Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
The Song That Conquered the World
T
he first song I loved was my mothers. Each night, she would sit on
the left side of my bed and sing the same lullaby. Her voice was
sweet and small and shaped to fit inside a bedroom. On trips to
mymaternal grandparents house in Detroit, my Momi would sing the 1S
same tune in a lower register, with a scratchier timbre and German R
1L
HIT MAKERS
lyrics. I didnt know what the words meant, but I loved them for their
ancient mystery in the old house: Guten Abend, gute Nacht...
I used to think the song was a family heirloom. But in first grade,
at one of the first sleepovers in my Virginia hometown, a young friend
turned the dial on the small music box by his bed and digital chimes
tinkled to a familiar tune.
I learned that my mothers melody was not a family secret. It was
astonishingly common. There is a strong possibility that you have heard
it dozens oftimes, and perhaps thousands. It is Johannes Brahmss lul-
laby WiegenliedLullaby and good night, with roses bedight...
Millions of families all over the world have sung a version of
Brahmss lullaby to their children, every night, for more than a cen-
tury. It is one of the most common melodies in the Western Hemi-
sphere. Considering that a lullaby is sung every evening for hundreds
of days a year for several years in a childs life, there is real possibility
that Brahmss lullaby could be one of the most heard songs in the West-
ern Hemisphere, if not the world.
Wiegenlied is undeniably beautiful and simple and repetitive
all necessary elements of any song produced for infants from the throats
of tired parents. But a melody so universal is also a mystery. How did a
nineteenth-century German tune become one of the worlds most pop-
ular songs?
INTRODUCTION
In the summer of 1868, Brahms sent the family sheet music for the
lullaby with a note. Bertha will realize that I wrote the Wiegenlied for
her little one. She will find it quite in order... that while she is singing
Hans to sleep, a love song is being sung to her. The songs first major
performance came one year later, on December 22, 1869, in Vienna. It
was a huge commercial success. Brahmss publisher rushed to make
fourteen arrangements of the songthe most of any Brahms piece by
farincluding for four-part mens choir, three-part piano, the harp,
and the zither.
A lot of Brahmss melodies are beautiful, but Wiegenlied uniquely 1S
fits the standard structure that modern music listeners recognize in R
1L
3
HIT MAKERS
INTRODUCTION
HIT MAKERS
T his is a book about hits, the few products and ideas that achieve
extraordinary popularity and commercial success in pop culture
and media. The thesis of this book is that even though many number
one songs, television shows, blockbuster films, Internet memes, and
ubiquitous apps seem to come out of nowhere, this cultural chaos is
governed by certain rules: the psychology of why people like what they
like, the social networks through which ideas spread, and the econom-
ics of cultural markets. There is a way for people to engineer hits and,
equally important, a way for other people to know when popularity is
being engineered.
At its core, the book asks two questions:
These two questions are related, but they are not the same, and the
answer to the first has changed less over time than the answer to the
second. Products change and fashions rise and fall. But the architec-
ture of the human mind is ancient, and the most basic human needs
to belong, to escape, to aspire, to understand, to be understoodare
eternal. This is one reason why the stories of hits harmonize across
history and, as well see, both creators and audiences are forever replay-
ing the anxieties and the joys of past cultures.
One can find answers to both central questions in the story of the
Brahms Wiegenlied. Why did audiences immediately adore his lul-
1S laby? Perhaps its because many of them had heard the melody, or
R something like it. Brahms had borrowed a popular Austrian folk tune
1L
6
INTRODUCTION
and bedecked it with concert hall grandeur. His lullaby was an instant
success not because it was incomparably original, but because it offered
a familiar melody in an original setting.
Some new products and ideas slip into the well-worn grooves of peo-
ples expectations. In fifteen out of the last sixteen years, the highest-
grossing movie in America has been a sequel of a previously successful
movie (e.g., Star Wars) or an adaptation of a previously successful book
(e.g., The Grinch). The power of well-disguised familiarity goes far be-
yond film. Its a political essay that expresses, with new and thrilling
clarity, an idea that readers thought but never verbalized. Its a televi-
sion show that introduces an alien world, yet with characters so recog-
nizable that viewers feel as if theyre wearing their skin. Its a piece of
art that dazzles with a new form and yet offers a jolt of meaning. In the
psychology of aesthetics, there is a name for the moment between the
anxiety of confronting something new and the satisfying click of under-
standing it. It is called an aesthetic aha.
This is the first thesis of the book. Most consumers are simul-
taneously neophiliccurious to discover new thingsand deeply
neophobicafraid of anything thats too new. The best hit makers are
gifted at creating moments of meaning by marrying new and old, anx-
iety and understanding. They are architects of familiar surprises.
The Wiegenlied was a familiar surprise for its German audience.
But that alone didnt make it one of the most popular songs in the whole
Western Hemisphere. Without the wars that rocked central Europe in
the 1870s and 1880s, millions of Germans wouldnt have emigrated and
perhaps millions of children who know the song by heart today would
never have heard it. Brahmss musical genius gave the song its appeal.
But German emigration helped to give the lullaby its reach.
The way that ideas spread, both to groups of people and within
those groups, is deeply important and widely misunderstood. Most peo-
ple dont spend a lot of time thinking about all the songs, books, and 1S
products theyve never seen. But a brilliant article in an obscure journal R
1L
7
HIT MAKERS
goes unread, a catchy song with no radio play withers in obscurity, and
a moving documentary without a distribution deal can be doomed to
oblivion, no matter how brilliant. So the first question for people with
a new product is: How do I get my idea to my audience?
The Wiegenlied was played live only for several thousand peo-
ple. Yet today millions of people know the tune. The song spread far
beyond the shadow of the Vienna opera house, through families and
friendships and a variety of social networks around the world. So the
deeper question for people with a new product or idea is: How can I
make something that people will share on their ownwith the audi-
ence of my audience? There is no formula here. But there are some
basic truths about what brings people together and makes people
talklike why selling a dating app requires the opposite strategy of
selling a hipster fashion line, and why people share bad news with
friends and good news on Facebook. Making beautiful things is critical.
But understanding these human networks is equally essential for hit
makers.
Some people disdain distribution and marketing as pointless, bor-
ing, tawdry, or all three. But they are the subterranean roots that push
beautiful things to the surface, where audiences can see them. It is not
enough to study products themselves to understand their inherent ap-
peal, because quite often the most popular things are hardly what any-
body would consider the best. They are the most popular everywhere
because they are, simply, everywhere. Content might be king, but dis-
tribution is the kingdom.
INTRODUCTION
HIT MAKERS
INTRODUCTION
Talkies
and Indies Movie Tickets Per Capita, United States: 19292015
Enter the 40
Market The Great
End of WWII
Depression
35
30
Tickets Per Person
Paramount Decrees
25
TV Is Commercialized
20
15
10
2009
2005
2003
2007
2001
1949
1999
1943
1945
1969
2013
2015
1989
1965
1995
1963
1993
1959
1939
1983
1985
1929
1947
1997
1955
1967
1933
1987
1953
1935
1979
1937
1957
1977
1973
1975
2011
1941
1991
1961
1981
1951
1931
1971
vast ecosystem of live sports, both brilliant and formulaic dramas, and
endless reality shows. The most famous moviemaking corporations in
the world, like the Walt Disney Company and Time Warner, have for
years made more profit from cable channels like ESPN and TBS than
from their entire movie divisions. In the early twenty-first century,
every movie company is not so secretly in the television business.
But today television is merely the largest screen in a glittering
world of glass. In 2012, for the first time ever, Americans spent more
time interacting with digital devices like their laptops and phones than
with television. In 2013, the world produced almost four billion square
feet of LCD screens, or about eighty square inches for every living
human being. In developing regionslike China, Indonesia, and sub-
Saharan Africaaudiences skipped the era of desktops and laptops 1S
altogether and started with computers in their pockets. R
1L
11
HIT MAKERS
Television Radio
Newspaper Digital
90%
Magazines Mobile
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
o%
'30 '35 '40 '45 '50 '55 '60 '65 '70 '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 2000 '05 '10 '15
INTRODUCTION
cast television was live, ad supported, and aired once a week. This
made it a perfect home for dramas and crime procedurals that relied
on several cliffhangers per episode (to extend viewership through-
outthe commercials) and pat endings. But streaming television, which
is often commercial-free, rewards audiences who watch for several
hours at a time. People dont have to stop after one episode of House
of Cards on Netflix or Downton Abbey on Amazon Video; they can
watch as much as they want. Combining the aesthetic of film, the epi-
sodic nature of traditional television, and the binge potential of a
novel or Wagnerian opera, the near future of television isnt bound
bythe straitjacket of one-hour blocks. Its long-formor, perhaps,
any-form.
Meanwhile, smaller content is eroding television from the bottom.
In April 2013, Robby Ayala, a Florida Atlantic University senior, posted
several videos making fun of the campuss abundance of raccoons on
Vine, a defunct social network of six-second loops that, for millions of
young people, made for better television than television. When he
amassed more than one million followers a few months later, he dropped
out of law school and went to work for a Twitter-owned network for Vine
stars. He amassed 3.4 million followers and a billion total views of his
videos and earned a living by performing in sponsored posts for com-
panies like HP. Actors used to go to Los Angeles or New York because
those cities housed the gatekeepers who owned the distribution of
media. But now any person with a phone or computer could be next
weeks viral sensation. In this moment of gate-crashers and global at-
tention, anybody can be a hit maker.
Technology has always shaped entertainmentand our expecta-
tions of what sort of content is good. In the eighteenth century, audi-
ences who attended symphonies paid for a long evenings performance.In
the early twentieth century, the music industry moved into the business
of radio and vinyl. The first ten-inch vinyl records could comfortably 1S
hold about three minutes of music, which helped shape expectations R
1L
13
HIT MAKERS
that a modern pop single shouldnt be more than 240 seconds. Today, a
Vine is just six seconds.
Is six-second entertainment ludicrously brief? It isif you were
raised on Schubert, Brahms, and concert halls. Its notif you
were raised on Robby Ayala, Facebook, and the 3.5-inch screen of a
smartphone. For better and for worse, people tend to gravitate toward
the familiar, and technology shapes these familiarities.
The screens are getting smaller, and theyre also getting smarter.
We used to merely consume content. Now the content consumes us
tooour behaviors, our rituals, and our identities. Before the 1990s,
the music industry had no daily information on who was listening to
songs in their homes and on the radio. Today, every time you play a
song on your phone, the music industry is listening, too, and using your
input to guide the next hit. Facebook, Twitter, and digital publishers
have tools that tell them not only what story you click on, but also how
far you read and where you click next. We used to just play the hits;
nowthe hits play us back.
These smart devices have injected a measure of science into the
work of building hits and helping companies crack that ultimate code
for consumers and audiences: What do we pay attention to, and why?
A book that seeks to explain the tastes of billions of people and the
success or failure of millions of products is going to make some
assumptions that, while defensible in the aggregate, fail to account for
some exceptions. Ive tried to avoid making sweeping statements that
arent supported by a significant body of evidence. But taking great
care to avoid wrongness is not the same as always being right.
A few months before I started writing this book, I found two quotes
that I liked. I copied them to a note on my computer that I could always
1S see. They are the quotes at the beginning of this chapter.
R The first quote comes from Italo Calvinos book Invisible Cities. It
1L
14
INTRODUCTION