Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and Statistics
Identify learning
Identify learning and areas for improvement by analysing safety
information
Data consistency
Improve consistency in data definition and analysis to facilitate
benchmarking
New indicators
Provide advice and guidance to other sub-committees and task
forces on developing and prioritising indicators
OGP Safety Data
10 April
Revised draft 18 May
12 March 1 May
company [in Word format] Formatted 31 May
23 March 27-29 Mar circulated to final draft goes report circulated
1 March results Final changes
circulated to Draft report [in SDSC meets to Safety to Tom Pearce to Chairs only
Deadline for Committee, for format and of Safety incorporated
contributors Word format] review draft
submission of SDSC and layout Committee and report
for comment circulated to report [in Word
data contributors and SDSC published
SDSC by email format] - allow 2
-allow 1 week for comment electronically
19Mar weeks - allow 1 week
- allow 2 weeks 25 May
24 Apr
2010 safety data - scope
8 Contractor
Overall
6
4.5
3.9
4 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.2
3.0 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.8
2.0
1.7 1.6
2
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Safety Data Trends 2010
Lost Work Day Cases - by category Lost Work Day Cases - by activity
% LWDCs associated with each reorting category % LWDCs associated with each reorting category
Assault or Caught In, Unspecified -
Violent act Under or Transport - Construction,
Other Water, incl.
other
Commissioning,
1% Between 9%
10% Marine activity Decommissioning
17% 4%
Transport - Land 12%
Confined 7% Diving, Subsea,
Space ROV
0.1% Cut, Puncture, Transport - Air 0.5%
Scrape 1%
Struck by 4%
Seismic / Survey
26% Explosions or Operations
2% Drilling,
Burns Workover, Well
5% Services
Exposure 24%
Electrical
Falls from Exposure 1% Production
Noise, Operations Lifting, Crane,
height
11% Rigging, Deck
Slips and Trips 10% Chemical,
Office, operations
Biological, Maintenance,
(at same Overexertion, Warehouse, 7%
Vibration Accommodation, Inspection,
height) Strain
17% 2% Catering Testing
6%
7% 16%
SDSC Fatality and High Potential
Event Workshop
8 core rules
10 additional rules
Comprehensive package of
support materials
Causal Factors
The main change to the 2010 report is the addition of causal factors for fatal incidents and high
potential events. The causal factors are as follows:
PEOPLE (ACTS) PROCESS (CONDITIONS)
Improper position (in the line of fire) Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices
Personal Protective Equipment not used or used improperly Storms or acts of nature
Improper decision making or lack of judgment Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment
Fatal
Causal Factors 2010 data Incidents Fatalities
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organisational : Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment 30 33
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organisational : Inadequate supervision 18 20
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Improper position (in the line of fire) 16 17
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Improper decision making or lack of judgment 14 16
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organisational : Inadequate training/competence 13 13
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Violation intentional (by individual or group) 12 15
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Violation unintentional (by individual or group) 12 12
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organisational : Inadequate communication 12 13
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organisational : Inadequate work standards/procedures 10 11
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products : Inadequate
design/specification/management of change 10 11
High Potential Incident Causal Factors
Events of Lesser
Consequence
Tier 2 Events
Tier 4 Performance
Tier 1 Process Safety Incidents
4
HPIs stage 1
yes
Level 2 System to capture and report data is in place but not fully implemented and embedded.
no
Level 1 System to capture data is under development.
Figure 1 OIHC Gap Analysis Tool 2008, Element 1 Health Risk Assessment and Planning
HPI Results - Company B
Health Risk Assessment
2010 4
3.5
Health Risk Assessment
4
2009
3.5
Public Health / Promotion 3 Industrial Hygiene
Public Health / Promotion 3 Industrial Hygiene
2.5
2.5
2
2
1.5
1.5
1
1
0.5
0.5
Health Reporting 0 Medical Emergency Management
Health Reporting 0 Medical Emergency Management
1 HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING (generally understood to relate to 'within the fence' activities)
Workplace health hazards are identified, their risks assessed and a health plan addressing any risks is implemented for the following:
Figure 1 OIHC Gap Analysis Tool 2009, Element 1 Health Risk and Assessment Planning
HMS Gap Analysis Tool 2010 by Element
OGP / IPIECA Elements
Fitness for Medical
Health Impact Health Risk
Public Health / Task / Health Management of Emergency Industrial
Assessment Assessment
Promotion (8) Surveillance Reporting (7) Ill-health (4) Managemen Hygiene (2)
(6) (1)
(5) t (3)
1.13 2.00 1.60 1.88 2.59 2.43 2.20 2.67
1.13 2.23 2.80 2.25 2.82 2.71 2.30 2.67
2.25 2.38 3.00 2.88 2.88 2.86 2.90 3.00
2.29 2.46 3.00 3.00 3.06 3.00 3.00 3.11
2.63 2.90 3.20 3.38 3.12 3.43 3.40 3.11
2.75 2.92 3.20 3.50 3.25 3.43 3.90 3.56
3.00 3.00 3.40 3.88 3.47 3.57 3.90 3.78
3.25 3.38 3.60 4.00 3.82 4.00 4.00 3.89
Av. by
2.30 2.66 2.98 3.09 3.13 3.18 3.20 3.22
Element
HPI Conclusions
Facilitates benchmarking
21
Conclusions