Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

INTRODUCTION

The recently enacted Companies Act 2013 (the 2013 Act) is a landmark legislation and is

likely to have far-reaching consequences on all companies operating in India. While a part of

the 2013 Act has already become effective.

2
0
2
01
13
2
1
2
000
9
8
An attempt has been made to reduce the content of the substantive portion of the related law in

the Companies Act, 2013 as compared to the Companies Act, 1956 (1956 Act). In the process,

much of the aforesaid content has been left, to be prescribed, in the Rules (340+) which are

Page | 1
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

yet to be finalised and notified. As of the date of this publication, 282 sections and 38 Rules

( which includes recently notified rule on 03.11.2014) have been notified and a few circulars

have been issued clarifying the applicability of these. Notification of Rule is still continued

even after passing the Act in August 2013.

This important legislation, that has been in the making for over 10 years, started off as an effort

in 2004 by the then government to make changes in Indian corporate law in the context of the

changing economic and business environment and to make Indian corporate environment more

transparent, simple and globally acceptable. Since then, as this legislation has taken final

shape, it has been influenced significantly by other recent developments in the corporate sector,

especially those where stakeholder interests seemed to be compromised. The erstwhile

Companies Act 1956 (the 1956 Act), which had been in existence for over fifty years,

appeared to be somewhat ineffective at handling some of these present day challenges of a

growing industry and the interests of an increasing class of sophisticated stakeholders.

Learning from these experiences, the 2013 Act promises to substantively raise the bar on

governance and in a comprehensive form purports to deal with relevant themes such as investor

protection and fraud mitigation, inclusive agenda, auditor accountability, reporting framework,

director responsibility and efficient restructuring.

Page | 2
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

OBJECTIVES
To understand the new Provisions of Company Act 2013

To understand the difference between provisions of Company Act 1956 and Company

Act 2013.

To understand how new Company can be formed and its operation.

To understand the benefits of Companies Act and its Cons.

To understand effect of Company Act on Business environment

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The study focuses on extensive study of Secondary data collected from various books, National

Journals (ICAI & ICSI), government reports, publications from various websites which focused

on various aspects of Company Act, 2013.

Page | 3
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

NEW CONCEPTS

One-person company:

The 2013 Act introduces a new type of entity to the existing list i.e. apart from forming a public

or private limited company, the 2013 Act enables the formation of a new entity a one-person

company (OPC). An OPC means a company with only one person as its member [section 3(1)

of 2013 Act].

Private company:

The 2013 Act introduces a change in the definition for a private company, inter-alia, the new

requirement increases the limit of the number of members from 50 to 200. [section 2(68) of

2013 Act].

Small company

A small company has been defined as a company, other than a public company. (i) Paid-up

share capital of which does not exceed 50 lakh INR or such higher amount as may be prescribed

which shall not be more than five crore INR (ii) Turnover of which as per its last profit-and-loss

account does not exceed two crore INR or such higher amount as may be prescribed which shall

not be more than 20 crore INR:

Dormant company:

The 2013 Act states that a company can be classified as dormant when it is formed and

registered under this 2013 Act for a future project or to hold an asset or intellectual property and

has no significant accounting transaction. Such a company or an inactive one may apply to the

Page | 4
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

ROC in such manner as may be prescribed for obtaining the status of a dormant company.

[Section 455 of 2013 Act]

Class Action Suit

A class action or a class suit is a lawsuit that allows a large number of people with a common

interest in a matter to sue or be sued as a group. The concept is common in developed countries

such as the US, UK and Singapore but has till now, not existed in the Indian Law. The

provision of class suit gives stakeholders an edge in retrenching their rights.

Mergers and acquisitions

The 2013 Act has streamlined as well as introduced concepts such as reverse mergers (merger of

foreign companies with Indian companies) and squeeze-out provisions, which are significant.

The 2013 Act has also introduced the requirement for valuations in several cases, including

mergers and acquisitions, by registered valuers.

Corporate social responsibility

The 2013 Act makes an effort to introduce the culture of corporate social responsibility (CSR)

in Indian corporates by requiring companies to formulate a corporate social responsibility policy

and at least incur a given minimum expenditure on social activities.

Officer

The definition of officer has been extended to include promoters and key managerial personnel

[section 2(59) of 2013 Act].

Page | 5
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

Key managerial personnel

The term key managerial personnel has been defined in the 2013 Act and has been used in

several sections, thus expanding the scope of persons covered by such sections [section 2(51) of

2013 Act].

Promoter

The term promoter has been defined in the following ways: A person who has been named as

such in a prospectus or is identified by the company in the annual return referred to in Section

92 of 2013 Act that deals with annual return; or who has control over the affairs of the

company, directly or indirectly whether as a shareholder, director or otherwise; or in

accordance with whose advice, directions or instructions the Board of Directors of the company

is accustomed to act.

The proviso to this section states that sub-section (c) would not apply to a person who is acting

merely in a professional capacity. [section 2(69) of 2013 Act]

Independent Director

So far only listed public companies were required to appoint independent directors under the

listing Agreement. Companies Act, 2013 extend such requirement to cover big public

companies also. The term Independent Director has now been defined in the 2013 Act, along

with several new requirements relating to their appointment, role and responsibilities. Further

some of these requirements are not in line with the corresponding requirements under the equity

listing agreement [section 2(47), 149(5) of 2013 Act].

Page | 6
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

Secretarial Audit

The companies Act 2013 provides for compulsory Secretarial Audit by Certain class of

companies and annexing the same with the Board Report. With the introduction of Secretarial

Audit, the scope of already existing compliance certificate stands widened. The Board of

Directors also has to explain in its Board report to every qualification, reservation or adverse

remark or disclaimer made by the Company Secretary in his Secretarial Audit Report.

Page | 7
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

IMPORTANT CHANGES /HIGHLIGHTS OF

COMPANY ACT, 2013

Following are some of important changes / highlights of Company Act, 2013.

1. Setting up of a company

2. Share capital and debentures

3. Reporting Framework (Annual Accounts)

4. Higher Auditors Responsibility

5. Wider Director and Management Responsibility

6. Corporate social responsibility

7. Investor Protection

8. Compromises, arrangements and amalgamations

9. Revival and rehabilitation of sick companies

Page | 8
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

Setting up of a company

The 2013 Act specifies the mandatory content for the memorandum of association which is

similar to the existing provisions of the 1956 Act. However, as against the existing

requirement of the 1956 Act, the 2013 Act does not require the objects clause in the

memorandum to be classified between the main object of the company and other company.

The 2013 Act introduces the entrenchment provisions in respect of the articles of association of

a company. An entrenchment provision enables a company to follow a more restrictive

procedure than passing a special resolution for altering a specific clause of articles of

association. A private company can include entrenchment provisions only if agreed by all its

members or, in case of a public company, if a special resolution is passed.

Where a company has changed its name in the last two years, the company is required to paint,

affix or print its former names along with the new name of the company on business letters,

bill heads, etc. However, the 2013 Act is silent on the time limit for which the former name

needs to be kept.

The 2013 Act mandates inclusion of declaration to the effect that all provisions of the 1956 Act

have been complied with, which is in line with the existing requirement of 1956 Act.

Additionally, an affidavit from the subscribers to the memorandum and from the first directors

has to be filed with the ROC, to the effect that they are not convicted of any offence in

connection with promoting, forming or managing a company or have not been found guilty of

any fraud or misfeasance, etc., under the 2013 Act during the last five years along with the

complete details of name, address of the company, particulars of every subscriber and the

persons named as first directors. The 2013 Act further prescribes that if a person furnishes

Page | 9
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

false information, he or she, along with the company will be subject to penal provisions as

applicable in respect of fraud i.e. section 447 of 2013 Act.

The existing provisions of the 1956 Act as set out in section 149 which provide for requirement

with respect to the commencement of business for public companies that have a share capital

would now be applicable to all companies:

The 2013 Act imposes additional restriction on the alteration of the object clause of the

memorandum for a company which had raised money from the public for one or more objects

mentioned in the prospectus and has any unutilised money.

The 2013 Act includes a new section to enable the issue of depository receipts in any foreign

country subject to prescribed conditions [section 41 of 2013 Act]. Currently, the provisions of

section 81 of the 1956 Act relating to further issue of shares are being used in conjunction

with the requirements mandated by SEBI for the issuance of depository receipts. In several

aspects across the 2013 Act, it appears that the 2013 Act supplements the powers of SEBI by

incorporating requirements already mandated by SEBI.

The 2013 Act includes a new section under which members of a company, in consultation with

the board of directors, may offer a part of their holding of shares to the public. The document

by which the offer of sale to the public is made will be treated as the prospectus issued by the

company. The members shall reimburse the company all expenses incurred by it.

Share capital and debentures

Page | 10
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

The provisions of 2013 Act regarding voting rights are similar to the existing section 87 of

the 1956 Act. The only change noted in the 2013 Act is the removal of distinction provided

by the 1956 Act with respect to the entitlement to vote in case the company fails to pay

dividend to its cumulative and non-cumulative preference share holders.

The 2013 Act restricts the application of securities premium for a certain class of companies

if they fail to comply with the accounting standards. The 2013 Act continues to state that

securities premium amount can be utilised for purpose of writing off preliminary expenses.

Companies would no longer be permitted to issue shares at a discount. The only shares that

could be issued at a discount are sweat equity wherein shares are issued to employees in lieu

of their services.

The 2013 Act reiterates the existing requirement that a company cannot issue preference

shares with a redemption date of beyond 20 years. However, it gives an exemption for cases

where preference shares have been issued in respect of infrastructure projects.

The existing requirement of section 81 of the 1956 Act in regard to further issue of capital

would no longer be restricted to public companies and would be applicable to private

companies also. Further, the 2013 Act provides that a rights issue can also be made to the

employees of the company who are under a scheme of employees stock option, subject to a

special resolution and subject to conditions as prescribed. Further, the price of such shares

should be determined using the valuation report of a registered valuer, which would be

subject to conditions as prescribed.

The 2013 Act includes a new section that provides for issue of fully paid-up bonus shares

out of its free reserves or the securities premium account or the capital redemption reserve

account, subject to the compliance with certain conditions such as authorisation by the

Page | 11
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

articles, approval in the general meeting and so on. However Section 23 does not permit

private companies to issue bonus shares.

Reporting Framework (Annual Accounts)

Mandatory requirement for Consolidated Financial Statement (CFS)

Page | 12
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

The 2013 Act mandates preparation of consolidated financial statements for all companies that

have one or more subsidiaries. These would be in addition to the separate financial statements

and are required to be prepared in the same form and manner as the separate financial

statements. For the purpose of this requirement, the word subsidiary would include associate

companies and joint ventures. Currently preparation of consolidated financial statements is

mandatory only for listed companies under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)

regulations. Preparation of consolidated financial statements now required under the 2013 Act

would pose significant challenges for unlisted and private limited companies, who would be

preparing consolidated financial statements for the first time.

Revision in Financial Statement

Under the 1956 Act, companies are generally not permitted to revise or restate financial

information presented in their financial statements. Material misstatements in the accounts

related to previous years, whether due to occurrence of fraud or error are reported as a prior

period adjustment in the financial statements of the year / period in which such misstatements

are discovered. However as per New Act, if an order is passed by the court or tribunal to the

effect the relevant earlier accounts were prepared in fraudulent manner, re-opening of accounts

can be done. Further, If the Board feels that the financials or the Report do not comply with

the applicable provisions of clause 129 or 134, they may revise the aforesaid in respect of any of

the three preceding financial years after obtaining approval of the Tribunal.

Financial Year to be uniform

The 2013 Act also requires all companies to adopt a uniform financial year of 1 April to 31

March with limited exception to a company which is a holding company or subsidiary of a

Page | 13
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

company incorporated outside which may be required to follow a different financial year for

consolidation outside India.

Changes in Depreciation regulation

Schedule II to the 2013 Act requires systematic allocation of the depreciable amount of an asset

over its useful life unlike Schedule XIV of the Act (which specifies minimum rates of

depreciation to be provided by a company). The depreciable amount is defined as the cost of an

asset, or other amount substituted for cost, less its residual value. Useful life may be

considered as a period over which an asset is available for use or as the number of production or

similar units expected to be obtained from the asset by the entity. Amortisation of intangible

assets should be in accordance with notified accounting standards and is not specified in the

2013 Act.

Mandatory Internal Audit

Class/classes of companies to be prescribed in this behalf to mandatorily appoint an internal

auditor who shall be a chartered accountant or a cost accountant or such other professional as

may be decided by the Board. The objective of introduction of this requirement is to strengthen

the system of internal controls in the wake of allegations of recent corporate frauds.

Internal financial controls reporting

Page | 14
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

The 2013 Act also requires the Directors Report for listed companies and Auditors Report for all

companies to comment on whether the company has adequate internal financial controls system

in place and operating effectiveness of such controls.

Other Important Provisions

Companies permitted to keep books of account or other relevant papers in electronic mode in

the prescribed manner. The draft rules add that such electronic books shall remain accessible in

India for future reference.

Annual financial statements of every company (except one person company, small company or

dormant company) to include a cash flow statement also.

The existing regulatory regime governing transfer of a specified percentage of profits to

reserves before declaring dividends dispensed with. However, declaration of dividends out of

reserves to be subject to rules as may be prescribed. Companies will be allowed to declare

dividends out of their current profits even when they have substantial accumulated losses of

earlier years.

Higher Auditor Accountability

Page | 15
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

Auditor Appointment and Rotation

As per the 2013 Act, instead of the present provision of appointment from one AGM to the next,

individual or a firm to be appointed as auditor for a five-year term. Change of auditors before

the five year term would require special resolution after obtaining the previous approval of the

Central Government. Further the auditor concerned would have to be given a reasonable

opportunity of being heard. However the appointment has to be ratified at every AGM. If the

appointment is not ratified, it appears that the process for change of auditor would have to be

followed.

Listed companies or companies belonging to such class of companies as may be prescribed

cannot appoint or reappoint an audit firm (including an LLP) as auditor for more than two

consecutive terms of five years each (in case of an individual there would be one term of five

years).

Non-audit services

Company Act, 2013 provides Prohibition on auditor rendering specified non-audit services to

the auditee company/ its subsidiary/holding company e.g. accounting and book keeping

services, internal audit, design and implementation of any financial information system,

investment advisory services, investment banking services, management services etc.

Auditors report

The reporting requirements have been extended. Further, the Central Government, in

consultation with National Financial Reporting Authority, may direct inclusion of specified

matters for specified class/description of companies. As per the Act, the auditor has to report:

Where the company has failed to provide any information and explanations, the details of the

same and their effect on financial statements.

Page | 16
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

Whether the company has adequate internal financial controls in place and the operating

effectiveness of such controls.

Observations or comments on financial transactions or matters which have any adverse effect

on the functioning of the company.

Any qualification, reservation or adverse remark relating to the maintenance of accounts and

other matters connected therewith (this is in addition to the assertion relation to maintenance of

proper books of account).

Reporting on Fraud

If in the course of performance of his duties as auditor, the auditor has reason to believe that an

offence involving certain fraud is being or has been committed against the company by officers

or employees, the matter should be reported to the Central Government within the prescribed

time and manner.

Auditing standards

Auditing standards have been given legal recognition under the Act which requires that every

auditor shall comply with the auditing standards notified by Central Government. The Central

Government may prescribe the standards of auditing as recommended by the Institute of

Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), in consultation with and after examination of the

recommendations made by the National Financial Reporting Authority

National Financial Reporting Authority

An independent authority, viz. National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) to be constituted

to make recommendations to Central Government on formulation and laying down of

accounting and auditing policies and standards, monitor and enforce compliance therewith and

Page | 17
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

oversee the quality of service of relevant professions. NFRA has been vested with quasi judicial

powers to investigate matters of professional or other misconduct (as defined in CA Act) by

chartered accountants for such class of bodies corporate or persons as may be prescribed. At

present matters relating to professional or other misconduct are handled by the Institute of

Chartered Accountants of India. The new provisions would raise a number of practical issues

apart from questioning the validity of the concept that a professional should be judged by his

peers.

Wider Director and Management Responsibility

The 2013 Act increases the limit for number of directorships that can be held by an individual

from 12 to 15 [section 149(1) of 2013 Act].3. One director to be resident in India. Every

Page | 18
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

company shall have at least one Director who has stayed in India for a total period of not less

than 182 days in the previous calendar year.

In prescribed class or classes of companies, there should be 1 women director.

One of the significant aspects of the 2013 Act is the effort made towards incorporating some

of the salient requirements mandated by the SEBI in clause 49 of the listing agreement in the

2013 Act itself. To this effect, the 2013 Act requires every listed public company to have at

least one-third of the total number of directors as independent directors.

The 2013 Act includes Schedule IV Code for Independent Directors (Code) which broadly

prescribes the conduct for independent directors.

In order to discourage inappropriate practices, the 2013 Act states that any person who fails

to get elected as a director in the general meeting can no longer be appointed as an additional

director by the board of directors

The requirements relating to audit committees was first introduced by the Companies

(Amendment) Act, 2000. As per the 2013 Act, the audit committee should have majority of

independent directors. Chairman of the audit committee need not be an independent

director. A majority of the members of the audit committee should be financially literate, i,e.

should have the ability to read and understand the financial statements.

Company Act, 2013 provides for mandatory constitution of Nomination and Remuneration

Committee and Stakeholders Relationship Committee for prescribed companies.

The 2013 Act prescribes similar requirements with respect to the disclosure of interest by the

director as contained in the existing section 299 of the 1956 Act. The only change that could

be identified is where a contract or arrangement entered into by the company without

Page | 19
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

disclosure of interest by director or with participation by a director who is concerned or

interested in any way, directly or indirectly, in the contract or arrangement, shall be voidable

at the option of the company.

Every company belonging to such class of description of companies as may be prescribed

shall have MD or CEO or Manager and in their absence, a WTD and a Company Secretary.

Individual not to be the Chairman of the Co. as well as the MD or CEO of the Co. at the

same time.

The 2013 Act provides for mandatory appointment of following whole time key managerial

personnel for every listed company and every other company having a paid-up share capital

of five crore INR or more*:

(i) Managing director, or chief executive officer or manager and in their absence, a

whole-time director

(ii) Company secretary

(iii) Chief financial officer

Corporate social responsibility

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) had introduced the Corporate Social

Responsibility Voluntary Guidelines in 2009. These guidelines have now been incorporated

within the 2013 Act and have obtained legal sanctity. Section 135 of the 2013 Act, seeks to

Page | 20
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

provide that every company having a net worth of 500 crore INR, or more or a turnover of

1000 crore INR or more, or a net profit of five crore INR or more, during any financial year

shall constitute the corporate social responsibility committee of the board.

As per Section 135 of the Act, companies with a specified net worth or turnover or net profit

are required to mandatorily spend 2 percent of average net profits of last 3 years to be spent

on CSR activities, otherwise reason for not spending to be given in Board's Report.

Under the draft CSR rules, net profit is defined to mean net profit before tax as per books of

accounts and shall not include profits arising from branches outside India.

Every qualifying company needs to constitute a CSR committee of the Board consisting of 3

or more directors.

The mandate of the said CSR committee shall be:

To formulate and recommend a CSR policy to the Board;

To recommend amount of expenditure to be incurred on CSR activities;

To monitor the CSR policy of the company from time to time.

The Board of every qualifying company is required to hold following responsibilities:

To approve the CSR policy recommended by the CSR committee and disclose the

contents of such policy in its report and place it on companys website;

To ensure the CSR activities are undertaken by the company;

To ensure 2 percent spending on CSR activities;

Page | 21
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

To report CSR activities in Boards report and disclose non-compliance (if any) with

the CSR provisions.

The draft CSR rules provide the format in which all qualifying companies shall

report the details of their CSR initiatives in the Directors report and in the

companys website

Activities which may be considered as eligible CSR spend are provided in Schedule VII of

the Act. The specified activities are as under:

Environment sustainability

Empowering women and promoting gender equality

Education

Poverty reduction and eradicating hunger

Social business projects

Reducing child mortality & improving maternal health

Improvement of health

Imparting of vocational skills

Contribution towards Central & State Government funds for socioeconomic

development and relief

Such other matters as may be prescribed

The companies shall give preference to the local area and area around it where it operates for

spending the amounts earmarked for CSR activities.

Page | 22
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

CSR projects / programs may also focus on integrating business models with social and

environmental priorities and processes in order to create shared value.

CSR activities shall not include activities exclusively for the benefit of employees and their

family members.

Companies may also collaborate or pool resources with other companies to undertake CSR

activities.

Investor Protection

The Companies Act, 2013 has made significant amendments vis--vis related party

transactions making this a significant focus area. The responsibilities are rather onerous with

strict consequences in cases of non-compliance.

Page | 23
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

The transactions of a company with its related parties which are not in the ordinary course of

business and which are not arms length would require the consent of the Board of Directors

of the Company.

The scope of related Parties transactions has widened which now includes leasing of

property, appointment of agent for the sale or purchase, related partys appointment to any

office or place of profit in the company, its subsidiary or associate company.

Provisions relating to caps on inter corporate loans and investments extended to include loan

to any person. The rate of interest on inter corporate loans not to be lower than the prevailing

yield of one year, three year, five year or ten year Government security closest to the tenor of

the loan.

Loans (as also guarantees/securities in respect thereof) and investments by a private company

or by a holding company to or in its wholly owned subsidiary would also be covered by the

provisions.

The concept of class action suits introduced empowering a specified number of shareholders

and depositors to take legal action in case of any fraudulent action by the company or if the

affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the

company or its members or depositors. Class actions suits have been prevalent in US,

Australia and some EU countries. The provision is a significant step towards protecting

shareholders and depositors.

Specific definition of fraud has been introduced. Fraud includes any act, omission,

concealment of any fact or abuse of position committed by any person, with intent to

deceive, to gain undue advantage from, or to injure the interests of, the company or its

Page | 24
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

shareholders or its creditors or any other person, whether or not there is any wrongful gain or

wrongful loss.

Compromises, arrangements and amalgamations

The 2013 Act features some new provisions in the area of mergers and acquisitions, apart

from making certain changes from the existing provisions. While the changes are aimed at

simplifying and rationalising the procedures involved, the new provisions are also aimed at
Page | 25
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

ensuring higher accountability for the company and majority shareholders and increasing

flexibility for corporate.

The section dealing with compromises and arrangements, deals comprehensively with all

forms of compromises as well as arrangements, and extends to the reduction of share capital,

buy-back, takeovers and corporate debt restructuring as well. Another positive inclusion

within this section is that objection to any compromise or arrangement can now be made only

by persons holding not less than 10% of share holding or having an outstanding debt

amounting to not less than 5% of the total outstanding debt as per the latest audited financial

statements

The current procedural requirements in case of a merger and acquisition in any form are quite

cumbersome and complex. There are no exemptions even in the case of mergers between a

company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The 2013 Act now introduces simplification of

procedures in two areas, firstly, for holding wholly owned subsidiaries and secondly, for

arrangements between small companies (section 233 of the 2013 Act). Small companies is a

new category of companies, introduced within the 2013 Act, with defined capital and

turnover thresholds, which has been given certain benefits, including simplified procedures.

The 1956 Act, allows the merger of a foreign company with an Indian company, but does not

allow the reverse situation of merger of an Indian company with a foreign company. The

2013 Act now allows this flexibility, with a rider that any such mergers can be effected only

with respect to companies incorporated within specific countries, the names of which will be

notified by the central government. With prior approval of the central government,

companies are now allowed to pay the consideration for such mergers either in cash or in

depository receipts or partly in cash and partly in depository receipts as agreed upon in the

scheme of arrangement. (section 234 of the 2013 Act). These new provisions can be greatly

Page | 26
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

beneficial to Indian companies which have a global presence by providing them structuring

options which do not exist currently.

The 2013 Act has introduced new provisions for enabling the acquirer of a company (holding

90% or more shares) by way of amalgamation, share exchange, etc to acquire shares from the

minority holders subject to compliance with certain conditions. This has also introduced the

requirement for registered valuers, since the price to be offered by majority shareholder

needs to be determined on the basis of valuation by a registered valuer (section 236 of the

2013 Act).

Revival and rehabilitation of sick companies

Chapter XIX of the 2013 Act lays down the provisions for the revival and rehabilitation of

sick companies. The chapter describes the circumstances which determine the declaration of

a company as a sick company, and also includes the rehabilitation process of the same.

Although it aims to provide comprehensive provisions for the revival and rehabilitation of
Page | 27
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

sick companies, the fact that several provisions such as particulars, documents as well as

content of the draft scheme in respect of application for revival and rehabilitation, etc. have

been left to substantive enactment, leaves scope for interpretation.

The coverage of Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 (SICA) is limited to only industrial

companies, while the 2013 Act covers the revival and rehabilitation of all companies,

irrespective of their sector. The determination of whether a company is sick, would no longer

be based on a situation where accumulated losses exceed the net worth. Rather it would be

determined on the basis whether the company is able to pay its debts. In other words, the

determining factor of a sick company has now been shifted to the secured creditors or banks

and financial institutions with regard to the assessment of a company as a sick company.

The 2013 Act does not recognise the role of all stakeholders in the revival and rehabilitation

of a sick company, and provisions predominantly revolve around secured creditors. The fact

that the 2013 Act recognises the presence of unsecured creditors, is felt only at the time of the

approval of the scheme of revival and rehabilitation. In accordance with the requirement of

section 253 of the 2013

Act, a company is assessed to be sick on a demand by the secured creditors of a company

representing 50% or more of its outstanding amount of debt under the following

circumstances:

The company has failed to pay the debt within a period of 30 days of the service of the

notice of demand

The company has failed to secure or compound the debt to the reasonable satisfaction of

the creditors

Page | 28
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

To speed up the revival and rehabilitation process, the 2013 Act provides a one year time

period for the finalisation of the rehabilitation plan.

SHORTCOMINGS IN THE NEW COMPANIES BILL

After more than 10 years of discussions, drafting and delays, and five different ministers

heading it, the government has been able to replace the 57-year-old law with new definitions

and a host of other things. However, there are certain shortcomings in the New Bill which can

be read as follows:

Page | 29
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

1. Independent directors: There are pitfalls in the provision of Independent Directors for three

reasons. Firstly, how independent can Independent Directors be when they are appointed and

paid for by the promoters? Will promoters appoint truly independent people on boards?

Secondly, are there enough persons available to be appointed as Independent Directors? Once

the prospective person is told about the responsibilities he will have to bear, the actual

number of competent and willing Independent Directors diminishes. Most Independent

Directors diminish; in fact, end up adorning corporate boards without the time or

commitment to work in the interests of shareholders. Third, if eligible Independent Directors

end up taking up 20 directorships each, how can they really serve each of those companies

shareholders diligently? To sum it up, although the concept of Independent Directors is

good, corporate governance will need to have a heavy dose of regulation.

2. Corporate social responsibility: The New Companies Bill makes no effort whatsoever to

define CSR. The only obligation is to set aside the funds, form a committee, formulate a CSR

policy, and spend the cash. If members dont spend the money, they will have to explain the

reason for not doing it in the annual report.

3. Excessive bureaucracy: In order to make directors accountable, the new Companies Bill

mandates that every director shall register himself or herself with the government and obtain

a Director Identification Number (DIN). Like the UID, which is supposed to give every

Indian resident a unique identity and prevent fraud, the DIN will enable the government to

monitor the number of directorships any person holds and also his/her track record.

Considering Indias track record, where bureaucratic supervision of corporate affairs more

Page | 30
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

often than not leads to corruption and bribery, how many directors will want to risk being on

the governments watch list? Will DIN discourage more competent people from taking up

directorships or encourage them?

4. Class action suits: The best new provision in the Companies Bill is the enabling of tort

action and class action suits. The most important point is whether shareholders of

government-owned companies can sue the government for squashing minority interests. It is

worth recalling that Coal India has been sued by a minority shareholder (The Childrens

Investment Fund) for following the governments diktat to lower coal prices in 2012. There is

plentiful scope for class action suits against ONGC, Oil India and GAIL, which are

subsidizing losses in the oil marketing companies. Class action suits have to be filed before

the National Company Law Tribunal first, but banking companies are excluded from such

action.

CONCLUSION

The new Companies Act 2013 is a welcome step. It is more stringent and requires strict

compliance by corporate sector. The non compliance or irregularity in compliances may

attract heavy penalties. The Companies Act, 2013 marks a paradigm shift in Indias corporate
Page | 31
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

law regime, and has far reaching implications for both domestic Indian companies and

overseas investors with a presence in India. Some provisions, however, continue to remain

inoperative and are likely to be made effective by the Indian government in due course. This

piece makes it easier to understand the changes in the 2013 Act that affect multinational

corporations having Indian companies or those looking to make investments in India.

REFERENCES

Helps from M/s. Ankit Chokshi & Co., A Chartered Accountant Firm

Website of Ministry of Corporate Affairs

Page | 32
 Study of newly enacted Company Act, 2013

Journal of ICSI as well as ICAI

Report of PWC Firm on Company Act, 2013

Report of KPMG on Company Act, 2013.

Page | 33