Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Max Hantel
• Literature
o Don’t conform the literature to your ideas, build around the literature
o DO NOT MIDDLEGROUND – YOU WILL LOSE!
o Remember Hiroshima built around one cards – Ford
o Take on historical context of topic, literature
Historical genealogy – why past is key to future, etc.
o Questions resolution
o Decisions to make:
Relationship to topic
• Topical or warrant for resolution or affirm resolution or Kritik the topic
What is your relationship to framework or topicality
• If no plan – what is strat is T-USFG is read
• Answer DAs with aff turns case – Kritik DAs (high risk, high reward)
• Rape of okinawans has been continued by American military justifying need for forward
presence
• Framing of CP is a solvency deficit to the CP – intertwining between reps
• Negative says you shouldn’t get multiple reps – no division between plan text and
representation
• i/l cards designate why starting point, bearing witness is needed to break the system
o point of intervention/ try-or-die
o least strategic k aff – but need plan text for hs judges
o solve a manifestation of impacts
• find specific cards
vision of topic
• where you want the topic to go
IMPACT TURN
• Heg good, etc. read no link – has nothing to do with
• Have link defense
• Kritik and answer impact turns
• Don’t lose to offensive args
• Neg Ks – best argument is a permutation
o Think about how Ks may interact with your aff
• K Affs
o Structural violence
Militarism is a juggernaut, eroding culture
o China threat aff
Arrest cycles of paranoid threat construction
o Drones
Mechanization of war
o Orientalism aff
o Remember Hiroshima aff (Butler 09 – “differential ways in grievance” “site of unnecessary struggle”)
Remove nukes from territorial waters
Framework – mcclearen 99 “unflinching recorders of the struggles” “define notions of what is
topical in pedagogy”)
Zinz 93 “do not absolve educators of educating of these events” “hiroshima is still our text”)
o “NO” plan
Say some shit – depends on judge
Make plan about language – Word PICs (see antonucci for word PIC help)
Historical genealogy – why past is key to future, etc.
Card that talks about what you’re doing and why we have to exclude
• Framework (email framework blocks to Max)
o Be dominant on question of valuable education
o Your interpretation key to in-depth knowledge of the topic – contextual evidence
o Call them racist – Richard Delgado card
o Impact turn notion of fairness – veneer of objectivity
o Your aff is the heart of the topic
o Interpretation of why there is predictable negative ground
o Carol Cohn 87 – impact turn roleplaying
• Implementation
o CX of 1AC is the most important part of the debate
Judge needs to understand your aff
Constant CX practices of 1AC
• What do you do?
• What mechanism?
• Role of ballot?
• How do you solve?
o 2AC- Kritik DAs, have impact calc – torture o/w nuke war
Cut cards on framing issues – Precarious Life by Judith Butler – conflating individual lives is
dehumanizing, makes arresting violence impossible, war becomes inevitable
o Predict word PICs that might be run against you
Impact turn PICs – say why language is bad
• Content
o Orientalism
o Defending cultures and self-determination good
o Okinawan structural violence,
o Gender aff
o Bagram torture aff
o Irony affs okay – Jody Dean ev
o Including more women in military will solve all the problems – disruption of
Defending white men’s burden irony aff
o Peter Koveillo – homoerotism of nuke “apocalypse from now on”
o Historical genealogy – orientalism
Neitzsche genealogy and history by Michael Foucault
Chalmers Johnson – D&G
Ian Buchanan
o
•