You are on page 1of 4

Compact Ultra-Wideband Bandpass Filters Using

Microstrip-Coplanar-Waveguide
Simplified Structure
Wang Haimeng Qin Weiping
Nanjing University of Posts & Telecommunications College of Mathematics and Physics
College of Communications and Information Engineering Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Nanjing, China Nanjing, China
13770699205@139.com qinwp@njupt.edu.cn

AbstractA novel compact ultra-wideband bandpass filter (BPF) microstrip line and CPW embedded on the ground has been
is proposed on the back-to-back composite microstrip-to- reported as an alternative BPF design availability in UWB
coplanar waveguide (CPW) structure. In this study, the CPW is passband. Because of merits of the broadside-coupled
composed by the defected ground structure (DGS). The structures associated with the electromagnetic coupling, great
microstripCPW transitions and the CPW shorted stubs are more attentions have been paid on it.
adopted as quasi-lumped-circuit elements for realizing a three-
pole high-pass filter prototype. By introducing a cross-coupled In this paper, compact UWB bandpass filters are
capacitance between input and output ports of this high-pass developed by adopting the high-pass filter prototype and
filter and suitably designing the transition stretch stubs, a transition stretch stubs to create the lower and upper stopbands,
compact three-pole ultra-wideband bandpass filter is respectively. Specifically, a composite microstripCPW
implemented with two transmission zeros located close to the structure is proposed to realize a lumped-element high-pass
passband edges as well as good out-of-band response. Being filter prototype, which is essential in developing the UWB
developed from the quasi-lumped elements, and not from the bandpass filters. First, by using the microstrip-to-CPW
transmission lines, the proposed ultra-wideband filters have sizes transition structures to implement two series lumped capacitors,
more compact. The proposed ultra-wideband filters have the using a CPW shorted stub structure to implement the shunt
merits of compact size, flat group delay, good insertion/return inductor, and also introducing a suitable cross-coupled
loss, and good selectivity. Simulated responses of these filters are
capacitor between the input and output ports, a very wideband
demonstrated.
three-pole bandpass filter with two transmission zeros out-of-
Keywords-%DQGSDVV filter; FRSODQDU waveguide(CPW);FURVV
band is developed from the corresponding three-pole high-pass
filter prototype. Second, by suitably modifying the shape of
FRXSOLQJ ; KLJK-pass filter; PLFURVWLSFSZXOWUDZLGHEDQG 8:%
CPW for adjusting the position of the upper transmission zero,
a four-pole UWB bandpass filter is fabricated with two
I. INTRODUCTION transmission zeros properly located. Finally, in order to
The interest in ultra-wideband (UWB) radio systems has accurately locate the frequency range of passband within 3.1 to
been tremendously increased since the Federal Communica- 10.6GHz as well as good insertion/return loss, the
tions Commission (FCC) in the U.S. has released the lengths W2 , L , L2 need to be properly adjusted and optimized.
unlicensed use of UWB in February 2002 [1]. There are several Being that the quasi-lumped elements in the filter design is
advantages for UWB radio system, such as transmitting higher adopted, the proposed UWB filters exhibit the slow wave
data rates, needing lower transmit power, and simplifying the behavior and have sizes more compact than those of published
error control coding. In such a system an UWB filter is one of wideband filters.
the key components, but the BPF is required to have 110%
fractional bandwidth at the center frequency of 6.85GHz with
II. UWB BANDPASS FILTER:SCHEMATIC AND
low insertion loss over the whole band. In order to meet the
PRINCIPLE
FCC limit, good selectivity at both lower and higher frequency
ends and flat group-delay response over the whole band are
A. Structure and Equivalent Circuit of UWB FILTER
required. In recent years, UWB bandpass filters have been
investigated in several approaches, such as composite lowpass- Lets start to construct and characterize a CPW and a
highpass structures [2],[3],non-periodical shunt-stub loading [4] surface-to-surface microstrip/CPW coupling structure [9]. As
and multiple-mode resonator (MMR) [5]-[7]. These wideband shown in Fig. 1(a), the CPW is formed by bottom-layer circuit
filters have good suppression on-out-band response; however, layout which is named by DGS(Defect Ground Structure). As
they have the drawback of large circuit size or imperfect group well, Fig.1 (b) shows the three-dimensional and top-/bottom-
delay over the passband. In the papers [8-10], new UWB BPFs layer circuit layout of the proposed filter. Obviously, the circuit
using broadside coupling with open or shorted stubs between a layout indeed constructs the compact structure of microstrip to

1-4244-2424-5/08/$20.00 2008 IEEE 626 ICCS 2008


CPW. These designs of the similar structures are found in
many papers [8-10], which have much advantage such as tight
structure, tight coupling and small measurements. In addition,
the structure is apt to realize broad bandwidth filter, especially
with good out-of-band response as well as fine insertion/return
loss. Overall, the layout is a symmetrical structure between left
parts and right, not but between the front and rear.

Fig.2 Equivalent circuit of Fig. 1 (b)

As it is shown in Fig.2, which is an equivalent circuit of the


Fig.1 (b), the series capacitors C1 are implemented by the
microstrip-to-CPW transitions, and the shunt inductor L is
implemented by the CPW shorted stub connected to the ground.
The cross-coupled capacitor C2 is formed between the
adjacent microstrip parts of the two capacitors C1 . The frequent
point of lower transmission zero is controlled by the cross-
(a) coupled capacitance C2 .

B. Simulated Results Of UWB Filter


Here, the parameters of Fig.1 are provided. First, constant
parameters include the length W1 = W3 =0.2mm, W4 =0.2mm,
W5 =0.4mm, L3 =1.4mm, W6 =0.4mm and W7 =0.4mm.
When the lengths L and L2 are set up with 4.2mm, W2 is set
up with 0.2mm and L1 is equal to 1.5mm, the simulated results
of the proposed structure are shown in Fig.2.

(b)

Fig.1. (a) Bottom-layer circuit layout of CPW (b) Top-/bottom-layer circuit


layouts to show the relative location between top microstrip and bottom CPW
layers of proposed wideband filter.

The simulation and optimization carry out using the


commercial software IE3D based on the finite element of
moment. The BPF is fabricated on the substrate with a
dielectric constant of 10.0 and a thickness of 0.5mm for tight
coupling and broad bandwidth. So impedance of input is 50.

(a) | S 21 | & | S11 |

627
group delay, the frequency range surpasses the regulation of
UWB filter.

(b) Group Delay Display

Fig.3 Simulated results of the proposed filter (a) | S 21 | & | S11 |

As it is shown in Fig.3.(a), this implemented filter has a


very wideband with a 3dB fractional bandwidth of 120% from
3.1 to 12.0 GHz and two transmission zeros are found at 2.0
and 13.5 GHz. On the basis of the Fig.2, the first transmission
zero is created by the cross-coupled capacitance C2 and second
transmission zero is generated by the resonance associated with
the microstrip parts of the capacitors C1 , C3 and the CPW
shorts stub. The filter has a minimum insertion loss of 0.09, and
the return loss is greater 17dB than within the passband. In
addition, the Fig.2.(b) shows that this wideband filter exhibits a
flat group-delay response between 0.25ns and 0.5ns over the
whole passband. A great segment of group delay response
locates from 0.25ns to 0.35ns. Note that the group delay
exhibits negative numbers around the frequencies at which the
transmission zeros are observed. With the transmission zeros,
the proposed filters have good selectivity and stopband
rejection.
So, a very wideband bandpass filter is successfully
constructed. In order to develop a filter meeting the UWB (b) Group Delay Display
standard, the high-frequency response needs to decay early. In
other words, the frequency of the upper transmission zero is to Fig.4 Simulated results of the proposed UWB filter With parameters of length
be cut down. Analyzing the factors of influence on the upper L=5mm, L2 =4.2mm, W2 =0.2mm
transmission zero, there is a resolution that length of central
metal belt of CPW has to be adjusted. Last time, set the length For this reason, three parameters have to be modified and
L to be equal by 4.2mm. Now, set it to be equal with 5mm. On optimized. In accordance with factors of influencing the
the side, for the time being, keep the other parameters frequency point of lower and upper transmission zeros, it is
changeless. necessary to increase capacitor C3 and reduce inductor L
Obviously, in Fig.4, 3dB fractional bandwidth of the BPF through augmenting the length W2 , L and diminishing the
has changed from 2.83 to 10.75GHz, which by and large meets
the requisition of frequency band of UWB. However in the length L1 in order to raise the frequency position of the lower
wake of the frequency of the upper transmission zero transmission zero and cut down the frequency position of upper
descending from 13.5 to 11.8GHz, the frequency of lower transmission zero. In the end, optimize UWB filter by properly
transmission zero slightly changes from 3.1 to 2.83GHz. Even adjusting the length L2 .
though there are good insertion/return loss, selectivity and flat

628
Set the parameters as bellow, L=5.2mm, L2 =5.2mm and doesnt influence the selectivity out of band. It successfully
carries out that the bandwith merits the requirement of UWB
W2 =1.0mm. The simulated results of the proposed UWB filter through slight adjusting the detail parameters. As it is shown in
are shown in Fig.5. As shown in it, this UWB filter has a Fig.5 (b), group delay slightly fluctuates between 0.3ns and
wideband with a 3dB fractional bandwidth of 113.4% from 0.7ns, furthermore, bellow 0.4ns in great part of frequency
3.12 to 10.58GHz and two transmission zeros are found at 2.15 range. Comparing with the front results, there are very tiny
and 11.83 GHz. changes. In the mass, the group delay keeps relatively flat. So,
a novel UWB filter is successfully accomplished with good
insertion/return loss as well as flat group delay.

III. CONCLUSION
In this paper, UWB bandpass filters based on the
microstrip-to-CPW transitions and CPW shorted stub
connected to the ground have been successfully implemented.
Lower and upper transmission zeros have been generated and
properly located. With the transmission zeros, the proposed
filters have good selectivity and stopband rejection. In addition,
the dimensions of proposed UWB bandpass filters are much
simpler and less than those of the published UWB filters. The
proposed filters with good frequency performance and flat
group delay are attractive for UWB radio applications.

REFERENCES

[1] FCC, Revision of part 15 of the commissions rules regarding


S S
(a) | 21 | & | 11 |
ultrawideband transmission systems, FCC ET-Docket, pp. 98153, Feb.
14, 2002.
[2] C.-L. Hsu, F.-C. Hsu, and J.-T. Kuo, Microstrip bandpass filters for
ultra-wideband (UWB) wireless communications, in IEEE MTT-S Int.
Dig., Jun. 2005, pp. 679682.
[3] W. Menzel, M. S. Tito, and L. Zhu, Low-loss ultra-wideband (UWB)
filters using suspended stripline, in Proc. 2005 Asia-Pacific Microw.
Conf., Dec. 2005, vol. 4, pp. 21482151.
[4] H. Ishida and K. Araki, Design and analysis of UWB bandpass filter,
in Proc. IEEE Topical Conf. Wireless Comm. Tech., Oct. 2003, pp. 457
458.
[5] L. Zhu, S. Sun, and W. Menzel, Ultra-wideband (UWB) bandpass
filters using multiple-mode resonator, IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon.
Lett., vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 796798, Nov. 2005.
[6] L. Zhu and H. Wang, Ultra-wideband bandpass filter on aperturebacked
microstrip line, Electron. Lett., vol. 41, no. 18, pp. 10151016, Sep.
2005.
[7] J. Gao, L. Zhu, W. Menzel, and F. Bogelsack, Short-circuited CPW
multiple-mode resonator for ultra-wideband (UWB) bandpass filter,
IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 104106, Mar.
2006.
[8] K. Li, D. Kurita, and T. Matsui, An ultra-wideband bandpass filter
using broadside-coupled microstrip-coplanar waveguide structure, in
IEEE MTT-S Int. Dig., Jun. 2005, pp. 675678
(b) Group Delay Display
[9] Jung-Woo Baik, Tae-Hak Lee and Young-Sik Kim, UWB Bandpass
Filter Using Microsrip-to-CPW Transition With Broadband Balum
Fig.5 Simulated results of the proposed UWB filter With parameters of length IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, VOL.17,NO.12,pp.
L=5.2mm, L2 =5.2mm, W2 =1.0mm 846-848, December 2007
[10] Tsung-Nan Kuo, Shih-Cheng Lin, and Chun Husung Chen, Compact
Ultral Wideband Bandpass Filters Using Composite Microstrip-
By comparison with the front simulated results, the Coplanar-waveguide Structure, IEEE Transaction On Microwave
insertion/return loss become to be better from 610.5GHz, Theory And Techniques .VOL.54.No.10.pp,3772-3778 OCTOBER 2006.
however, it deteriorates at lower frequency from 34GHz. It
slightly changes in out of the pass band, none the less, which

629

You might also like