core~oc~e ohl~c.ro:ol:'l:bece :hl<ll~b whJ:dxoeCoCG ll~<liQ
t,; .) .>::3 , .)~ \ eJ.) 0 yj::.J
cccro:cbcoeroro
0
c~c~b .)
oih:>re~ uccccoooQ:::ll:lco~M<do
.) .) .)~ .)~.) 0.) .,)
:cro
1
ro:cbc.oemro
0
CCOWro:ol:'lcoPe
.,) 0 ..)~.)
d:oro~CCcoOoWrfJOOCCIEl::'>
.)0 ..) .) .) 1,;
ttCoco,
c; 0
II ~Q
:5" .>::.J
OC<CCC c{,ccoolowrfJroCCIGe> ccccre~OCfJ~ CCC~be:oQ~'liJ ,.
CC :.>om
.) ..) .,) 1,; .) .) .:~::::.1 :_j 0
n~e!?]'Cl)(')e..l
, !?]ro ccccco n cb ~cccnrooro o , ':':1
cccececc~oo~::lCO
n. r _'-~ ;.>trocro n: ,
y' 0 .) .) .) .,) 1,; 0 0 .) .) 0.) .) 0 ...
&becero \
oRcc:coo::lCoto:X.ol:l
.)~ .)0 0 .)0 ~J .) ' 0
2<11Ce& u@ccJref')O(X)
.) .)~~h .)
:hlco~,
e1.:> to
0 ...
~o,~J ~
cbchle~bce~ ICCCCoe~c.ro otc~~ ~re~OC(')~ crccro:dxoeCoro n~icl'lffi
:_j .) ' .:> ' ~ .> .:>o Y .> .:> o 1gc.~~
H!r:c.&~ !~
n: " L':":l tr9 1 l':"J 1':""'1 l __t_ __ 'II i!.. r , ~ OC.CC~Oe(Jl)
wetro~ ccx:cccl:loe::>~eeccros- ~
ccccro:oxoemro ")cccooo~c.oco
::> oro~
.> .:> o.> ..>o ..:> .> .:> o .> .> o.:> .> .:>
:croro:<hc.oeroec
0.
@cc&cc~
~
w:~~.e~~
. ~
IX.@o
0
1.:)000
y
:chcoeroro
s~~
o6c
, ,
861
v _1__ ___ 11
ucccoece:axcecnw
.:>
v , .1_ ___ 11
II uc.ocoeca.:':~coec
.) 0
(~:cbco~~a::)
u 11 J_
..,ecowcoo.-,co
. .)
ooc
coc
OOJ

(o) ~ Ol'if~fl ~II


(J) Of!90' t~o~~~~cxi: "9o (oxp:goo~) ~ F-
u~!h,~ c.cc~c.~lk~fb 86
~~ks ~~ ~~\L ~trw~ g.,gcog ~~sore~bg ~~~~ (C3,C:bcj.~re
~~rdx.o ~sdK.o ~co~li,~fb ,ba; (c) bb 6g~coo2~ s~grcoo:dxo .j.
nbc ~ ~c.~~~ ~~d>~ e:cbco ~:te Cstlc ~
:I=J:oe~oo to~eo ,~~:co~rod:> td:m::> wrewc.co~ ,C2ccolre:~&:Cbco
O!J .;) 0 ~.;)' .;) 0 1.. .;) .;) .,) " e.::! .
:~:chco ~@o nC2cceOO~:Cbco CDhleo~~ ::>'lo r or coloJeo:~~!'):cbc.o
0 .;, \0 \ "~ \ .;) .,) e.::!
IC~e eg~c :&.:Ot'c:cbco!'):cbco ,"l!:l~(vS.b . l~b~b o.oo'oC ~~orcoeftC.t:O
" :::J ~ oh " " o o ""
:!') lo~eowc.o!')~ bb:io;lll;f.~)::>eo cob~rocc~(CD\.:c.oeco!') &b
o w .:> oe e .:> 1.. \.., " " " e .;,) "
e:c.rocbGih.-t>
.)
tro~d""6'l)weo
. .) \.) .;)
&:c.cx:x:oc.fcoon
.;)
llore:a
.) &
:CJ~bd,c.o
0 .
II!C.('lb:~ c.co8ftn na.i'lororcbe:c.oococfroe>
.,) . .)
. 1 , .. 0 ,.n:
n:je'~'~ c.cp~n uptoeocc:c.cosoc.'ro~
n@cc:~ra@b
~ .,) .)
hJ
0
~<.>~ e.G
t~ &eo
' t:~:;,lv..~.Lb
., o., .) CXlCO~WeM.u: c.:~
~ oe J
b':" ::xlc.M
~ ~'""!.3
M ~flbl'u
.:> ~oi
tloobF~ :_rb~cc~
...JJt..L~~uhco
~~IHW
fi::~:c.~
!)".,--. J:::>bc.cc~:"'IJ::>rco;ce
.., .) ~.) :J .) .)Q . .)
Mcoo<l .)@cc~<X'C~Pe1:o
0
~.re&~oxc
.., .)
w1:1'ltlls~~ccGc:J::X.h:l~~&>c.rco::>
0 .)0-- J .) .J:I J ~ .) J c.occt6CL>:::;~<b
~ ~ )~
cocco @cclkc
,)
1
\
CCC::>0ce~ &:cax:oc.fco::>
--~--
u::;:lccGc:J~b::>~ec.oro
)""" ..):3.> .lO.Ji
we&c.c~
0 \
ofcoc.cc/,lt?.:.e~
.) ~_,
t:::>bc.cc~i
~ ~
ofco\Wk.o~:Cbco
.J 0 !) ~
fi::oeo:c.~ .)CC~C;6CCCo
.)() 0
~t:l:c.e:c:@~
.,:J ~
t:obc.cc::>W@cc~~oCo:c.~
.) .) 0 .) .)
~CO?cce~cXo
~ ~
., <:.roeJ~IC.CCOCO tcwseJ02 nobc.cc~li:oPco""" ~~seJ02:cbco
o :J o , .) , S', .r- .,)
..,~~o
.., ~~
.., . tbcs .)coPe:o~
.,LJ c :@~ ;ec;s:~oreo6:Cbcou
.) cb .)0 :)
.ucore"'tJ:h,
.) 3"'"'::1
. u:c;rft
..~rOctl
. :oc;r.:leco
~ :::1
"'otewc:o 'l:ue&,~
~ .)0.) 0 4! ..
uwfe:olil
~ .) ..,
c :@~
~
c!, ,)'&~tu::k!>I'CLlft:dKo
o. ..)
11
ccu:crerue
e .:>
~OC
0 <:: 0 0 C' C' C' 0 C' C' 0 OC' 0 C' (C') C'
oxp:cq~ ~01 jo:>~~ox~ oro~ro:))211 CXf!ld~~q Sdro o 1'P~tm
c:- r,-s ~ o ' r.;'C' C' c:- C' C' o ' r.;c-
~G:DJtO::O~I l:i]I~:O?L ~~!Dtj4> ~OO)C~C::))211 u:>C~0;1 '\(~!r.llj4>
C' C C' !(; C' C' Oc (' QC' C'
SdOi?O>o:>c~c:'P~' g)Jij):3JGr1~ OJtptWmJ<;~:!nwt 9:> f~: :> tgC:<>Jm
0 0 C' C' (.:!_ C' C' (' ') 0 C' 'T'~ C'
01 :)),~q~o"l2'1 mc:I8'-':0>J~C ~3d:x1.>019dqc:c;;"' t)C0?::))2ll
" Provided that the Coun shall reject the application unles;
perusal thereof and of the judgment and decree appealed
from, it sees reason to think that the decree is contrary ~o
law or to some usage having the force of law, or is othetWise
erroneous or unjust."
-.
11 ~uC c.o 1 (~) !ow :'!:oobo~h.J~b (c)
\ .,) 0 .,) ,J
V61
Goc
"~ftbo~~ cf. ~ d.,r:f~~
11 ct'ccco~ ~oc.rococJro~ e&cc;roR
.) ,) 0 , ) 0~ .) \ ~
tbes:c.r~ WC\XCC.Oree.c 1cJ=l m:xLXX>W
.) .) .)
G~a ,)~:c.r~ cb:..JJ:oc.~~W
~~ ~ ~~~ .)
:xlC(

OC' C' C
~ccc;oo-;,oocp:~:QJl o
C'f:: C' C'
'Peoooljcooc?t
!:::! 0 (' (' ('
oxr~~= 2=~t=ox: c:~~

g c: c: c~ C' c c: c: )
e:~JG)OJC tjCroC'jr GCO~'J(J)CO'J:~
C'
t oeGG
~c
,
~ c:
tl~Gco'Jc~t.::~r~'J~cc
c ~ C' 0 c: c~ (' ('
tlcroc'lr
J

c
Gcqpmco?:~'l~
c )
Cf?O
Je 'l'
<'f:! (' (! ~ C'OC' C'~ <'C::<' C'OC' C" (' C' C' r;;: C'
~O)O)~I~~Iol ~VO <?~JlUO)UO)eot~OC:I ~:xlf!lO)CT.IGO)~~J~!DGt:j?CI
r::. "l' C'O C" C"
l:f"l'flo'J?IOUIIC>e-"ctf II

~ C"
;oz
L
C>~rron
C'
\1 .
CO('
no-:>~'l~ro~
~ C.:. L \.
C' C'
C.:.
"fi.roooo::n ~
J'l
~ :ox:
4
<" .Jl.S9 C" C'
u-l''"'diT.I:))O)GO)~
'- \:
OOC'
~s.cll
-JIL.
~-
~'?f"..VO:
<'0~"~~~ ('. ('C' r.:;::c-r:::C'
::DIT.IG0)~9JO?fg ~~?c:0
;r
c:'l?~p:c:o ::D~~:III
('~ 0<."<"f.:<"
4l>')tr;,OO)i:! II
('

r.:::: <'J::<"
~GeJ-:>Cioc='P~P~'l G9J'XI>~~o o-:>~Jloro, ~t:J":oa 0)21~ll)'XJ)O)
C' (' 0 r::: 0 (' L. c
rt.O?J
OC" C"
~c::neoz qoo~cf":'llc:t::l"c:
OC" C" J? r.::;:: C" ;r- (' <"
c:o ~::neoz ~<!.?'!"

Basudeb Mander v. The State, A. I. R. 1929, Patna, p. 11z ;


C'-J:':~ C'OC ~ OC'" (") (' (' 0 0 ~S: S'
Sloi?Cv"'CO'> ~c. fC:C:GO'>?I G~l ~c I ~-:>
('
') I oer<t 'lt<l?t' O? 1J ~ro, 'le::~'i'1
::neu
J;;C' C' C' C' C' 0 C' OC'
tJ~OOC'JyGCO~?OXO?:~~ II "2:IrOC}f 11
J;;C' C' C' C' C' 0 ~ Q C' 0
tl:::~'JyGC\J~?Cf:XX)?:~'j~~ II II!J.l~:'JG$Gfe1: e:~:el II

r,:,!t (' (' C' . 0 C' C' C' C' C'


O'.>cp:~t.::J: e:Otlf':O'.>CII llt;;(\)~'XD<X>?:~ e:~J>COC~~ >m~c~:'J
C' 0 C' C' C' ~C. ~ 'T'C": C' 0 C' C' f_<?
CD'f>:c;~ro::n~ <1c:~~f: GSI ~OOJC<WPJ COOX>yroy:IJ.I
C'
o c;p:nroC'
C' ~ c C' C'~ C' C' C'~
'l?~ocooxp:~e:J:~: oe~Sr ~~>I c;pooroe;j~~ 0?0 ~I 'f>C'::nme1:
C' C J;:C' C' C' OA; C' Q C' C' C:
<{nlol 9\SO SXJ tl~Jil:~t::n~~l G9'Jro<X>?:~ e:~J4)())Cqn: ~C\.{0
~ C' C' c: C' C' 'T'J;:,.... C' C' C' C' C' C' C'
~y:~~ G<X>'X3(1) j ~>I t;;OI ~"JJC~?: '.)!CD~:~: t;;<X>?CSC8? 0 'Jro~q
C' C' C' C' r,: c: c: C' C' o orR C' c:
(3~ rJ' OOJOGro'X'Jiol~ (j)(l(T.)::IJ'tCD::D~O{I ::1)?0.)')00)~1 >~

o:x:o:::n
~~~..- ll g:c:1!. 0121::.
~ C'
::!.1.J11<4)1 C'
tr.X.l:>OOOOiolCD
ii.JL J
09 COCI
A
C' C' C'
~O)OlOCt;;CDmCDI
11. T~ ~~T

O(!Gj
c C'
~to ~[jc;oc~oo
~':C' (' C'
:1 ' ( ;>) s
f oaC- ~g, coe~oi~oS
\j.~ u ~~. ~ .....u. J
nc ~ ~I(,X7)J
. 7
"C:O)?
0 "
oaC- ~~g, &c~')(l)
r;,~ u
C" ''\ Of.'? .....t.,.<' 0 1: ~ 0(' O':f~ <"J::<"
oo ~tlo" :')ll)?OO'>~r.' ""'"'JICC><p~t:j~tm, c:n':J;ocl:lc~u
'"
~~
0'
Rrea~
~~ic
auc
oeo
....~ ~ ~C' C' C' C' C' C' .(:: 0 ~
Of!&& ~~ U>ltiCOOC~O)C~:~OU>I GroJ?CD~c:B Oe??1JG~Gf~!CD
-
~~J~
U>:;IS')QOOC
t. JL 6
C'
GCOI?OXO~GOI
JJ
C'
rt.
...,.
G~?("Y.)C\!~q>O!)(\)!~
C'
11 J
C'.
1J

L J
::OG::r.l?O?:UI Cl':>C'::OO?
u.C T ~
~ ('~
:

C'
C'
08~ 9\SO 00')
C
COOC'
q>~
C' C'
q)G 0\ C' C'
q>~GOXI~G::O?C\):"1'1!1
C' C'
?O)Q.S
0
C\)!);)00):"1'1 C' C'
~c
' . t. L Jl
C' o
JL i4 Jt
C'~
C
[Y.
-JT l ~

~~4l
C'C' C' C' OC' C' C' 0 C' C'
~:;!lCD q>O)=n ~C\):U C\:lOCO?!:x>=n;;o::o=n q)')QI[Oro C\)0::0~?1 GC\:li?CD
U C!. C::. L L C l C,i, lJ l L l ll J JJ
,..., C'
W:>~CCII C'C'
::OOC 00
C' C' ?C!II
0 C' C'
::OCDGo:>~:OOCl::O Cl GC\:ll':lCD::OGOI ..
'l'. C'
OOGO)Cl(X)')!
0
"- L Jl )J n. JL .a JJ
C' C'OC' 0'1 00 C 0 C' \0
c:~?
J
eor;!3~Cl
I
rom:;,~cq>cn
t T
'-KIOK1.> ooroc;:u::o=n 11 mmmc U>:;>ro::o
- Jl l L L c 7LL~ 6 l . . .L

q>'):;>llOCO~ro:'l)Cl
C' OC C'~ C'
CQUO):"l"lOOW
C' ~
:me C' 0 C'O C
O?ffil;,ffi::OCDGo:>Q
C'
~O~CG
OOC' ':lC!CDI C' 0
tJ CL.! l L c.!. A 6 l ~ Jl L l
C'
GC\:li')CD::Oc:l U:"l"l')Cl GClGS
.<: 0 @3: ~[s C!00o1:!CIIO)O)OCDOJ.:D
C CO OOC' C' C' C C' C'
o:>roGo:>:;>~IO)o1:!C
JJ n. C.:. II ~ T t.L .a t. C..:. 4.1 J
~. r;::: U o c cr.;: c
C' C' c 'l' c
OOGeJ':lC!tf"'!~J?!GO ::O:J<[O?~ q>oo'jytj1DGC\:l::0211U>~OO~~CGUI C'~C
if ..
C' r;::: C' ~ C' C' C' C' .<: C' C' C'
0)~ ~GeJ?C!tjC!'f>~J?!~9 o:>mGo:>OO')QJ1<Xf?GC\3j:lCD~c:JI roroOU>OC
o~ c 'l c r,;:c ~ c ~ ~ o <: C' o C' c
~::J q)')QJ[OOI::OmG~J?!tjq)~e:::Y)'<; e:C\feJ:~c:n O{D~:;>Jm~pro2:
C' 0 !;::: C'O C' r,::;::: C' 1: C' C' C' 0 C' 0
~2~ ~el2~C~OOG~?C: ~G<J.?'l::Otj~l c;c:G:>?~J[UCJt O>JLU~~'f?'
~o:>f:'l'~
.c ~ '(' c
G~')CO?CG~')C~m
C' c o c o
:;,J[O~GU!tjc:~~Gt:.j')C!
~c o ~ c ;r
GO o;1CGftj! l
c r,"!
c 'l'O C' c OC C'~ c r;::;::: c C'
q>?~JLOOOI ~ rom~m~p:'f? ~C\)~t:Jt"!UCO?:GL,j?C: 00C~?!Gf9m?:l
0
CX))')QlllUCD
C 0 OC'
~rom rooo:>~?
C'~ C'
GC\)1')0)~0001
C
!);)
?!~.:D::Ordl
C' ~ C'
C\:lV')ol>
C'
t. tJ t. C L l ll J JJ U. J C.:. II. JJ l L I

mG~: ~GuTGo1oSGQJ II ~6?~ U>~::r.l~OOG?6:8:'f~J?!"J?I


C' .l;, 0 ~0 c
Gropro~~u2:>5J G~GfeJ:9:ro:>:o:>~1 Basudeb Mander v. The State
()
0 00001 OOG
c C' c., Q c C' C'
')C: c:m~1?:o1:!C O):"l"l::O:"l"l())CC:I~~')C~
0?(' C' 0('.
~C ~CCGO??
('
JL -l- u J iLC c.:, L I J L
C' ~ o ' o ~ c ~c c
( j) m~~c ti~oo?:::OO?~ ::r.>G~')C:~c='P~J:l=OO')I Gropm~::r.>UJ
C' C' ( ) C' 0 r::::: ~ C' ~ C'OC' C'
o:>roGo:>O>OO'fO? j q>?QJlUCJt OOt:J":~ 0?2!0?GU>?rom Dt9U~C::O~~

U>OOo1:!C~~:CIG
OC' C' 0 :>C: C' 'l'
GOI C\)CO).:D(.J)
C C'
~GO)')G:::O?G
I ?C C' C'
IDGroo:>m II
c
IL ~~JJ 6 ~l A C:.
C' C' C' C' ( ) c C' ~ C'A; 0
COOf CjC!:::OroG::OOlOO"JOO j G:>?QJ[OOO')I GC\:pm~mDtorU9J cq10:>
C' 0 ('~ C' c ., c C' C' C' ~ C' r;::: C' C'
~JlUCJt 'P~::oooel:<.p~ 9~:s.? Ul 92::~U>:;>Jmm~~<: DL9uGel:>c:'!?' GC\1Pm
C' C'O . C' C'O C C 0 C'
0)()) q)?QI[UO?C OO::OmGC "''000 ())10(1) GU!OOU9S GOGS~ o1:! O)q)O)')
n. U 6 L U.- 6 .J, U L T ~~ T J l
co c c c c o ~,c;~c ' r;::;::: C' c
~::Of:~<; G~')CO?CG~?C~CO 00~~ GU:~GeJ?C: OOC~:>:Gy')ro'):l
C'.<: 0 ~ C'C' C'
U>~~:> ""3Pm~e~ o2~G~Gf~: 922lf:o:>~ Luckmi Singh v.
The State (?)OO~'~ M. Ata Muhamed Khan v. The State(9) o1
~
Q:>aCm!O)C
c: ~ _Q_ ~ o c
c;oQJimO?l~CO?
~ c
I GCUI?ffio:>GOI
'l' C'
OOGOXI C:~? ~G3rD9
oc
-, -1.- 6 . L U J 'L --."]1 IL JL 6 J1 J C-
C OC' 0 ~ C' C' 0 OOC'
(\)())~CCDCDYCIO m: ~:"l"lo:>QI~OO~CGO??GO II
. ' t -T-11 C C::.L:U LL

(l) A.I.R. 1929, Patna, p . xu. (3) 44 I.C.P., 456.


(:z) A.I.R. 1934, Rangoon, p. 42. (4) A.I.R. 1950, Lahore, p. 199.
(s) 1954, B.L.R., P93 (6) A.I.R. 1945, Mldras, p. 111.

'.
uK~~~f g;ba:~:~&:~ (:&a:) .fU<Ccb~ 1CJJ'Erost'l~ 1~l~
.)w6 oc coo~ ~~~~
.) C11llc
;;:) c.cc~re
.) ~b
.)~ ode .)c.okcg:t:;:~coo_,d, ~~~ :J
.) Clltlc t
u(e) rrr ~l'goe~soo~ ~'~ Cstlc
(&~:coo3'->c 16~ ~b~ce3>) ?~~cf)1~~cco~~ uc.ub ff
.)
ro~oc.l.,
~~
(~:c.oowclto~ ~~b:>ce:>hl) s~tlc t
~ ~ ~~
#~ ~retf :~:cbco
~oceoCc.oo.:>dt
~ ~:.:~,
nlrez&:dtc.oc.c.o900~
~ .) ~0
,
C' ...~ 1:: 1:!" ~
~c. uw~l t2E~oo?cttcrrt.t?"tcc'~ c:t.t?celt J ~~oxp:OfB'
(' C' C' 0 C' C' C' ( ) (' C'
()O') ...
C' e ~ ' _o ' C'
!lfC't)(OO) ~0?~ cxz:\lco?::::o~ "
" When the defence fails to cross-examjne the prosecution
witnesses concerning the version of the facts whlch the
defence allege. it is usually safe to conclude that the defence
is an afterthought, and in fact had not even been concocted
at the time when the prosecution witnesses are examined.''

OB
ot>c
-, -,
aoz-
''SOb se
(\')hO,LCI~Cl~
oof
po
~-- ~-.

!OA

'.
'.
n(otW) ~r (.C) fWfb IC ~ac I (~~C.e&ll>Sc't.O!I (b)
11 (~c;o~d,co) uouf IC.e ndi'M~"t?yic.l'lffl 1c ~~c ( ~)
ufC~ 1c.: uc.llot;~bg?yXc.l'l_ffi 1e u~c (f)
utl~C c.c. "i:oJbifwtb 1b cbic (c)
for
.~of
.1i!F ffi M~f.S~to:~ SOO"d, Fd, tl()~ !~!b L<~ c .
coc.~~: ~~~ Csac c.cc~l;re ~ ~Cc ~~;co '/,:~~ '!~ C~ac t
n(e) C FX~soo.,d, ~~ 55ac
lta~&:>c.rw~:au uaX.oect'cbe:c.oowc.lroe>~b::re....hl .
~.> e .> .> .>.>3':..:1
u:xn:~n
.}- v
uaX.cec~:c.ooc:o::.b~bxe-J)l
.) .) .) .) .)',j
nc.o~~w
.:> 0
c.~:xnlrww
-- --:t
olo:de,o6Lucc~:~
~ .) l 0
1wc.IJoo~:~
.) :,j 0
c.$,
:o~:C.G::xb~
.>:::.1 ,)
W:@&o
0 ,)
C.CC~~~~c.u&,~
0.)
C'OOGCX\)f'lf'l IIZ)C'CBQC.CO~f'l:> C.cc~b~~
j ~,) 00 ~-- ,)::l,) ,) 0.)
?'l.orrrxsxo ~soc.ih>:> :g<i!>~&:b~soc.~~ S2cc~co~~~ rcb:c.Mn ~~jlt
:x:o:.l.&,
.,) .)
Wc.CD!IC.f'l!l -'J:orecd~ex,&becoc.~~ @c:dbc.oowc.~~~~
0 .) .) T'..J.) ) -- .) -~ - .Je.
~
.....C:l:e
r:l.
#~ ~lbi ~&rdx.o
~ooe.J'Jc.oo.,d,
~ l'..:J~ .
~
or: ) _C: 0 OC' OC' _0~ C' __ _0 0 C' 0 OC' C' C' 0
( ~fj ~ 9X><.9 e:rot ~c~~ ~ ~:D2;D e:rof ~f O':)f1?
Cl oefi(i
C'C' oc
~
0 C' 0 C' C' 0 C' C' (' 0 ('
<c: :~;;.sJ('T.) CO<O~:><Oo:>?:-r.> :x>?: ~::o<iX.I?C cro cro roroow oo:>:a:n~ n
JJ C
e~~co.s
T l &. tL Jl.
0 C' C' 0 0 OC'
~:>Go:>:>ro ~:ro.srot
0
~:o:>t<Oa
0 .
~
C'
rouo<OC6 CO 000
{ OU)U):l)~
C' C'
L
00
L [, --T
C'
cr:>;x:>Q:D"'~"~II
L11 t:: oo:n
l l
0 0
OOXl)
ll
C' 8
~ L ..01
('
:~?ro ~::n:<c:aroocro~er
~T [., l .AI l
0
)J-
J
0 0 C'
1 )
c c C'
~:x:ro:>oxn
L
C'
n. C-..
<O~?C:
c
~c
J
('~(' OC'
COline

.;OJC II
A
(' (' 0 (' (' C'A; C' ~r;;.('r,;.~ C' r;;~ (' (' 0 0('
~C9f ~~q oo:>~X~I ~oj>~-?OJ? "'tj~tf':'QC r:Jr~~ OO?::ne;n e:rof
<c::nro:
L
@
:".s?O)J <;;g?C coo cro CX>G~?Go:>:>ro
T JL l l
(' ('~ OC' 0 (' (' 0
')QO
('\ 0
C\)('f.)
l
('B:ro1c(' 0
~::n:GCl~
:UI:. LAIJ
0

c <" o r,:C' C' OC' ro C' "T' C' C' o c-r,: ( or,: ) o
G~?So:>~ l:1fro2?:n~:~B: CJ?t:GOI o:>COO:>::ne;u ~~ "?t:rj CJ?
c- C' c- C' "1 C' o 'lO o C'(;'S o C' C' C'
q
Gbl')<Oo:>?G~?q'Jt l:oo?::ne; II c:tq'J:l~I :~:G_iiO)f Gbl?Cc:J';<1? C<Xl~Y OO.?.Go:>?
2
C' C' C' C' ~~ 'l C' \f,~ C'r,:C' OC' o C' C' 0 r;;C'
.~c ~2:o:>~~e:q ~ c;':q~=~l:1:' <Obl?C~~<1? em ~Gbl?G<X>?CJ? l:1fw
co
:X> Ct o
e::n:GClCT:>J Gbl~C
('~00OC'
Ccr:>?: C' C' C'
.Smo<:x)?::X>~ II
g))' -0~
OX)) <"r<" ll
. CI)()I~C:~'J
l .it A T C L L L o- l .
c c- C' r::-c C' o C' o o _ c-{c- o .c- C' C'
oai.Sj
~
:;>oi~4)t OOX\)O);tt~:n~ II OOG~ ?ml e:o:>:GClO) OO:>e
LJ 0 C t. I L ..0:1
ro COOblJ <Obl?GOO?
JL
o c- C' C' 4}~ o o o C' C' o C' o . ~ C'
rol ros:o:x:;o.s
6T -IT .
~:Y.>:GC!D?:
[; ~ L AI--
CO<OY?GOYXF.>
l l;
GOI O'JO CIJO):X>~ II
l c
9 o
roroowo:>
C'
<O:.n::
C' o cffirocc:woc
OC' <! cC'
c au'X'0?G:n.:> C' C' o o o
2 :~m~c
L _QJ l JL 6 o ""I ll
G~:x>o:>:>rol ::~:o:>:<c:Cl
L I:,- L .,61

m ro:o:>e
(' ('('~: <J~o:>t\ roc;~:<Oro:
0 0 ('
ro:nonu G(; ro1o o ooo
C'
~c Gmc:roro
(' 0 ('
oT l L .,\ t IL o tJ ' J ~.-- L
r.:. C' o ) c
h.~
~= t1>:n
0 0 C' c (' ('
2
C'
11 O(O:>Ct~
cr;; ( o~
C\(l:lj eu o:>mG:n a;ro:;,J~
c 8 .
('
_<::

c
C'
~eiS? :r~om
('
C' C' C' C'

ooc:o:>eu::DU) co :> : :n
2 :::moCl'))~ <O~?Go:>?o:>c
C'
l
r 0
.01 c.:,
C' ~<::
o
C' <' Buc
c:.:.-l
::-
c.:.-L
C
ll
CX){d
C'
J
w:n"J::n~
ll
C'
6

OOO)<::):l),:).) II
~
cc:CJ ~X7:l<O:X>
u CXXJ)~Iro~.?
c. r J
~Q\~::1 ~~0 ~OiroG:X>?

h.'
:J'Jl;;}C: ~m
l \,...J
('~:n~l(' U)Q) ~:o:>:Garo
--.
0 0 C' C' 0 C' Q C' ' c
G~?GO)? Q)::,~~c ~oa:>:n=nY:> OQIS"l
l) LJ
~-\
:;;>
L:J . -r C:. L [io L ..il l l JL J 0 A C J t; ~ t
' c c- rc- h_C' .,.. c- C'A; rC' c-
~~~: lgOOJmG'))? !Jdl5C: !ld'P"OI OlC 0:>~~ !9~?:ne;u
o C' cr;;c- O<" C' r.;:C' C' C' o <" C' C' OA;
e:~:b_il:l:>~l <O~?Cr:l~')? CCXXf SJQJC:tj~bl?Go:>~ c:w:o:x:'Jt0X?9JI
C' 0 C C' (' <'C' OC' OC' 0 9 0 _c:: , C' C' C'
L0~1'J:q:>::> CX>G~?Go:>?:X>jX)
ll b "EJ
Gbl?C em0 -A
C OCG~~:I ~::n:GCl<:U C\)('f.)Quxr.>c
L L [. 1:. l AI l) ~
C'O (' C'h.C C 00 C' C' (' .. C'O C' 0
G'l_)~GtG~? 00:><00:>? tJ>:X>2:11 ~~C\XOOW~C ~CDjGfCO:U') ~2:~
ox;;;):Gro: 0':)?: GC roto<" o ooo ~cc come:~:>:
0 C' o ,.... C' o r1
I~? Q);y OO!'-l:>rol :;>":~roo
[
l 6 6 tl ' J T- J &.Jl l:J LJ\
c C' C"'S c- ~ (' o c-
9oop:~ OOIDJl:OCG:n? ~ ~()) :X>tt;l GO':)~: oxp:~Ej:ro1
9 0 "T' 0 r.:C' (' c \ C' (' C'
e:~:Gj) 9X>OI ~:~ t90G:X>? 'Pe:no:> <?!3'=1 ??e ~I ~~J(i,) o:>COO?::x>~
c c C' ('
~"- eo~s~ ~?:qc: ~~:;,p:ne;n
OC'0\0 C' '('0 (' C'C' ~('0 ('
ooco
l
?C oo:n:n o:x:oo:>:<O:n:> ~Q)J~ OW<.9JC'f.l'Jt 9X>e;j?C:5l:n~
I. l
C' C' C' 0 c (' C' 0 0
::r.l?:GroJ?~? OW<.9JID ~:ne;11 Groprooo?:~ e:~:coj~?:l oxpr
(' (' (' oc C' 0 (' C'
~c OlOXJt 0':)':1~ :;,J~o:> otm:ne;"
LA
0 , n , 1 ___ ,.
<:~II n.)c.oc.occ~<:J~ro:a:x.oecoec
0
:,~
.)
(:c.rftro:cbcoemcc)
o
r IO<Kft~::X.ft~:C
l,;:> :> e
0 <' <'
2 :~'-l'JC~Ioi'JC
ul J
~t
J

(;t~uSc.&,-,
~~?t'l(~;,T)
<.>:JT~f:;,tu
JOO

<~) a~~-~c~ oe<t'l' '~ 0~ oe'2"


r?
(J) Qmt~~ IOQ'>{V I oerol 'lfolfr 0, J II
~
81:
co:l-l.'roa 0.,) .) .,) 0
!:!,)..J..,:toeec&<.orecc&ccococcb:> u@cch:leRoco
,) ::::::3\.~.)
:c.n.,ccococc
.)
ow Ioocofc
~ J.,; .,
wc.w~oo
,) 0
~:bJW:'!Gbb~ro
. ~ .)
ob~Aee ::X.Ccc~ccoohcinalewc.w:>J
t., .~o .). .:) .)0 .,)0 .) ., - ;5- -- j - .)
u@cc....Q:~!Je
.) r..j ~)
Joeeeeool:ooeo
.) .) .)
w:~fi

o-Heecol,ccwrewc.W:'J
.) ' .) .) .)
C.CC:'J:J:iJ;b:'Jro
t;:j
"h:wrerob:>
0 .)
Oc,h:l:;&
0 .) .:::::l 0
u@cc:cc~@oo
.> Ct.>
t:' tooo::ob
.>..J.,
@cc~oc.ro
.l .> .>
~bfuo:~
.> .l,
c.~oC:dbxHokec~cc1Q~ro
.,o .> :.>o .> :..:lo
t:obeocc<.tiO<Cto:oco
~ .> "".> .>
!lc:'Jo2coro:b:)ot:;;):t:;;)e:<'lb:t
.J
&,a; a!cce.e.cGR:
.>::::::J G.j .> f.., .)G .>
orero :cro;t,
.>0 .>~ .>
~ (l)~p,'(.G 'ilc.w~~~ olrec.ococo :::OO:c.h.l:Jol'lec ::>f:~i)P.e;11
.> .>o \O .l o .J ~ t... .>o .>
uwrec.oQ:Cr:
.,
.> .lO
.> ....J
--cb:::oeooec
.)
bcc :J~:~ ~ci->ceo2ccro
.) .)
:b:'Job~:cbco
. .) tt
@::c.oo~hl
.>
u@cceC".roo
.) ~ ,) \.)
'w~ro
0
.:Jtcwc.!ro~
:> .)
c.wooR.l:Je
.) ~.
moc~:cboo
.)
cccceoo.
.) .)
~ c.cc:::oecdx>
0 ~ .)
ec:c.rfl&:bec.oc.!h,:'J
0 .)
cdc
wc.!h,:'J bccc:'JoC:::m u@ccwcb~rw
.,) .).)
:oooc.cc~o2:,
J
.)
flbl:'J:JOfleG .)oRcc:>OO
.... :l .~ .>0
IO~;c.~ooo
~ .:> """ 0
sde,:cccc.cwc.oo~ccewcc
.) .)
:oc.EO]:>Jcl6j~c.cl2ccecX-owc.oe:"J
.) o.-..J .).....,.)0.) \.) .)
wo!x.cm
.) 0
uc.oC:o~cc
.) .)
cCC.oe$ W!OOOecO>f~ CCIJc @cc~C.CO>~:orec.c w:&e&ect~So II ccccec.oR:k :O:'JOtw
.) .> .) .) .)O .)~ .> .) \.) :_:j .)0
ac.ec&wc.!b:"J
.)
w:&ro'flu

::lcd:e:ohlo:b.J ctX:Ocoreecb:>
~..... 0 .) :J 0 0 .) 0
cc:c.r~&:bewc.!Cu:'J
.)
u<2ccro:"J.J:J
.) r-'.J
'oc.h.l:'J:Ab:,;::x.R~Ooec.o li:cor4lW14'>8 'w2c.tt~e:tbllec o~:oc.tob~:"J~fwhl:)ft
~ ~ .) l. .) :.J \. ;) 'S'.,) .) 1.,.. 0 .) 0 l, .)0 .) .) -.J .) :..3
<!bl'e,:oe:c.f~eroe"c.c
~ .)0
c.!l&wreec
c .;,
C.CC:'Jhl:oc.EOJ:'Jro
:; .) -..J
46Ge:C.ttieCOOOA~ec
.) t.. ~ .)0
w:d~
0
?~ uaicce}tl(l)~
l..>o .> vor.J ::l
moo~:lrcoec
.>
::~<:::'Jo2:b:'JOh.l:h.l:Jbbl:'J:JOei!C
:J ~.>:J.)o
.>WLft...:l lo...)O tfGO>t:J~c.cc~c\
Ohxoc.oe:"J o&~e CCtlc 2cc~eceE;!:ol'eec wC!cwc.!h,:"J o~g_,kec u@cceC:e~
., .;, ..> :J . ., ..lo ..:u.> .> .:~
o .) ,o-,
acboo ~:'J:o~:c.~coo,ewro ~et:3:oreec
.l . .) . t,.;.)
.-lO .>:J .l
:c.ec:dC'!&bewc.ltu:"J
.)
c.o/!cwc.!h,:'J
-- --;,
ccr
0 ,, I{__
wc.oa:;cc:c.CXX.OC.1rue>
11.) .)
(\cf
,
&ll
~cb (c)
It 0~:2 :Q4o~l5~b:'/)e.c
.J e $'J o
l .,
II :X.0C0C0
(.., , ) .
.Jo .J o
0 :coo:cll
.J o e
11 :ro~o cco&ftu 11 aX.oe.c&:ccxx.oc.~~bxeohl
c .J .J ,J ,J ,J~
~
u0~cocc:l'lco:ct!aroc.co
.) .)
olo:c.Pe~cb
.::J .::J
llct!cc"'[:J;.;~a, c.l!:ot:l~~:cbco
.) ~~ .) .) ~0 '
bca ooC Mmt:;;~cocc~cbn
~ ~.)
wrecotl:'
~
Qe
~ ::J
aa hx'c:~w:~O(\')"u-:z~t:dxo ooCftlvb fl~~n~~~cl,
:X.ot;:)
.> .)
arelde :~:cbco
~'""""
(ttcb~:coo
coc.fro~~b:)ceohl) . (Qbi:C.0G:2) :)o~c.<"~Q~:)c.oo~~hl ucob
.>
oc
.> .> ..> ..> ~ ..)~ o e .>o .>~ ..> ..> ~
r ro~Lol~
t~
~~vc +
6cf
<~~:~)
~~~1 0\'
rt?;)~:i
~sllc
llcf
. e'
II ;c~ ~
(b) " leGe> JCP C.<.OCP~H
~ e
II WCot:n:cr~tu:cbc.oe&ec
~ 0
u@c:c:~C2@6 'co (llbr) cdr cc It{ oo~ 1d~o
"' .) .J 0 ~ \
-t(~)c.~ I(S")~ec IJ>~ lrJcccc:fo~~tc~~~~C.COc~ ~tcbcogl'l IC.Olt I~
u@a;!,ll&;~ oll.ucc:cw@cc~ob;re:occo!J
.> 0 11 0 .J. O.J o)OO o)
~bx.ce:):O~
...;,
.J
fcoobec:lero
.) " :r
oikccctuboc
:J 0 0 0
c.cceohl 0 0
lb:o~'b:J ~ohl:c.~:~:ll,
.,)::.1.$ :1 c.~core:~c3hl
.) .) :l
cc :@t 1of .:>~ftec:h:>bfeot'l:cbco
;, o .)
no;o~eRooro
.JO .>
:<X!<UW:..J:lre:occo:J
.J o S'~o ;;,
~booo:ol>
.> .>
rcoobec
.>
2Q<U
.J
'coboc::iro~ co:cr~:Cbc.oe~
o e e:J\,; o
ohiO:, IIO:>:>OI't:lrooec
;, ~o ~
:X.ocore:oil
.> .J OJ i::1
'ohlcccohxo,:lPt~boc
.>::J .> ~ 0 e
CCCoGhl~b:o~'b~
.:>::.:J.>
ohl:cc.c:&:~
.> ::J
u@cc~CC
0 0
cl,bocoroeeo
& &.>1. .J .JO ~
c.ccMboc
.J o o
c.cc~...Q~b:o~!>:~ oc:J:cc.c:~:~ c.fiwfe:oill:o uo:~ool't:lfcoc.c 'obfe:oSI
~:b .>:3 o o :: .>tlo .> .J .> .:J\:1
(b)k ~~~ ref JF~gfeot~:cbco ~soccsoo j>.;sore:?~"ooo c.cc~:_rc.J~N"
ro!;lre::xb~
.)~ .)
ocororol>
.)
~c.@rco~ 0'co:dt~:@oo:oco
~ ' .) . .)
~~l>Cccocof,a
1.) ~
'ohlcc":U:ko
.) ~ 0 0 .)
(\')G(.O f,;~cc c dcoo:~cc r c.~:k.lco ~:~:c.rl't:@OO c.cc~oeecocc &cob~~ce
.JO .1 .)0 0J :>- .) .)O :J .J .) .)
,rt:.,Qc.c:cn.,
~J:l
ooo'ob oeorco
~
c.~bocoro~
0 0.)\,;
~:~:c.f~:<hcoe&-lecu
y 0
uwrecoc:J:~
.) ~ :3
ut;, ~ oe~:oc.c.o~t
0 0 .> 0 .)
rbw cc :@
.) 1of ~flwtbo:,rWft:cbc.o-oOtt
Jo .> ~
:>O:lrww
.> .;,
o' (b) l.c ":@~
.>
ref
~flc.c:~:,fwl'l:dtco
,.) 0 ~
~b:oere::xl,o~OJOJo
.':1 ;j .,
~:c.tA:@&o
0 .)
c.c:co:o&::noe~tc.c.cOio.llr:c
~ j\,.:
.orr
I.
cff
JJJ
JR

CIVIL REFERENCE

Bejou U Thet Pe, J.


c.c.
H. T. AHUJA AND OTHERS (PLAINTIFFS) 966
v. Apl. 23.

P. C. GHOSH (deceased) represented by his wife DAw HLA


YIN AND DAUGHTER (DEFENDANT).*

Suit for recovery of Money due llll accounts taken-balance shtet prepar~
by a qualijied aceouniant-failure to point our itt ineorrectness-no proof
of irreruJo.rity or erroneousneu- whtther st4ficient to attach liability on
the defendant.

Held : The defendant P. C. Gh~h was a working partner in the partnership


business and was therefore access to the account books of the partnership firm.
the balance sheet prepared by Mr. A. S. Hakeem was incorrect he should
able to ,point it out either to Mr. Hakeem or to the Court. This he had
failed to do. There is also nothing on the record to show that the balance
sheet prepared by Mr. Halceem, a qualified accountant, either irregular or
erroneous. Under these circumstances the defendant P. C. Ghosh cannot be
allowed to say that the balance sheet prepared by Mr. Hakeem is not sufficient
to attach liability upon him.
Dogar Mal and others v. Sunam Ram and others, A.I.R. (1944) Lah. p.
s8, referred to.

R. Basu for the plaintiffs.

Tin Maung for the defendant.

U THET PE, J.-This is a suit for recovery of


K 51,74392 due on accounts taken. It is the case of the
plaintiffs that they and the defendant P. C. Ghosh carried
on the partnership business under the name and style of
Messrs. Ahuja Radio House at No. 126. Sule Pagoda Road
and Ahuja Ghosh and Co. at No. 254/264, Barr Street.
Rangoon ; that the capital of the partnership business was
Civil Regular Suit No. 7 of r96z.

'.
JJ9
c.c. K r,oo,ooo to which defendant P. C. Ghosh contributed
1966
K 26,428 ; that one of the clauses of the Partnership Deed
!!:oT.:= provided that the .nett profits and losses after payment of
" outgoings shall be shared or borne by the partners accord-
P. C. GHOSH f . . 1
(oECEASE[I) ing to the amount o capital respective y su scn
b 'bed by
~~~::- them. That the partnership was dissolved by mutual
w;rv. '?~ consent on the rst june 1959 by a Deed of Dissolution
AND by which the partners agreed to go into and accept the
DAUGHTER. h
partnership accounts outstanding on t e 31st May 1959.
That on going through the accounts it was found that the
defendant P. C. Ghosh had to pay K 29,49183 being the
amount he had overdrawn and his share of contribution
to the loss incurred by the partnership business for the
period ending 31st May 1959 That the defendant
P. C. Ghosh was also liable to pay income and super-taxes
amounting to K 9,39802 for financial years 1946-47 to
1953-54 and also K 9,75988. for financial years 1954-55
and 1955-56. That the interest payable on these amounts
from 31st December 1959 to 30th Januazy 1962 was
K 3,09419 thereby bringing the total amount due by the
defendant P. C. Ghosh to K 51,74392.
The defendant P. C. Ghosh filed a written statement
by which he denied the correctness of the amount claimed
by the plaintiffs and further contended that the suit against
him was not maintainable inasmuch as the partnership
was not registered. That the partnership stilr' subsisted
as he was compelled to sign the Deed of Pissolution by
reason of coercion, threat, mi!_!representation and fraud.
That the suit against him was barred by limitation.
During the pendency of the suit the defendant
P. C. Ghosh died and his wif~ and da1,1gliter were brought
on the record as his legaJ representatives. One of the
plaintiffs, namely, M. T. Ahuja. was dec~red an insolvent
and the Official Receiver. was accordingly substituted in
his place.
J.J.)

On the pleadings filed by the parties my learned c.c.


966
predecessors joined the .{Q&lowin;g issues: H. T. AltuJA
ISSUES. AND OTHERS
v.
1. W~s the late P. C. Ghosh compelled to sign the P(o~C::.:O:,"
Deed of Dissolution of Partnership under iiEJ'R.ESEHT
.
misrepresentat1on. f rau d. coeroon
and t hreats wzn
DBYtaS
~w
practised by the rst plaintiff? Hr;_'~rN
2. Is the suit not maintainable for want of oAucHTtR.
registration of the plaintiff-firm and of the
Partner.shlp Deed and for the allegations m~de
in paragraph 1 of the written statement?
3 is the claim against the defendants barred?
~- 1s the amO\~_nt K .51 7i39l claimed by the
plaintiffs as shown in paragraph 6 of the
amended .plaint correct?
Issue No. z
The burden on this issue is on the defendant but there
is not a shred of evidence to substantiate the allegation
that he was compelled to sign the Deed of Dissolution by
coercion, threar.-misrepresentation or fraud. Jn fact none
of his legal representatives had chosen to go into the
witness box in support of the defendant's allegation. The
issue must therefore be answered in the negative.
Issue No. 2
Since the plaintiflc; had produced the Deeds of Regis-
tration of the firm Exhihits H " and " H {1)" the
contention regarding non-maintainability of the suit for
want of registration cannot be sustained. This issue will
be answered accordingly.
Issue No.3
This issue has not been pressed by the learned Advocate
for the defendants at the time of hearing. The suit having

'. '. '.


Jfi
c.c. been instit11ted within three years from the date of dis-
1966
solution of the partnership business is clearly within time
~oT.o~~ vide Article xo6, Limitation Act. The answer to the issue
"G
P. C. HOSK
will therefore be in the negative.
(DBCEASED)
REPRESENT- Issue No. 4
ED BY HIS
WIF1! DAw The learned Advocate for the defendants strenuously
HLA YJN
AND argued that the plaintiffs' claim having been based mainly
DAUGHTER .
on the balance sheet prepared by Mr. A. S. Hakeem could
not be said to have been proved against the defendants.
He submitted that .the accounts prepared in the ordinary
course of business are admissible in evidence but such
accounts cannot form the hasis of defendants' liability
unless there is evidence to show that the defendants have
in any way admitted its correctness. I have no quarrel
over the proposition that under section 34, Evidence Act
the entries in the account books kept and prepared in the
ordinary course of business by itself do not prove the
li~bility of a party to the suit hut in the present suit it
must be borne in mind that the defendant P. C. Ghosh was
a working partner in the partnership business and was
therefore accessible to the account books of the partnership
firm. If the balance sheet prepared by Mr. A. S. Hakeem
was incorrect he should be able to point it out either to
Mr. Hakeem or to the Court. This he had failed to do.
Besides the Exhibit documents " A ,. and " F " clearly
indicate that the accounts of the firm had been gone into
by Mr. A. S. Hakeem with the joint consent of the
defendant P. C. Ghosh and the zst plaintiff H. T. Ahuja.
There is also nothing on the record to show that the
balance sheet prepared by Mr. A. S. Hakeem, a qualified
Accountant, is either irregular or erroneous. Under these
circumstances the defendant P. C. Ghosh cannot be allowed
to say that the balance sheet prepared by Mr. A. S. Hakeem
is not sufficient to attach liability upon him. In this
connection it will be relevant .t o refer to the decision in
JJ?
Dogar Mal and others v. Sunam Ram and others (x) where c.c.
it was held that: 1966
" The partnership account books being accessible to all the H. T. AHuJA
. kept more or Iess un der the surve1'11ance AND v.
partners, and bemg OTIIERS

of them all, are prima facie evidence against each of them, P. c. GHOSH
and, therefore, also, for any of them against the others. <:;=:~
Consequently, in a suit by some of. the partners against the TEo BY HIS
others, it is not open to the defendants to ask that the ~~!~~
partnership account books relied on by the plaintiffs be AND
formally proved or to contend that they were not prima DAtJGHTER.
facie evidence against them."

I am therefore 'Of the view that the defendant P. C. Ghosh


owed K 29,49183 to the plaintiffs for the amount he had
overdrawn and for his share of contribution towards the
1oss of the firm. As regards the amount of income-tax
which the plaintiffs had claimed fro~ him, namely,
(K 9,7S988+ K 9,39802) K 19,15790 there is an
admission by the plaintiffs that a refund of K 19,65012
had been benefited by the firm vide Exhibit " L " which
was not available at the time when Mr. A. S. Hakeem
went into the accounts and was therefore not taken into
consideration by him when the balance sheet was drawn
up. Since the defendant P. C. Ghosh . had contributed
K 26,428 towards the total capital of K 1,oo,ooo he is
entitled to a sum of K 5,19310 out of K 19,65012, the
entire amount of refund of income-tax. Thus the total
amount owed by the defendant P. C. Ghosh to the plaintiffs
was (K 48,64973-K 5,19310) K 43.45663. Interest on
that amount at three .per cent per annum for two
years
and one month will come up to K 2,71668. The gross
amount payable by the defendant P. C. Ghosh is therefore
K 46,17331.
In the result there shall be a decree forK 46,17331 in
favour of the plaintiffs with proportionate costs against
the defendants.
:B (x) A.I.R. (1944) Lah., p . s8.

'. '.
'.
JJO

CIVIL REGULAR SUIT

Before U Thet P~, 7.

c.c. H. T. AHUJA AND SEVEN OTHERS (PLAINTIFFS)


r96(>
v.
Apl. :13.
P. c. GHOSH (deceased) AND Two OTHERS (DEFENDANTs) .
Trmlsjer of Proputy Act, s. 53- a representative suit for declaratio11 th4t
a deed of g(ft is not hindint: UJXI the p/ai1ltiffs -tohetJrer a mit for taere
dularatioll is 'mnmtainoble- whether cpurtfus is payable tmdet' s. 7 (iv) (c)
of the Court Pees Act -suit by crtditors -burdeu of proof of fraud on the
creditors-shifting of the burden to the dehtor.
llild : A suit under s. 53, Transfer of Property Act fur more declaradcn
is not maintainable and that the coun fees payable is governed by s. 7 (iv) (1) of
the Court Fees Act and that the plaintiffs. must pay oourt fees according to
the amoW\t or the conseque.n tial relief which tlicy are now claiming.
Vella)lya Konar Qnd onotkr v. Ramaswami KMar 4nd anotJrer, A .I.R. (1939)
Mao. 094 ; A.K.,1.C. T. V. Chettyar v. R.M.A.R.S. Firm and ethers
I .L.R. u Ran. 666; Asgar Ali v. C.V..R.M. J.'irm, I.L.R. 14 Ran. 81 ; Maun.r
Ba Maulrg v. Maung Ba Yin (~1}4o) .R.L.R. 59 (F.B.), referred to. Held
further : ln a suit filed by creditors under s. 53, Transfer of Pcopeny
Act the initial burden of. proving that it is a fuud on the creditors rests on them,
but if they can adduce facts Which are sufficient to show prima facie that the
intention of the dehtor was to dclay or defeat the creditors, the debtor must
meet their case and expiain his conduct.
Moharmrurd !Jhaq and others v. llfohammtul 1'usaf and another (19Z?) I.L.R .
R Lah. 544 , referred ro.

R. Basu for the p.laintiffs.


Tin Malll2g tor the defendants.

U THET PE, j.-This -is a representative suit for


declaration under section 53, Transfer of Property Act
that a deed of gift executed by the defendant P. C. Ghosh
in favour of the other defendants who are his wife and
adopted daughter is not binding upon the .Plaintiffs to the
extent ~f K 59,25.17I.
"Civil Regular Suit Np. r6 of 1962.
JJe
It is the case of the plaintiffs that they and the
defendant P. C. Ghosh carried on the partnership business ~~f6
under the name and style of Messrs. Ahuja Radio House H. T . AJtoJ...
at No ' 1 26, Sule Pagoda Road and Ahuja Ghosh and SEvENANI> OTHERS
Company at No. 254/264, Barr Street. Rangoon ; that one "
. tJ\ h P. C. GHOSH
of the terms o f t he partnersh1p was at t e partners (oCAsto)
should enjoy or bear the net profits or losses according TWo A~:.,us.
to the respective amounts of capital subscribed by them ;
that the partnership was dissolved by mutual consent on
the 1st june 1959 by a deed of dissolution by which the
partners agreed to go into and accept the partnership
accounts outstanding on the 31st May 1959; that on
going through the accounts it was found that the defendant
P. C. Ghosh had to pay K 29.49r83 being the amount
which he had overdrawn and his share of contribution
towards the losses incurred by the partnership business
for the period ending 31st May 1959; that the defendant
P. C. Ghosh was also liable to pay. income and super-taxes
amounting to K 19, I 5790 and also K 3.094 19 as interest
thereby bringing the total amount payable to K 51.74392 ;
that on 3rd August 1961 the defendant P. C. Ghosh
collusively and with intent to defeat his creditors executed
a deed of gift purporting to convey his sole property,
namely, a two-storeyed putca building known as No. 15.
Sooniram Park, Rangoon. with its site valued at K 25,000
in favour of the other defendants, who at the time of the
transfer knew that the defendant P. C. Ghosh was indebted
to the plaintiffs and that the plaintiffs were. entitled to a
declaration t~at the deed of gift was not binding upon
the plaintiffs to the extent of K 51,74392.
During the progress of the suit but before the hearing
was started t!he defendant P. C. Ghosh died and the other
defendants were brought on the record as his legal repre-
sentatives as well . Then, one of the plaintiffs, namely,
H. T. Ahuja became an insolvent and the Oflicial Assignee
was accordingly substituted in his place as a plaintiff.

'.
'.
c.c. The defendants contested the suit on various grounds
J966
amongst which it was contended that the plaintiffs' suit
H. T~HuJA for bare declaration without consequential relief was not
sEVEN oTHERS maintainable and that the suit was not properly valued

P. c.vGHosH for the purpose of court fees. They further denied that
(o~~Eo) the deed of gift was executed with intent to delay or
Two oTHERs. defeat the cr~ditors.

On these pleadings the following issues were joined :


r. Is the suit properly valued and paid for the
purpose of _court fees ?
2. Whether the suit for bare declaration is main-
tainable without consequential relief?
3 Was the deed of gift. dated the 3rd August T96r
made by the late P.. C. Ghosh in favour of th<'
2nd and 3rd defendants with the intent to
delay or defeat his creditors to the knowledge
of the aforesaid alleged donees without
consideration ?

Since the present suit is an offshoot of Civil Regular Suit


No. 7 of 1962 of this Court, the learned Advocates for
the parties agreed to adopt the evidence recorded therein
as the evidence of this case and to base the decision of
the instant case on that of the other one.

Issues No. 1 and 2 will be considered together.


. .
It has been sub!Jlitted on behalf of the defendants that
the court fees should have been paid ad valorem inasmuch
as the suit is one for declaration with consequential relief
and that a suit under section 53. Transfer of Property Act,
which entails avoidance of transfer by the debtor cannot
be said to be one of declaration, pure and simple. The
learned Advocate for the plaintiffs on the other hand
contended that the suit under section 53, Transfer of Pro-
perty Act is one for declaration without any consequential F-2:
relief. In this connection he reHed upon the decision in c .c.
r6
Vellayya Konar and another v. Ramaswami Konar and --
another (1) where it was held that a suit brought by a H . T~~uuiA
creditor under section 53, Transfer of Property Act, for a sEvEN OTHms
declaration that an alienation by the debtor is void against P . c . Guostt

the cred1tors . . f 11 f d
IS not a suit or cance anon o a ocurnen
t (DECEASED)
AND

securing money or other property falling under Two o T HERs


section 7 (iv-A) but a suit to obtain a declaration where no
conseq_uential relief is prayed falling under Article 17A of
Schedule 2 as amended in Madras.

With due respect to the learned Judge who had decided


the case, the fact that the plaintiff in such a suit has asked
for avoidance of the transfer to the extent of his and other
creditors' claim clearly indicates that it is not a suit for
declaration pure and simple. Although the success of such
a suit will not have the effect of cancelling the instrument
of transfer executed by the debtor it will necessarily
result in the avoidance of transfer to the extent of the
total claim of all the creditors, both present and future.
In A .K.A.C.T.V. Chettyar v. R.M.A.R.S. Firm and
others (2) it has been held that :

" When a suit is brought under the provisions of Order 2 x,


rule. 63, of the Civil Procedure Code by an attaching creditor
to establish his right to attach and bring to sale certain
property, and in order to succeed it is nece.ssary to
avoid a transfer of the property on the ground that the
transfer has been made with intent to defeat or delay the
creditors of the transferor, the suit must be brought in the
form of a representative suit for the benefit of all the creditors
of the transferor. The valuation of the suit for the purpose
of jurisdiction is the value of the property transferred, and
not the amount of the attaching creditor's decree. If the
creditor succeeds in the suit the decree enures for the benefit
of all the creditors of the debtor, both present and future."
~28 ( r) A. l.R. 1939 Mad. 894 (a) I.L.R. 12 Ran. 666.

'-
J?J
The above decision had been approved by a Bench in
,~6~ Asgar Ali v. C.V.R.M. Firm (3). See also Maung Ba Maung
H. T. AHUJA v. Maung Ba Yin (4) wJiere it was held that a creditor
AND cannot sue for a bare declaration that a transfer bas been
SEVEN OTHJ!JIS
Cl made by hts
debtor fraudulently wtth
mtent to de f eat or
P.(oECEAsED)
C . GHOSH de"l ay h"1s ered'1tors.
AND
TWo oTHERS. ' When a suit under Order 2 I , Rule 63., Civil Procedure
Code which is ordinarily governed by Article I7 (1) -of
Schedule II of Court Fees Act turns into a suit under
section 7 (iv) (c) of Court Fees Act, if a plea under
section 53 Transfer of Property Act is made therein, there
is the more reason to hold that a suit instituted under the
provisions of section 53. Transfer of Property Act falls
under section 7 (iv) (c) of the Court Fees Act. l therefore
hQld that a suit under section 53, Transfer of Property Act
for mere declaration is not maintainable and that the Co~rt
fees p~yable is governed by section 7 (iv) (c) of the Court
Fees Act and that the plaintiffs must pay court fees accord-
ing to the amount of the consequential relief which they
are !low claiming.

Issue No. 3
Jn a suit filed by creditors under section 53, Transfer
of Property Act the initial burden ~f proving that it is a
fraud on the creditors rests on them, but if they can adduce
facts which are sufficient to show ;prima facie that the
intention of the debtor was to delay qr defeat the creditors,
the debtor must meet their case and explain his conduct.
In the present case, it is clear from the evidence of
Mr. A. S. Hakim (recorded in Civil Regular Suit No. 7 of
1962 of this Court) rhat the defendant P. -C. Ghosh was
supplied with a copy 'or the balance sheet on the
2nd December 1959 and that he was therefore aware of
the fact that he owed substantial sums of money to the
(3) l.L.R. 14 Ran. 81. (4) (1940) R.L.R. 59 (F.B. ).
plaintiffs before the execution of the instrument of gift c.c.
1966
dated the 3rd August r961. It is also not in dispute that
H. T. AHliJA
the defendant P. C. Ghosh was not possessed of any pro- M'D
SEV111 OTHERS
perty other than the building which he had gifted to his v.
c. GHOSH
wife and adopted daughter. It must therefore be assumed P.(DEC.\S!>)
that the defendant P. C. Ghosh intended to defeat or delay AND
TWO OTHERS,
creditors when he conveyed his sole and only property to
hi~ wife and adopted daughter. See Mohammad Tshaq
and olhers v. Mohammad Yusaf and another (5).
tn view of the decision in The Bank of Chettinad Ltd.
v. U Taw (6) the plaintiffs will be allowed to suitably
amend their plaint in the light of the answer to the issues
Nos. 1 and 2 and pay the deficit court fees within one
month from this date. failin~ which their suit will stand
dismissed with costs. If the plaintiffs amend their plaint
and pay the deficit court fees. there will be a decree
declaring that a deed of gift dated the 3rd August 196 c is
not binding upon the plaintiffs to the extent of
K "f6,I7)-"31. being the amount decreed in Civil Regular
Suit No. 7 of 1962 of this Court \vith costs.

(5) (19'171 LL.R. 3 Lah. SH (6) (1957) B.L.R . s6 (S.C.).

'.
J\>9

C{VJL REVISION

Before U Thet Pe , J.

c.c. KO THAN (APPLICANT)


/966
v.
Mar 9.
DA w SAw MYA {RESPONDENT)

N;gotiabft- Instruments Act s. 4- prom1ssory. not~ -intenll.on oj the parties.


ff,[d: A c-~rc-fu E an'alys is of the dQcument shows that the panics intend
it to be a " cord of two items of debts due by the petitioner to th~
respondent with n promise to pay within 11 certain period. The parti~
n~ver intended the document in question to be a promi$sory note.

(Nawab Majnr Sir) Mohammad Akb~r Khan v. Attar Singh and othas
A.I.R. (19~6) P.C. 171 at 174 ; Lala .Karam Chand and another v. Firm
Mian Mir Ahmtd Aziz Altmad and another, A.I.R. (1938) P.C. 121 ;
Kulsnmbai v. A . K . Mandtitrallu. Firm, A. J. R. (1939) P.C. Sind :t8r ~
referrcci tc .

Ba Tin for the applicant.


Rishi Ram for the rcsponcient.

U THET PE, J.-In Civil Small Cause Suit No. A-49 of


1964 of the Rangoon City Civil Court, the respondent
Daw Saw Mya obtained a decree for K 500 against the
petitioner Ko Than. It was the case of the respondent
that the peti~ioner, who had been selling. clotho~ c.oJillllis-
sion basis i'n her stall.in Thingang)ru~ Municipal Bazaar..
approached her for an advance of K 500 to enable him
to open a food shop as the business in clothing was slack
and that a sum of K 500 was accordingly advanced to
the respondent.. who thereupon executed an acknowl-
edgment of a debt and that the . petitioner had failed to
repay the amount in spite of repeated demands.
Civil Revision No. 17 of 1965 agairu;t the dec:ree of the )rd Additional
Judge, City Civil Court of Rangoon, in. Civil Small Cause Suit No. A-49 of
1964, dated the sth May rQ6s.
Petitioner. on the other h.3nd. denied having taken any c.c.
19{)6
loan from the respondent. He pleaded that he had never
Ko "''HAM
sold any cloth belonging to the respondent on commission tlo

basis and that he was occupying the stall as her sub-tenant DAW SAw
MYA.
at the daily rent of K 2 which he had been paying
regularly. After hearing the parties and their witnesses
the learned 3rd Additional judge who took up the trial
of the suit accepted the respondent's case and decreed her
suit.
It has been strenuously argued on behalf of the
petitioner that the deed acknowledging the debt.
Exhibit " ro '' was in fact a promissory note which being
insufficiently stamped was not admissible in evidence and
that the suit having been based on the said qocument
should accordingly be dismissed .
A promissory note is an instrument in writing contain-
ing a promise to pay a certain sum of money to a particular
person. No particular set of words is prescribed by law
how a promissory note should be written. out an instru-
ment in order to be a promissory note must fall within
the four corners of the definition contained in section 4
of the Negotiable Instruments Ad. The question as to
whether the document is a promissory note or not mu!>t
be decided on the intention of the parties which is to be
gathered from the reading of the document as a whole.
Funher. a promissory note being a negotiable instrument
which is .meant ro pass from hand to hand must be certain
in its construction and free from ambiguity. In other
words; in construing a document the test to be applied
is whether the parties intend the instrument to be a
promissory note and whether the document in question
is negotiable. If the answer is in the negative. the docu-
ment is not a . promissory note but a mere agreement
acknowledging the debt with the promise to pay. In this
connection. the Judicial. Committee of the Privy Council
c.c. has ruled in the case of (Nawab Major Sir) Mohammad
1966
Akbar Khan v. Attar s;ngh and others (r) that :
Ko THAN
(), "Such documents must come into existence for the pur-
DAW SAW
MYA.
pose only of recording an agreement to pay money and
nothing more. though of course they may state the consi-
deration. Receipts and agreements generally are not intended
to be negotiable. and serious embarrassment would be caused
in commerce if the negotiable net were cast too wide."
The above decision has been affirmed in Lola Karam Chand
and another v. Firm Mian Mir Ahmad Aziz Ahmad and
another (2). In Kuisambai v. A. K. Mandviwalla Firm (3)
it has also been held that:
.. In order that a document should be a promissory note
within the meaning of section 4 not only must it be a promis
sory nOle in form but it must in addition be intended by the
parties to be a promissory note. i.e. it must be intended to
be negotiable and to pass from hand to hand."
Now. the document in the present case reads:

o c oe c C' o 'l c
O)(l)O')C ~ox;:a:m:ot::nm n
l \ J -. t ~
I
1
;
I
A.l.R. (1936) P.C. 17r at 174
(r) (2) A. I.R. (1 938) P.C. 121.
(3) A.l.R. (1939) Sind 281. '
F -~
J??
The document recites the existence of a previous debt of c.c.
1966
K .2oo, which the petitioner was unable to .pay, and pro-
Ko THAN
ceeds to state that petitioner received K 500 from the (/.

respondent who made the advance at his request so as lo DAW SAw


MYA.
enable him to open a food shop and that the amount will
be repaid within six months (rom the date of execution
at the monthly instalment of K r.oo. It further narrates
that the previous debt of K 200 will also be repaid within
the period of six months. It is dear therefrOm that the
document is not an undertaking to pay the definite sum
of K 500 inasmuch as it also says about the liability of the
petitioner to pay the previous debt of K.'2oo. Then there
is the clause which recites that the sum of K .soo will be
repaid in monthly instalment of K 100 which however
runs counter to the stipulation that the entire amount will
be satisfied within six months from the date of execution.
Such an instrument cannot, by any stretch of imagination.
be passed from hand to hand as a negotiable instrument.
A careful analysis of the document shows that the parties
intend it to be a record of two items of debts due by the
petitioner to the respondent with a promise to pay within
a certain period. The parties never intended the document
in question to be a promissory note. Thus, the main plea
of the petitioner regarding the maintainability of the
respondent's suit on account of the invalidity of, the
document. Exhibit " m " fails and cannot accordingly be
accepted.
Another submission made on behalf of the petitioner
is that the Court erred in allowing the respondent to cite
the Handwriting Expert after she had closed her case. It
must at once be pointed out that the parties agreed to the
taking of the expert opinion on the handwriting of the
petitioner~ vide diary order dated r6th November 196<1 of
the trial proceedings. The petitioner cannot therefore be
allowed to turn round and say that the course adopted by
,:3A the learned trial Judge was improper. Besides. the need

'. '. '.


c.c. for calling in the aid of the Handwriting Expert arose only
1966
when the petitioner denied his ~ignatures on the exhibit
KoTHAN documents after the close of the respondent's case and the
II.
DAW SAW
MYA.
trial Court was therefore perfectly right in obtaining the
expert opinion in his search for the truth.
As regards the merits of the case. there is sufficient
materials on the record for the trial Court to come to the
conclusion that the petitioner had in fact taken an advance
of K 500 from the respondent and it would be wrong for
me sitting as a Court of. revision to interfere with that
finding unless it is either perverse or obviously wrong.
S. S. Mohamad Hanifa v. K. 0. Mohamad Kasim (4) and
Sultan Ahmed v. Nasara ]aman (5).
Inthe result the application for revision fails and is
accordingly dismissed with costs. Advocate fees K 34

(4) (1950) B.L.R. 2~ (H.C.) (s) (195o) B.L.R. 369 (H.C. ).


CIVIL REVISION

B~fort U Thn Pt. J.

MA THAN AND ONE (APPLICANT) c.c.


1966
v.
Mar. 3 1
MATHEWS JOSEPH {RESPO~DENT).*

Cod~ of Civil Procedure 0. 26 Rule 5 - isrut of commission for examination


of witness residing abroad- whtthtr ttJident:e relttJOn t and mential for tht
proper decision of tht suit -whether application is bona fide.
Held: Under Rules. Order XXVI of the COde of Civil Procedure. the
issue of commission for examination of witnesses residing abroad can only
be sanctioned if the evidence of the witnesses is relevant and essential for the
proper decision of the suit. A party should not easily be deprived of the
evidence which is necessary and essential to his case unless his application
is malafick. The futile attempts made hy the putitioners to have their evidence
taken d~ bmt esse before the departure of the witnesses to India and East
Pakistan would go to show that their application for the issue of commission
was bona fide and not actuated by any motive to delay the disposal of the suit.
P. A. M. Abdul KadtT and ttn others v. S . M . M . Molridmr Firm by Pro.
p r~~lor S. M. Nagoor Metra and six others, ( 19SS) B. L.R. 123 H.C.; M ..J. Sheth
f!# Ca. v. Ramiza Bi and another, A.l.R. (1938) Mad. 647 ; Issac MmGSseh
MqeT v# Sllbb4 Rllo ond ather1 (J9Sz-S'3) Vol .LVII C.W.N. 6os ; Messrs. The
AUric CorjHWatiarl v. Mnm. Mtrcar~Jile Bonk of /r~dia Limited (1957) B. L.R.
z88 (H.C.), referred to .

.U Aw for the applicants.


,
Kyaw Zan for the respondent.

U THET PE, J.-ln Civil Regular Suit No. 966.of -1963


of the Rangoon City Civil Court, petitioners sued the
respondent for recovery of K 3.908 due as rents, mesne
_profits and damages. The petitioners' case, in short, is
that the respondent had been in occupation of three out of
four rooms in the two-storeyed building known as No. 31,
137th Street, Rangoon since the end of December 1961 as
Civil Revision No. 41 of rQ6s, apinst the orde.r of the and Judge of the
City Civil Court of Rangoon in Civi I Regular Suit No. 966 of 1963, dated 2nd
August 1965. .

'.
c.c. their tenant, and that the respondent had failed to vacate
1966
from the ground floor .room although the tenancy had been
MATHAN
AND ONE
.terminated with effect from the end of December I9<)2 and
tl.
MATtlWS
that they had incurred the loss of K I .558 in payment of
jOSEPH. labourers' wages as a result of the respondent's refusal to
allow the workmen access to the rooms which at the time .
of the respondent's occupation required minor works to
be completed. The respondent contested petitioners' suit
on various grounds amongst which it. was co_ntended that
he was in occupation pf one groundfloor room on~. and
that he had never denied access . to the petitioners"
workmen at any time. On these pleadings. the trial Court
framed six Issues, three of which read:
I. Are the plaintiffs owners/landlords of the suit
building and was the defendant formerly
occupying three rooms in .the suit building as
alleged in paragraph 10 of the plaint? .
2. Has the defendant oc.cupied rhe . two rooms on
the upper floor? If so, froin which date and
is the defendant liable to pay rent for the two
~ooms for the period of his .o ccupation?
3 Did the plaintiffs suffer loss on t he grounds
mentioned in paragraph 6 of the plaint and
paragraph 8 (iii) of the plaint and can the
plaintiffs ask for d.lmages-1

At the hearing, -the petitioners cited amongst other


witnesses one ML A. R." Ghose who had once resided in
one of the ground.floor rQ0ms of the house in question and
one Abdul Mon~ff. one of the ~orkmen who was alleged .
. . to have heeh denjed free :access to the rooms by the
.respondent. These Witnesses could not however .be
examined for various r~asons with . the result- that
!\. R. Ghose left Jor India on 25th July 1964 and Abdul
Monaff departed for East Pakistan on 16th August 1964.
The 'a ttempts of the petitioners to have their de bene esse c.c
1966
examination taken before their departure did not meet
MA THAN
with success owing to the shortness of notice given about AND ONE

the date of their departure and also to the illness of the "
MATHEWS
learned Advocate for the respondfmt. The petitioners JoSEPH.

thereafter applied for issue of commission for examination


of the said witnesses under Rule s. Or~er XXVI of the
Code of' Civil Procedur-e. After hearing objections raised
hy the. respondent, the learned 2nd Judge who had seisin of
the case rejected the petitioners' application .on the ground
that the~e had heen inordinate delay in applying .for the
issue of commission.
It is true that the petitioners applied for the issue of
commission only on 27th May 1965 although the witnesses
had left Burma on 25th July 1964 and z6'th August 1964.
But they had explained that the delay was due to the fact
that permanent addresses of the witnesses could not easily
be obtained. No one can deny that there had been an
exodus of Indian nationals from Burma in recent months
and these refugees would have a hard time in their search
for permanent home and the delay in applying for the
issue of commission cannot under the circumstances be
said to be unreasonable and without cause.
It has been said on behalf of the respondent that no
revision lies against an interlocutory order of a subordinate
Court relating to the issue of commission. A complete
answer to this argument is to be found in the decision in
P. A.M. Abdul Kader and ten others.v. S.M. M. Mohideen
Firm by ProprietorS. M. Nagoor Meera and six others (I)
where it was held that the revision against an order refusing
to issue commission for examination of a witness residing
abroad was competent under section 25, Rangoon City
Civil Court Act.
The issue of commission for examination of witnesses
residing outside Burma will naturally occasion the delay
(1) (1955) B.L. R. 123 H.C.
c.c. in the disposal of the suit which cannot be allowed to
966 happen without adequate reasons especially when the
MA THAN
AND ON"e Courts are at this juncture trying their level best to reduce
fl.
M.\THBWS
their respective files. Under Rule 5 Order XXVI of the .
JOSEPH. Code of Civil Procedure. the issue of commission for
examination of witnesses residing abroad can only be
sanctioned if the evidence of .those Witnesses is relevant
and essential . for the proper decision of the suit. . Th.e
Wisdom of this rule is based on the principle that the
iefusal to allow a party to adduce evidence which is
relevant and essential to his case would be tantamount to
the denial of justice. In short, a party Will be erttitl~
to the issue o{ commission if .he can establish that the
evidence proposed to be taken is essential and necessary.
It bas been held in M. f. Sheth & Co. v. Ramiza Bi a.n d
another (2) and in Issac Menasseh Meyer v. C. Subba Rao
and others (3) that where a party has clearly established
that the evidence of a witness is necessary, ~ut he is not
within his control or resident within the jurisdiction of
the Court, he is entitled as of right to a commission and
that the Court has no further discretion in -the matter.
Although I am not prepared to the extent of laying down
that a party is entitled as of right for the issue of commis-
sion when the requirements of Rule 5, Order XXVI are
fulfilled, 1 am of opinion that a party should not easily
be deprived of the evidence which is necessary and
essential to his case unless his applh:;ation. is mala fide. ln
this connection, it has been ruled in Messrs. The Asiatic
Corporation v. Messrs. Mercantile Bank of India
Limited (4}:
.. That iri the matter of issue of commission to examine
certain witnesses in a distant coontry, especially where his
examination would cause delay. the Court must be fully
convince~ that the evidence of such a witness is really rele~
vant and necessary for the proper decision of the case."
(z) A.J.R. {1938) Mad. 6.47. {3) (1952-SJ) Vol. LVII C.W.N. 6oS"
(4) (19~7) B.L.l( z88 (H.C.).
J9?

In the instant case the learned Advocate for the c.c.


19,66
petitioners had stressed that it was essential and necessary
M.\ THAN
to obtain the testimony of A. R. Chose and Abdul Monaff Az.;DONB
on which the success of his suit really hinged. He con- o .
MATHEWS
tended that A. R. Ghose who had occupied one of the JosErH.
rooms of the house in question would be able to testify
whether the respondent was in occupation of three rooms
as alleged by the petitioners or only one room as contended
by the respondent and the evidence of Abdul Monaff was
also essential in deciding. the q\lestion of damages cl~imed
by the petitioners inasmuch as he was one of the workmen
to whom free access. to the room was denied by the
respondent. These allegations of the petitioners had not
been traversed by the 'respondent and it must therefore-
be taken as substantially correct. Besides, it must not
be forgotten th~t the petitioners had made genuine, though
futile, attempts to have their evidence taken de bene esse
before their departure to India and East Pakistan, which
would go to show that their application for the issue of
.commission .was bona fide and not actuated by-any motive
to delay the disposal of the suit.
Under these circumstances I am of opinion that the
lower Court erred in rejecting .the petitioners' .request for
issue of commission .which i's hereby set aside and l direct
that the petitioners shall be permitted to issue commission
for examination of A. R. Ghose and Abdul Monaff. I
would also .like to . suggest to the learned trial Jud~e that
pending the return of the commission papers the hearing
of the suit should proceed by examination of other wit-
nesses so as to prevent undue delay in the disposal of the
suit. In the Circumstances of the case the parties shall
bear their own costs so far as this application is concerned.
38

. . .
J99

CIVIL REVISION

Before U Thet Pe, J.

c.c. MR. B. GHOSH (APPLICANT)


1966
Mar. 12.
v.
R. R. DEY (RESPONDENT) .

Application to stt aside ari e.x parte decree-TW~rring of time meaning of substituted
service.
Held: Time will run ft:om the date of the decree if the defendant had
been duly served with summons, but if the summons has not been duly served
I imitation will be computed from the date of knowledge of the ex paru de~ree.
Held ftn'ther: Substituted service may be due service under the Civil
Procedure Code but it is clearly not due service within the meaning of An ide
164, Limitation Act. The expression " substituted service" clearly connotes
that it is not due service, to serve that is due to the defendant or that is due
according to the provis ions of law for the purpose of service.
K .K.N. K.A .R. Chettyar Firm v. Aga M. Sheera:tree, (1939) R.L.R. p 6o6,
referred to.

Khin Lay for the applicant.


B. K. Sen for the respondent.

U THET PE, J.-In Civil Regular Suit No. Khagwe-304


of 1964 of the Rangoon City Civil Court the petitioner-
plaintiff sued the respondent~efendant for ejectment of
the premises known as room No. 6 in house No. 8, Wun
Min Lan, Bauktaw. On 3rd March 1963 and 21st April
1963 two attempts were made to serve the
summons on the respondent but without success.
The petitioner therefore applied for and obtained
permission of the Court on 25th April 1963 to take out
substituted service of summons. Then the suit was heard
and decreed ex pane on the 15th May 1963 as the
Civil Revision No. 40 of 1965 against the decree of the Additional 3rd
Judge ofthe City Civi ICourt of Rangoon, passed in Regular Suit No. Khagwe-
304 of 196~.
respondent failed to put in appearance before. the Court c.c.
1966
on the date fixed. Thereafter the petitioner took out
MR. B.
execution of the decree and ejected the respondent from GHOSK
the premises on 3rd July 1963. The respondent thereupon R. R."D t;v .
lodged an application on 22nd July 1963 to set aside the
ex parte decree on the ground that he became aware of
the decree against him only when he was ousted from
the premises by the Bailiff. The Court therefore ordered
an inquiry in the course of which it was brought out that
the r~spondent was in fact absent from Burma at the
relevant period during which successive attempts were
made to serve summons on him and that he was then on a
visit to India after he had obtained leave for four months
from the Indian Embassy, where he was working. . On this
finding the Court took the view that the respondent was
really unaware of the existence of the suit that was pend-
ing against him and that it w~s sufficient cause for his
non-appearance on the hearing date and accordingly set
aside the ex parte decree. Being aggrieved with t~at order
the petitioner has brought the present revision.
In this application for revision, which is rather limited
in its scope, the only point that poses for consideration is
whether the application of the respondent to set aside the
lex parte decree in the trial Court is barred by time. The
relevant article of the Limitation Act applicable to an
application of this nature is Article 164. which prescribes
a period of 30 de~ys from the date of the decree or where
the summons is not duly served, when the applicant has
knowledge of the decree. In other words, time will run
from the date of the decree if the defendant had been duly
served with summons, but if the summons has not been
duly served limitation will be computed from the date of
knowledge of the ex parte deere~.
It has been argued on behaff of the petitioner that the
periodof limitation must be reckoned in the present case,
from the date of the decree inasmuch as the summons on

'.
c.c. the respondent made by substituted service on the
1966
direction of the Court must be deemed to have been duly
MR. B .
GHOSH served on him, and that the application for setting aside
v.
R.R. DV. the ex parte decree having been made more than 30 days
from the date of the decree is barred by time.
It must be pointed out that substituted service may be
due service under the CiviJ Procedure code but it is clearly
not due service within the meaning of Artide 164, Limita~
tion Act. The expression " substituted service " dearly
connotes that -it is not due service." the service that is due
to the defendant or that is due according to the provisions
of law for the purpose of service. I am fortified in this
view by the decision in K.K.N.K.A!R. Chettyar Firm v.
Ago M. Sheerazee (1) where a Bench of the late Judicature
of Rangoon has held that :
"Summons by substituted service effected in proper form
is not necessarily due: service f?r the purpose of Art. 164 of
the Limitation Act.
The word 'effectual' in O 5 r, 20 (2) of the Civil Procedure
Code does not mean due service : it means that the Court
heilr!ng the case may pro<.:ecd with the suit as if the sum.
mons had been personally served on the defendant. In art.
164 of the Limitation Act and in O 9, r. 13 of the Civil
Procedure Cocte due service oi summons' means not only
that the summons was served in proper form according to
the directions laid down in the Code but also that the
summons was served under circumstances which en?.b!ed the
Court to be satisfied that the defendant had knowldge of
the decree against him, except in the case where the defend-
ant h11.d purposely put it out of his power to have s~ch
knowledge.
ln O 9, r. B of the Civil Procedure Code the words pre-
vented by ;my sufficient caiJse from appearing' mean causes
other than Jack of kno.wledge of the proceedings. so that
this rule is jn the same terms as art. 164 of the Limitation
Act."

(1) (1938) R.L.R., p. ~C'6.


I~ the present case it is not in dispute that the c.c.
r6
respondent was away in India at the time when the
substituted service of summons was taken out against him MR. B.
GHOSh
and it is therefore but natura_l that the respondent would u.
R. R. DEY.
be in complete ignorance of the existence of the suit that
was pending against him and of the decree which was
subsequently passed ex parte. The appliCation of the
respondent is under the circumstances within time
inasmuch as it was filed within 30 days from the date of
knowledge of the decree.
For the aforesaid reasons, this application for revision
fail_s and is accordingly dismissed with costs. Advocate
.fees K !7.

238

'. '. '.


CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

Before U Thet Pe, J.

c.c. RATANLAL (APPLICANT}


zg66
Mor.t. v.
M.A.P.L. FIRM BY MA AUNG KYI AND ONE
(RESPONDENTS}

Code of Civil Procedure-dismissal order far default of appearance whether


the Court should proceed under 0. 17, R. z C. P~~
Held: The dismissal order of the Additional Chief Judge for defa.ult of
appearance by the petitioner on the date fixed for filing of affidavit of docurnenJs
must be deemed robe one made under Rule z or J, Order XVII. .In a case
where the default under Rule:' 3 is coupled with the defau.lt under Rule z as
well, the Court should proceed only under Rule 2.
Maung Khant Gyi and four v. Ma Thet Hninandsix. 3 Ran. 63 ; Amarsingh v.
Chaturbhuj and others, A.I.R. (1957) Raj. 367 ; Ma Hla Nyun v. Ma Aye
Myint and others, A.I.R. (1937) Ran. 437 ; Pratif.){ldi Bhayankaram Pichamma
v. Kamisetti Sreeramu/u and others, A.I.R. (1918) Mad. 143 (F.B.), referr-
ed to.

~. Chaube for the applicant.


S. A. A. Pillay for the respondents.

U THET PE, J.- In Civil Regular Suit No. 102 of 1964


of the City Civil Court, Rangoon, the petitioner sued the
respondents for recovery of K 5,000 due on a promissory
note. On 1st July 1964 the learned Additional Chief
Judge who took up the trial of the suit ordered the parties
to file affidavits of documents by 15th July 1964. The
parties were not ready with their affidavits on that date
and asked for further time, which was extended till
29th July 1964. On the date thus fixed, both the peti-
tioner and his Advocate were absent and the suit was, on
the oral application of the Advocate for the respondents, c.c.
1966
dismissed with costs.
On 31st July 1964 the petitioner applied under Rule 9, RATA;~"'
Order IX of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the order F~~A~~-~A
dismissing his suit, but the learned Chief Judge who then Ac:-~c KYt .
had seisin of the proceedings as the learned Additional ANo oN.
Chief Judge was assigned to duty elsewhere, dismissed the
application on . the ground that the order dismissing the
petitioner's suit being one under Rule 21, Order XI, Civil
Procedure Code could only be appealed against or reviewed
on the authority of Maung Khant Gyi and four v. Ma Thet
Hnin and six (I}. Hence this revision application.
It has been argued on behalf of the petiti~ner that the
learned Chief judge had misinterpreted the order dated
the 29th July 1964 passed by the learned Additional Chief
judge as being one under Rule 2 r, Order XI, Civil .Procedure
Code inasmuch as the order to file affidavit of documents
was not purported to be made .under Rule I I, Order XI.
which requires that there should be an application for
dis~overy of documents by one of the parties. His conten-
tion, in short, is that the order of the learned Additional
Chief Judge in requiring his client to file affidavit of docu-
ments must be deemed to be one under inherent powers of
the Court as provided by section 151 of the Civil Procedure
Code, and that the provi~ions of Rule 2 I, Order XI, will
have therefore no application to the order of dismissal in
the instant case.
Now, Rule 2 I, Order XI, Civil Procedure Code reads:
"Where any party fail~ .to comply with any order to
answer interroga~ories or for discovery or inspection of docu-
ments, he shall, if a plaintiff, be liable to have his suit
dismissed for want of prosecution, and, if a defendant, to
have his defence, if any, struck out, and to be placed in the
same position as if .he had not defended, and the party
interrogating or seeking discovery or inspection may apply
(1) 3 Ran. 63.

',
c.c. to the Cow:t for an m:d.er to that effect, and an order may
1966
be made accordingly."
RATANLAL
M.A:P.L. It is clear therefrom that a suit-can be dismissed under
FIRM sv MA this rule only on three grounds~ namely, (i) the refusal to
AUNG KYI ..
ANo oNE. answer interrogatories under Rule I I ; (ii) t~e refusal to
make discovery of documel)ts 1:1.nder Ru_le I2; and (iii) the
refusal to permit inspection of documents under Rule 18.
The same viW has been expressed in Amarsingh v.
Chaturbhuj and others (2).
Now, Rules II anq 18 undoubtedly have no application
to the present case. Rule 12 also will not apply inasmuch
as there is no c,:~pplication by the respondents for discovery
of documents when the Court ordered the parties to file
affidavits of clon;ments. It must therefore be assumed
that the dismissal order qf the learned Additional Chief
Judge for defavlt of appearanc~ by the petitioner on the
date fixed for fili_ng of affidavit of documents must be
deemed to be one made under Rule 2 or 3, Order XVII.
In a case where the default under Rule 3 is coupled with
the default under Rule 2 as well, the Court should proceed
only under Rule 2. 1 am fortified in this view by the
decision in Ma Hla Nyun v. Ma Aye Myint and others (3).
In Prativadi Bhavankaram Pichamma v. Kamisetti
Sreero.mulu and 'others (4) it was held that :
There is no conflict between Rr. and 3. O 17. They are.
2
ind~pendent and mutually exclusive. Where the requisites of
R. 2 are satisfied, that rule and not rule 3 should be applied
although, i>~ addition to the absence of the party, circum-
stance exist which would satisfy the requiremems.of R. 3
Rule 2, O 17, deals with cases of absence of parties arid -R. 3
with failure to do what was ordered. If the party fails to
appear, R. 2 applies and the Court should not a5sume that
he is .gvilty of default and apply the stringent provisions of
R. 3 R. 3 applies only to cases where die parties are
(1) A.! R. (1957) Raj. 367. (4) A.I.R. (1918) Mad. 143 (F. B.).
(3) A.I .R. (1937) Ran. 437 -
present and have not satisfied the Court as to the existence of c.c.
t966
any adequate reason for their not having done what they
were directed to do.'' RATANLAL
tl.
.' M.A.P.L.
FIRM BY MA
Of course, the Court is at liberty to proceed under AUNC KYI
Rule 3 to decide the suit forthwith when there are sufficient AND ONE.

materials on record. In the instant case it is clear from


the order of the learned Additional Chief Judge that the
suit was dismissed for default and not on merits of the
case. Since the dismissal order could only be interpreted
as being made under Rule 2, Order XVII, the provisions
of Rule 9. Order IX will apply so that the petitioner can
ask for restoration. The learned Chief Judge therefore
erred in holding that such an application is incompetent
and this order is accordingly set aside with costs. I
further direct that the application shall be re-admitted by
its original number and proceed to hear according to law.
Advocate fees K 34 .

'. '. '.


\

J~J

CIVIL FIRST APPEAL

Before U Thet Pe, J.

c.c. SfATE COMMERCIAL BANK (APPELLANT)


1966
v.
Mar. 18.
U PO DAN AND SIX OTHERS (RESP9NDENT).

Burm~se Buddhist Spouses-impleading the uife as a party defendant--loan


taken for the benefit of the joint family business-liability of the wife for
the debt contracted by the husband. '"
Held: The defendants U Maung Maung Saw and Daw Khin Than are
admittedly Burmese Buddhist spouses and the latter will have an interest in
the properties that belonged to her husband. The appellant Bank had therefore
rightly impleaded the respondent Daw Khin Than as a party-defendant.
The loan in suit was taken for the benefit of the joint family business in which
the respondent U Maung Maung Saw appeared to be an active member and
the circumstances of the case indicated that the respondent Daw Khin Than
must be deemed to have consented to the acts of her husband. Therefore
the respondent Daw Khin Than is liable for the debt contracted by her
husband.
U Pe v. U Maung Maung Kha, to Ran. p. 261 (P.C.); N.A.V.R. Chettiar
Firm v. lv/aung Than Daing, 9. Ran. p. 5Z4 (S.B.), referred to.

C. A. Soorma for the appel1ant.

None for the respondent .

U THET PE, J.-In Civil Regular Suit No. 10 of 1963


of the District Court of Moulmein the appellant State
Commercial Bank sued the respondents U Po Dan, his son
U Maung Maung Saw, daughter-in-law Daw Khin Than and
grandchildren Maung Thet Kyaw, Maung Du Du, Ma Kyu
Kyu and Ma Tin Tin Saw for recovery of K 3,11,369-69
due under an equitable mortgage. It appeared that money
was in fact borrowed by U Po Dan and his deceased wife
, " Ci vi I First Appea l No. 70 of 15. Ag<~inst the dec:ree of the District
Judge r>f the Coun of M oulmein in Civil Regular Suit No. 10 of 1963,
date~ 30th J une 19fi5.
Daw Kyin Hlaing, who held power of attorney executed c.c.
1966
by U Maung Maung Saw, for himself and .for his minor
Children aS Well,-tO run the joint family busineSS, in Which S~!!c~M-
their son; daughter-in-law and grandchildren has certain BANK
v.
interest. The lower Court after hearing the parties u Po DAN
.AND SIX
decreed the appellant's suit against all respondents except- oTHERs;
ing respondent Daw 'l<hin Than on the ground. that she
did not own any of the properties mortgaged and that she
had never granted a general power of at~orney to the
respondents U Po Dan and his deceased wife Daw KJinj
Hlaing to act on her behalf. Being aggrieved with that
order dismissing the suit agaitlst Daw Khin Than the State
C<:>mmercial ~ank - has -b;roqght ..the present appeal. The..
respondent .paw; lqiin Than against whom this appeal has
been mainly dlrected however' failed to put in appearance
with the result that hearing had to proceed in her absence.
Under the Burmese Buddhist Law the husband and wif~
held during the subsistence of their marriage the interest
in all the payin, Jettetpwa. and Hnitpasone properties
belonging to either or both. Vide U Pe v. U Maung Maung
Kha (r). In the present case since the respondents
U Maung Maung Saw and Daw Khin Than are admittedly
Burmese Buddhist spouses the latter will have an interest
in the properties that belonged to her husband U Maung
Maung Saw. Out of the various items of properties
mortgaged with the appellant-Bank four belonged
absolutely to U Maung Maung Saw, and the remainder to
U Maung Maung Saw jointly with his parents and children.
The appellant-Bank had therefore rightly impleaded the
respondent Daw Khin Than as a party-defendant inasmuch
as Rule I, Order 34 of the Civil Procedure Code enjoins
that all persons having an interest in the mortgaged
security or in the right of re.demption should be made
parties to a mortgage suit.
(x) ro Ran. p, ~6r (P.C .) .
c.c. The lower Court has fpund as a fact that the loan in
1966
suit was taken for the benefit of the joint family business
STA'tJI CoM-
MERCIAL in which the respondents U Po Dan, his deceased wife
BAHt< Daw Kyin Hlaing and U Maung Maung Saw appeared to
"
U PoDAN be active members and the circumstances of the case
AND SIX
OTHERS . indicated that the respondent Daw Khin Than must be
deemed to have consented to the acts of her husband and
parents-in-law. In this view of the matter the present
case is coVered by the decision in N.A.V.R. Chettiar Firm
v. Maung Than Doing (2) where it was held that a debt
contracted by the husband could be made liable under
.certain circumstances by the wife.
In the result the appeal is allowed with costs and I
direct that there shall also be a decree in favour of the
appellant against the respondent Daw Khin Than as wen.

(a) 9 Ran. p . 524 (S.D.).


CIVIL REGULAR SUIT
Bfr>re U Kyaw Zmr U,J.

THE BANK OF COMMUNICATION (PLAINTIFF) c.c.


19(>6
v. Mar. JO.
KHYN COMPANY (DEFENDANT).

Suit for Recot"'Y of Loan on a promissory not--debt ba"td by Limitation-


aclmowltdt:mmt of the /tJQn with a promise to pay-'wlretlrer tire docununt
is a pro-note or a11 acltnGaJinlgmmt of the dtbt-a promise to pay a ba,td
debt comes under s. 25 st~b-s. (3) of the ContrQel Att - fflhethtr to bt stamPtd
undir No. s (<:)of ~elrftlule I of the B11rma Stamp Act as ammdtd by Act
No. 28 of 1957 fllltttlrer .admiuible ;, et~itknce.
Held: Reading the do<:ument (marked D) as a whole it is held that it is
a promise to pay a barred debt onder sub-s. (J) of s. 25 of the Contract Act
because it(i)is in writing,(ii)signed by the defendants( iii) expressing a promise
to pay,(iv) the barred debt referred to therein. It is more than a mere ack-
nowledgement under s. 19 of the Limitation Act. It is primarily an admowl-
edgment with an express promise to pay the t imebarred debt due on the pro
missory note marked A dated 9th July 1954 and the defendants had notieeofit
Mortgage /nsur1111ce Corporation l.imited v. CrJmmiJSiontrs of Inland RttJmue.
(1881) 20 Q.B.D. 645 ;Mohammed Altbar Khan v. Att4r Singh, 63 I.A. 279
(P.C.) ; Conpatdas Kaludas Gosai v. Harioallabh Onkarji TritJedi, I.L.R.
(1942) Nag. 126 ; Ghulam Murtaza v. Mt ..Fasiunnissa Bibi, l.L.R. 57 All.
434 ; GofJind Dos and others v. Sarju Das, J.l.R. 30 Cal. 268 ; Satyaketu Datta
v. Ramtsllt:ha~tdra Sm, I.L.R. 6o Cal. 7t4, referred to.
Htld afso : The document. marked B have been held to come under
sub-s. (J) of s. 25 of the Contract Act which begins with the words "An
agreement", and is to be stamped under No . .5 (c) of the schedule I of the
Burma Stamp Act, as amended by Ac:t No. z8 of 1957. As it now stands it
is not admissi'ble in evidence (or not he'ing sufficiently stamped hut under
Proviso (a) to s. 35 of the Burma-Stamp Act retd with s. 33 (t) of the Act
and Proviso (b) to sub-s. (2) of the said se~tion and also paragraph 263 of
the High (Chief) Coun Manual it can be admitteii in eviden<:e on payment
of the deficient duty togefheT with the pernlty required.
Uavid Suthnland Clerk v. Rose Crimslratc, A.I.R. (t9a3) Lah. 481 ; Pra-
smma Kumar Pal and Sanatan Kunaa v Panaulla Miji and atrotlr~r. A.I.R.
( 1923) Cal. 659, refened to.

Saw Taik Leong for the plaintiff.


Aye Moung for the defendant.
Civil Regular Suit No. s8 of r96r.

'. '.
c.c. U KYAW ZAN U, J.-The material facts are these:
1966
THE BANK
On 9th July 1954 the piaintitf bank lent K 75.200
oF CoM- with interest to the defc;ndant fi.rm on a promissory note
MUNICATION
o. marked A.
KHYN
COMPANY. After the debt had become barred by the law of Limita-
tion the defendant firm wrote to the pl;~intitf bank on
15th July 1958 acknowledging the previous loan on the
promissory note and the interest due expressing at the
same time that they " promise to pay " within a short
time. This letter marked B is stamped with a twenty-pya
stamp. When the defendant firm failed to pay as
promised the plaintiff bank sent a legal notice on 2nd May
1961 (filed) wherein it is.stated:

" . . . That the aforesaid on demand promissory note


became time-barred and the said Khyn Company signed an
acknowledgment dated rsth July 1958 acknowledging that
they owed my said clients the sum of K 75,20000 plus in-
terest up to date due on the On Demand Promissory Note
dated 9th july, 1954 and at the same time promised to repay
the same within a short time.
Please treat the aforesaid notice of mine as claiming the sum
of K 85,93165 (Kyat eigthy-five thousand nine hundred
thirty-four and pyas sixty-five only) as due on the acknowl-
edgment and promise to pay a time-barred debt dated 15th
July 1958."

As no payment was made in spite of the aforesaid


notice the present suit was instituted for the " recovery
of K 85.934-65 due on acknowledgment of and promise
to pay a barred debt" with interest thereon at the usual
court rate from date of suit till realization with costs. In
the plaint it was stated that demands had been made for
payment but to no avail.
The defendant firm in their written statement admitted
execution of the promissory note marked A but denied
consideration. As regards the letter marked B dated
15th July 1958 they stated that it is not an acknowl c.c.
1966
edgment but a promissory note which is not admissible
THE BANK
for not being sufficiently stamped. No reference whatso- oF CoM-
M UNICAT ION
ever was made in the written statement to the demands (1.
made by the plaintiff bank. This document marked B KHYN
COMPANY .
dated I sth July 1958 is as follows:

Dear Sirs,
We, the undersigned, acknowledge that we owe the sum
of K 75.200 (Kyats Seventy Five Thousand Two Hundred
Only) plus interest up to date to the Bank of Communica
:ions, Rangoon, due on the Promissory Note dated 9th july
1954 executed by us, and we hereby promise to pay the same
within a short time.

.Yours faithfully,

Ba Hla
15th .July J958
KHYN Co."

By consent the following three issues were framed and


before taking oral evidence the 2nd and 3rd issues were
argued as preJiminary legal issues. This order relates to
these two issues.

ISSUFS.
I. Was the promissory note dated 9th July 1954
executed for consideration?
2. Is the document marked "B" dated 15th July
1958 a pro-note or an acknowledgment of the
debt due on the barred pro-note dated 9th July
I954?
3 Is the document marked " B " dated 15th Juiy
I 958 admissible in evidence for not being
sufficiently stamped 7
c.c. Reading the document (marked B) as a whole I am of the
r6
opinion that it is a promise to pay a barred debt under
THE BANK
OF COM- sub-section (J) of section 25 of the Contract Act because
MUNICATION
u. it (i) is in writing (ii) signed by the defendants (iii) express-
KtrYN ing a promise to pay (iv) the barred debt referred to therein.
CoMPANY.
Shorn of the words not relevant for the purpose of this
suit sub-section (J) of section 25 runs as follows:

An agreement made without consideration is void, unless-


it is a promise; made in writing and signed by the person
t.o be charged therewith, to pay a debt of which the
cr~itor might have enforced payment but for the J~w for
the limitation of suits.

If the parties meant it to be a promissory note they would


have used the usual promissory note form beginning with
the words "On Demand We, the undersigned" etc. as in
the note marked A. If the document marked B was meant
to be a promissory note it would have been without
consideration but for the reference made to the previous
promissory note marked A which was a barred debt.
Quoting the observations of Pollock, B., in Mortgage
Insurance Corporation Limited v. Commissioners of Inland
Revenue (I) where the learned Baron said:

"I think it is dear that for the purposes of the Stamp


Act it cannot have been intended that a document :should
be treated as in part a promissory note and in part as agree-
ment. It must be either one or the other. The question
is, what- is the dominant, the substantial effect of the instru-
ment? In this respect the prior decisions assist me in form-
ing a conclusion. The Courts have said that in order to
determine the question two things must be enquired into--
what is the intention of the parties, and what is the 'instru-
ment in the common acceptation of men of business, or
persons among whom it is commonly used." F
(1) (1881) 20 Q.B.D. 645.
and alluding to Mohammed Akbar Khan v. Attar Singh (2) c.c.
1966
Niyogyi, J. in Ganpatdas Kaludas Gosai v. Harivallabh THE BANK
Onkarji Trivedi (3) said: oFCoM-
MUNICATION
.. the test is not that the instrument contained a promise "
I<HYN
to pay but whether or not the .parties clearly intended the COMPANY.
document to serve as a negotiable instrument.
It is consequently necessary to look into the terms of the
document and the surrounding circumstances to see whether
it was intended to be a promissory note in the sense of its
being intended to be used as a negotiable instru~ent. It is
a well recognised rule of construction of documents that
they must be construed as a whole, that every part of the
documents must receive attention and that the intention
should be gathered-from the whole context of the instrument
so as to make one. entire and consistent construction of the
whole:"

I entirely agree .that issue No.2 in question must be decided


on the .]ntention and the real characteristics of the docu.
ment marked B. Emphasis was
made on the barred debt
and the express promise to pay the same. The legal
notice referred to above and the plaint are more than clear
that it was meant to be a document acknowledging dear
previous barred debt with an express promise to pay the
same. Unlike an . acknowledgment of liability under
section 19 of the Limitation Act, which must be made
before t~ expiration of the period prescribed for _payment
of the debt, the express promise for payment under
section 25 (3) of the Contract Act must be made after the
expiration of the period prescribed for payment of the
debt. Ghulam Muitaza v. Mt. Fasiunnissa _B ibi (4). In
Gobind Das dnd others v. Sarju Das (5) it was held that
where it is sought to recover a time-barred debt on the
strength of a subsequent promise tp pay made in writing
by the debtor; the document relied on rimst contain an
(z) 63 I .A. 279 (P.C .). (3) I.L.R. (1942) Nag. u6.
48 (4) I.L.R. 57 Ali.4J4 (s) I.L.R. 30 Cal. 268.

'. '- '-


fio
c.c. express promise to pay under section 25 (3) of the Contract
JC)66
Act. See also Satyaketu Datta v. Rameshchandra Sen (6).
THE BANK
OF C OM I am of the opinion that the document marked B is
MUNICATION
u.
more than a mere acknowledgment under section 19 of
KttYN the Limitation Act. It is primarily an acknowledgment
COMPANY .
with an express promise to pay the time-barred debt due
on the promissory note marked A dated 9th July 195<4 and
the defendants had notice of it.
The next point to be determined is whether this docu-
ment dated 15th July 1958 and marked B is admissible in
evidence for not being sufficiently stamped. I have held
above that it comes under sub-section (J) of section 25 of
the Contract Act, which begins with the words "An
agreement ". It is stamped with a twenty-pya stamp.
An " agreement " under the Burma Stamp Act as amended
by Act No. 28 of 1957 is to be stamped with a three-kyat
stamp under No. 5 {c) of Schedule I of the Act. There is
however a conflict of authorities on the point. In David
Sutherland Clark v. Rose Grimshaw (7) the Bench of the
Lahore High Court referring to section 25 (3) of the
Contract Act held that:
" a written promise to pay a barred debt is not required
by any of the provisions under the Indian Stamp Act to be
st amped."

With due respect to the learned Judges I do not agree.


think the words "An agreement" appearing at the begin-
ning of the section were overlooked. The Bench of the
Calcutta High Court in the same month of the year in
Prasanna Kumar Pal and Sanatan Kunna v. Panaulla Miji
and another (8) however held that a document under
section '25 (3) of the Contract Act is an agreement within
the meaning of No. s. Clause (c) of Schedule I of the Indian
Stamp Act. I am inclined to e1gree with the view of the
(6) I. L.R. 6o Cal. '1'4 (7) A.J.R. (19a3) Lah. 4 sr.
(8) A.I.R. ( t 91J). Cal 659.
fio
Calcutta High Court. The document in question as it
now stands is not admissible in evidence for not being
THF BANk
sufficiently stamped but under Proviso (a) to section 35 0 , CoM
of the Burma Stamp Act read with section 33 (I) of the MUNICATioN
v.
Act and Proviso (b) to sub-section (2) of the said section c KaYM
and also paragraph 263 of the High (Chief) Court Manual OMPANY.
it can be admitted in evidence on payment of the deficient
duty together with the penalty required. The learn~
Registrar of this Court as the Officer to whom the duty is
delegated in this respect shall comply with the require-
ments of law and the rule mentioned above and resubmit
the record at an early date to the Court for consideration
of the remaining issue No. x;. If the plaintiff bank fails
to pay the deficient stamp duty and the penalty within
the time fixed by the learned Registrar the document
Marked B dated 15th July 1958 shall stand rejected as
inadmissible in evidence.
Costs shall follow the event.

',
'. '.
CiVIL REGULAR SUIT
Btfo't U Thtt Pt, J.

c.c. THE stATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD


1966
(PLAINTIFF)
Mar. 17.
v.
AUNG TRADING Co. (DEFENDANT).

ClUtiO~ of Gunnitt by s-IMs of 1M gunnitt-luit fo, comp~uation


tllhtthn tlu t~tritt~l cont,act of DgTtC'IMftt is ttiforceoblt ill law-Act of
God ar dtftnct-- whtthn tht agrttmtnt is t;oid rmdtT 1. 23 or s6 of tht
Contract Act.

Hfld : The manner in which the document was executed would ro to


ahow that the panies never intended that it should be a contract of agreemem
without which there is to be no binding contt2ct between the panies. The
facu of the case clearly indicate that the parties intended to make, and believed
that they had made a binding oral agreement on the carriage of gunnies to
which Ex. (o) fonns only a part. In thls view of the matter, the queation as to
whether the document in question is enforceable in law or not does not arise
at all. Shattluwlal Narayandal Muntlatk v. Tht New Mofuuil Co. Ltd. and
othtrs, A.I.R. (1946) P.C., p, 97, referred to.
Htld ju,thtr : An act of God is available as a defence only when tt as
impossible to provide against the occurrence and it is not enough to show thai
it was not reasonably possible to provide against it. Inclement weather
conditions were not unexpected on the west coast of Arakan especially during
the monsoon aeaaon and it cannot therefore be said to be so unexpected that
no human foresight could reasonably anticipate it. The sinking of L.C.T .
No. 495 in the pn:sent case on account of strong wind cannot be said to be due
to w major or an Act of God.
MtJnindra NtJth Muhlrnjtt v. Mathuradas Chatturbliuj, A.I.R.(r964) Cal.
p. 175 ; Cushing v. Pttn Walkn and Sorr (Warrington and BuTton) Ltd. ( 1941 )
(a) All. E.L.R., p. 693 at p. 695, n:ferred to.
Held further : Assuming that the contract between the parties comes within
the purview of the Burma Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, there is no provision
in the Act prohibiting the def~ndants from foregoing any benefit bestowed
upon them by the Act, where a person of full age with competent understanding
entus into a contract freely and voluntarily which is not expressly prohibited
by law, it cannot be said that the contract is ether illeg~l or against publ ic
policy.
HtJisbury's 14ws of Englmtd, 19~, 3rd Edition Vol. 8 p. 143, referred to.
Civil Regular Suit No. 87 of 1957.
H~d further : At the time when the parties entered into the contract of c.c.
carriage, the defendants as carriers by !lea must have anticipllted that there &966
were certain perils of sea journey especially durinR the monsoon season ,.,hen
TmSTATt
the sea is usual'y rouRh and stormy. Therefore the defence of. frustration AGRICUL-
of contract is not available to the defendants. TURAL '
MAitiClmNG
K. M. Modi v. Mohamed Siddique and ont, (1947) R.L.R. 413 ; Rantoon 80AJID

to.
Tihpltone Co. Ltd. v. Tit~ Union of Burma, (JC).48) B.L.R. p. 5:t7, referred "
AUNG
TaAoJNGCo.

fl.fyo Khin for the plaintiff.


Tun Maung for the defendants.

U THET PE, J.-The State Agricultural Marketing Board


(hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs) sued Aung Trading
Company of Akyab (hereinafter referred to as the
defendants) for recovery of K 1,27,056. It is the case of
the plaintiffs that by a writing dated 27th May 1957 and
signed by the defendants at Rangoon, the defendants
offered to transport 200 bales of gunnies from Rangoon
to Akyab in their L.C.T. No. 495 and that the plaintiffs
after accepting the said offer delivered zoo bales of gunnies,
which were however lost in toto when the defendants'
L.C.T. No. 495 sank off the west coast of Baronga Island
on the Istday of june 1957; that the defendants undertook
absolute liability for the loss of the said gunnies from
whatever cause and that the defendants had refused to
compensate the value of the gunnies which amounted to
K 1,2],056.
The defendants. while admitting the execution of the
writing dated the 22nd May 1957. contended that it was
not admissible in evidence as it was not properly stamped
and that it was not enforceable .in law as it was a unilater~l
agreement. They then questioned the valuation of the
gunnies and pleaded that the absolute liability agreed to
by the defendants was subject to Act of God or vis major
which was responsible for the total loss of L.C.T. No. 495
'! 48 with the plaintiffs' bales of gunnies on xst june 1957.

'.
fie;
c.c. On these pleadings my learned predecessor joined the
t966
following issue~ : -
THESTAT1!
ACRICUL-
TtiRAL ISSUES.
MARJ(8TJNC
BoARD I. Whether the agreement or. memorandum dated
(1.
AUNG the 22nd May I 957 is admissible in evidence
TRADING Co. ,
and/or enforceable in law?
2. Whether the defendants' liability was subject to
Force majeure or act of God?
3 Whether the sinking of L.C.T. 195 was due to
Force majeure or act of God?
4 What was the value of the 200 bales of gunnies
involved in the suit?
5 To what relief, if any, is the plaintiff entitled?

ADDITIONAL ISSUE.

I. Whether the agreement is void under section 23,


29 or 56 of the Contract Act?

Issue No. I.

It has been asserted by the plaintiffs that the document


dated the 22nd May 1957 was not an agreement contem
plated by the parties and that it comprises the
memorandum of the defendants' offer to transport 200
bales of gunnies from Rangoon to Akyab on conditions
mentioned therein, and that the contract was complete
only when the plaintiffs accepted the offer and delivered
200 bales of gunnies. In other words the plaintiffs' -case
was that the agr~ement between the parties was an oral
one.
It cannot be disputed that an agreement of this nature
needs no writing and the real test whether there is a ~om
pleted contract between th~ parties without drawing up
a deed is to see the inteJ)tion of the parties whether
there is to be no binding contract till a formal
document is executed or whether the document is c.c.
1966
merely to be a record of the bargain which the parties are
THE STATE
under contemplation.. Thus it has been ruled by the AGRICUL-
TURAL
judicial committee of the Privy Council in Shankarlal MARKET INC
Narayandas Mundade v. The New Mofussil Co. Ltd. and BoARD '
tl.
others (I) that: AUN.G
TRADING CO.
"By the law of India, an oral contract is valid and enforce-
able; but in such a cas~ it is .a question of construction
whether the execution of the further written contract is a
condition or term of the bargain, or whether it is a mere
expression of the desire of the parties as to the manner in
which the transaction already agreed to will in fact go
through."

In the present case it is dear from the testimony of


U Maung Maung Gyi (PW 2) and U Tin Maung (DW I)
who has once worked with the plaintiffs that the procedure
adopted by the State Agricultural Marketing Board in the
transport of their gunnies was to call upon the carriers
registered with them \\:'henever there were gunnies to be
consigned and that the carrier concerned was to sign on
the document similar to that of the Exhibit o and after
that the gunnies were handed over to the carrier for
transport. U Maung Maung Than, the agent of the
aefendants, admitted in his evidence t~at he had to see
only the clerk, not the officer concerned before the docu-
ment Exhibit o had to be signed by him. The manner
in which the document was executed would go to show
that the parties never intended that it should be a contract
of agreement without which there is to be no binding
contract between the parties. The facts of the case
clearly indicate that the parties intended to make, and
believed that they bad made, a binding oral agreement on
the carriage of gunnies to which Exhibit o forms only a
part. In this view of the matter, the question as to
tA (r) A.I.R. (gs6} P.C., p . 97

'.
c.c. whether the document in question is enforceable in Jaw
1966
or not does not arise at all. Then the document having
~R~;'~ been impounded under section 33 Stamp Act is admissible
MA~c in evidence in view of the proviso(a) to section 35 Stamp
BOARo Act. The issue will therefore be answered in
the manner
"
Autotc indicated above.
TltAoiNC Co.

Issue Nos. 2 and J will be considered together.

An Act of God or Vis Major is an operation of natural


forces which no human foresight can provide against, and
of which human prudence is not bound to expect the
possibility. It is a direct and violent as well as a sudden
and irresistihle act of nature as a prudent man could not
by any amount of ability foresee would happen or if he
could foresee that it would happen, could not by any
amount of care and skill resist . In other words an act of
God is available as a defence only when it is impossihle
to provide against the occurrence and it is not enough to
show that it was not reasonably possible to provide against
it. The facts of the present case must, in .the light of the
above principle of Jaw, be scrut~nized whether the sinking
of L.C.T. No. 495 was due to an Act of God.
According to .the story of Capt. U Thaung Nyunt,
(DW 3), Master of the ill -fated L.C.T., the weather
worsened from the 3oth May 1957 when the velocity of
wind reached up to gale force and big waves began striking
against the side of the vessel with the result that sea water
got into the engine room which was eventually flooded
in spite of va1iant attempts of the crew to pump the water
out. The vessel then began listing iin the rough sea
although the cargoes were jettisoned to correct the Jist and
finally sank on the Ist June 1957.
lt must be borne in mind that during the monsoon
weather stormy conditions along the west coast of Arakan
is not uncommon and gales of considerable intensity are
by no means unusuaL There is the lone statement of c.c.
1966
Capt. U Thaung Nyunt to the effect that the velocity of
TH5TATB
wind reached up to fQrce five. It is significant that the ACRICUL
TUR,<\L
defendants had not chosen to support their Captain's MARKETING
version by any weather report issued by the Meteorological BOARD

Department. Captain U Thaung Nyunt did not explain "


AuNC
TMotNC Co.
what he meant when he said that the wind reached force
five. Be that as it may, even assuming that an excep-
tionally strong wind had swept at that time, such inclement
weather conditions were not unexpected on the west coast
of Arakan especially during the monsoon season and it
cannot therefore be said to he so unexpected that no
human .foresight could reasonably anticipate it. In
Manindra Nath Mukherjee v. Mathuradas Chatturbhuj (2)
the law on the subject of vis major or Act of God was
exhaustively discussed and it was decided that:
" An act of God is an operation of natural forces so
unexpected that no human foresight or skill could reasonably
be expected to anticipate it. In the town of Calcutta during
the monsoon season stormy weather is not unusual and
storms of considerable severity are by no means unprecedent-
ed. Wind velocities of from 31 to 48 miles per hour are
sometimes experienced in Calcutta and gusts of from 28 to 33
miles per hour are not uncommon in the monsoon season.
Therefore. a gust of wind with a vel01:ity of less than 27
miles per hour in the town of Calcutta during the monsoon
season cannot be said to be so unexpected that no human
foresight could reasonably be expected to anticipate it and
.cannot be regarded as vis major or act of God:
ln Cushing v. Peter Walker & Son (Warrington & Burton),
Ltd. (3) Hallett, l has thus remarked:
" Counsel for the plaintiff submits, and counsel for the
defendants concedes, that, before wind can amount to an act
of God, so th.a t the defendants escape liability for the action
of the wind, the wind must not merely be exceptionally
(~) A.t.R. (1946) Cal. p. 17S
(J) (1941) (~) All E.L.R., p. 693 at p. 695.

'. -.
jio
c.c. strong, but must be of such exceptional strength that no one
1966
could be reasonably expected to anticipate or provide agains~
THE STATE it. I do not think that it is necessary to examine such
AGRICUL-
TURAL authorities as there may be, but, having regard to what has
MARKETING been decided in respect to other natural phenomena, such as.
BOARD
f). for instance, an exceptionally high tide, or an excepticnal
AUNC downfall of rain. I think that counsel for the defendants was
TRADJNcCo.
correct in making that concession."

For the aforesaid reasons the sinking of L.C.T. No. ~95


in the present case on account of strong wind cannot be
said to be due to vis major or an Act of God. The answer
to issue Np. 3 would therefore be in the negative. In view
of the answer to issue No. 3. the issue No. 2 does not arise
for consideration.
Additional Issue No. I.

It has been submitted on behalf of the defendants that


the Burma Carriage of Goods by Sea Act has given them
certain protection as carriers by sea and that the contract
which imposes liability on them otherwise than as provided
by that Act must be regarded as void under section 23.
Contract Act. The learned Advocate for the plaintiffs
countered that the Burma Carriage of Goods by Sea Act
has no application in the instant case inasmuch as no Bill
of Lading as stated in section 4 of the Act, had been issued
in respect of the goods carried by the defendants. The
document in question, namely. Exh ibit" c ( :>)"which was
issued by the defendants in respect of the gunnies which
they agreed to transport, is clearly a freight receipt and
not a document of title. lt is therefore rather doubtful
whether the contract of carriage between the parties falls
within the ambit of the Burma Carriage of Goods by Sea
Act.
Even assuming that the contract between the parties
comes within the purview' of the Burma Carriage of Goods
by Sea Act, there is no provision in the Act prohibiting
the defe~nts from .forgoing any benefit bestowed upon c.c.
1{1
tbem by the Act. Where a person of full age with com
petent understanding enters into a contract freely and THI!STATE
ACRICVL-
voluntarily which is not expressly. prohibited by law, it TUJIAL
MAIIKETINC
cannot be said that the contract is either illegal or against BoAliD
public policy. In Halsbury's Laws of England (4). it has "
AUNC
been said: TltADtNc Co.
As a general rule, any person can enter into a binding
contract to waive the benefits conferred upon him by an
Act of Parliament, or. as it is said, can contract himself out
of the Act, unless it can be shown that such an agreement
is in the circumstances of the particular case contrary to
public policy. statutory conditions may, however, be im-
posed in such terms that they cannot be waived by agree-
ment, and. in certain circumstances, the legislature has
expressly provided that any such agreement shall be void."

The plea under section 29, Contract Act, which has


been referred to in the issue has not been p~ at the
time of argument. So far as the defence of frustration of
contract as provided under section 56, Contract Act, is
c-oncerned, I am of opinion that it is clearly untenable
inasmuch as the plaintiffs had already carried their part
of the contract by handing over the bales of gunnies to the
defendants who were under a duty to hand it over to the
plaintiffs' representatives at Akyab, and whose failure for
its delivery could not, as noted above, be attributable to
an -Act of God. Frustration of contract is a premature
determination of agreement lawfully entered into between
the parties owing to circumstances so fundamental as to be
regard~ by the law both as striking at the root of the
agreement and as entirely beyond what was contemplated
by the parties when they entered into the agreement vide
K. M. Modi v. Mohamed Siddique and one (5), and Rangoon
Tf/ephone Company, Limited v. The Union of Burma (6).
(4) Halsbucy's Laws of England, 1954, Jrd Edition, Vol. 8, P '43
{s) (1947) R.L.R. p. 413. {6) (rC}48) B.L.R. P 527.

'.
c.c. At the time when the parties in the present case entered
1966
into the contract of carriage. the defendants as carriers by
THE STAT
AGRICUL
sea must have anticipated that there were certain perils of
TUML sea journey especially during the mon~oon season when the
MARKETING
BoARD sea is usually rough and stormy. I am therefore of the
A~~o view that the defence of frustration of contract is not
TRADING Co. available to the defendants. The answer to the issue. will
be in the negative.

Issue No.4.
U Maung Maung Gyi has computet! the value of the
~nnies at K 1.27,056 and his comput-ation has not been
challenged by the defendants in his cross-examination.
Th~ Exhibit "o" document by which the defendants under-
took to bind themselves also discloses that they would
compensate the amount as fixed by the Chief Movements
Officer whenever any loss and/or damage occurred to the
gunnies .or twines consigned. The answer to the issue
will therefore be that the value of the gunnies is K 1.27.056.
In the result the piaintitfs' suit is decreed with costs.
CIVIL FIRST APPEAL

Before U Tlrn Pe, 7

u AKYIT KAW (APPELLANT) c.c.


JC)66
v. MGr. Jl.

DAW NGWE THEIN (RESPONDENT).

Urban RIJtl Omtrol Act, ro-Imrd in posusimr of Receiwr-wle of. Ian(l


by tM origiul ownn-lrlther tM buyn obtJJinltl good title Cl'lln tM lmrd-
fDMtlrn tM trans/nee can cl4im rent from tM occupant of tM premius-
bona fide mt~~irm~~P~t of tM prrmises cmrstruchim of building.

H'ld : Although the suit land was in po$Session of the Receiver at the
time when it waa purc::ha~;ed by the respondent the original owner Daw Khin
Thein Thein, to whom the possession of the property was restored by the
Court subsequently, never lost her title O\'er the property and the respondent
must therefore be deemed to ha\e ohtained good title over it by vinue of her
purchase from Daw Khin Thein Thein.
Orr v. MutJ.ia CMtti, I.I~.R. 17 Mad. p. sor at 504 ; Emtmt M ortgage
and Agmce Co. Ltd., mul another v. Malrammed F=vl Karim, A. I R. (1926)
Cal. p. J9S at 39z , referred to.
Held also : The' provision of s. ss (6) (a) read with s. 109, Transfer of
Property Act clearly authorize the transferee of the property leased to claim
rents accruing therefrom with effect from the date of transfer and the transferee
accordingly comes within the defin it ion of" landlord" ins. z (c) of the Urban
Rent Control Act, 196o.
U ~yo v. Abba Kouim and one, (1959) R.L.R. p. 281 ; A .S.P.S.K.R.
Korrupan Cltmyar and one v. A. Clrokka/irrgam Chtrtyor, (1949} B.L.R. 46
(S.C.) ; IJafD Pu v. Ko Don, (1955) D.L.R. 33 (H.C.), ~eferred to.
Held furtlrn : The respondent hall said that she really did intend to
contruct the building on the land and that she had the means to do so. There
is nothing on the record to controvert her statement. Then there is the statutory
reC)uirement of executinl! a bond which should dispel any ma/g jid' on the part
of the ret:pondent in seeking ejectment of the appellant from the suit premises.
DDID DDtD Tlri v. U Thein Maung Gnd Co., Ltd., and mre, (1956) B.L.R.
p. 1-4 (H .C.); U Tun Pe v. U Marmg Tin tmd/our othru, (1959) B.L.R. p. 16
Civil Fint Appe21 No. 144 of 1()64. Against tlu. decree of the Additional
Third judge of the City Civil Court of Rangoon in Civil Regular Suit No. B/2JS
of 14, dated znd December 1964.

'.
J?J
c.c. (S.C.) ; U Lu Gak v. Maurrg Thaurrg Tm aruJ tllr~e otlrers, (196o) B.L.R.
1966 p. 156 (S.C.), referred to.
U AKYJT
KAw Ba Tin for the appellant.
v.
DAW NCW.I!
THlN.
Tun Tin for the respondent.

U THET PE. J.-In Civil Regular Suit No. !"; 235 of


1964 of the Rangoon City Civil Court, the respondent
sued for ejectment of the appellant from a piece of land
known as Holding No. I2tm o block No. 32, Kamayut.
measuring 318 of an acre under section 12 (i) (d) of the
Urban Rent Control Act, 1960. It was the case of the
respondent that the appellant was in occupation of the
premises as a tenant of its original owner and that she
became its own.er by virtue. of her purchase from the
original owner and also the landlady of the appellant by
operation of law and that the premises were bona fide
required for construction of the building. The appellant
on the other hand denied the ownership as well as the
tenancy put forward by the respondent and pleaded that
the premises were not bona fide required for construction
of a building inasmuch as the respondent was already
possessed of a house nearby. On these pleadings the lower
Court framed the following issues.

ISSUES.
1. Whether the plaintiff is the owner of the suit
land?
2. Whether the defendant is the tenant of the
plaintiff?
3 Whether the plaintiff bona fide requires the land ?
4 To what relief is the plaintiff entitled?

After hearing the parties and the witnesses the learned


trial Judge gave a favourable finding on all the issues to
the respondent and accordingly decreed ~ler suit. Hence c.c.
rC)66
this appeal.
U AxYlT
It has been strenuously argued on behalf of the KAw
11
appellant that the trial Court erred in coming to the DAw NcWJi
conclusion that the respondent was the owner of the TKEIN.

premises. It would therefore be necessary for me to trace


the history of the holding in question. The land in dispute
forms part of a larger plot known as holding No . .12/A
measuring 3079 acres which originalJy belonged to one
Sultana Khanum Kia who alienated the entire plot to Mrs.
Sukhwanti Nath (a) paw Khin Thein Thein on 24th August
1955 forK 45,000 vide Exhibit D. Daw Khin Thein Thein
in turn sold a portion of the plot which forms the subject
matter of this litigation, to the respondent by a registered
instrument on 8th December 1960 for a sum of K 13,992.
It appeared that on 22nd August 1958 the Central Com-
mercial Bank of Burma instituted a mortgage suit against
four persons one of whom was Mrs. Sukhwanti Nath (a)
Daw Khin Thein. Thein in CivH Regular Suit No. 79 of
T958 of this Court. One of the mortgaged properties was
admittedly holding No. I 2/A which Daw Khin Thein Thein
had puchased from Sultana Khanum Kia. On 8th January
I 960 the Official Receiver was appointed the Receiver
of the mortgaged properties. On 22nd June 1962 a pre-
liminary mortgage decree was passed on the joint applica-
tion of the parties, paragraph 6 of which reads:
" That the plaintiff and the 2nd and 4th defendants fimher
agree that during the period allowed !or redemption, the
plaintiff will be at liberty to dispose of the properties men-
tioned in paragraph 12c of the plaint to wit:

ALL THAT piece or parcel of freehold land situate in


the Registration of Sub-District of lnsein in Lot No. 32,
Kamayut Town Quarter, Inscin Township, Insein District,
measuring 3 acres or thereabouts together with ali ease-
ments and appurtenances attached thereto.'

'.
c.c. either wholly or in plots upon price agreed between the
11)66
. plaintiff . and 2nd defendant and to apply the sate proceeds
U AKYlT . thereof in reduction of the decretal amount due by the said
KAw
" defendants to the plaintiff." .
DAW NCWE .
THEIN. On 28th january 1963 on the joint application of the
parties the order appointing the Official Receiver as the
Receiver of the said plot was vacated so that it might be
disposed of either wholly or in plots upon the price agree-
~able to tbe parties. Then on 6th january 1964 the)ast
and remaining item of the mortgaged properties which- is
. nqt relevant to the present proceedings was released from
the possession of--the Receiver and res_tored to the parties.
It is clear therefrom that the parties arrived at an amicable
settlement and the final decree was never drawn up in
that suit. .
It is true that when the respondent purchased the suit
land from Daw Khin Thein Thein hy a registered deed on
8th December 1962. the OfficiaJ'Receiver was in poc;c;ession
of the same as Receiver in the mortgage suit filed by the
Central Commercial Bank of Burma. But it must be borne
in mind a Receiver is appointed hy the Court for the sole
purpose of taking charge of the property which is the
suhject matter of the suit with a view to protest it until
adjudication is made who is entitled thereto. The
appointment of the Receiver does not in any way affect
the proprietary right or interest of the rightful owner. It
does not have the. effect of transferring the proprietary
. right or interest of the owner to the Court or the Receiver
arpointed by it and the real owner is therefore under no
impediment to deat- with the property subject, of course,
to the .right of the Court to manage it through the Receiver.
It would be of interest to refer to the decision in Orr v.
Muthia Chetti (t) where it was observed that :
" The terms receiver and manager are synonymous.
and though the appointment of a receiver may, in certain
(I} r.L.R 17 Mad. p.SOJ, at so. F-2~.
cases, operate to change possession, yet it has no effect what- c.c.
14}66
ever on the title of either party to the property which is
placed in the possession of the receiver: U AKYlT
KAw
The following observations in Eastern Mortgage and DAW
"NCWE
Agency Co . Ltd.. and another v. Mohammed Fozlul Karim TKEIN.

(2) are also apposite :


" The object sought by the appointment of a Receiver is
the safeguarding of property for the benefit of those entitled
to it. His possession is on behalf and for the benefit of all
the parties to the suit in vlhich he is appointed, and is the
possession of all the said parties according to their titles.
The property in his hands is in custodia legis for tbe person
who can make a title to it. The title of the real owner is in
no way affected either in theory or principle by his appoint
ment."
In the instant case although the suit-land was in posses-
sion of the Receiver at the time when it was purchased
by the respondent the original owner Daw Khin Thein
Thein. to whom the possession of the property was restored
by the Court subsequently. never lost her title over the
property and the respondent must therefore be deemed to
have obtained good title over it by virtue of her purchase
from Daw Khin Thein Thein.
Now regarding the question as to whether the appellant
is tenant of the respondent. the provision of section
55 (6) (a) read with section 109 Transfer of Property Act
clearly authorize the transferee of the property leased to
claim rents accruing therefrom with effect from the date
of transfer and the transferee accordingly comes within
the definition of " landlord in section 2 (c) of the Urban
Rent Control Act, 1960. In this connection it would only
be necessary to refer to the decision in U Mya v. Abba
Kassim and one (3) where it was held that :
"Under section 55 (6) (o) of the Transfer of Property Act
~SB the appellant who had purchased the property from the
(2 ) A . J.R. (1926) Cal. p.J8s at 392.. (3) (1959) B. L .R . p . 281 (H C .).

'.
'.
c.c. previous owner wa~ dearly 'entit~ tO the rents and profits .
1966
accruing therefrom from Jhe date of the sale and .tbus comes
U A1CYIT within the ddinition of land lord in section 2 (c) of the
I<Aw
o. Urban Rent Control Act and that the respondents are undoub
DAW N.Gw. tedly tenants within the meaning of that in section 1 (g)."
THEIN.

The learned counsel .for the appellant further submitted


that since the Central Commercial Bank was collecting
rents from the appellant the lower Court should not have
held that the respondent was the landlord of the suit land.
A rec:eipt in the name of one Ma Sein Sein was filed with a
memorandum of appeal but this receipt did not say that
the rent had been coHeaed in respect of the land in dispute
or that it had any t.hing to do with the appellant. Apart
from that the appellant had never .contended in the trial,
Court that the Central Commercial Bank, and not the
respondent, was the real landlord and he could not there-
fore be allowed to put up an entirely n~w case at this stage
of the proceedings. It is settled law that a party should
be allowed to win or lose on a case set out in his pleadings
and it is not the function of a trial or an appellate Court
to make out a case different from the one set out in the
pleadings. A .S.P.S.K.R . Karrupan Chettyar and one v.
A. Chokkalingam Chettiar (4); Daw Pu v. Ko Don (5).
As regards the question whether the premises were
bona fide required for construction of the buildings, the
real tests are (a) whether the owner intends to build and
(b) whether he had the means to build. If these conditions
are fu Ifilled the owner is entitJeJ. to a decree under section
12 (I) (d) Urban Rent Control Act although such a decree
might have the effect of ruining the tenant. It has been
repeatedly held that motive is not a deciding factor in the
matter of any bona fides. There is a spate of authorities
over this point and I need only to refer to the decision in
Daw Daw Thi v~ U Thein Maung & Co., Ud., and one (6) ;.
(-4) (1949) fi.L.R. 46 (S.C.). (S) (r9ss) B.L.R. 33 .(H.C.).
(6) (1956) B.L.R. p.14 (H C).
U Tun Pe v. U Maung Tin and lour othea (7) and U Lu ~Ji6
Gale v. Maung Thaung Tin and three others (8).
In the present case the respondent had said that she u KA~
really did intend to conStruct the building on the l~md and Dw "NcWII
that she had the means to do so. There is nothing on the THEIN.

record to controvert her statement. Then there is the


statutory requirement of executing a bond which should
dispel any mala fide on the part of the respondent in
seeking ejectment of the appellant from the suit premises.
Lastly as regards argument that the appellant had
already put up a substantial structure on the lana a com-
plete.answer is to be found in the decision in Ko Tun Sein
and two others v. Ko Wa Nab (9) where it was held:
" That the law h;ls been sett.fed since 1899 that Lessors
are not estopped in equity from bringing ejectment by reason
of tenants having erected permanent structures upon the land
leased to the knowledge and without interference by the
Lessors."

In the result the appeal fails and is accordingly dis-


missed with costs. Advocate fees K 51 .

(7) (1959) B.L.R. p .t6 (S.C..). (8) {r96o) B.L .R. p. ~ (S.C..).
(9) h 9SI) B.L.R. p . 19J(S.C . ).

'. '. '.


CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL
Before U Thet Pe,J

c.c. u AUNG MYINT (APPELLANT)


1966
v.
Mar. ,a.
u HOE (RESPONDENT)

APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE EXPAIITE DECREE-summon; duly served


on the wife-onus to eSioblish sl4/{icit11t grounds for non-appearance running
of time where the d~fendant is duly strtlt.d wirh summons.
Held : Since the summons was duly served on the w1fe of the appellant
he must show the existence of sufficient. cause for not appearing on the hearing
date. The onus is on the appellant, who wanted the decree paSsed against
him ~x portr set aside, to establish that there were sufficient grounds why there
had been no appearanc" by him on th" dat" fixed for hearing.
Radlul Moluln Datt v. Abbtu Ali Biwxu and others, A.l.R. (1931) All. 294
(F.B.); U Aung Gyi v. T-M Govtmmmt of 8u1ma (1940} R.L.R. su (F. B.) ;
Nagt:thwar Bux Rai v. Blmlror Dayal Singh, A.I.R. (1924)Par. 446 ; Vitta
V~nkatachalam and another v. Sivapuram Subbayya, A.I:R. (1928) Mad.
6ss. referred to.
Held further : In cases where the defendants have been duly served with
summons time will run from the date of the c.Jecree and not from the date
of the knowledge of the decree. A decree against the appellant was passed on
16th March 1965 and the application for setting aside the ex port~decr~e having
been made more than Jo days. thereafter is clearly out of time.
Manindra Chandra Datta v . Churamani Thapa and others A.I.R. (1949)
Assam s. rderred to . .

Thein Han (1) for the appellant.


Mya Tin for the respondent.

U THET PE. ].-This is an appeal against the order


rejecting an application to set aside the ex parte decree
by the defendant. In Rangoon City Civil Coun the
respondent instituted a suit against .the appellant for
recovery of K 2.000. On 18th February 1965 summons
Civil Misc. Appeal No. -41 of 1965. against the order of the 3rd judge,
City Civil Court of Rangoon in Civil Regular Suit No. 516 of 1964. dated
toth August 1965.
w~s served on his wife Ma Hla HI a Kyi. but on the date c.c.
1966
fixed for hearing. i.e. 16th. March 1965 no one appeared
for .the appellant and the stiit .was accordingly heard and UAUNG
MvtNT
decreed ex parte. Then on I. ~th June 1965. the appellant o.
UHOE.
applied for. setting aside the .ex parte - deer~ on the ground
that he was a.w ay ih Bassein when.: the. suit against him.
was heard and.decidtd. The learned 3rd Judge who had
seisin of the ~pplication dismissed iton the 'sc6re that .the
appellant had . failed to show sufficient cause . for not
appearing when the. suit. was calie<l for hearing.
It has been urged: on behalf of_ the appellant thaf the
lower Cou-rt erred .in dismissing his application \Yithout
giving .him an opportunity to cite :wimesses--in suppOrt of
his case. . It must.at once be pointed out that neither the
appellant nor his counsel had -ever asked the lower Court
to allow him to call ~tnesses; The diary order dated
r.6~h;July 1965 ofthe trial .Court proceedings shows that
counsel for .the _appelJant requested a date for arguinent
after submitting to the . Court that' the appellant; would
not file any reply to the objection of the respondent.
lt is settled law that under .Rule 13. Order IX. Civil
Procedure Code an ex partedecree against a defendant can
only be set aside when one of the two conditions is
satisfied, namely (a) when the summons was not duly
served or {O) when the defendant was prevented from
appearing on sufficient cause. Radha Mohan Dart v.
Abbas Ali Biswas and others (1) . and U Auilg Gyi v. The
Government of Burma (2). ~ow, Rule 15. Order V, Civil
Procedure Code provides that summons on a defendant
can effectively be. served on the a~ult member of his
family. In the present case, since the summons was
duly served o_n the wife of the ,appellant he must show
the existenc~ of sufficient cau$e. for not appearing on the
hearing date. The onus is on the appellant, who wanted
the decree . passed against him . ex parte set aside. to
B
( 1) A . I.R. (1 931 ) AF. 294 F.B. (2) (1940) R . L .R . 512 F. B.

'. '. '.


c.c. establish that there were sufficient grounds why there had
~6
been no. appearance by him on the date fixed for bea-ring
U AUNC .
MYIN1' vide Nageshwar Bux. ~ai v. Biseshwar Dayal Singh :(3),
fl.
UHoE. Vitta Venkatachalam and another -V. Sivapuram Subbayya -
(4) The appellant in the instant case . had not -.filed .any
affidavit or.asked the Court to allow him to-call witnesses
in support of his application, and I -am -therefore of
opinion . that the lower Court has rightly rejected it on
the ground that the appellant had failed to establish .
sufficient . cause . for his non-appearance. -
Then; there is the questionof limitation regarding the
appeilant's application. In cases 'where the defendants
have -been duly served with summons as is in the present
case time will run from the date of the decree and not
from the date of the knowledge of the decree: Manindra
Chandra Datta v. Churamani Thapa . and otlzers (5). A
decree against the appellant was passed on 16th Mar~h
1965 and the application for setting aside the ex parte
decree ha~ing been made more than 30 days thereafter is
clearly out of time.
In the result, the appeal fails and is accordingly
dismissed with costs. Advocate fees K 34

(3) A.I.R. (19Z-i) Pat. 446. (4) A.J.R. ( 1928) Mad. 6ss.
(5) A . I.R. (1949) Assam s.
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL .

Btfort U 17rtt Pt, J,

U AUNG THEIN (APPELLANT) c.c.


r#
v. Mar. u.

u THAN HTUT AND ONE (RESPONDENT)


EXT;CUTION OF DECREE-application f or imprisonment of tht iutlgmttlt
. llt61M-0. :u R . 40 C.P. Codt and Pr'otJisfl to
s. 51 C.J>.C.-f.l1htn the-
Court has power to ordtr imfjritonment
Held : Under Rule 40, Order 21. Civil Pr0<:1edure Code a decree-holder
caMot eKeeute his money decree- by imprisonment of the judgment-debtor
except in certain circumstances specified in the proviso. to s. 51 which .is manda-
tnry in character. It is therefore incumbent nn the deeree-holder to establish
the circumstances justifying imprisonment or the jud,gment-debtor. The
appellant had failed to discharg~ .the burden placed upon hirn to 5how that the
respondent had neglected or refused to pay the decretal amo~nt or some
substantia.! part of it.
Ch. Harpal Singh and others v. Lala H ira Lai, A.J.R. (1955) All. 402 at
p. 4~4 ; K.V. Muthu Pathar v. R. S . Mani Rao, A.I.R. ( 1956} Mad. s8o at
p .582; Atta Karim v. Mt. Bibi Habiba Soghra, A.J.R. (1951) Pat. 355
referred to.

Wan Hock for the appellant.

Myint Myint Khin for the respondent.

U THET PE, j.-ln Ovil Regular Suit No. 965 of the


Rangoon City Civil Court the appellant sued and obtain
a decree for K 3,500 with costs against the respondent.
The appellant then took out execution of the decree and
sought an order for imprisonment of the respondent in
civil prison from the executing Court, which after due
enquiry, rejected his request on the ground that the
respondent had not refused or neglected to pay the
Civii Msc. Appeal No. :s of 1965. Against the decree of the City Civil
Court of Rangoon in Civil Execution Case No. 697 of 1964.

'. '.
JOJ
c.c. decretal amoun~ ~r some substantial part thereof. It is
Jg66
against this ord~r the present appeal has been instituted.
UAuNG
THEIN Under Rule 40, Order 2r, Civil Procedure Code a
"
UTttAN decree-holder cannot execute his money deer~ by
HTUT AND
ON I.
imprisonment of the judgment-debtor except in certain
circumstances specified in the proviso to section. 51 which
is mandatory in character. The executing Court has no
power to order the imprisonment unless a judg~ent
debtor comes within the mischief of the said proviso.
The object of the rule is apparently to prevent creditors
from unduly harassing indigent debtors~ It is therefore
incumbent on the decree-holder to establish the
circumstances justifying imprisonment of the judgment-
debtor. Thus, it has been. remarked in Ch. Harpal Singh
and others v. Lala Hira Lal (1):
. . . It was for the decree-holder to get such facts
on the record either by his own evidence or by cross-exam in.
ing the judgment-debtor or his witnesses as would lead to
the satisfaction of the court on one of the points mentioned
in clauses (a) to (c) to proviso to section 51. Failure of the
decree-bolder to do so cannot go against the jl,ldgment
debtor.''
It has also been said in K. V. Mu.t hu Pathar v. ~. S. Mani
RaCJ (2):
It is not for the judgment-debtor to prove the 'negative .
but for the decree-holder to prove the 'positive', and for the
court to find in favour of the contention of the decree-holder
and to record its reasons for ordering arrest."
In Atta Karim v. Mt. Bibi Habiba Soghra (3) it has been
held:
"According to section 51. Civil Procedure Code, as it stands
after the amendme.rat by Act XXI (2.1) of 1,936. the onus of
proof is on the decree-holder to establish that the judgment-
debtor had sufficient means to pay the decree within the
meaning of sub-clause (b) of the proviso to section sC'
(1) A.LR. h9sS) All . 402 at P-404 (2)A.I.R. <~<is6) Mad. s8o ~t p. s82.
(~) A.I.R. (1951) Pat. 355
In the present case the appellant had alleged that the c.c.
966
respondent was possessed of a Land:Rover motor-car
UAU NG
which was worth more than- K zo,ooo but he had not THEIN
adduced any evidence to support his allegation. The v.
UTHAN
respondelll, on the other hand, denied that the vehicle HTUT AND
ON~.
belonged to. him. The executing . Court held that it
belonged to the respondent's second wife Daw Win Kyi
who had already sold it for K 8,200. Since the appellant
had failed to discharge the burden placed UpOn him to
show that the respondent was in fact the owner of the
vehicle the value of which would satisfy the decretal
amount it could not be said that the finding of the
executing Coun was erroneous.
The executing Court further found that the respondent
was jobless and had been subsisting on the allowance of
his adopted mother and that his sha{e to the extent of
K 5,000 in Yadana Su-pone Company which had already
been nationalized by the Government could not yet be
realized. In these circumstances there are sufficient
materials for the executing Court to hold that the
respondent bas no means to pay the decretal amount and
that he has not neglected or refused to pay the decretal
amount or some substantial part thereof.
In the result the appeal fails and is accordingly
. dismissed. In the cir(:umstances of the case there will be
no order as to costs.

'.
CIVIL SECOND APPEAL

c.c. u AYE MAUNG (APPELLANT)


1966
v.
Mar. 19,
u BA TUN AND ONE (RESPONDENT).*

Code of Civil PTocedure, O'd" 41 Rule 31-Judgment of the tst appet/ate


CouTt-what it should contain.
Held : The judgment of the learned District judge is not really a .Judgment
within the meaning of Rule Jl, Order 4' . Civil Procedure Code which requires
that the judgment of an appellate Court must contain points for determination,
the decision thereon :and the reasons for tJte decision. The object of thi;
rule is to enahle this CGurt in second appeal to judge whethe r the lower appellate
Court has properly appreciated and decided the c-ase. The first appellate
Court in affinning the decision of the Court below need not of cowse encumber
its judgment with unnecessary details but it must independently w,eigh the
evidence on the record and arrive 11t its own conclusion. Mere e"pression of
concurrence with the finding of the trial Court without giving any reason is
nor a propn judgment.
Sailaja11anda Pandey and one v. Lakhichand Sao and others, A.I.R. ( 1951)
Pat. 502 ; Ma Saw and others v. Ma .Bwin Byu IV Ran. 66, referred to.

Hla Mauns (1) fort~ cij>pell~nt.


:. - .
Than Mormg for the respondents.

U THET PE, J.-This second appeal by U Aye Maung


arose under the following circumstances. In Civil
Regular Suit No. 8 of 1963 of the Township Court of
Yamethin, appellant sued for ejectment of the respondents
from a barrack standing on a _piece of land known as
Holding No. a /I, Wahtoc Block No. 28, Yamethin, under
.section 12 (1) (a) and (e) of the Urban Rent Control Act,
1960. It was the case of the appellant that _respondents
Civil Second Appeal No. 4 of 1965. Against the decree of the District
Court of Vamethin in Civil Appeal No. 11 of 1964, dated 17th November 1951-
arising out of Civil Regular Suit No. 8 of 1963 of the Township Court of
Vamethin.
had been in occupation of the premises in suit as tenants c.c.
19(16
of one U Sa, the original owner thereof, at the rental of
K 3oper inensem, that the appellant became the owner of 'itA~~
the prenfls~s by virtue of his purchase from U Sa with a u B: TuN
registered deed dated the 6th March 1956, that the AND oN.
appellant bona fide required the premises for construction
of a building for which purpose he had obtained the
required .permission of the Yamethin Municipality on
2oth December 1962, that the respondents were in arrears
of rent for a period of four years, and that they had failed
to ~cate from the premises in spite of a notice sent by
registered post on uth October 1962.
The respondents, on the other hand, pleaded that the
barrack in question did not belong to the appellant as it
was built by them with his knowledge and consent and
that the appellant did not require the premises bona fide
for construction of a building inasmuch as he was possessed
of another house where he was residing. Then the legality
of the notice was also questioned by the respondents.
On the pleadings filed by the parties, the learned
Township judge framed no less than nine issues. After
hearing the witnesses he dismissed the appellant's suit with
costs. The appel1ant thereupon went up on appeal to the
District Court of Yamethin in its Civil Appeal No. I I of
1964 which affirmed the judgment and decree of the trial
Court. Hence this second appeal .
Before going into the merits of this appeal, it would
be necessary to comment on the judgment of the lower
appellate Courn. In the appeal before the District Court
me memorandum of appeal shows that various grounds
were raised against the judgment and decree of the trial
Court and that amongst other grounds it was contended
that the trial Court erred in not coming to the conclusion
that the respondents were his tenants and that the premises
were bona fide required for construction of a house and
6A that the notice was valid in 1aw. The learned District

'.
c.c.
19{16
Judge in d~liv~ring his judgment simply restated the find-
ings of the learned trial Judge and. merely concluded that-
U AYB
MAUNe there were .no grounds to distu~b th~ judgment and de~ree
"
U BA TuN of the 'trial ' ~ourt without spc~ifically dealing with the
AND ON. points raised by the appellant. This judgment of the
learned District Judge is not really a judgmen.t within the
meani.ng of Rule 31. Order 41, Civil Procedure Code which
require-; that the judgJTlent of :an appellate ~oun must
contain points for deter~inatio~. th_e decision thereon the
reasons for the decision. The. object ~f this rule to is
enable this Courr in .second appeal to judge whether the
lower appellate Court has properly appreciatect and decided
the case. The first appellate ' Court in affirming the d~ci
sion of the Court below need not of course encumber its
judgment with unnecessary detaiJs but it must indepen-
dently weigh the evidence on record and arrive at its own
condusion. Mere expression of concurrence with the
. finding of the tr~al Court without giving a~y reas~n ~~
not a proper judgment. In thiS: conne~lon, it has been
held in Sailajananda Pandey and another v. Lakhichand Sao
and others (I) that:
"The Legislature has ~ ntrusted 'a very important duty to
the first appellate Court. It is for that Court to decide finally
all questions of fact on which the disposa r of. the su~t m.i ght
depend. It must appear from the judgment of the lo wer
Appellate Court 1hat it has made an honest endeavour to
.make a proper appraisement of the merits of the cases P.Ut
forward by the part ies, and it . should never appE'.ar to the
litigant puhlic or to the superior Court th.at it has agreed
with the trial Court. simply because it was nor incl ined to
take much trouble over the case.
If th~ lower Appellate Court does not examine the fa~ts
and the evidence for itself and does not even mention the .
points which the case raises, it will be certa!nly failing in iis .
duty."

See.also Ma Saw and others v. Ma Bwin Byu (2).


(1) A. l.R. {1 951 ) Pat. 50 2 . (2) IV Ran. ~6:
For the aforesaid reasons, I hqld that the judgment of c.c .
1966
the lower appellate Court does not conform to the provi-
sions of Rule 31, Order 41, Civil Procedure Code. It is ~~~
therefore set aside and the case is remanded to the District u 8 ,.v.TuN
Court for pronouncement of a judgment in accordance AND oNE.
with law. If the learned judge presiding in the District
Court is a different Judge or if he be the same judge but
has forgotten the arguments placed before him, it will be
open to him to ask the parties to reargue the appeal. The
costs of this appeal will abide the result. There will be a
refund of the court-fees in respect of the present appe.tl
to the appellate under section 13 of the Coun Fees Act.
JOO

CIVIL SECOND APPEAL.

Before U Sein Thinn, J.

c.c. U JAMA (APPELLANT)


1966
Mar. 13.
v.
MA BI (RESPONDENT).*
Suit for specific parformaiiCe of Contract - oral contract between the
parties--whether th! contract .has been prooed- tJJ/uther 1M appellate COilrt
is justified in disagreeing with the finding of tlie trial Court-intention of
the parijl determining factor - whethf!! or not time was the essence of the
contract--whether the suit is time-barred.

Held : It is an admitted fact that the alleged contract was 1n.ade orally
bemeen parties whose relationahip vras not such as to inspire trust towards
each other. The transaction involved property the value of which was quite
substantial. It wouid therefore be ludicrous to $Uppose that the contract in
question was effected orally and that no step whatsoever had been initiated for
the last four years or more since the defendant first started betraying sign that
she was not going to fulfil the terms ofit. 'TI1erefore the trial Court was justi-
fied in holding the contract to have been not proved. This finding wea arrived
at by the lower Court in spite of the te~timony of three witnesses ~hom it had
seen and heard before it. The first appellate Court which did not see and hear
these witnesses was therefore not justified in holding that this evi dence could
override the facts and circumstances appearing on the record of the lowH
Court in favour of the defendanr.
Cllinnaya v. U Kha, 14 Ran. p. 11 ; U Htan Hmat (Appellant) v. Daw
Gon (llespondent), B.L.R. (1957) (H.C.) p. 73 ; Ma Tin Ti11 v. Daw Kan Slli
(1948) B.L. R. s82, referred to.
Held further: It was the Intention of the parties whi ch must be considered
as a factor ien detrmining whether or not time was the essence of the contract.
It is in evidence that the plaintiff first wanted to have the transaction completed
on the next day. It was only at the request of the defendant that an agreement
was reached by which the defendant promised to implement her part ~f the
contract within fifteen days from the <late of the original contract. Thus it
seems clear that among3t themselves the parties: have definitely chosen a time
limit within which the terms of the contract were to be completed. There is
nothing vague or indefinite about the time fixedsineeit was cle-.arly laid down
as fifteen days. Therefore the cause of action arose as early aa the a8th
Nowmber 1959 when the defendant failc:d to perform her part of the contract.
As the suit was filed only on the zsth January 1964 it waa clearly time -~.
Civil Second Appeal No. 1 of r965_. Against the decree of the District
Court of Kyaukse in Civil Appeal No. 3 of -1964, dated the 15th October 1964.:
JOe
I
Ramkrislma and another v. Laxminarian and another, A.I.R. Nag. (1929) p. c.c.
1966
164 ; K. Saryanarayanamurthi " S atyanarayanamurlhi, A.I.R. (1925) Mad. I
211 referred to.
UJAMA I
v.
MA Br.
I
Hla Nyun for the appellant.

]. Emanuel for the respondent.

U SEIN TurNN. J .-The plaintiff-appellant U Jama sued


the defendant-respondent Daw Bi specific performance of
contract iQ the Subdivisiona:l Court of Meiktila, his case
as set out in the plaint being as follows :
On the 13th November 1959 the defendant Daw Bi
entered into an or~ contracr by which she agreed to seU
out a tenanted house and its site, hereinafter referred to
as the suit property, to the plaintiff for a sum of K 2 , 500.
In pursuance of this agreement Daw Bi accepted an
advance of K 809 and having handed over her title-deed
surrendered possession of the suit property to the
plaintiff. It was also stipulated that on payment of the
balance of K :r ,700 the defendant would execute a
registered conveyance in favour of the plaintiff.
Thereafter the plaintiff on s~veral occasions called
upon the defendant to implement the contract but to no
avail. On the 14th Marcq 1962, the defendant served a
notice calling on the tenants of the suit property to pay
up the arrears of rent due tq her. The plaintiff by way
of replying to the notice on behalf of the tenants sent a
letter to the defendant stating that he was the owner by
virtue of the contract which he had entered into with the
defendant. In spite of this objection the plaintiff again
sent anoth~r notice dated the I rth November 1963. this
time calling upon the tenants to quit the suit property.
Hence this ~it by the plaintiff for specific performance
of the contract for sale of the suit property by accepting
the sum of K 1,700 being the balance of purchase money
remaining unpaid hy him.
Jeo
c.c. The defence set up by the defendant was one of totat
1966
denial. According to her no contract whatsoever was
U]AMA
ever entered upon between her and the plaintiff in
"
MA Bt.
respect of the suit property. It was also asserted that .
the title deed in respect of the suit property was lost by
her and that the matter had not only been advertise-d tn a
local newspaper but was also reported to the police:
Thus the main issue in the case was whether or not
the defendant entered into a <;:ontr:act as alleged hy the
plaintiff. The plaintiff was abte to produce the title deed
which was alleged to have been made over to him by the
plaintiff at the time of the transaction. Evidence was
alsp led to show that it was in the house of Ma Thein Yin
(P-W r) that the contract was made and that besides the
parties to the contract Ma Thein Yin. Saya U (PW 2) and
Ko Twa In (PW 3) were present when the transaction took
place. It was also asserted that the plaintiff made ;:m
endorsement at the back of the title deed evidencin~ the
p~ment of K Boo as advance money and that taxes for
certa~n period were paid by the plaintifL
The defendant, on the other hand, would have the
Cour~ hold that the title-deed was lost from her possession
sometime in the year 1962 when she sh.ifted her residence.
Documentary evidence was produced to show that she
advertised abotJt the loss of it in "Bahosi " daily . U Kyi
Aye (OW 3). a Police Station Writer. was also examined
to prove her report to the police regarding t he Joss of her
titled-deed. Some tax-rece.i pts were also tendered as
exhibits to show that she bore the taxes for the suit
propeny.
The trial Court after discussing the evidence adduced
by the parties came to ~he conclusion that the alleged
contract for sale of the suit prQperty. was not proved. It
was however pointed OIJt th<\t some sort of transaction
involving payment of K Boo and resemJ>ling that of a
mortgage by deposit of title-deed did ta~.e place bet:weeP
the parties. But in view .of the inordina.te delay. io tiling c.c.
1966
the suit the learned t-ri31 judge was of 9pin.ion that the
U]AMA
transaction could not have beeR a contract for ~al.e of the v.
suit property. It was .also held. though hardly necessary MA Br.

in view of the fi.nding already arrived at! that the suit


was time-barred. The st.~it was accordingly dismissed.
each party being ordered to bear it's o~n costs.
On appeal to the District Court, Kyaukse. the learned
District Judge did not concur .. . with the finding arrived at
by . the trial Court that the contract for sale was, not
proved. Observing that theJacts that the defendant was
a hie to produce ' tax-receipts. that she had advertised an~
rep9rted about the loss of her title-deed. and that the
tenancy of -two rooms in the suit house was given by
herseif personally . to . tl1e tenants, could not override the
evidence given by the persons who had witnessed the
transaction between the parties the learned District Judge
held that there . was a contr.act for sale between the
p<~rties. He however agreed with the trial Court that
the suit was , tim~. barred and accordingly dismissed the
. appeal with ca..<;ts throughout. Hence this second appeal
before me.
The main ground of app~al before me now is that the
lower Courts erred in holding that the plaintiff's suit was
time-barred. But as this appeal could be disposed of on
another ground not relating tD the question of limitation
,, would defer. discussing this matter. The first point to
be considered in this appeal is whether the first appellate
Court was justified in disturbing the finding arrived at by
the trial Court that the alleged contr:act for s~le was not
proved. . In view of the fact that ihe oral evidence
obtaining on the record of the lower Court was inconclu-
sive either way. unless it can be shown that the decision
of the trial Court was plainly wrong it was not compete.n t
for ' the first appellate .Court to intefere with it. This is
t11e principle which was clearly laid do.wn in the case of
c.c. Chinnaya v. U Kha_ (1) and which was followed by this
1966
Court in U Htan Hmat (Appellant) v. Daw Con
U ]A.MA
t/. (Respondent) (2) where the foilowing headnote appear:
MA Br.
" Where there is a conflict of oral evidence, and the issue
in the case depends upon the credibility or the witnesses
a Court of appeal ought to bear in mind that it does not
see or rehear the witnesses and should not interfere with a
decision arrived at by the trial Judge unless it comes to the
conclusion that the trial Court was plainly wrong."

Thus in the light of the principle propounded above it


would be necessary to determine whether it could be said
that the finding of the trial Court was one in which the
error was palpably discernible as the evidence adduced by
the parties was conflicting.
The alleged contract between the parties being an oral
one a heavy burden rested upon the plaintiff to prove his
cas~. No doubt the payment of K 8oo as advance money
was alleged to have been endorsed in writing at the foot
of the rev~rse of the exhibit title deed. But the e~try
was made in pencil without any signature appended to it.
The year of the transaction was also wrongly mentioned
as 1921. Therefore the trial Court seems justified in
considering it as a " piece of work done in the sly ". The
only question that remains to be considered is the
sufficiency or otherwise of the oral testimony of the
witnesses regarding the existence of the oral contract
between the parties , First of all the plaintiff U Jama
would have the Coun hold that no instrument was
executed to evidence the transaction as he trusted the
defendant Daw Bi who had been intimately known to him
for many years previous to the making of the contract.
This is however not warranted by the fact and circum-
stances obtaining on the record of the case. For it is in
evidence that parties came to know each other only a few
(t) 14 Ran. p. '1 - (z) B.l.R. (957) (H.C.) p. 73
months before the alleged transaction and that the c.c.
1!)66
plaintiff did not even know the exact locality of the
U ]AM.\
defendant's house. Therefore the odds are against the tl.
plaintiff's story that he handed over K Boo to the MA Sr.
defendant without requiring the latter to acknowledge
receipt of it in writing. No doubt Ma Thein Yifi: (PW r).
Saya U (PW 2) and Ko Twa In (PW 3) tried to corroborate
the statements of the plaintiff regarding the agreement
entered into between the parties. But here again their
evidence is not free from doubt. For instance there is
discrepancy between the evidence of Ma Thein Yin and
that of the other witnesses, regarding the manner in
which they all arrived at her house. Equally inconclusive
is the evidence tendered by the defendant. The trial
Court accordingly observed that " as the evidence adduced
by the parties are conflicting it is rather difficult to say
which side is true. " In such a dilemma the lower Court
would be competent to invoke the principle laid down in
Ma Tin Tin v. Daw Kan Shi (3) to the effect that it should
consider which story fits in with the admitted circum
stances and resulting .probabilities.
In the present case before me it is an admitted fact
that the alleged contract was made orally between the
parties whose relationship was not such as to inspire
complete trust towards each other. The transaction
involyed property the value of which was quite
substantial. It would therefore be ludicrous to suppose
that' the contract in question was effected orally and that
no step whatsoever had been initiated for the last four
years or more since the defendant. first started betraying
sign that she was not going to fulfil the terms of it. I am
therefore 'inclined to the view that the trial Court was
justified in holding the contract to have been not proved.
This finding was arrived. at by the lower Court in spite of
. the testimony of three witnesses whom it had seen and
(3) (1948) B:L.R. 582 . .

'.
c.c. heard before it. The fjtit appellate Court which did not
1966
see and hear these Witnesses was therefore not justified in
,,..
U]AMA
holding that this evidence could override the facts and
MA Br. circumstances appearing on the record of the lower Court
in favour of the defendant. In this connection the reason
why the trial Court should be considered in a much better
position to correctly weigh these evidence than the flrst
appellate Court could be summed up in fbe following
words of Viscount Sankey Whkh were quoted with
approval in the case of Chinnaya cited above.
~Witnesses without any consicious bias towards a con-
clusion may have ~n their demeanour, in their manner, in
~heir hesitation, in the nuance of their expressions, in even
the turns of eye-lid, left an impression upon the man who
saw and heard them which can never be reproduced in the
printed page."
. .
The learned counsel .for the _appellant makes most of
the fact that his client have been paying t~xes for the
suit. property. But it is also common groond that the
defendant had also paid taxes for certain periOd. As the
plaintiff ,started paying taxes only subsequent to the
advertisement appearing in the " Bahosi " daily I do not
thi~k this fact should weigh heavily against the defendant.
In any case as the plaintiff has not been able to bring
home his allegations regarding the execution of the
contract I would hold that the trial Court was correct in
coming to the finding it did.

Coming to the question of Iimitati<>n the whote matter


hinges on the point whether or not time was the essence
of the alleged contract. From the plaintiff's own showing
it is dear that Daw Bi undertook to perform her part o f
the contract within fifteen days from the date of the
alleged agreement. Much reliance has been placed by the
learned counsel for the appellant on the ruling in the case
of Ramkrishna and another v. Laxminarian and another c.c.
1966
(4) where it was observed that ordinarily in agreements
UJAMA
for sale of property time is not of the essence of contract.
But this is not a general rule which is always applicable "
MA Br.
to all cases in which sale of property is involved. Each
case must be determined on its own merit. In the same
case alluded to above it was also remarked that parties to
a contract could expressly or impliedly by their conduct
made time the essence of the contract. In K. Suryanara-
yanamurthi v. Satyanarayanamurthi (5) it was also held
that though ordinarily time is not the essence of contract
to sell land yet it can be made so by the parties.
Therefore it was the intention of the parties which
must be consider~ as a factor in determining whether or
not time was the essence of the contract. In the present
case before me it is in evidence that the plaintiff first
wanted to have the transaction completed on the next
~ay . It was only at the request of the defendant that an
agreement was reached by which Daw Bi promised to
implement her part of the contract within fifteen days
from the date of the original contract. Thus it seems
clear to me that amongst themselves the parties have
definitely chosen a time limit within which the terms of
the contract were to be completed. There is nothing
vague or indefinite about the time fixed since it was
cle~rly laid down as fifteen days. My attention has also
been invited to (A.l. R. 1944 Mad. 2 18) where it was held
that the stipulation regarding the execution of the deed
to be done when the brothers returned to the village was
held to be too indefinite to be regarded as fixing a date
for the performance of the contract. But the present case
before me is plainly distinguishable in as much as; the
time fixed was not indefinite. A concrete fifteen days
was stipulated within which the contract was to be
performed. Therefore agreeing with the concurrent
tB (4) A.l. R . Nag. ( 192.9 ,) p. 164. (s) (1 9 as ) Mad. 211 A.I.R.

'. '. '. '.


c.c. finding- of the two Courts below I would hold that the
1966
U ]A.MA.
cause"of action in this case arose as early as the 28th
v. November 1959 when the defendaQtfailed to perfonn her
MA. Br.
part of the contract. As the suit was filed only on the
15th january 1964 it was clearly time-barred.
In the result this appeal fails and is here~y dismissed
with costs_,throughput.
Advocate's fee fixed at three gold-mohurs.
CRIMINAL REVISION
Before U. Thet Pe, J.

U MYE (APPLICANT) c.c.


1966
v. Apl. 9
KO TUN YIN AND. ONE (RESPONDENTS}

Suit for Recot.oery of Rent from tenant-Urban Rent Control Act, 196<>--
TraiU/er of Pr:~perty Act-notice-no prooisii:m togit:e-Transfer of Property
Act, s. ro8 (t)--to pay rent-dutY. of lessee.
Held: There i:~ no provisic:in ei.th~r in the Urban Rent Control Act, or
ln the Transfer of Property Act requiLing the landlord to give notice before he
can in:~titute a suit for recovery of rent from his tenant. Under clause (1) to
s. ro8 of the Transfer of Property Act a lessee is under a duty to pay the rent
without any demand from the 'les~or.
Alliblwy Adamji Sheikh Jiwonji v. Gordhandas Jmuibhoy, A.I.R. (1929)
Sind 13 ; Haji Nasiruddin Karirz Maho;.,~d and others ,., Patel Hoji Umnji
Adam Co., A.I.R. (1<J41) Born. 286, referred to.

Kyaw Htoon for the appliqmt..


San Thein for the responden~ ..

U THET PE, j.-In Small . Cause Suit No. 461 of


1964 of the Rangoon City Civil Court petitioner sued the
respondents for recovery of K 190 .due as arrears of rent.
It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent was in
occupation of the southern p'ortion of the premises known
as House No. 494 (White Hall), Strand Road, Rangoon, as
his tenant and that the respondent was in arrears of rent
for the period from April 1963 to October 1964 at the rate
of K 10 per mensem, which is the standard rent fixed by
the Assistant Controller of Rents. The respondent on the
other hand pleaded that the notiCe sent to him by the
petitioner was invaiid and that the amount of arrears due
CiviiRedeion No. 16 of 1965. Against the decree of the 4th Judge of
SA Rangoon City Civil Court in Civi ISm II Cause Suit No. 461 of 1()64.

'. '. '.


_.eo
c.c. was only K 153, and not K 190 as alleged by the petitioner,
1966
inasmuch as he had vacated from the premises in suit with
1.:1 Mn
.,.
KoTuNYJN
effect from the 1oth july 1964 .
AND ONI!.
After hearing the parties and their witnesses, the
learned 4th Judge who had seisin of the case, dismissed
petitioner's suit on the ground that the notice sent to the
respondent giving only 24 hours to pay up the arrears of
rent contravened the provisions of the Urban Rent Control
Act, 1960. He had not however mentioned any specific
provision of the Act which was alleged to have been con-
travened. Section 12 (l) (a) of the Act, which the learned
Judge probably had in mind , deals with one of instances
where a landlord can claim ejectment of his tenant from
the leased property. It has no application to a suit by
a landlord for recovery of arrears of rent from his tenant.
There is no provision either in the Urban Rent Control
Act or in the Transfer of Property Act requiring the land-
lord to ,give notice before he can institute a suit for recovery
of rent from his tenant. Under clause (1) to section 108
of the Transfer of Property Act a lessee is und,e r a duty
to pay the rent without any demand from the lessor. In
this connection, reference may usefully be made to the
decision in Allibhoy Adamji Sheikh ]iwanji v. Gordhandas
Jeenabhoy (I) where it was held that :
" Section 108. Cl. (1), T.P. Act. makes it obligatory on the
tenant to pay or tender at the proper time and place the
rent due to the lessor or his agent and there is nothing in
the ~ection to require the lessor to make a demand."

A similar view has been expressed in Hajj Nasiruddin


Karim Mahomed and others v. Patal Haji Umarji Adam
& Co. (2) the relevant head notes of which read:
"Under S. to8 (1) a lessor is bound, in the absence of a
contract or local usage to the contrary, to tender the rent
to the lessor or his agent in that behalf at the proper time
( 1) A. I.R. (192 9) S ind '3 ( z) A.I.R. (1941) Born. 286'
and place. There is nothing in that section to require the c.c.
1966
lessor to make a demand for the rent."
UMYE
tl.
As regards the merits of the case there is nothing in Ko TeN YIN
section 25 of the Rangoon City Civil Court Act which AND ONE.

would require this Court to remand the case to the lower


Court for a finding on the actual amount due hy the
respondent. There are sufficient materials on the record
and I propose to go into the merits as well so as to shorten
the litigation. The respondent admitted having received
the notice given by the petitioner wherein a sum of K 190
had been dema11.ded as arrears of rent. If the actual
amount payable was only K 15-3 as contended by him he
should have protested then and there. This he had not
done. For this reason I am of the opinion that there is
substance in the claim preferred by th~ petitioner.
In the result this revision succeeds and I direct that
there shall be a decree forK 190 in favour of the petitioner
against the respondent with costs in both the Courts.

'. '.
CRIMINAL APPEAL

Before U Thet Pe,J.

c.c. UNION OF BURMA (APPELLANT)


1966

Apt. 22. v.
MAUNG BA MAl (RESPONDENT).*

Public Proputy Protection Act, s. 6 (1)-wllile committing theft of petrol


belonging to the People's .Oil InduJtry-arrest bf accused- legality or other-
tcise of the arrest -tuhether it can.affect the question the accused is or is not
guilt.'' of the offence charged -tuhetlzer the conviction is 'llitiated.
Held: The. tria l Court had held tl~at the respondent was arrested while
committing theft of petrol belonging to the People's Oil Industry. His arrest
under the clreumstances cannot therefore be saicl either irregular or illegal.
Even assuming that the arre~t .of the respondent is illeg-. .1, whic.:h is not
the legality or otherwi.;e of the arrest cannot in any way affect the que!otion
whether the accused is or is not guilty ,9fthe offence with which he was charged
~nd the conviction of an accu!oed .will not be vitiated simpiy because the arrest
is illegal. "
Tlu Stat11 v. Thu Daw1 01 L .O.R. 6o; The State'' Ravalu Kui:adu, I.L.R.
26 Mad. 124; The State v. Madho Dhobi, I.L ..R. 31 Cal. 557, referred to.

Thein Han (Government Advocate) for the appellant.

Ko Ko Gyi (3) for the respondent.

U THET PE, J.-In Criminal Regular Trial No. 155 .of


1964 of the 2nd Additional Magistrate, Chauk, the
respondent was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment
till the rising of the Court and a fine of K I 50 or in default
to undergo six months' rigorous imprisonment under
section 6 (1) of the Public Property Protection Act. On
, Criminal Appeal No. 306 of 1965 . Appeal from the order of the Sessions
Judge of Magwe, dated the 1st A.prilr96s, passed in Criminal Appeal No. 48
of 1964. F
appeal to the Coun of Session, Magwe, the respondent c.c.
1966
was acquitted on the ground that the trial was illegal and
UNION OF
void inasmuch as the arrest of the respondent was in BURMA
1/.
contravention of section .7 of the Public Property Protec- MAuNe
tion Act. The Union Government has now preferred the HAMAl.

present appeal against the order of acquittal.


The respondent was a driver in People's Oil Industry,
Chauk. On 28th March 1964 U Maung Maung Khin,
Assistant Security Officer, Chauk, People's Oil Industry,
after receipt of information that the respondent was pilfer-
ing petrol from the motor vehicles belonging to the People's
Oil Industry, shadowed lorry No. B-8545 driven by the
respondentwho stopped the vehicle in front of the house
of one U Hla Maung. The respondent then alighted from
the lorry and started extracting petrol from the fuel tank
or' the vehicle by means of a flexible pipe and some jerry
cans supplied by one Maung Hla Shwe. At this juncture,
U Maung Maung Khin who had brought a camera with him
took some snap shots of the respondent who was then
handed over to U Ba Shin, a Corporal of the Police Force,
Chauk, together with some 12 gallons of petrol seized
from him. U Hla Maung and Maung Hla Shwe 'were also
sent up for trial with the respondent. But since they are
not parties to this appeal, it would be unnecessary for me
to refer them any further. In the trial Court the res-
pondept pleaded that he was merely trying to clear the
fuel system of the vehicle which was then blocked with
dirt and that he was not stealing petrol. His plea was
however rejected by the learned trial Magistrate . who
convicted him as noted above .
On appeal against the conviction and sentence, the
learned Sessions Judge without going into the merits of
the appeal acquitted the respondent after arriving at the
conclusion that the arrest of the respondent in contraven-
~7A tion of section 7, Public Pr9perty Protection Act vitiated

'.
c.c. the entire proceedings. Sub-sections (z) .(2) and (21\) of
1966
.sec::tion 7 of the Act on which the learned, Sessions judge
UNION OF
BURMA based his order of acquittal read :
11
MAUNG "7 (I) Any police officer not below the rank of a sub-
llA MAl.
inspector or any other officer of Government empowered in
this behalf by general or speciar order by the President of
the Union may, with tbe prior approval of such authority as
m_ay be prescribed by the President of the Union, arrest
without warrant any person whom he suspects of having
committed or of committing any of the offences mentioned
in sub-section (1) of section 6 in respect of any Public
property.
(2) Any officer authorized in this behalf by general or
special order by the President of the Union may arrest
without warrant any person whom he suspects of having
committed or of committing any prejudicial act;
(2A) Any officer authorized in this behalf by general or
sepcial order by the President of the Unio~. may, if he is
satisfied with respect to any particular person tha,t circum-
stances exist which render it necessary to arrest him with a
view to preventing him from committing any offence men-
tioned in section 6 (I) or an offence of criminal breach of
trust in respect of any Public property, or any prejudicial
act, do s-o without warrant."

Sub-section (2) which deals with prejudicial acts has no


relevance whatsoever to the instant case. Sub-sections (1)
and (2A) relate to cases where persons are arrested for
suspicion of having committed or of committing or for
preventing him from committiQg any of the offences men-
tioned in section 6 (z). They have no application to cases
where the culprits are caught redhanded in the act of
committing any of the offences mentioned in section 6 (r).
Section 7 has been ena~ted where a person is required to
be arrested and detained for a period extending to six
months on being suspected of having committed or of
committing any prejudicial act or any of the offences
mentioned in section 6 (z). Since section 6 (z) is a non- c.c.
1966
bailable and cognizable offence, a person who is found to
UNION OF
have committed such an offence can be arrested by any BURMA
police officer without a warrant under section 54, Criminal "
MAuNe
Procedure Code. In fact, unde.r sectio.n 59, Criminal Pro- BA MAJ.
cedure Code even a private person can arrest a person who
commits a non-bailable and cognizable 0ffence in his view.
Jn the instant case the trial' Court had held that the res-
pondent was arrested while committing a theft of petrol
belonging to the People's Oil Industry. His arrest under
the circumstances cannot therefore be said either irregular
or illegal.
Even assuming that the arrest of the respondent is
illegal. which it is not, the legality or otherWise or" the
arrest cannot in a~y way affect the question whether the
accused is or is not g.uilty of the offence with yvhich he
was charged and the conviction of an accused will not be
vitiated simply because the arrest is illegal. In this con-
nection it has been held in The State v. Thu Daw (r) that
" Illegality in making an arrest does not .necessarily
in.validate a trial." The same view has been expressed in
The State v. Ravalu Kesigadu (2). The relevant portion
of its head-note reads :
" . . . . that the question whether the officer who
effected the arrest was acting within or beyond Ns powers
in makhlg the arrest did not affect t~e question whether tb.~
accused was or was not guilty of the offence with which he
was charged."

See also TheState v. Madho Dhc;>bi (3).


In the result the appeal succeeds and the ord~r of
acquittal is hereby set aside and I direct that the le.arn.ed
Sessions Judge, Magwe, shall rehear the appeal Gf :the
respondent on merits.
(r) 2 L.B.R . 6o. (z) I .L.R. 26 Mad. 124.

(3) I.L.R. 31 Cal. 557.

'-
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

B4ore U Tun Tin a1uJ. U Thet Pe, jj.

c.c. ZAKARIAKHAN (deceased) by his L/R MR. MOI:fAMED


1966
KHAN AND TWO OmERS (APPELLANT)
Ma,. 24.
.V

. THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, CHIEF COURT BUILDING.


RANGOON (RESPONDENT)

Wiuding up of compa11y-Burma Companies Act, s. 23s-inquiry into tilt'


conduct and acts of directors-surrender and forfeiture of shares entails
reduction of capital-can do tuith the sanction of the Court - -commission of
acb of misfeasance-assessment of compensation mr the loss suffered by the
Company~either throng nor unreasona/Jle--acts of of directors do not
call for benefitr of s. 281 Bunna Companies Act.

Held : The acts of the directors involving the surrend-er and forfeiture of
shares entailed a permanent reduction of the capital of the Company .Which
can only be done with the sanction of the Court under s. s6 of the Durma
Compani-es Act.
No provisions were made in the Memorandum and Articles of Association
of the Company authorizing the directors lo accept from any director or member
the surrender of his share.~ or part thereof and the acceptance hy the directors
of the surre~der of 10 unpaid shares belonging to Hoshan Din on 2znd March
1948 is therefore clearly unlawful and invalid.
Held abo: The conduct of the directors in making collusive furfeitut"e
was highly reprehensible. It is apparenr therefrom that the directors in
unlawfully allowing the surrender and making the forfeiture of share~ had
clearly committed acts of misfeasance within the meaning of s. :&35. Burma
Companies Act.
field further: The trial Court has based its assessment of compe nsation
on the amount of loss suffered by the Company and under such circumstances
jt cannot be s:~id that the trial Court had exercised the discretion either wrongly
or unreasonably. In fact it has made provisions for fair and equitable
realization of compensation in the last paragraph of its judgment.
Held further : The appell;mts in accepting tl:e surrender and 'Ord-ering
forfeiture of certain. shares might have acted with the intention of rel~eving
their friends wilhout any dishonest intention but their acts which are again.~t
the i~terests of the Company and other share-holders cannot be said to be
reasonable so as to entitle the benefits of s. 281.
Civil Misc. App~al No. 4lOf 1964. Against the decree of the Origi.nal
Side of this Court in Civil Misc. No. 22 of 1956.
Pattiam Veetlil Monohki Sankaram Namhiar v. Kottayan Banli by Officiql c.c.
Liquidator. Tellichery and otherl, I.I:..R. (1946) Mad. 507 ; Re Naraindas 1966
Lahoredas, A.I.R. (1934) Sinct 39; Re Mir~a Ahamad Namazi, A.l.R
ZAKA.aJA
(1924) Mad.'703 'a t 70~ ; Smt. Premila Devi and others v. Peoples Bank of KHAN
Northern India Lt. (in Liquidation), A. I.R. (1938) P.C. 284; The Pionur (deceased) by
Alkali Works Ltd. v. Amiruddin Slaalebhvy Tyebji, (1926) I.L.R . so Born. 461; hiaL/R Mil.
Balruant v. The Ceramic Industries Ltd., Chanda, I.L.R. (1950) Nag MOHAND
KRAHAMD
150 ; Rehmotunnissa Begum v. Price, l.L.R .Xs 1 Dom.J80; T.S.PL. Thinnappa Tti'O OTittliS
Chettiar and others v. G. Rajagopalan, Official Liquidator of Oriental Investment
Trust Ltd., Madras and others, A.I.R. (1944) Mad. 536 ; Peninsular Locomotive TH"
Co. Ltd. v. H. Langham Reed and others, A.l.R. (1937) Pat. 293, Omau.
LIQUJDATGa,
referred to. CHJUCouiiT
RUII.DINC,
RANGOON.
Myint Soe for the appellants.
U A w for the respondent.

U THET PE, J.-The Burma Publishers Ltd., Rangoon,


a Private Limited Company, duly incorporated- under the
Burma Companies Act was wound up by the late High
court on 4th September 1965, when the Official Receiver
became Official Liquidator, who moved the learned Judge
of Mie Original Side under section 235, Burma .Companies
to
Ac.t, make an inquiry into the conduct and acts of the
directors, . Zakaria Khan, Roshan Din, Hubdar Khan and
~ .

K. A. K:. Master and to compel them to pay K x8,soo to


the Company by way of compensation. Pending inquiry
K. A. i<.. Master died and action against bim was dropped
under the authority of Pattiam Veettil Monokki Sankaram
Nambiar v. Kottayan Bank by Official Liquidator,
Tellichery and others (1) where it was held that proceed-
ings under section 235 could not be continued against the
heirs of a deceased director. Public examination of the
directors shows that on 22nd March 1948 one of the
directors, namely, Roshan Din, who had agreed in the
Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company
to subscribe 30 shares of K 500 each, was permitted to
take only 20 shares by the directors, who again on
14th May 1 ~50 forfeited ;ertain unpaid shares belonging
(r) J.L. R. (1946) Mad. 507.

'. '- '.


c.c. to three of the directors, i.e. 10 shares belonging
1966
to Roshan Din, five to Hubdar Khan and 12 to K. A. K.
Z.AK.ultA
KHAN Master. on the groun~ of their inability to pay. Learned
(deceased) by judge therefore held that the. directors in allowing the
hisL/R MR.
MOHAM'EP surrender arid making the forfeiture of certain shares,
KHAN ANP
TWO OTHI!RS which they had no authority to do. committed acts of
t/.
THE misfeasance and accordingly directed the appellants
On:ICIAL
LIQUIDATOR,
directors to pay K rB,soo to the Company inasmuch as
CHrEFCoURT the liability of the directors of the Company for their acts
13UJLDJNG,
RANGOON. of misfeasance wa~ joint and several. It is against that
order the present appeal has been instituted.
It is no longer in dispute that the directors of the
Publishers Ltd. Rangoon had on 22nd March 1948
permiued Roshan Din to surrender 10 shares by allowi~g
him to take only 20 shares although he had agreed to
subscribe 30 shares in the Memorandum and Articles of
Association and that they had on 14th May 1950 forfeited
certain shares belonging to Roshan Din, Hubdar Khan and
K. A. K. Master with the sole object of relieving them of
liability. These acts of the directors involving the
surrender and for.feiture of shares entailed a Permanent
reduction of the capital of the Company which could only
be done with the sanction of the Court under section 56
of the Burma Companies Act.
No provisions were made in the Memorandum and
Articles of Association of the Company authorizing the
directors to acc;ept from any director or member the sur-
render of his shares or part thereof and the acceptance
by the directors of the surrender of 10 unpaid shares
belonging to Roshan Din on 22nd March 1948 is therefore
clearly unlawrul and invalid. In this connection it would
be of interest: to refer to ~tt1e decision in Re. Naraindas
Lahoredas (2) where it was held that:
" There can be no valid surrender of shares that are not
fully paid except where shares are forfeited as it involves a
(z) A . I.R. (1934) Sind 39
reduction of capital, and before this can be done, the sanction c.c.
of the Court must be obtained." 1 966

ZAKAJUA.

It has also been observed by Devadoss, J. in Re. Mirza KHAN


(deceased) by
Ahamad Namazi (3) that : hisL/R MR.
MoHAIIIED
" The principle therefore applicable to cases of- surrender ~~~s
is, the surrender is good if it amounts to a forfeiture. It is v.
THE
not open to the share-holder to surrender at will his. shares., OFFICIAL
especially, when he has to meet future calls, and it is nof LctQuti>CoAToR,
HIEF 'URT
open to a company to accept a surrender of shares, unless non.vtNc,
the act of the company can be brought within the rules RANCOON.
relating to forfeiture of shares. To hold that a company
can by a resolution of its directors accept a surrender of
shares would be to allow a company to reduce its capital at
its pleasure."

The Memorandum and Articles of Association do not


contain any specific provisions how shares can be forfeited
but the Articles of Ass9ciation provide that Regulations
24 to 28 of Table A in the First .Schedule of the Burma
Companies Act shall apply to the Company. These
Regulations deal 'vith procedure where forfeiture of shares
is contemplated. It could not {or a moment be pretended
that procedure prescribed therein were complied with when
certain shares belonging to Roshan Din, H:lbdar Khan and
K. A. K. Master were forfeited on .14th May 1950. It is
settled law that:
" In the matter of forfeiture of s~ares, technicalities mu5t
be strictly observed. And it is not, as it sometimes apt to
be forgotten, merely the person whose shares are being for-
feited, who is entitled to insist upon strict fulfilment of
conditions prescribed for forfeiture . . For, the forfeiture of
shares may result in a permanent reduction of the capital of
a company."

See Smt. Premila Devi and others v. Peoples Bank of


Northern India Lt_ (in Liquidation) (4). See also the Pioneer
(3) A_I.R_ (1924) Mad. 703 at704. (4) A.I.R. (1938) P.C. 284.

'.
c.c. A-lkali Works Ltd. v. Amiruddin Shalebhoy Tyebji (5) and
z6
Ba~want v. The Ceramic Industries Ltd. Chanda (6). It
z~=A must be noted that forfeiture in the present case had hcen
~~!'i.iRdW. made with the object of absolving the persons concerned
K~~~MED
._,AND
from liability, and not for the benefit of the Company .
TWo om2ss The. conduct of the directors in making collusive forfeiture
ThE was hlghly reprehensible. It is apparent therefrom that
L~~~~R, the directors in unlawfully allowing the surrender and
C~UE'FCoURT making the forfeiture of shares had .clearly committed
R~~::O~: acts of misfeasance within the meaning of s~ction 235,
Burma Companies Act. Learned Advocate for the
appellants had rightly conceded that the directors were
jointly and severally liable for their acts of misfeasance
but he submits that the words " the Court: may " appearing
in section 235 invest-the trial Court with the discretionary
power in the exercise of which it should not have made
an orcier t6 pay the entire amount of loss occasioned by
.the Company as compensation against the directors. How-
ever. he has not shown us how the compensation should
be calculated in the circumstances of the case. It must
be remembered that in matters of discretion the Court of
appeal ought not arid ordinarily does not interfere with
the exercise of discretion by the trial Court unless it can
be shown that the discretion has been exercised in :1
perverse or arbitrary manner. Thus it has been held by
the Privy .Council in Rehmatunnissa Begum v. Price (7i
that it is against the sound judicial practi~e for an appellate'
Court tc;> substitute its discretion for that of the Court
below unless the lower Court had acted capriciously or in
disregard of legal principle in the exercise of its discretion.
Jn the present case, the _trial Court has based its assessment
of compensation on the amount of loss suffered by the
Company and under such circumsta-nces it cannot be said
that . the trial Court had exercised the discretion either
(5) (1926) J.L.R. so Bom. 461. (6) I.L.R. (1950) Nag. 15o.
(7) I.L.R. XLII Bom. 38o.
wrongly or unreasonably. In fact it has even made provi- c.c.
1966
sions for fair and equitable realization of compensation in
ZAKAIUA.
the last paragraph of its judgment. KHAN
Lastly, it has been argued on behalf of the appellants (deceased)
bisL/R MJt.
by

that the lower Courts should have condoned and given MomUED
KHANAMD
them _relief under section 281, Burma Companies Act. It TWO OTRBIIS
v.
must at once be pointed out that the relief under this Tm
()n1CIAJ.
section can only be given when the acts complained of are LtQUJDATOJI,
honest as we~l as reasonable. The appellants in the instant CHIEF CoURT
Buii.DlNC,
cage in accepting the surrender and ordering forfeiture of RJ.NCOON.
certain shares might have acted with .the intention of
relieving their friends without any dishonest intention but
their acts which' are agaipst the interests of the Company
and other share-holders cannot be said to be reasonable so
as to entitle the benefits of section 281. It has been
ruled in T. S. 'Pl. Thinnappa Chettiar and others v. ,
G. Rajagopalan, Official Liquidator of Oriental Investment
Trust Ltd., Madras and others (8) that :
"Before S. 281 can be invoked, it mu,st be shown that the
directors have acted reasonably as well as honestly."

See also Peninsular Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. H. Langham


Reed and others (9).
In the result, the appeal fails and is dismissed with
costs. A9vocate fees K 34

(8) A.I. R. (1944) Mad. 536. (9) A.I.R. (1937) Pat. 293.

'.
'.
. 111iy)F ~f~ ~J~ !''~&acbc.o f><C~b 1~:~ ,~;~
so~> brosooJ ~~ Cs~c c.a::~llre ~ l.L so~li:~soo.:>cb 1~t~ CYJc t
u(e) ~Cr ~ec;F~gsoo.:>cb ~'~ Cs~c ,
W~eB !Gtn:~cc W:)C.CJ~ r !WGhldees ~hi~GhJ w:~rof) u@cch"J.4J
0 '$' .)0 0 .) \ .>::1 .) :'.] 0 .) ~:5':::1
:c. Poocuccne>:~cc cccc:2 r l:'.o:ob uC2ccel:e~,:e IW :)~:&:h"J(bcbco
.) e " e o .> .> \O ' O\ .> &-1
c.oo_,cbwcccb
.) .) 111:1:11~
r
o'J :::~ IOe>eshi~OIW
...~.. ::~ o
&:c.oowc.~ro~
.)
CCCC:)C~e>:~rol:o
.) .) .) o
ccbe :CCOC!X.~CI)el II II OC.t"):)OC.nl) C.C.O~IO:) nlre:t:;J&:cl,co
.) .) ~ vi. ~ O':j
od
-, \
ur~r (.C) G~~co:~bc:>o;c.fl.l.tJ te CCllc (r)
.) .) :""l' O ~0 l::J a.
,,cu c.c ,r ~ sntc.ruc~o2?~~c.fl~g (c)
11 LY ~_":"J 1! v 1 , 1 '::13 l!. _
ooccccc~oco~ft coa;cco::>e:>oeoo w :u:oo 1::x. }~ocwc.ec
0
('r)(X)::>.J b .J O.J .JO .JO 0 .J .J 0
.) .) ::.:1
~bcchl:oo o~cco:;,Xc~:&
.) .) .)
bee ccC ftch:eoor~
" .) "
~r~vrcoo
rr~~.)
r . . .,
:o~~1 ,w:ccoo~cc~wcc <l o ((') 1t r 11 "'
I'ICCI:lce.z' b"o o~c.M>tQ:c
?'f:::> oco 1
~ .J .> o .> .> .J ~ ~ .>~ e
uC2cctcw:w
.) 0
Co@cce~r'
0 .:>
J'eco~
\ :..J:>"' .)
Cocaccehl ~bteGw(\)({J()3 ~::x.r:;;teft:cbco w&o~rwe:~ft uccccXc
.) .:>::.:1 .) 0 \.) .:> .)::.:J.) ~ .J .:> .:>
,, 11 v , ":":}0 9 0 ~- ":":} tt~
:o~ w:ccoo ocoft:to::> uu:ccocce~:oo ~
S]ec'oo w:o
.:> 0
ffi ,.ccooccco:<"cc .:>0 0 .) .J 1., .) 0 .) .) .:>
?hl::x.Q~dxo eu:oiJ:,o:oRecto :>ib:>~e!Je.ec ~cc~~ahl :owococ
~::.:J .J ~ 0 .J:::J l, .J '"j 0 .J O.J:::J .J .J::.:J .J 0
9
5J 1 1 1 1 ":"JO 1 ':"J 1Z 1 1 1
w:cc:G() CL:OC.e.G~ft~:
2 : ~11cc:cb(J) 1DCCCO ClOOOOOOO
l, .:>Ol- .JO
~:10:::>.J e.G::>OIOOOCC o .J .J e e o .> .J eo
u2cc:~cc<2b
.:> .) " o
(c) ~ww.;,:lPo (o)ww ~~:ccmcooreoccoro1o
.:> S' w ~ ~ .) ~ .., e ..,
l,ecwroecaleec~M2
.J .:>
wocft~oe:2
.J .J e
u@cchloco
.:> :..J.J
~cc.oahl
.:>
~bh:l:ol~~
l- ..>::.:1 ..> ~ ..> ""'.j
o~:bft:cbc.o :ore:::Jrecco.cuc.coe>:P.cc &:,oehl:oreec l,wc~~'Co u@cc,o
..> .J .J .J e l- .J::.:l .J .J o .J l-
1
w:c.1ft ~
n tW ~e n r
:B~WleC.Cft oo~
., ..>
:xc~:oo~"1w:o~ 10ccoocceco:ftCC
o
,. ' '' .:>o o- , e
., " .>
":":} 1 J_ 1. _':")1 1 '' ':":!
u;ccocc~e
v "P.ft:wco oc }ec.cc~}1~e>:tm::>
o ~ cc wcccc::>ceooccccft: 2G'!:r
.:> ., o ' .J l- .J o ..>..>O ..>o .J e .J
"1oC2"'~~ooo2
l, e .J
@cc:::>!Jr,..l,re~e.e.o
.:> .J:::l'!" ..>0
~e~i;:coowrowoe
o ..> .J
::>o:x."'~=~ecw
.J .> .J o
111 n IV ,, r ~ ' 1 ~ V' _1_ _ _ 1
f"'W:c.'"' w ccceco:ft<C P.OO ~ wcs-~: ecorocc~:axo :ccc ::>ew
0 \ .JO 0 ..> 0 \ ..> 0
@cc:&e&lecft5o
.J
woc.ft~::>e:2
.J .) &
:r:;;t~el~~
e'j
l;c@o
0
~:>&:coowcr~
y .)
u@ccGhl
..> .J:l
n: r v1t 1CC:otl~ (JJ ~ ~GCDeCO , (1 1n
0(),CC0S'IW~I" 1 n
::>.) :C.OOWC.IC\)~@C\):)6'lft::>ce:>
..> .:> .) .) .) 0 0
COWie
0-.) .)o.J .)
cohl~eehJ u@ccecchl:k C:o~"'~bcoocu@ w:::>IJ:coo:cb~R&eo ucccdw
.J ::.:J 0 .J \.J ::.:J 0 .J .J ..> 0 .J:::J .J-'0 0 .J .)
~!, a:!cc:o!J:c.oo:o:~Q
.) .:> .,::::~
Cc::>C.ft::~~:dD
.,:..; 0 .:> .) 0
W:dft
0 \
IWeccewccbJ
.) 0
~hlcc!;('be>
.J::.:l 0
l _ ":"J J_ , 1 1 ~ 1 r 11 , r 11 IV ~ n
coa;CC eWc.o::cewc.~~ CCCX) BGW ftOOOC.ft:' > :':>'e.GW Cft:C.tft IWG :::>teCC
.J '\.) o .J 0 O .J .J 0 \ .J .J
_ 1l ':") _ _ 1 n 1 1o r r I! Oo
o~cocc uu;cc:C\...-~Wo.x:t:J'>COO ~:> :c.c:ooco~
.) 0 .J .)0.) .) .J
00
wee::>..> :ccx::cc~WGG .J .) ..>.) .J 0
- IJ:
:c.ooro '~ to~ecoow tl. " ~!3
, wsoCUft b wtecoft
n r :oc J~occwo:>cce~cee
.J .L o .J .J .J .J
..> 1!1..> 1o v\
] _1_ __ 1 1 "' 1 1 ] ,. tr 1r v
CCC:> wc~ca:: ~oo uo~:c.o::lCOoro 10~
.J ::x. e>ft'<DW ft::lce~o oc.
.:> .) () .)0 .)0 .) 0 0 .) .J J.,
"m'ft.ffi wreeccoo.>cc
.) .J
::x.h:loohl~l,ec Ito"&@"' ISe:c.ffl~ro:oc.Roo;ro a:!cc
.) ~ .J::l..> \ .J ~\ " .J .J ~ .J .J
~3"~ w:h-lec:Cbcodx.c.:e ~c@o thooe~ec tb:~o~ w6t~GW
0 .J 0 .) .J :J O
:c.r"'\Ito e'j .) .J

9~ u2cceob<PWC,J:J
.) \ ..> O .J :)'.j
bee eo6 ~Crn~"'CC.;>d,
.:> ~
:@ro(o ..> 0
1-I;:;JCCIC'l~.u:J oQolrdoe :c.ec::>Cft~:~!cW lealCCC~obocohla~
sstlc ~ ~.... 3~ .J::l.J ..J .) .J () 1, .J 8 .) ::I .
CCC
rcc
( ('c be:c.cnruc.IED~~b~re.._hl)
.) .) .) ~.j
r
n'l:
.>
(:c. re&:c.cn~c. fro~
1
4b~re~hl) c 10 :4&~c.e.c~h.> ~c.es~eccru
0 .) \. 0
.) .).)~ 1.. .) .)
1r 1..10 ecc
,.
( ..1..1eeJ)
C' C' OC" C"
IIC0(1)GC0?(1) ~CCGCT.>?
g ("
e::::oGmJ? II
Gee
, ._
S.bre::xb~;:;::l,.....MJ
.) .) :;"w.)~ ~:~Gc.cc&;Jc.o
5::J ,) ,) :..:J 0h..:c.ro:~c.ol;:ree>
e.:J.> <2cc'Co&:c.ro
.> 0 "'
coc.fcue> ~~r~sc.CX>COOJG~...o
.) ,)
tBcc
.)
cooe> toe> ::>C.o o~r~~ro
.>I...J,.> J.I \
uC2~
..)
r ~~ wwu;o ~-':':1- ,.,.
sJ :x.ree>ooxncc ~ r 1 , no ,,
o I:c.coo: :x.ro~ co:u:a.nsco
,) .) 0..)
:..).) 0.)
t:..).) 00.>.)
l:obc.cce>ohlcofecn~~b
.) ..) ..) ::1.> ..) ..) c.~c.bc.cx,:c.~ :::f""' t:obc.cce>ohlwreC2b
..) .) ..) ::J, ..) .) .3.l.b
re::xb~~hl
.) ,)
~Q~~'l,.,
.)~ .>:J ,)
<2cc:c.rtY..orea>Xnh:>
..) :..:1...... ..) ,) .) 0
uC2ccbC'
..)
oe>eoo?tiW
0 .) .)
wcccc~~:lrcoc.c
o .> .>
C2w..ure;m
.:> .:>
~eo&:c.(X)(O(.fcDe>
!j Yo .>
:@ro=Xo:crflWrec.oC2o
.> .:> .:> .>
11:1
;) ,.,~,
a..)cofto::core:c.h.l~C'a
..) ::::3..> c.cc~~hlc.oOO .,o~MOO>b
:h , cr (\..JJ:>
Jo1 IO~e
..) CgtJc
;;)
u@cchl::>co c.~:c.cc:r, coolre~e>~e>
,) :.33 0 .)
cco~oo~
..)
wc.oo~wro
.)0 .) .)
lk@o C.OC2ccb:o&l,c.ll
0 ..) ,)
C2cc:oQ:c.oo!;CO::,
..) .>:::1 0
:c.!;ooo
..)
v ~ ~ 11 ~ ,. l ,__ '::) }
"'() IOe>c.c:C.IAC:C:C.OOC/X.I(\)e> X
1e>(X) 1::::<:. . ~ zc.e
]~OCCCD cncc:CCO
5 ..... ..) .) 0 ..) ,) ,) ..) ..)
:o~cnc:c l:::>l:ll;:coocnowro ::,hlwreC'OSC2b c.cce><ko~ll
" .;~::;:1'".> .>:::lo , , 'J::l.> .) .) .> .> "
:otoc.c
.>o
2oob:>:l',oro c.c:ce>lc.oo11J~~co~::::c.u
.) .) 0.) . :..:J.> .) .) 0
.)::>m (l~) .)Goc.c 1c co~c.urec.U!rc.ue>
,) .)
IO~~~wb
1,; ,
.,
cf rot:J~ IG~ Cave I::X.h.l::l:X:Cibc.ero J.~ccoo:lrcoc.c
e1 ., ;;) , ::::3 ., ., ..... "J... .,
v "- v 9
:xD:C.IftoecooJ:ow c.cc~sc.oo
o ,, " ':':)"
I()~ sorocccoc.c ococowtec.u:rw~ r"
::>~sflro
,J -- ..) .) .) .J, .) 0 .) 0 ,) .) .>0
1ohl,n~c.c c.cc~MhlcoCo
~ :,j,.t. ., ,,~,
c.ub:~c.c
o r A:.:,..cccon
r , ~~~c.ro:CC~nS.w f;':j
.) ., ecce>:~
h.le>'OO uxh.l...:d):x:o c.~.C2cc~hl:::r;;Jh.lc.rooc.re:xncc8xno
0 ,J
ab~ .)x ::::3 .) ::::3"' .) .) .) :J .) ;::1::::3 .) .)
w:c.ro:flr.J~(uc.cc~ w&c.csboro ~'CoM ::,hl:fx.cc~ C2cc:c.r~
o ,::::3..> o .> ~ .J Yo oo .>:J o .:>
&:c.c:oc.cc.l'lu::~
.) c.uc.fc.uocc:::l olre~~s~coooo~ c.uc.oooo.>ro !;c@o
.) i ,J ..) .>0 ,J .) 0
~- .. o. ,. 1 ~ ':':1 __ 1 _ ':':1 , o _tr ~'=~
II et;(.~l:){.O!) CDO~ICO :et::l\X.t)et;CClC.COc.eCCOO::XU::::>o et::CCO
.) 0 .),J ,) 0 .) 0 ..) .) .) .) .)
~ccL~J:yb:c.~eo i-o:c.P~~lc~~ ~~t><.j) <b:WJo:fu scc~
.>~c.co~:d.Xc
, '
'ee.cc.ccowd,~
l. ,)
"Cc 1fl;:;:IQ nC2cc,l.oo
o o1~":,j ,
b):,.J;;lbOO:,ro
., ...J 5:::.1 .,
~:c.re::>1\
::.~ ., ., o
tbcncc
., .):XC<e2hl
., ~ .,~hi:F.ro:~Co
:::1 ,J ;) WC.~::~:hlmoe~tu~
.) .,
e:J.> ., ., , o~:c.re.~CC~n !::,t)!cc
., ...J
~'!>k<kblc.c
0 .>::.f
:h.lc.ut;:c.e::~
~.:>
C2cc:c.r~:b~()(\):c.ee>
.> .> .:> .>O
i:l~::lb 1: C2ccir.(J)hl
YO .> .> 1.> .J::J
x h.l~:?b~::~:x.c.e~<e:hlc.c w:c.r~4w ~.:~:ot;:b::~hcw~:2~. &oc
1100~(.6~ J :=:J .) .) .) .) !j 0 .) y ..) 0 .) .) .)
0
, ~ C2cc:c.Poccc::~cc w1erc.dobo IC.~:o@h:l~coccc>~ 'W:c.Pt~:C28o ~ kcce>cc
():>C.<X>l!~
lcc .> J l. .> o .> ~~.>o.> o .> .> 1
~ , J i!. __ . 1 ,. 9 r .11 n_,.~_ rr. .1b '=! L I! '?!. _ '-- _~
oo: WOUJCO CCCOOO<D ~:?W~ co:~lflCCIC.COC.UC.J(\)0 IIU:CC~a.:ccCC
.) J 0.> 0 0 . .) . ,J .) .) ,) 0 0 .)
c 10 , r o ,, 19
" . :cro:rocoflCOroecoc.ro~ :'.lCC ~
:oc. 1'!> :c.~
n ~col):c.ee>
~rooc.ccl!lw o ., ., ., ., . s ..> o .)
.,oeoc.c.eoomrocc e. ..)
0
., r,)
1 Lo
Cc:loooo
o .>
Mw!!-b
~ .>
:C2~w~
.>
WCG(\) IG~ooo ua?cc~ewc.~
'S' s -- .:> .> ;:::3 .>
ecc
'
(..I,e~) aoc.Rt'!>!i-co!!-l~Cc:oo
.) ::::3 0 0
co:d"'l;cbc.c
,J ..)
0
c.cc~:c.e~eowcb~:c.tt
..) ,)
.. U!cch.lerc.co
.) ;::j,
s"cc~t~&u .,wc.rro~ oCc:~c.5<b::>~ .>o .>
c.u'eo:ob
o .>
'Wa:x.h':lob~obeob
o .J -~
~d<rehl~,
.>o .> ..> :..:1 .>
SIS!~ oOOC.C <2cc:c.l\,:c.l"lCCoOOCC IC.CO~o!)looerocoec.c ~'""b(');h"J,'~:ree>
;);;) ,J .) ,) 0 ' .) J":T"" e.:J'.)'"'
be~
occ
'8l-:l ~~~f~~~ f'i=s~o.,U, .fJJGC~ ~~~flO r~:.
0
sob ~ g~~ l:~ilc c.:#:/i> Ue ~ fla~.,d., # ~~ilc !
. .~(e) ~~ .~ ~'~~soo!xb
re c~ac
11 ~:~a::2
.J .JO &
:r.:lhl3~b:oecu
&:j 0
"cu~c.c~be~(.(X)CJJC.rro!l~::>oe::>Q
.,) . .) ,) .) .).:.;.t
I :1->oCD ,Q cc.o&t)u u.)cu~c.c&:c oo~crro~~ooe::>Q
oe e .) .) .) .,:,:J
IIW\,
. r
..
of roil]~
?1
( tt :c.oowc.
.)
Fro:!S.b:>ce:>hl)
.) ..> .)~
ore
,
.
~~~~tti9
.I.gc~
oi.)
g:g:dgxe
ss.ac
cf~
..iJ:toi li ~
5
~
re, ~ t~
c ~s~~
dh -Bo 8-, ~~
c s l~~~
s 0')
g., ctl i ~

. ...._.. v . .o~ . ~CCJ ~

0
t ~ '8' !_q -.? ~ 1r. ~ gj B
gm o ~o ~Y. iI o0 c ...-.. .-g,
.. OS ~ (B., !?"' ~
~i~~J~ ~~~~ ~l ~c~-g,
~ r~~l fi.;;- cth:: ~1: ~ j irl1 i 1 r,t i "'t ~, "%-~ ..
1~tft1f
0' ~~~
...._.. --c
~ JT 1~- t1t~t~~t~ ~~:t!
~"1-c~
~
~$~~t~~
-8
~1':Fl ~ ~ ~
-e C 8 V, C'Yl '
-8 ~ v. g
5 j
g., ~
. ~8~ :r4i ~~ ~..e ~ ~ .,. cg ~
w . ~
.
s +o &
oS .v, re., 3 a
'fQT~~~~f ~~~ ~j~~,A~t ~ ~
~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ rnJ ~ ::&, -~ 3-l 8 t -g, ~ ~ i i _
~- t . !l'>
C!b ~ ~ ~ _g_ . re. ~~
~~ . .J 8
.rr. t~ ~ ~'*' ~4tl~ i~ ~ ..,!, :~ !~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~

.e [B., -e [B., . c -C "S ..C [B., ().) .m C'Yl 8 -e a

7'
N _
~~~~c.8f~
0~~
.;)
~F *
ss~
~r~
nX~:xe~ffi -~}sc:~:~&:cbw:O:xD !fir:> ~~\~
wb IJ (\)~ IG~~ b~~c c.ccoc.o8re~
,) ~0 ~ ;;) ,),)
cc ,)CO Ace ~~h'J~
o.::J,) tote
j
r;;)l:l~C t
I (C:V) f -"Ae& ~~~s~ l~'e ssvc
II
r
o1J:
,)
u@ccGhl~~C'o
~ ~:.:~~
1 ":'"l J 1 ':'J trc ,, 1L"-b r 011 "P
(()O::CCe!~CO~CO ICCCCO~<Xl OOWCOft ~I:Xn! ~CG GCO::>OOCG C.GC.ICO~:c.ro
.) '\ .:> .:>0 .:> 0 .:> .:> .:> .:> .:>
e2ccchltcdG~a.iboxlCocotu C2cchro c~ i::>~co&!h:lfb]Q},J~"rec.u&
.:> .:>~ .:> .:> 00 .:>0 .:> 0 .:> 0 .).; .:> ~~-~ .J
II 1 ':'J 1__..:\ ib " ,.:> 1' r1 ~111'2 1 .l . l
I!):C.I~CCOOXCCO ICCCC<OC\:JCCCO ::>0~ :C.CCI(')(.l)CO COC:C::>~CO:.JO! CCCCIS'~
;:) .:> 0 .:> .)O.J .:>.:> l..>O .:>0.>00
~ccGhl:::~ero
.:> .;,:) .:>
:c.cc (tJ.hlb:J)
:_jo
"::>:~rox~::>
.:> .:>
ecc.co::>xft~~:::~b
.:> .:> Y .:>
,:,hlcc
.:>~
:::>C.<O::lft::IOO~::l whro IG~ teccc.cc~~Gh:l::x.h':l~cccocb~:c.tc rohro JC~
.:> .:>0 0 .).; 1, ~ .:> ~ .:> 0 .).;
~ 2 '"'J lr n , n ,. 'L ,. 1:1 " ,.
<0:)0! IICCCCI:lWICOeCOC.ro~ WWteCOWC.W~W WCCC.Oie<OCO II!)C0
.:> e .;, o.:> .:> o ..> .:> o o .:> .> Yo
(~c.hlro) ~CO:d 0~
~ -:,jo .:> e ~
(f;lohlro)
~ :,jo
: 2c.cctu I (0c.hlro) ::~{):2 ll@ccecohi:ee
e o !..lo .:> e ~ ".:> :J
, ":'"l 1 " It r ~,,
(()O::CC~~IO~ 10~ C.ft:X
C.G!C.o:)CX) ]~00 ..,
cccce:C. J::>CO
, !C.e.G::>o:
1!7'2 : CC
.:> .:> 1, .J,.; ~ .:> .:> " .:>O .:> e e
tore C2cchlo
l. ~ .:> o
IC~ ewre::>bG
.J.; .:> .:> .:> e
IWC.~~:hlocc:tc
.:> {,j.;,
w:h':lec:Cbco:i!be.c
0-J lk@o
o
1 '"":I 111 l o '"'] Q 1 oV (I ~ Q @ \__ ...<1. L '":I
WO::CC::lO!iJWeGCCCCft ::lCO~t'leG ~eC.CC!t'lle!ft COCO II CCeo::ww COCCCC
o .:> .:> o- .:> .:> .:>o .:> .:> ~o .:> ~ '\o .:> .:>
10~hl li::xw~~::>~~::> c.&ccc::~~'J.Cit'l :::~IJ~:c.&; ::~hxow:~b 11 C2cc
l. .:> :J ~ .:> .:> .:>o!..l .,:::b .:>O o .:> ., .l
1 " _ 1
l _. o L l _ L ___ i!.. r ~ 0 1
reWOJ:x
}~:oe:.:>O....i co~c.ccco:::>~ ccoecoc:c ::>co:o cooco1c~
(j- .>
.:> .:>0 .) .)0 .) .) .) .) .) 0 .
'":I __ II' 1 1 'II' Ll 1 V n
IICCCC QCOCOCIXJCO~ mtOCO(()t'J ee.Go::CC~l:::OOoec.CC:t'lte
;) ;) '\ ~ l, ~ ~ ~0 ~ ~
v , '":I ]_ _ _1 _ 1 , 11 1 1 , '--~1 .-. ,.
ICCCCIOOJ<D::X:O!S'CO~CO WCCC.S'G~WeCO:>axnu>
!t'l COCOO!CU X
}~
.)0 ~ ~ ~ l. ;) .) .)0 ~ ~ 00 .:>0 ~ 0 .) 0
u@cctoGhi:::>IJeeo:\,e,ro~b tohicc:oe:c.h.loto !C.CGCcteo!;:2 :h':locc.{; W
~ l. .:>:J .:>:::h " .,:J .:>O ~.:>o o ~ e 6.j
(ocJJro) 0
:.:Jo Oro IC::l :bdb~CCO
""' 0- ;)- -
c.fl@cceC'o:~
;) \
wkc
0
IWC.~:hlocc:'tc
.) oJ::J
1 1 o lr 1 1 b1 1!: ':'::1
GCU~ <OCOC.C\XO:C.CCeG~ Wl:::S'CC ~0 !OW ~C.CCO
00 .)
s .).;
IGO !0~Llf'o 0 0
':'] r Olr ~ ~':'::1 0.1 Ill ~ 1o ltv
llcccce:OOGco::xlt"l~ w:~e wcoo~gtw o:ccGn
.) '\ .) ~ .) .) ~ '\ 0 0 ~.:>
COOOeG~bO~CG!~<XlOOCO
.) .) .) .)0~ ~
~00 ~~ wreroOO II @cc:c.cowc.i'roo to@cc
~ .) .) 0 .) ~ ~
':-l l_
, ,_ v
11 ~ vo "
ro:x:cco :re cocccc:x>: :>~t'lc:G
COOJ<X)~eJro
1ntWCGo:ro .r: tJ. ' :)ec.cc:t'lte:ft
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 ~ .) ~ .)0 .)
r:,Qcc~hl :,.J;;le&:boro ~GoOOO.,re::>to w:c.rt'l!;cbesb lll'ocotoo:-J;;Je
5:.1 ~:.1 s:::h ~., ~ .) .)0 o , ~.. ~ s:::h
:~co~to
.) ~0
w&x.. ~G~w~co::X.ocotu w&xs&!cc:~cco
.:> .:> 00 .:>0 ~ 0 .) .)
oc.t'lo:~&.xt'lo
~ ;) ~
~e.c
0
l~'""Jb , n 1 b D , ., n 1 ot o n ~ v
w:c..tt'l:ro::~ G ccccere::>6)((lt~CG w~~cc~c.cc:t'lJe:t'l coro
.> .:> o ~ e .:> '\O ~ ~ l. o o .:>o ~ ~ ~o .:>
1~:~ecce
V_lL 1V. 1' il _1_1 'il~ '10 1 b
CXll:lCO~eG
CtJC06)CGeCOeG :~COO.::>c.o:o:xc :>~!o WS'W IGO :S'~!::l IIO~e
0 '\ .:> .) .) .)..; 0 -y ~ '\
_1_ 11 1 'h ~ l 1 11~ CD 1 ':l
we:x>eroro ccohe:o:roco ~:o :co~~t'l woo:~cc:c
.J
~ xro::lt'l~ '\.) o .:> .:>o ~o e
~~a.f9
~~
0'
~!,J.C~
!s"c
c;rc
F-2l
. ~~~~~ g,~cc~~ fiCO~~~&:clx.o I'
a:~cb rcnG~ ~ c ~ ~tce~:chco bs~c t .,a
auC so~!ne& to~~:chco .,a c!~
11 &ecc:2a 1 culcu:e:dscoe&c.o
0 ~
(~:cbc.o~&1ro) :f~:Ll>lG~.
~
(:crfl~~<hco~~ro) C Lo :tcc5e1c~
#~ .,~,~ a~lbcLco
..
.I
~!~
=~J.C.
!Sic
a-~
ode
'-
lr ,, ~ ]
f'eCOt.ef'!)OC'U<DC.O
.
rcc
I
~~~J.O~
~
~FJ.CI!I
.-u
~- 1h
..;)
a ("!;)
I o
Cl"'
~ CI"J
a..
..
c: '> t> CEl on R ..Bo ., 1
Stt c 8.., ..(l';~ ~ o., o., fo.gffig
a- ~I) ii 8 ... c ..., s "sc;; "'t'('B., =" .... e ~
.. (J 0 s~ I) c!! " an Cl'> '-W J
8 0 ..a 8n... 801'1 1 . cl..i s...
~~ ~ ._,, u .,B ::., ~... it '-8 . S..
~8"1-Bo B J re.if [8..,
u Cl"' 8o o .,
8~ ~~ ...g- . ., i'5.,~ l:1 8 GB c! s,,. cil e ~
-u ::g -=i '"o,~'l !=! ~ ..~or=n ..& ~ ..; g., ttrn-. c" iJ.,........... .., ..o.. 8
..g e., e .. ~ "IS').. IS,'-eo .., .., .o., v
9 ~ ee c 6 a _. c
8~
c -u &1 rue 38, as, 1z ~ r .. ';;'.a l'e: 3J ()el') 8
0 _1) ... ........
-l- , :o e-, S 8 ~ " ~ R
., rg..
I') ..., ...,
eo .., .., "jc: "" (5., u
Ol OCl ~..,

~" ..2 ~o ~ --o ~ -or... .. o:n ~- un
o.,
1 " ..
..A
0
3 ..8o
, e
n.,
_g
:::8
ro8
13
..,.,
~ ~
8
1
1~"~, e.; c;.
~
B
..; 0 ~,.,
5
8
o,., 8
.-l/lo
o,
..a; oS v .-l/lo .-9 ..g o.
18""sF ~ =,.e .-9~... = = ..a ..e .,rn., ~ ~ a 1 ~o
~ ..~ ,.c:., 2 "" ~ Q - oS a, ~~ . 8 ~ ~ 2-. "..: 1 ~ g; ,.8 3 S
..Y o" ..~ ~~, ~jl') CCJ a" I t eEl @o s, VI')
B ..
em-u S,.
~ -~... ==
:::..>w...
a~ ]~ ~S:: ..~.. 5S"J~,. " "'" !:3 ,.....-..._ o, roo
.. (._ r. o rn un = o CCl ....211 c:c1
c.:..J e
a, .. ("~;) a 0., - ~ ." o.,~ sa.. ()I') .o, 8 01)
R " ...-.. u 0 _tt_ .,.. G> .-..,
. . ~, ..AQ ,.~ o (.') -u ..; :. o .., v o,., _go"
lo = " o 0 o., v !:! .o, ...D o
'B., .....~o,l!u a l
0
~"1., ";;;" r.:B,'"e f;l >& ..
~o 8 } 8 o,., -ffll') ~.. ..n, ~
.,vo r't> 8">...!) 0 CGJ ~ ~ 9., "LO'> ;; 0 _!) 6') ~ .-C 0
~ ::~~ ..~"..a~l)j~
an 8 c:cJLoO'l (8.l ~ e., ~ ~~o &, .-A ~ w., " -t/11') 8 ..::1 ~
~:? .., e, o fl 6"1 s ~ o., <i R
.. ..6 S ~ ~ t:::. o., c;,
- u >!C ....,...., (.) ~ 8 0 ~~ s 0 .. 1.)
~ ...... J . c L:~'l('ll;) c:!:: ... 0 ..... "
c~ .. ..~;~.
.,
11 e ... ,.~ ... C c;') 8 [8cl f.B., "0 S" '=85
J~ ~
an rm ..c u .. ....M, ->~o c a j e cn 88~
;r::i, -n,; v ::E .~ ~ ~f) B" ~., ~... 1.)
- ) ,..:;) Ul J 0 ;:}
~t~~ u
~c:n ~c ru..~
" s 8a,.,
!< r:'\1 0 ~, ~I') ~ u ~ "' ~.. Q') .. ..,., 8
~ ~J c ~ 8 ~qo ..g,. ..S C&ll> ..e ~.,a. ~ e._...
8 .n,., ~'l_f! ~ ::D c: ~'>W'>~ ~ ij ~ Ve
U 8 0 CB,. u S J ... 1-80 .,l:lo ...D
.-e8
t ~ all~~ [3] ~ ..ao~. . ~, 6
960 O'l U o II
~'I 8
~~~o~ ..S,
,....... (]1
..e... De-' 0 rn 8 \,) 0B
dh .. rft~ ..ti~ e
S e.,:~.., ~Bo:: a:; ..~ =" ..._... ,o., (;B.,~ o - ~ s.. "

"'I
I
N
,
.(~:cbco
,.
~roes
) ~Q~ces~~cft~
.)
~.) .)
( ~1e~) .)rowe~~ .)
~
(~:d.xo~&es) ~e:ec~~~
~~~:xo:J.W:(! :J;;I~d,co
~ .)Soe::l
Il l~
,;).I() I~
.)
C.co001 ll c.uloa:e:clx.oe!ncc
., . .
, ,
81
. ... ..
4~:es~lc~
.JO
b:::>coft
e.J
r
:)~ ucob
.)
.)
b:::>coft .)
vr ooco!'l
e.)
(~:cbco)
4-~:es~lc~
.JO
f ~~vc
ioa~n~:~ :~&:dxo
~=~~:cbc.o
':':l ~ 'J ,, L __ ~ n r , 'J ) 9 1 9
ucc<.e :crocc~::lroe.cGWtA c.oo~:e.c:c u~ :c.ccc.ec.oroeaxco~
.) .) 0 ..) .) 0..) 0 :>. 0 ..) ..)
1
weooo:hl:2
0 0
!:>~~e:2 w:c.rocorekwroi:)'to:ob
.) JO 0 0 ..) 0 ..) ;) 0 .)
u@c.c~~~
J :=:J
oc.ealo
.)
:x~~:o~ohw
..) ~ .) o .)0
otol)~tobl:c
.)
!:>~cn~re:2 JOO:ec:2
o :J o J .) ..) o
1~0:2 ~<.C~GQ
e .)0 o ..) :=:1.)::1
I" II
n g11roc.c:
c.tA: II ..-:! 1 1b1fl V 9
IW~ IWC.I~WCC<.CC.(I)c.e:':lC.CD~ ~ o:::>e:c.e:e.~ G W!ACC
0 ..) .) 0 ..) ..) o.J.) .J 0
w . _,_ "' r , . , n flo 1 , 1 'J
AWW IJ :) CCCUOC.IO~ O~<O~GA IC~-~l:O!C
..) .J
o o 1..tee.GC.CC~CJJro~oe.G:AO::G~e ..) .) .) o .J ..) o .)OO.J.; J o
C.ft!~CD ..)wd~Co
0
l!:lC.~~~C.CO
.J ~ ..L
tn~GA
te~ .eooro:ob @cc:C.COftO(I) 0- IG~
.)OO...L;
.) 0 .) ..) .)
fl 1 '] TI 1V v I<' r 1
o~t~~:o:c cccc:cw:s-co~t~cc:cc.c t:lcocooe.c:ftC'Ce~ro~
b:J<Oft rwro
.) ..) 0 J J 0 ..) J 0 .) OJ 0
~G:ec~ c~ !:>~:~:2 n~e&:>c.c~wc.c :c.wto (oc hle) oo:h.:2 !:>~ (r hle)
..)0 ...L; J ..) o ;:>' J o :J. e .) :J.
~:2 ~c.c~lfv..Qe.ccc~wccc.cw
.)0 0..) :=:10!:1 ..) 0 w2o:c.o:b
.)
ohlro
-? ..J
hle) ~G:w~
(a :J. .,>0
c~
...l,;
..)!:>~ (c hle)
:J. d~e:2 ..) :=:1..):1 ..)
..) 0 ~c.c~ohl:obe.cccft 0
toc.w~~c.G:lco
..) ..)
::lc.~~:c.e:ft~
.J :=:!
ohlw:ACCft~
.)::1 e o o
w(c~eA
o JOOw
JC~ :~.;>~:~b
o :>' J
Mbc1-o:2
..) ..) e
:cw:obJ
twb:)<Oft
OJ
(&;soc!h,~;~a;)
b~" (CC:>) .
0..)1
ofc.ocoM
..) ..)
~():(! + ~O:eJ:;~ IC~
..) . 0 ..)0 ,..~..
c.co:>sC!
..) 0
~?
C' , C' C' C' Q Q 0 (' (' C'~ ~ (' Q C'
:Dcorool ~roGo:>~ro;;,Jro :Do:>:::n:~ GO'.jfc;or;~(lt:Je!~CI e:u;;:<t :>eGG-
'f'OOC' 0 C' C'Q C' C' C' C' 0 C' f:C'r-' C'
G!31~c~~;;O?l0:>2: I:IO>C'):Jn: :Do:>ro ?. ~m~c ~c~:O:D')C:!:j~o:>t?t
a:YJ'J:Ga::>c- c:3T~:m8t
o
:J:tnCJc:.c;;()l
{:, - J1
C'

Go:>?C:<.UGY:O?:<;)G
II\. 6
C'
-r

'JY: GOI O)CO):l)


A
OC'
G:D:O~O)COIJ

c.:. II c.
\
I

o
l

:');o.s:e~c GOI Y0.;\0':><:1 G::oY :


T I.J I ... 4
J
C'
:DGicll?:
'T'
b
C' C'
rC'
:DGY<:l:Dc'CI~
A
0

C' o C'
G(J)I:O'J
f.l 4J
'f'OOC' 0 ~<:.
U. lJ -Jill
m .. ..
~
~~
c r o c C'Q c- o c -rooc o~ o o o r;:c ~ c
9(;[9"JO?.mo:>~: YO')C'):l:>2: e:o;;=<tG!JII:ICy~c:t ro~o:>~:~:~oGt.j"')C:
00 (' ('.' ~ (' (' (' (' (' (' (' ( ) 0 ('
::>.~?:ro2: roro;;,;:c;;t.j')C: OOC~?:o:>211 ~~c'<; ~roJC. ~ oa~~5
0 (' 0 (' (' ~ (' (' 0 (' ('
~..,:~:GY:o-:>:o:>::nrooo:>c ~~v:~s?: GY:o?:
O)(;:l.s ~o~roc;o:>?ro::n:
o U t> 6 T ~ \. IT o l C
c ,... (' o o c~ r;:c- c- c o c~ r.~ ~
O)~G~'JC:~ ~::opt.j?:t:)~G~?(; O:>roG~t.j:l:)p::D?: :oo:>eJ?:tj:
(' 0 (' 0 (' (' 0 ('~ ("
cc:roc;;ao:>c I:):J:>~9c:~o~l?:m c;;y:o?:l:)::n ro~ro:ro c;;o:~oo, GY:c?:~o~::n
t
o
y:oro
\. ~I o
roro;;,::~c:
ccc ~ roo;,:y-.>,ro
0
C'\ 1
\.
"
.
6

co~o~:in:o:>::nrow:>
6
U
co
u c.,
l
ffi lOCro:l:>::nu:> Be?
c- :o:
OC'
c.:.1.\. \
o
l 6.
t:!.

,..li; C' C' C"O Q C' 0 C' C' 'T'(;":


OO?"PI CJ~~ro2: YO')C9~'): e:o;;:<toa NCI:)U)?:ro ~coroG()I tio
1
(' r,:;::: (' ' (' (' ~ (" 'T' " (' ~
!D:;lj~J?:Ge;j?~ ~:~?:~o:>~ or.~~Gt.j?C: GOI GOiroGf<:1111
0 C' 'T' OC' ~ 0 ~ C' " C'O _c;:
~~.C <0&1 G~~COI oe:~ G~Gye:J:ro ::l)O');:))~ ro " I:IO>C')c:J
OC' 0 C' C' C'O ~C: C' 0 0 C' ;rr.: C'
~~f~2:G'}0?')~:~1 I:IO>C')c:I:O~~ e:~c:~ G() tjCO?::l:>2:m0>
~ C' c cc u Q C' ~c;: o C" o C" C' C'O C:: C'
Ge:J?C:I O)(J)GO:>::l ~ e:u;;:~<:~:D~:~Gt~2:9C?')C:~c I:IO>C')c:1f'JY2:
"' C' r - ' C' C' " tt C'O ~C: f C" 0 C' C'
IJUI:))~mCY.lG~?C:: ~:))~ ~ IJO>C9CJ IJO(\)'J~OO:>C:J:>O)~?S
C'O~C:O r;:c 0 9 (' '1'00(' r.:(' 0 C' G C'
YO')C')~IJ:OYJ?::D~V G':O?:Y:O e:u;;:<t:;OI YIOf~C:JC y::nm9c: e:~c;.
'T' OC' 0~ C' C' C' C" ~ C' 0 r,:;::: C"
c;;~, c;;~:o;;O?,c:;w .pY~p:ro~: co~an::l:>e:roro~e_j?C:t ~~'D?<.:
~ (' ce c- 9 C' ~c: o o o c c c or;::, o o
lc:IJ?:-;;el?~t YO')C'l::U2: e:u;;:<t~ rogs~o~o:>~:~:l<Jo:l:>e::;qcr-=<:f? urgs~

ro5~?:du
C' " C'O ~C:
O:>mGO)Q) ro " 0 C'
3li:IGt~e:C'\O'Xf:<JtC
Q C' C"
I:IO>C')c:J~~
C'
y ?Y2:~
C' 0

o (' -rr.: CC' c- (' ~,,.$.$. C'o ~c: c-r;: c- c c-


e:~c:t.J? Gt:ll tlcx:>?:tjc:~<; OO)...t.J\ '":!) YO')C')c:l OO'X:~O~ GIJ?CO>CGjl
r.: ) OC' C" C" C' C' C' C'O OC"C'
( Q)t1 o j m :D0000?-:~0?9:: ro?G'PmGro')('l)<>~ero 1:10>c'l'P ~1:13
0 f:!:' 00 C' C'O ~c;: C' C' 0 0 C' r.~ 0 C'O r,:;::: C'
Y~X.~C: Y\:IO?UC YO')C'lf:t:O~ f ?1:>2:~ e:~C:t.J?G':ti: GO:~YGeJ ?C:
(' (' ~c: (' (' ('0 (' (' (' (' \ ('
ac:roc:co?:c:tll
J1 OO'JCO)CGC\1:1?
At J YO')C'\:D?: :DOI:>!l'XlC:
-- t
GO>?OOQ):O:o:>::n
u. u.
C' ' 0 C' C' ~ 0 C' OC'
~:>:~NI:>G>? U)<l(J)O),!'>'JY~'JK\)C: : GO:I:IO:>:'DOO ::>c:~;n O:>:O?OYml
tJ o l LT C J 6 C:. l J IJ
oo (' (' " " Q (' _<:. 0 (' " (" (' ('" c: ('
~~~C II :x>O)G:))::l :;> e:u;;:~c:t:D\:IGf<'?.e:G,~?')C:ti IJO>C')CI f ?Ye:;
, (' (' r C" OOC' C' r,:;:: (' 0 C" C'Q C'
IJUIO:>::D<J'J(\):'D: o:>:l::o:O:>:'D(J) lciOC~C II ~:O(.l)~,O':l"X:OOGO:>? I:IO>C')O:>:'D
C I c:, It 0 C.:. l t t "-' 1. C
(' (' C' OC' C' ~ OC'\ OC' C"O 19C" ('
~12j:') Q)~OGCO?CT.>O"'...C ~blGOO?Crol : :D\:IXSCO::o:>I<T.J<Y.l1 C ::>12")~ ::>~~~
t.:. r a.J 6 IJ o T '- \J - n- \:..v.., '-J
0 l C" C" r.: C"\ C" Q C" OC' Q (' C' (' _!::
~00)")(\) 00 'JOX:t~ l:l~~:))2l e:o;;:ct~Gf ~e:G']~X)C:S qc:c:w
(' co ('
( :> ) O(!Cj :> ~I '}f~f)C<:X?:t G? CjCj:JII
0 J_ II
II :C.~~() I~ I err)~ C.CD3flll 11 c.uc.owe:ClJc.oecow
.) . .
V 1 _1 II
"~c.fl~:h:.:2u 11 c.uc.owCI:I:Cill co ecoe.c
.> e .) 0
CDOIC:a
..> t; e
~:I~!;Oj'Oitfx>l~ :~&Kbc.o
v 11 J~
ttecnwn:wco

utl~ c. ~~o r (c)
~soot.t=g
r
~'I
,rco:cc~lc~
U3"0(_C=~
r
0'1'
.;)
_rco:a:~J,C~
-:I
9 . 1 _l_ -- "
n
.~
c.ocou;oo:CDCDecnm
0
* (e:cbcoe&iw)

1r 11 _,_
nemWCDO_,CD
:>
, I
,
SO~:
~g~~~f~ 3->J~?cx:f1 ~1~ F~ ~fw~ Lt~
cr "->~F~ # c3~ ~ce~re~ fU ~1i~~~ '!a Cs~ t
II (e) eCf ~ ;;~~soo~ ~~~e Cstlc
11 ::>Vt1c.c:2 s~hl5::>b:he.cn ~tc.ulowmcr.l)ccc.c.oosr,
.)o:J 0 e:J 0 ~ ~ 0
u~ cc.osuLo~u nFc..o~b~:c.co~c.r"'ofb~os~B
u:c:c::>:J.cc: uwloeo~:c.cowc.r"'e.b:>ce:>CJ
.l J .,::J
s 2u 0 ,) ,)
tee
(e:Cbc.oe&ies)

:~reccce>
.:> 0
r
::>~
~
(~:Cbc.o~tnes)
YO
0 J . - 11
wcoeoe:c:DtOec:ow
~ . .
cs~ :.
ll@ccroe>
,)
e:c.cxxoc.!Eu~rc:&
, . ,) 0
c.ubcob .:>
tJc rot~ .)
l'c~~
,)
Ct~tlc
:J
11::&:~ !.;
':5", roc.c~Pco:ftl'co
.)0 .)
I!I:~COOOft ~ ~b:oocor{)(O() 1bec CC ftCb ooolrec.c:ob rb:ll\."a;
~- .) .) 0 ' .) .) .) .) 0 .) .) " ~!>"""'
l:7~ol3l:lc.cce>:dt'Jec
:. o ,) el
lohlcccoere
.)~ .) .)olrec.c:oc.hl&Q
.) ~ , eccceooolret;b
.) ,o .) o :hl:oe> 01
:bk.od,~c.o M:~ccce>ce c.l,olPec.c:oc.hl&Q (e) eccococc ~cc:o~
o.:> .:> Jo .:> .:>~' .:> .:>
:oc.hloco &e~c.oeCoo:: w:OO:c.ec:c.Pt'J!>6 ~ccMbb:::>b co::x:ec.~
,) !j ' 0 0 .:> 0.) .:> .) .) v
., ~ o n ., 1 . 1 1r " n
ccc ,, c.ucoec:c.rft::>~ro
.) '
r::> ccoocoe> :x]-,e:o~ , c.ccorw
.)
000'~r rJ
" .) , 1 n 0 ' .) '1 0 '1 r.:> ' n .)n
:::>e>:OIO~ OIW 000 CC ::>~ c.ocoesc.oocorocoJe IOIW 000 0
,)1, ,) .) ,) .:> .) .)
' c" ::>e>
r r 11 o " r n 11 ' 9
(0L) ,)c.oftaleCCe>eoCC
.) .)0\'0ICO
.) 000' 0 Oe> cocoeccoOOJroc.oleiOICO
.) .) .) --y .) 000 01:1 v 0~
r IL. ' 9. 9 r 0 II C_l '0
(c.l) COt'Jesecce>eoCC
.) . .)
IOICO
.)
000 0 0~ WC.OeGCOt'JCOOOWie
.) .) .) .)-
IOICO
.)
000
. OC Oe>
r II cr '1 l .)_ ___ ,,
(r) ..>C.Oftesecc~cocc .)
IOIW
::J
ooo oe> o.:t cc::x:ec.eoroft :~e
coe:o.xoecnes

., r r
cocoe.coJco ueesc.cc~:cee>oo
n ooo' oc .,o~ coocococoJe n (c) c.c:>fJe.ceccococc
,) .:> .),).) .> .:> L .:>
:~At'JigCOCCCOO
.:> oo'S'.:> .:>
o~:@&, I!I:O<:eCCOCOO
.:> .:> !!- .:>
AlU CO~O:~ro:@oo
,) e ' .:> .:>o .:>
C.CC~tc
.:> o
uC2ccrool:ehl
.:> .:>
o ~ ~cc1obte~:chc.o L o \
Oc.h"J~
J -~
c.cce>~I!'>Mbbob
O.) .)
ooo'o~:~'c
:J
!>~!'> ilooe:<bco

cbc.u1:o:o~:obc.c
.:> 0 .) .)
bwb .)
t.Jr
, n 'C~ ~ n r9 . TI 1rbr o 11 o L
roc.ccc.ccoc.es~ rc\'e v DC n ft~e o~oocccco oocooo c.ucoec:c.lft::>::>:oo
o .:> .:> e .:>o .:> .:> o .:> .:> .:> .:>
icbe:oe>cdoooco tooPco ooo'oC ~::> becc.okoC\X.OPe (6) c00c.ceCCI!'JCOX
\ .) ,) 0.) .) .) ,) . .) ,)
~:~:ocec.coroft OC.Ose>CO 9 'I. b C COC.GCC.OCOC IC!:e, 0' c~rJC COC. ~ II :::>c.. :'le .
:> .:> .:> e .:> .:> J .:> .:> .:> .:> -,
1 0 I lVt l il
:o~n 0 .)
lre rucoece:cbc.oe8-Jes
~-
Wcoc.ca:x:nro:c.ccnw
0 0 \ .) .) 0
o~:occoot'l
cc.:>0 .)O .)
(o) eccecocc Molrec.c ~cc:ochl~ (e) ecci!')(.Occ rolPC~cccoumccce>cc
.) .:>.) .) _,:_j, .) ,) 0
(co) col,ececcoo..>cc
.:> _,
co:~ceccocofl
.:>.:>e.:>_,
omle>cob be .
coco0h=:l
_,~.)
l<llt~ "0Ctlc
.
'E-:f
lt
utt~ccce:&oe ~~&, ~ ~
y ~ ' .) .>.Q .) .)
~tdcocb-kco
0 .) .;)
c.~:ot:l"emoolPe
.;)~' .;)
h!olrec.e:ob
0 .) .)
I'Me:c.t;oco .)
-::x.r,-;,~b:c.r~!>e
.) :::::.1 0
o~~ft {ot;bft
u,)00 0
:c.r<'l;~ccax.roeb:>
,) .)
w~roolPec.~
.) .) 0
t<:ft&::re:oc.hle .) :.:1
to
'
~f&l;,
.) 0
:ol:l:c.cx:hl
.,:::J
ae>~ toctl~ecr~ft
:.:i..L ',) .)
"Soo;!<'l;e
.)
o~lPec.e:oc.hl~~
,) ,) .) ~ \
( e) eccec.ucc
.)
~C. ~eta II ree:i:filft
.)' :::::.1 0 .)0....
-~CO:C.(X)CGWC.<D~ro .)
ecceaxc
,)
::>c~=;"Jee'!CJ:ol:lw&;;w
.) :::::.1 ,:_j.):::J,) ..) dxako :ccrow::;,c.h.'leb<::lClhlro;e
.) Q..) :::::.1 .;,:.:I w~ec:d<'J
.)
-co~re"td:o ~f:x~ee:oe :c.P~cc~.ccCOOJre:cl:lro a.:l.oo:leccceft
.> .) .J 6-o .) .l :::::.1 ' .l .J .J :::J .) .) .)
w::x:ec.roruft
,) .) 0
J<'lt;bf'lhlro!>e
00 .) :.:J
cdcecco&:urowreftSo
.) .) .) .) t;cdre:o.
.) 6ho~:be
.)-.l
~:@co~eco
..) .)
c.&c.rftCO&:ocoo.le
.) ,) ,)
b IC { 1c eccecocc .)
~OO>
:1
uCC<ccw
.)
:2me
.) \
~b:i:e<oo.:>
.) .JO .J
b.J'l:Xx.uPe~&
0 0 .> 0 .)
c.corw~
.> .)
~~~=~
.) .>
~~cct>~rw:ftrc.o
,:1) .> .
~cd~:ofl
,) \
l,te~~ececo
0 \.
w::Jeec.ax\}ft
.) .,) 0
a!J:Jr.ro\-~ft
3':1"~ .)00
to~cbco~wro
0 .)0.)
~~~ c.~c.oPeoPeOCC> ~hlcce:o~oco oow<'lc.ccrw~ n.hlro~
.:~ .> .l o .>~ ' .> .J .J e :>::::1 '
1
:c.ro:ob w:::>.rec.C!JC\Jft WCLlo
CCC\::.ro~:c.ooe~o :oo:xccoro
recsoo II
.J .> .>e .> o .) .> .J o
w:~c.wcoo
.>
abJ:oc.Q~e:ooeeolPe
.>00.):::::.1\. 0.)
w~b.)
be rocooh::l IG~ ~C .):::::1.)
:C2roeuolrec.G:oc.hl~ro
.) 0 .) .) :.:J '
(e) ecc

o.)oxc ,)ot:x.~~Pc.o~bb
.) :::::.1 0,) .)
c.ccorw.
.)
naireffo~
r
ooo'oc ;~ w~ec:c.rft;e.ocoOOxoo;re
.) t, .) .) .)
b 1c ,r tc co~roecc~cocc
.) .)
,broc.G
I ~~cob rc roc.<.e.,C 13~ 0CtJc l2c;c::Xcoco1".:P, Mdoore~ I..,QW
t,\ .) ) 0.) .) .) .) ~ .) :l:.:J
Jolt:=~an
(be) M
.>
f0)
\'
checc.~-oree lecce:ott:xo
.>O .> ' .> .>
~cwcoo
..>
,~'""'coo .:>Mc.b;c'
.> e '$".)""" .> ~s~c
oe&&
~aof
.
a::&JJu

3 1A
.
;, -.. ~&xc&be:c<XI~Gr~~
~ . - ~
<!~:3c.Co~
,,> -.) ~~
Jl'::>c6~:eo:2
~ 0
:~bS~a~eci1:
&" ~~ .. 0
RcU&'CC&:c<XIcudl"~
.>
~::><Botl
~ . ., ~ ~:l
' _., ..!'Ji~~f'lre~ooc:O ~ce:o~~ :ccn~;~rw.~cc; ~~~i:~
~a. :~'~:~see ~~~&~~~ it=~~ccc~f.dA&trwi~cc:~: ~~~~
c~c'.o~d:~:c.~~:~
~
t-c~beca,:cc~IW:crf'lb~IW::x.cc:~
. :~axb:~:c.<c o~
:>~ .. 61..> , ., .> ..>
kc:>ecw:~
o e ,..l
~~~ - :+obl!>CC
0 . ...
m!c:Coc.cclX'Olc:c.c
. . .) .) .)
@cc~:coowtJb,:>n
.) . . .)
i:ul'eco~:&t
, _ ~
NOa:e-as&, ~@a;:f,eQ:!~ :~aitD
, I ,--- -- 3,- ~~ --.-
~~~rWI:lC.CCO
., ~ . ~~oc~cl,ec.c.:cl,eic.lc
.,:::J,;:, :~ ~ ~ -~
ot-c~c.caal~~c.rit&l!!-l'w:.~cce~
., ~- o-
~fl.jlalrCU lu~c.o~occ r&::1'c.a:eF:c.._(c::) ~ ~~hce.M1'eo,:~m:~
-,

(e:cbcoet'nen) :~ccxec~xft~
.)0 .) .)
r
~~ .
(to:dxo~loec) ?5!c.ftf~~~oo~S2
i-c>S:~o~ti t~dxo
~e&,mc.oo~cl,
. .,)
n:j~
llG~~
?i
me.;!!
l.r~~
11'2~ro~to::'l:~ "toe.() e ecc~ ::x.~:>OQc.cc:....IJ~ d.occ
,) ' 0. " , ,) ,) ~ ,) :::1 5::J .) .>.0
'\!_ _._}_ ___ '! _ __ ~~~ r.:_<> ., , .. ~
C.CC~ftft u;Acee:coc.ocxncil I : ZOIX.CU ~::X.CC~:X.~ C'C()
. co 0 .) 0 .) 0 .) .) ~ .) .) .)
oro<2cc:ob
.) ,)
co:J;J:~cc(') 1:kl:~:bo
.) .. 3",j .) 0:1 We.()
0 "
co ,, eccocucc
..)
' !lOC.~~,
.). ::::T'.)
o
., .':1 r'l -r~1 ......: ':':! L l . __ _ 'l l BJ! ,.
coc.cc~:~t:()~ c.occo~
. 0.:1 .) .)
=~~ cccc:~o cue:ux.occot.e 1:
.) .) .)
e~(."C(')CCt=~o
0 .)0 :) . ~
cue:d:Xoetoa;

;c.q:;(7J:Jl:u)
...,.~o
1(2:2 :~d) :9Co(.O(Oc
o e e.::f""' .> .>
:x>~
.> :S'"T
11jg::
~~
~.,
~~
~
eM
euloweebe:c.ooc.uc.!h,~4b:lce:lCJ
.) .) .) .) .)::J
us~=~ :g~~b:~u ~low&:c.oos-uc.r"'oib1ce1f!J
;> ;) ;)
*.Yitcbekooc.Oc.ib,~~b~a:6:Ji
\ ;) :l>""'tuof.ro
..., ~~
'j'r
if! 11
b ~!. . . ( cc . .
K.cOOX:.~;~bxe~)
,) ;) .) ~.j
(c.Ccilcf.cC.c.O)
0
~~~c.(:,""Clixoo~@hl
.)0 3~ .s- .) :.l
!!~~
~~ i~MLco
~~~~~~
..
..f-3
81-:
u :~cc:2u
0 0
~~~,dx.oe~
.) 0
r
~':
(g,:cbco~~es) !?5e~
11' 11 1 1
AeCOWCOCOCC'tf CIKD
0
, ,
0 ,. . . ,~
~me.c coco;;
:J 0 .
(
NC2cc(x~J:u
J J 0
::>~eo :ccch~fe:KM
ao::> :JO O:J .,
:~cor001o
o1:J .> 0
<.u0'C.obcoc
0
!i~core::>be
e :J .> J e
:lk>c.ec~
:J
c.co<'nwc.w~ ~::>cW~<liQ(ClRbae&, enccccenco(JJC\) sc~l!RCO be.cc-,o'2
.J .J ~ .J~~b J \J .J . ;J'.>o
:.:hro C2a:w:::>~ Shlcce:::>a::':)JO!J <lllak.c:<..o'1:'l::xu::>h.la. ro(".;(.Coo::.:2Gt
.) 0 .) . .>:::.1 \.) .>l. .)....J
.)~ 0.) .)
.) OJ
;~oore.)Xft:;, .tta:
J
b::>eR CLJ:GJl&:.:bc.oe~:cbc.6
0 '.)
f;';j .
::>&d~CCCO ld,JOeCoeG
.)O . 0 :J
~:~
.)
zdx.o::>&e cobGre~C.t"l~ I ;.J::;]Ccl")~rco~t"l (u;,fiCGC.~~b:>O::OO CcCoro .
.>o OJ .> S:J " o ...>o .> o , o ' o
. . CCCC())~u~o Coc.o~-f
. .) '. .) 0 .) ,
c.obo:dx.o ~&.b clfe:X.R~ Jc.co!lJr...,h!ro~c:ri
.) 0 0 :i"OJ
::.:J:):::J .) :
:xr.J~Ghi:...J;;Jbc.roc.oCo
.
.) ~ .J::J ;)::J .)
Cct"leGCCt"l . a!ecb::>e6 X,h.J;,ccc~:~,":):OO? c.ooof coooreX60 . III::>Cj:;'j~
0 .>O 0 .J 0.) J ~ .) .J .> .JO . 0.) .> .) ~
coroc-> I"'QOCOCOro:c.bl:l'lCO::>QJcbco be.:C!!od C.~:;Qnax.oC\:';c.bl:~.oo t:>Co
:J 3':::J.> .) ~ .>O .) . ~.) .> :.:J .)O Yo
:::>~
.>
I;I:Jcc~reec&x.C.C~cc
3'::1 o :J e
~:~a8Co:2 ~~ ~~chlwc.m%0:ro~:~A
o J Y e
~.) ::1.:~ .)0
_r ' rb ... .lY ~ 1-1' t'::l r.J~
c;x-eco ':" ~ccro c.A0 3>et"l JCOmgc u:gc:::::J~~~ c.~cc'::::J~~
. :c.bl:t"lCC CCcctob::>et"l
:.:1 .)0 J 0 0.>
.~~o3reoC.t"lO
J 0.) .)
CO&h"JlcidXo
~
,:Sro~:k@o
. 0
.IWC.
,)
b
;hlc.~c.h:lsreoaG Co&OCCCeGCCOO.X:C l:ltol::>~ ~':d~cd~c:caJXG-f
o'J ~ .J 'o.0 o .>, Yo .) . .) . .J . .:> .:>
. .
uroc.cc~eC:occ.uCc : .;fusdxo ~~c
' .J ' .J . Yo .
.
u:c.rocc.~corere~ln c.ccoc:oc.roOO:I
. ~~.) . .) .
~~~
.J
eo:c.m.d7.
o .L.
::>fu:fo:2lBWG~
5::::1...> .J .) .)Q . .J . .:>
"S""' c~..J;J:~o:2C8cx.xto~a::>~ .) .J .) .>,o
it.b
.
IUC.NCC'IO&~o:2t2CL.l00-f
. ~ .) .) .) .).6
olx>:d.X.o
0 .
eoe:cbco
0
1iC
II :CC\XCIOOhla:::>QK.Qit'IOO . c.ccoohl~~. ::>Fcu.oe:c.bl:~co nr
\, ..)!j.):::J :.:J .)0 .)::J.) .) . \, \ ~ JO
u~crocc~}ic:~ . ~:cbco ~~~ . H,;
. u~ ~:c.rRC.c.lec.o<:.co~
.y,.,~--
,) ,) 0~
1
IC"XtJC.
_ eG~ ~CCI~ lcorcci@c.OO .X0 IO~tore~ .
... ~ , .) .) .) .L o ~-.:~c:c
11 L~ .
~
;~ ~~~~:u~ t~~:m~ oo'P=eo~sa-Xt oocp:~ o3S:'>: OfG6
~~: ~ ~~ ~:'1 *00-)~ uaE4
+~1:m:m o?'P:~e~ ~~:o:>S~:;~ 8+:"00?S~
;S~::l)~:m~ ~SooS~ID'):InS ~OIS::l)S:~t~cS~Soo'P:oS \,1~
(Q~
. ~:':(: ~. ~~ ~~=~.,:~ ~ ~01 .
~:oaf:~:
~~Bt:~~~.P~o#&p~
~~ ~~ Cr.>"f':~ o3~:'>: coc&obS:"'
. l"i'o~SGo:u~ a::n:l)~:m~~:ilJoS~:u-~r:> :l)G:m~~~s:
~-~~~~~
~00~ .&>S~oo.:e ~:ot~ .~~~,~ ~~:
(o) ~~ 84cx?=F::l)~ '"<>'6.E~S~ ~ wr~
GooS~~ ~~~ ~QlS~~~ ~~ 8~: ~~~~
~ ~~"' oo+:~ *~ .
. tS"oS:l)oS~:l)~oS:ilJoS~'l ~~&:ilJS~;~ ~~8~<1.:))~
"'coS~.~o :ilJbfloS:l)~ ~:'P9oSo:n o:>"f>:~f1:G~. ~
~~o:>S~ rofooM~ ~: o:>Sw.n:~
~~?~ooSw= ~~~&& ~~~
(~-o) 00 lol~ 8:ilt GS'mt~oo~ ~:G~: OOGOO:"'J':
(00>8~ (J~tv ~ ~ ~ 4.P& ~~
~~~~ ~=ct~=~~ el3S~t">S: 19t~:u~ ~~ ~=ct~=
o3:l)~Of OOtG_pt: GSJBt<ilJoSOO 06 oS~oro:~G:>~ G~t~
(,)~~97.): (,)~~~ 8~:00~ 19~+~~ (g)~ ":ilt ~:"?~:
~: G~Gt').)~l ~'1'<>'6s ~:"?~::))~ wS:~ +~G:m
~ m~: a?~ c;&~ ~~ +~ ~~~:
~#.a~~~"?~~~
O?oSG<&:>~: (,)~~:. c;S:c\ Bl'<ilJoSy.> ~:m~'>~~oS
~Gooo:>~ +~ ~~~!06t ~rfyy ~~~
8oS~:o:n GS'mt<ilJoS~oo cooS~~ ol3oSv~~;~ ~~:l)~ooS
~;~;i'i~~:~:mSo3=m ~: ~=~~ ~~~ ;~

(0) ~(\>) I ~0?~3~~: <f~

'. '.
yz.
I.
I
I
.) 0
~!;:; .:J~res<! ~h"J&:&c.o
~
g~~~B~o.>d,
~ o~O
..,~ lre:&.~:cLeo cc:O~:>:> ~
coc
foe
-,
v , . I. .. t1
" ICO~M:2u uc.ocowco:OK.Oecnm
~ 0
.> .> e
-. ~
....
. ..... ....
. IIwl, . ( _1_ 11 . ) Vo 1f . '"""] 1V
ftecpc.w~o
.~ . .. e:ep. c.oecnec .61e.G~ b~:re.~<b<b 1;cc<bc.co~~.ero .
0 0 . .: \ . . .) ... _.) .:J .).) .> . .
oc C\)eott
. ~
~~-
.> .
(ru:<hcoefuro)
0 0
:4~- ~ro (ro) c.ruco4t;;c;re~~
.) 6.) -.).)
.)
:. v "' ,. . "l ~" .1. __ r 1" "l ~" ..l. ~-
:)(OI)~~:c CCla.xo o~oco:sco:c: CC:cotD
.) , . 0 ~ ~
:0 " .).)
1-
II "
I
.o. .

.
. : . 3o..(d .Any -Assessee:- : . ~ .

d~ny]ng his)iabil~ty to.~ ~~sed u nder this Act,


(a)

.
. .
.:..
. .

:


Provided . furthe~ _ tha.~ ~o ~ppeaish~llli.e .against aljy.order
..:
..un~~r _this ..section _- u~~ ihe- t<ix-.-h~ bee~ -paid. ...
.. .. ..
Provided further that notwithstanding anything herein-
. . . . .... ' . .

before . contained the Government or any person


authorized in this behalf by the Government may
pennit an assessee. to prefer an appeal, not being
.an appeal. against an: order under.'sub-section f.!) o!:
seetion 46, on .payment of th~ ~x adriri~d and.on
furnishing sufficient security for th~ due perfonnlu~ce ::
of the order. that may be pa~ on ap~. . ..
ux;;~
L . Jl <>
Gro,.,r&o.,:~-~~oxni~~;;:m
)J IL ll - - T
~:h:>?:~:xhQS:<>~.,
. l fi . . . l Utg" II J
c c-~oo
-~ tj~?C:D~8G ,-
C'C'
?0 .(.0).<:: <"Q -~!;;:<" c
e~ . Gt~ttg"'I<>JOO [jOOO:D~I
~ . C' ~ C' . ~0 . C' . 0 C'
vti8"''<>JCPO oo:>?:~p:~ . o Sl:D2t may perrmt ~el D?"f"
. .: - _~h#_ pe~it_ ~~,~~- must pe~it ~~1~ cro?OSCft9~:~~~
C'.; ...:;;_-,.c:'' 'C'.:. ;_<, :; : '<.-' 0 . . ..: c-: :' o . . . C' C' . ot- :
.... <:c;a:y~ozOl . nxn<>.. oxp:(\)(JJ':>:s:m. <f=< ... croproto'J:~asxoc-r . :
::: .;;j:;;... ,\:. ~: ,::... ~. ~: ;., .. . ,! ~.:: > .
.. . . ~ ... ~. . "' ,'..
: &. ... .~::.-...~~.. '
. .. .
~ 1 . :< .. ~
sz~
':"'! 1 1 ,. n:
uu:ccwrocoo c.uc.rowc.IC\)~ : fi]1cc
.> .> o .> o .> e o
l!:?lW !" ~ 1'1. ..-::11 !Ill
DA: ::>ro ro~ ::x: ~::xc :o~::x:ecoco c.uc;e~CLu:ccce:oc.co~ :c.te>cc:c.co
0 .) .L .)
. .> .l.) .) 0 .)0 .) 0 .)
I[" 1 v 'L-- ~''I. ... 1--" "be rc :
c.uc.tro~o ccc;~:xn:c.e> oa.;Ge>oe c.e>c;Ae.c ~CJCG~:cowemec cc wctru~
:J ~ .> .)O ~- \ .)
. . r:-t l.L- . , 1 l.b~ v n 1
C.<&X.CG <;O(.oOC.O<Of'ICC I<; :::ec OJ!X.Om W
.)_, .) .) .) .) 0 .) .) .) 0 .
~
~.)011tC.CC:::x:::c.O::)(')eG:Oe>
' '::I II 1 . __ I'? L __ II ':"J II
rem cncc:cc~c.tro~ro :c.<X.U::xx>:x:ce:xoo IXI.i:C.tf'l&fKO:u:< tOWte:~
J .s .> 0 .) .) .) .) .) " .) .)
a)l)a;/:o 10~ tee>CoC2ccc.uche>c.ucc c<.Ce>CC .~JWJ;)d ~snUI b~e>f'lofroc.rro~
' 0 .)0 0 .) .) .) .)
wb.J('l c.~ohc.ax.e.c
.) 0 ' .)0
e:dx.o

eCne.G~ccoooc.ucc
. .) .)0 .)
ISGQC2e~bac.<:2o::.I:J:xe ~.):.:1.> .) .):::~.>
or n ~ .. r ..-:! 1 d r 'D 1
oo:oro~ o~c.ure: ::.uc.ucow c.e>sc(.(J()ecCCce lTW.l;) A'eW cccc:c.oo:cc
.) .)\,
.) .) .) .) .> 0 .)
., n ~ _.l 1 . ~,. l __ J. 1 " t[ . -:::~ ,.
ococ.ute: oc f'IG0 c.u: cc:axo roore<oa::rof'l occc:oc.cc~ cc
.) . .) .) .) 0 .)0 .) 0 .) . 0
ood
. '
(&be:ceoci>c lb~)
~ . ~
~co:c rft:ro~co &:ccoco<h~ftc.nt;e.G
o. ~ ~
r
::>~
.)
(&:c.oocodro~)
.:>
(~)tcftco~o
o . eo ~
eaft
.:>
o.)Jre.:.&.:cl,co .)c.coflo::> ~
:.)0
?eo
G. Strfj~v. C. N. Stqhm. T.L.R.9 Cal. 901; (1o~6) emil R~lar Su1a
~e''
No. 47 (r(}6J),'8.L.R. S26 (C.C.); !&.?C:Ot~:~{;~~:C,~~~(;)e:Y~I~tm,l
ut'uf . ~e&;>1 . , jf!O Mruammat Ahrafi KUaTv,Jai NtZTaitullulo~' (191o) 61.C
~(j} 862; Ma T1trilt Mev. Mawrg PIGYJN, (1915) 8 Bur. L.T. 73 ; Mt. Rakhi
J~ ~ v. Garib J?t''
A.J,R. (1953) Bilispur 26; FaJW-ud-din Kb (a) Harbmu R~.
m~cem v. Mt. B,o, A.t.R. (1926) Lab. 393; X- Y. YtdGfeJ~Qar:a" v. Saradarnbal
~roi ,.L.R. i3 Ran. 590; SiddU-Urr-NiuaBibi v. Nwm-UddirrKhlllttllldothm,
't.,dc, .L.R. (1931) 54 All. 12.8; Tt~~~. S/n:J< KY., v.. Cb C6aiM Ly-, (1947) R.L.R.
107atp; 119; U MarnwMIJUIIIv. Ma A}Bu, (r952)B.L.R.4o6 (H.C.); Prahhu
[)aylv.AiJ.arjiKauritm'.laMther, A.I.R. (1952) All. 8s8; BM~a Natlt v-.
S,_. Ikvi, A.I.R. (1954) P8t. 489 ; re S/'tffa (t847) z Phillips 2-47; i;,
SIIIJJioR4i v. Rllfrr Clunular Rai Gild aiwtlter, I.J.. R. (sqz4) 46 Ali. 706
+4ee2f=ooe
C' C' Q~C"O
o~~,=~~ n2=~st="
C'
d~J~;: ~Q:.)(J)~.
0 ("
. l ll A "2=:nt=~:')G-l~
I

..~;! ! '" ! ~ r r r
~ ..,n::J' t:'$0)J:>er:: . ngj~"f? ~"ii")(l)(X)?:~ ~~JlU~J?'
-~.;r ~.t;~, ~~~p: ~~!:iaXj1... !);)~::os;::o-:> roc;cuwp:
t:- OJ: ~ 0 C" C"~.,t ~ <" r- C:C" C'
,.-;. Cf'O'?t<:il ~~"U"'Oi- ~~l0~1MT ~')("T.)(X)-:>:r:r--: ~G>::O~ 11
(" ("
<:(\)I')('T.XX:><:>:::O.liC GC\)I')(l)C()'):
(" 0 0 0
~:nm~') ~~[':Y.n:l:>')(Y)
0 .
ro:mu:> . ::0
("6
. jl 1-i :- L J .
tt. J . a ~. t l o n. -
r.: c-r,~ (' 0 (" . 0 (' ('r.: ('
(" c: &
~J?I[j>l':l: '"'il"roc:c:>:~"t? ~f~tcc:o?:U? ~":n:>ro~: cp~?;w?mp:
,;:c- -r oo .~ r;;:c- r
[jG>~ IOC\jj?C'I)(X)')t ~~') !D~UX';?"W t)lGO::Oe? II _

~ 0 ' C" !;:;:: C" C" C' C" _ f':'G


~!T.>'i<>'t G>>GOOie_j:>lf:>GflCX o;)F"'f>"?G::OtG::O-:> o;)l~:~:
Q
('f.)G(I)! ::l).J;~~ 3;):))0)
- (" ('
00 :ilGmi?C\).S
(' ('
::l)'):~:n:n
\ ('("91
()~
(' ('
o;)U:::UtO::O~I?::\C,
('
J J tJ AT o C.:. &. -u It U J

~;;,JI~[:~~p: ~rf>euGn~&~ c; { o)~The ~jority Act, 1875


o~
l
('? =
-- -, ~~c
Jl J
~~or
"':nro;;ocGO??"o'
L
m ('
G. Stephen v C.N.
0
Stephm (l ) o:>:('c1m~ ~ ("
!DGO:>?cr.xY.>Cl(,I?OC o:>OXl)(Y)C;(O: ::o?:~?
(" 0
l C:J Jl. 4 J J

G::l);;o!:O?!Cl ?GCD:D:D
("[94>('~ ~:~1
'1
!30'0)0.)CT.>G!X::::orr.> 0:-lf ~G)('Ci(" " ("
:n::oc.->:~c
C'
" 4

G)O)O)('I)GCQ:::O::Om
J1
cc.:, ::>::> c..
r
StG> :D:O')l
&.
'1 <" r r
G>OO()IC! :ClOO"'PCT.X>::O:G::O?
J J

~co a <>1
J L L
g)i !:T.:G
~
C"Q 0 C' C" OC' C' C' r
ox;ro: .JiiQ/e:o:>
"
.lic::o-:>
LJ
::Dm;;ocGm-:>::o:nl
c x::cn(,lt?:;;.c
T &J J
C' r~
<.m::oo:>::~ ~
fsC' T~ ,,2r;:;::
c:~rtr:r--:~Gun
L.

(1) I.L.R. 9 Cal. 901.


. (:z) .(1963) B.L.R. 526 (C:C.). (4) <~910) 6 I.e. 862 .
{S) (~9I.S}-, 8 ,But, L.T.. 73
328 (3) (196)f. D.L:R. s98 (C.C.).
~ .
o.
~;()GOt aa~ Mt. R~hi" y.Garih_Pas ( 0) m!~<Ut:t
(" <"

. C"\>C . C"\ , .
C" C"O 5 C" C" 0 f.; .
f] iG>~iC: ~ ;G>~~~ G(l)')O){):mc:ro: ;G>Gm:>~ m 0 :>;GOJ:> m
r::::: (" r,:c- . (" . (" c-r;;:c-A; . (' ('
c.;ef>c:~J':l:mC::lc *:~OJ:> m~...oop: '=~~OJ~~jG>9!' mc:~m:,: ~o:;,JlO -.
!i:C" '
o;?tjG> ~oo:::c:o n
(' (' C'. 0 r.:c- (' 0_<:. (' ' ('
. Gcqpmro:>:or.;s c:~qpmoo:>:~9~mC::lc; c;c:~~ mFG'Pm
. ' c- '( ' 0 0 0 0 '(' r,: (' ("
GOJ:G:lJ':l mGro:;G>Gu:>~,!p ~~l::n?OJ?rq rq:qm~J?: t:jOOJ~
c- o o C' C" c- o
tnoo:>pm o:>!llCOOsm9~cqp OdG()OJ:> m~~G'f>O?<P.:lJtGOJ? C"OOro:rq
C' C' C' r,:c- C' C' OC' OC' C:
~?!3X:ropm ~:;,JlO~OdtjG>~o:;>JlUoot=~=9G_OO~nl\1ulla's Hm~u

Law
("'
~18::W~~~~~O-~?~O
r;:,!i?C'OC'
3:1GUOJ? Q,20)03JGNJ"(J)
c)". <p~
c- c-
' jOO. ~~
. c-

~~itcSn:l;:fr.~; OdG~IJ'J so3(J) t;;:;oo~:.OJ? r,:~O)~()) t;;(.9rr.:..:..?:i>~ll .... . .


f. tJ . lt.[j t:l J L . . . 6 \Jl Lj C:. L ~- C.:, ,

~J[ti~p~;{ afi:;,JtcS~= _~~J?= _rnci>~rJ ~8~ oe (~)~


c
ms~GcpmG::n:GOJ?
c
(J)GNI<J-:> mG,<l>~tj:l
or.~
'il'Go:>?
C" ~ cr,: c-
<XlCc:JC:;>J~?-
c
c- (' (' (' (' . (' (' ('(' (' (' . (' ('
rr.lG<.9:lJ~ ~:lJ<;Go:>? ~c:cqpmow~ ~~C ~:Go:>?3 ~O:>lJ(Oq{ :;>~0';10

9t~:>m~~~~~~ g)j~s<?o~ ::>'2 (o)m g]:'?.~~~~ .


" 17. (1) In appointing or declaring guardian of a the
minor, the Coun shall, subject to the provisions . of. this ,
section, be guided by what, con,s~tently With th~ law to'
which .the. minor is subject, ,a ppears in die circumstances JO'
be 'for the welfare of. the minor:
c- 'T'C: ". o C" c- r,::;::: c- c o c- c- -<: o c-
IDC'OC'OOOI C::JOI ~8<~J?:~ G0<.9f()t:o:>: ~2-l~C\.1}'? o_t~<:;G>U<X?C~::lJ.?

2003 .( Personal Law)~ 'SJGC$~ ~~JlcS'lt ro~~mco9: coo:~Gom?~t


O'l~ ~::n~c;m; ~Gropci>ooS (unfit) . ~o:>Gm:>ci>~(g: mGrotdi
OJva:n:> c;mx:'Pc:mxrmJl: We are) oo"i1~uroour
c- If
(' c c- c- c-
'J:"cn?mcoc -~
c-r,: c
c ( .
(' 0 (' (' (' (' (' . (' . c c 0 ('
<JlOPC\.')JCOOGOq ~O:>lJlO~:;l~!lJOI OO~~Gcpmo,?mc;;ro:aJ?:m~!lfU::lJtO
oc oC' C' C' C' c- . C' ~ C' o c o c-
OOy:~~:~ ~~~3 'iJ:Go:>?~J?:OJ~ g)t!lJ::lJmr11 IOOO:f>~ OC\(i'nfX]GO
(' .. .. ('
:l)~n Fakhr-ud-din Khan (a) Harbans Rai v.. Mt: Biro .(7) m~CYJ,C
"Without a finding that the father is unfit, ~he law-forbids'
the appointment or declaration of any other person to be
guardian. In such cases the welfare of the minors is the
main consideration."
U?~ s:>:oo:>::x>21 K. V. Venkatesu:arari v. Saradambal (8)
(' 0 (' (' ~<;;, (' (" ('
~~CI 91lrr-l000J~ 9c:~mFG'PmGOJ:GOJ? mGro: YJ?:::OOfT.>
(6) A.I.R. (1953) Bilaapur z6: (7) A.I.R. (19z6) Lah. 393.
. (8) I.L.R. 13. Ran. 590
I

I
I

i'

. .. " Shorn of the words which do not apply iri this case the
section states that nothing shall authorize . the Court .tc
appoint and declare a guardian of the person of the minOJ
whose father is living and is not, in the opinion of the Court,
unfit to be the guardian of the person of the minor."

~~a>Js:n~' gJl~tsu~:n~~~ Siddis Un Fisia Bibi v. Niza"'-


Uddm Khan and other~ (9) fr"'t..ci- ~~ro?d ~:
cO?: :n::f;:-Z 8:1d5:!3dhn: G<.9T!Uo? u
' C:.l" o.
" . . . So, where it appears tha't the minor has a
father who is not unfit to be the guardian of the person of
the minor, the court has RO authority to appoint any person,
not. even the father himself, as guardian of the person of the
minor;
So far as the power to appoint and declare the guardian
of a minor under section 17 of the Act is concerned, ~e
personal Jaw of the minor is to be taken into consideration
but that Jaw is not necessarily binding upon the court, which
must look to the welfare of the minor consistently with that
law: This .is so in cases where section 17 applies. In such
cases the personal law has to this extent been superseded
that it is not absolutely binding on the court and can be
ignored if the welfare of the minor requires that some one
else, even inconsistently with that law, .'is the ..more proper
!>t!rson to be appointed guardian of the minor. Where, how-
ever, the personal law is not in conflict with any provision
of th.e Act, it has not necessarjly been superseded."

u:>~~ -- 'l~Oftcr.Xp:~~O?~~ ~~~C>:n? Tan Sliwi Kyu v. Chan


... < ) , , ~ o ~ , a.
OC' r,; , ,
-. asn Lyan I 0 ~~ro2:: ~~.oc G~"XOO OOCJ:?C: t:J5.,t:o:n::n~ 11
Cit

" Indeed the question of true welfare of the minor is of


guardianship _u nder the law to which ~he minor is subject
such paramo,u nt_ consideration that the r-ecognize9 rights of
(~o) (1947) R.L.R. xo7 at p. u9.

. ..

'. '.
"C" OC"
. ' .. .s~-;, t19::D'XD? . ~GC\)CX)!q)!JdO)C!I ro"<XJ:I,ll'):ro0 ' 0 QQ
~O')o:>~:e:m
- _T '-0 . . l L U l l. ..
0 0 A. (" <: 0 C" . C" orr- C" C' 0 <: .
q~9J ~<;~Jtoc:or:~c; -~tl :>:G::i:nro~r rococo:~pzm ~~P=7S - ~
' '\ <: C" <: ~ '\ ' (" A\ C' 0<:
~Gfo:> ~~:~~ :0? GOJ?GOJ~ !01! o:>~o:>oo:>t:;:Gf9Jl ~U~C q>')!
<: c:r,:;: r:::. . <: C' Q (" ,,
G:O?m 0~?:0Cefcfi3"'! ~Gf99JCI OXp:'i)rm OOJ("J)QO!:O~GOII
0 . . ' . . . 0 (" (" ~ - Q(' c ("
~llo:>:>:o:> ~:Q)_!Jd9 ~roJcro~cr ~~:;nGo:>?rocps 8d~:O?roc:'
. . C'
P.rabhu paval v. Asharji Kuari and another (12) 1'~ Bhbla
- Natli v. Sh<m!a Devi (13) gJl'ft:DGo:>100'{'~q ~~ ~8.G~g:11'
-~~O;~:f;rof
u. C:f.c o
c00Sro&9:
a
9r.'::G~-:xDt
tj r
m<S~tt<S:o~t?:.r
1.1 ... u. J
:n<SOJrlt;r;g,
" u ~ ~
.-~9:0rl . t .

.lr)u,.:r.:OOS uti~o3L 2 is,cJ.,QOJ;c;j


T
'OO~:o~:~~
u.
0 l
.... ~ 01~~~
oat.;.J 6 t
The Hindu
J

Mi~o~ity and Gua-~dianahip .Act ~lGolt:<J~~ oo-:>::o~~


: mt~t>orGm9c;;o:o~'
4J llo
L.
~::,ocoso~~
C, C::J1~
l
. . d d(
~~~99:o~u
l J~ C.:. L .. ....) 0

'' 5. Save as otherwise. expressly provided in this Act.-


(a) any text, rule. or interpretation of Hindu Jaw or any
custom pr usage as part of that Jaw in force im-
mediately before the commencement of this . Act
shall ~ease to h~ve effect with respect. to a ny matter .
for which provision is Illa{ie in this Act;
(b) an y other law in force immediately before the com-
mencement of this Act sha11 cease to have effect
in so far as it is inconsistent with any of the pro-
visions contained this Act. rn
c c 0 C"
~!3.~. ~- ~ ~!DUG:O') ::D~Jrorl{ ~o:>~tj0: II
c' 0 (" C" A;~ 0

.. 6. The natural guardians of a Hindu minor, in respect


of th~ minor's person as well as in respect the minor's
(11) (r95 :a) B.L .R. 40,6 (H.C.). (t~) A.J.R. (1952) All. 8s.8.
.. {tJ} A.T.R. (1964) Pat. 489.
property (excluding his . or her undivided interest in
joint family property), are-
(o) in the case of a boy or an unmarried girl-the father
and after him, the mother: provided that the custody
of a minor who has not completed the age of five
years shall ordinaii\y be with the mother ; "

"13. (l} In the appointment or declaration of any person


as guardian of a Hindu minor by a court, the welfare
of the minor .shall be the paramount consideration.
(2) No person shaJIhe e~titled to the guardianship by virtue
of the. provisions of this Act or of any law relating
to guardianship .in maniage among Hi~dus, if the
court is of opinion that his or her guardianship W111
not be for the welfare of the miiior." .

'.
. r

'' It does not follow becatJse a husband's conduct


is such as to make his wife very unhappy. that he is there-
fore to be deprived of the custody of his children. To justify.
(14) (1847) z Phillips 247.
such an interference with the father's rights, his misconduct
must appear to be of such a nature as to be likely to con-
taminate and corrupt the morals of his'-~hildren. . . ,
C" (' c:l ~(' ~ (' (' ('
w~~'i~ <;031:>mco:>: ~9~ ~Y:Gloxtm>~Yp:~p ro~ro:~p:
'T' 00 (' C" ~ C 0 (' OC' r::: C'
::t:lC>Ul ~O'X'Jf ~G~:>e:Y~C>O?~C>Ul O?C>ro!YJ?:::D~ Ct:J?:O',{C U~:>
('~ oc (' (' (' ' C" ('
~~?: ~OOJO? Gropmco?::l[ ::t:lOO~ ~?~9:::0~? Oe:JO -r~~
roueC"~:l):'nl
C" ('
GOOI?mco'):::D~C
(' ('
G(X)l?O?CO:>: 0 (' \ 'l
~9::DO?YA.'U::O: ~;;>IG.S
::o:n('
c JJ u.. J JJ Jl lJ c:. c.
Ao -T
'P T&o'lt: ~p:~?Uf ~~B nSukhdeo Rai v. Ram Chandar Rai
(' ('
<md another ( 1 5) ~qcro~:-

. . It is not true to say that a father is liable to


be deprived of the society of his child, or the control of his
child, because he quarrelled with the mother or distrusted
the mother's moral i:haracter."
0 ('
-.-,-- ...... n
m:;om")::;:o

O?GC\)!~1?:~
u Grot?nSan:::o
.
.II ll
C
~C>~?YO?~
ll
~.;lco?:G~:I:l?
66
\'l
lJ J
c~:~cl
l ...
C'~O r::C' C'O
oxr=
2~tl\JX) (.\)COCO?: 1~'"f'i (2) O',{CI ~ ~ ~:tjO?CO?::~ C>9,?'1::0~ II
., . . I cannot see that such removal was without
sufficient cause. It was the privilege and duty of the respond-
ent as a father to look after the welfare of the children and
to provide them with good education in happy surroundings.
The privilege and duty was shared by the mother but by
law and by custom the leadership was with the father. In
the circumstance in which the home had been placed it was
probably a wise thing to send the children to boarding school
where at least they would be spared the pain of a disturbed
family. Sending them away to school deprived their mother
of the comfort of their companionship and probably made
her more troubled: and restless afterwards; but, Mr. Ghosh
had to make the decision trying to strike a balance between
bjs duty to the children and his duty to his wife. I cannot,
therefore, hold that sending the children away constitute
an act of cruelty on the part of the respondent towards
petitioner."
!)c&;3):;~J6, [J)~q ~~~ GOOJ'X~co?:~'):D::02 GOXJ~G:nac&g
L ('_-- ~<""'~ J (' C' C' C' 0 II. 0 (' -~T~ -1
G::D'X'OO?;t:Jc:D(~~ :m"~o.i?ro;,Jro O?ft:O?e>~JY~t 009'0t Dr;N .K .

. ( t.S);. ~I.. K. (192.4) 40 All . 700.

', '.
~~~
~
'.
~~
~m:~ooa

~J~"
A. That is why I have claimed my jewellery in this case.
In the separation case I did not claim. I now claim
for it because out of the jewellery proceeds I can
educate and bring up my children."

'.
oo6
u!cccti.:J@~b:co:2o:o&~oonW:cocc:lrt'IGG
.) .:~:3.> .,) .) .:J \, 0 & ~:~~ohl 0 .) li .)
:,- .):.:~ ccc~kColcco~lu:Rrco .~c.b
.)
::>CJO<:e
,.,::b .)OCCIO~f'IXc:o:>et"K.CC
.) u@cc~@abofecocdbOCt'lOoo~:craciOf;~cc:cooc@
.) .)...J.J
0 .) .) .)
.) .) " .)
rc.oe cldro~m:c.cea:
.) t.,
~:~b:1,a::be~luc.coe
:.- 0 .) .)
~cb:co:co::>t:locew:c.ra&c.o:::>l:l:o~e&a:
.) .) .)~.) 0 (, .>::::1
wrro:tcorcow~
.) .) 00
otlb .)o~ Z.tlb ~chc::o2ew
.) 0
:l:oorcocoo~cb
.) .)
!cc:d6:&:cbco:Xcxb&
.) .) o .
u@cco~c.olbcoeeJbcc:cf6
.) .)0.) .)
~b .)of Z.f.lb 6ChC:>OCeW
.) 0
:eoorcocoo~
~ .)
fj;C.OCCCOOO~;CO
~.) .) .) 0
t::> IJ:~~6ccc:ccc&beCa:oOO: ~:d6t'icco~cb ~cc~elkxbe &c.oc.he~~f'lfl @cc
~ ~ \ .) .) .) .) O.) 0 .) 0 00 ~
tcff'l:&:cbco
&
f'l:cc~bf'lrcoa:coa: c.orecoi.:J:k:;a ~:&coo~:l':oc.cu nwrcc.oC:lJe
0 .) .):.3.' \.) .) .:.:J.
r
. ::>tg
.)
cob
uoca::
.J "
J.hlbt;&:,:!l
.)~ 0
woca::K..ro hi
0 .J
'"~ ::Xorolococ.ec~
~...... .JO 1.. .)
~dxohxno
.J .J 0 .)
hic.ox.c.x:Jro:!l
0 .)
c:f &:ac.o::><.uc.rro:!l @a:::hJ('c;cbco::>\;(.()(} cocccb\k@o II re:!l~:l:lXet,:!lt"
.) .) 0':.1 .) .) .) 0 ',)~.)
cbooetloec
.J
1:>Co
.J
bs:~/o
~
cof.Jec ~tecacc~cocoo..,cb
,) ' .)
ta~ch"J&::cbco
.~
:>~3
.).)
wcccb ll&laro:!lW0 w&:c.oowc.lto:!l o6lcco~rw:!l" to~"ec IOQ I ():!)(.(JCX)C(l
.) <>1 " .) ~ " o .>o ~.. ~.L .)
""
CCCCWCocno d\x.oc.rro~
,)Q,J
.J
UOCCCe:>bGCO
.) .>0
: :>c.hJooXo~W to:..J:l:o~
,)~.J.) 0~
cocec

:c.we:dx.o

icbGI=J:Pac.ooewc.~ ~bKeooe~ :>Coalkoo..->cb
~ ~ G1 ., .) .) .) ..)
Jl!oa:; td~ro 11 C2a::b~hlc.&wc.lto~ ~oo: lllb :)C.ce:!l~ro:@,~~co
0 .) . .J~ .) ' .) "
11 :>'llwa2
.)0~
( o6
. '

"'
.s,~ -&-So~ ~ ~J ~ 1 , i~ ~ t-tJ l g, $..e . i~ ~ -8o
~J{t~j~-3of_,8~
,..., en 00
rn;: em -4) """'
lJ~~i
~
en lV)
~j J~~~~ .:n 0
ii 9
. J~
~ c,:v, ...C ~
-8 6) , ~ o8 ~ j -g ~%, ~ ~ ~ ~ J S 8; ~ 8 P. t !W 8 e ~ j 8 8 B~
en~ ~-Co en-.- 8-,-g .. s ~ 8 e c..&~~ (;B.,~ " 8 8 c 8 :8oo[-=8t 0

H~~~~~~~tT-g~~~J~~~~"~~~~~{s~~ ~
en. e e -co e.-P. en 8 ~ Q
8 o8 ~ $ (C) ~ *t
a!> ffi., ~ !R oS(D (B., (G) :!:!
cZ' ~ -$. -a 8 ~ esg rn-, en "S ~ ~ 8 . , ~. m8o ~ -g
Q.l,! e ..f! P.'l~ ~ ~8
~ ::5 (B., ~ + o - ee M ~ 6l O 6l
em (D 0 45 ~ ..8o & 0 (C)+ ""0 f""'\1 .:n 6)
+en ., 8~ 0 ~
8 a en ::s en -3o ~ en 8, ~
en "' ~ ~,--. o ro &,-ooesg l..VO(S) en Q -:O
.. ~cyl~ ~ '--' g Wl ~ 6) "8 ~~ 8 8 6) ~ 1,~, ., ~.ll s -<!Cl}t .&6)

~ ~ 2 CC1~~
CC1 ~c-8 ..... w
,+ 8w~"S
~-f.,i-,$.?8[18.,
. en~
en fr>
8 ~m,~%
~ro + e
i ~ ~
o8 -8 -t ~ o-. N ~ ~ ~ 8-, 8 8-, 8 ~ CCJCG)l. ciD - ~~~ ~ ~ - ~ 6l
~ c~ ~ 8 Ui. -&, rn., e o8 o8 .:8 ~ 1 -.8 ..e>'>
~ l'rl ~ $ ~ 6)
8 -a ~ Q'l -
8 6l c (B.,
9-: ..8o ~ c ~ (;B.,
en en ~ .. CC1
8 ~ .,g ,.2 .:8 8o 'f> IJ3n ~ 8 -8o ::i, Q 1
~ ~ 'Q ~ g. t '--' ~ i ~-a ~ rt l, s ~ -Be,~ ~ ~ ~ -g. --o .,
~~:J~~tt~r~~
.:8 en o
~ ~ l ~ ~1t~ifll~~Jlfit
8 .:8 ~ 6l
~ i ~ eg + -oo Q -vo 4l -v $ S fr> ..S (B., o m .. m
6>
. S, 8 8 8-, en~ 8-3o ~ ~i ~ 8 S "8 ~ o . -:p ~
g.,. 8 -~
1 8 CCJ em ~ ~ rn, f6)
qg ru., 8 ~' 8 o8 H rR !R .;& -& 6)
, t qu. 0
6l 8 ~ .B ~ ~ .. 4l .fr> S 1f ~ en~ ~ ~ ~ -9 c c ffi, 8 ~ ~ ~
~ ~-$. 8 ~-8o ~ 1~=8 g.,-$.. ~ e ~ -8o n en ~ ~ ' ~~r 1
-3o 8 8 .s, e a-, :, -+ 'Q -3o Ji ~ 8 ~ . _a. . , 45 ~ ~ a ~ -c
'ii' -So [ll., (1} -So .& ruo Q .""'
~ a "' ruo "" s- o ~ a s.. a i""" ~ ~ i
!Z')IZl
....., (B, fl 0

i l ~.1 I ~ '8
-e -"0
I
utecc:c.oohlxo w:r.J~~b:hwiX.@o 6hl::x.h':l~!xccero ~:c.rf'>r,chl
.) , ::J~ O,j 0 0 .) ::1 .) ~ .) , .) :_j
l2cc::>t:~:c.h',curo
.) .)0 ~.)
w~:b,:t():ooroco~re
0 .) v 0.) .) 0 c.~dJJJ:c.~ccrocc
.J:::l!.l ...
~cc
.)
o~~:c.Rwro
.>0 :..:J.J
w:JCCrooo
o J 0
t~c.I=7J~c.cc~~=o
.J ;:j J
10 orozoha:c.cocc
v J .>0 .> 0 . lecczh-l
.> ~
z~ec <2cc:bo6
.> .J .> .> .J
( cc.ceroroI1 ::>lccbc.occe~co .>
o~o:b~:.T>:aoo:cn~be
.J t. 0.> .> o-
nttcc&rero
.) 00
~ccohl:c.hl
.) .)
.):::J ::1 oC .)orw ctlC'tl c.~rob~wo~ ~cc~~
.)
, 11 r 1 ':":! ,' 1 1<7 1w b "
:<:ea.;C. IO~ ft!::>CC.c.cro IICCCCG CC<.>~WI.:l:lC.C'!~ C CC!ftt ~:~COCC a:>::;cca;
.) J 0 J .) .) .) .) .) :f.>
f')('()fOftcc
l,
~:::>1o~:boro
.)l, .) .)
~-fc.mcnro
.) .)
w2o~:oecc
.)
2cc&:coow&u:) ..),.J .) ..) .)
uC2ccohltt6b:co~2o:ottl2oo 10w
.) ..>::1.> ..) .) .) v0
::;-''!'..j 0 J \,;.) .) .)
:c.occ:lrftec a:>)o/..Q c.cc~re Co@cc,o~Co:llra.::ob ~cb=>":x:e .)~:o~ .>~cc
ll> .):::.b
11 II' " , [If' , II' , ] ,. '::I
:oo eftc.ro :c.eccc:c.oowc.1ro~
.)
JCOf'>eoo~n':':Ja.;eco oc.
.) 0 J.) ..)
~ro ltcccc:c.oo
0 J
O!CO
1 1({)CCC'
1 ' : ' :C)OCCCO: 11
1 1 b~t.C <.>00<.>00!0 '
!0 IOW:C.If'>OO 1'1"-.:l ccCCOO:IOCX) 'b!:>
W:
.> J . J J J .> l,o J .> vO 0
c.ocre::>C2coo<!-o:be>:lo:aorocof;l:e
.> .> J l. e J J o
~~ec:dl'loohl
3':..:1 J :..:1
c.cc~=>~o::>:c.hlwrn
.> o :_jJ o
w
"I. 11 1'1 1t 1 , L_ Q ~ '
ft~~C\J C.O:e>O'!rG~:I! ..CO W~Q::l!C.OjOOCI'l C.COe>OO~
. : b!:>~,C\X>C.C 1:C.tftffl ..
J JO l, 0 0 ..JOJ .>0 .> .>o
ecb~c.uc.ore Cl:ol:.o:S.ooroco[;l:e <2cc.b:~ro:bHoc~ IICCctohl@ftb
J .> " 0 JO J .> J o J 0 .> J J .>::JJ
orec.occ ~br.WOO O~:dftt:IOft l2cc:croc.C2fcoe> c.ocrroe>:C.U:Iee.G l:lb:~a;
.>OJ~..>.> l..> ..> v :fo
:~~~C.CO~
.) ..)
ecb:cG:2o:::>Q:>ce
.) .) .>:::1.>
w:d~OOJ:;,Q:o~e&a:;
0 0 .>:::1
tcob:h:5rw
:> .)
wto
0 0
otJ& 5-f
J
0tl& ftco
.>
c~o2~w :oo!:>rccco~cb @cc:dft:&:cbco
OJ..>. J .)
olocJ,b:
0
.
u@cc.cob:c.chl:re Coa!cc:::>~colbc.re~ tbro:c.rf'> otl& :~ 0tl& l"'co
.> .> 0 ..> ::J .> .>OJ ..> .> .>
__'], , n _ l~ 11be"" .ro .
C!)C)Ce<JJ :ooo,a.;c.co~ llOGte
ccc.oo
:c.a;cc o~~::l :o~eftc.cc
0 .) .) .) .)
\.) .) 0 J
S:dffl<.co~
.) .)
~cc~IX.ucbe>
) 0.)
ttux.fi~S~tcf'lft
0 .) 0
ttcc:dft:~:cbco ft:cc~bft
00 .) 0
n.... n , _ ..1. , ] ,. ':'J , arv._
ta.;eGCOe..1 WleC.O :re "" 'I!P il M~ ~~;C.CO.;xn:ccro
::X:. ~00 IICCC'C(\)e;~CWe
0 J .) \ \ .) ..)00 .) 0 .)
':":! ,_ ':":! 1
c n i!.1 n 11
,. 11 2 " .1. __ r
:ccroa.x:t:cc:c.rocoftH~WieCO
:a;cc:oe ccccoo1o c.cate: : cc:ux.o o-:
J o.> .> ..> .> ..> Jl-0.) ee .>
OC.I"'~:lC.ft~
J .)
C.COWIG~
.)\,;
olPe:r.Jec:cbco
.) O,j
IXo
.)
0 c.d'lro
.)
c.bxix.ib.:d)CL:CC~ro
.) '
coo~cb
.)
1olre&:cbc.o
.)
c.roe>o=*
.)
1c~e Ci:~tk
.>0 .) ;;;
:~c.h-l~o~!o:)
.) ~ .)0
wlu:oeel'lc.cc
0
lbrecoo ~~broolre:r,:dxo ~;6a;:l;ax.ec~ e2cc.erecoo
~ ..) .> .) 0 JO .) .> \ J
h.:::::":o~e&w
0 .>:::J
:c.ro&::c.cowc.froe>
-.)
lf'>:cc~b6rweccoaxorecchl:oo
0 0.)
~t; &a: ~cb:&cc
.):~.,,.,
1'1 "
llle~OCCCOCOCW~f')('()IOOCG n 'b'~,
({) Oro 1'1 II
W:C.Ift:O b
0 G
.) .) .) l,; 0 .) o. .) .) 0
":>st(.fti9 1 }TI ta __' J l
:re~oocs-:c. o~gow:xc:oel'l xc:o~et'lc.ec
ccccwccc.oo becceoc:ax.o
.) .) .) .) .) 0 .) .)
l,jG~ 'II b" "' 121'11_':':) b , ~ . },.
:c.CG<'I; eGO<PCG ccocnu;t'l :c.roo:oce fi:O :ce::~oo ::~ro
., c.c . coftc.G
, 1! x
'.) .) .) .)0 \ ' J .) 0 ..) C) -
, i
g.>lGitO
~
.,Jl~! PV
s~~c ~q:l JO SJ~UJO:> JnoJ ;)q:l U!ql!.M. punOJ :M( Ol S! l! JOJ U~~l
Co6
C:-:1
,
8-:
r
:::~
.)
oob
YEI
11 11 w&wl:u:clscoe~ ec
.) 0
11<ttc:~@bl_od;,
.J ~ .> 0 0
oC c.frur&ol:oo:>bct~~\,
~ 8.) .;,
ll~te
:J ~
0~ o~~Wl)
.>0.,)
0b~c I .;,CGOO~~~ .) ~
lli}l:ll:l dalAC() IC\liO~e:C ~~ C.GO~:I~~
... :J:J .)- t,; .;) .) .,) 0
16c 'Cool~~b
.) .>
u?ccg~]:_}ec
.)
~b:c.ee. .)olb.:>c.cc&:c.c:oc.uc.b~
.) 0.)
w~:c.<Pe:lrwec
.l:)
r.:>cncccccoc::xn
:> u@ccro~c.ro
0.) .,)
(Oiot) 10::1 =~Qe.ecdsoht::lcnccccdlc i!wccc.oo o.fwccecoo Oc.t:;;l~c.cc~~~:::ro 10:)
.;, ~ .J., ~ ~ :;:~ 0 ';)"., ..) j .) 0 .) ~ .) ..l..
od:Xokc Co@cc o~ahl :2rotfi!,C)l u@cco~ct::l:@ro:cc~&?fil~" o~ ~c wccc.c
;, , .> J O.J :J l e .J :,j .> .> o..>:.l .J .J _, .l ~ :J
co1eec~rcecoo a!ccwccec=ocoboeA u@cco;at::l :@ro:l:::l~l:::laf Sic wccecwte.c.c
\., .)B o .:> ., :>.) \.) .) .>u:>:l J O'J.)::J.>;) ~ '"'
aoc,t::l:orecc
., .,::.~ :>
@ccrucc~
.) .)
I:IOcob:>eA
~ ~ ,, -
IOhllc.ec:oQ~WCC:>~
.>:.l .,:::.~ .)
W:crftwrecoOOCCe>Wec
0 .) .J .)
c~-
J!.l .> .) .) .)
J:.Loc:bce 131:::lecc.olo,wro:xc'l,c.ol;:c.cctlr~"ec
B~ .,'o~:c.ri'I:<"~CDc.okoecc~
.). -- ~ .;, c.cc~l:::l:>eo
:.:ll wwc.c
.)
0 .) .)
ezcl,c.o ure~~l'l wreecc~ C.CC!!l:c.ccc.ol:::ll'woo wwc.c(Qzcl,c.o ~ ~"CCCDO:,~WCCCC
,)- .) .)
.) ~ 0 .) 0
a:V.,J..::>e~ IC~ccb~lo~ teecc.cc::~&?hJ I:?IJ"wz~ co&.cn I
:i~.) .) 0 \, .) ~ ~!'"J~--. .)wre,--'J:kMCD
!":I. .)
ne2cc:~~@bl:o
.) .) .,) 0
cl.o dwf..,c.o
.J
tobct~ltlctlc
.)
IC.CGcnec
.)
~
.)0
1obcollrw
.)'
~~ .)C.GO&:>:>~
.)O ~
na!cc...Cdsec:oc~~ecwrel:::l:>eoecc~wcc
.,) ~:3 ~ ~ .) :..3.> .,) ccc:~::>a,c:bco
..) lkwo~t:lwc.2~ec
.>:J.> ~
~:~~odx:ec.~wroecwreec
~.J O.l .>
c.cc~t;b
0
~~~ooo:,~~@*
~ ~.) ~
CDie<OC.ro~
j-L.; 0
~hl:cec:ol:l:c.co
1.r:1 .=>::J
wc.co5hlwre:c.col::ewtx>~!:Jc.fw~
.J o , o s- O'n :@~:@~~ ac t:@roc.cc~@ccot:.l.ch.l.~ef
.,) ., .> :; , .;, o .> .J::l. ~.., l.c
o~of
.).,)
Cc .)2ccwccec~:~Oc:ob~el'l
.) ~-.) \J
c~::::lccb~lo!!l
:>"" 0
~cb:~oo
.) .)
!,Q:@~coteruc.ro~
.):3.,).,) lo
n::::lcc
~"""
ro~e:oe:o:o:t
, fbwl\.~bec.cc~eQ:@~c.etewcro!!l
.) S'.> o.)--.>-t. .).....,., .>-.., ~c.oe:~ twl'llhf;:c:e!!>OO~~Q
e~ .) .,J ~o'w:cr..,
.d"C
ol:::lec:c. llo.:obecc.oGW<.
1,!.,l .,o l -o ;ecnio 'o-Hre:ro~cc::)C.t'>~obec
~--o-., ,s .:> .)
~:~Oc.oboel'l@cc~cboe
:a:J ,., ..> .1
n@cc~~b:oe:~oo cco'cc~ ,@roh.lrufea..OO
.) .) 0 .)
0 J- .)
1:1~11
')- .).) .) 0
nwl'eGOC:l::el'lnCD
~ .).) ::1 ,)
::::lcco~:>~b ~oroJll::el'ltecc~cc@.,,w:dAc.coc.;;>
n)"' ,;,(.! ~.) ~0 lo .) .) 0
PO~Mdl'l:OCOC.OOJrec.o C.CC!!lokwcco~:c.fl'lec C.~C ri'IC.C.OC;;)IO~ II @cc:c.col:::loc.o
?~~.ffi .) .) .) .) .,).)O ~ .J
:_j.J
!c~ kac.fl'lC.C.OC;;):CI:lec
0 ::J .)okcoc;;)t=Ocob:>eA
:.-.) \.). ~c.c~:c:bcon
.) 0 nwtecotl;(=wrow<:e
.) .,) :3. ,) ,)
;~
nC2c::
.)
oo~rw~
.)
~c~~
~~~@bw
.) .) 0
cub dwf&o
.,)
l:ooobo~w~b
.,) 0.> .)
I~ obtlc .~:CC~OCI'I~
.;)
O~OCeGOGoOC.fl&
,) .)0 .,) .,)
II @ccot:l:l'!CDc.eolrec.ol2cc C.CC~:Jo:dxo 1bec
.l .) .)O .> .l .J
.l:l .l okwcc .)o'f:c.fACC
Cc ~"~_s:~c!!lo2socc~cc~~cc:~~l;e c.l;~9p.rc-rw!!l:i:> ~~~cc6~~ ~$t!cc~5<?g
~wM~coJe ICUC.Soe>:hl:cee>GG
'$" .> 0 .> 8j.> . \..) .)
to:dfl:c.ec
0 .
~HPe:roea; 2:)C.Mwoba;
.) .) 13 .) .)
~:X.Ob::>eAcu:::>S
:>.) "\.) .)
11 @cc
.)
h ecco c-hll:D)
0 0 . 0
cr
:..:Jo :~(.CC:24o~
e.> ~eccub
(c. ::::::1 .) CC :hi
eJ
:hl~w~Cb:e)
:..:J .) 0 0
wbcob.)
21 (\)COA
.)
le Cl:IVC
::J
4b:cee>GG
.) .)
WCCe.G~~COb:)eA
.) :>-.) \.)
. .
11 ~ccoboestu~bocc:~ c.Mude~e> h>M~ft~f, Jc.E-,:::>IJ:oe>3hlrotc:::>co
.) .) 0 : .) .) 0 .) .) .>:::I .) :..:J 0 .)
.. .)
nC2ccGGl::)IJw(\):o6Ghla;.
.>.J _,::::~_, o _,:..:~
bw
AGo:~cocc~cb
._, ~_,
t:hlcellotc>cccc
c1:1C
::J
eJ _,
~b:-silrw ~:e&
.) 0
hoo:doccAt'c:S.cooh::
0 .>0 .)
:c.w:X.Ob~eft
.) "\.)
C2ccC:ee>c.rw~xA~
.) .) .)
::lro:hlce&;
.:i eJ m:cc~hi~G~ \. .>13 o
.) :..:~ ,) ::Jl:IC Wlee.G~Pea;eo CCCCWCCCG~~b::>eft
,) .> :y .> \.)
.
w:h:<P:I1o~ ":beer;~
. .) ~
II C2cc~:c.cohl::>coec:C,
.> ~ ~..) 0
I:CCrow:c.Pft
.) 0
:c.cca;col,a:;
.)
c.a>ecc;,wcc,::>Fi]er.e2cc&
.> .)...J .> 0
:c.roo;recd:Occ~cc:
.> .> .)
1 Pft:Wfle.c wtowcce:ebco~f
~ ll) 0 .) .)
wcctu:cbcolfbcucccoo~~@ccoJJft
.> 0 '$".) ,) ,) ,) ,) ::I
CCccGhlcuc.a;~a~
.) .> ::1.>
s:~c wcca;
.) ::J .)
C2cc8cob
.) .) '
.)::>Mt::>~~Pe~~cc:hloo.>tucb:e
.) .>8 .) :..:J .) 0 0
,ecb:c.G:dG
.) .)
lf~wcccoo~k
':)'_, .) .)
S.a:chlcocob
:..:J 0
.
u.)<CccMb:o&ot)la;:tero
0.> .) ~
~C2cc:c.ec
.>
owl:D wdmee.Cc.ccecc~:ob
lv.>O.> " ::>".>
edx.ulucb:e
.>.>0
wd~C:eec.Pw~Xft~
0.) .>.)
ICCCC
.>
~cob~eftJIGwcccoo~~S.ccchl<"5o
.> "\.) .'$".> .) .> :..:J 1~c.~~to 0 . 0 .)
.) ::::::1 0 11 .)<Cccb~~h><Ccc:ccocd.'n .
(o@cc:c.ecwh.--<occcecc
.) .) 0
co5cob:)eft
.) "\.)
uees2G:cec
. \. .)
e~ co~~b s.'lr
...... .) ::J
robJo 10el0~ It Cs.'ltlc w~cob::>eAtCCCcCe:~dco~:)C.fte t:<Croco:~G:C.,G~ ,r,
el. J... ::J o .> . \.> . .> .> .> .> .>
.)
coc.w~11 .)C2ccbt;C.O~
0
tu<Ccc:cco:b~~ooes~hla;ll
0 .) . .) .>:..:1
ccccGhl:c.Pftc.G:c.G:C2b:~cc
.) .) ::I .>. ~ .
tccc~~::>bnqft :Xooh.c.Gocw~
~.)0 .>::::1 ,) .) 0.>
(c) cd;a;ece~wcc
.) .)
11 .)<Ccc~~~co"Jr.J3re.
::::::1 .) ~.) .
~Ghl:c.G:ccb:~cc
'$".>::! .) 0
c~tcC:e~c.Pco~xA~
0 .) .)
~~:XOb~eft
.) .> "\.)
tw:<Ccowc.ucroeG~G~
.) .> .) .>
<"GRft:::>rew
e.> ::I .>
tc.~cc::>ro
.>
o~ .>o~ro~a;
.> J., "\
~wcccoo
'$".> .>
~kS.ccchl~5o
.> . :..:J
.
uC2oc0R lfX.occccGhl<" C2ccGhlwc.eseG~ s:~c wccec c.cce:cc~
.> ,)~~ . .) .>::I .> .>:3.> .) ::J .>
wc.bl~coroft
.> :..:1 .> .
~:~9:koohKcA
.>~.>o .> o 1<Cw~f
e .> c1:1C ::J
f'no:~coce~cb
.> o.::l.> tPlc.co
Ge>Gtihorow&rocn
.> ..Jl- _0 .0
,C2cc~coboeft ,co,ea;~Pea;to ,c,f,d(cchlrocoh
.) .) \.) l. .>1:> . 0 :..:J 0
11 C2ccG6i II;fficcccr OCL.>tu<" C2cct owl:D ::)toestuw~d>t :Xocb:cectO<.Uoo
.) .) :J'S' ..) \. ..) 0 .) l. ..) 0 .)0 0 :> .) ..) l,.) 0
w;~wb cr .robto ) S)~6)~ le Ct\VC tccb Je~e:e~crco~Xft~ &:ccowc.Fro~
.> el. ~ ::J o J... " ., .>
@cc (b.hlro)
.> \.>
:..:lo . .>~cob:)eft cf,dccchlft5o
:..:1
u<Ccco~GhlnbG~
.> ., ~.> .,
ck~ccchlwees
:..:J o
~bsc@:2G~m uoe.oa:;~ S.bhi ~~~lb:::>cro~oco ~Rccbb<.oe h>C2cc:cro
.> .) .> 0 .> ~.)., ':)' .> D .> ::J 0 0 .)
hl,~~~a;e2hles otowPeobG~~.:>:~}J,,fbwcccoo~fcb:oiJ:och.l~a;~a;
:..:J..r..
.) :..:J. .> "' .) 0 :> '$".) .> .> .) ~ .) ::::::1
' ..
II CCccGhl :~IJ:::rt :)CO ~::>ceohlcoo~cb ec:&lffi
, ..) .>::I .>:::1.) .) .> .>:..:1.) 0 'S'"'
,, .
1 berocc:ccowc
lcce.s-: p: "J ll , ..--"! 11 " >L
em . o rro~ .:xoema:;co 11 cccceooecoa; oco v::>
..) . .) 0 . . . .) ..) 0 .>. "\.) .)
ec6
b.:l:cbco
0
c.M~hl(n,c;cc~&!hle~G~
, 0 ~ 1., , ~ ,
1:1c
~ ,
cucccncuJeec~reGhlzoreesC2cccuccw
l. .:d),~ , , ,
i!>Xob:)efl
y~~ ~ ,, '$
,~&>~ec'G3 cuo1l:'Jcc:2 t;':j
,().j & :Qb~~b:hwlkC2o 0 0
c.cc&Dcucfco~
\,
~~oo~IW
, , ,
U'ccccb~co~
, 0
~cc~()hl:crocncuc.roocnC>cuccro
0 .) ::::~, ~ , y.)
ccc~cucccoo
, .)
~~:,cob::>efl ~ccQhl::>co ~ax:ce:dxo 1~:<bco ccc~hl , S)~:::>wwrocn
) , ', , :=:.~~, ,J 0 ~..L ,J .)
u,C2cce&!hl<~>~
, , ~,
~c cucces
J .)
cu1ero2o~hi
l. , .) ~.)
::>Peec .)C2cc::cob:::>ee~
, \.)
:>Ito
.)
h;d:.o$117. 11 cccc:coohl,o~ c.n;:?>cub .iJr roccc..:>G ~ ubtlc c~cb&kc:~e~
c "o '$""' .J ~..L .J 1 e .>
l!>tXob:::>efl
::,-, , , r:>l.oobo:~crcu~
, , , ::::>dcu~:~cowroroh:1ro
, , , o (c) col,er;
, 'l!il@hl
a~b ~
~flC.Ocuc.bd:> uC2cc:<..rohlro:?>b C2cc Jo(llhl(ll~.(,c wccecC2cctc ,:;,&,ce
, 0 .) ~..a.. .) l..) ~.) .) .) ,J
~cc~:b::> 0ccro&'_82coftC.W:?>~olreoro
e e .> .) .)
~~:6e~1Qooft'l!il
.) ~j. O'J 1!:1(2hl .)~
oh ~ I~R:bocoro .)
l!>~cob::>.::fl wd~ u@cc:c.rohl J{)~ ::>c.QelG~o~ 6c ,:,hlccohl~OOJb ill
:>~.) \.) .) 0 ..) ~..L .) :::::1 .)~.) .)~ .)~ .)
CCC.CC.o:>G
J e
re ub~c cl,..,Cb&kc:;e.:.bcobxe~
:> Y .> ,.,
drotebroolrec.o
., o .,
CCC~:cro
c:.ure:>co 16nhJ1l:l(.K,~rro:flrw wbcob:>M :X.o~:?>:Q&:cbco
.) .) '$', ~ .>0 .) e.:3 ,J \.)
0
.)cocccbmcoeo ,J
]SCD:::>C.W~ ~!=:l:::Jb It ceccb!~co~ ruccccoR(ll~ 6c c~.@cc:c.rohl toO:?>
O'J .) 3".,j.:> .) 0 0.) .)~.) .) ~..a..
rucuccrol!>::::>b fi:!sc.ro :b:Jcokoro .)0
o .) :> .:> '$' o .:> .>
:Xocnrubco~:)efl
.> o .> \.>
~:>to
r.>::>&:>coc.cc~:c ::::l.>o
C?W"l 1 r<> , l.l:J i!.. b r ~
ac.roowc wrrorro ,o~enco:5?;J ~!; 'JRccu 5oge:p cc rce~:c RC<l>~cc~:pcc
0
c.cc~:c.rohl::JCO ~cuccc.oo~~axces :,cob:::>eR ,l,wccre:>dcu:?>xR:>
~.) ~.) .) \.).) .) .) .) .) .)
11 o~:cc~dw:>e~o~ 1:1c cuccro
.) .)J.)
lorro~
.) 0
:ototcorob
.)0 \.)
&:!cc:cro:oOOJf)
,
UCCCC~~~rocPwe~o~
.) .) .) .)
s:IC WCCa:J
:J .)
CUio?el2()CPhl:orero
l. .) .) ::.:1 .)
2cc:X.Ob:>eft
.) .) \.) 6~
.)orro~bwM~cc:c~..c \ .)
:;e~ ccc~:C.OJ:::>hl .)~.
1
11 C2ccb ~~::>o~~~ec hJC2ccscroohl beccureC2&c.cc~ccll!l:crRcc~ C2cc
.> o .> \ o .> .>~ ., e ~ o .>
?coboeA:)rod,...hl"cd::o II ccccb~CO!) WCCCCICCPOQ :~.~wb eJr COCCC~.
v ' " :> 5~o o .> o o , "~ .> J e
I~ ubtJc :hlwPo l:u~b::)b ccce~tc uccccbl;CO~ rucccc:c.rohl IO>e>.lo
0~.) 0 ' .) .) 0 .) 0 0 .) ~..L
cccc-oc-Cc :~ce .)
<..f,wb;~~cc:ctc:~~
.) .)
o&,cokuro::JCOhcol,:c.cc:lPoo:;
. ) . ) . ) . ) .) I)
e~b:)e~
;:,~ , \.)
ohl: obuo~:cc~~hlflGf:
.)~.) .) ~.) :J
1>\C mlh<l>hl:orero CCCCW<CCBII!)bco
.)1:).)~.) .) .) ~.)
b:)ee~' ~Fcore:o~.oec:obu C2ccb!S!C~ rucccc:crohl 16>::>tcxob Cc rob,oc.~..,.
\" .> o .>o .> .> o o .> ~..L .) ev
.) .) :>.) \.) .)
1 o~~ oCtJc c.~cbffxc:;:;, e:X.Ob::>eR :X.o::::>bcooo:odw~ r::x.Pcu:;,:<!-co .) .) .) .) .)
wroec~c.cnCPbe , , :oPeo~c.R~Q , ., ,~ 1&l@hl o'J., ~ wc.boo ., o ll()::>:cc~lahiACP~ , ~ , 1:1c
;;; ,coccc:n
~~ecn2CPGhl:orecn
l. . .) .) ::.:1 .) .)C2ccX.oboe(')
.) \.) 0~
.)ofroh;besc.coc.o:>d:> 0
uC2cc~bl:c.~w~
.) .)~
wb Cc :~cecclcchl,()~~
.) .) 0 ~.)
ecce cccc:X.Ob:x:nbecccoc~cce~hloco
.) .) \.) ~ .)
:X.o:~e
.) ;>
bcoboe~uC2cc:n::>wc2Qec Co2cc,o:::>bhi@Rdw~ c.cc:C2~:@~o~ ~c
.) \.) .) .) ~ .) l. .)O.)~.) .) .) .) .) :J
ii;i;:c.WCP~ Cc c.kJ.Jccec l!>~cob::>efll~hl:c.ec:~Qi;&!~:ce:;,Ql~
'S'o :=:.~, .> .> :> .l \.> "~ .,:::J :> ::::1 .,
6c. "~~CP~
cc6
~ ?J>kc.tlt!3
(,]COOS~~
b~
~~rc.o~
J>C.f'~
feb
cc6
~~~.. 19
, ~~ ':"l ' 1 ' 9 , 9 1 If F I > L 1 l ~... ~-- _._
ICCCG OaJOOt'CC'C(I) aJ:JC:>ncnaJC.aJCC ICfl ~:lCO()(naJC.aJCC I:;!()C ftCO 'K::JT'~
0) ) 0 0 .) .)0.) 0 0.) ,)Q,;t .).
r
s>f
(~:cbco~ 1ffie.c)
u 11 j_
t'lecnwcoo~cu
. ~
-
~
~~
~~tlc:
81
ua!cc:~l.l(!@b
.) ,) .)
(o}O
0 0
tloc c.~wr&o ac.occc.coc.rocc aC~c I (b)ccca:Jh.acc:> IC.C.O$:>:>\ o~:~c.cc
~ ,) ,) .)0 .) .)0.)
u~bc c.fwr&o
~
a~co
0
1o~c

a(b)c.:c
.)
,oh,,cc~
.>0
~c.c.05:>:>~
.)
;~ ..(I)~
.)O ~ .>
u~co:k:A
.J .) o
:h-l~~~:~
~ ~ 6 ~,
u nc.ul.oe.ceacl,coe~e.c
.J
ofb
~~~GI'IJ9
~~~
~~'
~b~c.~
3~~
c(b
!:11~ l
~l~.!li<::
...$
.a <-
'
s<>' -So..a~$ s:&,~ 8 ~t1,s~~r&,8 srn.,~ s.,~~ s ~~-So~
~ i ~ cn~ CGn~ ,'-tS' rS,~-~, ~ ~ o.:; ~ 8
-t ~ -t~ c \:S
wt
~ . t~ :t~ t r~41
roo CGJ
en j 8, i l Ctl
~ 8-, 8 ~[B., ..F 8-> ~ ~ -2. ? 65 en,&~8 ::&,... Sen v
cy'l 6) >Q
~- - -3oB-> _Be,s., .en ~ -g., g., ~ ~ s j ru., e c1 ~ ,.e ~ -g og, 4 ~ --8 s, 8 cg.,
~e ""J 1 B. t 1$&,~_;: ~ ~~ $ ~ ii 81.;[ 1i' ~re-.!;[o.. ~: 1J::
"="' '"="' rBJ -& Q'l CY> o8 c
!1 (:B.;~- s rn-, ~ e 1:! -~L~ f ~ ru., ~ ~ a ~ ~-&
~ ~ s c., ()
rn: - ~.,% ~ 8 ~ B-> ~, B-> ~ " 6) o, ~ -g oe -a 8 ~~ s :,
i:j '"a ~ ~ 1j ~{ . ~-l} .B ,&1. ~'ll1J',i1l <& 8' &.1' sio
~t 6)
~\:S~ sv rn., OS~ ~ fB.,enw~sroo
e ~-t 8 B-> ..ao ,~~~~~ -e. t,jen ~~ ~ ~~,.8~ s &:ru-, ~
l tc ~v
t.
...-fl>"l
s 6)
ao~ cn .. c s, e., e -c . 8 ..{) :& s,'-tS' ii., 6)
.g .~ .8 ?. ~ 8 f' "il" i ~ ~ ~ 41 -s, ~ [lh -8 "" !]"> ~ -8 ~ ~ o8 . en
8 ~ =0 - V
s 8 (B., ~ ., fBo J -t S S, S ~ ~ rgJ ~ a., Q
8-> Ctl (;') 6>
g., .. 8 +l ~ .e., co 8 (;/ ~ Ctl
[B) -c & ~ ~ ~ 8 en fl., ..P~ 8' s .. 6)
f 1 tl r
g ., .. (B., +l.1, ~
g., -8 c -g CGJ -8 ~ [B., a., en :;Eo ..a :> ~ 8 ..8 ~
1v .,~
~ .2o ..s -e -t s.,..; .. ~ --8 -8o ~ ..ao s .~ rn., ~ ~ '' ~ ~ ~ s.. . s t.
~ ~ ~ [8.,-:t,-S ~ ~ E&(ID~~ b8 & ill, it 1_,ru.,.: ~ '{~-g t ~ ~ 1J
Boi&LF~~~~~tE~fcJ&~~~
8
t tt&
~1J~~~~
em a 8 cm1., -8o -2~a.., ~t~e~~s8j~~
6)
..8o ~ 8-> (: 8-> en 6)
~~~
.. J ~
~~~
-8o ..
n'l "'5 ..8o f.. ~ e ~ en ~ CCJ @ -1 j ~ o8 ~ ~ 8., 41 w .. 41 --~
6)
~ oS ~
en 8
::!
~ c e --8
8, v, ~ (B.,
_!)
8 !4 ~..so w..s ~ ~
P." -c
41
S., ~ Z> ~ C:V, ~ =2
t- ,,
.. ;j.,
-+ ~~
8-> -8o ::&
;j.,
cf3 ~ ..
.,
o.)
0
~:)~'c.
1-sc.
r
~~ftO
.s!ic
c!f6
""') 1 r 1
CCf'Jf'JC\J:O~:)(e:) cu:Cf'JCCCO
.J .JO .J .J 0 0
uc.o&we:ilicoel!ow.
.) . .
II uc.o&wk:ilicoel!ow
.) 0
... ..
nwb
.)
tlc cocos
.)
11. ) . tl
ecncr; ~cco~:oec
:;, o
o.f 6
9Je
t: t: !;~ t: t: 0 ~ t: \ t: t: ~
OC' C'
~~:::oc:gtfiDI GO'J?Cffi t1~~.94>Q-j>:~cqct ~?~?~P3 oeG~ oe'&
c- c- c- c .,
sc- (' (' (' (' c
~'>I ~f".> .f' 9~ffCT> 7 f :>Cj~S'r.>dfGro:>~ Q~~ G~?CO>Ce>~:>c
GV~G-1
t: ~ C'
OC'
:o~ qc=c~Gfa>lcf;~?
OC' C'
mY3 om~?:(J)C:QJ, ~
C' C' ~
m9m~s
(' ('
c.~?mGy~~ n
(' C'

(~T). ~~
<'
~e
0\0 C' C' 0 C' 0 C'O C'O
(X)CJ>o:>C~?m>?:e>scnox: OOU)Qmcn:ro G~?C<OQl:~C <O~?C:'l1GOO?COO~o:>
l ... TT 6 l\. ~-~.- -1 6 J. c l tl L
C' "'' cr,:::::
ro~: OIOC~~211 G~?C>f'~~~: G'Pm~ro?Cj: ClC:::g G~?i"OO?:~
C' C'OC' 0 C' C'O f;l! OC');. C' r,::::: (Cl51TJ ~~
~~
(' 0 ' 0
~~n ~op~ c;~?rn4>?:~tJ:<Opmr ~;>=~l? fX):DQd;>Gro:>mq<:t
0 C' ..C OC"C" C' C' C" C' C" C'OC' ( OJ;:_,..)
oxp:cqoo?Cc;~:I:I~31~?CG~:IG~OiG~')CO)C~?C~g G~JC4>f ~tf'1
C' ~~ (' (' ' 0 9 (' (' ('
:DtljlQ

~~~
..
a~

0 C' C' C' 0 t:r,::::~t: (' (' 0 (' Bf'v~~cll


9,~2?1 O)()f :D'l~J?:rq G~:>m~tjf~2?11 c;c:~ ~:GID?:n4>:q:'f':>
C r,::::: C' ~ r,::::: C 0 0 (' f.~ C' C'OC' ( 0~
~~f~~~l:~:t009JGfe!~211 ~~G~':>m>:>:tj:<Of'')O)I GV:>C4>f 9tJ"
";(c~ o t:ot: t: (' (' (' ('
9) GyG~?I (1)~~~)?~1 G~X4>f!D?: <O~?CG~:;~ G~~G~?COX:C:~X
o
o:>m o co ~:').')11
como t: c c
G~?CGO>:~c
C' C" t: "' t: C"
GV':>CO)CQ~')CO)O)CI Ql:o:>GO>IX:4> OIQ
"'O o o
l let. C OJ L4 U jJ
r;;:;: C' C"r;"._ 0 C'OC" ..C OC" 0 C'Oo C' r_:C' C' C'
~~~II OOIDct-~~ c:Y'XG>fc:l tDY~t:;~CD~I groooJ'tj~ G~-:>C<'X>C
GY?Cc'n Y:ID>
ll
(" ('9 CCJ>GOI':>OCI:W.:>:m
(' (' u
' J tJ
0
L
"
QI~CQ)O)~:').') II
JL
(' ('
G
(' g} ::n 0
L
., ("
QI:~CO>mcnox:
JL--T
('
6
('

mooQmcn:ro
t: c Bot: <' o
c;~xc;O>:rot cro;ur? ocac G~?cm
C'
oo?: Gone: <' o (rooec)
U. --\.- l 6 J 1J L il l l
c o t: .5:. c c c ~ ' o ~ t:ro C' C'OC' o t:~c o
o,'1m9J C:~fO~"):~~II~:J?~ [t.~CJ :Gpm G~X~yOf (\)(.))t:IC~~j-:>51
C' ~C:: OC'C' 0 \~Q C' C' C' C' C' 0 C' 00 0
cc :~ :J;l~C} CJO:)')::;>IU:t G~")CG:;):~c G:D~ G~XO:X::C:~:>Co:l:D:'l)l ~VO:>
I ~ l. !..:1 6 J ll t C L
OC' 'T' ~ ( 0~ 0 ~C' r,::::: C' 0 ~C:: C' C'
Gf<XF'P ~:>:U')~')~ t:Jyro?e!~~~~ ~~j")CI3dOC:T.l0~ G!ll G~?lj C\.'ftj"
_c:: r~ o o c (' C' ., ('
c- C'~C' c 'T' ~
7) c:ll tj4>~~~:0f G~~~')COX:GI:I?C(l) Ql:~~ ~o:ltj-j>~~~~ <031 G4>')lj0)
~ , or~ (' o o "' (' c c (' ('A\ r~ (' o o (' c c ~
ffiltJ?~tj~~:'i}:Of QI:;~I:I~O:>C:j-j>GOOX:Uf9J tj~~:~:~q. ~"):')yUC ~:~
c o t: t: ~ r:c ccr.~ C' t: c
G!:j~~::~ll CJI!T.lt9C::T.lc:p1:1J:>:entj:Gpm ~")9JO~C G~?CG~:ro
(' (" (" (' A\ ' 0 (' (' (' (' ('
G!j!O)I QQ")CO)CG~?CO) Gf:>(l)roG'f>SJ ~?CO~OC~?:~~II G~?COX:G~X
C' (' (' C' C' C' C' 00 ~c:: (' (' (' 0 C'
~.:n :D')0)('1)(\)('I)~:>OJ 'D~:U~?:GC\JI')t>?l ~~CI:DX7.XUC\)O)O)C O)C
C.:.C IlL C!. Uo iC 6 \.
'l C C' . 0 C' C'OC' C' _<:.
CO?:G~") Qt:~c c;a:n:x>?:C:SG~:> GY:>CGO>:m (\)'j;QO)(\)O)Q)I G~?CGO>=t
J eJI 6 T A L J L L L 6
C C' "' C' 'l C' 0 C' ~ C' C' 00 OC'
~")O)O)())COI:~c Qr::mJ'P'l~~?:::u~u IDI~ . c;-.ncc;;~:m .~~~co:>:
"' (' C'~C' A\ 0 0 C' (' <(' (' (' ..c C'
G~'.:> QI~S Gf')O)t:JY~ ~:9oxp~cl G:O~ G~')COJCG'c>")Cc:l ~?::oo:>
c t: <' ~ c o A\ ' L~ .o c (' t: c t:
9C~ Go:!lcn'f' 'j~:JI romJtj: ~Gf'P50C G~~:~"):~~ II oel)j ~~4>1
~ (' (' ;.Ji, (' (' C'~\ (' 0 (' Q 0 C'
t:j<]_OXO ~e 'jO)GtCJ>I CJI~~~ OOO::l)ri):V'lYJ?:m GY?CG~:Of 00<1:00:~
C' C' 0 C'~ C' 'l C' 0 C' OC' C' 0 C'
~~ IIC:VXG~:~~G~') <:;m~~GO)')CQI:o:>GQJ?C:~ro~: ~::;n~:9ro
(' (' (' (' ..c (' C' "' (' 0 0\ ('
:02?U GI,)')CO)CG~')-::;1:1 ~(I)?C:f?:q<: QI:O)QQJ?C:~ 'I~~~~ II G~~
(' (' C' ..c (' 0 ("~ 0 (' ( 0~ ) ..c C'
<O.~?CO>CGQ?CCI :DGOO:>c:rqt OO'f'Ore1: e:G~:>C:G~ 9tf? 1:1 f>D<Ooo:
:sA C'
:;,JOXJXjl G~~GI:I?Co:>CIO~Xq<: ~?::r.lOXJC::r.l0:>3I0:>:Q:1)Vl~2~
(' (' (' (' (' C' ('(' (' \ (" ~
9 ~ CJ'Xl

cocnSco~:
(G:~cn~
~~~
(co~1)~:
~

~
~~~'l
~cn~Sc
9?J
OC' C' C'
iCCGO'J') O'Jcp:CJ:~JlU

CDC:00'J9'4)W~~
-..- ll Jl
(" .
O'><F'~g~ e~~~F.

t ~G&
C'
"~?C~J~"(:>'JC 01
C' C' "'
'1 (
m~~m'P:~~p:
0 )

c:~ ~E

G cpu r,: ('
tj2QOO'JC~l':lt(:>")~C~
(' r,: (' 0 (' . .).
(oo~~oxr=~
cpc'~t:;~:~u
~~:~ ~
Pev
..r. O)'l ~"
lc:sococ~?t
~ !-<'!:! .. ~ 'I -.S <'('~ .. 1::
"""ot:r':-<OmfiY.IUI');r-CXJCcr-~Jrl aa0 ,a
~
~::~CO?rnaaCO?IUJ?I_lC:UI " -r oof~ " I:"
'{~t'[OU')C\:lQO)')n)QOI:JCU "C! "
ClOCl:J":IJIY>~
~ c~ o .. .. ~" "... " .. o(' o~
O'>~lt!C: OCO:IJO)(r)OJ O'at:JOOUIC!f ~OU?C\:lQO)')I'D:l>~lll ~;o~c U~OI
C:...i .. (' (' 'I .. (' ('. ~~ (' . .. ~~
~~~,:IJIY> II IIOOO'>fCT.>01'1t;l~~ WIIIQO')~~~:D?I Ue::~~~f<7.10'> 00~
~t..lt. C'C't' C'. 'lt't' C'C' , . .. r
:DC:""c-:D') ~J'"'~OCJ):DO'):MI C:(\)')O'>QIOOf~I:D'l ~oc.Jii)lC:ZI~:D~:D?I(;c.\lj'>fl?

Cj~:d ~6t~ZOlJ~ O')QOOIC:UI~ oato?t'r"~ ~'fX'#rooStr&;J'!r;ri~fi&.,JCJi


" -1: " .
:D~ -t:J?I::l)(l)Q:D :g<;CO?COO'XO?IUJ?I!)')QUI
" "' ~'('"'U~OO-~f:D<O:CO')I'D~
oou (' .. .. .

~~.,J~!t:n., 6i:ne" ~ :D.,:~:l)O')Q(X)')~:lxxm


ic:o:ef
oL_" ":t..--<:
~~10')1 O)O')fCT.>O,~ ~.. " cc:..r <7.l'f'1ro:>(:::emn:
COCI:f"OlJO')O')l<"~ltj'; oo o" "
41000lJC\)('7)0lJ

...r.i...-:o~!~c.~.,W.ro~:n~~- - uw;o~~ n
..,...~.11 l ... C:::Vt .. "
:n:n?:W?CF:Ifi~'ccocml
.. (' ('0 ~ . .. ~
C::DI ..r-10')? , , I
( .(\
:len C'
~011
'l
ee C'
')2?(llfl~rt
(' ('


0 ('
~:xncp:cxrn~mll
C' 0 ~!! 0(' ('
:n~~cncpta~mn ~~~~='l~scot~=c==ut=(J)~ 11

~:~c:JI
oe:~ttll
. .~~~~:ncp.=<:q
. o ('('
G~?C~JO~~')CI
..
G~?COXD
('('

'1" ('Q (' (' (' (' (' ( "~") (' 0 Q '1" (',
( ~~I ) OO?CG>I GroJ?:x>t:;~ ~JG>OX: ~~I O'>C"$"a Gro:8:3:lGOI ~:x>o>
C' C C' (' C: C' C'GI C' OC' C' \
~3'd re~ OXJI ::ootOT<; <000?C0('8) 00 ~4)0ffiJ~GtX!f ~~C)J~o:>~G:x>?l
\ r.<? 0 ( (' (' (') ~ ~c:: Q (' (' Q ('
or.:~t qoou:>::D~: cp:nmG>~ oxp:~~:c:v O'jCC)JffiCJt ~GmJtO

o.:>(-t ~~6:~:x>~ll
::leG:J ~.,~. cp<:~t.?,~ ~ r# ?1!7' ?1!0' reeu
r;~
t oe..,., ~t~J ~0<7.1t::JI'i ~ JO "(" ,:I~:D'> oei1J
" "Q " _$ C' (" " $ r
0?.,C>I3C:::r.l')O) 0 '10'~)
Gt~ 1 ~;l!il qc&n ~IO'>'f't~f~ ~tni ~~~~~ f-3
, ,
1 ") l j_ . ll <1 . I!~ l , . 1
~ooro :c.ro:c~ ro:axcecoro ueesc.cc~co o::;o rofle:.cll:):cc:cc:x.e>~
. .)0 0 . 0 t.. .;0 0 . .)0 y 0 0 .) .
~~!COOt'>
..
OOrob~dtxeooxc
.) .)
be::xccc.
.)
@cc:k:x.m-~2
.) .) .) 0
:~:~ecb
.) . "
~~reccbd .)
.) .,s 0 . CC ..)W~~ ~b . b r C\X.CC~
J 0
IC~e
.)
b~~ WC.~'lb :::J .) 0
. ~- I(L~. J r f'? ILh -L 11l...':':ln :1!~!.
~cc~eooa.:ros t'>CX>:cccc.orro ocra..~'C~ ~IW ucow~
. ) \0 .) .) \. .> o .> o .> . YO
1...':":1 v v 1 , ':':I . __ '::In i)}L~~- , 1 ~---
wcccc:c.cc:~J()~ ~rooc.oro cccc~cc.o r: ow"~ wewCDWG .
0 .) .) .) t.. p .) . . \.) .) . .) . . 0 .)
cdcc~ l2c:Cooc\c.ccc~b roccoroco d,:o:'!oocw (C hlhJ). ~lU:c ~d.,ce
.J ., .J .> .> .J : \ ..> ., ::lo ~ o .,
..1.. 1 ., . ,. i!. . , ~ 'J . 1 , E n 101 , ~ . c
o:wcoo oco:o::~ cc
.) 0 -0 0 . .,.
. 0 :ecce w::;c.roero
0 . .) 0 0 .)
l:)(bte:soo:x.e.~ cccc:ccc
. . y.) .) .) .;) .
. .,_ .
trecc~ 5':3.:> :..PwP~wro .)
~:>:de>:eecu.
y 0
uc:ie:~ro
:)\ .) .
:c.~ .(0 - hlb:-)
~0
:&cxe.ce~:a
.) . .) &
'~:~ecb. rW.<:cb&>e futdco~~2rCo:~eo@ ~eec~ce@h cr.():>& ~ch4e>
~ . ' :; -.J 0 0 . . . J .) ~ ~ .J ,JO
:c&:a.:ro :de>:re&> u-oo~e> :,.,QciJ~hlU :@cxc.cc~blbe> k@cc t::;J
.> .,. .>
. ZCcc
~ o o :>~b o o .:> o .J ~
.:cco::)c.cee>
. .>
oro:2oro&kc
.:> o.>
. .C.wc.oOc.c::x.cc~
. ., o .J
6o:lu:c.ro
.> .
.:e.oewc:.coe>:lo
ol.:>::J.> 1..:
r n 1 11 ..-::~ to . 9
j)hl 1 ':1 ......., '::l L ~~-
. c.ft:c._rm~co. ~~:ccc1e~:c.a~~ . - ~~ !J~:~ .. u~ccro.ecw~
n 1"' - n 1 1 r .1.... 9 n lh;JO II
:c.ro1'te:jti>~c.e>e>. ~ccs:e>:~cce> J!l<D<]JG'f~cc::>. ~co~:5'-Jeo rco~ooc.o
I :klhlc,hle>@cdhl
e.t~ ::~ .) .>::1
:c.cc:de>:c.ccd~ e?tch"J:4bl:~o (.(jcbec.<X:xccc uer.o
.) ~ -.)~ .) .) .. ~..
CCCeWCDe)
_,__ffi1
CCfte: CCCC ... n
, 'J IO~jO::.C.O
II.OCOCO:c o
'CCOiO ..
:oc ... v 1
)~;C.CC<.lP.OO
.) .) 0 .)0 .) .) 0 . :/...J .) 0 ...I .) .) 0
1 '' n 1 11 '::I . , v 1}
co~cce>wc.co-,coro :cro ~ioa::co:
11o , a ooco:c.re>:reco utcCC<Xe>Wo: COCC!>
.) . .) ...I.) . 0 .;) . 0 .) .) 0 .) .)"
kucbeohlc.G
.) .>::1 .>::1
rc.w:c.ec.4r~e~ Q,hle.ce:c.c:re 1., .
:c.edlhlo~"\:co:C!
::1.>
r:hl~kcceco
0 . olo .
. r 1
1. _ r 11n 1 'J ~ II 1 ,, ~ "'
:~coeo~gwco :oo::x.coo:cc ftCO tlroroco:c :cccc:c.ce>:ceco. utccc<X~Kcc
. 0.) 1., .)0.) o- .) . 0 .) .
~j . 0 . :.) .
:oocc~

. .c.wPwl:CCo:oc.lbe
0 \ .)
&:4e.ce>rollhlofuco:8
c & .)0 ::~., .
:h1400x:e2rccroS.cco
o : el.> 0 .) .)
--:1 . n 1'L Q 1 r 1 n , ,, J. o o lb ,
::CC~te:S'W~C.t'>O ro:_jccwc.wo ~~gcosoco w:c.cfl:cero rw:c.cc:~~ !> :e>OO
~ . .): .) .) 11. , , .) ....... .) 0 .) .> . . <1.) .. 0 .~ 11 11 , .) .)
cccb:c.h'J@@cece
.o ~.
:cc<Xcre:S&oc.e>o
.) . .) .) . .:)' .
u@ccro~b:c.wlc-c@cece
.) __,.
oo.:ccAro
.) .)0
11Ro1.Uco:2
~j.) 0
r2c~e>l2oo:~.
.) .) 0' .
<bro.)~~cre:&~flo:c.cc
.) . .) .)
. .~Aec a=:ob.. -2cG
.;).)0 :> .) .)
I (dhllu)
~o
. :&;;,.4ce> &chl:oPe:*~ro
.J::I .>
a:>ll~ottco:aroro*reed:o ua:~bewcom
o.Jo :> :.:~..> . .o ., .,s o ;). \.) S::l
,. ,, r 1 "" , } o .1 1 r ,. ,,
cc JOe>flro
0 .4 .JO
coro:::>-::cerooo
. .) 0 0
J(.cc.oooccc:
\ .
ee> ~~1iCC!>o:c.cto::>Owo 01g;cero
.)...I 0 I., .> .> .) 0
I n 1_ o 1. o .1. ,. 1 1b } "' r 1
cccc~xco
.) .)
oc.o:~c.w oc.owcc UI:>OC'v~ : e>ccoo e>:ero:()ect:c.~e>
.> .) .> o Yj .> . .> . C .:>
At>..G ,bc_h"J~c.cco:c.h:J ccoc.o:oc.e>oc.c~o rohlocl2ccc.hl~4bmo:::c:Jeco
.) 0 .) ~. :::1 .) .) :> .):J. .) . ~ .) .) t..
~gi~ c.u&1,15oe~es
~ -~ 1 .)0
r:@roc.cce~c.hl~J.hl
.) .)
: :xt,"JoC.coo:oebe>fl:f~o
~ 3:.3 .> . ~ .). .
w 11hloh:co:2
::.:~., 0
~ ~.:I ,~hlccb:c.h"Jccc.hle~
.,::~ ~. ::~
::x:h"Je>b:x:oooro:ceo
.) ~ o .) .>o . .
&ro~-&c
.) w
1ee> ~:m,,..
;r--r ~h"Jcc-~
I
6 In10
hBofle.c t2c~eoec &roM:c.re>:C.CCftro eei:G!b.@cc (c hlLu) 11Gh.\:co:2
.>0 .> .)0 .) . .JO .>.:>0 .> ~0 ::J.) 0
r 6 ~~i'~

~&ooc.e \ .:>
ohec:~ellb:awb
.> .JO
o~:eo t:Xo~rec:E;ebc.~
\ e.> o .>o . \ .) .,!) .:> o
oc @~a;b .,
~c
:::J
1 rl '.:I TI . j_V . r 'II an COOl~-- 1 Jy
I
I roccco~g ~~~e
bl;II:JC cccce!>co - rc.e..ohe: t(.O(ECO:JKOW O:i ftC.G
!. ~sic s 0 .) :::J .) \.) _ . .) .) 0 . . y ..)
c!c!6
r
,. L c.mc.coecwc.ro~ecccoo;cc n 1 1<> ~ 1 1 1
ccccs-~~S'OI 1o~roco m:uxo
ooc.o::)o
:ceo ~ 0 ~ ~ ,) ,) .) 0 .,l, 0 0
~-:1 eroe.c C.CC~bte:CC~CO II t:><bhl:)oc.orewOO C~l)biOW~WCQ :~c.h'J~cnhloog
'. ,) 0 ,) ;:, .>:1.> ~ ,) ;:,- l, ,) ~ J ~ J~b
1CCcce?>c.co~:00> c.cc~eflb &nro:;:,b
"";:,c.co~:~cceoo ~
.) ' J ftco~cc~(OO:>~
,) .) ~0 \0 0 .) .) J ,)
\~ .. ; moor, c.cc:;,ecnb~rro ftcotohl:c.co lc~:c.corowc.coe>e.ccc~wcc ccc:;,:@co
.) .)0 '" " 0 :.; .) ,) ,)
11
1 n 1 117 ~ ,. I.. 1r " b r ,. , J_ -- -
eco ccccs-~:scn 1o~e.cco:;:,~ uo~ot'l~:J efl :ce:t'lo~ flCOcoro:~rot:.e
.> .> o ..l. o .> o .> \0 e J o o
J:ccroh.>dxoO,co
,) 0
:cc~~oCbwto
..) L. ,) 0
l:>hle.c~cc~:...JJroroflcoft
.>:.:1 ..) 0 ~,) 0 0.>
f,a.-'&C2A j
tt.':dAhl:cco
0 :J ~cch':lwewt.cwcb:;,:;o
~ ~..) 0.> 0 .> ..)
'tc:fle.cllhlokco:2
0 .>0 :::J.> 0
IXo~e.ci(Z
.J '$
ucc~cnhl:oQeccftre~flW
.> .>:J .>:::h J JO
d:OWIOcUcot:.e
.>0 L .>
wPro
.>
rowc.we>
.>
(oC2nbcnkl
.>
;:,md'lhl:c.co
":::1 J -'
&!ccwtod..;t'le.cllhlobx.o:2
.> .> o o .>O :1.>
C2ccw:ob
e .> o .>
Ibe.cwrei::ew
.) 0 ..)
'b:> r..::>&biow4u.X:\)
y l,
I:oc. We~af:il::>oco4cc:;,~ccadL..ececc rw
~ .)~~b ..) j .)
..) .) 0 .) ,)
c.cc:;,ecnbHw
\.) .)
~ro:dt'l:tero
0
<CcccoS.cc:;,mo::>r,
.) .) .) .)0
c.cc:;,flb
0
f,cow::>b
0 J
1~1G
~
r n' <r ''
rocccoo o~C.IftCV:
cbcceroes
" lll:)e<orocce>:axo
_'L __ :c.ro:o;;wco
l 'L ::>C.fl~ tc.wm
.J J .> o Y\.> J .J .J
ax..ro~ (oo~teMPe<l'COco C2cccnhl:C2&oll!lll:iilotDco:2 t~cnt::.leco:C2&1~flC.CC
" .>oo .> " .J:I " Y :I.J e '5' .J:I .J
-n v 1 11 ,. r r b r 117 r.1.> '7
cccccn:cc:c.lt'lffi(\:> C.ft:~c.cl em:c.uro c.ccee~ <"CC:scoco :>ct'l:;, m1ecoro
-> ' e.> 1., .>O.> \ o " ~ ~ e '.>
w~cnc.Pro~oc.t'l~ ro:h':lec:d.x.o:lkcce.c~ lkC2o tcbb.;@:chco
.)
oG:cbco 0..)0.) ~ o::l ~ 0 0\
oco:r,
.)
tbe.c tlocf1;'ttJc
;J
flctxocc~Cb tui:o4cndwe>oc.p,~ t:~ooc.obl:>c.fl~
.) ..) 0 0 ~0.) .) .) ~ :.:1.>
r _l_ -- ,,
:>~:
2:cc~ ,~:axcemec 16e.c:c. nfl:c.cororoc.coe>cr:ccex.c.:cc IO<t.'COW
;, e o .> .> L.>
uC2ccroe>ehl~
.) \ :.; ,
:>oodxehl
~ ~
:dfl:C2ao
~
wll6lob.::co:2
:~, &
r -n 1711 "'" r . r
:~c. cccc~c.ccro :c.1ft:cero tc.ft:f'lCCieo~ro
.>
]~a.> :f'lCOieo~wroD:>:ob
e.>L.>O.> Y.> .J o e.JLJO.>
1 1 b r 117 '""'J L l7!.
: cooc.co~:cc c.cc~et'l flCO:sco<o :>C.t'l~ ucccccc~cw~ :;:,c.]~~
0 " '0 " .) , ..)
~ '""'111 r 1. ~ -n n..) 1 .:1_.)--
ooececciW c.cc~e~o flWscce>ro61::>1; cccct'lb::::e:~ "coroo~coco:a:xo
" " \ .> .> .> ~o .> o e .> .> o o
eroro

ICCCC~ceC2rwrooo& &?cce!;b ft:~e.cfle.cllhlob.::co:2 uee.cc.cc~
.> _, ~ ~o " \ o e .>O :1.> e l,
~~h:l~re~cncn c.u (oc hlh>) :~oooc.fl~:2 ()b,oc.o~ro t?>hlcce11:o~ eck5
-> ~ .> ~o .> .> e 1., ~ ~ .>:I 'o o
~<!:~:oe.c ~bg;~h':locc:oo &r...o?>~:c.P~co~~ ~ccel;lb~
cotec.uc.cv:;,. 1o1.>o
.> L -' .> .> ~J .> .> .> _, \0
11 r1 _1_ 11 1 TI lfb r 1 liJ 1 a
COW?l::<V:coccecoro
v o
IW:C.IftCOOCC
o
n 17 '::InW ect.:eeo
-> .J 'o
t=~:se.GftW Sl nroco:
e .;,o .) e
II!!Kp Cv:OO:f'JCC :c.e.c&:~
Y 5~ 0 e .> o .)OJ<!:adwe>:>C.A~
.>
Otto~elc.vb
.> .>
b CI:C.CC.4>C
J e l<b~~
.) b~t)c;
:J
1 1 . '""'J 1 r 1 1 r L n:>:>~Gf'l~
.)0 1!:3
c:pc. s~ 00 C!.Y....UC\."CC:P,COJeo~wro :oo:>c.co~:cc ftcx:>:oo
~ -' \ 0 .>0 e~L..>O.>
0 11 a::cc e:<:e:flo."'C 0.> O.> -> ~?'-~
t:l>)cproo'~:me =~ 0 o&>~xob
v ~ .) .J
roc.cco~ l<n~e b~:~tJ~ h::<!:&x.aQ:x.fl~ <!:ec."
I 0 .> ;J
cr 0 .) ..) :_;_,
] I n1 17 1 L '""') b 1!:1?!. 1 II !, l()
=?WC. IOCBW!ec:ewcoco::>o IICCCCCQ~fl :ce:f'JO IX.O~ C.U:C.If'l:C.<nec.CCOe.G ~
~ .> o .> o .> .J o e " o o .>
:X:.tt9$reo ""~ .) ,) .)
~~?c.rJe>:te
~ :.; l,
ud<"ceccPwroo:>&
.) .) .)0
~:c.Pft<:eC2Pro:occcn
.) .)
lwroco:llhl:b.xuc.Qeoro
..) :.; .) ::J .)
IC.Uror...ocooo(l,no;oro
.) .) , o .) o ,
lo.>roco:llhl:hxuc.Q~ f,:~C:to::>b 1:hllXO~ wo:!cc
.) ~ " ::J o o .) el o .) ss~c
( 6d6
as'
,
(e:cbcoe~ro)
.
::>::>~c.a~bl~oc.roe@hl
.,)0 .,:_j .,) .,) ~
~
(~:Cb~~ro) &b (lee) 5~~re5c.ae
jlo8~ fl~&~t1i_1&&cbco
iB

'.
obb
u~&w.c~~~ f:~adx.o ~- ft5o (~) !oo:coo 'L~~!>
~bof roc.sc~f '1~~ bsic ca::~~re fo rc s-oflcc;:~soo~ ~Q bs~c t
~c5 ~~~,ac~~.
#$ f)$~&i' ~~~
ge&.mc.o~
. .,
y
lll'l_i)O
:I e&ec lo~flm ~t()::XC ~~~~cob
. 0 .)0-- :.~-LJ 0 . ~
wh.l&acbco .)c.oo_,c:], (:&xc) ,)coccd, cocoh r01.)0 .., .. .,)
oc oxc;c~~ ~te bsvc C.(C~~re i'> l.oc ~:,ccx:gsoo->cb ~te bstlc t
nub.l,b oo:,ccle&cc~ rct~e C~:~tJc
.) . ,) ;) ~
r II Wit
0~ .)
.J
cc (.\')~
666
9 1 1_ 11
II &CJJ(.OCCO):cuc.oemw
~ 0
- ,
IE-:1
o66
I
j
I
, ,, )
(~:c.bco~cne.s
17 1 -- 11
uc.oc.owe:aKOecnm
~ . .
, 1 ,.
II C.OC.Oe.GOOtCDC.O~C'Oe.G
~ 0
89t
c ~ !!! :oe u Gl s::i..& c c e o 8 e ~~ eve>
.:
s ()
P. 9-, 4l <-- rn .:o
oc;- ~ ~ ..c
&~ en -a. o8a., :e- 3. ..8B 8a., rn.,
81 ll
/ 1? 8&> an
rn., rs 8
~~~~i~T~~ ~~~ a.,~~+J. J }~J S~~~~
..4)~ ~ s e .s ~ -flo')~ e ~/~~~ ~ s ~ Dn cve>,~a ~
T Gl
~ e ~ &, ~ ~ ~ ~ s .. a., en ~ -s a., ~ i. J 8 ~~ 8 Q

Q
-;.~ ta., ~~ JO - .s s~ ~ . ~
~!~t~~~t
~ a.,
ft~~i :~~~~~tll1A
~ 8 l~ 1 e-,::S e
~~~t~
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Gl Gl e e e oa Cl-8 Gl

t 1., ..a. ~ ~ l ~~ ~ ;
t r . s w~ -ao [ ~[B.,~ . t ~ , -. =t t c ~
~ ~ 1 t t~~ ~ pJ ~ d . 8 8 rfu&,,~$1rn. ~ i! ~~rl P..
~s~ ~~-@~~t~~ ti~~~~ ~ri~ t ~~
t. P. l~ g e ..Bo e c !!! c.,
o:s Gl o 1:1
=jf om
~ 8 ~;:s.,~
8...o ~s ....s., ~~ ~..Bo ~ s8 ~ -a ~[B.,s;:[B., ()~g,f
~ s c .. i: :8 .o., ()') 9 ..8o ~ &, ~ ~/ ~: ~ o8 ~ .. ~ ~ :;&~ P.
Gl Ci?
e ()') 8 .~ 8 e'l&,
! 8 - .., a., Gl ~ ..8 ~ 8 o n en
JJ ~~ ~1 c ~ ~ 8., ~~ Gl ~~ c :s- . j-l ._ ~j ~ ~~ .v c ~
! . oil 1 ~j t~ 8 8. ~ ~ i ,6:~ f f J ffi. L~~j ~
6>- - C., Glr-51
~tJt~e_t
me Qu~Crn_,~-3
s.
~~j~ ~!l~.rt
.. e - ..e= t ~'~J. i~t/~~~%
c ~ ;:(; :::!)() '-t1 J Gl
~~ (Y.)

~ s ~ ~ ~ ~rn 8 .@ . s l ~ ~ ~ GS ..
4~~~~
~1All~a . rl~rl~ ~~rl~.t~ L~~~'ije
!!:~ l
!&'~
rr~'*'~ I ~CT)~
-e :o.; u
. ~
ucccc0~b:,
.:> 0
(. cdbco
.:> .:>
P6)('()o
.J
wolrdoe
0 .) .)
JIGGhl: hl:c.cocoro
~.) ~ 61 .) .)o~e& 0
ro :c.roro:cbc.oeroro
u@ccw'l:occftre~~ce S.bcot\xce~:cbco fGwcccoo ofl,eclffi :c.edo:cbc.o
.J .) 0 .J .)0 .) .J ~.) .) .) s .0
etnro

J:hlcor()(OO
0:J.:> .>
wwr~~bG
0 .>
ll.:d~d:Oro IC.CC~ecol,Pe~~ro
..l & :> ~;, .:1 0
1-b~~ercoofco
:J ..)
1
wc:>co:>~
.) .;,
7:>b'l:oro 1bw G~b ~dxccc.a>cb
.) ~ . :J .)
1o~rofu:cbccel:nro
~ 0
I~I0 Cc
~l, 0
nedooe~bcororoo
.:> .> .:>
l~hlccco~C2~
.>~ .> e
o~c~o2:cbco doed2ccehllo~
.> ..>O .> \~...1..
~~
.>
wcoro
.) c.l,:~k:le~wo .) .J
.J:::h .:> .) cccb~:::o &:~31
0 .) .
na:!cc~b:c.~~oo~ro
.)
10~ :~c.Qe~e,
.:> .J ...1, .., :::3
w~wo
.) ..)
wcb~:;o
.) ~
ICC~~::xQe>e.c~ccwc.cve>b)
\ 0 .) ~ .) ..)
tt;;~ro
0 .)0
~:thea~
J
1SrJ'hc.w
.;,:,)
~KCCeiCC
'\\
o~:C,ro/1,
.)
d.ocbocc:tt
.) .)
w:c.rl'lwPecc&Jcc~a.;cc
0 .>.) .)
CCCC;r,e(oa:;
.)
wc.e.c~
.)
lleecc.cc~(;t2QaG:4ce
l. .) :=:!.> .)
c.~c.recc~ too~ltu lto:c.rMbofnlftro
. 0 .).) 0 .) .J..:.J
u!!lJe.w1o~ 10~ :xt:;J~ec d,on.hlc.o'C c{,:::J~l~
:J .J L ..J.. .> :::3 ::::.:1 o .>:Jo
C2ccr:;Jeboewero
.> :=:J, .> L
~6a:too0~c.w
.J .> _,
CClccw:oS
.> o .> .>
1n[u~~8no::::>1o~
.> ~..> ..)L
t.uto
o o
wPeec i:cceteeclccS.~~ :CClroBGro ~~:Jh>:cbcoe(\r.ec .~f:ecoo IWftc.cca:!cci;~
.) 0 .) 0 .} .) ::> 0 .) .)0 0 .) 0
wrew&cc~wcc
~ .) .)
:C2oX.oC2cc:c.cccoo
.) .) .) 0
d,:,ecc:~cec
l..
l~ec~cccoto~ 0 .) .)_,I .) .,)
-C2('):2fl<oolre:~
.> e.)O .J o
c.MPemc.ccecid1:~:::co
.J8 o _,
~lhX:ebe.cwrew&
_, o ~ J
R:db:~~
;,-
1k(.(..)G~teCDC2cc IXO~ ~co:~eco:~eec a:>Ae.G ~:&..>:::i:,a6 .2.cc~CG~Go:::h
. 0 .J '\ .} ..> 5 C .) .J.O.> .) 6.) 0 ~0.)
ll.:cr.ww
~.)
n0!;ftc.dew&cc~wcc
.) .) .)
c.cce.eect!cca;t)l
0 .) ,:~
wwbbe2cc@~
.) . .) .)
e:::J-.e~
6.)0
~b&:!cc:,~;)Gl::>ecr;
.> L .J:::J .J
t:ctroc.cc~~C2ccb:::>Rco;!l
.> J o .> .>_,
h.:C2ccW4;,wcc~~
o .J ~ . ..>
wec.c
\..
. ,. bbl n _t_ _ _ , "' " , ~ ,, , -::::1 o
.:GWf!Je '..jft ~~~:axo~cr..a:; ~<.Oe:ececo uc;:fto~?~<.nfC.W~ c.osccc~~
wCnoo::>cc::>i.o~ ,(1,,o~ :cfl'l:ccoe.c::.uc.coe.eccc~wcc ~rw:~occ-<J c.cce.
J . .J :> Jl;. l. 0 .) .) .J .) .) -
wcro~bY~cci;:b~xec
..> .J o ..>
~ba.:mr.G
..>~ ~
cc'occ
\...
:2coo~2co
e.) e
".oocn~(')
;,
1-b~b
.;,o
CC~WCC~QWrfl e&o C.cce.k@ccwtooG ::>CC:OIO~ :f)]kQ ;ctX;:CCOft --
.> .>'..:J.> .J o o .J .> .> .> .)L e o ~ .
. o.J
~bl:c.e.ctoccc
&oro .>~. .J
n2ccG~~::.k:!Ct.Xn~ev(')c.w
_, .>::1.> .>:::I.J .>
Jcc~OOJre@l:'oc.cc~
' o .> e
Cl:>ro wru~~l;.Jro c0wPee.cwoo::
y.) 0 .)00.:> .) 0
do~<Phl:
.) ..J .J
,:..:J ben' 0tJb Ac~cocc~cb
u2cco~.2roe ibchl~~ec()(.() <ncr!cce<:eul:o:c.cc~
. J .) ' .J ~ .) .) J '\0 .)
<.o&~~ ,cocrro'?leBlacc~!)rowoo.,!oroec c.fl~c.r(')(.()realn ~:>rod.) ~:,Slcce
.J .) ..) ' " .) .J .) .) :>- 0 .> . .) _J '
'cea:& :::x.J:;J~cro,o :C2roto:dxo."!mro t:;,c.Ei)l~h:lc.rowtb~ ~4-Pecr.;
0 ~ .) ~ I.. :> 0 .) ~ ~ .) .) .)\)
he~
e
cc C2 1XccGlu~ot:l:2
J o .>:..:l., ~wc.rw~~Gro:2
.J ..>
.:C2coccce.:cecbxo&:>
e . .:> ..> o .J
w2~ ,::::ch:l;,:ctcwcb"~r~esbc.~
.J
:xr:::;J~,o:CC!m&l;e.Eut.u .:>~~eee.obl:a
.J ~ ~,; J o . o .J o .>'..:J e
.J ::::1 .>O e
) -::::1 .,. II _If ''l _1_) <> r 1 >o II I[ ::J
v CC: 0:::(')CCCIW~JOCC;c IC.OW ~CCC :>~:C.WX:.C:CC ICCfteBC IW~OOeB!<.-
o JO .> .> e .> e o .>o J ;:> e
v , , 11
II C.UC.OWOOICDCOCC'I'lW
:1 0
v 11 , 1.
"ecnwcnCDGn:wc.o
0
CC.b
f)
l l ..()
~:tor 11l <-a,
~ 8 6) . .]a~ 8 3 ~ 8 ~~..so s ~ ~-a. 8 cS ..g ~ 8 ~
81 ~ ~ i. ~ ~. 1 6>
~ ~ . _, .2. cfu ~~ ~ ~ ~') =tr [B., " 0 0 I
t .V
rn, -c -t. .o-, a, 8 -.. e ~ .::, -u ~ o ~ .. -& 0o :1! ~ 8 ..so J
- ..so~ 8 8 ~~ ~ .:8 ~ ~ ? e ~ e -c ~ ~ 8 ~ 'j- ~ !, s . s., 6)
_.. e -v oS c. 6)
i;i., .8 .e . -v . 8. . -a ..So . Jl .. -c ~
~t~
v,
&~~l s ~~i1~~t~
s, -8 ~ ..so ~~ ~ c
"5-8 e 8 0'1
" t 0'>
~t. a~o~o-,~~~ro~~~~g ~ 0'1 Col
o c6> Col !!! u;) ..
e-, CCJ J6)
~ . t a .
-C"l ov
em v -o 6) -3o e-, .e 6) -u ov " -& ~ o-1
n'l 6, 1; ~ 8 8 ~ ~ a, L:8 ~ _e;
0, <;; d 6)
~ s -a -a .8 -v 0'1 ri.>_
~ lcv.o
t t ~ a.-s-a -a8 -8s
ru ga c8 ~ ~ ., o2 8 ~
... 8' -1.>
-s e~. s., ~a,s:: 1-, ..8 ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ s 1,
~ ru.....E 8 e ~ 8 c
<-& d ..
-9 8 ~~ 6) -t.? [B.,~ on
~ ~ s e s ~ C'l
~ ~ s ~ r 1 8 'j- .. i 6)
~ ..e t:& v -H
~ ~-a rn,,.e rm ~ :.9 :Boj ~ a s,ru... a, !=C ~ 8 . . . , ~ s s 6)

"' a..ao. .. .8 ~~ 0'1~ c ~~ ~!, ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ r, ~ ~ ~~ .e.. ib


~~a ~-s n8 8l -+ .. s-H ~ 8 !Q6)cS.e ~ s 6)
.. v ~ Y.. 8-, -a [B., ro e ~ .-u ~ . ~ 0'1 0'1 .. -t.? -a J(
~ -- a v 8 O'l 00,
~~
oX., c -& c -t d . v h... ..& ~ ~ i ~ ..PJO
~ ~ s ' 8 8 e t ~f ~ 8 a., "'f ~ ~ ~ ~ e- i.& 6)
J

8
~.rf &Lrlt 1 Alo~ ~a, a t i ~j::!l . !fJ 1l ~;[ u.dlo
n'lY.g .~-&~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ e ~ &J~ ~!
~ ~, ru,
6) -;
-& C9,il ..8o ~ ~a
6) a 0'1
:S Jl .JS~ t;B,e ~ g., -t@ Of$8.. rn-, . l:%{ 6)
f "'!" -uo 8 ~ t 0'1
"t, :, v 8 . ~ ~ S~ 6> n ~ -& ..c> 6> h S .!,
eg~ -& a s . Oo do~ v e ,g'l ,.8o-,
~~1~-H ~'j-1r~~ rn,lrn-, Ao2~~ ~r
C,:V,
~
..s[B.,~~ ..So~
~ ~ ~..So~ -a V 0'1 1 ..s ..So -3o ~~..So~ ~ ..So~
9~
wr!n'F68 g~:o.:>~~;n ?~8 =mSj ~~ ~o8 oo~ ~OOJ?t~= :lGG
~f~ OO'P:~o?:y5'-> 000 c0) ( m 'Ja68 ~:~~:t FW ~~Ojl+'"?
!n~~~s (~rr) coos !n~JOS~~o'Sn ~oo~ o?=oS 89~= ~
~:'N':;-9 ~ oofi> ~o.JO#, ~:~ ~:oG~ ~~:Jjl~
~:~ (o)!nw068-
of
"As the value the appeal does not exceed Rs.500,
the appellant can only suceed if he can bring his appeal
\~ithi_n .the ambh of clause (a) sub-s. I of s. I 00 of the
Civil Procedure Code, that is to say, unless he eould show
that the decision is contrary to law or to some usage hav-
ing the force oflaw."
l1?9t:J ~9 Gm.3e. ~OO'P(j) !n'j06t- .
"Unger the provisions of ss. I 00, 101, second ap-
peals lie only if the decision is contrary to law or if the
decision fails to determine some material issue oflaw or
if there is any substantial error of defect in the proce-
dure. S. 100 says nothing about the findings of fact, con-
current or otherwise, and therefore the finding of the first
Appellate Court upon a question of fact is fin<\1, if that
Court had before it evidence in support of the finding,
howev~r unsatisfactory it might be if examined.
<Y? ~cxn:eo.:n~P9 So.:>e3u
~~<m: W:j> !n~~'li068 oo88 ~8'ltcr' ~rm~ !nU;?.;,
~:rr Sd~~ oo~:~o.:>e3 !nUjl~ oo~::X:Orr ~~ ~8!- ~~=<J;?~t:C('
rr+m+~: ~~'lo.:>e3 ~~: ~:oS ~t'\'}1(' !n"i~ ~Go.:>~
!n~~ SdCXY.>: ~ '->~ oo88'l~~ 9t:!n~t9 ooSo.:>~~
~.;,~:~eli o~ ~~~ m ~~:>.:>.;, (m) ~:~~<a>
9t:C(' ~: ~oo.:>~ oo~p S~to.J9 ~~~ ooOJ88Gc5Jt:
oot>:GOO?&xn:{: ~ ~fl:> ~Go.:>.;, oot'}<YY.>=. 98:oo~jX;d
croo~ ~ ~.;,~:~ Gsno5!n~.;,~ If o.?:OJO~:Cf' coos
(o)oe~ ~ B+~'~cxl:e m'->JOSto ~??'
(j}'lfCJ?~~~cxl: Ge ~> ~
Deokali Pattak v. Ramdevi and another (?)

" If th~re is eviden~e upon which a finding of fact has:


been arrived at, which could have been arrived at with
propriety by the first appellate Court, the High Court on
.; aUJPuy q:ms 'VVA ~DJnlUJ loa
.nJN. ~po;) ~Jn~:MUcf I!A!d ;>tp JO ool s ~pun 1r.Ktd~ pu~
:1
'.
11 wCoe.ce:cbcoelbec
.) .
. .
11 wW<:d:\):cbc.oe~
.) 0
~C2cc:~~@b t~()C dwrAc.o Ja (.ocdw~b e:d,c.o~n Jet IC.U ~ o\-!!11,.
,;) ,) ,;) ~ .) ::J' .) ~ ,) :.:J
11CV :c.~CIJ(\)c.w 1of 1o:x.w~~o
e .> ee
1.J~c.oc.wct4~
.)
o~1o~Lflb
~ \.. O.)
ucllf 1:d&oox.w 1Lc 1ooc.w~Qbo
O.J 00
J .JW~rc~c.o~ ::.'fnc.o1o
I. .J 0 .J .J I.
ucr c.fwri'IC.() IIC.~C.W
.;,
IOC IC):X.W~Qbo IGC.OIOr(.) O~IOIC
o.J eo "li .> ...-~
uC2cco~w6lw~
.) .)0.) .>
uxh~oo w:~m eolbx.cc~b "t'l:owc.a~ro kofA:<bc.o :hb&:c.:,~rocclroccc. :,tAW
~ ~ 'S ,) ' .) ,:) .j .> .J .) .)0
c.cc~ec.chre
\..)
:C2c.oc.cc~c..o
.)
'(cC.UO,
0 '0
no~~fu:x.h:l~cc
0 .) :::::..1
~bw~cocb~::>O
.) .) .) .) .)
"oi:Jt~r,
.).::1
.. , 1 'l r ~ ""'J 1 '" ~ ~
ecx:cccoc..oc IW~ncc c.cc~:c.cx:ccAie :ccc.oc.c.ceccc..oe:ooc.cc~:)(.O IO~:c.lt'l(()(I)CCWieCC
0 0 .)0 .) .) .) .) .,) ""' .,) . .)
C~o2 J:obtcco:::~
~ .,) .) ~
IO~::>P.:::c.h:l~a;
.J-.J,) ':::::;j
CO:~o:~<'I~WC.CC~II
j .)
uwrec.oiJ:ee
.) .) :J.
"'" ~ :oc.h:l~a; ~ba:6lc.c&wcb~oo ot::'l4~tc:~
0 0 ~ ::::::J .) ,) :) ,) .) .,::~
lnwcoc.o~-:ot:'l:c.ooc.o~reaf!tc:@c.oc.c.eeccc..o
0 .J:::J .) .>0 .)
:~c.cceoC.O
3 .) .,) ~
lne:c.rAwrowwreCD
,) .)
ceo2 r:obc.cceoC.O
~ , .)
roech:::~C:::c.h:leD w:ru:&ot :t\wc.CD:~-:otlhe~:cl,c.o ~b
-.L ,) :I .) :::J .J .J .>:to ' .J
soe~CD .fcbej!Jro ~9oeb~ (co) (c) f,n~~c~o<?~r.o :be~j:~e:~b:l~d,Jfg!
(~:cbco
( efueG):hJto:.::>C('}~
e:lo .:>
COOO:CG<rlto:.::>o:cbcou!>::.::>b):ru~('}A
.:> .:> o .> Y .>
I G~
.J.. wt,
.J .
~
.) cr. "' ~~
(~:cbco~&-,ro) r t() b.J5cf)e> ~~tic .f.
\
96?
~ ~ ~ oeGo ~ ~~ ?4'-c~ oeGG
rnrSeoc;;s<?&~ :> j( :>) ( oo) ~~bYJ>=t~- rncriJ[=Yot Olc;;o:nc;;~, ~:-01J
c;;~ro:c\\ g~c;;o:nrn~ rnc;;oo~c90\ ~
rn~~'P:~~ o~ ct>WtB: ~:arc;;oob (:>)ro o.:>~o:>~ c;Sf~~wc;ro:o
~o3oo rn~~SOlo:>~ c;;snrS ~:i'S'iJ:oc?:m !n<jrnG:>t: I.:'P
Cf6bct>o.f.><;t= eoc;;s rn~rnrorSi'~ ooSo:>rS~c;;o.f.,98: ~voSc:m:c;;o:n
~:<p oob~~~~ ~m ~rn8~:c? ate;;~
' RrSooSb: yt ar&~80lur c;;ro.prSro:ll':o:>~u
0~ ct>W@ ~:c?c@ (?) ootGO.:f.> !n~Yp:c? Go;>a:r.>
~g~~~~~~~oo?~
~G~~~~~~~
c;;o:noS~d)y.p:c? .~~~ rn'ic?cSGoo:~ rncx?: moS c;;o:[g: So:>~u
USY ~~~~~~~~G~t9
o:>G~o;?~ fm~ ~~~ ~sfl &&pg ~
dfyyc;ro:m c;;ootarsn: c;;9J:'P~ rn~6 ~8trorn'l 9J:~:8:
Bbt 98:~ c;;~~a:>:o:>t rn~: ~c? ffl~ rnGem~
rnl!.ooS~ ~s..,. s....... ~:m , . . . ~OI. ~s 0coo~~o3
~ I ..,_,-"'-"-yv"l'f'Y-' I - { """"'~('f"' if-- {''j":' R I ~

GCf6~'}Go:>? ~Cj!nG:>t:t:'Pf~ Go.f.>9t: 80GS!n~Jd5 rnrod)y.p:f~


~8:1 c;;~ rn~~ ~ p.of;: F~~
mt:~:).)~O( YGCf6~'\Go SIOI.t~ <ltc:>lo-n(:>)rnwn OlooSt~~oo~SltoS
s
(J) rnvi'~ 'l~~c;;Ol;~ fji~4)(Y.Y.)O')~ (?) rnvY.r: 06 ~voSc:m:G:mvc?
.p~rncx?:rno5Go:c:m:~ ~I i'~Grol '' u~oo'P:(9)rnv"68'
c;;snd)Ol~~8: rncx?:~oSc;;o:c:m:o:>~ll
.. Under the provisionsofss. 100, lOl ,secondappeals
lie only if the decision is contrary to law or if the decision
fails to determine some material issue of law or if there is any
substantial error or defect in the procedure. S. 100 says
nothing about the findings of fact, concurrent or otherwise,
and therefore the finding of the first Appellate Court
(o) ~~~~ :>Ot ~:1 oo J?'
. (J) o~~~~~ ocz ~:1 oo JeOI
(?) O~~G~3 JOI C'I>'X\XDcg.>:l fY.> e?f
(Cf) 'JtO?f~ G1 o:xuoS-r> ~G
upon a question of fact is finat if that Court had before it
evidence in support .o f the finding, however unsatisfac-
tory it might be if examined."
SiiOOoS G~OJ ~'\t ex? :folJ':~ t ~J'i <JSo:n:G~~ s;)~Ofoa6
~o:>ool"?691 ooyB'il'i~ ~;;o(9+~:o:>6'P~~ GS7.>oS~:;S~:~:me
~~~eoosS'il~~~
ro~:~:1 oo::>.JG:mo:>~91ryoS<m:~~ ~d3o:>S'i~U(~~
o8~;;'Po$~o$(9oS'l+ Si1Gj?8:1ol~Goa ~o$oo~o:>~B'il~t:1 ~o?o.1
O')o:>IO:mo:>~: 9i'ioS~o:>') oo8~'f'l ~~S'il')?+ v:>=
<#:f: ~
oo~ ro&~;F41 d~m otS~fr1S~~~ ~~
ooS:o}~ ~Si~Gt~~ lolG~OII
. ~ G~oc?ro ~:~ g.)O')~ ~F
tnOi~ >,oo~ ~
~~~~~ .
1r 11 1~
fteCOWCOO.;)aJ
. ;)
~aoo'P:~~oSN "~::ncc;1n:n
~:;,oo'P::;,~oSn 11 !n~:'}G~~t~=. ~:o3t:mtu

~ ~nSXJ?OOxf>=c?~G~
'PC~ ?fi sx-r ~cxntsab ~ ~~~ ~~
:>.nUY.>o~fl. OCX>IJ!n<:xj1:00~::lj?~:c 898 dJo5~ IJGOOJ'f>b~~
~~o8cc;o.n~~~~~
!nwS~:<;>!nce>:>t=t=~!n~~1o'f?' "6t~~~ o?J?rtS'
Ol~o:{.> 09oS( oeG~ r'f'S, ~a}ScoJO) '}o5cc;,068' :>.nunod5~
~Jt:Of!nyt 2~WGof>:lj?~:~:Go:uSSt~eg:>co~:GJioS~~ Gt'P~
~:cc;'PoSotSsn:cc;o:f: ~ ?f?~:l:n:An !n~tGa:noSg ~&~H~n.
~&cc;'PoSgj: sS<Scc;~~'lmt068 cc;cc;:;o:cc;t~oS ar.;S~:tr.> 98:sn:
6l:~J.p:tcS?oScm ~oSr;;:Gco~~n ~:cc;o:ySSt~~ Gs<rSmS!n<Yj?
!n~ce>cmt:cm 98:m:'ltBIO?t~J.P:~cc;.poS~ 1n~:cuS~ ~oScc;~:~n
~'P<>6t 9t:~sn: ~Gsnt ~J~oS~tGOII
' dl~-~:cc;mfiSt~ cc;:pSmS.!n~!n~GOY.>t::))~, s%cc;o~
ooCJt:ro:cc;t~~ ~:cc;m.fiSt~c.f cc;Sl98 (~@ ?);-9 ~?:cc;~tct:
(~@ J)~:>:~ sS<)cc;sno$~:;:ot:a:ngj:l ~<)G~?6t'J0G'f>~~
~:cc;m.JSStci>~~~n ~:cc;mfiStci>~ scuS'PfclP:G06fD~ cc;SI'*m
G~J:+:G:An!n~ !nU?t~OO'P~ ;S~:;9 !nCJ~CJo3ooScc;unoS~m
98 :sn:G1:;~ roScc;:>t: ~:cc;mfiStmcc;@:>~~~~ ~ ~-cc;@:>~~~
GOOtc+:~:'fCO~~II
dJoS8:M w:An:~J,p:m ~:cc;mfiStsn= ~Jt=ot!l. @~~Goo:~
~~oSgj:CJt=ot9c~~:068 !nce>:>t:>=~~ ?jcdt=v oo88~:
OOG'j:~Go:{.>ffi~ (~-0)~~ G:;:Q:~:cc;~.{j ~8dJoS~ G'j:Uf?~c ..
#~ ~.cc;~ ~:an: Gl:~'f? ~~'P:a'?tS~*
ln~J~CJo3ar,ooScc;ID'J05 al?.Sr;;:>t:cc;UI~~~~ ~cc;.po5 ~Jt:Offl:f>oS'
'PcooSoo'P:O?t~=~~ cc;:;:o:~~a:ncc;'PoSo:r.> G~oo~:cS~oSOJ?~9
9t:1n~t:ot 888?cc;co~~~~
~G~~~s~:c#Gf?c&mo5e'f0~ 1nZJt !
<>6t t;;:;:o:~g G~~:~:GCO~~~~ !nGco:>t:~ :;:o~t~:G<.900t (~@-~) F-~
uofb ~lrerCO~Icbc.o ICCilc ~)ca:~cc~ (b)
u(Sllrerco~:chco) cc ~~gb~~c~"~f~ bedc (c)
u(~co~F:chco) bCc 11l:ogbg~~CI'IJS 1~b~c (f) B.
ubrc feofb lsCnc 1(~) CCCI~ICC~ (c)
9 s.e
OC'o C' C'
iCCGo:>') OO'f>;~;~JlO
. .C' . .
meoo:>93oo~~
T . IL JL

<mp=~a: e:~J~~s~e

Gg')8Gs-;):Gg')8 .
c m~~mro:03)
. l ~ ~ -~
t oeG&
c
~c ~0)
r,: c : .c J
i;: (:- . 0 ~ C'

. (m<.l?t~ro'P:5) *
0
00 'l(T.)II
. .. tl~G.cx:pc~t:lfg ')~c~

~eix>~B: ~;~ ?~J' ~~J8=~J8i 'lf~c!::....:.~~~~~.?: o1:a:~t(ti


~Jr8~:g:--:-,~~~~='t~~~- Jee (J) (c) ~g~~j~ ~Ji=~ -~~t~~
;..;:e~~;r8,i ~~~~ dxpto3~<! ~~~ "rom ~~~~~~~i~~.t~=~c~~;i ~J~
-, ~ \1 , .. & l 'J '"' l ll ~-- ~: ~:.
" lT L .. L,

.9 ~&2:T.~~1ro. o1:9<&1~ ~~o>'f:~c(' o1=2=~f"o1:~-' ~~-=~=9~ooS~tBt


c:.j;-)~1
- T
~::m
&
!l:l::8r~c6~
T Jll:J 1.
oa~~:=d'
Cj T -4
tOO>;imm:c&>
u. -- -T L
~:s?c&;r;.s
T
\. T
-..- IL.
o3r8mJ ~::0~
<' o <' ' o "'' o r,( a o C'-\ ., o <'~<'
:;>~OOO)!l:l~<: !!:~<i~axp:~ ~:l?~~OI ~CI[jtl IIV~OK\)::x;:l)')'_G!:C:~ftlC:
(' (' 0 h('
\'1 .,Jm.oo.:0c:~" cp~=e~' tt~~~ J~e
. ('~ (' cJ) <oo) [:!<' (' (' . .. c-r.:(' ~~-
~c=~Jm~c !l:l:r.>Jt:oc c: ~X:-:~'ln
: . . . . 0
~

.. ('' . ... : <'


G"1l'>()')Q:)'): ~!n~m II II
. ~. t:J 0 t: . 0 . ~ 9 . <'
G(\)J '>O'>CX>')::;,'F>;t&.l~m 11 II!P~:']G~Gfei: 2;~~11

ro..ri::;.;~:
T It~ ~ta1~1i
~ q
u~oo:5i':nc:O:~
~ --~ -~
G~-:>8<..~sGIJ?~!PGuT,
.
ci:n::n
. ~

~y~:x)~:~~:D?: Q1:!Jfi}'f> (i _;;upS: 9?,G!D?g~~~~ G::>J~?f'J~~')G6?~


1>p<!::i)~@3:<l~ ?OJU)!P'l ~~~-=>~::lJ2q Gm~O)es ~ro?~sa8
oxnoS~t= mJ:5G~9t' ~~~'oSY roO?.:-m'1'::>;?@3:~:i ~eGg ~r'f>doo
~:y3;)~oS .. ~J co8 ii.l~i~i~OS~::n~u c8~~f&~(J)j~;):i)J::~i :DOO~
~ Jl J \ b. . "i. tJ J . C..:, l r. l UT ~ 1t.

~=~~~?~;ro:r;;~j[m
--T l . .
~~:~!PW~O?a::na:t;:.;r.:~~~
.~'i! . .o. ll .o. . tj" l j C.:.
u.

.' ; ~~~~!:ciuJC; !PG?~:2:'fYj?~~suoS~~~j ~~?~:Ct~~~j~


roa' ~~~~?ci<.9Tt<X).,:t~~t.:&nm:>:
o tiC!.. tj tj
oo8Ga:i?~:RiG"Tii"'~e:iCSGo
- .-[ , ..
t C. . . . trJT \ .u :Sc:nO,~
~ ~ L -[ A :

U)Q~~g ~ c:4>;:;;0:r.:c&.f.
L JL' A t ~- ~-IT cJ 2
rrii;,i6ro(\,~;?:Y?r
U J
: ~m">GY~[J.)f.:~~~
' IL . T AI l
ro~~:n3m
. 11 --: .- - -c
g1:~~c8::xiro~J~os~~
~ . . . J . . ..... .. \. .1 . " J
c8~g1:~fc8::nr.:~~co~r
... l :. J "" ttC::l .. GYx
.
~ o~G"' ~~~r .roeOOSiOOJ;X,i!l:IIKrl
C. ..J I. J .-( . ' ll A
::>n
: I ' f .

: t' o~fsc : ;~~~ -iT;~~~;~ ~a ~J ~i Ot:l~c ~~~j :~~::J.,~-;., ~ 'l-'~t~1r


\;. 7 t ~ . -( . ~ ,A . , J, { ~ I .t;, } LJ - . L ' 4'

r:~t'? <>c~~:o5ffi:~~~~~rr8
Cjc.;;.lft..
cJ. : -.r . ~ J.
~'-m,s$:~J~U:>~.
\IT ~.
Jl .
~~~~~
~ .. ..... l
~94l=~~S')oor ~~~m ~~&td \><> JCJ)SX"t 06M
Ssc:oS~cm:(:1(> Vt ~tSo.:>te
-ll)~c;s):~

~
~ ~'lG~ ~tf>ro ~~ ~~O)+=~llt37.>:t
Ei~-~, ~OO:>cp:~ ~~~S')!G~ m ~~ Ql:~~ ~:o:>{. Ql:sa&p
Ej~w~~co G ouoS'l~: ~scoScp G ~.rS~>9 ~o.:>orrGooto.:>+:Gl) G0-)~:'1&:1(>
oxp:~:~~~~~ ~G~of:
(~-J);9~;;oot~mpoS;, (~-?)~e\\ 06oS~JoSS')'l ~"ill&' ~o.:>~;9
~OO?cp:~~O)~ 'ltl6'P~ GO)~ ~Ol:o?-cqoS ooS~~:M
S')O(OO?cp:~~ ~~ Ql:~8Jt O?b~: G06~~ ~~~
9t:~tb~ ~~:a?:CJboo5GtffG-roSr ~ Goo80-)+:Gljm ~:~+:St
B<x\~c&ff'P GOOGS')!G~ ~~~ ~S')G~
G0-)0-{ ~~~S')()')JO't G~GS7.Gootro ~OOGtf~:{j ~(\)')GO)?
Ol:~=gJtt~ S')e>JoSGo1C:!dJ>:1r~ :o.:>~ Go.:>OjlG~C o.:>t:~llroco~:r
woot~S')!Gootro ~ ~:~ ::>.)~~ S')*~~
a?:~ . S S')~t'P' oeG9 rtS. GfdCO JO ~G~ e-r->~ S')~+m
So.:>~ roi:QloS~:G~!dJ>:~ ~S')~t0'6cS fn~Jc:S~~t'P~
S')OOt:Gcpt~Wo.:>~H Go.:>~GOOto.:>t:GlJ GS7So5~>:0-)~ S')~
'?.~:~:ro?f9: ~OOCGS'):GooC~ ~GfG:::mal3~~ ~Gc5f0{->:cpr
GOOCGS'):~ootro i:G0Jo5>:'f G~GOf~ OJ:~:8Jt~ ~J~oSo10J~11
~'l:~:8Jt~ Gf"o5Gcflo;?C 'Jroro?GcpoS::&l:oo~:~:GCOo.:>~u QIO(>G~sc\)
~~~ ~'l:~~t ~OOXGOGFt' GootOJ+:Gll!f' G-roSGcfeGcf>
\'fl~~ro?~ Go.:><?~:OJo:>tr fclG::>.:>c?~ Go.:>:SJfoS~JoS~:~ OG~t:
~[! ~l:f>uScpcooSoocp:~~:ooo;?& ooS~~~ ~GfloS ~@[. ?'PO?oS
cpccxfXrxp~cnot O?~~t cF:>~ ~~. ~
~oot~S'):Gicr.>&n Qt~ ~~~ ::>.)~ G~
oocpot ~=\)G~ (~-JJ~~ Go.)~scoScp~:~ oSGoo:~So.:>~
Go:>~~ Gl:sa&p G ~oS'JM sa&p~ (o) If' V~'Jfd~ scoScp
So.:>~ g1:scoS'P!dJ>:~ o.:>o5Go.:>~Ol:~:8lffi9 J"?&~ 9~80-)~0'jl
~~~::>.:>~ ~S')G>&:~:G~ Gtl7:>05~<6~ O?'P:~:()')
i
~mp:~~ \>OJJ)~~~G~ F-3 t
I
~;;CX>?scoSoo::>.:>oSoo~+:Ol~&: '(>' 'ftroto.:>~ oo&~:o.:>~
Cf?O
d:n~t oa~+OSCIGOJ:So5 <>o;>ro:>o.?:OJ&p~ G~'!OJ~rp oeGG
~00xp:<9 G~GSCI:GID~ GOJ~ G~OJfG~ wrom SCI~.f:<#: c.:<n= <n
~ ~2 s;~:;Slro. ~ &~ ~oo-xp;# tq
0J0SGOJ~ Ql:~:gjtO'h>~l c;cg:a;>:9SooSG<f~GcfOo51 GOJOj?G(J')tOJt:GffD ~c.:o:nfi
SC!f:~ ~:cgt:St @joo~ Ote>:'P06~' SCIOji~OO'P:c9 G(J')tc;s;~:c;(J')tm @t<n~.c o
GcfOoSO?G'f>c9oS'P' G(J')tOJtlG~ ~C\foS~oSro:n:w: G(J')tGSCilG~(Y)
GOJO? SCIGoTg~=[g: aa06 &0la:nc;o.n Ql:~: 81+~ G ~JOS~:cS='f'
OO'f>Ot~ogo$ ~JoS:n9 ootw:OJ~u cio?~.9tS'P~ 9o$~o$
~:o5~9 Ql:~ G ~JOS~ &:'P c;pcOJoS~:y&~ (JXoo) Jee
~t:~t SCICri..fctS:oo~'}Goa o~~=910Wt~ ooS<>:m
:n,PsxuoS'P~ oaJtO oooS~:a <>~~OJt:c;~ Gl:ocuS'P 9M
~ ~Gfd?8<0:n:~~G~
~ ~ #-~ ~ <cl ~ oxp:oi!fro
SCI~~OO'f>:~ <O(J')tGSCI:G~ SC~GJ. 'f>COJ05~:y~ ?O j(j)SC19
~co? ~ !fY><#~ ~~~s~ ro-e
Go:ntsaJS oo0JoSOOC'76JtlGO:OY.>:<S;I.f'l S'CI<j:WlSCI'lfC\:nSCISSCI~~
c;o::noSf.@t:sn:9 ~"6fOJeM~~~t<Om
~<>:>~ <>:.moS~:o~~ oo'P:~~:.,JVoS~~ :na+.~
oS~~goS~ :nc;,:~~ S)O)~SCIOi~
~

,.
't' , 11
r 2 l_r. b,
II <bl!:: : s-:::lj~ :aeG II 11 wcoa;e:mcoecna;
.)
.) o e o . .
11 IIWtoa>~ci}:,i-->:cbcceroa;
.) 0

( e:cbcoe&>ro)
b\;"e>~C.ee> II f
.)
e~~
{ 5 c.e~ uc
:e!:J:>c.ro~:>c.ee>
.Joh ..>
?~~:') ~.re:g :~lc:cbco
1r 11 1
6eroe.cco
. ..)
0.:>03
9'2?
C" (. OC" OC" C' 0 c 'L C' u
())C
4
c7 ~G)cn..<;::n~:co?:GlOO.sl
J -T --IT IDCX>O>DXn:W
IL - - - [ l
G~?CGO~C IDCX>O>miD:ro
J . tt --1.- t.
::>eGG
c- c- o -r c c- c- ee/ r,:.,. r,: c- c-
G~?CG.z1'J"?.3:l001 qcro~:1 'l?e:nroq~~ ?cs" :xx1 ro91 t:f"'fa."r:fXn:D~ ,.~.,g,..!lnd
0 C' C' 0 C" C' C" C' C"GI C" OC' C'
Grpo'J:D Cl cc:o:>ID?! !3')(\)0~CGOO?C~CO :::> ~G>G>fDIOlGG>9.S ID~.S::li~O) r~c
0 4 J] , L t J J U T lio Ui J 1::3~:1
' c- ' c-r.Rc- c- '"~' c- o, o , r.::: c-
~:D~n G~')CGID?Ctl~:ro qc:DJGOI OlJ'10JG:A??!T.l~~O( ~GfDJtO:Dj~SI ::>u ~;~.,l~;olr
' ~ Jll ...~.,g..j~
~
o c-
m q::Dooo:>oocrot m] o: r::c O>~G>I
:::acs\5 c- roeororoo:>wro~ro
c- c- o oocromO>
c-
C::::J L' L tl -[ c::J iJ ~ LJ .T ll Jl J b.
C'
ac
C' C' C' C' ., C' C' 0 C' C' 0 ..,.. \ C' - J
<2Ca:l G>CO?::D:l"l II G~?CGOI~CG~?CGQ'J())OXI:>:Dtl qc:ro!PGOI Oli~OJG:D?
~oo-:>6~
... 1
(j(' 0
C.:.
(" C'
!P~.SO) ~GO)J.SO:D ' C rr.lc.X>O>OC
~ t . "T IL
e Ol~G>I
Ol2\5j
c. LJ
C'
J AI
("
L C.:.

CO~O())!T.IO);;x.l _O'flol?t?CII
-r Ill ...
('6COl g]n:.
0:::
L 11
L UJ
~f OC

C' C' C"o:l C' C' C' 0 0 ~ C' "lC'


!P~ro
J
90j ox::romO>e~
4 ~bJ c.:. rooo~
ocrooro?::D:nll lll
j O>ro
l\.
rr.JI:lrocroc;:orc:
J\.6
C'GIC' C" . . C' C'
me:;:4X)CO>Jn:>::lJ'1ro~o>e:;n

. . (' C'(_RC' C' ') c (" 0 c (' (' f:l? c C' r.:
G~?CG(J)?C[j~:l GY?CGUI,SGI:l?CG.il')"?.:>.:l~l O?OO(ri&LGC:J?n:>:::nro
e e
OC' C C"O
\5 "tCO>tqc~G:D?I G~?CCI:OCGfDJ:~:>!T.lf:qc
C' ") C' G1 C'
0@15j
C'
~TG>I G>fD())C;::b:>a:l
C C' .
oe
c- 9 c-
")fDGt2:;Gf9 f?'J~OldfGro?:DI 2!eGI:l?Cc- ( "itr::>
or,: ) c c- oc ( or,: )
9
~~ ~O)JCC>'f <\{tf 00
c- Gl 9

o .c: 9 c- .c- c-o o (or,: ) o c C'(}?C' r,;:c


"?.<:~~:' :n~m ::>?_ ~G>~~ ~a cql.jo l"'1' G~:>cG::r.nctl~:m ~o:>?:!T.lt;-o
'lC' c co ~: 'I r;:c~co ct, o J::C' c-
GOic::oc:9y !PO:X:::rr.lG~I:~p~tj';tJ:'~:GO>JXO~ ~:qp~:>:t)c~ljG>:D2:; II ~
o r.:"
') <' C'rsC' C'. ') C C' 0 C" '1 0 C'GIO C'
tr.):;Jiro Gl:l?CGrrJ')C ~:1 G~?CGOI~~c;;y')~GOOO)O':IC GI:O)trn>Q :J.):Y>II
. J Al~l .... 6 I. Jl c
co C' o c o ~ o c
Cjc:o:..~e:? Y~l ~?:G:npc:G:D?Gf'P:l:.ro:>9JI ~a:::;n: sxoc:o:;>~
'
:;qG:;:,I :::0?:
' lo6
'T'
6
C'
c:("Q:::O~"lll
C
C'
~
0
(X):JJS?:O?c
" T e
("
C.
0
Y:l'>l~
~c;: C'
G~')CO~lO)GO)'):::O
C' '
6
('
lt.
c
GY?CGCI
.AI

oY:>~
0 ~0
( ~-?)' o1qc:Gro:
0 ')
( cqjhq r,;:C'
~~c;;m ( ~-'2) o;l~:o2n
(' 'T' C' r;::;:: C'
Y~[rq !J.IU?.oo:>'P:..-q~o>p:ro Gt~~J?ltlq ooo:x:::roG~G::ll c;::;cnc~?:el'Pqc'
o ~:r.... " c- c- ,. c- " , o o o c-
~am 'tl:rof6C:~?G;,.)')ro2:~9' qc:m"'t~~co:qc~1 G:\)? ~qc:G::D:o:n:
' Q C' C' 'r OOC' C' 0 or,:c- ~ \ 'r 0 C'
ooo;?::r.le:;oo:9t C9~:c;::;:,, 'P' ~qc:c;:ro::::o~ ~~ll"'1tJrS!~c;;O>I otG:x>")
N:l"l:t
C'
t:r.lo:>:;J:J.>ro:ro~r'):~:n
0 :'1 C' ('
Gr:roococrooc;;.s
c :n c1
C' 0 > C'
:;n.s?:::l.>~o>~p:mo
c
c IL -c ... u J \. T , . .~. ... c..
\ \koC' C OOC' C' C' . \ C'O 0 .!:
'):J.>j94:>Gf:De?ll O(qC:Gro;ro G~?CG.llG~:>CID-::>:1 ~proqc~G:D') Y2[c:!
mc;;o
9
e::l'>G~?Cm
:D?:GCOO)())C(;
0
?O.S
C' 0
QC:rum:D::II ~:jX>GI:l?COO:::O
C' OC C' OC' 0 C' C' Gl Q C' 0
o,. T I. c ll l L 'C {:...........
l 1.
C' c C'OL~ 51 r;::;:: C' r,: G1 G1 C' ~ 9 O C'
Gl.nCGjlGI:l?CG'Pc:"~lj: :nmul:rr.JGef'C:GC:J?'PI ~el:e:qc: t:fEl<J?CO)
0 C' OC' C' C' 0 0 OC' C' C' Q . 0 0 C'
CO:>;i :;l.p:G'(':T.>01Co:>f.:::o211 cx:p~O{Co:>f:'f'qCI 0(. ::lJY:~~[O(I G(J';>?C

[S~:1 C'
G09.\\CG~?CGOJOJ:;Q:D?:G
..6lJ
C' (" ') 0
lbG
' 6 (' ?C~I
('
cc:a:>OO(j)C
f tL b
0 C' "'
Gl:n:>O)G)OIG
L
0 C'Q ') ')C: C'

r.:r.: C' C' c C' C' [ (' C'99 C'


G~?l.j::211 Gf ')()'Y.))G-e ~~j trG>I ~fDOX))?('.). JO ')O?G~qc1 2:~G~'JCfD
C' C' f.C1 \ 0 C:: OC' C' C' 0 OC' C' C' 0
roootr:~%')r~'=9JO{CO>Jmoo::::oen ~CJtCO>J:n3 ~<><T.1'f>=ot~J ?:m
0 ") 0 C'GI(;;:C' f,RC' C' ~ 0 r;::;:: C' '10 C' 0 OC' C'
~2:;[rr.1l :GI!,"l'~<.P~c:Jq lJiol:GQJ:>roSJ~:~~?:Cel')C:O I~:D2 !J <XfotC:;JJ~?
37A (' . (' " , C:C' c. f. 0 (" 0 0
~<i)G:J.)O>::J)~O) m tjG>X~II G'JqO>ro'P~I:>J:>:;x>e; Y~[<1! ::PG~Go:>?
sock~ :d'flsocoe.sso!li~ ~boo& C.OS2cc~&,c.cc~cc c.ul~fl IAsock~=~
6~~* ~~~ ~~flo:~ so!e~&,c.cc~cc ~~~f) r:c.w:S24-c.o =~6
=~~fl ~~ sJ'c.u1w~c:e:~J ~SOCnfl~c:e~~fl w!Tes~
n~cq~es <.ce~:~:6~1&es t<:A~e.s1~~~ uS2cc~l~~sJe~&,
c.cc~cc~l~ ~cb:~~c.re~E~:c.esf)& r:~cro~socb$d'fl~:cbc.o~&e.s
wfl <:.CC$4-~:>=~ ~ckccc ~:coS<! ~eswges ~~:6~
tK)~~ ~es~ ~~d,~ ~e.s ~~
'17e.sc.cc~gcc:~c.roro~ c.8<!-Pwcl'ecc7 ~~e.s~ ~ccg!IP.o
"SCcc19:c&gc.o to~cc19c:e& =~cJ~=~&:c.A c.A:~sotl,legos~
:~~&~~~~ g&..v~e.s:cl'fl~:cbc.o~&e.s gcJ~c.cc~~:~cJ~es!bc:e&
eoS2cc~l9 sole~lOc.cc~cc~l~fl g:ces:gJ~sooo:>~~sacc:So:b~
sot~,c:pco g&:d'f):gc.oc.ocrovfl:cg:~&O , =~~socb~sc~~ :~&::cbc.o
~:ckflX1~w@ ib:~~~~~~
~:cbc.o ~l!nes:!~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~
~~~~ ~:cbc.o ~&es ~~4>~~ ~:t> r?~
&o:d'flc&~ &->es /,:d'flgoo:>~:gPwe.s S2cc:d'fl So:cbc.o~&->es
nSd~l9 g&c.o:c:e~ !P~ocbc:e 1::?<l~~ :&:~:croso&x]aocbf:'w.>
wge~~~fl ~CC!tjG w1ocb~fl uSC~ :c.es~~
~~~~f) h~ ?cc-~$CCS~fl
~socb~=~cbes~ sa'l~ n~~fl ~ ~~~
c.8:1tugc.es~ &d~fl ,gc:ec.otl,~ "S2cc):~:b.~soAsoc.u co&ol~fl
~:sas~:?a'l~ ~~~6~) 31~~~:cbc.o ~ch/ec#~
c.3cc c.coyfl:c.): !&Os>&:~ 1:J:c&j,e~ ~~~fl w:g)gc.es~gCfl~
,~: ~: ~&::cbc.osoovcb socccb<tbtoG iJ~:of.f):gPo 'i>~C.O)Oof.~
tnc.oAc.S ~ u$2cc grwl~~c.o:c.cofl:c.cc r:c.esl~f)w:gJ gc.es~ 3Cfl~ ?~fc.6t!3
: ~ro~@ ~ nsaccS>~~S'~ ~c.o: f& &o v& ~&@,?:>
So ~~~~
I~C'CCO$~*c8~Cog<:.es~ w:glgc.es~:?a'J~ I!US~flib~~c.osock~ ~
bS'~~~
~~c9f'~c.o:c.cofl:C.CC r:c.es~fl 1w:gjgcw~~ ~~~ 'f>~~~c
"S2ccllksocb~~g~ (o-~) ~=:<~ , lJ:~f):glh ~~cc):c&..~r~~ cgJ
J~:ckf):grogl:c.w ~~socb~~9~:c.wsro~Sft~~&3c.&l~ 3eo~~c.osock~
nS2ccbci-~:c&g&~CGO~ l~bgrssf):0:>@c.o 11S2ccl:c&Jr~ ~~
6) ..s e ~ .2:, e & .. rs ll3n ~ -?. ~
t ct1 [B., 8 ~; s o8
3-,~ ~ ~ -+ ~ J3 6) f8 f8 8 f8 f8 ~
t [B.,~
()'l 6) ~&: .2:,
~
1,~~tt=~~~~~~~t~~~
a 6) e 8
-+ e 6) l+~t-ai~' O'l ..B <D -oo l !&1 .
t +a o8'
8c c
-3o~ ~ ~ i , cnj ~

CGD
()'l
@n '-"
~-e o~
:::>
-8o
t ui,c~ e ~ ~
[8
.
\j')
8O'l f8
(G) v
O'l ''
-oo 9 vo
8
O'l
.,
t> 0
r7h ...!>
CGD d
-+'l
*; ~
IOL o:Q ()'l ,()'l <= ()'l
Q'l
~
* ~ W)
CC1I
~ ~6)0 So 86) cBQ'l -..o ~
'' 8 ~ 0 CCJ COiJ
Q
6> t:EJ ~
-v -
~~
'=m
c C
~ C
t =if~~ fQl6) '-tjJ
~
l vo
~ ~fSP
. rno 1;., 8 ::s
-Bo~-r~}~a-,~~~~~e
c -8o (')') & O'l ~ C'l
fB-,~1 c
~~co
e ~ ~ 6) i ~ rs ..e ~..eo & 1 -c { 6) oe -B
~~~ .,8 T ~~ rs
[B., ~ CRX!c~ ~ 8 ~ g, j~~ ~ -:5o ..e.
en ~ c e -+'l -
w .. . o8e g.,~ _t ""5
6) ..!>C'l U:::) -3o ~8o 3-, ~.. vm .('6))')em e ~ -..o, i ~
tt~~, f;
t>
!Q
::> ex
O'l 0
()'l
()'l

a$
- ~~~~~~~@~~~~~
::>
O'l c C
. . ;;.. o8
-v c '-">J
O'l ...0 l.> )
1~~ -&:c~~o8. J ()'ll
-
.V Cl ,.....
-+'l ()'l

8 a1 ~ ~ .:& ~ 8 3-, 8
t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o2 -. -+'l
<D v Jj"""""' - p m <D Gi: ()'l ..
~ rt ~ 6) c~ Oi")~
[B.,~} 3X., ~ ~-3oc ~
..B
.v afl Gi: ~ .. \j') .,
em-a m rs
.....,J -s.. s, , c == ,.
eo!:g' 8 ..ao
. f.tHltl
f8 ~ - ~,
. ~-..&~~1

fjrif~~~ia~~t+ti~~
rn., rn-, 8 i.l 6) rn-,~ P
*~J o-+
"::5 O'l O'l ., Co ~ .. -+'l ()'l ()'l U'l O'l
-8o f8
~ -8 8 e --8e ::sf8 f8
un
~~ 8 S ~ O'l
eoem..vo1,
cj
f8 -+is" CGD
~ c CC1 - +a &, .6> 6>
f
c 0\.)'l &!o Ot>
0
c
-o h'- ::> -+'l
=.u V'l
~ [Boc =8v v~ 'lf e CGD -So..en 8 -B~ s6) g .vw~ .en rue en~ :o f
:o .'~
8 -+-l
C'l O'l
.8... ~ ~ ~ -..o, Q'> -
6)
~ ~~
v I:CI'l
+a l Cl'l O'l ..!>
8 .. en t
cfu~-s-P-t~ae
-g.; ~ f8 -8o ~ 6) c o8 fB., g '"'
e ~w irn-, Jl~~~ o~e~rB., ts8-arti6)~JJ~:: em Z"' f8
~or~
.,e -+'l
.. -So -8o ~ ~ P. [Bo 3-, -S ., J, -3o ~ -So o?. .. -3o ~ 3-, -a lr ~ n'> ~ 8n-> i o8~ S2

0 ~
Cl1 ~ '1 fi q;a cs. %-
-+o
-r nl ":1;.,
fl
~t fl
f' nl I en u::
Cl'> ~>!!>
o.
- -e ~ -~
C' C' ~ C' OC' C' C' C' ( ) C'
OOC~?:Gfl.)2 II OJ!Gt'fl~ 'CCGCT.>') ~<; G:n: Gioi')C :) ~~~ OO'fl:
0 ~3=~Jl~' ;xn-~cS(~j) ~nti~ro1 OJil9~19:~p:~?: el~?:G?~
C' 0 C' C' C' 1: (;;: C' . '. ' C' '1 OC' .,..f.'~~ C' ('
GOJ?m~J(l)~?l ~OOOC~?::J?..lX['C:f":Df.j<;l G!::Q?O?OI~~c: G<.tl t:t-'{0:).)211
"Such is the case against .each 'of the accused individually.
But r must again remind you that it au hangs on the question
~f Ma Nu's consent. Unless you find ' that Ma Nu was taken
by force and against her consen't you shou'Jd find all of the
accused not guilty. I need only fut:ther remind you that
any reasonable doubt that you . m.ay have should be given
in favour of the accused."

F -~
r .
::.1!:
~
l J_ 11 '
( ~:a:K.o~meB) cc.o~csu)dofbg~b
" I~ ,. . . ~ r111 _l _ r l'L ~ f9~ 1 __
.)oco"~co fl~<"C:c :wl<"C:mco o>:::x.o:sw:c: <"C:ox.o
. 0 .) 0 O...J -> .) .> 0 0
1f 11 -J _ .
6ecow6:mco
0
, -t, ...0

~~tt li ~
~
s~
s &Jo, dh" ~
}oS(')') t~ a.,
JL 8e.,.es ~~ a
u g 8 ..ao s t-& e -a8 ~ u
~j .s~ .s~ ~-a S,.B
S 1r. ~ V
~ ~ 8' ~ 8 ~ f>
~ ~ .e ' (B.,~ ~ ,.q ~ ~ ' ',

~ ~ .s a., ..eo ~ -a a., i, () d'l


~ s - ru., -a s oX., 8 e -~} .e ~ 1 e-;

~~ ~~~ g,:g -rr.Jtf tt 9-t ~ litj .ii ~ .a.Q 1 Jj,


_q e . . l~~ ~ ~~::g-. .i. . ::l! 'lt"~_j
O"'"g G: ~ :t, S., n
~ b ~rnJ~ g., o-,[B.,
8 ~~ ~ ~ S, oO
~....;l {,~o~ ~8 J ~~t!}...,
0
&, ~ ~ ~ a ~ 1., i, ~ -B ~ ~ o8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 1 ~ ~t n ]: -t
o8 ~')~ $~ s ~ 0"~ ~_s:~=t g, ~ t.{~ 8
~~ 8
~ ~ ~ OSl~!2"
-a &, ru 8 av ~ ~ O'l
0
.~~ (')') - o o8 C'l --= o 8
~- J
-~
o
!ii}~iJJ{ti~tt~&i~l{i~
~ ~-a - l-,o8 -3o .. ~ ~ ~ -e- WJ
f\J1i
~f:r ~ ~, 8 ~ 8 ~ (')') ~1 o Jl s 1.'. -'
-r. 8 ..!Jo ~ ..!) m ..a
~ -& -a ~ &,
~{ oo~ ~..;;<- wo ooa; ~s ~ '8 -~ ~s
~ , ~ f> ~ ,.e ~ o8 -a [ .. V
~ ~ ~ 8 ~ g> .e. g.,~ -s ~
v, ~~8-.o.&s.,o..S . -a~
..! -
ilfLI
-4 . @~~ewo~~'. lr~~o~~s~ ~~s~
Sl
~ u 8 ~
-aoasrueva8~
_g
a., an t.oU'l ..!) (C) -
l:(ij:' ~ ~~ -Q J -
1 i 8 ~ -a ..!) C'l n a ~
~g.,~ ~ ~ "8., ..''
.. :,;
"'~~ ~ .e!d ~ 8 !d n ~ 3 ~ ~en {
1 "' t () _!)c) 8 8 ~
~.;e.a ~ S,n ~ - 35 ..8.
-C
~ i s ~ ~ i1 ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ 19. u ..e 8 8
(!)')0. (')')
~ -a=c (')') ~~ -~ 8 8 e~
.:a-eo
"" t _g ~ ~ a .: fllo
~ -~ ~ t _a, _., 8' a { -. .,., ..a ""' ::il
:f<x:.Lc~
~~
c.c.o~
rocrc.>~~~~b
.) ~
0 .)
oob
u(~)~ w~ (~)sues cc.o&,u
u:~O:x.re,u,:2u
.> .> 0
.)
( &:be:c.rowcltuo)
. ~o:booJ:;"J:h:l~~o~
.) .)~ ~ .)
r
~~
.)
1
CO~CCOftCCOCOO~CG
.) 0 .).)
co6
-~ !cc1uhl t()~c.o:2 c:he:cooc.uc.fcx~ oobe.c:d~c.urea..:Ct.:;w (o:c.~e.c ~cc
.> o ~..L e ' .> .> .> .> .> .>
:ottoc.o o&>:&c.oc.ro~ w&::c.oocucJro~ t :@e~;orod\::m ~b:eohlem
.) .) .) .) J .) .)
.>:.:! )
II @ccc.uruc.o(:,re;tlC:.C enC2~ba~;O~ orc.u 0c
.) .) 0 .) .)0 .) .)
c.obG
.) 0
~&::c.oowc.fcw
0 .)
c.u&be~c.ooc.oc.r(\)~
.)
owcb',Q~~
.) :.:!.>
wc.hJa::l:l'&:be
0 :f
: c.ooa..:c.IS:>~ ~bok~:c.t::-:lc.uC\XL.lre c.~ccr~:cbc.o l:.u~cc ,bcc;c.r~w~<:ehl,o
.) .) .)0 ::::3.) .) 0 .) 0 :.:1 L.
:~ob0(c)
.) 6
CIOW~
t, 0
4~coC.nc!Q
~ 0
.)::.1 ~:_ge:d t'bcem
~
enC2CCWC.CI;~~
.) .)
C.~:c.f('}
c.urd:ehl
.>
~ecbeKcoa..:d~~
o:J ::f .>
w:t::-:l~c:cbc.o
~
lX.C2o:l1c.uce.c~
o .>
o&>cbt!c
.> o
uC2cc~X~Cl..Xu~w
.) .) .)
bob"'
L. 0
=~Qc.uc.ro::>hl
J:::b
: oc.t::-:l~e.:;~bwrocoo h,;l,c.ucc.occu. c.cc.o ~cc:c.ooc.oRre o&:~e.c d:.oe.c
.:> ~ .> .> .> o e o.> .> .> .) .> .>O
~ccre;x.c:.o~ C:cbe :cooa..:c.~~~ :Ra:~~~hl :d"'~b:x.re~CL..\; c.vto
.) 0 .) .) .) ::J .>0 .) :.:1 .) .) .) L.
'h:o~'Ccooolrd~:;,
0 0 0 .)
tuc.Gk~cc
0 .)
~~m~mo
J 0
c.ft<vrebehl
.)
~"ttbe:c.~ax.rro~
0 :.:1 :y .)
bhlcc.}o:)oto
.>:1 .) L.
C2"'ec:&
.)
o&:cG~c.&c
.) .)
~ccoede
.) .)
tOOJtt:c.cxxs.;c.~.:~
.)
f ut>
,;Jop1aq1 S'lSO:>
Uf pal~Suadwo:> S! ;}t{ pue ;)P!Se l.<>S S! lflOAej S!q U! aaJ~p
auod xa ue J~ .IJ!lU!e[d aq1 ..<q p<>u!elsns aq 01 p!es ;>q p[no:>
d!qsp1eq [l:?;).l .10 a:>psnfu! aAe...a Moq aas 01 l{n:>YJ!P S! 11
os op 01 dln(!eJ uo 11nsa1 pfnOM
d!qspJeq JO ;}:>psnfu! a..\e...a awos SS<>jun 1ap1o ..Uoln:>opalUI
ue lSU!e~e UO!S!A.U U! ;}J<>j.l<>lU! lOU H!M UOO;) q~!H <~ttl
1m<0
\{2!H atp Ol S;l!( UO!S!A;}J ~ l.mO;) {'ep~
<>ql ..{q pa1ue.l8 S~M
~<>J:>ap auod xa ue apJse 8upldS JOJ aJnpa:>OJd l!AP JO apo;:>
dt{l JO 1 ajnlf'XI .Rp.l() ;apun uo!le:>Hdde ue :uaqM 1el{l.,
ua:!ccro~e~l:o ::Xoectoo.x:ro~ o&:oo:>bG
.) \ \ . .>0 l; .)
.>'
(f) :t~osc.cn:c.oore
.) 0 ~ ;:)
a(l..),m IIW a!,::,~~
.(o)c.uw I:W OCCOoo:>tt>
.> .> -.,- .> .>
(:~b),w. IW~ lfKG
~ ~ .> .> o
:dxo~co tu:lrftC.ooro le!cc<hlro:c.roec ecwem r<~<hl:xltc2fl
.) 0 ~ .> .>~ 0 \ .>~.> 0 .>
uo~:;~~~tnro~fl :.J:Icobl5cc
.)00 ... 0 5::b ~,)
~cocrro~ c.~::>IJecohl:~cdb COC2cccoc.cooeu ~b:rec.uroco6 wl:xos
.> .> .,::h.> ::.:1 .> .> .> .> .> o e e
coccwccco
.> .)
le!cceco~re
.) \,)
bec:d~::;rJ:::c.t:;;~~eck
.>::1 .) ~
c.~:c.rfleorebehl
.> 0 ~
~::~& be:c.rococfcoo:xx:.o:Q&:dx.c~cc e:o:xc~re~ coco&~c:c r:c. ,., J..,h)Cc
::>- .> .> 0'::3 .> ' .> e o.> "'"'"'~o
uoo:>~refl tne2cc~ccec:occf.!b~~ c.~r~co coeec ~:~'&::c.cxx.ocfroo
.>00 .> ,) .> 'S':.> .) .) .) ,) 0 ::> .)
~hlcc:>\-k::>Q~
.) ~ .)00 .) : j
lhtta:!fl
0 .>
co~:c.cccoc.lh::o
.>
wcorebehl
0 ,)
~:~:Q~~~ -lk@o
0 ~ y ~ 0
le!ccco{;xce~tocolu wloecb:hw axcccro~~(nb wa:!ect.>ro ~:~olre~~
.) ,) .> t.. .) 0 .) 0 .) t.. .)0 0 & ::>.)
c.coo:>:>~ c.ccl6eobc.~~ tt~5 :bo:<bco ~cec.c~ro:Qe.c <b:Jk
.> .>0 '$' .) 0 .) ' ~ .>0
k~~ t~!,~cnoccoceco&cdo
00 0 .) .) .) .) 0.) 0 .)
M~c.5 .>olre~l5o c.C.O~:>:)\-
.)
tfbcocccoo~~
.)0 '$',) .) ,)
&c.rft3co::>eff,
0 .)
r~cc~ecMc.5
.) 0
S.o:~,..J:;J:~
.) . :;~ ct.j
~~~
.>
&be:c.cowc.rro~
.>
c.:;,
do6
a~lnec ~jgcc !'l~&:d,c.o ~ ~G gej<.ufb ~~~oc.c:c~ '!?~~
~b uc (\)ft~ ~'~ C#e c.c:c~re ~ bs .;o~~21soo~ ~te bstlc*
uotlc ~~
,) .,
. I Gt~Cl'lilc
.) ;)
uc.o:~cc:2
jO 0
(:Q~~~~b:~e.c)
o:J 0
u uco&>me:cbwel'ow
.)

(e:Cbcoe&->es)
.
:>:>~Cft~Q~:>ccoe>C2hl
.)O .)~ .) .) ~
?>i
.,)
(tu:dx.od:'oes)
0
:~:>cese>
.)0 .)
#& o~:i 8&::dtc.o
~e&mc.oe>Qd,
. .)
Cub
98
IIW!, Cf
~
r
~\:
.)
( ~:cbcoe&e.c)
o
:h-lwh>:2
e:lo o o
uo6
y
trlc.t'lMc.co
~
:~ II flOIOICO c.<.0&t'HI II culoa.e:cbcoe~w
.1 ett .l
1 S!Jic
iob
11~cr>~scbco 1~ co ~~~~~tt'tJS '1~ o~c (I')
IIC 1px,j0 I~C ~ (c)
lllC.f'libdK.W
*
=f'JFo:~
~
ce>6
11~00e&ec
.> a
oolx.oc
0 8 e
C.CC:'>C.O~re
.) ~.)
L:IC.C.O~: &
-:1 "~&:::cbco6:cbc.omacxo E~fb if.o o3o Of:ICc~:~ed:~c.o ~~~b rstlc ~
uCr .)c.o~ec~e&w

l'lbo l'l:cbc.o r..)G~~ bl>l~c
:J

n.)c.o&w:c.r~e:ckc.oel!nw
. .
ftl6.
t:c.roccoR(v1-tJ3tpn
.,:::.~ RH) :hl:c.co:xJcoo
e'J ~!Xe~
.,.,o . .,o,
WeeG~ tbeccore:c.,....h) f(')::lo00 r ch~c.K>re::l :doo;cbco IIC
0 ~ .) ""',j..t, .) .)0
V6
.)
.
u2ccrooe\.
co~c:ob:>{,:t; to:c.rOCt>Peccc.cooJ(')(OC.CSeJ oro~ro cotoro& . uCCCC(\)Oore~
.) .) 0 .) .) 1,. .) .) .) 0 ;;)
CoJOCCD~~
~,.
~te~:dx.o co:dfte:cbax'!l'nro
o ., o ,
fbol:=:l:hl~::>::xx.on cocc:hlro
"::Y .,~ e:J ., ; ) c ., e~
tbro:c.PftWrecoR:teJo
.) .) :::.1 1,.
cCfb0oc . co~ro .) . .)
?.>~ :J~Cforrc ~cS~ft:dx.ooecn
.) .) .
c.Mcr;ecn tcohlbfl
.> o .>
::::1 . ., C2cc:de~e:cbc.6
ow:~~c.~o~
e<hro

!Gab';c.cc:~Qdo~~
'$'.,.._. .,:::bo
cocbooo
.) .)
l:Oflfl
0 00
M~oo:> e2cccol;xre:xoa.xLJ<::e wocr;lrero ,bcr;olrec.o
.) .) .) .) .) .) .) ~ .)
cnocr;:ocboo::
.) . .)
. .)oooftroa:R:oPero
.)0 .:>:::.1.)
~:c.re>ec:dx.oe&ro
0
&a:Re:cbco
.,:::.~.
uC2ccoQ:::>Qeee~:dx.o
., .>:::.1 .,:::ho \.
~b:ooorococboo.~ro
.> .> .> .>
:d~ro(')~:t>eG
.>
~~=~~
.)0 ., ::::1
c~oS..)
aXoo::~ccoro~oo
.) .) .)0 0 0
:~cccco~oQ
.J':::J tt .) .)0
.):::) c.cc:crft(ooooh.>) &d:o~~
.)O
?.>~:,ero
., .>
~:crfte:cbco
~-
e&1ro

cl,:oR:X:o~o
.,:::bo :dftb:dxoe&ro
o :Xoftro
.> .>O
GQ:::>rero
.,::.:~.,
,d:,ohl:hle:o~ro~hl &:de!u:cbcoe&e.C :C2a:b!,eJbG t:hl
.,:::.~ eh .) .,:_j o o ., o o:J
cohlcoPo
.) :_j.)
cl,olrec.o
.)
cnow:::xb~e~ro
.) .) .) 0
co:dftro:dx.oe~a::
0
a.:tcec&
.) 0
II @ccbeC'Y.l;:oob:c. Pe>;orcobwc CO:C rft
.> ,., o " e
e:dx.oe&>ro

IG~bbcoc::>~cr;
'$' o e o.>o
~~:Oxo:dx.o::>ro
. o \ . .>
uCfb0oc .lcol,cr;~es
1
:~fl:dxo ~~~w~b tooaifue:cbcoeCoe.G 46b:I=7J~do4 ~cccorocu,(')~
0 J..> .) ...L o .J ~ ..> ..> .:> .> "'
olrec.o
.)
M ooocc
.) 0
~d~o
~cc:c.co:o;,&M
.) 0 00
co:df':ro:<hcoe&cr;
0
~:::>roes
.) .)
c.cooo::oo u@ccro~eM:; c.cc:c.roo:cbcoe~es~@roc.cc~e?:e~ cocboo;co
0 .) \.)O .) .) \0 \ .) .)
::>Wcco~t.:>:cbco
.)0 .) .)
::>ecn
.)
bJ~rooo
0 . 0
t:hleeob,fft~fle;:;
OJO .)0.) .)0
wro:ob
0 0 .)
oRcc!;
.,:::] 0
.) .)0
~bM::l ;bro(w) ~C. e~so .)
c~o2 :boi::>chl~fu:@&o
.) :_j ' .)
C2cc:c.Pe~to:cbco
.) 0
~ccJIJfl :oQ:o:X2~J.hlw ooo(c ;~bo ~cc:cco~b co:dfl
emes .:>:::.! :_j .,:::1 .> .):_jo o ., o
e:<htoe&ec

2oh;zP:chcod::to
.) 0 \ 00
~~cbtc
.) 0
u~@ccro~~:cbco
0\
.XO
.)
S~Cfbrr c
;J
col,es~ro
.:>
=~fl:<bco

.w~w46
o'J.> .)
~b.>o~flro
o ., ., o
.~b:o~:c\;cna
.> .)
~fteG
.> o
w:c.Pft
o
b.>:dxoe&ec,:hl:flCCcora
o o ..,
o1 .,) o ., tcolrec.ococo o
co:tPoo:dx.oe&ro

.~ccre:::>t:l
., ~ o .) '"'J
~bre~:o~
.)
~.oo~~rco
0 .)
co:dflro:dx.o
0
e&ro

~hlccb~6:>~
.>:::.1 0
:~cEOJ~co~flo~oh
.) - ' .) .) .)0
~:>Qo 0 ~
;) :.!J cl,:c.Pe>e:cbcoerow l.Jeeccccoo.>cb~o~~recs .) 0
u2ccoee~~~b:X:o~:!>
.) \ ~.) .) .)O
cocb~::>o orot>e;:;oo :c.wro:d~:dx.oemwlco:dfte:cbcoe&roo\;tY...n tbro
~ .) ~ .)O 0 0 0 .)0 ~
olrec.ococo
.) 0
~bcno:ocboccoo
.) .) .) 0 0
u@ccroen.CJ
.)
4bore:o~::>to~wrorob,oc.~~
:)'::J .) .) .) .) Ol.
bJ:crft~~Mco t:hl:o~:Xo~OO:Xo ooo'c o~ ,.,Rro;~:c.Pftro:dx.o emro
o ., e~ ., o o o :r:::.~ o
&mo tiGreolreolrec.<D &c.ccocc otobb ...oc~_, te getJc ~b
.) .) . ;;) .)
.) '$' 0 .) ~
b rol~~
9'1

~GG J"
0 C::: 0 CH" ( ) C' '"rk, C' OC'
m'P:cqc:~ ~~~.,~qs oo CJ?[- r:~ t1oo:>:::o2t~~=oxp:~

. c- c- ,;;:c-..oc- .c- r,::,


~J-:>:roro~ ~~Jc:(jiD~ ~rl:1":'/"
c
m!c:
(Licensee.)
~~ .
ul j ~r:;;~ c;;;;8:~::ocu:>:r
0 .
"l' c 0<"
el~lD?Co:>t:
~~~ rocp:cqYJ':::oe?
o

C" ~ OC' C'


C"
m~~'OO{{G
0

OC'\ C" C'


OC" (
'.:l:>
)
cr;,c C'

C
G(jJ
Tf,";
tj::Uc:tOOctc:r
6
c- OC'

0
~QIC: ~Y())C G.SOOCQ::O:TI~o:>ro G011')G
--u
:GC 0 000
01 Jll t1
("
6 T l c.!, o o '
'l::ug~-:>:1
0 C" (" .C' C' C' C'
9" oxp:CI:[ Y~::o~::ocn:n7:r=: ')::O~~~: ~
c .c C' (" ("~ (" . 0 ("
oc;Y
<.,.
GO)')())~~C
-.., J It
00:>:).)(1) I. G~?f'I"IQ:Y?
. ,... "] J
~U)QCDCD!mY!?:OC
IL -- T -l t,; J
(" 0 ' c C' (" 0 . (" c-r.; c f.~ 0
-:;,JlU~::Oei OOG'I_)C:!DOtn ffio:>ID?OlJlU'f':> OJffi~(l)~'):tl: ID9G~ :J,ooo
Q c 0 . r,;~ c. or,~ r;::c- r::: . . t: C' '
~~= SJO;lOOXf>:cqyJ:>:m ttrro~t1: tliD'JO'?:r ~0ooc:;; "t1x:ro
~?:~~~~ SJ00nSc;;()Tu1 U)~OO~Yp:~8 ox}:oS::~Jr&p:c;;')~
0 ' 0 C' 0 c-. C' (" (" C' . 0 c (" c (" ("~
U)~3d,:KD ll):n::l.S UOX)CCO.IC Y 1Dmcc:1 !)O)U) Gffi?ffiQI~C 00':>:00)"
L JL L 6-1. ~IT lJ . -\. "1- l IJ J :1
c- OOU)Q
. oxo:<:cYt?:::O:UI
o c c Be- oc- c oc8
cu:n:
c.- "" -- -r L " c.:-.
OOO>IC:
u O~())C . 6 G.SCX>C
r L :Y-:>
J
s:;tDQo:>co:Q
JL - - T
J:: c ( oc c-o) r;;:c- r:::r r;;:c c-
YJ?:c:3 00~~00')1 cqc10c1D Yp:oot)ID "rcr--:::o-:> t:j1D::02:Jt'1~:1 OOO;(Q
c-
C' . A\ r;:: 0\ . 0 c
0:>9?!Q~p:~~m ~:n?Go:~ "t:lQ:{~9m?:1 OOo,(Q m'P:cqYp:::o2'
OC' C" 00 C' r,;:c- 0 C' C' A\ C' C' C"
~51c OOo,(Qo:>'P:oop:m m~~'lt OOQJc:t:liDmYif ()tn~?:SJromGcpen mu
<;0=9Y~OO!j"l
c- r.s f1Df?Gt.j:OI
c-. ~ "' o c- r.:~ c- ~~ o
. 9CJ:?OO::Ot)': y4>f'J"'ej:O"f
-t-
mrooo~m G~
o
';0
c- c~ o\ o c-
::OCDYCD : COIOOO:).)~s:;mc:c- e o c- o c- . <"
2("));1 ;;>IYCDGC:mmc;;roo:>::n II
J L6 l U ll -j tJ J -1 ~
(". 0 ('" 0 ("
. U)~OOo;?Q~~C OOo,(Qoxp:~Yp:rol m<l?~OW m;;t:~Gf~~ 0)~
(" <: -1 c r;;: C' C' ' 0 C' 0 C' (" 'lr,~
~l'f? tDXOO~OO~o:> ~JJ't ji:S 9:lfjCD~Jm~1 cnc;p:il0l:{~~ 00)UCGf01t1
c- r,; o c- c- r;:;::: '1 or,: o c o c- c- '1 c-
c.n CXY..JI>lB:;x;>G::O?::Uf:?!l OO~r_:p:y ?G::O?OOQI CJ:?t1:;x;>QJffiCJ? ~~~OXli::O~tJ.t
~ 0 ~ 0 ~ (" r;;:c- (" C' ("
();)~;;> mc:p:(\.Yp:c:~ o2.,~ GSGi'e:J:m c;;ropmco?::ntj~l qc:s:J~:umt~
C' C'~ r;;: C' C' 0 () C' 0
ocn::omSJ ~~!3;lt:jCDGU!'Jy ~GO:>~GO II o,{G::O') OOu;?Q oxp:C\l~J"J:
C OC''l C" C C' 0 ~ 0 C"
m~m C\lmo'"~x~mo:>~ o2"J~ GS~ft:j:rol O<JurrQ oxp:otYp::n~
C" C' 00 C'. . .<: C C OC ( OC' C'O)
::J)QIC: 4>00YCDC OOU)Q mcn:~~l?:ell :DOCS"dG9~C G.S:XX:::O
---r " CQCIDCID
4.1
<:.
6
C'
Yt?:~? ID::o::n;;c
It
C" 0 0 OC'
o,
(" 0198
J T l
C' 0
t
OC'
:~c co::o m:x:~croc~-:>:1 cc:roc;;.smc::o::n OOQC
t
C' C"
ll [.:, L J l l 1t L t t.~ T -1. C!. 6 oi

::oG'i:~ oo~ axp:QYp:m 9t~~i;. oxp:y~:teoo9~o~ :>!( ( cqoo~::~Jrb)


C' oc- .r::;:c- O ~ C"r,".. OC" 0 C" C' r;:;::: 0 C' OC ("
!JXjl 'JU:x>Y:t::Jc: Y<jG::0:9JI OOQJC:(j"' !3.lY~C!I 1Df?Ge:J:o-fp 'ff~

wo10? ~*oo:>~ u
. 0 C' (" C' 0 C' 0 (" oc- r:i! 0
~G:n:>r ~cpc::nom ('J)0')4)'::>QJ[~ ~Jm:x>Y:tl:lmo,(Q oxp:~p:m
r;:;::: o, ("
.
(" C' C' 0 (" . ' 0 (" 0 0
cou:co'):::o~ 4>9"~i~"roJ?Ge:J:~:>p: 9~9r cn'P:~~~:n~ooctc:1 nm0
-~
ucrw~:a
olrebt5~
.)
cc.o~:>:>~
.) .JO
C:.X.co~w...;n
.) .J
nwloC&besc.c:owc.root>~b:>a:::>Q
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
11 ~c.o:dn uw&w&:c.oowc.rooe4b:>oe::~Q
.) 6 ~ .) ~ .) ~~
u2cc:t@26kC:O / , coero&
~ .) .) 00 \.J .J
:chco) rCcc r:l:o::>bG::>:>9c.<"'
.> e .>o .):] .)O
tiJ .~ cC~c :>:>~GfltC
~ :J
'Goc.co:~@hl
.>
M ()
.> ;J ~
kow
.> o ~
no!>(; c.~wr<"'c.G rcc r:dA~c:ctk~b oc.ft:~~oC.ft$ ~hcoeo? ~
-> ' .) .> .:. o- .> .:> .> -0
UO:)~
.) .)
2<"1ec.oe
\.)
~\,
.)
locde)Jo~
0 .) ::Jj a~b:~ec .)~
:. 0 J:>ltuoC ax2cc~
.) .) 0 .)
cococc .)t6o~
,)
Xcoo~ch
.)
wwc.c:h':lc:c
' o:J tc.S
'ico~ .eel! 1oM ?ri<-"t9 re~tic (r)
ao6C dsurtteG tc!c Krl'tfoa::.Ffb (C)
~~
.) ot
U~:CC!> .)
~s-r(JJ8ti
C.OC.C:U~~ tC.OOCCC.OC.OO!)(.C ~b::>~C.<:C01:&l2oo e~" eg~
.., ~ .) .) .JO .J .) ..J 'O \0
?0~
0r
'l'Jccccc!lc.oc.Q~~"'Q
;j
~~&, f,coo~hlwiO~l~~<ec.clffi
.J ~ !:l ~ o o.J o.J:.:.b 1.. .:1.)
~cc:c..o:2oti.>h:>t'l
'3"" .) .) o o
h>
o ssilc
co(;
I
rc:-:1
I
o~:o<:ce: J@cc:oQcecoce 'Cc:occa:: 'otroli'>Oro w~Pea;;/n II feoccc0:f'> en@cch.l:.
:J ~ .) .)::J .)
.>B' 0 0 .) ,) .) 0 0 0 .) ~
cea.:ce
.) co:o&xc
.) :c.rf'>OC.CC~!P.CO:@<J>
.) . .) .) I!)!::>CCCc
:>- .) @cc:o<:cec
.) .) .)o'roJ~b/n
.) 0 0 IWH!le:
\,
.,d<J>IIO
l.
<J>Q
.:>:.:r dea;
.) lfeoc<:cteA
0
eo@f'!~WM~
.,) .) .,)
corA loJh,0::@Abdc
.) 0.)
c.ccccro~cbecoco~l',
0 0 .) . ...
1bec Cc eeoC!:@"
.)
Jccb<~:c.ttA
'
'Cc:~:cbco
0
olb:mo<J>hl:ofeec
,) l., . ) : l . )
,fGcocc()()
';:r.... ,-
,o~Sc.oo
ccetlilw{bc.ce~
,;) \.......J.) .)
cewce
.)
:ore:ofee;c '<:.o:occec o'roL~b/n
.) .) 0 .) 0
0 0 COA:CC~~ ~r><J>hlec;c.cc
.)
0 ..>':1 .)
IOCCa: @ccroJ~/n of~f,':&e<J>hl IC.CCIOCCe WICCOAQCO nCdA@WW
.,) .) .) 0 0 .) ,.,::.~ .) ,l,; .,)~ .) & .) 0
loth ,ob.,fe
00
roG@b
.) .)
~cc:~c.3hl
.) .)
wc::loC!' li&>coc.co~
~ 0 .)
rnP,eec
.) ... 0
'Cck
0 0
u&!ccce&->
.)
hl@Aco~1h
.) 00
liln
.>
wcW001J/;eec ,fGl!.o:oc.co::>:c.cc:occec C.CC$Ho<X!co <hleo :c.cc:occec
""' o S" .:> s-- ., , .J ..,:.,:) .>
co~recc
,i)
.)~cc:~al=l
... .)::.J :oreec
.,) 0 .)
b.Job:c.wa .)cck0
:occo$:ccc:occecn
~ .)
nc.orecotl:~QO)
.) .) :.:J .....
uccCnA
.)
@ccb@:tt
.J '
!Sook .J .) .), .,) .) ,~...
vs.) \ .)ocecoo$:~orofcocoro&!cc:~c:;::lbc.o
c:"X>2 u@ccb:ttdfco ~CO(.C0001lgecG
.)
.) :> t.,; o
rwfcococo
:>o o
~ccohoco
.>o.>
w:crAw~:C.OO!~C3hl
o- .> ., ~
~~~~ coo2 :1bcc gc{o\\Z u~CC<J>$1~ c.ccccc~cc~ e<1>~!5< }'cejce jffl
~.>0
OO~!Sdxc .l:xobco~
.l
JC.CQ>~d,~A
\.)
~:&:cbco
O
ICC.O~ w:dOOco
0 O.>
:oe~ CCC~~W.>
z-:Xtxc Cc c~:@~ cb :X:e:dA":occecarooacc ookA~tJ J:;:;":lroccc$<J>tJ~!,:c&ec
.;) .,) ~0 .;) t,.; .,)Q .)~ ) .... .) .>:JS 0
tcrA:t'>:cbco
ohl:c.cc~accc::>/6h.i<l>r.:J fuo5o :ore:oreec 6:;;:;":lQII IICVrocolJ:ae
.):I .) .,) ::::J,):t 0 . .) .,) )""~ ~ ~ ::J
11~1'1, o~c.ohl:ae CCJ~cl,a;m~:JHI'IO'liOI'IC:C-;C.O ~c:cQcvl;oc.~:I~CO<le
0 0 ::1 .) 0 ,)
,) Ol ... 0 .) ::::J., ~ .)
aore:ol'ew'l:o:oc:cw
.> .,) 0 .)
3 o'roJ8'h~
.) 0 0
wft:ccebl'l
0
'oOec:c.cc:occw-ob:<.c:uo
.,) :1 .) .) &!cd:e
.J 0
:oc.(l)e~<.cc:occw-:ol:l!:)~tJ:l:e co~w:xobco ~:oCh1:~1,:oOw wreco
;) ,) .)~,)0.) :J . 0 .) ., .,::J::::] c.. .,::] .,) .
c.onco :occw
, .)
o~:c.cc:occw
.) .)
c.o}na~
.,) g ,-
uote:orewsc.cc:oc:cec
.) .,) ~
CcvccGOO
s--~ .) o,:<.ttt
.)
abok ar.oc:cal4'1mrol'lee citol:e:<.l\t:oc:cwl'lmlol'lcc ooka~O
.) .) ;t .) . "" t,
(c) Cc .)cbc.oc:~oc:@~
o .) .10 .) .>O .l:J
( ~be:c.cowc.
.,
Fro~) Wcot'7ro: w~Wflmt OflCC
.:;, oe o ..) l,;
:c. rfl~~~h:~~oCDh
..) .,) o .) .,) o .) .) .)
~ :)~(26c.uccro . :~hi5~w
.,) o
. I~:ro~ Wfl
o'J .
r
::>~
;>
( or;
86
uE>co:2u
.) _ 0
irc.rowc.l6~ c.cc~:c.cowc~
.) .)
~b:o~rocno
:;, .> . ,)
to~~cce2cc:c.ook(;
0 \. .) 0 \.
bee (f) br e~c"hc~o2wc.c
.) .)
sb~c.o&:occ:2rf':@<~
.) ,J .l ,J
::I )1;cnroro o~:c.tl:>o!-
.) ' :J .) 0 .;,o~ tJCfel..f ,Jc.of'lcc~:I=7Jc:oo.:>cb
e:'J.:> :~
(c~o2wcc
.) k5:b~:~~GG
,J
: M~:&x.c) :1=7J&:cbco:~ccto~So~H~~b roeect>:~b w:c.r~:c.oowc.fco~ '
:;, ~ o..~.> .) ..a, o ~ .l T
u(e) oCf so~edi~~soo.:>cb r~fe . Cstc
r 11 wit o (\)(()tit
5-og .J .)
(:c.r~&:c.cocoeF~~4b~re~h1)
.) .)~ .) .)
/
~~oo~~co~ch
.,) ~ ., _.,)
nlre:&:cltc.o
~
c.oo~~o~
., .)0
udw~c.c:2
' .> e
C.C.O~::l:>\' OJ(,CX)~C\)11
.) lO > .>
II :o:x. reo:Cn
O> e
ocC
ccC
rcc
r
~'l'
.,)
S'* oc
0)(0,
~
dcG
!~"t. l rt ~
"'W . c:n

~ l $tj J cJ~ !~T~ ~~~ 8 :t~~~ . w~ s ~i ~ iJ


" ..Q
~ cfu~ ~ ~ ::& ~ cl-B~~ ~ 8 ~
0
"t 4 . ~ ~ ~~
lit
~ ~ ~!f
c!!
~ s ~ ~~ ~~_:t ~~t~
~ ~ Jo i-v
t*"~t:~=~
~
6) ,8 ~
s ~-+~i ~f rt~t ~rr ctn . .
..
~ g, ..
9.:1 s -g
o8

.. 3->
'F -+
6') ..
oS .
()')
,f3 3? o8 8 2 6>~ -B '-C 8 V 1 -r 1 ~ ..e ~ ~ t V ~ "+ J)
8
~ cg3 ~'~ 6) ~ ~ 8 s :a ~ So ~ -+
~ s '88 ~~~ ~ t 8 8 -+ . a., ~ -e ~ :8
1t& 0
~i~4~] ri ~1~~~!6) ~j ~t~tt~t_~
t v .B S ~ 8 c ~ S 6>
~ : t e B ~ P. ~ ~ ~- S ~ ~ ~ ~;~~rn.,
~ 2 ~~ _:ru-,~ g ru-,~b8 [~'t, u ~~ ~ c5
~ "' f3 ~ o8 8 S, f"5l O'l
n ~ 6> 8 o;n - v V Cl.n
+ j.
.. ~~ ()') 6) c:lli w '-tl' ;oQ ~ -t !.Q --a e
oS q;; ~ ~~~~ l::S -v o
v e s ~ -8.. ()') sv
8
"
~f (_ UUJ
8: ~~ 6)~~ 1, ~.i!J.~~ -So 8 c 'H' ~ cl u' ~ - ~g., <.LJ V ,.100 -QO
f ~ JOO

<n C"l
o' m ru s 8
v-
r~6)~ -SoJf~lt~r~a~i:~J,tl a:rJ
e 6)~ % ~ ~~ v l
s -3 ()'c ) ~
t!~~~~
<n
14U {t,8 6>
~ ~
6> .<n -t -t)
::>
l -8 '-tl '-gl ()')
1~ f>c~~~~~~~tt~~~~~tl~ J
s:o ()')
~}~~
-r.> .. 8
6) ~ 6) -+ ~ o8, ()') ~l -8o -~ u <n
-So.. (): ~ :,;.,
6> O'l6> CG1 6>
t 8 ~o
~ ~ ~ ~ S -s c~ ~ ~~ ~ z c ceo 6) ., !...-t:'l ~ ~- . 6) ru ~
t ~ ~
-8 e ~ (-;;) .8, & ~ en 8 . lV-> ()
Ji '3 ..&eo { . m.....,
~ .. e j ()'..) .. .. .. o..re-.t\-s -3o
r~ i ~
Ill

eo ~ ~ -~ -s ~0 <n ~ . 8 J. ~,-~ _, e. fl<n ~


G 0'>
~
-88,o ~ -;fy,~
<n ~ "5 ::o ;
.,J.o-,-; ~ =!> 0'> ..v e co -&..so c a-, ~
t? =!>0 ~ v; .. .. 8-, ~ s, . . ~ g e ~ a-, r.:?n e 4) 8-, .. ; ..
=8 % ~ ~ [B,
. ~ + .. "5 =~
. 4:: co:> e-, -8o -8 v; <n
-to e 8->~ c~ ~ 8 =8~. m= "5~em l .:8 8-, ~ ~ a-, . ~ <-5 <n ~ ~ c8 .. m.,
~~1~~~~ !t~.t~l1i~IT! l~tr!~~t~,
r,e.,<n~lls
~ !;B
J~l i~~~~~J11
"iZ" L8 cg ~ v .. o-, Lcn o-, o -v
8~.. \J~~TiT~
-8 a-, "'~ 8 ...&, o t, -oo
-So a-, "1Z" 6) =!>0 a-, =4:: ~ &; ~ s -2 ~@-So e 8 -~ -
o-, ..9. 31) -go~ r.. m =4::
i, ~ 8 "'a i r:u-e
J. c oQ
~4)~~ m, ~ S ~ac.
-8orow e-, a~~~J ~ ~ ~"5
<n -eo 8 -:t, ~~ 9 ~ ~~ e ~8:: w
6) 8, 0'>
rno i =~jro ~.. m
~ljg -~ ~rk-ao ~~ ~&4>
S -eo "5 8 ~
4) 4) 4)
o c0'> t ~ '-"'~J -\:So -8.. CG1
s 8 m e -do .. <n~ o8
(lj, ; ffi, j ~; ~; 1f
c ll X:> ...!!)
... ~
sa-, ~ CG1
~ -~ 2" m e
~ ~ s, .,~-;:@a-, eg.,_~~ a~ a~ .o;
~. ~ e.v -t~a,
[B, e .. c =t "5 v = v m -e ~
rn-, 4) 4) [14) -eo v.
..e -e j
..
-to ~ ~ ,.8 0 -e-o 0'> O'l v .
~~ -~S~ ~e ~a rue ~-+m ~a-,~v .. 8a-,
m-uo .-u ~- ~ Len ~ - o _m o_ 9'1
=
~ ~ <n~ rn-, o
. - -uo 4) = ~ v CG1 ~ =Q ~ t:
.8 ~ <n 1 e <n - . s
. (G)
0')
8 . ~ ru_
lv> 4'l o8 ,.8
"5 0 J3 8, 'W S
8, .Q'> ac. 4)
V ~ 4'l r?rl
I) u::l4i . _ol ~; V
==
O'l 4'l 00 C 8, . ; ....! : C'l
e
(1}, ~ . ~--~~
t 8,
*=~ ~,a a,.rt.. v ~ a.~ 8,~
O'lcg ..
. -8o . '
v"


8
cgt 8c-, ~ v P. 8-> v; 8 e
~ !-{;.q)
~ -oo (')., ~...!!) -) .. 4)
~~
.,... s, c. .. t ..B 6v rn-, v
. ~ . . - 6) 6) - .. -go a . v; ce~ ,.88 s
~ o "t., .. ,
.. - 0'> ....! e .. C'l -oo <= C'l =V G
-So~ -. ~ti ~ flo -Sot s
~(B., -s ~ ..Bo a. a. ..a, ~Jgo.:t;., a. g~t
.2
1.,-+C"Ue
c .(').-) e.
.::P Gi"l
l et u
""i C!
nc.~c.rro::~c.cc ::1
1c.<XlWdC\>::~ ~b~~e~akc i:otrw~ wbwc :,y;I'ICCC.CC~~~re OQ~~::J
.> ;, '!j_, S'.> o e e :J .JO ~ .:. ::l~
l;fl-b-tl
:J
uolfo:&:cbco

,ll~w~b
01.> ~ ow 0
.,) ob .)~1le&cx:cococ
:
A:cbco tot~ t,.,k,J ...,,
t
"uf ~ ~~~ '1~ r;3i)e
( ~be:c.o:xt.Jc.rroe>) c.~e.c:2
. . ;) ~. e
t
~\"
.)
(:~r~&:c.oosvcJoo~) ~ . 1,0 ~c.~~=foo:~
~~~:~ :~~ }~6~ :~tt:cbco
V9 9 .1_
.,CD8CD$CG ftSCDGO
rue rue u-
: j ... ~~ I u .~.g
[ml'l'l .. 1),
T ':\1 ! en
.. ... .... . . .

1 ~ ~- ;['~ fii t~ ll ~il{J.: ~ !~!~\~~


~ .& -
1' ~ t~ 8 +l ~ ~ ~ c!1 -3 ~ &, .en 8 CGJ o
oS ~~ S 8
i., - ~ ~ ~ Ef :& ~ ~ ~ ct ~ ~., c J.o ~ i -g -g: S &, en -v
T~~~ -a~~~1~~~fJ ~~~~~~~8~~-~~~~~~
(;B., ~., ~ 8 rtn
-o ~ -8o [B., -8o :So <=o -3 (B., 2n -c roo
-<o
v
e0 :v UJ J
3 = + S ::S
- -.l) .
~ en CRD - ~=C v .. ~ ' - 0 8 ..
~ -co
~ ~
- v, -vo
CRD ~ ~
lliS) t -~~ ~ o8 8e 8.. ~ ,.8 ~ ~ ~ j' ~
-vo
dol
::)
~.
v-> ("t)'l (1
en 0u ru
~ l Cl'l
.... , m .en c
~ -v .v ~ -en
., cv
GO>
en en
+
~~@~S&
1, ::!>o en
E ..
~~*~~~~,
eo
__: ~ -~ ~ oa; 8
_ ~-~~~~~~~~~sf~
~ ~ a., :B 8. -~ ~ Q., S., 8., 1:1 CW ..
c~~
~Vi
f~~~~e~_ ,m~tefii~8o8~i~~~~~$e~
o ~ ro c!1 Jt., ~ ~ -3oJl = (B.,j -a Q'l .. 0 :So 6i s C'l .
-oo -oo u ~ ~ e- ~ . ~ ~ 8., = + ~ ~ c -B v 8 . ..& .& IS)
.' .. : ~ rn:,.~ $. ~ nn S{ . ~.,..e. =8 [B., a., ru-, ~
Gl t$ ::!)o 0 .. Q) IS) ::!)o ()'l
S:( ;j (;B..,
"~ .e . . . -8 8 ;j
--g,.. ~ -ro =
~8 45.. ~ . , -gc
~+
cw +->
~ .. : .. .. 8 . en CG1 ~ c = e ~ ::@ g, So g 8 c ~ s ~g ~ ~ ~ .& ..2o
t1
~. l':~ 8 t C'l~- ~ ~ ~ ~ [:B_, ~ (B., ~ _, ~ 8 e ~ ~., ~ ~ ~ "s .--g, -
-a
~ -g ~ -e t ~= J _ ; o., 8 =~ 2 ~ ~ ~ T~ ~ i, to ro
cg . [B-,8 :t, 8 -v V Jk oe, --o
. ,.t~ len~ i.,~ T ~ ~ ~~
IS):::> ' v =C men&,
~-roru _g., rn., ~ ru., ~ *~ ~ t c
(j) {' ..a1 o
ao ~CI'l
. 45 ru ~ ~CI'l 8 .2. --g., ~ ~ s -e 8 ~
t oS -So


~a
~
r~
c8.,
t~1~~1f~stju
IS)
~ ~ ~ ..8
+Jf~f1t1~J
[B.,
cw = -& ~ ~
~~~~
~ a., -8o 8 fB., (C) .v IS) :n -.l) ::@ _q,.,
-8 ]: .. ~ -~= -8 aA ~ =?. ., ~- :) ::!)o
IS) IS)
cnru-, .
ea., ~ CG1 ...n s ~ ~ ~ ..8 o8
:So 0~ ?fl 8 4d-> s c8a., e s.
8 ciD
- ~ en -8 ~ ~ ""$ ,.8 8 V en ~ ~ ~ ~., V -8 -~ ~
m. tW
.. .:ll' q;o 1>. s a ll . (!}> -s _ "' ., -B Ill" o2 .,.,.,
~ li ~ -s ~ ~ -s !c!
.,.
I
~
u: .)oCo!rwc.El~ocoax.w~:G~
,::,)., 0.) ::l .) .) .)oCJa:!c.rAc.co~cea.xnc.
:l .) t .)'o~
<.cocd,c:eboo~c.mA5~2
.:J .,
<.cc~:,~hl'o.:orea:@bw~cc:c.ooll
.J :.:J > .J ., > :.:1"'-n::~ .,:X.o:oh
., J:ol:lro
.,:Jo
.)~bnCo
.) ~:obc.e~ce
:.l.) 0 .) ..,
\.A: .)o'l:.oa:~CCIOC. :,;Cr;,l.@o:nro:@~: :>cu--:ot:l oa:Co ~bnCo'!O
.) ~ .) .) .,) .) ~.) 0 .) .) :.:1
owc.ws:G~.)oOA .)oo:irwa: .)'o~ of c
\..) . cohw ~cul'l5o I!C.CO.olASn cenC!wwcocc
.)
.) .)
: Aw:@eo:>c.w-:::>Cbe: oc.cos ~b ocecooo:c.rAwte:c.h:l 4~:,~ti'IW
;, ~ .)::::Jo- .> ~.lo
~bwc.tleooo
.) .,
., ., ::.:J _, ., ~_, .,
CUC.WSl{;OliO C.CO~CiebooSC.Ctlft!J~(!- ::>WOC.C'CSlC.CXI&:b&
.) .,) .) .,) .) .) .)
... f :~crA:@o:t'lco:CC!t: \
0 .) .,
.,:::::J
Lf>~to~~feol.cnh'J;h'J ~
WCCJ'I:o:oc.rwec.cooCCJbcc-
~ 0 .,) 0 .) .)
(e) (c) ffl t'IC~
.)
:korwt'l!cbCO
.)
r
:>~
.)
~:~tm1c.o
oli'e:&:cbc.o
..)
C.C.05:l:l~
..) ..)0
&~cc:&es ~i? G<fO:;,cbooGOcock .:?Oesl9W c.oc.voc@o~ ~:cbco
t'lOOO !6lc.o g& (rosd@ I ~<!>e oGtlc) rog~r~l? I ~~e r CCC ~~]
SCM~6.:: ~=-slso~:;,gco snlbg:;, u:cso&es ~~ c I 6es 6 ge.s
:9Pfl:$Co :gro:$C4-:gGOo ~<),:19 G <fO:;,cboo GOcock :$Croscc:;,gggeo
~.gtoes :g]gl~gb; :~oroc.c.o W,cc$Cc.o ~<fO:;,~c\~ chsro:;,cboo
~oo:;,c.coft g~(! J$!:;,(sddlS11.1.L) :~Clg6oo t6es c ~~es e:ooe! :gGO<l
n$Cccsol9 :19C.O :$Crococ.v:;,c:@o:~ c Cf>l?es o:cbcoeco so~es =(9 (;
s.co:;,cboo GOCOck ~ n$Ccc co~ ~ so~:;,sco soc.c.o:;,:8:;,:$Cro ~:19 (;
. <fO~ wcocA> ~~sc.o lkucc~ :pxs~ ~
woro~ (}:dx.oocoo ~ ~~~~~ C~cx}x:o)
~ ~:;, (~ c 1ooro~~ r# uoCc~ a"'~
1e gbtJc gcc<!>~~!~ess.co~cboo ~OO~C.COfl3~(! CIX;?~d<i-:~
!Tesu:c~:~ :~~()~GO co~s gP6:>~6esc&o~~ ~:cfft.:::cbc.o
u$Ccc~ lo~:~:c.oo
go:s6ro :&~~oo \'C.COSC 6es:sP<=>:$C() :gco:$C<!>:gGO() ~~ccod,gl ~
:$Cro~$Ccc:c.co~gGG0~!6:g~gt_l, abes( GO)(C) rtJ t'l~~ ~~srGOt'l:cbc.o
l?~es:~()g6oo &o=19~-!>sro~cboo .:::cbcop ~g~es5dcc~~ ~oo~
GO:cft'l~:cbco lnC>lnfl :cfftsro~cboo~oo~c.cot'l 3~(!.1$!~ (sddlSI1.!.L)
:~og6oo u:c~~=gsoc8~gco soc.c.o$8~ 6es=SPt'l:$C():gro:sa4-:gGO()
~es SCccif S.CO~ c:::cbc.o cA:gcl~ ~:SGGO~ :c.ooso&u$
~\A>~ gcJ:;,snc.ces lt$Cccl5&~ ~$Ccc:c.co ~gGGO:;,~& (.!dARid)
'#u:csocc ~sob=> :c~ ~ ~sc.o socw~s~
:lf sro:;,cboo~oo~c.cot'l 3~(! .1$!~ (S;:}dlS11.1.L) :~og6oo 16w(e) (c)
rtJ ft~~ :~gPGOf):cbc.o go!> (e Cf>l?es~cc:;,socc) :sP<=>:$C<l:gro:~4-:gGO()
~:~ ~ tlr c ~~(!oesft(X)O r# cctlc "~:cbc.o
..~r~
co~~ . ~~ geco W:>es~fegb: g~ ~:gdW~~6cc
~ il~!w!6 gsoPel~~g ~glPe+~&~ ?g*re1 ~sc.co~sc 1.o~e.s
~!~n:~ :cffto:::cbc.o GO:cf~:cbcoc:A:4.es~n c~9sJ'GO~:~ :~&::c.bco
R(r) 6"J~to~1 uso&>cs:&~:cbc.o
~~Clc n(c) :!ccc.c:~n uso&>cs:&,?P:c.bc.o
cfG .
~JJ

(" (",..r,: (" ' (" 0 (" (" 0 0 0 ("


!)e" c;;~:<On:>'Y.'J)o:>C~?rl) ~Qro:D~U ~Gp."'T.> CXX)U0'7D: e=ti~?CI UJ~i
C" A;_ C" _<:; C" 0 O o (" C" 'A;
co:>?~3J c:;-;:G'tG~'(>~ ~.:no:>::n~:;.12~Y 002:0).2:~? GO.)J?mCO?:~~
e"'e?"l;e')O) (;~(" (" 0 (" (" [ ) (" (" (" (" ( r::
ol? 2: ertC~ O?j j ::;ol ~~()I
O(l:>OXT.>?ro ~ <Oo:>?:x>roc:ro O@I:SO
(' (" (" c:: .s.r;::;: (" 0 (" 0 r;-~ ("
c;;~:c;;."'JY.Y.1)o:r;<O~? .~: ~~OJ~o:>~n qptr- ~?'.).)0) ccc;p~o:>J
. (" 'l (" ,.... ("' ("
2:2-x& 0.::2: ~ o!: ox:c;;~Yr.>~<OOOOJC?,U
ol J e:u r.oC" C" o A\ ' C"C C" C" ' C" ~
ox:p:OlldJ?:!'O t{C::n~~ ld~ O~'!>sq cos:<O!PY.J:><i ~:T.f,Cl09t:I"'::D?
(" ("
O:AXl:>{..? r-- (" , (" ("
GQlJUIO);:Al:))ll :Do.:>?~:::O.<;OC!d! ?~ O'X\C: c,lCX)')~
" \......J
'-- l..- L :J to; - -,
:m0l CJ -;:c;un r IS("
o C" "l o r o ' C" (" t:::C' C" ("
~GOJ? OIGq::D'OO?O?Cf:C'l{ ~;;o~~ldJ?: O'J9C:!J~e0 G'i1!~200:;omro
'
:D~OG;;D')::;Cio"D ~
(" (" 'r-"' (" O C'
lffi:l):1)34mc: ' ("
:.)\O<O;;Q?Cn;)')Ql (" ' (" :D:l.~U? O~Ql::O? :
(" e OJ~) II
("
l 4 ~r t.:.:.:~ . a -, .. '---" .. , " A 01 c
oom:Q:Y:?;ro
C" C" C" r C ' oCC" ~ ' OOC' c:
m'XU~c::.u:.-n~Jt::l:lo:> c;;roJ :>rosc;;,!.luj~'4>Q m..-n:G><:oococ ooU?
o
-\- u tJ 6, ru o c. -- L- 6 l l 6 Jt t.

ro=n:
(" r. r,:("
<O:>!;uoo:>::x>,~a;)'UCI m~"J:ro~Jr?::u,:u '=>~:1.>1;1
_o C" oo o_<:: ~ (" oc:
!droo:-nco.oc c;;:;n')c
J (" ("
c.:, v ~ t..:J L t a - .... &.n " L

om
1111
C"
34').)~~0)
J
o C" ~
t
r,o
o:n;:uw
u J O)Ql~(l)')
l J

o:>O"l:Q:Colt?:o:>:D <DC\UG)O);<;;Q)I
T U
C"
1...... -- -,
C" o rr ems;
m ..
C" C" C' f,_ C" OOC" C" 0 C" ~ C:
~o~m?Cc:cY.J;;o'f>GO)?Yj:>: Y~a.>~ tJc::;ql{c~r.; ~~~: GOlJUOO'):eJ~211
(" <:' <:' i;:C" C"
on~:lt)i>-:;;;o~r.~s o::;Colcc:::>tm~'J
(" "l OC"
<Oa;)'XT.YJI34cn:::.;
'1 C:
oo.:o:o 11
("
l - ~IT ' .J 0 4J J L ~
(" .... (" (" (" 0 (" (" ('
::>u oxp:Ol oxxp<Oo:>:> J u::o~ :oqmc;o:>?Gmp::OCD ;;2;:rou:
C"C" C" c:orr
G)c~J2=34 9 "2~"ro?roro:>:<O::l)') <XXl')~;::);"~' e~ ~tJ)")
(" C':J C'"l C:"l
~CDQ.\:iOO.:
---,J (})O')OI:l)OO');J
L
YU>:J.JOI:Dro?:
L
n
r-o C" c: C" c: <:- OC" c:r.;:C' C" ,..A; oC"
~9:1:3:G:D? omc:y2:00Col: G)C;Iol~ 2:'f.? ~!3 9 0CtjO:D2:I ~~!3 9
ro~:::S~u
CJ l \ l
"4 There shall be a voter's list kept with the trustees
and no person shall be entitled to vote for the Election of
a trustee or for member of the Council unless he is a Rohan
who has spent the last year in the Kyaunydike and whose
name has been borne on the voter's list for the 6 months
previous to the election as being a resident Rohan of the
Kyaungdike.
("' (" (" "'10 (" (" Q "T' ("
m~o~:;o* G>:>qc:~c o~~yp::x>2 roquooxc;;::>t 2ill5 ~U??<Ocoq
(" (" .... c (" 0 (" (" , 0 0' A\ ("
:;o~Gcn:> ;ou:f:~~m:>:;ooc ~?UX"OO'f>"-b:>? j ut:~C'l'.low:~ G!:]~<Oro?m

O)CG
C" c:oc-
?ro~C<OU::L,:l)ll
c-
O):;>().JU(J.)C
C" [)TC" C"
CO)()')Qt?:OC ldO<O>ro?U
C" o , c:
~;;r)~G)')CIC:
L ........, l Jl ~ \. \1 Jl ll ::J -1
OA;_ (" (" 1:: C:~ 0 (" (" (" (" . (" (" ("
U9f~ <O~lGro:>m O:X:GC']').J.>e.:l<O:l:>? ~b{.:VYJ?::x>~ q>O)c:.;;2:XJ~: q>2?:YJ2:
0 C: ' OC" C" C" 0 0 0 OOC"!;.:rA\
OX)I "{34UG:D? lol;;Q~ <OU~G:D? ~34::lJC:~ ~0? lol~~C~
(" (' r: ("r,::(" (' (' (' (" (" ("
c;~:c;;m:>ro mcG~?ro0 c:op:~p omc:t2:rou: o~:oJ2t8dq u~l
C:
~:;o9<0W~II <D'P:;;J(T.J'f<D 01 2:2?~l.OO:fn:>
C: 0 0 0 C" OC'
0?00
( ,..,J;)
Oe'tu ~'G)
("
~ 8 ~ 8 8~ r2. ~ ~ ~ 6) ~ ~
1 8 ~ ~ s 8 ~%
~1~1tj~
8fa., s 0~ <,. =
n ~ ~tlJ ~1t!t~~1
a., a.,-<D-w ;~ 8 8 ~~ 6)

~~]~~~r~~l~~~t~
a ,g: - 8 !l'
It~~~mrl~Jt~l~!
s s.. ~ all ~ e ~ ;:; ~ s, s.,
..s. "lll ~ rnl s ~ '3: 1 liD il. c1!io 8
[ ;' -i l ~ ~ t!~ l ~ ~ &.{ t t[ ;'fl ~ ~ ll ~ g,-i, n:
1J1~1I1}~t t~t 1 1 1~-~~s.,La!l~~L~
6)
~~~-~.u--g~~~U~I~l
~ rl ~ 8 {
~~~
~ ~ ~t
J!
~Q8
ttttLj~~~'
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~
.. 3-, .. L-
Jl c
0 :::!>0"'
qp ~ ...... s 0 r-,
ljfj C I
~ ~- e ~ 0 ~8 (;'
.. ) ~ e
a,:v,. :&,
&,~ , ~ i
~~~~~~~~ ~~~1~~ 0~~~~~ ~tJ ..
-&e t'1 S,3s s 8 3~8~ L-- -&v-3o _((
l: -c :!q & \:)') 0
8 ~ v c
a~ . "t'?~
~ c8
8 ltll
~ .,

~~g~~~~
-9. ..!>
Jt O"l V>
~~
R " ~ ~(jl.,
lf~ru-, tt&J~ ~ -fitt~t~~- ~
t S B 1,
{ti Jl ~ t ~ 1 _n ~, 0,~ tall rr t r~! .[
o L.;tc, ~P 1 ~f l s., i l'il ~ ~. 1i cl!io a .& e ciio

~i:to~f l i ~
!)J9
OJ:.! C' _,..$:~
~
C' C' C' C' C' "' C' ' C'
~e::r-~JO> ~'f'l J ~()0)-.A./\ '":1 oxp:Q ~0)~1:0)2? e>roc:
. <" <" t- ' C' C' <" e T C"
~~e'lO.) f2:coo: 02~2t!:nCJI cs:cro?roCO : G:x>? <Xl'J~:C~il ~?GCXXJ
. w 91? ~
(" "'' (' (' 0 ......!,..~ 0~~ 0' C' C' C' (" ("
~., J o:~~ 9C~L""'tt':~ 0c: ~'i~GO):>a:>~: 4X'f.)C:te::ro~J:

' ~'?.~ ('

~
C'

c r;~
(' C' <"r.:;. L.<" ,1; ....s.~
()2%~J2:00'JI C~:GO>?O>CY.>CGrJ':XY.>t:r-: ~Gl:I':>CD0)2 ec::g ~t:JC:QJ~?
~ c- "''C'
r:: r:: (" (" (" ("
01 J e:u . <" o<"r,:;c c C'
:J'J"'Fet=~O)~tr-' :nro.~c 0c::ro2: ~'1~u 11 u~ro'P:Q0)2t~cwtc:
C' (" (" 00 0 (" 000 ,,,~ 0
~J?:~?UC e~ (;XJ):lGCOCJ OO'f>GCY.>'><J? Q~~~~~:;o~tj:t~:~p:q
(" ("' 0 (" 0<" (" (" . (" (" ....s. ' 0
G::O~P.C(\)0)211 ~3)~4l~O)~CGrD:>cro2:~ooCro0)211 axp:cq
CJI-:>:mro.:n:oc~
u
-
--c.:,--_a
C'
CJC\'lm{D
~~.. - ....- ---. ~
C'\6:D:':l1tt("
.:nQ
~ C
('
csxn~O):>co:>c:eucs~c
T J J
(" C' 0 (' .
~mro
l
0 ~ (" ......~
~~x:c\".c.tbcro:n2u - ~t:lc:alJroCI-f CJICJ~ce:;qro~cucc--r "0">-'"Dtf'~
(' ,sr,..c (" 0 ....s. r.: 0 (" (" cr.~ ...
("

~OO:l:>~ll

0 ~A;~ (" (" (" (" (" ("


ro~cq:<"l1 t'll~u2?91c 2~5 '=l(.J)')G~ c m? r;;~Fcro?m'P~ -
:;xxp_
r,:<" . c c- c-cc- c: . c- <: c- c-
t>GCI f ')UXJ?CO'f>GO')') G~:GO:l')O)'fl5[~CGC cmC:f> 2:ro~:c2:~Je:cr.lq
(" (" ~ c:~ (' 0 (" (" (' ~ 0 0 (" ('
c~:cmxn SQCG~?-:7J 1,c; ~~o:>2~:> OOC5J?:o:>e:u g)r il~q icoxf.lo~;
r r:;::c "'' rC: or;:::: \ C' C" o c r;:::: c
mro2:cr.lt:JC!~I:sc~~~~GUII ~;;:c*~C'X)C= '=l~:x>2mo:>G~?C;I fXlXD
(' 0 (" r;_QC' (" (" ~ ('~(" ~' ("
OO'fl~o:>')~Jp:o1 o:F~IOo:>t:jCJ ~s:cm?m roccrllxDt:Jc: "'Dt~:x>ero
r;:::: (" -~ (" (' (" (" (" (" 0 (" ' (" 0
o:>G~x=~J?~G~:>St4>CDC:;>2:ro~: c2:~J2:rr.l9 ~0-?m;>?~O)e:o? ~zu
c-
C' <" c- c- <" ~ c c r.;:c c-
1,)~11
():1)C~2:~: C2:~Je:lf? ~G'J~t:j:Go:>? CC'=l:t?lf"'t ~CGUX~!I
!;, (" (' (" (' (" 0 0 0 0<" (" ('
g] cmc:t~:ru(:)~ c2:1,)J2:rr~ o:>o)roJmJ
1 g._;.lm.pro <.DQCO?'f:~:;;>J[Umt
<" . 0<" C"~ C" OC' C" A; 0 <" r.
UX)CI,;<J:>?o:>W~C'') O)J::Of?<{C ~'PG::r.>?~:~-~ 9COC9J C\10Jf?9?G']:
\
WGU!;;) ::>:>~~')
' ("
O);;!I:TI:~:UC
(' 9 ("(" 0 ("
IOGU(\)'=l'=l~) II
("
O')')OJ')G'j: G;l('.:li[GI.S
"''
!3d~ I 'J~.l\C
("
o LJ J vc.:. J .._,. J T a J
C' OC' C" 0 C" A\ ~C" C" C" C' C" C' C
0)\})<.l:{CGO:> ') C:"1.>C :f2:ro~:c2:~J e:n~ Gru:C?~9J t=~UCY.>~:G~Q>J Jl:!f'roy
o r C' ~ \ o C" C'C" o OC' C" "''
l!l'J
6
(\)ffi.S?OGOO?J
l T -, -
II m ro::o8J~CJI')::x;:n
C.J :. Jl 1.1 c:. ffil&t~:J.i:T.IGCl;;\CCIJI?:roc
6.1 L L JI l lJ 6
Cl?:OI
Jl
C" l C'f:-: C" C' ( OC' C' C" r,;:c- " 'D J J
O:>t::t::nnrottl2~c G'Joruo:ngs'PC' ::>G:Je ~~c ~0'it:GO)J roor an
v. B ak er (1) oqc<: ro:J>c r.
l.- C" 9 C' r <" <"
otners 6 1.:
cmc~~;n:ru~: c:x>:~e:m-
I'--'
. -
L_. lJ

" No person shall act as trustees who shall, directly or


indirectly, . -:~.ke. a lease of or '\told or occupy the estate and
property belonging to the chanty or any part thereof, or
any interest therein, for his own benefit or for the benefit
of any person or persons whomsoever."

q;;q~o:>211
00 (" 40
(1) (1959) 27 Be~v. 193.
~J~

~IJCIG
J\
<: roro!J?
6
C'
J
0
~:n:ya
L
0
Jl
C'
G:l>!CUXUG:l:>?
J
C' "@
oo:n:
CI'C
G) :
~c::
(J)'f'=~~G;o~.
6
~: :~eifi
C' C' C' ' C' C' 'lC' C' o, C' C' C' C'
m;om;om romoo~c ~ocou1c:
~:e ~~ :l>fE::U?Yrol omc:~e:roy: jO e:oe')c;e :>0')
C' C' ' 'l 'l. ' r (" ("
C'
OfE:IdJ2! co9:~G::UJ ~~rue:r cr-'P:~m ~I!OOJ!G~?C! GUI (\SCOOC~?:
r;;: o
r;:;:. (" ul r e:
C' C' C' C' C' Q Q C'OC'
G::U?CDfE!! <mp:'iJ:Gcn?ro O)'P!~::UfE <XXjU000!002: !JC\fU~CGU<Jt GtjOC{ 0 '4
e'e"mm
0

~ffi::l):))u The Master of the Rolls (Sir John Romilly) m1 ~:3


L ~ CJI \. ul J e'"
9:oSc:lin
" I am of opinion that a clause of this description must be
construed strictly, and that no person who exercises the
duties of trustee or acts as such ought to be allowed to have
anything whatever to do with, or .have any beneficial interest
in, any part of the charity property. The defendant, who
is the lessee of a portion of the charity estate, cannot act as
trustee ; he must either give up .tbe lease or the .trusteeship. "

LA
0 1 -- 11
uwcowe:c;DWemcc
~ . .
., 1 _l_ __. _lL
II IIWCOf.GCX~
~ 0
C.C09~~~
,
.) 0 ,:)0
uedcce<Cftre;Aec ~l.,erco ()~ f: WC:X:.Q)~O~~a:;
.> \.) .>0 .> .J ..) .)
.> .> .
0
~fi::b!Y'...o~ ~oc2ccwc.ble>~Ghl
0 .) .) :_j
1>10c
::J
.>0
ftch:~cccc.:>ch
..) e.::l.>
..):J ba:: (::>he.cft5o) 10~
..1,
:ese>:~o-;2
. ..) 0
:::>oo{'.ctcccecc:co~
.> 0 .> .\ ..) :_j
::>ooccooec
..) .)
c.u:f,coc.cce>
.)
,@cc::~c.otc:f,
..) . .> 0
~b:cee>ooecc
..) ' ..)
::til~orc.u:ftc~
. )...J .> .>0
cc&tNec
\ 0
:c.a;ooc.o~t'l
0
:)f-:u:hl:ce:eAI
..) &3 0 .) c.u~'
W:ec:~do:2 IOel\;t'l<Obcee>OO t:l~~ :>Co/c;ex;~ oc.h-l~to ucccd:e::>(:J
o .> o o .> .> Y.> J $'""'.> ::::lo J o ..l"J
C.UCOC.Get'
e
l cbchle>~beGGCC
:J.> .>
~cbce ~.)CCC.OOt'l IICCCCe:>b<Pec :::>c.c::J~ro~
.> oo .> .>O .>:::::1
:bc.o~
0.>
c.cc:X.oe2relu
.> .)
,&>~t:hcotc
. 0.>
::>Cot'
.> 0
lCX> cbt>tccQ~(o,e
00
W<are"N
I. 0 .)
Mt'ICO
.) 0
ecc~axcc.ub uC2CC'<llhl:c.Pc.uc.m~ a:> 1c~ec ::>C.ft~:)COW @cc:ece>:~n:2
.J ' .> J:::l s :r""' .> .> o .) .> o
.
urc
ti ~- .f!f'. t! uli tt ~~~ ~ -s:{E
8 a !). -!j~~ If. 8 8 a..~-Bo ~ ~ ..
~i l!~~
i ,.,
~B ~
(1:p !So Q 8 m-, ~'i0o'l .. ...8o 0 ~ (1}, ~ c . ~ 6)
5
~~~

e~ s So ~;o8 -a a
({' _!n ~ .Z,1-?. t~CP.JGh s, 8 i~ _~
... ~et~ ~a-,s ~ c"-s 8=~ -a~~i
~~io[BJ~-
e
So~ }~1 Q'l ru,
~ ~~6) T~~~J:
c v
~~-~ [~I
. ""W G;
S 9 ~ ~ ~ 0
';~ -8~f~ ~ ~ -f.-, 8 ~ 8 9
cy'l
~ 8o -&
a e rn S8o S -3o S 8 8o C'l
S reJ :f'Y, 6'l -v

~
~~effi., l
t ~~i~~~~~~w
-t -e 8-, n" ~
~~~~aiR~l-Bo~
v6'l 6'l
.m ~ 1 ffi, J:> =f S c-, 6'l -oo 6'l c
~.
0 0
~-+-w
f.~sao_t!t !b _,
~t~~~~il ~:t~~~~~ ~~~S CCJ [B.., = o 9nm c =
~
~~ol~i-S:~ ~it~t:tT!]: !:t~ '-o~ t;4 1
Jl ~ .rn. ~ trn. rs !'rtctd ru.f ~ ~ ~11~~.;;- ~ rt~ :r -r
t ~ i.~o8 ~-& s. i,l-g. ~ s ~* -+'l

a-, 6) ~~ !6) mw~. ~ a ~~lo ~ rln
-+ ~ <n c -8o ~ 8 _, 0 !b 8 ~ .. <:)') P. 1)1.)') ~J C1J4> 0 ') r51
'1fO'l-8o6) 8 ..s -a~~?1f~~ ~..8o . ~~-8o -f.-,
~ ,8 j
1r J ~ a-, s ~ e ] s ~j .s ~ t co v
~~1[~,~~t~~~a~,., 4-ilirJ!),I~ru.l~ ~
...., 'l).
CZ1~ 1r I ~ ...., COl
J..:t,ii COl u
&'en
-e ~
..
. . ..~liO!t:?
LmuroM ~4~ JO t\uoui9s~1 P~lRJOqtwo:)un ~lll uo ~de.1 JO pasn:>ou
Ut:1 P !ALIOO OllOll lJilO:) aqljO aO!lOt:?..ld paq&!lqRJSa flaM t:1 S.! l.J..
~&Acs(c) ?s>tC6f8 ~~5~!?1 ~ ~ 15> so~&> ~:gcl!)scc~
b:o~es :c.es~:c.bc.o sMgc.os>1e~g8 . ~~:~g ~&:~A:~~A ~?o:~.co
~cdk~gc.o sule~ ~c.o~~ ~Mes~ o~w~~
- ~~1o~~~~~~~
o~ ~gcoc.o ~:s@~ ccc~b gJcc~~
~~~c.o5~ ~cc:gsoec~ ~socesoog~ab-U:g~&~:gsoec ~?o~
~~~~We ~a:>~ ~~~ceS ~
~~~~~~~~~:es~:o~
cA:~~&eJ:gsotc g&~Pe?u:es~: o:~ :g~es~ccgc.o :~~~&~
b:ges IOeJloft !c.o:c.oo:ro:~otso4>cA:goel!o b,~~bgccc:ese~:!o:~
cl,~ccso&>go ocb~c.c.u gccg egc.oSJe~suc.oo~cA:g\;&eJ:~soec
s>&~le~:es~:fo:~~sore~ga ~cc~~cc!S'>s,rcolffi :s~A :c.es~
~5:cJo~oo=:?b ?oo:~ft ~~sa~~ co~cbc.o
~c@o:~soc.es~ 1~ccb~&~ ~cc:c.oo~gb~esb, &~ft:gsoCc cA~oo
~ic&~oe:%'C A~rooo ~?oeJ:gsoCc: ~~ ccceJ:c&:~oe:%'C
~c;x:>:eseJ:to~ IIOeJ;?OO:cbc.o cl,:gfr.!c.o.g~ fso:dft~bez gci> c.ao&x:o
~cc2.oocc.c5cc ~)OcheJ ~xJb:J:~eJ gJc.82.occc5'-'C &o~c.c.u ~?o~
,~ccoe& ~ccpc.beJ ~ ~ ~~:o~
~cc~c.oeJ~ ,gr~o~~:g~St!ccc8eJ~CGeJft cA~es~ u~MeJb:rogo
~~esles~& ,c},l'.oft&>&oes '~ccft:fg ccceJb~ gPco~~tiA 'cotres .
soF~ s&:cM:<J~ ~~a.$oc.oo5:gc)~ ~~
ocb~c.c.u ~eseJ:o:~ ~cc~ro~~ KilsuPe~~ ccceJ~ccgPco:g~A
~ wrooo co:eseJ:o~ s-ocke{o t?cco~ ~~
:cfft:~soob&o ~cc:ggsol8 . ~c.oec;.o :c.es:eseJ:!o:~ co~roeJ~
~]~ :&,:ooeJco C.CCeJci>eJ%S:?&:ies goci>eJso&>goftc.c.u &o ~rooo co
- .-

ss - ss6)~ ..~
~=8
" V
en
-8C'l c~ -8. o8en
& 8 --111> -8 ..
~
- -c -8 ~ 0 ~ S e 6) 6) 6) 8 o8 : ~ -g.,
(J
(';;) s, o ~ B S 8 tV> a-, ;:s cfu
~
(';;) -Bo -vo 0'> S, ~ S en -&, 4:: 3-, en
~~ --B8 @-8
3-,~~ 2"~ 6) ~ 6) ~ ~8aoru &! -8 ~ ~
"i1 B .$, -8o g, -e ~ .8 ~ --~ a-, ~ S ~
~ ~ 65 S ~ ~ 3-, CCl citJ 8, S
fiD -3o en ~
s S co+ .-o ~- ~ B ~ en~ ...!D S e
~ e-, "' c lB., ~ -& oe, 6) c, S
~
eo
.:D
()')
nJn~
~ -3o cS~ -2~ ~~8 c"Js ~B r:a * ~ ~ ~ ~
%8 ]" g_,~~i
..a.t: :
S c, ~ S en 8o :::> ~ oe, g,
=c S -&>'1 -co -8 v S 4::V"> -&,
8 + 8 & en 0..o ~ =c, ..
.. -8
~ =4:: ~ en
6) --111>
en --4:: ....::.. "" B ~ c &o '-B; 8 c
j c [B., -> ~ @ ~ "2" -~ "R ~ .. ~ 8 CCl
s., s, & (C) 8 .en 8 ~ 8 ~ fl ru, s ~ e
B~ O'lmcBg8~8, "'4::[B,l
l 3-, en S =~ 8 S,[B, -8 3-, 8 B ~ :::>
~
B B 4:;of<F1=v = . ~ 8 rn, a-, -vo
2'1 ~ an ~ ". v B 4:: .P.... ,. 6) o8 6) ...e
en ""8 S, 8 3-, ~ C' S, B en o8
8 c --s B -?, ~ ~ ~ B ~ ~ ~ ~
{ 1 e,o8
~-Bo...8 ~1_, (B.,@ 3-, 8 B S
iS B ~ " 8 -&an !?"~i ~~
G') b8 c c 06) ~ c 8v v O'l 6) . 4:: -vo 0
1l s,-voe~15~ ~3,...!D@rn,4:: .-
s, ...!D +en u
~Cf.i~~ -3o en~
.. .. -S --
,...,..,cc; roo
"""'ro
+'>\en c.. o
f) ......... ">
l. .n-. fi
g:> n-> ~ 1~ ~
- -e u -~
urwl'l
rcucl,cu6cuCle:Git:flt\:>CO(')(!;cl,co ort\:l,e:oeOOOWQ.')WCle~C.OO.olc],-~fl ':GQ)COO
.lO.) ~ .J ~ ~ .) .l 0 0 .) e
c.cco6@t\:>M\'>--GOh,..,
0 ~ JIO .>
c.ohlculccc:lrwcc
Jl Jl ~
~b~l,moec.t\:lett\:ls-:..J:l:noc.oC,
.> 0 Jl J'::J Jl
CIOftCUt\:lcure
.> ., J~
r.:lwb w&cc:Wloc.cce&.l.bnCle:no-s
~.. .> ::I oS .>
otloc.owre~
.>::.!.> .> '
bee ofb fiGh cocc'"'d.
.. .>
.(&6~
(:ll]c.c:g)
~SjGfiOg<:t~oG~LCO s>1reJ~l-c~cbc.o
g:;,oe:;,hlcoo.,c'b
~ ~ :.:~~
olre:&
~
:c:bco c.coe:>:>~
,) e,)O
r cc;
e oe~, ~g::&,o2 ~ 8 8os~ -8o~ 8 . -8 ~ ~ oel;~ ~ s 8
fl.-, 6) c .,s -+<> n
ir .. c, .&1o e ., s, _; 816)
a-, o.. o v. 2 -a
u ~ <Yl ""'-Bo 8 +->......, 8U"> ., +'> u ~-8o
~ f)~ <X:);
u (B, 8 -So (B, o8 ~ C ~ OCI ~ 1;,
- r v.~ a., j s,
8
~ JfJi~~sil~~~;~Y~~~,~~~i~~~~~
118 s, e 1, ::gg ~ ~, -So i o2 -8o -3o -a .0') oO
g.,
f 1~ ., oe -3o t ::e, -3o ., a-, ,., ~
, ~~a;i~Ts,L4t1~~
u ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ s, s,
. ~ -e -t ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ r i-, ,_, rti1tJa1iliJ~Lfj & 00,
r-1
~ .~ ~ ~~ e ~1, l Of ~ J1 a-,;;,[B, tre., ~1~@ 1-, Q' <Yl
~ .-. c
~ ~ [B, = 8 8o CSJ -8 -8o ._, P.l, 8 CS1 - =C [3J
6) ~ ta-,~-&a-, 8~ a, -8o P."' <Yl
..... <Yl
~ a~ -S ~ a.,-a-, o8 a-, ~-=a, t ~ s ~ a.,~'* ~ ~ lL ~ [B, = g,
...!) ~ ., 6)
<Yl -+<> ..s a ~ =c ..uo o . fQl riD a-, LS1 eo 8 8
-g a-,.~~ c cg1 a =C ..sl'4h ~ oo% 6) a-,_5 ~~ ~ 8 :So 8 -r~-t ,~ 6)

8., C3J .~ + a-, <Yl ~ OGl c -c CEJ s, 6) ~ s, ~ a-, e -a ~ -9o o8 ('.g}, 6)

CC1 ...!)
8 oa @ a, o8 :g :: ~ ~ s, &2 . S:> 8 - ~ ~ c1 ~ [],., ~ ~ .~; <Yl rB
o-. a-, &, e [B, <Yl 8 ~ "'$ . a-, v8 -g s eo .. ~ ~ 0 ~ (i)J l8 6)
~ -c o8 ~ [B, bB 8. s, ~~ 8. -8 ::!>0 8 ~ J"P_ &._ o8 -i':"' s . a-, -.; P."' :do oO
-4: s,e-,8-~&~s,~ s,~ca-, w~~~ .. ~e~a~~ J1
lg., ~a ~~ ~ c,_; -So s,~ ~ 3"'=f~ 8 -~ e ~ 8 o & ~ ~ .~cJ8, ~
s,~a
6) 6) .,
~4~~oa~@[B,-Bo~
OGl (])) e So <Yl - (]'J ~
a
~T~~P."'~ ~e~~~
O!J ~ [B, -a 8
..
~ tl ~
Sot ~
l J1 ~ 6) [ <Yl a 1f ~
l:df) 0 6)
-:!>
.~, -aa-, ~ -8. C"> c c ~~ "'$ ..8o '!3 -8 ..& ~
s ~Q ....
~-a = _<Yl-S
CBJ !.2~
~ en ...!) oY.> - =e
\)') a-, .. eo ao ..
j
e., ::!><> .a,
-6
~~f.. 19~~ ~-t[B,.,*e~
~ o8 bB v.- ft
9~;r~sr
c
v. (i)J
~t~~~
-8 ~ ~ P. ~ ~ ~ Q 11)_ -c .. ~
() a-, 8 <Yl P."'--8 <Yl 1 <Yl-t" ~ 8 .. ~ ~ d ~[],., !:J,-8o 0">~ ~~ 8
~IE c:e1
. . . . (B., roo
.. .

~.1sj;..*-1~
~ J o-. g., ,. en '-'
yC'l-e g .-Q
.-Q
......... (C)
'1/0~ru., C'OO

.4.t ..
~J o-. t~~
'lr" n. -e ~
I ~enen ~
6) go ~ ~ Q 8 8 .$. ~'1f -8o 8 8 ~Jl
(I') ""1;
3-, ~ ~~
2 ..8S ~ ~ 8a, 01 o8cn ....,
01 fB, s V"l Q) l m -8 en bV J ~ QJ a, a,
-8 8
'1
uo ft
-~eT~~~olc~
~~ ~ 6)
uo snu . ll:n::So. }i
u ?> ~~~~ld~~S
. ~ ~ e-; ~ 8 ~~ c ~~ .s~
~J .8 Q), G
~ ~~~~%s1~~~~~~aj~~~~s~J~~~~~
~"*lin 8 V"l
a,l(J")oS en Hol(J") eo"'...., ~ 8~-c oS ffi-,~..9. c ~lS(l ...!)

~ @~~1~*a,~~~~j~
()') .!). \:S ~ c ~w e c;; e -e-o ~~~
6)
. ~~
~- ~
ta,-s~1~~~srn.,
c Jf d-, ..s 0) V"l 6)

~~l~~i !~~~fB,; - ~~l ~~~01t - 8~c


~'\:S S [B., S.., eo = 8_ mll;(l..& 8 8 8 ~ ~ lr(J") 8 ~ ~~ P... 8, .. ~
~~~~=~s..,~E~~de~ rn.,~ r ~a,CSJO) ~~~
d -8 3, 8 01 -+"> u-, en a, (:B., = ""S -u ~ ~ oU -c 8 ~ e.,
01
~~fB,!~tCSJf~~8~~
(')'} V"l
c 8 -+"> 8 (')'} \:S d - a, d 8 ~~(.i)
-+">
~iooa,l~~
6) J)
~-8s.., 8o
~
l~$~~~~1~tt~~t
~ ~ ~ ~ [B,~ ~ ~ ~
Jl~~ ~~rt ~~~s
s ~ ~ ~ a, d -8 d-, 8 . _2 Otn

~~!S~~~S.,~~tt~~
c n is .. ~ -8 ~ -8 .. =c 8.
~~~~8~~~ ~
~~g~
~ ~
(I') Q),
=G
-3 c e S a,
S.. ~()') eo 01 e., ...., c c6) ;:s 8 _ !B
.X,~~ 8 -8o g., g., eg., a o8 8J ...!) ~ ~ .. ~~ en & 5 g
6) ' 6) 6) 6) . Q') 6)
~V"l @
Q '\:j C"l
~ ~ :::!
c 8 l(J") ~
-& : ., flHID ~ t:gJ ~ ~ .it a. a. a. rl t""' * cl t e ~ o It --ll ,]:
Ul, 8 ~ ,()')a e : 8 ~ % ~ i ~ 1, ~ ~ c;;-&
~~
c 8
t~ ~ ~s _.a. . ~ .,rwrw ~ 9 ~ r-81 a,~ ~a ~[fu ~ ~ a,~
~~t~i.~~8-8o~8.e~
-3o -S \:j
0
C:: -3o 8 8 e., .o a rn., a
l~~te!~1 \:j
()') ~ ~ ~ fB, ~ -Q -3o . ~r~
.. % ~ -

.,

- ~.
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

Before U Thd Pe, J.

B. LADASARiA (APPELLANT) c.c.


l966
v. :/uttl t8.

u KYI (RESPONDENT).

Extcution of 'coment-Ucree-Money-Lentkrs Act, 19+s-ca"Jii"6 Olt mollty


lending business after the enforcement of the Act but eeasi11gJ after a c~tain
period-whttMr a money-lender within the meaning of the Ac.t -carrying olf
tile bUJiMss of money-lendmg after expiry .o f 'lriOI'Iey-lnttlittg certificatt--
ubether to be rtgaried as n money-lmder as defined ins. :t (6)-S. 9 o/ the
Money-IANkrt Act-ptohibiting Court from passing any . ore/# on the
application of a .,oney-lender for execution of a decree-regutration of
money./ender to be in force-wlu!thn: re/i,j am be gronttd whm licence
expires before makiiVl any order.
Held: A pel'llon who carries on money-lending business after the enforcement
of the Act but ceases after a certain period will relllllin a money-lender within
, the meaning of the Act. The :appdlant has admittedly carried on the bu.sineas
of money-lending till April r8th 1965 when his money-lend.ing certificate
lie
eJCpired, must still be regarded as a money-lender as defined in a. a (6) of
the Moncy-Lend'ing Act, .and is therefore governed by the provisions of the
Act.
5. 9 of .the Money-Lenders Act clearly prohibits a . Court uom pasaing
any order on the application of a money-lender for ex~ution of a decreeJmtil
and unless the money-lender i.s..rcgisterCd under the MoneyLenders Act a nd
the registration is also in force. ln other words, the registration must be in
force at the time when the Co\lrt contemplate!! to pass an order on the application
of.t~ money-lender. Although the r&gietration may be in force at the time
when the execution applic~tion is made, no relief can be granted when tbe
licence czpires before any ~rder is actually made. .

Than Aung for the appellant.


Myint Soe for the respondent.

U THET PE, J.-In the Rangoon CiJ:y Civil Court


appellant obtained a consent decree for K 2o,ooo against
the respondent and the execution of the decree was, by
Ci.vil Miscellaneous Appeal No. s:t of 1965 ag:ainst the order ofthe
I Chi~f Judge, City Civil Court of Rangoon in Civil Regular Suit No. to68 of
I'J6J, dated the ZQth:Septembcr 1Q65.
c.c. mutual agreement, stayed for six month'S. Before the
ao66
expiry of the period of six months the respondent applied
B. LADASARII\
and obtained an order to pay the decretal amount by
v.
u KYI. monthly instalment of K 900 with effect from 17th .May
1965. but he defaulted in payment after depositing 'two'
instalments with the result that the appellant made an
application on 2Vd july 1965 for permission to execute
the balance of the decretal amount. The application was
however resisted by the respondent on the ground that the
appellant being a money-lender could not execute the
decree under. se(:tton 9, Money-Lenders Act. 1945, inas-
much as his money-lending certificate had already expired
on 18th April 1965. The contention of the respondent
was accepted- by the learned Chief judge of the Rangoon
City Civil Court who had seisin of the case and the execu-
tion application was accordingly dismissed. It is against
the order of dismissal of the execution application the
present appeal has been brought.
It has been argued on behalf of the appeilant that the
provisions of the Money-Lenders Act. 1945, do not apply
to the instant case inasmuch as the appellant who is merely
winding up his money-lending business after the expiry of
his money-lending certificate on r8th April 1965 ceases
to be a money-lender within the meaning of the Act. The
definition of .. money-lender" has been given in sub-
section (6) of section 2 of the Act which reads:
" ' money-lender' mc<lns :1 person who carries on the
business of advancing loans as defined in this Act and shall
inclt~de his legal rcp~escntatives and succcssors-in-intere~t
whether by inheritance, assignment or otherwise:
Providt d tth:lt nothing in this definition shall apply to:
(a) a person who is the legal representative or is by in
heritance the successor-in-interest of a deceased money-
lender together with all his rights and liabilities, if such
person onay winds up the estate of such money-lender and
does not adva.nce any fresh loans ; or
(b) a person who from the <l;lte on' which -this Act comes c.c.
1966
into force me.relv winds up his f'l!Oney-len~ing . business
and does not a<l~.. :mce any fresh loan~... B. LAPASI\11
f.J.
U Kv1.
We are directly concerned with proviso' (b) ~C(:<)~irm tO
which a person whq docs not . advan~e .. fresh foans but
merely winds up his money-lending : business on: the
2nd Nov('mher 1945. the day on . wh~ch the Mone.y-Lenderc;
Act. I9<JS came . into force, wil! not .com~ within the
definition of " money-lender". Ir
therefore follow~ that .
a person .who carries on money-lending business after the
enforcement of the Act hut ceases after a certain period
will remain a money~lender within the meaning of the Act.
Since .the appellant in the pre.serit case has admittedly
carried 9n the .busi ~css of moriey-'!endiilg till 18th A.pril
. 1965 when his money-lending ce'r tifkate last expired .. he
must, still be regarded a~ a moncy~lender as de.fined in
section ' 2 (6) and is therefore governed by the provisions
of the Act.
The next poiilt that has . been canv.assed on behalf of
the appel.Jant is that since he has in'itiated the execution
of the decree before. the money-lending licence expires he
should he allowed to ~~ntinue the executip~ inasmuch as
the act of the executing Court in closing the execution .
proceedings when it ordered payment of the decretal
amou.nt b'y .instalments. which has sin.c e been flouted by
the respondent. shoufd not he allowed to prejudice his
fight. In this connection we will have to look to section 9 ;
. of the Money-Lenders Act, the relevant ,portion of which '
provides:

"Notwith~t;~nding ;mytliing contained in ;my other law


for the time l'-eing in force, no Court shall pas<; ... .. .... , ... .....
an order on an applicati011 by a mOney-lender for the
execution of a decree rcbting to a lo;m or to any security in
respect of a loan, unless the money-lender is registere<i
under this Act and the registration is in force."
c.c. .The above sectiqn clearly prohibits a . ~ourt from pass-
JC)66
ing any order on the application of a money-lender for
B. LAD.&SARIA
(/, execution of a decree until and unless t.he money-lender
u KYJ.
is registered under the Money-Lenders Act and the registra-
tion is also in force. In other words, the registration must
be in force at the time when the Court contemplates to
pass an order on the application . of the money-lender.
Although the registration may be in force at the time when
th'e execution application is made, no relief can be granted
when the licence expires befor.e any order is actually made.
In the present c~se even assuming tftat the appellant has
instituted his execution application before the expiry of
his money-lending licence~ whiCh in 't act is not, the Court
cannot possibly grant hfm any relief inasmuch as his licence
has expire<.! before anycirder i's contemplated by the Court.
It h<Js been said that the money-lend~rs will face much
hardship .if section9; Money-Lenders Act, is not interpreted
more liberally .. It. must at once be pointed out that the
Money-Lenders Act has been enacted for the benefit of the
working people as a \Yhole and it is but natural that some
hardship may occasion to the money-lenders who form
only a minute fraction of the working people. A court
of law whose duty i-s to enforce the law as it stands cannot
listen to any argument of hardship lest it might result in
the introduct~on 6f bad law and erroneous interpretation
of statute.
In the result the appeal fails and is accordingly
dismissed. In the circumstances qf the case there will be
no-order as 't o costs. '
CIVIl. FIRST APPEAL
&fore V Tltlt Pe, J.

DAW HLA YIN AND ONE (AP~ELLANTS)


c.c.
v.

U MAUNG SEIN AND TWO OTHERS (RESPONDENTS)'<


- 1966
J uneJO
Code ofCivU Procedure-code, 0. 41 Rule 27-additional evidence-
admission after the appreciation of evidence on record to
enable to pronounce judgement or for any substantial cause-
whether it can be exer_cised before the appeal is heard on merits.
Held: Add\tional evidence under Rule 27, Order 41, can be
admitted only when the court, after the appreciation of the evidence on
record as it stands, requires it to enable it to pronounce judgment or for
any substantial cause. The proper time for the exercise of the discretion
under the rule therefore is when the court finds, on exmining the evi-
dence as it stands, that there is some defect or lacuna apparent on the
face of the record. It cannot be exercised before the appeal is heard on
marits.
Kessowji/ssur v. Great Indian Penisula Railway Co., l.L.R 31
Born 381; Parsotim Thaku and others v. La/ Mohar Thakur and others,
A.I.R. (1931) (P.C.) 143 at P-148; Maung Po Nyein v. Maung Tha
Saing, A.I.R (1939) Ran 92, referred to.
Myint So-e for the appellants.
Maung Maung Myint for the respondents.
U THET PE, J - This order relates to the application
by the appellants dated the 19'11 April1966, under Rule 27, Or-
der 41, Civil Procedure Code, to admit additional evidence by
examining one- Daw Phwa Sein- who had not been cited in the
trial Court. The application is, ofcourse, stoutly resisted by the
respondents. Additional evidence under Rule 27, Order 41, can
be admitted only when the Court, after the appreciation ofthe
evidence_on record as it stands, requires it to enable it to pro-
nounce judgment or for any substantial cause. The proper
time for the exercise of the discretion under the rule therefore
* Civil First Appeal No. 20 of 1965, against the decree of the 2nd
Judge, City Civil Court of Rangoon in Civil Regular Suit No. 635 of 1965,
dated 27'h January 1965.
.
c.C
1966
is when the Court finds, on .examining the evidence as it
- stands. that there is .some defect or lacuna apparent on
DAW Ht.A f -
YuuNo oN~:: . the face o the record.
It cannot
' . d be f ore t he
b e exercise
u MAUNe appeal is heard on merits. .
SsiN ANo The Privy Coundl in Kessowji Issur v. Great Indian
TWO OTHERS.
Peninsula Railway Company (1) has held that the legitimate
occasion for section 568 (now Rule 27, Order 41) of the
Civil Procedure Code is when on examining the evidence
as it stands, some inherent lacuna or defect becomes
apparent, and not where a discovery is made outside the
Court of fresh evidence and the applic;ation is made to
import it. Then in Parsotim Thaku and others v. Lal
Mohar Thakur and others (2) the above decision was
approved and observed that:-" The legitimate occasion
for the exercise of this discretion is not whenever before
the appeal is heard a party applies to adduce fresh
evidence, but when on examining the evidence as it stands
some inherent lacuna or def~ct becomes apparent." See
also Maung Po Nyein v. Maung Tha Saing (3), where itwas
ruled that:
"Further evidence is not intended to be ordered on special
and preliminary application before the appeal on the merits
has been heard and r he evidence as it stood examined by the
Court."
In the present case the appeal has not yet been heard
and the additional evidence, therefore, cannot be ordered
to be admitted under Rule 27, Order 41. In the resu)t
the application of the appellants fails and is dismissed
with costs; Advocate's fees K r.7.

() J.L.R. 31. 13om. J8I. (2) A.J.R. (1931) . (P.C.) 143 at p . 1-48. f
(3) A.I.R. ( 1939) RRn. 92.
CIVU.. FIRST APPLICATION
Before Dr. Maung MounR, C.J. and U Thtt Pt,J.

DAW KHIN KYI. widow of U Ba (deceased) AND ONE c.c.


1966
(APPLICANTS)
v.
DAw MA MA (RESPONDENT) .
UnionJudcciary Act, s. 6-constructian of will-plain and unambiguous languagc-
v:hether it shall rcceivf. its Literal ccmstruction use of ambiguous V!Ords --duty
of Court to ascertain the intention of the testator-consideration of surround-
ing circumstances, ttstator's family relationship. lu tator's uu of uords in a
particular sense-construction settled- duty of Court to corry out the
exprnsed intmtion of the ttstator-whethtr the low favcmrs inttstacy either
wholly or partially.
Held: It i~ cardinal rul~ o construction that where the language of a wi ll
ie plain and unambiJ:;UOUS it shall r~ceive i tsl iteral construction without attempt-
ing to give any conjectural nmendmcnt. Hut where the words used are
ambiguous the duty of the Court is to ascert!l i n the intention of the r.cstator
and i n do i ng ~o it is entitled and bound to bear in mind and con~idcrcJther
matt~rs I ike surrounding circumstances, testator's family relat ionship and the
probabi I ity that the testator would use words in a particular sense so as to
11rrivo: at a right construction of the will jlnd to asccrt:tin the meaning of the
language used by the testator. Once the construction is settled it i s the duty
of the Court to carry out the intent ion exprc~sed by the te~tator.
KiJtammal and otht'Ts v. Saraswathi H:zi Amm::zl, A.I.R. ( rQJ9) Mad. IIZ;
Brijroj Singh v. Shatratra11jai Singh, A.I.R. (1 947) Oudh 45. referred to and
followed.
The general rule of con~ truction of a will is that the law docs not favour
intcs!Alcy ei:her wholly or partially. A will should not be construed so as to
lead to par: ial intestacy unless the plain meaning of the words used thcre'i n
make~ it ncce~sary to do so.
Naraindas and others v, Tcltchand.at~d others, A.l.R. ( 1923) Sind 42 ; S .A.S.
Rathnathammal v. M. Arulanmuiam Pillai and others, A. l. R . (1946) Mad. at
12 ; Sm. Vislmibai alia~ Haribai W/0 Bhai Jhamatmal v. Bhai Loltuma
Satramdas and others. A.L R. ( 1946) S ind, ro8 referred to and followed.

N. C. Sen for the applicants.


Than Tin for the respondent.
U THET PE, J.-This application for special leave under
section 6 of the Union Judiciary Act, arises under the
Civil First Application No. 17 of 1966, aga-i nst the decree of this Couri:
Civil Fir.;t Appeal No. 61 of 1965, dated th~ 4th December 1965 .
following circumstances. One Daw .Mya a Burmese
Christian spinster and adoptive mother of the respondent
0 .\Wwmow
Kn. Kill:-> D~w Ma t'v1a die d on 27t h Septem ber 1958 Ieavmg
. a W'll
1
0" c HA
(DECP.ASF.u)
by which the respondent was appointed the sole executrix
ANn o:-:E of her entire estate to which the house and its site known
uAw;i A!\IA. as No. 72, r65th Street, Rangoon (hereinafter referred to
as the suit property) forms a part. The respondent applied
for and ob~ained Probate of the Will in spite of opposition
by the late U Ba, father of the applicants, who contrnckct
that the Will did not affect the suit property in respect of
which Daw Mya died intestate. It appeared that during
the pendency of the Probate proceedings U 8a took posses-
sion of the suit p~operty thereby necessitating the
respondent to institute a suit in the Rangoon City Civi!
Court for declaration of ownership and for possession o!
the suit property.
One of the questions that arose for consideration in the
tr~al Court was whetht-r the suit property was the subject
of disposition by the Will of the lalc Daw ~fya. The
relevant clause of the Will which has been the root cause
of the dispute between the parties reads:
"Secondly-! give devise and beque.1th to my sole adoptive
daughter MA rvt.'\, aged 2 t years, Burmcc;c Christian, residing
at 72. 165th Street, Tamwe, Rangoon and my lcyac.v (all
movt'ables) as the said Ma Ma was brought up and adoptt>d
by me from her baby-hood when she was only twelve days
old with a view to inherit my estate to and for her own use
I
and benefit absolutely and !nominate constitute and ;tppnin~
Ma Ma who is living with me."

The learned trial Judge took the view tharthere was Ia.t ent
ambiguity in t h<' :th<we wordings and therefore allowed
extrinsic. evidence which clearly showed that the tektatrix .
intended to leave her entire estate including the suit pro-
perty to the respondent. He accordingly decre~d the
respondent's suit with costs. The applicants came up on
appeal to this Court against the judgment and d,ecr~ of
the trial Court which were however confirmed by our c.c.
Jl)66
learned brother U Sein Thinn, J.. after holding that the
DAW l{HJN
learned trial Judge was perfectly right in admitting KYI, WIDOW
extrinsic evidence to explain the language of the Will OF USA
(DECEASED)
which is latently .ambiguous. The applicants being ANO ONE
tl.
aggrieved with the decree of the Appellate Court has now DAWMA MA.
sought permission for special leave to appeal.
It is a cardinal rule of construction that where the
language of a Will is plain and unambiguous it shall receive
its literal construction without attempting to give any
conjecturable amendment. But where the words used are
ambiguous the duty of the Court is to ascertain the inten-
tion of the testator and in doing so it is entitled and hound
to benr in mind and consider other matters like surround-
ing circumstances, testator's family relationship and the
probability that the testator would use words in. a
particular sense so as to arrive at 4 right. construction of
the \Viii and to ascertain the meaning of the language used
by the testator. Once the construction is settled it is the
duty of the Court to carry out the intention expressed by
the testator. The principles upon which a Will should be
construed have been succinc~Iy stated thus in Kistammal
and others v. Saraswathi" Ba{ Am mal (I):
Certain principles upon which .a will should be construed
are as follows: The first principle is that the Court should
give effect to the plain meaning of the words used. Secondly
if there is any ambiguity, the Court should in interpreting
the langpage lean towards carrying out the know.O . intentions
of the testator as far as they can be ascertained from the
recitals and from the surrounding circumstances. Thirdly, in
interpreting ambiguous words, the Court should bear in mind
the presumption that the testator was not likely to inetend to
create an. intestay regar-ding the residue of the e.stare:
Fourthly, the Court should not strain the language of the
will either in order to give effect to the apparent intention
of the testator or in _o rder to prevent an intestacy. finally#

(1) A. I. R. (1939) Mad. 112 .


c.c the Court has no power to insert in the will a disposition
1966 which is missing, however desirable that di$position may be."
DAWKHIN
KYit WIDOW
OFU BA In Brijraj Singh v. Shatranjai Singh (2) it has also been
(DECEIISBD)
AND ON
laid down that:
. -~~.
..D"AWMAMA. " One of the cardinal principles governi~g the construction
of wills is that the Court should ascertain the dominant
intention of the testator from the words used in the document
and give effect to it to the extent and in the form which the
law allows. The Court is entitled and bound to bear in mind
the surrounding circumstances, the testator's manners, his
outlook based on his particular religion and social cusroms.
his position, his family relationships, the probability that he
would use words in a particular sense and many other things
which are summed up in the expression 'The Court is entitltd
to put itself into the testator's armchair '."

In the present case the relevant portion of the \ Vill


which deals with the disposition of the properties of the
testatrix provides that~
"Secondly-! give devise and bequeath to my sole adoptive
daughter Ma Ma, aged 21 years, Burmese Christian, residing
at 72, x6sth Street, Tamwe, Rangoon and my leeacy (all
moveables} as the said Ma Ma was brought up and adopted
by me from baby-hood when she was only twelve days old
with a view to inherit my es.tate to and _for her own use and
benefit absolutely and I nominate constitute and appoint Ma
Ma who is living with me."

A careful reading oi this passage shows that the purport


of the word " and " appearing between the words
"Rangoon" and "my legacy" is not altogether clear and
unambiguous. The learned Advocate for the applicants
had in the course of his arguments submitted that the
worCl " and should be substituted by the word " as " so as
to make the meaning of the passage clear and correct.
This is a tacit admission on the part of the learned Advocate F
(~) A.I.R. (1947) Oudh. 45
for the applicants that the meaning of the words used c.c.
1966
therein is ambiguous. Under the circumstances, it cannot
D AWKHIN
possibly be said that the lower Courts erred in admitting Kn, WIDOW
OFU BA .
extrinsic evidence in construing the Will of the late Daw tDCEASED)
ANDONB
Mya. .v. '
Then if we were to construe the Will of the late Daw DAWMAMA.
Mya a~ suggested by the learned Advocate for the
applicants, it would result in partial intestacy of the estate
of the testatrix. The general rule of construction of a
\Vill is that the law does not favour intestacy either wholly .
or partially. A Will should not be construed so as to
lead to partial intestacy unless the plain meaning of the
words used therein makes it necessary to do so. Thus, it
has been held in Naraindas and others V. Tekchand and
others (3) that :
In construing wills, the test is what did the testator mean
having regard.to the words used. One of the cardinal rules
in construing a will is to avoid an intestacy whether wholly
or partially."

It was also observed in S.A.S. Rathnathammal v.


l\f. Arulanandam 'Pillai and others (4) that:
" the general rule of construction of wills w~s that a will
should. not be so construed, unless the plain wording makes
it necessary to do so, as to lead to an intestacy with regard
to some part of the testator's property."

The same view has also been expressed in Sm. V1shnibai


(a) Haribai wjo Bhai ]hamatm.;l v. Bhai Lokumal Satramdas
and others (5).
Besides it must also be borne in mind that speciallt.JYe
under section 6, Uriion Judiciary Act, will not as a nile be
granted in th~ absence of any special circumstances such
as want of jurisdiction or doing of a great and irreparable
(3) A.I.R. ( 1923) Sind, .f2. (4) A.I.R. (qH6 ~tud. at 12.
(S) A.T.R. ( 1946) Sind ro8.
c.c. injury or involving a question.. of great public or private
196~
importance-vide f. Huie v. L. K. Aiyavoo Naidu and four
~~~w~o~~ others (6). No such special circumstances are present in
oF 'tJ DA the instant case inasmuch as the lower Courts had in our
(DsceASeo)
ANDONB opinion rightly interpreted the law relating to the construc-
DAw~M.A. tion of Wills .
The application is accordingly dismissed with costs.
Advocate fees K 85.

F
(6) (1951) B.L. R .8 1 (S. C .).
CIVIL REVJSJO}tlt

Bqor~ U Thtt Pt, J.

DA W OHN KHIN (APPLICANT) c.c.


1966
v. May 19.

u KYIN SEIN (RESPONDENT).

Cod~ of Civil Procedure Order XXI, Rul~ a9-1tay of xtcution-ll.lit by lanll


lord against tnumt for rtCOfJtry of arrttll'l of rmt-suit by tmat~t for rtc(lftrY
ofmf!MY givm Dltecurity-opplicationfor rtay of exuution by tmant.
Htld : There is no restriction whatsoever in Rule 29, Order ar, Ciil
Procedur.: Code that the stay can only be granted when the nature or the
pending suit is identical or similar to that of the decree sought to be cxe.:uced.
The object of the rule is to prevent multiplidty of execution proceedings and to
enable the decree-holder and the judgment-debtor to adj ust their claims
agairuot each other when the judgment-debtor h"" instituted a suic against the
d ccree-bolder.
Klllltlll"""41 v. MutlrulriiiNimuwarru Clutty, A.J.R. (1936) Mad. ro.a ; S.M.
Nagori v. BaburQO, A.I.R. (1956) Madh Bharat a29 ; Ttll'irtiprosad Roy v
Narayan Kumori Dehi,J.L.R. 17 Cal. 391, referred to.

R. Chaube for the applicant.


Tun Win for the respondent.

U THET PE. J.-The petitioner is- the landlord of the


respondent in respect of room No. I jn house No. 57,
Myanma Gone Ye Street, Rangoon, at a monthly rental
of K 150. In Civil Regular Suit l-!o. 429 of 1964 of the
Rangoon City Civil Court she sued her tenant and obtained
a decree for K 1,650 due as arrears of rent with costs.
She then took out execution of decree in Civil Execution
Case No. 84 of 1965. In the meantime the respondent
instituted a suit being Civil Regular No. 290 of 1965 of the
same Court against the previous landlord U Po Thaing ~nd
the respondent forrecovery of K 13,100 being the amount
~8 given as security to U Po Thaing in respect of the room .
Civil Rr:vision No. 55 of 1965, against the decree of the Jtd Judge,
Rangoon City Civil Court in Civil Execution No. 8-4 of J')6s. .
c.c. under lease and applied for and obtained the stay of execu-
1966
tion under Rule 29, Order XXI, Civil Procedure Code.
DAW OHN
KHlN Being dissatisfied with the order staying the execution, the
~.

U KYIN
petitioner has brought the present revision .
SHIN. It has been argued on behalf of the petitioner that the
lower Court erred in staying her execution case inasmuch
as the respondent's suit was one for money pure and
simple, which is essentially different in character from
decree for -rent obtained by her. Rule 29, Order XXI,
Civil Procedure Code reads:
" Where a suit i~ pending in any Court against the holder
of a decree of such Court on the part of the person against
whom the decree was passed, the Court may, on such terms
as to security or otherwise as it thinks fit, stay execution of
the decree until the pending suit has been decided."

A perusal of the rule will show that there is no restriction


whatsoever therein that the stay can only be granted when
the nature qf the pending suit is identical or similar to
that of the decree sought to be executed. The object of
the rule is to prevent multiplicity of execution proceedings
and to enable the decree-holder and th~ judgment-debtor
to adjust their claims against each other when the
judgment-debtor has instituted a suit against the decree-
holder. Thus it has been held in Kannammal v.
Muthttkumarraswami Chetty (I) that:
"0. 2 J . R. 29 embraces every kind of suit which ic:
maintainable. There is no Jimitati'on in the rule. Once it is
conceded that a suit is mai!1tainable, the procedure laid down
in R. 29 is at once attracted. The object q.f -t-he rule, is thar,
should a plaintiff in a pending suit succeed therein, then there
can be an adjustment of the decree or claim by that plaintiff
against the decree obtained against him i~ the other suit in
the same Court without it being necessary for the succ:essful
plaintiff in the pending suh to t<lke out execution proceedings.
Execution in the other s.uit is stayed so that the rights of the
(r) A.I.R. (1936) Mad. ro2.
parties can be adjusted. In cases where it is likely that the c.c.
1966
decree-holder in the other suit may take steps which might
deprive the plaintiff in the pending suit of the fruits of any DAW OHN
KtUN
decree which he obtains, an order staying the. execution in v.
the other suit should be :nade. The rule is not an imperative u KYIN
SEIN.
one; and the Court has a discretion either to grant the relief
asked for namely, stay of execution of t)1e decree, or to
refuse it."

Then in S. M. Nagori v. Baburao (2) it has been ruled


that:
"Order 2r, Rule 29 clearly gives wide powers and
discretion to the Court for Pa'!Sing a stay order. It has ample
discretion in passing an order as to the tenns on which the
execution of the decree can be stayed until the pending suit
has been decided."

Besides the arrears of rent which has become due by


a tenant come within the definition of debt as defined in
section 3, Transfer of Property Act and a decree for arrears
of rent must therefore be regarded as a decree for money.
In this connection it has been held in Tariniprasad Roy v.
Narayan Kumari Debt (3) that a decree for rent obtained
by a landlord against his tenant is a money decree .
The learned Advocate for the petitioner has submitted
an ingenious argument that the stay is inequitable inasmuch
as a landlo:t;d who is entitled to receive rents every month
has been denied of his right whereas the tenant is enjoying
the tenements without any . hindrance. Firstly, it must
he pointed out that the order of the lower Court has not
the effect of prohibiting the petitioner fr6m demanding
the present and future rents. It applies only to the arrears
of rent which has ripened into a decree. Secondly, it
must not be forgotten that the respondent had made a
claim against the petitioner by instituting a suit and the
petitioner cannot therefore be allowed to harp on equities
(2) A.l.R. (1956) Madh Dharat, :uQ. (3) A.I.R. 1? Cal. 391 .
c.c. by pressing his rights alone while ignoring the claim of the
1966
respondent.
DAW OliN
KHIN
Then an order under Rule 29, Order XXI, Civil Proce-
V dure Code, is purely a discretionary one which will not as
u KYIN
SEIN. a rule be disturbed by the Court of revision unless it can
be shown that it is manifestly unjust or patently wrong.
In the instant case the order of the lower Court cannot
either be said to be manifestly unjust or patently wrong.
In the result the application for revision fails and is
accordingly dismissed with costs. Advocate fees K 34.

F-4
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS

Before U Kyaw Zan U,:J.

MA MYINT KYI (APPLICANT) c.c.


1966
v.
June%.
U KYAW AND ANOTHER (RESPONDENTS).

Guardian artd War:d Act, s. zs-app/icati01f by mother frw 'ustody of her minor
son- mirror too young to be copoble of forming an intelligent opinion of or
~prtuing lau fliew-insanity of father-applicant's financial mtam to look
after the child-applicant not unfit and incapable of retaining the custody of
tire child.
Held : The minor, who is a boy aged about 5 years and who cannot be
considered to have pas,ed tender year is very young yet to be capable of forming
an iJ;~tclligent opinion of, or expr~ing his view. Hia father is insane and has
no means to bring him up. Due to unavoidable circumstances, for example,
insanity of the husband and her own bad health then applicant had to seek the
help of the respondents for the welfare of the child. She has the means
to look after the child and there is nothing on the record that her husband
or
. would ill-treat the child. There is no dispute that she is unfit and incapable
retaining the custody of the child. In the~ circum.stances, she sbould not be
deprived .of her natural right to have the custody of her own child.
Fann')' Emmeliu Peterson v. Eanrut Henry Sluwe and anoihtr, 24 Calcutta
Weekly Notes p. 71r, referred to.

Thein Shan for the applicant.


Cheng Po for the respondents.

U KYAW ZAN U, J.-This is an application under


section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act.by the mother
for the return of her minor son, now aged. about fiveyears.
to her custody. The respondents arc the boy's aunt
(father's elder sister) and her husband. The father is insane
and is residing with the. respondeq.ts. The parties are
Burmese Buddhists. The applica'rit' is now about' 20 years
of age. She says she was married in the .y ear. 132'2 B.E.
128 (I96o)~ So she must have :been quite young when. she
Civil Miscellaneous No. uS of:r96s.
c. c. got married. About .a .year after the marriage, when she
1966
was in the family way, her husband became insane and
MA MYINT
KYI
she was helpless. After the birth of the child she took a
v. second husband with the knowledge and consent of the
U K,Aw
AND relatives and elders including the respondents and when
ANOTHER.
the child was about I r months old the respondents to.o k
him to their house, which is next door in the Government
barracks, to sleep with them at night. It appears from
the evidence of the applicant and of the witnesses that the
trouble arose when the Census was prepared. The child's
name was entered in the list of the respondents' household
as well as in the applicant's own list. The question then
arose in whose list he should be enrolled. The elders
decided that his name should stand in the respondents'
Jist. The applicant alleged that the boy was confined
within the walls of the house or room by the respondents
not allowing him to come to her as before. The minor
calls the respondents mr;;o and :J.?r;;;y and his step-father
S?GtP The applicant has a child aged about a year
old now by her second husband. She is now earning K 104
per month and her second husband K 90 per month.
According to Daw Kyin Hmein '(PvV 2), the maternal
grandmother of the minor. the respondents took the child
at night to sleep with them from the time he was about
two years old and only when the applicant married a
second time. The applicant's brother-in-law U Tin Myint
(P.\V 3) deposed that the trouble started when the minor
was enrolled in the household list of the applicant as the
son of her second hushand (tQe minor's step~father). The
respondents not being satisfied would not allow the child
to go to the applicant's house as before. He confirmed
the evidence that the minor was looked after by the res-
pondents at night w&ile the applicant looked after him
during the day. He also confirmed the evidence of the
applicant that one day. when the child tan away to the
applicant's hou'se from his confinement a~ the place of the
respondents Ma San (the__2nd respondent) forcibly took him c.c.
1966
away from his hiding-place behind the cupboard. A report
M.~ MYINT
was lodged at the police station and U Tin Maung, the Kn
Secretary of the Five-Men Committee (PW 5) deposed that v.
LJ KYAW
the matter was settled when U Kyaw (rst respondent) AND
ANOTHER.
undertook in writing that he would not in future take the
child forcibly but would look after him properly.
U Kyaw (rst respondent) deposed that he fed and
looked after the minor from the time he Was a child of I l
months as the applicant was unwell and her husbana was
insane. She was working then. He admitted that he was
not pleased when the child was listed as the son of his
step-father when he still has his own father, who is insane.
He stated the applicant even agreed to give the child to
him by a deed but she changed her mind the next day.
He denied the child was kept in confinement but he
admitted that the police warned him not to do. so and that
he had signed that he would not quarrel with the applicant.
He earns K 86 per month as an employee in the Water
and Sewage Department of the Rangoon Corporation while
his wife Ma San earns about K 300 per month as a fish
monger. He has a grown-up son and daughter. The son
is married and has a child but the daughter is still single.
U Tin Pe .(DW 4), a member of the Five-Men Committee
corroborated thc evidence that the applicant at first agreed
to give away the minor to the respondents rather than to
U Tin Myint (PW 3) by a deed but she changed her mind the
following day. As the child bore two names as his father
the witness sent for the parties for questioning. There
w..1s a dispute and evmtually he enrolled him in the house-
hold list of his inatrrnal grandmother Daw Kyin Hmein
(PW 2) as the son of Ko Thaung Shwe who is his real
father. This witness was an over-zealous witness who
gave his own view of the case to the police without being
12A questioned to the prejudice of the applicant. I do not
think he can be quite relied upon.
The parents no doubt have a paramount right to have
the company and care of. and the control over their own
MA MYIN T
KYI child. This is based on the law of nature. This right
v.
u KY.~W cannot be taken away unless there are very good reasons.
AN D Of the parents the father is to be preferred if the child is
ANOT HER.
not of tender years. But in cases where the father is unfit'.
or the child is of tender years the mother's right supersedes
that o f the father's. This is the law.
Now. in the instant case, the minor is only about five
years of age.and cannot be considered to have passed tender
years. He is very young yet to be capable of forming an
intell-i gent opinion of, or expressing his, views. His father
who is being looked after by the respondents is still insane
and has no means to bring him up. Though she has
allowed the child to be brought up and looked after by the
respondents, the -applicant has never abandoned or deserted
him. Due 'to unavoidable circumstances, for example.
insanity of the husband and her own bad health she had
to seek the help' of the respondents for the welfare o f the
child. She still had the legal custody of the child though
she allowed him to sleep with the respondents at night till
very recently when the trouble started and the application
was filed. She is earning enough and has means to look
after the child. There is nothing to show on record that
her second husband would ill-treat the child. The step-
father himself is earning. There is no dispute that the
applicant is unfit and incapable of retaining the cus_tody
of the child. In these circ;umstances, she should not be
deprived of her natural right to have the custody of her
own child. I am also of the opinion that it will be for
the welfare of th~ ward to return to her custody. In a
somewhat similar case of Fanny Emmeline Peterson v .
Earnest Henry Shave and another (1) a posthumous infant
about three months old was inade over to his aunt (mother's
sister) by the mother as she was going to be trained as a
(,) 24 Calcutta Weekly Notes, p , 77~ .'
uurse. When the mother w;~s in a position to maintain c. c .
JC)66
.and educate him, having b<.cn qualified as a nurse and
permitted ro have private pr:-~ctice, she applied for the MA l<n MYINT

-c ustody of the child who was then about S<'\Tn years old. v.
U }.; YAW
The infant called the aunt .. mother" and the mother ANn
(app1icant) as " aunt ". The aunt was carning a very .
drcrnt income and has two children of her own. She was
n~ry fond of the minor whom she supported uninterrupted-
ly right through with no help from the mother. It was
hr!d that a mother cannot be deprived of her natural right
of absolute control over her own child when there is no
-suggestion whatsoever against her char::~cter or fitness to
act as the custodian or guardian of her own son.
For all the reasons given I ::~llow the application and
restore the minor to the mother (applicant) but this will
not prevent him from sleeping with the respondents at
night as he used to do. if he so wishes. or visit them at any
reasonable time. In the circumstances of the case the
parties shall beat their own costs.
CIVIL.FIRSl' APPEAL
Before U Thn Pt, J.

c.c. MA THAN K.1 AND SIX OTHERS (APPELLANTS)


1966
May 18. v.
DAw GE (RESPONDENT)

Suit for rtcovrty of porsession of a howe sitt-irt/r~tuous sa.le detd-~".dmce of


pourssion of thr site or purchartr not as lictrue"t--odvtru poruuion from the
date of invalrd sa[e-Limt'tation Act, Artidt 144
Held :The fnfruchJous sale deed clearly. shows that the respondc nt had
been in possessipn of the land not in the capacity of a licensee as alleged by the
appellants but .i n the capacity of an owner after h~:r purchase from U Po Kyan,
father of the app.ellants. Since the respondent came into and remained in
possession of the propeity l!fter the execution of the unregistered sale deed, her
possession became adverse to the vendor from the date of the inl';~lid sale and
a suit by the vendor or his successor in-title after the lapse of 12. years from that
date would undoubtedly be barred under Article 1-44, .Limitation Act.
Qadar Bakluh and others v. Mangha Malandothns. A.LR. (19~3) Lah.
-495 Sohan Lal v. Mohon La/, J.L.R. so Ali..Qs6 at 997 ; Mahipal Si71{jh v.
Sarjoo Prasad. A.I.R. ( 192.6) Oudh, 141 ; Mt. Jasoda Kuar v. Janak.Mimiaml
otherr, A.J.R. (1925) Par. 787, referred to.

Dr. Ba Tin for the appellants.


Myint Soe for the respondent.

U THE.T PE, J.-Jn Civil Regular Suit No. 1209 of 1963


of the Rangoon City Civil Court, the appeJJants sued the
respondent for recovery of possession of a house site known
as Holding No. 234. Block No. 230. 2nd Kwin Kyaung
Street, Ahlone, Rangoon, on the ground that the respondent
who had been in occupation thereof since 1947 with the
permission of their deceased father U Po Kyan had refused
to give up possession although permission granted to her
had been terminated. The respondent contested the suit I

Civil First Appeal No. 43 of JQ6s, against the decr~e of the 4th judge, F '
Ci1y Civil Court of Rangoon in Civil Regular Suit No. uo9 of IQ6J, dated tho
2oth February 1965.
and pleaded. that she had been in occupation of the suit c.c.
1116~
land as the owner thereof after her pu~chase from U Po
MA THAN
Kyan .by a deed of sale d_ated the rst March '1947 and 'that Kvr AND SIX
the suit was barred by time. The learned 4th Judge who OTHB.RS v.
had seisfu of the case fiearcl the parties and their witnesses DAW G.
and dismissed the suit after coming to the conclusion that
the respondent had been in occupation of the suit premises
as an owner not as a licensee (!S alleged by the appellants
and that the suit was barred hy Article 144. Limitation
Act. Hence this appeal.
The present appeal having been instituted on 24th May
1965 was admittedly out of 'time by 63 days inasmuch ~s
the date of the decree of the lower Court was 2oth
February 1965. The appellants had asked for extension
of time for appeal .under section 5. Limitation Act on the
grounds that {i) the trial Court had delivered judgment
without informing them or their counsel, and (ii) their
counsel was.prevented by illness from attending theCourt
and making inquiries .about ,t he progress of the suit.
The diary order of the lower Court's proceedings shows
that on 12th January 1965 the trial of t~e suit was
temporarily suspended as the Courts were shifting to new
premises. Then on 19th January 1965 notices vyere issued
hy the Court to both the-counsel to fix the date for hearing.
On 26.th January 1965 U Ba Nyunt appeared for U Thein
Kyaw. learned counsel for the appellants and the Court
fixed for hearing of arguments on 13th February 1965
when U Kyaw Htoon appeared for U Thein Kyaw. There-
after, the Court delivered judgment on 2oth February 1965
when U Thein Kyaw was represented by U B(\ Thating.
From the mere fact that the diary order of the lower
Court's proceedings contains a statement that notices were.
issu~d to both the counsel, it does not necessarily follow
that learned counsel for the appellants must be presumed
to have been served with the notice under section r 14 (e),
Evidence Act. But subsequent appearances made by U Ba
:A
c.c. Nyunt, U Kyaw Htoon and U Ba Thaung on his behalf
1966
clearly indicate that he must been aware of the progress
MA TIIAN
Kn At'D SIX of the suit. Thc_Jaking of dates hy U Ba Nyunt and U Ba
OTiii!RS
Q.
Thaung could have been done out of courtesy .and without
DAW Gl!. any authorisation by U Thein Kyaw, but U Ky~~ Htoon
could not have agreed to be present without his consent
and knowledge when the final arguments of the case were
heard on r3th February 1965. If U Kyaw Htoon had
appeared without any instructions from U Thein Kyaw, the
appellants could have easily obtained an affidavit to that
~ect from U Kyaw Htoon. This they had not done so
and I therefore hold that the plea of the appellants that
their counsel was not informed of the progress of the suit
by the Court is without substance.
As regards the ground of illness, .u Thein Kyaw, learned
cotrnsel for the appellants had not chosen to mention in
his affidavit that he was bed-ridden during the period from
19th january 1965, the date when the Court issued notice~
to the counsel, to 24th April 196.5, the date when he alleged
that he became aware of the decree. Even assuming that
U Thein Kyaw was ill it is not a sufficient ground under
section 5, Limitation Act in the absence of proof that he
was complete~y disa~led to attend to hi$ business vide
Gaw Kyin Lyan and one v. G.wan Paik (1) and V. N. Nadesa
Thevar v. A. V. Muthusami (2). Then the fact that he
took no interest whatsoever in the progress of the suit for
a period of nearly four months clearly indicates. that he
was guiltyof .gros$ or GUlpable negligence in the discharge
of his duties as a counsel which could not.be .a good reason
for granting of extension of time under section 5. Limita-
tion Act. Aye and Sons Ltd. v. The Hon'ble Minister for
Finance and Revenue (3) and Daw .Q hn Sein v. Daw Hnin
Zi (a) Hafiz Bee Bee (4). For the aforesaid reasons I am of
the view that there is no su.fficient re~son in the present
(1) (196o) B.L.R. 385 (H.C). (3) (~ 96J) B.L.R. 52 (S.C).
(z) (196j) B.L.R. <4r4 (C.C). (4) Cr96o) B.L.H . 264 (H.C).
case for granting the appellants' application .for the exten-
sion of time under section 5. Limitation Act. MA THAN .
KYJ ANO Sll'
OTJt!ERS
Then the appellants must also fail on the merits of tJ.
OAw Ge.
the case as well. It is no longer in dispute t~at the res-
pondent had been in possession of the suit land after her
purchase from the bte U Po Kyan, the father of the
appellants for a sum of K I 50 by means of a sale deed
dated rst March 1947 (Exhibit 1). Since this sale dee<i,
though compulsorily registrable under section 17 of the
Registration Act. had not been registered it docs not affect
the suit prope.-rty nor can it be received as evidence of any
transaction affecting the suit property. But under proviso
to section 49. Registration Act. the respondent is entitled
to use it in evidence for the purpose of proving a collateral
purpose. namely. the nature or character of the j>ossession
and how she had come upon the suit land vide Qadar
Baklish and others v. Manaha Mal and others (I) where it
was held that:
" A document. although inadmiSsible for wanr of registra-
tion, to prove title. may be referred to in order to .:~scertain
the n:lture of the po<;session sought to be disturbt"d."

The infructuous sale deed clearly shows that the respondent


had been in possession of the land not in the capacity of
a licensee as alleged by the appellants but in the capacity
of an owner after her purchase from U Po Kyan, father
of the appellants. Since the respondent came into and
remained in possession of the property after the execution
of the unregistered sale de~d. her possession became adverse
to the vendor from the date of the invalid sale and a suit
by the vendor or his successor-in-title a.ftt>r the lapse of
r2 years from that date would undoubtedly be barred

(5) A.J.R. (19~3) Lah. 495.


c.c. under Article 144. Limitation Act. Thus in Sohan Lal v..
1966 J

MA THAN Mohan Lal (6) Muketji, J., who wrote the leading judgment
KYJ AND SIX had remarked that :
OTHERS
w.
DAW 0. . . . Where in an intended sale, which can be effected
in law only by a registered document, no such document is
executed and yet the intending purchaser gets possession, he
gets possession with the consent of the intenrling vendor;
but, nonetheless, the purchaser's possession begins adversely
to the vendor. If the intending purchaser be fortunate
enough to continue, undisturbed by the vendor, in possession
for 12 years, he would acquire a perfect title as against the
f~r.mer owner, the vendor. . _. "

The same view has been expressed in Mahipal Singh v.


Sarjoo Prasad (7} the relevant headnote of which reads:
If the possession is acquired by a person under an invalid
title and he continu~ to remain in possess'ion for more than
IZ years, although the document relating to his title may be
invalid for want of registration or any other ground yet the
possession having lasted for more than J 2 years the title be-
comes an unassailable one."
It has also been ruled in Mt. ]aseda Kuar v. Janak Missir
and others (8) that :
"Even when a registered sale deed is found to be illegal,
the purchaser gets full title to the property purchased, if be
is put in possession in pursuance of the registered deed and
continues to be in possession for over twelve years openly
and adve~ely to the vendor."

In the result, the appeal fails and 1s accordingly dis


missed with costs. Advocate fees K 51.

(6)I.L.R. so All. 986 at 997 (7) A.I.R. (196a) 0\Jdh rp,


(8) A.I.R. f19~) Pat. 787
F-4 .
CIVIL FIRST APPEAL

Before U Thet Pe, J.


c.c.
1966
RAMNIRANJAN LHILA (APPELLANT)
v.
RAMNIRANJANDAS MAHABIR PRASAD FIRM
(RESPONDENT).

Suit for rtC()f)I'TY of dwnages for m!Jiicioru proucutio11 and arrests-pauing of a


cMque which was dislwnoured-prosecuJion for cheating. whetMr reasonable
or probable cause for-acceptance of CN(/UL and-crediJing it into accounts
nlating to all contracts-cMque found welns-apprtht nsion that fraud had
bem practised--prosecution ir. a criminal court -whtther answt'l'able in a
suit for damagts for ma/iciow prosecution - compctmt legal advii:e on disci~sure
of true and relevant faits-whether a valid protection agninst action for
malicious prosrcution.
/leld: There is the undeniable fact th;~t the app~llant had passed to the
respnndent a cheque for K 8,zso wh ich ..on presentation was dishonoured
by tho: .Uank and-it could not therefore be ~aid that the respondent had no
reasonable and probable cause for the prosecut ionof the appellant for chcllting.
The respo~dent in. institutini criminal prosecution against the appellant had
not in anyway fabri<:ated a false case against the latter.
K. K. S. Kader MPera v. S. P. Mohamed Abuhatker and B;othPrs and
a11other (tQSt) ll.L.R. 38!! (H.C.); U Soe v. Mnun:: Ngwe Thaandothers
V nan. 7051 Moha,;ed Amin v. Jogrmdra Kumar Bannerjee and others A.I:R.
(194 7) (P.C.) roS; Sah Mauji Ram v. Soh Chatmh~R. (tcnQ) (P.C.) us;
Ba/bhaddar Singh and anotht'l' v. Badri Sah and a11othn A.l.n. (1926) (P.C.) 40,
referred to. '
Whatever the nature of the dispute that might !!ltist betwetn the parti~.
the respondent had rightlY, or wrongly accepted the ~heque and credited it into
the accounts relating 10 all contracts aQd the cheque wasTafer found to be uselcs,.
Under these circurnstancrs the respondent I ike a'flY ordinary' man of prudence
would naturally entertain an apprehension that the apndlant had practised
some sort of fraud upon him and that would undoubtedly-l>e a reasonhle and
probable cause for proSefut ing the appellant in a crinYrrrah:oW't for which he
could.not be answerabie in a suit for damages for maliciou!o pro's ccution.

Civi I Fii'St Appe<~l ~o. Ss of i4, agai~!t me de1=ree of the Chief Judge,
City Civi I Court of Rangoon in Civil Regular Suit No.. 624 of 1962, dated
znd fl1arch 196~.
C.C. Raja Braja Suttdn D~h and othcr1 v. Bamdcb Das (al ia.s)Pattanaik and othns
1966 A.I.R. (1944) (P.C.) r ; Mt. Vilayati Begam and others v. Nawal Kishorc
RAMNIRAN- andanoth"A.I.R.(I947) Oudh 116 at. I20, ~t'ferred to.
JAN LMILA I"t i s ~ettled law that 1t competent legal advice on disclosure of true and
v. relevant facts without the lawyer being misled by the c lient afford s a valid
RAMNIRAH-
. JANI>AS protection agains.t an actlon t or malicious prosecution.
MAHABIR Daw Yon v. U Min Sin 19~0 R.L.R. 631 ;8. Sum!ll Prasad v. Ram Sarup
PRASAD Sastry and anothu A.l.R. (1946) All. 204 at :u 1; Albert Bon'lan v.
FmM. TobacUJ Co. of India Ltd. A.I.R. (1929) (P.C.) lmperial.uz: Sm.MmrijciJ uo{o
Kaikhwrot) Suntoke .... Shorab Perholfafl Kotwal A.f.R. (1949) Nag. Z7J .
referred to.

U Wan Hock for the appellant.

Mr. M. Jaffer for the respondent.

U THET PE, J.-This is an appeal against the judgment


and . decree of the Rangoon City Civil Court dismissing
the appellant's suit against the respondent for recovery
of K so.ooo being damages for malicious prosecution and
arrest.
The appellant is a partner of the firm known as Santlal
, & Sons situated at No. 50, 29th Street, Rangoon. which
deals. amongst other things, in extensive business of
buying and selling country produce such as wheat, gram
and pulses. In the year 1956, the appellant's firm
executed eight contracts undertaking to supply certain
bags of wheat in favour of the firm known as Ramniran-
jandas Mahabir Prasad to which the respondent belongs
as a partner. It appeared that the appellant's firm could
carry out only one contract of 200 bags of wheat and
were unable to fulfil the remaining contracts. They had
to pay the respondent's firm a sum of K .21,750 as damages
in respect of two of the contracts. When the respon-
dent's firm pressed for prompt compliance of the other
five contracts, the appellant's firm on 31st August 19.56
sent a cheque for K 8,250 drawn on the United Commer-
cial Bank, Rangoon and signed by the appellant with a
F-431
forwarding letter (Exhibit q through their Advocate that
the money was in respect of payment of damages for the c.c.
1966
contract kflown as " May Delivery Contra<;t . The
RAMNlJtAN.
respondent's firm thereupon replied through their JAN LHILA
Advocate vide Exhibit D on 4th September I956 that Cl.
RAMlflltAN
since the amount of damages for the remaining unfulfilled lANDAS
MAHABIR
contracts had already been agreed upon by the appellant's PRASAD
firm. the amount sent to them would be credited towards FIRM .

the damages due by the appellant's firm on these contracts.


Then on 5th September 1956 the respondent's firm
presented the cheque for payment but it was dishonoured
and returned by the Bank with a note that it exceeded
.arrangement. The respondent thereupon prosecuted the
.appellant as partner of ~antlal & Sons under section 417.
Penal Code for passing a worthless cheque in rhe Court
of the Eastern Sub-divisional Magistrate, Rangoon. The
learned Eastern Sulxlivisional Magistrate in his Criminal
Regular Trial No. 486 of 1956 issued a warrant of arrest
against the appellant who was. haw~. re-teased on his
furnishing security and ultimately discharged the appei-
Lmt after holding that the dispute was one of civil nature.
The respondent thereupon went up to the Court of
Session. Rangoon. and subsequently to the High Court to
revise the order discharging the appellant but without
success.
On these facts the appellant sued the respondent for
recovery of K so.ooo being damages for malicious prosecu-
tion and arrest. The respondent resisted the suit on the
ground that he had reasonable and probable cause for
believing the charge of cheating he had preferred against
the appellant to be true inasmuch as the cheque for
K 8.250 signed by the appellant was dishonoured by the
Bank and that the prosecution was launched without any
malice on his parr. The learned Chief judge of the City
J38 Civil Court, Rangoon. after hearing the parties and their
witnesses dismissed the appellant's suit on the ground that
the respondent in instituting the criminal prosecution was
. .
c.c. not prompted by any malice and had reasonable and
U)66 .
probable cause for believi~g the charge to be true.
R.o.HIRAN- It is settled law that in a suit for damages for
JAN LHILA
" malicious prosecution it is incumbeilt ~n the plaintiff ~o
R&MHIRAN-
J.uiDAS prove the following point~:
M"MABIJt
PRASAD
(J) ihat . the plaintiff was prosecuted by the
FlAM. defendant.
(2) .that the proceedings c6mplai!1ed of t_erminated
in favour of the plaintiff.
(3) that the prosecution was institutt>9 witho~~
: reasonable and probable c.:ruse. .-
.(<f) it was due to malicious in1ention of 'th:e- de-:fen-
dant and not with a mere intention of carry~
ing the 'Jaw into effect. . .
vide K. K. 5. Kader Meera v. S. P. Mohar:ned Abubac:ker &.
Brothers and anothe_r (J) whkh approved the decision in
U Soe v. Maung Nf{Wi' Tha and others (2). See- also the
_dt;>cision in. Mohamed Amin v .. ]ogendra Kumar Banrlerjee
and others (3) the relevant head-note of whkh re<;tds:
In an aqion for damages (or malicious prosecutioo the
plaint rtf _mu<,t prove . that the prpreedings instituted against
him .Were malicious. without reasonable and probab]e cause~ :
that they terminated in his favour (if that be . poss_i~le.l. and
that he has suffered'.damage."
In the present rase there is no dispute _ac;_ to ahe fact
t~at the appellant had been prosecuted . and that the cri-
minal proceedings against him and e~ded i~ his .favour.:
The other two points. namely. whether the respondent
had prosecuted without reasonable and probable cause and
~ . $

maliciously must also be established by the appeLlant if


he is to sua:eed in. his ac(ion for damages. Thus. it .has
been ruled in Soli Mouji Ram .v. Soh Chaturbhuj (4) that_:
.. 'in order 10 succeed in a suit for malici~us prosecution
1he plaintiff has to establish that .1he defendant acred "with-
. out reasona~le and probable x ause and m~lidously.''
. . . . . . . .
(t) (19511 Rl..R. 388:(H.C.). : , (z) 'V R;m. 7os. ..
(Jl A. I R. <~47liP.~.) ioS. 4) A.J.R. ( 1'939) <PC.). Zls
In the instant case- there is the undeniable fact that the c.c.
16
appellant had passed to the respondent a cheque for
K 8.250 w~ich on_presentation was dishonoured by the RAMNtRAN-
JAN LNtLA
Bank and it could not therefore be said that the respon- \7,
RAIIINJAAil-
. dent had no reasonable and probable cause for the prose- JANPA5 .
MAH.\BIR
. cution of the appellant for cheating. The respondent in PRASAD
. : instituting crimin-al prosecution against the appellant had FtRW.

-: nc;>t in anyway fabricated a false case against the latter.


In this connection it has been observed by the Privy
Council in Balbhaddar Singh and another v. Badri Sah and
another (5) that :

"The question is not: Did the.. plaintiff commit the


off~nce or did defendant invent the offence against plaintiff;
. the two queries exhausting the possibilities of the situatio~l.
The question is: Has plaintiff proved that defendant invented
and instigated the whole proceedings for prosecution."

It was strenuously argued on behalf of the appellant


that sincethe appellant in dispatching the said cheque
had .expressly intima_ted that the a mount was in respect
of the "May Delivery Contract'', the respondent had no
authority .to accept the cheque and - credit the amount
towards the damages for all the contracts and that no
question of 'dishonour of the cheque could arise if the
respondent did not agree to the proposal made by the
appellant. Whatever the nature of the dispute that
. ~ight exist between the parties. the respondent had
rightly or wrongly accepted the cheque and credited it
into the ac;:counts relating to all -contracts arid the cheque
was later found to be useless. Under these circumstances
the respondent like any ordinary man of prudence would
naturally entertain an apprehension that the appellan~ had
practised ~orne sort of fraud upon him and that would
. unaoubte~Jy be a reasonable '!nd probable cause for pro-
se_cuting the appellant in a criminal court for which he
(S) A.l.R. (rgz6) (P.C. ) 46.
c.c. could not be answerable in a suit .for damages for
1966
malicious prosecution. In Raja Rraja Sunder Deb an~
RAMNIRAH-
IAN LHI~ others v. Bamdeb Vas (alias) l'atta.n ak and others (6) it was
c-. been lai-d down that :
RAMNlRAJf
JANP.U
MAKAIIIR '' In order to succeed in an ac:tion for l"aalicio~ prosecution
PRAS"t> the plaintiff must in the first instance prove two things=
FIRW.
(1) that defendant was malicious and t2) that he acted with-
out reasonable and probable cause. Malice has been said to
mean any wrol)g or indirect motive, but a prosecution is not
malicious merely because it is inspired by anger. However
wrongheaded a prosecutor may be, if he honestly thinks that
the accli-Serl has been guilty of a criminal offence he cannot
be initi~tor of a malicious prosecution. But malice alone
is not enough: there t.nust also be shown to be absence of
reasonable and probable cause."

It will also be of interest to note the following obser-


vations which occ.ur in Mt. Vilavati Begam and others v.
Nswal Kishore and another (7):

"We consider, as a result of a survey of these authorities.


that on the question of malice and r.e asonable and probable
cause. the following propositions are established: (1) In an
action for malicious prosecution m'alice' is not merely the
doing of a wrongful act intentionally but it niust be establish-
ed that the defendant was actuated by malus animus, that
is to say by spite or ill will or any indirect or improper
motive . (z) If. however, the defendant had reasonable and
px:dbable cause for launching the c.r iminal prosecution no
ainount of. malice will make him .lia~le for damages. Simi
larly. if the prosecutor honestly believed that the accused
was ~~ilty of a criminal offence he is not liable for malicious
prosecution no matter how wrongheaded he might have beeri.
(3) Reasonable and probable cause must be such as would
(.
operate on the mind of a discreet and reasonable man. Con-
sequently due care and caution and adequate enquiry must
I
have been made by defendant before he lnmched the pro- f.:
secution. (4) Malice' and want of r.e asonable and pro-
(6) A.I.R. (194.ot) (P.C.) 1. (7) A.J.R . (1947) Oudh. t16at. 12o.
bable cause both have reference the state of the defend- c.c.
1_966
ant''> mind at the date of the initiation of criminal proc~ed
ings and the onus rests upon the plaintiff to prove them. RANNIRA.N-
(S) Malice and want of reasonabl~ and probable cause must IA.N o. LHILA

be proved indept>ndently of each other but in the circum- RAIINIRAif-


IAHIMII
stances of any particular case each may be inferred fro{n the MAH.\BIR
other. (6) Want of reasonable and probable cause cannot PRASAD
FIRM.
be inferred merely from the fact that the plaintiff is innocent
of the crime imputed to him. (7) The initial burden of pro-
ving absence of reasonable and probable cause and the
existence of malice rests upon the plaintiff. .(8) The burden
may shift during the trial. (9) The amount and nature
of evidence required to discharge the initial burden depends
upon the facts and circumstances of each case. If a man
acts on his own knowledge then the fact that the complaint
was a false one will raise a presumption that there was
absence of reasonable and probable cause and that malice
existed. unless it is shown that his memory was defective
or that there wac; some valid ground for a misapprehension."

Another factor which is definitely in favour .of the respon-


dent is that he had obtained competent legal advice before
he started criminal proceedings against the appelJant. It
is settled Jaw that a competent legal advice on disclosure
of true and relevant facts without the lawyer being misled
by the client affords a valid protection against an action
for malicious prosecution. The respondent had admitted-
ly retained no less a person than Dr. U Ba Han who is
undoubtedly the doyen of Advocates in Rangoon Bar.
The correspondence th~t had passed between the parties
and exhibited in the ttial Court proceedings clearly shows
that the respondent had fully placed all relevant and true
facts before his learned Advocate, who was therefore in
no way misled by the respondent in advising him to
launch criminal prosecution against the appellant Thus.
it has been ruled in Daw Yon v. U Min Sin (8) that:
" If a person has laid all the facts of his case fairly before
his tawyer and has launched a criminal prosecution acting

(8) (t94o) B.L.R. 63t.


c.c. .bona fide upon the advice of the lawyer, he would not be
rg66 iiable t.o an action for damages for malicious prosecution.
R.\MNJ.RAN But where he launches the prosecution upon certain facts
JAN LWJ...\ which he knows or must have known to be untrue, he
v.
R.\MNIRAN cannot take sheltef' under his lawyer's advice."
JA,)IDAS
MAH.Utll
PRASAD In B. Sumat Prasad v. Ram Sarun Sastry (md another (9)
fiRM.
Braund J, has this to say:
". . . It has never, I think, been doubted that the
taking by a defendant to a suit for malicious prosecution of
competent legal ~dvice. and the acting by him on that advice.
are strong circumstances pointing to the existence of reason-
able and probable cause for any prosecution based on that
advice subsequently initiated by him. Albert Bannan v.
lmperial To.bacco Co. of India. Ltd. (1o). That assumes. of
course. that the facts, upon which the legal advice is sought
and given. are themseives reasonably conceived or ascertained
by the defendant. In the present case there is no doubt that
the facts were actually true."

The same view has been expressed in Sm. Mani.jah wjo


Kai~.husroo Suntoko v. Sohrab 1'~shottan Kotwal (u)
where it was held that-
''An advice of a lawyer in proper drcumstances and pro-
vided t he lawyer is fully and fairly placed in possession of
all relevant fac ts within the defendant's knowled2e would
in some cases atrord protection against action for malicious
prosecution. But lhe condition is that the lawyer should
not be misled and that he should be given all the facts and
be given the true f;jcts. Where the defendant had misled
his lawyer by supplying him with facts which the defendant
"knew to be false. de-fendant is liable for malicious prosecu-
tion if upon the advice of his lawyer tendered in such cir-
cumstances. he inslitutes criminal proceedings against the
plaintiff."

For the aforesaid reasons, the appeal fails and is


accordingly dismissed with costs.

(9) A.J.R. (1946) All. 204 at 211. (lo) A.I.R. (1929) (P.C.) z22 .
. (u) A J.R. (1 9 m Nag. 273.
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL
8tfort U TMt P~, J.

V.E.RM.AR. CHETfYAR (APPELLANT)

v.
u MYA SHWE (RESPONDENT) .

Cod~ of Civil Prt>udur~ 0. 38. Rul~ 1-o"~t btfor~ jutlgmntt- wh~tM an


'og~nt can b~ arrtsttd btfor~ judgmtnl in a suit againtl hit principal.
Held: Order J, Civil Procedur~ Code, aurhJriz.es an agent to appear and act
{or and on behalf of his principalin a sui 1 by or against the latter. All his acts
and appearanc:ts arc done on behalf of and 10 the name ofilis principal. The
remedy by way of arrest on the other hand coruemplates an action which is
p~rely personal in character provided for the purpose of puni&hing a party for
his contwn~ciouS conduct and therefore an ;~gent cannot be arrested before
jud~:ment .in a suit against his principal.
Rarrgoon Co,rmercial House v. S"t~njal10n Muslttikhou Trading Corporation
(1955) B.L.R. p. 35 (S.C.), distin&uishcd.

S. A . A. Pillay for the appellant.


Myint Soe and Myint Thein for tt1e respondent.

U THET PE . J.-The short and interesting point that


aris~s for ~onsideration in this appeal is whether an agent
of a defendant can be arrested before judgment under
Rule . 1. Order 38,Civil Procedure Code.
The respondent-plaintiff sued the defendant V.E.RM.AR.
Chettyar Firm who are the principals of the appellants for
recovery of K I ,700 due as money lent in the Rangoon
City Civil Court and applied for attachment before
judgment under Rule 5. Order 38-. Civil Procedure Code
of certain sum of mone y lying in the hands of Suburban
Development Officer, National Housing Board, Jnsein.
Civil Misc. Appeal No. :u ofr()6s. againstthe order oftbe Third Judge
(U Kyaw Hlaing), City Civil Cod'lt, Rangoon, in Civil Miscellaneous
No. 3-4 o( J96S. dated ith May r5.
c.c. The learned 3rd judge who had seizin of the case dismissed
1966
the application for attachment before judgment on the
V.E.RM.AR.
CH&TTYIUI
ground that the money was unattachable and that .
the
" defendant was possessed of immoveable property sufficient
U.MYA
SHw. to cover an.y decree that may be passed in the suit filed by
the respondent. Then the respondent sought and obtained
an order to arrest the appellants before judgment under
Rule 1. Order 38. Civil Procedure Code. Hence this
appeal.
Now Order 3 Civil Procedure Code authorizes an
agent to appear and act for. and on behalf of his principal
in a suit by or against the latter. The agent has no right
to sue or he sued in his own name. He appears and acts
not in the personal capacity as a man but in the represen-
tative capacity as a party and with the intention of acting
as such party. All his acts and appearances are done on
behalf of and in the name of his principal. The remedy
by way of arrest on the other hand contemplates an action
which is purely personal in character provided for the
purpose of punishing a party for his contumacious conduct
and I cannot therefore see how an agent can he arrested
before judgment in a suit against his principal.
Furthermore it must he horne in mind that under
section 201 Contract Act the pr-incipal may revoke the
authority of his agent at any time and highly insoluble
solution may arise if the agency is terminated soon after
the arrest of the agent. The decision in Rangoon
Commercial House v. Shahjehan Musktikhan Trading
Corporation ( r) relied upon by the learned Advocate for
the respondent has no relevance whatsoever to the facts
of the instant case. It was held therein that an agent
who entered into a contract in his name could be sued in
his own name In the present case the money in suit was
borrowed by G. Sunderasan Chettyar the previous agent
of the defendant Chettyar Firm and the appellants could
(r ) (1955) B.L.R. p. 3 5 {S.C .).
not therefo.re be personalfy held responsible for the loa~ '':.~~f& .
taken by his predecessor. / . - -
For the aforesaid reason the word .. defendant .. used vc~~~~R
in Rule J, Order 38, Civil ProcedJ~re Code does not include u.MYA
the agent of the defendant, who cannot therefore be SHw.
arrested before judgment. In the result appeal succeeds
and the order of the leatned 3rd Judge dated 7th May 1965'
is hereby set aside with costs. Advocates fee K 34
,_:I
~~
(ec:c.oosocfro~ 3re1 ~)
roc;
u:::>ce
->
IG r::>ec cro&>n
e ->
uco~w
.)
&:c.oocudro:>
.)
c!b~:>Q
.) ., .)~
~~sccc~~:c.
.e bCtJc
- -
0 (" ("
mOIC(OW')C
I
accused, to consider the facts and circumstances attending
his position and then to decide the question of reasonableness
or otherwise of his apprehension. Abstract reasonableness
ought not to be the standard." c
~c
:t C'
0(;";. 0 C' C' ~ "' C' C' C' ,
'?,c:r- f,f~Jf~cp:f':)O~~<; ~U)?C'fiifOUIW~ . ;> CTlf- (;!D?m<JI
( )
w~{ ~1 ?"
r,;:c- C'O C' 0 C'
!D~:!Dijroc;o:cx>?::u2~2: c;~9:u2u

" The law requires that it should be made to appear to this


Court that a fair and im'partial trial cannot be had
before we take anion under sec. s.6 17). &. Pot.
and we think that we should not be doing our duty if we
pretended to accept as reasonable grounds which we knew to
be insufficient and unreasonable simply because the litigants
were foolish enough to entertain them. To ext~nd the rule
in the manner suggested by the learned Counsel would be to
encourage a distrust in the integrity and independence of the
magisterial courts in this country which would amount to a
serious evil. We conceive it to be our duty rather to dis-
courage unreasoning apprehension and distrust than to en-
courage it. We are not prepared therefore to apply the rule
unless we are satisfied that there is in the present case a
reasonable apprehension that the Petitioners will not have a
fair and impartial trial in the Court before which their case
tl \
rs at present.
OQ C' 0 C' ~ _<:: 0 C' C' r;;_ c- "'" 0 OC'
~9c cxt=~J?=O? c;co?m~91 oxp:<X.~p:c:~ >O?~c t:!~c;or ~~~~? ~:')fa
0 C' C' 0 OC' r;;: c- C' C'C' C' C' C'
fa~.,
Jl 1
>cnm:we 1\.
>=9~~~?~u>~Tin
(. JL u c.-, mt~o!Dc;.s~c
~ l T J
w:o:u::n
t\ c n !D:nw
~ C' 0 C' Q f.": C' 0 C'f,O C' C' C' ~ r,;: C' C' C' C'
Ce;{)<;~G :U? 2:1:::e ,?::U2 l{:l:>~~3 ~OOGO:>?C~Ctt:j:lj() ~2 11 c;c: ~2
C' C' 0 (", . ("" C' ~ C' C' ~('
~=~p:~ !D~J?: ron:>Q)g, ~ tc;;ox~yY.>Gt~wt::".tl(i:U-2 r' ~:oc:fap:
c- c- c- c c~ c- c- G r.;:c- c- c- c-
~S ro2: !D~W? t>l]) ~m91 ;omoo~t9~ ro2:tl>:u2 " o~:nm 'f<:OO?
'~ C' 00 0 0 00 0 C' '\ C' C' C'
oxr=:l?~:~:~ ~~gcom!D~~:l:>?~~m wo;mot~;x)?C~n:>c;~'l:l:>2?
~ C' C' C'~ ~ C' C' ' ()-. C"f,~. r,: 0
:no?=~'~ OO?:u~ oxr=O?.t:!= >e=>:>=~t=co~octf >m?:~t~?~
~.S: c- c- o c- o oc- ~ c~ c- ~ c-
cr- =~ ?1 ro::nmmcn'P:Q)~p::nct~q ~JC ~:9fa~t:! "<:t:!~uxp!Dc;t:lx :
o c-r,:. c- oo oc- ~ c-~ c- ~ c- c- o _c. o c-c-
~C::U?tl?:ro2:1 ~=9~ei?St:!~w'P !Dcefx:'t? <lC:OJc:l >003:))?
r,;:c- 'T' 0 C' C'O OC' ~ q~ - r,;: c- C' c- C'
tj>c;ut ro?C~? >O?O,?:w~:'fGt:!?C: t:11f:U? tl>:u~ O?.;o:u2u qc:
~ C' 0 \ C' OC" C' ~ C' <:: OC' (' 0 f.":
t!co2~ ~::nm Q)~cc:peororo'l': O?.e!:m c;c:c:~ !Dfa~~ O"?:m?:Dlco?:

c:u?
e
e='"m:'""';)c 7<: f:ir:Je~co'>C~~:Jt""~~ ~
C C' C C" ~C" O'f.! ( )
<t ~c; e=:n~ ~<:
C' C' (' f:i
r:Je C'

(?) ro~?: 8~~oS ~ :>e o ? cy<p' (9<J9)


(s) oeGo ~ ~tw"'~tc4u o-, oGu
aA;~~ffi~ha; !f'~&adxo;~ ~(> 'Lo~b
c.ob e rocott tC)'~ IIQ~c c.cc~re o1.o cc -c:o~Ji~oQ~ tC)i~ Cll~c +
~ ,:) .) ~;) .) :J .) ,J .):,j.) .) :)
u( ()) b!> .)c.o~"l.~.?~fCOQC), ~~ ss~c

11 ~0 :~ttoalem
:)~o".)0
J!noec:c.rM:dtco

"co ~ "ah
~
'CMt t-o~S:~c.ceec.~~ c.~tcuoo 'cu:c.tttcuroa~c.!fJn 9 flab
0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 .) .,) :..:J..,: ~
aenewcc '".Wifltoloc.Q)O I:)C~o
.. .. . ..:~..
='':ICO..fJ~bm
~ .;:_]
CC ftchcen~m \:c.ean:>C.Q)O
.. . .. ..
( :crf)ec:ccx)(.ucfroe>~re~hl)
".) .) .) ~
C ro
l-
:~cc~croe>w
..>0 ,) 0
~:)oe:)Qcoo..xl,
,) ,) :.l.>
olrer~tdt~
,)
c.co&:):)~
,) .)0
St
:~@::>rc.u<.o:,bc.e~~:e.c'W,::>c.cc~:~rolo
..) ..) 0 ..) .) 0 .) .) 0
::>~cb(c
..) 0
ua:!cccoo~rc.u
.)
fG~hllo~e.c
'5' ..>::.i..L
ro:cbcoc.Moc.co ~bcchl::>c.e.c~:c '!.::>eo mcccc~:c.@c.u:e~co:::>c.ro~ ~e~e.~:d:;
o .l ..> ::.I.> .l .> :::::1 ..> .l .l ..>o .>o
:C. @c.uRccmrc.@CCC.UC.C.U~CC a:! CC tde~e:cb<.O cb@hlCc II ()~(_CO~::>~ ree~:Cc e.G
..> ..> ..> .>:Jo .>o
IO~e.c:dM:<:bco eoc.uremC.UC.C.U~::>Q::>OO 1besJ G t>~Ch J,()hlCc IIOOCOmfl
..L 0 .) .) .>::.1.) .) ..) :JO .)
:e~bo c.cc~e:o::>coro 1btE t~ t'lchc::>o2c.ucc l,:c@c.u:e~co:::>c.ro~ c:O,:e~bo
.) ' ..) ::J .) .) .) ..) .)
: ('l{): Xo~ a:;IG) I~C.~~: C. re~: X ~~es:; 1OC.Ua:>c.G
..) .)0
::>b :C.()(.U' C. CC~e\ :o~coCo
.) .) ~ ..) :::::1 ..) :::::1 l...)
ua:!cc~~::>N IO~:::>c.~~C.UCoft ~~c.ure:~c.3hl,o l:l ftCh ai:ftOOII:):::>b
.l .l ..L .> :::::1 e .> o .5 .> .> :J 1. ::J .l .> ~- ->
IC.UC.
.)
rro~a:Rcc bft :::>Q:c.oo:c.cc :b~:fKOC.Of,Rccoc.crod:.oe.dC!cc ehl I~
.) 0 .) :::r 0 .) .) .) .) 0 .) 0 .) ':J..L
::>eoc.uoocccccc:
.) .) .) o:J~(.C:<bcocoo~cb c.ucc<:bl'lS<Rcc e:o~c.oto:e~bo ::>~~c.c
.) .) .) ' .) .) .)
101C2CCro!':I:C.a:>~OO:>b<:ro;C.(\)U>~~GC (r) C.CO:IOO~ :,~4c1:u II O:>CC.OO:>~O:::
~ .> \ .>. e .> .l .lO .> .lOO .lO .
~e~hlcccc:o~wro
.) .)
,bee ::Jt~ l'lGh
.)
c.~;l'lboc.cc:>e:o~coro
.) \ .)
t::>lb:>bl'l:::>Q:c.oo::>co
.) 0 .>:::1 .)
:('lcocof>ecwro ucccco~ro~bhl::>-e.eXoe.c ::h:l'lbo ,ee.cRccbe~:cbco ::>co:&
.> .> o \ o .> o J :J.> .> .> L .> o ' .>
:-:.e.c:dftl!:cbco

w:l"lCCCCt,Co
0 .) .) 0
II CCccro~b::>co:t'lCOCOft
.) 0 .) .) .) .)
l:::>c.~~CC~Cofu
.) :::::1 .) ~.
CC!cc
.)
~:ecce
:.:1
ec<.uroc.cfficc,:C2co
0 ' 0 .) .) 0
ec1:::>c. h'J~:c.oob:::>eoccc.cc:>wcro:>cch1(offi
.) :::::1 .) .) ' .) :::::r.
ecce
.)
4-~!Cl:(ca; Ghlece~es:; X :C.GC.U Rcc nro!Cl: ::>O:c. 00> lbm:c. GCCC.UC.C.U::>e.c
~ .>:J .) 0 .)0 .) .) :J .)0 '5' .)
:c.e.ceeco2e.cc.uc.re~e.ct"'e.c ,C2cc:lll:b~oh'J:h1b::>&e o:X.oftec :h1(bdxo
e .> .>O .> .>:::::1 e:J,.>o .> o e::J
lft:O~ftCOto W!t'lOO 1be.c ftGhcM2c.ueG 1>1
;;:C.GC.U:oco:::>C.ro~ ::>hlro
e .> o .> .> .> ;J .> .> .>::.io
u C2cc@RC2ftbre~cc~::>::>rc.u~re ::,~c.ure:~c. 3hl I!) 11 cM2
..) .>:IJ 0 .) .) .) .) .) .) ~ y ;)
c.ue.c ~:cocu:oco:::>c.ro::>
.) .) .)
,c.f>:::>QG~e!ClCC!coe.c
J:::l \ ~.)
:c.e.c::>c.cc~:~C:ow
.) .) 0
:h'Joh'Jb
e:l.>:::::l\
c.c.xtft(C!coo::;
, ~ .>
::>rocnl.oW:ftbo
.>O .> o o .>
CC!cc~bl:lrl"l:2 otcdc.5b Xc>~e.cecn xh'J!:>ro
.> .>~IS e J ' .> .> :::::1 o
nCC!ccro::>::>bbl(l>~
.) .)0.)~
WC2cc:c.oo:o::~cohle.c:ree.c
0 .) .) :r . ~~e.cC.o
.) 0 (c) .)c.c.o8oo~
,)0
::,fcnl-c:td.u:ccro::>od.oe.ceo
.> ., o o .> .> .>O o
"n~C.co~::>~ref)~c.urec.ul;::>c.ce::>
Joo :> .> .>
be.c (c) ::J~>~
l"lcoc~o2c.ue.c
..) .)
~;c.oc.u:oco:::>c.ro~
.) .)
a:!ccc.urec.uS:::lcre~ro
.) .) .) .) 0
,~,oec.u~Jc.re~
v \.) .)
c.uc.uc.cn~co:2colU:c.IJe.c ::,hlccoe.c~ b::::::cn uo::>::>~~ft ::::liJoe.cfu ~bc.u~
.> e :::.1 .;>:3 .> ' o .> .>o~ .l:::IJ ' .> .>
::>CCC~
.>
tC.eGC.UC.cn~co:2co ~:c.IJe.c
.> e
nC2ccGhlCCftbcJJ(bc.ce~ :::>We.c
:::.1 .> .>~.> .> .> .>o
,f'lbo
0 .)
::>romwMcccc~ c.cc~be:::>Q:o~cooo:e~bo ,:,c.h'J~c.cc~:::Jo~:lrcoe.c
.)0 .) 0 00.> .>:::1 .) .) .) ~ .)
.)~- coc f)ch:ro::,rc.ucoo.:>cb
.) .) .) t!:>hlcccomfl:flbo
.>:I .) .) ~cc:o~coro
.) .) ,be;:h:>:,rc.u
.)
Btt
1 11
COf'C.e.G~COCDG
.) .)
1r ~ 1
Aooeo coo~w
;) ,) ;)
6oG
..
YM
r
~~
(&:c.oosoc ~roeJ5re5~)
~:>oo~QC.OO.::>cb
~ .)~.)
olre:@.:cbc.o C.C.05~:>~
.) .).)00
:I
" "~cn::><"~:2
.> e
~~!>b:oa:
o
w 11 w&cc&beac.ooWGrro~+boeeot:l
-> .> .> .> ,):,]
n .)w&u:&::c.ooc.oc.r(\)~~boosoJJ
.) .) .) .) :.l
(&;~
(i;"~SCOO)
.,
?-
(~:c.ro~c.rro~tb5ce5~D 5c.o:L~~c~
II (IJ"~_?COt'l)
?~!t~~
(,:x.<D:l?
-> :,'
->.
~co:L~ J.C!I
~svc
0~
uru&e.ctc.rt~e:d,(.Oe&'!C
.) . .
nc.cc:C.C:2n
0 0
e I() Wc.2:~0J:2
t., .) .)
(:C. r~e:cbwe&-1e.c) .rGC
e
0~
( ro:cbc.oeen~) ~bee IG~
0 .) \ ""'
~~:x.ucc:2 :~&tc:b<.O
:J LJ.) 0
lf 11 1 _1 _
~eC'OWC'OCOG ":CDCO
0
cllG
11l,c Lo
wc2:k!:o::l
.) .)
i'
ib~..Lfl~
s~ilc
rtJG
:-:j
u0c r
cix:.:Ca
.)
.l:.) coa20
r
.) \
~
::~bee me
.,~,
6tx; _
Ui
~
8"' a~e~~~s~~~~t~~~t~n,~~
l
-{3 rn-,
&> e l8j6l t
c liD 11 !!I c-o. -eo 2 3o ~
lttt~J
.. ~.. ~ c -S
t~~~~ s~!~~~I~1Li~~~rt~~~~i
-oo (B., en -oo i\ ;:s en 8 ee 6l 6l -..
sJ
f~%~
~
oR' ~ rt
rn, o-. ~
r s
1,~1
6l
~
(B., ~ ~ ~ (; ~ s, s, f.. 8
gc 8 ~ e _ ej. 8
8 rn., ~> J! rn.. e
2(t) -~-o
tJirl~it' -tiEriiFs ~~!~L
s rn.. ...s ;;g i' :
-
C>W
~
0 ~ ~ j ~-aotnn-Bo j -&,-.So~~ &,cg . 9('~ s -s ~~~:St.
-e
@~~tie*~~ ~ae~~~~~~i ...e~ i~i-
_.!)
..$o
S ~
% ..a.
11}> S ..
c.:M ..c '(B., e u v c->
~t~~ ~ ~~Jf..&j~i..&Rij. J r!~Tl
1\
!:?">
0:: s - . . .() .2o
. .. co ~
(B.,_!) c.1
i)
(jC)
..
!-
~~~

~
~s=s c->~
!!! oc
~ -+<> ~
i) -c
e ~ o-,
8 8
.& ~ o.
~ ~ t 0'>
&> 42
---?.
c
-g
o
I>
~~~- 1 t~-~~rr~~~B~I~1- f~~ll
0 (;4)
<"')
~
u
....
..4)
~ s .. ~ ~ s ~ ..s s ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ cyo * c 6l
~
..3
.....,
:Bo~~l+.
s,
~~~l
~ s, "1 ~ i
gJfl=f~~~!
s ffi.,-c :1S s 1~.
~
~1
r
\Y> 6l
~
~s ~s s ~ mn~ ~ ~-c g, ~ ~ rn., ~1 ~..e ~
:rn~~w %~ ~-a..~ sgJ i~ e~~~ 'Es~ l
~ ~ oa
_g c8- ~
j G}e .. ~ ~ ~
~ ..ac->% o~ ~a ~en~
-P. -e u
~ }1, ~.. ~- 1 -8
..
6l
C?,O
I
f)
.,~'$,
ocg ~ ~-
en ~ ..II
..a 8., 0">
r
~~
( &:coowcfcDe>~b~re~hl)
.) .) .)~
~~~c(')MJ
. ) .)~
~~cooeC2h1
0 .)0 .) .) ._,
::rol5~
.)
ere:2
,) 0
,h.l&:cbco
~
~ooooOco~
.) .)~~ .
.) ~
olPe:~:cbc.o_. c.coeo~~
. o.)O
~s~~8se
'-' :o&'i'1:1 -8 (E)-v ~ sj~~~c
~ ..;ru 8 ~ ~~~~~~~~~
~~ 8 8-8 ::F o
&~u~-
8-,8 ~ 8
() ~ ~ 0') .s, ~ . [B., l ~ s s., .$.? ()') ~~ . o8 8-, ..V> -g

E -8o
"t. m ~ ()') -fl> ~ &, .8, .. (Yl .. ~ So ~ ...!) ~ ~r re., r31 4) 8 :::g
~ t 1f~-8 ~@3.~-~ttt
_; 8 ~ ~- ~ t e 1 t t ~- ~! ~ .s, n:~ t~.lo
-i! , _eo~~ ~ g., ib Q'> -8 ~ s ~J -.8o s 0

' - '

~ 0"11 O ~ lCI'> 8 -+o


~ru m o~~ & -8
C'> m u
~
~
~ .::.. ..8o~o8
-
s CSJ 8 -t."

1 o
t -<: .-u
=
m ~ 1:C1 m
..a
.-vo m ~

~ m-g ~..!) 4) ~ ~r, 8 ~Jk ~ ~, S ~ :f).,~ 8-,
-t
+- ~cr - ~.. ao~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:f)., ~...!)
t s
..P. ~(Yl o()')
~ 4)
q l,J. f 1 t~- ~ ...... .. c -oo ~ "'l:S :::s ,-,..... V'll~' 0') P.l, 0
s
CEJ m
S,.s
4) ()') ~ oe-
C'> ..2 S I!IU'> -3o m ()') 0 S ~'+ m ~ ~oo ,
{:f).,
~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ =r~~ ~ ~.&-"1
. !
J~~~l~~~s~it
--oo m~ O'l .. "i20as
~~~ ~J~ ~.-u.-uL 8~
m V'l c-3o -:fl>'>o o
-t 4) m s 0

0
~
~
~
m -v
J""58 =: -:So S
-e. . -8 0
m
~ m~~.,Q l' .2. i,l-<::5 .~e
~
O'l -3o [tl '"S ~
~ ~l ~_; ~-8 ,2} ~ ~8 ~~ ~-r-~_
c --o u ,
rv_ m
lW:' v ~ -
' o
V'l
m'l
c
C?->
. g-> 8o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l " 8 e - s
...!) . 4) - -So 0
~ ~~ s, ~ ~ o8
~ s.. ~ -fl>'> ~ ~ v ~ e
s8 oo~ s ~
~ . i ~s o8-:fl>'>~e ~ ~
--o 8o 8 s ~ t;, ..8 [B., -fl> ~ 8- ~ c ~ --... Q -8 ~ J 4) ~ ~
~!~!s,~@S
-8o ~ (Yl
- ~~1-:f).,Si
-
"1)'> .. 8 & o8 8
~j9~~~~~1~
s ~ 8-, 0~ o,-fl>
- ~~~ -
(Yl
~ c, 8-, -t-1, ,()') -fl>

@10..(!. -a s s .. e. ~:f)., 8-, 's ~ o8~ ~@ ~ -t 1o8 rn,


,. g., --;: 0 8 CEJ
0"1 o8 o8 8 g CCJ v S 02:1 8 m ~ ()') .. -fl>'>
.v, ~ Q). -8 -8
0

~. 1, ~ -fl>'>
s rn, .~ ~ ~! e o -s 8 ~ w ~ -Ro -r -~ ~ ~ ..) C'>
-fl> !11 (Yll
0
g ~ CSJ 8 oa ~ lr
(Yl -fl>'> -vo -eo ~ .::
0 '
rn.:, -vo
o~-t ~ s~ el~ x, ~ ..e -ao8
-a
+
~ ::!lo -: -: .o,
r ~ G;1 .J5 ..8o os ..(! ..s .ss . ...o ~ cz:n 0"1 ~ -~ Q'> 0

II o. -e
t~il l i~.
wac.rtte.:d,c.oe.eocc 'coke .Jalced:i::
0 0
u@ccl)~bo:ro
.) 0.)
(o@cdw~l,
.) ,:, .)
c.i,::x.D....:1
.) ~..J
,hlwb>:tccwr~
O'J, o ., o J wwc.ro~
~
G~e C~:~2c :o~ec
.> . . ;) .>o
<!Ccceeewoo
.> ~o .>
wccewcc:oS
~ .>
~~:boro
,) .>
OGlec .)WG~ceC.CCC.C.O::><C!hl
~ ,) .J .) :.J 0
'co:cbc.o ohlcc
.) ::1 0
1), rt'I:C.a::ecwc.<X>:!le&
.)
ecc::>WCC
.)
&?cc@A
.) .)
1
~ccofwlo:
.) .) .)
'wwfeeecoCocnru:C.omw
0 .) 0..) .J ,) 0
L:WO~ce
:>.) .)
C.CCC.c.oe@hl
.J .) :_j 0
ru:cbc.o uedcco::>
.)
..Q@,bo:~ (oR:R:f'lCCwr~ (. ~:~ooruoooc.coo I~IOealtcWf~&c.~::>CC w:c.fr~
:l.J.> 01 &1 .) 0 .) .) .) .) 0 t,; ~ .) 0 .) 0
1
ol)~ec .~Qcc()t'l:o!Joecro rt'l:lrt'IWrewlbc.o:::> &?cc@~ ~b:Acewr4l k:boru~o.w
.) .):1 0 .J:b 0 ~ .) ~ .>0.) 0 .)
.) J .).) .) .)
~cct;to~:oiJoc.oOc.o:,
.) 0 .) J..5 ,-
.) 0'Ccw~co aloecho
.) 0
ua?cco~:c.oo!Obe
.) :.3.> wc~o2 :oc.h:l::>o~:Acewfo
.) :=:1 .) 0 .) 0 .)
1
0:C'IleC.C~reec &?cc@t't w@roc.<.eecc :c.r~oo ~CC~IO o!o:~OoNOOOcGOO w:boN
o \, .>B " J .> .> \.. .> .) , .) o o .J .>
r00ec
..,
&?cc:c.<X>
.)
OOOP.hco;, I~CC ob !'Ch cer2CJ.iec ~II
.) .)
. II corecoe3:ee
.) " ~. .) .) .)
1: ;,c.fco~"c.tco::>
.) .) 1:: .)
9rew ~cocc:t~W: @() Q;)c.co
.)
~ce!(l;~ tbwceo<! ,;,@(.c<:e~:cbco-::Jtlbw~b::> l:cc.cc;,h ~cce=
~ :..:1.> .) 0 ' .)~ .) S' .) . .)
~
'coc.c.c~cc 0'w;,f,-,.)~oe c.~a.~ tbreeJ:lc
0.)
~W-fC .)cOw
0
;c.m.-> ~tSo ceo2 .)cocc
:ttco:@~c.w-cote@~c.cc~cc
.) ~ .) 'c.o@cccC:oCmbc.ocbewro
~ ~:J .,)~ ,) .) c.cc;,~~cc
,)
eWC\>@~c.<.eecc
.)
(o@cctdc.om
.) 0 ,) .)
~w 0~l(.rftioet
.)
:ru.!. . (..t~plQ ;{J~,\1(~0)
4.10' ..
li!cc:o&oco
~ , ., :~c.D~;IJcoh.l
., ~ e1,) OJ.)~oe-roc.c.u :~~cceCl.Jro
,) .,
@&c.cc~cc o'w:c.fto~~ce
-ollec.o(?c.@~o ~cceeolre @C.Cc.ec~ wao~:C!9t 4;., ~It c.~:o9,eeo:cb.co
~ .) o ~ o .) .) .) o.> .> .) .>wo \.
1bw (e) c c::>o2:@~ -tod ~,w :oo:lco,:cbco
.) .)
::~~
.) .) 0
(d) ila:J ttch
,)
c~o2ww
.)
ooC.w-::~tl~:t~ccwr6l 'O!tt o~ew co@C.Cc.ocecc :c.ft~&
0 ,)l, ,) .,
~ .)~.)0 .)0 .)
4rew ,)~cc@tt
.)
oo1o
.) .) .) .)
"" :>~:9onoo-:9ooooooow &cc:c.cooco"h~~
., .) .) .,) .) .)
o~ ftco cet~2ww
.) .)
oo~;.;Q:c:cbco
,) \.
ib~b!>e:~dco
.)0 0 ,)
~ccfe:ods~coD~oe
.) .) \.) QJ,
tba:nlfec.o
.)
2c.@~
.) 0
~ "' o '"I Cl'!_. l. r 1~ ., ~" _l_
O<OO::>CCGIClC :~lmC.O O't OC.O:<l<X>:C: cc:~C.O
:~ o .> e e..J , .> ,) o o
1r 11 r- 1
fteCOWft::>O ft:OJC.O
.
olre:&:d,c.o
;> o .
Gc.oeoo~
:> .>o
~hlrr~ft
:>
wreeccooxc
::1'"" o .> .)
'teccc.ucro::>ro
.:> .)
:::>Ch:l!'>:hl:ftCC(()r(')
.> ~ O'J .l o .)
~ n:le:cbco
o e Y;
u o r 1 1 ':") r ':") 1~ '0 1 v I -:1
o"lCG (()
emcc :>COfte.Gem CCI::::>C' C llecCCO::>~ft 1r Cl"'ecfto::>ece~ ( ) (C1) l.ls:\
.) .) 0 .) .) .) 0.) 0 \ ::J
ftCo c~n2wec noO>ec c.r..Hnohlwgw 'Rcc:hl:ftcewr(') C2cccvgeoe:cbco
.> .> J I. .>::.Jo .> 61 J o .) .> o
" 1 ~I' b::>ec~eec "
emcc

w:cJt'lru:
o 1 cb c.cecnec
o
" ~coccc.on ::>t:cccc
.:> .:>
r ':") 1ce<nJOI.:>I'l:
S.:> o t.o
o ~lb'ceo
.:> .)0\
, n , .. , , , ':"] , ...-.. r ~ ~n ~['
:::>cocccccceceo
.)0 .) \0 \ 0
a.me.cecn ICCCC~c. t'le:
.)
r cbc.cemcc

cccco
.)
Iwe::::
.) .) .)
uC2ccro~
.)
l l ':":'I 0 1 I ~ r n _I T"l r ~ ~ .~- ll
ce ~ C!lecCCIO::>CCWI()ffiO <.rJOCUC ::>t:Wie:JOG ecCC <::001'1r re t'l~OC.UC.CC\)t'l 1::>]
o ..> t..> .> _, oe 0.) .:> ..> O..l \..> ..> ..>
.)
x~~~ .):Xn:c.ft 1:..):>bc.cc ::>bec:c.rt'l<,.lea:
.)
coo2 1::>bc.cc
.) .)
~bec:c.rt')(.t){'eecc~<.u<c
.) . .)
c./:,: -J:lec.ohl :ecr:.)Jb tn1o:cc
~J,.) ::.J . t.
~~(I dw~t=~ srec.a<.occ rt=~<m<2ooK w cf,fx:-.em
.) .) .)I) .) .) .)
t I . -, ~~~ b ':":'Ill 1 J. ~ __ ll ll 11 1 0
::>::><.OCCCC: en ewru cccoc.c.c~ <..u:C.It'0 IC\J:a.:>CD<::cnc:.c cccn<ne 1<..u:<.1t'l
.) .) 0 .) 0 0 .) 0
.)
ohl::>reec 1::>b
~ce .>:::!.) .)
Cn<?.cc~::>::Xn:c.;,
.) .)
C.ft::j;}e:~f"(U\)
.)~h. .)
h:lkuc.crut,
.) <.c.x..ureec
0 .)
.-:1 1 1!. b 'I)
lb' v 1 " , . 1 ....... 11 cb 11 ]
ecccce,not'l:
.> 01,.0
~ec::>eec ~ cee a.;t'lec ccwecn eccc:c.II''Je: c.oecncc cca
.) .)0\0 0\ .) .)
I ~'- ~ _ __ ~ j_ 0 I V 11 1 11 1 J~ ~ __ 'lr 0 l
0
ro:c.ow 1cnome:xc::>co
.) \.).)
<.ut'>ecnec em O.J:Cit'lro:wwecncc
0 p
'a.x:orooo
.) 0
"C2ccohl::>j;}wN:oorebwc
.) ..>::.J .> :::1.> o o e
~~W>bo 1am
.:> .> o o
, .., l " " ]'ro:axo
:::><Occeccc
.)0 .)
ece ~ :oe.c.ccec wc.oece:a:>co
\0 .)
" l ~- ecncc
ccG.) 0
J~ ~- 1~wee
.) .
r n n cb' , ' ll ~ , , ' l n
<On :>~:CJfl<..uleC.UC<..u~oo e:-ce~ao Wt'>CC C.C\:<DCO c.uel ::> Wle(()(.<.rJ~
.) .) .).) 0\ .)0 .).) 0 .).)
l Tl , ~ .. 0 b 1 [' ~ ,. ,~ " " 1
::JCDe.c eccc:cooce :><0<..u1e::> G 'P~c.::><..u<.ecvt'l:b l:>co~ccoo
..>0 .) 0 .) .) .) 0 " .) .) 0
uttccro*hlt'lnco
.) o ::.1 .)
<n,n:,cc[,A
l., .)
fGehlhl~~~ruc.rw~~recc
'5' ..>::.Je'J .) .) .., o
cocc:Aw:2oruc.w
.) .) .)
':""l ro TJ 1 1 r 11 " o TJ g
:ec\\X.t'l::>~ ecccce::)cco:;,ecn :t::~c. ~:>~ceo~:
cbco c.c ~ ft: 3'::>ceccoo
.) .) 0 . .) .) .) .>00 \ \ .) .) .)
' n 1!., ;. '
:ro:C.f.C!C.It'J:lC)QCCCC<.Uem Wt'lf.C
1 " ICCCCe: ':"J "
cb <OeCT"lf.C n'
,CC<l>'0.>:cbCO I W;C.I~CV
. .) 0' 0 J .) 0 0
J~ ~ ~ 10 11 ':":1 11 l ,, , ' 1 !)
:ox.oecncc CCCb u ccccro~o'e~ U"ll n<..uoo:o~t'l w:c.c~<O ecce
e:cb<0:> ~oo
:> . .) 0 .) 1..>0 0 0.) .)
. ,.
'oo:::>tto~<..uCOt'lt''l " 011
C.UC.Ot:e:C.It'l'>'ceOO Icb"'"l
:c.CC:i:l:OO n1
!C.I~~ce ~
b:x.ro~:~ 'WWO
0 .) 0 00 .) .) 0 .) .) 0 0 .)
1:>!obc.ub ~r rocce~ 1e~h CC~c A:cc~1Cle~:...J;leme(()C\) ,:hiC2whx:.ccecc
..> .> e _,
::.1 .):::J' ..> .:> .:>
1 , ~-
,w;c.rt'l~ceoo wco: ::>::> c.cc~cc un~c:e:::> L
5Jt'l ,w ::x.g ~emmo
. . (,jow ooco ~ e~w 1 , I 1 1~ 1
0 .)0 0.).) 0 0..> 0.) \.)0 .).)
ke ,~x;nJrec.o2c.C2~ e2x:~C20Clb w'C.Oro:dx.ceme.c ocohle:cbc.o
~ .) .) 0 .) .) .) 0 0 .)~
'""') 1 ~ 1_':")
L'~~ "l V
uecccro~
<ncecc,ooa:owt'lcc ::>' lcci'L
.) .) .) 0 0
I. 0 \ 0
ooo~ cb",ee:::>c.c.c~
.)
t')Qt')h,'ICG :::>l:.oecct!cc:XCb w:c.rt'J;~:cdce ICCCC:dt'le:<bc.oeCncc
.>O'J.>OJ .)0 .) .) 0 .> 0 ~ .)
&ohlro:cbco
.>:lo
:.,Qcct;~bdw
r-l o.>
c.cc:c.rt'lro:dxceCocc
o
,(o:..J;t. ~~:E>:C:e :hi
o !;.1- J e:~
wccc.oo o~:c.rffiocd:orfGehl;hlt;bwcb~ <Ccc:c:.rOO.,:dx.oe(oo; w:c.rft~
.:> _, _, .> o ':t.>~ o'lo .> .:> .> o o ..>
h1 Q Q e:n~f'l <O::>~CC n n 1 cb " h1
u ::x.~<::>e::.J~::>~ l::>c.~ec.cc~
' v ~ TI ::>CCIW c.u:C.It'lro: c.cccnec
0 0
; . ~r l .J 9.) ' .J J . ,. 1 .> .,.
:ccc:G:ce
.>
::>cocb:x.ro~:e~
J &L
1nsc.rfl~
.>
e2cc:c.oo::>cb::>
.> .>
1:c.ccoo(0(\):cbcoemcc


00 9
II'

. e -SoCCJ
~ - -cg.,~
t ~
~-v8 -9
s8 s t s t ,.q;
s ~-
8., ,.8 -9 ~ -e g.,
~ q;~ ~ -9 oQ)~ -So~ c --&,1-+
c 8..so ..s8
~ ~- -9
!UTa~sr~ ~~~~~- ~~~l~ l~ ~~~Jr
e ..s ()')~ ;; j: &>%c:fut 8 o8 <- ~J~ -.C) ~ v t.t Q'l~f ~ ~crn ~-a
~~9L~(Y)J~~-
q;
- ~~- ~i_ ~"iEti~ t~i 0.
-~ ..8" ~ 4 J, ~ ~ ~ ~~ ""'1, ~ ~ -~ j" ~ ~ 1-, 1, i ; Q
u~E~~
v ~ .. .8
., ~ 8 + oe.- 3
8 s
g.,: ..ao~~oS V
-Q ~-8 ~ _g:: g., = "1?
LBJi~ 8 ~m; -~l~_P, ..g:% ~r ~~~ :r
s .. ~ ~ . ~rn.,o8 ~ s e., c8
~ t1Q'l i-s8 -8~ ~ ..8o
.;:j, v
s g" ~ cfJ ~ ~ - . s ., oS ()') 8. J ..eo -- e 1 -& oe;, ~- 8 g? ..
..8ot~~}R~AJ~~~~~&~~~~~~
~% ~J 8" ~ s -~~ ~~~~
" ~ o8 @-3o.-o ~ j ~ ()') 8.,-8

t~..ao~:~~~;~~~rl~
()') 0
vo
--(')
e
::n .8 ~
V'l
1 f~ii;E~~~s~~~lt'~

8 8
-
Q ..8
v ..
('t)O V,
~ m
9n
_
-i:i
- v
OV
M
~
~ <-
-c
v
OV
m
iJ')
~~~~~~88{~a.,JT~1
q;
~
()')
-g., s 8 -s
o
eo ; "
8
a., e~ . s ~ ~ -8o ., ~ -Bo8J~t~i~_
l (/)
-s . ; s..sfs~~Jt
an
-e ..e -s"Tr'i ~- 8 eo ~
-f/>0
~
.-u
~ ~ c~-
-Po
u d.,
9n
8
l~r1i~a.,~
1 8 ~ en "'
..a _~ ~,~~~
..s .. .: ~s-BX" ~T~~~~st ..uQ
~ -+ ~ 8 ~ ~ ..B ~ S., ~~~~~- -s 8 e ~-g
-8-,
-8_, '2 ~ ~ J ~ CBJ e-, -& o8
c .Q), --'Q [B., q;
"' e 8 ., ::2 .v;
a~e a.,% ()') e .g., a.,~~ s~ -8o s()') . ()') ~ ~ .
J c ~
t. ~
];! '8 ~- a.,s! tell ~ cfu~"i
o ()') . .. t'IO ~ ;;
~;{ ~ ~~~~--8 ~" j. ~ em~ <~ ~ .M.~
x.:; 8 -+ ~
crn
--'Q .. v ~ ~ ~
-3o '""i J ~-<; -3o .... -S -s ll" " "" ~ ~""' $, ffil ~ .... Cll-> . jj, (]}; (!"> -3o ""8 .... -s !
8~ f)~ CZJ
-S 1 ~ i ttl~ i-. ., $;~ ~ .
~-=~.t gdh lh ., '$.~. t ~~ l I g:? (;')
g., o-. e.i !.4 ..B -e 0 0
..e .. -+ . 0
u ~~~ ~~~~
~ .. ~ a; f) a., l~ ~ -s~
~ leo~.r rlh .. ,1J, ~ c,~
s. l I~m <-~
s., (';., e.>J 41 tO~
0
0
~ -v G) ~ ~ G) a -.C)
..,q !:Q ~ -v 6) 8 8 ~ -8 tGJ...r> ~ e &
0
-~ ~
s, ,_!)
s0 ~ -e ~ ~ 0 (B., 6'> ..6
I:Bd OS') e ~ ~~=6
U'l =6 ~') s, &2 ~ .J3o ~
J -+'l
~ ~
~
~ ~ G)
~-a -fMC g-> og' (')')~
... o -fM ~
" 6'>

6) 8-,
89
f
ro -&'> ~ ~ -8 (<;)
~ iS .8. e ~ :8 8' 8 --g ~ ~ .. ~ 00 t& ~ s-, -8 :8 j') :Yl G)
0

oSen o8~ 8~ ~g]: .. ~8 j ..So ~m, ~ r&,-go


=e c 6'> 8 .. 8o s-,rt_
. ~ w- ~. -e~ ..so e
~ [B., '?n ~
~~ 8e ~ ~ [&, -fM c
l:&J
6) s, a % e 8 s-, ~~~ a s-,-8o~~ ~ ~ oS -Bo 2 _,~-(: o8 ~ 8 ~ ru-,
i
~ ..a en [, ~ "' 2 ~ Cf.O en -fM V -& (B., W ~ & 8-, o86'> . q_j,. cyD G) 8-, ~ ::.tr' _ ~ e a
JJ> ~ .. -8o 2 ..Co '--' g., ~ .v.. ...e-o 4? liD 0 8 Y. 8 . e ~ CSJ-+'l -&o=e' ~ eo ~
6'> q;;(l =u
~~~~..a ~ fQl ~~A~~~~~f~1-a~~~~~e~~~,~8
6'> ~ c C'l .-!) o CD
(B., !/l ~ u " u o8
(B., e ,en fl., C
g., 6'> "'&) V"
e - ~ ~~em~ v <!""~ ~ 8 e = ~-do~ -8o~ -3o ~ ..s ffi, 8 o8 ~~
m, -.8o 8 o-ft>
~ :S .:c 8 s-, e ..n m, .. 1 ts ~ ~ ~ -a s, ~ d'l
(; ..eo-a J ~o8 CC1-~~ ..8o G) a ~ ~ 8,fl..B ') ~ _,., s-, :6 -So-&j> 6 8o 1-,
~~~~~~}~~~~~ 0 ~ i]~j~CCJ~~~
0
6'> 8'l
C"~ ..Bo ~ 8 6'> ..~ 8 ~ S ~ ~
~~&jV
~ 8-, 8-, e 9 lf ro qr -8o -e t,i;
go ~..a ~ oo ~ 8 o CB-, ..a -t., c.. s 'iYl ~ eo 8 o ~ ts ~ Q a g')
6)8 ~ 6'>s,~1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ .C .--4\o>~-+'l8a ~')-2 e ~ ~ ~-v ~~~..at
-uo V _Q...
- -8o l CI'l v -0o en
-s -c~ 8-, -;:, -+ o-ft> ts _;:S C'l ~
~ ~ ~ -8 OS') 8 ' = ~ ~ -::> 8 s, . -fM "B ~ s-, ~ ..Q ~ :j;! ~ g' ~ . ~~
~ g' ~ ~ rn, -2 ~ s, 5::: 1: +'1 e 6) ~ ~ ~ C?.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ 6) oe ~ Gt -8o .. ..
0

~~~r1 ~{;: 1 t1~1., 1-8o ~~ ~~1')


-8o ~ ., ,.e "' 8 . ..eo a ~[B., -8
~ t ~~~~
0
i~ ot~ ..8o
%
~
~ e ~ ~ en 0 ::h "] &
~o ~~ru.,~ ~~a 6) 8 4--! s;.g~~s-,-g(:B, eos~ ~8 8 8
~L~iG)S,iL~~~~~A~-2
So '10 ~ 8 ~.. (')')tan (; ~ ~
~i~i
'iCItS . ~
L~~ -9o~$at~~
~ -8o c~ S,(G)
ceo en Gn
~ J eg CO)
-2 ~ ~ ~eg O')~Q,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ .t)..
s- ~ -g s-,~ e c&i
<=
8 ., 8-, ,.-8o ~ V
.Jk ~ ..8o .,8 ~ U'l
ts ~ ~ ~~ Q'l
-8o ~ -s ..s 8.:C G') C'l V
g>~~ :~~~~ -~ts>s*~~: c.a,r~~ ~s~sn~~ro~
~~~~~~ -
~SOC" ~!re ~~ ~cco~.t~~~co ~!5~~:cb~&1es
. <),!~ ~~ ~~sno:~eJSoro ~ ~~:cb~&1es
~~~~co -+ox?:>~ccip:c ~~
. . ?Pg>Sc.o scccsno~~ g&~eco cb~g>& . lo~CC!5>b:o~:J:~
~ ~~~ ~ sccc:c.oogtQ =~~~
~ r.s6~:~cc~~ ~:&,ol>M!~~
~~:~:cbc.o co~~ ~~~g.x:o
1
1Mc$d eJ:c.Jes :tpco"'$dJ~c.e.s~:~ g>&,eeil_~.:.- 6v:eft.Jc:h~4-~re
=~roc.O(f-y) :~~:~ sm~s-OgG~~~~:cb~fues ~so&
c.cc(o~g*c~l"l c.81l:o~ ~~;~g>CO co:g6 ~g>cesoos+:&,~re
scccg-glees r.~co(c-~) sa~~=~ ck.l+~i'l"l9 sccc~~soro
.?so-.cb!oe ~ ~~:dx.oc:&es ~ ~w=:s6
~CCCO*g>& lo ~cqs>:c.&goo. cA:gcf->:)~g>CO ~
. . 2.oc.Ccocc ~es~:cbco ~:d'eJre scccg>ccsoo ~oh&,(S" Xf~ slcc
~~ ~~~ ~~ 1e~~~~:cbc.o
~&es ~:&w:s6 ~~:~Sc~~cc~~~=o~~~k"~~
~ :&,(p~ ~~~c:.roSe:~co:~ ~:~g>~~e~
(g~ . ~:&:\'oe co&o~:cb~&>es ~~~:cbco gococcesocc:s6!oco
~MC ~ -~~~~-- ~~~~
CA:'C&
~go ~&es t3~sc:.co~~ cA~re s~es:tc.co:o~ ~ ?P:c
M~~t<e ~~~~:o~&~~
~~ :cb~&es :l:g&:gt,oo ~:cccso~, s99~=& (S"Xf;=s6 s~~g
1m . ~ :~:!:cool ~:o~sooo& %~so :g~b
~~ co:~:~&>es ~&o i ~ ~~ ~~cc~sOCc~ t: ~~g:o~
?~~ffi gc~:~:cb~&,es~~~:cbco ~~:b~ g&gbx.Gg~~
~F~ ~~~~ ~~ooc&,{~)cr '~
3~ ~es~ soAes ~~soos-h~re~#es ~cb~~ c.8
~09
1 ~ * , ~.t~ i t~~ :;
il$11}ls'fJIJii
c ___ -s e ~ ~ J>.., 8 s~ c (.) 6) ~ e 8 6) 6)
8 "1> o8 rn-,qp
P. m -c "
t ~
_E 8-,..8
V V
eel~
U ..
2 eo&,~ ~ O'l~;;S
e (3d ::>
t1 .. v S e v, 8 ~ ...!> - cn(B., s-, V'l
f.@~8~s~- ~~1~~t&,es~~~ 8
rn-,~ ~ 3 ~!;&] 8 g;., s ..s -8oo8 - ~ 8 --- -v. ~ ~ e ~ 8
- :, c "5-> e -$.o a., e ..a - s a., --g., c c., J a ..ao ~ 0'> ;r
0)
2 ~
(.") C" .. ~
V :, s-,
.. G51 s
~ ~,
~ ~
-& e s-, s..
s ~
. 8., 8 <= O'l ::> 9t oS e
~ [B., (Y) 0')
J
~ J
~ (G) 8-, ~ ..& &o ~- 8-, (.) 6) ~ .~ ~ ~s Jr
~ rn-, ~ c \}) ~ ~ ~ -;!) <""') P. 8
~ 8!9 oO'l --s =
~ ~ " C!D g., ~ " ~ ~ V ...!> ~~1'?"~ 8-, ~. 8 ~
e
c [B.,~ ~c:g 8 8 ..8 -v - g.,,.e ()-)~___ 8 ~ O'l~ .
i
~ ~ c ~
~J 6> -o ;:s_, C rr> '1E ~
~ 00 8 8 ~-So
V, C
~
--,.,.
8 =
., 8 "8 '"f...!!) ~Q ~6> i'
~rt-&~::
---+<>:!
~ r~,rt
.. -&-s
f
..00~
t~a., ~c., ~ 5s 1 6)
~g.~ . ,
0 ....
~ ..s ~, -u a: ~ .-:n
::c- s:: s v ~
v
-v
e - em ru ..- t: -c <""') v oe;, ~
s {e
:aC ~ .. co (Y) <""')
~J
c .. ..vc
rn., ...co
fd ~ 6> o8 ~ (B., 8 -., ~ 6>. C V' V
()-) ""iM ~ 6) 8
..e - m =eS -s ~ -3o ~
8 a., e . .~oo e
-v. s s -So j;; - e ~ ~ OX.,CC"J s~ f ~p.J-a
~ -v ~ 6) ru [B.,o., ~ [B.,G51..!.> Q'l
-vo ~ ...n
s., r s -8. e co ~ ()-) s ..8o .
!1l1~~~1tJ1~~ ~Iiw
~s-, :So s ~ -a e ..!.> s., e ru., s-, "" ~ ~ v G51
+ ov 6) o;CO ()) {
1 . ... [B., j ' 8 s rn, -g~ ..& i
O'l OV f.> _.8, -8o = ~ n j " "'8 W~ 8 6) (.)
(")') ::s-, .. LLJ "' .;:n v eo ~ v
~ v
s @ ...n
~1 e ~ ~ s., ru-, -e--, 6) & ~ .a,
oa ~ g-> V, a ru., ~ rno ~ ..ao ~ -s a~ ~ a., -.eo~
~ScGroS oo'P~:~
'PcooSf9Sa:>Sv
~~~c;cnS~~oooE~~~~~

~GcmcS?too~cSc ~0-)t:G~(G~ B,~,o:r.>~t=(cSoocS'lt


Gcwo5cm:Oi?)
;q
~~~(8oo8'1t G~co:>:~)
~or-~11<;00-~ ~~"' ~~
~~~o!!~:>:c;'flD05~sS'XI ~~f--1~~
~~~~~ ~~oor&n&B~~
~~~~ ~~~ ~~U?o5 ~~~ ~
~~-(:cp 0t~:an:f~ -to5f~~:= :.>~~~
~w4~1-~~~~~
~~~~=E~ ~- rooScx&~
~~ oo;a~~~ S~JR~S)c;'f ~~~~~o# :>.XmO axp 'FlY~
a4-~c.~~-~o~U>?: \oSc;o:'Jt OO>Ot ~"'?~~!= ~~
~:aS~ I sx&o.:>~~~ ::noa?B~~t~ ~<O~C:F~ tn~:'l~
Cl(~'f 00'} onot~OJ~I q~:~ IJ~OJ~:m~ ~:~OJ~OO OOOttJvroSI
oooScoOc&i:jp: ~OGcxntOO~G'J:o.:>~ :ma:r.>G'J:rJSi~ 0?\i<O'J:~&>S:
aa~~o~.tc5c~ oocgf.~~~ roo5~01Jq~~o.:>~ tnGiOo5.~c~,~,p:;{
;;~'lSunfOY.>a:r.>oS~,~,p:mme o8,.~.o8 ~aocoo (:1 ~'lbunfOY.>a:r.> .
~caSe:w.p:mro~: ~OG<X>?c:'l:oSi~GOf tbc:Ul~:loiJ':g:>m ~'foS cxn:~c:a:r.>
o~oS~~~ tm~o?:o.:>~ c;~c;U{9~:1 ~~o:c5:~: &:t~
~::J>G<tt~ Coi!;OO'}Ct oe~ol +~n~~C~'JC<X?:i OO'f':~oSc;mr OO?I
OJG~~OJ~I
Russ v. Russ(l962-3) Weekly Law Reports 930 Court of
Appeal ~t:o.:>~
~ 900 tn'} at:~~:m 'f'04~ ~~G~~ tn~
++ ~~ ~:m> ~:n&:>.n ~:neW ~~ #tnO?tOOOOJ
~~ ~co&~cc{o~~~~
:t?~ccgso=go~cpw~8~~ccM<J~o~~
~~e~scccJg:d'~tc.cogbecJ,~&:b~:c.coso~~~ol>~:c.oosocf&)~
~cc~~~~~& G~ cp~w~~w:cc~escpoocb '<J+ec~~ r:~:~cbc.o
cpovcbpc.ccb ffltoo ~tu~b1bbsol6o:~oooo6~~c'l:~~vcb
Jx:ogikb:1~ c.c.o3~ _.&~)8~:'!cc~ rc.o\?ge~ ~~~"
?~~~~
=~cccp:~:co:go ~ ~~~~~P s:~~~
~:~~c!c:cbc.o ~~~~~ ~:~lc:cbc:D
( c )~re~:~ n so&xsM,~:ca>socL>~~~~
n:ooiO c.c.o3~ nso&xslc:c.oosocfo~~~
~ffi6~~~~~ l.o~focc.o ib:o~~:c.c;on bcs oob
60 :{o~soooo, :as&:b~~~ w&~ ~~~~~ ~~~soto
om~0m ~9:goo=~ w~o~goog>ro c~b~:c),:<.<X)(S~:~
"y ~sore!! to!' h: socJto~ II J>b' -yre SOGCO~ ~:cl'nst,o:b~,., to
!'b: gm !.l,esm: to~m s~o<! i> 9:cle so tea:: )'c.)smt,o P,m
Ff~~OI eSS!JO S6l 'liTV fttaQ ttpfttDQ
!8 ewJn8_J~M01
8161 lfTV aU[DUIS 'tt ;JU!fJJ;JJSnO:J
!Fng~osoch~ ch~g8cs ~tosoo<!gxs
~~gg:> ~g~~#o:tce~Ac.olt :cbc.oocc.ccc ~lle!Fn~j& :b9CS~m
~~~~~rlot-och~~ks~
=~ooto=~~~i>~ goosorotci> ~~~~~i>~=~~~~ !~c.con~
=cAa:~~ r =Fslo~!.r ~~~goosooo soc-A~~~cJMs&>
~cc ):d'n:GCX>m S"r:4>~ l.o~ccb ~ ~~ ic~ccc~ ~~eel!>~.t s-u~~
:fe:ccon:fe~oo 31o:c.bco ~ow~soc.ftx>~ :~ooc-J,~ccbs-utos-utoi;ciP
~cc~ ccc:~~s-ul'.o~ fbg~soc-J,~f,~)c.bm~~so~ sol.oe"i;c ~~ft
:fijfle ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ sc~~ ~
~cc:f~~ 868 '1\l;M';) lJ> VlllfVIFJUS 'tt VJpUal!lJS ~
l>~(Le~)
~no~~t:o~ ~~~~FilJcs
?>~:fa:~
~c:cci> cccw:c:A,:~:c.bc.o :c.c.o~~~:, =~f?J ~=~so&t~
?~tCA'Iffi
~~to~aa:~~~~~~ &~f3
fb !> S'JGCO:> SO ~o ~ )e s-uc..oo~m S,Oa:; )lc.):>m w ~ ~J=c.twc.co:,
~~~~~~*~~tb~ 9~
~
uo~~l"l:gglgc.es:;, g&:~soo!>~ 1:3rof'C:;,~:o~1c.o 1c.oe.s~e.s
-:J ~~~~:<fi">S'c.b~e.sg~es S21"lJ:e.s~~:;, u~cco~ J~:o:;,:<fl"lgo@~e.s
~:gdh:;, bJg=es~:;, 1co~:e.s~~:;, :cfu~q:Aesg;ccr 1col"l~~:o~
~~eswes ~c.o:iJes :c.es~glfu 13&-f~ckccc~s:;,oc ~cc~
cocmccsc-oo:t? g-i>:<fl"l:~<!-~~ ~ccJ~ck:cJ~g'fu ~~=ccF~
:~4-~~~b:ges~c:.@o c.cc:;,g;8gc.re~I$'!SO~ :c.Qsn~g1Pe<l>~~:;,SW~?3
~g~e.scocmcc~sco:;,:~ lg-t>:d'l"l:~<!-~&e,~c:.@o l>:<fl"l~ccAe.s
..cro~cctn~e c.8gJgc.es~lo~b:o~so~:ccol"l
~ ~~socb~l"l MJe.s:CCOI"lgoo go:c.bc.o ~~:~
~~<"g-t> :~GgPco ck:~<!>~"'bo!>so~ be.s:bocccc.cc 1cogGJ~
goog;ro :c8:g~ ~:gbroA I col!cg~:cJSocco~ [S!W~ II~CC~
=gcc.o~ :c.cosod'eo~ be.s:~grcosoovcb ~so~@ :ccol"l col"l:g
~ ~e.sc.cc~ )g~<l>~ c8~ 1~I gc.ol"lgcc<" :g~:gPees ~:gb
~ ~=tc? ~=&po:o~ ~~F ~:CCOI"lgro
coc.Sgb ~~J~crogc.co:;,&:ig~:~&>e.s g~:ccol"lg~gro"
N~CC~sob:>sre~~ ~glfu ~chcccbso)~:oo:gGco~
~:cfuc.b:g:gcJ~ c.cc~h~g~Aes g~:&~~IS>soooe.s
..u~cc!S>oo~ lo~"'sJb:>~gcc cots>:o:;,so~e.s:c?ee.s
:J:ro:~G~~snPc.osnrc.o~so6)so6)e.s ~~=~~~~ ~sooo:g=o~so~=c?e
~:oo:;,gGck:c.J :scc.o:~ gc.og ylfu ~~es~ 1~c.]:;,&x:>
n~ccoo&> to~ccge.s~ egc.osoleso~:c?e ~cc:c.cc~C.Off>
~I">G~:&g~=tc.oes ~c.cc~soccsoos~~:;,g~~~2o g-i><l>:;,e.sgre:~:c.bc.o
~s~oo&, lo~cc~:l~Ae.s c.cc~J=b~e.s&w ~so&e.sl!c~:&e.s
~cc:d'I">Ae.sc.cc:;,~~ n~ccoo&->eo~ccglckc.oG:;, ~b:ge.s:b~eosw:;,
i~l'l
KJ1bG~ ~:b:;,%o<!>~ ~:.fa~lsofu:~~CC~I"l ~+
~cc:<fl"l:c.cc:gb:g~ c.cc~g~<l>~g&~oo~ 1g&:~a~ :fko
l'w:~>
u~ccro~:c&gc.o S:~:fcc~
~~:c.c.oes:~e.s ~:c.es:d'l"le.s :~~ S2cc:c.co:o:;, ~:d'"'sole.s:c?ee.s ?~tc.flffi
~~~~~
c.cc~C'.o~ccg:<:.COI"l~rogle.sgo:c.bc.o scJ~c.cc~J~:gc.occc.v~w~
lo:ccol"lgrog)~ :~~4>~2.oe.s c.8:cfu:g19~g-i> Ac.c.oG~~geoljl"l:g
s
ce~
sxm:O'j?~tcx?:'-~,p:co~: <:>~:oo~tm~~O(:<>o:lJ~II *r0'6' .oe~9 rtSt
?F::mo88t='-~~= ~cv.cxS~~='i~ sxo~~~~eoos g"t=~~:l;)e2
<>cpoS~:~o:r.> ~~~: ~:~~~ &fa?:~:~ a:>~: ~:
~O~'-~~" ~:nu)c:;~~~ ~~11~oYJ~ o2pS<>ont:~:o.;~
?~pn::mo8 t~:ns4:::p~:'-l,p: S~o:lJEu
~Jf:lJ~:Y,p:d' o-Joa?f?Aw~ .G~GwoSCY.)')CY6o$'Jt ~:'J0'6t
~~<>9:~9 onot~o.:>~u 98:~Y~o.:>~ ~o:n~ ~:C16oSo.:>~m
oo:>cf>~' ax&x>&:&::>: ~cxn8oo~ ::m::mG'f~'
~~:>8: 116J~C~ ~~ cooS~&:>e~~~
~~c~:. ~+::m::mo~, #8~ ~
~'lSunt::mo:r.> ~cuS:~:y,p:ma:>~:t ~~scm8s9: ~N':sOf tSs018:
~:g.>m ~~cm:~:ri> o~~:d? +co~:~:o.:>~ ~@:1
~&oS~:t:YJ>: @<>tl~u
~+m+ ~<>06=~<>.sr'.}S~=~ ~a%~cm8s9:eoss~'
oo~ ooSco8oosYu:n:>t~ ~~~~~~ Y<.m:ooSGo:noS
~ ~o~~~ +~ oo:ooysf::m
o:r.>~9Ss01 ~fP:cx?:oo~:~'JSG> Yo.:i.>:ooSsunoSoooSy~ 0?6p:o8
cooSoo&sOI:o.:>t:~88:~ ~oS~ryoS'-~1~" ~9'0'6 Y~G:lJ:~ry>~
CY.Y.)C\)G$0:>~ mfi.mGOJ? cx?:oo~:~'J' cooSoob~t:l fYl>~t:~
~:~ ~6{'=~~ coo5;1)~o3~safJt
Russ v. Russ (J)d*'# ~tG'}=t9ooSo.:>oSso:r.> sx;0'6:sx;~:
~~fm:m~=? ~~c~:~ ~If apxo&
~~ ~'a'"'fcf>oS0'6t:~ ~t:<f>b!G6po5~~ coo5G06Pi!OOJ SGOfC\."ijoS~~~~
d~~s y~~o.:>~ ?~::mo:r.>ob~J:o.:>~: YU(oS' oe~ rtS'
~<Xil:o8~:~:~eoGs068 ~o?Jt:'-~o8u ~<>~9 116Jtb~:lJ~ ~eoss~9
~~v~ ~:oS'lt'-~UfoSG~JU ~~Gco:>tG')lf~ooSo.:>oSGo:n 2 oGSI
SX>06:SX>~ <>&&.row. ~~>>?'fO o~ <"'6J~Y~
Sso.:&u~:' 116Jt&~~CY.)'): eosso.:>S !ar&g"t:t8g9* oo~ro
eo<>a'-~,p:~o:r.> s:>S:ro9oS~so:n ~G~<>t' ~<>06=~s.sr ~=9rr0ls
'-~.P:t9 ~;:o&~:~oS~sn8 ~9~:~~SGoo.:>~P

(J) (1962 63) Weekly Law Reports 930,Courtof Appeal, 41 C. W.N 898.
o o ~ 'T'r c cg c , o~ c c
02)~3d~:9G;)G;'~: G3l ~ n;;:~ 101 V~C9:xl2 oxp:v~~~9Jl';C:~2
C r,;:c r.:;::: C f,"; C Q Q C 0 C oOC ') C C
roq>!OC!dtD?:ti~G~?C: ~mo:>30XJGO)?C!~"1('J)GO)?C!~~COl~21f GOJJ?
r.:;::: o c c o c r.:;::: c r,;:c ' o c oc"'' c
GeJU ~-:>:v9ro C~~l roe: ro'P:OGeJ'JC:tj<; ~:;qcro-:>C:Q~C010)2:; II
0 (' ('" <: (' 0 (' oc 'l 0 ('
~QJO)CJ
l -r o
Q:l~OO)CDICCX>:08V
-r u a. t (".()0
7-
!r.l<:'IVIO'):
-ln.
J Q)QO)c,)9~COIII
-~ L
CX>03VOJ9
a. t.
C'" OC' C (' ~ q;: ('
GC9J'XOOO':>;~cG~? ro'P:O:ColtD?!Vt1iroo Of roct1:x>211
C'"C'" 0~ r,:c C'" (' 0(' G ('o 0
O]~l.X>?l~!>Jr::~cOlccm: ~3Col c;oo ro91 Yt!CoJO)e:roJ 'P~o~:o:,_
0 c: C" 0 ('" h ('" c: 0~ ('~ ('" ('" (' (' 0 c:
090)G'9jJroCO?l~CGOt:jC:~2l Od';{IOLr:}fi::JfCDJe:roJe: 01DG::O:CD?J C1.iOJO
9 0 r,:;::: C C 0 C'" C: <: h <: OC" 'c- <: Q
G:TI?~3d2lf.{ V~~V~?l ~O)!>J~r:::OCDJf2:~?t:l~ 9~CG09f ()fO)!
h ('" J;"'.J: (' (' (' (' ' A;
ro:>Jt::!c:tl"':n2n rocvm:>:Ofoo Y<JfO)'
. r,;: ('
~:>~Gr YG;>J
s
Gm'XOd?:tlo~ro
r-' ('" ('" 0 ' 0 (' ('" (' (' C'"h (' (' ('
OJG~?!::!3dC1.iOJGOJ?CDCol~O)f 090)GCX>?OX!9r OJCD~O)t::)C:<Jfo:> Col<JfO:>
c: 0 (' A; ('" ('" 0<' 0 (' (' C'\ ("
o:n~o1>G~l9JI 'V:m:n:;Gro?G:n:>mvtml ~J~o:>9~e:;n ;;m;;~G~:
r,: 'l' "l c c or,: o r;~
ti::l))PYJ?~ GOI GUim'9JCffi:>!J O)'P!V\)!ColJ:>!(J):))') CX>Lti::rof?ColJ?!lf.{l Odti!
~~<>w~:Go:~fGov2u Sailendra v. Snehalata (?) ~G:::o:>d;o1~~
C' (' C' (' 0 C'C' 0 C' <: 0 ('
'~o:>~JmVJ?!~JI$o:>cx:>?:~2~1 O]~Uoa'}e:;~-r:cq~~ll
" It is contended that in law a marriage of this character
cannot be celebrated and cannot be given legal effect to.
There are various authorities cited to us in support of this
proposition.
On the other hand on behalf of the wife and on the part
of the Deputy Legal Remembrancer, who ~lttended the Court
as amicus curiae, we were invited to uphold the learned
Magistrate's decision as he was merely giving affe~t to the
-section of the Code which gives proper and speedy relief
in the circumstance, and that he ought not to be burdened
and this court of criminal appeal ought not to be burdened
civil law which could not possibly concern it.
I am inclined to accede to that argument. It seems to me
that if the Petitioner here wishes to impeach the validity of
his marriage. he should bring a declaratory suit in a Civil
Court when the whole question can be investigated and the
authorities pros and con canvassed in this regard."
o c _<:. o ~ ~ c- e <: nr.::;:::
0~ ;nf:G~ell ()~')~G~Gfe_j: Col~o:>:> OJU :mr Odl[:lY-D j e:romcx:>o'?eJ
~2~~~:>1 2uG!3)pt=~~ r~:roJ~Jd~f:v<JfoS~t oo'P:vo8~u1~
C' \~C' cc C' C'Q C' C' (' C'~ r,;:c- 0
G9'XOrot::!c::n?i:Jq)~2n <,>~c9~c o:><:p:ocromcx:>o9J vm:>:a:~tlo~
or uspo (S'6r) 'liTV (C) rs IIWJn(l J;IMO'J (gr61) lJTV (b)
:crR:crowax.co~ecto u@ccbro:, ~:cr~~a..:cc :cblec :.~:cPece:oo
,) o- ,) '.>o o .:> ~ ,)
r:cr~coree~o l!l:cPwcm~
,) ,) :s- '3 0
,)orocbec 11 re~e::>~&~ CCOOJCC :c\;e.c::xoec
\ ,)0 .) ,)
(n@CCIO~()(X)CUC\) CCec~~~ChCo ~<.Cfl:~ft II CCCCeCe :;:)bfG&,ttM:~Q
.) 1.. ',) ,) e ,) .:> o .J .)0 .> 'o .:> '5' ,) .>~
:cbl:~::o tiGeo(uJ!J~ @ec~t. c; ~ch coo2 wee ~b~:cbl:Aro ~cmobe 1w2o
::.l.:>o '5'\,) ::1 e .:> .:> .:> ::.l.:>o .> .:> .:>
,)oco:uro
,) l:;:)bU.:C'ooo~kmobe
.) ~ ,) .) ,) ,F:.:C.Cbe)IJ~"~:::JQOI~
15' .)
\ :.:J ,) ~,) ~<"-ifc s l:leocbd::lr~
,) & 0
:lr~eccuvf'wcm~ ueroCCCe>:::>C.<.0$(.0bCD<O!C.CiiA I c.u._/' :C('()ft:l(\) II fe~
0 ""B l,. .) .) 0 1 \ .)
be~A::>Ooiob~
\ ::J .)~.) - @ceo;~~
,) ,)0
r .)ecb~oc.ccu:.c
,)
~&cb)....
,)
uCCCC~~ec 0CJCC1001;)1
'b~ ,) . oo ,) 1.. .>::.:1
~c.mobe :@rowo:S.o r~olni~m(gbe U:cc~c.rc.oc.m~ uU:a:
.) .) .) .)0 ':5' ,);:],) ,) ,) '3 0
.)oCo~Cro .)
:GCO:?f:<bwco:_sc.e~ro:~l ?f (C) !l!.~a " P.m.oa ~ccgco ~
:~cJ~~J~ soRx>~gc.~ gfr ~~c.o gcc.o~~~~ ~~ soc5~cc:do
coo2:_rb j>~:_rc~1 ccc:c.rRc~n2:6~~~" ~~a:::cror;oo2:6~gc.co~g~
1~:c<.u:cu wc.Zt:cro:oo:>bc lcu~c.e~fu:;:J :h-14-~~cco cb:x:o
'S' o o .> o .:1 ~ ti':j o :s- e.>
~~~~s~G~pcb~ c6~:6~w~8c..G ~o1uc~o2sow :6~:~:gg::> n?or~o~
orcu~re
,)
:,~;,ic.ofo:cbcooc. C.CCC I:lflUrettA
.> .> .> o- .:> ,)::>~ln
o :6~w .,::':J8wco:~62n;;lcc
., o- )~ eroo
..
:oro:C2~
.) ,) rcu2oooowX>
.) .) ,) ~:hlee~o
e'h .) ,)oC.Ocb::x.oc~t.:J~
,) e~u:w'be>:~cc<.u
::.:1 ,) .) o
t:C2ro
,)
d:o~~(',(X)WC\)CcCo II f)\;hlt:;;\ eXo~eJ: ::>CC: :)JOel ohlcr;:C<OO :)(\)
o
bJ:,)::JC.Qe>e
:::::~ , ,) o ,) ,) o o &1 &1:::::~, -> o .) ,) ~.. .) ::.:~ ,)
:c{;cr;:)COe::2 f :ccruc.rw~~ f ICLJC ~~:hit:;;) eoro(()(\) WC.~~ell~:Croecro
,) o ,) ,) .) .) e'J~ , J .).) =>
rrcccct;:do:c.ooe.cwc.co~enccccbe<llhl~c.SJe~c.cc~~cccclo::>~c.uc.bl~
,) 0 .) .) \ .) ~,) :::::1 0 .) 1.. ,)0.) :.:J
:<!-e
,)
:ccno:~eoro::Jo:cbco
.) .) ,)
;::)OW'b~:~ccw
.) .) 0
:C20JC~C2ccb::vwwro1:c
,) .) ,) ,) 0 0
oo rr CCccCbt)J
.> ,)....J
1
C't'C d;;lecuCowro ~bdu~ec.uc.~~~(;cba::::>C.O hc.of, C.Otoft 0C Uc;J:~Cc
,) ~\,) ,) ,) .) ::.1,).> 0 ,) .) .) 0 ~,)
l:lCocboro(()(\) ICC ebR::::Q~I~edea::C2bcc tCCCCb::>eo l:lCo~ec~
.> .:> .> ' \ o .>::::h ~ .> .> .> e.> .> "5""
,;uo,~eufpJo tedo:>sfd;} p;)Af3J3J ;)Aeq p[noqs
aq :ll?tp 3At!S 'l! S'WlOJJ~d OI{M UOSJ3d 3\{l JO AlJJede:> 3t{l
l{l!A\ JO {)<)WJOJzad SJ l! woqM .!0 SUOSJ:>d 3t{l JO A~pt!dt!::l :}tp
ttl!M lOU pue 'l! UUOJJ:xi ,(ew O\{A\ uosJ3d 3tf1 pue ,(uow3J3:>
aql IP!M A[UO ste~p 'lJV 38epJew ueps!Jl{:) s UO!l:><>S
..<JUo iuour.u3:> 3tp Ol SJ3j<~J pue , p3leJq3[3:> , Stre3W
PV 38eJ.Uew mepsp1Q s s ur p3S!UW3[0S, p.1oM 3q~ ..
rr~cc:cro&e!c~ I~ (b) WJVUI$ ' .A ~u.tp.l<IISUO:J
H reooXo~CCC.O~COCC W:::>rea::@be.cll:)~Cc:c.Q:~ro rrC2cca..x:ccooccc
.) .:> .> .> o .:> :s-o .:>
::1 .>O .:> .> .>
.>~:oro:C2~~ccb()(X)(JJ(X)
.) ,) .) ,) .)
r:C2row
,)
C Achcooewec
,) .)
:b~:cQ:OO)(')('X)(.{)C
:..:1.:>0.),)
~cm01be nre*(')Cn@C'CIO~~(oll'e cbc.o~::>reecttbe.c CCC~;:)~e~cbe~
.> ,) 0 ,) "' \ ~~ ,) ,) ,)0 ,)
6c~
o C' C'C' J:.OC' C'O C' r;:c-
GXll 'i):ml 't'C'O:rn'J)J~a:t=<i~~ CfOO c:~ "t~:;,J~~~ roc~w?:Gc:~?ro
::O:u<J?
C' OC'
;o:
C'
:Y.>:U?I (,)U)'):4XJOOOIC
Ol~CO):'nm
o
:;}O):DII
C'
OO:JJ'=/.S(T)
0 C' C'~ \ C' 0 OC' 0
C.:.-l fLl L C-"i.
-~ G 1. C:. l .. l
C' C' cr;: C' c "' ' o C' C'' c
oxp:~O)GO)'):U !JJOO~rt.'{'qc G!D?:n<JI ~:l;1 GO:Y.>f>~::l)O~:l:>~ll

" There is no provision in the Indian Christian Marriage


Act to the effect that marriage amongst Indian Christian's can
be proved only by affirmatively establishing that the provi-
sions of S. 5 of the Act were complied with or by producti9n
of a certified copy of the marriage certificate as permitted
by S. So of that Act. The Evidence Act also does not lay
down any special mode of proof of a Christian marriage.
Hence admissions by either of the spouses of the fact of
marriage. evidence of eye-witnesses who were present during
the marriage ceremony. subsequent conduct of the couple
in living as husband and wife for some time and the opinion
expressed by conduct of persons who had special means of
knowledge of the subject, being all various recognised modes
of proof of a marriage may be admitted in evidence to
prove a marriage among Indian Christians also.
Section 488 of the Criminal Procedure Code is not included
in the Proviso to S. so, Evidence Act. Hence for proof of
marriage in a proceeding under S. 488, Cr. P. C., the standard
of proof need not be so high as required either in a RToceeding
under the Indian Divorce Act or in prosecutions under Ss.
494, 495, 497 or 498 of the Penal Code. Thus, even opinion
e~pressed by conduct of persons who had special means of
krtpwledge on the subject, may suffice to prove the fact of
marriage in a proceeding under S. 488, Cr. P. C."
~co6So1 m~
...
O'd"w1
Jl..
06Gr,:;:,...8:06:;lldJGr:>:
~_, -" -~r~-
&8
J
eoG:l 06G00!06G~T1
0

06:qcli O?.~GGf '01~ ~:a? GCO?a'5~J9 GoTGo1oSG::>.n :mt? GOT068


m&o
--61..
c:Bm ()~
L CJI ::S G~o8
Cj "
en:~o5::n~'"
~
Lot ~ L
~:n~:Gccli
L cp 0 o~'f ~~rfJ&8
-" J
06r:;:,.,:
l:J""
_C r,:;:,... C C' C'' ~ C' C' C' C:~\. 0 C' 9
0'4GCO?m ~CO?:~: Gb' .. c;: romrooyq>c::m e;:ro'=l:~s ~r:~1:3:06~ro~

~~ 8:G:>~ I 9 8::l:>~~~s~an: I 'PeoaSroJ~oi:lf3~ CfOO !ro91 ~())')~


q)~o) Go:~t onot ~ur t~f38: ~t~8u c.,t:m (,)a>t9:x>~ ~?~~~
0 c: 0 C' .s
(,)U)');0900 (,)'JOO,m~9J
.
~(\)0) roCtj~ G:?
c:r.: ' C'
O)~~:G~? ~<:~<;)J(T)~ :l)?
(' 0

c- c- c ,!\\ o r.; c- cr;:: c- c


:;x)CDCOO)G)OG~S~~~ ~:~ox;Uf'l;'(jO::O~ II

) 8 c: C'
0041c ooc;p::>?.e1:ca
~ _<:: C'
GCO'J("'OOIJm~ ru\00<;)11
C' o C' C' c- r.:c
om~c'i):C:Jc;oc~~
C' o
C'"' C' C' r.:: (' f.:C' 0 0 C' ('
!JJCO.'T.lOI ~OO<;)J(T)(,)J"=~~ C:J~-9ro:l:>~ll
{:c. r~t!cbe:c.ooc.oc.fC\)~
., \ . .)
i'=too5c.~~ ur ~~~5C.~~( le~)
V9
~ccsu~s-cMe~~es :$2ro~~$2ftb
G~so:c?e :ce~~G ~fso~cc:c?e:~ t~oco:~&:cbc.o ~c@o <.ce~~=ce~~G
~~:g:o~:~c~~ ~~:~:cbc.o:&es:~ ~~ :g6 3cc ce~
&>S2fl~~gb~:cbc.o c8c.o/'~~co $2cc:~&:cbc.o~c@o <.ce~~:ce~~G
~~es :~6:!'6@~~(") :g@~cJ~J ~&cb:ce~~@ surosuce n$2cc
ce~ lo$2cc3ccG~~so&es :c.es~:~6 #oce&> ~:cbc.olkc@o
lo~~g(") :~c~:ill~oo~~~ ~cJ~&o scccJ:cJ~ lo!S'so~!e
~ ~~t>~:M:ro :Xo~~ ~~
~g&>w ~~:gesJC.rosoro co~:~6 .cb~soc!o~c.oi j-6glbc!o
~A~~P :c.es:d'(")&by:c.oosudro~ uS2cc~ ~6:ce~~GSOOJSOOO
~~c.osule~:c.es~:~6 Rscccsu~so"()soo &<?!ges$Cccso&g~:cbc.o
J.,O~W'&o Llc6 y :c.a:> soc.Jk~ I ~c.]~'&o:gc.)~es IP soooes
~ccg:?lco:d'fles c.8:ill:?OO gg:~gb~ ~:cbc.o~~es
~ccm~~ :$2~gg ,91l!osol:c?e ~:~so~e ~~cc&surow
sulees C.CCelCJG$000100~ :$2ro3to:l>ees:~:cbc.o u$2cccbCJegj:cl'fiW
~ ~.cbc.oww ~ ~ ~:cbc.o
~cc~ cbso8 oo~~goo lo~~:~co:gc.o~:cbc.o $2ccsuleg6i
~:~ &ces:d'fl&tec:h~o:l> co$06lc.o ttb.:>so&g~;cbc.o ~~fl:~ae
:~el'eeb:> :c.es~:~6~cJe&o ~cco~+e~ :c.W:d'ft:c.<:x>essuc.oo~es
. yccesocc ~cc~~ :c.esff>:g6 ':$Croc;.ccecec!n co~&:cbc.o:&xs ~
~c@o . to~fl:d'fl:c.a:>essoc.ooees ~es~ges . gc.e.sesuc.me:oe~~es :f&~91f
tS:>~c.t'l:>(e)
:ru{o:g6 t?cccero ~ooe:~g~ ~x?:>w ~~~eO:> fl:!l~c.t'IMC
~:ces ~:g6 .:~~:cbc.o fso~:cbc.o ~ ~~fl ~
lc-?cc:g&:~~ ~cc:~ ~:cbc.o:~o ?~~ffi
~~~!?!
n:!~
:~soJ:c?etolk(") :d'~c.<:x>essuc.oo:;,ee; <.ce~~ gc.e.sesuc.roe:oe~es 9~
ocs
~t~ ~tiP lo
~~~ ~.,~~ rrr ~~~~ ~c@~-=~lsob
=oasom.
:g,srrol!l ~c;n &c.~~~ c.cc~&es =~~~ ~l!l ~kv~
&f:>gro~ ~s~~ ~?o=c.oso~ ~ ~ =~~soosooo .
:<".bco6 clt =~~ sooso~JigC.XS- =~J&- =~~:Ol!l c.o~'t
esvb ~~- :~~ :~~t~F!3~9> ~~~~
ocrofS ~so~ - l!fF~:~ fb~ :g,sJ&>l!l ~foes F~~soosooo :clx.cXo, ~C)Oxs
99ac t (y:cb~&>es) so!:~:~
* . 3+
(~=~~) r l9 ~" (~) ~ca:A
~~ :sco:1&:~ . ~&::cbc.o
. A~~6So tt:cbc.o
gfe:~:cbc.o SCO~?~t
'Lt .md~~N '9P6l '() 'liTV(c)
~f&:~
~
r t?'tf~"~
(!)stxsc.ceA
ema: ,ba; fff Aco c~o2cow 2c@5.')
0 .,) .) .) 0
:cece:dx.oe~ec

h:~cocec~
.)
:I _v_1!' __!__ v ,. ll '- ~ ~ -n r n1 rrr ,
:xonwc:uJ COCO((l(X) 110~~6 coccccoo:ha;a; ::>I:COieOO .10 ACO
.) .) c s 00 .) .) .) .) 0 ~ ,)
coodwc.c ,:,
2ccc~o
.) o
lh&cce
c. ,:,
rc.h:..JJO::cccc~'!!J
:S:::Jo ,:, ,) ~ :::>Q~rdrorob ..>:::l.J .J o
co:~b
~
1 II c ~) 9 f l TI II 1 1._
wmw ooo.vv ::>!) t')(O~eco co:c.~:oxo
nw ooocooc~ 9o~cccceoa:;
o ,:, ..> ..> ;:) ..> , .> o-
eCocc oib:o~to:c.Pe:oe>~hl 1c.a:e:cbcoeroec co:c.P~"~!;cbmb oro~e.cem
0 .) 0 .>:..3 0 ' .) ,
u;:;:Jcco~h:d~:xo
~.... .,) :xh1~wro6:fVl~Pro~
.) :::::.1 ~ 0 :::::.1 .) ko&e~d~
.)0
:c.a:;:::>b
.,)
c.cc
coOOa:tc.~red~ ~ccc.ro ro::xKilrubc.otc h:~oo1:o l2ccboc.ooooA
:1- .) :l .) ..1; .).Jj- 0.) 0 .) .) .) .) .)
r 1 ~ 1 ,, ,, ~ r 1 ~ L~ 1
ta:cce:ccc.oecnec cca coro:c.ccoru ~ :c.cou:: co
.) .,) 0 .) . .) .) ,) 0- .,) 0
o:l ~eccnrotc.a<nco
....<:>u~Se ~Ill JO
UO!lft:>a-,Q np WO.lJ .MOIJ JCneJmeu pue ~ll!!P~WW! pue lJ<l.t!P
~R R S3hwq> pue s~SSO[ tpns .lOJ ..<ruo .,,qe![ S! .t<lnet 014~
"(1!dpupd S!l{ WO.tJ lU~W~nqW!~J Ol p3[l!lUOl ~ ll!.M lUOl8e
~ql lf.>!qAl .IOJ ~8emep .tO SSO{ h..r.AOl lOU 5! l! 1ng ' ,
-c.~coreO::J:J[,c~n2coec
,) 0 ~ .,)
2c.C2&
.,)
~cc:~ttC2b
0 .,) .) .)
:ocQ~o~l!.b eGec;~:w~
,) ~ .>00 .>3 ~
c.rro~ ~eccci5'~CCI'I
.,) .) .)
lrecc:c.recnro:c.CKdo
,) .,) .,) 0
co:&coca;~
,)
1~
l':.1C"' ue2ccnoohl
,) .,) ::J
jc)xcc~~efba!m ~cc~l sorec.~~ ~ccbl~ ~P:sb
.)xooOOll; .,) r...:J-"' o
~:cbco .,)::>&>~~ ,,) ()r.Jc.cco&nc.oc:oW
.,::~ ,) .) o .,~~ fu:c.rft
:O~~hl ,:J :c.ec::)b ~
co:d~:cbc.oeroec
--o-
c./,core~XV.....
., ~
l~tc.CX>~re~
.:~ .,) .Jo
~b ).,,..B.,.():)'........
ooo'cL ~!) OO.,.:a::c.rft;~ .,) ,J
~b:o~ 0wtc.r~.u:J .3:.:.1 @cce:cbc.o
,)
, ,. . . . o nt~ll; L~tr
:c.~owec ccc~cc::>c.
ecna:: cccoccGoG '']~cncca; no~o~ree , c.occcc~
0 ' \ ,J 0 \ .,) 0 .,) .,) .)00 ,) 0
1,M:c.PI'Koreeehl 10
rrl ~co c~2ruec
..> .,) .,)
: .,)::>~crcow
:::Jo .,) o o :.J L s- de@~ .) o .>l2cceO::::J \o ::.1
coa.x:x:>ec
.>
:ttroc.cc~!;
.;, .J o <:boo~re .>oo .>~ ~Gi:c.ecrcdccn~ tc>@ccbe .> . ~~c=Joc.~~
.,::::1.>
olre :ce:ecc
,J 0 .,)
c.cc:,~ccecorgoc.ooo:ob
.,)..... \.) .,) .,)
i:coccc.oo
~.) .)
~~&.o:oo.u::J
.,) 0 .3::.1 c.~:cbco
e~ec r:c.cobGQJy. u@ccGhl--cc:..J;I~:d,co co:c.r~b :f::lCe@cc&
..,):::!~" .,) .>~"' :>:::J,o, 0 \ o'lo .,) 0
:croa;coc.ro~ec ,) :oc.j:';"J~:c.rorob
.>:::::3 fuolto
().>
ooo'o0 0~ hco~ec .)
o~cc:oo
,)
1 II 1~ S2 .1. 11 9 ~- 1 ~ r q _ TI 9
cc:c.e:o~s- J cce:ccc.oec.nec ~C.OCD:~C!IC!II'lC'.a:> O<:occmo::>~ea.Jcccccx:
0 .,) ,) ,) oo .) ,) S . : l O.) \
:ne~hl ,):J w:crfl!;cbecb 0 \ t.
ec.cc.cc~crucoc.o .)
b:~ 0
:h1o1Pe~
o:::J,) .) 0 lcotoAxh'J~ ,) .,) ~
core:~CO::>to &::~:c.rel:o:<hc.oe'l.lnec t:C2rodle2ccbe ;..J:Iee~:cbc.o :te:ftCC II MIJo1!.,2
..> ..> .>O :::> o .:> .> ~o ' e ..> :;"':.:JJWe,
e:cbc.oe&ec

~~CD urecco~:c.&ooo
,) .,) ,)
C.ft:::>C.J:;;l~~~::>fuoro
,) ~ .)0 .)
corocore
,)" .,)
~ec
.)
:,b
,)
c.Ml,:occoo ororo:c.r~:d:;codhw '-eiiO:~' ~~cob 0 robrod_, r 1,0 ZLCI"' ...
,) .J .,) o t.. e.J .:>
:$
r ,Jo et.. (e) we&C.Cie~
IG~e tiC~ ~ccbe:ce:ACC:ob hbcob
.,) ,) 0 .,) ,) ,)
rr (I)COA f()~ ~Ctlc 1;lccc.rococ.l:.l~ .) .)
,) .) :l" ,J :..:1 . - -
we:cbc.ce&ec Qgic
0 ;};J
..,~ &beoo:ao~hl
' .;>:..3 :hl:o~cb~:ctt
eJ ~ wo~ 0&:c.re:o~~hl
.,:,j
b.C3
~~~~~so~le~~goo~ oo~ftbc~:o~ ~
~:~&>es &~:cbc.o g+~orc.o~es ~~ ..19~:gb Kt:Cfp
:~ Gg 1oo oo(;cf & g&Aes~co ~'*:dx.o ~&,w &g::cbco -
g&g.>le~~~coi ~=~soc.es~ g<~:&,:gcJ~ ~ P
a!J:~cl~gccb ~<;o:&,~:c.bco ~&>es:gb~:c
-$2ccoo:cgco Gg cjco
ooc 8~ccgccb gcc~~es g{p~~ ~cc:~:gnso&es~;.,
r~<!>~ llGllc r:gb&ogrco oo6r s~ so&esoo c ~c.oco ~Jes ..
~f&>:~ :)ooi>~cl- gccso~soosob:>:c.bcot'l ~gb:>es sacc~:c.bc.oc;&>es oestl,~
~ ~~ ~~<FCO~~sooa
(;x!=u:, a!J:s~so:~ce&> 0saccgccb :gb~grco oobc s~~ccb:oooes
- ~~ccb:gb:t,b bsro~?osoo so&es~es :gb&ogrco oofll 8~c.oco
~~ ~gcdco cp&esSCJb oc g+oo cc ~ccb~gfees:gb ~~=*~:c.bco
~9
~ ..... en
~

aa u
I
~
en
1... . ell')

J ,..-....
tJ .c c!!
~ s
I , a.:.s v.~~~ ca ..2 ]. a ..._
- ~ ~So ,.8c, 6... Sl ~... ..., ..D ~
a ..8. s
.t <2 dl ,jo t._~ ,
..., c:n rB.. t a ..: ~ . . ~ .. ::.,)
= ru f) I]J c!! a.
rn... t: ~ ~
8'.t I ~ ..s-, e 1- .ll ~ a~ = 1a..
....
,. ..4) ....... -0>1) - ... .. -
c:n v ~.. a"' = . . c.en >ttl C1
a.. - Cl:l.. c ~ an 6) c c o-. uc
6)
..a
rt.v ,. = rS. o., ~ f.
""'""2" ~ ~ "~ =~ ; ,
rB0 ,
., -e ..2o ~ _ ~ "' ~"' ~ -= 8 S
B ... " s " oo ..a
C)
-.~1. -:rt
~ ~.f.. - 2~~ a.J
(]1 r"'o f) v ;; ~
rn1 ) 3o ...0 ()I') ...lllo
o., c: ~~
!t "c: .tBo ....
.. - ,.e 0v
0 n.,
~ ,.~ ~ ..i+o a ~... an~ e <:;> ~ "' j, B B -! C1 8 n.
~... .. ~ s ~ ~ rn, -fA... ~ &J . ,., G)
r.B,. a . 0 l1
8,., '"!!
" 9 ,. ; v.,
tB .. o ~Bo- ...So. . a n " S ~ e" ~ "t ~ ~~
.,c; " I') G)
e " S ~ ~
"'"
~ 8 ~ lo II ..J/1
8\J.,
.../) 6
g" <-,. .-a9 eo a cD , ~c0 ._., ... 2 ~
~oa~ste J .o,.,

~- . . ...llltoJ f -Olt
~ ..~0 roo
8 c:n t> ci), o, .. ... g <= o, .. ... - -D ~
g ..:? .. s
(i;1 f) ..D "......
_ ,.IC " "
8, a .2e.,
Co 9
....... ~ c~ .., ~ o, ..... .,
ou w .. 2" c; e o
[, o, ~
5 '"
\"c;' ...,.
g> ..S, 0" S .,8 5
c!! ..c: (';:) f)

~
. i ~ u
~l:lo ~" .,g
4:
J ~- .-e8 se oil~ "W ~ ~
- f)"' ,
i :r". ....
i Ji ~
v ~.. r:6 ~c:.,
c, " .. ; j ~. . a ~f ~ j ~ ~ ~ &, g.., f .. ..~v. >
::c:
s- " -" 0 .. i c ..,
-to, - (];!"!:'> s ..... f)
c ,i; ......
CEl. ~
:t.. ~... i 1' . ~~ l y 1; ~rn... . ~ , ~~ .. &..
~, c:
.. ~... sc... ~... cu., an
~ rn, l:i.n , o, "' ru.,
a ~ "J . . 8o
..._.,
J Ra . ~o ,.6 "c: l:l ..c; S e., ~ =.S ..I o
~- ~ 3-8,:ijfl:l.,u 0
., Cl~ =
P,...
...... - c:o ..~oc;
~ .. -~~--&,. -, .. o ~~ ~II 111
e ' " o - Co
~~ loC" 1" ..~ 2 9., 8
0 ,t ..&l o
;o
t"I. rs
S c cs -D
~"> ~., 1]1 c; B '"f!
~.., "~
~ .. ., f
..c: ..D.. e ,.a .. .;
_, 8
.. ; .o..
e""' ~.. s... .... "' a ,g., ua ~ a, g; =c e "~

.,. .
ut:~oc1co :~~~~~b:gron 11 wloc.ce:cbcoellncc
.) . .
lllftO 10 ICO c.c.o&~u nwloc.c~:cbc.odocc
.) 0
.> e e
.~ lc:z;J n c:n
0
~- :1),~ -~ -' ~.. !I ..$1
, g.,
-o :;., G'1

s s o -eo~ e G) oe -: s s s ~~~f s~e 8 ~ sJ 8 J


~ji
~~
tr!ttl
en e ~ -S ::!)0 ~ [BJ
~~r
c 8 .:
r~; t~f~~rt~~
! ~s ~ [il ib G)

~~ ,.8
~ ~~~a 8 e..s
~ - S (B., ~ G> 0
P.3n ~ ~~~i++t~
C(B., ~ -S ~ ~ V ~L~
~ 6').
II P.lli,. ~eo-9 " ..aoCS"Jg,11--oo .. oii a.,~ o o -~
a .o-, e-> g.., oe " ::C ~ " 0"1 en ~
:li"
~ ~ e .a l!l. 1.g .a, "{lo-a
'*' tt t~L.ll s i! ~- ,~fiiJ 'i!
~~~J~~c&~~~ ~~ lf~~+ 9 1i~~8.: ..
-&cl~~~ ~:=f~ &., ~ ~- ~ l ~ S,Cf t~ ~ct:$t~
~~g~Jfi~~;~~ ?if& ~~tlli'*'gt
en ~ ~ a ~c s -9 -9 s ~ l' ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ .,?.1-8 1r i 0
~ ~ ~ rt ~ ~ i ~ ,.B i. ffiJ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ l ..g._ l~ ~. ~ -
en _~ V " 1}3;] " .. ov .. -8o ~ ~ ~
$ %ll.irrl = -Sc g'
o
8o ~
ru 00 ~ ~ 8
~
0"1 len S.., e->
~
8 CC1
!*
8fYl

-8o ~- ~g.,-t"

c ..
.. "P. ro_
"
~ \:5 G>
c ~
.. '-bJ-S
..&, g..,
-
ic 0\)')~ 4) 5 ::P. .t
~s 1Jl
O'l l 1U, ~ "
. 8 " V') -8o ~
e
1~/. -8o en
~~;t~ ~~ io B ~8 cih R8 B, 8 t"
c ~:
W e ~ ... H s ~ -9 d " -t"
4l
~' . ~ -~~~J
-eo% .. -t"-t"
~f~~c~oii&~~~S~~
~ ~ ~ e ~ 1r I:IDl~j~ s
G> v . P. _So c -8o ~ ~ ~ ..S ... ~ ~ ~ .en
O:rJ -:!>0 .m (;") e CEJ '>!> .. ~ . ~ W> oS m 1l?
..e ..SO
fb$ ~8 c ~ " -8 G) B ~ - ., en~ c &, 1}3;]
G)Q G>en~ 0'>~8 . ..
~ " ~ . ~G)@
.. o v s s il
ctn en e nn c., \:5 en
~ S.., ~~ \:5 $.<>-c .en-S
l -.s~ ~ ~ ~~~ 8
- e I~
~~f sr-t ..a .., '1 -8o(B.,~ '"5
r
:::>~
.:>
-.:1
9L
~""~
~~
rM>lf~r"a
!!k
C~9
..
111'1
o~o
e~Co~I"'C.C I:>II=:J&acbc.occo.:>cb (:l~wococccb) :keened; ,!.eCOO(.coC.cc noM$
~- ~ .J ss--~ o- 01o ~'
., --~- .J ;J;J ., ~b
c.ub OC romA 10~~ ~~!Jc c.ccocoiolrc :>to be .>co&:c1,:h.'lc.oo,;xb
.>
IO~e
~
c~tJc
;.J TI
uo~~Mc~k.cs=~ ~~~e ~ 3 tlc
11 (}~.2 :h':l~e~Se~b:Gccu
.) 0 0
e:!
u.)co&we:cJ,coe~

r
~II:
(~:cbc.o~&->e.G) ~l~p~c~~
1r 11 1
C'lecnecco O.o>CJ.)
. ;,
n(s>lre~>~ld,w) fbc c.o:!x>ffl~c.~f9 1c~c (f)
IIC~ GO a~_rbgfwfb I~C (C)
-,..
:Q ~ . s ..s. e -So --g., o8. ~ q,_ e~ O)s ~
J 0) 0) Q .,8 - 8 v .en
'-' ur -Bo s 8-, -8
-a -88 s ~ ...!ls ~
-B ...c 8-, .~ ~ + c
8 80) 8a-, ~
.-Q 0)
.. 0) en ~ 8o c v
~ ~d-, ~
f s . . ..2 o8
3 X~., ca11.,~ e & es, ..8o ~~ a. -vv o-; ~ ~ a, !a
~ v: ~ .~
1 l a, i
!?" o8 ,~ j ~ ~il~ il J -g.,%;. ~. 1 ! i ~~'":'P J -~ ~- ; t
4).
l 8-, 0. J ~ . 8 ~ ~ tJ ., ~ S., .Z, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .en rt S., Cl { 0) t e>o

~ j%::&, ~~~~~ ~1~1 ~.tj~-a. 0)-s G"l- ~Jio~~


e 0)
~~
*S.~-a =a a CU"l~% -m ..S ~ s . n V -S' a, :8 ..D --rr ~.:
oS s J g-, g o-; n-> ~
en v ~ u
a s, ~ ..D
"a5 LBJ-+ ~
8 . . &:: a -. JJ ~ 2 ~
'*'
-8 -c en-s e-, o-, 1.-CI">
~ tih1 j a --a 11" 1
cl!lj. a.,~- s '".Bo..!i '4->
~.& ~k.&~ .. 1~ rn;~.:
b8 ... ::n 0') .. ...!)
CC1 P. a.. ::!>o ~r a-, ~ ;j.., a V ~ ..a. a ..6 ~ e., o P. ] -a ~ 0)
s..
lf ~
s --g., OS ~ 8 as .1) 8 0. ~ .& & ~, ~ 8 .. _, V X-, CC1 ::&, s iL ~ [B., :f).,
~ :: .. ~~--6-?-fl")-t.> \:n 3-,~~ ..g. -g.,0)~8fuen- ~~~"~$
.. 0) -+? ~ ~ 8 =if ~~~-Bot c { ~ ~J>.o~ s .e. ~ * f)

~l ~i S e u -s--6-? 8 o en.: -a 95
i f~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~1
~ en . ~ ~J (I
e '8 -8 (')., i) -oo 8 ..8o ~ u -a o8 .. ~ v -8 ~ ~-
-3 ~ ~% e enrn.,..c> o 8 rn.,~ .:3 ' o ~ 2 '0 8" s en e ~ OS
~.... 0) 0)
...so ~ = n-> e-a .. - -g R e., s t: J e., ~ ~ ee ~ s ~ .. 0)

;j ~ en _, ~ ..8o ~ ~ t;. , ' S ~ -?. ~ . . ~ ~ S.[B ~ ~ .~ g i. -t


~ &, -&,J. 8 ~o8:1-S J ~~ ~-So 1 .. ~~ ~ 0) :r o,l 0)

s. en :: ~ g: as ~ -8 ~ ~.,}
-i e
~ 0) 9n 0)
_g rn., a, -+ co (:B., ..3o 0) ..!)0
e -ft<l ~ -+? -a o8tf ' s, e i, s~~- -s ~oa-,8 ~~
..a. [B.,~ w 8-, ~ ~ -&i,-& '8 '..&_:_rn3 ~i!-&~ -s
..& o .. ~ f' CiD , 0') a., -{3 .en ~ Q:>

ll ~J:l;.~ ~ f-t:s
~1 -f h. elL~ g,cl~t.l L; a ~

~~ ....0 G"l
M ~
J.. too
n.
... le. lct ~
no
- -o
.:
. y.:
~ o.:xl5GX> rnG~ SXOO: ~:4>~:~ +~ G~: ~~~
~~ ~:0-)~ ~ *"# OO~VOOY aj> oo&:~
'l~c:S'P' coSG.y.>oSG:n:~~~c:S<p:c GOOCcoSoo~ 'c9(,)~
~:c;;UfagcGtGooX>~ ~c S'iltl(~oo'P:~oo c;;ooecoSd?oroS
fpS~~ c;;oo8co5c:'i ~c;;~<#~ sc&pcp ~:
9 oooSc.liS'il+ ? ooo5CJ~:x>f99 oroSf.WSc: CJc:f?oSd> ~~t9
CX?:A>~~G~ GOOC~CGOOC~:~ 06oS~~JoS~ c;;a:noS~Gt~=
S'iltl{OO:>'P: CX?G~~d? ot>~mc:~~ ~&r c;;ooecoSoo 'lt~
~ ~:~fpS?:x>~ ~~ ~
~:~~ ~~~G~~~~ <t+m~~l
dS'il'lf<>2c c;;ooccoS 97.>::x>oS~'f' oooii~oo'P=~Sc;;.>c: .
ffi.~~~Goo8~~~
~G~OO~:I s;)O?~OOGp:~c GpOOoSmJ9cx?:Cf&c.l ?9 j (0 )~r ~:G~.
~06oS~~t9 G~:cb~~cr o5:x>U:>f9S4>'P rn<o~C:CJ~~CGur
qc:sx.&'~:Go.n ooSsaby.>oo~ ~"6t?:x>~ ;c:ma#
~:c;;oo::x>~CJ~~cr qc:~S'ii<X(~d?uro~:x>~"
u.>~co:~cc:2 :E.U:~~l5~b:~u
.)0 e e...J o
u:.colocce:<:bc.oe:!ow

11 ~e:x.fl~::X.fl~:2n uco~wb>:chcoe:!ow
,) ,) .) & ,) 0
~~:cbc.o ~:J:c.co~es c.cc1bso:~ :re~!lw ~cb:~ ~es
~~w~w~&w
n$2ccro~) :s~:o~es :s?f>es~~
.1,6'l~~fusoooes ~~e~soro&o sorere~oo~ $Ccc:~&;:cbc.O:~g.>~~
~o :$Coo~~~oo :sc.J~g c.cc:s:c&:!t>!bSo~=& 3c~
~cbss~ co:&~ye~ ~ sce~:c.o:& {o:&:se:l'&l ~~s&sooo
~~~es ~~~ ~gfwco:sb ~:cbcosco~ ~
.19~~:cbco~b-les bes:cfe~:c.coessoc-ro~es cc~socet..osoroes
n$dccoo~:c&~so& :scJ~s
~oo~~ll!:A J,~c ~ ~:~Jrecc~3ccso:&:&~ ~~o6:i
~v=~soo6~~ ~~e.o:\\~str~:i 3~~s~ ~:scJ~Il!:~
cbgos ~~ck~ :3\7~:, '~#o w(cc-~) ~oh~_w~
!~ ~cc~~~ ~:re~ .cb~ ~~~
~l$Cco:s~ 3cclm:<')~IC.C.00 soob:~~so~es c),~siW
~~..>~=>~ :~:c& ~& :~:cb~b->es
~#JJ ~ ~e{o (G~) e@ ~~) ~
sock~ ~ccoo~bso~s!3 ?fsacc:c&:!?J~ ~:cbco~~ cb~~
~cb:ckcsw~ :saro(c-~) sco:~e~ seg ~~siW 3Jccgc.oscs~
:sc.J~=~so*~:cbc.o~&1es ~ &~:c.es~srw sacc~b:>~
IO~ijfu~~~sc<'):cJes
~:cA-es:tes ~~ ~~&e.s ~
~e ~ sc-coe>c.S ~~ ~ :$CoocA:is~ ~CCGOO:goo=sb
-i:~sob~ GCJ.>Swlogreb sacc~siW \res~so~~b:>
~ 3cc:cls'ce.s tw:~8 .cbc.oos0~ wsocA-~sdoo:goo:~~
$(!cc~~rwb:cc~ \':c.&c.O~ sacc (r -So) ~b:>e~ 4-~:~:~es
W.S:!e~"!w:~ 'S~saJ s&ltes!e~ 6 ~el@ ~~sob l:J
~ .g+~ (;9tlc' ~!& ~~grwu.~ Q:~
~~fues 3~~ ~~
~~cbc.o (s~o):&>a: ~ ~so&~ges. ~:c.co:~g;:>
~~ ~ ~~~ ~r l,es(c'JI socces
c6s
cb~l~ ~~~cc~l~(')b~ ~:!ccrc.ooc.cccc ~ cA sule{esu& <.Cc$~
~(')go~ ~)cc:cc~cn&t'l go~asoro g&~es{x:> cb~~sob (')~ or
~+~ G~dc cAhc.cc~:c8~gees n~c!>~~sJ'e~so& :gcl~~t'l:c~:ge:Jbo
w~es9a:~~l :gees ~cb:~~:gees w(a-~)lf~cp:~:U~:1eG
~succposJ'ere~ c.cc*~cc:c&:~ b~:~ 3~:cb~fues
-~s-es~:cl't'ls>~= ge:~o w:cl't'lcc~succ~: s>b ~~ &x>:c.bco~~es
ao~:?t~lt'J o:~ cA:~~~bcbgos c.w~c.ccc.ccw ~cc~~
~Jcc=~su& =:?clegtbt'l ~~.v~~ cAcbgosc.cc~~ g~giW
woc.bre & ~~~~ cA:~3cc ~bcbgos g&@e~soc:A>~ c:.cqo
sucJOO~es~es ~eel;&~ ~~ccc!>~~ so!OO:s{x:>soto ~~ :!cc~ifw
~esc.cc~su~~lsc~ ~:cc;c~ w~~(') !'succsoo~+cbgos
:s~(')so~=cA~ =gc~g
go~:cbco~&,es <:A&c.cc~su~:c.es&cc~ sudto~es~ccgtsot<?~~(')
::?<J~es ~g8 :R}:cA2o ~cc:cc~ c.cc~e~c:A> 6 <!>~@ cA ~es
c.cc~:cBgJ:gees 3es~cc:c&~so& ~(') cg~ r~&3('):ces
oes~So:cbco ~t'oes ~:c.4-es:ies gjes~ccb:?j~:!cc:c&:~so&
So;cbco~t'oes cbsv~~JSC&> ~:cl c:csu~ :~ooscc~~t'lcc~succ
~ccbs>Bgesgco &o~ccs-o~ :c.wl!ccc~ w&x>:c.bco~~es
8f
?~~!til -$2cc~groo~c&~2oes~ ~~~ gJft:gcl8eel~)O">
c\~~sc!3 so8socb~so ~!ge:s!F=~socw~ ~~=J~g ~=sd'c.o~:b~sOOE:8\?c.o
~ ~rc.oes1:~:c.o:~ () c.8~$UCC~: ~ soc.es ~.10~es ~:cbco ~ 2nes
s~~w~~
~cc1c.o!~ c.Asofe'!:oSOWJ~
!F~ ~ hes(r'f~ocb Sd~~'!:oes
u~&cc ~J~ ~~(ctchco (~) tkD a~?>~co:t a~l~b
~r roil?l~~ ~y~ ~3tlc IGa:~rei-c bf ~/;:~~ !-~ C~tlc !
11 !,~ ~~~~ # ~~tlc
n::>c.~~:lo:2
.) o e
(:h"J~~~b:1K.c)n
e'.:3 o
w~we:Cbcoe&u:
.;,
II C.~~CC CCDCOIC~II H c.u&,(d:\):cbcoe&,u;
:J .) l, ..) 0
~~ l r8. ~
f.J~~ ~ ~

!f.f~fJff!l}tt~~Lfftfl~
~~ttlt~f&t~t~~-~~~1!
ttflil''
~~ill~~'
-= v og -~ s a 2 ~J c . 8 0') ..a 8 oS . SP

G: V "
~i~:~~~ti
(],
Jt!l1~ ~1t~~~~..S~.lJS' " " ~~n~t tit
v ~ C s V \1 ~ ~ ()") O'l ~ ..
rn, 8 -8o ~ ~ ~ ~ -~
t e. ~& e _:3 ~ B ~ ~ .= lCI'l
"' .. e o 8 - ~. - -3o O'l
t. i %
~ en..!> (B., 8 0 liE=> a., fS ..
~ ~o
s, ~ ~1 ~ cv.o~ -?.> 8 CSJ - cg 0') ~ "' 0') ..vo ;:s.,~ ~ . a oS
~~~~~f4l~f~~~~l;t~~~tit. t~t~ ~~i
~
..!)
8
..
8~ ~~ ffi, ~ -o
~ -oo cffi a8 s.. o
..00
~ c
0')
~ ~ s,
a., -oo

0')
s ~.
~ 8a., 1)., .
j :&,
~ ~. -+'>
~ . l~l!~~~t~..s
s, "1:" .. f
. s . ~1~L~~~~f """W' a.,
~~~ ll., a; a., Y. ~ e B., ~ ~ -& 8 ~ -So :! -Qo
~ -8 -- ~~::!)0~ 8-.~~ . ~ 8., ~[B., - ~ .. -0 ~ S.,..&, ~--5-, s .
~
+> o-, Ci')~
.s s ~ ~-+'>""12 "'-So= .a m -- _e s a.,
liD (;., \:S
a ~ eM ~ r8-, .~ g l-32&J
o8 ~
{.t-i, ~o8~ ~ -3l$ltt
e ~c :t m O'l
iS
!!~ ~lt-
(B.,
'os -+ O'l -+'> o ::S ..-Q ::> ..P. }
en
a., o8 - F62 ,~ ~ "' c:w ~ a., e '-' ~ -a .a ~ e . I ()") -- V' \j

-& &, ~ ~ ~ ! - ~ =2 . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -8o ~ t ~ ~ ~


t (B.,

!J!!!!tilll!ilfll&i tf,titJlfl
11
. .b..
s9'2

O'".JU>.~"'nm:CO
0
roc
(" (' ~GCI J.lY~:O':>?jl
0 (' 0
).):"1)
~ 0 0 (' ~c: 0 ('
e:~:O.seJ 8'J~:OCOOCOC. ~t\t\
tl _. .. T " C AI ~.. t IT l e> 6
(" (" (' (' (' 9<" 0 (" (' ~ (" (' .,. ('
<):T.>CI;>~Q:~ro~e 3d~df3d00 G:;()?~~O)(;t,>:GfG~~c: ~~~C GUI ~C
c c o c- r.: c-r.o c-~ 9 o c- o c r.: c- <" 9 c ~(,)?fox:~
~~II 9c:cq 3dQlJC:tjt>~: 0 'J<'l?t~::e~ 2::J.{;.'Jf.<""q -~~ljS ~y::;o:~~
c c [1 G'l \ ("~
~
~eo
0 9 0 0 (" 0 (" 0
m;)~~=" sm
cc:m o:>Y:oo: :Y Y
l l J .ll. l, 11T l
~ro?) u0=n:Yt?: ro<.DG=:o?rooo:Y?
f.)~ IJ l tl tl l J
J::f.. O C' o \
c~r.c c c -r ~ o c OT"'" t CCII
())Coj9()~2?tJ{ <"l2())G~I Gtp;q=n~ II
0 .C::. 0 ~- '1 (" (" ~ (" 0
mor,OOJ'P:ro,CJ 0~?11 G~Gf~: GGI(J)())? ~GY?O:.I Y~Gj)::O~ '\(:;q:
(" ("
Y~=?t Ye?Oitj4>o~?C:l'1lY:OUIII GY?C<"11::0?:.
'"~r.: (' ~ (" 0 0 'l (" ( 0~
~tfr
)
~21
("
3d~JC:
('

r.: c c , o c:- o A\ ocrR ~ c- c o c c t ,


lj~()e~~lm 3dUU)?"J ~:9J. CO~ct:l:DeGt4)21 C\~:;q:~~ Y~O?. Y201
r,:c ~ c o o 'l o c o.!: . "<"~~c::. r,:c:-"1 c-
ljt>~~?C:9 Q~lll ~L'P~C Ojl_:;q:eJm~"f? ())Co~ 3d::Ol'3001~~ut
~ 0 ~(" 0 (' (" (" (" 'l (" ~(" ("
G[jY.q~.,?:~C:"J? romJG:ll? :::O:T.>G:::O~:T.>~JffiYU{OOUIII 9c:[jc 3d~JC:
r.:c-9 c- c-~ c 9 o c ~ o c- c '1 r,:c co<"
Y(9G:>Ym GY?CroCo::021 2 : :J.t:'Jf YoG_iFJ?,.OO~C 0?.'Jc:91:3dtl4) ~~
CJ:l;)
c (" ("
rorouroucoroc YYJX\)()(X)ffi <XDUG
(' 00 (" C' 0 (" -:>C:I
(" . Y GOm 0 0 0 (" ("
e:~:os~C
T Cl l L L .a t l l iil L l IT J
(" oc
q?~::; :;;>,c:GD?C:I
~ c:-
roc 0 m
("~
Y~Gj)OO
~
G~
0
jO G~J;'P cn,_c
(" r.:c-
Y'J:::OtlSI
oc <" ~ c- c o c- ~ ~ ~ r,:c r,:c c-
~Y:GY?C:G~?C: o;?ro:;q~Jffil:f?l YoG~C1"3dGtj?:::O?tl():::Otj<:;1 GOO?m~
c o ~ c c c 'l c c~ c ~ 0 c c~ c
QlJffiY~G:ll?G~?q (\)ffiYQl:::O<:;OIII GY?CroCo:::02 Y~Gj)9 3d"Jf~J()c.'l.(J)
.,
Gtml
c c c 'l c- r o c c- c c
!DQJC:tl4>4>2!JJQI~C
r.: c- <" '1 c
~Gjlrr.t qm'1mcm4>m <.9Gpq~qGUiml
'l ~ (' 0 (" c (" '1 (" (" 0 (" (' ("~
Gl_:[j?:~q 'JffiY2YUf())()111 Oi'Jffi~.p:G=:o? U~e?:Yp:rr~ro~:t GY?CQ)CO
. r:tr<X:JUIII
OO"J
, C?t~::::o2
o c-
~s c:- r.: c- c:- " c c
3d:;lJC:tJIDG>2!D~Imt !D~f8':>'J~:Gf:::O~
c

Y GQO) comoooo?: G:::o?ro;D:t


~C' 'l
C (' (" c
0 ("
GY?CQ)C :x>;:l)l GY?CGC\:l:
C C" 0
OO!J.l~l<l)~Qiffi
L
.61 0. L \........o I. "' I '---"

o~ c) orc- oc- r,:c r,;: c <" c ~ c C' o "l


( C\:{tjIS 3dY~3dUG.p?,tjo:l:::Otj<:; I 3d~mG:::O?mG!!_~;j?C: :::OmG:::OOO~Ut II

ro:;o : m
0 "
cro: cro: G:::O())GU:
(" ,, r.: 0
(J)GlU?OOCO:l CC\..1:!3dY:Dc::!:l)Y?I
c (" 0 0 ('
mQ?~C
tL l l l T l lJ l-L4:1 l C:. :J"I 1l J l~ J

3d
T 0 9
?~.S:()UCI?YI?:roc
a u 6 c::!G:::O?:ll(J)
11 fl. ..
(" '
3dY())())C
JL 6 o
C' '1' '"" '
YGUI 0
OOCUIII Cl3dCOQ
o
(' '1
Yt?:root
-, T J 1 u
c:- " C' r,;:c:-r.~ c f,~ ~c ~ ~c ~
rooc:::oroG=n~p:m m:;,Jc:tl()tl:ro~c tl :~c:1 <.~oGlJ3d?: GY:0 ;;: DG=:o?

!DQlll y
'l GCI()) 0 ("
ro:;o: :::o:::O Y::O:::OY:UOI o:>G m?c:m
c (" "C' (" 0 0 '1
YXOIII !D:::OO">C\:l:r>:
0 ("
.AI ILl L... C1~C L L C
(' 0 ~ C' c 0 '1 C' 9 (" (" ( ~ )
Y~OOYGD?c: ~~~?:01:::0211 m~::::OtJS' 2:~f:GY?C :;JtlJ
r.: (' eu
c
(" (' c 0 (" ~ 0 (" 'l C' C' (' 0 oc C'
=nmG:::ooom~'mm' ~:Gro?m 3dGro: oomur=n:nu cc::::o:n n:G>~C~?roc
c. lJ 1. t! L l C.:. I C.::. l bl o
r~
C\:(1:11. G~:~q Gt:JU)?Gm?Y())
c ~ c:- o o r.: c " c
emg tl()()l:l)~ II
c _c
~C:c:t ~:;lJffi3d'):;qroJC
c:- c o c
'1~~:Q?OO())
Y Gc::!GI:')<J??
,.01
OOCC
!J:IDY~C
l J
001:
\
6J
C'"!
C\)YtJ)())Uit 3J::Omro:::o:Y:).)Uill
tl l
O
L
C'
C.:.
0'1

'1 ~ (" (" (' (" (" ~ ~ c (" 0 co ("


G t:tl:x>~ 3dCY(J)f 3d'Jffi~:G~::O~U'f G[j?G~?C: Cllm:;qoo?:QJffi~:::0211
~ (" ('~ 0 (' . r;:;;: (' r.: (" (' ("~ (" 0 C' ("
Y~Gjlffi GQ?C())Ct:Jt'Xl !D~~Gt_j?m:::Otj<:; l GY?C())CO"ff::::OroJm:::O?:~q
C' 'T' oc
OO())G~I YG ')CI(J) :;o c:Y?
,
o -o '1 c c o o c
(.l)())YQ()Ill GY?COOC :::O:D ro:;o: (\)Q(J)
"
.. -I L l J tooJJ C.:. i\.l d.l
lb:xd:.u:JOO:X..ft~ ICC:~ft w:c.rft I()~C!;fle.G ,~lee bl~co~ce,~ c.cc~~~()(G
'S'.) 0 l. .)0 " 0 0 .I, ,) 0 .) :,j., ,) ,) 0
" r o o c:J ~':"":!" 11 r
coe.c_r'!l':ro~3'-f'l~ ~w~g;o,?C.ft~ ' Leecc.cce:c.:::~~e.c ;c;c~ce e>rpcc
fte.c~~Qft
.)0 0,),)
:,j w@l:o l~tocoPeco~
,)
~:>:Q&:d,co
:>e.:J &c.C2o:e,coce.c~~hl:~b
0 ., ):,j.)
II @cc~&toMw
,)
,(o@cc
.)
~w~~c
.) 0
,)
~wPehl~co
,)
,) 0
:,j, 'ro II cccc:c.tt Q ::)(OCIJ1 r.:lck~~~
,) :_j_, ;;':j
@ccwrec.h1~1:o ~O:X..ft~
0
~c@o .)o.f::)ch1~~~
,) ~ 0 0 ,) .) 0.)
:,j 0 II .)@cclbFrocccc.hl~cc
:,j :> ,)
'bwcccon M:~I:IC:e@ccchl~ ro~c.ec~brocc
'S' .> " .> .> :::lo .> :..J
o ., .> o'w~b:'cow .,
.> o o t:>Cocb:rwe
:~f'ICX) ~ le~bl~<o:X..ft~ w( b-hlro) O:JC.ft~ IW~~Mhlft::>Peec
" 'S'.I, :J., " o ::Jo .J e "::J "
u@f'I:>~Cllhl
., .>o.>:J .,:J
.,~(b,Cllh!C.CliCCC~:n~ ec@h1:>eft
o ., ~.>
ckClloo
o u@cc~eeec
.> oo
l ':"") , r J,O 11 L hJ 11
CO~CCrp?,O:CCli!O~ J~;c~:.)CX)SC.M C.O~:;;:> IJC~~C.CC~C.OfiC.CC~CC
w::>b
.) ,:,hlcc~~w"Jt;JCliPe
.)::J .) ~,) .)M@Gl:)ee~
,) ~.) fl~~::>b
y.)
C2cc.bl~co~c.ft~
.) :,j., .) tbccwre
.)
WOOcc~WCC ~ (f.hle) ~C.ft~:~b.:>:2 IIIO:>~chl~ft reoCOC.O m@ccaJ~l(.(]l
" " ':> :,j. .> " e L. .) o :..J .) .> ., ::J
~cc:o~l:Crot;"~Qf'IW~-:>c.Q~C.ft~ tuc.Clll:o t:hlCllhl:lllftcCll:c.Cll:@b:f'ICC c.[.;c.Cllb::>
.) 0 :,j :..;., .) 0 0 . e'J.:. ::.:1 lb .) e 0
u@ocb~&;~:.,cob!~c.o~c.f'l~
.) 0 !..:).) .)
IWC.Cll
0
c.cc~Cllhl
.) ~
cc~ececc~wcc
.)
~hi
.)~
(ce) .)
L ':":! . 1 o ' b~ v r r ;. .,.,.. Q rJb 1 2
:;;:> ~~~cc:cco~rprom :1eeft~~ ftLeecc.cc~~cc f'I~JC"~:,jft ?l!ij :g;:e
IW~C.f'I~J~~:d u@cclkcc:dc.o58:.$2<oe>CW~C.COQ~ o~:b~~h> :>toC~bJ IC.:.,
.> .> e .) o e e e .J ~ .:> ~j. .'J o
CclXCftt:e(f.fl1e)
0.) ::J. )
~(.f1~:~~:2 II (;flwfeeCC~COCCIGw<Ccooo_h~Q:~C.f'le>:f'lr,;)
".). & 0 . ) .) S".) ,) .) .:.::::1.:. .)~
:hlteioe>cbe>h1cc :hiC:e:-c.o.:n~c.we>b:PeM~W ec uee.cc.cc~~ccQ~Jc.f'le>
e'Jo.l. ~0 e'Jo . .) 0 \,. . oo::J.>.)
w:~cQ~e.c:ob ,:,tilccw~:ree> 00 ;e> :c.w&koc.e>~:~~m2 tcc!;be>tue2cc
o .:l ~ .:. .>::.:1 .:. o o o ., ., e " o o .>
:reel oC
o
;~ cooo~~Qfl., ~b:l:c:2 WQ~(O~(.fleJ ~hloo ll &f'lcdew&xce>
o ::.1 .) o e :J, .> .,:,jo o .> "
wee :@roC"cccoo o~;~l:ll::ec.hl~(o ine>cb~Qcc~bc.am ltowtoc.W .
.) .) S"J" .) .> .:>:::Jo :..J "L ~o .> \,..) o
C.u:h.l:crwc.cne>..:;
o ~ S e
:dcK>e "\;e>corew&>cce>wcc
.) ", o .> .:. ,
t'Gwccc.on:,~:~l:lb
~.:. .> .> .:.:::1
w'Jt;JCllre
.> a':l.>
c.occaxcco
.> .>
,(o!;<'>bift
o :,j wbl:>co:>cft<?
:,j, .:l no~~~:~CJfl
.>0 .:.::::1
c.~::>I:IC:e@cc
.,:::Jo .>
C:d.uo<o
'-.JO .J
rf'IWb
.> Cc IWWCroe>ro
" . 0 C.CCe>e~ro ,_. .>
".:. eflO~fldee.c ICllhlro:t;:~b&
.,::J 1.. .>
cooo~e>Qe> ~b:l:c:2 @ccQ~co~c.f'le> u@cco:e>,J:J:Qwrewwew S.b
o :,j .> o e ., :,j, ., .:. :>J ~.:> o "
C.Cli:2Cllh.J(o(2cc(]l
.:. o o ., tc.roe>::>Qc.ohlcocc
.:.:::::1.> ~.:l ow~b:tc:2 ., .>
.:. o e t~cbcccn~ .>
ow~crft:@3o
li3cn~h.l~ ',!;1 W~b:tc:2
;,c&>i;~Qf'l
o :,j "S~ ~b:ec:2 .,:::1, ~.:.
.> o e IC.CU~:~I:lcohlcocc ~ .> ~.:> o:J o .:> o e
@ccQ~~cfte> h,:cbc.oecnm "C2cch.looCllocc:ec~",oe> coCll:cc~ec i.ut!ie.c
.> :.:!.:. .) 0 ,) ~.) 0.) .> .) 0 0
wc~e>:hld:c.Q
.) 6'1 C.uwrerowdroe~
-~ 0 ;) ' .)
~:~:dmh1b15~!;c.@o
y ;;':j 0
tC2cc
.)
'<.on~I'W
0 .) .)
u@cc:cece~o c.~:c.cc:l\, dX2ccH'>WOO:c.Clle Q:>c.o:>cfle>
..> .> o .) L .) o ~.) ~
C.uo;:c.Clle:lrwro
o .:. IS
ccncccccncro
::> oo
~a::~
,3"'..:1 o
c.cccoc.ro~:xh.l~ro
.:> , ~
d,CliCllhl
":J
:,b<h~:t'l
.> ~ e o
~c.rolt'l:~&>
.... o
CJ.Z~I:It'l ,:>to:lrt'l~oo;t:lw;
!j ..> ~ ~
&cc:~bJbwc.r.-:1:>
.> .J .> ~
~rocc ecwft~ u@cc::>e:c.coooii!.ee :,~&:!h1t'I:C2ro:c.e.c!;'"~Ct'l 1C2cc'
.> o ' ':>" .> .>o .> 'S'o .> .> ~ .> ::J .>
c.o~
.>
:@roh>~b:'cc:2
.> o .>
::,hl~,e @cd::e&
o e .>:I l.. .> o
n2cco~Mb:c<D:2o
.> O.> .>
un~~<'lffim
o o
c~wrecc&cd:e<.n@cc,ob:>Q :,c:J:>cho::xoec:t'l::>b ,:,hlcc:c.ro:oo wbl;,c.o
.) .) ' 0 .) l.. .>::1.>:::1.> .) 8.) .>:I 0 ::1.>
:>c.t'l-., w:t'lc.o,eok.wro ~b:'cc:2 r::x.Q~biXO~ axccc:c.co2re a?ret'l:~f'l
.> o e.> t- -.> o.> .> o e .> :::::.1 o .> .> .> .>o
:h'l:c.coc.oowuxce::>,e!) ,@ccbl:>c.o:JC.t'l~ beco.leweo ..:,!;'"~Q<'l uo~c.oent'l
o'J .) .) .) .) L. .) ::J.> .) .) .) :> ::1 .)
l:c~!):ftwb~ F(')":>~:2~romcc C2ccbl:>c.oxt'l~ :,t,)cciX.uPec.uCocc:>wcc
.) .) .) .) 0 .) .) ::1.> .) .) _, 0.) .)
1 """) 1J r If rex 1'1 r , ..1!!'
<nccccoecwec :>~:C\)!):X.ft~ l:>rro: cc ~ WoG~u.JQ<.O 0(\)! c:e:)
.> .>0 .> .> .> e.> .> o.> .> o .>o
~:C.~WtuOCftCC;;Xt'l~
'S' ,J 0 0 .) 0 .)
IWC.~~:hl:c.G::Jt'ICO
.) &1 .) &c.c~~Xt'le>
.) .) et'lc.cc::>b
.) .) 0 ~~ .)
@ccbl:x.oxft~ no!>!;C"JWrecdxxc~ ::>ch:l~:ccowc.cc&Vbe.c bl:>c.o
.) ::1.> ,J 0 .) .) .) .) :::::.1 .) .) ::1.>
Xt'l~ n2ccru!)re UX2cd~~~ba;~~ @cciJ:>c.o:;c.ft~ r:>~~ba:ree.c
.) .) 0 .> .> .) .> :.::1.> .) .) 0 0
..J!!)I:l(') uo!)t;t'lwrewOO<:cowcc ~cccd~'to~:~~ 1::>!:>c.cc~!,e ::>bc.cc!)
~::J 0.).) .) .) 0 .).) .>L. .).)
el:lxo:JC.(')!)
.>:.:1.>,)
l:>tocbec
.) 0
II~:J~b:Xr.J~ cbo~~!l :dt'I:Cc~ :@ro
.) .)00 .) :::::.1 .)
e:c.<KCCCOCC
.) .)
c.<e~:c.cxxood:>
.) .)
..,hl: :>b II@CCb::::c.r.J~ec <be:~@~tte>
3':.:1.> .) 0.)~ .)
e
.)
:,e ,3hlr,...nJ::Jwre S\ :C2rocft:dt'IC.tlewbe ,t,,oec.oe bbeh:>C.t'le> c.cc!)
I, .) ::.~-~~.) :; .) .) .) L. '- ' .) .) l.. .)
c.roxoo~:>w :cec~:l:c:2oo:>o~t,a;C2ccl:l:>ro:>ct'l!) u2ccwhxo&:~o~b
.> .>o .> o e.> .> .> .> ::1.> .> .> .> o .> .> .>
:>to&c.ococ;~e<D:o'!.l:l, :c.a::l:l:>ro:x.ft~::>b Heec.c.cc~c.cvw<be> :>c.t'le>:~b.J:2
.>O o .> o 01 :.:1.> .> .> l. .> .> .> e
rre2ccw~::>e ~b 1e!?:c.~ ec:>c.fte>:~~:C'-Slli.2 c.oftc.woccnl:le> ?f:be>!(lb.:>
.> .> o .> o .> .;., o .> .> e e e.> ::J .> :-j.
::c.ccbl:>ro:x.t'l!?
::1.> _,
I:JrC\)::>OC.U~(J);C ue2ccb~<e <.u<2CCC(\)rrftcdo ~elblf'l
.l .> .>o e .> oo o .> o _, o o ::J.
:h'lc.ro:>cre~d:.u
61 .) .) 0 wroro:,ec.oe::>tu
.) l, .) .) 0
bl:>c.c~c.t'le>~<t'Cc
:.::1.) .) .) "C2cc(J)Rl:b:c~
.) .) :I .)
:ee:>b~ Ccf'le.(.[;~Qt'l ,@cc (~Qtv) ~(J):C u@cc;C.~:>CO c.~@cc~c.ttWro
.> o .> o :.J .> ::Jo .> o e .> .> .> .> o
IO:>CD:kc :)(.(')!? OCftCCeot;~Q(') ,:,hlccbcc::>c.hJ~:lrwc.c f,co eoc.rCL!)
l,,) .) ,) 0.>00 ::J .>:::! 0 . ) :::::.1 l!i 0.)
r 1 - ' 1-
r-(')!? <3'~;c.row.rc.f'l~ :c.cc ~CCCC!? 'Lea ccc~ cb ~~~~ ~c.o:r-l:~C.t'l:>
1
:hlrro::JOO .>o ..,
er... .) ~...~,IO~t'ICCO:X.fte> ~:hl:c.r.J@@(k&
O'J ~. ftwCCt'l~
., .,o o(c~~Qft~
@cc
.)
Q:JCD ::X:.ft::'l
db.>:C.G:2o &!I 'md:> II C2cc
J.> .) .) .) 'S'
16~0!?!('\)~0W!c.rftWfec.uCxxce>WCC
.) .) .) ::> 0 .) .)
celn ln..::Ccc::Xn:c.~
.) .)
c.~ocwbxno
.) .>0.)
cc~"~:>c.r.J:oxc
\0 .) ~
c.cc~wc.ru~<.u:c.rft
.) 0
1
wfewOxce>WCC
..) .,) .,)
l!> m (b.Re) :><o:cx.~e> o\- (c.hle) OCUIO~ft CCCC
~0 :,:) . .) .,) .,) :J :..J. ..) \., ..)
:r.Joc:dY..o bc.2o:lkoc.re!? 11 @..,o~bce(h UX2oc:c.~\) c. ~~:>l:l:c.c.c:>relo
~ .)
0 .)
.> ' .>::1
:ll'ft~e>ec~ccrocc~
l'> .> .> .>
bAb:C.C:2
.> o e
~~~henxt'le>
.> .> L. .>
ih:;c.'Cc!xe
'S' o .>
wc.ow
,
.):>e~<'l:-::>re~
:>::~ .)
u::c:emft
, UX2cc:c.~::JOO
.) .) ~:hl<hl::>rec.c
oh ::.~ .) dw-"J:c.tt:':>Ce
.r::~ .)
" It is often and wisely, not thought safe to convict a
person upon his identification by ona individual under cir-
cumstances of strain and terror accompanying violent crime."
f
V6t
~cc~~~gw 1bo8so&~:cbc.o ~ccsoccsoo s~ks~
:as:gb ~~~~ ?f:gJ~~gos~ ~8 ~~
bes~ (0) (c) r oc s~ (e) (c) rrc <"~=~soccvcb co~cbc.o
~c@o:~soas8 .1o8es~c.o~oo8 ~:cbc.o~fues ~g'&'c
?cco~:~es bsooso8socb8so s~&8 ~cc4-8:s&:c.A
~ges ~~cbc.o 'kc@o~8 ~~bee:&,~~
~es:dbsoPerefu ~~:d'<"cb: ~Pe:~cJ8es 19~8soooes
r?c:-cre&
~~CO\{~ ~so& ~:gb ~8 ~
:f~recmg bee:~~ cb::fe:~ks ~GO<"
sooo8W~ cbskso&cc~ ~ ~) s-~ ~~~008
cr
~~esp \'l:g)~ &osoes:9eesc.cc8solo,Pe ~&~es~
"N~cc:~~ ?f 8LL '421
(96l) ~T'V a~r:nsA Ja4~oue pue eJnN =~38=~ ~=cbc.o
?f:~ ~coccsc c.q.ol} :d'~roesso!ees 1bo~8gJ coccsc s&
sure~~ ~ ~sg :as~:cbc.o ~ ?f:~cc~
:~b ~~c.ol!, SI,o8es:d'"sore~cc8socc c.cc8~so&o ~&socJ,8~8
!?SC08:~:cbc.o ~oo:g@<" :~&:!oo ?f~cc:c.A ~ccMes ~og
~~~ c.A.-s:o~9!) ~so&~~~
?~~ffi c.cc8~~~~#~
~.~~~ ~~~~
~ c.8:&:~ro ~ J98cb::fe:scJ8essoPoes~es ~~ ~c.ASdccScc~"
~~~~
l$dcc~cc$dJ~$dccsoreso&o u$dcc()8:d1goo ~~es~g C0{5'>~
~~c.o ~ 11 ~ti =<ffl~socc c.cc8:c.a:x:soCCCJ8 ?f:sb ~c.Aso~soeo
,,;ie&.c.d.u~t'ICC
o ~o
~:r::l&:cbccd)c.uowc.ccb:lxx.c
~- 8.::1 ,) .;, ~ '~fi<'CO
O'U o
hcob~
or roc.c.co\o Jo~e Ct~tJc c.cc~c.oMeooo r; c.cAc.c;i:h"lc.oo~cb IOYe C~:~ve +
I 0 ..) :J ;) .J .l ~.) .J ;)
neue ~C; ;;~;x,C; .;co~ ~Ye C~tlc
JIO:) :l;.)Q~
.> o :.J
.,):1 " .>
:b: CI;ohiCI;:c.coa:wc. oo~e.ccc !)C.UCC e2cc ewe. CO!) 'c.u:dt<~alec.uoo a::XDcc ~c.ucc :c. ::::.1
.> .> o J- .> -yo- .)
"c.;
n .)C2cco;.lQ:Cc:C;
.lO:_j
:,t:J,:!)C;
.>:_j
&!ccec.uc.oo!)
.> J
c.ccWc.urec.uoo
0 .l .>
~:n!) c.ure::x.occ 2ccc.ure
;> - ~ .) j --.- J .>
.) ~\ .) .J J :;,-.) .)
: ococct<~5o u ~ecem C.Occcc.:~ec.uc.oo~ 'wc.urec.uto ~ Jc.t'l~:>e.o: 2 c. r.wre:.):x.occ
0.) 0 .)
f'l5n ,:,hlcceaec.hl!) : oc.h"l~GQ ooro:cbc.oe'Cnec c.~ecc.cc!)(.Ceobc 'wc.rco!)c.c:C
.>:J \ 0 :J .) ~ .>~ ,) 0 . ..) ,) \,. 0 .)
o
@cc:CI;!)OC.O:let'l:)
.> .l .J
:c.CI;::>S
~
c.u (l,.hl'ru)
::Jo
Xl'\~:>c.c:
.J .,)
c 2cc:r::l~:cbc.o:&wc.C;!)
o .> Oj .J
ue2ccn:!>:>~re:tte; c.ccot:l,::!>C; be; C!>c At:o c.oCnt<l
.) .)O .>:l .)&!ccorwh:c
.) .> .> .>
~ :::J~ ~~:!>CI;e2ccewc.oo:!> be; 0Cc 1'\coc::>Oa ecc:!>wcc 'c.uc.urec.uoo~S:!>:t,~tt
:S"" 0 .) .) .) .J 0 .) .) 0 :.
: ~c.o:>U::c:.r,;cb:!>c.
.> .)0 .>
Cl:> I :>9- !Cfl;Cce; GQ.."' CC.O:C.OOC.CC.UC. (X):!>(I; CC :!>W('Cehfx.c I n~:CC.O
.>o::.l .>:.T""' > .J ~ ~ o
~:clxo :cu: :~ ff> ~co :~ ~# ~"':!>CC :~co &, ~ ~
:6:)C;0ee;
.)
:ct?ro-:bcoC:o:~e:I'\:!>~&,~Q '..,c.uC1(.U{)CC lcoCnA :C2roolec.uro c.cc!)
.) .) .) .) .) .>:l .) .) .J .) .) .J
rec.uoo
0 .)
:hl1lJr!
01:J" .)
cc:t'lrw c.~a>fe::x.occt'!Sn
.) ,)
c.cc~e:O:!> :>to: ~eG611
' .) .) '
M c.ul'ecoCl:~
.) .) !]
:)~
.'
.)
11 ,, 1
ftecoecc.o o_,O)
. ;)
na~:2 (:h:l~~IS~b:hro) u
.>6 .i'j 0
0
II ::x::eo:x.c C.COOftll
.) 0.)
~~XotoccC
.)0 0
e.G
~
cbocob0 .>oo~~ c.Mrew .> I)
c.cc~:Loahl:oew
.>::1 .>
,--hlw~ccb~"
5::1 ~ .>~
c.~:::x.co~
. .> 0
w
c.~corAe:ob
.> :;- ~
bhlcc:c.oo:::x.ce~
..>:3 .)
coPCIX.UM~~
.>
lucoc.e~e:10
.> 0 . 0 .) "
l@ccecc.cc~((..e
.> .>
Wc.l'wocc:2 co'C.o!;'~;~::X.t)~ H:c.o~:)(O::X.6~ oeo:C,coc.c.o~ u@ccc,~!;
0 .> 0 0 ~ .) ~ ..) ~ ..) ~ ~ 0
corro@cof,
.> ..>
e 1000. corea.Xo
..>,J,; ~ ~
c:2a~ ro:ob c,f,hl~ c.ccro::oe &ahlw
Y o.> o .> :::1 o o o.>:.:l
=?COo'wl2cc~~ @ccb:dx.oemc.o I :,Rccf."J[; c.cccoc.cn~a.~ er-R~)-
~ ..> 0 \ .> 0 .) ::J ~0 .) .> ...JO
~~~~:X.t)~ M (cJ~lro) :ec~OCOOC.t)~ oro:~w'Co:ob IC.O~rew (.((.~
.) ..) ~ ~0 .) ~ 6 0 ~ ..) \)
1 ':':l , r o 1_ l ,, o 1r ~
~cccoe::>'::IC :c.wc. 'w~cc: :xoflec
re
2J ,.cccc~ c.uru:cocoecoc.c
O ~.>.JL .J 6 o .J
u@ccro~ahl:...J:le:o~ahlcc ::X.oa:;~cd~hl,~~ oeowoow 1cce~WC\)
.) ..>:3 ~' .>:.:1 ~0 .) '~""" .) .> ' .)
~rereOO:> ~::~:ob @cc:h1&:cbco :JY..c.;c.cc~ ~c.@o :@coccc~re~
.) :>.) .) e:J ~ 0 ~ .)
::x.f."J~~~&
.) ~ 0
:oboc.o~e~
..) .)
~:c.ec:oc."~:eh.1
~ .) .>C>':l
coc.rwocc:C!
.) 6
:Q& E"w
e:J .).)0
1!11 c-Pe) (o'!IJ:c.o~f> &ahlft@ c.o~reec2aaR:oeec l:oc.h'J~bc.ccc"t~~
y ~. .>O'J .)~ 0 .)Q .) .)~..) .) ~ .) 00
eudwocc:2
0 .) 0
c.M~cc
.)
l:::x.hJ~t)~~oc.t;~:fKO:hl~weo
~ ~ 0 J .)0 ~ .)
c.c.d~coc.h1~
.) :::1 IG~c.ro
'S'
o o r 11
]~CD] n 'J _1.. L o J _ _ _ o ll
aoa :oc. ::>Of'lfl C.t)(C.C.CC~ lc.ecc.,wxcc laxe<J:oxo oco: ~
\.,) .) .).) ~ 6
.> 00 0 \ ..)
:c.cc:o!Y't.bhlcce;t){)C.Ca.x:bocro
.) ~:::1 ..) ..) 0 .>
'Cc:~eeb\ Afc.o~....cob
~
cc C\XCfl
.)
le~e
.)
c~tlc
::J
1:hl4-~
e1 ::x.'":t)(O
.) .>0
~6t.Cflf'l
..)0 00
r@ccb:::cbcoe<oec
.) 0
rc.c.x:.<!e:hi;Loahl
..) o1 .)~ :oeez J

u@ccro~:c.oo:n~reoblooo w4-ochce C.O@ccahlcbwc
.> .> ..)~.) .> J .>.:.:1 .)
<2"
.)
0 I J . ___ 1 I( o. 1 10 0 r Q
C~CC~Iet) C.W'i'CV:CC~ OCOC.UC.~~
Cf'tIOXBJGOO 1111::>1:><.0~ :::x.
1e>b:<:eCCe>
" o Yo .> ~ .> "
bc,h"J~d,wc c.cc~(;b oeonco:ole~:C u@ccro~beo~
.) o ..) .>o .)l. o .)
:2~ :~we:01e~:C
&h "" o ~ ~
euecocbwc
0 .>
c.cc~lXokl :Xonco:o1e~:2 wccc.P(.()C\) 1e c dxvu c.cc~o:~o
..) ~ .) .)0 .) " 0 .) !) ..) \ .)
:>Cococ.4-~c.oS:c.<! C!XCC.rc.oro le c <hwc ccc~o:<!o ::~:6~ le b cbwc
.) .> .) ~ !) .) ' " .) .)
c.-cc~o:~o
\ .)
o~~~cooob
.) .) .)
,cb:ce~a.~~(2Q
~ .> ~
co (oc-hl'cv)
~0
:t,C2dco~:2
.) 0 .) 6
~ocbce 1'Gc.uluo
.>
'S'.) 0 0 0l:i::b:ce~cc@hl ~c.ro~\rc.u
.> :.:J OJ.>
tu:oc.ro~CC u:dc.o~!2
o .) ;:,- .J 0
u@cc
. ~
(\)~!Xoo
.
l.o@cc~o:recco
0..)
bhl~dedxvc
.>:.:1 .>
l:c.ccc.rc.oocc:C!
.) 0 .)
oeoroc.uwcoro
' .) .)
v l_ l . u1L9
rr o ' 1
C.C.OCGruiO
l.
::>lr:C.COC.Uo=
~ ~o
1:00<.0~ :>CO IOO:ftro c.o:c.C.OC.O<:e a:>:C.O~::X.O:X:f'l~
o .> .J.. .> o ~o:>- ".>
.1_ o ..1.. ~ ,, r o " n
IcboCC COCG::>~:C.If'l:
t!TlJ C.Ocoo:CCC ,.CCCD:I< :::eCG ro:c.CC IOOjt.C
..) .> 0 t,..) .> .) 0 .)o-J
n:>:>tUI~
.:oo ~~~~Xfl~ 1c.o~:b::x.t~e> nh.loco-b c.(L)(.t;cb~:c.~ tt:~e~::.c.ob cuoc.coo
?.:lc.~ ..) ~ .> 0.) . .>~b .) 0 .) .) \ .>
1
j oi.) 11 I ':':} ( 'llr b 'nt . 1
c.owo~r:c.c~oc.o:.c.f'lo ecce cc-t_)
ru C.ic.ue>:cc:
n ' 1 2 :fl: ~elru-c 1ea:co
.) J ..> ~ 0 .) 0 :.Ia L 0
~:X'o:>c.e~
.)0.) .)
u~loo :5"~
..1.. 11 t 11 1 a r n... 0 I) I ~ s
C.l'lcccoeo~r;lc :c.ccc.!Wocc: IICCCC
~3ec
2 ococ.ote::x.occl'l nco
~:cocoecnw .> ~ t.. .) o.> ~.> o.)
OG~
:cc~:X.o:x.ft~
.) .) .)~~cc~co 1(S) locoo~@Q
.) ;)0 .)
;) :.:1 .)~.. :oh:4& 1o~ore
;)0 .)
1@~~~
.)
, !IJ
~ 0 :.3
:tcw,

~ece:dxo
~
tucdewoo:::>S
o .> .> .>
t)l.oe~o:::x.Q~~w~l,
"C .> .> ~ .> .> :oCoccwre
.)o .)
" , ,::;;t ., v o b r o v Q
f]>OOg:> t:r~::>t~~oo1c.c?', Gft~lecpcoccc~df>CC wc:c~socc 'Lew
GCC::>:~bl:ft::>
.):.3 0 \ 0
uCCc:c::>~:~bl:ft::>U.:hlc.oc.ctuwrewoo
.)
&woo
.)0 .):.3 'S",j.> 0 .) .)
c.i:c::>eb::!wto~
\ 0 .) .)
cob
, .)~~wre'llJ~;I!>:~
.) :.J..> y ~@cc : ~ h"J~::>~e>b:Occ
o
lWIO\btewOOe;i',
t, o ..) .:>
:ehlrow,
e~J \
MwreC:ed'x:x:cce~C:ew&>~..ocob@cc:cc.occe>wcc
.> .> o .> o .> .> \.> e .>
li::cnwe; "(d) .)~CoOfl~~*
':>.> .)0
~~
.)
:~cooccc
~.)
II re~::>i-JIJI'I:tce.c
.)0~
~Q~e>e;~CCeWGCO~
.>:J ..) tuwrecdo!;l5e>:C,
0 .) ,J
.) c
~:>:::>b ucccc::>~'llJ:tte.chl::>c.o b.Jwreeaae.coo l::>c.eze~~c.l3::>oo :::>c.~Mhl
~ .> .) .>o::l :..h o .> .> o .> .) .> ~ .>:::1
cc~~ccC:ew&wc.c::>rw~ce
.) .) 0.) .) .) .)
t:::>c.Q~c.o~e>wcc
.) ~ .) .)
c.cc~bre'""';:;lr.J(n
:ten"':::::J.
@.)cc:::>S
.)
l~oC:ew&
o .>
GW~
~,;
\ \
~~wrew&ro~
.> .> .>
cccc:2:2c.o
.> e e
cc~wc:c
.)
lbe.c
roc
::r
t'ICO:oo~rwcoo~
.) .> Y .) .> .> .>
IICCCCroOCeCLJCo
wccc.oo:,~wi'eeaae.c::>&x:ob
.) .>
.> ,o .>
~ccec.hl~
.> \ ~
:c.a.fte~
oo
:::>c.~~::>ooax2cc<Jihlro:cbcoeroe.c
.> :=::1 .> .> ..>:to
co~~~:x.ft~
.> .>
leCCC.CCe>Wcb~~::>:i', l:@coccce>ee<ll<lle.G eoo\;cbe.cb II !::X.Qe>C.hle>l:.o@CC<liQ
L .J ..> .J , . ~ .> o ' .> ~ :J .> .>:J
ro:dxoeroe.c
o- c.lo,occ.cc~coe.>
:c.e.cc.rwe>c.c:2
.> e
Wbe>~<2~c.('le>
.) .>
lcb:~bl:fte>:c.eo
.>~
be>~CC::x.<'~e> :@rocow~:h::>cfte> u~.:~eeeco<':o c.cct.oCCcc::::ooro:cbc.oe(!ne.c
.) .) .) .) 0.> ~
\0 ..> .) .) 0-
Il,;eCGC.CCe>wcbe>\5~:~
.>
t:CCO)C.CCe>eCewOO
.l .> 'o .l
!::X. h.Je><llr,lro:cbc.oeCow
.) ~ .l :.:Jo
IC.lo&
C.CCOC.OeWc rcoe>c.c:2 eoobwbe>~(2::X.fte> IIL:Ibro~W@cc:c.ooPd:CCC ::>Co
.> o ..> e .> ' ..> .> :> o .> .>
cb:o~\l>hleo cc.e.cro:cbcoemez bJ:c.rf'ICLJreco&c.cc~el:ecdo ~oob l!>ro
.>J o o .> ..> 'o .> .J ' Yo
c.u~:fl::X.
..> OJ
fte> .>:,~t;e>~CC
.>
::>c.fte> ttcc:
.> ..>
r:J~.bcbc.o&wc.e.ce>l;c.
f;':j .) 0
@o oc.o::>h!::>b
.)...., ..>
l!,cieh.lb.J
L .J ~0
(r)cco~oo~
.J
~~o:;,cro~gw uoe>::>~'l!Jfl:ttcc
.)O .:> .,) .Jo::J
<llt)Jcc
.l....J
-:c.oocccoc.ooe>e.cc:ce>wcc
.) .)
~ccewc.ooe>tu:c.
.) .) 0
rocurew&:>
y .)
,~ 'C.orc~:c.IJ
::> 0 .) :::1 e.c
"@cc~~!IJ:tcez
J .>o:.3
~hl~~eclecc~coc.oo~
J:t ..> .>
c.ccC:.uwreal:o
o .> .>
l!)~:oe>wre:::>c.occ
Y .> ..>
..>0 ..> ..> .) .)
u:Xoa.~ccehl l()e>::>rowooez @ccc.ure:::>c.occ<'~So ul!)ecem Ct-.@cc~~e
\~.).. .) .) y, .)
coc.ooe>
.)
b.Jwrew&:>c::>c.~e>::>c.o:2 c.[,a;re:::>c.occ~So ,~hlccetec.hl~ :oc.Qe>
0 ..> .) :>-.) .) " ..> ..> .)~ \0 :.3 .) :=::1
....hl::>oro:cbcoeroe.c
:r',j.> o
c.ll&c.cc~c.oe~~=~c
.> .> 1...
l.odeo~cc:2
o J e .>
C2cc:e.c~:xox<'~~
J .>
:c.e.c:::>S
J
w(0-fiiro)
~0
x~~~co:c
.> .)
@cc:h.I'Cc:dx.o:bwc.e.ee>
0 .) {tj .)
~c@n::>hloo
0 J~O
u;:;lcc<ll~cc~te axo<2C2f'l:,~coo2 c.&:ore
'5'- .) ::!.> 0 .) 0 .) .)
r....hl:te I!):Q&::dxo:fxoc.e.co ~@o lecce:c.or2<ll rli:::o~:ro~e.c tuc.ure
~.,j :y e:J .) 0 ..> ' .) ~ 0 .)
ulbQ:x:e~~R L...ti"CC ~:n<'c:cl:x.o:Coo:; ,11;:,~ I~"~Gt'!>
.,J..,~ 'Y.,:..:J o JO :l- e'j CJ.>o.;, "''
c.v(, X (\.)(.CC~C tG~e c~~c (.CC~<.O:..re ;)Co tl coOO;;.:ncooO>cb ~e (;{)tlc l
J 1 e .) ;, J J J &j.> .J :J T
" (w) r.r f>:.cc ~.ro:.rs.oo<>cb 'St~b 3~tlc
.) .)~
( &be:c.co~c.lro~~b:)(:e::>hl)
. .) .)
nG!-:c
.) 6
:h-l~e>b:hccu
~ 0
ncoloc.&&berc.oowc.r~tb:xl!t:)Q
~ ~ .) ~ ,::1
u(f) .J:x.o~co:2ft
.:>
cu~a;&rc.oowc.r~~oC
e n ~- ~ .> ~ ..,!,3
vo
':'] l( j_ t:l 111 ,. l !?]~
11 cc:ccos-occo c:cc;cca::ccco c:ca.x:ccc()CI) :cc:co
U .:> O.:> .:> 0 0 0 0 \ 0 .:> .:>
:2cotu~J.CJ(o l::>~roeJ.Cl~obJ.CJ c.ccowc.hle~hlf[;co~ccb *b~~
e o .:> :.Jo .:> ,:.Jo .:> :.J .:> :.J .:~:..3~.:> .:> .:>
wecoco
we.~ec ,, "1ro ,.
l!:lCO~f>
':")I'" '
cc:cctc..f>cccccflcx:ux>r 2co
.) 0 :> 0 00 .:> 0.) 0 "
II CCcc:ca:dc. ~
.) .:> ""_j
:~eciOCJJC.eco
.)0 1.. .)
-:1t> be
.:>
f>ch:h-lcocc~cb
.:> e::l.:>
II ?Jic.".ffi
~CD~~
r
~~
~CC:!J
:X.O:X:.":!J
:> ~
- -'-
11 co&we:cbc.oe~.c
;') . .
11
h,)~~~n~
0
~~lneoa::la:
~ 0 0 .) ..,
;,::J )orc:o~:cmCCQ)(.OOUI:('C:I~
~a:ec.uc.ooo-'ft
~ .) 0
~:c.ooa:cuc.ooow
0 " ,) .,)
c:c:..,)wee )~cee~c:.ucoo:. :cccwrewlx>
-~~~ ?cezn:~1w :o:~c.oec.osu!b~& ~~~~~g3 f&-ffiaa
-wPewooceocuce
" , ,)
cc:co:@c.o:<lco---~J.J.-.tl\<>m..QA lxe bvd ftch:~coc:co:Jch
, ~~ ~ -r..3 , 0-j,
(~:cbco~~er;) ?~~C.At~~~GCX>el?~
?i-
lr 11 J
Aecowcoo.-,~
. ~
ao
uwloa:e:cbcoel!oec
.) . .
r
~~
.)
( :c.r~ro:cbcoe~en) (' 10 t;"e>:4~:Xfte>
0 ~ ~ ~
1r 11 . _1_
Aerowcoo~m
. ..,
:c.es ~so&cc~socc ccc~su/'cog.>t,OOJS>~ ~~es ~ccge~ $?=.sen
17 es~:cbc.ogc.o~ ~~~~&~r~ ~~~:cbc.o
~ccco~gJ:gJ~:o~g~es :g&oes ~cc~~S"~s&soroes
~<:<"$-UCO {p:clhs.<.lelbb:> ~~:gb $(Jcc:~&:cbc.o:~s-oc.es~~c@o
?o:xp::~OO:> ~~g&xb~:ces ~:gb wgG:~es
1:gcl~l5><" g&cbs-ocobJ CO~~:cbc.o<:&,es UO~~:gJs-ocb~sO<:fuW
~~ ~~ thco~ ~ c gos~#es
J9::les:gb gJcc~~o:gcJ~&dlf'co~g~ co gc.es~ccc cb~~:cbc.ogc.o:t?
:us ~us ~c.cc ~:c.bc.o<: &1es bes:cfft:c.ooes s-oc.oo~W[p soroes
n$2ccco~~:?*~ &c.og~:d'ft:c.ccesso~es :gcJ~<JJ:&,:$(13o
$2cc:c2d!o :d't'l:~&, ~<;o~:gb S.U:d't'l:ooessooes ~.{.~~c.ogco:oi
:g&gc.og8s-oco :$2coco( 6-~~)$(Joo~<" u$2ccco~~~ c.8co~
:gcJ~$23o~cccM?:o~so'8 :c.es:&:~&, ~:oi-~:sb fpS06'1c.o~:oi
co(G-~~J~~et'l c.bcc~:c.o~ :us:cft'lcc~s-occ $2ccb~:gJsoco&>
ccc~~gb :~:go ~<;x:>fpgc.es~ccc 1i:Se~ ~:cbc.o<:&>es
{p:d't'l:$23o
~~ p&s~ ~~~ ~ Gsfos ~ocb
!?~~~ ~~ ~:o~~ px;o(r-}:>)~~
:~&::c.bc.o~ooc.bsoc.cc.bt'l5o il~&oso~co ~soccsoo.{. ~so co&>~
$2ccgus~ccc g&bg.>b ll coso(') ~ Ggllc s-uo!-~~ u~:~:~~
{p:d't'l:ooessooes :GJso~:~:go
' $(Joorf~ :$(13o<:cc~socc ~<;x:>~:gb
~:go ~e>c.cc ~e> ~~&es ~:gb
u~so~:~:go ~&&os-o~co bes:~c.occ :usrf~:!& ~:c.bc.o~&>es
$(lee(o-~)gre~ge:~ :V~:!e~ s&~~sob G coso(') tg~~ Gsllc
n$2cccoe>~:c.l:gcJe>es googc.o ~:e~
~~:~ gcc:c:?fsosocb~:c& :us(c~)so&:~:~ ~:/toe~
$2~oo g&so# ao~ ~:4~ :!cc:&,:~
?~iuttB
g~$(JJoo~t'l n$2ccm~=c&so& ~&,&> {p:d'<":$(13o$2ooessooes 0~~~
~.{.[~ 52cc~!egPc.o oGll 3e~:Hc.o c.cos-oc.b~gosoc.co~:~:~&> ~
~:c.e ~~~e> ~6-~) ~~t'l 4-~s-ofug~~gcc.o~ cB:gco .r ~
lf~:f&:~~
'so4>1~:gco:~ ':?~~cc ~~es~e~oi- oc @<bg.lb co~S"~o~ 1
g~~ Gsdc S2cc~& ~giPe&oes cb:gJ:gcJ~es<!>:<:Rg!Aes

II c.ob CC
.)
~~
00~
~c!J ~:) ~t~~0'68' <"lJOt~tO<xl>ct=c? >O~~c?t~~:>t: :)eG~
rtSt Ct'f~CX> rO ~Gcf!06t GOOt~mfi~t~~ ~~oSa:n:~')O;i>~ ~W?~~t~o
Cf~ ~~ro:> >~f~ :no?:<>::m ~~:9?~ 9?~ t&
:x>oo:ooS~ G~:~~ a:n:~:>t:~ *>~ ~~oSa:n: ~~U?oS
(:,)~~3 ..
~~~~'P~qro ~~ "m"~~:~
OO')t:Olo~~:y,p:~~ar.roSa:n9:m: u?~:n6+~~:>8:n ~Gf?oS
G~:~~ :n&f.cm~xn ~~::n~ ~&~ o}lSa:f:n06oS
:n:#J~ 9?~t4f G~~ (Y) G~~
u?@~:nOtan:~ o~~:"P:~ ~'Pt:~Jo?:~oS'lt :nG:>t:~~
c9o~~:Y,p:sn: OJ:')~:<X\>dJ~: <9~:~:~0:')t Gay,poSa:n:G::>.nGtp~
o~ood3oo'P::noS ']'COdJO?'P:~::x>~ 'PcodJmJa?: yy eG
:n9 >GOIGc;s Goo mJo' 2l68foaro~::m >oSooS{> ~&;>i> :)0 r'
<1JOt>oS~::n~lmt: ooS~:t :).)~[: J~~ SleEt G<6 oJOCPJO ~c?
G~oSa:n:~oory 01:'1~:~:o3fl:oo~:?e\u
~~cpoS :nw~ >O?t~ Y>S~oo:~o8 Gay,poSa:n:~or~m ~:068
o3~:00~:a:n:~X1J O~~:y,p:~ :m~~of GOlCO?l')tG<mt:~'P G~oS
CO?=on>ma:>~: c9o~~:"P:~t 98:~::mayJ8 t~o:a:n::x>G>t: :nf8
:n~t ~~oSa:n:Ga:>o.:>~tt o~~ood3oo 'P::noS 'PcodJO?']':OfiB:
:x>e?, tS~:tS<9oSJ? :>:cpl9:~cpoS ']'CodJmJa?:yy ~:)G (m ):n')l
~~a:n:~:m: ~~:YJ>:J? ~OttS i-~o:Groo.:>tt c9:n8~J?
;.~~~t6::>.:> ~ar.roSan=on>m ooxnod5>oS~8~0'68 8oo8woot~8:?
~o:hroe: :n~'l:~:~~?Gxn~ ~toot~~ ooSC9tO?t~t:a:>?t:
~ro:x>~tt
~~oSa:n:~ o~G~~~:m ~ar.roSa:n:~:x>~ ~ar.roSa:n:
~t ~ooS~mJ>#~ :n?>04=0'68 :na:po~~ :n~:x>oo:
ooS~:YU(dJG:>t:t S?!ft!f? GOOt~mw~ MG~I ~ootGmW
'i'~ :nayO:nOj1 "?o:J.?tS~ Gay.poSan:~'l:J.?t::>-:>2 98:e\ ct:c1
GOObGmfi~tm ~:Oi?~Olt::x>b:GxnG:> GOOtGmj)~t~ Bc!JGC16S
::>.:>~ ~ar.roSa:n9sn: :nm~:~~cfJGsnt a3~roeoo'P:~~t:::m
~:J ~::>.:>~ "m " cx{;:!f? a&'rxn:Go:::>.:>~ ro9&S:x>~
50A :i?GOJ? o.:>oSG:x>:nGanoS:na:n:+~t:t o~e:~.p:J? 8800ry ~:oo~:
n :e~:~(e)
com:~rco: ~
~ ~ .
i+
o~:JC:or-~
j,Jt.J li f
i~ J. ~J. ~ ~t ~,~ ~ ~ t:rcr ~1:1 ~ :tJ. l~tf :~
1 Sl _t;
1 G) J l t ~lo :rr~~
~~1, iJ -8 8 r t~
l~~~+i~~~Jrt~
~lT n~~~l!G)
tgi~11t
~~~~~-~
~~~t$~f }~
fl
~t~~tJ
~ -%, .. ~ ~J g., o .. s ~ ~ g., 1 ~ ~ ~-So + a.,

G>~g~~H~
-- v - v ~ .
[B., .. ~~ ..8 ~~ i~+~~~tc.
~ 8 a8 G) iS .., ~ G) c8
~~l
~
..eo or ..2o (B., ~ s - s ~ t] 1
1
8o -c v ~j .
~ rt G) ~ e~liD
m Sl ~
s., o8a., ~ l 8., s8, ~.. ea.,
~14 ~ s 8 .. a., ~ 8 ..& .& .. . ~ ~ ~ c ;
tn . 't ~i~ ,a ,a o!l ~ .,~ i qj:l ~:iio ll. I 1 a..~ .
i ilt~~~,,t~+Tt{ !tl~lft~Jt~
Jo!)
G) ..&
SeT~~~t[B.,~i~a.,i~~~~t
e ..n
..a ~ G) L!~J~rJL ~ --1
~tt..&,~~ ..n
.. ~ ~ J 2-
,., ;t;, ..
~, 1-c
. , ~~~e a~ a.,~ rn.ef t. . ~.1~....~ a.. ~.. ~~'lh j :.aoa ~.. ~
~:a ~ .,i
~ oS 111 ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~~ilo J ~1 ~ s ~ ~1 r G) ~~ r!,~
~~f~J ~~~~t~iL ,t 1 ~f,t-ir,.!~
e s [B., ~ rn f ~ o8 So [B., -a [B., ~ .. ~ '"'S -3o ::!)o &l G)

~~ .. s loJ &(ffi, '"'S '"'S [B.,l ~ . , ., ~ o3 ~a ~1., ~ s' +


s
' ~~~~a.,~ea.,*rn~-~
oe: -g;; -& ~ So 8 3::$ .,l~~l~g~~~..aos~~
~ ~ ~ an .. .. ..8
l1. ---&, ~ ~ ~ ~i.a -;:&.~ ~;; ~ ~.&1 ~1 ~ ~:r 1 s ~ ~
c8 8 P, -+ ~ ~ e
'f ~ ~ ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ ..3o ~ 8 ~ cgJ ~ S, c., -s _a &
~~e~~~a.,J+~~~~~~~tg~~ ~~~~ ~Al!
~~-~-i~ . i~~~Hs~~~~~~~a+~e
l) G)
~ ~~~~ G) ..
-D c., & ~ [B.,t ~ ~ o8~ ru8 '11{' ~ -+ ~ ~::i,., Gl .. &l :l G)
s ~ ~ a., l :!lot -~
~ ---, H - ~ l o ~ 9 oe, tl :l c~ o ---, G)
-&>") -&>")
o0 0 ~ ~ 00
.;n --, Cl ..
a., ~ o8 G) c o8
8
J S .. g ~rnon ..eo~Jee ~
o13 .2 f!: ~ ~].-" - ].i" ~ 8 3':!;, U ~ 3, iJ 5 .6 9 ~ n
8-, og ~ ..&, Cl\.n tj 0 ,.&
8 G)
8-, 0 .
(')., a s' <V
~~ 0 V V -s e .;n
~""lto_
~~ tl
s~ 1 a,
iJfJ~Iltl 3,
lttt~~itf i~~t
[B.,
j> 1!il "S el>. o., -S .e. 8 ~ ~ ""' ""' st re, Jj s, s 8 ~ ~
~Cl!l roe

il~t l.i rr
-e
:1
(&b~:coo
(so~cec~cre)
r
.)
:>1.:.
I
~ ~
I
v 11 6 If
II CCC.OWC'C c : <:COWC ICOl:)
.) . .)
r
:)~
.)
n$2ccc;o~SOASOcc3re3~ ~be$<;&o ~l9$cJ'eoe gP&>
ccc?sug+ c goegc.coe g+groes :roesg+ r goegc.ooe g+g&,es c.cce
:c.co:o$coll, ScbsoAsoccgos~~es r~c;o~@$2c.oes ~~ c.cc~&$
w:~e:~<!-:'kocw$ J5>$esgc.es$:~ccgre$ &:c.ooc;ocfeo$ ~~~
S2ccre2o eoS2ccccl9~$ ~gos~~es co~ g]
4>$W secc:o$c@O :cw:gb gc}$~ -S2ccgcc~ ~$33t.ro$&>
?~tG6tS ~ccoccS2co~ ~WC.CC$~ <jPS~e.El S2cc:gb g<!-psoo$b~~~es
z.~~~!?J _ ?c.C~:gb r:J3~c;oc.coe ~S2~1:~~c.o :c.cc:gcfco~llic.o -~~:~~c.o
~ _ &:ccesoBsoo S2ccgc.es$~ccgre$ &:c.coc;o&oe :saco3 ~eseco
~c.cs~:tcc~c;oo,~ nS2cc:c.cosollsoccgreg~ ~bG$~Pco ~~CfCoe ~es~<!- b g:osgc.co$
99ac 3+~es ~::?:c.co:oeg<!- 6 srosgc.ooe3+F co~:cbc.o~ees
bll~ .
r
::>~
.)
.(cmCbcoefue!,G)
o o
. ::>ce (~) ::>bcobt;
.) .) .) oe
0
II :::>oetO I ::leG C.COG~ll
~ e ~
j-,:1 :C2&
.) cccc:b~:cbco
.) ~~w~bl:::>c~~~ct9.X..e.G
ob .) .) ~ o ~b:o~core:chJ~('C
.) .) ::::l.J
cccco
;f,effie.c

&:!cc:cro~e
.J .:>
:ce.c:~ro:cc~o
.>o .:>
cu:fiil~~Gd~ccco
6':1 o
~ro:cbcoe&1e.c
Yo
ucccco~ro
.) 0
<!-b~@:~cewc~ccchl
.) .) .) 0 :..:1
ccc~ee:,ccc=~
0 .)
:,cccooo;~
.) .) .)
wcb~::>o
.) .)
~hl~~dbce;:,hl
.)~ .) J:J :ce.c~~cr;
.)0
~~:C,c.uce.c~
:> .)
ibe.ccuPe:crocuc
.) .)
rtu~ .)~b:o~
~.
.)coR:ee:c0:20 .) ccuru:~ch1~:,h14~e.c
' .) :J .J;:J ~::>ce:>hl
.) J:..:l ,bee Cl ~en .) 1::>Fro~c=~:,e
.) 0 .)
::>Oeme.c cu:hJ~~I5~~cC2mg)ro:cbcoeme.c
.') 6.:l o :>o
uo~~c=~:,boe&1e.c 1be.c Sl
o .:> .:>
~cnc~o2coe.c
.) .)
:b~:cbco~~w~b
ClJ.J .)
~0hl:;:,Qc.oF,Pe
':).)::; .) :::b
:::>toe.ccuPe:~c3hl,o
.) 0 .) .) :..:lt. c
~coo~2:cc~
.) .)
ob .)~~en:ooorco~:cbc.ocM~en
0 .) .) 0
ccc~:cro:chl~('2
::::lJ
~b:::>&?c.o
.) .) ~
0
l:c:C, 0w:cr~;~ .)&:!cc:cro~becucco~
0 .)
0hle.c:~ro:cc~o
.)::; .)0 .)
~ro:cc3o
:ce.c:.)0 .)
IICCCC
.)
ro~(])R::>!:'l:c.cowcFro~
,:J .:>::I .) ~e<'ne.c10
5 .)
4b:o~wrcxno
.) .)
~hlcco4Pw~~
.J::l .) l:c~~e.c
0 .) 0
t:n uccccroewroc.of,Pe~~e.c ~b:::&::>co ::Xoe.ccoo0~ ~cccub ?'ln
o .J .J 0 .J JO .) .> .J .J .> .> .> J
:b w:d~:hl~':>~
0 ~
ccc~:cro~becoccu!:)
0 .)
ahle..c:~ro:ccl$o
.>:J .)0 .) coro:cbcoemec
0
~ClGl:~oo:cc3o
J ...J JO .>
1wd~:hld:chl
.J oJ C.Ucucc0~
~ 0 .> .>
:20~
OJ
c.uolPe=
.J
hl'&:cbc.o 0~ccco
f;':j
uee.cccc~c.ucb~ &:C,~:dxo !G~(uib u~cuO:x:cF,Pe~~e.cf'lna:> ~bc~:ch"J
L J C
o'J.> .> ;,- .> o .> JO .> .> ~
11:o~ &:C,ft:cbc.o 1
'l!:l~(u~b ,be.ccoPe:croc.ucFro~
0 0 0 1.> .) F,:C,eroe.c
.) .) .):,kcocucFro~
.)
t()Gh cub
L \ .>
be C\XOOh=:l
.>
r0fe C1:1~c
::::/ J ::.J
::>C:ocow ro:cbcoecne.c
.JO J o o J
~b:o~h0.ec 0
t:i;:cbco <"::cbc.o!G<!-w<!-b <.u~e.ctill ccc~lkcc ooo'gc :tdco ,rt;@9ccftb
O'b .) 0 s 0 0 ::.J 0 .) ':) .)~.)
d :c h.l ~
cccw:c
0
r('):::>e;
.)
C\)r; ccc~~coroe.c
0.)
orcu:xcc~:l::>
.) .) L.
:tdc.o
0.)
lbe.c
J
I ::.J~;r co :..e.cc~o2c.ue.c
.>
G~c.c.u~ :6!:)4rocco~
G.) .> .>
lc~k5cuccro~.)
::>~cbcc
.> 0
oob
>
:~
(l).)~
~s~
~ob
?09

OC' C' C'


iCCGO)') O)'PI~I~JlU

t ;,~&ti C'
':>(Y.)C'O':>
C'
'PC'OOO 0'3Ga>GOOGOOI
6 6 ll .0

<ifCO jO '}~II
~ (' "'(' ~ " (' (' ~ 9 (' 0 ('
oxpt~el~~J[O I C:31 O')Q)')~?CC:~?C,C, OO't'f~e! I e::l.>O'.>C:~C:~

9 r::::: ("
2:e:12 ( GroJ ?~c.xr:>:~)
~s
J

C'Q ( C' )
~QC'] GroJ ?mCX:l':>:<;)'J~
(' (' (' ( ) (' (' c;: .. 0 0 <'(~ (' 0 (' ('
cpeoa>mJ<:Cl:lll./!1~ 900 0 ---iii.O')l~a (I)C4180f ')CD~"lm l:jl
9~cO?:O~?C'D
'I<' (' 0<' .. <'flr;::<' ~(' (' <'('~
OOICI;))(:IOfCO,C'\f O??Of':II:JCI-1.0')1~1 UOC'OJt;;f~C Q)Cr:r'~m.J:~l
~ (' ('0 0 (' (' (' ( ) c;: ~- (' .. ('
0\~'\f<mon "j -c:pe'OO'>C'OJC,CO,~O U ~c;o ~ a Cfls?fi:~JO:>-~CO')O)O~?
~C::: <'
--o?CI~Cf~ ~co~c;co~
0.. (' (' ('
0)9t:::I?CII:f"ltp"J')I O?.~"e~0?---0 0010')
;r ''-" C:::<'~

C::: <' !:!


<' ;r <' .S. C'....!~ r:c
Of~ti !DOt:::I">Oli:I"'I'P"J?l OKu ~co~:l !D~z:D"'"'Ir.'lBCI-O~?C'OCO?I~
<'

.ll .. (' (' (' c:: <'9<" C" (' <'f:.! r.::!
O~JII,C, O?OI.O'XY.lUJ~? COGI.O?CD "t:::~el!COC:O?CDO!I)?C --<tftf"'CXl?I!T" II
cr;-...,t c .ll occ o <',S. <'C:! or;::! " C::: "
'JflTCO?l~~ O~J\13):.1S9<"'3 OfifCJ"l~l:r"UP ~O)')O)O~? :Dcle:J?C'
(' (' .il (' .ll 0
~ U~CO- !DU.,\:~?:coe:~~ !I)V~\::u:ooe:m, ef:!ne;,O OOICI~~'~Tt
c (' .,., (' ' f
C'~..., c c " c~ 0 c ~.S. c .il .11
!T'""'. :1)?1 O~IO't:Oo?t; O,'XY.l'\fOO?Ofll:f"l -.?IOCf<Xl IIOI.n C:Ok'ff~z:u"lIU.zl:
c
caa
L
.B .
~ c comc:mmllc<ac
:a1:na>eax: c
I
C'OC'
Of0)1Cc ui.O?:mo :nooom

a ('
OCDrDQO

c:J
-l- - ' 6
"'f Jl l & e T --
c
(' (' t C" C' ....( (' ~
~f
' rDfG~.,~~O'\!i'c. o:>ttnJCOf:~.>a:DOO)J?C"O :n?:wou:~~ 11

~
.:6 (' ('
,
O?~tm u
\l--
11~
tple&?O>OXXX>toJ;o:IJI"I):u
(' . 1 0 \ 0
-T '" 1. . ,
~unr~:n
..
c.:;.
.. ~
T
" _Q 0 ~
coc=t c:.s')O)=m
t. "

( 0(" (\ "' (" ( 0("( (~ 0 (" 0('
~::013X7) C.I:Diil (I)O(l)CO '):G~')O) Q () I C ::c::~.sa> C '\t OO'lrul II co::O~t.3X7> Cl
a tL jj " '- T- -,. --T " I L
c- ..... C:'" o c .. (" ~.. ..
~~')C5m01tn1 <.IO)':)I~C('! OC"Jr:;:~W~ ~00 11 WW?I~~ CoiCmJ~t~c

CIX:~:ljlm g~~:~~{ oo~H~~~ ~9t~2~gu~eu ~.,qocc ~c


c <" ( ) c __ r ~~r::;. _r o ' c .. ocr.:. o "
mJq~t't3~ <jOO 9 S 9GCO~ ~':) "'""t.::J"JCICoiCj::O (\)C+~~ Cf~CO":Colj~ei
W)")l~~
(" 0 !>.. c: ..
0 .. r:: " ["".A,. ~~ (' r::;. c
O?IO'j 00tn Coi9~C~ C::1S':>f:CO?:l:lCI tf""'C.I~~II ~CCO')O)QOY.> ~~?C a
1

oa~fi
\;,.
o~~~
LJ
----i':r.x;oogco
"'l-'V'VV.I 0 6
cru,-xfx:onwof
lJ ~ I
;,11

t =>eG:J ~:;, cpeoo5 ~oo8'i ~oS :JJ (~) ~~~J~~:o, =>ers:J l'~'to~""'
oe ~~~~
c ' r <'l'? "
'I !;.!! o.. o c
'\f~f!Jtl oxp:cai~JlO C1Xpi~~IG ~tm, I.K:~Jfl..!'"'"'Cf:l =>ec;o l~OI
~c: ~..r:.( ..

oc c c c c r . , . ..
~..-x:o OXD:Ciaccc:
c
T . L - - -~
:Dtn!>OC:JUII
[.: -- \ ~ ll ::o'l ooc~c:C~':>
. :D~CCOI
A .. .._ =~oc'lt
..
F-S
CO)J?O>~')II
~~~~~~
}~
~=i
~~
sob
. ?0?
(' (' (' (' (' (' (' (' C'A;
~~q ~:cr4urr:;>OC')f ~(\)J ?O!>CX>"):~2t G"1j ')O')~")~J ?:~q Uo:>:J:>m~ I ~e!SG
0('o() 0
e'e
C' C' C'(' C'E(' C' ('') OC'
~II')COOCGC .rtC :l:>CCO?CO .5~?.1iCC :> o:>~~o:>CI ~!T.l?m<JI!T.lOJC:
A J 1:..:, l 1 l ~ J\.6 L
c (' r.~ r,:c- (' :o8
:J)~:~eoo-zu:ro?:tt:[j~~>~ u
113~11
ccr,:C' (' Q(' (' (' C o ('('

m:;>ea:>:
t:J~GCX>?C~
('
611.
(' (' ('
o:>'P:ID'jCG'): :::Pm2UGn~n~ ll 8:>')1 !T.lurr:;JOC'ff
0
Grol?roon:ox).)G(\)t?mro?~l?:rot
JJ .AUl:.!. J.l L
m. ~:m<;s
\! T
('c

rowroc
A
C' ('

('o 0 0 (' ~ 0 ~ C'o (' ('
oxnIL roro:;>Gro~ot
Jl
COG(\)J?rom?~ :rot
JJ
~=~ roroO>ID2!1D?:co:"lJ
T::;
('
:O")Iclf'IJ~Oo:>!T.ll.l;?:;>~; !T.lGf~q
C'


l
h ('
A
('. ('
1..

roro:;>102:10?: c:~c~qoo~~O'( :J:>O?:;>JU


(' t J
C' (' 0 0 ('

(' 0 (' (' 'l 0 (' r,:;: ~ (' (' r.:('


')fC\?:0~11 G(\)J"'ro~?Utm~:O~ ~t:j?:;>m Gg,?Cjl0?00:02t8:>ttC
<'
(\)U:l:>"):
1.
C' C' C' OC'
::WS?ttCC' !T.lrotl:
:r>~ ~lcll?:tte :Offi;;()CG:))?:::PG'):
C.:..tl lJ UJ 1.1

L
g ::o;l;l \-!.
C'

C' C' or,: o r,;: C' C' <' "C: C' o r c


OCGf:O~:l:>?l.lrol CX?tt::roprq G[j1jC:'IJ~ ":ffmf~C:~~::n[9q I oxp:
g c o C' o C' oC' c C' cr;: c- C'
>9CG9:1:1wlc u:>~:~cop:GI0~2t :::Pl2:Jd(\)?0X:Ut~ii)'Jf :J.)CD?::JJC\1)
0 (" (" ("" 0~ (' ~ 0 (" ("
1)Gf(\)JC roroO>'lGUI:I~ II '?,ttCI G!T.l?m~:n:ll:lt:))~ O?:Oo:>'f>:I:IJOO~
0 C' C' C' C' OC' C' 'l C' C o (' C'
I:ICIGO'J?C l:l?:u:>c:O>Io:>GOll? OOI:I~Gii)?C:C:.SUfl:ll Unl:l \l ~I n:IW:;>OC9.S
;1 -r
GJX
('
m;
('
Gronmro?m
0 ('~
;;>c
J

e1y:n IDJ.:>:').)
o
11
OJ u
('(' (' n. t 1 '" T

.() o -ii JJ b L 0 l -~ C C:.,

(' _<:. 0 ~ 0 (' (' 0 ('


<;;(\)J?ma:>?:~~;~ O~?~G;JGfC:J~ 2::f:<;;!T.l?Crol I:IW?:Il)?:>90?:3J~~?

:D<;;:));3:)e~!DI:IOOC)UC
o Jl. l
' (' ('OC'JC('mll>?:l

('
(\)0:))');
l
:').):))I:II?::Da:>:l
('
C.:, IL IJ
\C'
<:J
CJ 6 ?:;>m
;r
'l 1." 0
GU GUiroGC\2~:))2t
C' 1:':
tJ::ropOXJUtJII>tj:l
l"J:C'f.~ C"J:C'
(\)CtJil)=?.e'\1
C OC' ('
~UIOroete:u;;:l:lc~l
C' (' r.::C'

0
'-
('
:))I:JU?o:>
4.
('
I:JW?:Cu:>U)
.. (.!. J 6 I. u \.l
"
c: o::n:n~c~~COIJ~ ~U) ~~ n:ICJO?~~G ?CI:JU?O?~
l
(' (' (' (' (' '
'l'l;; ("
(" _<;. (" (' \ (' ~ (' r,: ("c. (" Q (." 'l'
(\)Cc:li8';JG31 ljo~m G2tJ~u~::nei !DG~?C~t:J:;>Jmtj<;l ~f:mruC<;;O>I 'P~
0 (' ('r;: (." (' 0 (' (" 0 (' (' 0 r.: (' ('
~ffi'lh:lc::;o~m?t on;>9o:>GO??C:~c:o~:;qc:l:n ~rtlO?:;>Jm~?t ro'P:
Q C' 0 C' OC' OC' C' C' C'J:C' C'
V'lC<;9;!:lW!C u:>~o~:~GID~2t !T.l~e8';J(\)?OXJUt~>~?:9r !T.lOO?:!Dro?
0 A; !;; (' 0 (' (' r,:;: (" ('r: (' ('
fj~Gf>9JI g)IGNJ?ro~?rq (\)O)~:))~((;t:j?C: O?Ctt~?:G(\):))~ If ~(\)J?roa:>?:
_C 0 ~0 () C"
o
:;>')~1:11 U~")~G~GfC:J: e:c']GCJ j ~I cr~ommJ~or:~31:1
('o ('
900 9 m91 ()

g CC' (' c -r o o c-ot' C' c r;::::: (' o 1


~f:[91)~.))2 roCG:;)f '{'~IJ"tffi~CG~?C O?Gro?mG:O? O'JGt:j?c:~urro
o (' \ OC' r,:;: C' OC' C' C' C' CC' 0 C' C' C' h('
1:190?::nGf>~CGt:j?C;I 1tUVro~e:uf~[9C:I ~LO?~M~O? loOW?:Cu:>tJ?.l:IC:
v::n:r>
(' ('f. ('
roc <D::nro 1:1 l rou:;>Gvm?~c~
(' c 0
:::o~l !T.li:JO?"u9uror (' (." . ~ (' \ .
u. ~ttv
J L 6--
I\.
~men
~1 T
u. 1 1\. , l
h C" r,:;: C'O'l C' 'l' 0 OC'\ oC'
3)e~?:~ro?roG:O? !DG~?C:~urroJ rocG:;>r 'PJ?.~:~"tm::r.> ~c~u:>?:Q;>?W90?
C' OOC" r,:;: C" f.":C" C' C'f.": _<:
GO??C:~~CGt:j ?C: tJfC\ftOOCt1~?:(.'111

i2B
( ~) oxp:~:<>,JlOc'i ~r!~li ~~~ 1 cpeo~:m~~oo. ~ropoS~.,~ j n
11 ~cccoA<.occorw Co
.> .> .) .>
cobCMh.lio~~ II (accrutuoruo W<.oO!cobo:dxo I ~Q,.,.....JJA::JC.c:;"J~
., o i':l ., " o ., .> <> o .>~.T-"3':..:1 " ~
fb~~~ ~x.ro~;xJro~ fb~C'occ :oo~cc !f~l:~ .j>c~8:>
11 C2ccce8-lroo'IW ln bcc:o~A:c.a; wc.rro~eclecc~~orw~ce
.) 0 .J.J .J .J .J .> .J
:~ro~~:b~~&xcc~~~6 @cc:lPA&wOO 11 C2c:d. co~o~~ <cc~bwcb~
.> .J .> .J _, ~ o o .> o .J .J
&Ccocc ~!occt,bcuc.cc~ t,b:c.o c.k(;]e:c.crn'llorro~~l)~o~wcbowco tc
0 .J \ .J \ ....J .J O.J .JO.J .> 0
-~"':o~bo:c.o ueecc.cc~be~cobo:c.o
.,XeOrecc:&
" :hlee &' ~ . .) 'S'o~
el .)b~:lPA:lrAa::C2~ :.> o . l, o ," o
t:.hlcc:o~bo:c.()
.):::J ..) 0
w:c.rc.oc.co~ocu
!) ..)
,chc:;"Jb~~:c.co:c.cce~
~ 00 0
w:c. rwc.cn~
~
u~ooe~ kbcoc c.cc~~re
0 0 ~ 0 .)
:J a:>c.co~;l!,;h':l&:dx.o ~:cbco~,l!,e tlloo!:1'1 ~~ l <:o~~;h':l~:Jxo tof~ c~tJc I
:>-s ~ so 01.) .:> .> ~ .:> :J t
rr01c s00ec ~~ ~5o ":cbco ~~~ b~~c
u2t'IO~boel!ol:oe2ccoo: Jrc.o ec ~ .) .) .
rXt>
....
(o) (c) JV ~ CO:OO orc.o IOQ ICl~CX>ec 2et:'oec.et:c.oet: ~Ct:Oe:OC.COO ~boec:o~
.) .) \, ~..J., .) .) .J .) .) 0 .) ,J .)
~COOOI'II'I
6-.J oo c.oe:cbco
'co:c.rf'I:CC~oo
0 .) 0
"oc.h:l~ n2et:GQ
.) ~ 0 .) .>.:3.)
@~bco~r.
.,)
n:,co;~ec
.) .>0
~boec
..>
to~ ooto:o!:>
o .)
,co:crl'l:2~
o ,
~ccokwcc
.>
:of (fl)oco1o
.Jo s- -- .., ~" .:>
., t; rcorooa..~e ehlec:cfl'l:01~\)
.J:.:t o~
u
.:~Jioc.coll,
(.,:
l:)(a)oco'o
:.- .) l,;
Ghl:::~rec.o
;, ::J .) :c.ect:>fl~
0 0 0
:oCoa:&?cc~:oc.co~
.) 0 .) 0 .J
:c.r~ro:dxo
0-
IICCCt:c..<~coro:~C22b
.) .) 0
,) .)
cob .!>~u~
.) .)
ll:lbt.lc
::;
(cc)
I(b) C. eel oec ec~ u2co :,~C.O~CUAt'l(llAbcua :,f :c.rl'lteoUe ocnd, oo'Cga.rCt: ~fl
.> .Jo e .:J .> .> .) o.>e .> ~ .J .> :~ .>
u;:;~ccet::l@..,boe~ kC2ccoo:lfcoeo ok ft.l I'ICo
:S" .>:.1.) ,J .) .) .)
1 kol'wl'l:cbco
.)
.bccadocorec.o
.)
~cc:c.ook:occo:.
:i 0 .)
o~ccccocc
.) .)
~b:c.oo~e
.) .)
ot::lc.o:c.r"k
.>::J
.rlres>h:: ~(a)$1colo :c.ec:c.rfl~:c.bco :;cJ~~co (a)~Lo ~soccsoo]f:c.rl'la~30
ohl:oeec 2c.& teec a::.ro:cbcou@ccehl@l'lbcohl:k c.cc:~ec:c.rRc.ofe~~ccltroo&>
o>:J.> .J 0 :>o .J .>~.J .>~ Jo .> '\.>.J ~~.,
c.roOeec
0
l:)ro:cbco
;:, 0
.~dx.ohl:te
.) .) :_j
'co:,bo::>bG of:c.Gecslrl'lec
0 .,) .)0.) 0 .) l~)
c~ecu
~-
II c.orecoQI'at
.) .) :I
.)
~t::lcc
-cbooe&a::.)~ .
~=b~eco<osC,coc.ec~n=ll~o:dxo
.lO .) .,) Yo ' S".> "
'Gc.occcoo o~ (6))oco1o bee ft.l Rcl->:kofc.oR:clxo
.) ~ l. ,., .)
:X.o IO~ec e:chco e&x,c cur~:oc.~:lP" c.o:c.fRro:chcoe~
-> ""' ..> o .:> B' o
d .)"oecet:coCc
.)
ocb
cc6
ct:c.bco co~~:c.bco:~soc.es~~C@o sc.bs-o~re so!es-ol:~ ~soccs-oo
g~otccc~ n~ccso~s-o~le gbgco!ge.s [9~:!-~sob de ~~~f)~
,g~~ 69llc lo~eJg8~t~:~cc.o~ sAe.s~ ~cc~:c.bco &og8c.ccsocc~
g~~~coe.s rll fl~ *'3R:oo:c.bco ~cc r ~ g8cccpcc
~~ ~ ~:cbco ~c.bco~.r~
n~ccgl ~=~cl~:l'>~:(.(X)(') ~&rs>osoco ~~
~cotsle.s~cc~eJ &o:d'eJ:rosocos-oosoco gl:gees ~cc:~b a'l~cc:c.oo
~=~ ~~4-~e.ssoreescoge.s "'P:c.oo~:~ ~o~~:~:c.es &o:d'eJsole~g8
~:d'eJ~lc.bco ~&cb:s&sco c&re~b:> coeJ~~~ ct=cbco
~!e~~ =~?Pe.s:dhg.>le:~ ~~ &<> ( fl)gcot%o (c)
nbge.s:o~
&ogrco ooo'c6 8~ ~ccgl=9co
~:&:~~~~ :&:~
~ (f))gc.qs> ~cc:~~ ~ :asct:c.bco (r)
nb:c.oo!e gle.s:d'eJ&gl!egls ~(fl)gcot? :c.es:~~:c.bco (c)
'"~~ cA~c.ccpcc ~ ~:c.bco ~+
:s~soSscoe~ ~cceJ~!i:~ :~co~:~ bsoSscoe~ =s~ce
ses~ ~&o:~b :~:o~rogco~ <pfl~~~(}:c.bco co&o:gb g~~ -$dec
~ ~~ ~~cp ~(fl)gcW ll&,e.s~~
:d'(')~:c.o~osog g&>(fl )goo19~ ~~ccc:)]~:~:~ :~~+
:c.cc fSt>~=i ~cc&osb~~ g~fl~gle:i ~ccgl:&~:c.bco
H~CCCO~~:c.cx:>!f>Og.>CO &o:~:rosoco
s-oosoco l%ee.s ~Ja;rs>&>:c.ors>&oso=c.bco ~9rc.oc.c:i ~ccfl~~~
~~~ eJ~e ~v ~=sb ~~=~so:c.bco !f:Sb
&e.sc.cce:~ ~ 6c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~:c.oo:gsc:so fp:d'eJ:rosocosoosoco cwsoSscoee gJes&~g(s
c.cc~:~co:igco so&es (f))gc.Ut9~ cogrcoc.c=i soc:he:~:~cce:sb
c.b~=4e~ s&g+e 66de ~ccfl~=~=i ~:c.oo=g~=so . ~ic.oc.c=i lfi~S~
A:&,.~ ~~~~~p&e.s{fl~ ~
co&osPc.oc.c:i g~fl~~~=i c.cce)g :d'eJ:~:gb ~re.sccce:~cce St>e:i r ~~=' .,
~cccoe:~cce S">~:i g&~~sob de COeJ~ 1~~ ~de 93tk:
feb
(J) .131fJOUV puv J[V'fS pVUIUIV'fOJV .I!JfV.if /1 .131f10 puv UVI/JI
Ul!'fD}[ 1npqy !'fSUnJVs&xb$F 1~cc~3c.o ):~ 3tge~:cbc.o
_bes Ill "~b :~rw ~cc~:cbc.o lccso19~oo =scl~=~~~~
(~~~pw~~~~~~~~
~:~bx.s ~ccoo~l:c&~p~~3c.o ~300gc>~ s& Ill
(')~b :~Poo('):cbc.o ~ccks~ ~~sofees(')3o scb:o~ ~~
3&;~~gtl&> eco w:dh:~~~~~ ~c@o c.cc~son~+:~~+
~
:3:#c300 ~bx.s ~~ glfu eco ~+b(') ~~ ~~
pooes 19~~~l>c ~S'>oo~ ~+e 69llc ,&.,c.o +~~So ~cc~
goon ~so~ bes (~) soo8 :~4- tbc!ges :~~Wft:cbc.o {pAes ~:sb
~:3~~" =s~~cc:c}!~ ~{oSo ~ccsb~~ ~
~:~~:cbc.o ~~oo ~~c.o~oo~:ces
:c.essb~~ cbg ~(')c.c.o~rw c.cc:~~c.osb~~ sFJ:o~n ~Aesp
~~=~ ~So ?ccso~so~lec~&l lnso~b ~"~suS~
c&~~~~~~
goosocce~ :d'":3fycc +:scl'w~sccoo: 3cl'w~~ ~cc\h9 3&gfeoo
(~~~~~~~~~~
~c@o ~cc~JCJi.ccc sacclocc(')ccges!e g}es:~~C.Oif'I9C.C.O~
~s-occsoo ~+:cl'":$d&o( n)gc.oLo ~vJ~c.cc~~~~~c.oc.ccvc,cf:b
~~:i ~:cbc.o cAol-ro: ~ccsoccsoo ~~ ~ccoo~
~~61~~~~~
~cc~~&~~c.ccpcc~go~c.oes
3&~ (10) + (ce) (o) (o) (co) (o) (e) (c.o) (c) Ill "~b:~ll:.o
~~~~~~
~~lnst&~~~oo~~
Oft~$ s&Au:P =~~son + (~) ~Res ~c.ccsocc ?cc=c.oog>~
~ =~~ =~=~~=#c~oo s&Au:P ~ (I) ~ge.s ~c.ccsocc
r~o$~:~ ~ ~3es ~~=s~socc +(n)gwt9
;a: 3es~cc~ :i~ :ooc.o~:lo ~fwc.c:i ~cc"~~
. ~cb
bcb
?~
rJ$ ~~~:8~~ot'f' c;~~~8~:S~~ c;96c;~~~t: oeliG
c;~~=OJ':{g:c;.y.>oS' c;Slc;~~e q8:~8~t:e\ OO'f->:o8rJ$oSoo:t\j>uS ~:~.:ooOI J
~c;~oo:~c;~~~S ~o~e:Yp:~ oooSoooSo.%:ooe:an:c;f:>t: t&
~~tan:c;oo~e c;SJc;y~e 61m8(())d$ G.y.>oS~:!~S?b~Jib~ .:.s~~~
~:O?OOJS~
c;:Sc;8: oo8:~:~ ~~c;~ ~c;:>~ c;~c;y~~
d~t~ uoS~ ~SO? otS~::OOS~oS S~eo? Oioo~S'1i
~oo~:t\j>c;u~e ~cooSc;~OI 91ooS~:YS:~'i~ OO'f->:C~YJ>=~~
~~~ oomoSoo~: &S&Soo: ~y~: ~
q8:~~e mfic:x?:~&(,) ej ~'1 OO'f->:Yg~Sc;:>S:~ 8'1Sc:x?:gsm:[:
~~
oor~06Svcm: oocoo506Sc;~:~~~S: c;SJc;y~~
~:::nroJSc& c;:S~eo:r.>YOOI ~:O?OOJ8 c;~~:OJ':{g:c;cpoS 61mb(())
oie;Yp:rJ$ 88ro c8t:o.%:an:Ol~eO? ~~lcm:c;oo~e ~c;&
~cooSOl 8qSc:x?:~
g;n:rJ$:g;n:an:!cm' OO'f->:~YJ'=~e ~oSo:ng9
~v& r d$ d~'i06S yc;o:nS:~~S<J? u~~c;g;noS~:oo'l':ot~=
O?tooS:~e cp:~S:c;oo~eu
~ ~2:ro=~t c.fm~~ ~~
eJ ~v& (00) (~) (0) (u:>) (C) (>) (00)
~rbo:r.>g~o:>eIOOJ~c:x?:~y
~ (C) ~ G~:o:>~ ~o:r.>#.YJ'=~toS ~~ ~o:r.>~~k
oorojpYot c;o;nc;~q ~ o:>rbo:r.>gq ~ GO:~o5YGO:~ rbO(.~t
oo~oSSo:>en ~'1'068 OOJ~c:x?:~&(,) eJ ~v& 01 ooy&coS (0) 068
S?5c8=~oo ~l9=~vs ~e=c;'f->oS~S=t~ ~~:))~ 3~~8 8~
Ol~c;ooo:>en d~'ll'06S oo'l':~y.r: c;o:n8:~o:>~~~s: 88~!37.>:
~~JS:So'1mb(()) ~ 'i:mcSl~Oj?~:yp:~S ~~~80lro 61mb(()) t~
o:>oS~So:>~ oie:Y,p:d$ q8:~oo c;o:~5'1t ~8t,ooSq8 CtliloSqye
So:>eu ~c;:>~ ~oie:Yp:rJ$ OO'f->:~ro 88oooS~ c;o:~b'lt
c;O':>?S:~o:>~ o:>oSo:r.>g~~e ~corbc;~OJ OOJ~c:x?:~y eJ (0) (0)
068 ~mj:oS~eO? ~ooqc;oyen ~c;~ o~~Gsi:>rb~O')'l':~:
~e ~rb~o:>~~JrbYJ>: YC)~Go:>::J?~rb ~'i~ey,p:e\ ~~~i'~
c;~:c;~ F~ ~oS~ ~ ~:~o:nS~
~~ ~& j ~e d~t~ sxriJFYotUjl ~:aS~ ~:If'
cp:o#:c;ooo:>e-
-
\lol
>

4 ~8 [~~ oS ~ ~ tQ&~~!f) J ~=ir


~ ~~~~ CBJ~ ~ ~ e~~l cad-S~ f~8
~
<-&..&, e a ..!> .,gb8 c re., ~ . ~ .c c ru-,..foo . -:- ....
'-'
.-u
s s .. s! e
...., ';- l ru-,
s & f) e i .!I, ao..&: t "1i . ~
....
~ ~t: s,~~~ -~~~ ~{~s
~ a~ ~ ~.8 ~ !lli. ~l~~~~ J ~~~~
c: S ~.:nx u ~~en .. 8 8o~ ,_.._ - S n
(,0

-@., t~~cSl~~~~~~ . ~ i~~~ S" .. ~ ~&, ~


eo e~~A~t~~~8W ~l ~ ~~~Ji~ }~
-5.,
-8.
.. ~ill~~fl~l~J~t 1t~~~~!f-e
~8,&CBJ~~~~i~t.~~~~~ ~lfc~~~ej~
tj.- ~1r e CCJ 9n cy&> ~ 8 ~.&t~~ e ~~ ~re., ~
{ e..H
3
,J.ini~s.,~ s ~ oS~ 4;-ft<) ~..!>~g c ~
~ e~ ru-,t
(';)
J ~ ~ ~r-8, ~1r :reB., ~ ~
S V .. n
~ c6 1 ~..s
en ~ oS ~ ~ ah .. -(:
g . 1en c~ ~ s.,
~
r!~~~~~~~
~ J ~
.:8
rltfrt
re., s
!1JI~J1 Itt~
~-g.,~, e ," rBo
n ~ ~-rt ~..!> o n
~ ~ n~ "s o, .. ..Bob
IJ.3n- S ~ ~- ~ ~ <=g ,.B n en ~8
~~~t ~~~t
"t ~ B 1 a, ~
$~~~~8.. o3
s~ {~aol
8
~ j , ,_,
f) e~ ~ ~t.~~ s~
1 -P. c =2 &,
~ ~ ~~ 8 ~ ~ :8 ~ ~ ~ .. 8, ~~ ~ ~ 8 oS, .i6l
n g
1f) ~g:; l ..e a..,
~ ~'!B.4ll ..a.~di.. t ~ ~
e ~ ;.g t~-8 s ~~
&.
!
.f -f l i. a ~ g.,~~.g.,. s ~ g; ~
L
~
~
t:r. t I'll jI-
u~:>Oe~
.)
.
~}Fcc:t~coMe fS'co~~~iM''3~roo:> ~ei'I<X:~~ge ~~~ 'Lo~~!, -,r
{\)CCC~~ l~tl, Csllc I~Co .)co~cc~:lotrooe:GI'I<X:~ ~~~ Cgtlc t
e
11.0C col,ec ~el.loccl:o:>&:>occ f'l:dxo
~ . ,e,:,
,)
c~llc
;)

1floocc r:C";'j:~=~~c.rro~
( e:cbcoe(!nes)
o'J. e:J .) ~ .)
r
~It
~=G:a
.) 06
.A~&es ~c.o~ ct:e':Xll>le g+~~~so6 o<! ro~=> 1go!oe Gs~c !fSCO$~
~:d,oo ft:cbc.ogtke ~c.o g& be pAes~:cbco ~e cstlc t
pAw A~&es~s fl:c.bco ~+e Gs~c
.cr
t?cc:f~?f~:t?:>gbg!lo~~es!~~~C.6:?J~~:f?op.s:?Jp:?J
~ccFfbfusoc.c.o:?J lo$CccgJso&es:~:cw
g~~~e.e: cJ,11g~~g ~:gb o:?JgtO!~ lo$Ccc~crog g;c.co~gc.o~~~gg
g>c.c#o!re \,a; 6bc ~gOsooC<pe& socc:~co:$t!Grocc.o &gt~~ ro$Ccc
~#~~ ~#oJO! ff>g8~~ !F:&,g~~:!JW:cgw cJ,:g~g~b~ro jS>:!JW
:~&,Q~~cs $Ccc:cc~:?J~~ $Ccc~~&lu; ~t sofeso:~t;tgoo
-$Ccc:f~ fp~ (cp>~
so&:cbc.o) f()6 e.G u<x>gb~ffi Jg<!>e ()6()c ~~~~ s~so~~
.GGc e.G fto16 tg.e CCdC ~)cw ~~ IW~ IC:IW~:?J sao~
1{~~9) c6~ <pCC(.()(.COC& g+e ofdc (~)cw 1g{s IW~ 1gb~lo s~~~gb
-:lee gSCc.oW be.e:s~oa sccc:~~~ ~:&,:$C3olbes gso4be.e:~
~:o::c~ t?cc~!~ ~0~~ ff>:&,:$C3o be.e:l'l~~r o:c.c:c~ g~J
~~:gc.oGGgl'eoo ~soog~g;relboo !F~:cbc.oc;&>e.smaot c.c:c~~~ccg~:~
0~ ff>:&>:~~ m~~ g<io:gbfel; ~!&snfu I ~~~:9e
~ ~ ~~ &;~~~~
socc~!re bes 66c tlbs~socs socc:gco:~o roc.w ---~t~C'I~t~
~~~ '#~ ?P~~~ ~~ -:~~
~~3o9~es -- ~ ~~~ bes~ --- :~' :&,:~3o
besc.ccg ~~ -- :~3o~~ --- 11~~ :~~~
( ~=cbco~.locs) r 19 ~~ft ~~)=~!tea
g+
(&o:c.bc.o~locs) 9 l9 oOC.C:~
1~locsro~b ft:c.bc.o
g&>~~o~socc:~:~&::c.bc.o
gfe:~:c.bcosa>~?~i
.s. cu. ,
~ -c l ...0
~.!;1:1>. lrt ~
~ .. en
en

S 0 S ...!> 6> ..'..? ~ S 8 6> 6> ~ - S c c -.. ~ 0 ~ n ~

~ "3. ~ ("Ql
~ ~~~::w1 ~ ~~ 6>
-g: a.,:!.
n-> -o;:; .cwl ~t~ ~ ~ P. ~ ~,f~
fi1 V 6> .. r.> Cl i (.0
~ ~ .: '-tS J ..0 8, ~ ~ -a ..& ~ ~ 00 -.. -.So -t) (B., .. -t) ~ -.()
~ fil 8 czn g" n-> OC : :. 8-, 6> ~ -t: 0: S --t> 3.., -eo fil ~ ~ t; 0 (9
Gi S, .()') c -.So ~ ~ d.lo ~ ...!> ., =1r t ~ -a o ~ 6> ~ Gi an :o<O c 0 -s9 .S(9 .S
~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ } ~ ~ 8 ~ <=S ..& 8o r$. ~ =g ~ rm G')i v t.l t.l
~ dlo 2 -... s r5l (B., -t)
:t, .. O'l
.... ~ ~ L..
=t: ..s Ia., .e~ s 9
t 8 ~ o;:; -a
~ +-> ~ ~ ~ so ~ s ts x.: . _8 ~ ~ ~ czn :t;., o 1
U:$ J 6>
L.. -vo 0\YI "
l V> O
: "'H CIO O'l (: 00 (B., ::!)o t.l
~J t',o ~ -< ~
a ~S ~ e ~ ~~ .. ~ ...8o
6) +'> 4 o &J ~, ~ ~ (fu s s -e :t, Cfu ~ s, ~1 i
~:a. ~ ~ i
()') oa .6> 6) ..

j~~~~.~~-.So~~
len 0(:
v 6) ~ e (B., -\j
..&. ..._, ::1>" (: ee
IB1 oe, 00' s ~ ~-.So1~~~Sv~~-~~~@~ ~ J oS~ &! t; g
:j~~
v a;) 8 0(: l!D
oS ., ()') u
8 ~1~t..&g*~~~rn,s~l~1~fa~rn.,to_ lCI?
...., (.) -Q 6) ~ lCI? ~
~ ~
- -
~r~~~:o(.O~ ~~~~~ (B.,s,~()')-;a.,~~~ -
--4:
r:n ~ 6) 8 ~ ~ -co 0 ~ ..:, ~ ..8o "' -s: 8 (: ..g ~ 8 -.() 8 ~ - -
~ 1> c&,
. (];") ~ ~ =~ ()') %. -8o 0 8-, &J ~ ~ ~ ~ <o (S., ~ 0 8 '9 ~ ~ 1
~ &,'1< 6) 6) 6) o:(.O
~.... ~ .. 0')-+ 0\YI-vo s v ~ ~ il
~ _ .v, 1 ~ c 6)
s .()-)
8 '1>' ..E ~ ~ ~ s s 8 a~ =t s _()
c ~ -+ C.l 6> = 6> -t>
-8 -C. ~ ~ -8 ~ - .. !?">
s8-,
go86) c..3o~~~6)
l &~
en m -t,
-a8 ~s_g->-,.:>~1~ ...) iS w o8
e., ~ -&> O'l ..._, Q'l t; O'l '11- ~
~~..8os t2:>~-.Sofll"~
~ltJ~}~~ :~a.,a.,4 ~~~i s ~@$~~~ "
.) s, -So 4 .. (";) .. ~ 8 ""&;
..-oo '"""' ()') +'> ()') ,.8. "' i
. o-, ~ ~ ~f, 6) fj, ~ o o ~ 3., ..8 sa ~ S .. c a; ~ ~ w
~ ~ 6)~ 8 ~ 8., .),~ 6) 6) liD 6) g 6) t..S' Gi
~ 0(:
~ :Z: ~ ~ ~ oc ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ()
oa s,
8 ~
.. ~80')8~~~ ~ ()') ~oaBrn.,:t;.,~..so~s ..so~~
]>

S.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ...3o~:f. ~ ~ S So~ ~o8 &,1~ ~~ S oot' S J ~r


~- 6)
oc 8 ~ P. 8 ~ ~ ~ .. ~~ ~ $~ 8 ~ .. ~ -f.i ;:!)0
~ g~. ~ 8 re, g a ~ &,
~~!
i, ~ ~ en ~ o[ .. ~ -:P.
rq t ~ @3, -&: . 1
tf l! t .
~ ll:~~ ... ! ~ ~ ~ ~t:t -i 1
2S oa2S ~~ 1~:t~ ....ao Sot~.~ 8 t 6)
6) l.i:)J 0') J}
~ l:IID.&:~i~ "lfl~ _z.1,l
~ 1r ()V/ 8 o8 en~+
CGl...() en .
~J ru (:") c
.
.B
~ =. . ,
lCI'),.fp ....:x> ...c'l v
-2c
8
2m.,~~ ~~c~~ir ~ ;:!)0 ~ ~ . -

~-8
~
g,t-fl..,1~~~j
c ..8o..!) .
j rt: ~-- v -.~; ~&, [3]~~
~ s, ~<-o8~8 8
l ~*t
' . 8
~~
~. 6) 6) '

0')
.en 9
~ ~ ~ &; Dn ..r~
'"B ~ en
~_t}~
~ W S,
.. ~ ~ s.. s~ _w"il ... rn..tl&:. .a ;!;.lS ell.,
~ S o8 :-v. cyo
s, S,. ~- -~ ~ -a 1: 8 ~~
J ~it
9n c
s ~
~jit fli . ~ ;tl:! ; t ~t- j i :fi..t .:t11
c
~cr j ~ t~rn,.:d ~,tre.~.a ..& c
~"'l' s
J!ll~ti ~'~~~~ttt
~c~c~~if ~~ ~~j~~rn.,
1ittftfl
~ i ~J T~~:sa
~ ~ ~~ - c So,
16> ~ ~c&l. 6> + ...3o
g, J Len 8 m j S ~
~ IZJ 0') ee 6 -NOcfjf~~ ~ ~ ~ o3 ~ 8 8 ::;- ..8 e...8o_2_-t3 .. ~ ~ g>
~..8oen~~~ -+'l~s,~ ~~~~~~ ~ 8
~ J e ~ cg
~ _ B. ~s
=:r ..asS..8o ..so ..e ~ en .:
~&~~&&~ ~~1 it6~i t~i~.~rn,' ~~~A roo
~ e 9 o
~,. &"1;.. ~ I~ ...0
~ ~ . . :, G'l ~-
- G'l
ueisa
~ 0
(:r,a~~tb:hw)
e:J 0
u uwloc.ce:dx.oelnw
~
r
0~
~
( o~:dxoe~)

~CDG~2
.) . e
?~~ffi
~~
~
~~~
~c
f:Ib
?.f.l '
~~c:>: ~s~ ~&~'f sxpWn ~SooSo-xp:o:J):~ oeGJ ~ ~
~aS:nxo oo ~ ~;m~ oxSGO.)OO?rnyd) (s) SXl ~o:~~
~
~mpoS~p:tn06oS ~~cmoS!tS'tV [9d)~a:n:Go.Y.~ ooty=~p:~ ~
~~:@~1 ~Gm,poS~:m:o?:~ ~t~S:~ ~troe~:'l
~'
~Eca
~wP::l)~ ~g)S oeG? rtS. .att~' ~o ~G;g~ ~Sc:>:
GSCOOru5~:&G'):otm oxSG:l)~~ (t) ~ ~Soobxp:o.Y.~:~
dlc;;mpoS~p:97.>:o?:~ oeG? r<fbl attOl~ro' J~ C)oSG;~~t8
~~'* ~:(X)')::l)~l ~oo,SOO'):GOJ)
OOCJJ>:~ ~~~~a# ~ooS:n'P:o.Y.I::l)e3 oeG? rtS. att~
-~~~cm:9~~. cm:~~:
97.>:a?:~ tooe306S:~troe3~S:'lt S~~~ ~GoopoSCJJ>:~
Go:r.>tGcmt~ ~~:ro:.y.>:t .G't't:')~Go.Y.I o.:>.:>.y.>~GOfG0JoSGOO?G~
-ooS:~ oo~OJ~ 97.>:Grof.>1p GmpoSa\ oot~:Gs~ too~~
GO:~t:')~eOjlGo.Y.I :>.:>.:>.y.>'f'roe: ~GOfGOlo$G~GOD ~~06(1$
~tcjp:GScO"foSI( ce3:~e::l)d)Vd)G'f~oSeoGsy&~ O? (j} 068
3300j:ootGOI *~ ~~'P~~Of ~~oSeoGSSX) g"lJo$oo~
~Sc;;o:cm:S:'f' 'f':oaS::l)e3or O?oo:l)e3 ~ot~oo'P:~~Gor
ooScm:Go.Y.~ g;.1Jo$~ t'11JSroe3: ~Gm,poS~p:~ G'PS:'lGS~
+~ ~roe3 GO~:S: ~ ~~:l)~ ~::l)~
~ 'f':o#~ ~ ~61~~ ~')!0~ ~
G~~ ce3:~~~d)G'):~eoGs y&~ JO (?) SX) Ojl~
~~~ ~cp~S:o.Y.I @S:l)~ ~~eoGsy&~i'~ ore~~ y&~ J1
( o)/J9 (j) ~t~o.Y.~~t ~SooS:n'P:o.Y.~:t~ ~O?~oo'P:~~
~ooS:>?.'P:o.Y.I:c\ s:>:~w-r:~Gor g~t S:l)e3
~rooSOl ~S:~p:G~ ~:i>oo~~o'T ~Sc:>:~~
ce3:~Je::l)d)Vd)G'): ~o$~sy&~ O? (j)/ J9 (o)/ J9 (j) ~~')
~ ~ ~ oo:nSsc&ro:ro O:ij~ ~
~~~~~~:~~
oo"':~'lt ~a~;}Jifd) ~rt5:>.:>23
~ooS:Y.>'P:o.Y.I:~ar&ct:~~~:'f"e30l9Sar519:ij ~~=~
~. ~~cnS:ncp."o.Y.~:c\ +~~:~ ~'l
IS-:J
-$dccoe&> lop~ ~~~
tb~~:c.bc.o "'rc.ut!:cn :~ros-cc~~~~~ :~gc.o:c.bc.ogoos-ock~
bw~ (f) 6f/(c) 6ft(~) cr t'lyb c~oas-ocs :b~so"'socc
=SR,=~~ 8e:c]::>~! c~6scc~~:&l ~=cJe.s ~+~=~
~~=saro ~=ccc:cbc.c~c.o~ ~~~ ~.&cbcs~Sc>
~~~~&~~~
~~ :ccc-.cbcc~c.o~ treecn -$d~ lo~ ~o~:~ c;o
~@6'>..&6'> 6'l e 8~
l66'lL8t5!8
6 '~.,0~ ~ -8
t 43 w~~ "i s, 0) s, J j l .-i JJ
W ~ e 6'l
&,8 rn ~ e ~
~~ 8~-t~ ~- e8 -8o
~r e 6'l c:v.a> CYl s
t ~t!"' flct t -3o a.,j/.:
6'l ~ V>qp~ S S
~~ 8 ~1
roo"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
f3'l
..8oV
roo o
t)o
n'l (B)
LY.C> 6'l 6') ..
100
6'l '-j
~~c,~a~'[+~1r~~
.. iS ~(B)--~
4
~. @., [B., ..e a., -a f?l 6'l s ~ ~ ~~! e/c; t:i-R g,oQ ~~
::s .-{,)() ~ ~ ..3 ~ .. .-8o (_ ..e . j a.,
1-a s6'l6'l..eo-s..a 6'l ..: 5 &l~oS e &o roo
..!)
tn ~g CYl
8 8 6'l a., ~ ~ 0 6'l .. a.,
fln ~ O'l m-8 ~- J r6'l &,(B.,
-aa., :2 a_
~~ . ~ ~ flt1r rt
CCl ~- -3o-B ~ 8-, ~- ~, , og ~ CYl - oe .e '
..ao ~t e
smg.,
0
~ c6'l -B6'l g6'l
~
o8
5
CYl
t &,_s ~~
6'l g., v
citl-PJ()
CYl8 tn CYl fl.;
-+ { , 8 ~ t ~ 6'l :B ~- ~ .. s
&, ..a , -+ CYl - -a "t, ~ . CYl
etn~...P.'f~~~6'l~
. -8o lS . ~-8 s o:n
e ::sCYl ~ fl
~ 8 s -$. .-{,)() . 6'l g'l 2 CYl~ ~
~~T!trt~l~r -o~
6'l Q
'11
6iw ~-3o~ 6'l8~6>
x..Bo c .9.
s6'l~CYl~CYlC
.. (B.,-- v
an .m ~ e ~ ~ CYl s ;:s, 1 ~ ... -
-8 s
il
~..&-'>
6'l 6'l
~$' . .,
n'l 8 ~ ,.8 8
a ~a., }6'> 8
ff 9
~
e ... ~..so
fl rn,
~ e ~ CYl~
...H 8 -;,X,~ ~1 (B, -s 8
o
en
g: 8, ~~1 ~
- ~
et in &,CCJ .. 6'l 6'l
- n'l . (:1 (B., n, in ~
cca o .()') ..S ~ S ~ = (B) .. ~:: 6'l ::Q
~ s ..85 ~ ~ ::! ~ 1i 8 ~ ~
g.,1a8~~~:t-r~
6'l a.,~ dhS~
' -i1l>

r?ii-&
C,
[[J ~
!i,
n'l . oS
,.8
8
t 6'l
G
6'l
eo J. V

.1)
V Sffi,
-:
ane'O.,~
t
6'l 6'l

U>J ~CYl -v ~
e -as.. ~
J.. ~~% w~~ ~[B.,~ ji. -&, frnl 8 -8-J 9-,..0
.o ~-a CYl
::s a., .. --5 U(J ~..,&, on'!
~-s~~8~tn!;Pn~ffi.; Q" ~ ~ flr,

8~.&
.a. &. il
~~~~ ..0
_f:t..!
~~-l 0> ~
~G~ G.;nCij!G008~c~ ~o:>t:ffi00 o:>a;>#r SCICijlbo:>OO: Gcx$9:
~8=~=~=oa8 ~s~t:o:>~ Go:>~: 9o:>t :noaoSGoo.,SG: 9~ G:>S:
~~;ooS
t& ~:'f' lnt'l(oXn'f'l~ G008Cij!Goobo:>t ~<%t~:~ r;;o,:h
~ES')~ 9~~:~298:~~~~
o:xiJ:G~ O?G~t: 98:$ O?G~~: ~ocn axxxbo;f:. GUS~
G:c.~E:~:I
:n'95o.:>oo:~:~:m :nS+.C1JvoS~ 8: &:ooo:>t"
~!~
ln~~O'>'f':9c!i O~~G~~+~:m ln<.ljl~O'>'f>:~o:>~ aa
:nC\(Oo.:>oo:~.p::m: Gf.4>~~~o:>tm~tlf ~~o:>~m~tmoS mC\(5
<Ynooo~:co00?8G)~=>ttJ? ~~CXijOOJ o:>oS<yoScxn:S: ~:>~o:>~ :n~:
S~:Go.:n :n~V' ~Gt G ~oS Scoo.JSoo~: mar5m~moa:
S~:9o:>~Of Uj?OO')'=>~oSSG:>t: ot~~~~~ ln<.ljl~O">'P:9$
~o$ro:Cijlu$ GOOtv:~$ ~oS~C1jo5ln') GOObCijlGOObo:>~ 4>01:~8~
4>0l:o:>o5'lt GI:>ScoooSc.m;~:nooS: ooS:~ Go:>~:')G~8: GOf~8Gt~
ooar5~tmoat: eoo.:>~:'J~~8:rp lol{S8:~~bGOII
~'f'068 ln~~O'>'f'lc:' O~G~~f~:OO GOObCijlG008o:>~
mar5oS?'P: coOO?boS4> coo:>~: 8:~:>~~ cocx$G:~:>coo:co~:
GOjlpoSc:Ocm ~'18a?: ooG[poS:n~:~ ~:<m:0')806':$u ~w O')Sr$
~:S:'Po.:>t ~:m~Srv ~:8:'1'~ oo~ooBvJ
'=>Ojl~ttG~JII ~~:>g dm'itoat GOObCijlG008o.:>~ lnC\(OO~'f>:
co00?8~4>e .~~ EfmM ~a?~=*~=~~
SC]5co:>t:t:'N~coor F~ ~~~coo:vo.:n vtmtcoo~
cooobCijlGOOt ~:>~~~=>~<;> coo.:>~:'lo:>~~8:;~ ooSo:>oS~
OOOjioXn'f':~::noS<y o:>a?lll o~=>'f'::r.>oS 'f'COoS O?'f'l:lj?~:~:$ oeG~
rtSJ 'PcooS~:.~mvoS 9? oat ~J<roScm:coo.:n ~~ouoS~ ~:mcm:
1~11 ~lnW<f" '>,008CijlGOOb:m: @oSog-:>:o:>~ coi:>SGO?Sc.me~ G'=T.>bl:lj?
cooo8~8:m: 'Pc.~y&~=> ?o9 m9 oo'P:g~o:>~mw Qcoooo:>~"

~s~ ~98~o:>~ ~:~Srrlm:5l~:mo?= v .


~G~r OO'f':~:>m~y~=> oo SX)O?'f':~byyo:>too~~ ~
9~ 9? ln'J ~~(.\)~:Go.) cg:&o:n
ooa+.~o.:>~98: co.poSoo5g~t:~:>jg[~btJ? CX?G~JGO-n ~:5l~=>jt=oa~ mo.?:! F-!
?.P
;soo~ o.x>5~~eoos't>&lol c;o a# ~;~:coon tnG~GOOS~~ oefiG
~00, qx&o:~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~:o>E
~lyloScm:coon ~=;-& 0-:>05~:>.)~ ~~~I.IJ':~ ~;.poSg~:>.)~ t&
Sl)fllolJ?:06 Sl)o:?:@t~~;o:>.)~N cxf.@ 8')G>Jo5oo.S~~:>.)~ ~E~S
C(O::m:~op.>&)ba?:;-9 ~:>.)oSc;;a;>fi o.x>510o.:>~ eoos't>&lol 9J ~ ;~~.
Si)~=a;s~ Bsoo~ ~~~

oor~ Si)Ol~oo'P:~ SI)?:~:SI)'):cm:t~ ~~r->


~ ~~~ ~SI)ro: ~~ ~~
G>JiyloS~Go:>? Sl)'(~ Si)~~OO'J'l~Go.JSCft:l Si)~~OO'J':~Go.JS c;:
~~ &~: +G~J~ ~ ~~ G~Oj>IO~ ~
~(Oo.:>*~ Si)~ ~ ~~~
G~cm:Go:>? 91lG'>::'J'IolJ'ltnGO'f '(00~ ~:[9oSt: ~;ta
91l0j>0:>.)00:Iolt:~:~ G~~'f'o5~ lbGOO:~Go:>? :>.)o5Go.:> CJ:6o5G>Jo5
lolJ'lSI)G~m SI)GB~9o5 Sl)~:~oS l')lol~ [9S:>.)~I

~~it9 ~:>.)oS~ Gooty:~9m Goota;>Goo:>.)~ SS97.>:


>UI:~o5')~0C\T.>:Of 101ol~G.po5 ~:Gfol5Go:&:r.,~~:~ G~~97.>:
~ooo$o.:>~ o.:>G0')')[9t. ~o5~ O?oSf~ ~IG.>t:l ~Gpo5
GOOtOj>GOOto.:>~ SSe:\) GlolSGcr.hune~ +Si):w:oa cm:BoSB8:
~: aaoSw:'P Goo80j>l0oo8 :>.)~ Goo~97.>: O?oSf9oooScm
~o5cm ~:19= ~ooo5Gt~o5 cm:~oSS:>.)~~G::m ~~~OO'J':~
gog~v:> lol<J?oSiol!ftG.>8: ~;Ofcg8~;tc:\)u

G~o:&:ne G~l:>.)c,n:oob~l:>.)~ Gfol5Go:&:r.,~Qf ~Cf0<%t


~ ~OIIG~<.m~:cm:fd)~~
G~ oot:Gt9Joat c;t::>.)~ ~&mo+co~:Goo:>t: lol~G~Of
lol~tG~ Gootyti.~ ~~~o591l') G~Oj>G~:>.)~ GC:r.>t~SI)?:
~oooS~:G;noS ssa\ Si)a;>oo<6?'P=~'P GlolSGo:&:n~~=oa
~ oot=*-"'~~~ G~Oj>G~~ ~:
Goo:>tsOSGt::000foSOf lol~;tGOA GOOt~tSI)?: 07oSt9 ~ooo$~:
~~e~~~=GOO?~~*d
i~{:occ
~~cc :~~:)::~
C so~:~<l>~&~ u$(!ccso~roo &cog~~o:c.bco ?PJ~J~~p tjro:~:UtCC
~~ re~~:gc)e>es. ~sooso8so<b~gofp!ges !?:@~~~ ~~~
:~ccgb:>es g~e S:occ' ~c.J~:cl't'lgb:gc.J~esLosocoes ~
~co:~~
S2cc<Jsat'lbre2o lo$2cc<J~ sog<~-~soS~c:.re~:c.b&gbxs ~~ .
go<l>~cro ~~a:osm~~~ ~g~ c.A%:es~gso~:c.c.o r:$2co 99tlc
rrb
Z''iinG'~
'-" .._.... .._.... ..._...
~ ~fl~~
cSl
~ ~ i, 8 5 t~~~i~J1-~~ttl
c S., ~ -& m ~ og t:'
L~
ft
J,J:J,J. ~ 3-, .....,re, ~ m %ee c:o
~ t.. ~ ~
8 :1;, j
~ ~ t' lt~ -i.~ .. ~ ~\ ~;,.~tJl. g,~ Jli
~~~~ifJrJtlfJaiTl~..so U~lr~r
:;& ""Yo" C'l "' .. ~ oc ~ 0 ~ CGl-8 + i5
IZlc:Jn
l.l~f) ~ee' -3o . ~ f.Q -;VI)~()') +~ <:8 !.4 ~
a., f.Q (B., ~Jt.. ~ ..00~ """&) .. ()')-g.
........ ~ .a ..... ~ 3 ~ ()')1!,3., ()') e ~ 2 ~ .. o:; ~ ~ ~..Bo .,_ $
~~~~ ~ ~ ~ H s: ~ o8 ~ So -Bo ~ ., tJ-, r/ ~ ~ ~ (B., .ey, ~ ~ o8
. Bo
eeeeeeS 8 P.'l ~ cg e 6B ~ ~ ~ -&, ~ .2 ~ CP,< cg ~ ~ 0 a.,
-a .t '*
~~~ ~... ..
:f" ~ ~~ (B..,~ e
'2"~ &>o..il -+" .. -oo
....0 s... 0... ~ ~
~~~..Bo
;:S..,
e ~ ~~
a.,-~ ....... 0'"1
..a. ..s. ..a. -
U U II

~-s
~ ~
1 ~~;l~~lt~~~~r~~~!gi~~
"ciS~ $~i~~~~e
...0 Q') '~~ 0'"1 ,.8 ~ 00' 8 OC (B., ~J ~ ey, ~
~ f~) -Bo=J..Bo ..So~
e fl
~ Is
-3o m C"n 3-,
r~at~t~~~~,~~~ 8 ~~~~
-9 -5 P.'lc ~ ..3o S ~oc ~ ee .. ~ ~ ~ c t
~ --t)O ~ 0 a P. ~:f.).., oc a., e~ o8~ ~.a
f)
~ 8t) ~ (')') "1) -:00 ~
~ 8 ~ ~ i --
bB f) g, ctn . o:; ~

~~ ~~~~l~t 1 T1i~LI+&~t~
~8
r~
ig~~P.'l~~ci~-&,~~~8~~! -8o 0 ~
f3 [l:1 X.., H .. v t
ty, ~ ~~, ~ 8 ~~
...-... c ~ 8~ 8 :$. ~ ~ ..,J 1
G) 0'"1
-e <-'. ~"-oo
i.. + .-.. CUCI v "
J~ ey, ~~~~ A~~~~~~~~..Bom ~
n

c.. Gl'l
~:;t~. t li 11
f) +
~
~~ I~en -Q
~

"8 + * ~ ~ ~ ~ s -3o ll->-8 8 r!, ~ g.,1


..Qio ~ ~ 8 J., 8 .. 8 s...a'ij' il tl
~u ~ ~ g., s (')., _g>-8 Cl?> !:'l g g, ...(')')..8. !:: ~ l
, : -4> en =t 1 :f.,..., ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ 't .~ ~
oe,..,. -4>
~~1., ~ ~ r*, '1-?0 if) !?'> ~ .Be. -g., 41
~ So C' _l__g i., ~
v ,8 . ~.oe 8 zgs ~~ -v. en S s., -+> c
a~ ''r?\'18.. { ~- aos -o cuo
1i
l'hs.,O g
..Y> ~roo~
.. ()') S
f) -B C'> ~...,
I)
c 8~ f)-3o- -aS '- 0 ~ i5
[]J oe = u... rgJe S..~c . ..8 s 8
-g~s., .. 8., 1"51..D (")')
-41 .e l'h re, (C) ..s .. -8 8 8 . () 6)
~8~ "~Cil 8 ~ s., 0'> -B..
s .(:, - :Z' s.,o s, ,CCJ 't' +"> 8 -+o
oS
~soS...E>s
..r.l~8 8 8 ~
~ ~ o8 ~~~~~~t~~ ~1 (")')
IS S .z' '1C 8 Q_;;; ooe,-.. 0 ,.8 ccmo ioe'
-w
(")') j 1 0 f)
S.,S,J ::y, g, 0) ~ s., _g o8 -NO @ .1> !?'> 1f , ..&, 0 CE1
(")')

s.,
s ...0 g ~,.a - cw=4; ,s t'j ~ ...,::&...s 1 ~ -flo ~
~ s, .,
~ .(")') (")') e CC')
~oS~ % 1 tb 8 ~ Jore, ()')~ 8 cl 8s., ~ '(
~ "5-l .. 8 ..S S an-8 ~
0" () , l'h .. a;) (")') ~ g.,
6)
~:~
-<: .......
~
-v .. O'l -- ~ re, ~ g"
em .. 8.. s, P. ::8
1""\1 !:J -8
~ LDO=e
.. ..De-,
C'
o. ~
\ a ~
.J;.
Il-ls., c j ~ ~
Q f~ ~ ' !?'> 6)
tf)
~ roo
e (')')~ s - fin~
oS
sen -ao=!,!R ~ c,
} ~ 0 (')')~ 2!)
8()') 8o:)o->-Bru.,
8 8,.8..
-:M~ ~ r=-o S!io P. . (,") 00 cuo l:h -oo
c.n c '-"'J ~ oe, vo .. .c:
~rt c g., ..e; .Be. - -&-2 ~-g an ~
Q ~ .()') !'! -So C'> f) an _g" C -as .,~ '-"
~~ ~ ::Y, ~ Cil ~ P." S: 8" C'> 8 oe,c8
i I
Uh::: 0 ~ ()., ~ f) (C)Ci)) .. ,2 v s s., ..&, ()') v.
S ~ !< re, !?'>~%~~ em ~
~: s . ~ ~ ~ !l".g
~ ~ ~ ::!!) c o8 !:&)~
~g., roo -~
s c 0 8 s -3o ~, .. So
.. :e
'-"*
_n ~ e s -8.. ~
.cn8..C'I~ ...,2 . ~ .e ~
~ m S o8>8 ~c sio
..
8 t . .....~,. , ..~ ..
8 v roo
., re, - ::8 -8
~ .. re,~ .. (')') =C
~Q
...3o
l
~
>

tt~Ttf~~+~ ~~~-.~tlift iitt:+J~~


0
~~- o, ~ .. 5 - - ~ . : .. ~ , ~ .. ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ t ~!
. tn 8 () !a -uo [C) J) 8 G) en rP.
13 3-, - !"l'Yi
_ ..e-<> e '\:S
~ ~ ~ ~- en -Q
-So~ g ~ \8 . -x,
eo ~8 ~ ?9l
~
~ ~~ 8 }l 1m
~- -9
Q') I
"' ~ <;rl ,..,.,., ,... "' V
aa.,
G)
f. 1 fB:,
~
G) \ .
i
Jr
c.,

--flo
[8.,
<:n ~
1
8
rP~
'l;{'
""f1
CQi1 c
G) rt)
t t"'
"'
~ =!)o
.,
..
e
0

- , . 8 ~ ~ ..
1 -v- -a -a G) -So ~ ~.. s :r 0, 8 ~ f)
1
~t$!ttt11~1~~xtlilit1~i a.;,~t1
'f J!
~ 8 - '1!l ~ t ~ ~ ffi.,-. .. t rn, ~ m;l ~ 1"t g., !i'l 0 .,.

. &>
~ -Be 8 J g., 8 tl ~ ~~ ~ j ~ ~f ~ i.~ ~ ~- ..&, ti'' d'l \:5

0
~ ~ f t ~i:!:1f~ em ;, t~~dl,j 5~l~~ H. . j:1 ~ ~ t ~
~ < ~ ~ ~ " ._,.,_~ . ~ilf.,; t ~ ~ li'!
~ l~ (;1 ru.., ~ 'r :t, ,~ ::&-, ..8 e -6 ~ ~- ~ ! ~ f ~ ~ g, ~8 i ('8., G) --flo
Jr~-R_s~rn..,-Soe ~~ ~ r ~[\}>~~4S 1., [ s8
;~Atej
..&~~ = + .. en
ilf le
LBJ(B.,~ ftn ...
t;~~
~ I U'>-t> iD-e
J-&-'l~~l~ ::! C'l
Jr1 .. -8o

~~ l
~l$,~
..e &,
l l~
-'0
.. xgo~ kukwi c.cc~ftre ~c.o~?
J'" :l g>lbf']fcec)i:ol~~.~~~~~ il~CCJO~"ffl~~ 1~tef9iJc f
a~ so~~~So ftl&c.o ,,a c ..
,.
~Lines &~ L'osoo ?suJ~ sJcc ~ :g~ so8gca:~ ~a: so!-:cfft (~.
ga:W llg <'~<'>s~o2 :6~=sc~~ :~3o bs le:gcb~ ~?so :~co
scc~~~ccso~re:gcb~ gcc~ bft ~:cfft8~:1e~ :g&oa:~cc~IS'
g&glleco-soc.o (o) ~cc~socc :~coc.o ~~~~~~ ga:$2ccgfse<' eo
~~socJ~ooa: :?IS'~a: c)i$2re?r~cc~ g19 ~ :c.ee:Sc::g~:~ c.o:~c.o
soc.co~~c.o=~S>c.c.coi-oi-
tga: {~)sow &~=~=~a: so+a:soc.co~
'fC :~:c.cc~ slccg~gg c.osoc.co~ r C :gcc:GCC $2ccg :cfft~g~es
:cog~a: ~:gb ~ra:c.cc~=~~ =~S>c.c.coi>oi> {g)soc.e:- {g)ga: ~gg
~~~ g:glea: j7WC.CC~~sal {p:cfftsole~cc~socc ~)OCCS0(') so!-
solesoc.c.u~:gb a$2ccg) soresoc.c.u~ sccc?se ..=croCC(Sl~ggso:c.bc.o
~:c.bc.o {p~g:glea:, $2cc~ solesoc.c.u~ ft<X>O c.kpresoc.c.u~
sccc~:6~ ~~so&> e ~ soresoc.c.u~ A~~ ~=coofse:g
~~ ~ ssgfse~ ~~=~&xs &~:c.bc.o
&os~~=glea: c.o:c.rft~:c.bc.o~&>es &~~:cbc.o 3 &~a:
~
:slso~:gc.b~ ba:greco \?3cb~ sooa::gc.b~a: (e) soAa:<t~SOCC
~~~&>a: ~:glees ~~~~ g&~~ cr ICOC.C.C~
1~-!-e cgl'Jc ba:sole~loc.c.c~cc?;o ft~CCCO~~~fuc.c.c~cc c.o&:g19~
eo~CCL~ g8gg:gc.b~ {pl~sccc:c.oo+g19~ ~=g~:~ c.ots>g=o~gre<'
~ g&~bsob ~r IC\)~4-o tgM o6dc ~CC!j5>C.C.Cotot tges
{~)sow {p8~:1b g&glleco~c.o?;o u:gcJ~~:c.oo!ges besgl'eco~c.o
(0) soAw~cc~socc ~Sc=g~:~ s+c.c.c~sts>~ {p:cfft:gc.ocogreco
saccsoccsoo ~ccg):glea: :Jc!n:lb -!goGo 8~ A~*~:~
gM~sob (;c co\?1?4-o 1go!-e o6llc ~cc=t,oc.c.coi>oi> tga:(g)soes
~ccro~) :~oi-ol- tges(~)soes c.A:c.cc:~:~a: g~~gblto !~&>:~
~ rc ~c.cc ge.e:~g~~~ ~~ ~ ~l'lc :l~b~:~&cs
!P'i)
c.A:gb ~~~~~oi-oi> (g)sou;(g)ga: ~ ~~glees i~c.oSt
~cc~&~ be.s:&,~<t~ sacc~~ g&ke:eco cAccc.cc 3~
~ccco~:c.oo;,~ 3?Psacc:~~1leseco {p rg/~cc soAw~ ~
~~in~
$2cc~~ ~~~~&,a: SJcc~~2oc.c.c~ c.b:co:sG socosoce
~~~&,a:~c8~&~co~
r
~':
.)
sstJc t (&:c.ooa:c.!ED:?>)
.J .J
:x~:?>:e.G:?>:2e
c I! ,, ~" J 1 ..
::>coo~co~ea.:cc: :><.f!~:X.f'l~ <.C.OCOIC:>
.J o .J
g: o
cc:mco :Jo\tr ~ .J .> l# .J
o 1n1e:e~,,cc:axo
ebb
, I
u~:fccJlc~ :~~l5~b:~a:: 11 II ot:lttroc. COC'CC.CO~:I)
~:l ~ .
n :~~b1:2n 11 w!ow&:be:c:.oowc.r(\')~
.) .)
o.>:.J e .
11 :~cc&e c.co~ftll
.)
fbb
u@ccb:o~~
.) :5:1
~
wc2::>hrotuWc.ohlc.c:tecc
.>oJ o o , :.:~ ~
ccoob.:>~
,
tu:::>l::l:ce~oo:oo~
:.:~ o ,::::~ , ,
cccMd:o
,
K:r, cc
o rr
<.ooo~dcccc:3wreee:::>c.Q~eeb::> co:C, kwG~r:;;llbccc~cc :JOli::@ft:cl'f,
.) .) ~.) .) ::::J 0 ::::::1 .) 0 .)
ecce~ r::>frok@ccde:@ro:,-bcrftro
,.) .) . 0 .) .)0 .) .)
woccc:,~:c.r~cc~cc
.) .)
@ccdccr::hl
.) :.:.1
corecc:::>c~~cc ::>tocb& u@cc::>~e<oro:@roc.o:C, :~ )C.C;!;let:CocCCOCC
~ .> :::::J .> o . .> .>o" .> .,c -;,~
CC
, . b::> r::>rroteC2cc~roc.cc~ccewroco:cr~cc~ r::>& rooc~co:;klwreee
0 0 .) 0 .) :::::1 .) .) 0 .) -L :.:!.>
-:,:x.h.l~wc.cc~cocccoo
:::::J .) .)
c.ccM:c.r~cc~c.c
.) .)
corecococ.Cc.o
.) .)
nC2ccb~c.ohl:te
.) . ::::::1.> ::I
~:Cc tuc.oc2::>bcnb.J~oooo eCb::>bG:ce~oo to:c.Pft:::>e~ C.CCOCC\X.Ock

~'{ 0 .) .)0.) 0 y 0 00 .) .) 0 .) 0 .) .)
core::>o:cbco
.) 0 .)
&c.oc;;,~~to"'ft
0 ;>
@ccootcG
0 00 .) 0 .) 0
rolBh r:~ c.cc~bocce~:<'~coW
.) .) 0
-~occ.o~"'bc.ohl:eewt;xcee.> &:eoccc.ohl:te::>bG:::>e~ co~ r:C,:cbc.o
..J .> .>:::1.> .> o' .>::i.>e.> .> o
"::>blflsx r:;;J~ee~bwrOO)() ~"cccooMwrewffi
_,:_j " ::::J " " " rr " " " '3'-'
tti~flCCI:l~o:b~o{:;1:hJ rCbGhl:::>l::lxce~:oco w::Xoeecwc.cc ccc~:::>t
<> .>o Y.> .>::::fe:J .>::J.>:::b .> .> .>
Oro wcoo2 to4-occob::>
..) 0 .) 0
u@cccro
.) ..,l; ,::J, .>0 .)
roe~Ghl~occo .)~bw~xcee~::i.oe.mflro
.) .)
.:C2~1oce~n2 co~c;>:boo~:Q wblhlc.o:,~@cc:c.cowc.l6e~&b::> ne2cc...Q
.) l- .) . .)~ ;;':3 .) .) O'J .) .) .) 0 0 .) :;~
::::>l::l:ccowcfcoeJ
.>:::1 .)
bo:oeJC.Ofxocc
l- .) .)
we:l'lb:rbo
0 .)
l:l"'CG~hJ:::>rero cw"ce:::>c.co~
1.. ;y .)O .,)~.) 0 .)
tmbe~eco~a:;
o ..>
~c.ocbxrow:rf>flc.c
ccce~:o;c.oc~o2 ~.> ::>ro1le.cffi
t.; .>o .>
uC2cc::>~:o~
'$""' .> .>o
.mOO:xc
..J .)
tue:ftb:rbG
0 .) 1..
:~rodoe.cccc~cc<'lft
.) .)0 00
w:xoC2ccoe.cJ...
.) .) .)
... @cdo:be>
3~ .) .)
O~:r:;;) u@ccGhi~OCCO ~~:be>or-J:h.l ~b:o~co~cce:ftb:ifxll orro:cco
.) :::::1 e.:J .) .) ::1.> y.) .) ~ ~ .) .) .) .) v .)
.>
wc!Eue~ c..u:rbfte.c ~& r ~ro::>rocb& ul:l~lK2cce:c.cowclb:>~CbeJ
1.. .>c .> o .> .>o .> o Y .> .> \ .> .>
~cecco~o:b~~:h.l~bc.oftc.occe
o.) .>:::::J~b.) .>
:ftb:r
.>
b<:PO::>Il:u~cewo
1..'5'.> .> G.>
lrec<P C2cc:r bftro
.) ' 1...> 0
uC2ccC\XIJclb:>e~
.> \ .)
toroc.o~~b:)C'e::>kl
L. .>
ohlcm~~Fec.G
.) .) .,) :.:.1 .);:j.) .)
w:MTI
':)
w::>Q~
0 .>:::b
::>ccee>w:::>eooocwc.e.c
.) .)
~cc:::>fnec
.) .) .>
~~occdeftba..ll~
0.) .) .)
:;c.ce~d:>
.) .)
w~o:b~nh1:h.l
.) .)~ ;;':!
xEOre>&
.) ~ 0
ucccc:r~~c.ccCbxce~:,f'ICO
.) t.;.) .>
W
0
"occo
-cccooe.c:::>~
.) .> .>:::b .)
wcoo2 .)C2cc:ol::lwl;xcee>tcoo 0 0
u@ccroohl@ftbc.o!;"xce~
.) 1.. .) :::lJ .)
CO~otbe~oh1:q . C2roMc~ ~ec w:beJe.c~)eroc.cce>ne.(t:O~
.l
.> o .>
.> ~ ~
:>Frorow:lVJO
.> 0 .>
wc~o2h:>
0
rdhl@cc:cco:k5hlc.oftc.occ
.) ::1.> .) :_j.) .)
~coo2:be~oh1..c:-J
:;"',j .) :::::J'C!;':J
e:ft"b:t&
L.
cb:>Cehl~ l:u:b~cewce:r&ftroo6 w:~~b\:2 :Q~e~~e>l~c.@o~:~C2h'J: 2
JO :,jOj o .> 1.. .>o .> .>0 o:s".j e :t3 o Y J ~ 0
u@cchlocdom~!'):,e:::>h:c.cococ.lb:>eJ
.) :.:.1.> L. 0 .) .) 0 .)
~b:o~cc:
.) .> .>
e:f}b:tb<P
.) L.
co~o:b~
.)
{)Q:Q
.>~&:::1
w~c:phl:rbfte.o ::X.oecwre~ccc~cc toolrec.OO:> rdhl:ol::le:to:b~
<l::iL..>o .>0 .> L..> o .>::1.>:::1\o
~4Qe>&c.cc~
"S'i :=:!
::>Fro:hl@ro:cW;c.~:xwe~
.) ~ 0 .>
~:c.roo.>roaxoree.c
0 .) .)
rOQlre
L. ~
66b
-.,..
'(j' 8 ~ ~ l s ~ e ~ s ~~ e s ~
l ~ ~ s s So 1 co ~ ~ ..8o -' ., So ..e ILl,

..-4)
~ t~ 9-. :~ rj, t ~~ j ~i~~t
s e ~ a., a a., 3
~ ~:[~
..8o . v ..o 3 ....
,fil: ~d2..8 ~c!tiri C'n -P. ..... nh e? en
-t, ~ ~ (B., 1!.1.e s s ~ ~ oe, ~ 8
~ ';(')-; ..e ~ ~ r!J 8 8 ~ s ~ .2-,
-
~ j a,
~ So~~~m~*~ ~~tre.,~a
C'l
s o8 c-g ~ ~ : l-So-&..o r&l s e .
l~~ re., ~~~
s ~~
t
~e I ~~~! 1 1~];~r :t
~ l ~ t~~~ eo;:j ~ ~~-g e~{t'f t ~ ~ ~ ~
5 &~J~~~~1~~~j,rf ~ 4
J, ~ j'., .Q), ~t';;' ..s ~:&:!8 So~~ m v Vl .
n "..., 5 v C'l
~ ~ ~ ~!S e~ g, oS
e sm_[:&~ ~ g., .. c:g.,
~{~~ .,. (B.,
., ~. ~
i ~ ~v ~i~-Sol
$,
n m n .
8 l~~"~J~ ~$em ~!~~r
.. =t ~, g., -Po j g., .m ~ a., . e 8
~4!L~'~a
a.J
JJ e _a . ~o8 -~~~~T&~Jg~s~~~l
s a t, ~ * ~ ..8o,.g g., s a l S.,-2-,CCJ~ ~ - if -j ~- c-,

~~ ~~
~~~s
-2 ~ t p -r~ ~ f !J'i;&; 4~~,!ell..~
1 ~ -rtSs]~~1~~ ~~~~
~t~c! t
Sg ~t,s"~
tt.t'
g:' ~ ~ ~..8. ~ ~ ..8. a.,~ t &, OX., ~ ~ ~051 f?, ~ S 1 ..r..a; .m ~ S .
~ 8Pao ~ g.,i ~ a -3o !'I =aj~lnn g.,CP.'-s .& ~ ..&:~ 8 ~<=8
9 f
-e ~..8
1 ~~
S m
~~4~iA ~~~~~B~ ~ ~
S g.,~ ~ if 8 (B., c-,
~ L~~
c;;ffi.,

1 f ~~tflllix t'!i~l~ dl..J~illtt!


~ T
lt~ ~ Ii ~
1l . ., Ul
wlb~oc&c
ccc~::~:b~e:o
II bo~\;6:,..J;;l~CeW CC ::>bccc~ O~OOd
" 0 ~~0 ~ ~ ~ ~
&:t=~~b~ro cd:oe:@co'Cc l~ccac:J:hl~b::)'ow c.c.k~co'&c b~ccce~
~ o ~o ~ ~ o ~ ~:J O'Jo ~o '
:c.l:tro
~
~c.c:cro:<Cci~ t::>bc.ccebrocoo2wro :b:;,olreoesoh:ow
.J ~ ' ~ .J ~ ~ ~ ~0 .J 0
wro:rw~ td:>c.c.c~bezceo2wro co1oo~11ll coto6~@co'Cc 1d~tbe~
.> ~J ~ .Jl.ee:_j.> .> o .>
'oc.we~ coro~](l~w~b c.otoe:<Cco'Cc- t'&.o:b~c.coc.c.c~o@o>~b
o .> ~ l. e e :_j.> .> .> .> o ' .> ~ .J .>
coto6:C2c.o&:
0> .)0
tkSb:~ 0.)
co~6:C2cotc
.)0
tb:be.c
0
tocc:;';l~~rol;::lc.ree~
.J~.J.)
1mb~ eeohl~:@~:cQro l()~~becceo2coec:<'lcc@e :obccc~
.) :J.r..J .) ~ .) ::.:J .J .) 0 - ' .) .)
o~eh.ocoo2 c.cc~()hlo~ee.ccoeeco~bWo:ce:c9e.c~o::c.co:.C2o
.) .J :J,:, .) 0 \ ..J .) .J
~
'
.:obc.eceJbezceo2wro
.) .) .)
:b:;,olreoeco
.) .)
'ocowcoro:rw~ l:obc.cc~ba::
.>0.) 0 .) .) .J
cem2wec
.>
ro1oo~ro cctoma:!c.otc
J l. OO:_j .> .> 0
t:ot;:beOc.we
.> O.J
co1oo4-~~'C.o~b
.> l. OO..,.J.J .)
co~6:C2c.o'tc ~~:bec.coc.ccoo@oS.w~b c.otot=~:C2cotc t~c.Sb~'hec
.) .) 0 ' .) .J .) .) -.) .) 0 0
co~<'~:2c.o'tc
.) .) 0
1b:kw
0
1Fe~wre:~c
.J .) "'~..:b .) '$"" ,,
gJ:Je2cc .)cce~ l.lm;eo2wec!f?.
u2a:.hloco to2ccln\; c.cc ~bcdh toC.coel;e~c.ww:
.) ~.J .) \..0 .) 0
:.):>bc.o:e~bc.ohl:ee
.) .) .) :J. t: .)obccc~sbco~oc.re~rowoe
.) .) .) ;) .)~ ~ 0
.) .) w4mbooc:;';l:t:;;l
.) eo&!
. .
" A re-trial should . not be ordered with the object .of
enabling the prosecution to fill up deficiencies in the evidence
of the prosecution."
oo9~'P90?~oo~~J~O~ 1S m~:'l (?) rrJ~q_&:m-:>~ul3Jq~:!J;~:::JJo5
C'
G:..>:oo-:>:o:>e? II
"If the evidence actually adduced ~y the prosecution is
insufficient, to support a conviction, a retrial cannot be
(o) .;~J~g,~.,(9) O~JO o~p1 Q>? J@?ll
(J) ~~? :m:~?:c;oo~f:r o? eu
(?) G~t~ft~?(9) O~?O C'IXUro~?:t o-:) r(i:)u
ordered simply to give the prosecution another chance of
producing further and better . evidence."

m~OJfGr.Ja>~~ t~lC\ (9)qf G~:x&1~~~: ~~cq:~CO')::D~


r;: C' C'
"9.?9t:::1t:D2 11
" The next point we have to consider is whether the
accused should be re-tried (Here his Lordship considered the
...evidence and concluded). On the facts that I have just
narrated, it seems to us that the case is not so deal' and
decisive as to warrant a re-trial. . The first trial lasted about
nine months and has taken up a considerable portion of .
public time. The accused has been subjected to this
prosecution in addition to his insolvency, and on the facts it
seems to us that far _from there being a certainty, there is
not even much probability that, if we order a- re-trial, there
would be a conviction. The expenscs of a new trial would
be very heavy. We think that we should follow the principle
laid down in the state v. Durgadas (5) and refrain from order-
ing a re-trial. We reverse the conviction recorded against
and sentences passed upon the accused and direct that he be
acquitted and dis<:harged. The bail bonds to be cancelled.''
o~~ c- c-
aal:j"cp~t~9Cf')YO) ~
c mct:Cf
o (c) c c
~ 00~~ :02:1
,.,s o Q c ,
~~ )C~:~co'l::n~
"o
(' C':f ('
ro~: "9.?'1trr:n~:l

"A re-trial in a criminal case should not be ordered too


lightly and should be avoided as much as possible. 1\ re-trial
certainly should not be ordered, where it can be established
that there is really no evidence to go before .a jury, because
to order a re-trial in such circumstances would be to put the
accu~ed to unnecessary harassment."

(cr) ~ ~ OXJS~t&:ro':>nJ?tuS >? ( :><t'n-:37'2e) w


(,) ~~ Ind. Cas.a7 1
(G) !XX~~ ro<j~~t&:ro':>nJ?ftJI >'? ooon
~J
<" c- <" c-c- o c- <" o c- c-o i- c-
oeGii euc:~ ~<;IJ(7)':DC\XJ')WJ?::~:))?qc: 2:2l0:>:))2: Ye?[?lJ.>::lJ~ q,2:4l?:9f
o <" <" <"f,~ <" _C <" c ,
<" ~GU.:l)2:11 ~~
ootl:o:n:c;:::n? ~:))Yp:eu orn;;>Jro~'JI oxp:01

~~C:~Cf
....
. 2";:n?c
:.c
c-
<"

G<UI'Xr.>OO?:~
)S
r,-,i,__,toc

,
<" o r,:;:::: c o Oj;'.... c
GC\]?0)0)?!~ e:c;;~?C':D?: !:r.>tf""'v:~c~uxp ::T.X:t:j?C: ~ Y~c:f":D2: 11

\l
J:.
U:D?Cl
C.:.JI
o
~CIGS
eJIT
B: 2:'Cq>::itC
o c g
t.J
G<UI?mOO?
JJ
,
OI'J:ll~
i\.
c
~
C:f i. r <"'"I c c 0 0 ~ c r.:~
c:JT " "'T""c u 0 0 g C"
~mol c;;;;(>?C~G:>.:>? ue:?~ GSGft:j: 2:::nf:GY?C:T.ll.j'-' U~~ !:r.>~:9
~ o ~cor,:;::: c e~r.;co ,..;;. or.;c- c c
G:;!Gfttt: e::nr_y.C~ t:j?: p'j:x>2:11 2:1:!c;4ll: m ~:T.l~~ C::Jf~GOO:
c (" C" '"I c (" g (" 'T'
'lr
0("
OIJ'fo:>G::x>? ~~~~? ~?~~:u1:oe:u c;;ropman::l(. 2:G34?C :T.1~u1
!n<;IIC: 4:1
.tJ
(" ' c cum
::l)O)G::))OI ("
t J1
0 \
:T.~ro:x>:4l?:
6 \
Ei rou::>.:>:noo
(" c 0c ::itc ua>::l)O)CI
L
c '~
C:. l
C" ("
J 71
0<" ,
QI<C~G:))?
C C 0 '"I
::>.:>ffiG::l)Q)OIJffi~~UIII
g
e:G:T.~?C:T.lGO
;r :Dtj'I>GU:~CG<U?ffiG:x>':
L.C'
C OC' C'
l.

c- C' o r.;:c r.;c- c c- C' c OC' c-


::>.:>ffiG:))OIOIJm~p: ~1}:))\:jS tjf<Ue:ooGOO:'Jf ;;>J~OOG:x>? !:r.>~~~p 'f?:~c:
'l ' C' 'f.~ o c r,; O cr.; c c
0 1..))~~ c;;ropmrolj:l Cl'JC~: :T.lYJ?:::Qij?: O"{ OOCtj~?::x>~ II GCOJ?o;
_<:: ~ o <" c c c-oo ' ,
OO?!OI'J::l?.c:l G~Gfel: e:::n;;:<;~?Cm :))ffiG:OOI1JU9 2:G:T.l?Cffi !:r.>"l~:()?:
L. c- c o co c- cr.;c c- c o c c ~ <" c r:::
. rt..~.x>2'P ~m~mYJml:!c::nroGOJ:T.l'i~CY~G::>.:>?ro2:1 rr.x;t:j?c:tlc:
r::; c c o r.;:c o c rr <" c
'P:T.l91':Dt~?: ::nroG:l)OIO)J~J?: ~Gf:x>tj<; e:G:T.l:>C:T.lGUI ~C ~J'fO:>G:))?
oc- c- c . oc r,;_c '"I <" cr, c
ndY~~P'ftm;>G::n? .~Y~ l':3WI::ne:ur o:>Ct!~?:Gro::>.:>2n
0 0 ~ ~ (' g c c 'L.i <"0
U~~ :T.l4ll:'J G~Gfel:ro ~~~~ e : G!D?COJ2 :T.lOIJC : lj"' ~~
\ r.: (' (" 0 (" (" C" (' 0 r.: ("
~~:e>?: Dt~~~'P3 ::l)O)GOJYJ?! a,rn;,Jro~! ~tjOO::lJ?~'f.
0'1
~'j!UIII
g
2:G!D?C
("
!DGU ~C
;r (" (
Y::l)ffi?~::lJ?
~(" ("
0'"1 c
:T.lGt:j?C: ~U I::l)~ U
g
2
c :T.lGUI
: G:T.l?C 'T'
o:>C
6
("
6 0
c:~o~?
I
C' 0
O):))'):y YCICOJ?G
.1\ JJ-
(' ''
?Cc :T.lYCYlC
()U()
.t4. 6
C' 0
0())
/i
6
. ' ;r '1 C' 0 (" 0 ~ (' 0 "
OJ:::l)U) o<;u OO?G4>UI:l):D II OO'JX1Xr> :J(J):x>:))U):Dm :Oio?;a cm e:G34?C
c
C:. #l A A 6 l
(" 0 C' L.C' g (" 'T' C' (" 0 (" C' r,:c- (" 0
:O?OOJC ')cqm::n~s e :G:T.l?C:T.IGUI CJ?f- 'f>~Oo:>cqro~G:O? tjt.~mfl{

l [.!;
OC'
~GO:~c::n::n~?:Grol?()? U::U?CI
U 4 C
C'
Jl
C 0 (' C"
q)O)Cir.
JJ-
cr.>'P:.).)
i\
6 ~
:~:~
0 .
OO!:PYro
L Jl
0
L
ffi ro:n
C.:.
C'

c c ' oc- ' ' '1 ' <"!;"; c


. 1liOGOO: CD'Jf ~J'fO:>G:l:>?!J?U~'P 'f:>:~ :UI:))~~ cr.>Ctj~?: ::ne:u
c-c-
O)I~U:T.lG.S~C
<" ~
m ':DYm
o !DG:)): ()u
oc G(\)C\)?OJ::))U:))::lJ II
C' <"
axn:cu
o
b! l TJ " c:::J Jt l I c.:. -- ~T l
(" 0 .. ~ c-r.; C' 0<" (" 0 ("
o.:>mG:x>~J?ll:f? :T.l~:9"S"te3; cr.>ctjo.:>~!J?o:>"'c: <;roprooo?:~ 2:G!Jd?C
'T' 0 0 r.: ('
0
:T.~GUI mmJtjO:>:))':>:~? ~mo:q_oo?~C: ~~GU II
(" .r::: (" (' '"I . C'
GI)?CGUiffi()OOif 2:1;;!Jd?Cro
" ('

0 '1<" '"I C' (' ' r,:;:::: C' 1:':' (" 0 (' C' C'
'1_G!JICG:))'?91::))~ 11 ~ . o/"f!J?e_j~C r:JfGU::))211 cq '1 9ro~~c:~c
o c o ''"to C' o ' c c-
:G!J??Cm OGOO?Coocr.>e"l;;:))? oo:n:ooa>Oim U):x>?:::l):n(J) Y:D:x>:D
2 \ 6- .JI ()~ . L 1. l tt 6 C.:. L. C ~
(' C 0 ~<" 00 'l<"C'O ("
::nm<;;::D :T.~GOO?<P!DOO?:QI~" II, C OO()G~IC::JQG:))? U():D;YI.,:Y-:>
.J Jl t l l ~Jl oC (J 1
,
GUJ?C:~y:UJO)():GfG:lJ?
c ' "
()?'JC:':Dc:~J?: ~~00?~1 ()()GOO:~
s:.r:c ~
U~~()::!J
.. ' ' , c
c o , c '"I C' c o c c- or;: c- c r.;: c
roe:~ y~~ G~?CGUIO)OO) ~Ott00?:-<0211 o:>c:~lj()'lm?: !:ldO>JC:ti()
~~jg
3"~
Y.
3"alel~
~
~tb
?g~ffi
&~~~
gc..cs~~
~
_,_ - - - '\1 ) 11 Q , 11 1 Q q 1q 2
ccecoref}~~....oco rce>cc'=>'romco rxo:.,.co:
( e:axoeroa:;
o .:> Y.l J,.; .:> .:> .:> .:> e
1r 11 5 ]_
AeC'OWA 0 fUOJCD

bGb
oGb
gss-
CIVIL REVISION

B~for' Us~;, Tlri,,~.

c.c DAW SAW NYUN (APPLif2'ANT)


"t 1966
v.
jul. 21.
MA.' HlA KYfN (RESPONDENT) .

Code of Civil PToceduTe 0Tdu Jill/, Rule 1-wluJher the tkfmdant bouttd t,
'"s~nt writU1f 110ltm4nt-Jarmi1fg of '"limifJOry inw.

Heltl : Under the provisions or Order VIII. Rule I 'or the Code of Civil
Procedurt> lbe dt>fendant was bound ro present a written statement of the
defence when so requil'ed by 1he Court. The Code of Civil Procedure does
not contemplate filing <!f written state.m~nl piccc-mc.al. The Court,. if so
disposed, i:ould have made a preliminary issue out of the written $tatement
filed by the defendant and proceeded to try the same .

U Hla Nyun for the applicant.

Mr. S. L. Verma for tht: respondent.

U SEIN THIN, j.-Qn the principles laid down in the


case of Ma Than Yin v. Tan Keet Khang (1) th!s application
has no legs to s~and. The order for which revision is
sought was one made by the Subdivisional Judge in his
Civil Regular Suit No. 4 of 1965 by which the defendant-
applicant Oaw Saw Nyun was called upon to tile her
written statement in answer to the plaint of the plaintiff-
respondent Ma Hla Kyin . The plaint clearly. disclosed
a cause of action but the defendant by her written
objection contended that the suit was bad tor misjoinder
of causes of :Jction The trial Court dfd not proceed to
frame an issue on this point-a course suggested by the
defendant but insisted on t~e filing of full written statement
Civil Revision No. 4 of 1966.
"t Again.s t the decree of the Distl'ict Court of Myingyan in Civil Appeal
No . 2 of 1965 , dated the 5th March 1966.
(1) B.L.R (1951) (H.C.) 161.
by the defendant. 1 be order was apparently made under c.c.
1?66
the provisions of Order VIII, Rule I of the Code of Civil
Procedure by which the defendant: Was bound to yresent DAW SAW
NYUN
a written statement of her defence when so required by r-:
the Court. No d~ubt the Court, if so disposed, could have MAHLA
made a preliminary issue out of the written objection KYlN.
filed by the defendant and proceeded to try the same. But
since it had declined t9 do so and instand ordered the
defendant to file her written statement the defendant had
no altc::rnative but to comply .with it. As it was s;learly
within the competence of the trial Co.urt to make the order
it did I do not see apy ground to entertain this revision
application.
It may here ~ mentioned that the Code of Civil
Procedure does not contemplate filing of written statements
piece-meal. Order VIII, Rule 8 makes provision for a
new ground of defence while rule 9 contemplates
subsequent pleadings under certain circumstances. Apart
from these provisions of law the only pleading
contemplated by the Code so far as the defendant is
concerned is the written statement as laid down in Order
Vlll, Rule I. Rule 2 states that the defendant must raise
by his pleading all matters which show the suit not to be
maintainable, Or that the transaction is either void or
voidable, io point of law, and all .stich ground of defe'1ce
as, if not raised, would be likely to take the opposit party
by .surprise, or would raise issues of fact not arising out of
plaint, as, for instance, fraud, limitation, release, payment,
performance, or facts showing illegality. In other words
the written statement must be exhaustive of all the defence
Which the defendant is legally entitled to raise in answer
. to the plaintiff's claim. Thus it seems clear to me that
the defendant when called upon by the Court to file her
;sA written statement must file one which conforms to the
requirements as rrtentioned above. She is not entitled to
raise just one defence and reserve others to be embodied.
c.c. in further written statements. No doubt as pointed out
1966
e~rlier there is nothing to preve.nt the Court from fudng
DAW SAW preliminary issue on the pleadings placed before it and
NYUN
(1,
proceed to determine such issue before the defendant has
MAHLA filed a full written statement. Sometimes it is desirable
KYIN . or even necessary to frame a preliminary issue on which
the suit can be disposed of without going i nto the other
merits of the case. ~ut it must ever be borne in mind
that such a course is not always conductive to ex-peditious
disposal of cases. For if the issue is decided in favour of
the plaintiff it may entail further adjournments to enable
the defendant to file .. her final written statement.
Therefore the practice of allowing the defendant to tHe
incomplete written statement should be discouraged. I
would however like. to point out that this suggestion of
mine does not in any way effect the instructions laid down
in paragraph 154 (1) of the Courts Manual which must
invariably be "followed by all Courts concerned.
For the reasons stated above I would dismiss this
application w~th costs.
Advocate's fee fixed as two Gold Mohurs.
INSOLVENCY CASE
Bt/orc r:J Kyaw Zan U, J.

IN THE MA1TER OF RAMNtRAJAN LHILA (DEBTOR) c.c.


1966
v.. Af16. 6.
DAw THAN (APPLICANT) .

Rangoon JnsolencyAct , s. 9((,:} -commission of tm act of insolvency 'by' tire debtor


under - Rangoon Insolvency Act, s. J l(b) -- order of adjudication undrr--
burden to show that the Court has jurisdiction (o 'entertain the petiticm-
definition of" ordinarily rtsidtd "-proof tlruf tire t!ebtor normal(v or usual(v
au, dronh mrd slept attire place-rtqrtiremem by law of clear a1td utrcCJuivocal
evidence to adjudicate tt person insol1oe11t--pro~f tlrat the prnperty in question
i.f a dwelling-house--proof that it belongefi to the respondent during tire
rejui.fill! period of time .
Held : !he burden lies on the petitione to show lttat the Court to which
the petition for adjudication as insoln;nt is presented has jurisdiction to
entertain it. Madlro Pershand v. A. I- Walton (1913) 18 C.W.N. 1050 (1052),
rcfen-ed to .
HeM further : Tbe petitioner must prove that the respondent has nonnally
or usually ate, drank and slept at the place, in order to call it a "~idence ".
R. v. Inhabitants of North Curry (18Z5) 107 E.R. 1313; In re Oldliam
(187o) 10. M and H. 158;
Kumud Nath Roy Clrowdhmy v, Joti11dra Nat!, Chowdhury, I.L.R. 38 Cal

Htld furthn : To adjudicate a pe~on in.~olvcnt thee. must bt clear a~d


unequivocal ev'idence required by law. There must be cleaJ' pro?f that the
property in question is a dwelling-hou&e and that it belouged to the rl'spondeut
during .the requisite period of time.

H. M.: Fisher for the applicant.

Wan Hock for the debtor .

U Kuw ZAN U, J.-This is a petition by the creditor


(DAW TiiAN) to adju~icate her deb~or (Ramnirajan Lhila)
an insolvent. She alleges that the debtor has committed
an act of i~lvency under section 9 (e) of the Rangoon
Insolvency Act and this Court has jurisdiction to .make an
In.solvency Case No. 9 of 1965.
c.c. order of adjudication under section 1 I (b) of the Act as the
1966
debtor has within a year before the date of the presentation
IN THE:~~: of the petition I I th June 1965 (i) ordinarily resided.
TER OF """"'"
NIRAJAN (ii) had a dwelling-house being Nos. 52!54 in 29th Street,
L~A Rangoon and (iii) carried on business within the limits of
DAw TJIA"N. the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of this Court. The
debtor (respondent) through his agent denies the allega-
tions.
The b.urden Ji~ pn the petitioner to show that the
Court to which .the petition is presented has jurisdiction to
entertam lt. (See Mulla's Law of Insolvency, 2nd Edition.
paragraph I9IA at page 188). Evidence was given by the
agents of the parties. The petitioner though present in
Co-u rt did not go to the witness-chair to give evidence. If
any precedent is -required as to the burden of proof I need
only r~er to Madho Pershand v. A. L. Walton (I).
According to Satya Narayan the agent of the respondent
his principal left Burma for India on 2nd March 1964.
There is in fact no dispute that the respondent had left the
jurisdiction of this Court well over a year. before the date
of the presentation of the petition. lp Exhibit No. 1 the
petitioner did not deny that the respondent had left Burma
on 2nd March 1964. Her agent U Aye Nyunt also
admitted in his evidence that he saw the respondent in the
symmer of 1964 wr the last time.
The petitioners c~se is t,hat the respondent " ordinarily
resid~d " in his dwellinghouse known as 52/54, 29th
Street .. Rangoon but there is no proof at all. It is clear
that the respondent did not "ordinarily reside " at the
place within a year before the date of the presentation of
the petition (nth June 1965). He was in India during the
period, and is stiH there. The petitioner's agent U Aye
Nyunt deposed that he visited the place for the last time
in or about r96o/r96I and he spoke only to the respondent ,
though it w~s occupied by his mother, brother and family F-5!
(r) (1913) t8 C.W.N. 1050 (lOS2).
as well as by the tenants. When he was asked, " Do you c.c.
1966
know that in I 964 Lhila actually resided there 1", he
replied, "After March 1963 I did not know that Lhila IN THE MAT
TER OF RAM-
actually resided there." To make the point more clear NUtAJAN
LIULA
his depositions are reproduced here : I(

DAW TliAN.
" Q. And you do not know also whether he had given up
the place and had gone to India or not?
A. I do not know.
Q. In I96o/6r you had been to Lhlla's house and after
that you have never been to his house.
A. No."

According to Bayley. J., in R. v. Inhabitants of North


Curry (2) the word " reside denotes the place where an
individual eat, drinks and sleeps, or where his family or
servants eat, drink and sleep, and Blackburn, J ., in In re
Oldham (3) observed " A man's residence is where he
habitually sleeps." " Residence " is not identical with
"ownership." A person may reside at a place but he may
not ow_n it and vice versa. These vie,ws were adopted by
the Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Kumud Nath Roy
Chowdhury v. fotindra Nath Chowdhury (4) where
reference was made to Order 5, Rule 17 of the Code of
Civil Procedure in which the words " ordinarily resides "
appear. The word "ordinary" is defined in the Oxford
Dictionary as " Regular, normal, customary, usual. . ."
Hence the petitioner must prove that the respondent has
normally or usually ate, drank and slept at the place but
she has failed to do so.
The next point for determination is whether the place
known as Nos. 52/54 in 29th Street was the dwelling-
house of the respondent within a year prior to 1 tth June
1965. I do not think the petitioner has satisfactorily
discharged her onus of proof on this point. Her learned
(%) (8%s) 107 :E.R l:J.tJ. (J) (187o) M and H. 158.
A 10.
(4) I.L.R. 38 Cal. 394
c.c. Adv,ocate filed a certified copy of the Assessment List of
19.6'6
the Corporation of Rangoon 'in respect of the aforesaid
IN nn: .MAl- property. It is not a document of title. lt is for the year
TKR o
RAM-
NlR.\JAN r96r/r962 and the name of the owner is shown as
1
J~r.A "Ram Niraujan.Lhila." U Aye Nyunt deposed:
0AW TllAN.
"Q. Dont's you think that instead of making inquirieS the
whereabouts of Lhila is it not better to visit his dwelling-house
and find out ?
A. I went and made inquiries but I did not see him.

Q. So after 196o/6r whether Lhila was still in his
dwelling-house in Nos. 52/54 29th Street, do you know?
A. I knew that it was his dwelling-house
. Q. Do you know that in 1964 Lhila actually resided there ?
A. After March 1963, I did not know that Lbila actuaRy
resided there.
Q. And you do not know also whether he had given up
the place and had gone to India or not?
A. I do not know.
Q. In 196o/6r you had been to Lhila's house and after
that you have never been to his house l
A. No."

Assuming that the place known as Nos. 52/54 in 29th


Street was a dwelling-house U Aye Nyunt's evidence does
not show that it belonged to the respondent or that he
resided there within the required time. I have referred
to Civil Execution No. r t of 1963 of this Court as requested
by the parties. It is a case where the petitioner attached
this property in execu.tion of her decree against the
respondent. I find the address of the respondent was given
as No. 50, 29th Street, Rangoon. This was confirmed by
Satya Narayan in this case. The order of attachment was.
issued on 22nd May 1963. In.the Sale Proclamation how-
ever it was shown that the building comprising of seven
rooms was in occupation of the tenants and its site, a
freehold land, was in the name of "Mr. S. Poddar bein~
the .ancestor of the judgment~ebtor." . Only the right. c.c.
title and interest of the judgment-debtor 'were. to {)e sold
1966

and .the intenrled purchasers were warned to satiSfy them- IN THE MAT-
TER OF RAM-
selves as to the judgment-debtor's title to the property. NIRAJ'AN
LBILA
The record does not show that the property was the v.
respondent's dwelling-house at the time. It shows his DAW TBA."'.

father was " SANTLAL ' '. The learned Advocate for the
respondent submitted that in the absence of Ration Cani
and Household Ljst issued by the authorities the point
. under consideration could not be pressed by the petition
in her favour. To adjudicate a person insolvent there must
be clear and unequivocal evidence required by law. There
must be clear proof that the property in question is .a
dwelling-house and that it belonged to the respondent
during the requisite period of time.
The last point f~r consideration is . whether the_
a
respondent within year before Ilth June 1965 carried on
business either in person or 'through an agent. There is .
no positive proof that .he did so. U Aye Nyunt's evidence
runs as follows :
" Q. Before March 1964 did you ever visit the business
place of Lhila ?
A. No. .
Q. So you do not know what sort of busineSs he carried
on?
A. I knew through his agent Sitaram Lhila that they have
a ribbon- manufacturing business-."

This, of course, is hearsay. Sitaram Lhila WJS not


examined as a witness. U Aye Nyunt admitted that the
Government had nationalized factories in March 1963. He
learned from Sitaram how this factory was run after
nationalization. He has no personal knowledge. Satya
.Narayan, on the other hand, deposed that to his knowledge
the respondent did not carry on any business in Burma
1fter hi~ departure on 2nd March 1964.
?Go
c.c.
1966 In the above circumstances it cannot be said that ~e
I N THfJ MAT
petitioner has suc<:essf.ully discharged her onils of proof.
TER oj' R.AM. It must ther~fore be held that this Court has no jurisdiction
N1f1.UAN
ljBII.A
under the Act to adjudicate the respondent an insolvent '
. . v. and accordingly the petition . is rejected with costs.
DAW TUAN.
Advocate's fee five Gold Mohurs.
CIVIL MISCELL~OUS APPLICATION

Bt/ort U Kyaw Zan U, J.


c.c.
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF U KYAW GAUNG 1
9 66
(DECEASED) Aug.J8.

v.

.DAw NYUNT (APPLICANT).

Court Ftts Act, 1. s- "ft rtnce by Registrar of the Otigirtal Silk-No. 11 of


Sdse~le J of tht Court Fus Act-co~~tplae autll D:ltd pro~rtitl of tM
dutastd.to be shown in the A"llt.rurt A-S. 191(1) o/ tht Court Fus Act-
applicant to filt a tJOluation of the twopwty ;,. the /otlllttt forth in the Thil'd
Schftlule-Rult 4 of the Rults of Proettlur~ i11 tile Gra"t of IAtttrl of Alfmirt-
isr;atio" of the Rules a11d Ordm of the High (Chit/) Colll't-offidavit of
fla/uariort and affidavit or cwtificatt of valua tio11 of i~~tlfiCitJabZ, twop.yty
io accomt>~ny tht application. ~

Under s. s of the Court Foes Act th~ Registrar, Original Side, has referred
these points: whether the applicant, s Burmese Buddhist lady,should pay the
court-fee on half the value o( the properties left behind by her late hilS band,
who waa also a BuTmese Buddhiat, in respect of which she has applied for
I etten of AdministTation ainee the is al ready ibe owner of the other half under
the Burrneae Buddhist L.a~. and how the valuation of the properties is 10 be
sot forth in the applicat ion.
Htld: No. I J of Schedule I of the Court Fee$ Act says the fee is payable on
" value of tho property in respect uf which tho grant of . . , letters is mado ".
Tholettera are applied in respect ofthe deceased's property which mat include
beeidel hi own, lt ia tho corpua which ia important" and not ita componatt
pem. It will be beyond the scope of the Court, in such cases to find out
at tho outset who cb c aro interested i n the property besidca the deceased.
Accord ingly, it is ruled that the cnti!f and c~mplete asseta and prop.artit!$ of
the deceased as they stood at the tame of h1 s death mll.lt be shown in the
Annexure A of the applia~tion and the appropriate coun-fce be paid in
full upo~ the bas.is.of the entire Jlet valuation set forth by the 'applicant.
In rhe goods of Arat~" Stefl~" dtceast.l ( t9~7-2.8) 32. Calcutta Weekly
Nota, 799 ; ' " the soods of Probhal C hdndra DartUJ, tkcuuetl, I. L.R
(1946) I Cal. 77; /rt tl~ estate ' of u ro Khin, tkctastd (1918) I; Burma
Law Tim(s :s8; Ma Chan Mya v. Ma Ngroe Yo11 , a Upper Burma RuiJ~
(1914-tb) 74 ; Ma Hmyin and thre v. Maung Ba Mdung. l.L. R . 2 Ran.
n3 (u7); Ma Nwt v. Ma S ai Da , T.L. R. 'i Ran. is!! -.Mo San Nyun and
another v. Moun Tint, A.l.R.(1 930) Rlln. '.90. rcfc!rt~ to.

Civil Miacellaneous No. 75 of 1966.


c.c. Held further : S. I9t(t) of the Court Fe.es Act .which says that no grant of
t6
letters of adrninistrotion shall be made upon an application for such grant
iN 'IHEMAT- until the applicant has filed in the Court a valuation of the property in the
TEROVTIJJ: form set forth in the Third Schedule of the Act. It is imperative. Where
ESTATF. OF an application for letters is made to the High (Chief) Court, s. t9H of the Court
U KYAW Fees Act directs that a notice of the application shall be given to the Finan
GAUISG
(D~Cf.AS.!D)
c:ial Commissioner, who may penalise the applicant under s. 19E of the Act
v. if he paid too low a court-fee thereof.
DAW NYUNT.
Under Rule 4 of the Rules of Procedure in the Grant of Letters of Admin-
istration (page 2bf>)of the Rules and.Orders of the Higb(Chief) Court affidavit
of valuatio~ and affidavit or certificate of valuation of immovable property in
accordance with Rule 17 must aeco:npany the appl ~c.ation showing the n at_n c
of the valuer inter alia, if any, on the basis of valuation adopted. Under Rule
18 tbe Bailiff can make the valuation if request is made to the-Court for his
:<ervices. O f course, the correctn!:SS of the v~luation is a matter for the revenue
authorities and not for the Court to ~ecide. !n case"the valuaticiri is found o~
proved to be g11eater and too.high a court-fee has been paid tbereoB,_ remedy
is open to the applicant under s. 19A of the Act.

U KYAW ZAN U,. J.-This is a reference under


section 5 o_f tlfe"Court Fees Act SQ.bm~ttcd _to me for dec.1sion
at the instance of the learned Registr'a:. of the Original Side
of this- Coi,lrt. as a difference has arisen be_tweefl him artd
the learned Advocate for the applicaRt Daw Nyunr in th~
case. The pofnrs raised are whether the applicant,. a
B.urmese Buddhist lady, should pay cour.t-1e.e on half
the value of the properties left hehind by her late husband,
who was also a Burmese Buddhist, in respect of \Yhich she
has applied for letters of Administration since she is already
the .owner of the other half under the_Burmese Budd_Wsl;
Law, and how the valuation of the properties is to. be set
forth in the application. The Court is. no~. concerned
with the correctness of the valuation but with the setting
-fqrth of all the properties correctly. or in other words,
with the true and correct .assets of the decei!~~
. The points raised undoubtedly are of general
importance. No authority has been shown on the subject.
'I
I

lrr the goods of Aratoon Stephen, deceased (I) Costello, 1. F-5~


-(1) (r927-28) 32 Calcutta Weekly Notes, 799
sitting on the Original Side of the Calcutta High Court
pointed out that the High Court or a Civil Court, on an
IN TB& MAT-
application being made to it for letter~ of administrat!on, T&R OF 'fliE
has only to be satisfied that appropriate duty has been ESTATE OF
U KvAW
paid on the net valuation of the estate as set forth in the GAtll'IG
application and it is no part of its business to check the (DEC&ASED)
v.
correctness of that valuation which taSk has been reserved DAW NYUNT-

for the revenue authorities to be performed by them, if


considered necessary, after receipt of the usual notice of
the application from the Court. Civil Courts ought not
to cencern themselves to check the valuation put upon
the yarious items of property set out in the application
or in the affidavit of valuation according to the form
prescribed . in the third schedule of the Court Fees Act,
but they shoul!i merely satisfy themsel ves that the appro-
priate fee has been paid on the valuation declared by the
applicant. The learned Registrar should merely satisfy
himself that all the appropriate duty has been paid in
accordance with and upon the basis of the figures which
the applicant himself or herself put forward in his or her
affidavit of valuation. If that valuation is not correct,
it is the business not uf this Coun but of the revenue
authorities to make such investigation as they think fit,
and if they are so advised to move the Court under sub-
sectipn (4) of section 19H of the Court Fees Act. In
Civil Miscellaneous No. 34 of 1966 of this Court Kyi Kyi
Myint, a daughter of the deceased by his first wife Daw Pu
Lay made a similar appiication for letters of administra- .
tion with the knowledge and consent of her own brother
and sisters to which the present applicant Daw Nyunt
opposed. The properties in both the cases are identical
but the valuations given are not the same. Being a fiscal
matter it is not unusual to hold an enquiry by t~e Collec.tor
under section 19J-:1 (3) of the Court Fees Act to come to a
correct and uniform valuation of the properties for the
SB purpose of assessment of court-fee if he entertains any
??J
c.c. doubt or is not satisfied with the valuation made by the
rl)66
applicant, or if the applicant does not amend the valuation
lN TBE MAT-
TER OF THE to his satisfaction, he (Collector) may move the Court to
ESTATE OF . hold an enquiry into the true value of the properties as I
U KYAW
GAUNG have stated above. If it is the High (Chief) Court, the
(DECEASED)
v. application must be made in its Testamentary and Intestate
DAW NYUNT Jurisdiction and not hi its ordinary Original Civil jurisdic-

. tion. En the goods of Probhat Chandra Barua, dec~ased (2).


m the other case, the applicant Kyi Kyi Myint denied
that this applicant Daw Nyunt is the legal widow of her
father. the deceased, and there was severance of filial
relation between the deceased and his children, including
herself. She also denied the applicant's (Daw Nyunt's)
alJegation that her mother Daw Pu Lay (also deceased)
was divorced by her father. The applicant Daw Nyunt
has no issue by the deceased. Thus, the important
questions inter alia involved are whether the applicant
(Daw Nyunt) was legally married to the deceased and
whether Daw Pu Lay wa~ divorced by the deceased. The
right to inherit and the quantum of interest of the appli-
cant in the properties of the deceased depend upon the
answers to these questions. Evidence will have to be
led yet if the Court is desired to decide, but before any
decision is made the Court is concerned with and is to
look only at the estate of the deceased as it stood at the
time of his death for which rival applications for letters
of administration have been made. In the estate of
U Po Khin, deceased, (3) which is the oniy authority on
the point I could lay my hands on, it was held by Young, J.
that the estate of a Burman Buddhist dying in the lifetime
of his wife includes only half the property he died possessed
9f, the other half being his wife's property duriJ1g their
joint lives, and the court-fee is payable on half the property
he died possessed of for the purpose of letters of
administration. It is a short judgment and it appears that
(z) I.L.R. (r946) t Cal. 77- (3) (r918) t1 Burma Law Times 258.
it was a simple and straightfcrward case of a legal widow c.c.
tg66
applfing for \etters of administration. If this was so, I
.IN Til MAT- ,
hc1ve .no. quarrel with it as under the Burmese Buddhist TER OF TilE
Law the wife during their subsistence of the marriage has ESTA.U OF
1J KYAW
interest generally in all the properties belonging to either GA.UNG
or both. it is usual to regard all properties acquired by (DECASEO)
v.
the spouses during the coverture as belonging equally to Di\W :NYUNT.

the husband and wife but when the kind of properties, for
example payin, lettetpwa, hnapazon, etc., the status of
the couple, for example, eindaunggyi.- lesser wife, etc., ana
the rights of inherita.nce of the atet children against the
surviving spouse are in question. the quantum varies.
To illustrate the point~assuming that the applicant Daw
Nyunt is the legal widow of the deceased and that Daw
Pu Lay was not divorced, I may mention that in Ma Chan
Mya v. Ma. Ngwe Yon (4) it was held that the child of a
first marriage was entitled to three-fourths of the jointly
acquired property of the first marriage, and the second
wife was entitled to one-fourth. See also Ma E Hmyin
and three v. Maung Ba Maung (5). In Ma Nwe
v. Ma Sai Da (6) which was a case by the child of the first
marriage against the step-mother for administration of
the estate of her father (deceased) where the estate was
made up of payin property brought to the second marriage
by the deceased as well as of hnapazon property of that
. marriage, the major portion having been inherited after
the _death of the first wife and before his second marriage,
it was held that the atet child would get three-fourths of
the said inherited property which was brought in as payin
and the step-mother would get one-fourth. If the deceased
however inheritedduring the second marriage, the step-
mother would be entitled to half. As regards hnapazon
of the second marriage it was held the atet child would
get only. one-eighth share and the step-mother seven-eighths.
(4) z Upper Burma Rulings (1914-16) 74 (5) I.L.R. z Ran. 123 ( 127).
(6) l.I .. R. i Ran. 578.
??9
c.c. See also Ma San Nyun and another v. Maung Tint {7).
19fj6
Hence, it cannot always be said that the wife is entitled
IN THE MAT-
TER OF l11E to half the properties on the death of the husband. It
ESTATE OF
U KYAW
depends upon the special circumstances of each case. In
GAUNG the estate of U Po Khin (3) is thus distinguishable. No. I r
(DECEASED)
v. of Schedule I of the Court Fees Act says the fee is payable
-DAW NVUNT.
on value of the property in respect of which the grant
Cl

of . - letters is made." The letters are


applied in respect of the deceased's property which may
include besides his own_ It is the corpus which is
important and not its component parts. ft will be beyond
the scope of this Court, I think. in such cases to find out
at the outset who else are interested in the property
besides the de:eased. Accordingly, I rule that the entire
and complete assets and properties of the deceased as they
stood at the time of his death must be shown in the
Annexure A of the application and the appropriate court-
fee be paid in full upon the basis of the entire net valuation
set forth by the applicant Daw Nyunt. In other words
her contention that the fee is payable on half the value
of the properties is rejected .
Tc answer the second point. reference is to be made
to section 191 (1) of the Court Fees Act which says that
no grant of letters of administration shall be ':Jlade upon
an application for such grant until the applicant has filed
in tbe Court a valuation of the property in the form set
forth in the Third Schedule of the Act. lt is imperative.
Wnere an application for letters is made to -the High
(Chief) Court. section 19H of tile Court Fees Act directs
that a notice of the application shall be gi.ven to the
Financial Commissioner, w.ho may penalise the applicant
under section 19E of the Act if he paid too low a court-fee
thereof. In the connected case referred to above, the
applicant Kyi Kyi Myint valued the properties in full while
the present applicant Daw Nyunt, as stated above, desires
(7) A.I.R. (1913) Ran. t9o. (3) ("1918) 11 Burma Law Times 258.
to pay only half the court-fee on the value of the same c.c.
16
properties. Kyi Kyi Myint's valuation was worked out
I N TBE MAT-
by a qualified architect and 11censed surveyor and property iER oF TBE
valuer and it may be more acceptable than that of the EsrAri oF
tJ KYAW
applicant Daw Nyunt. Under Rule 4 of the Rules of GAUNG
Procedure in- the Grant of Letters of Administration (DECEASE> v.
[page 2o6 of the Rules and Orders of the High (Chief) DAw NYUNT.
Court] affidavit of valuation and affidavit or certificate of
valuation of immoveable property . in accordance with
Rule 17 must accompany the application showing the
name of the valuer inter alia, if any , on the basis of
valuation adopted. Under Ru'e x8 the Bailiff can make
the valuation .if request is made to the Court for his
services . Of course, the correctness of the valuaqon is a
matter for the revenue authorities and not for the Court
to decide as I have stated above. In case. the valuation is
found or proved to be greater and too high a court-fee has
been paid thereon, remedy is 6pen to the applicant under
section 19A of the Act.
For all the reasons given above, I direct that the same
valuation as in the connected case be made in the present
case also as advised by the learned Registrar.
CIVIL I'IRS'l APPEAL
Before U Sein Thin, J.
c.c.
1966 J. SANG -NJNG (APPELLANT)
Aug. 8 v.
u yA UK (RESPONDENT) .
Suit fc.r recovery of 1hare capital-a receipt granted acknowledging the receipt
of rrunre)'-no Jtipu/ation regarding the time for payment-Article 120 of
~he Limi!atiotr Act"-chiru Special Divisions. (Extensio!' of Laws) Act-
Notification .No. 23 of .fhe Chin Affairs Cou1fcil-vanting of relhf on the
principln of ju.stice, equity and good comcience.

Held : Exhibit " m " is merely a receipt granted by the defendant


ac:knowledgiag the receipt of a awn of K s,ooo. There is no stipulation
regarding the tiu}e for repayment and from the nature of the alleged transaction
betweea the parties it is palpably clear that the sum was not immed'iatdy
payable at the time when it was dra~ up. As the right to sue accrued on the
date when the defendant refused to comply with the demand made by the
. plaintiff, Article 120 of the Limitation Act is applicable.
&mesh War Mandai v, Ramchand Roy, 10 Cal. 1033 (1034) (0.8.), disting-
uished.
Held further : Under the Chins Special Divisions (Extension of Lawa)
Act, 1948, only cenain port1on of the Code of Civil Procedure are applicable
to the Chins in the Chins Special Division. The pa nies to the suit being
Chins the conduct of the suit between them is regulated by Notific'arioo No. 33
of the Chin Affairs Council dated the 2nd August l949 From the judeep1ent
or the lower Court It appears that the relief was granted to the plaintiff on the
principles of justice, equity and good conscience and therefore there is no
reason for disturbing the judgment and decree of the lower Court .

U Hla Nyun for the appellant.

Mr. 5. L. Verma for the respondent ..


U SEtN THIN, j.-ln CiviC Regular Suit No. I of 1963
of the Additional District Cour~ of Mind:).t , within the
Chin Special Division, t~e plaintiff-respondent Ya Uk fil~
a suit against the defendant-appellant Sang Niflg. Among
the mapy rei iefs claimed in the suit was one for recovery
Civil First Appeal No. 12 of 1964.
t Against the decree of the Add itional District Court of Mindat in Civil
Regular Suit No. a of i963, dated the JISt july 1964.
???
of K 15,000 being the -share capital contributed by the c.c.
1966
plaintiff towards the partnership business alleged to have -
been set up between the parties. It was the case of the J.sAN;.NINc
plaintiff that there was a partnership between him and the u YA LIK.
defendant in connection with a road construction work
for which the defendant had obtained a contract from the
Government. The plaint~ had already contributed
various sums amounting in all to K 15,000 as his share
towards the partnership capital, the stipulation between
the parties being to enjoy the profits derived therefrom
equally between them. After the completion of the work
the defendant is alleged to have drawn various sums of
money from the Government without making over any-
thing to the plaintiff inspiite of repeated demands. Hence
the present suit in which the plaintiff claimed, amongst
others, recovery of K xs,ooo only waiving the sum of
K 5 .ooo alleged to be due to him on account of his share
of the profits accrued from the partnership business.
The defendant by his written statement denied the
allegations in toto. It was also contended that the claim
of the plaintiff was barred by limitation. The trial Court
held that the alleged partnership between the parties was
not proved. It however came to the finding that the
plaintiff had advanced a sum of K 15,ooo to the defendant.
Regarding the question of limitation the learnedtrial Judge
was of opinion that Article I 20 of the Limitation Act was
applicable and that the suit was therefore w~thin time. A
decree for the said sum was accordingly passed in favour
of the plaintiff with costs.
. The only point that has been seriously canvassed in
this appeal is that. the suit was time barred. According
to the learned counsel for the appellant, the relevant
article applicable to the suit is Article 57 which prescribes
56A a time limit of three years from the date when the loan is
made. The Exhibit "ro" which acknowledges the receipt
of K 'r5,ooo by the defendant is dated r Ith A_pril 1958
c.c. and this date according to the learned counsel for 1he.
1966
appelJa'n t, being the time from which the limitation period
.J. SANG NING
Y. begins to run, the suit should have been filed on or before
U YALIK.
1 rth April 196r. I am however unable to subscribe to
t.his view. From the very 'wordings o f Article 57, it
seems clear to me that it is applicable only in respect of a
loan which is immediately payable. Exhibit" m" is merely
a receipt granted by the defendant acknowledging the
receipt of a sum of K 15,000. There is 'no stipulation
regarding the time for repayment and from the na.ture of
the alleged transaction between the parties it is palpably
clear that the sum was not immediately payable at the
time when it was . drawn up. The word payable in
Artkle 57 has been held to mean payable at once on the
loan. being made. Thus in Ramesh War Mandai v.
Ramchand Roy (1) it was held that where a loan is on an
agreement that it is repayable on a future date it cannot
be said to be payable immediately on the loan. being made
and a suit for recovery thereof is not for " money payable
for money lent" within. the meaning of Article 57 f
wou!d accordingly hold that in respect of the suit out of
which this appeal arises Article 57 of the Limitation Act
is not apposite.
rt is next contended that as the suit is one based on
partnership, Article 106 is applicable. Here again r am
unable to follow the line of contention advanceq by the
learned counsel for the appellant. As pointed above the
lower Court has come to a fi 11ding, which finding is not
unwarranted by the evidence obtaining on the record of
the lower Court, that the existence of partnership was
not proved. It is therefore dear that Article -ro6 whkh
relates to a suit for an account and a share of the profits
of a dissolv~ partnership is not at all applic~_ble. A
relevant article is obviously Article I 2o which prescribes
a time limit of six years fro~ the date when the right to
(1) 10 Cal. 1033 { 1034) (O.B.).
sue accrues. In the present case before me the right to
sue accrued or the d_ate when the defendant refused to
comply with the demand made b:y the plaintiff. The suit J . SANGNING
v.
which was filed on the 17t\1 Septdnber 1963 was therefore U YA LIK.
still within time.
Lastly, the learned counsel for the appellant, in the
course of his arguments before me has pointed out that
the relief granted to the plaintiff is not consistent with
the nature of his claim in the suit whi.c h was essentially
a suit for accounts. It must however be borne in mind
that under the Chins Special Divisions (Extension of Laws)
Act, 1948, only certain portion of the COde of Civil Pro-
cedure are applicable to the Chins in the Chins Special
Div!sion. The parties to the suit being Chins the conduct
of the suit betTeen them is regulated by Notification
No. 33 of the Chin Affairs Council dated the 2nd August
1949. From the judgment of the lower Court it appears
. that the relief was granted to the plaintiff on the principles
of justice,. equity and good conscience and I therefore see
no reason why the judgment and decree of the lower Court
should be disturbed. In the result this appeals fails and
is here~y dismissed with costs. ' Advocate's fee fixed as
two gold mohurs
CIVIL FIRST APPEAL
Before U Thet Pe, J.

c.c. MARIAPPA CHEITIAR AND TWO OTHERS (APPELLANTS)


1966
July 16.
v.
SHRI VRAJLAL NARANDAS DESAI AND FOUR OTHERS
(RESPONDENTS).

Cork of Civil Proctd~~re 0. 22 R. 2 muJ 4-opplicobility to appeal-Abatement


of qppeal-nc abatement though the hgal representative of the deceased
appe:lant not brought 011 tile record if the right of appeal surt'it1es to the
suroiving op~Uants-opplication of the test whether the respondenlf could
sue the surviving appellants in the Trial Court in the absence of the deceased
appellant.
The n:~pomleots who arc trustees of a temple instiruted a suit ajainst the
appellants. One of the appellants died and no substitution was made.
Held : If a case comes within the ambit of rule 2 of 0. 2:rCivil Procedure
Code the appeal will no-c abate in such a case even though the legal
representative ofthc deceased appellam is not brought on the record in as much
as the right of appeal survives to the surviving appeiiiUlts. On the other hand
if the case falls under rule 4 where one of the appellants dies and the right to
appeal does not survive to the remainillg appellants, the . appeal will abate so
far as the deceased appellant is concerned if no application for substitution is
made within time. The test to be applied is whether the respondents could
have sued the surviving appellants in the trial Court in the absence of the
deceased appellant. If the answer is in the affirmative, the case must belong
to the category under rule z and the surviving appellants will be entitled to
pro<;eed with the appeal without bringing the legal representatives of the
deceased appellant on the record.

Mr. B. K. Sen for the appellants.

Mr. R. Chaube for the respondents.

U THET PE, J.-This order relates to the question of


abatement of appeal. It is not in dispute that the first
appellant has died on 5th February 1966 and his legal
Civil First Appeal No. 55 ~f 1963.
t Against the decree of the City Civil Court of Rangoon in Civil Regular
Suit No. 804 of 1963, dated roth April t 963.
representatives have not been brought on the record within c.c.
1966
the prescribed time. The learned Advocate for the
respondents therefore contended that the appeal has abated MARIAfPA
CBETilAR
as a whole. AND TWo

.The law relating to abatement necessary for the present SBRJ ;~LAt
purpose is to be found in Rules 2 and 4, Order 22, Ci~l NA.RANDAs
DESAI AND
Procedure Code the relevant portions of which reaq: FoUR.

. " 2. Where there are more defendants than one, and any
of them dies, a'nd where the right to sue survives against the
sur\riving defendant or defendants alone, the Court .shall cause
an entry to .that effect to be tnade on the record, and the
suit shall proceed against the surviving defendant or
defendants.
4 Where one .of /two or more defendants dies and the right
to use does not survive against surviving defendant or
defendants al<me, or a sole defendant or sole surviving
defendant dies an<J. the right to sue survives, the Court~ on an
application made in ihat behalf, shall cause the legal repre-
sentative of the deceased defendant to be. made a party and
.shall proceed with the suit."

These rules apply mutatis mutandis to appeals. A


perusal of these rules show that if a case comes within
the ambit of Rule 2 no substitution is necessary. _The
appeal will not abate in such a case even though the legal
representative of the deceased appellant is not brought on
the record inasmuch as the right of appeal survives to.the
surviving apt:fllants. On the other hand if the case falls
under Rule 4 where one of the appellants dies and die
right to appeal does not survive to the remaining
appellants, the appeal will abate so far as the deceased
appella~ is concem~d if no application for substitution
is made within time. The test to be applied. is whether
the respondents could have sued the surviving appellants
in the trial Court in the absence of the deceased appellant.
If the answer is in the affirmative, the case must belong
to the category l,lnder Rule 2 and the surviving appellants
c.c. will be entitled to proceed with th,e appeal without bring
1966 '
ing the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on
MARIAPPA
CRETTIA.R
the record.
AND TWO
Y.
SHRl VRAJLAL
Thus it has peen held in Mt. Laxmi Bai v. Amrit/al (1):
NARANDAS . .
DESAI AND " Where the. right to sue is fully represented by the
FOUR. surviving plaintiff or defendant already on record Rule 2
applies: and when it would not be fully represented unless
some person n~t already on record is added as a party.
Rule 3 or Rule 4 applies."

In Sankru Mahto and others v. Blioju ;'vfahto an.d


others (2) it has been laid down that:
:The test whether a right to sue survives in the surviving.
plaintiffs or against the surviving defendants is whether the
surviving plaintiffs can .alone su~ or the surviving defendants
could alone be sued in the absence of the dec.eased plaintiff
or defendant respectively."

See also Guruprasad Sukul and another v. Tarini Char~n


Debnath and others (3) where it was ruled that:
' 1 Where there are several defendants to a suit. it is possible

for one defendant to press an appeal as against the whoie .


decree upon a point which is common to all the defendants
and the appeal does not abate on the death of one of the
defendants.''

The facts of the instant case show that a piece of lan~


in .J.(andawgalay Quar'ter, Rangoon. with a temple th~reon
belongs to a trust known as the Shree Bhuthanath
Mahadeva Temple Trust and the respondc:nts claimed to
be its duly elected trustees. The appellant refused to
recogpise. them as the trustees and they inserted public a
notice_in one of the daily newspapers that a public meeting
would be held on a certain dat~ in the temple premises
(1) A.l.R. (1933) Nag. p. 195. (2) A.I.R. (1936) Pat. p. 548.
(3) A.l.R. (1938) Cal. 634. .
fo~ the purpose of electing trustees of the temple. There- c.c.
upon the respondents instituted a suit in the Rangoon City 1966
Civil Court and obtained a decree against the appellants MARlAPl'A
CHEITIAR
that they were duly elected trustees and that the defend<!nts AND TWO
Y.
were restrained from interfering with the management, SURJ VRAILAL
control and administration of the trust by the respondents NARANDAS
DESAI AND
as trustees . FOUR.
It is obvious from the facts of the case that the res-
pondents could have continued their suit in the tr:ial Court
against the surviving appellants in the absence of the
deceased appellant. Applying the test which has been
mentioned above, I am of opinion that the appeal does
not abate although no substitution is made on the death
of the first appellant. The fact that the first appellant is
dead and the right to appeal survives in favour of the
surviving appellants will of course be noted in the pro-
ceedings.
In the drcumstances of the case there will be no order
as to costs.
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

Before U TMt Pe, J.

c.c. MESSRS. BHODIA BROTHERS (APPELLANT)


1966
July 2.
v.
FAIZAR RA.HMAN CHOWDHURY AND THREE OTHERS
(RESPONDENT).*

Insolvency-Burma Insolvency Act s. 4(2)-p/acing his claim by a claimant


before the insolvency Court-determination nf the quesrion-.uhether its
deciJion is final and binding between tM parties-whether t/Je claimant cn11
re-agit4te IM merits of his claim by brittging a regular suit-whether the
remedy liu if by way of appeal under s. 75, Burma Insolvency Act- grant
of leave to appeal-whether the Court can exercise in f(lvour af a creditor-
competency of appeal under s. 4 and 75(3) of the Burma Insolvency Act-
awidance of tranifers under s. 53, Burma Insolvency Act-grossly inadequate
c011Sitkration in tM transfer of tM house in tJuestion-tJJhether the transfer
was bona fide-bona fide transfer on accQUnt of pressure of a creditor-
absence of collusion and of knowledge of tM mlbarrassing circumstances of the
debtor--whether tM transfer fraudulent wit/tin the meaning of s. 53
Held: When a claimant places his claim under s. 4 of the Bunna Insol-
vencv Act before the insolvency Court and that Court proceeds to determine
the question its decisiOn is .final and binding between the parties and that it is
not open to the- claimant to re-agitate the merits of his claim by bringing a
reg\llar suit. The remedy by way of appeal is open to the aggrieved party
under s. 75, Burma Insolvency Act.
ShibNarainandanot"nv.Lachmi Naraintmd mwtlu:r,A.I.R. (1929) Lah.
761 ; Monomohan Roy Choudury v. Bhupal C!ttmtlm Roy Clwudury anti
othns,A.l.R. (1934) Cal. 122(2); Maung Ba Thaw v. Ma Pin, rz Ran. 194 ;
ThaivQf'ai Achi v. O.R.M.P.R.M.. Ramanathan C.hettyor attd tfle, (1940)
R.L.R. p. 643, referred to.
There is nothing in the wording of s. 75(3) of the Bunna Insolvency Act.
restricting the powers of the District Court or of the HighCourt from giving
leave to anyone except the receiver appointed :by the Court. The grant of
leave is a discretionary matter which the Court can exercise in favour of a
creditor, who is undoubtedly a person aggrieved by the decision of the insol-
vency Court. Therefore the appeal is competent both under s. 4 and 75(3)
of the Bwma Insol vency Act.

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 14 of 19.64.


t Against the order of the District Court of Akyab in Insolvency Case
No. 1 of 1956, dated 17th January t964.
In th~ maiUT of the Estatt of P. A. Mohamed Ganny, dtcea.s ed, s Ran. p. c.c.
375, distinguished.
Kandarwami Goundan and others v. Rangaswami Goundan and othns, A.l. R ""
MESSRS.
(1938) Mad. p 370, referred to.
BBODlA
Held further : T he bouse In question is worth not less than K 2,000 in BROTKR8
view of tbe testimony of a witness cited by the insolvent himself . The receivet Y.

had in fact epotted to the C ourt that the building is worth K 6,ooo. This FAlZAR
house has been tra nsfened by the insohent to his wife who Is entirely RAHMAN
d ependent upon him in consideration of defened dower of 5 ticals of gold CHOWDHURY
AND nmF.t
valued at K r ,ooo. It is appurcnt therefrom that the considetatlon is gtossly OTHERS.
inadequate. ;\1or-eover, the insolvent bad since then been living in the same
bouse after the transfrr which would go to show that the tr11 nsfer was not
btJ11a fide b ut m:~de with intent to defraud the creditors.

Official Receiver v, P.L.K.M.R.M. Chettyar Fi"" 9 Ran. 170 (P.C.);


Pope v, Official Assignee, Rangoon, t :t Ran. tOS ; Official As.rignee, Rangoon, v.
Subala Dati, 14 Ran. 109; U Ba Saing v. Ma Shein, A.t.R. (1936) Ran. so6;
Mt. Majidunnisa Bibi v. Babu Puran Chander Roy, Official Receiver and another,
A.I.R. (1941) All. 316, referred to.
A bonn fide transfer on account of pressure ucrted by 11 ced ltor for the
sati.sfaction of his debt in tho abstort or any suggestion of collusion lind without
a ny knowledge oftbe embarrassingcircumstances of tbe dcbtOI' is not fraudulent
within the meaning of s. SJ ; but th e transferee and the iusolvent were
a dmittedly intimate friend~. The tl'3nsferee knew th llt many suits were
pending against the transferor and th:at he was in embn!'l'as~ing c ircumstances
at the relevant time of th e transfer. All thtsr factors go to show that the
tmnsfer of the t11iloring shop was collushe aod not in good faith a nd it
sh ould accotdingly be :1\'oided.
Official Assignee, Madras v. S.M. Sheik Moidten Rot~~ther, A.I.R. (1.9:t7)
Mad. 1013, referred to.

Mr. M. A. Subhan for the appellant.

JJ Pha Tha Htaw for the respondent.

U THET PE. J.-M. Karim Bux, the 4th respondent in


this appeal once owned a house in Mawlee Quarter, Akyab
and a tailoring shop known as the Rangoon Modem Tailor
ing Shop in Bazaar Road, Akyab. The appellants sued
him and obtained money decrees in Civil Regular Suit
Nos. 16 of 1952, 13 of 1954 and 3 of 1955 of the Sub-
divisional Court of Akyab. In execution of the decree in
Civil Regular Suit No. r6 of 1952, the appellants applied
MESSRS. for the arrest of M. Karim Bux who thereupon moved the
BRODIA District Court, Akyab on 30th ]anua1y 1956 to adjudge
BROTIIERS
v. him an insolvent. On rst October 1956, the District Court
FAIZAR duly declared him an insolvent in its Insolv~ncy Case N?. 1
RAHMAN
CIIOWDBURY of 1956.
AND THREE
OrtiERS. It transpired that the insolvent had transfer red his re-
. sidential house at Mawlee Quarter to his wife Ma Than
Sein (a) Ma Hazara Khatoon, the 2nd respondent in con-
sid~ration of deferred dower by a deed date<! the sth of
June 1955 and also his tailoring shop with all stocks of
textiles, sewing machines and furniture to Faizar Rahman
Chowdhury for a consideration of K 5,000 by another
deed dated 15th July 1955 The appellants moved .the
receiver to apply for annulment of the said transfers but
without success. They therefore moved the insolvency
Court to have the said transfers annulled under sections 53
and 54 of the Burma Insolvency Act. Subsequently, the
appellants found out that the. insolvent's minor son Shah
Jahan had purchased a cargo-boat for a sum of K rs,ooo
on r7th january r960. They applied to the insolvency
Court under section 4 of the Act to direct the receiver to
seize the boat on the ground that the vessel had been pur-
chased by the insolvent benami in the name of his minor
son but their application was resisted by the 2nd respon-
dent as the guardian of the minor on the score that the
vessd belonged to the minor inasmuch as it was purchased
with the money belonging to his grandmother. The in-
solvency Court after hearing all the evidence dismissed
both the applications of the appellants who thereupon
obtained leave of the insolvency Court and instituted the
present appeal.
It has been argued on behalf of the respondents that
so far as the order of the lower Court under section 4 of
the Burma Inso!vency Act relating to the cargo-boat is
concerned no appeal lies to this Court inasmuch as section
4 (2) proVldes that "every such decision shall be final and c.c,
1966
bi.nding for all purposes as between, on the one hand, the
ME.SSRS.
debtor and the debtor's estate and, on the other hand, all BHODIA
claimants against him or it and all persons daiming BROTHERS
v.
through or under him." This arguni_~nt, in my opinion, FIAJZAR

is misconceived. What this section really means is th~t RAIIMAN


CJIOWDBVJI.Y
when a daimant places his claim before the insolvency AND THREE
OTIURS.
Court and that Court proceeds to determine the question
its decision is final and binding between the parties and
that it is not open to the daimant to re-agitate the merits
of his claim by bringing a regular suit. The remedy by
way of appeal is open to the aggrieved party under section
75. Burma Insolvency Act vide Shib Narain and another
v. Lachmi Narain and another (I). It has also been decided
in Monomohan Roy Choudhury v. Bhupal Chandra Roy.
Choudhury and others (2) th()t " the dismissal of the da.i m
under-section 4 really tantamount~ to a decision tJnder
section 4 and entitles the apPellant to an appeal under
section 75 read with Schedule I._of the Act." In fact, it
has been held by the Privy Council in Maung Ba T/1aw v.
Ma Pin (3) that under section 75 (2) an appeal. lies from an
order under section 4 not only to the High Court but a1so
to the Privy Council. The same view has been expressed
in Thaival]Bi" Achi v. 0. R. M. P. R:. M. Ramanathan
Cheuyar and one (4). .
The next submisson made on behalf of the respondents
is that the appeal against the order of the lower Court
under section 53, Burma Insolvency Act is incompetent
inasmuch as the lower Court can grant leave u'Ttder section
75 (3) only on the application of the receiver and not on
the application of a creditor. According to the learned
Counsel's submission the proper course which the appel-
lants should have ad9pted was to ask the receiver to apply
for leave to appeal and if he- refused to -do so they sh.:mld
'8 (1) A.I.R. (1929) Lab. 761. (a) A.I:R. (1934) Cat. 122 (2).
(3) 12 Ran, 19-4. , (4) (1940) R.L.R. p . 643.:
c.c. appeal to the insolvency Court under section 68. hi
J964
support of this submission, he relied upon the decision i~
MESSRS.
B:u:ODIA ln the Matter of the Estate of P. A. Mohame~ Canny.
BROTIIERS
v. Dece~sed (5) where it was held that if the Officia(Assignee
: : : refuses -to move to have the transfers set aside the credi-
CRoWBH11RY--tor's
AND THREE
relief is by way of appeal to the insolvency Court
oTIIas. under section 86, Rangoon Insolvency Act (which corres-
ponds tc.> section 6'8, Burma Insolvency Act) and not by
~y _of an application for leave to apply to have the tra~s
fer set aside. It must at once bepointed out that the said
decjsion has rio relevance whatsoever to th~. present case.
In that decision on the Official Assignee refusing -to move
the ~ourt to avoid the transfer under section 56, Rangoon
Insolvency Act one of .the 'creditors asked leave to apply
for setting aside the transfer and it. was held. that the
creditor should appeal to the insolvency <;:ourt agains~ the
order of the Official Assignee. Then there is nothing in
the wording of section 75 H) of' the Burma Insolvency
Act restrictin g .the powers of the District Court of the
High Court from giving leave to anyone except the receiver
appointed by the Court. The grant of leave is a discre-
tionary matter which the Court can exercise in favour of
a creditor, who is undoubtedly a pe~on aggrieved by the
~edsion of the i-nsolvency Court. In this connection it
will ~ .of interest to refer to. the decision in Kanda.Swami .
Goundan and others v. Rangaswami Goundan. and otbers
(6) where it was held that:-
" 'The words any such person aggrieved' in section 75 (3)
also include a creditor who .is aggrieved by an order of the
District Judge in an application to set aside a sale under
section 53 of the Act made by him upon the refusal of the
(s) 5 Ran. p. 375 (6) A.I.R. (J9J8) Mad. 370.
Official Receiver O take steps. Such a creditor therefore may c.c.
1966
appeal with the leave of the High Court under section 75 (3)
without first applying to the Official Receiver to appeal and MESSRS.
BHODIA
getting a refusal from him." BRomERS
Y.
I would therefore hold that the present appeal is com- FAIZAR
RAHMAN
petent both under sections 4 and 75 (3) of the Burma CHOWDHURY
AM> mREE
lnsolency Act . OTBERS.
Before we go into the merits of the case, it will be
necessary to examine the law relating to the avoidance of
transfers under section 53, Burma insolvency Act. In
Official Receiver v. P. L. K. M. R. M. Chettyar Firm (7) it
has been ruled by the Privy Council that where the receiver
is seeking to set aside a mortgage executed within two
years from the date of the adjudication of the insolvent
under section 53. the onus is upon him to prove that it
was not made in good faith and for valuable consideration.
The above decision was approved by the Judicial Commit-
tee in Pope v. Official Assignee, Rangoon (8). The same
considerations will apply to the case of a creditor who
asks for an annulment of transfer onder sectio.n 53 but the
burden of proof in the sense of adducing evidence never
remains constant. Once the receiver or the creditor
proves that the transfer was made within two years of the
insolvency and also that it was made either mala .fide or
-without valuable consideration the transferee is under an
obligation to lead rebutting evidence, failing which, the
transfer will be set aside under section 53 All that the
receiver or the creditor is required to sho~ is that the
transfer was made within two years and that it was made
either not bona fide or without consideration. Thus, in
Official Assignee, Rangoon v. Subala Dasi (9). it has been
held that:
" Under the provisions of section 55 of the Presidency
Towns Insolvency Act where th,e Official Assignee seeks to
(7) 9 Ran. 170 (P.O.). (8) 1z Ran. 105.
(9) 14 Ran. 109
c.c. set aside a transfer made by the -insolvent the on~ of proof
1~66
lies upon him. But if the Official Assignee proves that the
MESSRS. transfer .was made within two years of the insolvency and
1JHODM
also that It was made either not bona fide or without valuable
BROTHERS
v. consideration he is entitled to obtain an order set.ting aside
}'AIZAR the transfer. In order that a transfer may be excluded from
RAHMAN
CROWDBURY
the operation of the section there are two essential elements
AND THREE in the transaction that must be proved (I) that it was made
OTHERS.
bona fide. and (2) that it was made for valuable considera-
tion. lf the Official ASsignee has disproved one of these
essential elements the transfer does not con~in . both the
elements, and therefore the transfer falls to be set 'aside
under section 55"
Reference may also be usefully made to the decision in
U Ba Sain_y
.. .
v. Ma Shein (10) where it was observed that-.
. .
" In a suit to set aside a fraudulent transfer under Section
53. Provincial Insolvency Act, the burd~n of proof i~ upon
the offiCial Receiver. Such burden of proef can only be
discharged by showing circumstances from which strong in-
ference can be drawn that the transfer impugned was made
either mala fide or in the absence of valuable consideration.
And whe~e the Offici.<! Receiver dischargeS the prima facie -
. burden which Jay upon him, it is for the tranSferee to explain
the case which gave so many and so obvious grounds for
suspicion. and show that there was in fa~t an explanation
for the transfer which the Court could deem to be satis
factory:
Bearjng in mind the principles of law laid down in the
above decisions we shall now proceed with the respective
transfers which the appellants were assailing. So far' as
the house is concerned it is not in dispute that the insolvent
has transferred it to his wife, the 2nd respondent, in
consideration of the deferred dower of 5 ticals of gold
valued at K 1 ,ooo. ~e 2nd respondent had produced _a
deed of marriage dated t~e 12th April 1952, by which the
insolvent undertook to tr~nsfer his house if the deferred
dower was not paid within three years of. the execution of F-5
(1o) A.I.R. (1936) Ran. so6.
the deed which is a q'leer provision ina..;much as the house c.c.
1966
was admittedly worth more than K 2,ooo. It is true that
MESSRS.
Sf>ction 53 does not reqcire a transfer to be for full and BHODIA
adequate coiiSidcration but if the consideration is found to 8ROTBRS
v.
be grossly inadequate it will be a strong evidence of want FAIZAR

of good faith and a sufficient ground for setting aside the RAHMAN
CHOWDHURY
transfer. Thus, it has been held in Mt. Majidunnisa Bibi AND TURKE
OTllERS.
v. _Babu Puran Chander Roy, Official Receiver and another
(II) that:
" Section 53 does not demand that the transfer should be
for full and adequate consideration. Hence the transfer can
not be held to be without valuable consideration unless it is
found that the consideration was so small as to be negligible
in relation to the value of the property. An inadequate
consideration may be evidence of want of good faith which
may by itself be sufficient for setting aside the transfer.''
In the instant case the house in question is -worth not
Jess than K 2,ooo in view of the testimony of Jalil Ansari,
a witness cited by the insolvent himself. The receiver had
in fact reported to the Court that the building worth
K 6.ooo. This house has been transferred by the insolvent
to his wife who is entirely dependent upon him in consi-
deration of deferred dower of 5 ticals of gold valued at
K I .ooo. It is apparent therefrom that the consideration
is grossly inadequate. Moreover, the insolvent had since
then been living in the same house after the transfer which
would go to show that. the transfer was not bona fide but
made with intent to defraud the creditors.
Then, we come to the transfer of the tailoring shop to
the rst respondent Faizar Rahman Chowdhury. The
transfer was alleged to have been made for a consideration
of K s.ooo which was made up of an old debt of K 3,000
and a cash sum of K 2,ooo. The zst respondent Faizar
Rahman Chowdhury was unable to tender any satisfactory
proof that the insolvent had at any time~wed him K 3,000,
(11) A.I.R. (1941) All . 316.
c.c. which is quite a substantial amount. Not a single docu-
1966

MESSRS.
ment was produced to substantiate his allegation that the
BBODIA insolvent borrowed that amount from him or that the
BRO'fHERS
v. insolvent had purchased goods of tha_t value on credit.
FALZAR
ltABMAN Then there is his admission that he was aware of the
cuowHURY
AND THREE
embarrassing circumstances of the insolvent against whom ~
.
OTHERS.
the appellants had institute various suits at the time w en.
d h
the transfer of the tailoring shop was made in his favour.
No doubt a bona fide transfer on account of pressure
exerted by a creditor for the satisfac;tion of his debt in the
absence of any suggestion of collusion an4 without any
knowledge of the embarrassing circumstances of the debto.r
is not fraudulen.t within the meaning of section 53 ; but,
in the present case the transferee and the insolvent were
admittedly intimate friends. The transferee knew that
many suits were pending against the transferor and that he
was inembarrassing circumstances at the relevant time of
the transfer. All these factors go to show that the trans-
fer of the tailoring shop was collusive and not in good
faith and it should accordinely be avoided. In this con-
nection, it will be of interest to refer to the decision in
Official Assignee, Madras v. S. 1\'1. Sheik Moideen Rowther
(12) where it was remarked that:-
.. Absence of good faith could be proved by showing that
the transaction was a sham one, or that there was a resulting
trust in favour of the insolvent, but the same could be proved
by other circumstances also. If an insolvent transfers in favour
of one of his creditors to whom he owes much more than
the debt due to the transferee and the transferee also being
fully .aware of all the above circumstances, and in concert
with ~he insolvent brings into existence such a transfer deed,
and antedates the same, and takes such sale-deed for debt
(12) A.I.R. (1927) Mad. IOIJ.
cue to him without any contemporaneous. advance or other c.c.
1966
promise to },elp the insolvent to carry on his business, then
the transaction cannot be said to have been entered into MESSRS.
BUODIA
in good faith and the same should be held to be void against
BROTUERS
the Official Assignee under section 55 of the Act." v.
FAlZAK
RAHMAN
As regards the cargo-boat the insolvent had admittedly CHOWDHI!K\
paid the purchase price of K 15,000 as the guardian of his AND TIIKt:t:
Ol1lERS.
minor son, Shah Jahan, who was only 9 years uf age at
the time of the purchase and is dependent and Jiving with
him up to the present day . The insolvent had applied
for the renewal of the license of the vessel and had collect-
ed hiring charges from the paddy traders who had used
the boat vide Exhibit Nos. ~ 6 .and 17 and the evidence of
Mg. Tun Aung Gyaw, creditors' witness No. 2. Although
the insolvent and his wife. the 2nd respondent, would
have ft that the boat was purchased with the money be-
longing to the grandmother of the minor, the grandmother
had not come forward and explained how and froni where
the money had peen acquired : In fact, according to .Exhi-
bit " o " which is a copy of the statement of the insolvent
himself the grandmother is actually living with and depen-
dent upon him which clearly indicates that the version set
up by the insolvent and his wife is far from the truth. It
is therefore evident that the insolvent has purchased the
vessel benami in the name of his minor son with the object
of evading the rightful claims of the creditors. .
In the result, the appeal succeeds and the order o: the
.lower Court is hereby set aside and the appellant's appli-
cations under sections 4 and 53. Burma Insolvency Act
are allowed with costs in hoth the Courts. Advocate's
fees: K 85.

7A
CIVIL FIRST APPEAL

lJefMe U Thet Pe, J.

tC.C. MINGALA THUKA RICE MILL Co . LTo. BY rsT MANAGING


1966
PARTNER TAN KU AUN (APPELLANT)
July :22.

V.

U THAN SETN (RESPONDENT).

Suit for recovery of damages for foss of paddy-<Jccurrence of loll in n co/lisicm-


a nuning esse/ running down a staticmnry vessel-applicability of' doctrine
of res ipsa loquitor-burd~n on the part oftire moving l'essel to shoro no negli-
gence 011 her pnrt-judgment of a criminal Court-whetlaer reler>ant and
bindi"lf 011 a citil Court-liberty of n third party to sue the owner of either
Vl!ssel.

The appellant as managing partner of a partnership firm instituted the-


suit for recovery of damages for loss of paddy against the respond<::nt whose
passenger boat collided with and sank the -vessel in which the appellant's
paddy were loaded .
Held : \Jihen a stationary vessel is run down by a moving vess"J the
doc;trine of res ipsa loquitor will apply and it is obligatory on the part of tire
moving vessel to show that the colli5ion did not arise from any negligence on
her part.
Blanche Edith Catn v. Mrmgini Bros. , A.I.R. (1917) Bom. 282; R.S.N
Co., Ltd., and l.G.N. and Ry. Co., Ltd. v. Ram Kanai Madllab Chandra
/rwar Chandra Pal awd othfrs, A.I.R. (1936) Cal. 152 ; Ttt Toe Rice and
Oil Mi/11 v. The Inland Water Transport Board, ( 1963) B.L.R. :ll7 , referred
to.
Had further ; The judgment of the criminal Court is not 1-ele\'aot and
bindi ng- on the civil Court.
Harihar Pratad Si"lfh and others. v. Mt. Janak Dulari Kuer and others,
A.I.R. (1941) Pat. 118 ; Ramadhar Chaudhory and otkers v. J011ki
Chaudhary A.I.R. (1956) Pat. 49, referred to.
H eld further: A third party hat liberty to sue the owner o either vessel,
the collision of which hod rceulted in an injury to him.
G. Papacltris~ulos v. A. Corrie, A.I.R. (1933) Ran. :135, referred to.

Civil First Appeal No. 93 of 1965.


t' Against the decree of the :md Judge, City Civi I Court of Rangoon in
Civil Regular Suit No. 53~ of 1962, dated sth November 1965.
Mr. H . M. Fisher for the appellant. c.c. .
1966 .
U Pha Tha Htaw for _the respon9ent. MIN GALA
TIJili4 RICE
U THET PE; J.-This is an appeal against the judgment MILL
Co.Lro. BY
and decree of the Rangoon City Civil Court dismissing O"S .
MANAGING
the appellant's suit for recovery of K II,80750 as damages PARTNER
against the respondent . The respondent on the ot~er hand TAN Ku
AUN
has filed cross-objection for costs of the suit which has Y.

not been allowed by the trial Court. U THAN


SEIN.
The undisputed facts of the case which had given rise
to the present appeal are as follows. On the evening of
the 6th February 196~: the motor vessel" Khit Thit Than"
loaded with pa.ddy belonging to the appellant was moored
for the night at the landing stage in Kywegat Village,
Maubin District. At about midnight the respondent's
passenger boat "Yadana Mai" which plied between
Kyonpyaw and Rangoon dashed into " Khit Thit Than "
with such a force that mooring ropes of " Khit Thit Than"
broke and she sank within a few minutes. The entire
cargo of paddy was lost and two persons who were sleeping
in the vessel at that time were also drowned.
When a stationary vessel is run down by a moving
vessel the doctrine of res ipsa Joquitor will apply and it is
obligatory on th'~ part of the moving vessel to show that
the collision did not arise from any negligence on her part.
In this connection, reference may usefully be made to the
ded~ioA in Bldni::he Edith Cates v. Mangini Bros. (r).where
it was observed that:
" "'fhe burden of proof in an action for damages for
negligence rests _p.rimafily upon the plaintiff. who in order
to maintain the action must show that he WJIS injured by an
act or omission for which the de-fendant is in law responsible,
except in the :cases where .law presumes liability from an act
or omission immediately upon proof of its occurrence. That
is to say, an exception to 'the .general rule that the burden
'{t) A.l.R. {1917) Born. 282..
c.c. of proof for the alleged negligence is in the first instance on
1966
tbe plaintiff occurs whenever the facts already established
MINGALA are such that the proper and natural inference immedi?tely
Tlruli RICE arising {tom them is that the i~jury complained of was
MILL
Co.,LTD. BY
caused by the defendant's negligence. To these cases the
JTS maxim 'res ipsa Ioquitor .' applies."
MANAGI NG
PA.ItTN.R
TAN Ku
A tiN
Then it has been held in R.S.N. Co. Ltd. and I.G.N. &
v. Ry. Co. Ltd. v. Ram Kanai Madhab Chandra Iswar Chandra
U THAN
SJN. Pal and others (2) that :

"The burden of proof in an action founded upon collision


between a vessel at anchor and one in motion, is upon the
owner of the latter to prove that the collision was not
occasioned, by any negligence on their part. They have to
prove that the collision was due to inevitable accident not
arising from negligent navigation."

This doctrine has also been explained in T et Toe Rice and


Oil Mills v. The Inland Water Transport Board (3} that:
"The doctrine of res ipsa kxjuitor 1s simply a rule of
evidence which fixes the burden of proof. The essential
condition for the doctrine to come into play is that the facts
must speak out so loud and clear that no other conclusion
can be drawn from them except that the defendant had been
negligent.''

In the instant case the facts show that the vessel " Khit
Thit Than " was tied up for the night at the landing stage
when sre was run down and sent to the bottom by the
respondent's ve5sel "Yadana Mai" which "speak out so
loud and clear " that no other conclusion can be drawn
from them except that "Yadana Mai" had been negligent.
The evidence adduced on behalf of the respondent as
deposed by U Po Myint (DW 2), Ko Aung Shwe (DW 3),
Ko Khin Lat (DW 4) and Ko Tin Aye (DW 7) boils down
to the allegation that " Khit Thit Than " was tied up
(z) A. I.R. (1936) Cal. rsz.
F-5
alongside two cargo barges which were moored close to c.c.
1966
the river bank and that there was only one light on the
barge closet to the bank and that the collision took . place MIN GALA
THUKA RICE
as a result of the absence of any navigation light o.n " Khit MILL
Thit Than " . On the other hand, the testimony of Ko Sein Co., LTD. BY
ITS
Myint (PW 2). Ko Aung Sein (PW 4) who were the clerk MANAGING
PARTN!R
and engine driver respectively of " Khit Thit Than " and TAN K u
U Thein (PW 6). the master of the cargo barge; show that A UN
Y.
there were anchor lights on both the barges as well as on U THAN
the ill-fated " Khit Thit Than " at the time of the colli.s;on. SEIN.

It is apparent from the evidence of Ko Tin Aye -and


U Po Myint, the Serang and a crew respectively of" Yadana
Mai " that . the. nig~lt was clear without any mist or cloud
and that visibility was good at the time of the accident.
The Serang was not even using the search light of his vessel
inasmuch as he could see objects with his naked eyes from
a dbtance. Under these circumstances the accident could
have been averted by the CYercise Of ordinary care and skill
lzy the Serang of " Yadana Mai" which is clearly Jacking
in the in stant case.
Then according to the Serang of the vessel " Myawadi "
Ko Aung Shwe. a witness cited by the respondent, the
navigation channel of the river at the place of collision
was 200 feet wide which could not therefore be said to
have been blocked by " Kbit Thit Than " inasmuch as it
was tied up alongside two cargo barges which were moored
close to the river bank. All these factors would go .t o
shO\v that the collision was caused on account of the
negligence of the employees of the respondent an<! not by
the absence of light or by obstruction of the navigation
chanllel by" Khit Thit Than"
It has ~en suggesteu on behalf of the respondent that
the acquittal of Maung Tin Aye, the Serang of "Yadana
Mai " by the criminal Coun is a clear indication that the
employees of "Yadana Mai" were not guilty of any
A negligence. It appeared that Maung Tin Aye was
c.c. prosecUted for having caused the death of two persons by
1%6
his rash and negligent act in Criminal Regular Trial No. 32
MINCALA of 1962 of the 3rd Additional Magistrate, Maubin and that
THlJJC.A RICE
MILL he was ultimately acquitted of me offence with which he
Co.,LTD. BY
ITS
was charged. A copy of the judgment of the criminal
MANAGING Court had been produced in ' support of the contention
PARTNER
TAN Ku
that there was no negligence on the part of the employees
Atffl of "Yadana Mai ". It must at once be pointed out that
Y.
u TllAN the judgment of the criminal Court is not relevant and
SEIN. binding on the civil Court and it is not a proof of absence
of any negligence on the part of " Yadana Mai ". See
Harihar Prasad Singh and others v. Mt. Janak Dulari Kuer
and others (4) and Ramadhar Chaudhary and others v.
]ankf Chaudhary (5).
It has fur~her been said on behalf of the respondent
that the vessel " Khit Thit Than " was overloaded and that
such overloading was responsible for its sinking after the
collision. It must be borne in mind that " Khit Thit
Than was berthed at the landing stage and she would
not have sunk if she had not been run, down by" Yadana
Mai ". The overloading of " Khit Thit Than " could have
no relevance whatsoever to the occurrence of the collision
and its eventual sinking.
The learned Advocate for the respondent further
contended that the appellant should have sued the owner
of " Khit Th it Than " for the loss incurred by him. It
must be pointed out that a third party is at liberty to sue
the owner of either vessel, the collision of which had
resulted in an injury to him vide G. Papachristopoulos v.
A. Corrie (6).
Another argument advanced on behalf of the
respondent is that the appellant's firm not having been
registered under the Companies Act was not a legal entity
and has therefore no legal right to institute the suit under
(4) A.I.R. (1 491) Pat. u8. (s) A.I.R. (1956) Pat. 49
(6) A.I.R. (1933) Ran. 235.
?ee
appeal. The reacfy answer to this argument is to be found c.c.
1966
in the provisions of Rule I, Qrder XXX which provide that
MtNGALA
any two or more per.sons cafl'o/ing on business as partners TJru~ RIC
can sue or be sued in the name of the firm of such persons. MJLL

Besides. the appellant's firm has been registered under the Co., LTD. BY
ITS
Partnership Act and the suit under appeal is therefore M'AJIAGING
PARTNER
competent. TAN Ku
I shall now go into the quantum of damages. It is an AUN
v.
undeniable fact that the ill-fated vessel " Khit Thit Than " U TBAN
SEIN.
was loaded with paddy belonging to the appellant at the
time she went down to the bottom. Ko Maung Shit, a
witness called by the respondent himself has stated that
" Khit Thit Than " was loaded with paddy at the time of
the accident. Ko Sein Myiilt (PW 2) who was working
as a clerk in " Khit Thit Than " at the relevant time h.1d
testified that the vessel was then loaded with 3,2 50 baskets
of Ngasein paddy. He was supported by paddy broker
U Yu .Htaw (PW 3) who had to pay K I 1,15750 as the
purchase price of paddy on behalf of the appellant.
Ko Han Sein (PW 5) admitted receipt of that amount from
U Yu Htaw for 3,250 baskets of paddy. The combined
testimony of these witnesses would leave no room for
doubt that the appellant had suffered damages amounting
to K II,I5750 for which the respondent must be held
responsible.
In the result the appeal succeeds and i direct that there
shall be a decree for K I I. I 57 50 in favour of the appellant-
plaintiff against the respondent-defendant with propor-
tionate costs in both the Courts. The eross-objection of
the respondent is hereby dismissed.
000

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION

Before Dr. Maung Maung, C.J. a11d U Thet Pe, J .

tC.C.
1966 OUNG SEIN CHIT (APPLICANT)
Aug 71J.
v.
T-HE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER . OF INCOME-TAX.
BURMA, RANGOON (RESPONDENT).

Certiorari- application for a writ of-- The Burmd Income-ttl.-.: Act, s. 23-
e:o:ercise ofrevisional power by the Additional Commissioner of lflcome-ta:o:-
merging of the appellate order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner a11d
that ofthe assessmmt order of t!te lltcome-ta.-.: Officer-to be questioned 0'1ly
u11der s. 33A-proviso to s. 33 sllbject to tile substantive part of the section.
Whetbe1 the exercise of evisional powe1 by the Additional Commissionct
of Income-tax has the sanction of law.
I

Held: When the Assistant Commissioner (Appellate) passes his


appellate odet in the assessment made by the Incoml'-tax Officer the assessment
order merges in the appellate 01der. It may be questioned only under s. 33At
i,1., by way of apJJe.al to the Appellate Tribunal whose powct may be
invol,ed e.ithct by assessee or by the Commissinn e~ Tho proviso to s. 33 of
the Buma Iocome-hax Act that the Commissioner." should not pass any order
pt~judicial to an assessee without bearing him or giving him a reasonable
oppol'lunity ol' being heud " is subject to th e substantive part of the section
which makes the re\isional powet.. subject to Ute provision of the Act namely
s. 31 and 33A. Therefore, the Additional Commissioner: did exceed his
tevisional power when . he pmpot1ed to use it to disturb the appellate otdcts
of the Appellatl' Assistant Commissionct:

Gopar. Chandra Sen t' . lm:oine-tax Officer, Calwtta and others, (1963) so
I. T. R. 87; Velayud(wtt t Commissioner of Agriculturttl Income-tax, (11)63) 47
I. T. R. 93 ;George Oommeu ".Commissioner of Agricullurni.Jitcome-lax , ~1964) 6:t
I. T. R. 977 ; Daw Sint '' . Tire Additimwl Commissiouer of Jucnme-wx. Civil
Miscellaneous Applicutiun No. 124 of 1957 ; Blwrflliwttjll ~ Co. v. The
Atlditimwl Commissiollt'r of iiiCflllle-tax. Civil Miscellaneous Application
No. :t of 1966; Bur11111 J\'migutioll Corporation Ltd. 1. Cmnmissiouer of Income-
tax, (r959) B.L.R. J Io (H.C.), referred to.

ChiJ Misct>llaneous Application No. 42 and 43 of 1965.


000

U Paing for the applicant. c.c.


1966
U Ba Kyaw. Assistant Attorney-General for the respondent.
0uNGSEIN
DR. MAUNG MAUNG, C.J .-A common question of law cmr
v.
arises in these two cases and we have therefore, on the TBEADOI-
IIONAL
motion of learned Counsel. heard them together. The CoMMas.
question is whether the exercise of revisional power by SIONEROF
INCOME-TAX
the learned Additional Commissioner of Income-tax has BYJWA,
the sanction of law. RANGOON.

The assessee is the same in both cases. He was assessed


to income-tax for the year 196o-6r in one case, and for the
year 1961-62 in the other. He appealed to the Assistant
Commissioner of Income-tax (Appellate) against the orders
and obtained some reductions in the assessed income. He
did n<?t go further to the Income-tax ~ppellate Tribunal
as he could under section 33A (z) of the Income-tax Act.
Nor did the Additional Commissione1' who could, under
section 33A (2), direct the Income-tax Officer to appeal.
Instead, the Additional Cot.nmissioner opened revision
proceedings, purporting to exercise the power under
section 33. and set aside the assessment orders of the
Income-tax Officer as well as the orders passed by the
Assistant Commissioner (Appellate), and directed that fresh
assessments be made.
The applicant-assessee assails the orders of the
Additional Commissioner as ultra vires.
U Paing, learned Advocate for the applicant, argues
that the revisional power invested in the Commissioner by
section 33 is "subject to the provisioJlS of the Act .. and
section 33A (2j clearly prGvides that if the Commissioner
has objections to any appellate order passed by the
Assistant Commissioner, he may direct the Income-tax
Officer to appeal ~o the Appellate Tribunal against such
order. Once the Assistant Commissioner has decided an
appeal under section 31, U Paing points out,~e assessment
order merges into the appellate order which stands as the
OOJ

c.c. operative decision. That decision, it is argu.e d, may nor


1966
be disturbed by the Commissioner by way of revision. It
O UNGSEIN
CHIT
is only the Appellate Tribunal which is compeil:ent to hear
v. and determine an appeal from the decision, lodged either
TBEADDI
TIONAL by the assessee or by the income-tax Officer on the Com-
Co~fMis. missioner's direction. If the Commissioner who felt
SJONEROF
INCOME-TAX dissatisfied with the appellate order could open revision
BuRMA, proceedings and revise the order, then he would be acting
RANGOON.
as judge in his own cause in violation of natural justice.
Several rulings were cited by U Paing in support of
his arguments. Gopal Cbandra Sen v. Income-tax Officer,
Calcutta and others (1) makes the point that when the
Appellate Assistant Commissioner passes his appellate order
on the assessment made by th~ Income-tax Officer the
asS-essment order merges in the appellate order. Once
the appellate order becomes oper.ative, it ~ay be questioned
only under section 33A, i.e. by way of appeal to the
Appellate Tribunal whose power may be invoked either
by the assessee or by the Commissioner. Rulings under
the Madras Agricultural Income-tax Act-which defines
the revisional power of the Commissioner in terms similar
to section 33 of the Burma Income-tax Act-lay down
dear principles to that effect. If, instead of directing that
an appeal be filed, the Commissioner should call for the
proceedings himself and revise the appellate order of the
Appellate Assistant Commissioner, he would be offending
natural justice for acting as judge in his own cause. See
Velayudhan v. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-
tax (2) and George Oommen v. Commissioner of Agricul~
tural Income-tax (3).
U Paing submits that for the purpose of these cases.
it makes no difference whether the revisional power pur~
ported to be used by the Commissioner was under
section 33 as amended by. Revolutionary Council Law
so I .T.R. 87.
(1) (1963), (2) (t96J). 47 LT.R. 93
(3) (1964), 62 I.T.R. 977
F
00\)

No. 27 of 1963 or. under the section before the amendment. c.c.
1966
The powe .. must in either case be exercised subject to the
OUNGSEJN
provisions of the Act. Cn:rr
There is a proviso to section 33 that the Commissioner v.
THEADDI
" shall not pass any order prejudicial to an assessee without TIONAL
COMMIS.
hearing him or giving him a reasonable opportunity of .SIONEROJI
being heard". This, U Paing submits, does not mean that INCOME-TAX
BURMA,
the Commissioner may pass a prejudicial order provided RANGOON.
he gives the assessee a prior hearing. The proviso is
subject to the substantive part of the section, and not
vice versa as the late Supreme Court ruled in Daw E sjnt
v . The Additional Commissioner of Income-tax (4). The
substantive part of section 33 makes the revisional powers
subject to the provisions of the Act namely, for the purpose
of this application, sections 31 and 33A.
U Ba Kyaw, the ldarned Assistant Attorney-General,
concedes that the proper course which the Additional
Commissioner should have taken was to direct that appeals
be filed with the Appellate Tribuna}. His own revisional
power is limited to cases in which the assessment order
has not been ~po~ed of by the Appellate Assistant Com-
missioner. The meaning and purpose of the power is to
aid the Commissioner in his general superintendence over
the Department and t.o check collusion below. He is not.
however, to be an appellate authority in. competition with
the Appellate Tribunal. U Ba Kyaw also concurs with
the view that the proviso to section 33 does not create for
the Commissioner any power which the substantive pa~t
of the section does not bestow upon him.
In Bharadwaja & Co. v. The ~dditional Commissioner
of Income-tax (5), a Bench of ~s Court decided a similar
question touching on the limits of the revisional power
of the Commissioner under section 3 3. In that case it
was the assessee himself who went to the Additional
(4) Civil Miscellaneous Application No.1:&4- of 1957.
88 (S) Civil Misc~Jianeous Applic.a tion No. :& of 1966.
c.c. C<?mrnissioner on revision against an appellate order of the
1966
Assistant Commissioner whe.n he should have gone on
0UNCSEIN
CHIT
appear to the Appellate Tribunal. The Commissioner
v. entertained the application and proceeded to pass orders,
THE ADDI-
TIONAL some in favour of the assessee and some adverse to him.
COMMIS-
SIONER OF
The assessee then came to this Court with an application
INCOMK-TAX for wrir of certiorari, sa}ring that the Commissioner/ had
BURMA,
RANGOON.
acted ultra vires in so far as he had decided against the
. asse55ee and intra vires in so far as he had held in the
assessee's favour. The Bench, while remarkin& that the
Additional Commissioner had acted only because the
assessee had invoked his revisional power, and then in a
just and fair manner, decided that the exercise of the
revisional power over the appeilate order of the Assistant
Commissioner was without legal sanction. The whole
order of the learne~ Additional Commissioner was there-
fore set aside.
. . . ..
In these cases, the learned Additional Commissioner
had acted on his own motion. Good grou-nds might well
exist for him to object to the appellate orders. but the
proper course to take would be to have ~ppeals lodged
with the Appellate Tribunal. Taxation . i~~s must be
strictly construed and fairly applied, and the tax*payer
should see and feel that he gets fairplay and justice. We
must note that the learned Additional Commissionernas
shown both fairness and learning in his revisional orders,
in some of .which he has not hesitated to rule ip favour of
the assessee when add*backs are unjustified. But here, we
are concerned with the legal limits of the Commissioner's
revisional power and our duty to check when the limits
are exceeded.
At fir.st sight the application~ before us appear to be
out of time. But the applicant files an application in each
case, supported by affidavit, to show that he beca!T.:e aware
9f the -revisional orders. against him several weeks after
. they had been passed .. and he had proceeded, with due
diligence, to file the applications to this Court. By this c.c.
1966
computation. therefore, he is within time, submits U Paing.
0UNGSEIN
citing Burma Navigation Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner CHIT
of Income-tax (6). , v.
THEADDI
U Paing arso ar.gues, on the strength of the ruling in TIONAL

Gopa/. Chandra Sen v. Income-tax Officer (7). that even if COMMlS-


SIONiltOF
this. Court should hold that there has been delays in filing INCOME-TAX
BURMA.
the applications, they may not be rejected on the ground RANGOON.
of delay alone if the applicant can establish on the merits
that the impugned orders are in violation of tlie principles
of natural justice.
The Department does not dispute the facts laid out in
the applicant's affidavits, and U Ba Kyaw does not contest
the applications on the ground of limitation. We hold,
therefore, that the. question of limitation does not stand
in the way of our disposing of the applications on the
merits.
For the reasons that we have outlined above. and in
the light of the rulings we have surveyed and the views
expressed by. the learned Assistant Attorney-General, we
hold that the learned Additional Commissioner did exceed
his revisional power when he purported to use it to dis-
turb the appellate orders of the Appellate Assistant Com-
missioner. These applications are therefore allowed, and
we set aside the revisional orders passed by the Additional
Commissioner.

(6) (1959), B.L.R. 110 (H.C.).


{7) ( t 3), so l .T.R. 87.
ooG

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION


Btjore U Kyaw Zan U, J.

tC.C.
1966 THE BANK OF CHETIINAD LIMITED (APPLICANT)
Aug z6. V.

THE INCOME-TAX ASSESSMENT, COLLECTION AND


INSPECTION BOARD, RANGOON (RESPONDENT).
Spec1fie Reluf Act,s. 45-jurisdiction oft~ Court limited to cases of clear breach
of duty to do or fnrbear from doing-Burma lncom-ta:c Act, s. 30, prooiso
4-aercise of discretion by ~ Income-tax Assesrment, Collection artd
Jrupection Doard-corre<toteu not to bs challeotgt~d-party not to be di,.ected
has to exercise the discretion.

Applications under s. 45 of the Specific Relief Act to make an order re-


.quiring the respondent Board to allow the applicant Bank to prefer the appeaH
against the assessment of income-tax on payment of taxes admitted on
fumish1ng sufficient securities for the due performance of the orders that may
be passed on appeal under the fourth proviso to sub-s. (1) of s. 30 of the
Bumla Income-tax Act as amended by the Union of B~rma Revolutionary
Council Law No. 27 of 1963.
Hdd: To make an order unders. 45 of the Specific Relief Act the j.uisdic-
tion of the Court is I i rnited to cases wnere there is a clear breach of duty to
do or forbear from doing, as the case my -be, that is to say to exercise its
discretion or refrain from exercising its discretion:. The fourth proviso to
sub-s (1) of s. 30 of the Bum1a Income-tax Act casts that duty on the
Income-tax Assessment, Collection and Inspection Board . The applicant
Bank's grievances were considered by the Board, and thus it had exercised
Its discretion. When once that discretion has been exercised borta fide its
correCtness cannot be challenged nor can a party be directed to exercise the
discretion in a particular manner.
In~ matter of Ru!Ua NOJ'ai11 Row, I. L. R. ~8 Cal. 479, d istinguished.
S.M. Mtkherji v. Rwsell, I.L.R. (1941) CaL 387, referred to.

U Wan Hock for the applicant.

Mr. S. K. Ghosh, Government Advocate, for the respon-


dents.
U KYAW ZAN U, J.-These three applications under
section 45 of the Specific Relief Act to make an order
requiring the respondent Board to allow the applicant
F-~
41 Civi I Miscellaneous Application Nos. 123, 124 and 1~5 of 1964.
Bank to prefer the appeals against the assessment of c.c..
1966
income-tax for the years 1961-62, 1962-63, and 1963-64
on payment of taxes admitted on furnishing sufficient Tin: BANK
OFCBETTl
securities for the due performance of the orders that may NAD LTD.
Y.
be passed on appeal under the fourth proviso to sub-
THE INCOME
section (r) of section 30 of the Burma Income-tax Act as TAX AssESS-
amended by the Union of Burma Revolutionary Council MENT, CO.
LLECTION
Law No. 27 of 1963 which, stripped of the irrelevant AND INSPEC-
TION BOARD,
portion, runs as follows: RANGOON.

'' Provided further that notwithstanding anything herein-


before contained. the Government or any person authorized
in this behalf by the Government may permit an assessee to
prefer an appeal, ( . . . . . . . . ) on payment of
the tax admitted and on fllmishing sufficient security for the
due performance of the order that may be passed on appeal."

The three applications are similar in nature except for the


year of assessment and the amount assessed. The point
involved for decision is also the same in all the applica-
tions. So this order will cover all the three cases. The
proviso quoted above is concessive and gives discretionary
power to the respondent Board. This is not disputed.
See Messrs. Santlol & Sons v. Income-tax Assessment,
Collection and Inspection Board. Rangoon, being Civil
Miscellaneous No. 174 of 1963.
To make on order under section 4 5 of the Specific Relief
Act one of the five conditions provided is that such doing
or forbearing is, under the Burma Income-tax Act, clearly
incumbent on therespondent Boardin its public character.
The jurisdiction of the Court is limited to cases where
there is a clear breach of duty to do or forbear from doing,
as t he case may be. that is to say to exercise its discretion
or refrain from exercising its discretion. There is no doubt
that the fourth proviso to sui> section ( r) of section 30 of
the Burma Income-tax Act casts , that duty on the
BB respondent Board. What the Court has to see is whether
c.c. the Board has performed its duty or not, or in other words.
1966
whether the Board has exercised its discretion or not. If
THE BANK
a statute confers a discr,ctionary power the refusal or
OFCBETTI-
NAD LTD. neglect to exercise the discretion may be enforced by_an
Y.
THE INCOME-
order of the Court under section 45 of the Specific Relief
TAX ASSESS- Act, but when once that discretion has been exercised
MENT, CO-
LL.ECTION
bona fide its correctness cannot be challenged nQr can a
ANDJNSPEC party be directed to exercise the discretion in a particular
TIONBOARD,
RANGQON.
manner. In In The Matter of Rudra Narain Row (r) the
petitioner called upon the Board of Examineers , to show
cause why he should not be allowed to appear at the
ensuing examination upon his fulfilling the necessary con-
ditions und~r the law. About ten years ago he was tried
for impersonation at the examination but for lack of proof
of-his identity he was discharged. About eight years later
he offered himself as a candidate at the examination. The
Board investigated the case and exercising its discretion
came to the conclusion that he was not a fit person to be
accepted as a candidate. The Board considered that it
was entitled to rely upon the decision of the previous
Board and without referring to his present status refused
hiM to be examined. Considering himself aggrieved by
this order, he applied under section 45 of the Specific
Relief Act praying for relief mentioned above. Stanley. J.
sitting on the Original Side of the Calcutta High Court.
observed that if the Board had gone into the question of
the present fitness of the candidate and had, in the exercic;e
of its discretion, decided that he was not a fit and proper
person to be admitted to the examination. he certa: nly
would not have entertained the petition, for it wa.s for
the Board and not for the Court to determine the fitness
of a candidate. As the petitioner's present fitness was
never considered the relief prayed for was granted against
the Board. The learned judge observed that a man's moral
character eight years ago was such as fully to justify a
(1) I.L.R. z8 Cal. 479
ooe
refusal to accept him as a candidate but he may be of a c.c.
1966
reformed and estimable character eight years later. In
the cases now under consideration it cannot be said that Tm:BANX.
OFCHETII
the applicant Bank's grievances were never considered by NAD LTD.
Y.
the respondent Board. It considered the cases and THE INCOME-
exercised its discretion. In S. N. Mukherji v. Russell (2) TAX AsSESS-
where the applicant asked under section 45 of the Specific MENT,CO-
LLECTION
Relief Act that the respondent should grant an import ANDINSPEC
BoA.RD,
license Panckridge, J. sitting on the Original Side of the TION
RANcooN.
Calcutta High Court held that the Controller in his discre-
tion having refused a license the Court would not interfere
in the matter. The judgment says:
" . . . my reason for refusing the application is that r
consider that under the Notification the applicant cannot ask
for a license as of right, and it is within the discretion of the
Steel Controller's department to grant the license or to refuse
it, and with that discretion I cannot interfere."

In Civil Miscellaneous No. 174 of 1963 {Original Civil


Jurisdiction) referred to above I had the occasion to inter-
pret the fourth proviso to sub-section ( r) of section 30 of
the Income-tax Act and it will be quite appropriate to
quote the relevant portion of the judgment in that case
which was confirmed in appeal being Civil Miscellaneous
Appeal No. 13 of 1964. In that case also an application
under section 45 of the Specific Relief Act was made to
make an order requir-ing the respondent Boatd to permit
the applicant firm to prefer an appeal against the -assess-
ment on payment of the tax admitted and on furnishing
sufficient security for the due performance of the order
that may be passed on appeal as in the present cases. I
have said in that judgment:
"The word 'may becomes imperative only when the
power is coupled with a duty, otherwise 'its meaning is
-58A permissive. It is dear therefore that the intent of the
(2) I.L.R. ( 1941) 2 CaL 387,
c.c. Legislature. which is the test, in enacting 'section 30 (r) of the
1966 {\ct is mainly not to allow an appeal unless the tax has been
TBEBANK paid. This is the primary object. In view of this conditional
OFCHETTI- prohibition, which is imperative in the third Proviso, no duty
NAD LTD.
Y.
is cast upon the Board to allow the applicant firm to prefer
1'HE INcoME. an appeal on payment of the tax admitted by it and on
TAX AsSESS- furnishing sufficient security for the balance under the fourth
MENT, CO.
LLECTION
Proviso, which is purely discretionary. The Board could
ANDINSPEC- have refused permission traight away to prefer an appeal even
TION80AJU>, if the applicant firm offered to pay its admitted tax and to
RANGOON.
furnish sufficient security."

It must be remembered that I am not sitting on appeal


against the order of the Board to enable me to criticize
and go into the correctness or otherwise of the discretion
exercised which as the lea'r ned Advocate for the applicant
Bank has submitted may be arbitrary and unjudicial
considering the facts that the applicant Bank has duly
paid up the delayed assessments of income-tax for a period
of about 10 years amounting to over a million kyats within
one month of the urgent notices of demand made and
undertaken to pay its admitted amounts for all these three
cases and is prepared to furnish sufficient securities for
the remainders. It seems that the applicant Bank could
not have done better. The learned Government Advocate
who appeared for the respondent Board could not challenge
these facts in his argument nor did he file any counter
affidavit on behalf of the respondent Board refuting the
facts though, I very much regret to say that postponements
had been granted from time to time as requested for nearly
'!'No y~l'S before the learned Registrar to file reply
affidavitS.
In the above circumstances I have no alternative but
to dismiss the applications. They are accordingly
dismissed with costs. Advocate's fee two Gold Mohurs
for each case.
000

) CIVIL REGULAR SUIT

Before U Kytlfll Zan U, J.

THE BANK QF COMMUNICATIONS (PLAINTIFF) c.c.


1966
v. Jul rz.
KHIN COMPANY (DEFENDANT).

Code of Civil Pr~tdurt, 0. VI Rule t7-amendment of pleadif18s-at mry


stage of the proceedings-ui/r.tthM proposed amendments to be Ullderlined
in red ink-principles for guidance in allotDing amendments.
Held: Under 0. VI Rule t7 o the Code of Civil Procedure the Coun
may allow at any stage of the proceedings to amend the pleadings. It is
discretionary depending upon the ci I'CUI'Jl$tances of each case. It would have
been more convenient if the amendments were underlined in red ink in the
ll'elevant paragraphs of the proposed amended written statement so that whel\
the two written statements were compared one would see> at once what was
:amended and what was not.
The principles for guidance ate : -
No amendments shall be allowe-i-
{a) Where it is made at a stage when it would cause injustice to the
opposite party, or where it woul'd necessitate a tk novo trial;
{b) Where it WOISid change the defence completely thereby implyill8
that the application is not b('1Ja fide ;
(c) Where tli.ere was no possibility o misconception of defeoc:e at the
beginning but on being unsuccessful in the case originally put
forward attempt is being made to change the front and seek to
be suc:cessful on another and completely different ground.
Ma TJJ.i,. Tinv. U Nyar~andfourothtrs,(t9S3) B.L.R. 26o(H.C.),refetredto.

U Saw Taik Leong for the plaintiff.

.U Aye Maung for- the defendant.

U KYAW ZAN U, ].-The sole issue now remains in this


suit to be decided is whether the promissory note dated
9th July 1954 (Exhibit A) was executed for consideration.
I have dealt with the facts of the suit and other issues in
my judgment dated 30th March 1966. Under section u8
of the Negotiable Instruments Act every promissory note
Civil Regular Suit No. s8 of 1961.
o~c;

c.c. forward attempt is being made to change


1966
the front and seek to be successful en
fRE BANK OF another and complet~ly different ground.
COMMUNJCA
TION
.KmN"coM- 1 agree with the learned Judge in Ma Thein Tin v. U Nyan
PANY and four others (I) when he said:

ft is an accepted principle now that leave to amend


would be re(used when the amendment seeks to introduce
a totally different new and inconsistent case and the applica-
tion is made at a late stage of:}he p~oceedings."

In that case also evidence was l~d and the parties had
closed their respective cases andthe amendment of the
written statement was sought only when the arguments
were to be heard on the remaining issues. ple~ding estop-
pel; which was an entirely new defence not pleaded in the .
original written statement. For all the reasons given above
I have no alternativ-e but to reject the application for
a~endrnent of the written statement, and accordingly it
is rejected:
Now I come to the issue in question. I must say the
defence has failed miserably to discharge its burden of
proof in the suic. U Ba Hla has stated in his evidence
that he did not receive cash from the plaintiffs on the spot.
He said he was in custody and only when he was released
.from prison he found the papers showing that be. had paid
up on 9th August 1954 the loan of K 75,200 taken from
the plaintiffs. He deposed that he had altogether paid
. K 8o,o62.o3 . Since the amount claimed in the suit is
K 85,934.65 . I must say that he did not sufficiently explain
the difference in the amounts. U Ba IDa is a business man
and he has studied English up to lOth standard. He did
not deny the contents of the original written statement.
It is hard to believe his evidence that he was in custody
and could not get the relevant statements of accounts
(1) (1953) B.L.R. 260 (H.C.~
showing the repayments made by him when the first c.c.
1966
written statement was filed. This written statement was
signed and verified by him on 25th September 1962 and Tat: BANK 'OP
COM:MUNICA-
the record sbows that he .was .arrested by the B.S.I. in TION
v.
connection with an offence onb' on 2Ist July 1964. There KHIN CoM.
is no ether eVidence except his own to support the defence. PANY

I answer the issue in the affirmative .


In the result there shall be a decree against the defend-
ants for payment ofK85,934.65 with all costs ofthe suit.
o:>G
CIVIL SECOND APPEAL

lkfore u Sein Thin, J,

t c.c. U PE AND 1WO OTHERS (APPEJ..LANT)


1.966
Aug.9. v.
SAO PO KHAM, [BY .HJS AGENT DA W TIN MAY,
SAO TUN PHA (MINOR) BY HIS FRIEND SAw PO KHAM]
(RESPONDENT). .

Suit for ejutment-pka that permissiO'II War given by the ownu to CQnstruct
perma~t buildings-Eawnents Aci--whethn a sufficient defence lltflinsl
the ejut1Mflt-:Suit for ejectment-plea of advere poss~sion-constitutWn
of adveru ponession-physical elrClusive pouetsiO'II, op,;, and hoshk flll.tlr
inUntion to lwld for himself as owner.
Hlld: The Easements Act has not yet been enforced in this count.1 UJCI
therefore the equitable docuine cannot be allowed to prevail over aD,y epedfic
provision or law concemed.
Even if it can be proved by the appellant-defendant that he had been aU owed
to build a substantial structure on the Iants by the previous. owner this fact in
itself would not be a sufficient defence against the ejectment sought by the
ownera.
Matlruri v. Bhola Nath and otlrert, A.I..R. {1934) All. 517, distinguished.
Ke Wa Nah v. Ko Tun Sein and two others, B.L:R. (r9sr) (H.C.) 188,
referr~ to.
Htldfurr.hn : To constitute adverse ponessi.on physical elCclusive poiNt
lion muat be open and hostile with the intention to hold for himself aa owner.
It was not the case of the defendants that they had at any time any claim to
ownership in respect of the suit land and a& auch their pleas of advene
posaesaion were untenable.
U Thin v. U Thaw, B.L.R. (1961) p. 417 (H.C.), referred to

. U Hla Nyun for the appellant.


U Tun Tin for the respondent.

U SEIN THIN, }.-These three appeals, being Ovil SecoDd


Appeals Nos. 3, 4 and 5 w~re heard together as the
respondents were tbe same and the question of law: ipvolved
Civil Second Appeal No. 3tS-4 of 1965.
t Againa tbe decree of the District Court or Taunggyi in Civil Appeal
No. 4,5.7 of 1963 dated the 24th ~ovember t964.
was similar. Appeal No.. 4 was however slightly different c.c.
1966
and I therefore propose to take it ~p first. In Civil Regular
U PE Al'iD
Suit No. 4 of 1961 of the Subdivisional Court of Taunggyi TWO
the plaintiffs-respondents filed a suit for ejectment of tile OTHERS
v.
appellant-defendant from a plot of land known as Lot SAO Po
KiiA.M(8Y BIS
No. 137, Sao San Htun Road, Alebaing Circle, Taunggyi. AGENTDAW
The plaintiffs' case in a nutshell was that they were the T:INMAY,

owners of the suit land and that the defendant who was SAO TuN
PBA
given permission by their predecessors-in-title to build a (MINOR)
8YWS
temporary dwelling house on the understanding that he FRIEND
SAw Po
would vacate the land whenever required by the owners KllAMJ.
had refused to vacate it in spite of repeated demands.
In so far as is relevant for the purpose of the present.
appeal the defence set up by the defendant was that he
was permitted by the late Sawbwa of Maukmai State, the
then owner thereof to construct permanent building~
thereon, and that in accordance with the said permission
he had substantial buildings constructed according to the
plans approved by the Taunggyi Municipality. He also
denied that there was undertaking on his part to vacate
the land whenever required by the owners to do so. The
trial Court granted a decree in favour of the plaintiffs
with costs and on appeal to the District Court of Taunggyi
the judgment and decree of the lower Court were
confirmed. Hence the present second appeal.
The only point that has been urged in appeal before
me now is that as the defendant was a licensee who had
constructed permanent and substantial structures on the
land with the express permission of the previous owner
he could not be ejected from the same. The authority
for this seems to be the ruling in the case of Mathuri v.
Bhola Nath and others (1) where it was held that eyen
though the Easements Act does not expressly apply the
principles underlying Chapter 6 of the Act, being in
consonance with justice, equity and good conscience. may
(1) A.I.R. (1 934) Allahabad 5 17.
000

c.c. well be applied and that therefore when an owner of land


1966
gives permission to another person to put up a building
U PE AND
TWO
of permanent character and he incurs expenses in the
OlBERS
Y.
execution at such work the licensor is by necessary implka-
SAO Po tion . estopped from revoking his permission so as to
KBAM(BYBJS
prejudice the licensee whose position has been compro-
ACENTDAW
TIN MAY, mised in consequence. It was also observed that it would
SAo TUN be inequitable. unjust and unfair to allow a licensor to
PBA '
(MINOR) order that the licensee should forthwith remove the work
BYBJS
FRU:ND of a permanent character which he has put up after
SAW Po
incurring expenditure. Thus the ratio deddendi in the
KBAMJ.
case cited above by which the licensor was precluded from
asserting his right of ejectment was based on equitable
principles embodied in the Easements Act. However our
late High Court has in Ke Wa Nah v. Ko Tun Seirz and
two others (2) expressed the view that in this country .
where Easements Act has not yet been enforced no equit- i
able doctrine can be allowed to prevail over any specific
provisions of law concerned. Thus in the case cited above
it ,Was held that where the prev~ous owner has allowed a
person to construct a permanent substantial building on
thE- land without granting him any lease or any right over
the land and th~n sells the land to another perso" and the
purchaser requires the land bona fide for erecting a ~uilding
he is entitled to eject the defendant. Therefore in the
present case before me even if it can be proved by the
appellant-defendant that he had been allowed to build a
substantial structures on the land by the previous owner
this fact in itself would not be a sufficient defence against
the ejectment sought by the owners. I would accordingly
hold that the lower Court was justified in decreeing the
plaintiff's suit. l.
Appeals Nos. 3 and 5 wh.ich are almost identical in :
point of law as well as of fact arose out of Civil Regular F-!,.'
Suits Nos. 3 and 5 of the Subdivisioq~l Court of Taunggyi '
(2) B.L.R. (195f~ (H.C.) 188.
wherein the plaintiffs"respondenrs sought to eject the c.c.
-1966
defendants-appellants on the same ground as in the former
suit already dealt with. The defences set up by the UP AND
TWO
defendants were however different in that they pleaded OTHERS
Y.
adverse possession. The defendant-appellant U Pe by his SAO Po
wriUen statement filed in Suit No. 5 stated tnat he had KllAM!BYms
ACENTDAW
been in occupation of the suit land since the year 1946 TIN MAY,
with the permission of one U Aung alleged to be the owner SAO TuN
PBA
thereof. In suit No. 3 the defendant-appellant U Ba Au"lg (MINOR) .
BY IDS
likewise averred that he had been in occupation of the FRIEND
SAW Po
suit land since 1942 under similar circumstances. From
KHAMJ.
the evidence obtaining on the records of the lower Court
it appe~rs that U Aung was no other than the care-taker
employed by the late Sawbwa of Maukmai State, the
previous owner. Thus the defendants' case was that they
were permissive occupant and I. cannot therefore under-
stand how it could he said that their possession had been
adverse to the owners at least during the life-times of the
late Sawhwa of Maukmai State and his employee U Aung.
There is evidence on record to show that Sawbwa of
Maukmai State died ~bout the year 1954 followed a couple
of years later by the death of U Aung and therefore even
conceding that the defendants' possession became adverse
to the owners after the death of U Aung the suits were
dearly within time. In U Thin v. U Thao,y (3) it has been
pbirited out that there is great weight of authority and Jaw
is. settled that to constitute adverse possession, physical
exclusive possession must be open and hostile with the
intention to hold for himself as owner. In the present
case before me it was never the case of the defendants
that they had at any time any claim to ownership in
respect of the suit land and as such their pleas of adverse
possession were untenable.
It is common ground that neither the plaintiffs nor
9B their predecessorsin-title had ever been in occupation of
(3) B. L. R. ( 196) p. 417 (H:C.).
c.c. the land and therefore the Jaw of limitation appticabJe
1966
was Article 144. The defendants were therefore bound
UPEAND to discharge the burden of proving adverse .possession as
TWO
OTHERS
I'(
laid down in U Chit Tun v. Daw Ngwe Thoung and
SAo Po others (4). But there is nothing on record to indicate as
KBAM[BYHIS
AGENTDAW
to when their possession had become adverse to the owners.
TIN MAY, As to the correct meaning of the term adverse possession
SAO TUN
PBA
the following observations made in P. Lachmi Reddi v.
(MINOR)
BY HIS
L. Ldchmi Reddi (5) are apposite:
FRIEND
SAW Po .
"An adverse holding is an actual and exclusive appropria
KHAMJ. tion of land commenced and continued under a claim of right;.
either under an openly avowed claim or under a constructive
claim (arising from the acts and circc.!nstances attending the
appropriation). to hold the land against him who was in
possession. (Angell, sections 340 and 398). It is the inten-
tion to claim adversely accompanied by such an invasion of
the right of the opposite party as gives him cause of action
which constitutes adverse possession."

Applying these principles to the present case before


me it is impossible to hold that the possession of the suit
land by the defendants have been adverse for more than
twelve years. In the result these appeals fail and are
hereby dismissed with costs.
Advocate's fee fixed as two gold mohurs.

(4) B.L.R. (t96J) p. r,:P.


(s) Indian Supreme Court Rullings, 1957, p. 195 2<>6.
CIVIL REGULAR SUIT
Befort U Kyaw Zan U, J.

u PO DAUNG (PLAINTIFF) t c.c.


196~
v.
Aug. 4
PE.._OPLES' BANK No. 19 (DEFENDANT).

Codt of Civil Proctd~re, 0. 33 R. 6-application to dispauptr-0. 33 R. z( 1) -


obtaining leave to sut as pauper undtr~uty to shOtiJ that all tlu propeny
. consiits of tke items set out anti valued in tht schedule to the petition-
fraudulent suppression in the disdosur~ of ass-ets-dismissal o_rthe petition.
Held: One of-the conditions required under Order JJ, Rule 2 {t) of the
Code in orde~ to obtain leave to sue as pauper is " that the plaintiff is a pauper
and that all the property of the plaintiff consists of the items set out and valued
in the schedule to the petition "
In the matter of the disclosure of assets any frnudulent suppression must
result in the dismissal of the petition.
Durga Prasad and aMUter v. Sriniva1a Surtka and another, A.I.R. (1930)
Pat. 368 ; Chtllammo/ v. Muthulakthmi Ammo/, l.L.R. (1945) Mad. 628 ;
Maharaj Bali and another v. Mt. Tirath and others, A.l.R: (1952) All. 6oS,
referred to.

U Ko Ko Gyi for the plaintiff.


U Hla .Gyaw for the respondent.
U KYAW.ZAN U, ].-This application dated ISt March
1966 under Order 33. Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure
by the defendant Bank being People's Bank No. 19 is to
dispauper the plaintiff on the ground that he did not
correctly and in good faith give his list of properties and
the valuations in his schedule when he applied . to the
Court on 13th March 1962 for leave to file the suit in
forma pauperis under Order 33, Rule 2 of the Code. In
the schedule he showed an " old one storeyed timber
building with zinc sheet roofiing and bamboo-mat walling "
without its site being No. 35. Nigyawda Street,
Kyaukmyaung, as his valued at K Boo amongst other
moveable 'properties valued at K 100. fn an inquiry into
pauperism"-..before the Collector of Rangoon in Revenue
Civil Regular Suit No. So of .1q6z.
OJJ 1:

c.c. Proceedings No. Yawma 13-7 of 1961-62 at the instance


1966
of the Attorney-General he however deposed that the
u Po DAUNG house in which .he lived being No. 39. Nyigyawda Street,
PEO:u:s Kyaukmyaung belonged to him though the site is State
BANK No. land. This contradicts his statement in the schedule of
19
.. properties filed with the application for leave to sue in
.forma pauperis. U Rai Jyaw Thoo an officer of the
defendant Bank in his affidavit affirmed that the Bank did
not oppose the application as it believed what the. plaintiff
had stated in his schedule, and the Court accordi}lgly
granted the leave applied for, but in the course of the
hearing of the suit the plaintiff deposed that he is now
living on the rents he received by letting out his house
No. 39, Nigyawda Street, Kyaukmyau ng. He said he was
receiving over K roo per month as house rent up to date.
The application for leave to sue in forma pauperis was
inade on 13th March 1962 and his deoosition in the suit
was recorded on 3 rst March I9Q4 In his deposition he
gave his address as" 35. Nigyawda Street Kyaukmyaung."
His application under Order 33; Rule 2 of the Code and
his depositions show that he owns two houses viz, Nos. 35
and 39. Nigyawda Street, Kya11kmyaung. As mentioned
above he never disclosed house No. 39 in his schedule. In
his counter affidavit the plaintiff swore that the
figure " 35" in the schedule was a typist's mistake, and it
should be "39." He craved leave of the Court to amend
it, but the Bank opposed the application. He insisted that
house No. 39 and not No. 35 belongs to' him and it is now
worth about K 6,ooo. According to him the latter belongs
to his son with whom he is now li'\Ting. The Bank replied
that the def ~ndant's plea that it w.as a typist's mistake
was an after-thought and that it is unbelieveable that the
house valued at K Boo in the schedule would fetch over
K roo per. month as rent. What it wanted to say was
that ifthe house (No. 39) fetches over K IOO per month F-!
as rent it must surely be worth more than K 8oo. The
point for determinanon is whether, e.\'en. assuming that c.c.
house No. 39 belongs to him and th.a t he is now living 1"'
with his son in house No. 35 his suppression of the U Po DAUNG
f'.
monthly income of over K Ioo .per month is a gr-ound for PEOPLES'
dispaupering him. BANX No.
19.
One of the conditions required under Order 33.
Rule 2 (1) of the Code in order to obtain leave jo sue as
a pauper is ''that the plaintiff is a paup~r and that .all the
property of the plaintiff consists of the items set out and
valued jn the schedule to the petition." In the Bench
decision of the Patna High Court in Durga Prasad and
another v. Srinivam Sureka and another (1) Courtney-
Terrell. C.J. said:
"It is most important that all applications for leave to sue
or prefer appeals in forma pauperis should set forth with the
utmost good faith as in the disclosure of assets in insolvency
proceedings, the whole of the assets of the applicant. It is
the practice that .notice of the application is sent to the
Government Pleader in order that an investigation may be
made by Government officials into the truth or otherwise of
the applicant's statements of fact and, therefore, it is incum-
bent upon the applicant to state with the utmost good faith
all the necessary materials for such .an investigation. If he
merely states that he is a poverty stricken individual with no
assets but a few valudess articles and conceals the fact that
he has interest in properties, of however little ultimatevalue,
it is impossible for the enquiry to be conducted with any
efficiency."

In that case the applicant djd not set forth the value of
his share of the equity of redemption of the mortgage in
suit, ;lnd the Court rejected the application for leave to
appeal in forma pauperis with costs. In Chellammal v.
Mutlwlakshmi Ammal (2) Leach, C.J. said:
"Under Order 33 Rule 2. . . it is the bounden duty of
the petitioner to make a full and accurate verified statement
98 of his or her prqperties."
~---------------------------
(1) A.f.R.(t9JO)Pat.J68. (:~) I.L.R.t1945)Mad.6:a8.
c.c. Quoting a. previous decision of the Court it was further
1966
held that "the utmost good faith is required of the -peti-
u Po v.DAuNc tioner in the matter of the disclosure of his assets and any
P&oPLES' intentional departure from good faith, whatever the motive
BANIC No. may be, must result in rhe dismissal of the petition."
19
' lastly in Maharaj Bali and another v. Mt. Tirath and
others (3) where there was fraudulent suppression of assets
in that the applicant omitted to include in the schedule a
decree in his favour for costs for Rs. 2 50 the Bench ef the
Allahabad High Court composed of Ghulam Hasan and
Mootham. JJ. relying upon Durga Prasad and another v.
Srinivasa Sureka and another (4) held that Order 3~. Rule 2
of the Code is mandatory an_d refused to interfere with
the order of the lower Court <lismissing the application
for leave to sue as a pauper on the ground that the
'applicants were guilty of fraudulent suppression of assets
which was a finding of fact. The Bench held that the
finding was correct. It was further held the fact that
even if the suppressed assets were disclosed it would not
effect the question of pauperism, is not relevant at all.
In view of these authorities I do not think I should
allow the plaintiff's application dated 7th April 1966 for
leave to amend his schedule. It is now six years that he
has slept over the matter and he would not have applied
if no application was made by the Bank to dispauper him.
It is hard to say that he applied for leave to sue as a pauper
in good faith. The said application is therefore rejected.
According to his own evidence in the suit the plaintiff
was at one time, at least. a wealthy man for he could
borrow near1y K 6o,ooo from the Bank on various dates
within the space of a few months in 1957 and on one
occasion in r958 by pledging his diamonds, which he said
were inherited by him from his mother-:_,_)aw. He stated
that he lost his fortune because he was a victim of dacoity
and theft and he also gambled away his n~oney at horse
(3) A.I.R. (1952) All. 6o8. (4} A.I.R t 1930) Pat. :368.
0 .r.l ..
racing. He said he had never hit the jack-pot though he c.c.
1!166
bet K 5,000 to K 6~ooo at each meeting.
For all the re~sons given above the application of the U Po DAUNG
Y.
Bank to dispauper the plaintiff is allowed with costs. PEoPLES'
Instead of dismissing the suit forthwith I feel that it will BANK No.
t!J. .
be just and fair to allow the plaintiff .to deposit the required
court fee in full within a reasonable time. I accordingly
grant three (3) weeks' time from today for payment of
the court fee before the learned Registrar (Original side)
failing which the suit shall stand dismissed with. coSts oil.
contested scale. The plaintiff shall pay three Gold Mohurs
as Advocate's fee for the matters in hand.

59A
ofi
CIVlL FIRST APPEAL
B#jor~ U Thd Pe , J.

t c.c. u TUN MIN . ~NO ONE (APPELLANT)


1966

JuL 16
v.
PEOPLES' BANK No~ 22, RANGOON (RESPONDENT).

Suit for declaration that tht tram/~ of a house was void against the creditors-
presumption nf fraud in rase of a voluntary uttlement-tramf~or largely
indebud at the time of settlement-transf~ee to show good faith as well as
(Jaymnrt of consideratiun-wheth~ a gratuitous consideratitm such as
natural love and affection is a " t'Oluable " consideratitm.
Suit by the respondent hank for a declaration that the transfer of a house
made in favour of the ut appellant by his father who was a judgment-debtor
of the bank was void against them and other creditiors.
H~ld : There is a strong presumption of fraud in case of voluntary
settlement when a transferor is largely indebted at the time of the settlement.
This presumption will be further strengthened if the transferor conveys all his
properties without making any provision for his creditor.
Maung Than Sftn v. U Po Nyun A.J.R. (1"933) Ran. p. 2SZ at 253
referred to and followed.
In order to save the conveyance from the liability of being avoided it must
be shown that a transferee had obtained the conveyance in good faith as welt
as for payment of consideration. A gratuitous consideration such as natural
Jove and affection is not a " valuable " consideration. A transfer in considera
t ion of natural love and affection is not a transfer for "consideration ".
Chidamharam Chttliar v. Srinitasa Sallria/ and others, A.l.R. (191-4) (P.C.)
p . 137 at 139 ; Ramasami Pi/loi v. Adinara)'ana Pilloi, ao Mad. p. 465;
Sulthpal Kuar v. Dasu and anoth~. A.l.R. (1919) Oudh p. 95, referred to.

U Sein Bu for the appellants.


ltlr. C. C. Khoo for the respondent.

U THET PE. j.--Qn 3rd March 1~59 the respondent


sued one U B.. Tin the father of the rst appellant for a
recovery of K 12.70007 in the Rangoon City Civil Court.
A consent decree was passed on 8th December 1960. The
Civil First Appeal No. 55 of 1965.
t Apinst the decree of the City Civil Court of Rangoon in Civil Regular
Suit N,o. 695 of 1963, dated the asth May 1965.
OJ?
respondent took out execution-of the decree and attached ~9C;,
a house known as No: 466, Lower Pa7.undaung Read, . - .
Rangoon. Then the ISt appellant applied for the removal u .!~"[0~1 "'
of and succeeded in removing the attachment on the p,0 ;ti_,.
ground that he was i n possessi9n of the house after U Ba DANKNo.u,
RANGOON.
Tin had conveyed it to him by a deed of gift dated 28th
June 1960.
The respondent thereupon sued the .appellants and six
others for a declaration that the transfer made in favourof
the I~t appellant by his father U Ba Tin was void against
them and other creditors. The 1st appellant pleaded t~at
he was unaware of the litigation between his father and
the respondent and that th_e .gift was executed in lieu of
inheritance. The learned Chief Judge of the Rangoon
City Civil Court who had seiz~n of the case decreed the
respondent's suit after hearing the parties and their
witne~ses. -Hence this appeal.
It is well settled that there is a strong presumption of
fraud in case of a voluntary settlement whe.n a transferor
is largely indebted at the time of the settlement. This
presumption will be further strengthened if the transfemr
conveys all his properties without making any provision
for his creditor. Thus it has been held in Maung Than Sein
,v. U Po Nyun (1.) that:
" It is only when there arc creditors in e>Cistence at the
time of the gratuitous transfer or when a transfer is made
just before a man emharks on some very hazardous specula-
tion that it can be presumed t~at the gift is made with. intent
to pttt his property out of the reach of his cr~ditors."

In the instant c-ase the evidence adduced on behalf of


the respondent shows that U Ba 1in was heavily indebted
and the respondent had filed a suit against him on the date
of the e-xecution of the deed of Jift in favour of his son and
that he had no property other than the one he had
(1) A.l.R. (~JJJ) F.an. p. zsz at 253
OJO

c.c. voluntarily conveyed to his son. The tran,sferor


1966
undoubtedly had t~e intention of delaying or defeating
U TuN MIN d1e claim of his creditors.
AND ONE
v. In order to save the conveyance from :the Habilicy of
PEOPLES' .
BANKNo.U,
being avoided it must be shown that a transferee had
R.\NG()(}N. obtained the conveyance in good faith as well as far
payment of consid~ration. In the present case there is no
valuable consideration: A gratuitous consideration such i
as natural love and affection is not a ' valuable .. considera-
tion. A transfer in consideration of natural love and
affection is not a transfer for " consideration." ln this
connectiOn reference may usefully be made to. the decision
in Chidambaram Chettiar v. Srinivasa Sastrial and
others (2) where it was remarked:
~ As. however, Mr. Krishnaswami Iyer on behalf of the
:~ppellant strongly . contended that the last paragraph or
section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act as interpreted by
this Court in Ramasami 'Pilla{ v. Adinaraycma Pil,ai (3).
warrants a different view being taken we shall btiefly deal
with his contention. In effect his con~ention is that wherever
there is any real consideration however small. for the tr~nsfer;
the question of intention is immaterial and the transaction
must be held to be one, entered in good faith and therefore
not invalid as . against creditors either ljnder the Statute, .
13 Elizabeth. Clause 5 or under section 53 of the Transfer of
Property Act, even though it was in fact intended to delay
or defeat creditors and had the intended effect. This conten-
tion is. we think, on the face of it unsustainable for the
simple reason that under both 'enactments good faith as well
ns consideration is made, in terms. an essential condition pf
the validity of the tran~er."

See also Sukhpal Kudr v: Dasw' and another (4) where was
held that:
"Transfers foi~ded on what ls de"sigttated good or
meritorious consideration, .such as natural love and affection.
F_-;~
(z} A.I.R. (1914) Privy Council, p. 137 at l39 (3) 20 Madras, p. 4T>s.
(4) A.I:R. (1919) 9udn ;>. t9S
while creating as they do a moral as. distinguished from a
legal obligation, do not count a transfer for consideration,
but are looked ~pon as merely voluntary. Such voluntary
U TUN MIN
transfers are not transfers in good faith and for value, to AND ONE
which the Jaw . extends protection, if fraud, is meditated or v.
Props
if the necessa')' effect of those transfers is to perpet~te a BANKNo.22,
. fraud on third parties." RANGOON.

It has been contended on behalf of the appellants that


the gift was exe.cuted in lieu of inheritance which should
be regarded as valuable consideration. This contention
-cannot be acc~pted inasmuch as a deed of gift does not
recite that conveyance was made in lieu of inheritance .
and it is also extremely unlikely that U Ba Tin would
convey his sole property to the ISt appellant alone as
inheritance when he had another son called Ko Than
Nyunt. Besides the Exhibit (Q judgment passed in the
claim case instituted by the Is.t appellant coupled with the
address given by him in the trial Court proceedings clearly
showed that the Ist appellant had been living in the house
in dispute where his father also resided. It is therefore .
obvfous that the xst appellant must have bee!l aware of
the litigation that had been going on between his father
and the respondent, and the transaction of gift under these
circumstances cannot be said to be bona tide.
In the result the appeal fails and is dismissed with
rnctc ~dvocate fees K 85.
.;;~<-r.e&~l~ c.a::>s-oftre!~c.o:x?-i3
lcadxo "'F ~~~ _fc.oo!~fb ,rlo e~ ~~~a:cl,eo '~e l:gie ~
nf & ~ ,&, mcbc.o t,C 33ie
" (c) :h'Jww:2u
0-jo o e w~e~
.J
II :~fe I (re) (l( I() C.c00(')ll KW~tcb<Oe~
.) !) .)0 & ,) . 0
fUe:cbcoel:nw)
fl~:~b:>:2
.> . e
r
$If
(bJ:cbcce&->ec) :2~co:2e
o e.:>
do~~~~~OO~W
.:>
WOOW::>b
.:> .>
W<OACD
.> oe
bo
o
(tec)QOOW
.J .J
~00xp:~ro~ ~Uf:m'l':~ CY?~~o} ?-'' .SjloS' ~ >;_,~
~t:~:~ rofco~:Gcpr ooSGo:no5&>.,~ "6t~~ C'l'>roC5(~)
~G9 rtb ?o'Sro~8:ro 98:o.:>~ ~:Go:~:?m~~ ~0(~ ol\(oeli'i)
exp:~~a&x;'t G~ oeoo ro.j&~ 't'lt~ ~G~~ Gcn:>8:~Go:Y.> <Mo:>o5('iE:
~o5sxOjJ
-~.sl ~~:~~ ~~:~ ~~GIJ:>8~
~'i~~9'Cf> .
sn: GO:~ Gcpo5oo0oou:~G~: ~~ ~ ~mE~:)
~~OJ G~~.r:~;~ 0 ro.j&~ joSooS@: oeoo OOJ~ '}~:.1 ~ .
oo'P:g*o:n~.sl o~Gsn~~ oo'P:~ro Goo8::no3f:::l:>~ ~~~ ~~~:~o

oo'P:~ o}.&n:~<J?oS~ Goo8::no3f:sn: G~CJ:?o-SGo:~:x&o~:


~~~'P:~ ~~ *~~ ~0?~'1':~~ co&x.o:~ CY.Y.>Ot
G~: ~ax?=~oS!~::l:>~ll .
. (.l)T~~ .~Lii?:m'P:~::l:>~ a&;) ~~oo: G~::noSf:sn: aa
't'lt~G:m G~~.r:~ <Xj>oSGO!'}t ~Uj?~9':~ CYj>~~ ooGt:@P:
cm:8:~ ~CJ:?oSGo:'lfro~: cn:>:Scm:8:~Gou ~~:;,JOS~~ ';&,~
GO:, o~~G~~t.l~=~p:ro of~::l:>~u
W068 ~Uj?~O?'P:~ CY?~~ o~~G~~;B:ro ~Uj?~O?'P:~
:))~ 98:'1'lfGo:n G~ ?Go ~~ oeG9 rt& ;>o-Sro jO 'lr&; ~8
ooS@& oooJ roi)~ oeG9 ri'S' >d5oo8o-nro o ~G~068 ooS~&
Goot::noSf:sn: <X?oSorr~8:~::l:>9 98:~ IW~d)::l:>~ Goot::noSf: sn:
-G~CJ:?oSUj?~8'lf snam~cm:::l:>~O( ~Uj?~O?'P:~O(~~sn: ~cot
G'Pd)G>~G>t:l oot:~ ~COtG9'd)G>~::l:>~~~t: Goot::no3f:sn:
G~~o:~:~ ~~o/'~~Gtl99 Goot::no3f:::l:>~ ~ ~
~aS G~<Xj>o5~~8:~~ G~*'lt ~g9~G'fl(> 0?9':8009
~'l 8oSotcn:>:Scm:@:SG8: oo81Pl>:::l:>~u
::l:>d5G::l:>~eoGsv~~ oo~ ~'l' "?.ooS~:::l:>~ 98:~ G~~!w~d5
c; ~[p:~ooS~:sn: ~'"8:8:'1' ooSr!f> ryfrof::l:>~O( ~cot
G'l'd5cm ~>~9 ~:i>Jd5~~s: ~rP=arn ~~
so5~~ oo8:~ ~'lt G~o? BW~~ ~~c;>S:I&.'Pr>
y:>:<J.6t:::l:>~O( G.y.>d5cobt:~~tg~ ~GOY,>GOII
oor~W068. ~Lii?~oo'P:~::l:)~ oeG9 ri'S' <;>oSro J0 ~G~068
~GIS ~oro~~~:~~ G~~:>&
I:t.
; ti {It1 1<t ~
~~J~~_; O'l

S.,
.i t}$.
~ ~
l~~~~~t
8
s rt m
v
-~
-8
I ~ w.-1'
..8
fl fl
00
..!J
-+'!
ll ..S
&.,
V

co
-:t1-a t~~[1~
~ ~ .s
~ ~i!
_, s ~ ~~
*
~ -1:" oS i
t ~~~~~~i~ ~~. ~. ~m J
~ ~1 ~ -s, :-~ 8
:r~ [J. . .
.,_~~ t t ~ tcr~ t_p., ~ .t~ .
j ~ & r!J cg' ~ '' ~ ~ , ; a ~ &, n e
c ,Dn ~ ~ ..3o ~(;B., ~ ~ 0 ~ f)

~ _1) j f) -g., 8 ~ ~ ... ~ ~i, ~ ~


~~1. 8~!~ tEr~,i~t
/ ~i~~ j !&Jl.' ~ ~t!'~tl
H a., OlJ ~J -g., f)
. [B., :1Y, &, ~
-> m s . ..
t~~ ..ao '~ aj'
"t, m ..8 -8o 8 ~ 8-; .
~ '8 f) o() V .
s :a: ~I~~ }1 ~r ~ p; _1
0., S,-Bo
~- ~::&; $.* v t ~ ~<- ~ ~ t
1'
0

You might also like