Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wheaton College
POWER OF COACHING AFFECTS ATHLETES 2
Project Proposal
We are interested in how the power dynamics and authority that comes with a coaching position
affect athletes during their time playing for specific coaches. During the spring semester of the
2015-16 school year, we took Sports Communication with Dr. Langan, and are curious to explore
more about this topic of the coaching power dynamic. Additionally, all three of us are currently
athletes, and have been for the majority of our lives. We have all had positive and negative
experiences with coaches due to different factors. However, power is a crucial factor that all
coaches encounter, and have to learn how to navigate.
Variables
Playing Time/Player Status (Cranmer & Goodboy, 2015; Laios, A., Theodorakis, N., &
Gargalianos, D., 2003; Scales, P. C., 2016; Matosic, D., & Cox, A. E. 2014; Stirling & Kerr,
2009; Turman, 2006; Van Breukelen, van der Leeden, Wesselius, & Hoes, 2010)
Coaches tend to believe that expert power (i.e. knowledge of technical skills and
experiences) is the most effective in producing high achieving athletes and teams (Laios, A.,
Theodorakis, & Gargalianos, 2003). Because of this, coaches may develop better relationships
with those athletes who are considered starters or play at a higher level than the other athletes.
competence through the use of rewards, such as collegiate scholarships and playing time
(Matosic & Cox, 2014). These rewards tend to be given to the players who play more often
and/or start due to a high level of athletic ability or a strong coach-athlete relationship. This may
lead to emotional abuse of the athletes, which affects the player-coach relationship (Stirling, A.E.
& Kerr, G.A. 2009). Turman (2006) found that starters perceived higher levels of reward power
use when compared to non-starters (pg. 273). Van Breukelen, van der Leeden, Wesselius, &
Hoes (2010) conclude that social differential treatment was negatively associated with team
RQ1: Does the status of a player affect the relationship that the coach has to that player?
Gender of Coach/Player (Theberge, 1990; Ruggiero & Lattin, 2008; Duquin & Schroeder-
According to Theberge (1990), female coaches are less concerned with seeking to
contest male and masculine dominance, and instead with greater participation by women in the
athletic world (pg. 74). Tomlinson & Yorganci (2016) found that in a male coach/female athlete
POWER OF COACHING AFFECTS ATHLETES 4
relationship, from the athlete perspective, there is a nature of dependency rather than individual
responsibility. Duquin & Schroeder-Braun (1996) explain that female athletes are more likely to
view coach-athlete conflicts as more serious and are more likely to seek out social support.
Ruggiero & Lattin (2008) describe the phenomenon of female coaches interacting with female
athletes of a different race. Lensky (1990) found that young girls have a desire for male attention,
RQ2: Does the gender of either coach or player change how the interactions take place
Age of Athlete (Rezania & Gurney, 2014; Duquin & Schroeder-Braun, 1996; Smith, Zane,
Athletes of all ages experience pressure to play well. Whether that comes from their coaches,
parents, or fellow athletes, it is a very real pressure that begins early. Duquin & Schroeder-Braun
(1996), show that as age increases in athletes, peer pressure increases as well. Similarly, as
athletes get younger and coaches interact with younger kids in youth sports the power dynamic
that coaches have is different than when the athletes are older and more mature, competitive, and
responsive to coach influence (Smith, Zane, Smoll, & Coppel, 1983). As the athletes get older,
the athlete-coach relationship can be either strengthened or weakened by the coachs interactions
with the athletes. Commitment to the coach can be further influenced by age and power
dynamics (Rezania & Gurney, 2014). Weiss & Fretwell (2005) look at the dynamics of sons
having their fathers as coaches within a U-12 soccer league and find that there are direct
level, insider information, involvement in decision making, special attention, quality time, and
RQ3: Do the ages of the athletes impact how the coach utilizes his/her power in regards
to the players?
Method
Survey Questions
First we can ask respondents to pick a particular season of a sport (i.e. Basketball season
during junior year of highschool). We can then ask respondents who are considered athletes what
percentage of the game/competition they play, as well as their role on the team (i.e. starter,
benchwarmer, waterboy etc.). Matosic & Cox asked respondents for their perceived competence
in their sport on a 1-7 Likert scale, in which 1=not competent and 7=extremely competent
(2014), which we will also ask to validate an athletes player status. We can follow up that
question by asking if their relationship with the coach was perceived as being weak or strong.
Respondents rated the strength on a five point Likert scale with 1=very weak, 3=neither weak
nor strong, and 5=very strong. We can ask respondents who are considered coaches if they
develop better relationships with those who play more or are starters, as compared to those with
less playing time who dont start. Respondents rated their relationships with each starters and
nonstarters on a five point Likert scale with 1=very weak, 3=neither weak nor strong, and 5=very
strong.
Gender of Coach/Athlete
We are currently still looking for sources that ask questions regarding this variable.
Questions may be along the lines of if they have had more positive/negative experiences with
male or female coaches. We can ask respondents who are athletes to consider the aforementioned
POWER OF COACHING AFFECTS ATHLETES 6
season of a sport, and ask the gender of the coach for that season (male or female). We can ask
Age of Athlete
We are currently still looking for sources that ask questions regarding this variable. This
can be determined by a question that has age ranges from 18-25, 25-30, etc, that the survey taker
will mark their age range. We are looking for questions concerning if the effect that a coach has
References
POWER OF COACHING AFFECTS ATHLETES 7
Cranmer, G. A., & Goodboy, A. K. (2015). Power play: coach power use and athletes'
614-633. doi:10.1080/10570314.2015.1069389
Duquin, M.E. & Schroeder-Braun, K. (1996). Power, empathy, and moral conflict in sport.
Peace
and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2(4), 351-367. Retrieved from EbscoHost
database.
Laios, A., Theodorakis, N., & Gargalianos, D. (2003). Leadership and power: two important
Lensky, H. (1990). Power and play: gender and sexuality issues in sport and physical activity.
Matosic, D., & Cox, A. E. (2014). Athletes motivation regulations and need satisfaction
examining coaching practices and commitment to the coach. SpringerPlus, 3(383). doi:
10.1186/2193-1801-3-383.
Ruggiero, T. E., & Lattin, K. S. (2008). Intercollegiate female coaches' use of verbally
Scales, P. C. (2016). The crucial coaching relationship. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(8), 19-23.
Smith, R.E., Zane, W.S., Smoll, F.L., & Coppel, D.B. (1983). Behavioral assessment in youth
POWER OF COACHING AFFECTS ATHLETES 8
sports: coaching behaviors and childrens attitudes. Medicine & Science in Sports &
Stirling, A. E., & Kerr, G. A. (2009). Abused athletes' perceptions of the coach-athlete
Theberge, N. (1990). Gender, work, and power: the case of women in coaching. The Canadian
Jstor database.
Tomlinson, A., & Yorganci, I. (2016, August 15). Male coach/female athlete relations: gender
and power relations in competitive sport. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 21(2), 134-
Turman, P.D. (2006, December 5). Athletes perceptions of coach power use and the association
between playing status and sport satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 23(4),
Van Breukelen, W., van der Leeden, R., Wesselius, W. & Hoes, M. (2010). Differential treatment
and team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 43-63. Retrieved from
sport: cordial, contentious, or conundrum? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,
76(3), 286-305.
POWER OF COACHING AFFECTS ATHLETES 9