o President didnt gravely abuse his discretion It was neither whimsical nor capricious of him to implement his election promise o Petitions include statement of Duterte's election promise of Marcos' burial as a public pronouncement without giving details on implementation o Petitions acknowledged public opposition to this election promise during the election season o Petitions then amount to judicial admissions Petitioners state as fact that the burial is a matter which the public was consulted. Thus petitioners admit that the issue should be left to the will of the people Petitioners tried and hoped to sway the issue in their favor using the political process Yet the election of the President clearly shows the will of the people. It was only Duterte who had a stance on this issue during the elections. The other 4 were silent on it. The votes on the other 4 candidates cant be counted against the burial. Though the votes on Duterte could've been due to agreement with items in his platform irrelevant of the burial, what can't be questioned is that Duterte didn't lose because of his burial promise. Allegations that the promise was a mere election pitch - a promise made to be broken, are unfounded due to the DND Sec memo to the AFP which mentioned the implementation of the campaign promise. Now, after having lost, petitioners through their pleadings have admitted this to be a political question. On RA 10368: The Human Rights victims reparations act o The petitioners and victims have been given recognition by the proper political body and the reparations due to them when the law was implemented. J Caguioa grills Duterte's SolGen o The burial was a plan to unite and reconcile the country. Policy of reconciliation is in line with Oslo, Norway talks. (I think this refers to the CPP talks) o The urgency of the burial is part of national healing. 218 congressmen agreed to this. This is a matter of the wisdom of the political branches. The question of whether the country is ready to reconcile on the matter is shown by BBM's popularity in the last elections. o Shows that the national damnation of FM is no longer present. o BBM's high numbers make the Marcos' a legitimate consideration in the executive policy formulation. The redemption of an election pledge and policy has its basis on the election results o Compliance with the campaign promise can't be tainted with grave abuse of discretion POLITICAL QUESTION TO BE RESOLVED POLITICALLY