Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I N P I A G E T ' S THEORY OF
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT
by
in
THE U N I V E R S I T Y OF B R I T I S H C O L U M B I A
April, 1978
written permission.
Depa rtment
The U n i v e r s i t y o f B r i t i s h Columbia
2075 Wesbrook P l a c e
V a n c o u v e r , Canada
V6T 1W5
ABSTRACT
ACKNOWLE DGEMEN TS
I. STATEMENT OF THE P R O B L E M 1
a) Questions Concerning E q u i l i b r a t i o n 2
b) Methods o f Approach 2
III. STRUCTURALISM 8
a) Properties of Structures 9
b) Functioning of a Structure 14
IV. A P P L I C A T I O N OF S T R U C T U R A L I S M TO COGNITIVE
DEVELOPMENT 15
a) Structuralist Explanation of Cognitive ,
Development 16
b) T r a n s i t i o n From B i o l o g i c a l t o C o g n i t i v e
Functioning 17
V. E Q U I L I B R A T I O N AS A HYPOTHETICAL CONSTRUCT 19
a) Meaning 20
b) Fruitfulness 21
VI. B I O L O G I C A L AND C O G N I T I V E S E L F - R E G U L A T I O N 22
a) S e l f - r e g u l a t i o n by F u n c t i o n i n g 24
b) Regulation and C o g n i t i v e S t r u c t u r e s 27
VII. C O N S T R U C T I O N OF C O G N I T I V E STRUCTURES 31
a) Meaning o f Cognitive E q u i l i b r a t i o n 34
b) Mechanisms o f S e l f - r e g u l a t i o n 37
Page
CHART 1 39
CHART 2 40
1
I. S T A T E M E N T OF THE PROBLEM
to S i x P s y c h o l o g i c a l S t u d i e s , says that:
The p r i n c i p l e o f e q u i l i b r a t i o n w h i c h r e g u l a t e s
the i n t e r a c t i o n o f s o c i a l and m a t u r a t i o n a l factors
is essentially dialectical i n nature.'
I am e v e n u n c l e a r a s t o e x a c t l y w h a t p h e n o m e n o n g
e q u i l i b r a t i o n i s and i s n o t supposed t o d e n o t e .
2
b) Method of Approach
development, a n d how h e p u r p o r t s t o do s o .
theory.
4
is that a s t a g e c o n s t i t u t e a s t r u c t u r e d whole ( t h e r e w i l l be
b) Equilibration
B u t a r e we t o b e l i e v e t h a t a n o r g a n i s m w h i c h i s
a c t i v e a t every s t a g e of growth s h o u l d , upon
reaching the apex of i t s development, become^
a mere s l a v i s h i m i t a t o r o f i t s s u r r o u n d i n g s ? -'
some type o f o r g a n i z a t i o n .
III. STRUCTURALISM
a) Properties of Structures
says:
We s h a l l d e f i n e s t r u c t u r e i n t h e b r o a d e s t p o s s i b l e
sense as a system which p r e s e n t s the laws o r p r o -
p e r t i e s o f a t o t a l i t y s e e n a s a s y s t e m . 12
composition" of a square.
laws of composition.
T h e s e l a w s m u s t o f t h e i r v e r y n a t u r e be
s t r u c t u r i n g . . . a s t r u c t u r e ' s laws are defined
' i m p l i c i t l y ' i . e . , as g o v e r n i n g t h e t r a n s - 1 4
is called self-transformation.
b) Functioning of a Structure
tendency of a s t r u c t u r e . F o r example:
F u n c t i o n i s the a c t i o n e x e r t e d by t h e f u n c t i o n i n g
o f a s u b s t r u c t u r e on t h a t o f a t o t a l s t r u c t u r e ,
w h e t h e r t h e l a t t e r be i t s e l f a s u b s t r u c t u r e c o n -
t a i n i n g the former o f the s t r u c t u r e of the e n t i r e
organism. 0
structure. I n h a l i n g i s an example o f a b i o l o g i c a l a s s i m i l a t o r y
. . . i n an i n f a n t o f f i v e o r s i x months o l d , t h e
s e i z i n g o f t h i n g s by b o t h h a n d s i s an a s s i m i l a t i o n
schemata, but the s t r e t c h i n g out or b r i n g i n g nearer
o f t h e h a n d s a c c o r d i n g t o w h e t h e r an o b j e c t , i s n e a r
o r f a r i s an a c c o m m o d a t i o n o f t h a t schema.17
...of a f u n c t i o n may b e s a i d t o b e t h e a c t i o n
exerted by the f u n c t i o n i n g o f a s u b s t r u c t u r e on
that of t h e t o t a l s t r u c t u r e . . . o r g a n i z a t i o n as a
function i s the a c t i o n of t h e . e n t i r e functioning
on t h a t of the substructures.18^
structures.
17
actions but:
I n p r a c t i c e , we c a n a c k n o w l e d g e . . . t h a t i n t e n t i o n a l
a d a p t a t i o n b e g i n s as soon as t h e c h i l d transcentds
the l e v e l o f simple c o r p o r a l a c t i v i t i e s (sucking,
l i s t e n i n g and making sounds, l o o k i n g and grasping)
and a c t s upon t h i n g s and uses t h e i n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p s
of o b j e c t s . 2 1
the d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n means a n d e n d s .
19
What v a n i s h e s w i t h t h e b u r s t i n g o f i n s t i n c t i s
e x c l u s i v e l y the c e n t r a l o r median p a r t , that i s ,
t h e programmed r e g u l a t i o n , w h e r e a s t h e o t h e r two
realities persist: the source of organization
and t h e r e s u l t a n t s o f i n d i v i d u a l o r p h e n o t y p i c .
adjustment. T h u s i n t e l l i g e n c e d o e s i n h e r i t some-
t h i n g from i n s t i n c t a l t h o u g h i t r e j e c t s i t s method
o f programmed r e g u l a t i o n i n f a v o u r o f c o n s t r u c t i v e -
autoregulations. 2 2
calls equilibration.
V. EQUILIBRATION AS A H Y P O T H E T I C A L CONSTRUCT
mechanism o f c o g n i t i v e self-regulation. As a s t r u c t u r a l
structures.
a) Meaning
is m a i n t a i n e d by mechanisms o f r e g u l a t i o n , o r regulatory
b) Fruitfulness
and s t r u c t u r a l .change.
22
autoregulations.
a) Self-regulation by Functioning
is n o t t h e same a s a m e c h a n i s m o f s e l f - r e g u l a t i o n . There
self-regulation:
S t r u c t u r a l r e g u l a t i o n i s t h a t w h i c h o c c u r s when
the m o d i f i c a t i o n brought-about i s e i t h e r a n a t o m i c a l
o r h i s t o l o g i c a l , whereas, f u n c t i o n a l r e g u l a t i o n h a s
an i n f l u e n c e o n l y o n t h e e x e r c i s e o f p h y s i o l o g i c a l
r e a c t i o n o f t h e organs.24
compens a t i o n .
structures.
itself i s limited.
motor s t a g e o p e r a t e s i n an e n v i r o n m e n t defined by b i o l o g i c a l
28
be resolved.
We s u g g e s t t h a t t h e . e q u i l i b r i u m . . . w h i c h i s brought
a b o u t by l o g i c o - m a t h e m a t i c a l s t r u c t u r e s c o n s t i t u t e s
a s t a t e - m o b i l e . a n d d y n a m i c , a n d , a t t h e same t i m e
s t a b l e - a s p i r e d t o u n s u c c e s s f u l l y b y the- succession
of forms, at l e a s t where b e h a v i o u r forms are concerned,
throughout the course of the e v o l u t i o n of organized
c r e a t u r e s ?7
form of organization.
30
A c t i o n s c h a r a c t e r i z e d by t h e i r v e r y g r e a t g e n e r a l i t y . . .
they are also reversible...(and) are never i s o l a t e d
but capable of b e i n g coordinated i n t o o v e r a l l systems.28
regulation is obtained.
. . . i f i ti s t h e s t r u c t u r e s which e x p l a i n e q u i l i -
b r a t i o n , o r i fon t h e c o n t r a r y t h e s t r u c t u r e s
can be i n t e r p r e t e d as t h e p r o d u c t o r r e s u l t o f
a process o f e q u i l i b r a t i o n . 3 0
look a t t h e mechanisms o f s t r u c t u r a l c o n s t r u c t i o n .
of c o g n i t i v e s t r u c t u r e s , t h e r e must be r e a s o n to believe
vary.
33
construction:
. . . i n b e i n g c o n s t a n t l y r e g u l a t e d by e q u i l i b r a t i o n
r e q u i r e m e n t s , (a s e l f - r e g u l a t i o n whose c o n d i t i o n s
become t h e more s t r i n g e n t as i t s t e e r s t o w a r d a n
e q u i l i b r i u m t h a t i s . m o b i l e a n d s t a b l e a t t h e same
time), f i n a l l y y i e l d s a n e c e s s i t y that i s a non-
temporal, because r e v e r s i b l e , . law?^
'34.
Cognitive structures can be e q u i l i b r a t e d i n d i f f e r e n t ways.
tion.
tional laws o f t h e s t r u c t u r e .
compensations o f e x t e r n a l i n t r u s i o n s by t h e a c t i v i t y of the
, . .. . 36
subject .
...the compensations by i n v e r s i o n w h i c h
1
are
/ c a n c e l l a t i o n s - o f t h e d i s t u r b a n c e / , a n d t h e - , c o m p e n -
s a t i o n s by. r e c i p r o c i t y , . w h i c h a r e . m o d i f i c a t i o n s
1 1
o f t h e schema t o accommodate i t t o t h e i n i t i a l l y
d i s t u r b i n g element.3 7
force possible.
I t , .too-, h a s t h e t w o f o r m s o f i n v e r s i o n a n d r e c i p r o c i t y .
procity, b u t o f t h e r e c i p r o c a l i n t e r c o o r d i n a t i o n o f them.
of i n v e r s i o n and r e c i p r o c i t y , a l l o w us t o d e f i n e a variable
in an a l g e b r a i c statement:
37
3x:.+ 2 = 7
(3x + 2 ) - 2 = 7 - 2 (-2 i s t h e r e c i p r o c a l o f 2)
(3x)(1/3) = (5)(1/3) ( 1 / 3 i s t h e i n v e r s e o f 3)
x = 5/3
original state.
b) Mechanisms o f Regulation
secondary e f f e c t o f s t r u c t u r a l compensation..
struction ( i ,e . , a c c o m m o d a t i o n s . ) . I t i s not d i f f i c u l t to
CHART I
m e c h a n i s m o f k EQUILIBRATION
Reciprocal
Assimilation
mechanism o f f - C O M P E N S A T I O N
mechanism
of F U N C T I O N I N G
Assimilation Accommodation
CHART I I
S T R U C T U R A L CONSTRUCTION THROUGH F U N C T I O N I N G
-<u>. Environmental
Intrusion
Equislibration
Compensation Compensation
by >ration by-
Inversion' <>/s 'V <T
Reciprocity
Regulation Regulation
by by
Positive Negative
Feedback Feedback
Assimilation Accommodation
*See Page 42
41
structure.
S', b e a s s i m i l a t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s t r u c t u r e , S. The a s s i m i -
lation of S 1
as a subclass of S implicitly entails construc-
gni _ S i I I^
s p^fi r e c i p r o c a l a s s i m i l a t i o n b e t w e e n S, S', S",
S" , 1
e t c . , not only e s t a b l i s h e s a l l connections between S and
a n d how e q u i l i b r a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f o r t h e i n t e r n a l consistency
questionable.
B a s e d o n C h a p t e r s O n e a n d Two, we c a n s e e w h y e q u i l i b r a t i o n
equilibration.
44
The s p e c i a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of e q u i l i b r a t i o n as a regulatory
of e q u i l i b r a t i o n .
40
of the d i a l e c t i c a l process.
relations.
C o n s t r u c t i o n , i n b e i n g c o n s t a n t l y r e g u l a t e d by
e q u i l i b r a t i o n r e q u i r e m e n t s , (a s e l f - r e g u l a t i o n
whose c o n d i t i o n s become t h e more s t r i n g e n t as i t
s t e e r s t o w a r d an e q u i l i b r i u m t h a t i s m o b i l e a n d
s t a b l e a t t h e same t i m e ) , f i n a l l y y i e l d s a n e -
c e s s i t y that i s a non-temporal, because r e v e r s i b l e ,
l a w . 42
of logico-mathematical structures.
To f u r t h e r e l u c i d a t e i t s e x p l a n a t o r y nature, equilibration
principles c a n be l i k e n e d t o t h e u n c e r t a i n t y principle i n
b) Language o f E q u i l i b r a t i o n
law.
equilibration t o be s u c h a phenomenon:
laws.
concept of equilibration.
. . . t h e k n o w l e d g e o f t h e e n v i r o n m e n t w h i c h i s so
a d m i r a b l y a t t a i n e d by t h e human m i n d i s o n l y so
a t t a i n e d by v i r t u e o f an e x t e n s i o n o f t h e
o r g a n i z a t i o n ' s s t r u c t u r e s i n t o the u n i v e r s e as
a whole. 4 6
52
stage.
53
attained:
I f t h e n o v e l t y t o be c o n s t r u e d i s s u g g e s t e d by :
t h e p r e c e d i n g c o m p l e t i o n s , i s i t riot p r e d e t e r m i n e d ?
The r e p l y i s t h a t t h e w o r l d o f p o s s i b i l i t i e s i s
never complete, nor, consequently, given i n a d v a n c e d
are.
b) Verifleability of Equilibration
changing i t .
generated by s t r u c t u r a l i s m , a n d f r o m w i t h o u t i t , we come
FOOTNOTES
1. J e a n P i a g e t , The C h i l d a n d R e a l i t y , (New Y o r k :
V i k i n g P r e s s , 1973), p . 146.
3. Ibid,, p. 90.
e d . b y T. M i s c h e l , (New Y o r k : A c a d e m i c P r e s s , 1 9 7 1 ) ,
p. 3 3 2 .
14 . I b i d . , p.' 1 0 .
15. Ibid'., p . 14 ^
37 . Ibid., p. 26.
3 8
' O P - c i t . , Piaget, (1957), Translated by present author.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
F u r t h , H a n s G. P i a g e t a n d K n o w l e d g e ; Theoretical Foundations.
New J e r s e y : P r e n t i c e - H a l l , 1965.