Professional Documents
Culture Documents
STARBUCKS COFFEE
Marketing Concentration
Business Administration Major
Faculty of Social and Political Sciences
University of Indonesia
I
EXCECUTIVE SUMMARY
II
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
Over the course of its history, Starbucks has bought or acquired companies like Peet's
and Seattle's Best Coffee, and took over many locations of Coffee People and Diedrich
Coffee stores. In the 1990s, Starbucks was offering stock options to employees and went
public. Today, Starbucks has about 182,000 employees across 19,767 company operated &
licensed stores in 62 countries. Their biggest presence is still in the United States, with 11,000
locations. Starbucks can be found in such diverse nations as Chile, Romania, Bahrain and
Bulgaria. The most recent expansion was to Budapest in June of 2010.
Starbucks mission is to inspire and nurture the human spirit one person, one cup and
one neighborhood at a time. They always believe in serving the best coffee possible. It's our
goal for all of our coffee to be grown under the highest standards of quality, using ethical
sourcing practices. Their product mix includes roasted and handcrafted high-quality or
premium priced coffees, tea, a variety of fresh food items and other beverages. They also sell
a variety of coffee and tea products and license their trademarks through other channels such
as licensed stores, grocery and national foodservice accounts. Starbucks also markets its
products mix with other brand names within its portfolio of companies, which include
Teavana, Tazo, Seattles Best Coffee, Starbucks VIA, Starbucks Refreshers, Evolution Fresh,
La Boulange and Verismo. Starbucks had total revenue of $14.89 billion as of September
29th, 2013.
2.2.1. Strength
2.2.2. Weaknesses
a. Expensive Products
While most people consider Starbucks coffee a luxury good and would pay
whatever price is set for it, there is an increasing opinion that Starbucks charges too
much. Starbucks does differentiate their products with being highly quality couple
with the whole Starbucks Experience, but in times of economic downfall,
consumers will likely consider switching costs to competitors products with lower
prices. Starbucks are also very inflexible in terms of location while setting prices.
For example, Starbucks charges the same price for their products whether youre in
LA or Beijing. These premium prices could also pose some weakness for it to
succeed in developing countries.
2.2.3. Opportunity
c. Technological Advances
Starbucks has leveraged the use of mobile applications and has an investment
partnership with Square, a mobile payments app that is integrated with its Starbucks
app. This creates an ease of use process for customers, aligns customer loyalty
through reward programs. Starbucks has already set the bar in the industry with this
advancement and about 10% of its transactions in the US have been made using
mobile applications. This is a growing field and would drive more business to their
stores as technology advances. Not only for the mobile apps, technological advances
differ and has various effects in every aspect such as transportation, computer
system, architecture, and stuff. Starbucks could have another advantage by using
technological advance, like pushing down budgets, creating a more efficient
production or delivery system, expanding their global marketing, and so on.
2.2.4. Threats
a. Increased Competition
This is by far the biggest threat that Starbucks faces with the market being at a
mature stage, there is increased pressure on Starbucks from its competitors.
Companies such as Peets and the Coffee Bean have grown large enough to seriously
compete with Starbucks. Other companies, such as McDonalds, Dunkin Donuts, Burger
King, etc, already have the infrastructure in place and are instead adding quality coffee
to their menus to compete with Starbucks. Not only that, since Starbucks has made
another standards for coffee shop, so many new coffee shops popping out and using
imitation logo of starbucks or selling the same menu with lower prices. This could effect
a price-sensitive consumer to switch their daily coffee brand.
There is a moderate threat of new entrants into the industry as the barriers to entry
are not high enough to discourage new competitors to enter the market. The industrys
saturation is moderately high with a monopolistic competition structure, and Starbucks
being the leader. But at a localized level, small coffee shops can compete with the likes
of Starbucks and Dunkin Brands because there are no switching costs for the consumers.
Even thought its a competitive industry, the possibility of new entrants to be successful
in the industry is moderate. Anyway this relatively easy entry into the market is usually
countered by large incumbent brands identities like Starbucks who have achieved
economies of scale by lowering cost, improved efficiency with a huge market share.
There is a moderately high barrier for the new entrants as they differentiate themselves
from Starbucks product quality, its prime real estate locations, and its store ecosystem
experience.The incumbent firms like Starbucks have a larger scale and scope, yielding
them a learning curve advantage and favorable access to raw material with the
relationship they build with their suppliers.
Threat caused by subtitutes are high. There are many reasonable substitute
beverages to coffee, which are mainly tea, fruit juices, water, sodas, energy drinks etc.
Bars and Pubs with non/alcoholic beverages could also substitute for the social
experience of Starbucks. Consumers could also make their own home produced coffee
with household premium coffee makers at a fraction of the cost for buying from premium
coffee retailers like Starbucks. What makes the threat from subtitutes are high is There
are no switching costs for the consumers for switching to substitutes. So its important to
note for industry leaders like Starbucks for trying to counter this threat by selling coffee
makers, premium coffee packs in grocery stores, to at least minimalizing threat from
subtitutes.
Suppliers do have low pressure on Starbucks. The main inputs into the value chain
of Starbucks is coffee beans and premium Arabica coffee grown in select regions which
are standard inputs, which makes the cost of switching between substitute suppliers,
moderately low Starbucks, with its size and scale, has the power to take advantage of its
suppliers but it maintains a Fair trade certified coffee under its coffee and farmer equity
(C.A.F.E) program, which gives its suppliers a fair partnership status, which yields them
some moderately, low power. This makes the suppliers in the industry also pose a low
threat of competing against Starbucks by forward vertical integration, which lowers their
power. Starbucks also forms a highly important part of the suppliers business, due its size
and scope, which make the power of the suppliers lower. Given these factors, suppliers
pose a moderately low bargaining power.