Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract: A simplified method is presented in this paper for the estimation of forces at the base of telecommunication
towers mounted on building rooftops due to seismic excitation. Although some codes and standards propose simplified
methods for the evaluation of base shear forces for towers founded on ground, no method yet exists for the evaluation
of overturning moments. The proposed simplified method is based on numerical simulations using truncated modal
superposition, which is widely used for seismic analysis of linear structures. The method requires the prediction of input
seismic acceleration at the buildingtower interface, the definition of an acceleration profile along the building-mounted
tower, and the determination or evaluation of the mass distribution of the tower along its height. The method was developed
on the basis of detailed dynamic analyses of three existing towers assumed to be mounted separately on three buildings.
It was found that the method yields conservative results, especially for the overturning moments.
Key words: self-supporting towers, earthquake, horizontal excitation, dynamic analysis, acceleration, modal superposition.
Rsum : Cet article prsente une mthode simplifie destimation des forces agissant la base de pylnes de tlcommunication
installs sur les toits dimmeubles et causes par une excitation sismique. Alors que certains codes et normes proposent
des mthodes destimation simplifies des forces de cisaillement la base pour les pylnes autoportants installs sur le
sol, aucune mthode nexiste encore pour lvaluation des moments de renversement. La mthode simplifie propose est
base sur des simulations numriques utilisant une superposition modale tronque qui est couramment utilise pour lanalyse
sismique de structures linaires. La mthode requiert la prdiction de lacclration sismique linterface immeuble-pylne,
la dfinition dun profil dacclration le long et la dtermination de la distribution de la masse du pylne le long de sa
hauteur. La mthode a t dveloppe en se basant sur lanalyse dynamique dtaille de trois pylnes existants prsums
tre installs sur trois immeubles existants. La mthode a produit des rsultats conservateurs, particulirement pour les
moments de renversement.
Mots-cls : pylnes autoportants, sisme, excitation horizontale, analyse dynamique, acclration, superposition modale.
[Traduit par la Rdaction] Assi and McClure 1363
Can. J. Civ. Eng. 34: 13521363 (2007) doi:10.1139/L07-061 2007 NRC Canada
Assi and McClure 1353
by the Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) govern the tower design, then a detailed dynamic analysis of
and mounted on a building rooftop during the 1968 Off- the buildingtower combination would become necessary
Tokachi earthquake in Japan. Sato et al. (1984) analyzed the for a more accurate assessment of internal forces and base
data from strong-motion accelerographs in selected build- reactions.
ings owned by the NTT in Japan. They studied the input
seismic force to be used for the design of appendages, par-
ticularly telecommunication towers, and found that a maxi- Method of analysis
mum acceleration amplification of 4 at the rooftop was
appropriate. A drawback of their study was that they aver- The proposed method is based on numerical simulations
aged the amplifications calculated for the two main horizon- using truncated modal superposition analysis to determine
tal directions, considering that the structural system may be the maximum forces in the tower legs at the buildingtower
different in both principal directions of the buildings and interface. Three-dimensional (3D) finite element models for
consequently affect their response. Hiramatsu et al. (1989) three towers assumed to be mounted on three buildings were
reported the continuation of this investigation of the seismic generated using the SAP2000 software (Computers and
response of NTT telecommunication equipment mounted on Structures, Inc.) (Wilson and Habibullah 2003). Elastic time
building rooftops. In general, their results agreed with the history modal superposition analysis was performed for each
earlier observations of Sato et al. buildingtower combination. The 20 lowest frequency modes
There have been unofficial reports of tower damage incurred were considered, and a uniform viscous damping ratio of 3%
during the 1994 Northridge earthquake in California, involving critical was used for all modes, which is a common practice
mostly localized damage in the vicinity of antenna mounts for bolted steel lattice structures (Madugula 2002). Two of
(Madugula 2002). Similar localized damage was reported by the modeled buildings are located in Taiwan, and the third is
Pierre (1995) following a visit to Japan after the Hanshin located in downtown Montral, Quebec, Canada. The models
Awaji (Kobe) earthquake that occurred on 17 January 1995. of the Taiwanese buildings were calibrated using floor accel-
Kanazawa and Hirata (2000) developed a seismic response erations recorded during the 1999 Chi Chi earthquake, and
spectrum method for the analysis of secondary systems while the fundamental periods were extracted by system identifica-
considering the dynamic interactions between the primary tion techniques using the same accelerograms (Assi 2006).
and secondary structures and the transient response effects. The model of each buildingtower combination was sub-
To evaluate their proposed method, the researchers performed jected to two sets of earthquake records applied to both prin-
cipal horizontal directions (U1 and U2) of the buildings.
timehistory analyses on a buildingtower model consisting
of a tower mounted on a single-degree-of-freedom primary
system. A similar approach had been developed at McGill Description of the buildingtower combinations
University by Khedr (1998) and Khedr and McClure (2000) for Some geometric details of the buildings and towers along
steel lattice towers on firm ground and subjected to both with a brief overview of the main finite element modeling
horizontal and vertical earthquake accelerations, but their assumptions are presented in the following sections. The
method is not applicable to towers mounted on rooftops or earthquake records applied to the base of the buildings are
other flexible supporting structures. In a preliminary study, also described.
McClure et al. (2004) used numerical simulations to explore
the correlation between the building accelerations and the Buildings
maximum seismic base shear as well as the base overturning Geometric properties of the three buildings studied are
moment of towers mounted on building rooftops. This study given in Table 1, and their isometric and facade elevation
was the precursor of the research reported in Assi (2006). views are shown in Figs. 13. The lateral load resisting
This paper presents a simplified, accurate, and yet easy to system (LLRS) is either a reinforced concrete frame system
implement static method for the analysis of telecommunica- (frame) or a moment-wall system (dual). Detailed 3D elastic
tion towers mounted on building rooftops and subjected to models of the three buildings were generated in SAP2000.
earthquake excitation. The purpose of this method is to pro- Rigid floor slabs were assumed, and the columns, beams,
vide tower designers a tool to quickly determine the seismic and walls were modeled in detail. The mass of nonstructural
forces on telecommunication towers mounted on building components and finishing was distributed to columns and
rooftops, namely the tower base shear force and overturning walls according to their tributary area. Table 2 summarizes
moment. In design, these seismic effects can then be com- the lowest periods of vibration obtained for the building
pared to those of other environmental loads like wind and models, corresponding to the fundamental sway modes and
ice. If this preliminary assessment indicates that seismic loads the torsional mode.
Fig. 1. Isometric and facade elevation views of building CHYBA9, Fig. 2. Isometric and facade elevation views of building CHYBA4,
Tainan, Taiwan. FL, floor. Numbers indicated on elevation view Jia-Yi, Taiwan. Numbers indicated on elevation view denote labels
denote labels of the various sensors. of the various sensors.
Table 2. Natural periods (T1, T2) of the building models. Fig. 5. Finite element mesh of the tower models: (a) tower TC1;
(b) tower TC2; (c) tower TC3.
T1, sway T2, sway T2, torsion
Building mode (s) mode (s) mode (s)
CHYBA9 0.30 0.26 0.17
CHYBA4 0.41 0.31 0.23
2020 University 2.00 1.90 1.36
Table 6. Characteristics of magnitudedistance (MR) scenarios considered for Montral, Quebec, Canada.
Record 1 Record 2
Magnitude, Epicentral PGA PGV PGA PGV Duration Return period
M distance (km) (g) (m/s) (g) (m/s) (s) (years)
6.0 30 0.430 0.170 0.520 0.150 8.89 2500
6.0 50 0.240 0.072 0.190 0.084 8.89 2500
7.0 50 0.510 0.190 0.630 0.290 12.39 2500
7.0 70 0.300 0.140 0.290 0.160 12.39 2500
7.0 100 0.240 0.150 0.260 0.210 20.56 2500
5.5 30 0.180 0.047 0.190 0.045 20.56 475
6.0 50 0.240 0.072 0.190 0.084 20.56 475
7.0 150 0.130 0.079 0.130 0.086 20.56 475
7.0 200 0.084 0.072 0.087 0.067 24.08 475
7.0 300 0.042 0.042 0.040 0.040 24.08 475
5.5 50 0.069 0.022 0.083 0.028 23.08 75
6.0 70 0.045 0.015 0.045 0.018 23.08 75
7.0 100 0.039 0.015 0.035 0.015 5.83 75
7.0 200 0.084 0.072 0.087 0.067 5.83 75
7.0 300 0.042 0.042 0.040 0.040 12.39 75
Note: PGA, peak ground horizontal acceleration; PGV, peak ground horizontal velocity.
The prediction of the tower acceleration profile a(x) is the base shear force, Vbase, and the base overturning moment,
key factor in this method. It was found that the acceleration Mbase, using the proposed method:
amplification profile along a telecommunication tower
mounted on a building rooftop matches reasonably well its l l
fundamental mode shape when mounted on a rigid base. [1] Vbase = Vx dx = m(x)a(x) dx
Equations [1] and [2] provide the basis for evaluating the 0 0
Fig. 6. Concept of the proposed simplified method. Mbase, overturning moment at the base of the telecommunication tower calculated
according to the proposed simplified method; SRSS, modal combination method using the square root of sum of squares; Vbase, base
shear force at the base of the telecommunication tower calculated according to the proposed simplified method; x, position of tower
section along elevation.
where Vx is the shear force distribution along the tower; Fig. 7. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC1 mounted
l l on building CHYBA9, U1 direction. The prefixes H, M, and L
in Figs. 724 denote high, medium, and low a/v ratios, respec-
[2] M base = Vx x dx = m(x)a(x)x dx
tively; and 2%, 10%, and 50% denote probabilities of exceedance
0 0
of 2%, 10%, and 50% in 50 years.
Fig. 8. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC1 mounted Fig. 11. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC3
on building CHYBA9, U2 direction. mounted on building CHYBA9, U1 direction.
Fig. 9. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC2 mounted Fig. 12. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC3
on building CHYBA9, U1 direction. mounted on building CHYBA9, U2 direction.
Fig. 10. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC2 Fig. 13. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC1
mounted on building CHYBA9, U2 direction. mounted on building CHYBA4, U1 direction.
Fig. 14. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC1 Fig. 17. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC3
mounted on building CHYBA4, U2 direction. mounted on building CHYBA4, U1 direction.
Fig. 15. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC2 Fig. 18. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC3
mounted on building CHYBA4, U1 direction. mounted on building CHYBA4, U2 direction.
Fig. 16. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC2 Fig. 19. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC1
mounted building CHYBA4, U2 direction. mounted on building 2020 University, U1 direction.
Fig. 20. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC1 Fig. 23. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC3
mounted on building 2020 University, U2 direction. mounted on building 2020 University, U1 direction.
Fig. 21. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC2 Fig. 24. Acceleration amplification profiles of tower TC3
mounted on building 2020 University, U1 direction. mounted on building 2020 University, U2 direction.
Table 7. Calculated tower acceleration amplification factors in Table 10. Proposed tower accel-
principal horizontal directions U1 and U2 for tower TC1 on eration amplification factors for
three buildings. towers mounted on stiff buildings
(T < 0.5 s).
U1 U2
Amplification Amplification Tp /T Amplification factor
Building Tp /T factor Tp /T factor 00.6 1.0
CHYBA9 1.43 0.40 1.24 0.80 0.91.1 4.0
CHYBA4 0.92 3.32 1.21 1.43 1.2 1.0
2020 University 0.19 1.25 0.20 3.21
Note: T, fundamental period of the building; Tp, fundamental period of
the tower mounted on a rigid base. Fig. 25. Proposed and calculated tower acceleration amplification
factors versus Tp /T for towers mounted on stiff buildings (T <
0.5 s).
Table 8. Calculated tower acceleration amplification factors in
principal horizontal directions U1 and U2 for TC2 on three
buildings.
U1 U2
Amplification Amplification
Building Tp /T factor Tp /T factor
CHYBA9 0.72 1.09 0.62 0.60
CHYBA4 0.46 1.00 0.61 0.91
2020 University 0.09 2.12 0.10 2.75
Table 11. Verification of the simplified method for towers TC1, Conclusions
TC2, and TC3 mounted on building CHYBA9.
A simplified analysis method is presented for self-supporting
Mbase/Mf Vbase/Vf telecommunication towers mounted on building rooftops sub-
U1 U2 U1 U2 jected to seismic base excitation in the horizontal direction.
Tower m s m s m s m s The proposed method was verified by comparing the predic-
tions with the results of detailed numerical simulations of
TC1 1.36 0.28 1.26 0.20 1.72 0.40 1.50 0.27 nine buildingtower combinations subjected to 74 input ac-
TC2 0.98 0.08 0.98 0.08 0.97 0.07 0.99 0.08 celerograms applied to the two main building directions and
TC3 1.03 0.01 0.99 0.12 0.96 0.05 0.99 0.14 generated in the SAP2000 software. It was found that the
Note: Vbase and Mbase are calculated using the proposed method, and Vf method yields conservative results for the base shear forces
and Mf are obtained from numerical simulations. m and s, mean and stan- and overturning moments. It is suggested, however, that a
dard deviation of the calculated ratios, respectively.
detailed dynamic analysis be performed for flexible towers
mounted on high-rise buildings and for towers supporting
heavy attachments, especially in high-seismicity zones. In
Table 12. Verification of the simplified method for towers TC1, such situations, higher frequency modes of the building
TC2, and TC3 mounted on building CHYBA4. structure may excite higher modes of the tower structure.
The proposed simplified procedure will nonetheless give an
Mbase/Mf Vbase/Vf indication of the magnitude of the tower seismic base shear
U1 U2 U1 U2 and overturning moment.
Tower m s m s m s m s
TC1 0.99 0.08 1.17 0.19 1.04 0.11 1.30 0.18 Acknowledgments
TC2 0.99 0.10 0.97 0.06 1.11 0.13 1.04 0.05
TC3 1.08 0.25 1.04 0.05 1.12 0.20 0.94 0.08 Financial assistance from the Natural Sciences and Engi-
neering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the
Lebanese National Council for Scientific Research (LNCSR)
Table 13. Verification of the simplified method for towers TC1,
is gratefully acknowledged. We would also like to thank
TC2, and TC3 mounted on building 2020 University.
Professor George C. Yao of the National Cheng-Kung Uni-
versity in Taiwan and the Central Weather Bureau in Taiwan
Mbase/Mf Vbase/Vf for providing the instrumented building data. Financial sup-
U1 U2 U1 U2 port from the National Science Council in Taiwan (ROC) is
also acknowledged.
Tower m s m s m s m s
TC1 1.04 0.08 1.60 0.54 1.14 0.08 1.39 0.26
TC2 0.99 0.02 1.03 0.09 1.09 0.03 1.06 0.06 References
TC3 1.05 0.15 1.12 0.59 1.02 0.13 1.21 0.47 Adams, J., and Halchuk, S. 2003. Fourth generation seismic hazard
maps of Canada: values for over 650 Canadian localities
intended for the 2005 National Building Code of Canada. Geo-
logical Survey of Canada, Open File 4459.
are the base reactions calculated according to the proposed
ANSI/EIA/TIA. 2005. TIA-222-G: Structural standards for steel
simplified method. The mean and standard deviation of the
antenna towers and antenna supporting structures. Telecommu-
calculated ratios are given as m and s, respectively. It is nication Industries Association (TIA), Arlington, Va.
noted that each statistical parameter is based on 74 numeri- Assi, R. 2006. A simplified method for seismic analysis of tele-
cal results. communication towers mounted on building rooftops. Ph.D. thesis,
Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill
Discussion of the proposed simplified method University, Montral, Que.
The average values given in Tables 1113 indicate that the Assi, R., McClure, G., and Yao, G.C. 2005. Floor acceleration
proposed simplified method predicts higher values than those demands for 11 instrumented buildings in Taiwan during the
from the detailed calculation in most cases, so it is conserva- 1999 Chi Chi earthquake. In Structures 2005: Metropolis and
tive in the base forcemoment predictions. Moreover, the Beyond: Proceedings of the 2005 Structures Congress and the
2005 Forensic Engineering Symposium, New York, 2024 April
proposed method becomes more accurate as the fundamental
2005. [CD-ROM]. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE),
period of the tower decreases.
New York.
The small standard deviations between the predictions of Atkinson, G.M., and Beresnev, I.A. 1998. Compatible ground-motion
the different loading cases for each buildingtower combina- time histories for new national seismic hazard maps. Canadian
tion suggest that the method is suitable regardless of the Journal of Civil Engineering, 25(2): 305318.
frequency content of the input seismic excitations. It is also CSA. 2001. Antennas, towers and antenna-supporting structures.
noted that the method is more accurate for the calculation of Standard CSA S37-M01, Canadian Standards Association (CSA),
base overturning moments than for the calculation of base Toronto, Ont.
shear forces. This was also observed by McClure et al. Hiramatsu, K., Sato, Y., Akagi, H., and Tomita, S. 1989. Seismic
(2000) in relation to the predicted response of towers founded response observation of building appendage. In Proceedings of
on ground. the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo,
29 August 1988. Japan Association for Earthquake Disaster Pierre, J.R. 1995. Damage caused by the Hanshin-Awaji (Kobe-
Prevention, Tokyo. Vol. 6, pp. 237242. Japan) earthquake to electrical and telecommunication networks
ICC. 2000. International building code. International Code Council and its impact on the implementation of emergency measures.
(ICC), Falls Church, Va. Report RE-GEN-95-40, Hydro-Qubec, Montral, Que.
Kanazawa, K., and Hirata, K. 2000. Seismic analysis for telecom- SAA. 1994. AS 3995 (1994) Design of steel lattice towers and
munication towers built on the building. In Proceedings of the masts. Standards Association of Australia (SAA), Homebush,
12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New South Wales, Australia.
New Zealand, 30 January 4 February 2000. [CD-ROM]. New Sato, Y., Fuse, T., and Akagi, H. 1984. Building appendage seismic
Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Upper Hutt, New design force based on observed floor response. In Proceedings
Zealand. Paper 0534. of the 8th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,
Khedr, M. 1998. Seismic analysis of lattice towers. Ph.D. thesis, San Francisco, Calif., 2128 July 1984. Prentice Hall Inc.,
Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill Englewood Cliffs, N.J. pp. 11671174.
University, Montral, Que. Sewell, R.T., and Cornell, C.A. 1989. Factors influencing equip-
Khedr, M., and McClure, G. 1999. Earthquake amplification factors ment response in linear and nonlinear structures. In Proceedings
for self-supporting telecommunication towers. Canadian Journal of the Transactions of the 9th International Conference on Struc-
of Civil Engineering, 26(2): 208215. tural Mechanics in Reactor Technology. A.A. Balkema, Rotter-
Khedr, M., and McClure, G. 2000. A simplified method for seismic dam. Vol. K2, pp. 849856.
analysis of lattice telecommunication towers. Canadian Journal Tso, W.K., Zhu, T.J., and Heidebrecht, A.C. 1992. Engineering
of Civil Engineering, 27(3): 533542. implication of ground motion A/V ratio. Soil Dynamics and
Konno, T., and Kimura, E. 1973. Earthquake effects on steel tower Earthquake Engineering, 11: 133144.
structures atop buildings. In Proceedings of the 5th World Con- Wilson, E.L., and Habibullah, A. 2003. SAP2000 users manual.
ference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, 2529 July 1973. Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, Calif.
Ministry of Public Works, Rome, Italy. Vol. 1, pp. 184193.
Madugula, M. (Editor). 2002. Dynamic response of lattice towers List of symbols
and guyed masts. American Society of Civil Engineering,
Reston, Va. a peak ground acceleration (PGA)
McClure, G., Lapointe, M., and Khedr, M.A. 2000. Seismic behavior a(x) acceleration profile
of steel lattice telecommunication towers. In Behaviour of Steel l tower height
Structures in Seismic Areas: STESSA 2000: Proceedings of the m(x) tower mass per unit length at position x
3rd International Conference, Montral, Que. Edited by F.M. M magnitude
Mazzolani and R. Tremblay. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam. pp. 335 Mbase overturning moment at the base of the telecommunica-
337. tion tower calculated according to the proposed simpli-
McClure, G., Georgi, L., and Assi, R. 2004. Seismic considerations fied method
for telecommunication towers mounted on building rooftops. In Mf overturning moment at the base of the telecommunica-
Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engi- tion tower calculated in the numerical simulations
neering, Vancouver, B.C., 16 August 2004. [CD-ROM]. Cana- MJMA Japan Meteorological Agency scale
dian Association of Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C. ML local magnitude
Paper 1988. MS surface wave magnitude
Miranda, E., and Taghavi, S. 2003. Estimation of seismic demands R distance
on acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components in critical T fundamental period of the building
facilities. In Proceedings of the ATC-29-2 Seminar on Seismic Tp fundamental period of the component
Design, Performance, and Retrofit of Nonstructural Components v peak ground velocity (PGV)
in Critical Facilities, Los Angeles, 2324 October 2003. Applied Vbase base shear force at the base of the telecommunication
Technology Council (ATC), Redwood City, Calif. pp. 347360. tower calculated according to the proposed simplified
NRCC. 2005. National Building Code of Canada, Part 4 of Divi-
method
sion B. Institute for Research in Construction, National Research
Vf base shear force at the base of the telecommunication
Council Canada (NRCC), Ottawa, Ont.
tower calculated in the numerical simulations
NRCC. 2006. Users guide NBCC 2005 structural commentaries
(Part 4 of Division B). Commentary J. Design for seismic Vx shear force distribution along the tower
effects. Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes, x position of a section along its elevation
Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Coun- m mean
cil Canada (NRCC), Ottawa, Ont. s standard deviation