Is there some insufficiency in the ethical law? another
question in the line of is there an absolute duty to God? The ethical is the divine (the first section of Problem II) Duty to God to love neighbour, but by doing this, you dont come into relation to God, you are just loving your neighbour God becomes a vanishing point by the nature of that circle and there is no such thing as faith
Kant: categorical imperative you should act in a way that could
be universalized as law (if its not in this way then it is unethical) To recognize goodness is to recognize the insufficiency of what there already is good has to be brought about and accomplished and it is the job of people to accomplish the good o For the good to be made actual, it requires the agency of particular individuals there is good in the world insofar as we accomplish it Argument against Kant in that particularity is sometimes needed in order to accomplish good (and Kants POV would essentially strip people of their particularity) Story of Socrates & Prosecutor o Conflict of duties (honouring parents & acting against murderers) because of the particularity of the situation We are all vulnerable to the possibility of conflicting duties Disparity: universal requirement/law v. particularity of prosecutors situation o Disparity isnt law v. desire
What is the incommensurability that dS was talking about?
How does Abraham think about what he does? Our duty to God isnt conditional to ethics; our pursuit of what is ethically demanded of us is conditional to our duty to God Recognition of what is higher than ethical demands and recognition of our relation to this higher as an individual Incommensurability Distinction b/w inner (private feelings and reflections) and outer (recognizable by others) o Ethics being internalized or only in the exterior Paradox of faith being the inner which is incommensurable that is not private or just for you (not something that is outwardly expressed and so no recognizable to others and yet still not private) You have to able, as an individual, be able to recognize yourself as a thing able to do Gods will, in principle to God We cant take refuge in what is universally required; it wont settle how you should engage the world or a sufficient way to settle the demand you are faced with; but you also cannot discard it altogether Inner v. outer; disparity b/w you as individual and your ability to do what is universally required of you You can never be rationally certain the worthiness of your actions in relation to God = the anxiety of faith Absolute duty to God isnt optional, but it is something that everyone needs to acknowledge | each of us in our particularity have a relation to God