Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ii.
iii.
The study focused on establishing the effectiveness of family planning methods used
among sexually active men and women aged 15-49 years attending HGH Family
Planning Clinic-Hargeisa Group Hospital. The study established the current family
planning methods, and find out the level of effectiveness of family planning methods
and the recommendations to family planning methods.
standard
days
(Calendar
or
beads);
abstinence;
withdrawal;
and
Some methods such as IUD, tubal litigation, vasectomy and implants require
authorization for use by a qualified health worker, while other methods such as pills,
injectables, condoms and counselling on periodic abstinence can be offered by trained
no skilled personnel (DHS, 2014)
An indication of the uptake levels for FP methods in Uganda is highlighted in the UDHS
(2015). All women who had ever heard of a method of family planning were asked
whether they had ever used that method. Men were only asked about ever use of male
methods, i.e., male sterilisation, male condom, rhythm method, and withdrawal. The
results show that just over half (52 percent) of currently married women have ever used
a contraceptive method, 42 percent have used a modern method, and 21 percent have
used a traditional method. The methods most commonly ever used by married women
are injectables (27 percent), male condoms (16 percent), pills (14 percent), and rhythm
(13 percent). Ever use of other methods does not exceed 10 percent. Ever use of any
method is highest among sexually active unmarried women, 75 percent of whom have
used a method at some time. Sexually active unmarried women are much more likely
(55 percent) to have used male condoms than either all women (18 percent) or
currently married women (16 percent).
Types Of Family Planning Pills & Their Uses:
There are two main types of pills; these are combined Oral Contraceptive Pills (COC's)
which contain oestrogen and progesterone, Progestin-only Pills (POPs) which contain
progesterone only. However, Emergency pills are another type of oral contraceptives
containing progesterone only.
Family Planning Pills has a number of medical benefits which include reduction of
menstrual cramps and ovulatory pain in the middle of the menstrual cycle since it
prevents ovulation. It also regulates the menstrual cycle and provides the woman's
body with normal amounts of oestrogen whose menstrual periods are irregular (too
often, too late, or not at all). FPP also reduces the amount and length of menstrual
bleeding hence reducing the risk of getting anaemia (Bertrand, and Monica Das Gupta.
2012)
The MOH developed the Reverse Logistics Strategy to facilitate the redistribution of
contraceptives between health centres at the district level and the National Medical
Stores. (ICF International, 2014) In situations where a health unit experiences a stockout, additional supplies may be picked from a health unit with the surplus, thus enabling
those out of stock to restock from others in the district. Although the logistics strategy
is in place, challenges include weak capacity and poor linkages between reproductive
health commodities planning, procurement, and distribution with the budget cycles at
national and district levels (High-Impact Practices in Family Planning, 2014). There is
no centralised or coordinated system for the logistics management information system
(LMIS) reporting. (United States Census International Database 2014) Stock-outs are
reported to National Medical Stores, while other LMIS information is sent to the
Resource Centre at the MOH. The LMIS form (HMIS 018) lacks essential logistics data
(consumption data, losses, and adjustments); yet, this is the form used to collect RH
commodity data (London Summit on Family Planning, 2012). This is further
complicated by the lack of a dedicated budget for LMIS; there is no system for
sustaining the availability of logistics tools.
2.4 The Recommendations About Family Planning Methods.
One of ICPDs concerns about the quality of family planning services is how programs
can maintain a sufficient and continuous supply of contraceptive methods. For some
programs, funding for supplies is already insufficient to meet the existing need, and
this situation will only worsen as the demand for family planning grows. Experts
estimate that the gap between needed and available funds could reach as much as
$210 million by 2015 if funding remains at the 1999 level of $140 million (Bongaarts et
al, 2012). The gap could be narrowed by increasing reliance on the commercial sector
and by reducing the proportion of clients who receive free contraceptive supplies.
Nevertheless, stocks will still probably become depleted, and program needs are
unlikely to be completely met.
Integration of the Standard Days Method into programs could help close the funding
gap. The supplies required for the Standard Days Method are relatively inexpensive.
Recent figures indicate that the U.S. Agency for International Development pays 6.6
cents per condom, 22 cents per cycle of pills, 97 cents per injection of Depo-Provera
and $1.45 per IUD (Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development. 2013).
In contrast, the one-time cost of a set of Cycle- Beads, which can be used for several
years, is about $1.50.
Once a woman has learned to use the Standard Days Method, she can rely on it
whenever supplies for other methods are unavailable. Hence, the method could be
introduced as a stopgap measure for returning clients during times of stock depletion.
In programs that are chronically out of stock, the Standard Days Method is both an
alternative option and a solution to an ongoing problem that can undermine program
efforts.
Accessible services are a hallmark of high-quality reproductive health programs. To
increase access, the ICPD Programme of Action recommends making family planning
information, education, communication, counselling and services available through
primary health care systems. This approach would make contraceptives available to
clients who need them and also offers a way of educating clients about new methods.
The successful introduction of a new method into a family planning program requires
more than simply announcing its availability. Programmatic concerns must be
addressed. The Standard Days Method can easily be incorporated into policy
development, service delivery, supervision of providers and program evaluation.
Experiences in Guatemala and Rwanda illustrate the feasibility of integrating the
method into public sector primary health care programs. In Guatemala, the Standard
Days Method was incorporated at the policy level, which is leading to its introduction
into services, the management information system and the supervision system.18 In
Rwanda, the method was initially introduced into a limited number of service delivery
points and is now being offered at an increasing number of centres. At the same time,
the Standard Days Method is being incorporated into the revised national reproductive
health program norms (Caroline Blair and Marie Mukabatsinda, 2014).
The Standard Days Method has also been incorporated into programs that previously
had not been involved in family planning and reproductive health. Kaanib, an
agricultural cooperative in the Philippines, introduced the Standard Days Method to its
members using trained couple and male providers.20 In addition, Project Concern
Internationals water and sanitation program in El Salvador incorporated the Standard
Days Method into its community development strategy. (Dosajh U, et al; 2013)
In both cases, providers were trained to ask clients about cycle length and discuss
couple issues related to method use, such as dealing with the fertile period, reducing
the risk of sexually transmitted infections, violence and alcohol abuse. Both
organisations trained their staff to make referrals to the public sector for other
contraceptive
methods.
The
advantages
of
using
these
community-based
organisations are that follow-up of clients can happen outside a structured clinic setting
and hours and that men are more readily involved. Primary health care systems and
non-health organisations usually use different outreach and service delivery strategies
to reach the public, but both have demonstrated their ability to increase access to the
Standard Days Method.
2.5 Factors Affecting Utilisation Of Modern Family Planning Methods
Family planning methods use is the expression of individuals desire to space or to limit
birth, individual demand for birth spacing and limitations are themselves shaped by the
surrounding social, psychological, economic and policy environment factors. It is
believed that information, education and communication about the importance of
modern FP methods use to play an important role in raising contraceptive prevalence
rate. But the fear of side effects, religious beliefs, partner disapproval and
misinformation can be a barrier to adoption or a reason for discontinuing modern family
planning methods. However different empirical evidence revealed that having
knowledge about modern FP methods alone could not guarantee utilisation of the
service. Thus, it can be summarised that modern FP methods use does not necessarily
depend on the knowledge of methods but there are other additional determinant factors
that influence the utilisation of the service. Among the various determinant factors
indicated by different studies conducted so far, few important factors indicated will be
reviewed below (Hailemariam A.et al.2006).
This study found that many participants perceive men to be obstacles to womens
utilization of MFP, and largely uninvolved despite the fact that men are often
responsible for decisions which affect the household. This was attributed to mens
reluctance to support the use of FP for their spouses or themselves based on fears of
harmful side effects and spousal infidelity, as well as preferences for large-sized
families. Mens fertility preferences and attitudes towards FP seem to influence their
wives attitudes towards the use of MFP (Kabagenyi et. al.2012).
A study conducted in Bangladesh revealed that the percentage of current users of MFP
among Muslims was significantly lower than their non-Muslim counterparts 30.2% and
36.3% respectively (Shahid Ullah.etal.1993). According to the 2011 EDHS report, the
significantly high proportion of females reported that in most cases religious leaders
oppose the use of modern FP and ethnicity and religion were the determinant factors
to the use of MFPM (CSA 2011). A study was done in 2007 in Sudan, an Islamic
country in the developing world shows that very few women reported the use of MFPM
as if it was against their religion and their cultural beliefs (Ibnouf H.et al 2007). The
descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in the rural communities of Osun
state, Nigeria 2011, explain the significant association between religion and ever used
MFP, shows that Christians having a higher uptake of MFP methods than the Muslims
community in that study (Olugbenga-Bello AI.et.al.2011)
Type Of Family Setting & Modern Family Planning Methods Use:
The type of family setting is another factor for determinants of utilisation of MFPM as
many studies revealed. The cross-sectional study done in the rural communities of
Osun state, Nigeria 2011, shows that there was a significant relationship between
family setting and ever used MFP with more women in monogamous family settings
using MFP method as compared to those from polygamous family settings. This may
be a reflection of the insecurity that exists among women in polygamous family settings
with the women trying to out with each other in the number of children in other to secure
their positions in the family and in the will when the husband dies (Olugbenga-Bello
AI.et.al.2011).
Age
Sex
Education level.
No. & Sex of Children
Infant mortality
Support from partner
Residence.
Income/economic status
Physical access
No & availability of skilled staff
Availability of contraceptive services
Staff attitudes & practices
Cost of contraceptives
Supportive policies
Infrastructures
Quality of FP services
REPRODUCTIVE INTENTIONS
Contraceptive
use
Childbearing
AND
CONTRACEPTIVE UPTAKE AMONGCLIENTS
Community factors
Social organization
Social networks
Religious beliefs
Family/Societal pressure for
births
House hold/kinship structures
Cultural values/norms regarding
fertility.
Individual
Personal preference
Contraceptive
Knowledge
Attitudes towards
contraceptives.
Medical Factors
Side effects
Contradictions
Formulation
References
Advance Family Planning. 2011. Taking injectable contraceptives to villages.
Retrieved on 5 November 2014.
Bongaarts, John, John C. Cleland, John Townsend, Jane T. Bertrand, and Monica Das
Gupta. 2012. Family Planning Programmes for the 21st Century: Rationale and
Design.
Ministry of Health, 2012.Essential Medical and Health Supply List for Somaliland.
(EMHSLU).
Ministry of Health. 2013. Annual Health Sector Performance Report FY 2012/13.
Ministry of Health. 2013. Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed, 2013.
Hargeisa Somaliland.
World Health Organization, USAID, and Family Health International (FHI). 2010.
Community-Based Health Workers Can Safely and Effectively Administer Injectable
Contraceptives: Conclusions from a Technical Consultation, Research Triangle Park
(NC): FHI.140
By Mohamed Shucayb Ahmed (Marty)