Professional Documents
Culture Documents
erties, but the individual clay minerals are not routinely identified. For example, kaolinite is not distinguished from its
polytype dickite; and the various expandable clays are not
identified, but are simply reported as smectite. Mixed-layer
clays other than illite/smectite exist, but have not generally
been recognized in reservoir sandstones.
Gay minerals are hydrous aluminum silicates composed
basically of layers of silicon tetrahedrons and aluminum octahedrons. Clays are classified by the number and type of layers
(Figure 2). For example, a 1:1 clay (kaolinite) has a unit cell
composed of 1 tetrahedron and 1 octahedron. A 2:1 clay (illite;
smectite) has 2 tetrahedrons sandwiching an octahedron. A
2:1:1 clay (chlorite) consists of 2 tetrahedrons enclosing an
octahedral layer that is bound to a layer of Mg(OH).
Mixed-layer illite/smectite consists of intercalated layers of
illite and smectite in either a random or ordered arrangement.
Only the smectite layers are expandable. With burial, the
amount of illite in mixed-layer illite/smectite increases at the
expense of smectite, as a function primarily of temperature,
although time, pressure, fluid chemistry, bulk chemistry of the
rock, and original composition of the smectite probably also
play a role (Hower, 1981).
INTRODUCTION
The concept of pore geometry, i.e., the size, shape, and distribution of pores in a reservoir, is important in understanding
reservoir behavior (Pittman, 1979a). A classification scheme
has been suggested, based on four basic types of porosity (Pittman, 1979b)in tergranular, intragranular-moldic, micro, and
fracture (Figure 1). Intergranular porosity may be primary or
secondary. Intragranular-moldic porosity is secondary. Microporosity is associated, predominantly, with clay minerals, and
is secondary in the sense that the pore space has been modified by the precipitation of authigenic clay minerals to produce pores of secondary origin. Fracture porosity, obviously,
is secondary and may be associated with any other porosity
type.
The best reservoir sandstones tend to plot near the intergranular pole of the ternary diagram (Figure 1) because of
increased pore aperture size, well interconnected pores, and
increased permeability. Reservoir sandstones with
intragranular-moldic porosity tend to have low permeability
because the pores are generally not well interconnected. Reservoir sandstones that plot in the lower third of the triangle
(Figure 1) need fractures, either natural or induced, to make
an economically attractive reservoir.
Sandstones with an abundance of micropores are clay-rich
rocks, and this creates a problem in log interpretation. In reservoir sandstones, the clay is most commonly authigenic, but
clays from a variety of allogenic types occur, also. This chapter discusses the origin and nature of these clay minerals and
the effect they have on porosity, permeability, logs, and wellcompletion procedures.
CLAY MINERALOGY
Within the oil industry the following families of clay minerals are generally recognizedkaolinite, illite, smectite, and
chlorite. Mixed-layer illite/smectite also is common. Within
any family there are multiple clay minerals with similar prop-
237
238
Pittman
INTERGRANULAR
POROSITY
MICROPOROSITY
INTRAGRANULAR
& MOIDIC
POROSITY
BEST
RESERVOIRS
INTERGRAN
INTERGRAN.
PORES ,
MICRO.
INTRAGRAN.-MOLDIC
POTENTIAL LOG
CALCULATION PROBLEMS
FOR WATER SAT.
Figure 1. Classification of porosity in sandstone. Intergranular porosity may be of
primary or secondary origin. Intragranuiar-moidic porosity is secondary.
Microporosityin reservoirs is secondary in the sense Mmacropores have been
infilled by authigenic day to subdivide and redistribute porosity. The best
^wa^^era/^p/o(/)9a;^(opo^tf)eWang/e. Sandstones w/tftabondanf
The effect that clay minerals have on porosity and permeability is shown schematically in Figure 3. The diagram incorporates the concept of Neasham (1977) that the geometry of
the authigenic clay has an impact on the quality of the reservoir. Neasham recognized three habits of authigenic clay
mineralsdiscrete particles, pore lining, and pore bridging,
which correspond with decreasing reservoir quality. Permeability is affected more than porosity because the pore lining
and pore bridging clays grow in pore throats. In Figure 3, the
volume and mode of occurrence of the clay minerals, and in
some cases the compactional history, influence whether the
sandstone will be an economically successful reservoir, a marginal reservoir that may be economic under selected conditions, or a nonreservoir. Of course, sandstones commonly
have mineral cements other than clay minerals.
;,\
INTRAGRAN.-MOLDIC
FRACTURES
REQUIRED FOR
RESERVOIR
micropores have potertiaiproblenTS fa caleulatim
Reservoirs
that plot in ^ehwer pan of tnetrian^ need fractures, either natural or induced,
to make an economic reservoir. Natural fractures may occur with any other
porosity type.
OCTAHEDRALTETRAHEDRAL-
OH
A1
0,2 OH
Si
'--6 O
7'K
T - <
239
10 K
12-14 %
LI
Na,Ca,H20,etc.
"6 0
4 Si
4 0,2 OH
7 V ^ \ 4 (A1M9)
K \ 4 0,2 OH
SMECTITE
DECREASING
r>
PERMEABILITY
u.
K
. / ;
A1
OH
OH
A1
BRUCITE
LAYER
\N4 Si
6 0
6 0
3 Si,1
4 0,2
4 A1
\V
J5~V4 0,2
\ 3 Si,1
N
6 O
X ILLITE 7
KAOLINITE
EXCHANGEABLE r
CATIONS - * -
V
L
~ 14 A*
LICHLORITE
,6
,6
,6
-y.6
J A
2
6
2
OH
Mg
OH
0
Si
0,2 OH
Mg
0,2 OH
4 Si
6 0
TOTAL C0UN1rs
/G.R.
PHlfTS |
SfAtSt
DISCRETE
IPARTICIES
- UJ-
Z
APPARENTSSH.
DISPERSED
MATRIX
Z"
-<-
\<
CO
iC/
CO"
r-^
V
RESERVOIR
i NOJVRESERVOIR
i RESERVOIR I
EFFECT OF CLAY
Ftgure3. Porosity and permeability of sandstones are affected by the amount and
mode of occurrence of clay minerals and, in some cases, bytheamountof
compaction.
240
Pittman
Mineral
CEC(meq/100g)
Kaolinite
Chlorite
Illite
Smectite
2-15
0-40
10-40
76-150
Formation Damage
Clay minerals in sandstones create potential reservoir problems because of their reaction to drilling, cementing, completion, stimulation, or workover fluids. The formation may be
damaged by the following mechanical or chemical processes
involving clay minerals:
(1) migration of in situ particles;
(2) expandable clays;
(3) sensitivity to acids.
Other types of formation damage that are not necessarily
related to clay minerals will be summarized later (see Krueger,
1982, for a good overview).
241
RELATIONSHIP
^DIFFUSE ZONE:)
R
F
F
^ /
R~~
'
CONTINUUM
OF WATER
L O G Ft,
WATER MOLECULE
CATION
OBSERVED
RELATIONSHIP
ANION
M O D I F I E D FROM FINK 119811
LOGR w
242
Pittman
Sensitivity to Adds
Iron-bearing minerals in sedimentary rocks and rust from
holding tanks and flow lines are potential sources of iron to
form precipitates within the formation as a side effect when
acid is used to clean the well bore or to treat damaged formations. Authigenic chlorite is soluble in common acids, is ironbearing, and occurs in the pores of a sandstone in a position
ready to contact any acid introduced into the formation.
Holman (1982) pointed out that although the precipitation
of iron hydroxide has been proposed frequently as a potential
problem, the conditions necessary to form this precipitate are
not commonly encountered infieldsituations. When acid contacts a sandstone it preferentially reacts with the fine particles.
This reaction increases with temperature. As the acid
becomes spent, the hydrogen ion concentration decreases
(pH rises) whereas the concentration of hydroxide increases.
Ferric iron precipitates as a ferric hydroxide gel, which damages the reservoir, at a pH of about 2-3, whereas ferrous iron
will not precipitate until the pH rises to about 7-9 (Sloan et al.,
1974). Therefore, ferrous iron does not generally create a formation damage problem (Smith et al., 1969). Ferrous iron is
much more common than ferric iron in sedimentary rocks.
Acid treatment of sandstone generally consists of preflush,
acid, and afterflush phases (Williams et al, 1979). The preflush,
generally HC1 (5-15%), displaces water in the pipe and formation and isolates water from HF that follows in the acid treatment, so that insoluble sodium and potassium fluosilicates
cannot form from a reaction with ions in the water. The HC1
also reacts with fine carbonate particles so that they are dissolved prior to contact with HF. This prevents precipitation of
calcium fluoride.
The acid treatment is generally an HC1/HF (3%/12%) mixture (mud acid). The HF portion of the acid reacts readily with
fine particles (e.g., clay and drill mud), whereas the HC1 portion of the acid mixture is designed to keep the pH low to prevent precipitation of iron (Williams et al., 1979).
Two methods control precipitation of iron: pH and chelating
additives. The pH control method requires addition of acetic
acid to the acid mixture. The pH remains low because the
reaction between acetic acid and calcium carbonate does not
go to completion, and unspent acid remains. This is valid only
CONCLUSIONS
1. Porosity and permeability of sandstones are affected by
the amount and mode of occurrence of clay minerals.
2. Authigenic clays affect permeability more than porosity.
3. Gamma ray logs may give a misleading impression of
shaliness of a sandstone because not all clay minerals contain
radioactive potassium, and because gamma rays are more
sensitive to uranium and thorium than to potassium.
4. Water saturations calculated from logs may be misleadingly high because of (1) water-wet, high-surface-area clay
minerals; (2) bound water held in micropores by capillary
forces; and (3) high electron conductivity related to cations
held in the Helmholtz Double Layer.
5. Sandstone reservoirs can be damaged by the following
mechanical or chemical processes involving clay minerals: (1)
migration of in situ particles; (2) expandable clays; and (3) sensitivity to acids.
6. Permeability generally can be restored to a damaged
sandstone reservoir by a fracture treatment or by acid treatment if the formation has not lost injectivity.
REFERENCES CUED
Abrams, A., 1976, Mud design to minimize rock impairment due to
particle invasion: Society of Petroleum Engineers Second Symposium on Formation Damage Control, p. 219-230.
Almon, W. R., and D. K. Davies, 1981, Formation damage and the
crystal chemistry of clays, in F. J. Longstaffe, (Ed.) Clays and the
Resource Geologist: Mineralogical Association of Canada Short
Course, Calgary, p. 81-103.
Archie, G. E., 1942, The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics: American Institute Mining Engineers Transactions, v. 146, p. 54-67.
Barkman, J. H., A. Abrams, H. C. H. Darley, and H. J. Hill, 1974, An
oil coating process to stabilize clays in fresh water flooding operations: Society of Petroleum Engineers Symposium on Formation Damage, p. 177-186.
Bertness, T. A., 1953, Observations of water damage to oil permeability: American Petroleum Institute, Drilling and Production
Practices, p. 287-299.
Christian, W. W., and H. J. Ayres, 1974, Formation damage control
243
in sand control and stimulation work: Society of Petroleum Engineers Symposium on Formation Damage, p. 63-74.
Clark, G. J., C. T. Wong, and N. Mungan, 1982, New acid systems for
sandstone stimulation: Society of Petroleum Engineers Proceedings, Fifth Symposium on Formation Damage Control, 187-197.
Clavier, C, G. Coates, and J. Dumanoir, 1977, The theoretical and
experimental bases for the "Dual Water" model for the interpretation of shaly sands: Society of Petroleum Engineers Preprint
No. 6859,52nd Annual Meeting, 18 p.
Davies, D. K., 1980, Reservoir stimulation of dirty sandstones: Society of Petroleum Engineers Proceedings, Fourth Symposium on
Formation Damage Control, p. 41-48.
Deer, W. A., R. A. Howie, and J. Zussman, 1962, Rock forming minerals, v. 3, Sheet Silicates: New York, John Wiley and Sons, 270 p.
Fink, J. B., 1981, Electrochemistry of induced polarizationAdvances in Induced Polarization and Complex Resistivity: University of Arizona Short Course Notes, Jan. 5-7, p. 103-138.
Fogler, H. S., K. Lund, and C. C. McCune, 1975, Acidization IIl-The
kinetics of the dissolution of sodium and potassium feldspar in
HF/HC1 mixtures: Chemical Engineering Science, v. 30, p. 13251332.
Fogler, H. S., K. Lund, and C. C. McCune, 1976, Predicting the flow
and reaction of HC1/HF acid mixtures in porous sandstone cores:
Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, October 1976, p. 248260.
Gatewood, J. R., B. E. Hall, L. D. Roberts, and R. M. Lasater, 1970,
Predicting results of sandstone acidizing: Journal of Petroleum
Technology, v. 22, p. 693-700.
Glenn, E. E., and M. L. Slusser, 1957, Factors affecting well
productivity-II Drilling fluid invasion into porous media: American Institute of Mining Engineers Transactions, v. 210, p. 126131.
Grim, R. E., 1968, Clay Mineralogy: New York, McGraw-Hill, Second Edition, 596 p.
Hall, B. E., and B. W. Anderson, 1978, Society Petroleum Engineers
Proceedings, Third Symposium on Formation Damage Control,
p. 19-26.
Haskin, C. A., 1976, A review of hydroxy-aluminum treatments:
Society of Petroleum Engineers Proceedings, Second Symposium on Formation Damage Controls, p. 35-42.
Hill, D. G., 1982, Clay StabilizationCriteria for best performance:
Society of Petroleum Engineers Proceedings, Fifth Symposium
on Formation Damage Control, p. 127-138.
Hill, H. J. and J. D. Milburn, 1956, Effect of clay and water salinity
on electrochemical behavior of reservoir rocks: American Institute of Mining Engineers Transactions, v. 207, p. 65-72.
Hoffman, U., A. Weiss, G. Koch, A. Mehler, and A. Scholz, 1956,
Intercrystalline swelling, cation exchange, and anion exchange
of minerals of the montmorillonite group and of kaolinite:
National Academy Sciences, Publication 465, p. 273-287.
Holman, G. B., 1982, State-of-the-art well stimulation: Journal
Petroleum Technology, v. 34 (February), p. 239-241.
Hower, W, 1974, Influence of clays on the production of hydrocarbons: Society of Petroleum Engineers Symposium on Formation
Damage, p. 165-175.
Hower, J., 1981, Shale diagenesis; in F. J. Longstaffe (Ed.) Clays and
the Resource Geologist: Mineralogical Association of Canada
Short Course, Calgary, p. 60-80.
Johnson, W. L., and W. A. Linke, 1978, Some practical applications
to improve formation evaluation of sandstones in the MacKenzie
Delta: Society of Petroleum Well Log Analysts, 19th Annual Logging Symposium, Paper C, 32 p.
Jones, F. O., Jr., 1964, Influence of chemical composition of water
on clay blocking of permeability: Journal of Petroleum Technology, April, p. 441-445.
Keelan, D. K., and E. H. Koepf, 1976, The role of cores and core
analysis in evaluation of formation damage: Society of Petroleum
Engineers Symposium on Formation Damage Controls, Proceedings, p. 55-70.
244
Pittman
Kowalski, J. J., and S. 0. Asekun, 1979, It may not be a shale: Canadian Well Logging Society Formation Evaluation Symposium
Transactions, No. 7, p. G1-G10.
Krueger, R. E, L. C. Vogel, and P. W. Fischer, 1967, Effect of pressure
drawdown on cleanup of clay or silt blocked sandstone: Journal
of Petroleum Technology, March, p. 397-403.
Krueger, R. F., 1982, An overview of formation damage and well
productivity in oil field operations: Society of Petroleum Engineers Paper No. 10029, International Petroleum Exhibition and
Technical Symposium, Beijing, China, March 1982, p. 79-104.
Labrid, J. C, 1975, Thermodynamic and kinetic aspects of argillaceous sandstone acidizing: Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, April, p. 117-128.
McBride, J. R., M. J. Rathbone, and R. L. Thomas, 1980, Evaluation
of fluoboric acid treatment in the Grand Isle offshore area using
multiple rate flow test: Society of Petroleum Engineers Fourth
Symposium on Formation Damage Control, Proceedings, p. 6167.
McLaughlin, H. C, E. A. Elphingstone, and B. Hall, 1976, Aqueous
polymers for treating clays in oil and gas: Society of Petroleum
Engineers Preprint 6008,51st Annual Meeting, New Orleans, 12
P-