Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dr. D B Raijiwala
Associate Professor, Sardar Vllabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat, India
ABSTRACT
Researchers from all over the world are finding new ways and new materials to replace the
cement constituents. In this paper cement in mortar was replaced by 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, 40%
50% and 60% with coconut shell ash (CSA). Durability of mortar was found out for NaCl, MgSO4
and saline marine or marshy water. To assess the resistance for the temperature change wet and
dry cycle test were also performed on the CSA mortar. Change in weight and strength of the
samples were found before and after conducting the test. Ultra sonic pulse velocity test were also
conducted to find out the quality of the concrete samples prepared with coconut shell ash (CSA).It
is found that the samples shows good resistance in different durability test and UPV test also
shows that the samples are homogenous and compact. Coconut shell ash may be considered as
suitable replacement of cement up to 10% as far as durability is concerned.
Key words: Coconut shell ash, Durability, UPV.
Cite this Article: Sankalp Sharan and Dr. D B Raijiwala, UPV Characteristics and Durability
Aspects of the Coconut Shell Ash Concrete. International Journal of Civil Engineering and
Technology, 8(2), 2017, pp. 400409.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=2
1. INTRODUCTION
The constituents of which cement and concrete are made are started to replenish from this world. It is
necessary to found the alternative ways for the replenishment of those materials. If any suitable
replacement material is found then there are lot of factors like durability aspects, economic aspect and
strength factors etc are taken in to the consideration. It is necessary that all the factors strike the right
chord so that any material can be selected for either for replacement or addition in the concrete. Plenty of
research work is done on coconut shell fiber. Coconut shell is agricultural waste which is available in
huge quantity in many parts of the world. Coconut shell ash is a cheap material and if is used to enhance
the durability of concrete then it could result in cost saving without affecting it strength of the concrete.
This paper aim was to assess the durability of coconut shell ash in mortar inn different conditions and also
to check the quality and homogeneity of concrete samples by UPV so that it can be used in non-structural
components, concrete pavements and other structures which is somehow exposed to those situations
which affects its durability.
60
M30
50
STRENGTH N/mm2 M20
40
7 days
30
20 28 days
10
0
0 10 15 20 30 40 50 0 10 15 20 30 40 50
%CSA
70
60
50
Strength N/mm2
40
30
20
10
0
0 5 10 15 20 30 40 50 60
CSA %
Strength before putting in NaCl solution Strength after removal from Nacl solution
Figure 2 Strength loss in mortar samples for the NaCl durability test
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
Weight in gm
0.5
0.4 Weight before putting in NaCl solution
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 30 40 50 60
CSA %
Figure 3 Weight loss in mortar samples for the NaCl durability test
Mortar samples were made with replacement of cement with CSA up to 60%.Compressive strength
and weight of samples before putting in the solution were find out. The strength before putting in the
solution of NaCl for 0%,5%,10%,15%,20% and 30% CSA were 59.23 N/mm2,60.35 N/mm2,65.23
N/mm2,68.26 N/mm2,61.23 N/mm2,58.30 N/mm2respectively. The mortar samples were put in solution of
NaCl for 56 days. After 56 days the strength for 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 30% CSA were 53.67
N/mm2,56.79N/mm2,57.67 N/mm2, 54.7 N/mm2, 53.67 N/mm2, 51.24 N/mm2 respectively. Similarly
weight of the samples before putting in the solution of NaCl were also found out.The weight for the
samples for 0%,5%,10%,15%,20% and 30% before putting in NaCl solution are 0.821 gm,0.817
gm,0.805 gm,0.796 gm,0.790 gm and 0.785 gm respectively while after 56 days removing from the Nacl
solution the weight were found out to 0.765 gm,0.753 gm,0.725gm,0.703 gm,0.683 gm and 0.625 gm
respectively. It is found that compressive strength and weight of the samples after NaCl durability test is
less than the normal strength and weight and decreases more as CSA % increases after 10%.
60
50
Strength N/mm2
40
30
20
10
0
0 5 10 15 20 30 40 50 60
CSA%
0.9
0.8
0.7
Weight in gm
0.6
0.5
0.4
Weight before putting in MgSO4 solution
0.3
0
0 10 20 30 CSA % 40 50 60 70
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
Weight in gm
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 30 40 50 60
CSA%
60
50
STRENGTH
40
30
20
10
0
0 5 10 15 20 30 40 50 60
CSA%
0.7
0.6
Weight in gm
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 30 40 50 60
%Replacement of CSA
80
60
50
STRENGTH
40
30
20
10
0
0 5 10 15 20 30 40 50 60
CSA %
4200 0%
4100 10%
4000 15%
3900 20%
3800 30%
3700 40%
3600 50%
3500
28 days 56 days 112 days
45
40
35
30
Strength
15
10
5
0
4020 4040 4060 4080 4100 4120 4140 4160 4180 4200
Ultra sonic pulse velocity (m/s)
Figure 11 Relation between UPV and Compressive strength for M 20 mix with CSA
4600
4500
Ultra sonic pulse velocity (m/s)
4400
0%
4300 10%
4200 20%
4100 15%
4000 30%
3900 40%
3800 50%
3700
28 days 56 days 112 days
50
30
20
10
0
4200 4250 4300 4350 4400 4450
Ultra sonic pulse velocity (m/s)
found that in M 20 grade of concrete after 28 days of curing the velocity for 0%,10%,15%20% and
30% CSA are3856 m/s,3868 m/s,3885 m/s,3920 m/s,3845 m/s respectively and for M 30 mix for
0%,10%,15%,20% and 30% CSA for 28 days of curing UP velocity are 4029 m/s,4046 m/s,4110
m/s,4103 m/s,4044 m/s respectively. A relationship between the 56th day strength and UPV value is also
found out it has the R Squared value of 0.9873 and 0.9836 respectively for M 20 and M 30 mix. All
samples have UPV above 3.5km/sec which indicates that all samples have good homogeneity and density.
After that relation between the compressive strength and UPV were also plotted and it has R squared
value of 0.9873 and 0.9836 which is quite good.
4. CONCLUSION
For NaCl and MgSO4durability test the reduction in weight and strength of the mortar samples were
observed. In both the cases degradation occur due NaCl and MgSO4.It is found that up to 10% CSA the
samples after conducting the test do not deteriorate much in weight and strength than the control samples
however with more % of CSA sample degradation is in not in accordance with the control samples and it
is degraded more. For wet and dry cycle test and marine environment test durability performance is quite
good up to 10 % to 15% replacement of CSA deterioration was not much as compared to control sample
but as CSA percentage increases deterioration was more in the weight and strength of sample with respect
to weight and strength before the test.UPV test of the concrete samples also gives good result as velocity
of electronic wave through all the samples are above 3.5 km/sec which is considered as good quality
concrete. Coconut shell ash can be used for the replacement of cement up to 10% where durability is the
concern however more research it needed. Coconut shell ash is a agricultural waste and a cheap material
so it can be used instead other waste material in concrete however more research is needed.
REFERENCES
[1] Paramasivam P, Nathan GK, Das Gupta NC. Coconut fibre reinforced corrugated slabs. Int J Cem
Compos Lightweight Conc 1984; 6(1):1927.
[2] Gunasekaran K, Kumar PS. Lightweight concrete using coconut shell as aggregate. In: Proceedings of
the ICACC-2008. International conference on advances in concrete and construction, Hyderabad,
India, 79 February, 2008.p. 4509.
[3] Ambraseys, N.N., Melville, C. P. A History of Persian Earthquakes. Britain: Cambridge University
Press, 1982, pp.219.
[4] Mannan MA, Ganapathy C. Mix design for oil palm shell concrete. CemConcr Res 2001; 31:13235.
[5] Nuhu-Koko MK. The use of palm kernel shell as aggregates for concrete. Paper presented at the 21st
annual conference of materials testing control and research, Federal Ministry of Works, Lagos, Nigeria,
1999, 20pp.
[6] Omange GN. Palm kernel shells as road building materials. Nigerian Society of Engineers Technical
Transactions 2001; 36(1).
[7] Rodriguez de Sensale G. Effect of rice-husk ash on durability of cementitious materials. CemConcr
Comp 2010; 32(9):71825.
[8] Kumar S, Kumar R, Bandopadhyay A, Alex TC, Kumar BR, Das SK, et al. Mechanical activation of
granulated blast furnace slag and its effect on the properties and structure of Portland slag cement.
CemConcr Comp 2008;30(8):67985
[9] Puertas F, Palacios M, Manzano H, Dolado JS, Rico A, Rodriguez J. Amodel for the CASH gel
formed in alkali-activated slag cements. J. Eur Ceram Soc 2011; 31(12):204356.
[10] Ray D, Sarkar BK, Rana AK, Bose NR. Effect of alkali treated jute fibres on composite properties.
Bull Mater Sci 2001;24(2):12935.
[11] Allahverdi A, Skvara F. Sulfuric acid attack on hardened paste of geopolymer cements. Part I.
Mechanism of corrosion at relatively high concentrations. CeramSilikaty 2005; 49(4):2259.
[12] Tikalsky PJ, Roy D, Scheetz B, Krize T. Redefiningcement characteristics for sulphate resistant
Portland cement. CemConcr Res 2002; 32(8):123946.
[13] C.Junco, J. Gadea, A. Rodrguez, S. Gutirrez-Gonzlez, V. Caldern, and Durability of lightweight
masonry mortars made with white recycled polyurethane foam, Cem.Concr. Compos. 34 (2012) 1174
1179.
[14] Fernndez-JimnezA, Garca-LodeiroI, Palomo A. Durability of alkali-activated fly ash cementitious
materials. JMaterSci 2007; 42:305565.
[15] Santhanam M, Cohen M, Olek J. Differentiating seawater and groundwater sulphate attack in Portland
cement mortars. CemConcr Res2006; 36(2):21327.
[16] Kalyanapu Venkateswara Rao, A.H.L.Swaroop, Dr.P.Kod anda Rama Rao and Ch.Naga Bharath,
Study on Strength Properties of Coconut Shell Concrete. International Journal of Civil Engineering
and Technology (IJCIET), 6(3), 2015, pp.4261.
[17] Dewanshu Ahlawat and L.G.Kalurkar, Strength Properties of Coconut Shell Concrete. International
Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET). 4(7), 2013, pp.2024