Professional Documents
Culture Documents
K. Muthumani
Professor, VIT University, Chennai, India
ABSTRACT
Concrete is widely used material across the world for construction of large structures. Due
to increase in industrialization and development of urban areas, high volume of resources is
required which are available naturally. This means high volume of resources is used worldwide
for production of concrete. To reduce the use of such resources and to decrease the negative
impact on environment, the uses of industrial waste and artificial aggregates as a replacement
of natural aggregates are increasingly used. Another focus required in material research is to
reduce the concrete weight density so that the effective dead load and seismic loads can be
lowered. The paper attempts to review the literature and present a state of art in making
lightweight concrete as reported till now for structural application.
Key words: Lightweight Concrete, Oil Palm Shell, Expanded Clay Aggregates, Scoria
Aggregates, Conventional Concrete, Pumice Aggregate
Cite this Article: V. Swamy Nadh and K. Muthumani, Critical Review On Structural Light
Weight Concrete. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(2), 2017, pp.
252263.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=2
1. INTRODUCTION
Lightweight Concrete (LWC) has been used since many years. Many monuments are constructed with
lightweight concrete and these are long lasting up to now. Lightweight concrete are mainly from natural
volcanic eruption and are common totals of volcanic root, for example, pumice, scoria, and so forth.
Sumerians utilized this as a part of building Babylon in the third thousand years B.C. (Fig. 1). The
Greeks and the Romans were first used pumice as a part of building development. These buildings are
still in existing with minor failures like St. Sofia Cathedral or Hagia Sofia, in Istanbul, Turkey, worked
by two specialists, Isidore of Miletus and Anthemius of Tralles, charged by the Emperor Justinian in the
fourth century A.D,the Roman sanctuary, Pantheon, which was raised in the years A.D. 118 to 128 (Fig
2); the auspicious conduit, Pont du Gard, assembled in A.D. 14; and the considerable Roman
amphitheatre, Coliseum, worked in A.D. 70 and 82. Notwithstanding building developments, the
Romans utilized normal lightweight concrete and empty dirt vases to make "Creation Caementitium"
with a special goal to reduce the weight. This was additionally utilized for the development of Pyramids
and the Mayan time frame in Mexico.
exchange happens through the grid and splits spread through the lightweight total (fig 3) particles.
Consequently, the lightweight totals are likewise weaker than the ITZ (5).
The utilization of lightweight total in cement has many favourable circumstances and are listed below:
Reduction of dead weight can decrease the footings sizes and lighter the upper structure. This may bring
about decrease in bond amount and conceivable lessening in fortification.
Lighter and littler pre-thrown components requiring littler and less costly taking care of and transporting
hardware.
Reductions in sizes of members and bar measurements that outcome in bigger vacancy accessibility. (6)
High thermal protection.
helps in imperviousness to fire of the structure (Kayali, 2007; ACI 213, 2003) (7).
molecule pressing technique. The outcomes showed that the blend configuration could be utilized for
OPC as well as for an assortment of mixes of totals. It rations the characteristic assets as well as advances
manageability in saving the earth. (21).
The utilization of GGBS as incomplete bond substitution in the OPS delivered expanded
compressive strength pick up contrasted with OPS with no GGBS over the curing time of 365 days. All
the blends experienced quality decrease of around 55-65% when subjected to warmth presentation of
200C. Be that as it may, the expansion in GGBS substitution at 60% was observed to be best in
minimizing the quality misfortune. The water retention of the OPS at 28 and 90days was observed to be
in the scope of 7.5-7.8% and 6.3-7.3%. The OPS with 40% GGBS performed best in lessening the water
ingestion of OPS because of diminishing in porous pores. (22)
The GGBS substitution level and curing condition slightly affected the post-crest flexural sturdiness,
while the expansion of low-volume steel fiber altogether improved the flexural durability of the OPS.
The expansion of 0.6% steel filaments gave more reliable change to the flexural execution of the OPS
contrasted with the expansion of a 0.3% volume division of steel strands. The impact of GGBS
substitution level and curing administration on the anxiety strain relationship of OPS was peripheral,
though the expansion of strands fundamentally expanded the pinnacle strain and most extreme
compressive strain of the solid, showing enhanced toughness.(23)
in. Agreeable solid which is half to 33% lighter than typical cement having great protecting qualities
with high assimilation and shrinkage can be made utilizing VP (27).
Pumice (fig 6) is utilized as a part of auxiliary LWC due to its mechanical properties is closer to
typical weight concrete. Penetrability of cement as observed by Anwar Hossain initial surface absorption
of volcanic pumice concrete is 34% higher that of the NWC, it is also mentioned that VPC can used as
structural lightweight concrete (27). Modulus of elasticity (ME) of VPC is important to consider as the
stiffness of the structure is based on ME value. There is an highly decrease of ME value in the VPC
concrete, as the density plays a major role in the making the structure stiff in which VPC is quite back.
The density of VPC is 1700-1800 kg/m3.
There is significant effect of VPC while using of admixtures. It improves the workability and
strength of the VPC as there is an increase of density while adding admixtures (3). Grade 2 which has a
particle size of 4-8mm of PA shows better results when compared to Grade 1(smaller than 4mm) and
Grade 3 (8-16mm). Grading curves are used to locate which kind of aggregates sizes can give the
optimum strength and other mechanical properties. Pumice aggregates are used as thermal efficient
material and thermal conductivity of PAC is 2.5-4 times lower than that of NWC (2) . The permeable
structure of pumice concrete is beneficial and acts as a thermal insulating material.
Payam shafigh et al., (30) shows the mechanical and micro structural properties of lightweight
aggregate concrete containing limestone and high volume of fly ash reduces the cost of construction and
disposal of waste. Replacement of cement content with fly ash decrease the strength properties and
replacement of fine aggregate with limestone powder affects the strength of the concrete and shows
adequate results. Oil palm shell and crushed granite is used as an coarse aggregate, oven dry density is
about 1650-1900 kg/m3, compressive strength of lightweight aggregates concrete shows 45 MPa when
no replacement is done (30) (31).
3. CONCLUSIONS
As the lightweight aggregates had low density than normal weight concrete, choosing of such lightweight
aggregates in structural point of view is a good initiative.
As per the review there are so many lightweight aggregates that can achieve the structural properties but
moisture content place a major role.
The compressive strength of oil palm shell gives more strength when compared to all other aggregates.
Silica fumes are added to decrease the pores in the concrete and to make concrete to better.
Micro structural analysis has to be made to make the grain boundaries to bond between the C-S-H gel
and the aggregates.
Moisture related problems are same in all the lightweight aggregates, reduction can be made by adding
silica as replacement of cement.
Selection of lightweight aggregates depends on the selection of construction.
Light weight aggregate can be used as structural, Non Structural and infill also.
REFERENCES
[1] Composites C. A novel material for lightweight concrete production. cement and concrete
composites.2009;35:(August 2016).
[2] Centre A. The effects of different fine and coarse pumice aggregate / cement ratios on the structural
concrete properties without using any admixtures. 2005;35:185964.
[3] Sari D, Pasamehmetoglu AG. The effects of gradation and admixture on the pumice lightweight
aggregate concrete. Cement and Concrete Research. 2005;35(5):93642.
[4] Ali N, Shekarchi M, Mahoutian M, Soroushian P. Mechanical properties of hybrid fiber reinforced
lightweight aggregate concrete made with natural pumice. Constr Build Mater [Internet].
2011;25(5):245864. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.058
[5] Dilli ME, Atahan HN, Cengiz S, Faculty CE. A comparison of strength and elastic properties between
conventional and lightweight structural concretes designed with expanded clay aggregates.
2015;101:2607.
[6] Desai D. Development Of Light Weight Concrete.Engineeringcivil.com [Internet] :115.
[7] Suba S. The effects of using fly ash on high strength lightweight concrete produced with expanded
clay aggregate. 2009;4(4):27588.
[8] Moores G, Yorkshire N. Lightweight aggregate. 2008:[Internet] 46-47 p.
[9] Hoff GC. Guide for the Use of Low-Density Concrete in Civil Works Projects Geotechnical and
Structures. 2002;[Internet];(August).
[10] Ardakani A, Yazdani M. The relation between particle density and static elastic moduli of lightweight
expanded clay aggregates. Applied Clay Science [Internet].2014;9394:2834.
[11] Ya S, Fadeev AS, Samohvalov O V. Defining limit values of temperature field in typical sections of
a rotary kiln producing expanded clay at a given density. Procedia Eng [Internet].
2015;111(TFoCE):2335. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.082
[12] Shafigh P, Ghafari H, Mahmud H Bin, Jumaat MZ. A comparison study of the mechanical properties
and drying shrinkage of oil palm shell and expanded clay lightweight aggregate concretes. Mater Des
[Internet]. 2014;60:3207.
[13] Bogas JA, Gomes A, Pereira MFC. Self-compacting lightweight concrete produced with expanded
clay aggregate. Construction and Building Materials [Internet]. 2012;35:101322. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.111
[14] Bogas JA, Brito J De, Cabao J. Long-term behaviour of concrete produced with recycled lightweight
expanded clay aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater [Internet]. 2014;65:4709.
[15] Basri HB, Mannan MA, Zain MFM. Concrete using waste oil palm shells as aggregate. 1999;29:619
22.
[16] Mannan MA, Ganapathy CU. Engineering properties of concrete with oil palm shell as coarse
aggregate. construction and building materials 2002;16:29-34.
[17] Shafigh P, Jumaat MZ, Mahmud H. Oil palm shell as a lightweight aggregate for production high
strength lightweight concrete. Construction and Building Materials [Internet]. 2011;25(4):184853.
[18] Shafigh P, Jumaat MZ, Mahmud H Bin, Alengaram UJ. A new method of producing high strength
oil palm shell lightweight concrete. Mater Materials and Design [Internet]. 2011;32(10):483943.
[19] Yew MK, Mahmud H Bin, Ang BC, Yew MC. Effects of Oil Palm Shell Coarse Aggregate Species
on High Strength Lightweight Concrete. ?e Scientific World Journal.Volume 2014, Article ID
387647, 12 pages. Research 2014;2014.
[20] Jumaat MZ, Alengaram UJ, Ahmmad R, Bahri S, Islam ABMS. Characteristics of palm oill clinker
as replacement for oil palm shell in lightweight concrete subjected to elevated temperature.
2015;101:94251.
[21] Aslam M, Sha P, Zamin M. Oil-palm by-products as lightweight aggregate in concrete mixture: a
review. 2016;126.
[22] Hung K, Alengaram UJ, Zamin M, Yong M, Liu J, Lim J. Assessing some durability properties of
sustainable lightweight oil palm shell concrete incorporating slag and manufactured sand. Journal of
Cleaner Production [Internet]. 2016;112:76370.
[23] Mo KH, Chin TS, Alengaram UJ, Jumaat MZ. Material and structural properties of waste-oil palm
shell concrete incorporating ground granulated blast-furnace slag reinforced with low-volume steel
fibres. Journal of Cleaner Production [Internet]. 2016;133:41426.
[24] Teo DCL, Mannan MA, Kurian J V. Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Lightweight Concrete Beams
Made with Oil Palm Shell (OPS). Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology. 2006;4(3):45968.
[25] Shafigh P, Jumaat MZ, Mahmud H. Mix design and mechanical properties of oil palm shell
lightweight aggregate concrete: A review. international journal of the physics sciences:
2010;5(14):212734.
[26] Sha P, Bin H, Zamin M, Jumaat B, Ahmmad R, Bahri S. Structural lightweight aggregate concrete
using two types of waste from the palm oil industry as aggregate. 2014;80:18796.
[27] Hossain KMA. Properties of volcanic pumice based cement and lightweight concrete.
2004;34(August 2003):28391.
[28] Salli , Bideci A, Haydar A, Oymael S, Yildirim H. Composites: Part B Polymer coated pumice
aggregates and their properties. Composites Part B [Internet]. 2014;67:23943.
[29] Atis CD. High-strength lightweight concrete made with scoria aggregate containing mineral
admixtures.Cement and concrete Research: 2003;33:15959.
[30] Sha P, Nomeli MA, Alengaram UJ, Bin H. Engineering properties of lightweight aggregate concrete
containing limestone powder and high volume fly ash. Journal of cleaner production: 2016;135:148
57.
[31] Munagala Sreenivasulu Reddy and Suvarna P., A Detailed Study on Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in
Pavement Quality Cement Concrete. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology,
7(5), 2016, pp.382 392.
[32] A Review on Fiber Reinforced Concrete, Grija.S, Shanthini.D, Abinaya.S. International Journal of
Civil Engineering and Technology, 7(6), 2016, pp.386392.
[33] Dr. Javed Ahmed Naqash, Ifrah Habib Lone, Amir Majid, Bisma Gayas, Itret Hussaini and Mubashir
Hassan, Accelerating Admixture Rapidite-Its Effect on Properties of Concrete. International
Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 6(12), 2015, pp. 58-65.
[34] Teo DCL, Mannan MA, Kurian VJ, Program CE. Structural Concrete Using Oil Palm Shell ( OPS )
as Lightweight. journal of advanced concrete technolog: 2006;30:2517.
[35] Gndz L. The effects of pumice aggregate/cement ratios on the low-strength concrete properties.
Constrruction and Building Materials. 2008;22(5):7218.