Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dr. Vlachos
September 1, 2015
The author, D.A. Carson, first opens his article by quoting a section of 2 Timothy 2:15 in
which Paul tells Timothy to be someone who correctly interprets the word of truth. Carson
then follows up by agreeing with Paul in regards to knowing how to interpret and handle the
scriptures.
In the second paragraph, readers are introduced to the term, hermeneutics. Carson goes
on to explain hermeneutics as the interpretation of texts and that through the years the
He explains that the term was once understood to be the science and art of biblical
interpretation. Carson describes the process of a single interpreter who would, well, interpret
scripture and then present his/her interpretation to two others. If the two interpreters understood
Carson then goes on to describe another form that hermeneutics has taken on. In time,
explains that these techniques were designed to dive into the history and culture behind the text
The third form that hermeneutics has evolved into is new hermeneutics. This form, as
Carson explains, points out the fact that all humans have personal beliefs and biases when
1
interpreting anything, thus emphasizing the interpreter over the text. Using this new hermeneutic
would mean that if every interpretation is not right, then they are all wrong and meaningless. As
a compromise, new hermeneutics has ruled that there is no interpretation that is wrong unless it
accuses another of being invalid or claims itself as being the only true and valid belief. With
Carson follows his description of the new hermeneutics with his personal views.
Although he admits there are valuable insights, he finds that this new hermeneutic contradicts
itself. He finds the irony of authors who, believe finding a texts meaning has more to do with
ones own interpretation rather than the actual text itself, write texts to persuade readers to believe
their own words as truth. Carson believes that this new hermeneutic is so busy pushing everyone
to have open minds, it has actually produced a population that has completely closed their
minds to Truth, wisdom, and understanding. He goes on to argue that although we as humans
may never be able to acquire all knowledge as God can, there is no reason to think we cannot
As the article continues, Carson acknowledges that every individual does indeed have
personal beliefs and biases based on our culture, history, and situation that may clash with a text
(the Scripture in this case). However, he does not see this baggage as inherently bad or a
reason to disregard the Scripture. He explains that the Scripture is indeed complete truth and
different interpretations can lead to a wider and deeper understanding. He even goes so far as to
say, Christians need each other to understand Gods words. Just because people interpret
The next section of the article introduces a few principles of interpretation the first of
which has to do with language. The bible has been translated into hundreds of differently
2
languages through out history. Carson explains that translating anything, especially such an
extensive text as the bible, can be difficult. It is not uncommon for the original Greek and
Hebrew words meaning to be lost or misunderstood in different translations. Thats why Carson
emphasizes the importance of referencing different translations and looking up the original
The following paragraphs explain the importance of being a good reader of the
Scripture. It is not enough to just read, you must strive to understand. Carson pulls directly from
the bible: using the beatitudes, the Sermon on the Mount, and the parable of the soils in Matthew
as examples to show how literary structure is used to communicate ideas. Inclusions, metaphors,
and chiasms are only a few of the literary strategies demonstrated in the bible. Carson also
touches on the importance of understanding of how larger structures work, and especially the
nature of literary genre. Understanding what a parable is will help readers begin to interpret the
meaning and reason behind it. Above all, a good reader, according to Carson, goes with the
flow of the text. Stopping to do research is good, but it is important to read for context before
Carson then warns against the analogy of faith. He describes this phenomenon as part
that it should never be interpreted in such a way as to jeopardize the great givens of
Christianity. At first this rule seems to makes sense, as Carson agrees, however he goes on to
warn about this belief. He explains that it is easy for a reader to succumb to anachronism and
inaccurate conclusions based of flawed theology. He also explains that it is easy for Christians
who have favorite verses to compare every other passage they read to that specific verse, thus
3
Researching the historical and archaeological background information of a passage can
help shed light on a parable or verse. Carson uses Revelation 3:15 as an example. In the verse,
Jesus says to the Laodiceans, I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you
were either one or the other. After some digging into the history a bit, it is revealed that the city
of Laodica had wells filled with lukewarm, chemical-filled water while the other neighboring
cities, Colosse and Hierapolis, took pride in, and cared for, their water. This background makes
When reading the Scripture it is important to ask questions and gain knowledge along the
way. Carson, however, does advise against asking inappropriate questions, like bringing up gay
marriage in relation to a verse that doesnt touch on the subject. He also mentions the importance
of understanding that the bible, although physically written by different hands, has one Author:
our God.
Carson applauds theological synthesis to further understand but warns about the chance
of collecting false or shoddy theology. He stresses the importance of reading with purpose and
gathering relevant and useful background information to fully understand the text.