Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
The case study will analyze the aspects of the integrating electronic medical records for a
medical practice. This author will discuss the concept of Pay-for-Performance, advantages and
limitations of cost-benefit analysis for IT adoption decisions, IT readiness for a group practice,
and challenges and incentives that small practices face in regards to implementing an electronic
planning, development, and impact of electronic medical records (EMR) on Dryden Family
Medicine (DFM). Their implementation of an EMR from their primarily paper-based system
and the transition that occurred for the practice will be discussed. The practice started as a small
medical practice, but as the practice grew, there needed to be changes to the methods of keeping
up with patient medical records and the practice adopted an EMR system.
Pay-for-Performance
Pay-for-Performance (P4P) is an umbrella term for initiatives aimed at improving the
quality, efficiency, and overall value of health care (HealthAffairs.org, 2012). These types of
initiatives have started to provide financial incentives to hospitals, physicians, and health care
providers in order to make improvements and achieve optimal outcomes for patients and their
health. With the Affordable Care Act expanding the use of P4P, especially with Medicare and
Medicaid, eligible providers and hospitals started implementing and starting to meet certain
quality metrics. DFM decided on a subset of 30 of these metrics to focus and report on. They
received a bonus payment for meeting the reporting standards during 2007. Having the concept
of P4P, it is encouraging medical practices to set up their practices in order to meet the
requirements and earn monetary incentives are definitely a huge advantage to the system. One of
INTEGRATING EMR 3
the focuses of this case study looks at how DFM was able to adopt the EMR system, and what
decisions. One of the advantages of adopting an IT system was that the billing system was easily
integrated into the new system. The electronic billing function had to work correctly the first
time, because the practice could not afford disruptions in its revenue stream (ONeill &
Klepack, 2010). Though they saw success with the billing system, there was pressure from the
start relying on the success of the new system. The office manager of the practice took on the
role of IT support person because they could not afford to hire an outside consultant. So the
office manager acted as the internal consultant, who would answer day-to-day IT questions,
they would then train others in the office. By doing this, the office was able to save in revenue
costs.
One of the limitations was that they had no experience in dealing with EMR systems, as
ONeill and Klepack (2010) discussed that picking the wrong vendor could destroy the
continuity of the patients medical record, incur significant additional costs, and disrupt patient
care and staff functions. The loss of revenue that would occur if the wrong vendor were chosen
been many disadvantages. The practice would not be able to maintain the workflow in
comparison to those who had adopted an EMR system. Other practices would be able to
communicate with others via electronically and they would still be trying to fax and mail their
patients records, which are always a hassle, disrupting patient care and workflows.
Prescriptions would have to be called in, lab orders would be done through paper forms. As their
patients started to get older and come with more health issues, the size of their paper records
INTEGRATING EMR 4
increased day by day due to their chronic health problems, which required complete
documentation. Keeping track of patient records also would have kept being an issue for the
group practice decides to implement EMR system. One of the major milestones would be to
pick a vendor to work with in implementing the EMR. They would have to look at the vendor
and how they did with the following criteria: service, support, and system reliability; product
culture; and finally, cost. A factor that tends to arise when it comes to IT, would be for the end
users to be prepared for a system that could take time and effort to learn. The staff would all
have to agree that moving to an EMR system would be the best option in regards to patient care,
as well improving workflow. For medical staff or providers who were not onboard with the
transition, this could cause some resistance in implementing and following through with the
effectiveness and thoroughness that an EMR system has with patient care.
Incentives
There could a lessened incentive or different set of challenges for smaller practices to
take on HMIS project like that of EMR implementation than a large-scale health service
organizations. When smaller practices are faced with the issue of taking on EMR system, cost
would be huge factor. Implementation of such a system requires a lot of money and time to
invest. Money would be needed in order to shop and research vendors; train staff; time that
would take away from patient care; IT issues that could occur. Those are some of the challenges
that could occur, even when monetary incentives brought forth with Affordable Care Act and the
Meaningful Use objectives. Some smaller practices may not see the incentives as much as to
bring on so much more responsibilities and hassle of taking on the challenge of implementing a
INTEGRATING EMR 5
EMR system. Where as large-scale organizations would be able to afford such an endeavor and
EMR system. The advantages and disadvantages of working with an EMR system were
explored. Cost of adopting an EMR was explored, as well as IT readiness. Coming from a
background of working a huge healthcare organization, the exposure to EMR has been extensive
as well as enlightening. From personal experience, paper records were such a hassle from
releasing records and having to carry laboratory requests to labs, where everyone waited around
for almost more than hour. Working with electronic medical records has made my job easier, as
well as fun, now that the knowledge has been obtained as to how and why healthcare must move
References
James, J. (2012, October 11). Health Policy Brief: Pay-for-Performance. Health Affairs.
Management at Dryden Family Medicine. In J. Tan, & F.C. Payton (Eds.). Adaptive
cases, and practical applications. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.