Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.1INTRODUCTION
Nondestructive inspection (NDI) methods used for this purpose [1] include, among
others, visual examination, eddy current inspection, x-ray and ultrasonic inspection, and more
recently, neutron radiography. Although each of these inspection methods can successfully
detect subsurface corrosion and cracks, they all have limitations.
Conventional visual examinations can detect large surface-breaking cracks or extensive
Corrosion induced "bulging" or "pillowing" of visible surfaces. However, this method generally
cannot detect small surface-breaking cracks or tiny surface displacements associated with
subsurface cracks or areas of corrosion where no pillowing occurs. Furthermore, even in areas
of significant pillowing, other reliable easy-to-use NDI methods must still be used to verify the
existence of corrosion.
Conventional eddy current and ultrasonic methods are essentially point-contact
inspection methods, which significantly limits inspection speed and makes these methods very
tedious. Through-transmission x-ray and neutron radiography inspections have limited
applicability because the source and receiver of radiation must be on opposite sides of the
inspection surface. A notable exception to this constraint is the successful, but relatively
expensive, x-ray backscatter technique. Detection of flaws before they propagate to the point of
causing failure, as occurred in the Aloha Air-lines incident in 1986 (Hendricks, 1991), is
essential. However, detailed visual inspection of aircraft is extremely time-consuming and
expensive, as it requires removal of the aircraft skin. Aircraft inspection costs currently exceed
$1billion per year. Considering the aging of the military and commercial aircraft. An urgent
need exists to develop rapid and effective non-destructive inspection (NDI) technologies to
detect flaws, such as hidden and inaccessible corrosion, cracks, disbanding, and voids in
aircraft.
Several NDI techniques are being pursued, including the following:
Eddy current and other electromagnetic techniques, such as magneto-optic imaging (e.g.
Thome et al.,1996) and magneto resistive sensing (e.g. Boltz et al.,1999)acoustic emission and
ultrasonics (e.g. Chahbaz etal., 1999)thermography (e.g. Davis, 1996)electrochemical methods
(e.g. Davis et al., 1999) and X-ray techniques, including transmission radiography (e.g. Birt et
al., 1994), and the limited-scan backscatter approach (Yacout et al., 1997).Advantages of the
limited-scan technique include the facts that it is capable of detecting flaws under multiple skin
layers (at least as deep as 0.635 cm, or 0.250in., in aluminum), it can be applied on composite
skins (where electromagnetic techniques fail), it does not require surface preparations (such as
application of acoustic coupling compounds required in Ultrasonic techniques), it reduces to a
single-figure-of-merit (unlike more subjective imaging techniques, such as thermography), and
it requires access toonly one surface (unlike transmission radiography and some electrochemical
techniques).[1]
Marvin Lasser et al.[2007] studied NDE of hidden flaws in aging aircraft structures using
obliquely backscattered ultrasonic signals in that technique Backscattering is induced by
discontinuities, which are present along the path of a traveling wave, with surface normal to the
direction of the incident wave. This technique has been investigated for various wave
interactions with discontinuities, including surface roughness, inclusions and various internal
flaws.
William L. Dunn, Abdelfatah M. Yacout [2000] studied Corrosion detection in aircraft by X-
ray backscatter methods in that method Corrosion leads to chemical (oxidation) and density
changes, both of which affect X-ray scatter and absorption. Thus, the backscattered response
from a collimated X-ray source scanning in discrete steps across a portion of the surface of an
aircraft.
R. P. Dalton et al. [2000] studied the potential of guided waves for monitoring large areas of
metallic aircraft fuselage structure in that where sealant layers are greater than about 1mmthick,
all modes have attenuation greater than 40dB / m. The work presented has also demonstrated
the problem of frequency-thickness sensitivity when transmitting guided waves across aircraft
skin joints, owing to the generation and interference of twinned carrier modes.
D. Tuzzeo et al. [2004] studied noncontact air-coupled guided wave ultrasonic for detection of
thinning defects in aluminum plates the inspection system is based on a pair of gas (air)-coupled
transducers for the generation and the detection of plate guided waves. The dispersive behavior
of such waves is utilized to detect plate thinning simulating hidden corrosion. By controlling the
signal frequency and phase velocity, those propagating modes most effective for the inspection
can be selected. Mode cutoff, frequency shifts, group velocity changes, and time-of-flight
changes are examined as features of the wave dispersive behavior that are sensitive to plate
thinning. In particular, it is shown that mode cutoff provides qualitative detection of the defects,
while peak frequency tracking allows quantification of thinning depth. Similarly, the group
velocity of certain plate modes excited in sensitive ranges is highly dependent on thinning depth
and can be used for its quantification. Finally, wave time-of-flight measurements are shown to
be sensitive to thinning length.
1.4 Objectives
The objectives of study are
i. To study corrosion detection in materials by using ultra Sonics guided wave .
ii. To find causes of corrosion in different materials.
iii. To find remedial action against corrosion in different materials
1.5HIDDEN CORROSION
1.6.1 Ultrasonic
Ultrasonic NDE offers the potential for a cost effective methodology for inspection of
hidden corrosion in large and sometimes difficult to access areas, such as insulated piping. The
field of guided waves has reached some degree of maturity, but unfortunately the number of
practical applications compared to the number of research papers is rather small. Guided waves
can be used in three regimes, depending on inspection distance:
Short range (<< 1 m)
Medium range (up to about 5 m)
Long range (up to around 100 m)
The short range methods include high frequency surface wave scanning with Rayleigh waves,
leaky lamb waves, and acoustic microscopy in which a leaky surface wave is generated by the
lens. The medium range methods typically use frequencies in the 250 kHz to 1 MHz range and
are applicable to plate, tube and pipe testing. The long range method generally uses long range
frequencies below 100 kHz, and the primary advantage is that it allows a large area to be tested
from a single transducer location without tedious scanning. Long range testing, which has the
greatest potential utility in field-testing, is usually carried out in the pulse echo mode.All of the
successful applications of long range guided wave testing to date have been on structures within
low feature density. This means that the coherent noise produced by multiple reflections
between different features is modest. However, it would be valuable to be able to test more
complex structures, such as aircraft fuselages, where the spacing between stiffeners is typically
less than 300 mm. Some initial work has been done on propagation in this type of complex
structure. [1]
the sample using a probe coil. The same probe coil or another detector then measures the
materials response to the induced eddy currents. Defects cause a perturbation in the eddy
currents, and this can be detected by a change in impedance or phase variation in the detecting
circuit. In the past, eddy current NDE was limited in detecting hidden corrosion to very shallow
depths by the lack of penetrating capability of the eddy currents. However, over the last several
years there have been several notable advances in eddy current NDE stemming from research to
detect hidden corrosion and other types of defects. When combined with magneto resistive
sensors, eddy currents can be used to detect corrosion in second and third layers in aircraft lap
joints.[1] High performance magneto resistive sensors are much more sensitive than standard
pick up coils used in conventional eddy current NDE, and they operate at much lower
frequencies. Their low frequency range and linear response to frequency allows for much
greater depth of inspection than with conventional eddy current NDE that operate at higher
frequencies.
Fig. 4. Two Energy Coupling Paths in a Remote Field Eddy Current Probe for Pipe
Testing.
defects diverts the eddy current from its uniform flow, and hence generates a normal magnetic
field component, which can be measured using Faradays magneto-optic effect. A magneto-optic
sensor, placed parallel to the eddy current induction foil, is excited by a linearly polarized light.
The plane of polarization undergoes rotation by an angle that depends on the local magnetic
field intensity, and the specific Faraday rotation of sensor material. Perturbations in the
magnetic field are monitored by analyzing rotation in light polarization. Commercially available
system [4] was first developed by Physical Research Inc. PRI, before purchasing the MOI
technology, recently, by Quest Integrated, Inc [1]. The system included CCD video camera
mounted on the imager, and the signal is directed to head-mounted display such that the
inspector would monitor, on-line, defects inside the metal. Sample of MOI inspection images of
a crack-free site, and a rivet with cracks in its site. [1]
1.6.7Thermography
Passive thermography is a well-known and accepted technique for the detection of
defect working parts in the electronic industry or for the discovering of heat losses of houses [1-
3].The specific of passive thermography is the measurement of the heat distribution on the
surface without any active impact of additional heat. The infrared-camera (IR-camera) observes
during the passive measurement the radiation heat of the surface under inspection. The incident
radiation will be converted by the detector into electronic signals and can be displayed as an IR-
image on a monitor or can be stored for further image processing on a computer. Using modern
highly sensitive IR-cameras, temperature differences of a few hundred degrees (about 0,015 C)
can be observed and measured.
between 50 and 1000 V to produce the ultrasonic wave. The figure below depicts the
ultrasonic wave, carried from the transducer to the unit under test (UUT) by a couplant
typically water, oil, or gel and is reflected back to the transducer by both external surfaces and
internal defects. Generating and detecting ultrasonic waves requires an ultrasonic transducer.
Piezoelectric ceramics within ultrasonic transducers are struck similar to the way tuning
forks are struck to generate an audible note with electricity, typically between 50 and 1000 V
to produce the ultrasonic wave. The figure below depicts the ultrasonic wave, carried from the
transducer to the unit under test (UUT) by a couplant typically water, oil, or gel and is
reflected back to the transducer by both external surfaces and internal defects. [5]
When operating in pulse-echo mode, ultrasonic transducers act as both emitters and
receivers. The reflected ultrasonic waves vibrate the piezoelectric crystal within the ultrasonic
transducer and generate voltages that are measurable by data acquisition hardware. When
operating in through-transmission mode, two ultrasonic transducer are used; one transducer
generates the wave and the other receives the wave. In a typical application, the ultrasonic
transducer is struck with a high-voltage pulse, which lasts to the order of 5s and then the
system listens for the echoes. The system listens to the order of 10 to 15s. Even in the most
advanced systems, the transducers are pulsed every 500s.The most primitive method to
analyze the reflected ultrasonic signals is time-of-flight (TOF) display, or A-scan.
Discontinuities that are closer to the ultrasonic transducer are received sooner than those further
away from the transducer. The graph depicts the TOF display from the previous example. The x-
axis on the A-scan is not typically units of time but is converted to distance. This conversion is
accomplished by measuring, or looking up, the speed of sound through the material that the
ultrasonic wave is traveling through and performing the conversion. Although there area few
exceptions, the speed of sound through a material is governed largely by the density and
elasticity of the material. For most materials, the speed of sound within homogenous material is
easy to research and find. Most ultrasonic nondestructive test applications range from 400 kHz
to 25 MHz the frequency of the ultrasonic sensor is chosen based on several factors including
detectable flaw size, depth of penetration and grain size of the material. Materials made of fine-
grained material, such as metals, permit deep penetration by ultrasonic waves of all frequencies.
However, coarse grained material, including many plastics, scatter high-frequency ultrasonic
waves. The higher the frequency, the smaller the flaws the system detects, but the depth of
penetration decreases. [5]
monitor the high-power voltage to the transmitter and the position of the user-defined integrator
windowing gate.
Two types of aluminum corrosion specimens have been used in the guided wave
experimental work. The in-plane dimensions of the plates were 250 mm 250 mm. The
thickness was equal to 1.524 mm (0.06 in.) for the first plate and 2.286 mm (0.09 in.) for the
second one. Three thickness recesses simulating corrosion at different depths were engineered
in both plates by machine cutting. The in-plane dimensions of the defects were 40 mm 40 mm
with depths equal to 5%, 10%, and 20% of the plate thickness. Figure 6 shows the overall
dimensions and the positions of the defects along with a picture of one of the test plates. Two
additional 20% thinning defects with in-plane dimensions 10 mm 40 mm and 25 mm40 mm
were engineered in the 1.524-mm-thick plate. These two defects were created to study the effect
of thinning length
Fig. 6. Dimensions and locations of simulated 5%, 10%, and 20% hidden corrosion defects
the test aluminum plates.
1.9CASE STUDY
Because of the frequency-thickness dependence of guided wave modes, there is a
possibility of detecting corrosion or erosion thinning of structures with guided waves. In
particular, at least three types of features can be considered in the testing: the wave mode cutoff
phenomena; time delay and group velocity changes; and transmission and reflection amplitudes.
All of these methods offer the potential to inspect corrosion-induced thinning in structures, such
as aircraft skin, chemical tanks, piping, ship hulls, and any other plate- or shell-like structure.
For different problems, there are different advantages or disadvantages of the guided wave
approaches. It is therefore wise to compare the different methods and to select the best features
for a specific problem.
Two types of aluminum corrosion specimens have been used in the guided wave experimental
work:
Plates with simulation corrosion prepared by machine cutting, as shown in Fig. 7: The corroded
zone surfaces are smooth and the depths are made at 5%, lo%, and 20% of the plate thickness,
respectively. Two sheets with different thicknesses, I .62mm and 2.16mm, were used.
Real corrosion plates prepared by controlling an electrochemical procedure, as shown in Fig. 8:
Artificial seawater (ASTM Standard DI 12) was applied, and the specimens were subjected to
static over potentials for 12 h at a current density of 1.4 pA/cm2. The corrosion depths were
randomly distributed from 0.02 to 0.1 mm in the corrosion zone with an average depth
measured being around 4%of the thickness. A non-uniform corrosion zone was also
deliberately made on the similar aluminum sheet, and the average depth changes were from 0.02
to 0.27 mm along the transverse direction of the sheet. Generally, the corroded zones have
rough surfaces.
Fig. 7. Corrosion simulation specimens: (a) 1.62 mm and (b) 2.16 mm.
Fig.9. Zone in the 1.62-mm plates at a 2.25-hlHz pulse excitation and 15" incidence.
Guided wave transmission RFs and FFh for both without (a,b) and with (c,d) the 5%
corrosion
It can be seen from the received signal spectrum distributions that some wave modes
were cut off as waves traversed the corrosion zone. To accurately locate the cutoff frequencies,
we used a tone-burst system sweeping the frequency to generate the modes to be cut off by the
corrosion. Figures 11. And12show the time domain results for such waveforms at a frequency
below the cutoff values for the machined segments in both1.62- and 2.16-mm specimens. From
the phase and group velocity dispersion curves, the modes in the former specimen can be
identified as A3 and S5. and the modes in the latter specimen as S3 and S4, respectively.
Fig.10.zone in the 2.16-mm plates at a 5.0-MHz pulse excitation and 15" incidence.Guided
wave transmission RFs and FFTs for both without (a,b) and with (c,d) the 5% corrosion
Fig.11. Transmission RFs of A3 (a,c) and S5 (b,d) modes at 25" incidence and 4.39 and
6.37hlHz,respectively, for the 1.62-mm plates without and with the 5% corrosion zone .
With this method, almost all mode cutoff phenomena in a certain range of interesting fd
values were observed, except for the SO and A0 modes. Similar results have also been obtained
for the 10 and 20% corrosion simulation specimens and are omitted here for abbreviation. The
cutoff fd values for Lamb waves can be determined analytically from the Rayleigh-Lamb
equation by simply setting the wave number to be zero. For symmetric modes it gives:
fd= CL/2,3CL/2,5CL/2,. . .
Where CL are the longitudinal and shear wave velocities of the material
Fig.12. Transmission RFs of S3 (a,c) and S4 (b,d) modes at 15" incidence and 2.9 and 4.32
kHz,respectively, for the 2.16-mm plates without and with the 5% corrosion zone.
Fig.13.RF of the SO mode at 1.75 MHz for the 10% corrosion simulation specimen
showing the group velocity measurement by changing the spacing (AS = 60 mm) of the
sender and receiver, measuring the time delay AT of the received waveforms.
suitable for the shallow corrosion in thin plates, and at different phase velocities the same mode
shows different sensitivity and feasibility to corrosion detection.
Fig.14.Transmission RFs and FFTs of the guided waves through a corrosion zone with
depth changed from 0.02 to 0.27 mm in the I .62-mm plate at a 2.25-MHz pulse excitation
and 15" incidence. Note the different scales in the FITS.
numerical simulation for different modes under different conditions or by experiments with
different receivers. We prefer the former method, because we believe that it is more general and
leads as well to improvements in saving time and cost.
Here we neglected all of the evanescent modes because the connecting cross sections between
the left and middle segments and between the middle and right segments were selected far away
from the defects compared to the guided wave length. The BE simulation also provides
information on how the transmission and reflection amplitudes vary with the corrosion depth as
well as the frequency used. It should be pointed out that the BEM calculation did not include the
guided mode generation and reception procedures(the procedure of ultrasonic waves from the
transducer to the wedge and from the wedge to the plate, or vice versa), so we will not match
here the BEM results to the experimental results that were obtained with the wedge transducers.
1.10 CONCLUSIONS
Many features can be used to evaluate the hidden corrosion-caused thinning in structures
with guided waves. However, for different problems, specific selection and optimization should
be made to obtain the most sensitive and feasible features. Generally, higher order modes at
high phase velocities show better sensitivity over lower order modes, but they are only applied
to short distances and require strict contact conditions. For the group velocity method, to
decrease the measurement errors due to the waveform spreading in the time domain, modes
should be excited at the relative no dispersive points on the mode dispersion curve. When using
the mode cutoff and frequency compensation method, it should be remembered that the received
waveforms will not just depend on the thickness frequency product, but also on the thickness as
well as the frequency independently. This means that one can recover the mode by increasing
the frequency, which is close to its original shape but not exactly the same.
The transmission and reflection amplitudes will also serve as good features for estimating
the corrosion depths if an accurate standard calibration can be made by a simple experiment or
by an effective numerical method such as the hybrid BEM used in this work. The effects of the
corrosion zone length on the received guided waves are important for the corrosion length
estimation, but they will not discuss here. In general, compared to the bulk wave methods,
guided wave methods are more global in nature and may provide a broad possibility for mode
control and feature selection. The features developed hereon mode cutoff, group velocity, and
reflection and transmission factors could be used to establish a robust feature vector for use in
pattern recognition analyses if required in certain situations.
REFERENCE
[1] George A. Matzkanin 1,H Thomas Yolken 2,Non-destructive evaluation technique for
corrosion detection
[2] R. P. Dalton 1, P. Cawley 2, and M. J. S. Lowe 3,The Potential of Guided Waves for
Monitoring Large Areas of Metallic Aircraft Fuselage Structure Journal of Nondestructive
Evaluation, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2001.
[3] D. Tuzzeo and F. Lanza di Scalea, Noncontact Air-Coupled Guided Wave Ultrasonics for
Detection of Thinning Defects in Aluminum Plates, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation,
Vol. 13, No. 2, 2001, pp. 61-77
[4] Y. Bar-Cohen, A.K. Mal and M. Lasser, NDE of Hidden Flaws in Aging Aircraft Structures
Using Obliquely Backscattered Ultrasonic Signals (OBUS), The SPIE Conference on
Nondestructive Evaluation of Aging Aircraft, Airports, and Aerospace Hardware III, Vol. 3586,
1999, pp. 347-353
[5] Sudhanshu Shekhar, Online Non Destructive Evaluation of Large Pipe Lines and
Cylindrical Structures using Guided Ultrasonic Waves
[6] W. Zhu, J. L. Rose , J. N. Barshinger & V. S. Agarwal (1998) Ultrasonic Guided Wave NDT
for Hidden Corrosion Detection, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation,10:4, 205-225
[7] I.N. Komsky, Ultrasonic Imaging of Hidden Defects Using Dry-coupled Ultrasonic
Probes, Health Monitoring and Smart Nondestructive Evaluation of Structural and Biological
Systems V, edited by Tribikram Kundu, Proc. of SPIE,Vol. 61770M, 2006
[8] Meftah Hrairi and Nurul Farahana Zuhudi. Ultrasonic Techniques for Detection of
Thinning Defects in Metal Plates 3rd Engineering Conference on Advancement in Mechanical
and Manufacturing for Sustainable Environment April 14-16, 2010, Kuching, Sarawak,
Malaysia