Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN: 2040-7467
Maxwell Scientific Organization, 2012
Submitted: November 14, 2011 Accepted: December 09 , 201 Published: February 01, 2012
Abstract: PERT is an acronym for Project Evaluation and Review Technique. It provides a method of
modeling, simulating and solving a wide range of simplex large-scale system problems. In this paper, project
scheduling in agriculture, for mechanized greenhouses construction in the Khuzestan province of Iran, is carried
out by PERT method. The operation of allocating resources to activities was carried out by means of breaking
the basic activities of the project into smaller ones. Network models are increasingly powerful tool for
modeling, scheduling, planning, controlling, and analyzing of agricultural projects. The generated PERT
network model is a powerful tool to help manager who could able to make optimum decision.
Corresponding Author: Nasim Monjezi, Department of Agricultural Machinery, Faculty of Agriculture, Chamran University, Iran
241
Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 4(3): 241-244, 2012
located in southwest of Iran (within 2958! and 33 North The last activities which did not continue to next
latitude and 4741! and 5039! East longitude). level composed the activities of the project
A project network is defined as a set of activities that (Anonymous, 2001; Abdi et al., 2010a). Activity is the
must be performed according to precedence constraints smallest control unit which allocates to small part of
stating which activities must start after the completion of project operations that has timeline and usually needs
other specified activities (Chen and Huang, 2007). Such resources and costs (Abdi et al., 2009a). After preparing
a project network can be represented as a directed graph. the WBS graph, PERT network will be draw.
PERT network model is a suitable method for
analysis and evaluation of mechanized greenhouse RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
construction project because project activities
aredeterministic and times of activities are probabilistic. Network models are increasingly powerful tool for
In PERT method, a network shows precedence relation modeling, scheduling, planning, controlling, and
between activities. Each node of network shows an analyzing of agricultural projects. The generated PERT
activity and each arrow shows relation between activities network model is increasingly powerful tool to help
(Zargar, 2004; Sabzehparvar, 2008; Burke, 2003). First, manager who could able to make optimum decision. By
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is prepared for drawing the WBS graph (Fig. 1) the following four goals
drawing network and simulation of mechanized are being met:
greenhouse construction project. In order to draw WBS
(Work Breakdown Structure) graph, the main activities of C Determining the deliverable products of the project,
the project were defined. Thereafter, the major activities C Assigning the boundaries of the project
of the project were specified. Then, the sub-activities of C Specifying the table of activities which should be
each activity determined up to the point that it was done to accomplish operation of delivering project
impossible to break the activity to smaller parts. products
242
Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 4(3): 241-244, 2012
C Determining budget of resources or cost and weight description and activities codes are presented in Table 1.
of the project activities (Abdi et al., 2009b) Results of this model include the following items
(Abdi et al., 2009b). It necessitates the preplanning. It
PERT network model resulted from mechanized increases the harmony and coordination. It usually
greenhouses construction as follows (Fig. 2). Activities predicts and determines the troublesome items. It
243
Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 4(3): 241-244, 2012
specifies and segregates the responsibilities. It refines the Abdi, R., H.R. Ghasemzadeh, S. Abdollahpour,
thoughts and increases the knowledge of user about M. Sabzeparvar and A. DabbagMohamadiNasab,
related subjects and their relative importance in whole 2010b. Modeling and analysis of mechanization
operation. It attracts the management attention to those projects of wheat production by GERT networks.
activities which may face problems or seems to be Elsevier. Agric. Sci. China, 9(7): 1078-1083.
associated with them. It specifies the optimum start and
Anonymous, 2001. Practices Standard for work
finish points of each activity in the operation. It facilitates
the possibility of readjusting of the project for new breakdown structures. PMI. Pennsylvania. U.S.A.
conditions. It facilitates the reporting and instructing Burke, R., 2003. Project Management: Planning and
procedures. It is a very useful device for educating Control Techniques. 4th Edn., John Wiley & Sons
employees in different fields of operation. It is the most (UK, Britain).
suitable tool for presenting the organizational chart and Chen, S.P., 2007. Analysis of critical paths in a project
their relation. It shows the relation between activities. It network with fuzzy activity times. Eur. J. Oper. Res.,
is adjustable and also updatable. Changing and modifying 183: 442-459.
the program in new and unprecedented situations will Chen, C.T. and S.F. Huang, 2007. Applying fuzzy
accomplish easily. Every parts of the network can be
method for measuring criticality in project network.
changed easily.
Inform. Sci., 177: 2448-2458.
REFERENCES Chizari, A.H. and H. Amirnejad, 1998. Management of
corn drying factory construction project using CPM
Abdi, R., 2009. Modeling and analysis of agricultural and PERT methods. Agric. Econom. Dev., 29:
mechanization projects with GERT networks. Ph.D. 257-273.
Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University. Fahimifard, S.M. and A.A. Kehkha, 2009. Application of
Abdi, R., H.R. Ghasemzadeh, S. Abdoullahpur, project scheduling in agriculture case study: Grape
M. Sabzeparvar and A. Dabbag Mohamadi Nasab, garden stabilization. Am-Euras J. Agric. Environ.
2009a. Modeling and analysis of mechanization Sci., 5 (3): 313-321.
projects of alfalfa production by GERT networks.
HajShirMohammadi, A., 2009. Project management and
Knowl. Sustain. Agric., 1(19-1): 157-169.
Abdi R., H.R. Ghasemzadeh, S. Abdollahpur, control: Application of CPM, PERT, PN and GERT
M. Sabzehparvar and A.D. MohammadiNasab, methods. Academic Publishing, Isfahan.
2009b. Modeling and resource allocation of Sabzehparvar, M., 2008. Project Control. Tarmeh Press.
agricultural mechanization projects with GERT Witney, B., 1988. Choosing and using Farm
networks. J. Food Agri. Environ., 7: 438-441. Machines. Redwood Books, Trowbridge. Zargar, M.,
Abdi, R., H.R. Ghasemzadeh, S. Abdoullahpur and 2004. Project Control. Parham, Tehran, Iran.
T. Mesri, 2010a. Modeling and analysis of
agricultural mechanization projects with network
techniques. The 6th National conference of mechanic
and mechanization of agricultural machinery,
Agriculture and Natural Resources Faculty,
University of Tehran.
244