Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Recommendations
February 21, 2017 SUMMARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION
Introduction
The main priorities for the Admissions and Financial Aid Working Group
(AFAWG) in 2016-2017 focused on:
(1) Rebalancing: considering the extent to which undergraduate
financial aid programs fairly address need across socioeconomic groups, with
a particular focus on whether there should be a rebalancing of how financial
aid resources are distributed; and
(2) Sustainability: identifying and evaluating possible options for cost-
savings for the undergraduate financial aid program while continuing
Cornells commitment to financial aid providing access for all qualified
students should there be another significant economic downturn that creates
a need to control spending on Cornell grant aid.
For each option presented, the AFAWG suggests a desirability rating of low,
moderate, or high. Financial implications are estimated based on the
assumption that each of the options in this report will be implemented; if
only some will be implemented, financial estimates of both costs and savings
should be revised.
The AFAWG agreed a primary goal for Cornells undergraduate financial aid
programs is to create as high-quality and diverse a community of scholars as
possible with the grant aid funds available. In practical terms, this means
that a significant portion (around 50% based on recent enrollment patterns
with need-blind admissions) of undergraduate students will not receive aid,
paying their full cost of attendance. Consequently, the other portion (~50%)
of undergraduate students will be aided, and should be distributed across
lower/middle/upper-middle socioeconomic communities, supporting diversity
of all types (e.g., race/ethnicity, geography, citizenship, disciplinary, gender,
political, economic, etc.).
The AFAWG endorses the concept that students and families should have a
significant stake in their Cornell education, reflecting their financial abilities
now and into the future. Parent contributions to the cost of attendance while
2
the student is enrolled are reasonable to expect for most income groups,
student contributions should be expected for all income groups, and loans
may be an appropriate component of most students financial aid packages,
particularly considering the value of a Cornell education in enabling students
to earn enough income to reasonably pay back loans.
For context, a loan of $23,264 (2015 mean loan at graduation for Cornell
undergraduates) being repaid through a non-income-based loan repayment
approach would require annual payments of $2,826 over a 10-year period
($28,264 total) or annual payments of $1,474 over a 25-year period ($36,838
total).
The AFAWG endorses principles expressed in the report of the 2012 Financial
Aid Task Force:
[These] principles reflect our core beliefs that our students benefit
immensely from studying with the most diverse and talented student body,
and our faculty benefit from teaching the most diverse and talented
students. Along with these fundamental values toward admissions and aid,
the university must also commit to sustainable fiduciary principles.
3
socioeconomic diversity related to aid programs, and various income and
yield comparisons for aided and unaided populations. We also include
recommendations to keep certain current financial aid policies intact.
4
Recommendations
5
Estimated impact: 290 students; Savings = $290K.
Desirability: TBD
2) Decrease the maximum annual loan for students from
families with $75K-$85K annual income from $5,000 to
$3,500/year. Estimated impact: 210 students; Cost =
$315K. Desirability: TBD (NOTE: Without 3.a.1,
the decrease would be from $5,000 to $2,500/year,
for an estimated cost = $525K.)
b) Change the lower and upper bounds of the $75K-$120K annual
family income category to $85K-$135K, and change the
maximum loan limit, raising the loan limit for the lower part of
this range and lowering the loan limit for the upper part of this
new range.
1) Increase the maximum annual loan for students from
families with $85K-$120K annual income from $5,000 to
$7,000. Estimated impact: 709 students; Savings =
$1.4M. Desirability: TBD
2) Decrease the maximum annual loan for students from
families with $120K-$135K annual income from $7,500 to
$7,000. Estimated impact: 300 students; Cost =
$150K. Desirability: TBD (NOTE: Without 3.b.1,
the decrease would be from $7,500 to $5,000, for an
estimated cost = $750K.)
c) Increase the maximum annual loan for students from families
with >$135K annual income who have need from $7,500 to
$9,000. Estimated impact: 1,258 students; Savings =
$1.9M. Desirability: TBD
4. Continue post-admittance preferential URM parent contribution
reduction for income groups $60K-$120K. Desirability: TBD
a) Include post-admittance preferential URM parent contribution
reduction (15%) for income groups $120K-$135K to correspond
to income band changes above. Estimated impact: 41
students; Cost = $259K. Desirability: TBD
5. Eliminate post-admittance URM parent contribution reduction for upper
income groups from selected states >$135K. Estimated impact:
107; Savings = $1.25M). Desirability: TBD
6. Increase the number of admitted no-aid international students using
need-aware admissions (without decreasing the international aid
budget, so aided international student admissions continue as-is).
Estimated impact: Additional 150 non-aided international
students would yield Savings = $2.03M. Desirability: TBD
7. Implement a need-aware admissions policy for transfer students.
Estimated Savings: (to be determined based on savings
desired). Desirability: TBD
8. Explore the feasibility of Cornell joining the Private 529 college savings
program https://www.privatecollege529.com/OFI529/ through which
6
families can purchase tomorrows tuition at todays rates.
Estimated impact: (to be determined). Desirability: TBD
9. CONSIDER ADDING IN AFAWG: Modify Cornells institutional
methodology for calculating need vs. no-need to move more of the
current no need population into the need group.
Report Narrative
US Income Quintiles for Context
When developing recommendations, the AFAWG recognized that current
Cornell financial aid policies were implemented in 2008-2009 and revised
significantly following the 2012 Financial Aid Task Force Report. US income
quintiles have changed over this period. Current US income quintiles are:
o Lowest: $0 - $30,311
o Second: $30,312 - $55,376
o Third: $55,377 - $86,310
o Fourth: $86,311 - $133,525
o Fifth: >$133,526
A recent New York Times article on economic mobility reported that some
universities are quite economically segregated, though Cornell was rated
fairly well regarding the chance a poor student has to become a rich adult,
measured as the percent of students whose families were in the bottom fifth
US income quintile when they were enrolled as students who as graduates
moved in to the top fifth income quintile as adults (59% for Cornell). On this
measure, Cornell was 3rd in the Ivy League and 34th out of 2,137 colleges
nationally. On a measure of overall economic mobility reflecting both access
and outcomes representing the likelihood that a student after graduation
would move up two or more income quintiles, Cornell rated 1,395th out of
2,137 colleges nationally (but 1st among the Ivies). In addition, graduation
rates at Cornell (93%) are among the highest in the U.S. and Cornell
graduates earn median starting salaries ($63,000) after graduation above
the U.S. median household income ($53,657).
7
enable Cornell to continue to have an economically diverse student
population.
Unrestricted dollars for grant aid have leveled out over the past few years,
following several years of sharp increase (and prior years of modest
increase), due in part to the Fall 13 financial aid program changes, changing
student demographics, and improved global economy.
Peer Comparisons
The AFAWG extensively reviewed peer institution financial aid policies for
comparison with Cornells policies, for Ivy and non-Ivy peers:
8
o Most peers examined, except for two non-Ivy peers, use need-blind
admissions for US citizens and permanent residents; most peers (Ivy
and non-Ivy) use need-aware admissions for international students.
o No Ivy peers award merit aid (grant aid not based on need), but most
non-Ivy peers do.
o Most Ivy peers do not include loans as part of financial aid packages,
and for those that do the maximums are lower than Cornells (typically
$5000 or $5,500 compared to Cornells current maximum of $7,500),
and those that award loans do so only for families with incomes
>$100K (Cornells current no-loan cut-off is $60K).
o Most non-Ivy peers award loans as part of financial aid packages, but
maximums are lower than Cornells, mostly ranging from $3,000 -
$5,500 although one school has a maximum of $7,500 (the same as
Cornell). The starting family income level for including loans in
financial aid packages varies for non-Ivy peers from about $40K to
$80K, although a few non-Ivy peers may include loans for any income
group.
9
low-income students are more sensitive to institutional grant aid than are
higher-income students. The study also found that sensitivity to grant aid
was unrelated to race and ethnicity.
10
These tables above and the chart below lead the AFAWG to conclude:
o Over time, the enrollment of non-aided students has been increasing.
o Since 2008, the largest shifts in Cornell enrollment among aided
students in the five US income quintiles and unaided students have
been between the unaided category and the fourth and fifth US income
quintiles, with numbers of students shifting in and out of these groups
as the overall economy has shifted. Enrollment numbers of other US
income quintiles have remained relatively stable over time.
o All of these indicators suggest that attending to socioeconomic
diversity must remain a priority for Cornell through our financial aid
policies.
11
Had Cornells financial aid policies been structured to hold the median cost
for all aided income groups, including the highest, to be lower than in 2008
(or the same now as in 2008), grant aid costs to the university would have
been much higher over time. For example, to bring the median net cost of
the aided highest US income quintile group down from the current (2017)
cost to the 2008 cost, $9.5M additional Cornell grant aid in 2017 would be
required as in the table below.
Median
Net Cost Count *
Yea Cou (2016 Delt Delta
Sector r nt Dollars) a ("Cost")
Contra
ct In- 20
State 08 230 $33,161
20 $4,1 $1,206,
17 294 $37,265 04 563
Contra
ct
Out-
of- 20
State 08 227 $38,263
20 $4,8 $2,189,
17 455 $43,075 12 678
Endow 20
ed 08 836 $40,733
20 116 $5,2 $6,156,
17 9 $46,000 67 937
$9,553,
Total 178
12
Table: Number of Students with Loan, Median Loan, and Median Expected Parent
Contribution by Income Bands, February 2017 (Not Available= students with no
family income data because they did not apply for or were not evaluated for
financial aid.)
Income Range Number Median Median Expected Range of Median
of Loan Parent EPC as Percent of
Students Contribution (EPC) Income
$0-$60K 990 $4,680 $0 0
$60K-$75K 345 $3,100 $6,500 10.8% - 8.6%
$75K-$120K 1093 $5,000 $12,600 16.8% - 10.5%
$120K-$150K 713 $7,500 $22,200 18.5% - 14.8%
$150K-$200K 871 $7,500 $33,100 22.1% - 16.6%
$200K-$250K 369 $7,500 $46,850 23.4% - 18.7%
$250K-$300K 156 $7,500 $50,800 20.3% - 16.9%
$300K-$400K 107 $6,500 $71,450 23.8% - 17.9%
$400K-$500K 46 $6,500 $101,900 >cost of
attendance
$500K+ 26 $6,000 $158,100 >cost of
attendance
Not Available 261 $7,500 NA NA
The table above includes all loans for students with loans whether awarded
as part of the Cornell financial aid package, or incurred voluntarily by
families. In Fall 2016, of 4,154 domestic students receiving loan as part of a
need-based aid package, 1,203 (29%) received loan in excess of the amount
originally assigned as part of their Cornell aid package. The mean excess
loan was $8,602, but the distribution is heavily right-skewed and peaks in the
$2,000 $3,000 range. The median excess loan was $4,385 (see table and
figure below).
13
$30,000+ 59 5% $38,800
Total 1,203 100% $4,385
To discern the reasons why students take out excess loan beyond the level
assigned in their financial aid package, we examined a random sample of 50
student records from the set taking extra loan. For 68% of the students in the
sample, it was clear from explanatory comments made by counselors or from
related data that the extra loan was being applied towards the family
contribution: this set included nearly all cases where the excess loan was
greater than $5,000. In 14% of the cases, the extra loan appeared to be in
response to unusual packaging circumstances, such as complications with
outside aid benefits. In 18% of the cases the reason was not stated and was
unclear.
The table below displays the distribution of excess loan by income level. The
table uses the income thresholds used in Cornells loan policies, and
suggests that the rate of incurring excess loan is greater among those in the
$60k-$75k income range, but the median amount of extra loan for this group
is below most other groups, as the median amount appears to be increasing
with income. According to a COFHE report on student borrowing, about a
fifth of lower-income students at COFHE schools that assign no loans in their
financial aid packages still borrow, typically borrowing amounts between
$2,200 - $2,900 if they do borrow. Comparatively, the Cornell data suggest
that a higher percent of no-loan students may be incurring loans compared
to other COFHE no-loan schools, but the amount that lower-income Cornell
students are incurring in excess loan is on par with other COFHE schools.
14
Table: Excess Loan by Income Category
Recommendation Details
The recommendations below should be considered in this context of peer
comparisons, Cornells values, accomplishments, and future goals regarding
a diverse undergraduate population, and actual student financial
circumstances beyond calculated financial need based on Cornells
institutional methodology for determining need.
15
(Note: in the context of this report, SAT/ACT scores are used as a rough
proxy for high ability and high-achieving students, recognizing the
incompleteness of such a measure. In practice, Cornell uses a holistic
admissions process and does not make admissions decisions based solely on
test scores.)
Even under a policy of $0 parent contribution for this income level, students
and their families are contributing to their Cornell education; even at the
lowest income levels students do not receive a free ride as is sometimes
claimed. In addition, except for the highest income group, the net cost of
attendance is reasonably similar for all students receiving Cornell grant aid
regardless of the tuition rate endowed or contract (Fall 2016 Cornell data
below).
16
simply that Cornell does not assign loan as part of the awarded financial aid
package. However, as noted earlier in the Excess Loans section, nearly
one-third of all aided students incur educational loans in excess of the
amount originally assigned as part of their Cornell aid package (median
excess loan was $4,385), often to meet the expected family contribution.
The rationale for changing the no-loan cut-off to $45K annual family income
reflects non-Ivy peer comparisons that indicate at least a small number of
non-Ivy peers award loans beginning at about this income level. In addition,
Cornell students have very low loan default rates (1-2%), graduation rates at
Cornell (93%) are among the highest in the U.S., and Cornell graduates
(Class of 2015) earn mean ($62,980) and median starting salaries after
graduation ($63,000) above the U.S. median household income ($53,657).
Graduates who are employed by a government or not-for-profit organization,
including teachers, may be eligible for various federal student loan
forgiveness programs.
Concerns: Lowering the no-loan cut-point from $60K to $45K will increase the
percent of Cornells class graduating with student loan debt. Cornell has
made strides in the past decade reducing this percent while the US average
has been increasing.
For Cornell, data on the relationship between SAT scores and family
economic status suggest the following:
SAT/ACT scores are weakly but positively correlated with income.
The difference in median SAT/ACT score between the non-aided group
and the lowest income quintile is a little more than 100 points.
For every $10,000 increase in income, SAT/ACT score increases, on
average, by about 3.9 points, although the relationship flattens above
$100,000.
Because the income and SAT/ACT distributions are both quite skewed,
there are relatively few admitted students who are both low-income
and high SAT/ACT, thus it is important to maximize yield for this group
of admitted students.
17
The chart below illustrates the large differences in high-SAT/ACT base counts
across income categories. Among 1,054 Fall 2016 admits in the highest
Cornell SAT/ACT quartile, 4% were from the lowest two US income quintiles.
There are 56 non-aided high-SAT/ACT admits for each high-SAT/ACT admit
from the lowest US income quintile.
18
Freshman Yield Rates for Regular Decision Admits, US Citizens and
Equivalents
19
$3,500/year. Estimated impact: 290 students;
Savings = $290K. Desirability: TBD
2) Decrease the maximum annual loan for students
from families with $75K-$85K annual income from
$5,000 to $3,500/year. Estimated impact: 210
students; Cost = $315K. Desirability: TBD (NOTE:
Without 3.a.1, the decrease would be from $5,000 to
$2,500/year, for an estimated cost = $525K.)
b) Change the lower and upper bounds of the $75K-$120K
annual family income category to $80K-$135K, and
change the maximum loan limit, raising the loan limit for
the lower part of this range and lowering the loan limit
for the upper part of this new range.
1) Increase the maximum annual loan for students
from families with $85K-$120K annual income from
$5,000 to $7,000. Estimated impact: 709 students;
Savings = $1.4M. Desirability: TBD
2) Decrease the maximum annual loan for students
from families with $120K-$135K annual income from
$7,500 to $7,000. Estimated impact: 300 students;
Cost = $150K. Desirability: TBD (NOTE: Without
3.b.1, the decrease would be from $7,500 to $5,000,
for an estimated cost = $750K.)
c) Increase the maximum annual loan for students from
families with >$135K annual income who have need from
$7,500 to $9,000. Estimated impact: 1,258 students;
Savings = $1.9M. Desirability: TBD
Increasing loans for all income groups above $45K distributes the increased
financial burden across all family types, excluding the lowest income. The
minimum family income for loans ($45K) is within the upper range of the
second US income quintile and reflects the minimum used by a small number
of non-Ivy peers.
Cornell loan repayment default rates are very low (1-2%), and Cornell alumni
secure jobs that enable them to pay back loans. For the Class of 2015, the
mean starting salary for new graduates was $62,980 and the median starting
salary was $63,000, compared to the 2014 median US household income of
$53,657.
20
In addition, a COFHE report on Student Debt What Seniors Report
suggests that nearly half of student borrowers expect their parents to help
them pay off their student loans, and this expectation is closely related to
parent income; students from higher-income families are more likely to
expect that their parents will help them pay off their student loans.
Concerns: Mean debt at graduation for Cornell graduates who borrow will
increase, as will the percent of students graduating with loans. While US
mean debt has been generally increasing (except for a decrease 2012-2013),
Cornell mean debt had been decreasing from 2006 until 2011, then began
rising again. Cornell mean debt, however, remains below national figures.
Mean debt at graduation for 2016 Cornell graduates who borrowed was
$23,264 while the 2014 national mean loan debt for all graduates who
borrowed was $28,950 and the 2014 national mean for graduates of private
nonprofit colleges was $32,600. Increasing loans for Cornell students in
these various income levels will bring Cornell figures closer to national
figures.
21
Increasing loans for upper-middle and upper income aided students may lead
to decreased yield for these students. Although the applicant pools of high-
achieving upper-middle and upper income students are quite a bit larger and
more robust than applicant pools of high-achieving lower-income students,
nonetheless Cornell must remain reasonably competitive for these students
against peers, some of whom award merit aid (not based on need). For this
reason, the AFAWG offers a separate recommendation (#4) to reduce loan
for selected high-achieving higher-income students.
22
Several schools are particularly strong competitors against Cornell for
yielding Black and Hispanic admitted students and have comparatively
generous financial aid programs for these students at all income levels, so at
least for the middle income groups Cornell should strive to make a Cornell
education financially attractive for these students, and can do that by
retaining this preferential URM treatment.
For example, in Fall16, the top competitors with Cornell for yielding admitted
Black students (525 total admits for Cornell) were University of Pennsylvania
(yielded 27 Cornell admits), MIT (23), Harvard (21), Princeton (21), Duke (15),
Stanford (14), Yale (11), Brown (10), Johns Hopkins (9), University of Chicago
(9). This resulted in Cornell enrolling 228 Black admitted students, while
these top competitors enrolled 160 of Cornell-admitted Black students (and
23
137 Cornell-admitted black students enrolled at other schools not in this top
list). Competition for these same students is fierce among elite universities,
and Cornell must continue to be competitive in this pursuit.
Hispanic non-enrolls (from among 989 Cornell admits) were similar in terms
of top peer competitors: MIT (24), Brown (23), Harvard (23), Stanford (22),
Yale (22), University of Pennsylvania (21), Johns Hopkins (19), Duke (17), UC
Berkeley (17), Princeton (16), but not as skewed to a relatively small set of
key competitors. Of 989 Cornell-admitted Hispanic students, 461 enrolled at
Cornell, 214 enrolled at the top competitors, and 314 enrolled at a variety of
other institutions.
Across all admits, for every $5,000 decrease in net cost, the yield rate
increases by about 3 percentage points. This has been consistent over the
past seven years. URM students (of any income) generally yield at a lower
rate than non-URM students but still exhibit about a 3% increase in URM
yield for every $5,000 decrease in net cost. Continuing to limit the URM
parent contribution for this income band will help Cornell be able to continue
enrolling a racially/ethnically diverse undergraduate population.
24
A COFHE report on Assessing Grant Aids Influence on College Choice found
that although lower-income students may be more sensitive to differences
in aid awards than those with higher incomes, this choice elasticity is
unrelated to race and ethnicity, calling into question the basic assumption
on which this Cornell policy is grounded.
Rationale: The 2012 Financial Aid Task Force Report recommendations led to
Cornell implementing several financial aid program changes that had been
targeted specifically toward URM students. Starting with Fall 13 enrollees,
Cornell eliminated preferential loan reduction for URM students, saving about
$5.7M of grant aid. In addition, Cornell changed from using a single level of
URM parent contribution reduction to a graduated parent contribution-
reduction algorithm based on family income.
URM (U.S.) Fall Freshmen Yield: Any student who identifies as one or more of the
following is classified as URM (U.S.): American Indian (U.S.), Black (U.S.), Hispanic (U.S.),
and/or Hawaiian/Pac Isle (U.S.).
College Year Apps Admits Deposits Admit Rate Yield
CORNELL 2011 6,301 1,464 673 23.2% 46.0%
2012 6,258 1,479 670 23.6% 45.3%
2013 6,623 1,518 724 22.9% 47.7%
25
2014 7,478 1,547 707 20.7% 45.7%
2015 7,595 1,615 756 21.3% 46.8%
2016 8,161 1,723 790 21.1% 45.9%
In Fall 2016 3,118 URM undergraduates were enrolled at Cornell. The 107
students affected by this change represent 3.4% of total URM undergraduate
enrollment.
Concerns: Similar to the rationale for #5 (which was to continue the URM
parent contribution reduction program for income groups <$120K and
extend it to groups <$135K), by implementing this change Cornell runs the
risk of losing higher-income URM students to top competitor institutions with
more generous financial aid packages. URM student yield is lower, at all
income levels, compared to non-URM student yield.
26
Cornell should be concerned that it is easier to recruit a significant number of
new URM students when they see on campus an existing critical mass of
URM students. If URM student enrollment begins to decline, it may keep
declining.
Using this approach could help Cornell return to or remain at its prior
historical levels of percent of students receiving grant aid (in the low 40s)
vs. percent of students who are unaided (upper 50s).
27
Concerns: As with recent discussions when Cornell changed from need-blind
international student admissions to need-aware admissions there will be
concerns voiced that this option would inappropriately privilege wealthy
international students for admittance to Cornell.
Rationale: A fixed budget for transfer enrollment, similar to the existing use
of a fixed budget for international students, would improve Cornells ability to
more actively control financial aid expenditures. Implementing this option
would not necessarily lead to a reduction of transfer students, nor
necessarily lower-income transfer students. Rather, using need-aware
admissions would help Cornell make explicit, strategic choices about how to
spend its grant aid dollars on transfer students. Cornell could affirmatively
decide to fully fund admitted Transfer Option students as part of a need-
aware policy. The financial aid budget for transfer students could be set at
the expenditure level that currently exists to provide financial aid to all
enrolled transfer students with need. Setting such a realistic limit based on
current enrollment could help prevent significant increases in financial aid
expenditures should another serious economic downturn occur.
For the university overall, and for each college/school, the demographic
profile of the enrolling transfer class is generally less diverse than the
freshman class, although on measures of economic diversity, transfer
28
students in some colleges/schools are more likely than freshmen to be
eligible for need-based financial aid in some years. Socioeconomic diversity
among transfers varies considerably from year to year. Using a need-aware
admissions approach could help stabilize economic diversity (aided v.
unaided) among transfer enrollment from year to year.
At least one Ivy peer, Brown University, uses need-aware admissions for
transfer students.
Concerns: Some colleges (especially CALS and ILR currently) are more
dependent on transfer students than others. Transfer students represent a
relatively small portion of the overall undergraduate student body,
approximately 12-15% of new student fall enrollment each year. The portion
differs by college/school, however, with significant portions of the graduating
classes of ILR (40-45%), CALS (30%) and SHA (25%) comprising transfer
students. If implemented, care would need to be taken to limit or manage
the impact for colleges/schools in which transfer students are important
contributors to goals for student enrollment.
Rationale: Nearly 300 schools currently participate in the Private College 529
program, including MIT, Princeton, Stanford, Duke, Chicago. The Private
College 529 Plan is most likely to benefit those who can already devote some
financial resources to their childrens education, and want to make their
money go further. It is likely that groups of middle-upper income families
would benefit the most. The Plan appears largely compatible with Cornells
current financial aid policies and packaging approaches.
A COFHE report on COFHE Parents and College Costs suggested that the
specific financing plan for a students education affects the familys
perceptions of impact on the family. The study found that college financing
29
elements that are associated with lower negative impacts include employee
benefits, pre-paid tuition and 529 plans (such as the Private 529 program),
savings, and gifts from relatives.
Cornell would have to be careful with communications about the Private 529
Plan. Unlike the public 529 plan where saved funds can be applied to the full
cost of education, the Private 529 Plan can only be applied to the cost of
tuition. We would have to be careful in our communications so that families
do not expect an advantage in the admissions decision process.
30
31
Appendix: Additional Charts and Figures
32
Black and Hispanic Enrollment Trends
33
Incoming Freshman Self-Reports (via Survey) of Family
Income, 2008-2016
Since 2000, Cornell has surveyed its incoming class of first-year students.
Most years include a question asking students to report the household
income of their families. Below are data from the 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014,
and 2016 surveys. Response rates ranged from 83% to 88% depending on
year. Confidential survey responses were merged with administrative data
on student financial aid status for the 2008 2014 survey years.
These data do not adjust for inflation; the proportion of students coming from
families earning >$250K has grown from a fifth or less to more than a
quarter of the student population (left panel). The profile of the unaided
student group (center panel) has shifted from one that is 36% highest
income (19% out of 52%) to one that is close to half highest income (24%
out of 49%). Some shift up is to be expected due to inflation.
34
Graduating Seniors Self-reported Impact on Family
Finances, 2006-2016
Below are data from the 2006, 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016 surveys of graduating
seniors. Response rates ranged from 45% - 50% depending on year. Confidential
survey responses were merged with administrative data on student financial aid
status. The survey question was What has been the impact on your family of
paying for your education (tuition, fees, rooms and board) at Cornell? where
responses ranged from slight to severe. The percent of seniors reporting the impact
of paying for college is severe or considerable decreased from 50% in 2006 to
47% in 2016 (left panel).
35
The table below shows the percent of graduating seniors reporting that the
impact has been considerable or severe. Darker red means the impact was
worse. The length of the bar is the number of students in that income/aid
category. Among those most inclined to say the impact was severe or
considerable are aided students with family incomes between $50K and $200K.
A COFHE report on COFHE Parents and College Costs suggested that the
specific financing plan for a students education affects the familys
perceptions of impact on the family. The study found that financing
elements associated with higher negative impacts include federal PLUS
36
loans, a second job, student borrowing, retirement account borrowing or
withdrawals, mortgage, private loans, and real assets.
Fall 2014
Fall 2014 Pell Pct of
Pell Count Enrollment
University of Southern California 4,323 23%
Columbia University 1,777 22%
Massachusetts Institute of
Technology 806 18%
California Institute of Technology 37 16%
Stanford University 1,104 16%
Brown University 1,047 16%
Princeton University 790 15%
Rice University 607 15%
Cornell University 2,207 15%
Dartmouth College 596 14%
Duke University 903 14%
Northwestern University 1,245 14%
University of Pennsylvania 1,607 14%
Vanderbilt University 956 14%
Georgetown University 957 13%
Yale University 705 13%
Harvard University 1,204 12%
Johns Hopkins University 781 12%
Tufts University 620 12%
University of Chicago 639 11%
University of Notre Dame 888 11%
Washington University in St Louis 548 7%
37
$75- $120- Aided Not
Fall $0-75k 120k 200k Total Aided
2014-
15 5.7% 4.6% 4.3% 5.0% 4.8%
2015-
16 4.9% 4.2% 3.8% 4.3% 4.6%
For the table above, the chart below provides the counts by income/aid status for
the two years (based on students enrolled in the Fall of each year):
38
Percentage of Enrolling Freshmen with Pell or Other Need-based Aid
39
SAT and INCOME
SAT total scores are the sum of the Critical Reading and Mathematics
sections, which (for the years being studied) can produce scores ranging
from 200 to 800 in 10-point increments (so a total SAT score can range
from 400 to 1600). Cornell does not include the SAT writing section is not
included in the SAT total score uses in most reporting. The ACT exam
(which is in theory designed to measure different mental constructs from the
SAT) produces scores that can range from 1 to 36, in one-point increments.
For much internal and external reporting at Cornell, ACT scores are converted
to the SAT scale using a score concordance jointly prepared by the College
Board and the ACT organization. Of 6,337 students admitted to Fall 2016,
about 73% submitted SAT scores and about 50% submitted ACT scores, and
about 20% submitted both SAT and ACT scores.
In the table below are SAT/ACT-equivalent quartile limits used in this report,
which are based on admitted students from both Fall 2015 and Fall 2016. For
this reason, these figures may differ trivially from figures used in other
reports. The SAT/ACT distribution among students admitted to Cornell is also
quite asymmetrical, skewed toward high scores (see histogram).
40
Note that the College Board reports that the SAT standard error of
measurement is approximately 30-40 points e.g., differences smaller than
40 are not necessarily inconsistent with random noise.
SAT/ACT Score Summaries for 2015 and 2016 Admitted Freshmen
Income Quintile/Aid Status
Secon Highes
Total Lowest Third Fourth No Aid
d t
Median SAT/ACT 1480 1380 1420 1440 1460 1490 1500
75th Pctl 1550 1460 1510 1520 1540 1550 1550
25th Pctl 1400 1270 1300 1340 1370 1400 1420
Max 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Min 870 920 990 990 950 980 870
Enrolling Median 1460 1360 1380 1420 1430 1460 1460
Non-Enrolling
1510 1430 1460 1485 1510 1510 1510
Median
Among aided students, those with higher incomes tend to have slightly higher
SAT/ACT scores than those with lower incomes, but the relationship is very weak.
For first time freshmen admitted for Fall 2015 and Fall 2016, the R-squared from
regressing income on SAT/ACT-equivalent (with no additional predictors) was 0.052.
The regression coefficient for income indicates that for every $10,000 increase in
income, SAT/ACT score increases, on average, by about 3.9 points. Across the
income range from $0 to $300,000, this equates to about a 100-point difference.
However, the relationship is not quite linear. The R-squared from a GAM model
(curvy regression using additive splines) was only slightly higher, but suggested
that the relationship between income and SAT/ACT is slightly stronger at the lower
end of the income range, flattening out above about $100,000 in income.
41
In the charts below, each small blue dot represents an enrolling admit, and
red dots indicate non-enrolling admits. A small amount of random spread has
been added to points at each categorical axis point to help in visualizing the
distributions.
This chart shows the distributions of SAT/ACT scores for admitted freshmen
from Fall 2015 and Fall 2016 combined, with median SAT/ACT scores overlaid.
Counts and yield rates (combined across years) are displayed across the
bottom.
42
All results in this section are based on domestic, regular decision first-time
freshmen admitted to Fall 2015 or Fall 2016. The table below summarizes
admit and enrollment counts, yield rates, and median SAT/ACT scores for
each income quintile and SAT/ACT quartile. Yield rates range from a low of
28% for non-aided, high-SAT/ACT admits, to 83% for low-income, low-
SAT/ACT admits.
SAT/ACT
Quartile Lowest Second Third Fourth Highest No Aid
Highest Admitted 38 77 119 242 446 1,957
Enrolling 22 30 59 106 167 545
Yield 58% 39% 50% 44% 37% 28%
Median
SAT/ACT 1560 1560 1560 1570 1570 1570
Third Admitted 60 143 135 248 453 2,370
Enrolling 40 76 87 129 207 1,028
Yield 67% 53% 64% 52% 46% 43%
Median
SAT/ACT 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510
Second Admitted 120 176 160 274 434 2,102
Enrolling 93 119 106 172 263 1,188
Yield 78% 68% 66% 63% 61% 57%
Median
SAT/ACT 1450 1460 1450 1450 1460 1450
Lowest Admitted 259 333 276 367 459 1,563
Enrolling 215 258 222 286 325 923
Yield 83% 77% 80% 78% 71% 59%
Median
SAT/ACT 1280 1300 1315 1320 1340 1340
43