Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted By:-
Nitesh Aggarwal
Roll No. 514084
Submitted To:-
Dr. Pawan Kumar Singh
Head, Department of Geography
P.K. SINGH
Head of Department
Department of Geography
National P.G. College
Lucknow
ii
DECLARATION
penned in the desertification in sole effort of mine and has only been
of Degree of Bachelor of Arts and not been used for any other degree.
Nitesh Aggarwal
ID 514084
B.A. VIth Semester
Department of Geography
National P.G. College
Lucknow
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Whenever a module of work is completed successfully, a source of
inspiration and guidance is always there for the student. I, hereby take the
opportunity to thank those entire people who helped us in many different
ways.
First and foremost, we are grateful to our thesis guide Dr. Ritu
Jain, Asstt. Professor, for showing faith in my capability and providing
able guidance and her generosity and advice extended to me throughout
my work.
Last, but not least I would like to thank all my faculty and my
friends for helping me in all measure of life and for their kind cooperation
and moral support.
Nitesh Aggarwal
ID 514084
B.A. VIth Semester
Department of Geography
National P.G. College
Lucknow
iv
PREFACE
v
Lucknow city has changed the characteristics of Gomti River due to
disposal of untreated wastes, which mainly include sewage, solid sludge
and hospital wastes. This has caused the degradation of Gomti River
resulting in aquatic pollution. The river water is extensively used for
washing, bathing, recreational and religious activities.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENT
Certificate.....................................................................................................................ii
Declaration....................................................................................................................iii
Acknowledgement........................................................................................................iv
Preface.........................................................................................................................v
List of Figure...............................................................................................................viii
1. Introduction 1-6
1. Source of Gomti river
2. Geological and Geomorphological setup of Gomti basin
3. Gomti in Lucknow
2. Study Area 7-8
3. Approach in the past 9-10
4. Review of literature 11-15
5. Tests performed on Gomti river water 16
6. Test procedures 17-23
1. pH testing procedure
2. Dissolved oxygen testing procedure
3. Total dissolved solids procedure
4. Total suspended solids procedure
5. Chemical oxygen demand test
6. Biological oxygen demand test
7. Results and discussion 24-32
8. Some Issues which need attention 33-37
9. Some Good News 38-40
10. Conclusion 41
11. Reference 42
vii
List of Figures
1. Gomti in Lucknow 6
5. Gomti Barrage 34
8. Pollution in Gomti 37
viii
INTRODUCTION
Gomti River is an important tributary of Ganga River and a
perennial river of Awadh plain runs across the major parts of Uttar
Pradesh, India, covering nine districts and a distance of approximately
940 km. During its course, Gomti River receives huge quantities of
untreated sewage agricultural runoffs brings lot of pesticides, fertilizers,
street washouts bringing oil, asphalt, sediments; industrial wastes all of
which significantly alter the physico-chemical characteristics of its
water. Before reaching in the Lucknow city, the Gomti River receives
wastes from sugar and distillery industries of Sitapur district. In
Lucknow city, various industries like distillery, defence, milk dairy,
vegetable, oil, carbon etc are pouring effluent directly into the Gomti
River. Besides the industrial effluents, domestic wastewaters are also
discharged into the Gomti River. In Lucknow city, from Gaughat
upstream to Gomti barrage, 19 drains are discharging about 200 MLD
wastewaters into the Gomti River. Thus, the Gomti River (at Lucknow)
water gets polluted right from Gaughat to Gomti barrage (Singh, et al.,
2005).
1
developed in order to keep check on the extent of water pollution, and in
order to maintain these quality standards. Water quality assessment and
apportionment of pollution sources of river is been done using in situ
laboratory analysis and multivariate statistical techniques. These
traditional techniques were time consuming, costly and reference to
sample site only. In contrast, using remote sensing technique is an
economical way to monitor water quality, because it can monitor large
areas in a short time on a repetitive basis. It is also easy to update water
quality parameters using remote sensing data, which allows continuous
monitoring of water quality. Several investigators have studied the
applicability of remote sensing technique in determining and
monitoring water quality (Johnson and Harriss, 1980; Khorram and
Cheshire, 1985; Verdin, 1985; Tassan, 1993; Braga and Setzer, 1993;
Arenz, et al., 1996; Dewidar and Khedr, 2005).
2
GEOLOGICAL AND GEOMORPHOLOGICAL SETUP
OF GOMTI BASIN
Incision of the Gomti river and its valley has been studied using
characteristics of longitudinal profile, escarpment heights, valley
morphology and channel sediment characteristics by Thakur et al. (2009).
The tectonic-driven incision is younger and superimposed over the base
level-linked incision. The role of climate-derived factors in fluvial
incision is secondary and not easy to evaluate. The valley margins of
Gomti river show prominent bluff or escarpment and are sometimes
referred to as banks. Escarpment height is basically height of the vertical
cliff along the margin of the river channel and river valley. The
downstream increasing trend of escarpment heights of the both river
margins is primarily related to incision of the river and controlled by the
lowering of base level of the Ganga river. Longitudinal profile of the
Gomti river runs from 185 to 60 m above mean sea level and shows three
3
prominent breaks in slope. The conspicuous convexity in the profile is
located above the sub-surface Faizabad Ridge and may be related to the
movement along this ridge.
4
water discharge is less than in the lower segment, but it shows maximum
incision. Further, there is wave-like pattern of incision. Indicating that
rainfall alone can not explain the incision pattern of the Gomti river.
5
GOMTI IN LUCKNOW
Right Bank
Left Bank TRANS
GOMTI
CIS GOMTI
6
STUDY AREA
The study area covers Gomti River in Lucknow district of Uttar
Pradesh.The river enters Lucknow at Gaughat and exits at Piperaghat.The
samples have been taken from 15 locations between Gaughat and
Piperaghat. The location map of study area and sample sites location is
shown in Figure 1.
1) Gaughat
2) Hussainabad
3) Gulalaghat
4) Kudiaghat
5) Pakka Pul
6) Mohan Meakin
7) Mankameshwar
8) Daliganj
9) Hanuman Setu
10) Boat Club
11) Lakhman Mela Park
12) Parag
13) Baikund Dham
14) Gomti Barrage
15) Piperaghat
7
Sampling sites of Gomti river
8
APPROACH IN THE PAST
1930s 1980s: collect the sullage / sewage through branch and
trunk sewers and carry it through pumping mains to a sewage farm
outskirts of TransGomti Area in D/S of the town.
2001 2010
The river is hardly able to dilute the incoming sewage/sullage of
the city by 10 times resulting in a steep rise in bacterial count
(about 2.5 x 107/ 100 ml against the maximum prescribed limits of
5000 counts per 100 ml).
9
EXISTING SEWERAGE STATUS
Population Lucknow City
10
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
According to study carried out by several researchers on Gomti
river, it has been observed that, the water quality has degraded rapidly in
recent years with wide encroachment of flood plains (Arora et al., 1973;
Bhaskaran et al., 1963; Bhargawa and Ram Tirath, 1982; Kuwar and
Kant, 1987; Pathak, 1991; Bhatt and Pathak, 1992; Mishra, et al., 1994;
Singh et al., 2003; Mishra and Mishra, 2008). Bhaskaran et al. (1965 in
Trivedi, 2001) carried out physico-chemical studies on the river Gomti at
Lucknow and concluded that the river water was significantly polluted
showing lower value of DO at many places. Arora et al., (1973 in Trivedi,
2001) observed that the river Gomti at Lucknow was severely polluted.
Bhargawa and Ram Tirath (1982) studied water quality of river Gomti at
Lucknow and concluded that water quality at upstream of Gaughat was
good for almost all beneficial uses, and water quality downstream of
Lucknow was heavily polluted and it was not suitable for bathing,
drinking without treatment, fishing, recreation etc. Kuwar and Kant
(1987) analyzed the water of river Gomti at Lucknow at several place for
few heavy metals and observed that it was polluted with copper (Cu),
zinc (Zn), and chromium (Cr). Pathak (1991) analysed the physico-
chemical parameters and heavy metal contents of river Gomti from
Gaughat to Malhar. The authors observed increased DO during winter
season with its drastic depletion during the summer months at all station,
except at Gaughat. The author also concludes that the cadmium (Cd) and
nickel (Ni) in Gomti river was little on the higher side respectively during
monsoon and winter.
11
Bhatt and Pathak (1992) concluded that river got highly polluted
downstream of Lucknow due to human interference and input of
municipal and industrial wastewater. Mishra, et al. (1994 in Trivedi,
2001) concluded that the river Gomti was highly polluted at Sahjahanpur,
Kheri and Lucknow having high value of BOD and COD during summer
seasons. Gaur et al. (2005) studied the impacts of domestic/industrial
waste on the water and sediment chemistry of river Gomti with special
references to heavy metals in different seasons (summer, winter and
rainy). High concentration of all the six heavy metals namely Cd, Cr, Cu,
Ni, Pb and Zn were noticed in water and sediments in rainy season
compared to summer and water.
12
Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn were noticed in water and concentration of these
metals increased from 2006 to 2008, while Cd was found below the
detectable limit. COD and TDS value were also observed to increase day
by day due to increase in quantity of industrial effluents and sewage
being discharged in the river, the level of DO also falling rapidly due to
increase in BOD and COD.
13
Assessment of water quality of river Suheli and Gomti is carried
out by Singh and Tandon (2010) in May and august in 2007 and in
January 2008. In the month of January the sites of Suheli river and
Basantpur village showed the values for conductivity whereas the site of
Gomti river from Gaughat to Pipraghat Showed increasing trend in
turbidity. In the month of January, May and August the site of Suheli river
and road bridge showed maximum dissolved oxygen and the Basantpur
region showed the lowest dissolved oxygen value in the year 2007 but in
the year 2008 the Kaima region showed the highest dissolved oxygen and
the tiger haven showed the lowest dissolved oxygen value whereas the
site of Gomti river showed the significantly decrease in the dissolved
oxygen in Gaughat to Pipraghat in both of the years. In the month of
January, May and August the site of Suheli river and Basantpur village
showed the maximum B.O.D. value and the Kaima region showed the
minimum B.O.D value whereas the sites of Gomti river showed the
increasing trend of B.O.D from Gaughat to Pipraghat.
14
Singh et al. (2005b) carried out a study on a 630 km stretch of river
Gomti, to study the distribution of heavy metals in sediments and the
partitioning of their chemical species between five geochemical phases
(exchangeable fraction, carbonate fraction, Fe/Mn oxide fraction, and
organic fraction) using Tessiers analytical sequential extraction
technique. Most fractions in the sediments associated with the carbonate
and the exchangeable fractions were between 11 and 30% except in a few
cases where it was more than 50%. According to the Risk Assessment
Code (RAC), the sediments having 1130% carbonate and exchangeable
fractions are at medium risk. The concentrations of cadmium and lead at
mid Lucknow, Pipraghat, Sultanpur U/S and Sulthanpur D/S are between
31 and 50%. They thus pose a high risk to the environment. Since the
concentrations of cadmium and lead at Neemsar (Cd 56.79%; Pb 51%)
are higher than 50%, the RAC as very high. In most cases, the average
metal concentrations were lower than the standard shale values.
15
TESTS PERFORMED ON GOMTI RIVER WATER
1) Colour
2) Odour
3) pH Test
4) Turbidity
5) Dissolved Oxygen(DO)
9) Permanent Hardness
16
TEST PROCEDURES
pH TESTING PROCEDURE
1. Rinse each test tube with the water sample. Gloves should be worn
to avoid skin contact with the water.
5. Insert the tube into the Wide Range pH Comparator. Hold the
comparator up to a light source. Match the sample color to a color
standard.
2. Allow the water to overflow for two to three minutes (This will
ensure the elimination of bubbles).
3. Make sure no air bubbles are present when you take the bottle from
the river.
17
4. Add 8 drops of Manganous Sulfate Solution and 8 drops of
Alkaline Potassium Iodide Azide.
5. Cap the bottle, making sure no air is trapped inside, and invert
repeatedly to fully mix. Be very careful not to splash the chemical-
laden water. Wash your hands if you contact this water. If oxygen is
present in the sample, a brownish-orange precipitate will form
(floc). The first two reagents "fix" the available oxygen.
8. Fill the titration tube to the 20 mL line with the "fixed": sample and
cap.
10. Remove the cap and Tritrator. Be careful not to disturb the Titrator
plunger, as the tiration begun in step 8 will continue in step 11. Add
8 drops of Starch Indicator Solution. The sample should turn blue.
18
11. Replace the cap and Titrator. Continue titrating until the sample
changes from blue to a colorless solution. Read the test result
where the plunger top meets the scale. Record as mg/L (ppm)
dissolved oxygen.
High total dissolved solids may effect the aesthetic quality of the
water, interfere with washing clothes and corroding plumbing fixtures.
For aesthetic reasons, a limit of 500 mg/l (milligrams per liter) has been
established as part of the Secondary Drinking Water Standards.
19
suction to remove all traces of water, turn vacuum off, and discard
washings. Remove filter from filtration apparatus and transfer to an
inert aluminum weighing dish. If a Gooch crucible is used, remove
crucible and filter combination. Dry in an oven at 103 to 105C for
1 h. If volatile solids are to be measured, ignite at 550C for 15 min
in a muffle furnace. Cool in desiccator to balance temperature and
weigh. Repeat cycle of drying or igniting, cooling, desiccating, and
weighing until a constant weight is obtained or until weight change
is less than 4% of the previous weighing or 0.5 mg, whichever is
less. Store in desiccator until needed.
20
washings, and continue suction for about 3 min after filtration is
complete. Samples with high dissolved solids may require
additional washings. Carefully remove filter from filtration
apparatus and transfer to an aluminum weighing dish as a support.
Alternatively, remove the crucible and filter combination from the
crucible adapter if a Gooch crucible is used. Dry for at least 1 h at
103 to 105C in an oven, cool in a desiccator to balance
temperature, and weigh. Repeat the cycle of drying, cooling,
desiccating, and weighing until a constant weight is obtained or
until the weight change is less than 4% of the previous weight or
0.5 mg, whichever is less.
21
oxidation of short, straight chain organics and alcohols. Again, without
the silver sulfate the COD of the sample would be lower than the actual
value. Sulfamic acid is added to remove interferences caused by nitrite
ions. Without sulfamic acid the COD of the sample would measure higher
than the actual value.
Even with the use of these additional reagents the oxidation of the
organic matter is not always 100% complete. Volatile organics, ammonia
and aromatic hydrocarbon are not oxidized to any great degree during the
procedure.
22
determined because there is no way of telling at what point during the five
days the D.O. reached zero.
One of the most difficult steps in the BOD procedure is deciding how
much sample to place in the BOD bottles for incubation. Some plants have
influent and effluent BOD's that do not vary greatly over time, while others
fluctuate greatly from day to day. In all cases, several different dilutions of
each sample should be prepared to obtain the desired dissolved oxygen
depletions.
If you have a general range for the BOD of your sample, you can
estimate the dilutions needed to insure that at least one dilution will meet the
criteria for most valid BOD results. The following procedure can be used to
calculate volumes for sample dilution from the estimated BOD.
23
RESULTS OF WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS ON
SAMPLE POINTS IN GOMTI RIVER
Sampling TS DS SS pH COD BOD DO Chlorid TH
e
Point No.
24
STANDARD PARAMETERS
Each water use has specific quality need. Therefore, to set the
standard for the desire quality of a water body, it is essential to identify the
uses of water in that water body. In India, the Central Pollution Control
Board (CPCB) has developed a concept of designated best use. According
to this, out of the several uses of water of a particular body, the use which
demands highest quality is termed itsdesignated best use. Five designated
best uses have been identified. This classification helps the water quality
managers and planners to set water quality targets and design suitable
restoration programs for various water bodies.
25
DESIGNATED BEST USES OF WATER
Designated Best Class Criteria
Use
Drinking Water A 1.Total Coliforms Organism
Source without MPN/100ml shall be 50 or less
conventional 2. pH between 6.5 and 8.5
treatment but 3. Dissolved Oxygen 6mg/l or more
after 4. Biochemical Oxygen Demand 5
disinfection days 20 C, 2mg/l or less
Outdoor bathing B 1.Total Coliforms Organism
(Organised) MPN/100ml shall be 500 or less
2. pH between 6.5 and 8.5
3. Dissolved Oxygen 5mg/l or more
4. Biochemical Oxygen Demand 5
days 20 C, 3mg/l or less
Drinking water C 1. Total Coliforms Organism
source after MPN/100ml shall be 5000 or less
conventional 2. pH between 6 and 9
treatment and 3. Dissolved Oxygen 4mg/l or more
disinfection 4. Biochemical Oxygen Demand 5
days 20 C, 3mg/l or less
Propagation of D 1. pH between 6.5 and 8.5
Wild life and 2. Dissolved Oxygen 4mg/l or more
Fisheries 3. Free Ammonia (as N)
4. Biochemical Oxygen Demand 5
days 20 C, 2mg/l or less
Irrigation, E 1. pH between 6.0 and 8.5
Industrial 2. Electrical Conductivity at 25 C
Cooling, micro mhos/cm, maximum 2250
Controlled 3. Sodium absorption Ratio Max. 26
Waste disposal 4. Boron Max. 2mg/l
Below Not meeting any of the A, B, C, D &
-E E criteria
A COLOUR CODING FREQUENTLY USED TO DEPICT
THE QUALITY OF WATER ON MAPS
26
This water can be directly used for
Blue water
drinking, industrial use, etc.
Water contained in soil and plants is
Green water
termed as green water
White water Atmospheric moisture is white water
Brown or grey Various grades of wastewater are shown by
water brown or grey colour
27
WATER QUALITY STANDARDS IN INDIA (SOURCE IS
2296:1992)
28
max.
Sulphates (as SO4), mg/l, 400 - 400 - 1,000
max.
Nitrates (as NO3), mg/l, 20 - 50 - -
max.
Fluorides (as F), mg/l, 1.5 1.5 1.5 - -
max.
Phenolic compounds (as 0.002 0.005 0.005 - -
C2H5OH), mg/l, max.
Mercury (as Hg), mg/l, 0.001 - - - -
max.
Cadmium (as Cd), mg/l, 0.01 - 0.01 - -
max.
Salenium (as Se), mg/l, 0.01 - 0.05 - -
max.
Arsenic (as As), mg/l, 0.05 0.2 0.2 - -
max.
Cyanide (as Pb), mg/l, 0.05 0.05 0.05 - -
max.
Lead (as Pb), mg/l, max. 0.1 - 0.1 - -
Zinc (as Zn), mg/l, max. 15 - 15 - -
Chromium (as Cr6+), mg/l, 0.05 - 0.05 - -
max.
Anionic detergents (as 0.2 1 1 - -
MBAS), mg/l, max.
Barium (as Ba), mg/l, 1 - - - -
max.
Free Ammonia (as N), - - - 1.2 -
mg/l, max
Electrical - - - - 2,250
conductivity, micromhos/c
m, max
29
Sodium absorption ratio, - - - - 26
max
Boron, mg/l, max - - - - 2
30
GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATION OF IRRIGATION
WATER QUALITY
Water Sodium Electrical SAR RSC meq/l
class (Na) % conductivity
(S/cm)
Excellent < 20 < 250 < 10 < 1.25
Good 20 - 40 250 750 10 18 1.25 2.0
Medium 40 - 60 750 2,250 18 26 2.0 2.5
Bad 60 80 2,250 4,000 > 26 2.5 3.0
Very bad > 80 > 4,000 > 26 > 3.0
31
Dissolved solids, mg/l, 500 2,000
Max
Calcium as (Ca), mg/l, 75 200
Max
Magnesium (as Mg), mg/l, 30 75
Max
Copper (as Cu), mg/l, Max 0.05 1.5
Manganese (as Mn), mg/l, 0.1 0.3
Max
Sulphate (as So4), mg/l, 200 400
Max
Nitrate (as No3), mg/l, Max 45 100
Flouride (as F0, mg/l, Max 1.0 1.5
Phenolic compounds (as 0.001 0.002
C6H5OH), mg/l, Max
Mercury (as Hg), mg/l, 0.001 -
Max
Cadmium (as Cd), mg/l, 0.01 -
Max
Selenium (as Se), mg/l, 0.01 -
Max
Arsenic (as As), mg/l, Max 0.05 -
Cyanide (as CN), mg/l, 0.05
Max
Lead (as Pb), mg/l, Max 0.05 -
Anionic detergents (as 0.02 1.0
MBAS), mg/l, Max
Chromium (as Cr6+), mg/l, 0.05 -
Max
PAH, mg/l, Max - -
MineralOIL , mg/l, Max 0.01 0.03
32
Pesticides, mg/l, MAX Absent 0.001
Alkalinity, mg/l, Max 200 600
Aluminum (as Al), mg/l, 0.03 0.2
Max
Boron, mg/l, Max 1 5
DS 520 500
SS 24 20
TS 544 520
pH 8.31 6.5-8.5
BOD 9.5 2
DO 5 6
TH 208 200
33
The values given in Values Obtained column are the average
values of all the sampling sites. The values in the Values Required
column are the Indian Standard Values.
Here we can see that except pH value all the values are above the
standard limits which shows that water of River Gomti is not fit for any
use and it needs immense treatment.
34
Treated wastewater from Bharwara STP is disposed into
river Gomti. It can be disposed into Indira canal for
Irrigation.
35
LOCATION OF THE BARRAGE
36
3
400 m /hr of methane production at Bharwara STP:
still not a reality!
37
Algae in Gomti Water
38
Pollution in River Gomti In Lucknow
39
SOME GOOD NEWS
On April 8, 2015, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav laid foundation stone
for Gomti River Front Project.
40
Students Of A City School In A Cleaning Campaign
Of River Gomti
41
Cleaning Of River Gomti
42
CONCLUSION
The DO, TSS, TDS and other parameters at some of the sites were
beyond permissible limit, water was polluted and is not suitable for
beneficial uses without conventional treatments. The river is highly
polluted due to discharge of domestic and industrial waste through
several drains. The increase in value of chloride, nitrate and total
hardness were also due domestic discharges. Increased concentration of
heavy metal in water at Parag, Daligaj, Mohan meakin and Monkey
Bridge area could be due to high discharge of water from catchment area,
industries and various drains.
43
References
44