You are on page 1of 456

A TREATISE

ON THE

ANALYTICAL DYNAMICS
OF PARTICLES AND RIGID BODIES

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS


C.

FETTER LANE, E.G.


100 PRINCES STREET

Soulum:

lirfu gorft:

Bombag,

Calcutta

CLAY, MANAGER

F.

G.

PUTNAM S SONS
MACMILLAN AND CO.,
DENT AND SONS, LTD.
P.

anto Jftafcras:

Toronto:
Til

J.
1C

M.

MARUZEN-KABUSHIKI-KAISHA

All rights reserved

LTD.

A TREATISE
ON THE

ANALYTICAL DYNAMICS
OF PARTICLES AND RIGID BODIES;
WITH AN INTRODUCTION TO THE
PROBLEM OF THREE BODIES
,

BY
E.

T.

Hon.

WHITTAKER
Sc.E).

(Dubl.)

Professor of Mathematics in

F.R.S.

the University of Edinburgh

SECOND EDITION

CAMBRIDGE

AT THK UNIVERSITY
1917

PRESS

Uf
irst

Edition 1904

Second Edition 1917

PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION

TN

revising this book for a second edition, I have endeavoured to givereferences to,

and in some cases accounts

of,

the

numerous

original

Dynamics which have been published by various investigators


I have moreover added some historical
since the first edition appeared.
researches in

matter, and rewritten


in

detail,

many sections. It is not necessary to specify these


but perhaps I may mention that the new explanation of the

125 sprang from a desire to do


justice to the earliest great work of Hamilton s genius that the changes in
69 (the motion of a body about a rixed point under no forces) arose from
transformation-theory of Dynamics in

my

opinion that the Jacobian functions are preferable to the Weierstrassian

in

the

numerical computations

a fuller proof of

and that

Sundman s theorem

should have liked

181), but thought

to

give

it

better to give

only such an account as might impel the reader to consult

Mr Sundman s

own

accessible

and readable memoir.

I wish again to

record

my

obligations to the staff of the

Cambridge

University Press.
E. T.

WHITTAKER.

EDINBURGH,
August, 1916.

a3

CONTENTS
CHAPTER

I.

KINEMATICAL PRELIMINARIES.
PAGE

SECTION

The displacements

3.

of rigid bodies
Euler s theorem on rotations about a point
The theorem of Rodrigues and Hamilton

4.

The composition

1.

2.

5.
6.

7.

8.

......
.......

and opposite rotations about parallel axes


Chasles theorem on the most general displacement of a rigid body
Halphen s theorem on the composition of two general displacements
of equal

Analytic representation of a displacement


The composition of small rotations

2
3

...

13.

Euler s parametric specification of rotations round a point


The Eulerian angles
Connexion of the Eulerian angles with the parameters
?;,
^
The connexion of rotations with homographies the Cayley-Klein parameters
Vectors

14.

Velocity and acceleration

15.

Angular velocity its vectorial character


Determination of the components of angular velocity of a system in terms
of the Eulerian angles, and of the symmetrical parameters
Time-flux of a vector whose components relative to moving axes are given
Special resolutions of the velocity and acceleration

15

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

22

9.

10.
11.
12.

16.

their vectorial character

18.

CHAPTER

II.

THE EQUATIONS OF MOTION.

10
11

13
14

17.

16

17

18

Contents

vii
PAGE

SECTION
26.

Lagrange s form of the equations of motion of a holonomic system

27.

Conservative forces

28.

The

29.
30.
31.

32.

...

34.

35.

Impulsive motion

36.

The Lagrangian equations


MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

34
38

explicit form of Lagrange s equations


Motion of a system which is constrained to rotate uniformly round an axis
The Lagrangian equations for quasi-coordinates
Forces derivable from a potential-function which involves the velocities
Initial motions
.

the kinetic potential

Similarity in dynamical systems


Motion with reversed forces

33.

39
40
41

44
45
47
47

......

of impulsive motion

...

48

50
51

CHAPTER

III.

PRINCIPLES AVAILABLE FOR THE INTEGRATION.


38.

Problems which are soluble by quadratures


Systems with ignorable coordinates

39.

Special cases of ignoration

40.

The general theorem


The energy equation

37.

41.
42.

43.

52
.

......

momentum and
momentum

integrals of

of angular

angular

momentum

54
58
61

62

Reduction of a dynamical problem to a problem with fewer degrees of


freedom, by means of the energy equation
Separation of the variables dynamical systems of Liouville s type

64

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

69

CHAPTER

67

IV.

THE SOLUBLE PROBLEMS OF PARTICLE DYNAMICS.

.... ......

47.

The particle with one degree of freedom the pendulum


Motion in a moving tube
Motion of two interacting free particles
Central forces in general
Hamilton s theorem

48.

The

49.

Motion under the Newtonian law


The mutual transformation of fields of central force and

44.
45.

46.

50.

76

77

..........
............

integrable cases of central forces


and elliptic functions

71

74

problems soluble in terms of circular


80
86

fields of parallel

"

force

93

51.

Bonnet s theorem

52.

Determination of the most general field of force under which a given curve
or family of curves can be described

95

53.

The problem

97

54.

Motion on a surface
Motion on a surface of revolution

55.

of

two centres of gravitation

elliptic functions

56.

99

...........
...........

Joukovsky s theorem
MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

94

cases soluble in terms of circular and

103
109
111

Contents

vii.i

CHAPTER

V.

THE DYNAMICAL SPECIFICATION OF BODIES.


SECTION

PAGK

57.

Definitions

58.

The moments

59.

Derivation of

60.

about a parallel axis through the centre of gravity is known


Connexion between moments of inertia with respect to different sets of axes

61.

The

some simple bodies


the moment of inertia about any

of inertia of

axis

when the moment

117

-.

118

of

121

inertia

.......

through the same origin

122

63.

principal axes of inertia


Cauchy s momenta! ellipsoid
Calculation of the angular momentum of a moving rigid body
Calculation of the kinetic energy of a moving rigid body

64.

Independence of the motion of the centre of gravity and the motion relative

62.

to

124

124

126
127

it

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

129

CHAPTER

VI.

THE SOLUBLE PROBLEMS OF RIGID DYNAMICS.


65.

The motion

of systems with one degree of freedom

motion round a fixed


131

axis, etc.

66.

The motion

67.

Initial

68.

The motion

69.

Motion

70.

Poinsot s

71.

Motion of a top on a perfectly rough plane

72.

73.

Determination of the remaining Eulerian angles, and of the Cayley-Klein


parameters the spherical top
Motion of a top on a perfectly smooth plane

74.

Kowalevski

top

164

75.

Impulsive motion

167

two degrees of freedom

of systems with

137

....

motions
of systems with three degrees of freedom
of a body about a fixed point under no forces

............
.............
.........
............

kinematical

representation of

the motion

the

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

CHAPTER

152
155
159

163

169

144

determination of the Eulerian

143

and

polhode

herpolhode
angle 6

141

VII.

THEORY OF VIBRATIONS.
76.
77.

...........

Vibrations about equilibrium


Normal coordinates

...

177

178

183

79.

Sylvester s theorem on the reality of the roots of the determinantal equation


Solution of the differential equations -the periods
stability

80.

Examples of vibrations about equilibrium

187

81.

Effect of a

78.

new

83.

constraint on the periods of a vibrating system


The stationary character of normal vibrations
Vibrations about steady motion

84.

The

82.

......

185
191

192
193

85.

integration of the equations


Examples of vibrations about steady motion

86.

Vibrations of systems involving moving constraints

-07

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

208

19;">

203

ix

Content*

CHAPTER

VIII.

NON-HOLONOMIC SYSTEMS. DISSIPATIVE SYSTEMS.


PAGE

SECTION
87.

88.
89.

90.
91.
92.
93.
94.

s equations with undetermined multipliers


manner
Equations of motion referred to axes moving in any
Application to special non-holonomic problems
Vibrations of non-holonomic systems

Lagrange

217

frictional forces
Dissipative systems
Resisting forces which depend on the velocity
;

Rayleigh s dissipation-function
Vibrations of dissipative systems

95.

Impact

96.

Loss of kinetic energy in impact

97.

Examples of impact
MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

.......
......
CHAPTER

IX.

THE PRINCIPLES OF LEAST ACTION AND LEAST CURVATURE.


98.

The

99.

Hamilton

....

trajectories of a

102.

dynamical system
conservative holonomic systems
The principle of Least Action for conservative holonomic systems
Extension of Hamilton s principle to non-conservative dynamical systems
Extension of Hamilton s principle and the principle of Least Action to

103.

Are the stationary

100.
101.

s principle for

non-holonomic systems
104.
105.

..........

Kinetic foci
integrals actual minima?
Representation of the motion of dynamical systems by means of geodesies
The least-curvature principle of Gauss and Hertz
.

.....

106.

Expression of the curvature of a path in terms of generalised coordinates

107.

Appell s equations
Bertrand s theorem

108.

245
245
247

248
249

250
253

254
256
258
260

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

261

CHAPTER

X.

HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS AND THEIR INTEGRAL-INVARIANTS.


109.
110.
111.

112.

s form of the equations of motion


Equations arising from the Calculus of Variations

Hamilton

114.
115.

116.

On systems which

117.
118.
119.

relative integral-invariant

263
265

267

Integral-invariants
The variational equations

Integral-invariants of order one


Relative integral-invariants

113.

.....

.........

which

268
269
271

is

possessed by

all

Hamiltonian systems

possess the relative integral-invariant

The expression of integral-invariants


The theorem of Lie and Koenigs
The last multiplier

in

|2pS</

terms of integrals

272
272

274
275

276

Content*

120.

Derivation of an integral from two multipliers


Hainiltonian systems

279
use of a

121.

Application of the last multiplier to

122.

single known integral


Integral-invariants whose order is equal to the order of the system
Reduction of differential equations to the Lagrangian form

123.

124.

a.se

in

which the kinetic energy

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

is

280

quadratic in the velocities

283

284
285

...

286

CHAPTER XL
THE TRANSFORMATION-THEORY OF DYNAMICS.
125.

Hamilton

126.
127.

Contact-transformations in space of any number of dimensions


The bilinear covariant of a general differential form

128.

The conditions

129.

The conditions

130.
131.

expressions
Poisson s bracket-expressions
The conditions for a contact-transformation expressed by

132.

The sub-groups

133.

Infinitesimal contact-transformations

134.

The

s Characteristic

Function and contact-transformations

288

292

....

for a contact-transformation expressed

by means

of

296

the

297

bilinear covariant

............
.........
........
.............
........
.........
.........
for a contact-transformation in

terms of Lagrange

bracket-

means of Poisson

tions

135.
136.

138.

139.
140.

300

Mathieu transformations and extended point-transforma

new view

of

resulting
dynamics
Helmholtz s reciprocal theorem
Jacobi s theorem on the transformation of a given dynamical system into

another dynamical system


137.

299

bracket-expressions
of

298

CHAPTER

304
304
305
307

......
...

310

Transformations in which the independent variable


New formulation of the integration-problem
.

302

....

Representation of a dynamical problem by a differential form


The Harniltonian function of the transformed equations

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

301

is

changed

309

310
311

XII.

PROPERTIES OF THE INTEGRALS OF DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS.

.............
.......
............
............

141.

Reduction of the order of a Harniltonian system by use of the energy

142.

143.

Hamilton s partial differential equation


Hamilton s integral as a solution of Hamilton

144.

The connexion

145.

Poisson s theorem

146.

The constancy

147.

Involution-systems

integral

s partial differential equation


of integrals with infinitesimal transformations admitted by

the system

of Lagrange s bracket-expressions

318

320
321

322

Contents

xi
PAGE

SECTION

a dynamical problem when

half the integrals are

known

148.

Solution of

149.

Levi-Civita s theorem

150.

Systems which possess integrals linear in the momenta


Determination of the forces acting on a system for which an integral

151.

323
325

....
.

328

is

331

known
152.

153.

.......

Application to the case of a particle whose equations of motion possess an


integral quadratic in the velocities
General dynamical systems possessing integrals quadratic in the velocities

332

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

336

335

CHAPTER

XIII.

THE REDUCTION OF THE PROBLEM OF THREE BODIES.


339

154.

Introduction

155.

The

156.

Jacobi s equation
Reduction to the 12th order, by use of the integrals of motion of the centre

157.

............
........

differential equations of the

of gravity

Reduction to the 8th order, by use of the integrals of angular


and elimination of the nodes

159.

Reduction to the 6th order

160.
161.

Alternative reduction of the problem from the 18th to the 6th order
The problem of three bodies in a plane

162.

The

163.

Extension to the problem of n bodies

344
347

348

351

.......

problem of three bodies

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

343

momentum

158.

restricted

340
342

problem

353

356
356

CHAPTER

XIV.

THE THEOREMS OF BRUNS AND POINCARE.


164.

Bruns theorem
Statement of the theorem
(i)
(ii)
Expression of an integral

358
in

terms of the essential coordinates of

......
....

358

Expression of the integral as a quotient of two real polynomials


Derivation of integrals from the numerator and denominator of
the quotient

361

(vii)

Proof that

366

(viii)

Proof that

does not involve the irrationality


is a function only of the momenta and the
integrals

momentum

371

the problem
(iii)

An

(iv)

Only one irrationality can occur

(v)
(vi)

must involve the momenta

integral

<

of angular
(ix)

(x)
(xi)

in the integral

Proof that

<

is

....

a function of

7",

Z, J/,

Deduction of Brims theorem, for integrals which do not involve


Extension of Brims result to integrals which involve the time

359
360

362

374
t
.

376
378

Contents

xii

165.

Poincare
(i)

theorem

The equations

(iii)

Statement of
Proof that

(iv)

Proof that

(ii)

(v)

4>

4>

.......

of motion of the restricted problem of three bodies


:

Poincare"

is

theorem

not a function of

q%

......

Proof that the existence of a one-valued integral


the result of (iii) in the general case

Removal

(vii)

Deduction of Poincare s theorem

of

is

the restrictions on the coefficients

m>

CHAPTER

381

381

Iff,

cannot involve the variables q,

(vi)

380

382

inconsistent with

,,, 2

383
384
385

XV.

THE GENERAL THEORY OF

ORBITS.

166.

Introduction

386

167.

Periodic solutions

386

168.

Poincare

169.

170.

171.
172.

normal variables

for a periodic orbit

criterion for the discovery of periodic orbits

three particles
of
Lagrange s particles
Stability
The differential equation of the

Lagrange

387
.

390

periodic orbits in the vicinity


normal displacement from an orbit

...........
..........
.......
.

173.

Korteweg s theorem

174.

The index

175.

177.

Characteristic exponents
Properties of the characteristic exponents
Attractive and repellent regions of a field of force

178.

Application of the energy integral to the problem of stability

179.

Application of integral-invariants to investigations of stability

176.

of stability

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

388
394
395

397
398

400
401

403
406
407
107

CHAPTER

XVI.

INTEGRATION EY TRIGONOMETRIC SERIES.


180.

The need
series

.............

for series

which converge

181.

The

182.

Trigonometric series
Removal of terms of the

183.
184.
185.

for all values of the

regularisation of the problem of three bodies

time

Poincare

410
411

412

first degree from the energy function


Determination of the normal coordinates by a contact-transformation
Transformation to the trigonometric form of If
.

........

413
414
417
419
420

188.

Other types of motion which lead to equations of the same form


Removal of a periodic term from
Removal of further periodic terms from //

189.

Reversion to the original coordinates

423

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES

424

186.
187.

INDEX OF AUTHORS QUOTED


INDEX OF TERMS EMPLOYED

4-2-2

4^5
.

428

CHAPTER

KINEMATICAL PRELIMINARIES
The displacements of rigid

1.

bodies.

The name

Analytical Dynamics is given to that branch of knowledge


in which the motions of material bodies, considered as due to the mutual
interactions of the bodies, are discussed

by the aid of mathematical

analysis.

It is natural to begin this discussion by considering the various possible


types of motion in themselves, leaving out of account for a time the causes
to which the initiation of motion may be ascribed this preliminary enquiry
;

The

object of the present chapter is


of kinematical theorems which will be required in the

constitutes the science of Kinematics.


to establish a

number

rest of the work.

Kinematics

is in itself

an extensive subject,

for a complete account of

which the student

In
dealing exclusively with it, e.g. that of Koenigs (Paris, 1897).
shall confine our attention to theorems which are of utility in the
appli

is referred to treatises

what

follows

we

cations of Kinematics to Dynamics.

We

shall say that a material body is rigid when the mutual distance of
every pair of specified points in it is invariable, so that the body does not
expand or contract or change its shape in any way, although it may change
its

position with reference to surrounding objects.

If a rigid body is moved from one position to another, the


change of
Certain special kinds of
position is called a displacement of the body.

displacement have received specific names; thus,

if

of every point of the

body which

the displacement

called a rotation about the line

is

lies

the position in space

on some straight

line

L;

if

is

unchanged,

the position in

of the body is unchanged, the displacement is called


space of some point
a rotation about the point P; and if the lines
joining the initial and final
of
each
of
the
of
the
are
a
set of parallel
positions
lines
points
body
straight

of length

so that the orientation of the

body in space

unaltered, the
displacement is called a translation parallel to the direction of the lines,
through a distance I.
w. D.

I,

is

Kinematical Preliminaries

[CH.

Elder s theorem on rotations about a point*.

2.

Consider a rigid body, one of whose points is made immoveable by some


attachment suppose that the body is free to turn about this point in any
manner, and let any two possible configurations of the body be taken for
;

We

now

shall

call

to the configuration
through the fixed point,

to

and the configuration Q.


these the configuration
shew that it is possible to bring the body from the configuration

convenience we shall

simply rotating it about some definite line


that a rotation about a point is always equivalent

Q by
i.e.

rotation about a line through the point.

To

was first given by Euler), denote the fixed


be
the
positions, in the configuration P, of two lines
point by 0;
the
fixed
which
are
fixed in the body and move with it let
through
point
OA OB be the positions of the same lines in the configuration Q. Draw
establish this result (which

OA OB

let

AOA

and bisects the angle


perpendicular to the plane
.ACM/: and draw also the plane which is perpendicular to the plane BOB
the plane which

is

and bisects the angle BOB. Let 00 be the line of intersection of these two
if they are coincident, we
planes, supposing them to be not coincident
denote by 00 the line of intersection of the planes OAB and OA B
;

Then

clearly in either case the line

in exactly the same way as


and
say, the angles

AGO

B OG.

it

OG

OA

and

is

related to the lines

OA

OB

and

OA OB
,

that

is to

A OG and

respectively equal to the angles


in such a
is rotated about

system

OB come

00

related to the lines

BOG are

It follows that if the

that the lines

is

OABC

OA

into the positions

and

OB
OC

way

respectively,
is therefore

The line
position unchanged.
unaffected by the displacement in question, and so the displacement can
be represented by a rotation through some angle round 06 which proves
then

will

retain

its

the theorem.

When

a body

is

continuously moving round one of

its

fixed in space, the displacement from its position at time

time

some

At, can,

through the fixed point.

interval Atf

The

line,
indefinitely diminished,
axis of rotation of the body at the time t.

When

a body

is

points, which is
to its position at

by Euler s theorem, be obtained by rotating the body about

definite line

when the

is

limiting position of this


called the instantaneous

is

continuously moving round one of its points, which is fixed, the locus
body is a cone, whose vertex is at the fixed point: the

of the instantaneous axis in the

locus of the instantaneous axis in space is also a cone whose vertex is at the fixed point.
Shew that the actual motion of the body can be obtained by making the former of these

cones (supposed to be rigidly connected with the body)


be fixed in space).

roll

on the latter cone (supposed to


(Poiusot.)

similar proof shews that if any two positions of a plane figure in the
are given, the displacement from one position to the other can be

same plane

Novi Comment. Petrop. xx.

(1776), p. 189,

25.

Kinematical Preliminaries

2-4]

regarded as a rotation about some point in the plane.


the centre of rotation.

When

3
This point

is

called

the body

is regarded as
continuously moving, the small displace
position to the position which succeeds it after an infinitesimal
interval of time can therefore be accomplished by a rotation round a
point

ment from one

this point is called the instantaneous centre of rotation.

lamina moves in any manner in its plane. Prove that the locus at any
Example 1.
instant of points which are at inflexions of their paths is a circle, which touches the loci
in the lamina and in space of the centre of instantaneous rotation.
(Coll. Exam.)

rigid body in two dimensions is subjected successively to two finite


Example 2.
If D 2 be the line joining the centres of displacement, and if
displacements in its plane.
DI be the line which is brought into the position
2 by half the first displacement (i.e.
by rotation through half the angle), and if 3 be the position to which D 2 is brought by

half the second displacement, shew that the centre of the total displacement of the rigid
is the intersection of DI and
3
(Coll. Exam.)

body

3.

Z>

The theorem of Rodrigues and Hamilton*.

Any two successive rotations about a fixed point can be compounded into
a single rotation by means of a theorem, which may be stated as follows
:

Successive rotations about three concurrent lines fixed in space, through twice
of the planes formed by them, restore a body to its original position.

the angles

Draw. Op, Oq, Or per


QOR, ROP, POQ respectively. Then if a body is
rotated through two right angles about Oq, and afterwards through two
right
angles about Or, the position of OP is on the whole unaffected, while Oq is
moved to the position occupied by its image in the line Or; the effect is
therefore the same as that of a rotation round OP through twice the
angle
between the planes PR and PQ, which we may call the angle RPQ. It
For

let

the lines be denoted by OP, OQ, OR.

pendicular to the planes

follows that successive rotations

round OP, OQ,

OR

through twice the angles

RPQ, PQR, QRP,

respectively, are equivalent to successive rotations through


two right angles about the lines Oq, Or, Or, Op, Op, Oq; but the latter
rotations will clearly on the whole produce no displacement; which establishes

the theorem.
4.

The composition of equal and opposite rotations about parallel axes.

A case of special interest is that in which a body is subjected in turn to


two rotations of equal amount in opposite senses about two parallel axes.
In neither displacement is any point of the body displaced in a direction
parallel to the axes, and this is therefore true of the total displacement.
Moreover, if any line be taken in the body in a plane perpendicular to the
*

0. Rodrigues, Journ. de Math. v. (1840), p. 380; Hamilton, Lectures on Quaternions,


the proof here given is due to Burnside, Acta Math. xxv.
(1902).

12

344

Kinematical Preliminaries

[CH.

axes, this line in the first displacement will be turned through an angle
equal to the angle of rotation, and in the second displacement will be turned

back through the same angle so its final position


original position; which evidently can be the case
;

exception,

only

translation.

when the

It follows that

total

displacement

is

be parallel to its
every line without

will
for

equivalent to a simple

two successive equal and opposite rotations about

parallel axes are equivalent to a translation in a direction perpendicular to


the axes; or, in other words, a rotation about
any axis is equivalent to

a rotation through the same angle about any axis parallel to


a simple translation in a direction perpendicular to the axis.

it,

together with

The converse

of this, namely the theorem that a rotation


of a rigid
about
body
any axis, preceded or followed by a translation in a direction
perpendicular to the axis, are together equivalent to a rotation of the body
about a parallel axis, is also true, being essentially the same as the result

stated in
2, that any displacement in a plane can be regarded as a rotation
round some point in the plane. By considering the angle between the
initial and final positions of
any line which is perpendicular to the axis and
moves with the body, we see that the angles of rotation round the two axes
are equal.
5.

Chasles theorem on the most general displacement of a rigid body*.

We

shall

now, consider displacements of a more general character. It is


evident that a free rigid body can be moved from
any one selected con
figuration P in space to any other Q by first moving some selected point of
its position in the
configuration P to its position in the
each of the other points of the body
being moved by a simple
translation parallel to this (so that the body is oriented in the same
way after
the operation as before), and secondly rotating the body about this point into
the configuration Q.
By Euler s theorem, this latter operation can be
performed by simply rotating the body about a line through the point so

the body from

configuration Q,

we

see that the most general displacement


of a rigid body can be obtained by
first translating the body, and then rotating it about a line.

We

shall

now shew

that the line about which the rotation takes


place can
motion of translation is parallel to this line. For let A
be the initial position of any point of the body, and B the position to which
this point is brought by the motion of translation.
Let
be the line
A
to
the
line
round
which
the
rotation
takes
parallel
through
place, and let
be the foot of the perpendicular from B on AK. Then the motion of
be so chosen, that the

AK

translation can evidently be accomplished in two


stages, the first of which
is a translation parallel to the line about which the rotation takes
place,
*
Mozzi, Discorso matematico sopra ilrotamento momentaneo del corpi, Naples, 1763; Cauchy,
Exercices de Hath. n. (Paris, 1827), p. 87; Oeuvres, (2) vn. p. 94; Chasles, Bulletin Unit: des
Sciences (Ferussac), xiv. (1830), p. 321 ; Comptes Rendus de VAcad. xvi.
(1843), p. 1420.

Kinematical Preliminaries

4-6]

bringing the point A to the position K, and the second of which is


a translation perpendicular to the line about which the rotation takes place,

to the position B.
But by 4, the second translation,
bringing the point
with
the
rotation
which
follows
it, are together
together
equivalent to

a simple rotation about a

new

axis parallel to the first one.

If therefore any

point on this axis be taken as base-point, the whole displacement can be


accomplished by a translation of the body parallel to a certain line through

together with a rotation about this line; this establishes the

this point,

theorem.

This combination of a translation and a rotation round a line parallel to


is called a screw
the ratio of the distance of

the direction of translation

It is
translation to the angle of rotation is called the pitch of the screw.
clear that in a screw displacement, the order in which the translation and

rotation take place

is

indifferent.

Halphen s theorem on the composition of two general displacements.


Halphen has shewn* how to determine geometrically the resultant of any two screw6.

displacements as a screw-displacement.

Let

and A 2 denote the axes of the two screws, and

Let BI be the line which

brought to the position

is

-4 ]2

A 12

common

their

by half the

perpendicular.

first

displacement

and rotation through half the angle), and let B2 be the line to
whose position A^ is brought by half the second displacement; let C denote the common
Halphen s result is that the axis of the resultant
perpendicular to the lines BI and B2
(i.e.

half the translation,

screw-displacement
position

For

B2
let

position DI
to DI and

is C,

and

which brings the line

the displacement is twice that

to the

DI and D2 be lines such that half the given displacements will bring A 12 to the
and D2 to the position A 12 respectively, and let
be the common perpendicular
C"

The figure thus obtained, and that which is obtained from it by rotating
right angles about A i2 , evidently coincide whence we have the relations
Intercept
Intercept

Intercept

made on B by A { and C= Intercept made on


made on B2 by A 2 and C= Intercept made on
made on C by BI and B2 = Intercept made on
1

Angle between the planes


Angle between the planes
Angle between B 1 and B 2

AiB B C= Angle
A 2 B2 B2 C= Angle
1

it

through two

= Angle

Z>

C"

by AI and
by A 2 and C
by DI and D 2

C",

between the planes AI D lt


between the planes A 2 D2
,

between

and

DiC

DC

screw about A 1 brings C to the position of


produced, the inter
being brought to the position of the intersection of D^ and C ; and
then the screw about A 2 brings
to the position of C produced, the intersection of
so C is the axis of the resultant
2 and C being brought to the intersection of B 2 and C
It follows that the

section of

and

C"

C"

and 2
screw, and the amount of the translation is twice the intercept made on C by
Also the line BI, which by the first screw is brought to the position
is by the second
brought to a position making the same angle with B2 that B 2 makes with B l ; and therefore
.

Z>j,

Nouvelles Annales de Math.

Mesa, of Math. xix. p. 104 (1889).

(3) i. p.

298 (1882).

The proof given here

is

due to Burnside,

Kinematical Preliminaries

the rotation of the resultant screw

Halphen

is

twice the angle between

[CH.

Bz and B.

This establishes

theorem.

Shew

Example.

by the composition

that any infinitesimal displacement of a rigid body can be obtained


two infinitesimal rotations round lines, and that one of these lines

of

can be arbitrarily chosen.

7.

Analytic representation of a displacement.

We

shall

now

see

how any displacement

of a rigid

body can be represented

analytically.

Let rectangular axes Oxyz be taken, fixed in space these will be supposed
form a right-handed system, i.e. if the axes are so placed that Oz is directed
vertically upwards and Oy is directed to the northern horizon, then Ox will
be directed to the east. Let the displacement considered be equivalent to a
:

to

rotation through an angle

&>

about a line whose direction-angles are

(a, /3, 7),

and which passes through a point

whose coordinates are (a, b, c), together


with a translation through a distance d parallel to this line. The
angle
must be taken with its appropriate sign, the sign being positive when the line
&>

(a, /3,

7) being directed vertically upwards, the rotation from the southern

is round
by the east. Let the point P whose
be brought by the displacement to the position of the
point Q (X, Y, Z); and let the point P be brought by the translation alone
to the position of the point R (, 77, ) then we have
evidently

horizon

to

the

coordinates are

northern

(x, y, z)

= x + d cos a,

77

= y + d cos ft,

%=z

+ d cos 7.

Let
rotation,

be the foot of the perpendicular from R (or Q) on the axis of


and let L be the foot of the perpendicular from Q on KR. Then

we have

X g= projection of

the broken line

RLQ

on the axis Ox,

being understood that projections have their appropriate signs, so that the
XA ), not (XA XB ).
projection of a line AB on the axis of a; is (XB
it

Now

the projection of

(projection of

Ox

is

A K on

the axis Ox)

- a - cos a {( - a) cos a + (T? - b) cos


|

or

and as
axis

KR on the axis

RL =

Ox

(1

cos

co)

KR,

it

/3

+ (f - c) cos 7],

follows that the projection of

RL

on the

is

- (1 - cos tu) [f - a - cos a {( - a) cos a + (17 - b) cos @ +


Moreover, the line

LQ

is

normal to the plane

RKA,

and

its

- c) cos 7}].

direction-cosines

are therefore proportional to the quantities


(

c) cos /3

6) cos 7,

(77

(??

b) cos

a) cos 7
a) cos

/3,

c) cos a,

Kinematical Preliminaries

6-8]

and since the sum of the squares of these three quantities, divided by the
the quantity sirfRAK,
expression {(-a) + 0?- &) + (-c) }, represents
1
and the three
,
follows that the sum of the three squares is equal to
are the projections on the axes of a length +
quantities themselves
sin w, the projection of LQ
measured along the line LQ. Since
2

it

KR

KR

LQ= KR

on the axis Ox

is

therefore

sin

&)

c) cos ft

{(

b) cos 7}.

(r)

On considering a special case, e.g. supposing that the axis of rotation


axis Oz, we see that the upper sign is correct and thus we have

is

the

Z - = - (1 - cos

&>)

{(- ) - cos

cos a cos /3(r)

+
Substituting

for

sin

to

{cos /3

cos

c)

rj,

(1

- cos w)

+ sin to

7 (77.
z,

c)}

6)j.

we have

cos a cos y(z

b)

(cos /3(z

cos

c)

y(y

c)}

&)}.

we have

F = y + d cos /3 - (1 - cos &))

{(y

- cos /3 cos y(z


4-

sin

Z= z + d cos 7 - (1

ft)

cos w) {(z

sin

&)

2
6) sin /3

a.

a)

- c)

(x

(cos a.(y

cos

c)

[cos 7 (#

cos 7 cos

sin 2

b)

cos a (x

cos a.(z

coordinates x, y, z of the original


which define the displacement.

The composition of small

a)}

c)}

7
cos

a)

/3

7 cos /3(y

cos ft(x

These equations give the new coordinates X, Y,

8.

7(

2
a) sin a

{(x

cos a cos (3(y

and

cos a cos

b)

their values in terms of x, y,

X = x + d cos a

Similarly

(- a)

b}}

a)}.

terms of the

in

position of the point and the quantities

rotations.

We shall now apply the last result to the case in which the rotation is
infinitesimal, the axis of rotation passing through the origin and there being
for co, where S-v/r
no motion of translation. We shall write
The equations of the
quantity whose square can be neglected.
now become
= x + (z cos /3 y cos 7) 8-v/r,

is

a small

8>|r

last article

F = y + (x cos
Z z + (y cos

z cos a)

x cos

/3)

S-^r,

8^.

are the equations which we should obtain if we successively (in


a
ty about Ox,
any order) subjected the body to infinitesimal rotations cos
It follows that any small rota
cos /3 8-^r about Oy, and cos 7 8^ about Oz.

But these

tion Sty about

line

OK is

equivalent to successive small rotations Sty cos


.

KOx

Kinematical Preliminaries

[CH.

about Ox, Si/r cos KOy about Oy, and &$ cos KOz about Oz, where Ox,
Oy, Oz
are any three mutually perpendicular lines which intersect
in one
its
.

OK

of

points, 0.

Enters parametric

9.

round a point*.

specification of rotations

The analytic expressions for the translational part of a


displacement are,
as we have seen,
extremely simple; but the expressions for the rotational
part are not so simple, and these will now be further considered.
Suppose
then that a rigid body is rotated
about a line through
through an angle
the origin, whose
are
a, ft, 7.
7, the coordinates
direction-angles
By
(X, Y, Z) of the new position of a point whose original coordinates were
&>

(x, y, z)

are given

(X = x

by the equations

2 sin a

\w

2
(x sin a

cos a cos

+
i

F= y

2 sin |a) (y sin

z cos

ft

=z

2 sin 2

sin 2

G) (

Now

introduce parameters
=cosasina>,

77

ft

cos

77,

= cos /3 sin |

\w {z cos

x cos ft cos

ft

cos

2 sin ^co cos

cos

^&>

y cos

7),

z cos

a),

a)

2 sin i&) cos ^o) (x cos 7

x cos 7 cos a

z cos a cos 7)

ft

2 sin -iw cos

/3)

(y cos a

cos

/3).

^, defined by the equations

= cos 7 sin

&>,

i&>,

x=

cos&>;

these parameters evidently satisfy the identical relation

r+7?

+r+ %

and the above equations can be written

=i,

in the form

If therefore the coordinate axes are denoted

by OXYZ, and

if

moveable

axes which originally coincide with these are brought into the
position Oxyz
by the given rotation, the direction-cosines of the two sets of axes with
reference to each other are given by the following scheme
:

Novi Comment. Petrop. xx. (1776),

p. 208,

6 sqq.

Kinematical Preliminaries

8-rlO]

It is readily seen that the

two successive displacements

parameters
(

r,

f *
,

(",

xx

x"=

f",

17",

and (,

77,

corresponding to the resultant of


x ), are given by the equations

x"),

f,

-^f-w -f-

These formulae (which were discovered independently at different times by Gauss,


Rodrigues, Hamilton, and Cayley) really constitute the theorem for the multiplication of
For ^,
?;,
may be regarded as the components of a quaternion*
quaternions.
k
where
+
i,
satisfy the equations
j,
X+i +y
,

i*

=j* = k*=-\, ij=-ji=k, jk=-kj =

and the above formulae are then


X"

+ Z i + jj +

all

t"k

comprehended

X+&+W

i,

ki=-ik=j;

in the single equation

(X

+ & + JJ +

*)

The reader who is acquainted with quaternions will observe that the effect of the
1
where q denotes the
rotation on any vector p is to convert it into the vector qpq
,

quaternion x + &+n} +

&">

The Eulerian

10.

the quaternion

itself is not

the rotational operator.

angles.

various methods of parametrically


practically useful of the
round a fixed
a
of
the
rigid body due to a rotation
displacement
representing
is likewise due to Eulerf: it has the disadvantage of being unsympoint
metrical, but is otherwise very simple and convenient.

The most

be the fixed point round which the rotation takes place, and let
be a right-handed system of rectangular axes _fixed in space. Let
Oxyz be rectangular axes fixed relatively to the body and moving with it,
and Oxyz
and such that before the displacement the two sets of axes

Let

OXYZ

OXYZ

OK

be perpendicular to the plane zOZ,


Let
are coincident in position.
drawn so that if OZ is directed to the vertical and the projection of Oz
is directed to the east.
to OZ is directed to the south, then

OK

perpendicular

by 6,
-^r,
respectively: these are
as the three Eulerian angles defining the position of the axes Oxyz

Denote the angles zOZ, YOK,

known

with reference to the axes

yOK

<,

OXYZ.

In order to find the direction-cosines of Ox, Oy, Oz, with respect to OX,
that these are equal to the projections on Ox, Oy, Oz, respectively,
Now this unit length has projections
of a unit length measured along OX.
where
OL is the intersection of the
and
sin
cos $ along OL
along OK,

we observe

<

planes

XOY and Z0z\

but a length

cos<

along

OL

has projections cos sin 6


is the intersection of the
<f>

$ cos 6 along OM, where OM


cos
along OM has projections
planes xOy and ZOz; and a length cos
cos
cos 6 sin -fy along Oy also, a length
cos $ cos 6 cos A|T along Ox and
sin
cos i/r
Ox and
sin
sin<sim/r along
along OK has projections

along Oz and cos

<

<

(f>

* This
quaternion will have its tensor equal to unity.

t Novi Comment. Petrop. xx. (1776), p. 189.

Kinemat ical Preliminaries

10
along Oy.

Hence

OX

cos

d>

<p

cos 6 cos

&

sin

cos a sin y-

sin

d>

sin

-vjr

alonsf

Ox
r

cos ty along Oy,

sin 6

cos

are

cos

on Ox, Oy, Oz respectively of the

finally the projections

unit length measured on

[CH.

along Oz.

(/>

Proceeding in this way, we obtain for the direction-cosines of the two sets of
axes OX YZ and Oxyz with respect to each other the
following scheme
:

Connexion of the Eulerian angles with the parameters

11.

The

^.

77,

between the Eulerian angles 6,


and the parameters
\|r
f
9
be
obtained
the
schemes
of directionf/j
%
may
by comparing
cosines which have been
in
and
10
9
given
they may however be obtained
relations

<,

>

directly as follows

Let OX YZ and Oxyz be the fixed axes and the axes derived from these
by the rotation w round a line OR, whose direction-angles are (a, ft, 7).

Draw

a sphere of unit radius with the point


as centre, so that planes
intersect
the
in
passing through
sphere
great circles, and lines intersect the
in
Then
in
the
sphere
points.
spherical triangle RZz, the sides are 7, 7, 0,
and the angle at
is
whence we have the relation

o>

sn

RZ

is

let v

Then the

<

6 about the pole of Zz, and


into an arc

7 sin

denote the angle RZY, so RZz = ITT


v.
brought to the position Rz by successive rotations

Moreover,
arc

sin

-v/r

about z

making an angle

but the
v

first

<

about Z,

of these transforms
v with Zz, at

or ITT

RZ

the
\-rr
second rotation transforms this into an arc making the same angle ^TT
v
with Zz, but passing through z and the third rotation transforms it into an
(f>

</>

arc
to

making an angle

TT

RzZ, or

TT

^TT

RZz, or

+ ty

TT

with Zz, at

(^TT

<j>

or

v),

TT

z.

But

or \tr
v

this angle
-f
</>

so

must be equal

we have

Kinematical Preliminaries

10-12]

RZX

Hence, since in the spherical triangle


angle at

Z is

-|TT

the sides are

+ $), we have
(TT
cos a = sin 7 sin \

v or

for sin

and the

$).

7 from the equation already found,

cos a sin

\w =

sin

sin

or

^6

sin

\Q

sin |

Similarly from the spherical triangle


cos

and again eliminating

a, 7, ^TT,

-v^

(-v/r

Substituting

11

ft

RZY

= sin 7 cos
ft

$),

(i/r

<).

we have
0),

(i/r

we have

sin 7,

cos

|(^

this gives

sin ^tu

or

?;

= sin cos (i|r


= sini#cosi(^

0),
<).

Moreover, since we have shewn that in the spherical triangle RZz the
and the angles are (rr ^r
we have
(?r
i/r

sides are 7, 7, 0,

<),

<),

&>,

the relations

= COS-i0COS-J(-V/r + 0),
=
+
7 cos ^0 sin %

COS i ft)

and

sin

cos
|&>

(-v/r

x = cos 1
= cos ^

or

The four parameters


angles

6,

<f>,

g,

77,

sin l

(-v/r

f
77

0).

are Aus expressed in terms of the Eulerian

sin 1

sin i(-^

-</>),

= sin ^0 cos |(i|r

1
f = cos
=
^ cos ^

(i^ +
cos Y (^ +

^>),

sin

(/>),

0).

7%e connexion of rotations with homographies ;j

Consider

0),

ty by the relations
(

12.

<),

+
+

cos |(\/r

now a

sphere, on the surface of which

the Cayley- Klein parameters.

we shall call 8} are


Let these figures be stereographically projected on a plane (e.g. by taking the
highest point of the sphere as vertex of projection and the tangent-plane at the lowest
Now let the
point of the sphere as the plane) we shall call the projected figures P.
sphere be rotated through a definite angle about some axis through its centre, so that the
let the figures in their new
be
figures on its surface are shifted to new positions
any

figures (which

drawn.

positions
the stereographic projections of the figures 8 (with the same vertex and
Then corresponding to the rotation of the
plane of projection as before) be called P
sphere, which changes 8 to S we have a transformation in the plane, which changes the

called

and

let

P into the figures P We shall now examine this transformation more closely.
If one of the figures P is a circle in the plane, we know that the
corresponding figure S

figures

must be a

circle traced

on the sphere, since by stereographic projection a circle is changed


S must also be a circle; and hence P must -also be a circle.

into a circle: therefore

Thus we
sphere,

see that the transformations of the plane, which correspond to rotations


of the
be such as to change any circle in the plane into another circle in the
plane.

must

12

Kinematical Preliminaries
may be shewn*

It

in the following

z=x+y J

Let
plane

that any transformation of this kind

where x and y are the rectangular coordinates of any point in the


complex variable z.
= x + i/ \/ - 1, where x and y refer to the point into which the point (x, y)
1,

circles into circles^,

Then any

a, 6,

c,

one-to-one transformation of the plane, which

be defined by

may

an equation of the type

_
=

are (real or complex} constants;

kind combined with a reflexion in one of

represented analytically

changed by the transformation.

changes all

where

may be

so that to this point there corresponds a definite value of the

Similarly let z
is

way

[CH.

or else by

a transformation of

this latter

the axes of coordinates.

transformation represented by an equation of the type


_ az + b
,

cz

+d

a homographic transformation, or homography. It appears therefore that homo


graphies in a plane correspond to rotations of a solid body about a fixed point, in such a
way that if two homographies correspond respectively to two rotations, the homography
compounded of these corresponds to the rotation compounded of the two rotations J.

is called

We

shall

now

see

how the connexion between

represented analytically.
Let us replace the parameters

77,

f,

rotations

and homographies may be

^ by new parameters

a,

/3,

y,

8,

defined by the

equations
*"~

/3--y
94

~ q9--

_/3 + y

l~

9,
Z*

2*

so that they are connected with the Eulerian angles


.

d,

_a + 8
X~~a
Z

>

(j>,

^ by the

equations

y=ism-.e

= cos-.e 2
These

"

"

Cayley-Klein

parameters clearly satisfy the relation


aS

and replacing the quantities


their values in terms of

of

a, /3, y,

a, /3,

8 the following

-y,

77,

8,

scheme

^
we have

Cf. L. K.

scheme of direction-cosines given

in

for the values of the direction-cosines in

9 by

terms

/3y=

in the

Ford, An introduction to the theory of automorphic functions (London, 1915).


straight line is to be regarded as a particular kind of circle.

J Klein, Math. Ann.

ix. (1875), p.

183; Cayley, Math. Ann. xv. (1879),

p.

238.

Kinematical Preliminaries

12, 13]

It may readily be shewn that the parameters


resultant of two successive displacements (a /3 y

equations
a"

y"

=a a+y
= ya +8y

(a",

t3,

ft",

and

= aft

+ft8

8"=yft

+ 88

ft"

y",

(a,

13
corresponding to the
8) are given by the

8")

y,

ft,

These equations shew that the transformation


a"z+ff

y"z

is

8"

the result of performing in succession the two substitutions

J=
,

+ ft

z=
,

an d

yz + 8

*,,

az

+ ft
^j

yz+8

and the connexion between rotations and homographic transformations

is

thus evident

analytically.

One advantage
(|,

r),

f,

x),

of the Cayley-Klein parameters, as compared with the parameters


that they retain some of the simplicity of the quaternion calculus, while

is

using the *J

of ordinary algebra instead of the

is

fixed axes

by f1}

and

<,

OXYZ)
**

before the motion, and (di, fa

tan \6{ by

/,

"**

"fj

Example

2.

If

after the motion.

Denoting

^ tan d
| t
1

008*0- sin $ 6

e-^s

from the equations

2
the quantities X-p,
Xi 2 are formed, and
2
and
the
symbols
2
quantities X^, X^,
1
,

these quantities are regarded as umbral


2
x 2 2 x l x 2 are replaced by -Y+iX,
shew
that
the equations obtained are
respectively,

XX

Z,

shew that

^=f

Y+iX,

k of Hamilton s quaternions.

j,

Let (6,
1.
\^) denote the Eulerian angles.
Suppose that a point in space
carried about with the axes Oxyz has the vectorial angles (0 lt
to the
t ) (referred

Example
which

i,

if

%i

-y +ix, y + ix, z,
- Y+ iX= a 2 - y + ix] + 2apz + /3 2 (y + ix\
Y+ iX = y 2 (-y + ix] + 2y8z + 8 2 (y + ix),
Z = ay (-y + ix + (a8 + py)z + p8(y + w),
f

and that these are the three equations connecting the coordinates (X,
referred to the axes

.Example

3.

OXYZ with

its

coordinates

(x, y, z)

Y, Z) of a point
referred to the axes Oxyz.

If

y + ix: y + ix

and

z=\\

Y+iX Y+iX Z=\


:

\1

:1
:

shew that

and \^=

y
13.

We

Vectors.

now proceed

displacement by

to

consider

the

essential

features

involved in

the

simple translation of a rigid body.

The operation

of translation in

itself,

considered apart from the body

translated, evidently possesses the following properties

Kinematical Preliminaries

14
1.

by any one of the equal and parallel


which have a given length (viz. the distance of the translation)

It can be specified completely

lines of space

and given direction


furnishes

2.

[OH. i

all

If
its

joining
to the sum

(viz.

since such a line

ACDE...KB

be a broken line

the direction of the translation)

the data which describe the operation.

AB

be one of these

lines,

and

AB is

equivalent

KB.
number of

operations

extremities, then the operation represented by


of the operations represented by
C, CD, DE,

These properties

and 2 are possessed by a large

and quantities other than the operation of translation an operation or


quantity which possesses them is called a vector quantity.
;

By 2,

a vector

AB is equivalent

to the

sum

of three vectors

A K, KL, LB,

respectively parallel to three given rectangular axes, and forming a broken


and B. These three vectors are called the com
line joining the points

ponents of the vector AB along the given axes.


cos a, Zcos/3,

be the length and

(a, ft,

7)

the lengths of the component vectors are clearly


cosy), being in fact the projections of A B on the axes.

the direction-angles of
(I

If

AB,

single vector which


called their resultant.

is

equivalent to any

number

of given vectors

is

is conceived as varying in dependence on a


parameter (e.g. the
between
the
vectors
difference
the
to
time),
corresponding
any two values of
the parameter is also a vector, and hence the rate of change of the vector

If a vector

with respect to the parameter

also a vector,

is

whose components are the


This

rates of change of the corresponding components.


of the vector with respect to the parameter.
14.

Velocity

and acceleration ;

Consider now a body which

is

is

called the flux

their vectorial character.

being continuously translated (though not

necessarily always in the same direction) without any change of orientation.


Its total translation to any time t is a vector quantity, and hence the rate at

which this changes with the time, i.e. its time-flux, is also a vector quantity,
if x, y, z are the coordinates referred
is called the velocity of the body
to fixed axes of any point fixed in the body and moving with it, then the com
which

ponents of the velocity referred to these axes are the rates of change of x, y, z,
i.e. are x, y, z (where dots denote differentiations with respect to the time
t}.
Similarly the rate of change of the velocity is again a vector, whose
components are x, y, z (two dots indicating second derivatives with respect
this vector is called the acceleration of the body.
to the time)
;

It is clear that if

and Q are two moving

points, the vector

which

represents the translation (or velocity, or acceleration) of Q is the sum of the


vector which represents the translation (or velocity, or acceleration, as the
and the vector which represents the translation (or velocity,
case may be) of

or acceleration) of

relative to P,

moves with P, and whose

i.e.

of

referred to axes whose origin

directions are invariable.

Kinematical Preliminaries

13-15]
15.

Angular

velocity

its vectorial

15

character.

Consider next a body which is rotating continuously about a line. Let 6


denote the angle turned through at any time t then Q represents the
speed
of turning at the time t.
If from any point on the line round which the
rotation takes place a segment whose length represents 6 is measured
along
the line, this segment will evidently furnish a complete
specification of the
nature of the rotation at the instant t, or (as it is generally
expressed) of
:

the angular velocity of the body.


The direction in which the segment is
measured from the base-point is to be connected with the sense of rotation

by the usual convention, namely that when the segment


upwards the rotation from the southern horizon

is

directed vertically

to the northern is

round by

the east.

An
and

angular velocity

direction.

Now

is

therefore represented

a body one

if

by a

line of definite length

of whose

is fixed
8,
by
points
experiences a small rotation Sty round any line OK, this displacement is
equivalent to successive small rotations Sty cos a round Ox, Sty cos ft round

Oy, and Sty cos 7 round Oz, where Ox, Oy, Oz are any three mutually
and (a, fi, 7) are the direction-angles
perpendicular lines passing through
of
with reference to Oxyz. From this it is clear that we can
regard an

OK

angular velocity represented by a length ty measured on


to

velocities

OK

as equivalent
ty cos j3, ty cos 7,

angular
represented by lengths ty cos a,
measured along Ox, Oy, Oz, respectively.
But this is essentially the fundamental property of vectors, and can be

expressed by the statement that angular velocities can be resolved and

compounded according to the vectorial law.


It must be observed however that an
angular velocity does not fulfil all
the conditions which enter into the definition of a vector, for an
angular
velocity about one line is not equivalent to an angular velocity of the same
magnitude about a parallel line. Angular velocity must therefore be regarded
as a vector which is localised
along a definite line.
Example. A right circular cone of semi-vertical angle $ rolls without sliding on a plane.
To find its instantaneous axis of rotation, and to determine its
about this
angular
velocity

axis in terms of the angular


velocity of the line of contact in the plane.

Since

all

points of the generator which

at rest (for there

the cone.

is

no

sliding), this

is in

contact with the plane are


instantaneously
is the instantaneous axis of rotation of

generator

Let
denote the angular velocity of the cone about this
generator, and let 6
denote the angular velocity of the line of contact in the
Then the motion of the
plane.
axis of the cone can be represented
6 round the normal to the
by an angular
o>

velocity

plane,

and the whole motion of the cone

compounded of this together with a rotation


that the component of angular
velocity of the cone
is

round the axis of the cone. It follows


about a line through the vertex of the cone
perpendicular to the axis is 6 cos /3
but
this must equal the resolved
part of co in this direction, which is wsin/3.
We have
;

therefore

w=6
which

is

the required relation between

o>

cot

and

/3,

6.

Kinematical Preliminaries

16

[CH.

Determination of the components of angular velocity of a system in


16.
terms of the Eulerian angles, and of the symmetrical parameters.
The position at any time of a rigid body which is continuously moving

about a fixed point

is

most conveniently described by taking two

sets

OXYZ

are fixed in space, while the


of rectangular axes, of which one set
the
other set Oxyz are fixed relatively to the body, and move with it
then
the
three
Eulerian
of
the
^,
specified by
body being
angles 0,
position
;

</>,

which define the position of the axes Oxyz relatively to the axes OXYZ.
We shall now determine the components, along the moving axes, of the
angular velocity of the body at any instant.
Let OK denote the line of intersection of the planes XOY and xOy the
;

angular velocity of the system is evidently compounded of angular velocities


about OZ, and -^r about Oz. Of these, the first can be
6 about OK,
law by angular velocities 6 sin i/r about Ox
replaced according to the vectorial
<j>

and 6 cos
about

about Oy

ty

Ox,

sin

sin

<f>

and the second can be resolved into


cos 6 about Oz.
about Oy, and

-fy

<

So

<j>

sin 6 cos
finally

\|r

if

denote the components of angular velocity of the body about the


axes Ox, Oy, Oz, respectively, we have
G>

I} eo 2 ,

o>

= 6 sin -Jr
sin 6 cos
= va cos y
sm a sin y,
i
a
1a) = y (p COS
ilr,

<j>

&>

ft) 3

From

t>

<6

c7.

-|-

we can

these expressions

at once deduce the values of

in terms of the symmetrical parameters

??,

%, of

for

twj,

o>

o>

we have

cf>=-

Similarly

we have
==
"4?

and we have

cos d

~H

^,

v2

$^.

>

+%

Substituting these values in the equation

The values
principle of

&>

a
.

= ty +

cos

#,

we have

and
can be at once obtained from this by the
2
and
thus
we have the components of angular velocity
symmetry
of o^

<w

given by the equations

Kinematical Preliminaries

16, 17]
17.

Time-flux of a vector whose components relative

17
to

moving axes are

given.

Suppose now that a vector quantity is specified by its components f, 77,


any instant t with reference to the instantaneous position of a right-handed
system of axes Oxyz which are themselves in motion and let it be required
to find the vector which represents the rate of
change of the given vector.
at

Let

&) 3 denote the


2
components of the angular velocity of the
resolved
the
instantaneous position of the axes Ox, Oy, Oz
system Oxyz,
along
themselves.
&>

&>!,

The time-flux of the given vector is the (vector) sum of the time-fluxes
of the components
taken separately. But if we consider the vector
?/,
it is increased in
length to g + %dt in the infinitesimal interval of time dt,
and at the same time is turned by the motion of the axes, so that (owing to
,

the angular velocity round Oy) it is displaced through an angle co 2 dt from its
position in the original plane zOx, in the direction away from Oz, and also
(owing to the angular velocity round Oz) it is displaced through an angle
(o s dt from its
position in the original plane xOy, towards Oy. The coordinates
of its extremity at the end of the interval of time dt, referred to the
positions
of the axes at the commencement of the interval dt, are therefore
(neglecting

infinitesimals of order higher than the first)

and

so the

components of the vector which represents the time-flux of


<"

are

Similarly the components of the vectors which represent the time-fluxes


of the vectors ?; and
are respectively
&>

and

3 ?7,

o>

Adding

This

we have

these,

vector in the

finally the components of the time-flux of the given

form

result

can

be

immediately applied

acceleration of a point whose coordinates


reference to axes moving with an

to

find

(x, y, z) at time

the velocity and


t are
given with

angular velocity whose components along

the axes themselves at time

are
(a>

&>

&>

3 ).

For substituting in the above formulae, we see that the components of


the velocity are

x
w. D.

yw-s

+ zw

zo>!

+ xa)

Kinematical Preliminaries

18

[CH.

Now

applying the same formulae to the case in which the vector whose
time-flux is sought is the velocity, we have the components of the accelera
tion of the point in the form

--

-yCtt

(x

yco 3

(^

#o>

+ za}

-I-

2)

(t>

(y

ZW-L

(#

2/

ft>

ya>i)

+ xo) ) + o)
s

(z

xw z +

2/&>i),

In the case in which the motion takes place in a plane, which we may
take as the plane Oxy, there will be only two coordinates (x, y}, and only one
component of angular velocity, namely 6, where 6 is the angle made by the
moving axes with their positions at some fixed epoch the components of
;

velocity are therefore (putting

z,

each equal to zero in the above

expressions)

+ xO,

y6 and y

and the components of acceleration are


x - 2y6

-yO- x6

and y + 2x6

+ x 0-

yfc.

Example. Prove that in the general case of motion of a rigid body there is at each
instant one definite point at a finite distance which regarded as invariably connected with
the body has no acceleration at the instant, provided the axis of the body s screwing

motion be not instantaneously stationary

in direction.

18.

Special resolutions of the velocity

The

results obtained

and

in the last article

(Coll.

Exam.)

acceleration.

enable us to obtain formulae,

use, relating to the components of the velocity


moving point in various special directions.

which are frequently of


acceleration of a
(i)

Velocity

and

and

acceleration in polar coordinates.

Let the position of a point be defined by

its

polar coordinates

r,

6,

0,

connected with the coordinates (X, Y, Z) of the point referred to fixed


rectangular axes OXYZ by the equations

X = r sin 6 cos
Y = r sin 6 sin
Z = r cos 6

<,

(j),

let it be required to determine the components of velocity and


acceleration of the point in the direction of the radius vector r, in the
direction which is perpendicular to r and lies in the plane containing r and-

and

OZ (this

plane

is

generally called the meridian plane), and in the direction

perpendicular to the meridian plane these three directions are frequently


described as the directions of r increasing, 6 increasing, and
increasing,
;

(f>

19

Kinematical Preliminaries

17, 18]

Take a line through the origin 0, parallel to the direction of


respectively.
a line through 0, parallel to the
increasing, as a moving axis Ox and take
of r
line
and
a
axis
direction of
parallel to the direction
Oy,
increasing, as
the
determine
which
The three Eulerian angles
increasing as axis Oz.
;

<p

OXYZ

are
reference to the fixed axes
position of the moving axes Oxyz with
of angular velocity of the system Oxyz,
(6, d), 0); so ( 16) the components
the axes Ox, Oy, Oz themselves, are
resolved

along

eoj

The coordinates

sin

of the

6,

&>

0,

<w

(p

cos

6.

point, referred to the

moving

moving

axes, are

17 the components of velocity of the point resolved


by
(0, JO, r);
to
the
moving axes are
parallel

and

so

sin

rd,

r,

6,

r<j>

and the components of acceleration in the directions of 6 increasing,


of
17) are
increasing, and r increasing (again using the formulae
2

-T-

]
!

(r0)

r<

sin 6 cos

r0, or r0
.

-r-

dt

(rd) sin 0)

and

fcf>

2r0

or

cos

rd] sin

+ r66 cos 0,

sin

r sin

d
-j-

at

2
2
(r sin

0,

6d>),

rd) 2 sin 6.

r&*

motion of the point is in a plane, we can take the initial line in this
in these formulae
and the quantities denoted by r and

If the

plane as axis Oz,

become ordinary polar coordinates in the plane since (p is now zero, the
components of velocity and acceleration in the directions of r increasing and
;

increasing are
(r,

and

(r

Velocity

(ii)

and

r0

2
,

rd),

r0

2f 0).

acceleration in cylindrical coordinates.

Consider now

a point whose position is defined by its cylindrical


coordinates z, p, $, connected with the coordinates (X, Y, Z) of the point
referred to fixed rectangular axes
by the equations

OXYZ

X = p cos

^p

d),

si

n
$>

Z = z\

be required to find the components of the velocity and acceleration


of the point in the direction parallel to the axis of z, in the direction of the
line drawn from the axis of z to the point, perpendicular to the axis of z, and

and

let it

These three directions are


in the direction perpendicular to these two lines.
z
the
direction of p increasing,
the
called
direction
increasing,
of
generally
and the direction of

<p

increasing

and the coordinate

is

called the azimuth

<p

of the point.

and

In this case we take moving axes Ox, Oy, Oz passing through the origin
increasing, and z
parallel respectively to the directions of p increasing,
</>

22

Kinematical Preliminaries

20

[CH.

The components

increasing.

along the axes Oxyz

of angular velocity of the system Oxyz, resolved


themselves, are clearly
COj

==

==

0,

d>2

0,

61)3

(D,

and the coordinates of the moving point, referred to the moving axes, are
It follows by
17 that the components of velocity of the point in
(p, 0, 2).
these directions are

and the components of acceleration are

Velocity

(iii)

and acceleration

in arc-coordinates.

Another application of the formulae of 17 is to the determination of the


components of velocity and acceleration of a point which is moving in any
way in space, resolved along the tangent, principal normal, and binormal to
its

path.

first the case of a particle moving in a plane


and take lines
to
a
fixed
the
0,
point
parallel respectively
through
tangent and inward
normal to the path, as moving axes Ox and Oy. These axes are rotating
is the angle made by the
round
with angular velocity (ft, where
tangent

Consider

<

some

If v denotes the velocity of


fixed line in the plane.
at
and p the radius of
the
of
described
time
arc
the path
the point, s
t,
curvature of the path at the point, we have
to the path with

ds
v

dt

ds
dtp

and the angular velocity of the axes can therefore be written in the form

(v,

the same axes are

(v, v

v\
.-}
pJ

Since

it

v/p.

Since the components of the velocity parallel to the moving axes are
17 that the components of the acceleration parallel to
0), it follows from

_dv

ds dv

dv

dt

dt ds

ds

follows that the acceleration of the

dv

tangent to

normal

its

is

path

ia

-j-

moving point

in the direction of the

and the acceleration in the direction of the inward

Now the velocity of a moving point is determined by the knowledge of


two consecutive positions of the moving point, and the acceleration is therefore
determined by the knowledge of three consecutive positions so even if the
path of the point is not plane, it can for the purpose of determining its
;

acceleration at

any instant be regarded as moving in the osculating plane of

21

Kinematical Preliminaries

18]

contains three consecutive positions of the point.


path, since this plane
Hence the components of acceleration of the point, in the directions of the

its

and binormal

tangent, principal normal,

dv

v2

ds

to its

path, are

Acceleration along the radius and tangent.

(iv)

acceleration of a point which is in motion in a plane may be expressed


in the following form*; let r be the radius vector to the point from a fixed
from the origin on the tangent to the
origin in the plane, p the perpendicular
at
time t, p the radius of curvature of
described
of
the
arc
s
the
path
path,
at the point, and v or s the velocity of the point at time t and let
the

The

path
h denote the product pv.

to the

the acceleration of the point

along the radius vector

into components

tangent

Then

to the

origin

can be resolved

and

~r

along the

path.

For the acceleration can be resolved into components vdv/ds along the
now a vector F directed outwards along
tangent and v jp along the normal
into
vectors
be
resolved
can
vector
radius
the
Fp/r along the inward normal
2
a
v
so
vector
the
and Fdr/ds along
/p along the inward normal can be
tangent,
2
rv 2 dr
rv
T- along the tangent.
inwards along the radius vector and
resolved into
pp ds
pp
The acceleration is therefore equivalent to components
rv 2 dr
dv
v -p H
-r- along the tangent,
on ds
ds
pp
z

rv 2
- inwards along the radius vector.

and

pp

The

latter

component
1 dv 2

2 ds

v2

which establishes Siacci


Example
tion of

1.

and the former can be written

pp

Id (v p*)
z

dp
ds

2p

ds

h dh

ds

s result.

Determine the meridian, normal, and transverse components of the accelera

a point moving on

is

the surface of the anchor-ring

be the centre of the anchor-ring and C the centre


and let
on which P lies. The polar coordinates of C relative to
and the polar coordinates of P relative to C are (a, 0, $) ; so the components

be the point (6, $),


Let
of the meridian cross-section
are

(c,

<p),

of acceleration of

and

relative to

are

transverse

ctj)

2
c<p

outwards from the

axis,

i.e.

and
*

Dae

2
c<

sin 6 along the normal,

c0 cos 6 along the meridian.

to Siacci, Atti della R. Ace. di Torino, XIY. p. 750.

22

Kinematical Preliminaries
The components

P relative

of acceleration of

fad -

2
a<j>

sin Q cos 6

C are

along the meridian,

(sin

-j-

sin 6 dt

to

[CH.

transverse.

.
<)

sin 2

normal.

t<j>

Thus

finally the

components

a6

2
a<j)

and

of acceleration of

(c + a sin

ad

cd)

6}

sin 6

-.
+ sm
6
-.

dt

sin 6

space are

normal,

c<f>

2
(sin 6

-y-

P in

along the meridian,

cos 6

transverse,

.
d>)

Example 2. If the tangential and normal components of the acceleration of a point


moving in a plane are constant, shew that the point describes a logarithmic spiral.
In this case
v -r-=a, where a
ds
so

i)

a constant,

=as.

Also

is

c,

where

a constant,

c is

= Cp,

where

C is

so

or

s=C-j-r, where

A and B

Example

are constants

To find

3.

is
(f>

the angle

made by

the tangent with a fixed

line.

we have

Integrating this equation,

where

a constant,

and

this is the intrinsic equation of the logarithmic spiral.

the acceleration

of a point which describes a logarithmic spiral with

constant angular velocity about the pole.

By
and

Siacci s theorem, the

-=5
2

so the

ds

components of acceleration are

along the tangent: but

if to is

53

PP

along the radius vector

the constant angular velocity, we have h =

u>r

components of acceleration are


co

2
?"

p
Since -

7*

7"

and

CiT
-5-

and

2o)

2 3

r dr

-j-

are constant in the spin


spiral,
;

as

jr

we

see that each of these

components of

acceleration varies directly as the radius vector.

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
1.

If the instantaneous axis of rotation of a

in the body,

shew that

it is

also fixed in space,

body moveable about a fixed point is


the motion is a rotation round a

i.e.

fixed

fixed

axis.

A point is referred to rectangular axes Ox, Oy revolving about the origin with
2.
2 2
x (distance),
angular velocity to; if there be an acceleration to x=a, y = 0, of amount ?i
shew that the path relative to the axes can be constructed by taking (i) a point
<o

23

Kinematical Preliminaries

i]

x = ri2a/(n 2 -l), (ii) a uniform circular motion with angular velocity (n-l)co about this,
but in the opposite
and (iii) a uniform circular motion with angular velocity (n +
this
last.
about
(Coll. Exam.)
sense,
l)a>,

3.
The velocity of a point moving in a plane is the resultant of a velocity v along the
Prove that the
radius vector to a fixed point and a velocity v parallel to a fixed line.
corresponding accelerations are

dv

vv

6 being the angle that the radius vector

4.
point moves
a fixed line in the plane, where

ponent

in a plane,

and

dv

^ + -cos0,

s+

and

makes with the

vv

fixed direction.

is referred to Cartesian axes

Exam.)

making angles

Shew

are given functions of the time.

a, /3

(Coll.

a, /3

that the

with

com

velocities of the point are

x - xd cot

(/3

- a) - y$ cosec

and obtain expressions

for the

- a),

(/3

component

y +y$

- a) + xd

cot

cosec

accelerations.

(/3

- a),

(Coll.

Exam.)

5.
A point is moving in a plane Q is the logarithm of the ratio of its distances from
also 2k is the distance
is the angle between them
two fixed points in the plane, and
between the fixed points. Shew that the velocity of the point is
:

<

cosh 6

- cos

(Coll.

Exam.)

(f)

two different descriptions of a curve by a moving point, the product of the


that the
places in the two descriptions is constant, shew
accelerations at corresponding places in the two descriptions are as the squares of the
the normal to the curve, in
velocities, and that their directions make equal angles with
(J- von Vieth.)
opposite senses.
6.

If in

velocities at corresponding

7.

A point is moving in a parabola of latus rectum 4,

and when

its

distance from the

the velocity is v shew that its acceleration is compounded of accelerations


and N, along the radius vector and normal respectively, where
focus

is r,

R=v ^
dr

N=^,% dr
%- (v*r).

(Coll.

Shew

o>

is

\|/-

and

yyo>2

9.
0,

The

+ (.coi +

velocity of a point

with a fixed

line.

is

2.o>

Exam.)

2r

that if the axes of x and y rotate with angular velocities coi,


the
angle between them, the component accelerations of the point
^
to the axes are
cosec \^,
x xo)i 2 (x&i + 2# 1 ) cot
+
2)
8.

and

1)

made up

cosec

(?/o>2

\|f

respectively,

(x,

y) parallel

2/o>

+ (yw2 +

of

2?/o>2)

cot

\/r.

(Coll.

Exam.)

u, v in directions

components
making angles
Prove that the components /, / in these directions of the accelera

tion of the point will be given

by

f= u u6 cot x~ v $ cosec x,
f = v + ud cosec x + cot x,
v<}>

X being the inclination of the two

directions.

Being given that the lines joining a moving point to two fixed points are r, s in length
in inclination to the line joining the two fixed points, determine the acceleration
6,
of the point in terms of
the rates of increase of 0, (f).
(Coll. Exam.)

and

<p

o>

Kinematical Preliminaries

24

|_

CIL

If A, B, C be three fixed points, and the component velocities of a moving point


the
directions PA, PB, PC be u, v, and w shew that the accelerations in the same
along
10.

directions are
/

cosAPB

cosAPC\

and two similar expressions.

(Coll.

Exam.)

11.
The movement of a plane lamina is given by the angular velocity and the com
resolved along axes Ox, Oy traced on the lamina.
ponent velocities u, v of the origin
Find the component velocities of any point (x, y] of the lamina. Shew that the equations
a>

tan

-T-

1
(

at

"-

)=

o>

one being the locus of those points which are passing


cusps on their curve loci in space and the other being the locus of the centres of curvature
of the envelopes in space of all straight lines of the lamina.
(Coll. Exam.)
represent circular loci on the lamina

Shew

12.

that

when a point

describes a space-curve,

acceleration can be resolved

its

two components, of which one acts along the radius vector from the projection of a
fixed point on the osculating plane, and the other along the tangent and that these are

into

respectively

L
P3

^
P

TdT + T*qdq
fi~ds

p*

~d7

where p is the radius of curvature, q the distance of the fixed point from its projection on
the osculating plane, r and p are the distances of this projection from the moving point
and the tangent, T is an arbitrary function (equal to the product of p and the velocity) and
s is the arc.
(Siacci.)

A circle, a straight line, and a point lie in one plane, and the position of the point
13.
determined by the lengths t of its tangent to the circle and p of its perpendicular to
the line.
Prove that, if the velocity of the point is made up of components u, v in the

is

directions of these lengths

and

if

their

mutual inclination be

6,

the component accelerations

be

will

uvcosd/t,

v+uv/t.

(Coll.

Exam.)

A particle moves in a circular arc. If r, r are the distances of the particle at P


14.
from the extremities A, B of & fixed chord, shew that the accelerations along AP, BP are
respectively

dv
-j- H

dt

where

v,

vv
rr

dv

cos a), and


ivr-f
rH
x
dt

v are the velocities in the directions of

r,

vv
rr

(r
^

and a

r cos

is

a),

the angle

APB.

point describes a semicircle under accelerations directed to the extremities of a


diameter, which are at any point inversely as the radii vectores r, r to the extremities of
the diameter. Shew that the accelerations are

4a4 F 2

where a

is

the radius of the circle and

V the

4a4

72

velocity of the point parallel to the diameter.


(Coll.

Exam.)

25

Kinematical Preliminaries

i]

The motion

15.

of a rigid

C and

in

body

two dimensions

is

defined by the velocity

(u, v} of

Determine the coordinates relative to


angular velocity
points
the point 7 of zero velocity, and shew that the direction of motion of any other point

one of

its

its

<o.

of

is

perpendicular to PI.

Find the coordinates of the point

P in terms of its

J of zero

and express the acceleration of


(Coll. Exam.)

acceleration,

coordinates relative to J.

A point on a plane is moving with constant velocity V relative to it, the plane at
16.
Shew
the same time turning round a fixed axis perpendicular to it with angular velocity
that the path of the point is given by the equation
o>.

and 6 being referred

to fixed axes,

and a being the shortest distance

of the point

axis of rotation.

from the

Exam.)

(Coll.

where
The acceleration of a moving point Q is represented at any instant by
17.
Prove that the
a fixed point and a describes uniformly a circle whose centre is
is a fixed point and p describes
velocity of Q at any instant is represented by Op, where
<oa,

is

a circle uniformly

18.

and determine the path described by Q.


(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

222

point moves along the curve of intersection of the ellipsoid ~g

the hyperboloid of one sheet -^


d

~"

+O

?/

A
>.

+C

- *~~
"2^T

=1 and

the curve meets the hyperboloid


of two sheets ,2
J1
a -/i

where h

is

constant.

+ b T--

l~

21

~~?
2

-=

1902.)

+W+- =

an d

the P oint where

its velocit y at

>

I,

*s

/i

Prove that the resolved part of the acceleration of the point along

the normal to the ellipsoid

is

h 2 abc (n

X)
-7=..

/ri

(Coll.

Exam.)

19.
A rigid body is rolling without sliding on a plane, and at any instant its angular
2 along the tangent to the lines of curvature at the point
velocity has components coj,
of contact, and 3 along the normal shew that the point of the body which is at the point
of contact has component accelerations
o>

o>

where RI, R% are the principal


of contact.

radii of curvature of the surface of the

body at the point


(Coll. Exam.)

CHAPTER

II

THE EQUATIONS OF MOTION


The ideas of rest and motion.
In the previous chapter we have
frequently used the terms
19.

"

"

fixed

and

"

"

as applied to
systems.

moving

kinematical considerations, it is
significance of these words; all

So long

as

we

are occupied with


purely
to
enter into the ultimate
unnecessary
that is meant is, that we consider the

"

displacement of the moving systems, so far as


with respect to the systems which are called
"

it

affects their
configuration

"fixed,"

question of what

leaving on one side the

meant by absolute fixity."


When however we come to consider the motion
"

is

of bodies as due
no longer be disregarded.
In popular language the word
is
generally used of

to specific

causes, this question can

"fixed"
terrestrial
to
denote
invariable
objects
position relative to the surface of the earth at

the place considered.

But the earth is rotating on its axis, and at the same


time revolving round the Sun, while the Sun in
turn, accompanied by all
the planets, is
moving with a large velocity along some not very accurately
known direction in space. It seems hopeless therefore to
attempt to find
rest."
anything which can be really considered to be
"at

In the nineteenth century

was supposed -that the aether of


space (the
and magnetic actions) was (apart from small
vibratory motions) stagnant, and so was capable of providing a basis for
absolute fixity. But this doctrine has been subverted
by the modern Principle
which
asserts
that
even
in
the
of Relativity*,
domain of electromagnetic
it

vehicle of light

and of

phenomena

impossible to distinguish absolute rest from a state of uniform


common to all the members of a system.

it is

electric

translatory motion

Accordingly in dynamics, although

we always imply
be

called,

that there

is

some

when we speak

of the motion of bodies

set of axes, or frame

with reference to which the motion

of reference as

it

may

and
which we apply the conventional word fixed,"
it
must
not
be
yet
supposed
that absolute fixity has
thereby been discovered. When we are
to

is

regarded as taking place,

"

considering

Cf.

or

Whittaker

Conway

History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, ch.


Relativity (London, 1915).
s

xii.

(London, 1910)

27

The Equations of Motion

19, 20]

the motion of terrestrial bodies at some place on the earth s surface, we shall
take the frame of reference to be fixed with reference to the earth, and it is

then found that the laws which will presently be given are sufficient to
explain the phenomena with a sufficient degree of accuracy in other words,
the earth s motion does not exercise a sufficient disturbing influence to make
it necessary to allow for its effects in the majority of cases of the motion of
;

terrestrial bodies.

It is also necessary to consider the

meaning

to

be attached to the word

which in the previous chapter stood merely for any parameter


time,"
varying continuously with the configuration of the systems considered. The
Principle of Relativity reveals the great difficulties that attend any attempt
to elucidate the idea of time
in particular, it is by no means easy to define
simultaneity, i.e. to explain what is meant by saying that two events at

"

at the same time."


However, a system of
time-measurement which is intelligible from the point of view of ordinary
instrumental work, and which is sufficient for our present purpose, is the
following we suppose that the angle through which the earth has rotated on
its axis (measured with reference to the fixed stars, whose small motions we
can for this purpose neglect), in the interval between two events, measures
the time elapsed between the events in question. This angular measure can
different points of space

"

happen

be converted into the ordinary measure in terms of mean solar hours, minutes,
and seconds at the rate of 360 degrees to 24 x 365/366 hours.
20.

The laws which determine motion*.

Considering

now

the motion of terrestrial objects, and taking the earth as

the frame of reference, it is natural to begin by investigating the motion of a


very small material body, or particle as we shall call it, when moving in vacuo
and entirely unconnected with surrounding objects. The paths described by

such a particle under various circumstances of projection may be observed,


and the methods of the preceding chapter enable us, from the knowledge
thus acquired, to calculate the acceleration of the particle at any point of any
It is found that for all the paths the acceleration
particular observed path.
is

always directed vertically downwards. This


and is generally denoted by the letter g its
in Great Britain, about 981 centimetres per second per second.

of constant amount,

acceleration

amount

is,

is

known

and

is

as gravity,

The knowledge of this experimental fact is theoretically sufficient to


enable us to calculate the path of any free terrestrial particle in vacuo, when
the circumstances of its projection are known the actual calculation will not
:

belongs more properly to a later chapter.


motion which is next in simplicity is that of two

be given here, as

The

case of

it

particles

which are connected together by an extremely light inextensible thread, and


*

The laws

of motion are due to

Newton

Principia, p. 12 (ed. 1687).

The Equations of Motion

^8
move

are free to

[OH.

So long as the thread is


moves with the acceleration gravity, just as if the other
But when the thread is taut, the two particles influence

in vacuo at the earth s surface.

slack, each particle

were not present.

We can now as before observe the path of one of the


and hence calculate the acceleration by which at any instant its

each other s motion.


particles,

motion

is

being modified. We thereby arrive at the experimental fact, that


can be represented at any instant by the resultant of two

this acceleration

of which one represents the acceleration g and the other

vectors,

along the instantaneous position

is directed

the thread.

of

The

influence of one particle on the motion of the other consists there


fore in superposing on the acceleration due to gravity another acceleration,
which acts along the line joining the particles and which is compounded

with gravity according to the vectorial law of composition of accelerations.


Denoting the particles by A and B, we can at any instant calculate, from the
observed paths, the magnitudes of the accelerations/! and/2 thus exerted by
B on A and by A on B respectively and this calculation immediately yields
;

the result that the ratio of f\ to /2 does not vary throughout the motion.
On
the
motions
which
result
from
various
modes
of
investigating
projection, at
various temperatures etc., we are led to the conclusion that this ratio is an
invariable physical constant of the pair of bodies

On

and B*.

consideration of the motion of more complex systems

it

is

found

that the experimental laws just stated can be generalised so as to form


a complete basis for all dynamics, whether terrestrial or cosmic.
This
generalised statement is as follows: If any set of mutually connected particles
are in motion, the acceleration with which any one particle moves is the
resultant of the acceleration with which it would move if perfectly free, and
accelerations directed along the lines joining it to the other particles which
constrain its motion.
Moreover, to the several particles A, B, C, ..., numbers
can
be
due to the
f^A)
assigned, such that the acceleration along

m m
n>

AB

c>

on

influence of
in the ratio
on

is

to

the acceleration along

m^-.m^.

The ratios of

BA

these

due to
numbers

the influence

mA mB
,

...

of

are

invariable physical constants of the particles.

The evidence

for the truth of this

statement

agreement of the calculations based on

it,

is

to be found in the universal

such as those given later in this

book, with the results of observation.


It will

be noticed that only the ratios of the numbers m^, m$, me, ... are
it is convenient to take some definite
particle A as

determined by the law

a standard, calling it the unit of mass, and then to call the numbers
B me,
?7ic/m A ... the masses of the other particles
,

m^jm^,

The ratio is in i act, equal to the ratio of the weight of B to the weight of A the ratio of
the weights of two terrestrial bodies, as observed at the same place on the earth s surface, is a
perfectly definite quantity, and does not vary with the place of observation.
;

29

The Equations of Motion

20, 21]

The mass

of the

compound particle formed by uniting two

or

more

particles

sum

of the masses of the separate particles.


is found to be equal to the
mass of a finite
Owing to this additive property of mass, we can speak of the
to take as our unit of
body of any size or shape and it will be convenient
known as the
mass the mass of the
part of a certain piece of platinum
this unit will be called a gramme, and the number
standard
;

y^th

kilogramme;

mass of any other body to this unit mass


representing the ratio of the
called the mass of the body in grammes.
21.

is

Force.

have seen that in every case of the interaction of two particles A and
acceleration
B, the mutual influence consists of an acceleration fA on A and an
BA respec
and
AB
directed
vectors
on B, these accelerations being
along

We

fii

and being inversely proportional to the masses m A and m B It follows


that the vector quantity m A fA is equal to the vector quantity m s fB but has
The vector m A fA is called the force exerted by the
the reverse direction.
A and similarly the vector m B fB is called the force
particle B on the particle
exerted by the particle A on the particle B.
.

tively,

With

this terminology, the

mutual action of a connected

law of the

on each other
system of particles can be stated in the form the forces exerted
This
is often
and
are
connected
opposite.
equal
particles
by every pair of
:

called the

Law

of Action and Reaction.

If the various forces which act on a particle A as a result of its connexion


with other particles are compounded according to the vectorial law, the
resultant force gives the total influence exerted by them on the particle A
this force divided by
A is the acceleration induced in A by the other

and the resultant of this acceleration and the acceleration which the
free (due to such causes as gravitation) is
particle A would have if entirely
the actual acceleration with which the particle A moves.
particles

is induced in
In general, if an acceleration represented by a vector
due to
called
vector
the
a particle of mass
the/orce*
mfis
by any agency,
this cause acting on the particle and the resultant of all the forces due to
It follows
various agencies is called the total force acting on the particle.
axes
of the
fixed
to
the
are
if
that
rectangular
components parallel
(X, Y, Z)
are
the
com
and
at
the
on
total force acting
(x, y, z)
any instant,
particle
at
that
described
is
which
its
being
path
ponents of the acceleration with

instant, then

we have the equations

mx = X,
Two

my =

Y,

mz =

other terms which are frequently used

Z.

may

conveniently be defined

at this point.
*

Force

is

the vis matrix of

Newton

Principia,

i.

def. 8.

The Equations of Motion

30

[OH.

The product

of the number which represents the magnitude of the com


of
a
ponent
given force perpendicular to a given line L and the number
which represents the perpendicular distance of the line of action of the force

from the line

is

called the

moment

of the force about the line L.

If the three components (X, Y, Z) of the force


acting on a single free
particle are given functions of the coordinates (x, y, z) of the particle, they
are said to define & field offorce.
22.

Work.

Consider

now any system

of particles,

whose motion

is

either quite free or

by given connexions between the particles, or constraints due to


other particles which are not regarded as forming part of the system.
Let m
be the mass of any one of the particles, whose coordinates referred to fixed
restricted

rectangular axes in any selected configuration of the system are (x, y, z) and
let (X, Y, Z} be the components,
parallel to the axes, of the total force
;

acting on the particle in this configuration.

Let (x + Sx, y + By, z + 8z) be the coordinates of any point very near to
the point (x, y, z), such that the displacement of the particle
from one
to
the
other
does
not
violate
of
the
constraints
is
point
(for instance, if
any

move on a given surface, the two


on the surface). Then the quantity
constrained to

X&K +

points must both be situated

1% + ZSz
m

called the work* done on the particle


by the forces acting on
infinitesimal displacement from the position (x, y, z) to the position
is

(x

Bx,

y+

Sy, z

it

in the

8z).

This expression can evidently be interpreted physically as being the


product of the distance through which the particle is displaced and the com
ponent of the force (X, Y, Z) along the direction of this displacement.
Since forces obey the vectorial law of composition, the sum of the com
ponents in a given direction of any number of forces acting together on a
particle is equal to the component in this direction of their resultant and
hence the work done by a force which acts on a particle in a given displace
ment is equal to the sum of the quantities of work done in the same displacement
:

by any

set

offorces into which

Suppose now

this

force can be resolved.

that in the course of a motion of the system, the particle

gradually displaced from any position (which we can


to some other position at a finite distance from the

is

its final position).


*

The work done on

Newton defined the Actio Agentis

along the direction of motion


p. 25 (ed. 1687).

it is

call its initial position)


first

(which we can call


which act on

the particle by the forces

as the product of the velocity into the component of force


evidently the time-flux of the work done. Cf. Principia, i.

The Equations of Motion

21-23]

31

during this finite displacement is defined to be the sum of the quantities


work done in the successive infinitesimal displacements by which we can
regard the finite displacement as achieved. The work done in a finite dis
it

of

is

placement

therefore represented

where the integration


the arc

is

by the integral

dx

v dy

dz\

as

(LS

(is /

taken between the

initial

and

final positions

along

described in space by the particle during displacement.

These definitions can now be extended to the whole set of particles which
form the system considered the system being initially in any given con
;

we

consider any mode of displacing the various particles of the


system which is not inconsistent with the connexions and constraints; the
sum of the quantities of work performed on all the particles of the system in

figuration,

the displacement is called the total work done on the system in the displace
ment by the forces which act on it.
23.

Forces which do no work.

There are certain classes of forces which frequently occur in dynamical


systems, and which are characterised by the feature that during the motion
they do no work on the system.

Among
1.

these

The

may

be mentioned

reactions of fixed smooth surfaces:

that the reaction

is

normal to the

the term smooth implies


in each infinitesimal

and therefore

surface,

displacement the point of application of the reaction is displaced in a direction


perpendicular to the reaction, so that no work is done.

The

reactions of fixed perfectly rough surfaces: the term perfectly


rough implies that the motion of any body in contact with the surface is one
of pure rolling without sliding, and therefore the point of application of the

2.

reaction

is

(to the first order of small

infinitesimal displacement, so that no

quantities) not displaced in each


is done.

work

The mutual

reaction of two particles which are rigidly connected


y z^) and (#2 y2 z2 ) are the coordinates of the particles,
and (X, Y, Z) are the components of the force exerted by the first particle on
the second, so that
Y,
Z) are the components of the force exerted

3.

together: for if (x1}

lt

(X,

by the second

particle on the

an arbitrary displacement

X (8x
But

since the distance


Cj

j/

first,

the total work done by these forces in

is

Sx,)

+ Y (Sy
\ v

Si/i)
3 */

between the particles


\2

/.

\2

_]_

+ Z (8z

is

&2-A
/
*

invariable,
\2\

we have

The Equations of Motion

32
and since the
have

force acts in the direction of the line


joining the particles,

X:Y:Z=(x 2

Combining the

[CH.

last

a?,)

(y.2

- y,)

(z2

n
we

- z,).

two equations, we have

X (8x

and therefore no work

&O +

is

F(S//2

- SyJ + Z (8z - 82,) =


2

0,

done in the aggregate by the mutual forces between

the particles.

rigid body is regarded from the dynamical point of view as an


of
particles, so connected together that their mutual distances are
aggregate
invariable.
It follows from 3 that the reactions between the particles which

4.

are called into play in order that this condition may be satisfied (or molecular
forces as they are called, to distinguish them from external forces such as

gravity) do, in the aggregate, no

The

5.

work

in

any displacement of the body.

reactions at a fixed pivot about which a body of the system can

turn, or at a fixed hinge, or at a joint between two bodies of the system, are
similarly seen to belong to the category of forces which do no work.

In estimating the total work done by the forces acting on a dynamical


system in any displacement of the system, we can therefore neglect all forces
of the above-mentioned types.
24.

The coordinates of a dynamical system.

Any

material system

constituted of a

is

regarded from the dynamical point of view as

number

of particles, subject to interconnexions and con


a rigid body being regarded as a collection of
kinds
of
various
straints
;

particles,

which are kept at invariable distances from each other by means

of suitable internal reactions.

When

the constitution of such a system (i.e. the shape, size, and mass of
the various parts of which it is composed, and the constraints which act on
given, its configuration at any time can be specified in terms of a
of quantities which vary when the configuration is altered,
which will be called the coordinates of the system; thus, the position of a

them)

certain

and

is

number

single free particle in space is completely defined by its three rectangular


the position of
(x, y, z) with reference to some fixed set of axes

coordinates

a single particle which is constrained to move in a fixed narrow tube, which has
the form of a twisted curve in space, is completely specified by one coordinate,
namely the distance s measured along the arc of the tube to the particle from
the position of a rigid
fixed point in the tube which is taken as origin
is fixed, is completely determined by three co
of
whose
one
points
body,
of
10 the position of
ordinates, namely the three Eulerian angles 6,
-v/r

some

<,

two particles which are connected by a taut inextensible string can be defined
by five coordinates, namely the three rectangular coordinates of one of the

The Equations of Motion

23-25]

33

and two of the direction-cosines of the string (since when these five
quantities are known, the position of the second particle is uniquely deter
mined) and so on.

particles

State the

Example.

number

any instant of a
smooth surface.

configuration at

a given fixed

of independent coordinates required to specify the


body which is constrained to move in contact with

rigid

We

shall generally denote by n the number of coordinates


required to
the
configuration of a system, and shall suppose the systems con
specify
sidered to be such that n is finite. The coordinates will
generally be denoted

If the system contains moving constraints


... q n
(e.g. if it consists
of a particle which is constrained to be in contact with a surface which in
turn is made to rotate with constant angular velocity round a fixed axis),

by q l} q 2

it
<?i>

may be
qn

<?2,

>

necessary to specify the time t in addition to the coordinates


in order to define completely a
configuration of the system.

The quantities q 1} g.2


to the coordinates q l} q2

...

q n are frequently called the velocities corresponding

qn

flexible string, free to move in space, is an


example of a dynamical system
excluded by the limitation that n is to be finite; for the configuration of the
string cannot be expressed in terms of a finite number of parameters.

heavy

which

is

25.

Holonomic and non-holonomic systems.

It is

now necessary

to call attention to a distinction

between two kinds

of dynamical systems, which is of great importance in the


analytical discussion
of their motion this distinction may be illustrated
a

by

simple example.

we consider the motion of a sphere of given radius, which is constrained


move in contact with a given fixed plane, which we can take as the plane
If

to

of xy, the configuration of the sphere at

any instant is completely specified


namely the two rectangular coordinates (x, y) of the
centre of the sphere and the three Eulerian
angles 0,
10, which
fy of

by

five coordinates,

<f>,

The sphere can take


specify the orientation of the sphere about its centre.
up any position whatever, so long as it is in contact with the
the five
coordinates
If

(x, y, 6,

<f>,

now the plane

by the coordinates

-v/r)

is

plane
can therefore have any
arbitrary values.

smooth, the displacement from any position, defined


to any adjacent
i/r),
position, defined by the
9
+
4+
B0,
By,
80,
B-^r), where Bac,

(x, y, 6, $,

coordinates (x + 8x, y+
By,
8^
are arbitrary independent infinitesimal quantities, is a
possible displacement,
i.e. the
sphere can perform it without violating the constraints of the system.
But if the plane is perfectly rough, this is no longer the case when 8x,
By, 86,
8$, 8-^r are arbitrary; for now the condition that the displacement of the
point of contact is zero (to the first order of small quantities) must be
satisfied, and this implies that the quantities 8x, By, 80,
8^ are no
must be such
longer independent, but are mutually connected (in fact,
B<f>,

"f

B<f>,

B<f>,

they

w. D.

The Equations of Motion

34

[CH.

as to satisfy two non-integrable linear equations) so that in the case of the


sphere on the perfectly rough plane, a displacement represented by arbitrary
;

infinitesimal changes in

coordinates

the

is

not necessarily a possible

dis

placement.

dynamical system for which a displacement represented by arbitrary


infinitesimal changes in the coordinates is in general a possible displacement
(as in the case of the sphere on the smooth plane) is said to be holonomic

when

this condition is not satisfied (as in the case of the sphere


plane) the system is said to be non-holonomic.

on the rough

fyn) are arbitrary infinitesimal increments of the coordinates


in a dynamical system, these will define a possible displacement if the system
is holonomic, while for non-holonomic systems a certain number, say m, of

If

(&7i>

&/ 2

equations must be satisfied between them in order that they may correspond
The number (n m) is called the number of
to a possible displacement.
Holonomic systems are therefore charac
of
the
system.
degrees of freedom

by the

terised

number

fact that the

number

of degrees of freedom

is

equal to the

of independent coordinates required to specify the configuration

of the system.

Lagrange s form of the equations of motion of a holonomic system*.


We shall now consider the motion of a holonomic system with n degrees
of freedom. Let (q lt q 2 ... q n ) be the coordinates which specify the con
at the time t.
figuration of the system
26.

Let
(xi,

2/t,

nii
Zi)

of the system, and let


typify the mass of one of the particles
its coordinates, referred to some fixed set of rectangular axes.

be

These coordinates of individual particles are (from our knowledge of the


constitution of the system)
the system, and possibly of

known
t

also

functions of the coordinates q 1} q2

...
q n of
be
dependence
expressed by the

let this

equations

Let (Xi, Yi, Zi) be the components of the total force (external and
then the equations of motion of this
t
molecular) acting on the particle
are
particle

mi

ar.i

it

niiyi

=Y

m^ = Z

i}

Multiply these equations by

*
first

/i

?fc

*b

dq r

dg r

dq r

Lagrange, Mecanique Analytique (1788), Seconde Partie, Section


suggested in one of his earlier papers, Miscell. Taurin. n. (1760).

iv.

The equations were

The Equations of Motion

25, 26]
respectively,

add them, and sum

for all

35

the particles of the system.

We

thus have
5-

2,Wi

&
4. ;;
Vi 5
g +
a

dfi
xi

d
y
h Zi
^

^\

?(y

9/i

]**2,[JLf
\
i
dqr J
dqr

I-

T^

^ 4. A
7

8<

ifl 5
dqr

t-

dq r J

where the symbol S denotes summation over all the particles of the system
be either an integration (if the particles are united into rigid bodies)

this can

or a

summation over a

discrete aggregate of particles.

But we have
a
7i

^J^fZL^^^/

<-<

_ Xi

..

SO

..

Xi ^

^T"

dq r

dq r

_d_(.Xi 3jci\_

~dt( dqJ
dq
~_ d
dt

i. a*A
Xii

Xi

^/a
dt\d
/

Xii

\d qi dqr

dqj

dq 2 dqr

and therefore we have

Now

the quantity

i2*n(#+#+#)
sum

masses of the particles of the system, each


this is called the Kinetic
half
the
multiplied by
square of its velocity
of
the constitution of the
of
the
From
our
Energy
knowledge
system*.

represents the

of the

system, the kinetic energy can be calculated f as a function of


<?i,

we

shall

denote

it

T(q lt
and

shall

qn, q\,

<?a,

<J

qn ,t;

by

suppose that I

is

q2

...

qn q lt

known

q.2 ,

...

function of

qn

its

t),

arguments.

Since

The mass of a particle multiplied by the square of its velocity was called the vis viva by
Leibnitz (Acta erud., 1695).
t The methods of performing this calculation for rigid bodies are given in Chapter V.

32

*f

(,~r

^r

The Equations of Motion

36
and

and

iji

Z{

[CH.

are likewise linear functions of q l} q 2 ... q n we see that T is a


do not involve the
...
q n if the functions /,
,

quadratic function of q ly q

2>

</>,

time explicitly (as is generally the case if there are no moving constraints
in the system), the quantities x, y, z are homogeneous linear functions of
q l} q2

...

q n and then
>

From

T is

a homogeneous quadratic function of q lt q 2

...

qn

it follows that the kinetic energy of a system is essentially


therefore a positive definite quadratic form in glt q 2 ... n and so satisfies
the conditions that its discriminant and the principal minors of every order of its

the definition

positive;

is

<j

discriminant are positive.

We

have thus derived from the equations of motion the equation

ftT\
dt(dqj

dr_y( Y dA+V
+i d-^+7
dq ^

dqr~i(

dqr

"

>

-+i\
9g

and the expression on the left-hand side of this equation does not involve the
individual particles of the system, except in so far as they contribute to the

We

have now to see

the right-hand side of the equation


can also be brought to a form in which the individuality of the separate

kinetic energy T.

particles

is

if

lost.

For this purpose, consider that displacement of the system in which the
coordinate q r is changed to q r + Sq r while the coordinates
,

q 1 ,q.2,...q,-i,qr+i,---qn

and the time

(so far as this is required for the specification of the system) are
Since the system is holonomic, this can be effected without
In this displacement, the coordinates of the
violating the constraints.

unaltered.

particle

m; are changed to

and therefore the

total

work done

act on the particles of the system

in the displacement

by

the forces which

all

is

*~\

Now

-*

f~\

ogv

09V

"!.

*-\
d<

of the forces which act on the system, there are several kinds which
Among these are, as was seen in 23,

do no work.

1.

The molecular

forces

which act between the particles of the rigid

bodies contained in the system

2. The pressures of connecting-rods of invariable length, the reactions


at fixed pivots, and the tensions of taut inextensible strings
:

The

reactions of any fixed smooth surfaces or curves with which


bodies of the system are constrained to remain in contact or of perfectly
rough surfaces, so far as these can enter into holonomic systems

3.

37

The Equations of Motion

26]

The

4.

reactions of

any smooth surfaces or curves with which bodies

of the system are constrained to remain in contact, when these surfaces or


curves are forced to move in some prescribed manner for the displacement
;

made on the

supposition that t, so far as it is required for


the specification of the system, is not varied, i.e. that such surfaces or curves
so that this case reduces to the
are not moved during the displacement
considered above

is

preceding.

The

forces acting

on the system, other than these which do no work, are


It follows that the quantity

called the external forces.

k
--4.r V 8(
=

9
^

/<

dq
is

4-p

JL i

ZAI

d ^*
-=

oq r

dqr

the work done by the external forces in the displacement which corresponds
change of q r to qr + $qr the other coordinates being unaltered. This is

to a

a quantity which (from our knowledge of the constitution of the system, and
of the forces at work) is a known function of q lt q. ... qn t; we shall denote
,

2>

it

by

Qr (qi,

We

q2

qn t)8q r

have therefore

fdT\ _3T__
~n
dt(dqj
dq r

^"

This equation is true for all values of r from 1 to n inclusive we thus


have n ordinary differential equations of the second order, in which qi,q2 ,...q n
;

are the dependent variables

and

t is

the independent variable

as the

number

of differential equations is equal to the number of dependent variables, the


equations are theoretically sufficient to determine the motion when the

circumstances are given.


be thus stated
initial

We

have now arrived at a result which may

Let

T denote

the kinetic energy of a

+ Qz$qa +

Qi&?i

denote the
(&?!,

8q

work done by

...

8q n ), so that

the
T,

dynamical system, and


...

external forces

lt

...

let

+ Qn $q n
in

o,re,

an arbitrary displacement

from our knowledge of

constitution of the system, known functions of q lt q2 ... q n q lt q2 ... q n


then the equations which determine the motion of the system may be written
,

the
,

t;

dT

dT\

These are known as Lagranges equations of motion. It will be observed


that the unknown reactions (e.g. of the constraints) do not enter into these
equations.

The determination of these reactions forms a separate branch of


* so we can
is known as Kineto-statics
say that in Lagranges

mechanics, which

equations the kineto-statical relations


*

Cf.

of

the

Heun, Deutsche Math. Ver.

problem are altogether eliminated.

ix.

(Heft 2) (1900), p.

1.

The Equations of Motion

38
27.

Conservative forces

[CH.

the Kinetic Potential.

have the property that the work done by the forces


of the field in a displacement of a dynamical system from one
configuration
to another depends only on the initial and final
of
the system,
configurations
Certain

fields of force

being the same whatever be the sequence of infinitesimal displacements by


which the finite displacement is effected.
a conspicuous example of a field of force of this character the work done
motion of a particle of mass m from one position at a height h to
another position at a height k above the earth s surface is mg(k-k), and this does not
depend in any way on the path by which the particle is moved from one position to the

Gravity

by gravity

is

in the

other.

Fields of force of this type are said to be conservative.

Let the configuration of any dynamical system be specified


by n
coordinates q l} q 2 ... q n
Choose some configuration of the system, say
that for which
.

q,-=a r

(r=

1, 2, ... n),

as a standard configuration then if the external forces


acting on the system
are conservative, the work done by these forces in a
displacement of the
;

system from the configuration

(q 1} q2 ... q n ) to the standard configuration is a


definite function of q lt q^, ... q n , not depending on the mode of
displacement.
Let this function be denoted by V(q } 2 ... q n ); it is called the Potential
,

<?

Energy* of the system in the configuration (q lt q2 ... q n ). In this case the


work done by the external forces in an arbitrary displacement
,

(%,
is

Sq 2

...

Bqn )

evidently equal to the infinitesimal decrease in the function V, corresponding


i.e. is
equal to the quantity

to the displacement,

~~

9F
5~

~~
<7i

dql

Lagrange

dV.

____

we introduce a new

then Lagrange

function

3q r

dqr

of the variables q lt q 2

d /dL\
UT-

dL =
5

0,

dqr

The Potential-function was introduced by Lagrange


is

...

q n q lt
,

...

qn

t,

equations can be written

dt \dq r j

Potential

L = T-V,

-7i

name

oq n

equations of motion therefore take the form

defined by the equation

dq n

dt \dqr )
If

8F,
#2

s~~

dq 2

due

to

Green

(1828).

(r=

1. 2, ... n).

in 1773 (Oeuvres, vi. p. 335).

The

The Equations of Motion

27, 28]

The function L

is

called the Kinetic Potential, or

39
Lagrangian function

completely specifies, so far as dynamical investigations


are concerned, a holonomic system for which the forces are conservative.
this single function

28.

The

We

shall

form of Lagranges
now shew how the second

explicit

equations.

derivatives of the coordinates with

respect to the time can be found explicitly from

Lagrange

equations.

Let the configuration of the dynamical system considered be specified by


coordinates q1} q 2 ... q n
we shall suppose that the configuration can be
of these coordinates alone, without t, so that
in
terms
completely specified
;

the kinetic energy of the system is a homogeneous quadratic function of


As was seen in
26, this is always the case when the
qlt q2 ,...qn
constraints are independent of the time, but not in general when the
.

constraints have forced motions (as for instance in the case of a particle
constrained to move on a wire which is made to rotate in a given way).

Suppose then that the kinetic energy

T= |
where a H

is

2,a k iqk qi,

k=n=i

a {k and where the coefficients


,

The Lagrangian equations

<%

are

known

functions of

of motion for the system are

= l,

2, ...n),

(r=l,

2, ...w),

(r

dt

dq

dq

or

*vJi^V.""*i?iika
w
n
^vj~l
v
c*
c
m
ZOnqt+2, 2,
r \qiq
I"/

"

or

;=im=i

s=i

where the symbol

1,

which

rt
= Qr,

= 1,
i

(r

2, ... n),

called a Christoffel s symbol*, denotes the

is

expression
1 /8$;r

9$mr

2 V3gm
\dqm

9^
dq

_ 5$;m \

9g r /
dq

These equations, being linear in the accelerations, can be solved


In fact, let D denote the determinant

quantities qs

$12

$13

$21

$22

$23

$31

$32

U-ll

It

for the

was introduced by

Christoffel,

theory of quadratic differential forms.

Journal filr Math. LXX. (1869), and

is

of importance in the

40

The Equations of Motion

and

let

rs

be the minor of a rs in this determinant.

of the above system by

lv

A 2v

A nv

...

[CH.

Multiply the n equations

respectively,

and add them:

re-

membering that the quantity 2


has the value

when

A rv ar8

equal to

s is

v,

is

s is different

from

v,

and

we have

when

zero

^~|

|~

This equation is true for all values of v from 1 to n inclusive; and


these n equations, in which q\, q 2 ... n are
q
given explicitly as functions of
,

q l} q2 ... q
of motion.
,

n>

q lt q 2

...

qn

can be regarded as replacing Lagrange

Motion of a system which

29.

is

equations

constrained to rotate uniformly round an

axis.

In many dynamical systems, some


part of the system is compelled by an
external agency to revolve with constant
angular velocity w round a given
fixed axis the motion of a bead on a wire which is made to rotate in this
;

way

is

a simple example.

direct application of
is

holonomic; but

it is

is,

as

we have

seen,

no objection to the

equations to such cases, provided the system


often more convenient to use a theorem which we
s

and which reduces the consideration of systems of this kind


that of systems in which no forced rotation about the
given axis takes

shall

to

now

There

Lagrange

obtain,

place.

Suppose that, independently of the prescribed motion round the axis, the
system has n degrees of freedom, so that if the given axis is taken as axis of
z, and any plane through this axis and turning with the
prescribed angular
is measured, the
velocity is taken as the plane from which the azimuth
</>

cylindrical coordinates of
terms of n coordinates q lt

any
q2

particle

. . .

q n these expressions not involving the time t.


in the actual motion be T, and if the
,

Then if the kinetic energy of the system


work done by the external forces in an
be Qi&qi

+ QSq,+

...

+ Qn &qn

of the system can be expressed in

arbitrary infinitesimal displacement

where Q lt Q 2

...,

Qn

will

be supposed to

depend only on the coordinates q lt q2 ..., q n and if the kinetic energy of


the system when the forced angular
velocity is replaced by zero be denoted
T
we
have
lt
by
,

Now

2?wr2 will be a function of q lt q 2 ..., q n which is


determined by our knowledge of the constitution of the
system denote it by
W. The quantity 2rar2 will also be a known function of 1} 2 ..., ni
q
q
q
the quantity

The Equations of Motion

28-30]

41

linear in q 1} q2 ..., qn it will be zero if, when co is zero, the


qi, .., qn being
motion of every particle has no component in the direction of
increasing
while if n is equal to unity, so that there is only one coordinate q, it will be
.

</>

the perfect differential with respect to t of a function of q


cases of most frequent occurrence, and we shall include
2
suming that ^m?^

dY

of the form -T-

is

<

where

is

these are the two

them both by

as-

a given function of the

CLT>

coordinates q lt q2

We

...,

qn

have therefore

and the Lagrangian equations

d /dT\

dT

dY\

can be written in the form

dY\

dT,\

dT,

dW
(

dt

These equations shew


motion

the

is

the

dqr

were

,,..,.

dqr

that, subject to the

assumption already mentioned,


angular velocity were zero, and
2
2
contain an additional term
a)
In this

same as if

the potential energy

rj

to

the prescribed

^mr

way, by modifying the potential energy, we are enabled to pass from a


system which is constrained to rotate about the given axis to a system for

which

this rotation does not take


The term centrifugal forces is
place.
sometimes used of the imaginary forces introduced in this way to represent

the effect of the enforced rotation.

The Lagrangian equations for quasi-coordinates.


In the form of Lagrange s equations given in
26, the variables are n
coordinates q 1} q2 ..., q n and the time t; the knowledge of these
quantities,
30.

together with a knowledge of the constitution of the system, is sufficient to


determine the position of any particle in any configuration of the
system,
which may be expressed by saying that q 1} q.2 ..., q n are true coordinates of
the system.
We shall now find the form which is taken by the equations
when the variables used are no longer restricted to be true coordinates of
the system*.
,

Consider a system denned by n true coordinates q lt q2 ...,


q n the
T and the work done by the external forces in a
,

kinetic energy being


*

known to Lagrange and Euler: the


due to Boltzmann (Wien. Sitzungsbcrichte, 1902) and Hamel

Particular cases of the theorem of this article were

general form of the equations


(Zcitschrift fiir

Math.

u.

is

Phys. 1904).

42

The Equations of Motion

&%

%)

+ Q2 8q,
...,
being
Lagrangian equations of motion of the system are

displacement (8ql} 8q2

Let
<?i>

o) 2 ,

&>i,

fy,

qn

..., to n

be

?i

+ Q n fy

...

so that the

n>

independent linear combinations of the velocities

defined by the relations

a>

where

[OH.

=a

lr

+ a 2r q2 +

...

+ anr q n

(r=l,

2, ..., w)...(2),

ann are given functions of q lt qz ..., qn and let dir^, dir^


..., d7r n be n linear combinations of the differentials
dq lt dq2 ..., dq n defined
the
relations
by
,

or

21

...,

d7rr

where the
These
C$

a lr dq l

same as

coefficients a are the


last

2rd<? 2

. . .

ct

nr dq n

(r

...,),

1, 2,

in the previous set of equations.

equations would be immediately integrable

the relations

if

C^

= V^ were satisfied
^~
oqm
oq

for all values of K,

r,

and m, and in that case variables

ir r would exist which would be true coordinates


we shall not however
suppose the equations to be necessarily integrable, so that dir^, cfor 2 ..., d7r n
will not
necessarily be the differentials of coordinates 7r a 7r2 ..., ir n we shall
call the quantities d^, dir^, ..., d-rr n
differentials of quasi- coordinates.
;

Suppose that the relations


equations
q<

= /3Kl w +
l

when

(2),

/3 K2 &) 2

...

solved for q l}

/3 Kn

Multiplying the Lagrangian equations (1) by


and adding, we obtain the equation

3T\

(d

Now ^Q K SqK

is

wn

&

(r
r

2i .,

q.2

...,

I, 2,

qn

give the

...,n)...(3).

..., /8 Br ,

respectively,

the work done by the external forces on the system in an

arbitrary displacement, so

2 /3 Kr Q K S7rr

is

the work done in a displacement

in which

all the
If therefore the work
quantities STT are zero, except S?rr
done by the external forces on the system in an
arbitrary infinitesimal dis
placement (Swx, S?r2 ..., S7r n ) is n^TTj + II 2 S7r2 + ... + U n 87Tn W6 have
.

d
2/3
K

By means

"

of equations (3)

function T, so that

=n
~
f^_^l
\dqj dq

K)

(dt

we can

suppose for simplicity that


of T be denoted by T.

...,

w ni

q n from the

2
...,
q ly q2 ..., qn (we
not contained explicitly in T) let this form

is

&>

O/TT

Then we have

eliminate q1} q2

becomes a function of w

rl^P

=2r

CL*.

The Equations of Motion

30]

43

and therefore

dT
^-

d /df
sj

But

*5<ft

Kr a KS

dT
-jda KS
at

dco s

dq K

is

zero or unity according as r

/^UXS*
+

different from, or equal

is

to, s

so

we have

We

also

7.

dt (fo r )

sdT

"25"

aT

Sfl

5i

-TT

have

dT__dT
v 8f
~r ** o
o

-a

oqK

oq

a&>

_ af

dw s dq K

"i

dq

^ v af

8ams

d(o s

Qmy

"r^^

dq K

Now

Sy8 Kr ^

coordinate

we

or

shall

2=

s* -, would represent
5

denote

by the symbol

it

if

?r r

whether

were a true

TT,.

a true

is

OTT,-

coordinate or not.

Also the expression

depends only on the connexion between the true coordinates and the dif
ferentials of the quasi-coordinates, and is
independent of the nature or
motion of the dynamical system considered we shall denote this expression
:

by

We

7rz-

have therefore

at

rg

5
\0r/

ii

-- =

Od) s

= Ur

(r

C7Tr

= 1,

2,

ri).

These n equations are the equations of motion expressed in terms of the


when the quasi-coordinates are true coordinates, the

quasi-coordinates

7^

quantities

are all zero, since the conditions

5-^
oqm

-,.-

are satisfied, and

oq K

the equations reduce to the ordinary Lagrangian equations

dT\

dT

Example. A rigid body is free to turn about one of its points 0, which is fixed, so
that the coordinates of the body can be taken to be the three Eulerian
angles 6,
^,
which ( 10) specify the position of axes Oxyz, fixed in the body and moving with it, with
reference to axes
fixed in space.
Let an arbitrary displacement (80, 8$, 8-^) of the
body be equivalent to the resultant of small rotations ST^, STT,, 8*3 round Ox, Oy, Oz,
respectively, so that diri, dir.2 o?7r 3 can be taken as the differentials of quasi-coordinates
<,

OXYZ

let

0)1,

o>

o>

be the components about the axes Oxyz of the angular


velocity of the body

The Equations of Motion

44
at

instant, so that diri, dir 2

any

are the differentials of quasi-coordinates corre


Shew that the equations of motion of
2
3

d-n- 3

sponding respectively to the velocities

[CH.

i,

&>

the body are

dT

(-(-}dt

dT
1-

dT =

<BO

^r

IIi,

\o<ai/

d /dT\

ffl

where

7* is

n n n
:

2,

ar
--

-- oay = H

a?7

3
OQ)

3,

OTs

the kinetic energy of the body, expressed in terms of 1?


2
3
6, 0, *//;
moments about the axes Ox, Oy, Oz, respectively, of the external forces
a>

a>

o>

are the

acting on the body

and

ar

of d&
stands for ^- ^

--

ot

OTT,.

It will

appear later that

Forces

31.

00)!

a>3/

T depends

derivable

from

j.

af J21

OTT,.

0<p

only on

af a^
+ i -i
07r

a</>

a 1}

VTr r

o) 2

&>

dy

87^
so the terms =
are zero.
uir r

a potential-function

which

involves

the

velocities.

In certain cases the conception of a potential-energy function can be


extended to dynamical systems in which the acting forces depend not
only
on the position but on the velocities and accelerations of the bodies.

For consider a dynamical system whose configuration is specified


by
..., q n and suppose that the work done by the external
forces in an arbitrary displacement (Bq lt 8q 2 ..., 8qn ) is

coordinates q 1} q2

Then

if

Qr

can be expressed in the form

dv

d /dv

jr-

-r^-.dt

where

V is a

tions of

given function of q lt q2

_
if

...,

qn q lt

...,

qn

= 1,

2,

n\

the Lagrangian equa

motion are

dt(dqj
and

(r

\dq r j

dq r

a kinetic potential

~
dqr

dqr

dt(dqr )

be defined by the equation

L = T-V,
the equations take the customary form

d fdL\

dL

U-.dt \dq r j

-T,

The
function.

function

)-a-=0
dq

can be regarded as a generalised potential


energy
of such a system is furnished
by the motion of a

An example

The Equations of Motion

30-32]

45

law of attraction*
particle subject to Weber s electrodynamic
mass
on
the
unit
the
force
acting
particle being
per
point,
/

-2

r2 \

__

2r

f>

the distance of the particle from the centre of force


is defined by the equation
the function

where r

to a fixed

is

in this case

Example.

If the forces

Q lt ^2

...,

Qn

of a dynamical system which

is specified

by

coordinates q ly q 2 ...,q n are derivable from a generalised potential-function F, so that


,

_dt

oq r

shew that Q l} Q2

...,

QH must

be linear functions of q\,

q-2 , ...,

q n satisfying the n(2n


,

relations

On the general
may be made to

conditions for the existence of a kinetic potential of forces, reference


.

Helmholtz, Journal

fiir

Math., Vol.

c.

(1886).

Mayer, Leipzig. Berickte, Vol. XLVIII. (1896).


Hirsch, Math. Annalen, Vol. L. (1898).
Initial motions.

32.

differential equations of motion of a dynamical system cannot in


It is how
be
solved in a finite form in terms of known functions.
general
ever always possible (except in the vicinity of certain singularities which
need not be considered here) to solve a set of differential equations by power-

The

series,

i.e.

to obtain for the

dependent variables q lf q 2

...,

q n expressions of

the type

*/2

the coefficients a, b, ... can in fact be obtained by substituting these series in


the differential equations, and equating to zero the coefficients of the various
*

W. Weber, Annalen

of -Aether

d.

Phys. LXXIII. (1848), p. 193.

and Electricity, pp. 226

231.

Cf.

Whittaker

History of the Theories

The Equations of Motion

46

the expansions will converge in general for values of


some definite circle of convergence in the tf-plane.

powers of
It

[OH.

within

plain that these series will give any information which may be
initial character of the motion (t being measured from the

is

required about the

commencement

of the motion), since


is the initial value of
q lt 6 X is the
This method of discussing the initial motion
value of q l9 and so on.
of a system is illustrated by the following example.
i

initial

Consider the motion of a particle of unit mass, which is free to move in a


rest, and which is acted on by a field of force whose components

Example.

plane and initially at

parallel to fixed rectangular axes at

determine the
Let (# +
so that

T)

initial

any point (x, y} are (X, Y)


radius of curvature of the path.

y + *i) be the coordinates

may

of

any point adjacent

be regarded as small quantities

.#)

and

let it

be required to

to the initial point

(.z;

y),

then the equations of motion are

3Y(x,y}

8y
If therefore

we assume

for

and

77

the expansions

to include terms of lower order than t 2 since the quantities


T)
(it is not necessary
TJ,
are initially zero), and substitute in these differential equations, we find, on comparing
the coefficients of various powers of t, the relations
,

y),

The path

where

Now

= 0,

of the particle near the point

(X

y) is therefore given

by the

series

denotes the quantity \&.


if

the coordinates | and

77

of

the radius of curvature at the point u

any curve are expressed


is

known

in

terms of a parameter

above expressions,

u,

to be

so the radius of curvature corresponding to the zero value of u, for the curve given

by the

is

(x ~ +
V

and

ox

r) x- (x *-+ Y ^\ Y
dy )

ctx

dy )

this is the required radius of curvature of the path of the particle at the initial point.

The Equations of Motion

32-34]

47

Similarity in dynamical systems*.

33.

any system of connected particles and rigid bodies is given, it is


possible to construct another system exactly similar to it, but on a different
If now the masses and forces in the two systems, which we can call
scale.
the pattern and model respectively, bear certain ratios to each other, the
workings of the two systems will be similar, though possibly at speeds which
are not the same but bear a constant ratio to each other.
If

To find the relation between the various ratios involved, let the linear
dimensions of the model and pattern be in the ratio x 1, let the masses of
corresponding particles be in the ratio y 1, let the rates of working be in the
ratio z 1, so that the times elapsed between corresponding phases are in the
:

z, and let the forces be in the ratio w.\.


have an equation of motion of the form

ratio 1

mx = X
so if

is

I,

for each particle

we

x is altered in the
we must have

altered in the ratio y

altered in the ratio

Then

ratio xz*

1,

1,

and

is

w = xyz*,
and

this is the required relation

between the numbers

x, y, z,

w.

If the forces acting are those

due to gravity, we have w=y, and conse


Example.
2
quently xy = I, so that the rates of working are inversely as the square roots of the linear
dimensions.
If the forces acting are the mutual gravitations of the
particles, every particle
attracting every other particle with a force proportional to the product of the masses and
2
2
the inverse square of the distance, we have
are in
/x so that the rates of

w=y

the ratio y\

working

x%.

Motion with reversed forces.

34.

A special case of similarity is that in which the ratio w has the value 1.
We have seen that the motion of any dynamical system which is subjected
to constraints independent of the time, and to forces
the positions of the particles, is expressed
the

which depend only on


Lagrangian equations

by

dT

d /8T\
7

where the kinetic energy I


velocities q\, j a

and Q

is

a homogeneous quadratic function of the


involving the coordinates q lt q 2 ..., qn in any way,

..., q n
a function of q l

Introduce a

is

q2

...,

new independent

q n only.
variable defined

and

let

accents denote
*

it,

differentiations

with

Newton, Principia, Book n. Sect.

by the equation
where i = V

regard
7,

to

Prop. 32.

r.

Then

1,

since

48

The Equations of Motion

d /dT\
dt

beC

hom g eneous
d fc^\

me

&>

-2

in dt, the above equations

drdq;)-^ =-$
is

..-,

But

of degree

a<T

where
3i,

dT
are

\M )

the same function of

qn, qi, q*,

-..,

[CH.

q,

qz

qn

...,

1,2, ...,),

<r=

>

q lt

...,

q n that

is

of

T (instead of t) be now
interpreted as denoting the time, these last
are
the
of
motion
of the same system when
equations
equations
subjected to
the same forces reversed in direction.
Moreover, if a 1} a2 ..., an
if

n are the initial values of q lt q,,

ft, /32

...,

q
respectively, in any
particular case of the motion of the original system, then a l} a 2 ..., a n -ifr,
...,
iftn will be the corresponding quantities in the transformed
i/3
thus have the theorem that in
problem.
any dynamical system subjected
to constraints independent
of the time and to forces which depend only on the
position of the particles, the integrals of the equations of motion are still real
...,

n>

q lt q

2>

...,

n>

2>

We

if

be replaced by

- V-

*J

-It and

the initial velocities

&,

..., /3 n

- V-

by

- V^l&,

l/32 ...,
l{j n respectively; and the expressions thus obtained repre
sent the motion which the same
with the same initial
system would have
,

if,

conditions,

it

were acted on by the same forces reversed in direction.

35.
Impulsive motion.
In certain cases (e.g. in the collision of
rigid bodies) the velocities of the
particles in a dynamical system are changed so rapidly that the time occupied
in the process may, for analytical
purposes, be altogether neglected.

The laws which govern the impulsive motion

of a system bear a close


analogy to those which apply in the case of motion under finite forces they
can be formulated in the following way*.
:

The number which represents the mass of a particle,


multiplied by the
vector which represents its
velocity at any instant, is a vector quantity
(localised in a line through the particle) which is called the momentum of
the particle at that instantf; the three
components parallel to rectangularmomentum of a particle of mass
at the point (x,
are

axes Oxyz of the

y, z)

therefore (mx, my, mz). If


any number of particles form a dynamical system,
the sum of the components in any
given direction of the momenta of the
particles is called the

component in that direction of the momentum of the

The impulsive changes

of velocity in the various


particles of a
connected system can be regarded as the result of sudden communications
of momentum to the particles.

system.

The
*

effect of

an agency which causes


impulsive motion in the system

They were involved

in the discovery of the laws of


impact in 1668 by Wallis

and Wren,

Phil. Trans. No. 43, pp. 864, 867.

t Momentum is the quantitas motus of


traced back to Descartes.

Newton

s Principia,

Book

i.

Def.

2.

The

idea can be

The Equations of Motion

34, 35]

49

momentum which

it would communicate to a
single
are the components of velocity of a
particle of mass m, referred to fixed axes in space, before the impulsive
communication of momentum to the particle, and if (u, v, w) are the com

will

be measured by the

If therefore

free particle.

(?/ 0)

w)

ponents of velocity of the particle after the impulse, then the vector quantity
(localised in a line through the particle) whose components are

m (u

m (v

-w ),

m (w w

),

represents the impulse acting on the particle.

For the discussion of the impulsive motion of a connected system of


particles, it is clearly necessary to have some experimental law analogous to
the law of Action and Reaction of finite forces such a law is contained in
the statement that the total impulse acting on a particle of a connected
;

of the external impulse on the particle (i.e. the


impulse communicated by agencies external to the system, measured by the
momentum which the particle would acquire if free) together with impulses
directed along the lines which join this particle to the other particles which
is

system

constrain

to the resultant

equal

its

motion; and the mutually induced impulses between two connected

particles are equal in magnitude

and

opposite in sign.

If we regard the components of an


impulse as the time-integrals of the
components of an ordinary finite force which is very large but acts only for
a very short time, the law just stated
agrees with the law of Action and

Reaction

for finite forces.

Change of kinetic energy due

The change

given set of impulses

Let an impulse
reference are

from v

in

to impulses.

in kinetic energy of a

(A,

/,

^,

may

dynamical system whose particles are acted on by a

be determined in the following way.

directed along a line whose direction-cosines referred to fixed axes of


be communicated to a particle of mass m, changing its velocity

j/),

a direction whose direction -cosines are (Z

The equations

direction-cosines are (L, J/, JV).

NO), to v, in a direction
of impulsive motion are
,

whose

Multiplying these equations respectively by

$(vL + vQ L

$(vM+v

),

),

and

and adding, we have

The change in kinetic energy of the particle is therefore equal to the


product of the
impulse and the mean of the components, before and after the impulse, of the velocity of
the particle in the direction of the impulse.

Now consider any dynamical system of connected particles and rigid bodies, to which
given impulses are communicated applying this result to each particle of the system, and
summing, we see that the change in the kinetic energy of the system is equal to the sum of the
impulses applied to it, each multiplied by the mean of the components, before and
after the
;

communication of the impulse, of the velocity of its


point of application in the direction of the
In this result we can clearly neglect the
impulse.
impulsive forces between the molecules
of any rigid body of the system.
W. D.

The Equations of Motion

50

[CH.

The Lagrangian equations of impulsive motion.

36.

The equations

impulsive motion of

of

system can be
Lagrangian equations of motion for

expressed in a form* analogous to the


finite forces, in the following way.

a dynamical

Let (X i} Yi, Zi) be the components of the total impulse (external and
molecular) applied to a particle m; of the system, situated at the point
The equations of impulsive motion of the particle are
(#,-, yi, z^.

(an

-x )=X
io

iy

(y

-y

io )

=T

i}

(z {

- z^) = Z

where (x^, y io z^) and (x i} y i} z^ denote the components of velocity of the


particle before and after the application of the impulse.
,

If
^ 2 ..., qn denote the n independent coordinates in terms of which
the configuration of the system can be expressed, we have therefore
,

<?!,

2 m,-

- asfe) =
\

(x t

"""I

h (yi

\
y*>)

vst

^- +
,

(&i

it}

Yv
)

5
9gv
??/

(JiXj

-*

cq r

where the summation

Now
it

is

in

extended over

is

OZ

T ^f ^

cqr/

oq r

the particles of the system.

all

forming the summation on the right-hand side of this equation,


26 that the molecular impulses between particles of the

seen as in

system can be omitted

the quantity

dq r

dqr

dqr

can therefore readily be found when the external impulses are known: we
shall denote it by the symbol Qr
We have consequently
.

2m,
t

But

as in

(& t

- 4-o)

+ (y t

2/ io )

oq r

(*t

oq r

- ^)

= Qr

dq r )

26 we have

da^_dxi
dq,.~dq

.
"bxi_

Vi

dqr

_ d (
-dq r

and similarly
.

dxi

_9^

*dqr~dqU
where q ro and q r denote the velocities of the coordinate q r before and after
the impulse respectively. Thus if

Due

to

Lagrange, Mec. Anal.

(2

ed.), n. p. 183.

The Equations of Motion

36]

51

denotes the kinetic energy of the system after the impulse, the above
equation can be written in the form

dqr
/rl

where

\dq r /Q

(~

)
\oqr/ o

/}

T1

denotes the quantity corresponding to ^-, but relating to the


oc[r

instant before the impulse.

Similar equations can be found for the rest of the coordinates q 1} g 2


set of n equations

>

>

qnl

and thus we obtain the

fdT\

which are known as the Lagrangian equations of impulsive motion.

These are algebraical equations


terms of q w qw

determination of q lt q2

for the

...,

qn in

qm they are not differential equations like the Lagrangian


of motion for finite forces, since the second derivates of the
,

.,

equations
coordinates with respect to the time do not enter.

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
1.
Two rigid bodies moving in space are constrained only by a taut inextensible string
joining a given point of one body to a given point of the other, and one of the bodies is
constrained to roll without sliding on a given fixed surface. How many degrees of freedom
has the system, and how many independent coordinates are required to specify its con

figuration
2.

point

is

referred to curvilinear coordinates

velocity is

Shew that

a,

b,

c,

and the square of

its

2 T= A a? + Bb 2 + Cc2 + 2Fbc + 2Gcd + 2Hdb.


p, q,

r,

the component accelerations in the directions of the tangents to the

coordinate lines, are given by three equations of the type


d_

f
F\
dT
fiT\
- --- =

3-. )
dt (d
\dd
oaj
j

3.

field

da

..

HTT

(~*

p JA + -, _ q2 + -T--, r.
-

JB

(Coll.

Exam. )

v/6

particle which is free to move in space is initially at rest at the origin, and is in
of force whose components (X, F, Z) at any point (x, y, z) are given by the expansions

JT= a +bx+ quadratic and higher terms


Y= cx+ quadratic and higher terms

Z=

dx2 + cubic and higher terms

in x, y, z

in x, y,

Find the radii of curvature and torsion of the orbit at the

in x, y, z;
z.

origin.

42

CHAPTER

III

Problems which are soluble by quadratures.

37.

The determination of the motion of a holonomic dynamical system with


number of degrees of freedom has in the preceding chapter been
shewn to depend on the solution of a set of ordinary differential equations.
If n denotes the number of degrees of freedom, and (q 1} q2 ..., q n ) are the

a finite

coordinates specifying the configuration of the system at the time t, then


the set of equations consists of n differential equations, each of the second
order, with q lt q 2 ...,q n as dependent variables and t as independent variable.
This set of equations is said to be of order 2n, the order being defined to
,

be the sum of the orders of the highest derivates of the dependent vari
ables occurring in the equations.
It is a well-known result of the theory
of ordinary differential equations that the number of arbitrary constants of
integration in the solution of a set of differential equations is equal to
the order of the system whence it follows that there are 2n constants of
;

integration in the general solution of a holonomic dynamical problem with

n degrees of freedom.

Now

set of differential equations of order

any given

k can be reduced

to the form

-^

X X

where

l}

...,

new

are

= X r (ae

known

1}

x2

..,

xk

(r

t},

= 1,

2,

. .

.,

k\

functions of their arguments, by taking as

variables (x1 x2 ..., xk ) the original dependent variables together with


their derivates up to (but not including) the highest derivates occurring in
Thus e.g. the set of equations
the original set of equations.
,

Q and Q2

(where
order

dx

~T7

4,

are any functions of the arguments indicated) which

is

can be reduced to the set

dx2 _

_
^3>

~~rr

dx3
^4>

~jT

f)
^Jl

\&lt MS*

x
^3>

&4/I

dx4 _ ^
^2

~~JT

\&lt

-%2>

fiat

^4)5

of

53

Principles available for the integration

37]

by taking

= 01,

#1

=&,

a*

#3

= 0i,

^4

02-

The form

= Xr (x x2
1

-^
therefore be regarded
equations of order k.

as the

may

...,

(r

fc>

form

typical

for a

= l,

&)

2, ...,

set of differential

rlf

If a function

f{x

x2

...,xk

~-

such that

t) is

zero

is

when

(#,,

#2

>

>

#*)

tt-t

are any functions of

whatever which satisfy these differential equations, the

equation
/(#i, x2
is

#,

...,

t)

= Constant

an integral of the system. The condition that a given function


furnish an integral of the system is easily found
for the equation

called

may

dfldt

gives

^ox-i

*- 4 +
4 + cx

o
d^j

and

this relation

<*

4-

identically satisfied in order that the equation

f(x

may

L.

oa;2

must be

= 0,

8
8^Y ^
= ^;
+ 57
+ 5 / ^A
dt
dx

57
dt

dxk

V Y + ^ -^2+
T

or

+ ~- xk +

oc 2

..., aek ,

t)

Constant

be an integral of the system of differential


equations.

Sometimes the function

called

an

solution of the set of differential equations of order k

is

/ itself (as

distinct

from the equation /= constant)

is

integral of the system.

The complete

furnished by k integrals
fr

On

2,

afc, t)

= ar

(r

1, 2,

k),

where a lt a z ..., ak are arbitrary constants, provided these integrals are


distinct, i.e. no one of them is algebraically deducible from the others.
For
let the values of as1} xz ..., xk obtained from these
equations as functions of
a 2 .. a k be
t, a,!
x r = <,.(!, a,, ..., ak t),
(r--l, 2, ..., k};
,

then

if

(a-j,

x2

...,

xk ) are any particular

set of functions of

which

satisfy

the differential equations, it follows from what has been said above that
by giving to the arbitrary constants a r suitable constant values we can make
the equations

/r

(ar,,

x2

...,

a! k

true for this particular set of functions (xl}


of functions (x ly xZ) ..., xk ) will be included

the equations x r
of freedom

may

t)

= ar

x2

...,

(r=l,

2, ...,

k)

xk ); and therefore this set

among

the functions defined by

The

solution of a dynamical problem with n


degrees
therefore be regarded as
equivalent to the determination of
r

<j>

2w integrals of a set of differential


equations of order

2n.

54

[OH. in

Principles available for the integration


Thus the

differential equation
?=-?>

which

is

two integrals

of the second order, possesses the

tan- 1

and

a.2

are arbitrary constants.

?_;= a
?

where

+ ? 2 =,,

On

solving these equations for q

and these equations constitute the solution of the

and

q,

we have

differential equation.

The more elementary

division of dynamics, with which this and the


immediately succeeding chapters are concerned, is occupied with the dis
cussion of those dynamical problems which can be solved completely in

terms of the known elementary functions or the indefinite integrals of such


functions. These are generally referred to as problems soluble by quadratures.
The problems of dynamics are not in general soluble by quadratures and in
;

those cases in which a solution by quadratures can be effected, there must


always be some special reason for it, in fact the kinetic potential of the

problem must have some special character.

The

object of the

present

to discuss those peculiarities of the kinetic potential which are


chapter
most frequently found in problems soluble by quadratures, and which in fact
is

are the ultimate explanation of the solubility.

Systems with ignorable coordinates.

38.

We

have seen ( 27) that the motion of a conservative holonomic


dynamical system with n degrees of freedom, for which the coordinates are
.., q n and the kinetic potential is L, is determined by the differential
22
<?!,

equations

d fdL\
U-T-

-T.

at \dqr J)

- 5dL = 0,

= 1,

(r

2,

. . .

n).

dqr

7)T

The quantity
coordinate qr

^-roq r

is

generally called the

momentum corresponding

to the

that some of the coordinates, say q ly q z ..., q k are not


in L, although the corresponding velocities
contained
explicitly
q q%, ..., qk
are so contained.
Coordinates of this kind are said to be ignorable or cyclic
It

may happen

appear in the following chapters that the presence of ignorable


coordinates is the most frequently-occurring reason for the solubility of
it

will

particular problems

by quadratures.

The Lagrangian equations


coordinates are

of motion which correspond to the k ignorable

55

Principles available for the integration

37, 38]

and on integration, these can be written

where

/3j, /3 2 , ..., /3&

These

are constants of integration.

equations are

last

evidently k integrals of the system.

We shall now shew how these k integrals can be utilised to reduce the
order of the set of Lagrangian differential equations of motion*.
k

Let

denote the function

dL

qr

r=\

~-r-

By means

(r-1,

f|-A,
we can express the k quantities q ly

of the k equations

v$r

2,

<j

..., qk,

which are the

2, ...,*),.

velocities cor

responding to the ignorable coordinates, in terms of


qk+i>

we

shall

qk+2>

>

<ln,

<ik+i,

qk+2,

Qn, @i, $*,

R is

suppose that in this way the function

->

ftk\

expressed in terms of the

latter set of quantities.

Now
tities

qk+1

Sf denote the increment produced in any function / of the quan

qk+l qk+2
,

...,

let

Bqn Bq 1}
,

qn

...,

&,

...,
2

qn
...,

fr,

$0

qn (or of the quantities q k+1) qk+2


by arbitrary infinitesimal changes Bqt+1 Sq

q2

...,

Sqn in its arguments.

ar
= b(L
by the definition of R.

...,
k+2>

qn

...,

Then we have
v
2,
r =\

3L\
qr

oqr/

But

and

since

We

have therefore

r=k + ivqr

r=k+lOqr

r=\

and since the infinitesimal quantities occurring on the right-hand side of this
equation are arbitrary and independent, the equation is equivalent to the
/

is

The transformation which follows is really a case of the Hamiltonian transformation, which
discussed in Chapter X; it was however first separately given by Eouth in 1876, and somewhat

later

by Helmholtz.

56

Principles available for the integration

in

[CH.

system of equations

(r

dq r

dq r

dL

dR

= k+l,

+ 2,

..., n),

Substituting these results in the Lagrangian equations of motion,

we

have
m

Now E

is

^-

f^\ _ O

^L
7
ac \oqr /
I

"~~

<"\

n
^

ft
*V

l"

J-

....

A/ ~|

7fc ).

oqr

a function only of the variables qk+l q k+2


...,q n qk+l
,

...,q n

and the constants &, y32


so this is a new Lagrangian
ftk
system of
equations, which we can regard as defining a new dynamical problem with
,

only (n

new

k) degrees of freedom, the

coordinates being q k+1 qk+2


,

...,

qn

and the new kinetic potential being R. When the variables k+l k+2 ..., n
q
q
q
have been obtained in terms of t by solving this new
dynamical problem, the
remainder of the original coordinates, namely q l} 2 ...,
q
q can be obtained
from the equations
,

k>

Hence a dynamical problem with n degrees of freedom, which has k


coordinates, can be reduced to a

degrees of freedom.

ignoralle

dynamical problem which has only (n

This process

is

k)

called the ignoration of coordinates.

The essential basis of the ignoration of coordinates is in the theorem that when the
kinetic potential does not contain one of the coordinates
q r explicitly, although it involves
the corresponding velocity

namely

= constant.

be given

q,.,

This

is

an integral of the motion can be at once written


down,
a particular case of a

much more

general theorem which

when a dynamical system admits a known infinitesimal


contact-transformation, an integral of the system can .be immediately obtained.
will

later, to the effect that

If the original problem relates to the motion of a conservative


dynamical
system in which the constraints are independent of the time, we have seen
that its kinetic potential L consists of a
part (the kinetic energy) which is

a homogeneous

function

and which involves


q., ..., q n
with
a
qk+i, qk+z,
any way, together
part (the potential energy with
sign reversed) which involves qk+1 qk+2 ..., q n only. But in the new
dynamical system which is obtained after the ignoration of coordinates, the
,

quadratic

of q lt

q n in

kinetic potential
cannot be divided into two parts in this
will in general contain terms linear in the velocities.
And

way

in fact,

more generally
when (as happens very frequently in the more advanced parts of
Dynamics)
the solution of one set of Lagrangian differential
equations is made to depend

57

Principles available for the integration

38]

on that of another set of Lagrangian differential equations with a smaller


number of coordinates, the kinetic potential of this new system is not
necessarily divisible into two groups of terms corresponding to a kinetic and
a potential energy.
shall sometimes use the word natural to denote those
of
systems
Lagrangian equations for which the kinetic potential contains

We

in the velocities, and non-natural to denote


only terms of degrees 2 and
those systems for which this condition is not satisfied.

As an example of the ignoration of coordinates, consider a dynamical system with two


degrees of freedom, for which the kinetic energy is

and the potential energy


where

a, 6,

c,

is

are given constants.

It is evident that q^ is

or

an ignorable coordinate, since

it

does not appear explicitly in

V.

The

kinetic potential of the system is

and the integral corresponding to the ignorable coordinate

where

ft is

The

a constant, whose value

kinetic potential of the

and the problem

is

is

determined by the

is

initial

circumstances of the motion.

new dynamical system obtained by ignoring the coordinate

now reduced

to the solution of the single equation

(3R
dt\dq
or

As

this is a linear differential equation with constant coefficients, its solution

immediately written down

where

A and

of the motion.

are constants of integration, to be determined by the initial circumstances


This equation gives the required expression of the coordinate 2
terms
<?

of the time

can be

it is

the value of qi in terms of

can then be deduced from the equation

which gives
8i n 2

and so completes the solution of the system.

58

Principles available for the integration


39.

Special cases of ignoration; integrals of

[CH.

in

momentum and angular

momentum.

We

now

shall

consider specially the two

commonest types

of ignorable

coordinates in dynamical problems.

Systems possessing an integral of momentum,.


Let the coordinates of a conservative holonomic dynamical system with
n degrees of freedom be q l} q
and let T be the kinetic energy of the
.., q n
and
V
the
system,
potential energy, so that the equations of motion of the
(i)

2>

system are

dT
dV
~-~~

d (dT\

Suppose that one of the coordinates, say q l} is ignorable, and moreover is


such that an alteration of the value of q 1 by a quantity I, the
remaining
coordinates qz qs ..., q n being unaltered, corresponds to a
simple translation
of the whole system through a distance I parallel to a certain fixed direction
,

in space we shall take this to be the direction of the #-axis in a


system of
fixed rectangular axes of coordinates.
;

Since

q-i

is

an ignorable coordinate, we have the integral


O/TT
-z-r

Constant,

dq l

and we

shall

We

have

now

discuss the physical

ab-*Sb*
dT

is

miW + *f + if

>

extended over

all

the particles of the system,

$-M^T*

dAi

<

difi

+ v-^ + z-

^
= Zmtiki,

^}

*^/

y<

as,

3ft
,

bv
y
9#o

since in this case ^-

dq

Now
the

this equation.

O/TT

where the summation

meaning of

8
^

26

^=

9vi
1,

^=

9^j
0,

0.

dq 1

oqi

-axis of
Smgfej represents ( 35) the component parallel to the
of the system of particles m^, and consequently this is the

momentum

r
ri

physical

meaning of the quantity

r
in the present case.

0Ji

~\m

The

integral

= Constant

9g,

When a dynamical system can be


interpreted thus
translated as if rigid in a given direction without violating the constraints,
and the potential energy is thereby unaltered (the way in which the kinetic
can

therefore

be

energy depends on the velocities

is

obviously unaltered by this translation, so

ignorable), then the component parallel to this


of the system is constant,

the corresponding coordinate


direction of the

which

momentum

is

law of conservation of momentum*, and systems


applies are said to possess an integral of momentum.

This result
to

59

Principles available for the integration

39]

it

is

called the

Systems possessing an integral of angular momentum.

(ii)

Again taking a system with coordinates q 1} q2 ..., q n and kinetic and


potential energies T and V respectively, let us now suppose that the
coordinate q is ignorable, and moreover is such that an alteration of q by
,

a quantity a, the other coordinates remaining unchanged, corresponds to


a simple rotation of the whole system through an angle a round a given
fixed line in space
we shall take this line as the axis of z in a system
of fixed rectangular axes of coordinates.
:

Since q

is

an ignorable coordinate, we have the integral


r
?i r
............................. (1),
;r-r- = Constant
9?i

and we have to determine the physical interpretation of

We

have as before

dT

/
j

where the summation


if

we

this equation.

is

=-- yt dyi
^.

r-

dqi

all

dqj

9?i

extended over

dzA

+ Zi =

the particles of the system.

But

write

Xi^ncosfa,

yi

dfa = dq

we have
d%i
~

= dxi

=
rism<f>i,

riSm>i=:

..

and therefore
3-r-

oq

Now

= 2m

(-

dayt

+ yiXi)

........................... (2).

r denote the distance of any particle of mass


from a given
and
if
denote the angular velocity of the
any instant,
particle about the line, the product mr*to is called the angular momentum
of the particle about the line.
if

straight line at

Let

moving

be any point, and


particle, the interval

<a

let

P,

of time

be two consecutive positions of the


between them being dt. Then the

This has been evolved gradually from the observation of Newton, Principia, Book i. iutrod.
if any number of bodies are acted on
only by their mutual attractions, their
common centre of gravity will either be at rest, or move uniformly in a straight line.
to Sect. XL, that

60

Principles available for the integration

angular momentum about any line


value of the ratio

OK

??z

-7-

x Twice the area of the projection of the triangle


a plane perpendicular to

so if

OPP

on

OK,

OK and

m, n) are the direction-cosines of


cosines of the normal to the triangle
(I,

clearly the limiting

is

through

[CH.

OPP

if (X, p, v)

we

momentum about OK is
angular momentum about

are the direction-

that the angular


mp + nv) into the

see

equal to the product of (l\ +


the normal to the plane
It is evident from
this that if the angular momenta of a
about
particle
any three rectangular
axes Oxyz at any time are A,, A2 A 3 respectively, then the
angular momentum

OPP

about any line through


whose direction-cosines referred to these axes are
is
mh
nh
we may express this by saying that angular
Ih-i +
(I, m, n}
2 +
s
momenta about axes through a point are compounded according to the vectorial
;

law.

The angular momentum

of a dynamical system about a given axis

is

sum

of the angular momenta of the separate particles of


the system about the given axis in particular, the
angular momentum of
a system of particles
typified by a particle of mass m, whose coordinates are

defined to be the

(xi,

yiy

Zi},

about the axis of z

and the summation


expression for

is

is

Sm^r^, where

extended over

the angular

momentum

all the particles of the system


this
of a system can be written in the form
;

2m* (ijiXi -

x^i),

and on comparing

momentum of

this with equation (2)

we have the

result that the angular


rlT

the system considered, about the axis

of

z, is

~-r
d^i

The equation

(1) implies therefore that the angular momentum of the


system about the axis of z is constant and we have the following result
When a dynamical system can be rotated as if rigid round a given axis with
:

out violating the constraints,

and

angular momentum of the system


This result is known as
momentum*.

the potential energy is thereby unaltered, the

about this axis


the

theorem

is constant.

of conservation

of angular

Example. A system of n free particles is in motion urider the influence of their


mutual forces of attraction, these forces being derived from a kinetic potential V, which
contains the coordinates and components of velocity of the particles, so that the equations
of motion of the particles are

_ar

mrXr ~
..

Kepler

d /3F\
e

law, that the radius from the sun to a planet sweeps out equal areas in equal times,
from this the general
to all cases of motion under a central force

was extended by Newton

theorem of conservation of angular

momentum has

gradually developed.

61

Principles available for the integration

39, 40]

shew that these equations possess the integrals


(

m r xr +^- J = Constant,

9F\

.,

yr + K-i

m r z r + ^r- = Constant,

cz r /)

r V
(

2 \m r (yr zr - z r yj
2

+y

m r (zr xr - x,. zr + zr
)

(^

may

be regarded as

.-

zr

9F)

= Constant,

^.-j

F-

JTTox r

an =
Constant,

xr 3

cz r

9 F!
F
=
C~yrgj}- Constant,
momentum and
generalisations of the integrals of

2 \m r (x r y r -y r x r ) + x r

which

3F -

Constant,

yJ

r \

F\

momentum.

The general theorem of angular momentum.

40.

The
result,

angular

(Levy.)

integral of angular

which

may be

momentum

is

a special case of a more general

obtained in the following way.

Consider a dynamical system formed of any number of free or connected


and interacting particles if they are subjected to any constraints other than
the mutual reactions of the particles, we shall suppose the forces due to these
constraints to be counted among the external forces.
:

Take any

line fixed in space,

and choose one of the coordinates which

to be such that a change in


specify the configuration of the system (say q^
in
the
other
coordinates,
implies a simple
q 1} unaccompanied by any change
rotation of the system as if rigid round the given line, through an angle equal
to the

change in q lf

We

suppose the constraints to be such that this

is

possible displacement of the system.

The Lagrangian equation

for

the coordinate q

is

dtdq
and

this reduces to

since the value of q : (as distinguished from

q^ cannot have any

a/77

the kinetic energy, and therefore


j

must be

zero.

Now

effect

on

T^T

the angular

is
-^-r

momentum of the system about the given line; and QiS^j is the work done
on the system by the external forces in a small displacement 8q 1} i.e. a small
rotation of the system about the given line through an angle 8q from which
1

it is easily

line.

We

moment

of the external forces about the given


Q
have therefore the result that the rate of change of the angular

seen that

is

the

62

Principles available for the integration

momentum

[CH. in

of a dynamical system about any fixed line is equal to the moment


The law of conservation of angular
when the moment of the external

of the external forces about this line.


momentum obviously follows from this
forces is zero.

Similarly

to

dynamical system parallel


parallel to this

of the total external forces acting on the system.

line,

For impulsive motion


results

the rate of change of the momentum of a


any fixed direction is equal to the component,

we can shew that

it

easy to establish the following analogous

is

The impulsive increment of the component of momentum of a system in any


fixed direction is equal to the component in this direction of the total external
impulses applied

to the system.

The impulsive increment of the angular momentum of a system round any


axis is equal to the moment round that axis of the external impulses applied to
the system.

The Energy equation.


now introduce an integral which plays a great part in dynamical
investigations, and indeed in all physical questions.
41.

We

shall

In a conservative dynamical system let q i} q2 ..., qn be the coordinates


we shall suppose that the constraints
let L be the kinetic potential
,

and

L is a given function of the variables


not
We shall not, at
only,
qn, q\, q-2,
involving t explicitly.
qi, #2,
L
further
so
that
the
discussion
will apply
restrict
conditions,
first,
by any
to the non-natural systems obtained after ignoration of coordinates, as well as
are independent of the time, so that
>

>

<jn

to natural systems.

We

have

dL =
~T~
at

..

r =\

..

2,

qr

r =i

Integrating,

"r

dL
;r-r-

Or o
dqr
-

qr r Urr,

r =i

by the Lagrangian equations

n
v<Jr

a constant.

This equation
energy or

we have
l

is

at \oqr J

dL^

*q,
r=
where h

d idL\

+ 2

vqr
/

dL

i
r=i

uq r

"

9Z

q? D^~

is

an integral of the system, and

is

called the integral of

law of conservation of energy*.

Galileo was acquainted with the fact that the velocity of a particle sliding down an inclined
plane from rest depends only on the vertical height through which it has descended. From this
elementary particular case the principle was gradually evolved by Huygens, Newton, John

and Daniel Bernoulli, and Lagrange.

63

Principles available for the integration

40, 41]

We

have seen that in natural systems, in which the constraints do not


involve the time, the kinetic potential L can be written in the form T
V,
where T (the kinetic energy of the system) is homogeneous and of degree 2

V is

in the velocities, while

In this

a function of the coordinates only.

case,

therefore, the integral of energy becomes


n

^
h=Zq
r=i
.

= 2T

2 r
Olj
^

LT

oqr

T +V,

since

T is

homogeneous of degree 2

It follows that in conservative natural systems, the

potential energies is constant.

This constant value h

in qlt

sum of

the kinetic

and

called the total energy

is

of the system.

This latter result can also be obtained directly from the elementary
equations of motion. For from the equations of motion of a single particle,

namely

m x = Xi
i

m yi = Y

m ^ = Z{
{

we have

Em*

(xi xi

where the summation

+ yiiji + Zi Zi) = 2 (XiXi + Yiiji + Z^t),


extended over

is

d S I m t (x?
.

y?

all

the particles of the system, or

+ zf) = 2 (Xdx + Ydy + Zdz},

increment of the kinetic energy of the system, in any infinitesimal


path, is equal to the work done by the forces acting on the system

so that the

part of

its

in this part of the path, and therefore is equal to the decrease in the
potential
of the
energy of the system. The sum of the kinetic and potential

energies

system

is

therefore constant.

The equation

of energy

m & + f + p) = Xdx + Ydy + Zdz


(

(where for simplicity we suppose the system to consist of a single particle) is true not
only when (#, y, z) denote coordinates referred to any fixed axes, but also when they
denote coordinates referred to axes which are moving with any motion of translation
in a fixed direction with constant velocity.

For let (, ;, f ) denote the coordinates of the particle referred to axes


and parallel to the moving axes Oxyz, so that

x=-at, y = T)-bt,
where

-ct,

the constant components of velocity of the origin


Then the result already proved is that
a, b, c are

d .4 m (e + ^ + C 2 ) = Xd +

fixed in space

Yd?,

of the

moving

+ (aX+bY+cZ)dt.

axes.

64

Principles available for the integration

Now we

[OH.

have
d.

= m (at; + bij + c dt
= (aX+bY+cZ)dt,
)

and therefore

d.im(x*+y2 + z = Xdx+ Ydy + Zdz,


i

which establishes the theorem.


It may be noted that from this result the three equations of motion of the particle
at etc., and subtracting the equation of energy in the
can be derived, by taking x =
coordinates (#, y, 2) from the equation of energy in the coordinates (, 77, ).

Reduction of a dynamical problem

42.

a problem with fewer degrees of

to

freedom, by means of the energy-equation.

When

a conservative dynamical system has only one degree of freedom,


the integral of energy is alone sufficient to give the solution by quadratures.

For

if

q be the coordinate, the integral of energy


.

dL
-TT-.

L=h

dq

a relation between q and q

is

from this equation, so that

.if therefore q be found


explicitly in terms of q
takes the form

it

9 =/(?),

we can

integrate again and obtain the equation


t

-.^r-r

constant.

which constitutes the solution of the problem.


When the system has more than one degree of freedom, the integral of
energy is not in itself sufficient for the solution but we shall now shew that
;

can be used for the same purpose as the integrals corresponding to ignorable coordinates were used, namely to reduce the system to another dynamical
it

system with a smaller number of degrees of freedom*.


In the function L, replace the quantities q.2 q 3 ..., q n by ftq2 ftq^,
,

ft

q^, respectively,

by

n(<j,,

<//,

qs

q.2,

where qr denotes

...,

...,

qn

qn,
,

<?i,

q-2

ft, q*,

dL

wehave

...,

qn )-

qn )

an

q2
r

differentiating the equation


,

q3

aii

(-1^,3,...,,)
*

...,

and denote the resulting function

Then

= &(ft,

Whittaker, Mess, of Math. xxx. (1900).

......... (3).

Principles available for the integration

41, 42]

Equations (1) and (2) give

**.*
ir

,-=2 ^i

oq r

80 _ *A
+ I
~
o
.

^-1

0$

oqi

Now

65

in the integral of energy


n
dL

r=l

qr

~]r-L
Off

........................... \^)

~i~ ^TT~

= h,

replace gv by^gv for all values of r from 2 to w inclusive, and then from this
equation obtain ^ as a function of the quantities (q2 q3 ...,q n qi,
qn)
and by using this expression for ql} express the function
,

>

>

<?2>

dL

g,

r=l 9^r ?i
in

terms of (^2

be denoted by

^3

...,

qn

q 1} q 2

...,

Let the function thus obtained

q n ).

then from (4) we see that

r)O

the same as ^-r

is

but

5^i

differently expressed.

Differentiating the equation of energy, which by (4)


the form

an -

written in

li=h,

(ft
1

may be

fyi

and regarding
the variables

But

it

(<?/,

as a relation which implicitly determines


q.,

...,

qn

q lt q 2

...,

as a function of

differentiating the equation


r,

an
8^

regarded as an identity in the variables (g/, q3

9X

Comparing equations

(5)

_j^

and

(7),

az/

and comparing equations (6) and

we have
i

(8),

ao

Wr

we have
1

30

^Wr

...,q n

a^na^

^8"

dL
W. D.

qn ), we have

"

q-i,

qz

-,

qn ),

we have

66

Principles available for the integration

Combining these with equations

(2)

dL^_dL
*\

-i

dqr

we

and

anQ

>

dq r

(3),

in

[CH.

we have

dL _
_

dq r

?i

dL
.

dqr

Substituting from these equations in the Lagrangian equations of motion,


obtain the system

d (dL \
-T. (5,
dt\dqr j

q
*l

dL
~

0,

(r

= 2,

(r

3,

. .

2, 3,

TO),

n).

dq r

or finally

Now

#zese

may
L

system in which

and q plays

be

dL

regarded as the equations of motion of a new dynamical

is the kinetic potential,


(qz ,

q3

...,

qn ) are the coordinates,

The new system


part of
obtained
of
coordinates, be in general
systems
by ignoration
i.e.
L
will
in the
not consist solely of terms of degrees 2 and
non-natural,
velocities (q 2 q3 ..., qn ) but on account of its possession of the Lagrangian
form, most of the theorems relating to dynamical systems will be applicable
the time as the independent variable.

the

will, like the

it.
The integral of energy thus enables us to reduce a given dynamical
system with n degrees of freedom to another dynamical system with only (n
1)

to

degrees offreedom.

The new dynamical system

will not in general possess an integral of


since
the
variable
energy,
independent
q l occurs explicitly in the new kinetic
L
if
But
an
is
potential
ql
ignorable coordinate in the original system,
.

then q l

will not occur explicitly in

any stage of the above process, and there


fore will not occur explicitly in
From this it follows that the new system
will also possess an
integral of energy,

namely

2
r=2

qr 3
Oqr

L =

constant,

and this can in its turn be used to reduce further the number of degrees of
freedom of the system.

The preceding theorems shew


n degrees

of freedom

and (n

that any conservative dynamical system with

be completely
integrated by quadratures we can proceed either (a) by first performing the
process of ignoration of the coordinates, so arriving at a system with only one
degree of freedom, which possesses an integral of energy and can therefore be
1) ignorable coordinates can

solved in the

manner indicated

at the beginning of the present article or


use the integral of energy to lower the number of degrees of
freedom by unity, then use the integral of energy of the new system to lower
the number of degrees of freedom again by unity, and so on, obtaining

(@) we can

first

finally

a system with one degree of freedom which again can be solved in the manner
indicated.

Principles available for the integration

42, 43]

The

Example.

Shew

kinetic potential of a dynamical system

Jj

and where

=^,

is

is

given by the differential

__~

__
5ft \3$iY

where

is

that the relation between the variables l and z


q
q

equation

67

9? 2

denned by the equation

Shew that the non-natural dynamical system represented by the last differential
equation possesses an integral of energy, and hence solve the system by quadratures.
43.

fs
is

Separation of the variables ; dynamical systems of Liouville s type.

dynamical equations which are obviously soluble by quadratures


constituted by the equations of those systems for which the kinetic
energy
of the form
class of

and the potential energy


where

vlt v2

...,

vn

V=
w w
lt

is

of the form

u>i

+ W (q ) + + wn (q n
w n are arbitrary functions

(?i)

...,

),

arguments so that the kinetic potential breaks


of which involves only one of the variables.
;

For in

this case the

Lagrangian equations of motion are

^ K (qr)
or

up

of their- respective
into a sum of parts, each

qr ]

v r (q r ) q r

- \ vr
+%

(q r) q,?

vr (qr ) qr2

= - ff [ (qr
= - w/ (qr \
i

(r

),

1 , 2,

2,

1, 2,

= 1,
(r

n),

n).

n),

These equations can be immediately integrated, and


give

%vr (q r ) qr
.

where d,

+ wr (q r ) = c r

^/

(r

are constants of integration; these


equations can be
further integrated, since the variables r and t are
q
separable, and we thus
obtain
c2

..., c n

^,
where ylt y a ...,yn are new constants of
integration.
,

(r-!,
These

2,

last

...,),

equations

constitute the solution of the problem.

An

important extension of this class of dynamical systems was made by


who shewed that all dynamical problems for which the kinetic
and potential energies can
respectively be put in the forms
Liouville*,

T=

V=

K
Wl

+ Ui (q ) + ...+* (qn )}
w
+
+ --- + wn (qn )

(?,)

^ ^

Vl (ft)

^+v

(q2 ) qs*+...

+Vn (qn ) j n*}

can be solved by quadratures.


*

Journal de Math. xiv. (1849),

p. 257.

52

[CH. in

Principles available for the integration

68

For by taking
>Jv

where
vi

(ft)>

ft

ft

...,

V2

kinetic

are

qn

new

(q r )

dq r

= qr

we can

variables,

v n (qn)

we

(r

replace

all

1, 2,

.
,

w),

the functions

suppose this done, so that the

shall

by unity
(ft),
and potential energies take the form
>

T=

^(ft +
2

ft

+...+ft> ),

V = - K (ft) + w
where u stands

for

+ wn (q n }},

(ft)

the expression
i

(ft)

The Lagrangian equation


d

u 2 (ft)

+un (qn

...

).

for the coordinate q 1 is

ar = _
fdr\ _

dt \9ft /

3^

dv
dql

Multiplying this equation throughout by 2uqlt we have

~
(%>

But from the

*g w+ ^+

.) =

integral of energy of the system,

%u(q +
2

q->+

...

where h is a constant. The equation


be written in the form

Integrating,

..:

2 ft

qn*)

{h^

(?j)

we have

= h-

for the

V,

coordinate

- w,

q^

can therefore

(q,)}

we have
2
^u q^ =

AM, (ft)

- Wj

(ft)

7j,

a constant of integration.
We obtain similar equations for each
the
...,
n
(ft, ft,
q )
corresponding constants (7!, j.2 ..., yn )
must satisfy the relation

where

71 is

of the coordinates

7i

72

+ 7 = 0,

in virtue of the integral of energy of the system.

69

Principles available for the integration

43]

These equations give


(qj

{hu-t

- Wt

(<?i)

dq

71}

[hu 2

(g- 2 )

(q 2 )

*)%}""*

dq2 =

...

- wn (qn ) + yn
{hu n (q n )

~%
]

dq n

this set of equations, which can be immediately integrated since the


variables are separated, furnishes the solution of the system.

and

For further investigations on this subject cf. Hadamard, Bull, des


and Burgatti, Rom. Ace. L. Rend. (5) xx. (1911), p. 108.

Sc.

Math. xxxv. (1911),

p. 106,

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
components (X, Y} of the force acting on a particle of unit mass at the
a
in
plane do not involve the time t, shew that by elimination of t from the
y)
point
differential equations the solution of the problem is made to depend on the differential
1.

If the

(#,

equation of the third order

dx

dx*

2.

if

rigid

at once be written
3.

free particles is in motion,

down

is

unaltered

h, k,

The

and

is

is

where a, b, c, d are constants.


an equation of the form

4.

when the system

In a dynamical system with two degrees of freedom the kinetic energy

and the potential energy

where

and their potential energy, which depends


in any configuration is translated
through any distance in any direction. What integrals of the motion can

system of

only on their coordinates,


as

--

&y

Shew

that the value of q 2 in terms of the time

is

given by

are constants.

kinetic potential of a dynamical system is

where

a, b, c

where

e is

are given constants

shew that

an arbitrary constant and

$>

q^ is given in

terms of

by the equation

denotes a Weierstrassian elliptic function.

Prove that in a system with ignorable coordinates the kinetic energy is the sum
of a quadratic function T of the velocities of the non-ignored coordinates and a quadratic
5.

function

K of the cyclic momenta.

In the case where there are three coordinates x, y,

<

and one coordinate

investigate the equations of motion of the type


8

/30\)

oy \dxjl

is

ignored

70

Principles available for the integration

[CH. in

where Fis the potential energy, Jc is the cyclic momentum, and the differential coefficients
with respect to x, and $ are calculated from the Jinear equation by which k is
expressed in terms of x, i/, 0.
(Camb. Math. Tripos, 1904.)
of

</>

The

6.

kinetic potential of a dynamical system with

two degrees of freedom

is

By using the integral of energy, shew that the solution depends on the solution of the
problem for which the kinetic potential is

and by using the integral of energy of


qi and q 2 is of the form
where

and

this latter system,

are constants of integration, and

|P

shew that the

relation between

denotes the Weierstrassian

elliptic-

function.

The

7.

kinetic energy of a dynamical system

T=
and the potential energy

2
ri

(qi

is

2
)

<72

(<?1

+ ?22

)>

is

F=-J
Shew (by use
and q2

is

where

a, b,

8.

and

of Liouville s

theorem, or otherwise) that the relation between q l

a 2 qi 2 + b 2 q%2 + 2abq l q 2 cos y = sin 2 y,

The

y are constants of

integration.

kinetic energy of a particle

its potential

energy

whose rectangular coordinates are

(x,

2
2
y) is ^ (x +^ ),

is

where (A, A 5, B C~) are constants and where (r,


are the distances of the particle
from the points whose coordinates are (c, 0) and (c, 0), where c is a constant. Shew
that when the quantities J(V + /) and \(r-rf } are taken as new variables, the
system is
of Liouville s type, and hence obtain its solution.
,

9.

The observation that

A system,

r")

"

a cat always

instant resume

Shew that

its

on

its feet

"

suggested the problem


completely specified by the position and velocity
Can it at a subsequent
initially without velocity in free space in vacua.
initial configuration but with a
different orientation in space ?

whose state at any instant

of each element, is

falls

is

the system is not conservative, or if the forces are derived from a


potential
not one-valued, the reply is affirmative but if the system is conservative with a
one-valued potential, the reply is negative.

which

if

is

(Of. Painleve,

Comptes Rendus, cxxxix. (1904),

p. 1170.)

CHAPTER

IV

THE SOLUBLE PROBLEMS OF PARTICLE DYNAMICS


The particle with one degree offreedom

44.

As examples of the methods described


now discuss those cases of the motion of a

the

pendulum.

in the foregoing chapters,

we

shall

single particle which can be solved

by quadratures.

We

motion of a particle of mass m, which is free


to move in the interior of a given fixed smooth tube of small bore, under
the action of forces which depend only on the position of the particle in the
shall consider first the

The tube can

tube.

in the

most general case be supposed

to

have the form

of a twisted curve in space.

Let s be the distance of the particle at time t from some fixed point of
the tube, measured along the arc of the curve formed by the tube: and let
f(s) be the component of the external forces acting on the particle, in the
direction of the tangent to the tube.

The

and

kinetic energy of the particle

its

potential energy

is

is

evidently

-f f(s)d,
where

is

a constant.

The equation

of energy

is

therefore

rs
2

|-ms

f(s)ds +

c,

J So

where

c is

a constant.

Integrating this equation,

where

we have

another constant of integration. This equation represents the


solution of the problem, since it is an integral relation between s and t,
I

is

involving two constants of integration.

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

72

The two constants


initial

time

and

can be physically interpreted in terms of the


thus if the particle starts at

circumstances of the particle s motion


= t from the point s = s with velocity
,

values in the equation of energy,

u,

then on substituting these

we have

and on substituting the same values

we have

[OH. iv

in the final equation


connecting s

and

t,

t^.

The most famous problem


in this case the tube

of this type is that of the simple


pendulum
supposed to be in the form of a circle of radius a

is

whose plane

is vertical, and the


only external force acting on the particle is
gravity*.
Using 9 to denote the angle made with the downward vertical by
the radius vector from the centre of the circle to the particle, we have

= ad

so the equation of energy

a$ 2

= 2$r cos

and f(s) =

+ constant =

Suppose that when the particle


a 2 /9 2
quantity -= has the value

sin

Taking

Now

^9 = y

this

mg sin

is

is

Then

h.

4#

sin 2

\Q +

constant.

at the lowest point of the circle, the

this last equation can be written

becomes

pendulum-problem there are two distinct types of motion,


namely the oscillatory," in which the particle swings to and fro about the
lowest point of the circle, arid the circulating," in which the velocity of the
in the
"

"

enough to carry it over the highest point of the circle, so


moves round and round the circle, always in the same sense. We

particle is large

that

it

shall consider these cases separately.

In the oscillatory type of motion, since the particle comes to rest


(i)
before attaining the highest point of the circle, y must be zero for some value
of y less than unity, and therefore h/2a must be less than
unity.

Writing

where k

is

new

2ak2

positive constant less than unity, the equation

In actual pendulums, the tube

is

centre of the circle, which serves the


the circle.

becomes

replaced by a rigid bar connecting the particle to the


particle to describe

same purpose of constraining the

The isochronism of small oscillations of the pendulum was discovered by Galileo in 1632,
and the formula for the period was given by Huygens in 1673. Oscillations of finite
amplitude
were

first

studied by Euler in 1736.

73

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

44]

the solution of this is*

where

is

an arbitrary constant.

This equation represents the solution of the pendulum-problem in the


the two arbitrary constants of the solution are t and k, and
oscillatory case
:

these

must be determined from the

initial

conditions.

From

the

known

is periodic, its
properties of the elliptic function sn, we see that the motion
on which
occasions
two
consecutive
of
time
between
the
interval
period (i.e.

the

is

pendulum

in the

same configuration with the same

velocity) being

4.(O^jr
K, where
,

K=\
(ii)

case h

(1

- kH y% dt.
z

)~? (1

in this
Next, suppose that the motion is of the circulating type
2
=
k
will be less
A&
2a
the
if
we
write
than
so
2a,
quantity
greater
;

is

than unity.

The

differential equation

the solution of which

and in

this

now becomes

is

and k are the two constants which must be determined in

accordance with the initial conditions.


(iii)

Lastly, let h be equal to 2a, so that the particle just reaches the

vertex of the

The equation now becomes

circle.

the solution of which

is

was remarked by Appellf that an insight into the meaning of the imaginary period
which occur in the solution of the pendulum-problem is afforded
For we have seen that if the particle is set free with no initial
velocity at a point of the circle which is at a vertical height h above the lowest point,
the motion is given by
It

of the elliptic functions


by the theorem of 34.

where & 2 =
*

Cf.

Whittaker and Watson, Modern Analysis,

t Comptes Rendiis, LXXXVII. (1878).

22-11.

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

74

[OH. iv

and therefore by 34, if, with the same initial conditions, gravity were supposed to act
upwards, the motion would be given by
|(r-r,),

But the period


(2a

- A),

same as if the initial position were at a height


and the solution of this is

of this motion is the

gravity acting

downwards

y = V sn { A/1
The

motion has a

latter

A.

real period 4

(\t7

/j

(r

- TO ), V\

elliptic function sn

is

=1

- k2

and therefore the function

must have a period


so the function sn(w,
4^-j/r,
\t//
double periodicity of the

where

must have a period

4*/f.

The

thus inferred from dynamical considerations.

Example. A particle of unit mass moves on an epicycloid, traced by a point on the


circumference of a circle of radius b which rolls on a fixed circle of radius a. The
particle
is acted on
by a repulsive force pr directed from the centre of the fixed circle, where r is
the distance from this centre. Shew that the motion is
periodic, its period being

[This result
the form

is

most

easily obtained

when the equation

of the epicycloid

is

taken in

being the arc measured from the vertex of the epicycloid.]

Motion in a moving

45.

We
to

shall

move

now

tube.

some cases of the motion of a particle which is free


smooth tube, when the tube is itself constrained to move

discuss

in a given

in a given manner.
(i)

at

Tube rotating uniformly.

Suppose first that the tube


about a fixed axis in space.

is

constrained to rotate with uniform velocity


shall suppose that the particle is of unit

We

mass, as this involves no real loss of generality.

We

moreover suppose that the field of external force acting on the


derivable
from a potential- energy function which is symmetrical
particle
with respect to the fixed axis, and so can be expressed in terms of the
cylindrical coordinates z and r, where z is measured parallel to the fixed
shall
is

axis

and r

the

from the fixed axis for a particle


perpendicular
in the tube, this potential
can
therefore
be expressed in terms of
energy
the arc s we shall denote it by F(s), and the
equation of the tube will be
is

distance

written in the form


r

= g(s).

velocity

were

o>

term

motion of the particle is the same as


zero, and the potential energy were

29, the

By

^r
the form

&>

Hence we can

^
where

c is

2
-ia>

{#(s)}

the prescribed angular

to contain

down the equation

at once write

if

=
F(>)

an additional
of energy in

c,

a constant.

Integrating again,

and

75

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

44, 45]

we have

^ [2c +

between

this relation

[g (s)}

&>

and

- 2 V(s)Y^ds + constant,

s represents the solution of

the problem.

Example 1. If the rotating tube is plane, and the particle can describe it with
constant velocity when the fixed axis is vertical and in the plane of the tube, and the
field of force is that due to gravity, shew that the tube must be in the form of a parabola
with

its

and vertex downwards.

axis vertical

Example 2.
particle moves under gravity in a circular tube of radius a which
rotates uniformly about a fixed vertical axis inclined at an angle a to its plane ; if 6 be
the angular distance of the particle from the lowest point of the circle, shew that

fa cos

V
where the function

is

2a

formed with the roots

|jf>

aco 2

aw 2 cos a

cos a

ty
and

t(]

is

(ii)

cos a

>

Off

~3g~>

a constant.

Tube moving with constant acceleration parallel

Consider

now

to

a fixed

direction.

the motion of a particle in a straight tube, inclined at an

angle a to the horizontal, which is constrained to


plane with constant horizontal acceleration/.

move

in its

own

vertical

Taking the axis of x horizontal and that of y vertically upwards, with the
we have for the kinetic energy

origin at the initial position of the particle,

r-i(?+A
= y cot a + ^ft

where

so

T=i(ycota+/0 +
= -ly cosec a + y cot a .ft + %f*t

2
,

and the potential energy

is

r=w.
The equation

of motion
d_ (dT_\ =
dt (dy )~

_ dV_
dy

2
,

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

76

[CH. iv

gives therefore

,.

"T.

or

(y cosec-a

+jt

gfcota) sin

we have, supposing the

Integrating,

and therefore

= \V

cot a)

=
2

g,

a.

particle to be initially at rest,

g cos a +/sin a)

sin

a.

These equations constitute the solution of the problem it will be observed


that in this system the kinetic
energy involves the time explicitly, so no
of
exists.
integral
energy
:

Motion of two interacting free

46.

particles.

We

shall next consider the motion of two


particles, of masses m^ and ra 2
respectively, which are free to move in space under the influence of mutual
forces of attraction or
repulsion, acting in the line joining the particles and
dependent on their distance from each other.

The system has six degrees of freedom, since the three rectangular coordi
nates of either particle can have any values whatever.
We shall take, as the
six coordinates defining the position of the
system, the coordinates (X, Y, Z}
of the centre of gravity of the particles, referred to
any fixed axes, and the
coordinates

(x, y, z)

at the particle

of the particle m.2 referred to

and which are

The coordinates

of

1}

parallel

moving axes whose

^+

TO2

TWj

(x
The
/T7

referred to the fixed axes, are

m +m
1

kinetic energy of the system


/

T=
The

is

Z+-2V
2

therefore

TT

m.2 /

m,

m + mj

raj

+ mj

m,

or

(wj

+ w ) (X- + Y +
2

Z"-)

m,J

*\
2

J^L L
771

m^ m

^+ ^+ ^

potential energy of the system depends only on the position of the


,

particles relative to each other, so can be expressed in terms of (x,


it

is

referred to the fixed axes, are

Z
and those of

origin

the fixed axes.

.to

be V(x,

y, z}.

//,

z)

let

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

45-47]

The Lagrangian equations

l =

m m.
m +m
l

The

first

..

of motion of the system are

_ _

Z = Q,

r=0,

0,

8F

m^m^

dx

77

m-L 4-

..

dV

J
z

m-jn^

m +m
l

"by

dV

..

dz

three of these equations shew that the centre of gravity moves in


velocity, and the other three equations shew that

a straight line with uniform


the motion of m relative to

same as if

m-^ is the

attracted to m^ with the force derived

from

and

luere fixed

--

the potential energy

were

V*.

lit/]

Example. If two free particles move in space under any law of mutual attraction,
shew that the tangents to their paths meet an arbitrary fixed plane in two points, the
line joining which passes through a fixed
point.
(Mehmke.)
47.

Central forces in general

The

last article

Hamilton s theorem.

shews that the problem of two interacting free


particles
is reducible to the
problem of the motion of a single free particle acted on by
a force directed towards or from a fixed centre. This is known as the
problem
of central forces. There is clearly no loss of generality if we suppose the
mass of the particle to be unity.
If the particle be projected in any way, it will
always remain in the plane
which passes through the centre of force and the initial direction of
projec
tion for at no time does any force act to remove it from this
plane. We can
:

therefore define the position of the particle by


polar coordinates (r, 6) in this
Let
denote the acceleration
plane, the centre of force being the origin.

directed to the centre of force.


is

We

shall not

suppose for the present that

necessarily a function of r alone.

The

kinetic energy of the particle

is

T=^(r + r*6
2

and the work done by the


(o>,

BO)

force in

2
),

an arbitrary infinitesimal displacement

is

-PSr.
The Lagrangian equations of motion
(r -rfc

The

latter equation gives

of the particle are therefore

=- P,

on integration
r2 6

= h,

where h

is

a constant

this is the integral corresponding to the


ignorable coordinate 6,

physically interpreted as the integral of angular

about the centre of

momentum

force.
*

Newton, Principia, Book

i.

Sect. 11.

and can be

of the particle

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

78
To

find the differential equation of the

called the orbit or trajectory},


the relation

we

path described (which

eliminate dt from the

first

is

[OH. iv
generally

equation by using

h d

~dt~~r2

d0

we thus obtain the equation


h d
2

dr\

fh2

h2

r dd (r d~6)

writing u for

or,

_
~

"

r*

1/r,

dh*

h*u2

This

the differential equation of the orbit *, in polar coordinates its


integration will introduce two new arbitrary constants in addition to the
constant h, and a fourth arbitrary constant will occur in the determination of
t

is

by the equation
t

2
T Ir d0

constant.

fi J

The

equation of the orbit in (r, p) coordinates, (where p


denotes the perpendicular from the centre of force on the tangent to the
differential

orbit), is often of
(

use

which (since h

18),

it
is

may be obtained directly from


now constant) gives at once

Siacci s

theorem

h?r

PY
2

dp
PD = -.-f
dr
ft

or

which

is

the differential equation of the orbit.

Since h = vp, where v

is

the velocity in the orbit,


v*

which

may

=P

we have from

this equation

p
-P,
r

be written in the form


"-iPfr

where q

is

the chord of curvature of the orbit through the centre of force.

We

frequently require to know the law of force which must act towards a
given point in order that a given curve may be described this is given at once
by the equation
;

if

the equation of the curve

tion

is

given in

(r,

is given in polar coordinates


while if the equa
p) coordinates, the force is given by the equation
2
p h dp
;

p dr
*

This

is

Theorie de la

substantially given in Newton s Principia, Book


and in the above form in Whewell s
(1765)

Lune

i.

and

Dynamics

3,

and in Clairaut

(1823).

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

47]

If the equation of the curve


ceed as follows

is

79

given in rectangular coordinates, we pro

Take the centre of force as origin, and let f(x, y) = be the equation of
the given curve. The equation of angular momentum is

xyyx = h.
Differentiating the equation of the curve,

+fy y = 0,

fx

From

these two equations

we have
where

fx

stands for ~-

ooo

we obtain

_
~
Differentiating again,

.dx

<M>

j.

dx

dy

we have

hfy
xfx + yfy

d_

(_hfy\ ___ hfx

"dx\xfx

_8

f__hfy_

xfx + yfy dy \xfx + yfy

~+yfy)

Performing the differentiations, this gives

_
But the required

(fy fxx + tfxfyfxy ~ fxfyy)


2

"?

force is P,

where x

_ n?T {jiffxx

oc

P-

and therefore we have

^J^Jy

this equation gives the required central force.

The most important


f(x,

2/)

is

case

In this case

result

is

that in which the

2/O, y) = ax- + Wixy + by- + 2gx +2fy


we find at once that the expression
Jxxjy

has, for points

of this

curve

a conic,

on the

+ c = 0.

~ tfxyjxjy +fyyjx

conic, the constant value

- (abc + 2fgh - of - bg* - ch


2

),

while the quantity

9/

+a
x^cx yf_,

dy

has the value

-(gv+fy + c},
and so is a constant multiple of the perpendicular from the point (x, y} on the
thus obtain, for the force
polar of the origin with respect to the conic.

We

under which a given conic can be described, an elegant expression due to


Hamilton*, namely that the force acting on the particle in the position (x, y)
*

Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. 1846.

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

80

[CH. iv

varies directly as the radius from the centre


of force to the point (x, y\ and
inversely as the cube of the perpendicular from (a;, y} on the polar of the centre

of force.
The two following theorems, the proof of which
regarded as the converse of Hamilton s theorem.

is left

to the student,

may

together be

If a particle moves under the action of a force directed to a fixed


(i)
point, varying
directly as the distance from the fixed point and inversely as the cube of the distance
from a given straight line, the orbit is always a conic.
If a

(ii)

particle

moves under the action of a

force

directed to the origin,

of

magnitude

where (x, y} are rectangular coordinates and p, a, /3, y are constants, the orbits are conies
which touch the lines
ax 2 + Zftxy + yy~ = 0.

Darboux (Comptes Rendus, LXXXIV. p. 936) has shewn that these two laws of force are
the only laws for which the orbits are always conies, if the force
depends only on the
Suchar (Nouv. Ann. 1 vi. p. 532) has found other laws of
position of the particle.
force,

which involve the components of velocity of the

Example

1.

If a conic be described

shew that the periodic time

is

-~ pj?,

particle.

^ given by Hamilton

under the force

where

is

theorem,

the perpendicular from the centre of

<V>

the conic on the polar of the centre of force.

Example

2.

Shew that

if

(Glaisher.)

the force be

a particle will describe a conic having

its

asymptotes parallel to the lines

Ax + 2Hxy + By* = 0,
2

if

properly projected.

48.

circular

The
and

(Glaisher.)

integrable cases of central forces

problems soluble in terms of

elliptic functions.

The most important

case of motion under central forces

the magnitude of the force depends


only on the distance
force by f(r), the differential
equation of the orbit is
<$>.(,

d& +
Integrating,

is

r.

_f(r)
~

hW

we have
du

where

c is

a constant

integrating this equation again,

~
J

h2

fy*

~r*\

r*

we have

that in which

Denoting the

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

47, 48]

81

When r has been


this is the equation of the orbit in polar coordinates.
found from this equation in terms of 8, the time is given by the integral

and

=T

r2 dO

hj

+ constant.

The problem of motion under central forces is therefore always soluble by


quadratures when the force is a function of the distance only.
Example. Shew that the differential equations of motion of a point P are always
integrable by a simple quadrature when the central force F is of the form

F=
where

is

a function of 6 only, while a and b are arbitrary constants.

(Armellini.)

We shall now discuss the cases in which the quadrature can be effected
terms of known functions, the central force being supposed to vary as some
positive or negative integral power,
say the nth, of the distance.
in

Let us

first find

those problems for which the integration can be effected


The above integral for the determination of

in terms of circular functions.

can be written in the form

where

a, b, c

are constants

the term in u~ n

~1

second degree

this gives

(a

+ bu* + 0M-?-

except when n

1
)"*

1,

when a logarithm

replaces

If the profolem is to be soluble in terms of circular func


tions, the polynomial under the radical in the integrand must be at most of the
;

-w-l=0,
and consequently
n

The

case n

the case n
quadratic

Next,

let

or

or

2,

-3.

however excluded by what has already been said, and


be added, since in this case the irrationality becomes
taken as a new variable.

1 is

1 is to

when w

= -l, -2,

I,

is

us find the cases in which the integration can be effected by the

aid of elliptic functions*.


For this it is necessary that the irrationality to be
should
be
of
the
third or fourth degree -f- in the variable with
integrated

respect to which the integration

= 0,

n =

3,

4, or
5,

5,

when u

But

this condition is fulfilled if

taken as the independent variable


when w is taken as the independent variable.
is

or

7,

It follows that the

problem of motion under a central force which varies as

nth power of the distance

the

taken.

is

is soluble

by circular or

elliptic

functions in the

cases

n=

o, 3, 1, 0,

2,

- 3, -

4,

- 5, - 7.

These cases were first investigated by Legendre, Theorie des Fonctions Elliptiques
(1825)
and afterwards by J. F. Stader, Crelle s Journal, XLVI. (1853), p. 262.
t Whittaker and Watson, Modern Analysis,
22-7.
W. D.

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

82
Example.

Shew

that the problem

following fractional values

The general

soluble by elliptic functions

is

[CH. iv

when n has the

=_n2

_A2

_i3

case of fractional values of n

is

_T

_sS)

discussed by Nobile, Giornale di Mat. XLVI.

(1908), p. 313.

The

cases in which motion under a central force varying as a


power of
is soluble
by means of circular functions are of special interest.

the distance

They correspond,
n=

as

shewn above,

to the values

2 will be considered in the next article

1,

2,

the cases n

3 of n

the case

= 1 and

can be treated in the following way.


(i)

tt-1.

In this case the attractive force

is

becomes

so the equation of the orbit

f*Y
I

M - \~^
~
tf
dv,

cv

fl

where

u?

v,

so

_
or

2 (6

j)

arccos

where 7

\2

is

a constant of integration,

=
This

is

the equation of an ellipse (when fi


0) or hyperbola (when
The orbits are therefore conies whose centre
>

p<

referred to its centre.

is

0)
at

the centre of force*.


(ii)

=-

3.

In this case the attractive force

so the equation of the orbit

Newton found that

if

a body

centre of the ellipse, the force

Prop. x.

is

is

becomes

move

in

an ellipse under the action of a force directed to the

directly proportional to the distance

Principia,

Book

i.

2,

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

48]

Integrating,

we have

(u

=A

cos (kd

+ e), where

k2 =

= J.

cosh (kd

+ e), where

&2

\u

83

= A6 +

where in each case

when

//,

1,

when

p>h

when

=h

^
h

=^

e,

and

<

h2

/A

2
,

are constants of integration.

These curves are sometimes known as Cotes

spirals;

the last

is

the

reciprocal spiral*.
In connexion with forces varying as the inverse cube of the distance,
that

it

may

be observed

if

be an orbit described under a central force

where k

is

P (r)

to the origin, then the orbit

any constant, can be described under a central

force P(r)

+ T-=,
3

where

c is

the intervals of time between corresponding points, i.e. points for which the
radius vector has the same value, in the two orbits being the same.
a constant

For,

if

accented letters refer to the second orbit,

If therefore

we have

we choose the new constant of momentum h so that

K = hk
this equation implies that the intervals of

orbits are the same, since

which establishes the

it

can be written

time between corresponding points in the two

This

result.

is

we have

),

I* /

sometimes known as Newton s theorem of revolving

orbits.

types of central motion corresponding to

kThe
lead, as

n=5,

3,

0,

4,

has been shewn, to elliptic integrals

5,

on inverting the integrals, we


As an example we shall

obtain the solution in terms of


elliptic functions.
take the case of n =
5.
*

Newton, Principia, Book

i.

2,

Prop.

ix.

R. Cotes,

Harmonia Mensurarum,

pp. 31, 98.

62

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

84

[OH. iv

be the force towards the centre of attraction we shall suppose


the particle initially projected with a velocity less than that which would be
acquired by a fall from rest at an infinite distance to the point of projection,
6

Let

fj,u

so that the total energy

is

negative

call this

Then the equation

^7.

quantity

of energy

together with the equation

sdr\

2
<y

it

Introducing in place of r a new variable p defined by the equation


r

= (^ v*

the differential equation becomes

-^

{^
The

roots of the quadratic

when 7 is positive their sum is


and the smaller [of them is less
Hence if the greater and less of the roots be denoted by e and e3
we have the relations
respectively, and if e2 denotes

are real

than

i.

<?i

61

so

+e +

es

62

63

>

>

0,

where
roots

e is
BI,

Now

a constant of integration, and the function

e z , e$.

is

real

and

finite

we

positive, and, as

cannot be greater than


has a

gj

formed with the

is

Thus we have

lower limit

At

/<-.

So

but when

>

e1

see from the equation of energy,

(6

>

e2

e)

>

es ,

is

real

and positive and

the function

p (#

e) is real

48J

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

and has a

finite

lower limit for

so e is purely real,

take

and

be

to

zero.

this is the

real values of

all

only

and by measuring d from a suitable


We have therefore

when

85
e

real

is

we can

initial line

equation of the orbit in polar coordinates*.

The time can now be determined from the equation


h.

dd

u,

or

Performing the integration, we have

where

(6) is the Weierstrassian zeta-functionf.

Example

1.

Shew

This equation determines

that the equation of the orbit of a particle which


5
^./r can be written in the form

t.

moves under the

influence of a central attractive force

r = asn

Kv

=z

or else in the form

a
-=
r

snf

4
is the
provided A
0, where h is the angular momentum round the origin and
4p,E
excess of the total energy over the potential
at
energy
infinity.
(Cambridge Math. Tripos, Part I, 1894.)
>

>

shew
particle is attracted to the origin with constant acceleration p.
Example 2.
that the radius vector, vectorial angle, and time, are
given in terms of a real auxiliary
angle u by equations of the type
;

o) 2

- a)

-^o(<D!

a>

+ a)

(Schoute .)

Among the points of special interest on an orbit are the points at which
the radius vector, after having increased for some time,
begins to decrease
or after having decreased for some time,
to
increase.
begins
point
belonging to the former of these classes is called an apocentre, while points

of the latter class are called pericentres


*

The

orbits are discussed

and

classified

both classes are included under the

by W. D. MacMillan, Amer. Journ. Math. xxx.

(1908), p. 282.

t Cf. Whittaker and Watson, Modern Analysis,

20-4.

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

86

At an

general term apse.


(e.g.

[CH. iv

apse, if the apse is not a singularity of the orbit

a cusp), we have

which implies that the tangent to the orbit

is

perpendicular to the radius

vector.

The words aphelion and perihelion are generally used instead of apocentre
and pericentre when the centre of force is supposed to be the Sun.
Example.

moves under an attraction

particle

r
r2

to a fixed centre

apses

+ r3

shew that the angle subtended

at the centre of force

by two consecutive

is

where h

is

49.

the constant of angular

momentum.

Motion under the Newtonian law*.

The remaining

case in which motion under a central force varying as an


of the distance can be solved in terms of circular functions is

integral power
This
that in which the force varies as the inverse square of the distance.
case is of great importance in Celestial Mechanics, since the mutual attractions
of the heavenly bodies vary as the inverse squares of their distances apart, in
accordance with the Newtonian law of universal gravitation.
(i)

The

orbits.

Consider then the motion of a particle which is acted on by a force


directed to a fixed point (which we can take as the origin of coordinates), of
from the fixed point.
pu?, where u is the reciprocal of the distance

magnitude
Let the particle be projected from the point whose polar coordinates are
with velocity v in a direction making an angle 7 with c so that the
(c, a)
;

angular

momentum

is

The

= CV

is

integral

sin 7.

differential equation of the orbit is

dhi

this

a linear differential

equation with

constant coefficients, and

is

,.

v 2 c 2 sin 2
*

Newton, Principia, Book

i.

3,

Props. XL, xn.,

xm.

its

48, 49]

where

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics


and

CT

87

are constants of integration.


This is the equation, in polar
whose focus is at the origin, whose eccentricity is e,

coordinates, of a conic

and whose semi-latus rectum

the constant

CT

given by the equation

is

v 2c2 sin 2

7
;

determines the position of the apse-line, and

is

called the

perihelion-constant.

The circumstance that the focus

of the conic

is

at the centre of force

is

in accord with

Hamilton s theorem for if the centre of force is at the focus of the conic the perpen
dicular on the polar of the centre of force is the
perpendicular on the directrix, which is
proportional to r, as by Hamilton s theorem the force must be proportional to 1/r2
;

To determine the constants


we observe that initially

#=a,

and

terms of the

or in

du
=
-775
dO

initial

data

c, a,

7, v

cot
c

substituting these values in the equation of the orbit and the equation
obtained by differentiating it with respect to 6, we. have
2

v c sin
2

\v

7=

/ti

/j.e

cos (a

c sin 7 cos 7 = pe sin (a -

Solving these equations for


6

and

or),

or).

we obtain

CT,

v 4 c 2 sin 2

2v

c sin

~~u?

cot (a

CT)

cv

sin

\-

-.

tan

7 cos 7

7.

The semi-major axis, when the conic is an ellipse, is generally


mean distance of the particle denoting it by a, we have

called the

1-e
and substituting the values of

and

already found,

determines a in terms of the

The time occupied


which

is

we have

a/

v.c

this equation

initial data.

in describing the whole circumference of the


ellipse,

generally called the periodic time,

T x area of

is

ellipse,

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

88

since h represents twice the rate at which the area

vector

the periodic time

is

therefore

is

where

[CH. iv

swept out by the radius


b is the

semi-minor

axis.

But we have

v c sin
I

so the periodic time is 2?r

by n

is

\/
V

Cl

fi S

1
.

It is usual to denote the quantity

n?a~

.3

the periodic time can then be written

called the

It

*/
V

7 = V pi

mean motion, being the mean value

of 8 for a complete period.

has been shewn by Bertrand and Koenigs that of all laws of force which give a zero
an infinite distance, the Newtonian law is the only one for which all the orbits are

force at

algebraic curves, and also the only one for which all the orbits are closed curves.

Example.

Shew

that

a centre of force repels a particle with a force varying as the


is a branch of a hyperbola, described about its

if

inverse square of the distance, the orbit


outer focus.
(ii)

The

Consider

velocity.

now

the case in which the orbit

is

an

ellipse

the equation

between the mean distance a and the velocity

establishes a connexion

and

radius vector c at the initial point of the path.


Since any point of the orbit
can be taken as initial point, we can write this equation

where

v is the velocity of

Similarly

and

if

if

the orbit

the orbit

It is clear

according as v

is

the particle at the point whose radius vector

is

a hyperbola, whose semi-major axis

we

find

a parabola, the relation becomes

from this that the orbit


2

is a,

is r.

= 2a
,

i.e.

is

an

ellipse,

parabola, or hyperbola,

according as the initial velocity of the particle

is

than, equal to, or greater than, the velocity which the particle would
acquire in falling from a position of rest at an infinite distance from the
less

centre of force to the initial position.

It can further

be shewn that the

a component j perpendicular

to the

dicular to the axis of the conic

For

if

S be

velocity at

any point can

be resolved into

radius vector and a component


^r perpen

each of these components being constant.

P the position of the moving particle,


P to the conic with the major axis, GL
on SP from G, and SY the perpendicular on the tangent at

the centre of force,

the intersection of the normal at

the perpendicular

89

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

49]

from

SPG

known that the

are respectively
sides of the triangle
of
the
velocity in the
perpendicular to the velocity and to the components
S, it is

two specified directions; and therefore we have

SP = h.SP = h
= v p~
~y p~ ^j
.

Component perpendicular

to the radius vector

_fji
=

Sfit

and Component perpendicular

to the axis

= -~p

x Component perpendicular
to the radius vector

_=

Bfl

which establishes the result stated.


Example 1. Shew that in elliptic motion under Newton s law, the projections, on the
external bisector of two radii, of the velocities corresponding to these radii, are equal.
Shew also that the sum of the projections on the inner bisector is equal to the projection
of a line constant in magnitude and direction.
(Cailler.)

Example
where
the

mean

2.

Shew

that in elliptic motion under

Newton s

law, the quantity

Tdt,

denotes the kinetic energy, integrated over a complete period, depends only on
distance and not on the eccentricity.
(Grinwis.)

Example
constant p

3.

At a

certain point in an elliptic orbit described under a force

/i/r

the

suddenly changed by a small amount. If the eccentricities of the former and


new orbits are equal, shew that the point is an extremity of the minor axis.

(iii)

is

The anomalies in

elliptic motion.

If a particle is
describing an ellipse under a centre of force in the focus S,
the vectorial angle
of the point P at which the particle is situated on
the ellipse, measured from the
apse A which is nearer to the focus, is called

ASP

the true anomaly of the particle and will be denoted


by Q\ the eccentric
to
the
is
called
the eccentric anomaly of the
angle corresponding
point

and the quantity nt, where n is the


particle, and will be denoted by u
mean motion and t is the time of describing the arc AP, is called the mean
anomaly of the particle. We shall now find the connexion between the three
:

anomalies.

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

90
The

relation between

We

have

and u

is

found thus

an d

=a

where x

ex,

is

[CH. iv

e cos 6,

the rectangular coordinate of

referred

to the centre of the


ellipse as origin,

r= a(l-ecosu).

or

Hence

(1

-ecosu)

(1

e cos 6)

= 1 -e\

an equation which can also be written in the forms

/l-e\4

sin-*.
+

and

e cos

The

relation between

We

have

u and nt can be obtained

ft

rea
circle

= I\J\A/

^^ where Q

in the following

is

way

the P oint on tne auxiliary

corresponding to the point

[Area ACQ - Area SGQ}, where C

is

on the

ellipse

the centre of the

ellipse

a2

w
wa 2 f-jr
(2
nt= u e sin

80

This

is

known

a 2e
x-

sm wV

w.

as Kepler s equation.

for the solution of this


equation is described
The solution
(1907), p. 83.

iiomogram

Congres,

Keims

by H. Chretien, Assoc. Franf.


analytical expansion has been discussed by
being that by Levi-Civita, Atti delta R. Ace.

by

writers, an important recent memoir


del Lincei, Rendiconti,
(5) xin. (1904), p. 260.

many

Lastly, the relation between

We

have

nt

Replacing u by
nt

which

is

its

- e^ sin
(1
1 + e cos

the required relation

moving

as follows

= u-e sin u.

value in terms of

arcsm

vectorial angle of the

and nt can be found

0, this

0}
j

becomes

e(l- e^ sin
1

+ e cos

this equation gives the

time in terms of the

particle.

solution of the problem of


calculating the

based on a geometrical deduction, was found

True Anomaly from the Mean Anomaly,


the unpublished papers of Newton.

among

91

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

49]
Example

Shew

1.

that
*
7"

r=l T

where the symbols

denote Bessel coefficients*.

For we have
1

du

dt

\e cos u
d(nt}

<

2jr

- e cos u

2
,.

=1

cos rnt f 27r cos rnt

cosrnt
.j
du
+ ~2

TT

[2*

r=i

<S7r_/o

TT

= 1 + 22 Jr (re) cos r?z^ J

jo

d (nt)

ecosu

-,

cos r (w - e sin u)}

aw

jo
.

Y,

.,

by Fourier s theorem t

r=l

we have the required

Integrating,

Example

Shew

2.

result.

that
2
^e sin 2n

Example

and

In hyperbolic motion under the Newtonian law, shew that

3.

in parabolic motion,

where p

is

+ ....

shew that

the distance from the focus to the vertex.

Example

In elliptic motion under

4.

Newton

s law,

shew that the sum of the four

times (counted from perihelion) to the intersections of a circle with the ellipse is the same
for all concentric circles, and remains constant when the centre of the circle moves parallel
to the

major

(iv)

axis.

(Oekinghaus.)

Lambert s theorem.

Lambert

in

1731 shewed that in

elliptic

motion under the Newtonian

law, the time occupied in describing any arc depends only on the major axis,
the sum of the distances from the centre of force to the initial and final
points,

three

and the length of the chord joining these points so that if these
elements are given, the time is determinate, whatever be the form
:

of the ellipse
*

The name

of Bessel is

commonly connected with

this expansion

Lagrange, Oeuvres, in. p. 130.


t Of. Whittaker and Watson, Modern Analysis, Chapter
Ibid. Chapter xvn.

but

it is

really

due to

ix.

Lambert s original demonstration was geometrical and synthetic the theorem was proved
and generalised by Lagrange in 1778 (Oeuvres de Lagrange, iv. p. 559).
:

analytically

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

92

Let u and

[CH. iv

be the eccentric anomalies of the points then we have


n x the required time = u
e sin u
e sin u)
(u
iif

Now

(u

Ze

u)

sm

u
cos

u -+ u
.

"2

be the length of the chord, and r and r be the radii vectores,

if c

we have

+r =

and

e cos

a 2 (cos u

e cos

4a2 sin 2

^2V

u +- u

2e cos

% -

b 2 (sin
2

u
cos

-u
,

sin u} 2

-e

(l

e cos

(1

;=

i = 2 sin U
a

so

cos u) 2

cos 2

^-Y.
2
J

Hence we have

--

+r +
+cc = .
2

2 cos

(u
fw

and

+ r -c = 2

2 cos

-u
-w,

/
f

H arccos

e cos

u -u
---2

- + u \]
U-

h arccos

e cos

yj

and therefore*
r
2 arcsin 5

+ r + c\ = u - u
a

2\

o
2

v-,^
and

arcsm 51(r
Z
.

+r

Thus

.a =

sm

lfr

fl

quantities a and

if

-c\% =
I

/3

1-

arccos

e cos

+ arccos
^~
2

are denned

+ r +c\$

[e cos

u+u\
2

by the equations
1

/r

+r -

the last equations


give
a

Thus

finally

pO = u

0.

u,

and cos

=a=

is

Example

It will

(a

j3

-2

cos

- sin

=-- sin -~
2

a)

(/3

sin

/3).

Lambert s theorem.
1.

that the orbit


*

= e cos

we have

n x the required time

This

+-

Examine the

limiting case

when the minor axis

of the ellipse vanishes, so

is rectilinear.

be noticed that owing to the presence of the radicals, Lambert s theorem is not free
of sign. The reader will be able to determine without
difficulty the interpretation

from ambiguity

of sign corresponding to

any given position of the

initial

and

final points.

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

49, 50]

Example

2.

To obtain

the

form of Lambert s theorem applicable

to

parabolic motion.

we suppose the mean distance a to become large, the angles a and


small, so Lambert s theorem can be written in the approximate form
a3 - 83
If

Required

tirne

{(?

+ + c) *
?

6M *
is

become very

/3

=
and this

93

-(?

+ - c) *
?

},

the required form*.

Example 3. Establish Lambert s theorem for parabolic motion directly from the formulae
of parabolic motion.

The mutual transformation of

50.

fields of central force

and

fields of

parallel force.
If in the general problem of central forces we
suppose the centre of force
to be at a very great distance from the
part of the field considered, the lines
of action of the force in different
positions of the particle will be almost
parallel to each other; and on passing to the limiting case in which the

centre of force

is regarded as
being at an infinite distance, we arrive at the
of
the
motion
of
a
problem
particle under the influence of a force which is
to
a
fixed
direction.
always parallel
given

For the discussion of

this problem, take


rectangular axes Ox, Oy in the
plane of the motion, Ox being parallel to the direction of the force and let
(x) be the magnitude of the force, which will be
to be
;

supposed

of the coordinate y.

The equations
,

and the motion

is

of motion are

= X(x\

a,

b,

c,

0,

therefore represented by the


equations

x)

where

independent

dx

c }~4

are the constants of


integration;

determined by the circumstances of


projection,

i.e.

dx

I,

the values of these are

by the

initial

values of

x, y, x, y.

While the problem of motion in a


parallel field of force is a limiting case
problem of motion under central forces, it is not difficult to reduce the
latter more
general problem to the former more
one.

of the

special

For

if

a particle

is

in

motion under a force of


magnitude

directed to

This result was given by Euler in his Determinate Orbitae


Cometae Anni 1742
Lambert published the general theorem.

(1743), before

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

94

we may take

a fixed centre (which


of motion are

[CH. iv

as origin of coordinates), the equations

y-

The angular momentum

of the particle round the origin (which is con


let this be denoted by A.
Introduce new coordinates X, Y,

stant) is xy
yx
defined by the homographic transformation
:

X-?,

F-i,

and

let

be a new variable defined by the equation

*-/?

Then we have
W/^A.

-_

**s

VUV

\
1

dt\y)

dT

dF_^/l\
**
^^
jx
rfT

T^i

d2

I
/

U/

C}/-\

feU

||

Vi

1/Tfc

U*JU

dt^_ _y_

7^

^.2
y

f)

\y

tx

if

f>

tx

3/T

_ V
J/-7/
V

-^

/-"*

-*

These equations shew that a particle whose coordinates are (X, Y) would,
interpreted as the time, move as if acted on by a force parallel to

T were

the axis of

problem

P*

and of magnitude

^-

As the

will yield the solution of the original

general problem of motion under central forces


motion in a parallel field of force.

Example 1.
alone

is

Shew

solution of this transformed

problem,
is

it

follows that the

reducible to the problem of

that the path of a free particle moving under the influence of gravity
its axis vertical and vertex upwards.

a parabola with

Example

2.

Shew

the curve /(a?, y) =

that the magnitude of the force parallel to the axis of


is a constant multiple of

x under which

can be described
/a/\

-3

\dxj

_ ay /a/y

j / dxy v _ ay /8/yi
2

"

84%

dx* \dy)

ty

dy*

\dx}

If a parallel field of force is such that the path described by a free particle
is a conic whatever be the initial conditions, shew that the force varies as the inverse cube

Example 3.

of the distance from

51.

some

line perpendicular to the direction of the force.

Bonnet s theorem.

We

now proceed to discuss the motion of a particle which is simultaneously


by more than one centre of force. An indefinite number of particular
of motion of this kind can be obtained by means of a theorem due to

attracted
cases

Bonnet*, which may be stated thus


*

Liouville

Journal,

ix. (1844), p.

Mec. Anal. (Oeuvres de Lagrange, xn.

113 and Note


p. 353).

iv.

of

t.

n. of the last edition of Lagrange

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

50-52]

If a given

orbit

95

can be described in each of n given fields of force, taken

separately, the velocities at any point


of the orbit being v 1} v2 ..., vn
respectively, then the same orbit can be described in the field of force which
is obtained by superposing all these fields, the
velocity at the point
being
,

Or + v +

n )4

For suppose that in the field of force which is obtained by superposing


the original fields, an additional normal force R is required in order to make
the particle move on the curve in question and let it be projected from
;

a point

so that the square of its velocity at

is

equal to the

sum

of the

in the original fields of force.


Then on adding
squares of its velocities at
the equations of energy corresponding to the original motions, and comparing
with the equation of energy for the motion in question, we see that the

kinetic energy of the motion in question is the sum of the kinetic energies
of the original motions, i.e. that the velocity at any point
is

Hence, resolving along the normal to the

orbit,

we have

m is

where

and

F?,

the mass of the particle, p the radius of curvature of the orbit,


...,
n are the normal components of the original fields of force

at P.

and therefore
of force which

Example.

zero the given orbit is therefore a free path in the


obtained by superposing the original fields.

is

is

Shew

that

an

ellipse

field

can be described if forces

respectively act in the directions of the foci.

This result follows at once from Bonnet


forces are equivalent to forces

a force

-^x distance

and

~ acting

theorem when

it is

observed that the given

in the directions of the foci, together with

acting in the direction of the centre of the ellipse.

52.
Determination of the most general field of force under which a given
curve or family of curves can be described.

Let
(/>

be the equation of a curve

(x,

y)

on varying the constant

We

c,

this equation will

shall now find an expression for the


represent a family of curves.
most general field of force (the force being supposed to depend only on the

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

96

on
position of the particle

which

which

acts) for

it

[CH. iv

this family of curves is

a family of orbits of a particle.


v denote the velocity of the particle, and (X,
mass parallel to the coordinate axes.

Let

force per unit

1 dv^

normal components of acceleration being ^

Substituting for

its value,

we have

v^

and

-yCtS

O respectively,

we have

namely

4>y*<l>xx

v-

Writing

and replacing
j- by

2
((}>

X=U
Now

Y} the components of
The tangential and

(4>

+
X

= - u ($x +
*

(/y)~

x
<f>

~
^>yy

<j>y

<f)

X y)

</),

<j>

^}

+\$y jg

this equation

(<j>X

becomes

</>/)

depends on the velocity with which the given


and F are to be functions of the position, of
we can take u to be an arbitrary function of x and y we have

u is arbitrary, since it
orbits are described; and as

the particle,

therefore

X = U (QxQw ~
and similarly

Y=

4>y$xy)

U
(4>y<j>xx

<t>x<l>xy)

~
^(f>y

+ %$x

(<f>xUy

U>

(<&/

^y^x),

<t>

x U y ),

These expressions for the field


is an arbitrary function of x and y.
of force under which the curves of the given family are orbits were first given
by Dainelli*.

where u

Shew that a particle can describe a given curve uy\der any arbitrary forces
1.
directed to given fixed points, provided these forces satisfy the relations

Example
PI,

...

vohere r k is the radius

points,

and where

Pk

97\
as \
2

rk

and pk

is the

the perpendicular on the tangent, from the kth of the given fixed
radius of curvature of the given curve.

For the tangential and normal components of force on the particle are

T=-?Pk ~

fc

k
*

and

els

Giornale di Mat.

N= SP &,
r
k
k

xvm.

(1880), p. 271.

so

97

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

52, 53]

from the equation

we have

A particle

can describe a given curve under the single action of any one
Shew that the condition to
acting in given (variable) directions.
be satisfied in order that the same curve may be described under the joint action of forces
respectively, is
2
..., acting in the directions of $1, $ 2
F\,

Example

of the forces

2.

<i,

...,

>

^]-0u
j,

where

ck is

the chord of curvature of the curve in the direction of

Example
function

>

3.

point moves
that an equipotential curve

in a field of force in

V shew

is

equation

$t

a possible path, provided

is

(Curtis.)

two dimensions of which the work

V satisfy

the

wn

The problem of two centres of gravitation.


of motion of a particle moving in a plane under arbitrary
The most
forces cannot be integrated by quadratures in the general case.
famous of the known soluble problems of this class, other than problems of
53.

The equations

central motion, is the problem of two centres of gravitation, i.e. the problem
of determining the motion of a free particle in a plane, attracted by two fixed
Newtonian centres of force in the plane its integrability was discovered by
;

Euler*.

Let 2c denote the distance between the two centres of force

and take

the point midway between them as origin, and the line joining them as axis
of x, so that their coordinates can be taken to be (c, 0) and (
The
c, 0).
of
the
is
taken
to
be
therefore
mass
is
potential energy
particle (whose
unity)

F- - p (0 - cY +
where

and

yu,

p,

2/

}~*

ft

{(x

+ cr + f\

~*

are constants depending on the strength of the centres of

attraction.

Now

ellipse or

any

possible orbit

theorem

when

hyperbola with the two centres of force as

either centre of force acts alone,

a possible orbit

foci is

and therefore by Bonnet

a
s

when both

centres of force are acting.


It
is therefore natural, in
the
of
to
the particle,
position
replace the
defining
rectangular coordinates (x, y) by elliptic coordinates (, ?;), defined by the

equations

it

is

x=

cosh

cos

?;,

sinh

sin

77.

Euler, Mem. de Berlin, 1760, p. 228; Nov. Cornm. Pctrop. x. (1764), p. 207;
p. 152
Lagrange, M4m. de Turin, iv. (1706-9), pp. 118, 215, or Oeuvres, n. p. 67.

xi.

(1765),

w. D.

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

98

= Constant and

The equations
ellipses

and hyperbolas whose

[CH. iv

= Constant

then represent respectively


are at the centres of force; and these are

foci

77

a particular family of orbits.

The

when expressed

potential energy,

T is

and the kinetic energy

cos

(cosh

77)

and

in terms of

(cosh f

cos

becomes

77,

77)

given by the equations

This problem is evidently of Liouville s type ( 43), and can therefore


be integrated by the method applicable to this class of questions.
The
for the coordinate

Lagrangian equation

is

J
c

2
f cos 77)

{(cosh

-jCut

-c

cosh

sinh

i}

^ T T-

=)

(jc

or
c

or,

-j- {(cosh

- cos

r;)

2c 2 cosh

using the equation of energy


c

-cos 2 77)2

^- {(cosh

= - 2 (cosh

=2

- F)

(A

- cos

(cosh f

Og

2
r)

77)

(cosh

A (cosh 2 1

Integrating,
c

- +

2 (A

- cos

77)}

cos 2

77)

- F)

^ (cosh

cos 2

17)

+C

(cosh

cosh

00377)

+
C

cos

(cosh

77) [

we have

(cosh
is

(_

= 2-j-(h cosh

where 7

77)

>

"2

T + V = h,

Og

- cos

sinh

- cos

77)

A cosh 2

tt

"

+ u!
-

cosh f

7,

a constant of integration.

Subtracting this from the equation of energy, which can be written


|-

(cosh

- cos
=

(I

+ f)

h (cosh 2 f

cos 2

77)

77)

(cosh

+ cos 77) +

(cosh

cos

77),

99

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

53, 54]

we have

_
p2

Eliminating

cos 2

(cosh
cfa

2
77 )

?7

__

A cos 2

cos

+ 7.

77

between these equations, we have


it

Aicosh-ff-1-

/U/

,,.

cosh

h cos 2

f(

./

A,

/i

cos 2 ?;

U,

cos

77

+7

therefore

c,

~^

At

cos

77

elliptic integrals,

we have

w=N

u,

---- cosh

h cosh 2

-fJU

77

Introducing an auxiliary variable

These are

---

T;

dtj.

>

and we can therefore express

and

77

as elliptic

functions of the parameter u, say

= % (M
(>

),

17

=
<t>

O)-

These equations determine the orbit of the particle, the


7
?) being expressed in terms of the parameter u*.
Motion on a surface

54.

We

elliptic coordinates

f.

next proceed to consider the motion of a particle which


to move on a smooth surface, and is acted on by any forces.
shall

is free

Let (X, Y, Z) be the components, parallel to fixed rectangular axes, of


the external force on the particle, not including the pressure of the surface
let (x, y, z) be the coordinates and v the
velocity of the particle, s the arc and
:

p the radius of curvature of its path, ^ the angle between the principal
normal to the path and the normal to the surface, and (X, p, v) the directioncosines of the line

which

lies in

perpendicular to the path at time

the tangent-plane to the surface and is


the mass of the particle is taken as unity.

The

acceleration of the particle consists of components vdv/ds along the


2
tangent to the path and v /p along the principal normal the latter component
2
can be resolved into (v /p)sin^ along the line whose direction-cosines are
;

(X,

p.,

v)

and

(v /p) cos

^ along the normal

to the surface.

We

have therefore

the equations of motion

dv
r
ds

dz
dy
X-dx
r + Y ds
f- + z ds
ds
, ,

YfM
*

.................. (A),

+ Zv ........................... (B),

Some

generalisations of the problem of two fixed centres will be found in a paper by


Amer. Journ. Math, xxxni. (1911), p. 337.
t The earliest investigation of motion on a surface was Galileo s study of the motion of a
heavy particle on an inclined plane (Discourses, Third Dialogue, 1638). The motion of a heavy
particle moving in a horizontal circle on a sphere was examined by Huygens (Horolog. oscill.,
Hiltebeitel,

1673).

72

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

100

[CH. iv

and

these, together with the equation of the surface, are sufficient to determine
the motion for the equation of the surface may be regarded as giving z in
;

terms of x and

y,

and by using

this value for z

quantities occurring in equations (A)

we can

express

all

the

and (B)

equations (A) and (B) thus become a system


fourth order for the determination of x and y

in terms of x, y, x, y, x, y
of differential equations of the

in terms of

t.

If the forces are conservative, the expression

- Xdx - Ydy - Zdz


will be the differential of a
potential-energy function V(x, y, z); equation (A)
can therefore be integrated, and gives on
integration the equation of energy

$iP

where
in (B),

c is

a constant.

V(ae

y, z}

c,

2
Substituting the value of v given by this equation

we have

This

is

(on eliminating z by means of the equation to the surface) a


x and y, and is in fact the

differential equation of the second order between


differential equation of the orbits on the surface.

The differential equations of motion on a surface are not


integrable by
quadratures in the general case there are however two cases in which the
problem can be formulated in such a way as to utilise results obtained in
:

other connexions.
(i)

Motion under no forces.


i

When
the orbit

geodesic

no external forces act on the particle, equation (B) gives ^ = 0, so


* the
is a geodesic on the
surface
integral of energy shews that this
;

is

Example.
of striction

described with constant velocity.

is the

particle moves under no forces on the fixed smooth ruled surface whose line
axis of z, the direction-cosines of the generator at the
point z being
.

sin a cos

respectively.

To determine

sin a sin

cos

a,

the motion.

Let v denote the distance of the point on the surface whose coordinates are (x, y, z)
from the line of striction, measured along the generator, arid let (0, 0, f) be the coordinates
of the point in which this generator meets the line of striction.
Then we have

x= v sin a cos
This theorem

is

due

y = vsinasin
to Euler,

Mechanica

= +v cos a.

(1736), n. cap. 4.

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

54]
The

101

kinetic energy of the particle is

We can take v and f as the two coordinates which define the position of the particle
evident that the coordinate
is ignorable, and the
corresponding integral is
dT =
r

k,

it is

where k

is

a constant,

where h

is

a constant.

+ v cos a=k.
The

integral of energy

is

T=/i,
Eliminating f between these two integrals, we have
v 2 (v 2 +

m = 2hv + (2h - F) m
2

If v is initially sufficiently large

shall

compared with
suppose this to be the case, and shall write
2

(2h

f,

cosec 2 a.

the quantity (2A

cosec 2 a = 2AX 2

where X

F)

is

is

positive

new constant

the equation thus becomes

The
defined

integration of this equation can be effected


by the equation

by introducing a

real auxiliary variable M,

Writing v = \m.v~^, this becomes

and this

is

equivalent to the equation


*-f>()-ij

where the roots

ex

32

e 3 of

the function
e2 = X 2

The connexion between the variables


v

|p (M)

are real and are defined by the equations

= m2

ex

es

and u

is

e1

e.,

+ e3 = 0.

therefore expressed by the equation

= \m{^>(u)-e

}~^.

Substituting this value of v in the equation which connects v and

=
Cf.

e%u

f (M +

!)

t,

+ Constant.

Whittaker and Watson, Modern Analysis,

20-33.

we have

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

102

This equation expresses the time


conjunction with the equation
gives the connexion between v

and

in

terms of the auxiliary variable

and thus

u,

in

t.

Motion on a developable surface.

(ii)

If the surface on

the

[CH. iv

known theorems

which the particle moves

is

we can

developable,

that the arc s and the quantity -

utilise

are unaltered

by

developing the surface on a plane: these results, applied to the equations of


motion given above, shew that if in the motion of a particle on a developable
surface under any forces the surface is developed on a plane, the particle will
describe the plane curve thus derived from its orbit with the same velocity as
before, provided the force acting in the plane-motion is the same in amount

and

direction relative to the curve as the component of force in the


tangentplane to the surface in the surface- motion.

Example

1.

whose axis

is

Prove that

the

is projected
along the surface of a right circular cone,
vertex upwards, icith the velocity due to the depth below the vertex.
traced out on the cone, when developed into a plane, icill be of the
form

smooth particle

vertical

path

and

r% sin | 6 = a*.

(Coll.

Exam. )

For on developing the cone, the problem becomes the same as that of motion in a plane
under a constant repulsive force from the origin, and with the velocity compatible with
We therefore have the integrals
rest at the origin.
r*

+ r2 2 = Cr,
r 2 = h,

where

C is

where h

is

a constant,

a constant.

These equations give


1

Cr3

dr\*

= -g
so

if

say,

where a

is

a new constant,

u = -, we have
r

du\ 2

a3 w3

and therefore

*-(*
0=1
J

(l-a
(l
V2 )2

=
which

is

equivalent to the equation

sin
.

r * sin

where v = u-a?,

~1
v,
3

%6 = a?.

Example 2. If in the motion of a point P on a developable surface the tangent IP to


the edge of regression describes areas proportional to the times, shew that the component
of force perpendicular to

IP and

in the tangent-plane is proportional to

the radius of curvature of the edge of regression.

where p

(Hazzidakis.)

is

Motion on a surface of revolution

55.

and

103

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

54, 55]

elliptic

cases soluble in terms of circular

functions *.

The most important

case of surface-motion which

is

soluble

by quadra

the motion of a particle on a smooth surface of revolution, under


forces derivable from a potential-energy function which is symmetrical with
respect to the axis of revolution of the surface.
tures

is

Let the position of a point in space be denned by cylindrical coordinates


where z is a coordinate measured parallel to the axis of the surface,
(z, r,
is the
r is the perpendicular distance of the point from this axis, and
<),

<f>

The

azimuthal angle made by r with a fixed plane through the axis.


z and r, say
equation of the surface will be a relation between

r -/(*),

and the potential energy will be a function of z and r (it cannot involve
since it is symmetrical with respect to the axis), which for points on the
surface can, on replacing r by its value f(z\ be expressed as a function of z
can be taken as unity.
only, say V(z); the mass of the particle
<f>,

The

kinetic energy

The coordinate

is.

is
<f>

by

18,

evidently ignorable; the corresponding integral

k.

where k

is

a constant,

is

or

can be interpreted as the integral of angular


the axis of the surface.

this equation

The equation
and substituting

of energy is

for
(j>

T + V = h,

where A

in this equation from the preceding,

integrating this equation,

momentum

is

about

a constant,

we have

we have
i

Constant.

The
of r

relation

and
</>

between

and z

is

thus given by a quadrature

the values

are then obtained from the equation of the surface and the

equation

(/(*)}*-*,
respectively.
h

Jook

The motion
i.

of a particle on a surface of revolution

Section 10.

was investigated by Newton, Principia,

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

104

We

shall

now

[OH. iv

discuss the motion on those surfaces for which this

rature can be effected by means of known functions,


surface is vertical (z being measured
positively

when the

quad

axis of the

upwards) and gravity

is

the

only external force, so that

The circular cylinder.

(i)

When

the

surface

the circular cylinder r

is

= a,

the

above integral

becomes
t

and

the origin of coordinates

if

is

so chosen that 2ha-

= k we
2

have

* ==

or

to

^g(t

y>,

where

is

a constant.

is

a constant.

The equation
then gives

<o

</>

where

t ),

(t

The sphere.
The case in which the surface

<

(ii)

the sphere

is

called the

problem of the spherical pendulum*, and can be realised by


a
supposing
heavy particle attached to a fixed point by a light rigid wire
of
capable
moving freely about the point.
is

In this case the quadrature

for

becomes
~

t=l

or

The

integral

which we

integral,

by

*i,

on the right-hand side of this equation is an elliptic


shall now reduce to Weierstrass canonical form.
Denote

#2 Z3 the roots of the cubic


.

since the expression

(/i

- gz) (I* - z*)-k*

Lagrange, Mecavique Analytiqve. The complete solution in terms of (Jacobian) elliptic


functions was obtained by A. Tissot, Liouville s Journal, (1) xvn. (1852), p. 88 Jacobi s own
solution of the problem of a rotating rigid body in terms of elliptic functions had been
published
The analysis connected with the spherical pendulum is essentially that for
previously, in 1839.
:

Lame

equation of order

2.

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

55]

105

I of z, and
negative for the values I and
positive for very large positive
values of z and also for the values of z which occur in the
problem considered

is

I and + 1, since the


(which must necessarily lie between
particle is on the
we
see
that
one
of
the roots (say z^ is greater than I and the other
sphere)
two (say z2 and z3 where z2 zs ) are between I and
I.
The values of z in
>

the actual motion will

lie

between

and z3 since
,

for

them the cubic must

be positive.

Write

so that e 1} e2

e s are

new
6j

4-

relation

is

new

"

variable,

-1.2.3)

constants, which satisfy the relation


e.>

+e =

<

--

also satisfy the inequalities e l

The

where t

*-4 + f

->d

and

6g

between

>

e?

>

es

and z now becomes

or

where
roots

a constant of integration and the function

e is

e-i,

e2

e3

is

formed with the

g>

Now when e lt e2 e3 are real and in descending order of magnitude,


$(u) and @ (u) are both real when u is real, in which case $(u) is greater
than e lt and also when u is of the form
+ a real quantity, where 3 is
,

&>

&>..,

the half-period corresponding to the root es


in this latter case,
lies
between e2 and e 3
Since in the actual motion z lies between 2 and z3 it
follows that f lies between 2 and e3 and therefore the constant e must con
;

#>(t)

<?

of an imaginary part
3 and a real part depending on the instant from
which time is measured by a suitable choice of the origin of time, we can
take this real part of e to be zero, and we then have
sist

&>

*=^+7

?<

+<**

This equation gives the connexion between z and t.


determine the azimuth
For this we have the equation
<j>.

-,

"

7,

Icclt

dt

where

is
</>

a constant of integration.

We

have now to

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

106
To
t 4-

&>

are

we take X and

effect the integration,

I
corresponding to the values I and
constants defined by the equations

[CH. iv

to be the (imaginary) values of


of z respectively so that X and /*
/*

new

these equations give

>

integral

W=

21*

___

now becomes

(x)

The

~-

_
-l

dt

[
4J* J

{$>

~ kg

+w -

(t

3)

(X)}

{>

(t

+ 0,3) - 9 00}
dt

dt

a(j
$\t

>

(X) dt

00 dt

%>

-\

But* we have

(X)

and therefore
- t(\)\t

a
this equation expresses the angle

(t

o) 3

/JL)

a- (t

as a function of

t,

o>

and

</>

X)
so completes the

solution of the problem.

We

see that

when

increases

by

2a>

1(

fa increases

by

2^ (X -/*).

Example. When the bob of the spherical pendulum is executing periodic oscillations
between two parallels on the sphere, shew that one of the points reached on the higher
parallel, and the point on the lower parallel at which the bob arrives after a half-period,
have a difference of azimuth which always lies between one and two right angles.
(Puiseux and Halphen.)

The problem

of the spherical pendulum has been discussed from the standpoint of


by F. R. Moulton, Palermo Rend. xxxn. (1911), p. .338.

periodic solutions
(iii)

The paraboloid.

Consider next the problem of motion on the paraboloid, whose equation


r

In this case the quadrature


r

for
i

=
t

2a?

z%.

becomes
A*

~
\

t= (a+z)*
(2hz-2gz*-^-\
*

Cf.

Whittaker and Watson, Modern Analysis,

dz.

% 20-53, Ex. 2.

is

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

55]

To obtain the

107

solution of the problem in terms of elliptic functions,


v, defined by the equation

we

introduce an auxiliary quantity


v

If a and

= ( \a + z) ~a

(where a

^ ft) denote

2hz

we can write

Define a

and

new

let e lf e 2 , e 3

respectively of z

and

it is

(~f)

variable

2gz*

- ^-}

dz.

the roots of the quadratic


2gz*

- k~ =

0,

4a

form

this integral in the

v=

(2hz

/*{4(*+)(*
by the equation

be the values of
corresponding to the values of -a,
then the integrals become

ft,

easily proved that the quantities ely e2


e1

+e +
2

The auxiliary quantity v can


defined by the equation
V

es

el

0,

>

e.2

>

e3

now be replaced by an
j

-2

the relations

e 3 satisfy

auxiliary quantity u,

)*
}

u,

{ff (<*+*))

and then the inversion of the


integral gives

= p (w +
where

is

roots e 1} e2

As
p (u +

e),

a constant of integration and the function


e 3 which are
given by the equations

is

formed with the

g>

+ a + ft
3~(a + o)

2a

_ -ajf_a -2ft
3(a + a)

-a-2a + ft
3 (a

+ a)

in the actual

motion z evidently lies between a. and ft, it follows that


lies
between es and e2 and therefore (as we wish u to be real) the
e)
imaginary part of the constant e must be the half-period 3 the real part can
be taken to be zero, since it depends
merely on the lower limit of the
,

&>

integral

for u.

We

have therefore

-~ a-,
6
9

since

+ ft = 9

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

108

The equation

to determine

and

t is

(a

+ z)

dv

in terms of the auxiliary variable u.

this equation gives

Lastly, \ve have to determine the

(j)

4a

azimuth

for this

we have

kdt

kdt

[CH. TV

la (a

fr

a,,)

-e

-a+a+

v
+ o)J

du,

and therefore
4a
3 (a

a)

where

is
</>

a constant of integration, and

I is

an auxiliary constant denned by

the equation
j
ft>

(I)

--

3(

so

The equation can now be written


,

ku,

"

a
the integral of
to be

which

i(0

found (as in the problem of the spherical pendulum)

is

=e
<T

this equation expresses


the solution.

(iv)

The

in
^>

cone.

r
is

0) 3

terms of the auxiliary variable

Consider next the cone, whose equation

where a

the semi-vertical angle.

z tan

is

o,

u,

and so completes

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

55, 56]

Since this

is

a developable surface,

we can apply the theorem

109

of

54,

and

see that the orbit of a particle on the cone under gravity becomes, when
the cone is developed on a plane, the same as the orbit of a particle of unit

we

mass in the plane under a force of constant magnitude g cos a acting towards
a fixed centre of force (namely the point on the plane which corresponds to
the vertex of the cone).
This ( 48) is one of the known cases in which the
problem of central motion can be solved in terms of
this solution furnishes at once the solution of the

elliptic functions,

and

problem of motion on the

cone.

Example
whose axis

is

Shew

1.

that the motion of a particle under gravity on a surface of revolution


terms of elliptic functions when the surface is

vertical can also be solved in

given by any one of the following equations


3a)

z(z

(r

2
,

a2 ) 2 = a 3z.

az

(Kobb and

Example 2. Shew that the same problem can be solved


when the surface is
2 3
2
6
(a* +3/ ) + 2a = 8a% (x* -f y ).

Shew that

in

terms of

Stackel.)

elliptic

functions

(Salkowski. )

an algebraic surface of revolution is such that the equations


of its geodesies can be expressed in terms of elliptic functions of a parameter, the surface
must be such that r2 and z can be expressed as rational functions of a parameter, i.e. the
2
equation of the surface regarded as an equation between r and z is the equation of
a unicursal curve
are the cylindrical coordinates of a point oil the
where z, r,

Example

3.

if

surface.

(Kobb.)

Example

Shew that

4.

in the following cases of the

of revolution, the trajectories are all closed curves

1.

When

the surface

is

2.

When

the surface

is

motion of a particle on a surface

a sphere, and the force is directed along the tangent to the


meridian and proportional to cosec 2 #, where 6 is the angular distance from the particle to
the pole. (The trajectories are in this case sphero-conics having one focus in the pole.)
a sphere, and the force

meridian and proportional to tan 6 sec 2


having the pole as centre*.)

6.

directed along the tangent to the


(The trajectories in this case are sphero-conics
is

Joukovskys theorem.
We shall now shew how to determine the potential-energy function under
which a given family of curves on a surface can be described as the orbits of
56.

a particle constrained to

move on the

surface.

The three rectangular coordinates

of a point on the surface can be expressed


two parameters, say u and v, so that an element of arc ds on the
surface is given in terms of the increments of u and v to which it
corresponds
by an equation of the form

in terms of

ds 2

where E, F,
*

are

known

Darboux has examined the

(1877).

= Edu + ZFdudv +
2

functions of u and

Gdv*,

v.

possibility of other cases, in Bull, de la Soc.

Math, de France,

v.

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

110

[OH. iv

Let the family of curves which are to be the orbits under the required system
of forces be defined by an equation

= Constant,

q (u, v)

and

let

p (u,

v)

denote the family of curves which

Constant

orthogonal to these.

is

Then instead of u and v we can take p and q as the two parameters


which define the position of a point on the surface let the line-element
in this system of parameters be expressed by the equation
;

ds*

=E

df+G dp

z
,

dqdp being absent, because the curves p = Constant and


and G being known functions of
Constant cut at right angles

the term in
q

and

q.

The

kinetic energy of a particle which

moves on the surface

is

the Lagrangian equations of motion are therefore

i-T^cto

where

(G p}

[-5
V

V denotes the unknown

<f

8p

op

op

potential-energy function, which

it is

required

to determine.

These equations are to be

satisfied

2
1

Eliminating

_p

by the value q =

they then become

P=
~dq~

85"

9//v^

we have

dq

Integrating this equation,

,,;

dq

we have

+ V =f(q\ where f is

an arbitrary function,

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics


or

111

^-

and therefore

where g denotes an arbitrary function.

Now

-~~

AI (P\ the differential parameter* of the

first

order of the

function p; and thus we have a theorem enunciated by Joukovsky in 1890,


that if q = Constant is the equation of a family of curves on a surface, and

p=

Constant denotes the family of curves orthogonal to these, then the curves
Constant can be freely described by a particle under the influence of forces
q
derived from the potential-energy function

V=*
where

(p)g(p) + &

(p)ff(q)^\^--ldq,

and g are arbitrary functions, and A! denotes

the first differential

parameter.

The above equations give

dq~

dq

and hence the equation of energy in the motion

is

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
/

1.

particle

moves under gravity on the smooth


s

where

denotes the arc and

the angle

<f>

horizontal

shew that the motion

is

cycloid

whose equation

is

= 4a sin $,
made by

the tangent to the curve with the

periodic, the period being

4v

*/

t/

2.
particle moves in a smooth circular tube under the influence of a force directed
to a fixed point and proportional to the distance from the point.
Shew that the motion is
of the same character as in the pendulum-problem.

If the line-element

on a surface

is

given by the equation

d2 = E du 2 + 2Fdu dv + G dv*,
the

first differential

The

differential

variables

parameter

is

<f>

(u, v) is

).

given by the formula

a deformation-covariant of the surface, i.e. when a change of


the differential parameter transforms into the expression
variables (u v ) and the corresponding new coefficients

made from (u, v) to (u v ),


the same way with the new

is

formed in

parameter of a function

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

112

[CH.

3.
particle moves in a straight line under the action of two centres of repulsive
Shew that,
force of equal strength p., each varying as the inverse square of the distance.
if the centres of force are at a distance 2c apart and the particle starts from rest at

a distance

kc,

where k

<

1,

from the middle point of the

line joining

it will

them,

perform

oscillations of period
IT

Jo

(1

-F

sin 2

6^

dQ.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part


4.

I,

1899.)

under the action of gravity travels in a smooth curved tube, starting

particle

of the tube.
from rest at a given point
If the particle describes every arc OP in
the same time that would be taken to slide down the corresponding chord OP, shew that
the tube has the form of a lemniscate.

downwards along the concave side of the curve y 3 + ax2 =


with a velocity f (2#)2 from the origin, the axis of x being horizontal
shew that the
vertical component of the velocity is constant.
(Nicomedi.)
A particle moves in a smooth tube in the form of the curve r2 = 2a 2 cos 2$, under
6.
5.

particle is projected

the action of two attractive forces, varying inversely as the cube of the distance, towards
the two points on the initial line which are at a distance a from the pole. Prove that if
the absolute force
of

thecurveis

is

p.,

and the velocity at the node 2/^ /a, the time of describing one loop

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

7ra /2/ii.

I,

1898.)

particle describes a space-curve under the influence of a force whose direction


always intersects a given straight line. Shew that its velocity is inversely proportional
to the distance of the particle from the line and to the cosine of the angle which the
7.

plane through the particle and the line makes with the normal plane to the orbit.
(Dainelli.)

heavy particle is constrained to move on a straight line, which is made to


rotate with constant angular velocity co round a fixed vertical axis at given distance from
Shew that the motion is given by the equation
it.
8.

where

by the

from a fixed point on the


and A, B are constants.

r is the distance of the particle


line with the horizontal,

line, a is

the angle

(H.

am

made

Ende.)

9.
heavy particle is constrained to move on a straight line, which is made to
rotate with given variable angular velocity round a fixed horizontal axis.
Shew that the
equation of motion is
2
2
sin a sin B
r8 sin a + ad sin a,

r=+g

the angle between the line and the axis of rotation, 6 the angle made with
the vertical by the shortest distance a between the lines, and r the distance of the

where a

is

particle

from the intersection of this shortest distance with the moving

line.

(Vollhering.)

particle slides in a smooth straight tube which is made to rotate with uniform
about a vertical axis
shew that, if the particle starts from relative
angular velocity
rest from the point where the shortest distance between the axis and the tube meets the
10.

o>

tube, the distance through which the particle

moves along the tube

in

time

t is

2(7
2
-^ cot a cosec a sinh (^

where a

is

u>t

sin a),

the inclination of the tube to the vertical.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

I,

1899.)

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

iv]

113

particle is constrained to move under no external forces in a plane circular tube


constrained to rotate uniformly about any point in its plane. Shew that the
motion of the particle in the tube is similar to that in the pendulum-problem.
11.

which

is

12.

small bead

is

strung upon a smooth circular wire of radius

a,

which

is

con

strained to rotate with uniform angular velocity


about a point on itself. The bead is
initially at the extremity of the diameter through the centre of rotation, and is projected
o>

with velocity 2& relative to the wire


given by the equation

shew that the position of the bead at time

is

= sn

sin
<f)

(modulus a/b)

bu>t\a

or
isin

= (bja) sn

(f)

(modulus

cot,

b/a)

or
according as a
b, $ being the angle which the radius vector to the bead makes
with the diameter of the circle through the centre of rotation.
>

<

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

Shew

13.

.r

+^ 3 = a 3

proportional to

is

xy (x

1900.)

that the force perpendicular to the asymptote under which the curve

can be described

14.

I,

particle is acted on

+y

}~

3
.

by a force whose components (X, Y} parallel to fixed axes


Shew that the problem of its motion is
(x, y).

are conjugate functions of the coordinates


always soluble by quadratures.

15.
If ((7) be a closed orbit described
by a particle under the action of a central force,
the centre of force,
the centre of gravity of the curve (}, G the centre of
gravity of
the curve (C) on the
supposition that the density at each point varies inversely as
the velocity, shew that the
points S, 0, G are collinear and that 2<7 = 3SO.

(Laisant.)
16.
Shew that the motion of a particle which is constrained to move in a
plane,
under a constant force directed to a
point out of the plane, can be expressed by means

of elliptic functions.
17.

Shew

that the curves

where a, b, c are arbitrary constants and


/is a given function, can be described under the
same law of central force to the
origin.

18.

Shew

a point in
19.

its

that

when a

circle is described

circumference, the law of force

is

under a central attraction directed to

the inverse

fifth

power of the distance.

particle describes the pedal of a circle, taken with


respect to any point in
plane, under the influence of a centre of force at this
Shew that the law
point.
of force is of the form
its

where

A and B

are constants.

Shew that the law


respect to a focus

is

of force is also of this form when the inverse of an


ellipse with
described under a centre of force in the focus.
(Curtis.)

w. D.

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

114

[en.

Prove that, if when projected from r=R, 6 = with a velocity V in a direction


an
making
angle a with the radius vector the path of a particle be/(r, 0, R, F, sina) = 0,
the path with the same initial conditions but under the action of an additional central
20.

force

^-.

is

f(r,nd,R,
where
(Coll-

21.

origin

Exam.)

A particle of unit mass describes an orbit under an attractive force


and a transverse force T perpendicular to the radius vector. Prove

to the

that,

the

differential equation of the orbit is given


<Pu

by
T du

~~
P

If the attractive force is

of angle

always

and the

zero,

<M?_

d6~

dd>

moves

particle

in

an equiangular spiral

prove that

a,

^,.2860*0-3 and

A = (^ sin

cosa)^

sec2a
.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

I,

1901.)

22.
varying as the distance,
particle, acted on by a central force towards a point
so as to pass through a point Q such that OP is equal to OQ
projected from a point
shew that the least possible velocity of projection is OP(^s,mPOQ}^ where p. OP is the
force per unit mass at P.
(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part I, 1901.)

is

23.
Find a plane curve such that the curve and its pedal, with regard to some point
in the plane, can be simultaneously described by particles under central forces to that
point, in such a manner that the moving particles are always at corresponding points

of the curve and the pedal

and

find the

law of force

for the pedal curve.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part


24.

If /(#, y) be a

I,

1897.)

homogeneous function of one dimension, then the necessary

and

l be capable of description under accele


sufficient condition that the curve f(x,y)
ration tending to the origin and varying with the distance alone, is that f be subject
to a condition of the form

Hence shew that the only curves


r (A

Proceed

to

of this class are necessarily included in the equation

+ B sin 6 + C cos

ff)

=1

the discussion of the case wherein f(x, y)

is

dimensions.
25.

An

at a point

ellipse of centre

is

described under the influence of a centre of force

on the major axis of the


nt

where

homogeneous and of n
(Coll. Exam.)

ellipse

esin

%Tr/n is the periodic time, e is the ratio of

shew that
u,

CO

to the semi-major axis,


t from the vertex.

and u

is

the

eccentric angle of the point reached by the particle in time


26.

Two

free particles

p.

and

M move in a plane under the influence of

a central force

Shew that the

ratio of the velocity of the particle p at an arbitrary


point TO of its path, to the velocity which is possessed at TO by the central projection of
on the orbit of p., is equal to the constant ratio of the areas described in unit time by the

to a fixed point 0.

radii 0/x,

OM, multiplied by the square


ratio of OM, Om.

which expresses the

of a certain function

of the coordinates of
(Dainelli.)

TO,

115

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

iv]

under an attraction to the focus. Shew


particle is moving freely in a parabola
at every instant a point be taken on the tangent through the particle, at distance
from the particle, this point will describe a central orbit about
4acos0/(<9 + sin<9)
27.

that, if

where
the focus, and the rate of description of areas will be the same as in the parabola
4a is the latus rectum, and 6 the vertical angle of the particle measured from the apse
line.
(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part I, 1896.)
;

When

a periodic comet
receives a small increment 8v.
28.

will

is

at its greatest distance from the sun, its velocity


that the comet s least distance from the sun

Shew

be increased by the quantity


48v.

3
{

(l-e)//x(l

Exam.)

(Coll.

+<?)}-.

If POP is a focal chord of an elliptic path described round the sun, shew that
29.
to P through perihelion is equal to the time of falling towards the
the time from
sun from a distance 2a to a distance a (1+ cos a), where a = Zir - (uf - u\ and u -uis the

difference of the eccentric anomalies of the points P,

(Cayley.)

3
moves in a plane under attractive
^/rV /z/rV along the
if it is projected
Shew
2d
distance
at
two
fixed
that,
apart.
r,
points
with the velocity due to a fall from rest at infinity, a possible path is a circle with regard
to which the two fixed centres are inverse points, and that, if the radius of this circle is a,

30.

radii

forces

particle
to

drawn

the periodic time

is

Exam.)

(Coll.

31.
A heavy particle is projected horizontally with a velocity v inside a smooth
sphere at an angular distance a from the vertical diameter drawn downwards shew that
it will never fall below or never rise above its initial level according as
:

v2

>

or

<ag

sin a tan

a.

(Coll.

Exam.)

A particle is projected horizontally with velocity V along the interior of a smooth


32.
sphere of radius a from a point whose angular distance from the lowest point is a. Shew
that the highest point of the spherical surface attained is at an angular distance /3 from
the lowest point, where /3 is the smaller of the values of ^, x given respectively by
the equations
2=
(3 cos -^-2 cos a) # + F
0j
,,
ivXMi. Hixam.j
9
= nf
V*
sin*
(cos

x + cos

2ag

a)

OJ

motion of a spherical pendulum of length a be wholly between the levels


ia
below
the
fa,
point of support, shew that at a time t after passing a point of greatest
depth, the depth of the bob is
If the

33.

fca{4-sn

(mod. V(?/65))

V(130/14a)}

and that a horizontal coordinate referred to the point of support as origin


by the equation
which

is

34.

a case of

Shew that

Lame s
if

equation.

a conical pendulum

projection of the bob describes an ellipse


with the angular velocity

is

(Coll.
is

determined

Exam.)

executing small oscillations, the horizontal


in the sense of the motion

whose axes turn

H
where $
I

i s the
angle of greatest deviation from the vertical,
the length of the pendulum, and g gravity.

that of least deviation,


(Resal.)
3

The Soluble Problems of Particle Dynamics

116

35.

particle is constrained to

fixed point

move on the

surface of a sphere, and

M on the surface of the sphere with a force that varies as r~

is

[CH. iv

attracted to a
r2 )

(o?

% where

the diameter of the sphere and r is the rectilinear distance from the particle to M.
If the position of the particle on the sphere be defined by its colatitude 6 and longitude $,
is

with

M as pole, shew that the equations of motion furnish the differential equation

where a and

b are constants

and integrate

this equation,

shewing that the orbit

is

a sphero-conic.

36.
particle of
semi-vertical angle is

angular
is

momentum

mass m moves on the inner surface of a cone of revolution whose


3
from the axis the
a, under the action of a repulsive force mp/r
;

of the particle

about the axis being

an arc of a hyperbola whose eccentricity

is

sec

-Jp tan

a,

shew that the path

a.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part


37.

Shew that the necessary

that the path on the cone

may

1897.)

I,

central force to the vertex of a circular cone in order

be a plane section

is

4-^.
..1

(Coll.
*

ifO

Exam.)

A particle of unit mass moves on the inner surface of a paraboloid of revolution,


rectum 4a, under the action of a repulsive force pr from the axis, where r is the
distance from the axis
shew that, if the particle is projected along the surface in a
38.

latus

direction perpendicular to the axis with velocity 2a/*2

it will

describe a parabola.
(Coll.

39.

about

A
its

Exam.)

formed by rotating the catenary s = cta,n<p


axis of symmetry, and a particle is projected along its surface from a
point

smooth surface

of revolution

is

distant b from that axis with velocity h (a 2 + 6 2 )^ /fe2


The direction of projection is such
that the component velocity perpendicular to the axis is h/b and the particle moves in
.

contact with the surface, under the influence of a force of attraction A 2

(r

+ 2a 2 )/r5

in the

Shew that, if gravity be neglected, the


direction of the perpendicular r to the axis.
projection of the path on a plane at right angles to the axis will have a polar equation
r

csmh- = a#.
40.

particle

moves on a smooth

helicoid,

z=a(f>,

(Coll.

Exam.)

under the action of a force pr

per unit mass directed at each point along the generator inwards, r being the distance
from the axis of z. The particle is projected along the surface perpendicularly to the
generator at a point where the tangent plane

Shew

velocity of projection being p*a.


the plane of xy is
2

/r

makes an angle a with the plane

that the equation of the projection of

= sec 2 a cosh 2
((f>

cos a)

Shew that the problem

42.

its

path on

1.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part


41.

of xy, its

I,

1896.)

motion of a particle under no forces on a ruled


surface, whose generators cut the line of striction at a constant angle, and for which the
ratio of the length of the common perpendicular to two adjacent generators to the angle
between these generators is constant, can be solved by quadratures.
(Astor.)
particle (x, y,

z}

of the

whose potential energy is (ax2 + by 2 + cz2 )


l.
Determine the motion.
(C. Neumann, Journal fur Math. LVI.

is

constrained to

move on the sphere x2 +y 2 + z 2

(1859), p. 46.)

CHAPTER V
THE DYNAMICAL SPECIFICATION OF BODIES
57.

Definitions.

Before proceeding to discuss those problems in the dynamics of rigid


bodies which can be solved by quadratures, it is convenient to introduce and

number of constants which can be assigned to a rigid body, and


which depend on its constitution it will be found that these constants
determine the dynamical behaviour of the body.
Let any rigid body be considered and let the particles of which (from
the dynamical point of view) it is constituted be typified by a particle of
calculate a

mass

axes are

situated at a point whose coordinates referred to fixed rectangular


(x, y, z).

2m (y + z

The quantity

2
),

where the symbol 2 denotes a summation extended over all the particles of
the system, is called the moment of inertia of the body about the axis Ox*.
Similarly the moment of inertia about any other line is defined to be the sum
of the masses of the particles of the body, each multiplied by the square of
These summations are evidently in
its perpendicular distance from the line.
the case of ordinary rigid bodies equivalent to integrations
f

is

equivalent to

2
I

(y

z2 )

pdxdydz, where p

unit volume, of the body at the point

The quantity
is

thus

2m (y + z )
2

ff

(x,

y,

is

the density, or mass per

z).

^mxy
body about the axes Ox, Oy and
and ^nizx are the products of inertia about

called the product of inertia of the

similarly the quantities


the other pairs of axes.

my

For the moments and products of inertia with reference to the coordinate
axes, the notation

A=2m(y + z
F = Zmyz,
2

will

B=Zm(z* + x
G = ILmzx,

),

G = 2m (x +
H = ILmxy
2

),

2
),

be generally used.

Two

bodies whose

moments

of inertia about every line in space are equal


be equimomental. It will be seen later that this
involves also the equality of the products of inertia of the bodies with respect
to each other are said to

to

any pair of orthogonal


*

Moments

(Horolog.

lines.

of inertia were first introduced by

oscill.,

1673).

The name

is

Huygens

due to Euler.

in his researches

on the pendulum

The dynamical

118

specification

of bodies

[CH.

M denotes the

mass of a body and if k is a quantity such that Mk 2 is


equal to the moment of inertia of the body about a given line, the quantity
k is called the radius of gyration of the body about the line.
If

moment

In the case of a plane body, the


dicular to its plane

is

often spoken of as the

of inertia about a line perpen


moment of inertia about the

point in which this line meets the plane.

The moments of inertia of some simple bodies*.

58.

The rectangle.

(i)

be required to find the moment of inertia of a uniform rectangular


whose sides are of lengths 2a and 26 respectively, about a line through

Let
plate,
its

it

parallel to the sides of length 2a.


Taking this line as axis Ox,
other
as axis Oy, the required
to
the
sides
parallel
through

centre

and a

line

moment

of inertia

is

or

where

cr is

the mass per unit area of the plate, or the "surface-density as it is


evaluating the integral, we have for the required moment

frequently called
of inertia

3
|<ra6

or

Mass of rectangle x ^6 2

The moment

of inertia of a uniform rod, about a line through its middle


point perpendicular to the rod, can be deduced from this result by regarding
the rod as the limiting form of a rectangle in which the length of one pair
of sides is

question

It follows that

small.

indefinitely

Mass of rod x |6 2
where 26
(ii)

26,

the

moment

of inertia in

is

is

the length of the rod.

The rectangular

block.

Consider next a uniform rectangular block whose edges are of lengths 2a,
let it be required to find the moment of inertia about an axis Ox
2c
;

and

passing through the centre

moment

of inertia

parallel to the edges of length 2a.

ra

Zm(y + ^
2

where p

is

This

is

the density.

),

rb

re
n

or

-aJ -b- -c

p(y

+ z }dzdydx,
2

Evaluating the integral, we have for the

moment

of

inertia
c

^L

(fca

+ c^

or

Mass of block x 1

(6

).

*
For practical purposes the moments of inertia of a body are determined experimentally
convenient apparatus is described by W. H. Derriman, Phil. Mag. v. (1903), p. 648, and by
W. R. Cassie, Phys. Soc. Proc. xxi. (1909), p. 497.

The dynamical

57, 58]

The

(iii)

Let
plate

it

ellipse

and

the circle.

now be required

whose equation

about the axis of


ra
I

to find the

moment

of inertia of a uniform elliptic

is

It is

x.

119

of bodies

specification

ra

a-y^dydx, where

the surface-density.

cr is

Evaluating the integral, we have for the required moment of inertia


z
or
Mass of ellipse x 6 2
\7rab ar,
.

The moment

of inertia of a circle of radius b about a diameter

Mass of

therefore

The ellipsoid and the sphere.

(iv)

The moment
equation

of inertia of a uniform solid ellipsoid of density

\p(y*

To evaluate

71

is

about the axis of x

where

x \6

circle

is

77,

is

T2

ift

?%

/T^
tv

L/

fc

r
O

p,

whose

similarly

+ z^dxdydz,

integrated throughout the ellipsoid.

this integral, write

are

new
pab

where the integration

variables
3

c III

is

the integral becomes

2
?

now taken throughout

a sphere whose equation

is

Since the integrals

and

^,

are evidently equal, the required

moment

of inertia can be written in the

form

or
or

or

Trpabc

(fe

c ) [
J -i

| (1
2

-^Trpabc (b

Mass of

i
ellipsoid x

- f)
2

),
2

(6

+c

2
).

120

Tlie

The moment
is

dynamical

of bodies

specification

of inertia of a uniform sphere of radius

[CH.

a about a diameter

therefore

Mass
(v)

The

Let

it

of sphere x

^a

2
.

triangle.

now be

required to find the

moment

of inertia of a

uniform

triangular plate of surface-density a, with respect to any line in its plane


the position of the line can be specified by the lengths a, ft, y of the per

pendiculars drawn to

from the vertices of the triangle.

it

to be the areal coordinates of a point of the plate, the


distance
from this point to the given line is (ax + /3y + yz), and
perpendicular
the required moment of inertia is therefore
(x, y, z}

Taking

ax

4-

fiy 4- yz) dS,

where dS denotes an element of area of the

Now

on the side
side c

plate.

Y denotes

if

the length of the perpendicular from the point (x, y, z)


of the triangle, and if
denotes the length intercepted on the

between the vertex

and the

foot of this perpendicular,

we have

Y = zb sin A

X sin A

and

Fcos

A = perpendicular
= yc

We

the form

= 387 (| -4- dXdY =


x

d(X, Y)

2A

is

A dXdY= 2A
-.

be sin

Hence the

dS,

integral \\y-dS,

where

extended over the area of the triangle, can be written in

lly-dydz, where the integration

values of y and z whose

sum

is

less

By symmetry,

the integrals

extended over

is

than unity

this

la^dS and

each have the value TV A.

ffxedS,

positive

equal to

z-dS have the same value,

and a similar calculation shews that the integrals

ffyzdS,

is

all

rr

r r

A.

on the side b

A.

denotes the area of the triangle.

the integration

or

(x, y, z)

have therefore

dydz
where

sin

from

\\xydS

The dynamical

58, 59]

Substituting these

moment

values

in

the

(ax

+ /3y + yz^dS,

the

of inertia of the triangle about the given line becomes


2
<rA

(a

+ @- + f +

i x Mass of
triangle x

+ 7 + a/3),

+ (?-?Y + f*
J(*?Y
2
2
\
(\
/

But

cr

integral

121

of bodies

specification

+ *Yl

moment

this expression evidently represents the

of inertia about the

line of three particles situated


respectively at the

middle points of the


mass of each particle being one-third the mass of
the triangle; the triangle is therefore
equimomental to this set of three

given

sides of the
triangle, the

particles.

is equimomental to a set
Example. Shew that a uniform solid tetrahedron of mass
of five particles, four of which are each of mass
and are situated at the vertices
of the tetrahedron, while the fifth
particle is at the centre of gravity of the tetrahedron

-^M

and

is

of

59.

mass

-iM.

moment of

Derivation of the

of inertia about

inertia about

a parallel axis through

the centre

any axis when

of gravity

is

the

moment

known.

The moments

of inertia found in the preceding article were for the most


taken
with
part
respect to lines specially related to the bodies concerned
these results can however be
applied to determine the moments of inertia of
:

the same bodies with


respect to other lines, by means of a theorem which will

now be

given.

Let f(x., y, z, x, y, z, x, y, z) be
any polynomial (not necessarily homo
geneous) of the second degree in the coordinates and the components of
Let (x, y, I) denote the
velocity and acceleration of a particle of mass m.
coordinates of the centre of gravity of a
body which
arid write

If now we
we obtain the
(1)

substitute these values for x, y,


following classes of terms

z,

is

formed of such

particles,

respectively, in the function/,

Terms which do not involve x y


l

,z 1

these terms together evidently

give

f(x,
(2)

Terms which do not involve x,y,z: these terms give


/(!,

(3)

y, z, x, y, z, x, y, z).

Terms which

2/j,

z 1} x lt

y l} zlt x lt y l}

z\).

are linear in x lt y lt z lt x lt ly z lt x lt
y

y lt

when the

expression ^mf(x,
formed, the summation being taken
over all the particles of the body, these terms will vanish in
consequence of
the relations
y, z, x, y, z, x, y, z) is

^mx =
l

0,

Sray!

0,

S mz =
t

0.

The dynamical

122

We have

of bodies

specification

[CH.

therefore the equation

^mf(x,

y, z, x, y, z, x, y, z)

(x lt y,, z lt
+/(>

x,, y,,

V>

z>

x>

z lt x,, y,, z,}


y>

z, 5, y,

z)

Sw,

and consequently the value of the expression 2m/, taken with


respect to
any system of coordinate axes, is equal to its value taken with respect to a
parallel set of axes

through the centre of gravity of the body, together with


the mass of the body multiplied by the value of the function f at the centre
of gravity, taken with
respect to the original system of axes.

From this it immediately follows that the moments and products of inertia,
of a body with respect to any axes are equal to the corresponding moments and
products of inertia, with respect to a set of parallel axes through the centre of
gravity of the body, together with the corresponding moments and products
of inertia, with respect to the original axes, of a particle of mass equal to that

of

the body and placed at the centre of


gravity.
As an example of this result, let it be required to determine the moment

of inertia

M and

of a straight uniform rod of mass


It follows
perpendicular to the rod.

length I about a line through one extremity


from the last article that the moment of inertia
2
;

above

result,

60.

we

see that the required

moment

of inertia

and hence, applying the

is

Connexion between moments of inertia with respect

to different sets

of

axes through the same origin.

The

moments of inertia of
a given body with respect to any set of axes, when the moments of inertia
are already known with respect to a set of axes parallel to these.
We shall
now shew how the moments of inertia of a body with respect to any set of
result of the last article enables us to find the

rectangular axes can be found when the moments of inertia are known with
respect to another set of rectangular axes having the same origin.

Let A, B,

C, F, G,

H be

to a set of axes Oxyz,

the

and

having the same origin


respect to the other will

moments and products of inertia with respect


Ox y z be another set of rectangular axes

let

the direction-cosines of either set of axes with

be supposed to be given by the scheme

^
li

The dynamical

59, 60]

moments and products

If the

are denoted by A B
A = 2m(y + z where
,

F G

C",

),

123

of bodies

specification

Ox y z

of inertia with respect to the axes

we have

the summation

extended over

is

all

the particles of

the body,

= 2m {(I x + m y + n z) + (I x + m y + n z)
= 2m [x (l + } + y (m + w ) + z (n + n/) +
2

= 2m
= 2m

[x (m,
2

(y

{I,

mn

2yz (m 2 n.2

3)

+ n, ) + if (n + ) + z (I, + m ) - Zm^yz - ZnJ.zx - Zl^


+ z ) + m* (z + x + n (x + ) - Zmj^yz - Zn^zx - Zljn.xy

I,

r/

and similarly

B = A1 + Bm.? +

On? - 2Fm.2 n2 - 2Gn 2 2 - 2Hl.2 m,

C = Al, + Bm +

Cn.?

We

l.

- 2Fm n 3

2Gn,l3

- 2Hl m
3

have also

F = 2my z
= 2m (l^ + m y + n z] (I x + m y + n z)
=
2mx + m m 2my + n n 2mz + (m. n + m n
2

12 1 3

= ^ IJ, (B + G-A) +

>n

(n

2 l3

n 3 l2 )

m C + A - B) + i n. n
+ (w + m n,) F + (n.
3 (

2 i3

2)

2mzx +

(A

2 l3

m + m

(I 2

I3

2)

2mxy

+ B - C)
n z l2 }

G + (I m +
3

or

F = Al. + Bm m + Cn. n -F(m. n


2 l3

m n - G (I n.
3

2)

+-

l.M 3 )

- H(l. m 3
2

and similarly

-G =

Al,l,

+ Bm^n, +

Cn-.n,

-H = Al,L + Bm.in, + Cn,n

- F(m. n, + m,7i ) - G (I n + n^ - H
(l^ni, + I^m
- F(m,n + m^) - G (Ln, + l^) - H
(l^t,, + l^n,).
A

ls

3 ),

The quantities A B C F G
are thus determined; these results,
combined with those of the last article, are sufficient to determine the
moments and products of inertia of a given
body with respect to any set of
,

rectangular axes when the moments and products of inertia with respect to
any other set of rectangular axes are known.
If the origin of coordinates is at the centre of
gravity of the body, prove
of inertia with respect to three
mutually orthogonal

Example.
that the

moments and products

and intersecting

lines

whose coordinates are

(l\i

where A\

"h,

i>

Xj, Mi,

"i),

(1 2

A + Jf^S + rf+vft

are

0",

etc.

<i,

n 2 X 2 ^,

and

2 ),

F M (X
-

(? 3 ,

X 3 + M:

3>

/X3

%,

I,

have the sarue values as above and

X3

/x 3

i/

3)

2J, 3 ) etc.,

is

the mass of the


(Coll.

Exam.)

The dynamical

124

of bodies

specification

The principal axes of inertia ; Cauchys momental


If now we consider the quadric surface whose equation

61.

where A, B,

0, F,

G, H

Cz*

ellipsoid.

1,

-<LFyz-

body with respect to the axes of reference Oxyz,

it

is

2Gzx - 2Hxy =
are the moments and products of

+ By +

Ax-

[OH.

inertia of a given

follows from the equation

that the reciprocal of the square of any radius vector of the quadric is equal
to the moment of inertia of the body about this radius.
The quadric is
therefore the same whatever be the axes of reference provided the origin
is

unchanged, and consequently

axes

Ox y z having

where

its

equation referred to any other rectangular

the same origin

is

A a? + B f- + C z* - ZF y z - ZG z x - IR x y =
A B C F G H are the moments and products
,

of inertia with

respect to these axes.

This quadric

is

called the

momental

ellipsoid of the

body at the point

principal axes are called the principal axes of inertia of the body at
the equation of the quadric referred to these axes contains no product-terms,
its

and therefore the products of inertia with respect

them

to

are zero

and

moments

the

moments

of inertia with respect to these axes are called the principal


inertia
of the body at the point 0*.
of

The momental
regard to

its

Example.
of its base.

62.

We

ellipsoid is also called the ellipsoid of inertia

centre

is

another

ellipsoid,

which

is

its polar reciprocal with


sometimes called the ellipsoid of gyration.

The height of a solid homogeneous


Shew that its momental ellipsoid at

Calculation of the angular


shall

right circular cone

the vertex

momentum of a moving

now shew how the angular momentum

is

half the radius

a sphere.

is

of a

rigid body.

moving

about any line, at any instant of its motion, can be determined.


Let
be the mass of the body, (x, y, z) the coordinates of

rigid

its

body

centre of

gravity G, and (u, v, w) the components of velocity of the point G, at the


instant t, resolved along any (fixed or moving) rectangular axes Oxyz whose

and let (oj 1; 2


be the components of the angular
3)
body about G, resolved along axes Gx y z parallel to the axes
Oxyz and passing through G. Let m denote a typical particle of the body,
and let (x, y, z) be its coordinates and (u, v, w) its components of velocity at
the instant t and write
origin

is

fixed;

<u

&>

velocity of the

x
U
*

= x + xi,
U +
11^

y = y
V =

+ yi,
+V
l

=z+z
W=W+W
z

The existence of principal axes was discovered by Euler, Mem. de Berl., 1750, 1758, and by
A. Segner, Specimen Th. Turbinum, 1755. The momental ellipsoid was introduced by Cauchy
in 1827, Exerc. de math. i. p. 93.
J.

The dynamical

61, 62]

so in virtue of the properties of the centre of gravity

2m^j =
moreover since

U
it

0,

Vl

y^w^,

we have

Sm^j =

0,

we have

17)

=Z w

^myj =

125

of bodies

s2)ecification

=X

o>

2 l &)j

W =y
l

(0 l

follows that

Sm^! =

If A 3 denotes the angular


have therefore

h3

mw = 0.

Sravj s= 0,

0,

momentum

of the

= Sm (xv yu)
= 2m {(x + #,) (v + Wj) - (y + yj (u + u,)}
= 2m (xv yu) + 2w (x^ y^iii)
= M (xv yu) + 2m (X^W x z a) y^z^w* + y^w^)
= M (xv yu) Gw Fw + C(D
A

C, F, G,

where A, B,

body about the axis Oz, we

H are the moments and products of inertia of

the body

with respect to the axes Gx-^y^.


Similarly the angular
are

momenta about

= M (yw
h? = M (zu
h

the axes

+ Aw

Ha)

Hw

zv}

xw}

Gco 3

n
_

+ Bwo

Ox and Oy

Fo) 3

respectively

The angular momentum about any other line through the origin can be
found ( 39) by resolving these angular momenta along the line in question.
If the body is constrained to turn round one of its
points,
fixed in space, it is unnecessary to introduce the centre of
gravity.
&) 3 ) be the
o) 2
components of the angular velocity of the body

Corollary.

which
For

is

let

(&>!,

about the fixed point with respect to any rectangular axes (fixed or
moving)
which have the fixed point as origin, and let A, B, C, F, G,
denote the
moments and products of inertia with respect to these axes. The com

ponents of velocity
coordinates are

(u, v,

w) with respect to these axes of a particle

(x, y, z) are

and the angular

in

whose

(17)

momentum

about the axis of

z,

which

is

2m

(xv

yu}, can

therefore be written in the form

Sm
or

Similarly the angular


respectively are

momenta
A(i) l

and

of the

Hw

body about the axes of x and y


Gu>

126

The dynamical

of bodies

specification

[on.

Calculation of the kinetic energy of a moving rigid


body.

63.

The kinetic energy of a rigid body which is in motion can be calculated


same way as the angular momenta. If the- general theorem obtained

in the

59 is applied to the case in which the polynomial


f(x, y, z, x, y, z, x, y, z)
has the form (x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ), we
immediately obtain the result that the kinetic
in

is equal to the kinetic


energy of a moving rigid body of mass
energy of a
mass
which
moves
with
the
centre of gravity
particle of
of the body, together
with the kinetic energy of the motion
of the body relative to its centre of

gravity.

To determine the

kinetic energy of the motion of the

body

relative to its

centre of gravity G, take any rectangular axes (whose directions


may be fixed
or moving) having their origin at G; let
be
the
1;
2
3)
components of
the angular velocity of the body about 0, relative to these axes, and let
&>

o>

(a>

denote the coordinates of a typical particle


of the body referred
The components of velocity of the particle parallel to these
axes, in the motion relative to G, are (17)
(x, y, z)

to these axes.

and therefore the kinetic energy of the motion relative


gravity

to the

centre of

is

or

2m

(Aw,-

where A, B,

C, F,

\(za>

- yo

+ Bw.?

+
+ Co)./ 2

s}

- zco^ + (y Wl xca^-},
2Fco
1&
2

(.v<o

2 (,) 3

2&>

G, H are the moments and

&>

2#&>

>,),

products of inertia relative to

the axes.

This expression may (by use of 60) be interpreted as half the


square
of the resultant angular velocity of the body in the motion relative to the
centre of gravity, multiplied by the moment of inertia of the
body about
the instantaneous axis of rotation in this motion.
If one of the points of the
body is fixed in space, it is not
For let (co 1} 2
necessary to introduce the centre of gravity.
3 ) denote the
resolved
components of angular velocity of the body about the fixed point

Corollary.

a>

&>

along any rectangular axes (fixed or moving) Oxyz which have the point
as origin, and let (x, y, z} be the coordinates of a
of the
typical particle
to
referred
these
axes.
The
of
of the
body
components

velocity

are

zo) 2

and

particle

17)

so as before

where A, B,

we

yo) 3

xais

zw^

yw

xo) z

see that the kinetic


energy of the motion

C, F, G,

H denote the

body with respect to the axes Oxyz.

moments and products

is

of inertia of the

The dynamical

63, 64]

specification

of bodies

127

From

this it follows that if one of the coordinate axes


say the axis of x
the instantaneous axis of rotation of the body, the kinetic energy is
^Aa)^; and hence, since the directions of the axes can be arbitrarily chosen,
the kinetic energy of any body moving about one of its points, which is fixed,
is

2
^/&) where / is the
axis of rotation, and

is

moment

&>

is

of inertia of the body about the instantaneous

the angular velocity of the body about this axis.

lamina can turn freely about a horizontal axis in its own plane, and the
Example.
axis turns about a fixed vertical line, which it intersects.
If
be the azimuth of the
horizontal axis, and
the inclination of the plane of the lamina to the vertical, shew that
(f>

the kinetic energy

is

where A, B, Zf are the moments and product of inertia of the lamina about the horizontal
and a perpendicular to it at the point of intersection with the vertical. (Coll. Exam.)

axis

64.

Independence of the motion of the centre of gravity and the motion

relative to

The

it.

shews that the kinetic energy of a moving


can
be
as
body
regarded
consisting of two parts, of which one depends on the
motion of the centre of gravity and the other is the kinetic energy of the motion
relative to the centre of gravity. We shall now shew that these two
parts of
the motion of the body can be treated quite independently of each other*.
result of the last article

Let a rigid body of mass


forces

As coordinates defining

coordinates

(x, y, z)

be in motion under the influence of


any
its position we can take the three
rectangular

of its centre of gravity G, relative to axes fixed in


space,

and the three Eulerian angles (6, 0, i/r) which specify the
position, relative
to axes fixed in direction, of any three
lines,
orthogonal
intersecting in G,
which are fixed in the body and move with it. The kinetic
energy is therefore

T=
where f(0,

0, &,

0,

M (x* + p + *) +/(B,

0,

+,

e,

0, ^),

0, ^) denotes the kinetic energy of the motion relative

to G.

Let
denote the work done on the body by the external forces in an
arbitrary dis
placement (Bx, By, Bz, B0, 80, 8^r) of the body. The Lagrangian equations of
motion are

MX = X, My =

Y,

Mz = Z,

<*L

dt

di

80
df

dt
*

Euler, Scientia navalis,

i.

(1749),

128.

The dynamical

128
The

specification

of bodies

[CH.

three of these equations shew that the motion of the centre of


gravity of
body is the same as that of a particle of mass equal to the whole
mass of the body, under the influence of forces equivalent to the total external
first

the

forces acting on the body, applied to the particle parallel to their actual
directions since the work done on such a
particle in an arbitrary displace
ment would evidently be
Bx + YBy + Z8z.
;

The second three equations shew that

the motion

of the body about

its

centre of gravity is the same as if the centre of gravity were fixed and the
body
subjected to the action of the same forces for in the motion relative to the
centre of gravity, the kinetic energy of the body is f(6,
and
-^r, 6, $, i^),
the work done by the forces in an arbitrary displacement is
;

<f>,

+
These results are evidently true also

<J>S

for impulsive motion.

If a plane rigid body (e.g. a disc of


any shape) is in motion in
its mass,
y) are the coordinates of its centre of gravity,
6 the angle made by a line fixed in the body with a line fixed in the
plane,
2
the moment of inertia of the body about its centre of
gravity, and if
(A F) are the total components parallel to the axes of the external forces

Corollary.

its plane,

and

if (x,

Mk
,

acting on the body, and L the moment of the external forces about the centre
of gravity, then the kinetic energy is

\M (x + y- + k*fr\
2

and the work done by the external

forces in a displacement (Bx,


By, 86)

is

and therefore the equations of motion of the body are

MX = X, My = Y, M&0 = L.
Example.

Obtain one of the equations of motion of a rigid body in two dimensions

in

the form

the mass of the body, / is the acceleration of its centre of


gravity, p is the
perpendicular from the origin upon this vector, J/F is the moment of inertia about the
origin, 6 is the angle made by a line fixed in the body with a line fixed in its plane, and L
is the moment about the origin of the external forces.
(Coll. Exam.)

where

is

The dynamical

64]

129

of bodies

specification

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.

1.

homogeneous right circular cone

the length of a slant side

and that

its

moment

is

I.

Shew that

moment

its

semi-vertical angle

is

/3,

and

of inertia about its axis is

(l-f

sin 2 /3),

of inertia about a generator is

Shew that the moment

2.

mass M;

moment

of inertia about a line through its vertex perpendicular to its axis is

f
atid its

of

is

its

by the two loops

of inertia of the area enclosed

of the

lemniscate

r2

about the axis of the curve

(37r

Any number

3.

distances apart o?12


i2, ..., prove that

cos20

is

8)
-

a2

x mass of area.

of particles are in one plane; if the


the relative descriptions of area A 12 ,

...,

masses are
...,

and the

Wj,

...,

their

relative velocities-

are respectively the moment of inertia about the centre of inertia, the angular momentum
about the centre of inertia, and the kinetic energy relative to the centre of inertia.
(Coll.

Prove that the

4.

moment

of inertia of a hollow cubical box about

the centre of gravity of the box and perpendicular to one of the faces

where

is

the mass of the box and 2a the length of an edge.

The

Shew

where a

is

an axis through

is

sides of the

supposed to be thin.
5.

(Coll.

that the

moment

of inertia of

the radius of the generating


and p is the density.

an anchor-ring about

circle, c is

its

the distance of

axis

its

Exam.)

box are

Exam.)

is

centre from the axis

of the anchor-ring,

Shew how

6.

body, and

if

there

what point, if any, a given straight line is a principal axis of


such a point find the other two principal axes through it.

to find at
is

a-

A uniform square lamina is bounded by the axes of x and y and the lines x=2c, y = 2c,
and a corner is cut off it by the line xja+y/b = 2. Shew that the two principal axes at
the centre of the square which are in
given by

its

own plane

- -

ab
tan 20 = -

2c
j-

(a- 6)
7.

are inclined to the axis of

Shew that the envelope

moment

(a

+b

of lines in the plane of

w. D.

at angle?

(Coll.

Exam.)

2c)

an area about which that area has a


and hyperbolas. Hence find the

of inertia is a set of confocal ellipses


direction of the principal axes at any point.

constant

(Coll.

Exam.)
9

The dynamical

130
8.

rectum

[CH.

Find the principal moments of inertia at the vertex of a parabolic lamina, latus
4a, bounded by a line perpendicular to the axis at a distance h from the vertex.

Prove that,
is

of bodies

specification

two principal axes at the point on the parabola whose abscissa

if 15A>28,

-a + (a 2 - 4aA/5 +3A 2/7)i

are the tangent and normal.

(Coll.

Exam.)

Find how the principal axes of inertia are arranged in a plane body. Write down
the conditions that particles m^ at (x ?/,-), where z =l, 2, ...,
may be equimomental to a
given plate. Shew that the six quantities m 1 m 2 &\, x 2 y^ y 2 can be eliminated from
9.

these conditions.
If three equal particles are

formed by them

is

equimomental to a given plate, the area of the triangle


3 ^/3/2 times the product of the
principal radii of gyration at the

centre of gravity.

Exam.)

(Coll.

uniform lamina bounded by the ellipse b 2x2 + a 2y 2 =


has an elliptic hole
(semi-axes c, d) in it whose major axis lies in the line x=y, the centre being at a
distance r from the origin
prove that if one of the principal axes at the point (x, y)
makes an angle 6 with the axis of x, then
10.

aW

tan 26 =

Sabxy

ab [4

(x*

~ d^

(x

^ ~ ^ ^ ~^
(

2 - cd
y*) + a
&*]
[2

"

(x

r)

~
2

r)

(c

-2

~
(y

^} ^2

r)

Exam.)

(Coll.

system of bodies or particles is moved or deformed in any way, shew that


the sum of the products of the mass of each particle into the
square of its displacement
is equal to the product of the mass of the
system into the square of the projection in any
given direction of the displacement of the centre of gravity, together with the sum of the
products of the masses of the particles into the squares of the distances through which
11.

If a

they must be moved in order to bring them to their final positions after communicating
them a displacement equal to the projection in the given direction of the displacement

to

of the centre of gravity.

The

(Fouret.)

moments of inertia of a body at its centre of gravity are (A, B, G )


if a small mass, whose moments of inertia referred to these axes are
(A B C ), be added
to the body, shew that the moments of inertia of the
compound body about its new
principal axes at its new centre of gravity are
12.

principal

A+A
accurately to the

first

B+B

C+C

order of small quantities.

(Hoppe.)

Shew

that the principal axes of a given material system at


any point are the
normals to the three quadrics which pass through the point and
belong to a certain
confocal system.
13.

If (I, m,
X, /*, i/) be the six coordinates of a principal axis and the associated
Cartesian system be the principal axes at the centre of
gravity, then shew that
,,

A l\ + Bmp. + Cnv = 0,
and therefore

all

principal axes of a given system belong to a quadratic complex.


(Coll.

Exam.)

smoothly jointed framework is in the form of a parallelogram formed bv


attaching the ends of a pair of rods of mass m and length 2a to those of a pair of rods of
mass m and length 26. Masses
are attached to each of the four corners.
Express the
14.

angular momentum of the system about the origin of coordinates, in terms of the
coordinates (A; y) of the centre of gravity and the
between the two pairs of
angles 6 and
<

sides

and the axis of x.

(Coll.

Exam.)

CHAPTER

VI

THE SOLUBLE PROBLEMS OF RIGID DYNAMICS


The motion of systems with one degree of freedom

65.

fixed axis,

We

motion round

etc.

now proceed

to apply the principles which have been developed in


the foregoing chapters in order to determine the motion of holonomic systems
of rigid bodies in those cases which admit of solution by quadratures.

systems which have only one degree of


42) that such a system is immediately soluble by

It is natural to consider first those

We

freedom.

quadratures

have seen

when

and this principle is


Sometimes, however (e.g. when

possesses an integral of energy:

it

most cases.
which one of the surfaces or curves of con
straint is forced to move in a given manner), the problem as originally formu
lated does not possess an integral of energy, but can be reduced (e.g. by the

sufficient for the integration in


we are dealing with systems in

theorem of

when

29) to another problem for which the integral of energy holds


been performed, the problem can be integrated as
;

this reduction has

before.

The
(i)

following examples will illustrate the application of these principles.

Motion of a rigid body round a fixed

axis.

Consider the motion of a single rigid body which is free to turn about an axis, fixed in
the body and in space. Let / be the moment of inertia of the body about the axis, so that
/0 2 where 6 is the angle made by a moveable plane, passing through
its kinetic energy is
,

the axis and fixed in the body, with a plane passing through the axis and fixed in space.
Let 6 be the moment round the axis of all the external forces acting on the body, so that
$ is the work done by these forces in the infinitesimal displacement which changes 6 to
6 -\-

The Lagrangian equation

fid.

of motion

d_

SVT\ _ dT_

dt\ti)
then gives

which

is

dd~

IB = 0,

a differential equation of the second order for the determination of

G.

92

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

132

If the forces are conservative,

and V

[CH. vi

denotes the potential energy, this equation

(6}

becomes

-^
80

10=

which on integration gives the equation of energy

$I6
Integrating again,

and

this relation

V(ff)

= c,

where

c is

a constant.

we have

= I\

between 9 and

being determined by the

The most important

f{2 (c

V}}

"%dd

+ constant,

determines the motion, the two constants of integration

initial conditions.

that in which gravity is the only external force, and the


let G be the centre of gravity of the body, C the foot of
The potential energy is
the perpendicular drawn from G to the axis, and let CG = h.
is the mass of the body and 6 is the angle made by CG with the
Mgh cos 0, where
case

is

In this case

axis is horizontal.

downward

vertical

and the equation

of motion is

This is the same as the equation of motion of a simple pendulum of length J/Mh, and
the motion can therefore be expressed in terms of elliptic functions as in
44, the solution
being of the form
.

sin
in the oscillatory case,

--

6
= A sn
,

and of the form

in the circulating case.

The quantity IjMh

is

called the length of the equivalent simple

pendulum.
If
be a point on the line CG such that OC=IjMh, the points
and C are called
curious result in this
respectively the centre of oscillation and the centre of suspension.
connexion is that the centre of oscillation and the centre of suspension are convertible,
is the centre of oscillation when C is the centre of suspension, then C will be
i.e. if

the centre of oscillation when

have by

is

the centre of suspension.

To prove

this result,

we

59

Moment

of inertia of the

Moment

body about

of inertia about

G + M. GO 2

and therefore we have

Moment

of inertia of

2
2
_ I- Mh + M (I/Mh - A)

body about

IjMh - h

Distance of centre of gravity from

If therefore the

body were suspended from


v

6+

0, the equation of

motion would

still

be

Mqh sin =
0,
.

J-

which establishes the result. It is evident that the period of


same about either of the points C and 0.

oscillation

would be the

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

65]
(ii)

Motion of a rod on which an

133

insect is crawling.

We shall next study the motion of a straight uniform rod, of mass m .and length 2a,
whose extremities can slide on the circumference of a smooth fixed horizontal circle of
radius c an insect of mass equal to that of the rod is supposed to crawl along the rod at
;

a constant rate v relative to the rod.

Let 6 be the angle made by the rod at time t with some fixed direction, and let x be
the distance traversed by the insect from the middle point of the rod.
The kinetic
2

c2

#2

(2a35-1

and the kinetic energy of the insect

is

due to

a component of velocity {x - (c2 - a 2 ) 2 0} along the rod and a component of velocity xB


perpendicular to the rod, so the total kinetic energy of the system is

there

is

no potential energy.

Since x=vt,

(t

being measured from the epoch

T= \m (c
The coordinate

6,

which

- 2a2/3)

is

now

when x

is zero),

+ \m {v - (c 2 - a 2 )^ 0} 2 +

the only coordinate,

we have

mv*t*0\

is igriorable,

and we have therefore

= constant,

or

(c 2

0-m (c

-|- )

or

0(2c
Integrating this equation,

- a 2 )^

{v

t;

- (c 2 - a

2 2
i!

)* 0}

+ mv2

= constant,

= constant.

we have

#-0
where

arctan

{vt (2c

-|a

},

and k are constants. This formula determines the position of the rod at any time.

(iii)

Motion of a cone on a perfectly rough inclined plane.

Consider now the motion of a homogeneous solid right circular cone, of mass
and
/3, which moves on a perfectly rough plane (i.e. a plane on which
only
Let I be the
rolling without sliding can take place) inclined at an angle a to the horizon.
be the angle between the generator which is
length of a slant side of the cone, and let
in contact with the plane at time t and the line of greatest slope downwards in the
plane.
semi-vertical angle

^ be the angle made by the axis of the cone with the upward vertical, ^ is one
whose vertices represent respectively the normal to the plane,
the upward vertical, and the axis of the cone ; the other two sides are a and
the

Then

if

side of a spherical triangle

angle included by these sides being

(TT

- 0}.

cos x = cos a sin

ft

We

(?),

have therefore.

sin a cos

ft

cos

but the vertical height of the centre of gravity of the cone above its vertex is I cos ft cos
^,
and the potential energy of the cone is Mg x this height if therefore we denote by V the
;

potential energy of the cone,

we have

V=

(disregarding a constant term)

^Mgl sin a

cos 2

ft

cos

0.

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

134

We

[CH. vi

have next to calculate the kinetic energy of the cone for this the moments of
about its axis and about a line through the vertex perpendicular to the
axis are required
these are easily found (by direct integration, regarding the cone as
;

inertia of the cone


:

^MP

sin 2 /3 and
discs perpendicular to its axis) to be
J/7 2 (cos 2 /3 + Jsin 2 /3)
moment
of
inertia
about
a
and
so
the
theorem of
60
the
is,
generator
respectively,
by
(since the direction-cosines of the generator can be taken to be sin ft, 0, cos $ with respect

composed of

to rectangular axes at the vertex, of

MV
all

z is

+ ^MP sin
Jft 2 sin 2 0(cos 2
+ i).

or

Now

which the axis of

2
2
1
(cos ft + sin ft) sin
2

points of that generator which

ft

in contact

is

the axis of the cone),

2
ft

cos 2

ft,

with the plane are instantaneously

at rest, since the motion is one of pure rolling, and therefore this generator is the
If w denotes the angular velocity of the
instantaneous axis of rotation of the cone.

cone about this generator, the kinetic energy of the cone


jj-

But

15)

MP sin

2
ft

(cos

2
ft

+ J)

w2

is

therefore

63, Corollary)

we have
a)

and substituting

this value for

o>,

=6

cot

we have

ft,

finally for the kinetic

energy

of the cone

the value

T=%MP cos
The Lagrangian equation

becomes therefore

is

ft

(cos

of motion

in this case
2
2
| Ml* cos ft (cos

This

ft

+ Mgl sin a cos2 ft sin 6 = 0,

the same as the equation of motion of a simple


I

cosec a (cos

2
ft

pendulum

of length

the integration can therefore be effected in terms of elliptic functions, as in


(iv)

44.

Motion of a rod on a rotating frame.

Consider next the motion of a heavy uniform rod, whose ends are constrained to move
in horizontal and vertical grooves respectively, when the framework containing the grooves
is

made

to rotate with constant angular velocity

co

about the line of the vertical groove.

Let 2a be the length of the rod,


its mass, and 6 its inclination to the vertical.
of
the
allowed for by adding to the potential energy
the
effect
rotation
be
29,
may
By
a term

where p is the density of the rod and x denotes distance measured from the end of the rod
which is in the vertical groove integrating, this term can be written
;

The term

in the potential

energy due to gravity

Mga
and the

is

cos

6,

V is therefore given by the equation


V= - Mga cos d - % Jfo*a* sin 2 6.

total potential energy

The

horizontal and vertical components of velocity of the centre of gravity of the rod
motion of the
$, so the part of the kinetic energy due to the

are a sin 6 6 and a cos 6


.

is

about

its

centre

its

centre

is

\Ma?6

z
;

inertia of the rod

The

integral of energy

therefore

is

Ma
or,

and since the moment of

the part of the kinetic energy due to the rotation of the rod about
It Ma?,
2 2
6
Ma
we have therefore for the total kinetic energy T the equation
J

centre of gravity
is

135

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

65]

62

Mga cos 6

2
M<o

a 2 sin 2 6 = constant,

writing

where

this constant must evidently be positive, since x 2 and


is not very large and that
suppose for definiteness that
than unity, so that x oscillates between the values 3^/4aco 2
e

denotes a constant

We

are positive.
is less

To

shall

x2 )

(1

3<7/4or

e/&>.

integrate this equation,

we write*

#=!+.
^8a
where

a new dependent
we have

o>

+
^12

Substituting this value for x in the differential

variable.

is

equation,

64

18"

where the values

correspond respectively to the values

it is

easily seen that

ei+e 2 + e 3

is

zero

and that

el

>e

2 >e 3 .

We have therefore =
+ y), where the function is formed with the roots e e 2 es
lies between e 2 and e3 for
and where y denotes a constant. Since
e^, and (P (<+y)
real values of t (since x lies between 3#/4co 2 and 3^/4aa) 2 + e/a)), the imaginary part of
the real part of y can then be taken as zero,
the constant y must be the half-period
|jf>

(<

} ,

$>

e^~>

e<{>

e/o>

o>

since

it

;!

depends only on the choice of the origin of time.

We

have therefore

and hence

this equation determines ^ in


(v)

Motion of a

disc,

terms of

<.

one of whose points

is

forced

to

move in a given manner.

Consider next the motion of a disc of mass M. resting on a perfectly smooth horizontal
when one of the points A of the disc is constrained to describe a circle of radius c

plane,

in the horizontal plane,


*

Cf.

with uniform angular velocity

Whittaker and Watson,

o>.

Course of Modern Analysis, % 20

6.

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

136
G

be the centre of gravity of the disc, and let A G be of length a. The acceleration
A is of magnitude cw 2 and is directed along the inward normal to the circle
therefore we impress an acceleration cw 2 directed along the outward normal to the
Let

of the point
if

[OH. vi

on all the particles of the body and suppose that A is at rest, we shall obtain the
motion relative to A. The resultant force acting on the body in this motion relative to A

circle,

is

therefore

2
J/co>

acting at

outward normal to the

in a direction parallel to the

circle.

Let 6 and
be the angles made with a fixed direction in the plane by the line AG and
the outward normal to the circle respectively then the work done by this force in a small
;

displacement 86

is
2
Mca>

sin (0

<9)

8<9,

and the kinetic energy of the body is i J/ 2# 2 where Mk2 is the moment of
The Lagrangian equation of motion is therefore
body about the point A
,

inertia of the

Mm = Macrf
But

since

=
a>,

= 0;

we have

so

^ be

if

sin (0

- 6\

written for (6

acco 2

^+-p-sm^

0),

we have

= 0.

This is the same as the equation of motion of a simple pendulum of length k2


the integration can therefore be performed by means of elliptic functions as in
44.

gjaca>

(vi)

Motion of a disc rolling on a constrained disc and linked

to

2
;

it.

Consider the motion of two equal circular discs, of radius a and mass J/, with edges
perfectly rough, which are kept in contact in a vertical plane by means of a link (in the
form of a uniform bar of mass m) which joins their centres the centre of one disc is fixed,
:

and

constrained to rotate with uniform angular acceleration a


to determine the motion of the other disc B and the link.
this disc

is

it is

required

be the angle which the link makes with the downward vertical at time t, and
Let
be the angle turned through at time t by the disc A. The angular velocity of disc A
0, and the velocities of the points of the discs which are instantaneously in contact are

let 6
is

Since the velocity of the centre of the disc B is 20, it follows that the
angular velocity of the disc B about its centre is 20-0. Since the moment of inertia of
each disc about its centre is i Ma 2 the kinetic energy of the system is
therefore each a@.

+ lM.
T=M.^V
m
and

= at +

The

f,

where

f is

a constant.

potential energy of the system

F=

is

(2M+m) ag cos 0,

and the Lagrangian equation of motion

is

(o_T\_

<ti\d<p)

dT__dV
~
80

80

Ma*0}= - (2J/ + wi) ag

sin 0.

- J/a 2a + (2 M+ m) ag sin

= 0.

J/u 2 n0

= c,

j {(6Af+f m) a 0-

or

m.~&o

*-(2$-eT- + lM.(2a?<tf +

iu

Since d = a, this equation gives


(6

Integrating,

M+ 1 m) a

we have
2
(3J/+ % m) a (fi-

(2J/+ m) ag cos

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

65, 66]

137

are
a constant depending on the initial conditions and as the variables t and
by a quadrature: this final integral
determines the motion.

where

c is

</>

separable, this equation can again be integrated

Example.

If the

system

at rest with the bar vertically downwards, shew

is initially

that the bar will reach the horizontal position

66.

if

The motion of systems with two degrees of freedom.

In the dynamics of rigid bodies, as in the dynamics of a particle, the


possibility of solving by quadratures a problem with two degrees of freedom
The integral
generally depends on the presence of an ignorable coordinate.
corresponding to the ignorable coordinate can often be interpreted physically
momentum. The formation and

as an integral of momentum or angular


solution of the differential equations is

by application of the
this will be shewn by the

effected

principles developed in the preceding chapters

following illustrative examples.

Hod passing

(i)

through ring.

Consider, as a first example, the motion of a uniform straight rod which passes through
a small fixed ring on a horizontal plane, being able to slide through the ring or turn in any
way about it in the plane.

rod
its

Let the distance from the ring to the middle point of the rod at time t be r, and let the
make an angle 6 with a fixed line in the plane let 21 be the length of the rod, and
mass.

The moment
is

of inertia of the rod about its middle point

is

\ MP, and the kinetic energy

therefore

there

is

no potential energy.

The coordinate

is

ignorable,

and the corresponding integral

dT =
r

is

constant,

vB
or

>2

(?

The

+ %l-) 6 = constant.

integral of energy is
;,2 _|_

,.202

_|_

^ I lfri

_ cons tant.

Dividing the second of these integrals by the square of the

first,

we have

dry
1

dft)

or

B + constant

where

{(r

+}

I )

(cr*

+ J cl 2 - 1 )}

4 dr.

1
Writing cr = s, this becomes

+ constant =

{4s (s

+ \ cP)

+ J cP - 1 )}

* ^s.

C 1S

a constant

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

138

If therefore
g>

denotes the Weierstrassian elliptic function with the roots

which

satisfy the relation e }

since

dr
>e

>e

3 if

positive,

constant $

The

we have

-^

is

0>(0-0

gj

)>

we have

sufficiently great initially,

(0-

s=ft>

is

[CH. vi

ei

where

is

a constant of integration

and consequently the

for real values of 0,

is real.

solution of the problem

is

therefore contained in the equation

0^e cylinder rolling on another under gravity.

(ii)

Let it now be required to determine the motion of a perfectly rough heavy solid
homogeneous cylinder of mass m and radius r, which rolls inside a hollow cylinder of mass
and radius R, which in turn is free to turn about its axis (supposed horizontal).

Let
<j)

denote the angle which the plane through the axes of the cylinders at time

makes with the downward vertical, and let 6 be the angle through which the cylinder of
mass
has turned since some fixed epoch. The angular velocities of the cylinders about
their axes are easily seen to be 6 and {(R
r}
R6}jr respectively and the moments of
inertia of the cylinders about their axes are MB? and \ mr 2 respectively
so the kinetic

energy

T of the

system

given by the equation

is

i m (R - r? A*
while the potential energy

is

given by the equation

F=
The coordinate 6

is

mg (R

clearly ignorable

dT =
r

r)

cos$.

the integral corresponding to

it is

constant,

30

MR^ -\mR{(R-r)4>-RQ} = k,

or

The

where k

is

a constant.

where h

is

a constant,

integral of energy is

T+

\MRW + }m{(R - r)

or

V=/i,

- BflY+m (R - r) 2

2
tf>

mg

(R -

r}

cos

= h.

Eliminating 6 between the two integrals, we obtain the equation

m (3J/+m)
This

is

the same as the equation of energy of a simple pendulum of length


(l

the solution can be effected by


(iii)

We

Rod moving

means

of elliptic functions as in

44.

in a free circular frame.

shall next consider the motion of a rod, whose ends can slide
freely on a smooth
vertical circular ring, the ring being free to turn about its vertical
diameter, which is fixed.

139

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

66]

be the mass of the ring and r


be the mass of the rod and 2a its length let
let 6 be the inclination of the rod to the horizontal, and $ the azimuth of the
ring referred to some fixed vertical plane, at any time t.
Let

its

radius

The moment of inertia of the rod about an axis through the centre of the ring
2
2
perpendicular to its plane is m(r
fa ), and the moment of inertia of the rod about the
The kinetic energy of the
vertical diameter of the ring is r{(r 2 -a 2 ) sin 2 5 + Ja 2 cos 2 0}.
system

therefore

is

T=\m (r
The

potential energy

- a2 )

+ } Mr^ + lmty (r2 sin 2 6 - a 2 sin 2 6 + J a 2 cos 2 0).

is

V
The coordinate

is

mg

evidently ignorable

<p

dT=

)i

(r

cos

6.

the corresponding integral

is

constant,

d<j>

or

Mr2 +

(j>

where k

is

m<j)

2
(r sin

6 - a 2 sin 2 6 + \a 2 cos 2 6)

Substituting the value of

a constant.

= k,

found from this equation in the

integral of energy

T+

V=h,

we have
lm

(r

- f a2) G 2

h + mg

(r

x.

a 2 ) a cos

-1
-

2
2
(r sin

k2
9
^ - a 2 sin 2

-- ....

&
\Mi + m

0+^a2 cos
,

2~m
2

5)

In this equation the variables 6 and t are separable


a further integration will
therefore give 6 in terms of t, and so furnish the solution of the problem.
;

(iv)

Hoop and

ring.

We shall

next discuss the motion of a system consisting of a uniform smooth circular


hoop of radius a, which lies in a smooth horizontal plane, and is so constrained that it can
only move by rolling on a fixed straight line in that plane, while a small ring whose mass
is 1/X that of the hoop slides on it.
The hoop is initially at rest, and the ring is projected

from the point furthest from the

fixed line with velocity

v.

Let

denote the angle turned through by the hoop after a time t from the commence
ment of the motion, and suppose that the diameter of the hoop which passes through the
ring has then turned through an angle \^. Taking the ring to be of unit mass, so that the
</>

hoop is X, the moment of inertia of the hoop about its centre is Xa 2 and this
moves with velocity 0, while the velocity of the ring is compounded of components
a$ and a\^, whose directions are inclined to each other at an angle \^. The kinetic energy

mass

of the

centre

of the system

is

therefore

T=
and the potential energy

The coordinate

is
<j)

is zero.

evidently ignorable, and the corresponding integral

cT
r

is

= constant,

80
or

(2X

+ 1) a- ^ + a 2 ^

cos

\/^

= the

= av.

initial

value of this expression

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

140

Integrating this equation,


(2X + 1)

(f>

[CH. vi

we have
vt
-=the

+ sin

initial

>//

value of this expression

=0,
vt

This equation determines

The equation

in

of energy

terms of

T
and substituting

for

its

Writing

value (v/a-cos-^-

this

.r,

value = 4*2

its initial

-j=
v v2X J
=
sin\^

\^.

is

+ l)

4-)/(2X

>

in this equation,

we have

becomes

--%=
v v^2X

+
P(2X
o

In order to evaluate this integral, we introduce an auxiliary variable

defined

by the

equation

u=

X
I

(2X + .r

2
)

Jo
Write x2 = 2X/, where |

which

is

new

variable

-4(1- .r 2

dx.

the last integral becomes

equivalent to

is

where the function

$>

()

is

formed with the roots

these roots are real and satisfy the inequality


ei for real values of u.

Now we

have

dt =

%=. (2X + #
vv/2X

JVKvdt
-

or

a
Integrating,

where

~
)

(u)

Thus

^2X

6i>e 2

)4

>e

so

is
$>(w)

real

and greater than

- a;2 ~ 4 dx.

2X

+ ^^-,

\du.

we have

denotes the Weierstrassian Zeta-function.

finally the coordinate

and

variable u by the equations

2X

the time

are expressed in terms of

an auxiliary

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

66, 67]
67.

141

Initial motions.

We have already explained in 32 the general principles used in finding


the initial character of the motion of a system which starts from rest at
The following examples will serve to illustrate the procedure
of
rigid bodies.
systems

a given time.
for

A particle hangs by a string of length b from a point in the circumference of a disc


(i)
The disc can turn about its axis, which is horizontal, and
of twice its mass and of radius a.
To find the
the diameter through the point of attachment of the string is initially horizontal.
initial

path of the

particle.

Let 6 denote the angle through which the disc has turned, and
string to the vertical,, at time t from the beginning of the motion

the inclination of the


let

m be the mass of the

The

horizontal and (downward) vertical coordinates of the particle with respect


to the centre of the disc are
particle.

a cos 6 + b

a sin 6 + b cos 0,

and

sin

so the square of the particle s velocity is

a2

+&

and the kinetic energy of the system

is

- 2ab sin

T= ma-6 + m&
z

-|

while the potential energy

(6

+ 0) 00,

mob sin

(6

+ 0) #0,

is

The Lagrangian equations

+ b cos 0).

(a sin 6

mg

of motion are

dt\d0

/dT\ _ dT_ _ 9 F

d_

dt\d(p/
2

J2

<9-a&cos

6 2 0-a6cos(0

are all zero

= 0,

these equations therefore give


initially
term gt 2/4a and that of
with a

so the expansion of 6 begins with a


hiher
suare of t. Assumin
higher than the square
Assuming

<9=gr/2a

term

30

+ 0)02 -#acos$

Initially the quantities 6, 0, 6,

and

c0

a& sin (0 + 0) = 0,
+ 0)0 + #6sin0-a6sin(0 + 0) 6 =0.

(0

= C + Dt* + Et+Ff< + ...,


t--

substituting in the

above

the coefficients A, B, C,

differential equations,

...

we thus

0-^+0.
4a

Now if x and y are the


vertical axes

through

x=a
and

ff

32a6

t,

we can evaluate

^
1920a6 2

coordinates of the particle referred to horizontal and


(downward)

its initial position,

(1

of

+...

*=

and equating powers

find

- cos 6} -

b sin

we have

= \ ad - 60 = -E2

approximately,

y = a sin 6 + b (cos 0-l)=a0=~, approximately.

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

142

Eliminating

and

this

is

[CH. vi

between these equations, we have

the required approximate equation of the path of the particle in the

neighbourhood of

its initial position.

A ring of mass m can slide freely on a uniform rod of mass and length 2a, which
(ii)
can turn about one end. Initially the rod is horizontal, with the ring at a distance ra from
To find the initial curvature of the path of the ring in space.
the fixed end.
Let (r, 6) denote the polar coordinates of the ring at time t, referred to the fixed end of
the rod and a horizontal initial line, 6 being measured downwards from the initial line.
For the kinetic and potential energies we have
4/7 2

T=%m(r* + rW}+%M.~6\

V=
The Lagrangian equations

mrg sin &

Mag sin

6.

of motion are

-._.
W~

~dtdf

dr

g sin 6 = 0,

r8 2

- Mga cos 6 - mgr cos


[f Ma*d + mr d + 2mrf0
and 6 are initially zero, we can assume expansions
z

<9

Since

r, 0,

= 0.

of the form

substituting these expansions in the differential equations, and equating coefficients of


powers of t, we find

_
~

coordinates of the particle, referred to horizontal and vertical axes at


position, are

The

x = r cos 6

x=(

or approximately

The curvature

of the path is given

and y = r sin

r
r

b^}

y=r

t*,

its initial

6,

6 2 12

by the equation

and on substituting the above values of


1

~~

This

is

62

and

Ma

(4a

9r

we have

3r

()

(Ma + mr

the required initial curvature of the path of the ring.

Two uniform rods AB, SC, of masses mi and m.2 and lengths a and b
turn round the point A, which is fixed.
are
freely hinged at B, and can
respectively,
Shew
vertical.
and
is horizontal
that, if C be released, the equation of
Initially,
nearer to G can be put in the form
of trisection of
of the
the initial
Example.

EC

AB

path

point

BC

f = 60 (1 + 2?n 2 /m

1)

abx.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

I,

1896.)

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

67, 68]

143

The motion of systems with three degrees of freedom.

68.

The possibility of solving by quadratures the motion of a system of rigid


bodies which has three degrees of freedom depends generally (as in the case
of systems with two degrees of freedom) either on the occurrence of ignorable
coordinates, giving rise to integrals of momentum and angular momentum, or
on a disjunction of the kinetic potential into parts which depend on the

coordinates separately.
(i)

The

following examples illustrate the procedure.

Motion of a rod in a given field of force.

Consider the motion of a uniform rod, of mass


and length 2a, which is free to move
on a smooth table, when each element of the rod is attracted to a fixed line of the table

with a force proportional to


Let

(#, y)

fixed line.

its

mass and

its

distance from the line.

be the coordinates of the middle point of the rod, and 6

The

kinetic energy

and the potential energy

its

inclination to the

is

is
11

r= ~

4<2

J -a

(y

+ rsm6} z dr,

V=pm(iy 2 + %a

or

The Lagrangian equations

where p

is

a constant,

$in 2 d).

of motion are therefore

#=0,
|

y
((20)

The

first

+ fi sin

w>

20 = 0.

two equations give

ct

+ d,

where c, d, /, e are constants of integration the centre of the rod therefore describes
a sine curve in the plane. The equation for 6 is of the pendulum type, and can be
;

integrated as in
(ii)

44.

Motion of a rod and cylinder on a plane.

We shall

next discuss the motion of a system consisting of a smooth solid


homogeneous
mass
and radius c, which is moveable on a smooth horizontal plane,

circular cylinder, of

mass m and length 2a, placed with its length in contact with
the cylinder, in a vertical plane perpendicular to the axis of the cylinder and
passing
through the centre of gravity of the cylinder, and with one extremity on the plane.

and a heavy straight

rail of

Let 6 be the inclination of the rail to the vertical, and x the distance traversed on the
plane by the line of contact of the cylinder and plane, at any time t. The coordinates of
the centre of the rod referred to horizontal and vertical axes, the origin
being the initial
point of contact of the cylinder and plane, are easily seen to be

ccot(\4

-)

+ asin$ and

acosd.

zj

Let

$ be the angle through which the cylinder has turned at time


of
the system is
energy

+ A ma 2 sin 2 6

d2 +

t.

The

MX

kinetic

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

144
The

potential energy

is

given by the equation

V=-

The coordinates x and

mga

ox

of x)

6.

the corresponding integrals are

constant

be interpreted as the integral of

may

cos

are evidently ignorable

<

ar =
(which

[CH. vi

momentum

of the system parallel to the axis

and
tiT

^ = constant

momentum

be interpreted as the integral of angular

(which

may

axis).

These integrals can be written

ic cosec 2 [ \4

+ a cos 6

2/

.
f-

+ Mx= constant,

2
c;

Substituting for

x and
</>

of the cylinder about its

<>

= constant.

the vahies obtained from these equations in the integral of

energy

T+ F= constant,
we have the equation
If

where d

6
,/TT
-kc cosec 2 - - -

This equation is again integrable, since the variables t and 6 are


form it gives the expression of 6 in terms of t the two
integrals found above then give x and $ in terms of t.
separable

is
;

a constant.

in its integrated

69.

Motion of a body about a fixed point under no forces.

One

of the most important problems in the dynamics of systems with

three degrees of freedom is that of determining the motion of a rigid body,


one of whose points
is fixed, when no external forces are
supposed to act*.
This problem is realised ( 64) in the motion of a rigid body relative to its
centre of gravity, under the action
through the centre of gravity.

of

any

forces

whose resultant passes

momentum of the body about every line which


the
fixed
passes through
point and is fixed in space is constant ( 40), and
the
line
consequently
through the fixed point for which this angular momen
In this system the angular

Let this line, which is called the


greatest value is fixed in space.
be
taken as axis OZ, and let
invariable line,
and
be two other axes
tum- has

its

OX

through the fixed point which are perpendicular to OZ and to each other.
The angular momenta about the axes OX and OF are zero, for if this were
not the case the resultant of the angular momenta about OX, OY, OZ would
give a line about which the angular momentum would be greater than the
*

Euler, Memoires de Berlin,

Annee

1758.

Elliptic functions were applied to the

by Eueb, Specimen inaugurale... (Utrecht, 1834)


Journal fur Math, xxxix. (1849), p. 293.
first

problem
and the solution was completed by Jacobi,

68,

momentum

angular

about OZ, which

OZ

angle 6 with

d cos

is

line

making an

through

where d denotes the angular

6,

It follows

contrary to hypothesis.

is

momentum about any

39) that the angular

145

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

69 J

momentum

about OZ.

is sufficiently specified by the


position of the body at any time t
knowledge of the positions at that time of its three principal axes of inertia
at the fixed point let these lines be taken as moving axes Oxyz let (6,
ty)

The

<f>,

denote the three Eulerian angles which specify the position of the axes Oxyz
with reference to the axes OXYZ, let (A, B, C) be the principal moments of
inertia of the

and

let
(&>

1( to 2

at 0, supposed arranged in descending order of magnitude,


be the three components of angular velocity of the system

body
,

&>

3)

about the axes Ox, Oy, Oz respectively, so that

&>!

Bw<,

Ca) s

or

=
=
=

10, 62)

d sin 6 cos ty,


d sin 9 sin
d cos

ty,

0,

16)

sin

<

6 cos

sin 6 cos

-v/r

cj>

-fy

sin 6 sin

(f)

Y+
;

cos

^=

-j

-v/r

"

sin 6 cos

ty,

sin 6 sin

ty,

TY

cos

"

These are really three integrals of the differential equations of motion of


the system (only one arbitrary constant however occurs, namely d, our special
set of axes being such as to make the other two constants of
integration
zero);

we can

therefore take these instead of the usual Lagrangian differ


motion in order to determine 6,
ty.

ential equations of

Solving

for 6, 0,

<f>,

we have

-\jr,

,*

rj
v

(A-B)d Cl

j.

T\ t/
if \_v*Jo
Prid
O-L1-1

-j-j

I//"

\lf

Gl Tl
olll

lf/>

\Lf

A. tj

= d

-T-

q>

Y+

cos 2

(d

Y = \n
VO

^D sin

TJ

>

AJ

d
cos r

sm

BD

,\
r cos

"

The

may

integral of energy (which is a consequence of these three equations)


be written down at once by use of 63 it is

where

c is

a constant

replacing

o>

a>i,

2,

w s by

their values in terms of 6

and

this equation can be written in either of the forms


w. D.

10

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

146

A-B sm

~- + B-C

Bc-d*

c s

"

A-B
sm ZQ6 sin
2

AB
.

Since

>

d}

and (cC

positive,

positive or negative

The

2
-v/r

C, the quantity

>

is

^-

2
A-G
^lc-d---

or

"

Ad

(cA

negative

- d?)

the

AC

c s
>

cos 2

B (A -B)

or

quantity

we

for definiteness

of the three differential

first

[OH. vi

shall

0.

2
&>

(.Be

+ C (A 2

may

o>

to be positive.

it

suppose

C) 3 is
be either

equations may, by use of the last

equations, be written

Bc-dr-B-C

A-G

Ac-d
AdT

This equation shews that cos 6 is a Jacobian elliptic function* of a linear


and the two preceding equations shew that sin 6 cos ty and
function of t
sin 6 sin ty are the other two Jacobian functions.
;

We

therefore write
sin 6 cos

where P, Q,

i|r

= P en u,

sin 6 sin

are constants and u

-fy

Q sn u,

cos 6

a linear function of

is

= R dn

t,

say \t

u,
-f

the

quantities P, Q, R, A, and the modulus k of the elliptic functions, are then to


be chosen so as to make the above equations coincide with the equations

& cn

A? sn 2

= - k + dn u,
1
dn u,
u=
u

~r dn u

k 2 sn u en

du

The comparison gives


A(d*-cC}

u.

B(d*-cC)
d*(B-C)

d*(A-C)
2

(A-B)(d -cC)

C(cA-ffi)

d*(A-C}
(B -C)(cA-d*)

ABC

(B-C) (Ac -d*)


The equation

for

k2 shews that k

is real,

and the equation

(A-Q(Bc-.ffi)

(B-C)(Ac-d
shews that

(1

k2 )

is

positive,

i.e.

that

k<

1.

The

quantities P, Q, R,

X,

are

also evidently real.

Now

a real

quantity a

may be

defined by

the

mutually consistent

equations

sn la
*

=i

T-TT:

cma =

The theory of elliptic functions required in this and the succeeding problems
and Watson s Modern Analysis, Chs. xx. xxn.

in Whittaker

will be

found

147

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

69]

_i
Since

(A)

where the theta-functions are defined by the expansions

= 1 + 2q cos 2iri/ + 2g
^ (y) = 1 - 2g cos 27Ti/ + 2q-

+ 2g
cos 47TZ/
2g

cos 4?

(y)

01

and q = e~

% 0) = 2i

cos TTV

Sn (v)

sin ^TV

7>

%<f

2q* cos Sirv

+
+

4
2? sin STTV

cos

cos GTTV

cos 5?
2^"*"

2g"

+
.

.,

.,

sin

we have

+ 2g cosh 2 7 + 2g
1 -2g cosh 2 7 +2^

cosh

4-y

,,_i

-...~

cosh 4 7

where 7 stands for Tra/2K from this equation 7 (and consequently a) may
readily be determined by successive approximation.
:

The Eulerian angles 6 and

-^ at

sin 6 cos ^r

sin 6 sin

\|r

cos 6

time

are

=
cnza

dn

ia sn (\t + e)

cnm
sn la dn (\i +
^ -

e)

or (omitting the

now given by the equations

en la

e)

The modulus k

of the elliptic functions

is

known; we can

therefore

determine the parameter q of the theta-functions by the equation

or

by the more rapidly convergent


q

where cos

= (k y.
/9

and thus the period

OZ

is

2
$ tan

/3

series

+ TV tan

10

-$fa

tan 18

/3

.,

K may then be calculated from the series


4<K/\

of the inclinations of the axes

Oxyz

to the line

determined.

102

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

148
If

now we

write

=7

(>jra/2K)

and

K} =

(-TrX/2

/A,

[CH. vi

we have

- 2a cosh 27 -f 2o cosh47- ...)(cos u,t +


...
(1
sin
cos \f
cos
cos
+
+
+
+
(1
(cosh 7
2yu,
4/4
.)
(fcosh 87
-2q
2#
.)
+ ...)(sin /4 o sin 3/4 + ...)
(1 + 2a cosh 27 + 2o cosh
sin u sin
cosh 87 +
cos 2/4 + 2(? cos 4^ +...)
(cosh 7 +
) (1
2
__
~ (sinh 7 y sinh 87 + ...)(!+- 2g cos
(cosh 7 4- 9 cosh 87 + ...)(1
2g cos 2/j.t + 2q* cos 4/u^ + ...)
4

i/

. .

4>y

"vj/"

. .

2<?

<?

The

quantities
motion.
Example.

q,

p,

7 may be regarded

Suppose that the body

a=l,
principal

moments

^=
Suppose that the

7r

= 2,

= 3.

of inertia are

a6c(6

+ c 2 = 20-87T,

=1677-,

of energy

= J,

C0 2

=&*.

round the principal axes are

initial velocities of rotation


ft)!

The constant

which specify the

a homogeneous ellipsoid of unit density, whose

is

three semi-axes are

The three

as the constants

=i,

W 3 =l.

2= 13

is

= A a)! 2 +

2
Ha>2

and the constant of angular momentum

f<03

3r,

given by the equation

is

so

The modulus

of the elliptic functions is given

by the equation

(4-5X^-c)_
whence we have

-(.g-cw-rf 2
2=i_2 = 0.760,

)"

....

= 1-0342,

#=1-68013,

K
TT

We

have also

so

A =0-6045

and

M = |^=0-5651.

The period

of the angles 6

and

is -r-

or

which has the value 11 11 8.

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

69]

and

In order to express

^ as trigonometric

series in

terms of

149

we must determine y.

t,

For this we have

and therefore

if

"*

be neglected we have
1

+ 2? cosh 2y_
~

1-1094

0-9337

cosh 2y = 2 -503,

gi vi ng

2y = 1-568

and hence
and

y= 0-784.

The quantity a

then given by the equation

is

2A"

a=

7T

A
zero

y = 0-8385.

limiting case of the general problem is that in which A


B, so that k reduces to
In this case the solution may
elliptic functions become circular functions.

and the

be written

^=
^~cosha
cosX<

>b

<9

sin An
sm(9sm^ = cosh

(C(Ac-d 2 )}%

where

r>.

of

cos

\- \(A-C)(Ac-d^
A 2C
j
\

<

smha=\

.,
2

(A (d

~^

cosh a =

0=tanha

^J- cC)

(A (d^
so the motion

about

its

own

is

axis of

symmetry

Another limiting case

is

Oz.

that in which

degenerate into hyperbolic functions

Example

1.

cC)}

a steady precession about the invariable line OZ, the body rotating also

rigid body

is

d 2 = cB,

so that

this is illustrated

F=l

and the

elliptic functions

by the following examples.

moving about a fixed point under no forces: shew that

ij

2
and 3 being initially
Bc, and
2 is zero when t is zero,
(in the notation used above) d
the
direction-cosines
of the B-axis at time t, referred to the initial directions of
positive, then
a>

if<a

a>i

the principal axes, are

a tanh x

y sin

/*

sech

cos

^,

/j.

y tanh x + a

sech ^,

sin

p-

sech ^,

where

_dt

f-B

_dt

((A

- B) (B C)\%

-B\~-AC~-

= (A(B-C)\
\B(A-C}\

y=

(C(A-B)}^
\B(A-C]}

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

To

obtain this result,


coordinate Q becomes

dt

the integral of which

we observe that when Bc=d 2 the


,

BC

Ad 2

is

cos 6 = y sech ^,

I,

1899.)

differential equation for the

AC

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

150

where y and x are the quantities above defined.

The equation

A-B ......
Ac-d
0sm
j^-sm
J.D

A-C cos

---^2
u4d

\//-=

then gives

sin 6 sin -^

and the equation

d
= -7
cos

= tanh ^,

2)

-=
JD
\//-.

(<

cos

cos 6 sin

<

sin

\|^

cos

<

J(7

= y sin
sin
/*)
These equations shew that the direction-cosines of the
OXYZ, which ( 10) are

gives

[CH. vi

^ + cos

cos $ sin

sin

\^,

.5-axis referred to the axes

<p

cos

<

\|f,

sin $ sin

\^,

can be written
sin

But

if

o) 10

W2o,

p sech

denote the

0)30

^w = ao? and
,

p.

W + CW =
=

tanh

sech ^,

initial directions of

so that

cos

^,

^.

the principal axes, since

d 2 = Be = B ( A on 2 + Ccos2 ),

1
3
yd, we see that the direction-cosines of
are given by the scheme
C<o

<B

IO , 0)20, 0)30,

referred to

0)20

0)30

and hence the direction-cosines of the

- y sin
Example

2.

/j.

AVhen d

point as centre, a

Z?-axis, referred to

sech x + a tanh ^,

rhumb

cos

/*

sech

o>

10

0)20, 0)30,

are

a sin ^ sech x + 7 tanh ^.

^,

= cB,

line

shew that the axis 6ty describes, on a sphere with the fixed
with respect to the meridians passing through the invariable

line.

(Coll.

Returning now
angle

to the general case, we


in terms of the time.
have

Exam.)

have to express the third Eulerian

We

</>

Now

COt

sn

whence
This function of
vanishes,

i.e.

-vr

,/l

=
dn ia sn

\t

dn 2 ia sn 2

vanishes with

t,

\t

and has poles when the denominator

when
sn \t

=+
~

-,

k sn la

so in one period-parallelogram (2K,

\t = ia + iK

+ sn (ia +

2iK )

it

and \t =

iK }

has poles at the points


ia

+ iK

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

69]

Near the former of these points, writing


only the lowest powers of e, we have
2

l2

dn2 ia/& 2 sn 2

.
"

\t

= ia + iK +

e,

151

and retaining

m
dn 2 ia

k sn- ia

e&

2 sn ia en ia

dn

A;

sn2 ia

so the residue at this pole of sin 2 ty, considered as a function of \t, is

dn
2A;

ia

sn ia en ia

2id

(A)\
-

Therefore the residue of dl-f.

A]

VD

function of \t)

-G)(Ac- &)AB}*
C

((B

sin 2

at this point (considered as a

-\lr

is

ABC
and the residue when \t/2K is regarded as the variable is consequently i\/4<K.
As we now know the zeros, poles and residues of this function, we can write

down

its

expression as a sum of logarithmic derivates of theta-functions


^ 01 (i/) has a simple zero at v ^ = iK /2K, we have

fact, since

in

&>

>

/\t

4A"

^
MOl f**!2i
^ r

r:z= Mp^

J 01

/ ^-

-J 01

<v

ia

and therefore

m\
~

/X
I

constant

AT
iN

ow S 01

/\t^ia\
(

2K/X

period

motion of
line.

<,

We

ZtJ^L

of
i.e.

^,

S- 01

//

- f\

purely periodic with respect to the real

have

so the coefficient of

27TI>

in

i.e.
</>,

2(?

COS

4t7TV

S-rrq* sin kirv

-..,
.

the constant part of

.,

or the precession,

<j),

is

may be

mean

the precessional motion of the system round the invariable

= 1 25- COS
^o/ (^) = 4?r^ sin ZTTV

written
q sinh 2y

oI

A
in

so the exponential on the right-hand side gives the

^01 (*

which

~\~A

is

(2id

I
:

/\t-\-ia\

/.
/

~9~V

which form

it

**,

may be

4
+ ...
2^ sinh
4
cosh 4 7 -

- 2q cosh 2 7 + 2^

calculated readily.

4<y

152

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

Example 1. In the
= 3, we have

6 = 2, c

case previously discussed, of an ellipsoid \vhose semi-axes are a =

2y=l

sinh2y = 2-294,

568,

7r,

so the

mean motion

of $, which

when j 4

is

d
M

cosh

^=

0-6956.

uniform circular disc has

The

in space, and
coinciding with
at any subsequent time

LQ2

arccot

4?l 2i

LQ2 + 4% 2
where ^

is

planes

0% and

the angle between

be written

centre

its

fixed,

and moves under the

disc is given initial angular velocities Q about a diameter


n about its axis coinciding with Of in space. Shew that

X = 2 arcsin f

503,

2-y

0-5986 + 0-0970,

2.

=2
=

1,

- 2q cosh 2y

or

action of no external forces.

may

neglected

q sinh
1

2-y
,

is

Example

[CH. vi

sin {(Q 2 + 4

-tan{(Q

)^

+ 4?i 2 )i.

It]

and the axis of the disc Oz and

o>

\,

is

the angle between the

(Oz.

(Coll. Exam.)
For let OZ denote as usual the invariable line, and consider the spherical triangle
Z&,
whose vertices are the intersections of the lines OZ, 0, Oz respectively with a sphere of

In this spherical triangle we have Zz = d,

centre 0.
disc

C=<2B=2A,

Zz = (fr.

Moreover we have

for the

so

and

The equations

of motion for 6

and

therefore

become

<f>

0=0,

<j>

= d/A

In the spherical triangle Zz, we have therefore

and hence

sin

and

cot

a>

= sin Z

sin

\Zz =

= cos Zf tan 1

^=

tan
(Q

+4n 2 )*

which are the required equations.


70.

Poinsot

kinematical representation of the motion; the polhode and

herpolhode.

An

elegant

method

of representing kinematically the motion of a


body
is the following, which is due to Poinsot*.

about a fixed point under no forces


*

Poinsot, Theorie nouvelle de hi rotation des corps, Paris, 1834.

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

69, 70]

The equation of the momental ellipsoid


moving axes Oxyz, is

of the

153

body at the fixed

point,

referred to the

Consider the tangent-plane to the ellipsoid which is perpendicular to the


If p denotes the perpendicular on this tangent-plane from

invariable line.

the origin,

we have

(since the direction-cosines of

= -r

which

is

are

Awjd, Bw^d,

Ca) 3/d)

constant.

d-

Since the perpendicular on the plane is constant in magnitude and


direction, the plane is fixed in space: so the momental ellipsoid always
touches a fixed plane.
if (x y z) are the coordinates of the
point of contact of the
and the plane, we have on identifying the equations

Moreover,
ellipsoid

Axx + Byy +

,11

rhp
UPC;
uiic vn
vdiiico

&>l

i//

pd

Czz

=1

_.,

and A(o x +
l

Mo
--

?/

G>2

-.

yc

Bw

pd

z?

y + Cw s z = pd

\/c

_1
i

_-

pd

yc

&>)

U>3

T~

and hence the radius vector to the point (x y z ) is the instantaneous axis
of rotation of the body.
It follows that the body moves as if it were rigidly
connected to its momental ellipsoid, and the latter body were to roll about the
,

a fixed plane perpendicular

fixed point on

to the

invariable line, without

angular velocity being proportional to the radius to the point of


contact, so that the component of angular velocity about the invariable line is
sliding

the

constant.
1.
If a body which is inoveable about a fixed point is initially at rest and
acted on continually by a couple of constant magnitude and orientation, shew that
Poinsot s construction still holds good, but that the component angular velocity about the

Example

then

is

invariable line

is

no longer constant but varies directly as the time.

For in any interval of time dt the addition of angular


about the fixed axis

system at time

t is

OZ

of the couple

Now

Nt about OZ.

principal axes of inertia Oxyz are


of inertia and
2
MS) are the
o>

(<!,

Aa>i=

momentum

(Coll.

to the

Exam.)

body

is

+Ydt

so that the resultant angular momentum of the


the components of angular momentum about the

C(o 3 where A, B, C are the principal moments


z
components of angular velocity: hence we have

A<a

JVtsin 6 cos

!//,

Bu>

Bu>.

= Nt sin

6 sin

\^,

C(o 3

= Ntcosd,

where

6, 0, -^ are the Eulerian angles which fix the position of the axes Oxyz with
reference to fixed axes OXYZ.
But these equations differ from those which occur in the

motion of a body under no forces only in the substitution of t dt for dt so the motion
be the same as in the problem of motion under no forces, except that the velocities are
;

will

multiplied by

let

whence the result

follows.

In the motion of a body, one of whose points is fixed, under no forces,


Example
a hyperboloid be rigidly connected with the body, so as to have the principal axes of
2.

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

154

[CH. vi

body at the point as axes, and to have the squares of its axes respectively
2
2
Ac, d
Bc, cP
Cc, where A, B, C are the moments of inertia of the
proportional to d
the
fixed
at
point, c is twice its kinetic energy, and d is the resultant angular
body
momentum. Shew that the motion of this hyperboloid can be represented by causing it
inertia of the

to roll without sliding on a circular cylinder, whose axis passes through the fixed point and
is parallel to the axis of resultant angular momentum.
(Siacci.)

The curve which

in Poinsot s construction

traced on the

is

momental

ellipsoid by the point of contact with the fixed plane is called the polkode.
Its equations, referred to the principal moments of inertia, are clearly the

equation of the ellipsoid together with the equation

p=

constant,

i.e.

they

are

Ax*

Example

Shew

I.

+ By- + Cz =
2

1,

when A =B, the polhode

that

is

circle.

^B^

C, shew that there are two kinds of polhodes, one kind


Example 2. Taking A
consisting of curves which surround the axis Oz of the momental ellipsoid, and correspond
to
cC, while the other kind consists of curves which surround the axis Ox, and
z
cB and that the limiting case between these two kinds of polhodes
correspond to cA
cB>d">

>d

>

a singular polhode which corresponds to cB


pass through the extremities of the mean axis.

is

The curve which


the moving ellipsoid

d2 = 0, and

consists of

two

ellipses

which

traced on the fixed plane by the point of contact with


called the herpolhode.

is
is

find the equation of the herpolhode, let p, % be the polar coordinates


of the point of contact, when the foot of the perpendicular from the fixed

To

If (x, y z } denote the coordinates


is taken as pole.
point on the fixed plane
of the same point referred to the moving axes Oxyz, we have
,

3/2

?.

_|_

square of radius from point of suspension to point of contact

-i

+#

""

Substituting for x

z their values as given

x =
y
{

=
=

=
=
/\/c
=
/\/c

by the equations

eoj/Vc

a).2

d sin B sin ty/B^c,

&>

sin 6 cos ty/A^/c,

d cos 6/C\/c,

we have
p-

=-

c
-=-

d?

d2
A-c
-.

sin 2

cos 2

T/T

d2

2
T sin
B-c

sin 2 -\lr

Replacing B and ^r by their values in terms of

_
cd?A*B*G*

_ (cA -

d*}

(c?

cd*AC

- cC)

t,

d2

+ TG~

this

cos 2 #.

becomes

(B-C)(A-

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

70, 71]

where

155

denotes the half-period corresponding to the root e^, this equation


expresses the radius vector of the herpolhode in terms of the time.
w

We

have next to find the vectorial angle

observe

that

six times the

in

terms of

t.

For

this

we

volume of the tetrahedron whose

Vcp ^/c?
vertices are the fixed point, the foot of the perpendicular from the fixed
point on the fixed plane, and two consecutive positions of the point of contact,
divided by the interval of time elapsed between these positions, and that this
is

quantity can also be expressed in the form


x,

y,

Acx \d\

Bey Id

Ccz /d2

A,
t x
/

B,
>

y/y,

the quantities involved, except %, are known functions


substituting their values in terms of t, and reducing, we have
All

of

on

A-C
which can be written in the form

_
%~
.

~B

(I

&))

This equation can be integrated in the same


way as the equation for the
Eulerian angle
and gives
c/>,

a
where ^o

ta)

is a constant of
The current coordinates
integration.
herpolhode are thus expressed as functions of t.

(p,

^) of the

Example 1.
particle moves in such a way that its angular momentum round the
origin is a linear function of the square of the radius vector, while the square of its velocity
is

a quadratic function of the square of the radius vector, the coefficient of the
highest

power being negative shew that the path is the herpolhode of a Poinsot motion,
however J, JB, C are not restricted to be positive.
;

Jfxample

2.

secting on the

in

which

Discuss the cases in which the polhode consists of (a) two ellipses inter
of the momenta! ellipsoid, (/3) two parallel circles,
(y) two points

mean axis

shewing that in these cases the herpolhode becomes respectively a spiral curve (whose
equation can be expressed in terms of elementary functions), a circle, or a point.
71.

Motion of a top on a perfectly rough plane ; determination


of the

Eulerian angle

top

is

6.

defined to be a material body which is


symmetrical about an axis
the
(called
apex or vertex) at one end of

and terminates in a sharp point


the axis.

We

shall now study the motion of a


top when spinning with its apex
on
a
so
that
is
placed
perfectly rough plane,
practically a fixed point. The

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

156

[OH. vi

problem is essentially that of determining the motion of a solid of revolution


under the influence of gravity, when a point on its axis is fixed in
*.
space

Let (A, A, G) denote the moments of inertia of the top about


rectangular
axes Oxyz, fixed relative to the top and moving with it, the
origin being the
be
apex and the axis Oz being the axis of symmetry of the top let (6,
;

<,

\Jr)

the Eulerian angles defining the position of these axes with reference to fixed
rectangular axes OXYZ, of which OZ is directed vertically upwards.

The

kinetic energy

where w

&>

is (

63)

denote the components relative to the


moving axes of the
(
16) we have

angular velocity of the top, so that

6 sin ^r

&>j

co 2

-t-

&>s

6 sin

ty,

4>

the kinetic energy

sin 6 cos ty,

= 6 cos ty + sin
=^
cos 6

therefore

is

T = \AB- + ^Aft sin

+ ^C (jr +

<j>

cos 0?,

and the potential energy is V = Mgh cos 6, where


is the mass of the
top
and h is the distance of its centre of gravity from the apex.

The

kinetic potential

L=T-

is

therefore

V=$A6* + 4

The coordinates

and

<f>

+ 4C (t +

sin 2

cos

<

0^-Mghcoa B.

are evidently ignorable;

the corresponding

integrals are

dT =

dT

and

constant,

^-r

--.-

sin2

or
A<j>

where a and

momentum

b are

constant,

d-fr

d(f>

constants

about the axes

+ C (^ +
C ty +
these

OZ

fj)

cos 0) cos

- a,

cos

=b,

<9)

may be

interpreted as integrals of angular

and Oz, and so are obvious a priori from

general dynamical principles.

The modified

kinetic potential

R=L

38)

is

b\s

a(>

The term -b 2 /2C can be


equation of motion

cos

neglected, as

it

is

merely a constant; the

is

d /dR\

dR _

Lagrange, Mec. Anal. (Oeuvres, xn.

p. 251).

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

71]

so the variation of 6 is the

of freedom for

same

as in a dynamical system with one degree

which the kinetic energy


b cos 0)

(a

157

The connexion between d and


energy of this reduced system,

is

^A6 and

the potential energy

is

therefore given

is

by the integral of

namely
2

(a-bcos0)
Aa-2
\AQ = - 2A sin - - Mgh cos 6 + c,
^

where

c is

a constant.

= x, this equation becomes


A*a? = - (a - bx) - 2AMgh (x - a?) + 2 Ac (1 - x

Writing cos

The right-hand side


when x = 1, the cubic

of this equation

is

).

a cubic polynomial in x

now

some real values of 6, i.e. for some


values of x between
1 and 1, the cubic must be
positive, since the left-hand
side of the equation is positive; when x = I, the cubic is
again negative; and
when x = + oo the cubic is positive. The cubic has therefore two real roots
which lie between
1 and 1, and the remaining root is also real and is
is

negative; for

greater than unity.

Let these roots be denoted by


cos

where cos /3

The

>

cos

so that a

a,

differential equation

\Mghft A$ dt =
If

we

we have

>

cos

a,

cosh

ft,

7,

/3.

now becomes

{4 (x

- cos a) (x -

cos

/3)

cosh 7 }}~*dx.

write

therefore

where the constants

+ constant =
el}

e?,

e 3 are

{4 (z

ej (z

e.2
)

e, e3 are

all real

el

and

2Ac + b

satisfy the relations

+e +e =
2

b2

~~

_Mgh
=
e-i,

(z

given by the equations

2Ac +

so that

(x

0,

el

>

e,

>

e3

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

158

The connexion between


where

therefore

t is

a constant of integration, and the function

e is

roots e 1} e2

and

fy

[CH. vi

is

formed with the

and hence we have

2A

Now in order that x may be real

for real values of t, it is evident that x must


between cos a and cos fi, i.e. $ (t + e) must lie between e2 and e3 for real
values of t and therefore the imaginary part of the constant e must be the

lie

The real part of e depends on


3 corresponding to the root e s
the epoch from which the time is measured, and so can be taken to be zero
half-period

<w

by suitably choosing

have therefore

finally

^
and

We

this epoch.

which expresses the Eulerian angle 6 in terms of

this is the equation

the time*.

Example

1.

If

the circumstances

sheiv that the value of Q at

any time

of projection of the top are such that initially

t is

given by the equation

Mgk

sec0=l+sech(^p/),
so that the axis of the
top continually approaches the vertical.

For

in this case

we

readily find for the constants a,

so the differential equation to determine

whence the

b,

the values

is

result follows.

solid of revolution can turn


freely about a fixed point in its axis of
acted on by forces derived from a potential-energy function p. cot 2 6, where
6 is the angle between this axis and a fixed line ; shew that the
equations of motion can be
integrated in terms of elementary functions.
2.

Example

symmetry, and

is

For proceeding as in the problem of the top on the perfectly rough plane,
the integral of energy of the reduced problem the equation

we

find for

(a -ft.

Writing cos 6 = x, this becomes

for

The quadratic on the right-hand side is negative when # = 1 and x= 1, but is positive
some values of x between
1 and +1, since the left-hand side is positive for some real
*

1,

55)
0,

It

may

when
P,

I,

be remarked that the present problem reduces to that of the spherical pendulum
k are replaced respectively by
M, C, A, h, a, b, c, cos 0,
I,

the quantities
k,

0,

h,

z/l,

<f>,

<f>,

\,

fjL.

159

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

71, 72]

the quadratic has therefore two real roots between


these cos a and cos /3, the equation is of the form
values of 6

\-x z = (cos a - x] (x
the solution of which

and

+ 1.

Calling

cos /3),

is

x = cos

a sin

2
(</2X)

+ cos /3 cos2 (Z/2X).

Determination of the remaining Eulerian angles, and of the Cayley-

72.

Klein parameters ; the spherical top.


When the Eulerian angle 6 has been obtained in terms of the time, as in
the last article, it remains to determine the other Eulerian angles
and
<f>

For

this

-\|/-.

purpose we use the two integrals corresponding to the ignorable

coordinates

when

these,

and

solved for

-\jr,

<f)

~Tsin2

give

b cos 6

_
=

b cos 0) cos 6

(a

C~

\^

Asin*0

we regard the motion

as specified by the constants of the


body
of integration (a, b, c), it is evident from
constants
and
the
(M, A, C, h)
that C does not occur except in
these equations and the equation for
for
and therefore an auxiliary top
the constant term of the expression
ty
can
be
whose moments of inertia are (A, A, A)
projected in such a way that
its axis of symmetry always occupies the same position as the axis of
symmetry
If

of the top considered, the only difference in the motion of the two tops being
that the auxiliary top has throughout the motion a constant extra spin

A)/AG about its axis of symmetry. A top such as this auxiliary top,
whose moments of inertia are all equal, is called a spherical top. It follows
therefore that the motion of any top can be simply expressed in terms of the
motion of a spherical top, and that there is no real loss of generality in
supposing any top under consideration to be spherical.

b(C

If then

we take

G= A,

_a
=

_
~

a cos

Substituting for cos

sin 2

24

<9

its

value from the equation

2A
and writing

and
<f>

i/r

a b
+b
~
- f)
2
A
(cos 0+1)
(cos
a+b
a b
=
+
1
2A
2X(cos + )
(coslT^Tj

b cos

A sin

the equations to determine

m- M9h
2

Mgh
2

12 A*

become

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

160

and k are known imaginary constants (being in fact the values of


and TT of 6}, the differential equations
corresponding to the values

so that
t

o>

[CH. vi

become

= Mgh(a + b)

Mgh (a - b)

Now

^ %/i (a

6)

the connexion between the function

once written

down by

substituting for

X=

6)

and its derivate


x from the equation
%>

can be at

Wh

in the equation
2

^} + 2Ac (1 - a?)

the argument of the ^-function is k, it follows from the definition of k that


1
and so the last equation gives
the corresponding value of x is
if

2
.

{2Ap (k)/Mgh\* = (a +

or
&>

Similarly

and therefore the equations

2^=*-,.

is

an

with

= iMgh (a + b)/ 2A-.

we have
>

Now

(k)

6)

= iMgh (a - b)/2A

(/)

and

for

-fy

</>

7\

2
,

can be written in the form

...T.+

the function

whose poles in any period-parallelogram are congruent


= k, the corresponding residues being 1 and 1
3
Hence we have
zero when t + 3 = 0.

elliptic function,
t

+ w = k and t +
3

and the function

$ (t +

is

&>

o>

&>

3)

and therefore
(k}dt
v

log
&

cr (

-|-

V-

<w

A;)
/7x
bv( A;)y
~y^ + 2 ^
^<,

+ constant.

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

72]

The

and

-fy

tr (t

+ k) a- (t + a)

a-

integrals of the equations for

</>

161

can therefore be written in

the form
..

where

<

and

(t

&>

o) 3

a- (t

k)

o>

I)

/)

are constants of integration.

i/r

These equations lead to simple expressions for the Cayley-Klein parameters


7, 5 (
12), which define the position of the moving axes Oxyz with
reference to the fixed axes OXYZ: for by definition we have
a,

fi,

cos 1 6

e$

*& + +\

= ism $6.

{3

y = ism^e.e^ ^-^,
1

= cos^.

e*

*\

{<t>

But we have

0=1 +cos0

2 cos 2

2A

~ (t +

or

cos \

Similarly

we

A \l {a- (t +

(k)
a>

a- (t

k)

Mgli

(0 3

<r

(t~+

k)

a-

k)

w3 )

(t

a) 3

k)}$

find
ft

sin

(T \

Tf

~T~

7\

^3

v ) O~

and on combining these with the expressions


we have

/4
\v

7\) i
*
I f

~T~ (J&v

for e

21 *

and

2i *

already found,

t)

o-

(0

o- (

i( ^" 0o)

7 =

<?(<

"

\M~gh

<r(l)~

tr (t

These equations express the parameters

a,

<o

ft>

3)

os )

7, 8 as

functions of the

time.
W. D.

11

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

162
Example

1.

M moves about a faced point

gyrostat of mass

[OH. vi

in its axis of

symmetry :

inertia about the axis of figure and a perpendicular to it through the fixed
and A respectively, and the centre of gravity is at a distance h from the fixed
gyrostat is held so that its axis makes an angle arccos l/ v/3 with the downward

moments of

the

point are

The

point.
vertical,

and

is

given an angular velocity \jAJMgh */3/C about

move about

free to

left

sin 2 6 sin
sin 2 6 cos

or

where

is the

20 = (

20 =

its axis.

If

the axis be

now

will describe the cone

it

- l/v/3)* ( - cos 6 + v /3) *,

- cos

(^3/2

+ cos 0)^,

azimuthal angle and 6 the inclination of the axis to the upward vertical.
(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part I, 1894.)

For in this problem we have

initial

initially

= 0,

= 0,

a = - jMAghltlZ,

= 4/3 jKAgh, c= -

cos0=
and these

shew that

the fixed point,

-l/v/3,

^=

= 0,

values give

Substituting in the general differential equation for

namely

6,

we have

A6 2 sin 2

6-- Mgh (cos 6 + l/v/3)

N/3

+ 2 cos 6) - cos 6 + v/3),


(

while the equation

b cos 6

Dividing this equation by the square root of the preceding equation,

= si
I

= 3*
Now

if

_ cos 6 - l/v/3)*

v/3

+ 2 cos 6)
"

l(x-

1/^/3)* (v/3 -2a;)

(^

+ v/3)

*
(

~*

we have

~
cos 6 + ^3) i cosec 6 dd,

(1

-^)-i

ote,

where .r= -cos

we write
u = (x-

we have by

We

"

l/ N/3)

(x

+ N/3) *

(v

3/2

- x) ~ ^

differentiation

have therefore

tan

or

which

is

20 = 32

"

-cos

6- l/v/3) (-cos

equivalent to the result given above.

~
<9)

*,

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

72, 73]

Shew that the logarithms

2.

Example

functions of cos

6,

3.

Example

163

of the Cayley-Klein parameters, considered as

are elliptic integrals of the third kind.

Obtain the expressions found above for the Cayley-Klein parameters as


t
by shewing that they satisfy differential equations typified by

functions of the time

"

where I denotes a doubly-periodic function off, these equations being of the Hermite-Lame
type which is soluble by doubly-periodic functions of the second kind.

simple type of motion of the top is that in which the axis of symmetry
maintains a constant inclination to the vertical; in this case, which is
generally known as the steady motion of the top, 6 and 6 are permanently
zero

since

we have
b cos 0) 2
-

(a

it

follows that

d ((a
= -Ja\
n

b cos

2A

dd{

QY

sm ,a
2

COS

Performing the differentiation, and substituting


we have

A<f>sin-0,

=bcj>

+ Aft cos 6 +

/i

for (a

Mgh.

This equation gives the relation between the constants

depends on the rate of spinning of the top on


73.

We

b cos 6) its value

its axis) in

and b (which
(j), 0,
steady motion.

Motion of a top on a perfectly smooth plane.


now consider the motion of a top which

is spinning with its apex


smooth horizontal plane *. The reaction of the plane is now
the horizontal component of the velocity of the centre of gravity,

shall

in contact with a
vertical, so

G, of the top is constant we can therefore without loss of generality suppose


that this component is zero, so that the point G moves vertically in a fixed
two horizontal lines fixed in space and
line, which we shall take as axis of Z
;

perpendicular to each other will

the
(0,

be taken as axes of

X and

Y.

Let Gxyz be the principal axes of inertia of the top at G, and (A, A, C)
moments of inertia about them, Gz being the axis of symmetry and let
be the Eulerian angles defining their position with reference to the
-\/r)
:

</>,

axes of X, Y, Z.
of G above the plane is h cos 6, where h denotes the distance
from the apex of the top the part of the kinetic energy due to the
motion of G is therefore ^J/A2 sin 2 6 6 2 where
is the mass of the top
and

The height

of

so,

as in

71, the total kinetic

energy

is

cos

and the potential energy


*

2
,

is

= Mgh cos6.

Poisson, TraitS de Mtcanique (1811), n. p. 198.

112

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

164

Proceeding now exactly as in


and
to the ignorable coordinates

71,
ty,

</>

sin 2 6
\A<j>

we have two

b are constants;

we obtain

coordinates

for

(A + Mh*

integrals corresponding

namely

+ G (^ +

<

cos 6) cos 6

= a,

cos 0)

= b,

C(^+(j)
where a and

[OH. vi

and on performing the process of ignoration of

the modified kinetic potential the expression

P-(

^~~? - Mgh

sin* 0)

cos

0,

is the same as in the system with one degree of freedom


which the kinetic energy is

so the variation of 6
for

(A
and the potential energy

+ Mh* sin

0)

fr,

is

(a

b cos

^-

2 J. sin 2

The connexion between


latter system,

and

BY
~
+ Mqh
,

t is

cos

0.

given by the integral of energy of this

namely

$(A+ Mh* sin

0) ft

= - (a

"

-/I

6 C

sin;

)2

Jfyfe cos

+ c,

c/

= x, this becomes
A (A + Mh - Mtta?) x =-(a- bx} - ZAMgh (x - a?) + 2Ac (1 - x

where

c is

a constant.

Writing cos

).

are separated in this equation, so the solution can


be expressed as a quadrature but the evaluation of the integral involved
will require in general hyperelliptic functions, or automorphic functions of
genus two.

The

variables

x and

74.

Kowalevski

s top.

of the motion under gravity of a body one of whose points is


not in general soluble by quadratures and the cases considered in
69 (in which the fixed point is the centre of gravity of the body, so that
71 (in which the fixed point
influence the motion), and in
gravity does not
of
axis
lie
on
an
and the centre of gravity
symmetry of the body), were for
known to be integrable. In 1888 however Mme. S.
long the only ones
Kowalevski* shewed that the problem is also soluble when two of the

The problem

fixed

is

principal moments
=
third, so that

of inertia at the fixed point are equal and double the


= 2C, and when further the centre of gravity is situated

in the plane of the equal

moments

of inertia.

and the centre of gravity be taken


through the fixed point
the fixed
of
centre
let
the
and
as the axis Ox,
gravity be at a distance a from
Let the

line

* Acta

Math. xn. (1888),

p. 177.

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

73, 74]

165

be the Eulerian angles which define the position of the


principal axes of inertia Oxyz with reference to fixed rectangular axes OX YZ,
co 3 ) be the
of which the axis OZ is vertical; let
2
components along the
point

let (6,

<f>,

i/r)

&>

(<uj,

be
axes Oxyz of the angular velocity of the body, and let
kinetic and potential energies are given by the equations

T = i (Aw* + Aw? +
)
= C{fc + sin 6 + (^ +

its

mass.

The

Ca>

<j>

V=
The coordinate

is
<j>

Mga

sin

cos

</>

cos 0) 2 },

ty.

evidently ignorable, giving an integral

dT =

constant,

;r-r

Off)

or

20

where k

is

a constant

sin 2 9

+ (-^ +

<j>

and the integral of energy

= k,

cos 0) cos
is

T + V = constant,
2

or

2
<

(^ +

sin2

Mme. Kowalevski shewed

cos 0) 2

<j>

= A.

sin 6 cos -f

that another algebraic integral exists, which can

be found in the following way.

The

kinetic potential

L=C0* +

is

+ ^C(^r +

sin2

C<j>

<j>

cos 0)~

+ Mga

sin

cos

-i/r,

and the equations of motion are

^(?^_ W =

dt

\M)

dt

d
dt

the

first

of these

is

20

cos d
(rf>

- -dr) 6 sin 6 +

cos

cos

ty,

(j

and on eliminating
2

-fy

(4>

between the second and

sin 0)

rit

Adding the
2

first

sin0

-=
((j>

= - (A cos

0-<dr)

third,

0+^

of these equations multiplied

+ t 0)=i

cos
(<

sin0
-^)(<f>

we obtain

by

cos

sin

^.

to the se.cond,

+ i0)+i

we have

-^ cos 0e~^,

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

166

an equation which can be written


sin 6

+ i6)* +

sin

=i

cos ^

7 = (i sin

where

=~

(4 sin

i6)-

sn

~"

n
~

+ i0) +

F= (0 sin (9- i8? +


"FT"

Similarly, if

we have

form

1
- ijr)

cos
(<

or

in the

[CH. vi

(0 cos ^

sin

sin

It follows that

d7

J.

.,.

tf dt

dt

UV = constant.

or

We

have therefore the equation

+ id)

sin
(<j>

7^-sin 0ar~*K j(0 sin

i6)

sin $6**
"^~

constant,

or
2

($

2
</>

sin 2 #) 2

+ (~^r

sin 2 #-|

+ i0) +e~ ((j)sm0i0)


2

l *l

^-sin0{e

((j>sm0

i *l

2]>

= constant,
and

this is the

required third algebraic integral of the system.

The first integrals which have been found constitute a system of three
differential equations, each of the first order, for the determination of 0,
(j), ty,
and they can be regarded as replacing the original

differential equations of
does not occur explicitly in them and we can there
fore use one of the three equations in order to eliminate
from the other two:
we shall then have a system of two differential equations, each of the first

motion.

The

variable

<f>

<

order, to

determine

and

-fy.

It has

been shewn by Mme. Kowalevski that

these equations can be solved by means of hyperelliptic functions


solution reference may be made to the memoir already referred to*.

for this

Cf. also Kotter, Acta Math. xvn. (1893), p. 209


Stekloff, Gorjatscheff, and Tcbapligine,
Trav. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou, x. (1899) and xn. (1904) G. Dumas, Nonv. Ann. (4) iv. (1904),
p. 355; Husson, Toulouse Ann. (2) vm. (1906), p. 73; Husson, Acta Math. xxxi. (1907), p. 71;
;

N. Kowalevski, Math. Ann. LXV. (1908), p. 528; P. StackeJ, Math. Ann. LXV. (1908), p. 538;
0. Olsson, Arkiv for Mat. iv. Nr. 7 (1908); E. Marcolongo, Rom. Ace. Rend. (5) xvn. (1908),
F. de Brun, Arkiv for Mat. vi. Nr. 9 (1910) P. Burgatti, Palermo Rend. xxix. (1910),
p. 698
a
p. 396; 0. Lazzarino, Rend. d. Soc. reale di Napoli, (3 ) xvn. (1911), p. 68.
;

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

74, 75]

167

Let y 1 y 2 y3 denote the direction-cosines of Ox, Oy, Qz referred to OZ, and


be denned by the equations

Example.

let variables x, y, r

2o>

o>

Mgay->
I

-,

0)30)!

-2a>

0,3(0!

w2

+ a, 3 2 a, 2

Shew by use

momentum)

of Kowalevski s integral (without using the integrals of energy or angular


that the equations of motion can be written in the form

where V is a function of x and y only, so that the problem


motion of a particle in a plane conservative field of force.

is

transformed into that of the


(Kolosoff.)

E. Liouville* has stated that the only other general case in which the motion under
gravity of a rigid body with one point fixed has a third algebraic integral is that in which

The momental
The centre of

1.

2.

ellipsoid of the point of suspension is

gravity of the body

an

ellipsoid of revolution.

in the equatorial plane of the

is

momental

ellipsoid.

3.
ratio

If

2C/A

On

J, A, C) are the principal

an integer

is

this, cf.

moments

of inertia at the point of suspension, the

this integer can be arbitrarily chosen.

the memoirs cited in the footnote on the preceding page.

Example. A heavy body rotates about a fixed point 0, the principal moments of
inertia at which satisfy the relation A = B = 4C and the centre of gravity of the body lies in
the equatorial plane of the momental ellipsoid, at a distance h from 0. Shew that if the
constant of angular momentum about the vertical through vanishes, there exists an integral
:

w3
where

2
(o>!

+ co 22

) +gha>i

cos 6 = constant,

are the components of angular velocity about the principal axes Oxyz,
to the centre of gravity and hence that the problem can be
Ox being the line from
solved by quadratures, leading to hyperelliptic integrals.
(Tchapligine.)
coj,

<u

2,

o>

75.

Impulsive motion.

As has been observed

in
36, the solution of problems in impulsive
motion does not depend on the integration of differential equations, and can
The following examples
generally be effected by simple algebraic methods.
illustrate various types of impulsive systems.

Two uniform rods AB, BC, each of length 2a, are smoothly jointed at B
horizontal table with their directions at right angles. An impulse is applied to
the middle point of AB, and the rods start moving as a rigid body : determine the direction
Example
and rest on a

1.

of the impulse that this


ratio

V13

may

be the case,

and prove

that the velocities of A,

1.

C will

(Coll.

be in the

Exam.)

We can without loss of generality suppose the mass of each rod to be unity. Let (x, y}
be the component velocities of B referred to fixed axes Ox, Oy parallel to the undisturbed
*

Acta Math. xx. (1897),

p. 239.

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

168

[CH. vi

be the angular velocities of BA and BC. The


BA, BC of the rods, and let 6,
components of velocity of the middle point of AB are (x, y + ad), and the components of
y), so the kinetic energy of the system is
velocity of the middle point of BC are (x
given by the equation

position

<

a<,

Let the components parallel to the axes of the impulse be

The components

/, J.

of

the displacement of the point of application of the impulse in a small displacement of the
system are (bx, By + add) and hence the equations of 36 become
;

0= -ax + ^a 2
while the condition that the system moves as

\x=y=lae =
Hence /=/, which shews that the
and as the components of velocity

are (x

2a<,

we have

y),

Example

lai>

=
<p.

These equations give

= \I=lJ.

direction of the impulse makes an angle of 45 with BA


of A are (x, y + 2a0), and the components of velocity of
;

for the velocities of

respectively, so the velocity of

),

if rigid is

is

and of C the values \/65y and *Jby

^/13 x the velocity of C: which

is

the required result.

A framework in

2.

the ends of tivo pairs of

the form of a parallelogram is made by smoothly jointing


uniform bars of lengths 2a, 26, masses m, m and radii of gyration
,

moving without any rotation of its sides, and with velocity V, in


the direction of one of its diagonals; it impinges on a smooth fixed wall with which the sides
make angles 6, $ and the direction of the velocity V a right angle, the vertex which impinges
being brought to rest by the impact. Shew that the impulse on the wall is

k,

The parallelogram

is

(Coll.

Exam.)

Let x and y be the coordinates of the centre of the parallelogram, x being measured at
right angles to the wall and towards it. The kinetic energy is

T= (m + m

(x

+y 2 + (mk2 + m a2 2 + (mb 2 + m
contact is # + asin# + &sin0, so

The ^-coordinate of the point of


the axis of
point of contact parallel to
(&r,

By,

B6,

impulse by

80)
/,

is

2
k"

2
)

the displacement of the

x corresponding to an arbitrary displacement


The equations of motion, denoting the
S.r + acos#50 + &cos080.

are therefore

fdT_ (dT\

_ _

dx

/^T\

la cos

- Ib cos

0,

80/o

(mk
(mb

+ m a2
+m k 2

6
<p

= la cos 6,
= - Ib cos 0.

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

75]

Moreover since the

final velocity of

the point of contact

x + a cos 6 6 + b
.

Eliminating

x, 6,

is

<j>

is zero,

we have

= 0.

.
<f>

from these equations, we have

<

[2

which

cos

169

b 2 cos 2

(m + mf)

the result stated.

The next example relates to a case of sudden fixture if one point (or line)
of a freely-moving rigid body is suddenly seized and compelled to move in a
given manner, there will be an impulsive change in the motion of the body,
;

which can be determined from the condition that the angular momentum of
the body about any line through the point seized (or about the line seized)
is unchanged
by the seizure this follows from the fact that the impulse of
;

seizure has

Example

no moment about the point (or


3.

line).

uniform circular disc is spinning with an angular velocity Q about a


P on its rim is suddenly fixed. Prove that the subsequent velocity of
J of the velocity of the point P immediately before the impact.

diameter when a point


the centre is equal to

(Coll.

Exam.)

disc, and let a be the angle between the radius to P and the
diameter about which the disc was originally spinning.
The original velocity of P is
Q.C sin a, where c is the radius of the disc.
The original angular momentum about P is
2
about an axis through P parallel to the original axis of rotation, and of magnitude
^mc Q.
and this is unchanged by the fixing of P, so when P has been fixed, the angular momentum

Let

be the mass of the

about the tangent at


tangent at

P is f me

is

rac 2 I2 sin a.

But the moment

of inertia of the disc about its

and

so the angular velocity about the tangent at


is ^ 12 sin a.
The
of the original velocity
velocity of the centre of the disc is therefore Jflcsina, which is
of P.
,

lamina in the form of a parallelogram whose mass is


has a smooth
Example 4.
It is struck at an angular
pivot at each of the middle points of two parallel sides.
point
which adheres to it after the blow.
Shew that the impulsive
by a particle of mass
reaction at one of the pivots is zero.

(Coll.

Exam.)

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
1.
Prove that for a disc free to turn about a horizontal axis perpendicular to its
plane
the locus on the disc of the centres of suspension for which the
simple equivalent
pendulum has a given length L consists of two circles and that, if A and B are two
;

points, one

on each

circle,

and

the length of the simple equivalent pendulum when


the middle point of AB, the radius of gyration k of the disc
is

the centre of suspension is


its centre of inertia is given
by the equation

about

where 2c

is

the length of AB.

(Coll.

Exam.)

heavy rigid body can turn about a fixed horizontal axis. If one point in the
body is given through which the horizontal axis has to pass, discuss the problem of
choosing the direction of the axis in the body in such a way that the simple equivalent
pendulum shall have a given length shewing that the axes which satisfy this condition are
2.

the generators of a quartic cone.

(Coll.

Exam.)

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

170

3.

sphere of radius b

rolls

without slipping down the cycloid

y = a(l

x=a(0 + sin6),
It starts

from rest with

of its centre

when

its

[CH.

costf).

centre on the horizontal line

at the lowest point is given

y = 2a.

Prove that the velocity

by

F 2 =-W (2o- 6).

Exam.)

(Coll.

rests symmetrically on two shelves


uniform smooth cube of edge 2a and mass
each of breadth b and mass m and attached to walls at a distance 2c apart. Shew that, if
one of the shelves gives w&y and begins to turn about the edge where it is attached to the
wall, the initial angular acceleration of the cube will be
4.

:-& + a) 2
where Mb and / are respectively the
of the shelf about its edge.
2

moments

of inertia of the cube about its centre

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

I,

and

1899.)

5.
A homogeneous rod of mass and length 2a moves on a horizontal plane, one end
being constrained to slide without friction in a fixed straight line. The rod is initially
perpendicular to the line, and is struck at the free end by a blow / parallel to the line.
Shew that after time t the perpendicular distance y of the middle point of the rod from

the line

is

given by the equation

(l-$ xtf(l-x )-%dx=3lt/2Ma.


2

(Coll.

Exam.)

6.
Four equal uniform
rhombus ABCD. The joint

rods, of length 2a, are smoothly jointed so as to form a


is fixed, whilst C is free to move on a smooth vertical rod

through A.
Initially C coincides with A and the whole system is rotating about the
Prove that, if in the subsequent motion 2a is the least
vertical with angular velocity
angle between the upper rods,
o>.

w 2 cos a = 3g

sin 2 a.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

I,

1900.)

A disc of mass M rests on

a smooth horizontal table, and a smooth circular groove


A particle of
of radius a is cut in it, passing through the centre of gravity of the disc.
is started in the groove from the centre of gravity of the disc.
mass
Investigate the
7.

^M

Prove that if a$
round by the disc, then
motion.

Mk 2

being the

moment

is

the arc traversed by the particle and 6 the angle turned

of inertia of the disc

about a vertical

line

of gravity.

8.

velocity

motion.
latus

G>

through
(Coll.

its

centre

Exam.)

body is moving freely under the action of gravity and rotating with angular
about an axis through its centre of gravity perpendicular to the plane of its
Shew that the axis of instantaneous rotation describes a parabolic cylinder of
rigid

rectum (^/4a+

*j2g/ca}

whose vertex is at a distance vS^a/w above that of the path


where 4a is the latus rectum of the parabola

of the centre of gravity of the body


described by the centre of gravity.

(Coll.

Exam.)

smooth uniform tube which can rotate in a


A particle of mass m
9.
The system starts from rest when the tube is
vertical plane about its middle point.
If 6 is the angle the tube makes with the vertical when its angular velocity is
horizontal.
a maximum and equal to
prove that
is placed in a

o>,

4 (mr* + J/F)

4
&>

- Smgrco 2 cos 6 + mg 2 sin 2 6 = 0,

The

vi]
where

Mk z

is

the

Soluble Problems of Rigid

moment

of inertia of the tube about its centre and r the distance of the

from the centre of the tube.

particle

171

Dynamics
(Coll.

Exam.)

10.
Four uniform rods, smoothly jointed at their ends, form a parallelogram which
can move smoothly on a horizontal surface, one of the angular points being fixed.
Initially the configuration is rectangular and the framework is set in motion in such a
manner that the angular velocity of one pair of opposite sides is Q, that of the other pair

being zero. Shew that when the angle between the rods
angular velocity of the system is Q.

is

maximum

or

minimum, the

(Coll.

Exam.)

11.
Two homogeneous rough spheres of equal radii a and of masses m, m rest on a
smooth horizontal plane with m at the highest point of m. If the system is disturbed,
shew that the inclination of their common normal 6 to the vertical is given by the

equation
(l-cos<9).

12.

uniform rod

sible string of length

c.

AB

is

(Coll.

Exam.)

of length 2a and is attached at one end to a light inextenof this string is fixed at
to a point in a smooth

The other end

horizontal plane on which the rod moves.


projected without rotation with velocity

Initially

GAB

is

a straight line and the rod

Prove that the cosine of the greatest subsequent angle between the rod and string

l-/6c.
13.

them

is

in the direction perpendicular to its length.

(Coll.

is

Exam.)

To a

slides,

fixed point arc smoothly jointed two uniform rods of length 2a, and upon
by means of a smooth ring at each end, a third rod similar in all respects.

Initially the three rods are in a horizontal line

with the ends of the third rod at the


middle points of the other two and, on the application of an impulse, the rods begin to
rotate with angular velocity Q in a horizontal plane.
Shew that the third rod will slide
right off the other

two unless
J3.

(Coll.

Exam.)

hollow thin cylinder of radius a and mass


14.
is maintained at rest in a
horizontal position on a rough plane whose inclination is a, and contains an insect of mass
at rest on the line of contact with the plane.
The cylinder is released as the insect
starts off with velocity V: if this relative velocity be maintained and the cylinder roll up

shew that it will come to instantaneous


makes an angle d with the vertical given by
hill,

F 2 {1 - cos (0-a)}+ag (cos a -cos

rest

<9)

when the

radius through the insect

= (1 +M/m) ag (d-a)

sin

a.

(Coll.

Exam.)

A uniform

smooth plane tube can turn smoothly about a fixed axis of rotation
and intersecting it the moment of inertia of the tube about the axis
is 1.
Initially the tube is rotating with angular velocity Q about the axis, and a particle
of mass m is projected with velocity V within the tube from the point of intersection of
the tube with the axis. The system then moves under no external forces. Prove that,
when the particle is at a distance r from the axis, the square of its velocity relative to the
15.

lying in its plane

tube

is
1

Q2

16.

(Coll.

Exam.)

uniform straight rod of mass


is laid across two smooth horizontal
pegs so
its ends projects beyond the corresponding peg.
A second uniform rod of
and length 21 is fastened to the first at some point between the pegs by a

that each of

mass

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

172

[CH.

universal joint. This rod is initially held horizontal and in contact with the first rod and
then let go, so as to oscillate in the vertical plane through the first rod. Prove that if 6
:

be the angle which the second rod makes with the vertical at any instant, and
distance through which the first rod has moved from rest,

x the

(M+m) x + ml sin 6 = ml,


and

(td

--

17.

body

^>

6\

ifr

= 2g cos 6.

(Coll.

Exam.)

rotate in its plane about a fixed point, and a second plane


smooth straight groove in the first body, its motion being in
shew that the relation between the relative advance x along the groove

plane body

is free

m + M cos

is free to

to slide along a

the same plane


and the angle of rotation & (no external forces being supposed to act on the system)
is of the form
;

where

P and Q are

respectively linear

and quadratic functions of x 1

(Coll.

-.

Exam.)

pendulum is formed of a straight rod and a hollow circular bob, and fitting
bob is a smooth vertical lamina in the shape of a segment of a circle, the
distances of the centre (C) of the bob from the point of suspension (0) and from the
Prove that if M, m are the
centre of gravity (G} of the lamina being I and c respectively.
masses of the pendulum and lamina, k and 1J their respective radii of gyration about
and G, 6 and $ the angles which OC and CG make with the vertical, then twice the
work done by gravity on the system during its motion from rest is equal to
18.

inside the

2
(

+c 2

2
)

<j>

+ 2mcZcos (6-$)

6$.

(Coll.

Exam.)

is attached to the end of a fine string which passes round


19.
particle of mass
the circumference of a wheel of mass M, the other end of the string being attached to a
point in that circumference, a length I of the string being straight initially, and the wheel
(radius a and radius of gyration k) being free to move about a fixed vertical axis through

centre; the particle, which lies on a smooth horizontal plane, is projected at right
angles to the string, so that the string begins to wrap round the wheel prove that, if the
is
string eventually unwinds from the wheel, the shortest length of the straight portion

its

(P
20.

carriage

rolls straight

is

- a 2 - J/F/m)*.

(Coll.

Exam. )

the horizon and


placed on an inclined plane making an angle a with
The floor of
and
the
wheels
the
between
plane.
slipping

down without any

the carriage is parallel to the plane and a perfectly rough ball


that the acceleration of the carriage down the plane is

is

placed freely on

it.

Shew

is the mass of the carriage excluding the wheels, m the sum of the masses of the
that of the ball. The friction between the wheels
which
are uniform discs, and
wheels,
and the axes is neglected.
(Coll. Exam.)

where

A uniform rod of mass m t and length 2a is capable of rotating freely about its
upper extremity and is initially inclined at an angle of Tr/6 to the vertical. A second
to the lower end of the first and rests
rod, of mass m 2 and length 2a, is smoothly attached
Shew that if the centre
initially at an angle of 2-/3 with it and in a horizontal position.
of the lower rod commence to move in a direction making an angle -rr/G with the vertical,
21.

fixed

then 3wH = 14m 2

(Coll.

Exam.)

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

vi]

22.

uniform circular disc

173

symmetrically suspended by two elastic strings of

is

natural length c inclined at an angle a to the vertical, and attached to the highest point of
the disc. If one of the strings is cut, prove that the initial curvature of the path of the
centre of the disc

is
(c

where

sin 4a

b sin 2a)/6 (b

c),

b is the equilibrium length of each string.

Exam.)

(Coll.

AC

rods AC, CB of equal length 2a are freely jointed at (7, the rod
being
freely moveable about a fixed point A, and the end B of the rod CB is attached to A by
an inextensible string of length 4a/ x/3. The system being in equilibrium, the string is cut

Two

23.

shew that the radius of curvature of the

initial

path of

at

is

_!_

"

181V

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

24.

rod of length 2a

is

supported in a horizontal position

by two

I,

1897.)

light strings

which

pass over two smooth pegs in a horizontal line at a distance 2a apart and have at their
other extremities weights each equal to one half that of the rod. One of the strings is cut
prove that the initial curvature of the path of that end of the rod to which the cut string
;

was attached

is

27/25.

A heavy plank,

25.

Exam.)

(Coll.

straight

and very rough,

free to

is

turn in a vertical plane about

its centre of gravity is c.


A rough heavy
placed on this plank at a distance b from the axis, on the side remote from the
centre of gravity the plank being held horizontal.
The system is now left free to move.

a horizontal axis from which the distance of


sphere

is

Prove that the

radius of curvature of the path of the centre of the sphere is


Mc )j(mb + Ma ) m and
are the masses of the sphere and
110), where d = (tnb
21&#/(5
the plank, and Mob is the moment of inertia of the plank about the axis.
initial

(Coll.

A light stiff rod of length

Exam.)

two equal particles of mass m at distances k


from the centre on each side of it to each end of the rod is tied an end of an inextensible
string of length 2a on which is a ring of mass m
Initially the string and rod are in one
straight line on a smooth horizontal table with the string taut and the ring at the loop
the ring is then projected at right angles to the rod, shew that the relative motion will be
26.

2c carries

oscillatory if
c2

27.

Three equal uniform

/P

>

+ 2i/m

rods, each of length

Exam.)

(Coll.

are firmly joined to form an equilateral


a uniform bar of length 26 and weight
is freely jointed to
c,

ABC of weight W;
the triangle at C. This system rests in equilibrium in contact with the surface of a fixed
smooth sphere of radius a,
being horizontal and in contact with the sphere, and the
bar being in the vertical plane through the centre of the triangle the bar, and the centre of
triangle

AB

the triangle, are on opposite sides of the vertical line through C. Prove that the inclination
of the plane of the triangle to the horizon is the angle whose tangent is
[abfj.

where

+ 2c\ 2 ]

= a -rc -^c,
2

-T-

[np (a
2

+ 1 c2 + A V - 2a6c]
)

= 12a 2 -c2

and

n=W/W.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part


28.

I,

1896.)

A body, under the action of no forces, moves so that the resolved

part of its angular


constant shew that the

velocity about one of the principal axes at the centre of gravity is


angular velocity of the body must be constant, and find its resolved parts about the other
two principal axes when the moments of inertia about these axes are equal.
;

(Coll

Exam.)

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

174
Shew

29.

[CH.

that a herpolhode cannot have a point of inflexion.

(A simple proof of
xxxiv. (1906),

p.

this result is given

by Lecornu,

(Hess.)

Bull, de la Soc. Math, de France,

40.)

In the motion under no forces of a body one of whose points is fixed, shew that the
30.
motion of every quadric homocyclic with the momental ellipsoid relative to the fixed point,
and rigidly connected with the body, is the same as if it were made to roll without sliding
on a fixed quadric of revolution, which has its centre at the fixed point, and whose axis is
the invariable

line.

(Gebbia.)

In the motion of a body under no forces round a fixed point, shew that the three

31.

diameters of the momental ellipsoid at the fixed point and the diameter of the ellipsoid
reciprocal to the momental ellipsoid, determined respectively by the intersection of the
invariable plane with the three principal planes and with the plane perpendicular to the
instantaneous axis, describe areas proportional to the times, so that the accelerations of
their extremities are directed to the centre.

(Siacci.)

When a body moveable about a fixed point is acted on by forces whose moment
32.
round the instantaneous axis is always zero, shew that the velocity of rotation is
proportional to that radius vector of the momental ellipsoid which is in the direction
of this axis.

Shew that

this

theorem is still true if the body


on a fixed surface.

is

fixed point and


(Flye St Marie.)

moveable about a

also constrained to slide

plane lamina is initially moving with equal angular velocities Q about the
axes
of greatest and least moment of inertia at its centre of mass, and has
principal
no angular velocity about the third principal axis express the angular velocities about
these axes as elliptic functions of the time, supposing no forces to act on the lamina.
33.

If 6

be the angle between the plane of the lamina and any fixed plane, shew that

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part


34.

A rigid

body

is

I,

1896.)

kinetically symmetrical about an axis which passes through a fixed


is set in motion in any manner
shew that in the

point above its centre of gravity and

subsequent motion, except in one case, the centre of gravity can never be vertically over
the fixed point

and

find the greatest height

it

attains.

(Coll.

Exam.)

In the motion of the top on the rough plane, shew that there exists an auxiliary
also with respect
OTJ whose motion with respect to the fixed axes OXYZ
the invariable planes being the horizontal
to the moving axes Oxyz is a Poinsot motion
35.

set of axes

&n<\

plane in the former case, and the plane perpendicular to the axis of the body in the second
case.

(Jacobi.)

uniform solid of revolution moves about a point, so that its motion may be
represented by the uniform rolling of a cone of semi-vertical angle a fixed in the body upon
an equal cone fixed in space, the axis of the former being the axis of revolution. Shew that
the couple necessary to maintain the motion is of magnitude
36.

Q 2 tan

{C+ (C- A]

cos 2a},

the resultant angular velocity and A and C the principal moments of inertia at
the point, and that the couple lies in the plane of the axes of the cones. (Coll. Exam.)

where Q

is

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

vi]

37.

made

vertical plane is

to rotate with

175

uniform angular velocity about a vertical

itself, and a perfectly rough cone of revolution has its vertex fixed at a point of
that axis. Shew that, if the line of contact make an angle 6 with the vertical, and /3 and y
be the extreme values of #, and a be the semi-vertical angle of the cone,

axis in

K2

A?#\ 2 _
-

-,

&Q n,

\dt /

where h

is

sin 2 a (cos & - cos /3) (cos y


cos a
cos @ cosy

- cos

the distance of the centre of gravity of the cone from

of gyration about a generator.

its vertex,

and k

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

I,

its

radius

1896.)

body can rotate freely about a fixed vertical axis for which its moment of
/ the body carries a second body in the form of a disc which can rotate about
a horizontal axis, fixed in the first body and intersecting the vertical axis. In the
position
of equilibrium the moments and product of inertia of the disc with regard to the vertical
and horizontal axes respectively are A, B, F. Prove that if the system start from rest
38.

inertia

is

with the plane of the disc inclined at an angle a to the vertical, the
through an angle

IF
arctan

f^sinal
-

first

body

will oscillate

Exam. )

(Coll.

}-

gyrostat consists of a heavy symmetrical flywheel freely mounted in a heavy


case
and is suspended from a fixed point by a string of length I fixed to a point
spherical
in the case.
The centres of gravity of the flywheel and case are coincident. Shew that,
39.

the whole revolve in steady motion round the vertical with angular velocity
and the axis of the gyrostat inclined at angles a, to the vertical, then

if

the strin-

i2,

Q2
/Q

and

sin

- Afl 2
j3

(I

sin a +

sin

/3

sin

cos /3=

/3

+ b cos

Mg sec a

=g tan a,

(a sin

a)

(/3

+ b cos

(/3

a)},

the mass of the gyrostat, a and b the coordinates of the point of attachment
of the string with reference to axes coinciding with, and at right angles to, the axis of the
flywheel, / the angular momentum of the flywheel about its axis and A the moment of

whore

is

about a line perpendicular to

inertia

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

its axis.

I,

1900.)

system consisting of any number of equal uniform rods loosely jointed and
the same straight line is struck at any point by a blow perpendicular to the rods.
Shew that if u, v, w be the initial velocities of the middle points of any three consecutive
40.

initially in

rods,

u + 4;V + w = Q.

(Coll.

Exam.)

41.
Any number of uniform rods of masses A, B, C, ..., Z are smoothly jointed to
each other in succession and laid in a straight line on a smooth table. If the end Z be
free and the end A moved with velocity F in a direction perpendicular to the line of the

rods, then the initial velocities of the joints

(AB\

(BC),

...

and the end

Z are

a, b, ...,

(Coll.

Exam.)

z,

where

0=A

(F + 2a) +

(2a + &),

= B (a
y + 22 = 0.

and
42.

points

Six equal uniform rods form a regular hexagon loosely jointed at the
angular
a blow is given at right angles to one of them at its middle point, shew that the

opposite rod begins to

move with T]o

of the velocity of the rod struck.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, 1882.)

The Soluble Problems of Rigid Dynamics

176

[OH. vi

shew that the initial axis of


fixed, is struck
body at rest, with one point
diametral
with
to
the
momental ellipsoid at 0, of
is
the
line,
respect
body
the plane of the impulsive couple acting on the body.
43.

rotation of the

The positive octant of the ellipsoid ^72 /a 2 +3/ 2 /62 + 22 /6 2 = l has the
44.
Shew that if an impulsive couple in the plane
-

act

upon the

2 \b

origin fixed.

a/

octant, it will begin to revolve about the axis of

z.

(Coll.

Exam.)

An ellipsoid is rotating about its centre with angular velocity


45.
2 , w s) referred
the centre is free and a point (#, y, z) on the surface is suddenly
to its principal axes
(Coll. Exam.)
brought to rest. Find the impulsive reaction at that point.
&>

(<BI,

A is
equal rods AB, BC inclined at an angle a are smoothly jointed at B
prove that the initial
parallel to the external bisector of the angle A BC
angular velocities of AB, BC are in the ratio
46.

made

Two

move

to

2 + 3 sin 2 5
2t

47.

15 sin |
2*

A uniform cone is rotating with angular velocity

this generator

is

(Coll.

o>

about a generator when suddenly

the altitude, a the semi-vertical angle, and k the radius of gyration about a

is

is fixed.

is

diameter of the base.


48.

Exam.)

loosed and the diameter of the base which intersects the generator

Prove that the new angular velocity

where h

(Coll.

rough disc can turn about an axis perpendicular to

its

circular cone rests on the disc with its vertex just at the axis.

to turn with angular velocity Q,

Exam.)

plane, and a 1 ough


If the disc be made

shew that the cone takes an amount of kinetic energy

equal to

|Q
49.

One end

/{cos a/J

+sin 2

/{7}.

(Coll.

Exam.)

of an inelastic string is attached to a fixed point and the other to a point


body of mass M. The body is allowed to fall freely under gravity

in the surface of a

without rotation. Shew that just after the string becomes tight the loss of kinetic energy
dvie to the impact is

where V

is

the resolved velocity of the body in the direction of the string just before
(I, m, n, A, p, v) are
C are the principal

impact, the string only touching the body at the point of attachment,
the coordinates of the string at the instant it becomes tight, and A, B,

moments

of inertia of the

body with respect

to its principal axes at its centre of inertia.


(Coll.

Exam.)

CHAPTER

VII

THEORY OF VIBRATIONS
Vibrations about equilibrium.

76.

In Dynamics we frequently have to deal with systems for which there


an equilibrium-configuration, i.e. a configuration in which the system

exists

can remain permanently at rest thus in the case of the spherical pendulum,
the configurations in which the bob is vertically over or vertically under the
:

point of support are of this character. If (q 1} q2


of a system and L its kinetic potential, and if ( 1?

q n ) are the coordinates


...,
n ) are the values of

...,
2

the coordinates in an equilibrium-configuration, the equations of motion

d fdL\
"7-,Upat
\oqrj

must be
ji

by the

satisfied

= 0, #2=0,

...,

(r=l,

2,

...,w)

set of values

= 0, ^ = 0,

#n

dL

=
-3oq r

#2

= 0,

...,

gn

= 0,

ql

=a

,
</

or 2

...,

qn

= an

The

values of the coordinates in the various possible equilibrium-con


figurations of a system are therefore obtained by solving for q lt qz ..., qn the
,

equations

|=
in

(,.

1,2,. ..,),

which q l} q 2 ..., q n are to be replaced by zero.


In many cases, if the system is initially placed near an equilibrium-con
,

having very small initial velocities, the divergence


from the equilibrium-configuration will never become very marked, the

figuration, its particles

particles always remaining in the vicinity of their original positions and


never acquiring large velocities.
shall now study motions of this
type*;

We

they are called vibrations about an equilibrium-configuration^.


*

More

we study

in this chapter the limiting form to which this type of


divergence from a state of rest in the equilibrium-configu
ration tends to zero the study of the motions which differ by a finite, though not large, amount
from a state of rest in the equilibrium-configuration is given later in Chapter XVI the discussion
strictly speaking,

motion approximates when the

initial

of the present chapter may be regarded as a first approximation to that of Chapter XVI.
t The theory of vibrations has developed from Galileo s study of the small oscillations of a

pendulum.

In the

first

half of the eighteenth century the vibrations of a stretched cord were

investigated by Brook Taylor, D Alembert, Euler, and Daniel Bernoulli, the last-named of whom
in 1753 enunciated the principle of the resolution of all compound types of vibration into inde

pendent simple modes. The general theory of the vibrations of a dynamical system with a
number of degrees of freedom was given by Lagrange in 1762-5 (Oenvres, i. p. 520).
w. D.

finite

12

178

Theory of Vibrations

[CH.

vn

In the present work we are of course concerned only with the vibrations of systems
which have a finite number of degrees of freedom the study of the vibrations of systems
which have an infinite number of degrees of freedom, which is here excluded, will be found
in treatises on the Analytical Theory of Sound.
;

We

suppose that the system is defined by its kinetic energy T and


potential energy F, and that the position of the system is specified by the
coordinates (qlt q2 ,..,q n ) independently of the time, so that T does not
shall

its

we shall also suppose that no coordinates have been


explicitly
the
kinetic
energy T is therefore a homogeneous quadratic function
ignored
with
of
coefficients involving q lt q2 ..., q n in any way.
There
t^n,
^2.
is evidently no loss of generality in assuming that the equilibrium-con
involve

<?i,

figuration corresponds to zero values of the coordinates q lt q. ...,qn so that


are very small throughout the motion considered.
9
;

2>

<?i*

9i>

<?*>

The

and products of q 1} q 2 ..., q n in T are


all the coordinates and velocities are
the motion retain only the terms of lowest

coefficients of the squares

functions of qlt
small,

>9n

<?t>

we can

q.2

qn

...,

as

however

in approximating to

order in T, and so can replace

all these coefficients


by the constant values
which they assume when q q. ..., q n are replaced by zero. The kinetic
energy is therefore for our purposes a homogeneous quadratic function of
l

<jn

i2,

>

with constant

??i

Moreover,

2>

coefficients.

we expand the function

if

by Taylor s theorem in ascending

powers of q l q2 ..., qn the term independent of q ly q.2 ..., qn can be omitted,


since it exercises no influence on the equations of motion and there are no
,

terms linear in q 1} q z

...,

qn

dV
since if such terms existed the quantities dqr

would not be zero in the equilibrium

position, as they

must

be.

The terms

V are therefore the terms quadratic in q l} q2 ...,q n


terms of the expansion in comparison with these,
the
higher
Neglecting
we have therefore
expressed as a homogeneous quadratic form in the
variables q lt q.2 ..., q n with constant coefficients.
of

lowest

order in

Thus

problem of vibratory motions about a configuration of equilibrium


depends on the solution of Lagrangian equations of motion in which the kinetic
and potential energies are homogeneous quadratic forms in the velocities and
coordinates respectively, with constant coefficients.

77.

the

Normal

coordinates.

In order to solve the equations of motion of a vibrating system, we write


the expressions for the kinetic and potential energies in the form

T = | (a n qf + a

22

q./

+ a nn q n + 2a
2

. .

l2

q,

q2

2a ls q q 3 +...+ 2a n _
l

1>

q n -iq n ),

179

Theory of Vibrations

76, 77]

of these T is ( 26) a positive definite form and the determinant formed


of the quantities a rs is not zero (since if this condition is not satisfied,
The equations of
on less than n
T will
velocities).
;

independent

depend
motion are

8F

d /dT\

if

a change of variables

-o-i,
-i

2,

....),

q 2 ...,q n
made, such that the new variables
new equations of motion will be

is

(<?/,

are linear functions of (q lt q a ...,q n ), the


,

(]b

U J- \

brri

-J-.

"

\oqr j

Ck

~t

(r=l,

-;,
oq r

...,),

2,

and these equations are clearly linear combinations of the original equations.
Suppose then* that the original equations of motion are multiplied
m.2 ..., m n and added together.
respectively by undetermined constants m,,
,

The

resulting equation will be of the form

where

Q=h

provided the constants

ra 2

lt

+ h^q +

q1
,

~i~

tinn^^ii

^~

These equations can coexist only


ftji A/

a.21

62i

a 22 X

b nl

n h l} h a
,

^ /\^m ^^i

Gfi 2

+ hn q n
...,

h n X satisfy the equations


,

"\

if

^ji>

...,

...

^/i2^^2

II
*~

^nH***

\
n,)

^=

"\

A/t7j,.

a root of the determinantal equation

is

Oj2

~i

6 22)

>

flinA/

2ri

b.2r

Om

this equation, we can determine from the


...,
n h l h 2 ...,h n ;
2
preceding equations a possible set of ratios for
these ratios may, in certain cases, be partly indeterminate, but in all cases at

Moreover,

least

if

one function

is

any root of

m^ m

Now

let

can be obtained in this way, satisfying the equation

so

U>

= o.

a linear change of variables be effected so that the quantity Q


there will be no ambiguity in
is one of the new variables

determined

This method of proof

is

due to Jordan, Comptes Rendus, LXXIV. (1872)

p. 1395.

122

Theory of Vibrations

180

[OH.

vn

denoting the new variables by q 1} q 2 ..., q n we shall take q to be identical


with Q, so that the above equations are satisfied by the values h-L = \, A2 = 0,
h n = 0. Since the form T is a positive definite form, the coefficients
\

. . .

"22,

33>

of q 2 q3
,

a nn of the squares of q z q 3) ..., q n will not be zero: so instead


q n we can again take new variables respectively equal to
,

^is

+ ^12 ft. & +


.

q*

By

this

so

"

change of variables the terms in q^, q^q z


that a 21 a 31 ..., a m are zero.

q^q n are

removed from

= 0,

h n =0, a 21

Now introducing the conditions h = \, h = 0,


= in the equations which determine m m
.., a nl

/i 3

lt

we obtain the

?i-

Tin

...,

we can assume

+ **in

..,2

?i,
1*33

1*22

...,

...,

mn

h lt h 2

...

= 0,

hn

X,

values

m = l/a n
1

611

ra.2

= Xiu,

fea

=
=

0,

m = 0,

0,

= 0,

631

...,
.

m n = 0,

= 0.

6 M1

It follows that the equation


.

dt
cfia

+ \qi =

has the form

\dqj
0,

d /dT\
while the equations

ji ( o^~ )
dt \dq r J

d /dT

have the form

so that

and

dV
5~~

do not involve

q^

(**"*,

>

oq r

dV

V9^r/

T = T-a n q*,

where

=T-

3-

~*

"

(r

2, 3,

),

9^r

V = V- ^a^q*,
and qlf

This last system of equations may be regarded as the system of equations


1) degrees of freedom.
corresponding to a vibrational problem with (n
Treating them in the same manner, we can isolate another coordinate q2
such that

if
T"

=T - lavtf,

V"

- F - faoKqf

do not involve q 2 or
and
a%, are certain constants), then
are
determined
coordinates
the
and
...,
n
4
by the equations of
q
q3 q
q2
of
a vibrational problem with (n
freedom, in which the kinetic
2) degrees
and
and potential energies are respectively

(where X2 and

T"

V"

T"

V".

Proceeding in this way, we shall finally have the variables chosen so that
the kinetic and potential energies of the original system can be written in
terms of the new variables in the form

T = % (a n gi + 229 + + a nn q n
V = i (&i 2i + /3*q + ...+ &m? ),
2

where a n a^,
,

...,,

Ai.

^22,

*
z

Pnn are constants.

*),

181

Theory of Vibrations

77]

If finally we take as variables the quantities ^a n qi, Va^g,, .... ^a


instead of q l} q 2 ..., qn the kinetic and potential energies take the form
,

V = | (/ij^ +
2

where pk stands

fJ, 2

q<?

for fikkl akk-

In this reduction

immaterial whether the determinantal equation has


The final result can be

it is

or has groups of repeated roots.

its roots all distinct

expressed by the statement that if the kinetic and potential energies of a


vibrating system are given in the form

+ a nn q n + 2a ^ q +
+ b nn qn + 26 q +
2

...

V=
it is

always possible

and

12

<7,

. . .

2a,l _ 1) n q n -^ q n \

4-

2b n -i, n qn-iqn),

when expressed

in

terms of the new

form

= \ /Mi + ^2 9V +

+ Mn

s
,

^, /i.2) ..., n are constants. These new coordinates are


normal coordinates or principal coordinates of the vibrating system.

the quantities

Now

find a linear transformation of the coordinates such

to

potential energies,

coordinates, have the

called the

that the kinetic

where

12

it is

fjt

a well-known algebraical theorem that the roots of the determi

nantal equation
b ln

=0

2 A,

an i A,
are the values of

for

o n i .................. a nn A,

which the expression

- 6 n ) q* + (a, X - 6
(a n \
2

o nn

22 )

q<?

can be made to depend on

+ (a nn \ - b nn ) q n + 2 (a u \ 2

than n independent variables (which

less

will

be

linear functions of q 1} q.2 ..., q n ).


Since this is a property which persists
linear
of
variables, we see that the determinantal equation
through any
change
,

is
<?i,

invariantive,
92,

qn

i.e.

and

if g/,
if

q2

q n are any n independent linear functions of


expressed in terms of q^, q2 ..., q n take

T and V when

the form

T=\

qi

+ a* q^ +

+ 2a

12

?/ q,

...),

182

Theory of Vibrations

[OH. vii

=0

then the roots of the new determinantal equation a,./X &,./


same as the roots of the original determinantal equation a rg \

b r^

are the

= 0.

But when the kinetic and potential energies have been brought by the
introduction of normal coordinates to the form

the determinantal equation

is

= 0,

so its roots are

//, 2

It follows that the constants

//,.

/JL Z

p n which
,

occur as the coefficients of the squares of the normal coordinates in the potential
energy, are the n roots (distinct or repeated) of the determinantal equation
|

a rs \

b rs

= 0,

where a n a 12
,

expressions for the kinetic


Lt will

and

bn

6 12

...

are the coefficients in the original

potential energies.

be seen that the problem of reducing the kinetic and potential energies to their

expressions in terms of normal coordinates

is essentially the problem of


simultaneously
reducing each of two given homogeneous quadratic expressions in n variables to a sum of
squares of n new variables the fact that T is a function of the velocities while V is a
function of the coordinates does not affect the question, since the formulae of transforma
:

tion for the velocities j l5 j 2

coordinates qi, q 2

...,

qn

>

^n are the

same as the formulae

of transformation for the

It might be supposed from the foregoing that it is always possible to transform


simultaneously each of two given homogeneous quadratic expressions in n variables to a
sum of squares of n new variables; but this is not the case for example, it is not possible
;

to transform the

two quadratic expressions

ax2 + bxy + az 2 and


to the forms
2

where

The

may

77,

f are linear functions of x, y,

conditions which

must be

and o
z.

satisfied in order that

be simultaneously reducible to the form

two given quadratic expressions

183

Theory of Vibrations

77, 78]
are, in fact, that

shall be linear*.

the elementary divisors (Elementartheiler) of the determinant a rs\ brs


If however one of the two given forms is a definite form (as we saw was
\\

j|

the case with the kinetic energy in the dynamical problem), the elementary divisors are
always linear, and the simultaneous reduction to sums of squares is therefore possible

this explains the circumstance that the reduction

can always be effected in the dynamical

problem of vibrations.

The universal possibility of the reduction to normal coordinates for dynamical systems
was established by Weierstrass in 1858 1
previous writers (following Lagrange) had
supposed that in cases where the determinantal equation had repeated roots a set of
normal coordinates would not exist, and that terms involving the time otherwise than in
trigonometric and exponential functions would occur in the final solution of the equations
;

of motion.

Sylvesters theorem on the reality of the roots of the determinantal

78.

equation.

We have seen in the preceding article that by introducing new variables


which are linear functions of the original variables, it is always possible to
reduce the kinetic and potential energies of a vibrating system to the form
q

+ Ma +

The question arises as to whether this transformation is real,


the coefficients
h ly h 2 ..., h n which occur in
1} m 2
...,
n

i.e.

whether

the trans

formation are real or complex.


Sijice these coefficients are given by linear
whose
with
the
\n
coefficients,
equations
possible exception of the roots Xj A,2
,

of the determinantal equation, are certainly real, the question reduces to


investigation of the reality or otherwise of the roots of the equation

au

\b

ttojA,

a m^
it

~ b nl

a 12 X-&i2

......

amX

b ln

......

a.2n

b2n

u nn \

b nn

ooX

a n2 \

b n2
.

being known that the quantities a rs and


2

Oii^i
is

b.2l

+ a^q +
2

...+ a nn q n 2

+ 2a w g

b rs are all real,


1

ga

+ ... + 2a, _
l

an

=0;
\

and that

]>n

gn_1 g n

a positive definite form.

Let A denote| the determinant \\a rg \ b rs


and let Aj. denote the
determinant obtained from it by striking out the first row and first column
let A., denote the determinant obtained from A
by striking out the first two
,

Cf.

Muth

s treatise

on Elementartheiler (Leipzig, 1899); or Bocher

Algebra (New York, 1907).


t Cf. Weierstrass Collected Works, Vol. i. p. 233.
The following proof is due to Nanson, Mess, of Math. xxvi. (1896),

Introduction

p. 59.

to

Higher

184

Theory of Vibrations

rows and

first

two columns, and so

Then

on.

in

[CH. vii

any symmetrical deter

minant, say

where arg = agr

it is

known

that
9a 12 /

and hence

if

0*u
signs

thus

vanishes the quantities

we have

and 5

OOufa*

must have opposite

the result that in the series of quantities


A,

A lf A

An

...,

A n = 1),

(where

any one member of the series vanishes for a given value of X, the two
adjacent members must have opposite signs for that value of X.
if

Let A r denote the determinant formed from A r by


replacing X by unity
and each of the quantities b rs by zero, so that A r is the coefficient of the
highest power of

is

in

Ar

Since

a positive definite form, A r is positive for all values of r from


coefficients of the highest powers of X in the functions A, A 1;

Thus the

are all of the

same sign

and therefore as X increases from

oo

to

to n.
...

An
oc

these functions lose n changes of sign.

Now

since

vanishes,

it

An

not zero and

is

A r_

follows that the functions A,

A r+1

A A
1;

have opposite signs when A,.


2
..., A n cannot lose or gain a
,

change of sign except when X passes through a root of A. But as X passes


oo
from
to -f oo
the functions lose n changes of sign
and hence the
n roots of the determinant A are all real.
The transformation to normal
coordinates is therefore always a real transformation*.
,

Moreover, since a change of sign is lost in the pair A, Aj every time that X
passes through a root of A, it is evident that Aj must change sign when X
,

increases from one root of

n roots of

to the consecutive root,

(nl)

are separated by the


each of the functions A,, are separated

roots of

by

and hence that the

A^

similarly the roots of


the roots of the function A,. +1
.

has the same sign at X =


as at X =
oo
the root of the function A n _! will not be negative. If moreover A n _ 2 has
as at X =
the same sign at X =
oo
neither of the roots of A n _ 2 will be

Now A n

has no roots

and

if

A n _j

negative:

for

if

this

condition

is

satisfied,

A n_

must have either two


two negative

negative roots or no negative roots, and there cannot be


roots since there is no negative root of n _j to separate them.

Sylvester, Phil.

Mag.

(4) iv. (1852), p.

138: Coll. Papers,

i.

Similarly in

p. 378.

Theory of Vibrations

78, 79]

none of the functions in the series A, A ls A 2 ... A n


general the condition that
the
shall have a negative root is that each of the functions must have
,

same sign

X=

at

as at

A,

=-

in order that all the roots of

have

shall

X=

at

oo

be positive

same sign

the

to be satisfied

Hence the condition

A may

as

(- l)

is

n~r
,

that each quantity A,,


that each of the
i.e.

determinants

But these

be positive.

shall

are the well-known conditions that the quadratic

form

Ai

2
<?i

+ b nn q n + Zb^q* +
2

+ b^q? +

Hence

be a positive definite form.


a rs \ b rs =

shall

minantal equation
the quadratic

gn

roots positive is that

its

\\

form
n _ n q n _l q

b nn q

a positive

shall be

finally the condition that the deter-

shall have all

+ 2& n _ lin g n _

definite

form,

1>

i.e.

that the potential energy in the vibratory

motion shall be essentially positive.


Solution of the differential equations ; the periods; stability.

79.

In order to express the configuration of any vibrating system in terms of


we first determine the normal coordinates of the system, and

the time,

express the kinetic and potential energies in terms of them, so that these
take the form

where

(q l} q 2 ...,q,i) are the

roots

of

(A,!,

normal coordinates, and (Xj,A, 2 ...,\ n ) are the


a rs \
b rs =
these quantities
equation
,

X>,

the

...,

determinantal

The Lagrangian equation

\\

||

\ n ) have been shewn

in the last article to be all real.

of motion for

any coordinate q r

= __
dt \dq
is

dqr

dqr

therefore
r

The

solution of this equation


.

rt

Ar

and

0.

is

+B

r /)
*

+ B r e~
where in each case

if X,. is

if X,. is

zero,

if X,.

negative,

rt

is

positive,

j.

denote constants of integration.

namely

186

Theory of Vibrations

vu

[CH.

appears from these equations that if all the normal coordinates except
one, say qr are initially zero, and if the constant \. corresponding to the
non-zero coordinate is positive, then the coordinates (qi,q2
q r -i,q r +i,
It

will

the coordinate

>

<Jn)

zero, and the system


perform vibrations in which
Moreover the configuration of the
is alone affected.

be permanently
qr

will

an interval of time 2?r/Vx,.. This is usually


that
each
expressed by saying
of the normal coordinates corresponds to an
system

will repeat itself after

independent mode of vibration of the system, provided the corresponding


constant

\r

and

is positive;

the period of this vibration is 2?r/Vx,..

Moreover, if the system be referred to any other set of coordinates which


are not normal coordinates, these coordinates are linear functions of the

normal coordinates

anji the

normal coordinates perform their vibrations

quite independently of each other thus every conceivable vibration of the


system may be regarded as the superposition of n independent normal
vibrations.
This is generally known as Daniel Bernoulli s principle of the
.

superposition of vibrations*.
If the quantities (Xj, \ 2 ...,X n ) are not all positive, it appears from the
above solution that those normal coordinates q r which correspond to the
non-positive roots X,. will not oscillate about a zero value when the system is
in its equilibrium position, but will
slightly disturbed from a state of rest
,

increase so as to invalidate the assumption made at the outset of the work,


namely that the higher powers of the coordinates can be neglected. In
this case therefore, there will not be a vibration at all, and the equilibrium
If however the initial disturbance is
configuration .is said to be unstable.
such that these normal coordinates which correspond to non-positive roots
X r are not affected, the system will perform vibrations in which the rest

of the normal coordinates oscillate about zero values.

The normal modes

of vibration,

coordinates for which the

be

stable.

as a whole

corresponding root

X,.

is

positive,

are said to

Xr

are all positive, the equilibrium-configuration


The condition for stability of the equi
said to be stable.

If the constants
is

which correspond to those normal

librium-configuration
the potential energy

is

therefore,

by the theorem

of the last article, that

of the vibrating system shall be a positive

definite

form.

This result might have been expected from a consideration of the integral of energy
for this integral is

T+

V=h,

where T and F are the quadratic forms which represent the kinetic and potential energies,
and where h is a constant. This constant h will be small if the initial divergence from the
7
if V is also a positive
equilibrium state is small. But T is a positive definite form and
definite form, we must have T and V each less than h, so T and V will remain small
throughout the motion the motion will therefore never differ greatly from the equilibrium;

configuration,

i.e. it

will
*

be

stable.

Histoire de V Academic de Berlin, annee 1753,

p. 147.

187

Theory of Vibrations

79, 80]

Examples of vibrations about equilibrium.

80.

We

shall

now

number

discuss a

of illustrative cases of vibration about

equilibrium.
To find the vibration-period of a cylinder of any
a perfectly rough fixed cylinder.

(i)

cross-section which

can

roll

on the

outside of

Let s be the arc described on the fixed cylinder by the point of contact, s being
measured from the equilibrium position let p and p be the radii of curvature of the
cross-sections of the fixed and moving cylinders respectively at the points which are in
contact in the equilibrium position p and p being supposed
positive when the cylinders
are convex to each other let
be the mass of the moving cylinder, Mk* its moment of
inertia about its centre of
gravity, and c the distance of the centre of gravity from the
;

initial position of

the point of contact in the moving cylinder.

between the common normal to the cylinders and the


the angle between the common normal at time t arid the vertical,
a + s/p + s/p is the angle made with the vertical by the line
joining the centre of curvature
of the moving cylinder with the original
point of contact in the moving cylinder, and
s/p + s/p is the angle made with the vertical by the line joining the last-named point to
If a denotes the initial angle

vertical,

then a + s/p

is

the centre of gravity of the moving cylinder.


is

The angular

velocity of the

moving cylinder

therefore

..,.,.
so its
kinetic energy is
.

The
V

\P

potential energy

Mg x height

is

of the centre of gravity of the

= Mg \(p
(p + p )cos (o+-] -p

moving cylinder above some

cos(a + - +
P

Neglecting

s3

P/

+ ccos

[\P

fixed position

+
p

this gives

PP

The Lagrangian equation

\ PP

of motion,

dT

fdT\

dt \di

Jf (# + c 2) (1

gives

+P/

PP

\ PP

and the vibrations are therefore given by the equation

where
X

is

A and

are constants of integration to be determined

by the

initial conditions,

and

given by the equation

XV9

The vibration-period
(ii)

tion of

ff
PP
-r~ 5 {(
COSa
K + C 2 (p + p
,

C[

is 27T/X.

To find the periods of the normal modes of vibration about an


equilibrium-configura
a particle moving on a fixed smooth surface under gravity.

The tangent-plane

to

equilibrium-configuration

the surface at the point occupied by the particle in the


evidently horizontal take as axes of x and y the tangents to

is

188

Theory of Vibrations

vn

[OH.

the lines of curvature of the surface at this point, and as axis of


upwards so that the equation to the surface is approximately

a line drawn vertically

where p

The

and p 2 denote the principal radii of curvature, measured positively upwards.


l
kinetic energy and potential energy are approximately

T=\m(xi -\-i/2
V= mgz

and

&
It is evident

(where

in is

the mass),

y*

from these expressions that x and y are the normal coordinates

the

equations of motion are


P2

Pi

and the periods

of the

normal modes of vibration are therefore


9^ZiTT

fl
\

1
I

anH

clIlLl

9
-.

zAe normal modes of vibration of a rigid body, one of whose points is fixed,
vibrating about a position of stable equilibrium under the action of any system
of conservative forces.

^o ymc?

(iii)

and which

Take

is

OXYZ the equilibrium

positions of the principal axes of


will
axes
be taken as usual to be these
the
moving
body
We shall suppose the position of the body at any instant
principal axes of inertia.
as the
9 ; we shall regard
defined by the symmetrical parameters (, ij,
77,
x) of
as fixed axes of reference

inertia of the

at the fixed point

independent coordinates of the system, x being defined in terms of them by the equation

The components

so

first

we

body about the moving axes are (16)

as small quantities of
account of the smallness of the vibration, we regard
?;, f
order x therefore differs from unity by a small quantity of the second order, and

On
the

of angular velocity of the

have, correctly to the

and the

order of small quantities,

kinetic energy of the body,

where A, B,
written

The

first

are the principal

potential energy

parameters (,

r;,

is

let it

which

is

moments

some function

given by the equation

of inertia at the point of suspension, can be

of the position of the body,

be denoted by V (,

77,

f ).

and therefore of the

189

Theory of Vibrations

80]
Since zero values of

(|,

correspond to the equilibrium position, there will be

77,

no terms linear in (, 77, f) when F is expanded in ascending powers of (, 77, f) the lowest
terms are therefore of the second order neglecting terms of higher order, we can therefore
:

write

V = a? + b^ + o? + 2fyC+ 2g& + Zhfa


where

a, b,

f, g,

c,

of determining the normal coordinates


two quadratic expressions

The problem
of reducing the

to the

form

where

(#, y, z)

Now

h are constants.

are linear functions of (,

77,

same as that

therefore the

is

).

the equation, referred to the fixed axes, of the momental ellipsoid in

librium position

consider in connexion with this the quadric whose equation

which we shall

its

equi

is

call

the

"

ellipsoid of equal potential energy

is

and determine the common

"

Y Z

be the coordinates, referred


Let (X\
set of conjugate diameters of these quadrics.
,
)
to these conjugate diameters, of a point whose coordinates referred to the fixed axes
are (X, Y,

By

Z\ and

let

the equations connecting

(X

Y Z

and (X,

Z) be

this transformation the equations of the quadrics are reduced to the

X ^+b^ + CjZ

=1,

and therefore the transformation which gives the normal coordinates


problem is

It follows that in

quantities (,

77,

a normal

f) will

But from the

mode

form

of vibration, say that in

in the

dynamical

which x alone

varies, the

be permanently in the ratio

definitions of

it is

evident that

r;,

are, to

the

first

order of small

quantities, proportional to the direction-cosines of the line about which the rotation
of the rigid body takes place, and consequently the normal mode of vibration of the
rigid

body consists of a small

oscillation

X
i.e.

about the

is

Z=li

line
2

whose equation

/,,

line

r
which

about a

one of the

common

=o,

=o,

conjugate diameters of the two quadrics.

is

190

Theory of Vibrations

Hence

we have the result


common conjugate

finally

oscillations about the

[CH.

vn

that the normal vibrations of the body are small

diameters of the momental ellipsoid

and the

ellipsoid

of equal potential energy.

To find the normal coordinates and the periods of normal vibration in the
(iv)
system
of three degrees of freedom for which

F= i

small in comparison with p and q ; and to shew that if such a system be let
go from rest with y and z initially zero, the vibration in x will have temporarily ceased
z
2
2
after a time irp (q -jo )/a and that there will then be a vibration of the same amplitude in
y as the original one was in x.
(Coll. Exam.)
where a

is

The form

of the kinetic

and potential energies suggests the transformation

which gives

(f7=

The
kinetic

variable

is

77

therefore a normal coordinate

to reduce the remaining terms in the

and potential energies to sums of squares, we write

and then we have

The

variables

?/,

<^>,

^ are therefore the normal coordinates.

Suppose that initially

and suppose that k


neglected.

Then

we have
z = 0,

^ = 0,

= U,

<f>

= U,

vibrations of the normal coordinates

last

= 0,
2 = 0,
z

so small that its product with other small quantities can be


to this degree of approximation we have
initially

rj

The

y = 0,

is

r,

The

x = lc,

TJ

and

f=0.
<

are therefore given by the equations

k cos pt,

=1

COS

equation can be written


4.

U cos [pt
L (l ---jL-Jl
I

or

jrW-tfU

= M cos pt cos r a7i


-

(f>

p(q -p-)

+ ~ k sin pt sin

a -t

191

Theory of Vibrations

80, 81]

The motion can

therefore be approximately represented initially by


T)

k cos

pt,

4>

= ^k cos pt,

or

y = 0.

x = k cos pt,
After an interval of time Trp(q
?7

)/a?,

the motion

= \k cos pt,

l;k

<f)

or

is

approximately represented by

cos pt,

y~ kcospt;

0,

which establishes the result stated.

81.

a new constraint on

Effect of

a vibrating system.

the periods of

We

shall now consider the effect produced on the periods of normal


vibration of a dynamical system about a configuration of stable equilibrium
when the number of degrees of freedom of the system is diminished by the
introduction of an additional constraint
is specified in terms of its normal
so that the kinetic and potential energies have

Suppose that the original system


coordinates (q 1 q,
the form

and

let

q n ),

...,

the additional constraint be expressed by the equation

we can expand the function / in ascending


and
retain
..., q n
q.2
only the first terms of the expansion: we
the
constraint
can thus express
by the equation
Since q

<?

>

powers of q l}

where A,,

<?n

An

...,

are small,

>

are constants.

As the

equilibrium-configuration

is

supposed

to be compatible with the constraint, there will be no constant term.


means of this equation we can eliminate q n we thus have

By

V = \ X.V +

+ ^n-i

The Lagrangian equations


fore the (n

/n-!

(A

9l

+A

_,

qn^y

of motion of the constrained


system are there

1) equations

Ar

qr

+ \ r *q r + f*A r =

(r

(r

l, 2, ...,

n-1),

I, 2, ...,

n-

1)

192

Theory of Vibrations

[CH.

vn

where
1

P = -T--.
(A & +
^l
n

+ -4

_!</_,)

+ -j-iCAtfi + ... + ^-i^n-i)


-d.

so the equations of motion of the constrained


form of the n equations

+ Vgv + pA r =

qr

where

is

//,

Now

system can be written in the


(r

1, 2,

n),

.,

undetermined.

consider a normal

mode

of vibration of the modified system, defined

by equations
(/!

cos \t,

qo

cos \t,

..,

qn

ar

(X,.

Substituting the values of a 1

equation

A^ + A

- X ) + vA r =
2

a.

2 a.2

2>

//,

v cos \t.

we have

Substituting in the equations of motion,


2

cos \t,

a.n

(r=l,

...,

a n given

...

+ A n *n =

2, ..., n).

by these equations in the


0,

we have

A*
-V

\i>

_AJ_

This equation in \- has (w


tion are evidently
interspaced

AJ_
-

-V
1) roots,

^n"

which from the form of the equa

between the quantities Xf,

A 22

...,

XH

quantities 2?r/X corresponding to these roots are the periods of the

2
:

the

normal

modes of vibration of the constrained system, and it therefore follows that


the (n
l) periods of normal vibration of the constrained system are spaced
between the n periods of the original system.

The stationary character of normal

82.

vibrations.

We shall next consider the effect of adding constraints to a dynamical


system to such an extent that only one degree of freedom is left to the
Let (q 1} q 2 .... q n } be the normal coordinates of the
system.
original

system the constraints may, as in the last article, be represented by linear


equations between these coordinates, and can therefore be expressed in the
;

form
gi

= /*i?i

& = Wl,

q,i

= p n q,

where /^ 1 /i2 ..., n are constants and q is a new variable which


may be
taken as defining the configuration of the constrained
system at time t.
Let the kinetic and potential energies of the original system be
,

fj.

V=

193

Theory of Vibrations

81-83]

so 27T/XJ, 27T/X 2 ..., 2TT/\ n are its periods of normal vibration: the kinetic
and potential energies of the constrained system are then
,

V = i (XV + V^ +
2

The period
where X

+ xn

>

f.

of a vibration of the constrained system

is

therefore

2-Tr/X,

given by the equation

is

_
If the constraints are varied, this expression has a stationary value when
n are zero this stationary value is one
1) of the quantities /i 1} /u 2

(n
of the quantities X a 2 X 22 ..., X n 2 and thus we have the theorem that when
constraints are put on the system so as to reduce its number of degrees
of
freedom to unity, the period of the constrained system has a stationary value
,

f*>

for those constraints which make the vibration

to be

a normal vibration of the

unconstrained system.
Vibrations about steady motion.

83.

type of motion which presents many analogies with the equilibriumconfiguration is that known as the steady motion of systems which possess
ignorable coordinates: this is defined to be a motion in which the nonignorable coordinates of the system have constant values, while the velocities
corresponding to the ignorable coordinates have also constant values.

One example of a steady motion is that of the top, discussed in


72 as another
example we may take the case of a particle which is free to move in a plane and is
attracted by a fixed centre of force, the potential energy
depending only on the distance
from the centre of force; for such a particle, a circular orbit described with constant
velocity is always a possible orbit, and this is a form of steady motion, since the radius
vector is constant and the angular velocity
corresponding to the ignorable coordinate 6
;

is also

In

constant.

cases, if a system is initially in a state of motion


differing only
from
a given form of steady motion, the
slightly
divergence from this form of
motion will never subsequently become very marked we shall now consider

many

motions of this kind, which are called vibrations about


steady motion.
The steady motion is said to be stable* if the
vibratory motion tends to
a certain limiting form, namely the
steady motion,

when

the initial disturb

ance from steady motion tends to zero.

Let

(>!,

j>

2,

p k ) be the ignorable and

coordinates of the system.


will

(q lt &,..., q n ) be the non-ignorable


Corresponding to the ignorable coordinates, there

be k integrals

dL
*

W. D.

This definition

is

due

to Klein

and Sommerfeld.

Theory of Vibrations

194

[OH.

vn

We shall suppose that these constants


where &, /3 2
ftk are constants.
in
the
value
have the same
vibratory motion as in the undisturbed steady
motion of which it is regarded as the disturbed form; this of course only
amounts to coordinating each vibratory motion to some particular steady
,

>

motion.

We
time

suppose the system conservative, with constraints independent of the


let its kinetic energy be

T=\
where the

The

2 ay fay + 2 2

Cy,

byqipj

+b 2 2

coefficients a#, by, cv are functions of q lt qz


-

...,

qn

coordinates are
integrals corresponding to the ignorable
pi

Let

n
2,

Cij

be the minor of

c y in
-

divided by this determinant;

quantities p r

+ 2b

{j

= fy

qi

= 1,2,

.,

k).

the determinant formed of the coefficients


then solving the last equations for the

we have

]j r

= 2 Cm (Ps

2 big qi).

pt in the above expression for T,

Substituting for pi, pz ...,


the properties of minors of determinants,
,

T=

i,

Now

(j

(a*,

- 2C

ls

I,

and

utilising

we have

b u bjs ) q iqj

2 Cufrfr.

I,

Let

perform the process of ignoration of coordinates.

be the

modified kinetic potential, so

R=
=

T-V-

2 (ay - 2 Cubabjg) qiqj + 2 Crs @ r b

i,

We

2 pr /3 r

I,

can without

in the steady

loss of generality

motion are

variables

qi,

R
qz

all zero.

...,

qn

q-i,

q.2 ,

- $ 2 C&&& -

and quadratic

suppose that the values of q lt q 2

If then the coefficients in

qi,

qz

...,

qn

expanded

q n are neglected in comparison with the


an expression consisting of terms
obtain for

in q l} qz

...,

qn

q l} q 2

...

qn

d fdR\
dR
(^
)-a r
dq
\dqj

-r.

and these terms can therefore be omitted.


by permanent

zero values of q^ q2

Now

...,

the terms which

qn disappear auto

(r-1,

dt

satisfied

R are

...,

and independent of q 1; q 2
q^, q z ..., q n
from
the
equations of motion
matically

are linear in

V.

l,s

...,

terms of the second degree, we


linear

qi

qn by Taylor s theorem, and all terms in the


thus obtained which are above the second degree in the

in ascending powers of

expression of

ls

l,f,s

2, ..., n),

Moreover, since the equations are


that no terms
..., q n it is evident
,

195

Theory of Vibrations

83, 84]
linear in q 1} q2 ,

...,

It follows that the

solution of

q n and independent of q l q 2 ..., q n can be present in R.


problem of vibrations about steady motion depends on the

Lagrangian equations of motion

homogeneous

in

which the kinetic potential

quadratic function of the velocities

and

is

coordinates, with constant

coefficients.

difference between vibrations about equilibrium and vibrations about


motion
consists in the possible presence in the latter case of terms of
steady
the type q r q s (i.e. products of a coordinate and a velocity) in the kinetic

The

These are called gyroscopic terms. The vibrations about steady


motion of a system are in fact the same thing as the vibrations about
equilibrium of the reduced or non-natural ( 38) system to which the problem
potential.

is

brought by ignoration of coordinates.

The equations

of motion for the vibrating system are therefore

dR
-5 =

d fiR\

-nlo-rdt \dq r j

where

rf!

q r qs

2 &., gr

r,s

a,,.,

but where y rs is not in general equal


expanded form are

2i</i

+ 2 jrsqr qs

</

(r,

$n =
to

jsr

/3 sr

= 1,

2,

. .

ri),

The equations

- &1 qi + 12# + (72! - Tia) - & 2 +


J2
9
13& + (731
+ (712 ~ 721) qi ~ 0*qi + && - j3vq + a, q + (y - y
a

r, s

r,s

and where

ql

2, ...,w),

can be written in the form

R=i2a

(11

(r=l,

dq r

7l3>

3,

zi )

of motion in the

& ~ $^3
q,

-/3&q3

etc.

These are linear equations with constant

coefficients, which are of the same


character
as
the
general
corresponding equations in the case of vibrations about
equilibrium they differ only in the presence of the gyroscopic terms, which
involve the coefficients (7^.
The presence of these terms makes it
7^).
;

impossible to transform the system to normal coordinates*; but as we shall


next see, the main characteristic of vibrations about
equilibrium is retained,
namely that any vibration can be regarded as a superposition of n purely
periodic vibrations, which
vibration of the system.

shall call (as before)

the normal modes of

The integration of the equations.

84.

We

we

shall

now shew how

the nature of the vibrations can be determined,

by integration of the equations of motion.


That
formation

is

to say, impossible to transform the


system to

it is

possible to effect the transformation to

formation, and this

is

normal coordinates by a point-trans


normal coordinates by a contact-trans

actually done in Chapter XVI.

132

Theory of Vibrations

196

vn

[OH.

them into a system of equations


denote the modified kinetic potential of the

It will be convenient first to transform

each of the

Let

first order.

R
system, so that in the vibratory problem
Write
function of q 1} q2 ..., q n q l q z ..., q n
,

R -==

<V-1

Qn+T

<5~T~

&n

a homogeneous quadratic

so that qn +i, q n +2,

is

are linear functions of q 1} q2

...,

qn

"
>

*/>

and

vice versa:

=l

the equations of motion can be written

^ n+r

(r

n)

dq r

Now

if

an increment of a function of the variables q lt q z


due to small changes in these variables, we have

B denote

q n +i, ---,qzn,

8R =

r =i

Bq r

qn

...,

-.
&<]>,

oq r

\oqr

n
^
2/\qii-\-roqr
~T q n .^-roqr)
*

"

S^

qn +rqr

\r=1

S (q n+r &q r
}+ r=l

q r $q n +r)-

Let the quantity

R,

q n+r qr

when expressed as a function of q l} q2 ..., qzn be denoted by H,


a known homogeneous quadratic function of the variables q 1} q
,

last

so that

..-,q2n

H
,

is

the

equation can be written

of motion, which consisted originally of n equations


can
be replaced by a system of 2n equations, each of
each of the second order,

and therefore*

the equations

the first order,

namely
9

= dH

0n+r

oq n+r
the independent variables being q l

We

shall

For

q2

...,

q 2n

dH

-goqr

/no

(r- 1,2,

...,),

as the
now shew that the function H, which has replaced
of
the
sum
the
kinetic
and
of
the
function
equations, represents
determining
considered.
of
the
dynamical system
potential energies

contains terms of degrees

This transformation

Chapter X.

is really

2, 1,

and

in the velocities,

and

a case of the Hamiltonian transformation given later in

197

Theory of Vibrations

equivalent to twice the terms of degree two together with the terms of
degree one, by Euler s theorem it follows that H, being defined as
is

dR

v
2

qr

r=\

T?

^-R,

oqr

will be equal to the terms of degree two in the velocities in R, together with
the terms of zero degree in R with their signs changed on comparing the
:

T and R

expressions for

given on page 194,

follows that

it

H=T+V,
so

is

the total energy

variables q lt qz

...

,q.

of the dynamical system, expressed in terms of the

In the case of vibrations about an equilibrium-configuration, we have


seen that the condition for stability is that the potential as well as the
kinetic energy shall be a positive definite form we shall now make a similar
assumption for the case of vibrations about steady motion, namely that the
;

total

energy

is

a positive

definite

form

in the variables q 1} q 2

assumption we shall shew that the steady motion


that the equations of motion
this

dqr
-rr
at

= 5dff

dqn+r
-^f^
dt

oqn+r

...,

and

is stable,

gwj

in fact

dH
^

dq r

can be integrated in the following way*.


Consider the set of linear equations in the variables q lt qz
S

qnj-r

~
+ dH( qi ,q

..., q^ n

,...,q2n )

~-yr
(r- 1,2, ...,);

if

we denote the determinant

element in the Xth row and

of the system by/(s),

/ith

f(s)
the expression of q lt q2

...,

q^

and the minor of the

column by

in terms of y lt y9

(X, /*
,

...,

ym

= !,
is

2,

...,2n),

given by the

equations

and the degree of f(s) in


than (2n-l).

q\,

s is 2n,

while the degree of f(s)^

is

not greater

In order to solve the equations of motion, consider


expressions
-, q.2n of the form
q?,

The method

of integration

which follows

is

for

due to Weierstrass, Berlin. Monatsberichte, 1879.

198

Theory of Vibrations

[CH.

vn

is taken round a large circle C which encloses all the


roots of the equation f(s)
0.
These values of q 1} q 2 ...,q2n will satisfy
the equations of motion, provided the equations

where the integration

,
,

(r=l

...

n)

dp n+r
are satisfied.

If therefore p l9 p 2 ..., p 2n are polynomials in 5 so


the expressions in brackets under the integral sign vanish when
one of the roots of the equation f(s) = 0, these equations will
since the integrands will then have no singularities within the
,

It follows that Pi,j}.2

",pzn

must be a

be

satisfied,

contour C*.

set of solutions of the equations

lie ....gn
,

~r

chosen that
s is equal to

Pr

when

s is

a root of the equation f(s)

this condition is satisfied

by the

expressions

P* (s)
where a

a2

...,

a^

The equations
<?

+o

/(5) 2M

+ a 2n f(s}.

2n>>l

(^

1, 2,

.,

2n),

are arbitrary constants.

by the values

of 1/5 in the Laurent expansion -|- in positive


s of the expression

and nega

powers of

{Oi/()m + Ot/(*). +

Now

of motion are therefore satisfied

= coefficient
tive

I/(*)I F

e s(t-t
t>mf(*)m,t]

-77-75

7v

(p = 1,

2, ..., 2?i).

on inspection of the determinant /(s) we see that minors of the

types
(X<H*

(#*!,

2,

...,)

are of degree (2?i


1) in s, and the other minors are of degree (2n
2) in s;
so the coefficient of 1/5 in the Laurent expansion of f(s)\n/f(s) is zero unless
\ = n + p, or fj, = n + \; in the former case it is 1, and in the latter case it
is 1.

Hence on taking

we

see that the quantities

ttj

OF-2

. . .

dzn

are respectively the values of

at the time

Whittaker and Watson, A Course of Modern Analysis,

t 76id.

5-6.

5-2.

we

If therefore
(f)

and
to

199

Theory of Vibrations

84]

() A/x

if ft,

any

write

= coefficient
>,

of l/s in the Laurent expansion of

are the values of

...,ft

definite value

of

ft,

...,

e*

..

respectively corresponding

22

we have

t,

^=

{ft,+a<MO,M-

it is necessary to discuss the


In order to evaluate the quantities
let ki+l, where
nature of the roots of the determinantal equation f(s) =
of
this
k and I are real and i denotes \/-l, be any root
equation; then
<f>(t)^,

the 2n equations

n +
,

(ki

7\

9j
+-

?,

^(?i>

q n+a

I)

>

&n)

(- 1.2, ....)
can be satisfied by values of q 1}
system of such values be
1

where %

gz

%zn

...,

7i

T),

rji,

dH(q
we

l>q2

o7

q^, ...,

+ M?2

q^ which
,

>

Let a

are not all zero.

&n + ^2i

^ 2 i are real quantities.

Then

if

we

write

,...,q 2n )_
-"

Wi>

<12n)n>

&>

have, on separating the last equations into their real and imaginary parts,

- ^ n+ . =
- ^a + Atya =

+,

+a
a

But

since

is

homogeneous and of degree two

2tf(&, |a

)= 2=

-.,

and using the

first

&,

....

=1

(a

2,

in its arguments,

fxfl d!,

-..,

W).

we have

f)A,

two of the preceding equations


,

=
=

0|

this gives

A S
(A)

2H

Similarly

(77,

77.,

=
77^)

A;

2 (. ??+ =

i; a

n+a ).

Moreover on multiplying the first of the preceding equations by t) a and the


second by r) n+a adding, and summing for values of a from 1 to n, we have
,

X=l

a=l

and similarly
2/1

71

200

Theory of Vibrations

[CH.

we must have

Since the left-hand sides of these equations are equal,

2
But from equations (A) we

see that, as

vn

0.

a positive definite form, neither

is

k nor

yaZn+a) can be zero;

(fa^n+a

so the equation f(s)

quantity different

We

has each of

its

we must

therefore have

roots of the

form

ik,

zero;

where k

and

a real

is

zero.

from

which the equation f(s) =


has
a J-tuple root s each of the functions f(s)\n is divisible by (s
s )i~
For let Cj, c 2 ..., c2n be a set of definite real quantities; define quanti
shall next

shew that

in the case in

ties q 1} q 2

...,

q2n

by the equations

Sq n+a

...,

((fr, q.2 ,

= Ca

<?2Tl)a

(a=l,2,

...,n)...

-sq a
we have

so that

(/=!,
Let

be any root of the equation f(s)


positive integer for which all the functions
s-ii

m
Sj i)

When

s is

(s

are finite for the value s^i of

expand

+ h^i) (s

let

be the smallest

taken sufficiently near

s x i,

we can

M , h^, g^, h^,


c:

c2

-.,

s i i)~ m+l

+ ((// + hp i) (s

1
s^i)""

+ ...,

denote real constants; and we can suppose the


so chosen that the quantities g^ and AM are not zero.

...

<jr

quantities

c.2n

Substituting this value of q^ in equations (B),


of (s

and

q^ in a series of the form


(<7

where

s.

= Q,

2,..., 2n).

m we have
Sii)~

and equating the

coefficients

H
H (g

(gi,
l

g2

. . .

.
2>

=
gm ) n +a + sji* =
gzn)a

Sihn+a

(C),
TT /I

and on equating the

coefficients of (s
(0

/\

s 1 t )~ m+1 ,

when

we have
>

when m 1
=
[c n+a when m
[0

w* = o
la

=0

>

(a

= 1,2,... ,)

(D).

201

Theory of Vibrations

84]

Now

by Euler

theorem on homogeneous functions we have


Zn

2H(g g
1}

gm )

...,

= 2 yJHfr, g
A=

...,g^)\,

or

by

(C),

%H (g

l;

g2n )

gs, ...,

= s, 2
a=l

and similarly

(ga h n+a

- h a g n+a

),

(gji n +*

- h a gn+a

),

2H

. .

(/*!, 7*3,

m ) = Si 2=
a

from which

evident that

it is

=l

o.

Moreover, the

h a g n+a )

(g a h n+a

not zero.

is

two of equations (C) give

first

2n

2 hiH(gl) gi ,...,gm)i + 8i 2 (hji n+a a=l


A=l
and the

2n

2
=l

g^

(h,

A an ) A

A., ... ,

a=l

But from the

first

- g gn +) =

(g a g n +

two of equations (D), when

\=1

g2

...,g2n

1, \ve

>

(F).

have

2 h ,H(g

(E),

two of equations (C) give

last

A.

=Q

h a hn+a )

)\-s 2
l

a=l

(h a h

n+aL

-h a hn+ai )- 2

a=l

(g a h n+a

- ha gn+a ) =
(G),

and from the

two of equations (D) we have

last

Zn

gjl(&,k{>

X=l

>..,h^} ),

+s 2
l

a=l

(g a g n+a

2 (g a hn+a - h
-ga g n+a )+ a=l

g n+a ) =
(H).

Also since

.ST is

homogeneous

we

of the second degree in its arguments,

have the identities


Zn

2n

2 h^H (g,,g

2,

. . ,

A=l

gzn )\

= 2 #*# (A/, V,
X=l

(K)

^//)A
I

2w

2n

2 gJH Qh,

and

h2

A 2n ) A

A=l

From

equations (E), (H), (K)

2
o=l

(gji n+

a-h

gn+a )

a=l

(ga h n+a

2
=l

- h a gn+a = - s 2
l

-h

ai

h n+a )-s l

(L).

2
a= l

(ga g n+a

- g a g n+a

),

we have
n

(h a h n+a

- h a h n+a ) + s 2
l

a=l

a=l

Comparing these equations, we have


n

gm

n
(h a.h n+a

(F), (G), (L)

...,

we have

n
sl

<x

and from equations

= 2 h^H (g, g
A=l

(ga hn+ai

-h

n+<1

0,

(g a g n +*

~ ga gn+*).

202

Theory of Vibrations

which

m
m

[CH.

vn

The assumption that


contrary to what has already been proved.
which was used in obtaining equation (G), must therefore be false
must therefore be unity, and consequently when f(s) is divisible
- s^if,
by (s

>

is

1,

each of the functions f (s)^

Now let Sj

s2 ,

.,

k
by (s-s^i) -\

is divisible

be the moduli of the distinct roots of the equation/(s) = 0,

sr

so that the functions


f(s)^/f(s) are infinite only for s= s^,
1
then denoting the coefficient of (s
in the Laurent
Spi)
in

/()W/(*)

powers of

(s

- sp i)

(X, /i) p

and

s r i;

expansion of

by

(X, fi)p

where

s 2 i, ...,

(X, /*)/ are real,

i (X,

fj,) p

and observing that the only poles of the


= sp i, and that these are simple poles,

function f(s)^/f(s) are the points s

we have

+ i(\
s-si

n)p

(X,

and therefore
<f>

(t)^

(X? /*)P

+ i (\

(\

rip

p =i

in powers of

(\,f*)-i\,n

the coefficient of 1/5 in the Laurent expansion of

is

<-)

M
,

Spi

rip
s

~ i (\
+ Spi

AQp

l
j

s.

But the

8 (t ~^
coefficient of I/s in the Laurent
sp i) is
expansion of e
f(s
s{t t
an(j t ^ e coefficient of
in
the
Laurent
of
e
l/s
expansion
/(s + sp i)

-<o)i

is

e~

Sf>(t

<>

)l
;

we have

therefore

{(X, /i)p

cos sp

(t

t )

- (X,

fi) p

sin sp

)},

P=I

and so

qn

finally

2 2 [&+. {(,AOP cos Sp


a=l

(*-*<>)

-(a, M)P sin 5P

p=l

- ^ a {(n + a, /i)p cos s


T/it s

motion.

p (i

- (n + a, /x)p

sin sp

(t

- ^ )}

- 1 )}]

O=

1, 2,

.,

2w).

formula constitutes the general solution of the differential equations of


Hence finally we see that when the total energy of a system vibrating

about a state of steady motion is a positive


definite form, the vibratory motion
can be expressed in terms of circular functions of t, and the steady motion is
is 1}
stable; the periods of the normal vibrations are ZTT/S!, 27r/s2 ..., where
,

are the roots of the determinantal equation


= 0, whose order in s 2
f(s)
to
the
number
coordinates
the
equal
of non-ignorable
of
system.

is.2 ,

is

...

The above

investigation

is

valid

whether the determinantal equation has

repeated roots or not.


Between the

coefficients (X,

p.} p

(X, /x) p

(^ M)P= -

and so in particular

(p-,

there exist the relations

x) P
(X,

(x, /i)p

X) p = 0.

=(M>

^)p

These relations follow from equations which


/()>

203

Theory of Vibrations

84, 85J

Cin virtue of their definitions) are

true for

/(*)*! namely
/(*)

-/(-),

Example. If the number of degrees of freedom of the system, after ignoration of the
ignorable coordinates, is even, shew that when the ignorable velocities are large (e.g. if
the ignorable coordinates are the angles through which certain fly-wheels have rotated,

would imply that the fly-wheels are rotating very rapidly), half the periods of
vibration are very long and the other half are very short, the one set being proportional
to the ignorable velocities and the other set being inversely proportional to these
this

velocities.

It was pointed out by Poincare* that the discussion of stability by the


method of small oscillations does not take account of some features which are

Thusf, consider a particle moveable


which
rotates with constant angular
bowl
on the inner surface of a spherical
If the bowl be perfectly smooth, the
velocity about its vertical diameter.
likely to be present in actual problems.

the
equilibrium of the particle in the lowest position is certainly stable,
But if there be the slightest
rotation of the bowl having no effect on it.
friction between the particle and the bowl, and if the angular velocity of the
bowl exceeds a certain value, the particle will work its way outwards in
a spiral path towards the position in which
bob of a conical pendulum.

85.

Examples of

A number
will

now be

(i)

of illustrative cases of vibration about a state of steady motion

considered.

= a, z =
particle is describing the circle r
2
is F=((r, 2), where r

when r=a,

If

we

we have

rotates with the bowl like the

vibrations about steady motion.

= b.

To find

write

for the kinetic

b,

in the cylindrical field of force in

= #2 4-y 2

which the potential energy


zero

it

the conditions

x=rcos8,

it being given that clV/dz


for stability of the motion.
,

is

y = rsir\8,

and potential energies of the

particle,

whose mass

will

be denoted

by m,

The integral corresponding to the ignorable coordinate 6 is mr 2 6 k, where k


The modified kinetic potential after ignoration of 6 is therefore
constant.

R=T- V-W

Acta Math. vn. (1885), p. 259.


is due to Lamb, Proc. Roy. Soc. LXXX. (1908),

t This illustration

p. 168.

is

204

Theory of Vibrations

[CH.

vn

For the steady motion we must have

the latter condition

is satisfied

2
3
by hypothesis, and the former gives k = ma

c(f>/da.

We

have therefore
is

z-^-.

r,

<

Writing

and neglecting terms above the second degree in p and


0aa

As no terms linear

3
-

we have

(Pa

in p or f occur, this is essentially the

about equilibrium, and the condition for stability

shall be a positive definite form,

both be positive.

is

same as a problem

of vibrations

79) that

that

i.e.

shall

f,

+-a

(f) a )

<f>bb

<t>

ab

and

(p bb

These are the required conditions

for stability of the steady

motion.
Corollary.

If a particle of unit

mass

describing a circular orbit of radius a in a

is

plane about a centre of force at the centre of the circle, the potential energy being
where r is the distance from the centre, the modified kinetic potential is

(3
<aa

where

r=a + p,

so the condition for stability

+a

<p

(r)

-<M,

is

<Paa

+a

P*

<

>

and the period of a vibration about the circular motion

is

To find the period of the vibrations about steady circular motion of a particle
(ii)
moving under gravity on a surface of revolution whose axis is vertical.
Let zf(r) be the equation of the surface, where (z, r, ff) are cylindrical coordinates
with the axis of the surface as axis of z. If the particle is projected along the horizontal
tangent to the surface at any point with a suitable velocity, it will describe a horizontal
circle

on the surface with constant

velocity.

Let a be the radius of the circle

we

shall

take the mass of the particle to be unity, as this involves no loss of generality.

The

kinetic potential

is

The integral corresponding to the ignorable coordinate 6 is r2d


kinetic potential of the system after ignoration of Q is therefore
r}}

-gf(r)

- F/2r2

= k,

and the modified

205

Theory of Vibrations

85]

is thus reduced to that of finding the vibrations about equilibrium of the


kinetic potential. The condition for
one
degree of freedom for which R is the
system with

The problem
is

equilibrium

= 0,

/)
\or l r=a

or

V=ga\f

(a\

and this gives

R = ir* {1 +/
Writing

r=a + p,

The equation

where p

is

small,

(r)}-gf(r)

and expanding

in

2
.

powers of

p,

we have

of motion

<^/

dp

dt\df>

therefore

is

-ga?f (a)/2r

p{l

and the condition

+/

(a)}+0p{/"()

+ |/

()]

= 0,

for stability is

<

the period of a vibration being


27T

Tg
axis
Example. If the surface is a paraboloid of revolution whose
vertex downwards, shew that the vibration-period is

where

is

and

vertical

the semi-latus rectum of the paraboloid.

To determine

(iii)

is

the vibrations about steady

motion of a top on a perfectly rough

plane.

Let A denote the moment of inertia of the top about a line through its apex perpen
dicular to its axis of symmetry, and let 6 denote the angle made by the axis with the
the mass of the top, and h the distance of its centre of gravity from its apex
vertical,

that after ignoring the Eulerian angles (p and ^, the angle


determined by solving the dynamical system defined by the kinetic potential

then we have seen

where a and
Let

a,

(71)

b are constants

n be the values

we have

depending on the
of 6

and
<j>

initial

is

circumstances of the motion.

respectively in the

steady motion, so

72)

A n z cos a + Mgk = bn,

An sin 2 a = ab cos a.
To
e

discuss the vibratory motion of the top about this form of steady motion, we write
in ascending powers of x, neglecting
is a small quantity, and expand

= a + x where x

of the
powers of x above the second and eliminating a and b by use
we thus obtain for R the value

R^AJP-lAx* {n

sin 2 a

+ (n cos a - MghjA n) 2

}.

last

two equations

206

Theory of Vibrations

The equation

As

x is therefore
x + {n 2 sin 2 a + (n cos a - Mgh/ A nf] x = 0.
x is positive, the state of steady motion is

stable

and

the period

is

27T

The sleeping

(iv)

vn

of motion for

the coefficient of

of a vibration

[OH.

{* - 2Mgh cos a/ A + J*g

h*IA*n*}~t.

top.

If we consider that form of steady motion of the top in which a is zero, so that
the axis of the top is permanently directed vertically upwards, the top rotating about this
axis with a given angular velocity, the method of the preceding example must be modified,

since

now the form

of steady motion in which a

is

a small constant

is

to be regarded as a

vibration about the type of motion in which a is zero so that we may now expect to have
two independent periods of normal vibration, the analogues of which in the previous
:

example are the period of the steady motion and the period of vibration about

As

71, the kinetic

in

and

potential energies of the top are

+
T=\
V= Mgh cos 6.
2

4<9

M(/>

The

sin 2

<?+|

tf(^ +

after ignoration of

= ^(^ +

we obtain

is

<

<f)

From

and

77,

system the value

+ b$ cos 6 -Mgh cos 6.

not a small quantity throughout the motion,

the quantities

is

<9),

R=\Afr+%A<& sin 6

As

cos

In the two last terms we can replace cos 6 by (cos 6


thus added disappear from the equations of motion.

and

<9)

for the kinetic potential of the


2

cos
<j>

integral corresponding to the ignorable coordinate

and hence

it.

1),

since the terms

we take

b<j)

and Mgh

as coordinates in place of

where

these equations, neglecting terms above the second degree in

77,

rj,

we have

and so we have

&-lAt*
The equations

of motion are

"

dt

bf,-Mg

(Arj-b-Mghr,=0.
If STT/X is the period of a. normal vibration, on substituting
differential equations

and eliminating

J and

- A 2 /I - Mgh
2

or

(X

r)

Ke

in these

= 0,

ib\

- \2 A

ib\

=7

K we obtain the equation


Mg,

A + Mgh) 2 - 6 2 X 2 = 0.

The two roots of this quadratic in X2 give the values of X corresponding to the two
normal vibrations we have therefore to determine the nature of these roots.
:

Theory of Vibrations

85, 86]
The

solution of the quadratic

207

is

The values of X are therefore real or not according as b 2 is greater or less than 4AMgh.
In the former case the steady spinning motion round the vertical is stable in the latter
:

case, unstable.

must not be supposed, however, that

It

in the unstable case the axis

necessarily departs very far from the vertical: all that is meant by the term
is that when b 2 <.4AMgh the disturbed motion does not, as the disturbance is

of the top
"unstable"

indefinitely

diminished, tend to a limiting form coincident with the undisturbed motion.

As a matter of fact, if b -4AMgk, though negative, is very small, it is possible for the
axis of the top in its "unstable" motion to remain permanently close to the vertical but
in this case the maximum divergence from the vertical cannot be made
indefinitely small
(for a given value of 6) by making the initial disturbance indefinitely small*.
2

Vibrations of systems involving moving constraints.

86.

If a dynamical system involves a constraint which varies with the time


(e.g. if one of the particles of the system is moveable on a smooth wire or

surface which

made

to rotate uniformly about a given axis), the kinetic


potential of the system is no longer necessarily composed of terms of degrees
2 and
in the velocities
terms which are linear in the velocities may also
is

The equations which determine the

occur.

vibrations of such a system will

therefore in general include gyroscopic terms, even when the vibration is


about relative equilibrium the solution can be effected by the methods above
:

developed

example

for

The

the problem of vibrations about steady motion.

following

will illustrate this.

Example. To find the periods of the normal vibrations of a heavy particle about its
position of equilibrium at the lowest point of a surface which is rotating with constant
about a vertical axis through the point.
angular velocity
u>

of the particle, referred to axes which revolve with the


(.v, ?/, z) be the coordinates
surface, the axes of x and y being the tangents to the lines of curvature at the lowest

Let

point,

and the axis of

being vertical.
i2

z= ~
%>i

The

kinetic

Let the equation of the surface be

+ ~- + terms

of higher order.

2p 2

and potential energies

of the particle are

V= mgz.
The

kinetic potential of the vibration-problem

is

therefore
y2\

5T(y&
/Pi
*

discussion of the stability of the sleeping top


129132, 292.

(1897), pp.

is

+ j-

^Pz/

given by Klein, Ball. Amer. Math. Soc. in.

Theory of Vibrations

208
The equations

of motion are

._

[CH.

=
cy

Pi

normal vibration is 27T/X, we have (substituting


equations, and eliminating A and B)

If the period of a

the differential

-2wiX

or

(X

The

- g/pi)

(X

2
o>

XAe, y = Be

lX

in

=0,

- glp z } - 4X2

= 0.

roots of this quadratic in X 2 determine the periods of the

normal vibrations.

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
1.

particle

moves on a curve which

rotates uniformly about a fixed axis, the


the
only on its position as defined by

potential energy V () of the particle depending


Shew that the period of a vibration about a position of relative rest on the
arc s.

curve

is

dVd
where

r is the distance of the particle

from the

axis.

Determine the vibrations of a solid horizontal circular cylinder rolling inside a


2.
the
hollow horizontal circular cylinder whose axis is fixed, shewing that the length of
b
is the radius and J/the
where
is
(b -a) (3M+m)l(2M+m)
simple equivalent pendulum
the mass, of the inner cylinder.
mass, of the outer cylinder, and a is the radius and
;

(Coll.

Exam.)

on a perfectly rough

and radius a
thin hemispherical bowl of mass
3.
is in contact with the inner surface of the bowl,
horizontal plane, and a particle of mass
small oscillations, the motion of
supposed smooth. Shew that when the system performs
the particle and the centre of gravity of the bowl being in one plane, the periods of the
is

normal vibrations are 2^/^X7 and 2^/^X3, where A t and X 2 are the roots of the equation
- aA)
- - a A)
0.
(Coll. Exam. )
%

ma\g

4.

string of length 4a

respectively,

and

is

is

M=

(\g

(g

loaded at equal intervals with three weights m,

suspended from two points

and

perform small vertical vibrations, the length of the simple equivalent

M and m

Shew that

symmetrically.

pendulum

if

is

sin (a - ft} cos (a- 0)


2
cos
a + sin ft cos2 ft
sin a

a cos a cos

where a and

ft

ft

are the inclinations of the parts of the string to the vertical.


(Coll.

Exam.)

A uniform bar whose length is 2a is suspended by a short string whose length is I


that
the time of vibration is greater than if the bar were swinging about one
prove
(Coll. Exam.)
extremity in the ratio l+9/32a 1 nearly.
;

5.

209

Theory of Vibrations

vn]

6.
An elliptic cylinder with plane ends at right angles to its axis rests upon two fixed
smooth perpendicular planes which are each inclined at 45 to the horizon. Shew that
there are two stable configurations and one unstable, and that in the former case the

length of the equivalent

ab (a

a and

is

pendulum
2

+ 62 )/2 V2 (a - 6)

(a

+ 6),

b being the lengths of the semi-axes.

Exam.)

(Coll.

rough circular cylinder of radius a and mass m is loaded so that its centre of
at a distance h from the axis, and is placed on a board of equal mass which
can move on a smooth horizontal planei If the system is disturbed slightly when in a
7.

is

gravity

shew that the length of the simple equivalent pendulum

position of stable equilibrium,

k 2 lh+\ (a- h} 2 /k, where

mk1

the

is

moment

is

of inertia of the cylinder about a horizontal

axis through its centre of gravity.

Exam.)

(Coll.

One end

is freely jointed to a point in a


of a uniform rod of length b and mass
smooth vertical wall the other end is freely jointed to a point in the surface of a uniform
and radius a which rests against the wall. Shew that the period of the
sphere of mass
8.

vibrations about the position of equilibrium

p 2 (sin
a and

sin 2 (a
/3

- /3)

is ZTT/JO,

where

+| cos a sin (a -/3) + f sin /3 cos 2 /3} =

-?--

2
(a sin a cos a + b sin

/3

cos 2 /3),

being given by the equations

a sin a + b sin /3-a=0,


(

m + M) tan - M tan a = 0.

Exam. )

(Coll.

ft

9.
thin circular cylinder of mass
and radius b rests on a perfectly rough
horizontal plane, and inside it is placed a perfectly rough sphere of mass
and radius a.
If the system be disturbed in a
plane perpendicular to the generators of the cylinder, find

the equations of finite motion, and deduce two first integrals of them
be small, shew that the length of the simple equivalent pendulum is

and

if

the motion

l4M(b-a)/(WM+7m.).
(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

I,

1899.)

sphere of radius c is placed upon a horizontal perfectly rough wire in the


form of an ellipse of axes 2a, 2b. Prove that the time of a vibration under gravity about
10.

the position of stable equilibrium

where

is

F=2c 2/5

that of a simple pendulum of length

and d 2 = c 2 -6 2

(Coll.

given by

Exam.)

11.
A rhombus of four equal uniform rods of length a freely jointed together is laid
on a smooth horizontal plane with one angle equal to 2a. The opposite corners are
connected by similar elastic strings of natural lengths 2a cos a, 2a sin a. Prove that if
one string be slightly extended and the rhombus left free, the periods during which
the strings are extended in the subsequent motion are in the ratio

(cos a)$

mass

(sin a)^.

(Coll.

Exam.)

attached by n equal elastic strings of natural length a to


the fixed angular points of a regular polygon of n sides, the radius of whose circumscribing
circle is c.
Shew that if the particle be slightly displaced from its equilibrium position in
12.

particle of

is

the plane of the polygon, it will execute harmonic vibrations in a straight line, the length
the simple equivalent pendulum being 2mgac/n\ (2c - a), and that for vibrations
perpendicular to the plane of the polygon, the corresponding length will be mgacjriX (c - a),
X being the modulus of each string.
(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part I, 1900.)
of

w. D.

14

210

Theory of Vibrations
The energy -equation

13.

of a particle
2
f(x)x =

is

2<f)

(x)

+ constan t,

If
and a is a value of x for which
(x~) is zero.
which does not vanish for x=a, shew that the period

<<

2p )

<$>

4
v

where h

is

[en.

(i/2/>)

(2/>)

(x) is

the

first

derivative of
<j>(x)

of a vibration about the position

is

/ra
2p

h
F (1/2/3+^) (
(a)
4/30(
the value of (x- a) corresponding to the extreme displacement.
)

(Elliott.)

A cone has its centre

of gravity at a distance c from its axis, there being in other


If the cone oscillates on a horizontal
respects the usual kinetic symmetry at the vertex.
and
the
be
shew
that
the length of the simple equivalent
plane
plane
perfectly rough,
]

4.

is

pendulum

(cos a / Me)

whereas

if

2
(A sin a +

this plane be perfectly smooth, the length is


2

(cos a/ Me) (sin a/A

15.

C cos 2 a),

+ cos2 a/C).

(Coll.

Exam.)

of equal uniform rods each of length 2a are freely jointed at a common


arranged at equal angular intervals like the ribs of an umbrella. This cone

number

extremity and
of rods is put over a smooth fixed sphere of radius 6, each rod being in contact with the
Shew that, if the system be slightly disturbed so that
sphere, and rests in equilibrium.
the hinge performs vertical vibrations about the position of equilibrium, their period is

l+3sin 2 a\4

where sec

16.

where

c is

w 1+2

a sin a = a/6.

sin 2 a,

sm

a.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

heavy rectangular board

I,

1896.)

symmetrically suspended in a horizontal position


by four light elastic strings attached to the corners of the board and to a fixed point
Shew that the period of the vertical vibrations is
vertically above its centre.
is

^WM)
the equilibrium distance of the board below the fixed point, a

a semi-diagonal,

=(

+ c2 )2,

and X

is

the modulus.

is

the length of

(Coll.

Exam.)

heavy lamina hangs in equilibrium in a horizontal position suspended by three


Shew that the normal vibrations are
vertical inextensible strings of unequal lengths.
(1) a rotation about either of two vertical lines in a plane through the centroid, and
17..

(2)

a horizontal swing parallel to this plane.


18.

(Coll.

Exam.)

A uniform rod of

of length b

is

length 2a is freely hinged at one end, at the other end a string


attached which is fastened at its further end to a point on the surface of a

homogeneous sphere of radius


motion of the system when

c.

If the masses of the rod

slightly disturbed

from the

and sphere are equal, find the


vertical, and shew that the

equation to determine the periods is


3 2
- 3
2a6c/x
gp? (66c + 19ca + 5a6) +g n (35a +156 + 2k ) g = 0.
1

Exam.)
upon a rough
suspended by

(Coll.
19.

A uniform

wire, in the shape of

an

ellipse of semi-axes a,

6,

rests

horizontal plane with its minor axis vertical and a particle of equal mass is
a fine string of length I attached to the highest point. If vibrations in a vertical plane
be performed, prove that their periods will be those of pendulums whose lengths are the
value of x given by the equation
{x (36

where k

is

- 2a 2 /6) + 56 2 + i?} (x-l) + 46 2 / = 0,

the radius of gyration about the centre of gravity.

(Coll. Exarn.)

211

Theory of Vibrations

vn]

A fine inextensible string has its ends tied to two fixed pegs in a horizontal
whose distance apart is three-quarters of the length of the string. The string
also passes through two small smooth rings which are fixed to the ends of a uniform
The rod hangs in equilibrium
straight rod whose length is half that of the string.
in a horizontal position and receives a small disturbance in the vertical
plane of the
Shew that initially its normal coordinates in terms of the time are Lcos(pt+a)
string.
and Mcosh (qt + fi), where p 2 and q 2 are the roots of the equation
20.

line

yA

^ 9a X _
2

ff*

a-*

= o.

Exam

(ColL

heavy uniform rod of length 2a, suspended from a fixed point by a string
Shew that the periods of the
slightly disturbed from its vertical position.
normal vibrations are 2nlp l and 27r/p2 where pi2 and 2 2 are the roots of the
equation
21.

of length

b, is

p>

abp*-(4a

22.

circular disc, mass M, is attached by a string from its centre C to a fixed


is fixed to the disc at a point
on the rim. Find the
particle of mass

point 0.

OC and CP

which
equations of motion on a vertical plane in terms of the angles 6 and
make with the vertical, and prove that if the system vibrates about the

position

of

equilibrium the periods in these coordinates are given by the equation

where a

is

the length

(M+ m) (p~a - g] {(M+ 2i) cp 2 - 2mg] = 2m 2cap\


of the string OC and c the radius of the disc.

Exam.)

(Coll.

23.
A hemispherical bowl of radius 2b rests on a smooth table with the plane of its
rim horizontal within it and in equilibrium lies a perfectly rough sphere of radius
b, and
mass one-quarter of that of the bowl. A slight displacement in a vertical
plane con
taining the centres of the sphere and the bowl is given prove that the periods of the
consequent vibrations are 2ir/pi and 2ir/p z where p^ and p% 2 are the roots of the
;

equation

1566%2 - 2606a^ + 75#2 = 0.

uniform circular disc of mass

Exam.)

(Coll.

and radius a is held in equilibrium on a


smooth horizontal plane by three equal elastic strings of modulus X, natural
length 1 and
24.

stretched length I.
The strings are attached to the disc at the extremities of three radii
equally inclined to one another and their other ends are attached to points of the plane
Shew that the periods of vibration of the disc are
lying on the radii produced.

and

J )}

where /i=2m^

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

/3X.

particle is describing a circle


varying as the nth power of the distance.
25.

be

less

than -

I,

1898.)

under the influence of a force to the centre


Shew that this state of motion is unstable if n

3.

Shew

that, if the force vary as e

the radius of the circle


26.

particle

is less

moves

2
"/r

the motion

is

stable or unstable
according as

or greater than a.

in free space

(Coll.

Exam.)

under the action of a centre of force which varies

as the inverse square of the distance and a field of constant force shew that a
circle
described uniformly is a possible state of
steady motion, but this will be stable only
provided the circle as viewed from the centre of force appears to lie on a right circular
cone whose semi-vertical angle is greater than
arccosj.
(Coll. Exam.)
:

142

Theory of Vibrations

212
27.

which

[CH.

under the influence of two centres of force


Prove that the motion is stable if
which a radius of the circle subtends

a circle

uniformly
particle describes
attract inversely as the square of the distance.

3 cos e cos

where 6 and

<<1,

<f>

are the angles

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

at the centres of force.

1889.)

I,

on the interior of a smooth cone with


heavy particle is projected horizontally
from the apex is c and the
its axis vertical and apex downwards; the initial distance
a horizontal circle should be
that
condition
the
Find
is
a.
cone
of
the
semi-vertical angle
and shew that the time of a vibration about this steady motion is that
28.

described;
of a simple

pendulum of length ^csec

(Coll.

a.

Exam.)

A circular disc has a thin rod pushed through its centre perpendicular to its
to the radius of the disc prove that the system
the
length of the rod being equal
plane,
cannot spin with the rod vertical unless the velocity of a point on the circumference
after falling from rest
of the disc is greater than the velocity acquired by a body
(Coll. Exam.)
ten times the radius of the disc.
29.

vertically through

Prove that for a symmetrical top spinning upright with sufficient angular
two types of motion, differing slightly from the steady motion
velocity for stability, the
functions of the time,
in the upright position, which are determined by simple harmonic
30.

and that
are the limits of steady motions with the axis slightly inclined to the vertical,
the period of the vibrations is the limiting value of that which corresponds to steady
motion in an inclined position when the inclination is indefinitely diminished.
Exam.)

(Coll.

One end of a uniform rod of length 2a whose radius of gyration about one
31.
end is k is compelled to describe a horizontal circle of radius c with uniform angular
Prove that when the motion is steady the rod lies in the vertical plane
velocity w.
an angle a with the vertical given by
through the centre of the circle and makes
w2

Shew that the

(FX

(k

+ ac cosec a) = ay sec a.

are 27r/\i, 27r/X 2 where X l5 X 2 are the


periods of the normal vibrations

sin a

2
a>

ac)

X2 sin a -

2
a>

ac -

2
a>

&2 sin 3 a) =

2
4a>

X 2 sin 2 a cos 2

a.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part


disturbed from

I,

1889.)

conical pendulum when


32.
Investigate the motion of a
harmonic oscillation of the point of support. Can the
steady motion by a small vertical
such a disturbance?
(Coll. Exam.)
steady motion be rendered unstable by
33.
it

The middle point

its state of

of one side of a uniform rectangle is fixed and the line joining


is constrained to describe a circular cone

to the middle point of the opposite side

The rectangle being otherwise free,


a with uniform angular velocity.
about the
the positions of steady motion and prove that the time of a vibration
sin
a.
divided
of
revolution
the
to
by
period
position of stable steady motion is equal

of semi -angle
find

(Coll.

Exam.)

centre of gravity

A solid of revolution, symmetrical about a plane through


34.
b which is
is suspended from a fixed point by a string of length
perpendicular to its axis,
The mass
of length 2a.
axis
this
the
of
axis
of
the
being
end
one
to
solid,
attached
moments of inertia at its centre of gravity are
and its
the solid is
its

of

M,

principal

from the state of steady motion in which the


,
is spinning on its axis with angular velocity
the
and
axis
are
and
body
vertical,
string
where p^ and p 22 are
2
shew that the periods of the normal vibrations are ^irlp l and

(A, A, C}.

If the solid is slightly disturbed

27r//>

the roots of the equation


HaPgp*-

= (g- fy2 (Mag + Cnp - Ap*}.


)

213

Theory of Vibrations

vn]

A symmetrical top spins with its axis vertical, the tip of the peg resting in
35.
a fixed socket. A second top, also spinning, is placed on the summit of the first, the tip
Shew

of the peg resting in a small socket.

that the arrangement

is

stable provided the

equation

(Mcgx* +
has

M,

roots real

all its

CQx + A {(M c + MK) gx* + C Q x + (A + Mh?}} = J/ 2AV)


1

their masses, C,

fl,

ii

being the spins of the upper and lower tops respectively,


moments of inertia about the axis of figure, A, A about

their

perpendiculars through the pegs,


the distance between the pegs.

c,

the distances of the centroids from the pegs, and h


(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part I, 1898.)

A homogeneous body spins on a smooth horizontal plane in stable steady motion,


36.
with angular velocity w about the vertical through the point of contact and the centre of
The body is symmetrical about each of two perpendicular planes through the
gravity.
The principal radii of curvature at the vertex on which it rests are pi p 2 the
of inertia about the principal axes through the centre of gravity (parallel to the
lines of curvature) are respectively A and
and that about the vertical is C. The
vertical.

moments

height of the centre of gravity about the vertex


weight of the body.

Shew that the

following conditions

must be

is

a = a l + p l = a.2 +p 2

satisfied

and Xw 2

is

(i)
(ii)
(iii)

The value
(A

if

of X

must not

+ B - C] \JB {M +

lie

(A

between the two values

- Cf)Y

JA

[a.2

B 4- a (E v

the two radicals in the expression are both real.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

I,

1897.)

the

CHAPTER
NON-HOLONOMIC SYSTEMS.

VIII
DISSIPATIVE SYSTEMS

Lagranges equations with undetermined

87.

multipliers.

We now

proceed to the consideration of non-holonomic dynamical systems.


In these systems, as was seen in 25, the number of independent coordinates
In) required in order to specify the configuration of the

>

(<?i>

<?2,

system at

any time is greater than the number of degrees of freedom of the system,
owing to the fact that the system is subject to constraints which will be
supposed to do no work, and which are expressed by a number of nonintegrable* kinematical relations of the form

An A

where
q%,

lk

12

+ A 2k dq +
2

...,

A nm

+ A nk dq n + Tk dt =
T ..., Tm are

...

7\,

(k

= l,2,

...,

functions

given

m),
of

q 1}

t.

Qn

dq

>

familiar example of such a system is that of a body which is constrained to


without sliding on a given fixed surface the condition that no sliding takes place is
expressed by two relations of the type given above. A still simpler example is that of ,a

The most

roll

vertical wheel with a sharp edge which rolls on a horizontal sheet of paper, as in the
integraph of Abdank-Abakanowicz and the integrator of Pascal the wheel moves only in
its own instantaneous plane, the friction at the sharp edge preventing it from slipping
:

If (x, y} are the rectangular coordinates of its point of contact with the
its plane, we have in this case the non-holonomic equation

sideways.

paper, and $ the azimuth of


of condition

tan

dy

The number

dx = 0.

<p

being m, the system will have


not
possible to apply Lagrange s equations
m)
(n
of the Lagrangian equations will
an
extension
a
but
to
such
system,
directly
to
discuss
the motion of non-holonomic
enable
us
which
will
be
now
given
of kinematical relations

degrees of freedom

it is

systems in a way analogous to that previously developed

for

holonomic

systems.

Consider then a non-holonomic

system, whose configuration at any


n coordinates q l} q 2 ..., q n
let the

instant is completely specified by


kinetic energy be T, and let the kinematical conditions
holonomic constraints be expressed by the relations

A.kdq,

+ A^dq +
2

...

* If these relations were


integrable,
(<?i>

92

which

1
>

is

1 n)

+ A nk dq n + Tk dt =

(k

due

to the non-

= 1,

2,

m).

would be possible to express some of the coordinates


i Q terms of the others, and the n coordinates would therefore not be independent

contrary to our assumption.

it

Non-holonomic Systems.

87]

Now

215

Dissipative Systems

is open to us either simply to


regard the system as subject to
these kinematical conditions, or in place of these to
regard the system as
acted on by certain additional external forces, namely the forces which have
it

be exerted by the constraints in order to compel the system to fulfil the


we shall for the present take the latter point of
view.
Let
Qi 8qi+Q*Bqt +... + Qn *q*
to

kinematical conditions;

be the work done on the system by these additional forces in an


arbitrary
is now not restricted to
satisfy the

displacement (Sq^ 8q 2 ..., Sq n ) (which


kinematical conditions), and let
,

+Q

8q 1

Sq 2 +...

+ Qn Sq n

be the work done on the system by the original external forces in this dis
placement. Since the substitution of additional forces for the kinematical
relations has made the system holonomic, we can
apply the Lagrangian
we have therefore
equations
;

as the equations of motion of the


system.

The

forces

Q/>

Qz,

Qn are unknown

>

but they are such that, in any

displacement consistent with the instantaneous constraints, they do no work.


It follows that the quantity
Qi
is

zero

for

all

values

dq

of

+ Q2 dq +

...+

the

ratios

dq :dq 2
l

equations

A*dql + A ti dqa +
t

Qn dq n

...

...

+ A nk dq n =

dqn which

satisfy

the

0;

hence we must have

Qr =

\A n + \a4 + ...+ \m A rm

where the quantities \ l} \2


altogether the (n

+ m)

dT

dT\

and

these

are

+ A 2k q +

sufficient

X.
q n ^i,
of this set of equations*.
fc,

>

)u>

The extension

\ m are independent of

r.

1, 2,

We

n),

thus have

to

...+

A nk qn +

determine

the

The problem

is

2^
(n

(k=l,2,

+ m) unknown

...,

m),

quantities

thus reduced to the solution

of Lagrange s equations to non-holonomic


systems is due to Ferrers, Quart.
C. Neumann, Leipzig Berichte, XL.
(1888), p. 22: and Vierkandt,
Math. u. Phys. in. (1892), p. 31.

Journ. Math. xn. (1871), p. 1

Monatshefte fur

...,

equations

^ifcffi

<1\,

(r

Non-holonomic Systems.

216

Equations of motion referred

88.

to

Dissipative Systems [CH. vin


axes moving in any manner.

The method given in the preceding article depends essentially on the


reduction of the non-holonomic system to a holonomic system by introducing
the forces due to the non-holonomic constraints. In practice, this is often
most conveniently done by forming separately the equations of motion of
each of the bodies of the system. It is moreover frequently advantageous
to use axes of reference which are not fixed either in space or in the body,
and we shall now find the equations of motion of a rigid body referred to
axes which have their origin at the centre of gravity of the body, and are
turning about

it

in

any manner*.

be the centre of gravity of the body, and let Gxyz be the moving
(u, v, w) be the components of velocity of the centre of gravity
resolved parallel to these axes, and let (0 l
2
#3) be the components of

Let

Let

axes.

0<

angular velocity of the system of axes Gxyz resolved along the axes them
w 2 3 ) be the components of angular velocity of the
selves; further let
&>

(&>j,

body, resolved along the same axes. Then ( 64) the motion of G is the same
as that of a particle of mass M, equal to that of the body, acted on by forces
equal to the external forces which act on the body (including all forces of
constraint, except the molecular reactions

between the constituent particles


Gxyz of

of the body) let (X, Y, Z) be the components parallel to the axes


these external forces.
;

The component of velocity of G parallel to Gx is u, and consequently


v0 + wQ2 we
17) the component of its acceleration in this direction is u
3

have therefore the equation

which can be written

where

(u, v, w,

of

denotes the kinetic energy of the body, expressed in terms of


and similar equations can be obtained for the motion
3 );
2
&>

<w

a>!,

>

parallel to the axes

Gy and

Gz.

Consider next the motion of the body relative to G, which ( 64) is


62, 63, we see that the angular
independent of the motion of G from
;

body about the axis Gx is dT/dwi,


increase of angular momentum about an axis fixed

momentum

of the

stantaneously coinciding with

Gx

in

space

and

in

is

A f^.\ -B
*

so that the rate of

In the applications of this method, the axes are usually chosen subject to the condition
moments and products of inertia of the body with respect to them do not vary but this

that the

condition

is

not essential.

Non-liolonomic Systems.

88, 89]

denote the moments


M,
have
therefore ( 40)
we
Gxyz,
If L,

217

Dissipative Systems

of the external forces about the axes

dT

dT _
=

**j

and two similar equations.

Hence

motion of the body

finally the

l*.(W\-aW

ff

d_T_

is

d_fdT^_.dT

,dT

dt

dt\du)
d.

determined by the six equations

(W\ _

dt\dw/

du

dt\dwj

dv

9o>i

3h

be observed that these are really Lagrangian equations of motion


in terms of quasi-coordinates, and could have been derived by use of the
It will

theorem of

30.

let (w 1} u 2
a)
Example. If the origin of the moving axes is not fixed in the body,
be the components of velocity of the origin of coordinates, resolved parallel to the
of angular velocity
instantaneous position of the axes; let (0 l5 2
3 ) be the components
of the system of axes, resolved along themselves; let (vi, v 2 v 3 ) be the components of
situated at the origin of
velocity of that point of the body which is instantaneously
,

coordinates; and let


referred to the

o>

(&>!,

moving

o>

axes.

3)

be the components of angular velocity of the body, also


Shew that the equations of motion can be written in

the form

tfiJ^-^W+e^X,
(VL\-fi^J+eM=

dt \c

dT - 7
dT
^
OV

+ u3
s

dT
where

(JT, F, Z, Z, J/, ^) are the


reference to the moving axes.

89.

Application

We

shall

now

dT OVi

dT

5
00)3

00)2
.

0!

dT
^
Oo>3

dT

dT =

JT-

Oo>i

dT

components and moments of the external

to special

forces with

non-holonomic problems.

consider some examples illustrative of the theory of non-

holonomic systems.
1.
Sphere rolling on a fixed sphere.
be required to determine the motion of a perfectly rough sphere of radius a and
which rolls on a fixed sphere of radius 6, the only external force being gravity.

Example
Let

mass

TO

it

218

Non-Jwlonomic Systems.

Dissipative Systems [CH.

vm

Let (b, 0,
be the polar coordinates of the point of contact, referred to the centre of
the fixed sphere, the polar axis being vertical. We take moving axes GABC, where G is
the centre of the moving sphere, GC is the prolongation of the line joining the centres of
<)

the spheres, GA is horizontal and perpendicular to GC, and


and GC, in the direction of 6 increasing.

With these axes we have,

0-2=

F,

GA

perpendicular to

si"
-<j>

03

0,

cos

0,

{
if

is

in the notation of the last article,

0i= -P,

and
and

GB

denote the components of the force at the point of contact parallel to

GB respectively, we

Y=mgsm0 + F
N=0.
M=-Fa,

X=F,
L = F a,
The equations

GA

have
,

become therefore

of motion of the last article

m (u
"*"

F=
=F =

fam

w3 +

(o>j

a>2

(o>

in (v-{-u0s)

mgsin

C/ 2

0)3

v0 3 ) =

O)l ~|~

U I O) 2

gam

i),

+ 0201s),

w.

Moreover, the components parallel to the axes GA, GB of the velocity of the point of
contact are u
and consequently the kinematical equations which express
2 and v -f ao) t
the condition of no sliding at the point of contact are
ao>

Eliminating F,

a^,

o>

2,

we have
-t70 3
|
<

v+u0 3

a02(>)

J*-

0)

The

= n,

where n is a constant; while substituting


two equations their values in terms of 0, 6, 0, we have

last

in the first

equation gives

a>

(a

(a + b]

The former
by

sin 0,

sin 0) + (a + 6)
+ b}-r
dt (0

the

anf>

= 0,

+ %an<f>sin0-%gsiu = 0.

0-(a + b)<p?cos0sin

a constant.

equation by

(/>

+ f cm cos 0=k,

and
Moreover, multiplying the second equation throughout by
and adding, we obtain an equation which can be at once

sin 0,

integrated, giving

n2 ^ +

where h

1}

and gives
is

first

cos
0<f>

for u, v,

of these equations can be integrated at once after multiplying throughout


2
(a + 6)0 sin $

where k

-f0i3=0,
g sin $ = 0,
= 0.
3

is

a constant

Eliminating
(a +

2
fe)

-2- cos

this is really the equation of

= h,

energy of the system.

between these two integral equations, we have

sin 2

&=

and on writing cos# = #,

- (k - f an cos

this equation

2
(9)

- ^-g

becomes

(a

+ b) sin

cos

+ h (a + 6) 2 sin 2

Non-holonomic Systems.

89]

219

Dissipative Systems

The cubic polynomial in x on the right-hand side of this equation is positive when
some real values of 6, i.e. for some values of x
negative when #=1, positive for
between -1 and 1, and negative when #=-1; it has therefore one root greater than
- 1 we shall denote these roots by
unity, and two roots between 1 and

x= + oc

cosh

where cos

j3>

cos a;

cos

/3,

a,

and we then have

\7 a + b)
where

cos

y,

+f =
)

- cosh

j {(x

y) (x

- cos

|8)

(x

cos a)}

a constant of integration.

e is

Writing
2
14 a+b
7A(a + 6) + ^a
* +
+ i(coshy + cos/3 + cosa)= 3
+
.

v(a

6)

the equation becomes

2=

or

where the function

is

formed with the roots

e2

~14(a + 6){

these quantities e^ e2 e3 are


,

all real,

C S/3

"

30<7(a+i)

and

satisfy the relations

ei + 62 + 63=0,

el

>e

>e

cos a and cos 3


(since x is real) lies between
hence the imaginary part of the constant e in the
we shall
argument of the ^-function is the half-period corresponding to the root e3 which
denote by
the real part of e may be taken to be zero by suitably choosing the origin
of time and therefore we have finally

Now

a*

so z is real

is real

and

for real values of

lies

between

ez

and

and

e3

<B

14

<

This equation gives the variable in terms of the time the other coordinate
centre of the moving sphere is then obtained by integrating the equation

of the

(/>

this integration can be effected by a procedure similar to that used ( 72) to obtain the
Eulerian angles which define the position of a top spinning on a perfectly rough plane.

Example 2. A rough sphere rolls in contact with the outside of a fixed rough sphere,
under gravity if z2 z3 be the greatest and least heights of its centre, during the motion,
and z be the height at a time t from an instant when z was equal to 2 2 prove that
;

(*2

where

el

e2 , e3

(= -

el

- e2 )

z}

[|f>

~
(0 e 2] = (*2 23)

(<?i

- e 2 ),

are real quantities in descending order of magnitude.


(Coll.

Exam.)

Non-holonomic Systems.

220
Example

Dissipative Systems [CH.

vm

Sphere rolling on a moving sphere.

3.

now the motion of a rough sphere of radius a and mass m which rolls under
on
another
sphere, of radius b and mass M, the latter sphere being free to turn
gravity
about its centre 0, which is fixed.
Consider

Let (6, 0) be the polar coordinates of the point of contact referred to axes fixed in space
with the fixed centre as origin, the axis from which 6 is measured being vertical.

To obtain the equations of motion of the sphei e m, we take (as in the last example)
moving axes O ABC of which GC is the prolongation of the line OGf joining the centres of
the spheres, and GA is horizontal. Let (0
$2
3 ) denote the components of angular
velocity of the coordinate-system resolved along its own axes, and let (wj, 2 ^3) denote the
components of angular velocity of the sphere m along the same axes. Then, as in the last
example, we have
1

o>

T= \
and

if

F,

parallel to

111

U Z + V- + W2 +

((Bj

(B 2

2
0>

3 )

be the components of the force acting on the sphere

OA

and

GB

respectively,

at the point of contact

we have

L^F a,
so the equations of motion

M=-Fa,

N=Q,

become

a) 3 -

<9

an

+ 0j 0)2 =

(1)3

+ ^3 Wi) .................. (1),

(02

+ 62013) .................. (2),

...................................................... (3).

To determine the motion of the sphere M, we take moving axes parallel to the axes
(JABC, but with their origin at 0; let (Q 1? Q 2 Q 3 ) denote the components of angular
we have
Then for the sphere
velocity of the sphere resolved along these axes.
,

and

its

equations of motion are

3)

Q 3 -(9 2 Qi +
The conditions

<9iQ

=F
=0

.............................. (5),

................................. (6).

of no sliding at the point of contact are


u-aa>2

= bQ 2

v+

aa>

= -bQ

.............................. (7).

In order to solve this set of equations we multiply equations


respectively, and add

thus, using

(7),

(3)

and

(6)

by a and

we have

a w 3 + bQ s + u&i + v6% = 0,
or

ai>

Integrating,

-f

&Q 3 = 0.

we have
a<a

+ bQ 3 =an,

where n

is

a constant.

Non-holonomic Systems.

89, 90]

Moreover, from equations

(4)

and

- f M(u Eliminating

^and

o>

#30>i

(7)

ao>

we have

- b6iQ 3 2

..

-v
(

(7),

Now

ud 3 + 0.0%

a&i

,.

(9-<i

5
sin

we have

.-

(9cos<9-

, N

we have

and ^ - # 3 co 2 between

f- (v +
or

(1),

rnr

M
F

= F.

aa>^

-63 v) =

Similarly from equations (5) and

Eliminating

- 6z

3v

between this and equations


(u

221

Diasipative Systems

this

<w

+ b6 2 Q 3 = F

and equations

we have

(2),

L
= and + b(M+ni)
9 sin 6,
2j/
.

M0 3 )

2M
an
d
(M+m}qsin
*
rr= ----r.r -r
_

the equations (A) and (B), from which 6 and

.4>sme

......... (B).

are to be determined in terms of

t,

are of essentially the same character as the equations found for the determination of 6
in the previous example the former equations being in fact derivable from the
and
:

present ones by making


very large compared with m.
as
in
the
former
case.
proceeds exactly

The

integration

therefore

4.
A uniform sphere rolls on a perfectly rough horizontal plane, under
whose resultant passes through its centre. Shew that the motion of its centre
the same as that of a particle acted on by the same forces reduced in the ratio 5 7.

Example

forces
is

Example 5. Form the equations of motion of a perfectly rough sphere rolling under
gravity inside a fixed right circular cylinder, the axis of which is inclined to the vertical at
an angle a; and shew that, if the sphere be such that &2 =^a 2 a being its radius and k
,

the radius of gyration about any diameter, and if it be placed at rest with the axial plane
through its centre making an angle /3 with the vertical axial plane, the velocity of
the centre parallel to the axis,

{sin

where

+a

is

\6 arccosh

this angle is 6, is

(cos

6 sec

i/3)

the radius of the cylinder.

For other examples

cf.

+ cos i(9 arccos

(sin

\d cosec A/3)},

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

I,

1895.)

Woronetz, Math. Ann. LXX. (1911), p. 410.

Vibrations of non-holonomic systems.

90.

We
system

when

shall
:

it

next consider the small vibratory motions of a non-holonomic


appear that so far as vibrations about equilibrium are con

will

cerned, the difference between holonomic

and non-holonomic systems

is

unimportant.

For consider the vibrations about equilibrium of a non-holonomic system


with n independent coordinates and (n
m) degrees of freedom, in which
the constraints are independent of the time. Let T be the kinetic and V the
T will be supposed to be
potential energy, so that for the vibrational problem
a homogeneous quadratic function of (q lt q,

...,

q n ), and

F to be a homogeneous

Dissipatlve Systems [CH. vui

Non-holonomic Systems.

222

quadratic function of (q l

There are

constants.

m
A

...,q n ], the coefficients in both cases being


equations of the type
q.2

lk q!

+ A nk q n =

+ Aaq* +

which express the non-holonomic constraints


are

= 1,2,...,

m),

and the equations of motion

87)

dV
= -^-+\jA
n + \ A r2 +

d /?T\
}
at (^\cq r j

-r.

+ \ m A rm

...

(r=l,

2,

...,>

oq r

these equations it is evident that \ l} X 2 ..., \m are in general small


quantities of the order of the coordinates and therefore for the vibrational

From

problem only the constant parts of ^. n A 12 ..., A nm need be considered. The


vibrational motion is therefore the same as if the coefficients A n A 12 ..., A nm
were constants independent of the coordinates but in this case the equations
,

A lk q + A sk q + ... + A nk q n =
2

can be integrated

(k

I, 2,

(A

1, 2,

...,i)

in fact, they give

lk

ql

+ A^q, +... + A nk q n =

m),

the constants of integration being zero since the values


qi

= 0,

q2

0,

qn

represent a possible position of the system.

motion of the given non-holonomic system is


the same as that of the holonomic system for which the equations of con
straint are expressible in the integrated form
It follows that the vibratory

A
we can

nate

lk

ql

+ A 2k q. +...+A nk qn =
2

(k

1, 2, ....

m)

therefore determine the vibrations by using these equations to elimi


of the coordinates (q l} q z ...,q n ) from T and V; we shall then have
,

and potential
and
the corre
m) coordinates
energies being expressed in terms of (n
the
sponding velocities the vibrations of this system can be determined by
a holonomic system with (n

m) degrees

of freedom, the kinetic

usual method described in the preceding chapter.

As an example, we

shall consider the following problem*.

horizontal
heavy homogeneous hemisphere is resting in equilibrium on a perfectly rough
second heavy homogeneous hemisphere is
A
itith its spherical surface downwards.
plane
a perfectly rough plane face of the first, the point of contact
resting in the same way on
The equilibrium being slightly disturbed, it is required
being in the centre of the face.
to

find the vibrations of the system.

Take as axes

of reference

its

rectangular set of axes


(1)
centre of gravity 2

Due

to

Z>>xyz

fixed in the

upper hemisphere, the origin being

Madame Kerkhoven-Wythoff, Nieuw Archiefvoor

Wiskunde, Deel

iv.

(1899).

Non-holonomic Systems.

90]

its

Z ^^

(2)
rectangular set of axes
centre of gravity Z\

223

Dissipative Systems

fixed in the lower hemisphere, the origin being

A rectangular set of -axes Rlmn fixed in space, the origin R being the equi
(3)
librium position of the point of contact of the lower hemisphere and the plane.
We further
Z<iZ,

define these axes

Z\, and Rn

by supposing that

Zz y,

are parallel, the axes

Suppose that at time


of axes are connected

in the equilibrium position the axes


therefore coincident, while the axes
z x, Z^, Rl
being therefore also parallel.

are vertical and

Z^, and

Rm

the coordinates of a point referred to these different sets

by the equations

= a+ n

The 24 coefficients in these transformation-formulae completely specify the


position of
the system at any instant. As however the system has
only six degrees of freedom, there
must be 18 equations connecting these coefficients or their differentials. Of these, 12 are
the ordinary conditions of the types

which express the orthogonal character of the axes


contact and rolling, which we shall now find.
Let

R R2
l

the remaining 6 are the conditions of

be the radii of the lower and upper hemispheres respectively, and

the distances of the centres of gravity from their plane faces, so li = %Ri, ^2 = f #2coordinates of the point of contact of the upper hemisphere with the lower are

x 2 =-li z yi,

yi= -

Rtf*,

h-R-iyz

zz

/j,

12

The

the conditions that this point shall be at rest relative to the lower hemisphere are

= 0.
The

last of these

equations gives 7 + ^273 = 0, which

the differentiated form of the

is

equation

^-7-73^2= -RZ,
an equation which expresses the condition of contact of the two hemispheres
the first two of the equations give

a-

at

R 2 y^ - a

0!

R ayi - & RW +

and these express the condition of


equations give as a

first

R^y-i

a3

/3 3 (1 2

rolling of the

approximation

(^ 2

R-zy^

while

= 0,

- -R 2 y3 = 0,
,

upper on the lower hemisphere.

These

224

Non-holonomic Systems.

Dissipative Systems

[CH.

vm

and therefore on integration

Similarly the condition of contact of the lower hemisphere and the horizontal plane

and the conditions of

is

rolling are

We

have thus now obtained the 18 equations connecting the 24 coefficients: taking
c i as the 6 independent coordinates of the system, and solving for
y\i a
the other 18 coefficients in terms of these, we find with the necessary approximation

a 2)

/3s?

2>

^3>

-l - $ (a 22 + 713

),

=-yi-

=1-

.-/sip,

U=i-i(yi
The

+33 2

).

potential energy of the system

is

F= J/j^c + M2 g (c + c ia + c2 /3 + c3 y),
or,

retaining only small quantities of the second order,

If

express the coordinates I, m, n of any particle of the


in terms of its coordinates relative to the axes 2 xyz and
l

now we

hemisphere
and form the sum

i2m (P + m2 + h2

for each hemisphere, neglecting

upper or lower

respectively,

terms above the second

order of small quantities, and remembering that the principal moments of inertia of
and radius R at its centre of gravity are %MR 2
a hemisphere of mass
R*, we find for the kinetic energy of the system the value T, where

+ C! 2

{^ Wi + l/

The equations
(i)

in F,
is

(1J7? 2

^2 +

+f

of motion evidently separate into three distinct sets, consisting of

Equations

for the coordinates

a 2 and

and do not correspond to vibrations

not disturbed

revolution.
(ii)

(iii)

We

^^^^

a2

these coordinates give rise to no terms


in fact, the equilibrium

in the stricter sense

either of the hemispheres is turned through


can therefore neglect these equations.

if

Equations involving the coordinates

b3

and

any angle about

its axis of

3.

Equations for the coordinates c 1 and y l these are exactly the same as the
so we need consider only the latter.
/33

equations for 6 3 and

Non-holonomic Systems.

90]

The equations

and

for 6 3

j33

225

Dissipative Systems

are, in extenso,

RM ^

- 1^2^2/3
2 J/2 6 3
+g (|
3-|^3 + ^/33=0.
The corresponding determinantal equation

for X,

where

STT/V/X is a period, is

=0.

This

and

is

a quadratic equation in X

this is the condition

The

it is

easily

found that

its

roots are positive

if

for stability of the equilibrium.

vibrations of non-holonomic systems about a state of steady motion


by use of the equations of motion given

are most conveniently discussed


in

88.

The method

Example.

be illustrated by the following example.

will

solid of revolution has an equatorial plane of symmetry, and is rolling


round its axis in steady motion on a perfectly rough horizontal

with angular velocity n

This motion being slightly disturbed,

plane, the equatorial plane of the solid being vertical.


to find the
period of a vibration.

Let G be the centre of gravity of the solid, and let (C, A) be its moments of inertia
about the axis and about a line through G perpendicular to the axis. Take as moving
axes of reference Gxyz, where Gz is the axis of the solid, Gy is perpendicular to the plane
through Gz and the point of contact (so Gy is horizontal), and Gx is normal to the plane
Let F,
R be the components of the force acting on the solid at the point
Gt/z.

F
F being in the plane
,

of contact,

plane.

Let

(6 l

and

#3)

Gxz,

w2

(wj,

being parallel to Gy, and R being normal to the


denote as usual the components of angular

co 3 )

velocity of the axes and of the body respectively, and let (u, v, w) be the components of
the velocity of G, parallel to the moving axes. Further, let p be the radius of curvature
of the meridian of the solid at the equator, a the radius of its
equatorial circle, 6 the
the angle between Gy and its undisturbed
angle made by Gz with the vertical, and
direction.

Then we have
di

and the kinetic energy

=-

=
o>!

4>

sin 6,

$ 2 =co 2 = #,

is

T= $ M (u 2 + v 2 + 708) + 1 A
The equations

of

from this point on the

# 3 = $cos#,

2
(a>!

co 2 )

+\

2
<7o>

18 therefore give, if P is the point of contact, PAT the


perpendicular
and G the perpendicular from G on the horizontal plane,

axis,

M (u - w9

+ w6 2

ai-Ato<i0 3

2
.3

<7co

=Fuo6-(R- Mg) sin 6,

+ Ca s 6 Z =- F GK,
.

6^+A^e-^-F.GN-R. XP,

=F .PK.

In these equations, (rA and j!\Tare measured


positively parallel to the positive direction
of the axis of z and the horizontal projection of this direction
respectively.
w. D.

15

Non-holonomic Systems.

226

The conditions

of no sliding at

Dissipative Systems [CH.

P are
GN.

sin 6

o>

sin 6

=
-^

= 0,
=o,

.O!

and the condition of contact of the body and plane

w cos 6 -11

vm

is

- OK cos + PKsin 6).

These equations determine the motion in the general case, when the disturbance from
When this latter assumption is made,
steady motion is not supposed to be small.

we have

where

x,

"&,

*)

equal to Mg.

are small; and F, F u, w, wj,


Moreover we have NP= (p - a) x-

o>

M (u + an6

3)

is nearly
are small, while
therefore become

QI, # 2 , $3

The equations

= - R + Mg,

=F

Mr,

=0,

Cw
w
+ atzr

aa>2

,77

where

o>i

Eliminating F,

=6

=^

=F a,
= 0,
=0,
QZ

W2=#2=x>

R, and replacing 6 1

62

a>

1}

o>

by their

values, the equations

become
=0,

Cw
w

=ax,

=-aw.
From
or

and

77

the third and

are constants.

of these equations we
The other three equations

fifth

and therefore the equation

Dissipative systems

We now

x + {MgA ( P -a) +

shews that the period of a vibration


2?r

91.

give,

for the determination of

A(A + Ma 2
this equation

see that

Cn*

and

are zero, and therefore

on eliminating w,

i-

(C+ Ma

)}

x=

is

2
2
(MgA (p-a) + Cn (C+Ma ))

frictional forces.

proceed to the consideration of systems for which the principle of


conservation of dynamical energy is not valid, the energy of the system being

Non-holonomic Systems.

90, 91]

continually changed into


in dynamics.

We

227

Dissipative Systems

some other form

(e.g.

heat) which

is

not recognised

shall first consider frictional systems.

If two rigid bodies which are not perfectly smooth are in contact, the
reaction between them at the point of contact may be resolved into a com

ponent along the common normal to their surfaces at the point, which is
called the normal pressure, and a
component in the common tangent-plane,
which is called the frictional force. The frictional force is determined by
the following law*, which has been established experimentally

The bodies

will not slide on each other, provided the frictional


force required for the
does
not
exceed
times
the
normal
/j,
prevention of sliding
pressure, where /A
is

a constant called

the

"

limiting coefficient of friction" ivhich depends only


on the material of which the surfaces in contact are composed. If on the
other hand the frictional force required to prevent sliding is
greater than fj,

times the normal pressure, there will be sliding at the point of contact, and
play will be /* times the normal pressure.

the frictional force called into

Painleve has pointed out that the four hypotheses

(1)

that the above laws of friction

hold, (2) that there exist rigid bodies, (3) that the normal pressure between bodies cannot
be negative, (4) that all accelerations and tensions are finite taken together lead in some

cases to contradictions of the fundamental laws of dynamics.


For a discussion on this
cf.
Comptes Rendus, CXL. (1905), pp. 635, 702, 847: ibid. CXLI. (1905), pp. 310, 401,
546; Zeitschrift fur M. u. P. LVIII. (1909), p. 186.
subject,

The

following

examples

illustrate

the

motion

of

systems

involving

frictional forces.

Motion of a particle on a rough fixed plane curve.


1.
Consider the motion of a particle which is constrained to move on a rough fixed tube
of small bore, in the form of a plane curve, under forces which
on its
depend

Example

solely

Let f(s) and g(s) denote the components of force


per unit mass
acting on the particle in direction of the tangent and normal to the tube, where s is the
distance of the particle from some fixed point of the tube, measured
along the arc in the
direction in which the particle is moving and let R be the normal reaction
per unit mass,
position in the tube.

and p the

coefficient of friction.

Since the components of acceleration of the particle along the


tangent and normal are
is the velocity of the particle and
p the radius of curvature of the

2
vdv/ds and v /p, where v

tube,

we have

S-/0-tt
Eliminating R, we have

__ + 2u

dv*

Integrating,

where
(f>

= $ds/p,

JV = 2

we have

and

c is

a constant depending on the

initial

circumstances of the motion.

The discovery that the friction is proportional to the normal pressure was
G. Amontons, Paris Mem., annee
1699, p. 206.

made by

152

228

Non-holonomic Systems.

The right-hand
we have

side of this equation is a

Dissipative Systems [CH.


known

function of

s,

say =F(s).

vm
Then

v2

and

so the relation between s

is

t-t

t
/

ds.

{F(s)}~2

This equation represents the solxition of the problem.

Example
mass

2.

m is attached

circular hoop of mass


stands on rough ground, and a particle of
end of the horizontal diameter. To find whether the hoop will roll

to the

or slide.

Let us investigate the rolling motion, assumed possible, and so determine whether the
produce this motion is, or is not, greater than the maximum friction

friction required to

i.e. p. times the corresponding normal pressure.


Let 6 be the angle
turned through by the hoop from the commencement of the motion, and let x and y be

actually available,

the coordinates of the centre of gravity of the system, referred to horizontal and vertical
its own initial position, so that

(downward) axes through

ma

x = a6a
where a

The

a\

ti

y=
9

cos#),

f
(1
M+m^

kinetic

6.

and potential energies are

The Lagrangian equation

For the
so initially

initial

[2

of motion

is

- sin
0),

therefore

M+ m(l- sin 0)}] + ma ft cos


2

2
-T-

Cvt

= mga cos 0.

motion, this equation gives

we have

_
if

,,

the radius of the hoop.

is

T= Ma2 ft + ma?ft
V= mga sin 6.

But

ma

M+m sin

/J

ma

nf

_
~

ft

F be the frictioual force and R the normal pressure,


F=(X+m),

we have

R=(M+m)(

we have

so initially

The hoop

-y+g

m(M+m)
2

will therefore roll or slide according as the coefficient of friction is greater or

than

less

m (M+m)
Example 3. A particle moves under gravity on a rough cycloid whose plane is
and whose base is horizontal if
be the inclination of the tangent at any point

vertical

to the horizontal, so that the equation of the cycloid can be written


s

and

if

tan

be the coefficient of
tar

ce

where

c is

a constant.

friction,

= 4a sin

<,

shew that the motion

is

given by the equation

Non-holonomic Systems.

91, 92]
92.

229

Dissipative Systems

Resisting forces depending on the velocity.

different type of dissipative system is illustrated by the motion of


a projectile in the air, as the resistance of the air depends on the velocity of

No general rule can be formulated for the solution of prob


lems involving forces of this kind a case of practical interest, however,
namely the motion of a projectile under the influence of gravity arid of a
resistance varying as some power of the projectile s velocity, can be integrated
the projectile.

in the following manner.

For low velocities (below lOOft./sec.) the resistance of the air to a projectile is nearly
For high velocities (say 2000 ft. /sec.) the
proportional to the square of the velocity.
resistance is approximately a linear function of the velocity.

At time

be the velocity of the

let v

n
projectile, kv the resistance per

unit mass, 6 the inclination of the path to the horizontal, and p the radius of
The components of acceleration of the projectile
curvature of the path.

along the tangent and normal to

its

path are vdv/ds and

v-/p

and hence the

equations of motion are


(vdv/ds
2

v /p

Dividing the

dv

d
dv

Integrating,

(1 \
-^
n
\v j

tan 6

d0

-T7j

kv n

gcos0

ti"~

+ -=
vn

we obtain

equation by the second,

first

v"+~

or

= g sin 6
= g cos 6.

sec 0)
do (n log

nk

sec

0.

we have

(I/O sec

Constant

This equation gives v in terms of

= - (nk/g)

fsec n+1 0d0.

To obtain

0.

t,

the equation

= pg cos

gives
gt

Iv sec0d0,

v is a known function of 0, this equation gives t as a function of 0.


The rectangular coordinates (x, y) of the particle can now be found from the

and as

equations

x=
The

solution of the

problem

Resisting forces proportional

Book

n.

Ivcos0dt,
is

thus reduced to quadratures.

z
and av + bv z were considered by
respectively to v, v
3.
The
case
of
a
resistance
2,
proportional to any power
,

Newton, Principia,
1,
of the velocity was then examined by John Bernoulli*
*

Opera,

i.

p. 502.

in 1711.

Non-holonomic Systems.

230

D Alembert *

shewed that

projectile, the integration

if

Dissipative Systems

gu denotes the

ratio of the resistance to the

[CH.

vm

mass of the

can be effected in the four cases

u = a + bv n

u = a + b log v,

u=a

(log v}

+ R log v + b,

a, b, n are arbitrary constants and R is another constant depending on them.


Siaccit obtained many more integrable cases, of which the following maybe mentioned

where

log
8

vdu

^c
^

where

a,

number

c,

b,

l+a(u-\}

are arbitrary constants

of terms involved being finite

du

du

-r- + C,
-icr j.
l+b(u + l) c

this equation defines


c is rational.

terms of

in

u,

the

when

Poisson pointed out in 1806J that the theory of singular solutions of differential
equations has applications in Dynamics, notably in the case of a particle under a resisting
If a particle is moving in a straight line under a resisting force varying as the
force.

square root of the velocity, the equation of motion


dv/dt =

The

initial velocity

being

c2,

the motion
v

so long as

t<2c/a,

after

which

it is

is

is

av 2.

represented by the general integral

= (c

^at)

represented by the singular solution

= 0.

Example 1. A heavy particle falls vertically from rest at the origin in a medium
whose resistance varies directly as the velocity. Shew that the distance traversed
in time

is

ff,9
-- --

9*

PHI?

where pv

is

e -*t,
K

the resistance per unit mass.

Example 2. A heavy particle falls vertically from rest at the origin in a medium
whose resistance varies as the square of the velocity shew that the distance traversed in
time t is
:

- log cosh
where

p.v

93.

(Jgii. t),

denotes the resistance per unit mass.

Rayleigtis dissipation-function.

When

a system is subject to external resisting forces which are directly


proportional to the velocities of their points of application, it is possible to
express the equations of motion of the system in general coordinates in terms
and potential energies and of a single new function.

of the kinetic

For
which

the energy lost to the system by the action of the resisting force
applied to a particle ra of the system, whose coordinates are (x, y, z),

let

is

in an arbitrary displacement

(Sac,

By, Bz)

be
kz z8z,

du mouvement des fluides,


t Comptes Rendus, cxxxn. (1901), p. 1175.
I Journal de VEcole Polyt. vi. (Cahier 13), p. 60.
Traite de Vequilibre

et

Paris, 1744.

Non-holonomic Systems.

92, 93]

where kx kv kz are functions of

x, y,

typical particle ra will therefore

be

231

Dissipative Systems

The equations

z only.

of motion of the

(mx =
<my

\mz

where X, Y,

Z are

kx x + X,
= -k,J y+Y,
= kz z + Z,

the components of the total force (external and


molecular)

on the particle, except the force of resistance.

Now

let

a function

F be

defined by the equations

where the summation

is extended over all the


particles of the system; so
called the dissipation-function, represents half the rate at
energy is being lost to the system by the action of the resisting forces

that F, which

which
and let

is

(q lt

q.2

...,

q n ) be coordinates specifying the configuration of the

system.

Multiplying the equations of motion of the particle ra by dx/dqr dy/dq r


and summing for all the particles of the
system, we have
,

dz/dqr respectively,
,

dx

dz\

dy
+ y ^+z=
..

..

>

^
=-S

dqj

dq r

dq r

/,

dy
dz\
--h kyy
~
v y ^- T k,z

dx

(kx x

dq r

-f

dqj

dq r

-^

oqr

As

in

26,

dx

;^

dqr

T is

-.

s
dq r j

we have
.

where

dqr

..

dy

.,dz\
-

oq

dqj

*
+y^-+^r
r

the kinetic energy

/dT\
-

dt \dqr j

dT

-^

dq r

and

--

oqr

Q^

=d

--

"

^,

dq rj

dq r

r>

where
+ Q2 8q2 ... Q n Sq n denotes the work done by the external
forces (excluding the
resistances) in an arbitrary infinitesimal displacement

while

we have

&+M

oq r

_dF
dqr
It follows that the
equations

ordinates (q lt q2

...,

of motion of the system in terms of the co

q n ) can be written in the

dT\

dT

dF

form

Non-holonomic Systems.

232
Example.

Dissipative Systems [CH.

depend on the

If the resisting forces

relative (as

opposed to the absolute)

so that the forces acting on


velocity of their points of application,

and

(# 2

>

g z)

3/2?

vm

two

particles (x^

zt)

have the components

-kx (xi-x&

-k v (yi-fa\

-*,(*i

-**(#2-*l)>

-*(&-&)

-*(*2-*l)

-z)

and
the equations in general coordinates can be formed with the
respectively, shew that,
expression
\ 2 {kx (x,

- xtf + k y (ft - ytf + *, fr - z,) 2 }

as a dissipation-function.

Vibrations of dissipative systems.

94.

is specified by its kinetic energy function, potential


methods similar to those of
and
dissipation function,
energy function,
the nature of the small
determine
to
order
in
Chapter VII can be applied
an
vibrations of the system about
equilibrium-configuration.

If a dynamical system

system with two degrees of freedom.


As in 76, we find that for the vibrational problem the kinetic energy and
can be taken as homogeneous quadratic functions of the
dissipation function

For simplicity we

shall consider a

and the potential energy as a homogeneous quadratic function of


the coordinates, the coefficients in these functions being constants. Taking
as coordinates those variables which would be normal coordinates if there
function, we can write these three functions in the form
were no
velocities,

dissipation

where

stable if

and X2 will be supposed


there were no dissipative

The equations

drtT\dT + W + d_V =

or

q\

</

we attempt

aq

dq r
l

A<jl

dqr

(r=l,2),

9<?-

+ hq^ + \ q =0,
+ &?2 + ^2?2 = 0.
l

to find a particular solution of these equations in the form

on substituting these values in the differential equations we have

A ( p* +ap + XO + Bhp = 0,
Ahp + B(p*+bp +
from which

it

would be

of motion are

dt \dqj

If

positive, so that the equilibrium


forces.

=
X>)

0,

p must be a root of the equation


+ ap + \0 (p + bp + X 2 ) - A ? = 0.

follows that
2

(p

Non-holonomic Systems.

93, 94]

We

233

Dissipative Systems

so that
suppose the dissipative forces to be comparatively small,
on this supposition, the
b can be neglected
squares of the quantities a, h,
roots of the last equation are readily found to be
shall

the second of the equations


Corresponding to the root p^ we have, from

connecting

and B,

B _

ih

VXj

of the differential equations


particular solution

therefore given by

is

= (Xj - X ) e ^ at (cos N/X] + i sin x/Xjtf),


= h*J\ e~^ at (icos VXxi - sin Vx^),
fa
^

i in these
and a second particular solution is obtained by changing i to
of the
solutions
It follows that two independent real particular
expressions.

differential equations are


r

= (Xj - X

2)

e~

^ at

cos VXjtf

and therefore the most general


(q t

f (?!

and

-{

= (Xj - X
=

~
e

2)

^ at sin

t al nns

Vx^,

v"X .

real solution involving e Pit is

= (Xj - X ) Ae ~ $ at sin (\/M + e),


2

sn
where -4 and e are real arbitrary constants. This represents one of the normal
modes of vibration of the system. Adding to this the corresponding solution
in e p **, we have finally the general solution of the vibrational problem, namely
1

= (\ - X ) Ae

at

sin

sin

(\/M +

Vx^ +

-4,

initial

circumstances of the motion.

Now we

<;,

+ A x 5e~
a

sin

+ (X2 - X ) Be~
:

bt

sin (*/\2 t

+ 7),

7 are four constants which must be determined from the

where

-B,

e)

con
suppose the dissipative forces such that energy is being
to the system, so that F is a positive definite form, and therefore

tinually lost
a and 6 are positive.

The

last

equations therefore shew that the vibration


at

and e
gradually dies away, on account of the presence of the factors e~^
of
of
u.
the
normal
are
vibrations
the periods
h, 6) the
(neglecting squares

as if the dissipative forces were absent and in a normal vibration, the


amplitude of oscillation of one of the coordinates is small compared with the

same

amplitude of oscillation of the other coordinate, while the phases of the


vibration in the two coordinates at any instant differ by a quarter-period.

Non-1lolonomic Systems.

234

Dissipative Systems [CH.

vm

similar analysis leads to corresponding results for systems with more


than two degrees of freedom supposing that the dissipative forces are small
and that the dissipation function and potential energy are positive definite
forms, we find that the periods of the normal vibrations are (neglecting
unaltered by the
squares of the coefficients in the dissipation function)
;

dies away
presence of the dissipative forces, but that the vibration gradually
if (q lt q 2 ..., q n } are the normal coordinates of the system when the
forces are absent, there is a normal vibration of the system when
:

and

dissipative

the dissipative forces are present, in which the amplitude of the vibrations in
of the vibration in q 1}
q-s,
q n is small compared with the amplitude
,

<?2,

and the phase of the vibrations in q2 q 3


,

...,

q n differs

by a quarter-period

from the phase of the vibration in q lf


Example. Discuss the vibrations of a system which is acted on by periodic external
which have the same period as one of the normal modes of free vibration of the
system shewing the importance of dissipative forces (even where small) in this case.
forces

95.

Impact.

Another mode in which energy may be lost* to a dynamical system is by


a collision generally
the collision of bodies which belong to the system
;

results in a decrease of dynamical energy.

The
mental

is based on the following experi


analytical discussion of collisions
When two bodies collide, the values of the relative velocity of the

law-f-.

surfaces in contact (estimated normally

to the

surfaces) at instants immediately

impact bear a definite ratio to each other


before
this ratio depends only on the material of which the bodies are composed.

and immediately

after the

This ratio will in general be denoted by


are said to be inelastic.

When

e.

e is zero,

the bodies

The general problem of impact reduces therefore to a problem in impulsive


motion in which the unknown impulsive force at the point of contact of the
bodies is to be determined by the condition that the change in relative
normal velocity of the bodies satisfies the above law.
96.

We

Loss of kinetic energy in impact.


shall

now

when two

find the loss of kinetic energy

perfectly smooth

bodies impinge on each other.

and let (u v w ) and


typify the mass of a particle of either body,
after the impact, and
and
w) denote its components of velocity before

Let
(u, v,
*

I.e. lost to

the system considered as a dynamical system

the energy

is

not annihilated, but

appears in some other manifestation, e.g. heat.


t The laws of impact were discovered in 1668 by John Wallis (Phil. Trans. No. 43,

and Christopher Wren

(ibid. p. 867).

p. 864)

94-97]

Non-holonomic Systems.

let

W)

U, V,

235

Dissipative Systems

be the components of the total impulsive force (external and


The equations of impulsive motion ( 35) give

molecular) on this particle.

m (u

ti

m(v - v ) =V,

U,

m (w - w =

W.

Multiplying these equations by (u + eu 9 ), (v + ev Q ), (w + ewQ ) respectively,


summing for all the particles of both bodies, we have

adding, and

2w {(u -

-MO)

(u

eu

+ (v

+ ev ) + (w - w } (w + ew )}
= ${U (u + eu + V(v + ev ) -f
)

(v

Now

so far as molecular impulses are concerned,

2 ( Uu + Vv + Ww) =

0,

and

W (w + ew

)}.

we have

Ww = 0,

2 ( Uu + Vv +

since the impulsive forces which correspond to each other in virtue of the law
of Action and Reaction will
give contributions to these sums which mutually

destroy each other.


Also, since the part of (u + eu ) due to the normal component of velocity
has the same value for each of the particles in contact at the
point where

the impact takes place (in virtue of the law of


impact) it follows that
the impulsive force between the bodies does not contribute to the sum

%U(u + eu,), and


+ ew

and 2TF (w

We

similarly does not contribute to

sums ^V(v+ev

the

).

have therefore

2{U(u + eu ) + V(v + ev ) +

W (w + ew

)}

0,

and consequently

2m {(u - M

(u

eu

+ (v- v ) (v + ev ) +

(w

-w)

(w

+ ew

)}

0,

or

This equation can be expressed by the statement that the kinetic


energy
impact is (1
e)/(l + e) times the kinetic energy of that motion
which would have to be compounded with the motion at the instant
before the
lost in the

impact in order
97.

to

produce the motion at the instant after the impact.

Examples of impact.

The impulsive change


rigid

bodies

in

of motion consequent on the collision of two free


can
be most simply determined by the
space
following

considerations.

The motion

of each

body before or

after

impact

is

specified

by

six

quantities (e.g. the three components of velocity of its centre of gravity and
the three components of
angular velocity of the body about axes through its
centre of gravity).
The total number of equations required to determine the

Non-holonomic Systems.

236

Dissipative Systems [OH.

vm

impulsive change of motion is therefore twelve. Of these, six are immediately


furnished by the condition that the angular momentum of each body about

any axis through the point of contact

is unchanged (since the


impulsive forces
act at this point) another equation is obtained from the condition that the
momentum of the system in the direction normal to the surfaces in contact
;

(since the normal impulsive forces on the two bodies at the


of
contact
are equal and opposite), and another by the experimental
point
law of impact.
If the bodies are perfectly smooth, the remaining four
is

unchanged

equations can be derived from the condition that the linear momentum of
each body in any direction tangential to the surfaces in contact is unchanged
is no
tangential impulse if the bodies are smooth) if on the
other hand the bodies are perfectly or imperfectly rough, the condition that
the linear momentum of the system in any direction tangential to the

(since there

is
unchanged gives two equations if the bodies are
condition
the
that the relative velocity of the bodies in
perfectly rough,
direction
after the impact is zero gives the other two while
any tangential

contact

surfaces in

the bodies are imperfectly rough, the coefficient of friction between the
surfaces in contact being y-t, the remaining two equations are given by the

if

conditions that

the relative velocity in any tangential direction is zero after the


impact, provided the tangential component of the impulse required for this
does not exceed //, times the normal component of the impulse
(a)

if

(/3)

equal to

In

//,

the last condition

is

not

satisfied, there is

a tangential impulse

times the normal impulse between the bodies.

all cases,

therefore, the required twelve equations can be found.

If the motion takes place in a plane, or if one of the bodies


procedure is still valid after making some obvious modifications.

The

following examples illustrate these principles

Example

1.

inelastic inclined

An

inelastic sphere of

plane of mass

M and

m falls

mass
angle

a,

is fixed,

V on a perfectly rough
on a smooth horizontal plane.

with velocity

which

rests

Sheiv that the vertical velocity of the centre of the sphere immediately after the impact
2

Fsin a
r-=-

Let

U be the

Exam.)

velocity of the plane after impact, u the velocity of the sphere parallel to
the angular velocity of the sphere, arid a its radius.

relative to the plane,

The equation

is

,.

(Coll.

omsin*a

and

this

<B

of horizontal

momentum

gives

TO (u cos a

The kinematical condition

U~)

= MU.

at the point of contact is

acau.

condition that the angular momentum of the sphere about the point of contact
shall be the same before and after impact is

The

m Va sin a = g

ma-o>

+ ma (u

7 cos a).

Non-liolonomic Systems.

97]

These three equations

give,

on eliminating
5

~
is

eo

and

U,

Fsin 2 a

(M+m)

+ -2m + 5m sin* a

~1M

which

237

Dissipative Systems

the result stated.

Example 2. A sphere of radius a rotating with angular velocity Q, about an axis


an angle a to the vertical and moving, in the vertical plane containing that axis,
with velocity V in a direction making an
angle a with the horizon, strikes a perfectly rough
inclined at

horizontal plane.
If the plane be tangentialltj inelastic, find the angle which the vertical
plane containing the new direction of motion makes with the old.

Take rectangular axes Oxyz, where


is the point of contact, Oz is
vertical, and yOz is
the initial plane of motion; and let
and 2 be the components of angular velocity
about Ox and Oy respectively after the impact, and
the mass of the sphere.
o>

o>!

Equating the

and

initial

final

angular

momenta about

Ma Fcos a = Ma
|-

Equating the

and

initial

final

angular

Ox,

we have

Oy,

we have

2
.
a>i

momenta about

= I J/a 2 co 2
| Ma Q sin a
2

The tangent

new plane

of the inclination of the

account of the perfect roughness of the plane)

0)2/0)!,

of motion to the plane yOz


and this is therefore equal to

is

(on

\Ma?Q. sin a

Ma V cos a
or

f a (Q/ F) tan

A perfectly rough circular


and length 2a capable of

a.

mass
and radius c impinges upon
turning freely about a pivot at its centre. If
the point of impact is distant b
from the centre of the rod, and the direction of motion of the
centre of the disc makes angles a, ft with the rod
before and after collision, shew that

Example

3.

a rod of mass

Let

F denote

its final

disc of

2
2
2
2
(3Mb + ma ) tan/3 = 3 (ema -3Mb tan a.

(Coll. %Exam.)

the initial velocity of the disc, and let v denote

its final

velocity

and Q

angular velocity.

Since there

no sliding at the point of contact, we have

is

v cos

Denoting by co the final angular velocity of the rod, and by / the normal impulse
between the rod and disc, the equation of the motion of the rod is
Ib =

The equation

\ma

2
u>.

of impulsive motion of the disc in the direction

normal to the rod

is

M(vsin(i+ ^ sin a) = 7,
and the law of impact gives the

relation
v sin

Equating the

initial

and

final

ft

angular

6o>

= e V sin a.

momenta

of the disc about the point of contact,

we have
Fcos a = v cos
Eliminating

v,

Q,

/,

o>

is

\ cO.

from these equations, we have

2 tan

which

ft

the result stated.

ft

(3Mb

+ ma2 = 3 tan a (mea 2 )

Non-holonomic Systems.

238

Dissipative Systems

[CH.

Example 4. A circular hoop, in motion without rotation in its own plane, impinges on a
rough fixed straight-edged obstacle in the plane. The velocity of the centre of the hoop
an angle a with the edge, and the coefficient
before impact is V, in a direction making
of friction

is

p..

To find

the impulsive

change of motion.

Let u and v denote the components of velocity of the centre of the hoop after the
the
impact, parallel and perpendicular to the edge, and let co be the angular velocity,

mass and a the radius

of the hoop.

Equating the angular momenta about the point of contact before and after the impact,

we have
-

Ma-<a

+ Mau = M Va cos a.

The law of impact gives the equation


is zero after the impact, provided the frictional
Since the plane is rough, u +
impulse required for this does not exceed /x times the normal impulse but if this
condition is not satisfied, the frictional impulse is p. times the normal impulse.
a<o

Let

F be the frictional and R the normal impulse

We have
and

if

u+

aa>

is zero,

we

The quantity u + aw

and

if

shall

-ft,

Ma?v=-aF.

have

will therefore be zero after the impact,

provided

7sino.

F=pM(l+e)

if

then we have

does not satisfy this inequality, we shall have

p.

Thus

while

M(u- Fcosa)= -F, M(v+ 7 sin a) =


R = M(\ + e) 7sin a,
therefore

finally, if

p.

<

/x^cota/2(l+e), the motion

cot a/2 (1

+ e),

the motion

is

is

determined by the equations

determined by the equations

7 sin a.

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
1.

which

A
is

of radius a is made to rotate about a vertical diameter,


perfectly rough sphere
uniform sphere of radius b is
with a constant angular velocity n.

fixed,

distant aa from the highest point: investigate the motion


placed on it at a point
and determine in any position the angular velocity of the sphere. Shew that the sphere
from
will leave the rotating sphere when the point of contact is at an angular distance 6

the vertex, where


COS

10
=^
17

^119

- -

a 2 w 2 sin 2 a
JT

(a+o)g
(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

I,

1889.)

on the surface of a cone of revolution


2.
rough sphere of radius a rolls under gravity
with uniform angular velocity n,
axis
its
vertical
about
which is compelled to turn
if a be the semi-vertical angle of the cone, r sin a be the
vertex

its

being uppermost

distance of the centre of the sphere from the axis of the cone,

be the angle turned

Non-holonomic Systems.

vm]

239

Dissipative Systems

through, relatively to the cone, by the vertical plane containing the centre of the sphere,
3 be the rate of rotation of the sphere about the common normal,
prove that

and

o>

14 cos a

(1^
where A, B,

3.

Shew

that

6,

solid

of revolution

I,

of.

1897.)

mass

o>,

Mac

~ (a cos

A (C+Mc 2 ) - M*a?#}

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

with a plane circular base of


without slipping with its edge in contact with a
rough horizontal plane.
O are determined by the equations

homogeneous

radius c rolls

r-=A,

Qn}

are determinate constants.

(7

6)

- Mc*& cos

~ (a cos

= (C+ J/c2

+ C (C+Mc2

6)

o,

+ Me & + AQ? cos 2 6 - ZMacvQ. cos 6 + C+ Me 2


2

cos 6

cos 6

- Mac Ca cos 2 = 0,

= Constant,
)
(
) or +
(a sin + c cos
the inclination of the axis of the
body to the horizon, Q the angular velocity of
the vertical plane containing its axis,
the angular velocity of the
body about its axis,
A the moment of inertia of the body about a diameter of its base, C the moment of
inertia of the body about its axis and a the distance of the centre of
gravity from the
base
(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part I, 1898.)
(-4

where 6

2%

<9

<9)

is

o>

4.

wheel with 4

spokes arranged symmetrically rolls with its axis horizontal on a


If the wheel and spokes be made of a fine
heavy wire,

perfectly rough horizontal plane.

prove that the condition for stability

is

where a
5.

is

the radius of the wheel and

body

rolls

under gravity on a

V its

velocity.

(Coll.

fixed horizontal plane.

Exam.)

If this plane be taken as

plane of yz, shew that

2m

(y -.y A )z-

(z

-z A )y} = Constant,

where

and (.r^, yA ZA ) of the point of contact,


(x, y, z) are the coordinates of a particle
and the summation is extended over i\ll the particles of the
body.
,

(Neumann.)

6.

One portion

perfectly rough.

moves with

of a horizontal plane

is

perfectly

uniform heavy ellipsoid of semi-axes

smooth

velocity v in the direction of its a-axis along the

towards the rough.

Shew

arid the other portion is

has

its 6-axis vertical and


smooth portion of the plane

(a, b, c)

that, if

the ellipsoid will return to the smooth portion, k


being the radius of gyration about
the c-axis, and that the motion will then consist of an oscillation about a
steady state of
*
motion.

In the special case a = 26, shew that after the return of the
ellipsoid to the smooth
the 6-axis can never make an
angle with the vertical which is greater than

portion,

arctan

Vf

(Coll.

Exam.)

Non-holonomic Systems.

240

Dissipative Systems

[CH.

A shell in the form of a prolate spheroid whose centre of gravity is at its centre
7.
contains a symmetrical gyrostat, which rotates with angular velocity to about its axis and
Shew that in the steady
whose centre and axis coincide with those of the spheroid.
motion of the spheroid on a perfectly rough horizontal plane, when its centre describes
a circle of radius c with angular velocity Q, the inclination a of the axis to the vertical
is

given by
{

Mbc (a cot a + 6)

A b cos a + C (a sin a + c)} O 2 + C baQ - Mgb

(a

b cot a)

=0,

the mass of the shell and gyrostat, A the moment of inertia of the shell and
to their axis, (?, C
gyrostat together about a line through their centre perpendicular
those of the shell and gyrostat respectively about the axis, a the distance measured
the shell and plane from the centre and
parallel to the axis of the point of contact of
b its distance from the axis.
(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part I, 1899.)

where

is

uniform perfectly rough sphere of radius a starting from rest rolls down under
between
two non-intersecting straight rods at right angles to each other whose
gravity
shortest distance apart is 2c and which are equally inclined at an angle a to the vertical.
If po, po are the original distances of the points of contact from the points where the
their distances at a subsequent time when
shortest distance intersects the rods and
8.

p,

the velocity

is V,

shew that

-/

,.

i6c4

(p*-

and that

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

I,

1889.)

A particle moves under gravity on a rough helix whose axis is vertical. If a be the
9.
radius and y the angle of the helix, shew that the velocity v and arc described s can be
expressed in terms of a parameter 6 by the equations
_

A particle

cc y
cos

y + 2 sin

y)}

inclined
projected horizontally with velocity u so as to slide on a rough
motion.
the
Investigate

10.

plane.

Prove that

is

if

2p,cota>l,

the particle approaches asymptotically a line of greatest slope at distance

u2
g
where

p,

is

2p,
2

4/x

cos a

cos 2 a

the coefficient of friction, and a

is

- sin 2 a

the inclination of the plane.


(Coll.

Exam.)

A rough cycloidal tube has its axis vertical and vertex uppermost. If a be the
11.
radius of the generating circle and a particle be projected from the vertex with velocity
\/4ag sin

a,

shew that

it will

reach the cusp with velocity equal to

2
[4aff cos a

where

a is the angle of friction.

(1

-2

sin

a~

(Jir

~ a) tana
}]*,

(Coll.

Exam.)

Non-1lolonomic Systems.

vm]

241

Dissipative Si/stenis

A heavy rod of length 2 is moving in a vertical plane so that one end is in contact
12.
with a rough vertical wall and the other end moves along the ground supposed to be equally
rough and the coefficient of friction for each of the rough surfaces is tan e. Shew that the
;

any time

inclination of the rod to the vertical at

0(&

+ a 2 cos2f)-a 2

(9

is

given by

sin2e==a#sin(0-2f).

Exam.)

(Coll.

thin spherical shell rests upon a horizontal plane and contains a particle of finite
mass which is initially at its lowest point. The coefficient of friction between the particle
13.

and the shell is given, that between the shell and the plane being practically infinite.
Motion in two dimensions is set up by applying to the shell an impulse which gives it an
angular velocity Q. Obtain an equation for the angle through which the shell has rolled

when the

particle begins to slip.

Exam.)

(Coll.

a is placed in a vertical plane touching a uniform rough


board which can turn freely about a horizontal axis in the upper surface of the board
(ft.)
through its centre of gravity, the point of contact of the disc being at a distance b from
14.

circular disc of radius

this axis.

string, parallel to the surface of the board, is attached to the point of the

from the board and to an arm perpendicular to the board at the axis, and
The centre of gravity of the board and arm lies in the
connected
to the board.
rigidly
axis.
The system starts from rest in that position in which the centre of the disc lies in
disc furthest

Shew that slipping will take place between the disc


the horizontal plane through the axis.
and the board, when the board makes an angle Q with the vertical given by

tan

where

is

the

moment

of inertia of the board about the axis divided

disc.

by the mass of the


(Coll. Exam.)

15.
hoop is projected with velocity V down a plane of inclination a, the coefficient
of friction being p (
tan a). It has initially such a backward spin O that after a time ^ it
starts moving uphill and continues to do so for a time t 2 after which it once more
>

Shew

descends.

that, if the

motion take place

given inclined plane, then


(ti

t2

)ff

sin a

in a vertical plane at right angles to the

= aQ. -

V.

Exam.)

(Coll.

ring of radius a is fixed on a smooth horizontal table a second ring is placed


on the table inside the first and in contact with it, and is projected with velocity T 7 but
without rotation, in a direction parallel to the tangent at the point of contact. Find the
16.

time that elapses before slipping ceases between the rings if the coefficient of friction
is p, and prove that the point of contact will in this time describe an arc

between them

of length (a log

2)//*.

Discuss the motion that will ensue

if

at the

moment

slipping ceases the fixed ring be

and left free to move, and prove that during the time that the inner rinhalf round the outer one the centre of the latter will be displaced a distance
released

where m,

M are the

rin g17.

rolls

masses of the inner and outer rings and b is the radius of the inner
(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part I, 1900.)

In the vertical motion of a heavy particle


descending in a
shew that the quantity

medium whose

resistance

varies as the square of the


velocity,

-ka.
e

where kv

is

the resistance, and a and

+e

are the distances described in two successive


equal
intervals r of time, depends only on T and is
independent of the initial velocity.
/3

(Coll.

w. D.

Exam.)
16

Non-holonomic Systems.

242

Prove that a heavy

18.

particle, let fall

Dissipative Systems

from rest

in a

medium

in

[OH.

which the resistance

varies as the square of the velocity, will acquire a velocity Uta.nh(gt/U), and describe
2
denotes the terminal velocity in the
a space
log cosh (gtjU)lg in a time t, where

medium.

Shew

also that, for the complete trajectory of a projectile in such a

between the asymptotes

is

U
where V
19.

is

the velocity

medium, the angle 6

given by
z
j

T72

when the

= arcsinh cot 6 + cot 6 cosec 0,


projectile

moves

horizontally.

(Coll.

Exam.)

Shew that the horizontal and vertical coordinates (x, y) of a particle moving under
medium of which the resistance is R satisfy the equation

gravity in a

dx3
v being the velocity

and

v* cos 3

(j)

the inclination of the tangent to the horizontal.


(Coll.

Exam.)

in a medium in which the resistance


20.
particle is moving, under gravity,
Shew that the equation of the trajectory referred to the vertical
varies as the velocity.
and a line parallel to the direction of motion when the velocity was infinite, can

asymptote
be written in the form

y=b

(Coll.

log (xjo).

Exam.)

Prove that in the motion of a projectile through a resisting medium which causes
21.
with
a retardation kv3, where k is very small and the particle is projected horizontally
is
the
of
(neglecting
path
velocity F, the approximate equation
2~.2-

the axis of x being in the direction of projection and the axis of y vertically downwards.
(Coll.

Exam.)

moves in a straight line under no forces in a medium whose resistance


v is the velocity and s the distance from a given point in the line.
where
(^_
Shew that the connexion between s and t is given by an equation of the form
22.

particle

v s logs)/*,

is

where a and

are constants.

A particle is moving in a resisting medium under a central attraction ; shew that,


be the retardation due to the resistance of the medium, and v the velocity, the rate of
vector to the fixed centre of force varies as
description of areas by the radius
23.

if

(Coll.

v,-f^ctt
J v

Exam.)

Prove that in a resisting medium, a particle can describe a parabola under the
24.
resistance at
action of a force to the focus which varies as the distance, provided the
vertex.
a point, where the velocity is v, be k {v(v-v )fi where v is the velocity at the
;

Determine

If

(Coll.

k.

A particle moves in a resisting medium


25.
R be the resistance, shew that
d

f 7

>

dr\

*
ds-\Pp*-T-\
\
dp)
r being the radius vector

and

under a force

-2%

2
,

the perpendicular on the tangent.

Exam.)

tending to a fixed centre.

Non-holonomic Systems.

vrn]
If

M=

l/r,

P=p.u

2
,

and

R = kv

equation to the path

differential

2
,

and we neglect

and higher powers, shew that the

is

P ecu
^2~ 3

1,7

\ctu
\~

-i

A being a certain constant.

A particle

26.

is

243

Dissipative Systems

Exam.)

(Coll.

moving under a central

force

(?)

<

repelling

it

from the

origin, in

a resisting medium which imposes a retarding force equal to k times the velocity.
that the orbit is given by the equations
~
~
A -; 3 e 2fc = ( (f),
r-6 = /ie~
r-^-kr

Prove

Jct

where A

is

a constant quantity.

Exam.)

(Coll.

A particle is moving in a circle under a force of attraction to an interior point


27.
varying as the distance the resistance of the medium is equal to its density multiplied by
Shew that the density at any point is proportional to the
the square of the velocity.
;

tangent of the angle between the lines joining


the circle.

it

to the centre of force

and the centre of


Exam.)

(Coll.

28.
A rod of length a is rotating about one extremity, which is fixed, under the
action of no forces except the resistance of the atmosphere.
Supposing the retarding
2
shew that
effect of the resistance on a small element of length dx to be Adx (velocity)
.

the angular velocity at the time

where

Mkz

is

the

moment

t is

given by

11

Aa*

of inertia about the fixed extremity,

and Q

is

a constant.
(Coll.

29.

Exam.)

disc of mass M, turning on a smooth horizontal table with


but without any translational velocity, strikes a smooth horizontal rod
Prove that the angular velocity is diminished in
at its middle point.

smooth oval

angular velocity
of

mass

the ratio
e is the coefficient of elasticity, x the distance of the centre of gravity from the
normal at the point of impact and k the radius of gyration about a vertical axis through
the centre of gravity.
(Coll. Exam.)

where

Two

and mass TO, are jointed together at their upper ends


symmetrically, with its plane vertical, on to a smooth inelastic
Just before impact the joint has a velocity V and each rod has an angular
plane.
Shew that the impulse
velocity 12, tending to increase its inclination a to the horizon.
between each rod and the plane is
30.

rods, each of length a

and the system

falls

m (P + c
where

c is

moment

sin 2 a)

F+ aQ cos a)/{ 2 + c2 +a (a - 2e) cos2 a},

the distance of the centre of gravity of each rod from the joint and

of inertia of each rod about its centre of gravity.

(Coll.

mk 2

is

the

Exam.)

31.
Three equal uniform rods AB, BC, CD, each of length 2a, and hinged at B and C,
are in one straight line and moving with a given velocity in a horizontal plane at
The ends A and
meet simultaneously two fixed inelastic
right angles to their lengths.

obstacles, reducing
triangle,

A and D

and shew that

to rest.

Determine when they

of the original

momentum

is

will

form an equilateral

destroyed by the impacts.


(Coll.

Exam.)

162

244

Non-holonomic Systems.

Dissipative Systems

[CH.

vm

32.
A smooth uniform cube is free to turn about a horizontal axis passing through
the centres of two opposite faces and is at rest with two faces horizontal an
equal and
similar cube is dropped with velocity u and without rotation so as to strike the former
along a line parallel to the fixed axis and at a distance c from the vertical plane containing
it, prove that the angular velocity imparted to the lower cube is
;

(\+e)cu
where a

is the inclination to the horizon of the lower face of the


falling cube, 2a
length of an edge, k the radius of gyration and e the coefficient of restitution.

Find also the motion of the upper cube immediately

is

the

after the impact.


(Coll.

Exam.)

and radius c impinges without rotation


perfectly elastic circular disc of mass
and length 2a which is free to turn about a pivot at its centre, the
upon a rod of mass
point of impact being at a distance b from the pivot. Prove that if the component of the
the
velocity of the centre of the disc normal to the rod be halved
Mb 2 =
the
33.

by

impact,

friction being sufficient to prevent sliding.

ma?,

(Coll.

Exam.)

34.
A perfectly rough sphere of radius a is projected horizontally with a velocity V
from a point at a height h above a horizontal plane. The
sphere has also initially
an angular velocity O about its horizontal diameter
to the
of its

perpendicular

Shew

motion.

that before

ceases to

it

bound on the plane

it

plane
passes over a horizontal

distance

where

e is

the coefficient of elasticity, and the distance

is

reckoned from the

first

point of

contact.

Compare the
35.

final

with the

initial kinetic energy.

(Coll.

Exam.)

elastic

homogeneous
sphere (coefficient of elasticity e) is projected against
a perfectly rough vertical wall so that its centre moves in a vertical plane at right
angles
to the wall.
If the initial components of the
velocity of its centre are u and v, and
angular velocity (Q) is about an axis perpendicular to the vertical plane, find
the subsequent motion after impinging on the wall, and shew that if its centre returns
to its original position the coordinates of the point of impact referred to this
point are
its initial

g
where a

is

the radius of the sphere.

(Coll.

Exam.)

CHAPTER

IX

THE PRINCIPLES OF LEAST ACTION AND LEAST CURVATURE


98.

The

The

chief

trajectories

of a dynamical system.

of

object
investigation in Dynamics is the gradual change in
time of the coordinates (q lt qa ..., q n ) which
specify the configuration of a
dynamical system. When the system has three (or less than three) degrees
,

of freedom, there

often a gain in clearness when we avail ourselves of a


geometrical representation of the problem if a point be taken whose rect
is

angular coordinates referred to fixed axes are the coordinates (q 1} q2 q3 ) of


the given dynamical system, the
path of this point in space can be regarded
as illustrating the successive states of the
In the same way when
system.
n 3 we can still regard the motion of the system as
represented by the path
of a point whose coordinates are (q lt 2 ..., n ) in
q
q
space of n dimensions;
this path is called the
of
the
and
its introduction makes
trajectory
system,
it natural to use
terms
such
as "intersection," "adjacent," etc.,
geometrical
,

>

when speaking

of the relations of different states or


types of motion in the

system.
99.

Hamilton s

principle, for conservative holonomic systems.

Consider any conservative holonomic dynamical


system whose configuration
at any instant is specified by n
independent coordinates (q1} q.2) ..., q n \ and
let L be the kinetic
Let a given
potential which characterises its motion.
arc
in space of n dimensions
of
a
of
the system,
represent part
trajectory
and let CD be part of an adjacent arc which is not
a
necessarily
trajectory
it would however of course be
sub
possible to make CD a

AB

by
be the time at which
trajectory

Let t
jecting the system to additional constraints.
the representative point (q 1} q. ..., q n )
on AB: we
occupies any position
shall suppose each point on CD correlated to some value of the
time, so
that there will be a point Q on CD (or on the arc of which CD is a
portion)
which corresponds to the same value t as
does.
As the arc CD is

2>

described, the correlated value of

be supposed to vary
continuously
in the same sense.
A moving point which describes the arc CD will there
fore pass through positions
corresponding to a continuous sequence of values
of q lt qi, ...,qn t, and
consequently to each point on CD there will correspond
,

a set of values of q 1}

q<>,

...,

qn

will

The Principles of Least Action

246

We

denote by 8 the variation by which we pass from a point of

shall

CD

to that point of

denote by

shall

which

+A

t lt t

terminal points A, B, C,

at

any point

If

[OH. ix

+ A^

AB

same value of the time, and

correlated to the

is

the values of

which correspond to the


the value of the function

LR

respectively, and by

of either arc.

now we form the

difference of the values of the integral

q n qi, q,
((& q*,
arcs AB and CD respectively,
,

taken along the

Ldt

= L&t -L&t +

Ldt

qn, t)dt,

we have

SLdt

AB

CD

-LA A +

64,

(o

r=

by Lagrange
,

at \rmi

r=l

But

if

/s

if

equations,

dt

\r=l

(Agr )B denote the increment of gr in passing from

and similarly
we have

dt

,,

to D,

we have

(Agv)^ denote the increment of q r in passing from J. to C,

and consequently
Ldt -

f
j

cx>

Ldt =
^#

Ag r

-^r-

L*=I dq?

and that
Suppose now that C coincides with A, and D coincides with B,
C and D are t and t, respectively, so that A^,
an(^ -^ then the last equation becomes
A(? n A, are zero a t ^
Ag 2

the times correlated to

>

= 0,
which shews that

the integral

Ldt has a stationary value for any part of an

actual trajectory AB, as compared with neighbouring paths CD which have


the same terminal points as the actual trajectory and for which the time has
the

same terminal
*

values.

This result

is

Hamilton, Phil. Trans. 1834,

Hamilton s principle*.

called
p.

307

ibid. 1835, p. 95.

and Least Curvature

99, 100]

247

If the kinetic potential L does not contain the time


explicitly, we can
evidently replace the condition that the time is to have the same terminal
values by the condition that the total time of description is to be the same
for

AB

n
gZ
CD, since S q r ^ - L, which represents the
r= l
r

as for

the system,

is

Helmholtz, J. filr Math.


value of

c.

(where the q s and

so that

total

Oq
in this case constant.
151,

p.

n,

...,

remarked that the conditions

ql

...,

q n)

+2

Vr

for

energy of

a stationary

(f,-*r)l dt
}

are regarded as independent variables) are

ffs

we again obtain Lagrange s equations.

The principle of Least Action for conservative holonomic systems.

100.

Suppose now that the dynamical system considered

is

such that the

kinetic potential does not involve the time explicitly, so that the
integral
of energy

4
2

rl

qr

dL - T I
L=h

dq r

AB to

be part of a trajectory and CD to be


Taking
part of
to
the
successive points of which values of the time are so
any adjacent arc,
correlated as to satisfy an equation of the form
as before

exists.

dL

r=l

where AA

is

2
=i

a small constant,

dL\

\dt-

qr

oqr J

(h
|

CD

A/&

OQV

we have

+ A/0 dt- !
J

dL\
~
}dt
.

AB\r=\

qr

dqJ

hdt

AB

!
J CD

Ldt-

Ldt

t
J

AB

coincides with

If therefore

and that

L = h + AA,

4r^~-

is

we suppose that C
zero, we shall have

and

coincides with B,

The Principles of Least Action

248

[on. ix

n
"bL\

dt has a stationary value for any


oq r /
part of an actual trajectory, as compared with neighbouring paths between the
same termini for which the time is correlated to the coordinates in such a way
qr
//[2
\r=i

^-r

to satisfy the same equation of energy.


Least Action, the integral

This

as

is

called the principle of

being called the Action.

In natural problems, for which L is the difference of a kinetic energy T,


homogeneous of the second degree in the velocities, and a potential energy
F, independent of the velocities, we have (41)

and the stationary integral can therefore

p.
"

in this case be written iTdt.

The Principle of Least Action originated in Maupertuis attempt (Mem. de I Acad., 1744,
417) to obtain for the corpuscular theory of light a theorem analogous to Ferrnat s
Principle of Least Time."
Maupertuis principle was established by Euler (Addit. n.

p.

309 of his Methodus inveniendi lineas curvas, 1744) for the case of a single particle under

force, and by Lagrange


more general problems.

a central

Example

1.

Shew

(Miscell. Taurin.

II.

(1760-1), Oeuvres,

I.

p.

365) for

much

that the principle of Least Action can be extended to systems for


Let the expression
exist, in the following form.

which the integral of energy does not


2
r=i

qr

~^r

vqr

be denoted by h

then the integral


n
.

2 qr

dL

+ 1 dh\
-j- }dt
,

c ?r

dt)

has a stationary value for any part of an actual trajectory, as compared with other paths
between the same terminal points for which h has the same terminal values.

Example 2. If a dynamical system which possesses an integral of energy is reduced to


a system of lower order as in
42, shew that the principle of Least Action for the
original system is identical with Hamilton s principle for the reduced system.
Extension of Hamilton

101.

principle to non-conservative dynamical

systems.

We

now extend Hamilton s principle to holonomic dynamical


which the forces are no longer supposed to be conservative.

shall

systems in

Let

denote the kinetic energy of such a system, and

let

2 Q r $q r

r=l

denote the work done on the system by the external forces in an arbitrary
displacement (Bqi, &q, ..., &q n ) the equations of motion of the system are
,

therefore

d /dT\ - dT
-

-j. U-.
dt
\dqr/

dq r

Qr

(r=l,

2, ...,

?i).

and Least Curvature

100-102]

249

Let a denote a part of a trajectory of the system, and let ft be an


adjacent
same terminals, the times correlated to the path /3 at the
terminals being the same as the values t and ^ of the time at the terminals
in the trajectory a; then if 8 denotes the variation
by which we pass from a
position on a to the contemporaneous position on /3, we have
arc having the

8r +
!,

**) dt

t,

r=i (oqr

<

0.

This result

Qr Sqr

r=l
is (like

the theorem of

Hamilton s

to

99,

which

is

dt

known

really a particular case of it)

as

principle.

102.
Extension of Hamilton
non-holonomic systems*.

principle

and

the principle of Least

Action

We

is

shall now shew that Hamilton s


principle, when suitably formulated,
true even for dynamical
which
are not holonomic.
systems

Consider a non-holonomic conservative


system, in which the variations
..., q n ) are connected by
non-integrable
kinematical equations
of the n coordinates
(q l} q2

A
where
that

Au A
,

lt

12

dq

...,

+ A&dq +
a

A nm T
,

l ,

...

...,

+ A nk dq n + Tk dt =

Tm

are given functions of q l}

denotes the kinetic potential, the motion


the n equations
if

d fdL\
dt

(dfr )

(k=l,

~ dL = ** An + ** A

<*+

is

+ ^nA rm

dq~r

together with the above kinematical equations; the

2, ...,

q.2 ,

...,q n

determined

(r

= 1,

unknown

m)

2,

so

87) by

n),

quantities

being
<?i>

Let

AB

derived from
*

Cf.

$2>

<Jn,

^-i, ^-2)

^m-

be part of a trajectory of the


system, and let CD be a path
by displacements consistent with the instantaneous kine-

AB

Holder, Gott. Nach. 1896,

p.

122,

and Voss,

Gntt.

Nach. 1900,

p. 322.

The Principles of Least Action


matical equations,

omitted

this path

[OH. ix

the above kinematical equations with the terms Tk dt


CD will not in general be itself a path whose continuous

i.e.

CD

description would satisfy the kinematical conditions, so

is

really a kine-

matically impossible path.


It may naturally be asked why we do not take CD to be a kiriematically possible path
the answer to which is, that in that case the displacements from
to CD would not be
:

AB

displacements consistent with the kinematical equations for in non-holonomic systems,


if two
adjacent possible configurations are given, the displacement from one to the other
is not in general a
there are infinitely more possible adjacent
possible displacement
:

positions than there are possible displacements from the given position.

Proceeding as in the proof of Hamilton


as usual a
displacement from a point of

AB

principle given in | 99, B denoting


to the

contemporaneous point on

CD, we have

Ldt-l
JAB

CD

Ldt = L B

^-L

A &t

-f

(~

Jtt r=i\oqr

Bq r

~
oqr

Bq r ] dt
/

...

+\ m A rm )Bq rldt.
)

Since the displacements obey the relations

A
it

lk

8q l

+ A 2k Bq2 +

...

+ A nk Bq n =

\ g A rs Bq r

follows that the terms of the type

0,

in the integral annul each

we have

other, so
T

TJ.

Left

>

J^

Z/<ft

T
A
T
A
= Lj
Aj - L^A^o 4i

-0

L\V44
.

Bqr

Jfcr-ll0$r

fV*<
-

. -

7,

cv

dt\dq r j

Bq
1r

\<dt.

We

From this point the proof proceeds as in 99.


thus obtain the result
that Hamilton s principle applies to every dynamical system, whether holonomic
or not.
In every case the varied path considered is to be derived from the
actual orbit by displacements which do not violate the kinematical equations
representing the constraints; but it is only for holonomic systems that the
varied motion is a possible motion ; so that if we compare the actual motion

with adjacent motions which obey the kinematical equations of constraint,


Hamilton s principle is true only for holonomic systems.

to

The same remarks obviously apply to the principle of Least Action, and
Hamilton s principle as applied to non-conservative systems.
103.

Are

the stationary integrals actual

minima

Kinetic foci.

we have only shewn that the integrals which occur in Hamilton s


and
the principle of Least Action are stationary for the trajectories
principle
The question now arises, whether they
as compared with adjacent paths.
are actually maxima or minima.
So

far

and Least Curvature

102, 103]

251

We shall select for consideration the principle of Least Action, and for
convenience of exposition shall suppose the number of
degrees of freedom
in the dynamical
a kinetic
system to be two, the motion being defined
by

energy

T=^a n (q

q z ) q?

a 12 (q

l ,

qs )

q,

qa

and a potential energy

The

discussion can be extended without


difficulty to Hamilton s principle,
with any number of degrees of freedom. The
principle of
Least Action, as applied to the above system, is (
100) that the integral

and

to systems

F
I

a
n<?i

2a, 2 g 1 5 2

2
22<7"

dt

has a stationary value for an actual


trajectory as compared with other paths
between the same termini for which dt is connected with the differentials of
the coordinates by the same equation of
energy

T+V=h.
This latter equation gives

or

dt

{2 (h

~2
i/r)}

so the stationary
integral can

where q2 stands

for

dq 2 /dq

(a ll dq 1

we
first

2a 2 dq 1 dq
1

+ a^dq^,

be taken to be

this integral is to be

at each of which the values of


q

Writing

and

q.2

taken between terminals,

are given.

this equation

maxima and minima (which was


by Jacobi) by a method suggested by Culverwell*.

shall discuss the discrimination of its

effected

Consider any number of paths adjacent to the actual


These
trajectory.
paths will be supposed to have the same terminals, and to be continuous,
but their directions may have abrupt
changes at any finite number of
For such a path let (q lt q2 + &q2 ) be a
points.
point corresponding to a
point (ft, ga ) on the actual trajectory; we shall
write
for
frequently
8q 2
a small constant the order of which determines the order of
is zero at the terminal
magnitude of the quantities we are dealing with, and
a<

where a

is

</>

points.
*

Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.

xxm.

(1892), p. 241.

The Principles of Least Action

252

[CH. ix

Let the expansion of the function

f(q 1}

let 8

/ denote the terms

When
value of

in a2

at

<

and

is

to

<

</>

Thus
1

Un

dq

(j)

degree in

and

its

terminals are fixed, the

(f>

If therefore

and R,

it

ft

follows that

be the numerically
can never exceed
<f>

sufficiently small the

can be diminished indefinitely.


very small, the

is

and as the sign of

^\2 J?

Un = ~ = (h"

most important term in

this is always the

(a n

same

+ 2a ls q + a^_q.2 2 )~ *
t

this is positive, since the kinetic

therefore a n a&

a 12

ranges the Action

Now

</>

is

is

positive.

We

is

-a

sign

maximum

2
12 ),

energy is a positive definite form and


thus have the result that for small

minimum for

consider any point

(a n a^

82I is

U n (the

as that of

of dq t is taken to be positive), we see that for small ranges,


Now
or minimum according as Uu is negative or positive.

and

For since

<.

we have

between

the range

if

and consequently by taking the range

<?i(p))/3,

ratio of

first

small,

denote the terminals.

greatest value of
(g KJZ)

<

large compared with the value of

is

.p
where

the range of integration

any point
zero at the terminals,

g2

57 denote the terms involving a in the

and

is

+a<f>,

powers of a be

in ascending

let

qa

the actual trajectory.

A on an actual trajectory, and let another actual


A making a very small angle with the first. If

trajectory be drawn through

this intersects the first trajectory again, say at a point B, then the limiting

when the angle between the trajectories diminishes


position of the point
on the first trajectory, or the
indefinitely is called the kinetic focus of

point conjugate to A.

We

shall

provided the

For

let

now shew
final

point

that for finite ranges the Action is a minimum,


not beyond the kinetic focus of the initial point.

is

and Q be the terminals

we have seen

that

if

is

very near

2
2
to P, the quantity S / is always positive and of order a compared with the
and Q. It is therefore evident that as we remove
value of / for the limits

and Least Curvature

103, 104]

253

Q further from P, the quantity 8-1 cannot become capable of a negative


value until after Q has passed through the point for which B 2I can vanish
for a suitably chosen value of
(/>.

Suppose then that PBQ is an arc of an actual trajectory, Q being the first
for which 2/ is zero
point for which it is possible to draw a varied curve

PHQ

we

shew that the varied curve PHQ must itself be a


For if
trajectory.
it is not a
trajectory between two of its own points A and C (supposed near
each other), let a trajectory ADC be drawn between these
Then the
points.
shall

ADC is less than that taken along AHC, so the integral


PADCQ is less than that along PHQ, which by hypothesis is
that along PBQ.
Hence frl along PADCQ is negative, and there

integral taken along

taken along

equal to
Q cannot be the

fore

ceases to be positive
that
is a

PAHCQ

Action

first
;

point for which, as

which

is

trajectory,

contrary to

and Q

is

we proceed from P, the

what has been proved.

the kinetic focus of P.

variation
It follows

Hence

the

a true minimum, provided that in


passing along the trajectory the
final point is reached before the kinetic focus of the initial point.
is

Lastly we shall consider the case in which the kinetic focus of the initial
point is reached before we arrive at the final point. Suppose, with the notation

P and R
PHQ and the

just used, that the initial and final points are


and
be taken, the former on the curve

and

let

latter

two points

on the arc

QR

EGF joining
along EGF is less
taken along PEGFR is less

these points being taken so close


together that the trajectory
them gives a true minimum. Since the integral taken

than that along EQF, it follows that the integral


than that along PEQR but the latter is
equal to that along
both integrals are equal from P to Q; and therefore the
;

PBQR,

integral along

since

PBQR

minimum but it is not a maximum, since the integral taken along


small
any
part of it is a minimum. Hence when the kinetic focus of the initial
point is reached before we arrive at the final point, the Action is neither a
is

not a

maximum

nor a minimum,

simple example illustrative of the results obtained in this article is furnished by the
motion of a particle under no forces on a smooth sphere. The
trajectories are greatcircles on the sphere, and the Action taken
or
along any path (whether a

trajectory
not)
proportional to the length of the path. The kinetic focus of any point A is the
diametrically opposite point A on the sphere, since any two great-circles through A
intersect again at A
The theorems of this article amount therefore in this case to the
statement that an arc of a great-circle joining any two points A and
on the sphere is
the shortest distance from A to B when (and only when) the
point A diametrically
opposite to A does not lie on the arc, i.e. when the arc iu question is less than half
is

a great-circle.

104.

Representation of the motion of dynamical systems by means of

geodesies.

The principle of Least Action leads to an interesting transformation of


the motion of natural dynamical systems with two
degrees of freedom.

The Principles of Least Action

254

[CH. ix

Let the kinetic energy of such a system be

and

energy be

let its potential

^(g 1}

By

q.2 ).

which the

to that family of solutions for

total

100, the orbits corresponding


energy is h are given by the

condition that
r
2
I

(an9i

Zouqiqi

+ a^q*} dt

is stationary for
any part of an actual orbit, as compared with any other arc
between the same terminals for which dt is connected with the differentials

of the coordinates

The

by the

relation

integral
r
I

tyyz (a u dq*

(h

is

But

therefore stationary.

2a 12 dq l dq 2

this integral expresses the principle of Least

Action for the motion of a particle under no forces on any surface whose
linear element is given by the equation
ds 2

and

therefore

is

Consequently

same as

= (h

1.

{a n dq^

%a iz dq^dq z

aZ2 dq./),

the defining condition of the geodesies on this surface.


of the orbits in the given dynamical system are the

the equations

the equations

to the geodesies

i|r)

of the geodesies on

Shew that the

this surface.

parabolic orbits of a free heavy projectile correspond

on a certain surface of revolution.

Example 2. Shew that the orbits described under a central attractive force
(r) in a
plane correspond to geodesies on a surface of revolution, the equation of whose meridiancurve is z=f(p), where
<p

and where

and p are connected by the

relation p 2 =r 2

<p

The least-curvature principle of Gauss and Hertz.

105.

We shall now discuss a principle which, like Hamilton s principle, can be


used to define the orbits of a dynamical system, but which does not involve
the sign of integration.

(xr

(X

In any dynamical system (whether holonomic or non-holonomic) let


y r z r } be the coordinates of a typical particle m r at time t, and

r,

Yr Zr )
,

the components of the external force which acts on the particle.

Consider the function


..

xr

X
--

--F y
m j +(y
V mj
\
r
-

/..

and Least Curvature

104, 105]

255

where the summation is extended over all the particles of the


system, and
where (x r yr zr ) refer to any kinematically possible
path for which the
coordinates and velocities at the instant considered are the same as in some
,

actual trajectory.
This function substantially represents what was called
by
Gauss the constraint and by Hertz (who however considered
primarily the
case in which the external forces are
zero) the curvature* of the kinematically
possible path considered.

We

shall

are supposed

In what follows Hertz

terminology will be used.

shew that of
to

all paths consistent with the constraints


(luhich
do no work), the actual trajectory is that which has the

least curvature^.

In the simple case of a single particle


moving on a smooth surface under no external
reduces to the statement that the curvature in
space (in the
ordinary sense of the term) of the orbit is the least which is consistent with the condition
that the particle is to remain on the surface.
forces, this result clearly

To

establish this result, let the equations which


express the constraints
to typify any one of the three coordinates of
(using
any particle) be
as r

?.xkr dxr

(k=l,2,

...,

where the

coefficients

xkr are given functions of the coordinates.

entiating these relations,

m),

Differ

we have
OTi*

xr xs =

Let x r be a typical component of acceleration in the


path considered
is
to
be
but
is
not
supposed
the
kinematically possible,

(which

necessarily
actual trajectory), and let xro be the
corresponding component of acceleration
in the actual trajectory.
Subtracting the preceding equation, considered as
relating to the actual trajectory, from the same equation, considered as
relating to the kinematically possible path, we have (since the velocities are
the same in the two paths)
Safe. (x r
r

- xn) =

(A?

1, 2,

m).

This equation shews that a small displacement of the


system, in which
the displacement 8xr of the coordinate xr is
proportional to (x r - x m ), is con
sistent with the equations of constraint, i.e. is a
possible displacement.

The components

of the forces exercised


by the constraints are typified

by

Strictly speaking, the square root of this function, and not the function
the curvature by Hertz.

itself,

was called

t Gauss, Crelle s Journal, iv. (1829), p. 232; Werke, v. p. 23. Gauss measured the
constraint
by "the sum of the masses of the particles, each multiplied by the square of its deviation from
unconstrained motion." The above analytical expression for it was first
given by H. Scheffler,
Hertz s theory is given in his Mecltanik.
Zeitschrift filr Math. in. (1858), p. 197.

The Principles of Least Action

256
(m r x n

work.

We

[OH. ix

and in any possible displacement the forces of constraint do no


have therefore

r)

2 (m r x ro -

- x ro = 0,

(x r

r)

an equation which may be written in the form

X- \ = ~2,m
--

..

xr

or (reverting to the use of y s

r
x ro ----

..

\*
)

... 2

2,??i,.

(x r

Xro)

and z s)

F,

=^
2,ra r

\/

<sc

x r\* +
---

(..

Fry

n ---

+ Sl {(r - ^ro) + (j/r ~ j/ro) + (^r ~ ^Vo)


2

}-

Since the terms in the last summation on the right-hand side are
positive, it follows that
.,

xr

X\
-r

mj

+ y r -- +
V mj

zr

^
>

which establishes the result

(/..
x,n
2<m r
]
r
(\

all

t,

Z
---

r\

f
>nj

Fr \

+ y n --- +
mj
/..

/.

(zn
\

stated.

Expression of the curvature of a path in terms of generalised

106.

coordinates.

Lipschitz has shewn* that the curvature of a kinematically possible path


in a holonomic dynamical system with n degrees of freedom can be expressed
in terms of the derivates of the n independent coordinates
position of the system.

which define the

q 2 ..., qn) be the coordinates; let (q 1} q2 ..., qn ) be the accelera


these coordinates in any kinematically possible path, and let
..., q no ) be the accelerations in the actual trajectory which corre
20
(ry 10
to
the same values of (q l} q 2 ..., q q 1} q. ..., q n ). Using xr to typifysponds
of
the three rectangular coordinates of any particle r and
one
r to typify
any

Let

(<?!,

of

tions

</

n>

2>

the corresponding component of force, the Gauss-Hertz curvature of the path


2
and it has been shewn in the last article that this can
is ^ni r (x r
r /m r )

be written in the form


(x ro
*

/m r }

"2.m

(x r

x r0 )~.

Journal far Math. LXXXII. p. 323. Cf. also Wassmuth, Wien. Sitz. civ. (1895) ; and for
further work connected with the principle of Least Curvature see Leitinger, Wien. Sitz. cxvi.
(1908), p. 1321 and Schenkl, Wien. Sitz. cxxn. (1913), p. 721.

and Least Curvature

105, 106]

The

257

summations is the same for all the paths considered, since


on
the actual trajectory we can therefore omit it without
depends only
the
whole
causing
expression to lose its minimum-property, and we can call
first

of these

it

the remaining summation 2w,. (x r

x ro ) 2 the curvature of the path.

Let the kinetic energy be

T=^Za
k

qk ql}

kl

where the quantities ak{ are given functions of (q l} q 2 ..., q n ); let D denote
the determinant formed of the quantities a
and let AM denote the minor of
ak in this determinant.
,

kt>

From

the equation

= 2 S a k iq k q

2,m r x; r2

au =

we have

av

=V
2

far

r-*

2m r

\}JUy

\jdjrp

v ~^ Xr22
+ V

~
<fc

_x
..

j_
r<)

3a?r
v
2i _

But

if

we

velocities are the

...

..

same

for all the

qko ).

(qk

oqk

write

_dsdT\
3*
at

"*

since this expression

Sk =

q k qt
*

dqrfqi

and consequently, since the coordinates and


paths considered, we have
..

oqk dqi

toq*

xr

XT
Now

is

55"

\dqk j

dT

dx

^ 5~r Xr

""

dq k

zero for the actual


trajectory,

the difference of the values of

-=-

(k

= 1,

2,

.,

n),

dq k

,.

at \dq k

we have

for the

path considered and

the actual trajectory,


or

8k = 2a w (qt -

q lo )

(k=l,2,

whence we have

qk

-qko = ^ ^A S
kl

(k

...,

n),

1,2,..., n)

and consequently

The curvature,

or

2m

(x r

- a^)

raSS
^
k
I

W. D.

2
,

is

therefore

17

The Principles of Least Action

258

But by a well-known property

of determinants,

[CH. ix

we have

22
k

and therefore
(q\>

q2,

107.

can be expressed in terms of the coordinates

finally the curvature

qn )

and

their derivates in the form

AppelVs equations.

The Gauss-Hertz law

of Least Curvature is the basis of a form in which


has
to
write
the general differential equations of dynamics.
Appell
proposed*
This form, as will be seen, is equally applicable to holonomic and non-

holonomic systems.
Consider any dynamical system

lk

dq,

+ A 2k dq +
2

...

let

+ A nk dqn + Tk dt =

(k=l,

2, ..., ni)

be the non-integrable equations connecting the variations of the generalised


in holonomic systems these equations will of course
coordinates q l q 2
.., q n
be non-existent.
,

Let S denote the function

^m

(x k

+ zk

i/ k

2
),

where

mk typifies the mass

of a particle of the system, whose rectangular coordinates at time t are


By means of the equations which define the position of the
at
any time in terms of the coordinates (q 1} q2 ..., q n ), it is possible
particles

(%k, Vk, Zk)-

to express 8 in terms of (q lt q 2 ..., qn ) and the first


these variables with respect to the time.
Moreover,
,

of constraint

we can express

m of the velocities

and second derivates of

by use of the equations

(q l} q 2 ..., q n ) in terms of the


the coordinates corresponding to these latter be denoted by
(pi,p 2
Pn-m)By differentiating these relations we can express q 1} q2 ..., qn
in terms of the quantities p 1} p.2 ...,p n _ m p ly p2 ..., p n_ m
q lt q2 ..., q and

others

let

hence

can be expressed in terms of this

n>

last set of variables.

Now any small displacement which is consistent with the constraints


can be defined by the changes (Sp lt 8p 2 ..., Bp n _ m ) in the quantities
,

m
(Pi, Pz,

Pi-m);

let

r=l

in such a displacement.

As

r &p r

in

denote the work done by the external forces


26,

we have

Journal fUr Math. cxxi. (1900),

p. 310.

and Least Curvature


Let the equation which expresses the change in
..., p n - m ) be

ock

259
in

terms of the changes

in (PI, pa,

where

7T 2
7r n _ m ) are
known functions of the coordinates: the
...,
of
this
are
of
course non-integrable.
From this we have
equations
type
9#/9pr *B irr and so the equation which expresses xk in terms of
(TTJ,

\pi>

PZ>

pnrn)

>

be of the form

will

ir r

r=l

pr +

a,

where a denotes some function of the coordinates.


equation, we have
n-m U7r
fj
rj n
ftGC

ctxic
*

whence

-^

Differentiating

this

= 7rr =

dp r
It follows that

Pnr = ^2mt

^+
k

..

xk

k
..

xk
V

and therefore

/*e

..

yk

~+y

..

f* + zk

..

dpr

9 r

+ zk 3

equations of a dynamical system, whether holonomic or not,

can be expressed in the form

dS

=Pr

(r

dJr

where

= 1,2,..., n-m),

&m

*
2
2
denotes the function
k (x k + yk + z k ), and (p,, p 2
...,p n - m } are
coordinates equal in number to the
degrees offreedom of the system*.

^8

It is evident that the result is valid even if the


quantities
are not true coordinates, but are
quasi-coordinates.

Example.

...,

p n _m

Obtain from AppelPs equations the equations

a>i

a>2

Co>

for the

p lt

motion of a

= L,
(C A) 0)30)! =
= -Ar
(A B)
2
(

C)

a>2

(03

JJ/,

<o

<i

body one of whose points is fixed; where (o^, co 2


3 ) are
the components of angular velocity of the
body resolved along its own principal axes
of inertia at the fixed point, (A, B,
C] are the principal moments of inertia, and (L, M, N)
rigid

are the
*
Sitz.

On

moments

o>

of the external forces about the


principal axes.

the connexion of these equations with the


Principle of Least Action,
p. 933.

cf.

H.

Brell, Wien.

cxxn. (1913),

172

[OH. ix

The Principles of Least Action

260
Bertrand

108.

s .theorem.

theorem in impulsive motion, which belongs to the same group of


as the least-curvature principle of Gauss and Hertz, is due to
Bertrand* and may be stated thus If a given set of impulses is applied to

results

of a system (whether holonomic or non-holonomic) in motion,


the kinetic energy of the resulting motion is greater than the kinetic energy

different points

the same
of the motion which the system would acquire under the action of
to the reactions
due
constraints
and
and
additional
constraints
impulses
of any

of perfectly smooth or perfectly rough fixed surfaces, or rigid connexions


between particles of the system.

For
(u, v

let

),

be the mass of a typical particle of the system, and let (u, v, w),
before
(u ly vlf Wi) denote the components of velocity of this particle

the application of the impulses, after the application of the impulses, and in
the comparison motion, respectively.

Let (X, Y, Z) denote the components of the external impulse acting on


the particle (X Y , Z ) the components of the impulse due to the con
Y + Ylt Z + ZJ the components of
straints of the system: and (X +
lt
f

the impulse due to the constraints in the comparison motion.

The equations

m(v
m(v

Subtracting,

m(u
all

-v)=Y+Y
m(w -w) = Z+ Z
-v)=Y+Y +Y m (w,- w) = Z + Z
,

+Z

we have
u)

motion are

of impulsive

=X

m(v

)=Y

m(w

w}=Z

Multiply these last equations by u lt v 1} w 1} respectively, add, and


the particles of the system we thus have

sum

for

2m
Now

-u

|(M I

MJ

+ (v

- v ) V! + (w - w) wi] = 2 (X^ +
1

from the nature of the constraints,

Y& + Z^).

follows that

it

finite

forces

the particles of the system and proportional to the impulsive


Zj), would on the whole do no work in a displacement whose
are
proportional to the quantities (u v 1} w^): and therefore we
components

acting on
forces

all

(X lt

have

I,(X 1 u

2m

or

this equation can

{(ttj

Bertrand

+Y

v1

+ (Vj

+Z w
1

v1

+ (w

w } w^\ =

be written in the form

2m (u + v + w ) - 2m
2

u^

notes to Lagrange

+ v? +
s

w,

Mec. Anal.

=
;

2m

{(u

- utf +

and Liouville

- v,) + (w -

(v

Journal

(1),

vn. (1842),

w,)

},

p. 166.

and Least Curvature

108]

261

which shews that

2m (V + v + w
2

and so establishes Bertrand

The theorem may

2m (V + vf + wf),

>

theorem.

readily be extended to the case

when

the forces are not

in this case the increase of kinetic energy per


impulsive but continuous
unit of time is diminished by the introduction of fresh constraints that do
not affect the potential energy.
:

The following result, due to Lord Kelvin and generally known as Thomson s theorem*,
can easily be established by a proof of the same character as the above If any number of
points of a dynamical system are suddenly set in motion with prescribed velocities, the
kinetic energy of the resulting motion is less than that of any other kinematicalty possible
:

motion which the system can take with the prescribed velocities, the excess being the energy of
motion which must be compounded with either to produce the other.

the

Lord Rayleigh has remarked + that the theorems of Thomson and Bertrand may both
be comprehended in the statement that the introduction of fresh constraints increases the
inertia, or moment of inertia, of a system.
Example. A framework of (n-1) equal rhombuses, each with one diagonal in the
same continuous straight line, and two open ends, each of which is half of a rhombus, is
formed by 2n equal rods which are freely jointed in pairs at the corners of all the
rhombuses. Impulses P perpendicular to and towards the line of the diagonals are
shew that the initial velocity,
applied to the two free extremities of one open end
parallel to the diagonal, of the extremities of the other open end is
;

3P

sin a cos a

TO cos 2 a

where

is

the mass of each rod, and 2a

/i

is

the points of crossing.

sin 2 a

the angle between each pair of rods at


(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part I, 1896.)

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
1.

If the

element

is

problem of determining the motion of a particle on a surface whose linear

given by the equation


ds z = Edu 2 +

ZFdu dv + Gdv\

under the action of forces such that the potential energy is V(u, v), can be solved, shew
that the problem of determining the motion of a particle on a surface whose linear
element is given by
ds*= V(u, v)(Edu 2 + 2Fdudv + Gdv 2 ),
under forces derivable from a potential energy

I/

V(u,

v),

can also be solved.


(Darboux.)

2.

two dynamical systems in which the kinetic energies are respectively


an d S&ijtjijfr, and the potential energies are respectively 7 and F, the trajectories

If

Satjtjtji

in

Thomson and

Tait s Natural Philosophy,

t Theory of Sound, Vol.

i.

p. 100.

317.

The Principles of Least Action

262

[CH. ix

same curves, though described with different velocities, so that the relations
between the coordinates (q\, y 2 ..., q n ) are the same in the two problems, shew that

are the

where

a,

/3,

y, 8

are constants, and that


"S,b

3.

ik

dqi dqk =(yU+ 8) 2aik dqidqk

(Painleve.)

If all the trajectories of a particle in a plane, described under forces such that the
is V(x, y\ with a value A of the constant of
energy, are

potential energy of the particle


subjected to a transformation

x=$(X, Y\
where $ and

y=+(X, Y\

are conjugate functions of (#, y\ shew that the new curves so obtained are
the trajectories of a particle acted on by forces derivable from the potential energy

with a zero value of the constant of energy.


4.

If

and

(Goursat.)

denote respectively the kinetic and potential energies of a


dynamical

system, shew that

differs

from
i
_

(/

..

.9

rv

...an 2

..

arv

by a quantity which does not involve the accelerations

and hence that

maximum when the accelerations have the values corresponding to the actual motion,
compared with all motions which are consistent with the constraints and satisfy
the same integral of energy, and which have the same values of the coordinates and

is

as

velocities at the instant considered.

(Forster.)

CHAPTER X
HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS AND THEIR INTEGRAL-INVARIANTS
Hamilton s form of

109.

We

shall

now

of motion.

the equations

obtain for the differential equations of motion of a con

servative holonomic dynamical system a form which constitutes the basis


of most of the advanced theory of Dynamics.

Let (q 1} q2 ..., q n ) be the coordinates and L(q lt q2 ..., q n q 1} q2 ..., q t)


the kinetic potential of the system, so that the equations of motion in the
Lagrangian form are
,

n>

dL

dL\
jiiaH-a r -0
f

at \oqr/

(r=l,

2, ...,

n\

dq

O T

^=Pr

Write

(r

(r

l,2,

..., TO),

l, 2,

09V-

7"

Pr =

so that

d</

From

If 8 denote the increment in


(q lt q2

...,

qn PI,
,

p2

any function of the variables


or (q 1} q2

...,p n )

-ST

2,
r =i

ft**
-

...,

we have

to small changes in the arguments,


T =
oL

^-^

5-

oqr

+^
,

oq r

\dq r

(>

o<7

r=l

*
6

%
2<

r=l
or

n).

the former of these sets of equations we can regard either of the


..., q n ) or (p 1} p 2
..., p n ) as functions of the other set.

sets of quantities (fa, q 2 ,

due

.,

pr q r +
,

4? /
2,

r=l

2 p^r - L\ = 2
r=l

(r=l

(p r oq r

q,

q n ql} q z
,

...,

qn )

Hamiltonian Systems and

264

[CH.

Thus

if

^ p r qr

the quantity
\

when expressed

L,

r=\

Cl

Ct

Cl

*Y)

ft

f)

"/)

in terms of

be denoted by H, we have
*\

\_i

s*

^40

&H=

2
r=1

**
>f>

% = 8^

}<l

*-

or

7-

<-\

a^

p r - pr^qr)

(q r

dH

dp r =

j-

/.

.
i

*-\

ai

dpr

(1),

T*

= 1&*#2

-??
T*

Ii

i2i
*l /

* *t

dg r

motion of the dynamical system may be regarded as defined by these


the
equations, which are said to be in the Hamiltonian or canonical form
IVie

dependent variables are (q lt q 2


of 2n equations, each of the
consists of

qn

...,

1}

p.2

...,

p n ), and

the system consists

first order; whereas the


Lagrangian system
n equations, each of the second order.

The Hamiltonian form was introduced by Hamilton in 1834*. In part he had been
anticipated by the great French mathematicians: for Poisson in 1809t had taken the step
of introducing a function
2
r=l

pr^r-T

and expressing it in terms of (q l q 2 ..., q n p 1} ..., p n ), and had actually derived half of
Hamilton s equations: while Lagrange in 1810 J had obtained a particular set of equations
in the Hamiltouian form, the disturbing function taking the
(for the variation of elements)
Moreover the theory of non-linear partial differential equations
place of the function H.
of the first order had led to systems of ordinary differential equations possessing this form
in 1814-15 and by Cauchy|| in 1819 (completing the earlier
for, as was shewn by Pfaff
work of Lagrange and Monge), the equations of the characteristics of a partial differential
,

equation

f(xi,xz -..,xn ,pi,pv


,

...,j0 n )=0,

*->

where

p.

dxl
Hamilton
the time,

etc.

dxz _
~

s investigation

~_

dxn

o$

^,
~

dp l

dpn

was extended to the cases when the kinetic potential contains


in 1848-50 and by Donkin** in 1854.

by OstrogradskylF

The equation

(1)

above

equation of virtual work.


8

is

It

often called the Hamiltonian

may

form of the
be written in the more symmetrical form

I p r dq r - Hdt) = d ( 5 p r Sq r /=!

r= l

HSt),

Brit. Ass. Rep. 1834, p. 513; Phil. Trans. 1835, p. 95.


t Journal de VEcole polyt. vin. (Cahier xv), (1809), p. 266.
J Mem. de Vlnst. 1809, p. 343.

Berlin Abhand. 1814-15, p. 76.


||

Bull. soc. philomath. 1819, p. 10.

Melanges de VAcad. de St.-Pet. Oct. 1848

** Phil. Trans.
1854, p. 71.

Mem.

de VAcad. de St. -Pet.

vi. (1850), p.

385.

265

their Integral- Invariants

109, 110]

which directly suggests the importance of the

differential

form

Hdt

p r dq r
r=l

in connexion with the differential equations of dynamics

When the kinetic potential L does not involve


function

will possess

not involve

will evidently likewise

Hamiltonian
and the system

explicitly, the
explicitly,

a constant.

-- L = h,

Or o^

r=l
is

137 below.

cf.

41) an integral of energy, namely

2
where A

t
t

Oqr

This equation can be written

(q 1}

q2

...,q n ,pi,p 2

..,p n )

= h,

and this is the integral of energy, which is possessed by the dynamical system
when the function
does not involve the time explicitly. For natural problems,

it

follows at once from

41 that

sum

the

is

of the kinetic

and potential

energies of the system.

Shew

Example.

that the equations of motion of the simple

pendulum

are

__
dt~dp>

where

ff=

>

dt

-l

and where q denotes the angle made by the pendulum with the vertical at time
the length of the pendulum, and the mass of the bob is taken as
unity.

110.

t,

is

Equations arising from the Calculus of Variations.

From the preceding chapter it appears that the whole science of Dynamics
can be based on the stationary character of certain
integrals, namely those
which occur in Hamilton

s principle and the


principle of Least Action
similarly the differential equations of most physical problems can be regarded
as arising in problems of the Calculus of Variations.

Thus, the problem of finding the state of thermal equilibrium in an isotropic


conducting body, when the points of its surface are kept at given temperatures, can be
formulated as follows to find, among all functions V having given values at the surface,
:

that one which makes the value of the integral

/3F\*

T + vy/
T
M8PV
,

integrated throughout the surface, a

We

shall

/8F\2)

\//\dxdydz.

-5-

minimum.

now shew

that all the differential equations which arise from


problems in the Calculus of Variations, with one independent variable, can be
expressed in the Hamiltonian form*
.

Cf. Ostrogradsky,

Mem.

de VAcad. de St. -Pet. vi. (1850), p. 385.

Hamiltonian Systems and

266

Suppose, for clearness, that there are two dependent variables


is

equally applicable to

any number

variable

t,

(t,

y, y, y,

the proof

(n)

z,

..., y,

of variables.

(m)

Let

[CH.

z,

z,

the dependent variables

...,

be a function of the independent


and their derivates up to orders m, n,

z)

y, z,

respectively.

The conditions that the

integral
(m)

\L(t,y,

may be
tions,

stationary, can,

y, ...,

(n)

y,z,z, ...,z)dt

by the ordinary procedure of the Calculus of Varia

be written in the form

dt

Now

dz

dt

write

dt

dL

P.m

=
by

dL

+ (-

Pm+2

i)

dt-

Pm+n =
and write

&=
Then

(m-l)

Qm+i

y>

==

Qm+2

=z

(n-D

>

(fm+n

=z

if

+p m - q m +p m y
l

+ Pm+ni (fm+n T Pm+n z

(where

267

their Integral- Invariants

110, 111]

supposed expressed as a function of

is

(m)

(t,

q lt

...,

q m+n Pi,

arguments q

lt

if

qm+n

lt

\J-LJ

\JJ-J
J,

r=0

dv

...,

dv

r=m+l

is

(n)

qr+i&Pr

+ Z$p m+n

m+n
p,.8qr

+ 2

q,-8p r

r=l

expressed in terms of the variables


(t,

PI, PZ, ...,p m+n

dq r

we have
and

dz

^
rm+1

m+n

8H =

^f

r\

dL

r=l
if

dz

m+n

(n)

pr &?r+i +j?H*&* +

dL

becomes

Thus,

(_/-/-/

r\

relations

dL

this

changes in the

r=l

=0

to small

pm = vLfdy,

we have

U JJ

-^

2 pr 8q r+l + p m 8y

m-\-n

p m+n

r=l

Using the

due

8 denote an increment

...,

^i

-rj-

(>,

Pm+n),
")

the quantities y and z being eliminated by use of the equations

pm+n = dL/dz), and

(n)

dH

^7=^
at
dp

the differential equations

qi,

dp r
j7

at

q2

qm + n

...,

)>

dH
= -^r~

(r=l,

2, ...,

m + n),

dq r

of the problem are thus expressed in the Hamil-

tonian form.

The systems of differential equations which arise in the problems of the


Calculus of Variations are often called isoperimetrical systems.
111.

Integral-invariants.

The nature

of Hamiltonian systems of differential equations is funda


the properties of certain expressions to which

mentally connected with


Poincare * has given the

name

integral-invariants.

Consider any system of ordinary differential equations


dx\ ~
dt

where

JTj,

...,

dxn

^* =- Y

dt

X n are given

dt

functions of

xl} x2

...,

An>

xn

t.

We may

regard

these equations as defining the motion of a point whose coordinates are


(xlf xz ..., xn } in space of n dimensions.
,

Acta Math.

xm.

(1890).

268

Hamiltonian Systems and

If

[OH.

now we

consider a group of such points, which


occupy a ^-dimensional
at
the
of
the
motion, they will at any subsequent time t
region f
beginning

A _p-tuple integral taken over f is


occupy another p-dimensional region
called an integral-invariant, if it has the same value at all times t; the
number p

called the order of the integral-invariant.

is

motion of an incompressible fluid, the integral which repre


volume of the fluid, when the integration is extended over all the
elements of fluid which were contained initially in any
given region, is an
Thus, in the

sents the

integral -in variant

since the total

volume occupied by these elements does

not vary with the time.


Example
in a plane

Consider the dynamical problem of determining the motion of a particle


let (x, y} be the coordinates of the
particle, and (u, v) its

1.

under no forces

components of

velocity.

The quantity

The equations of motion may be written


x = u, y = v, w = 0, v = 0.

7=

I(8x-t8u),

where the integration is taken, in the four-dimensional space in which (x, y, u, v)


are coordinates, along the curvilinear arc which is the locus at time t of
points which were
initially

on some given curvilinear arc in the space, is an integral-invariant.


is given by the
equations
u = a, v = b, x=at + c, y =

For the

solution of the dynamical problem

where

a, 6,

c,

are constants:

and therefore we have

7=

and

this is

independent of

t.

In the plane motion of a particle whose coordinates are (x, y] and whose
Example
velocity-components are (u, v), under the influence of a centre of force at the origin whose
2.

attraction

is

directly proportional to the distance,

x8u)

l(u8x
is

shew that

an integral-invariant.
112.

The variational equations.

The

integral-invariants of a given system of differential equations furnish


integrals of another system of differential equations which can be derived

from these.

For

let

the given system of equations be


doc

-j

(ar. lt

x2

...,

xn

t)

1, 2, ..., w).

Let (X, x2 ..., xn } and (^ + Bx1} #2 + & 2 ..., xn + &cn ) be the values of
the dependent variables at time t in two neighbouring solutions of this set of
equations where (Sx^ 8x2 ..., xn ) are infinitesimal quantities. Then we have
,

-j-

(xr

Sxr)

= X r (x + &%!,
l

x2 + 8x2

..., a; n

+ Sa;n

t)

(r

= 1,

2, ..., n),

their Integral-Invariants

111-113]
and consequently,

dX r

3X,,

j.

9X r

(r- 1,2,

...,

n equations, together with the original n equations,


a
set of 2n equations in which (x l} x2 ..., xn 8x lt 8x2
regarded as
are the dependent variables.
These

last

Now

may be
...,

8xn )

if

denotes an integral-invariant of the original system, the


quantity

2Fr (z\

-^

a.-

xn } 8acr

-j

must, since the path of integration is quite arbitrary, be zero in virtue of


precisely this extended system of differential equations and therefore
;

HFr

(x-i

x.2 , ...,

xn } 8xr

= constant

must be an

integral of these equations so that to an integral-invariant of


order one of the original system of equations there corresponds an
integral of
the extended system of equations, and vice versa.
:

If a particular solution

x2

(a?1}

Xn) of the original equations is known,


#2 .... x n ) in the extended
(ar 1}

...,

we can substitute the corresponding values

and so obtain n linear differential equations to deter


mine (&BJ, &fc 2 ..., &&n), i.e. to determine the solutions of the original equations
which are adjacent to the known particular solution. These n equations are

differential equations,
,

called the variational equations.

113.

Integral-invariants of order one.

Let us now find the conditions to be


.Sx,

where

M Sx
2

satisfied in order that

+...

Mn Sxn

),

n ) are functions of (x1} #2 ..., xn t), may be an integralinvariant of order one of the system of differential
equations

(Mlt

2,

...,

dxr jdt

We

= X r (X #
,

2,

. , .

xn

(r

t)

1, 2,

. . .

n).

must have
2

where the derivates of (8x1} 8x2

...,

...

Mn Sx

n)

= 0,

8xn ) are to be determined by the

Hamiltonian Systems and

270

[OH.

extended system of differential equations introduced in the

last article

and

therefore
11

rl

/l/i

/"/

i"

2(^&v + Jf ^F)-0
at
r

j.=i \ u/c

or

Since (&EI; &r2

$xr

Xtfcv

&) are

= 0.

ft*

independent, the coefficient of each quantity

in this equation must be zero

and consequently

the conditions

for

integral-invariancy are

Corollary

If

1.

an integral of the

jF^u
is

;r 2

>

differential equations, say

^i

= constant,

known, we can at once determine an integral-invariant.

For we have
a

dF\

dt\dxj

k-\0&

/a^\
a^\
^

a^ az
Z r ^5+ ^
dx

fc

Afc

OBr/

k=\oxk

="^

/aF
I

-^T-

dxr \dt

a^
2t

k=ioxk

\
A;

.JL(*

dxr \dt

= 0,
and therefore

the expression

dF
/Vv
2

^
Ar-l9r
is

an

integral-invariant.

Corollary
n

2.

S ^ Sorj
r=l u xr

is

The converse

of Corollary 1

aw integral-invariant of the

is

also true,

namely that if

differential equations,

a given function of the variables, then an integral of the system can

For we have
dx r )

k= i

dxk \dxr j

and consequently the expression


dt

k=i dxk

k=\3xk

()x r

where

U is

be found.

271

their Integral-Invariants

113, 114]

a given function of (# 1} x2 ...,xn t), is independent of


this is a known quantity.
value be
(t)

which

is

let its

(x^

x2

...,

xn )

<f>

Then we have

d U/dt
r

or

and

this is

(f)

(t)

dt

= $ (t),
= constant

an integral of the system.

Relative integral-invariants.

114.

Hitherto we have only considered those integral-invariants which have


the invariantive property when the domain of the initial values, over which
the integration is taken, is quite arbitrary
these are sometimes called
absolute integral-invariants. We shall now consider
integrals which have the
;

invariantive property only when the domain over which the


integration is
taken is a closed manifold (using the language of w-dimensional
geometry)
these are called relative integral-invariants.

The theory of relative integral-invariants can be reduced to that of absolute


integral-invariants in the following way.
Let

\(M

Sx,

M 8x
,

+ Mn

xn }

be a relative integral-invariant of the equations

dx r /dt =
where

(M

lt

2,

...,

M X X
n

1}

2>

...,

Xn

(r=l,

are functions of (x lt

2, ...,

x.2 , ...,

?i),

xn

t);

so that this expression is invariable with respect to t when the


integration is
taken, in the space in which (xlt xz ..., x n ) are coordinates, round the closed
curve which is the locus at time t of points which were
situated on
,

initially

some

definite closed curve in the space.

By

Stokes theorem, this integral

is

equivalent to the integral

where the integration is now taken over a diaphragm bounded by the curve
this diaphragm can be taken to be the locus at time t of
points which were
originally situated on a definite diaphragm bounded by the initial position of
;

and since the diaphragm is not a closed surface, this integral


an absolute integral-invariant of order two of the equations.

the closed curve


is

Similarly, by a generalisation of Stokes theorem, any relative integral


invariant of order p is equivalent to an absolute
integral-invariant of
order (p + 1 ).

Hamiltonian Systems and

272

115.

which

relative integral-invariant

[en.

possessed by all Hamiltonian

is

systems.

Consider now the case in which the system of differential equations


Hamiltonian system, so that it can be written

= dH

dqr
dt

where

For

this

system

denote Hamilton

initial

...,

r=

i2..n)

dq r

qn

p p
1}

pn

t).

let

s integral, so

(!, O 2

be the

dt

a given function of (q 1} q 2

is

= _3H

dpr

dpr

is

that

>

>

a n,

is

the kinetic potential

fii, /3 2 ,

let

ftn)

values of the variables


(q l

q 2)

...,

qn ,pi, p 2

...,pn )

respectively, and let S denote the variation from a point of one orbit to the
contemporaneous point of an adjacent orbit. By 99, we have
n

oil

= 2 p r oq r

r=l

Let
(q 1} q

...,

f3 r oot r .

r=l

denote any closed curve in the space of 2p dimensions in which


..., p n ) are coordinates, and let C denote the closed
q n PI, p
,

z>

t of the
points which are initially on G
the
last
round
the
set
of trajectories which pass from
Integrating
equation

curve which
GO to C,

is

the locus at time

we have
r

2 pfBor =

/3 r &ct r

and

this equation

shews that the quantity

>

2 p r &q r
=

is

a relative integral-

invariant of any Hamiltonian system of differential equations.

On

116.

We
the last

shall

systems which possess the relative integral-invariant

next study the converse problem suggested by the result of


namely that of determining all the systems of differential

article,

equations which possess the relative


(#!>

<li>

other

half.

qn) are half the

2 p r 8q r where

integral-invariant

dependent variables, and (pi,p2

Pn) are the

273

their Integral-Invariants

115, 116]

Consider then a system of ordinary differential equations of order 2n in


which the variables can be separated into two sets,
q 2 ..., qn ) and
(pi, p2 ...,p n }, such that
,

(</,,

is

a relative integral-invariant of the equations, and consequently by Stokes

theorem
J
is

an absolute integral-invariant.
Let the system of

where (Q lf Q2

...,

Qn

differential equations

t-fc.
P P ..., Pn
lt

(<?!,

&,

..-,

be

-P,

(r-l.

2, ..,),

are given functions of

q n ,pi,p 2

...,p n

t).

As the domain of integration of the absolute integral-invariant is of two


dimensions, we can suppose that each point in it is specified by two quantities
X and p, which do not vary with the time but are characteristic of the
trajectory on which the point in question lies.
invariant can therefore be written in the form

The absolute

integral-

v 9 (qt, ^
PJ)\ - ,
[[( ^
d\dfj,,
//(
3 ,1
JJ
\i=i
(X, (A) J
and as X and

/x

do not vary with the time, we must have


_

dt

(A,,

a,

(Qi.Pi)

or

8 (X,

Owing

to the

the choice of

_
"*"

/i)

3p t

8 (x,

8 (X, /*)

8^

8 (x,

complete arbitrariness of the domain of integration and

X and

the coefficients of

^ fi ^ ^,
d

dX

equation must vanish separately.

dpif

W. D.

8^

/*)

We

dytt

dX

d/u,

and

^
dX ^*

in this

8/u,

thus obtain

dpi

lg

Hamiltonian Systems and

274

These equations shew that a function


exists such that

Q r = dH/dp r
and thus we have the

H(q

lt

qz

P = - dH/dq
r

...,

qn

(r

[CH.

p,

p-2

- I, 2,

...

pn,

t)

...,);

result that if a system of equations

dq r

dpr_
~ p
L

~dt~ Qr

(r=l

n)

dt

possesses the relative integral-invariant


f
I

( Pi

then the equations have the Hamiltonian

dqr
dt
this is the converse of the

form

dPr

dH_
dp r

= _dH_

dt

dqr

theorem of the

last article.

If

Corollary.

is

+ Pn &g)

+ p-2 S? +

Sg,

(pi 8?i

+p

^q 2

...

+ p n fyn)

a relative integral-invariant of a system of equations

dqr /dt

where k
(qi,

q*>

greater than

is

->

qn pi,
:

P*>

is

117.

dp r /dt
in the

=P

(r

2,

k),

same way that the equations

for

~.,pn) form a Hamiltonian system

^^

qk,p n +i,

_
dt

dp r

a function of (q lt q z

(q n +i, q n +2, --,

n, it follows

dt

where

=Q

...,

q n p,,
,

dq r

pz

...,p n

only, not involving

...,pk)-

The expression of integral-invariants in terms of integrals.

If the solution of a system of differential equations

is

known, the absolute and relative integral-invariants of the system may

easily

be constructed.
Thus,

where

let

c l} c 2 , ..., c n

integral-invariants

n integrals of the system; the absolute


order one are evidently given by the formula

are constants, be
of

their Integral- Invariants

116-118]
where

(N1}

involve

2,

...,

and the

Nn

are any functions of (y1

y2

275
...,

y n ) which do not

relative integral-invariants of order one are


given

by the

formula
,

where

F is any function

By,

+N

Sy2 +...+

Nn Syn + SF),
r

of (xlt

the domain of integration

a?9

...,

xn

since the

t},

term SF vanishes when

is closed.

from this that any system of differential equations possesses an


number of absolute and relative integral-invariants of the first order.

It follows
infinite

The theorem of Lie and Koenigs.

118.

The preceding

results enable us to establish a theorem due to Lie* and


on
the
reduction
of any system of ordinary differential
Koenigs f
equations to
the Hamiltonian form.

Let
llf

= Zr

be the given system of equations, and

(r-1,2,...,*)

let

be any relative or absolute integral-invariant of order one of this


system,
where ,, ,, ..., j~ k are given functions of the variables we have seen in the
last article that an infinite number of such
integral-invariants exist.
:

Now

let

the differential form

be reduced to the canonical form

(PI,

,p n ,qi,

ft,

-,

qn

ty

are independent functions of (a^, a?a ..., xk \ in number not


greater than k,
be
zero
Let
u
u
.
be
a
set
of
other functions
J.
2
k
m
may
(u^
)
of (a?!, a?2 ..., a?t ), such that (u,, u 2 ..., u k _, n
q lt qz ..., qn p lt p*, ...,p n ) are
a set of k independent functions of (x 1} x.,, ..., xk ); and
suppose that the
,

and where
,

. . .

Archiv for Math, og Natur. n. (1877), p. 10.


t Comptes Eendus, cxxi. (1895), p. 875.
J The proof of the possibility of this reduction (which however requires in general the
solution of a number of ordinary differential
treatise on Pfaff s
equations) will be found in

any

problem.

182

Hamiltonian Systems and

276

[OH.

when expressed in terms of these k functions


system of differential equations,
as independent variables, becomes
dqr/dt

= Qr

dpr/dt

du,/dt

where (&, Q2

new

Qn

....

PI, P*,

(s

U,,

1}

...,

(r

= U8

Pn,

>

= Pr

= 1,

Uk ^ n )

1, 2,

2,

k-

n),

2w),

are functions of the

variables.

The expression

is

an integral-invariant
is

invariancy

since integral(relative or absolute) of this system,


as have been
transformations
such
unaffected

a property

by

performed and consequently


have the form
:

dq_r

is

= _3H^
~

dt

dpr

a function of (q lt q2

116) that the

dpr

= dH_

dt

where

follows

it

first

2n equations

=l

n)

dqr

p n t) only. The given


qn PI, p*,
thus reduced to a Hamiltonian system of

....

>

>

system of differential equations is


order 2n, together with the (k
2ri) additional equations

The Last Multiplier.

119.

Before proceeding to discuss integral-invariants of higher order than


those hitherto considered, we shall introduce the conception, introduced
Jacobi* in 1844, of the Last Multiplier of a system of equations.

by

dx

Xn X

dxn

dx2

_ dx

are given functions of the variables (xl ,xz ,...,x n x),


be a given system of equations: and suppose that (n
l) integrals of this
system are known, say

where (Xlt

2>

\Xi,
Jfr (T

<r\

n
U/ r

<Y

\i

=1

J.,

2
^,

1)

these equations let (xlt x 2 ..., xn ^} be expressed as functions of xn


then there remains only the solution of the equation of the first

From
and x

v
T
X%, ..., tCn} ICJ
,

order

dxn _ dx
TT

A-n

~Y~
**-

be effected; in which accents are used to denote that (xl} x


been replaced in
n and
by the values thus obtained.
to

Crelle

Journal, xxvn. p. 199, xxix. pp. 213, 333.

z>

...,a; n _ 1 )

have

their Integral- Invariants

118, 119]

We

shall

shew that

the integral of this equation is

fjf
7

X n dx) = constant,

(X dx n

M denotes any solution of the partial differential equation

where

+
anc?

277

(MX.) +

(* JO =

o,

denotes the Jacobian

The function

.M"

is

called the

as

Multiplier of the system of differential

equations.

For the proof of

this theorem,

we

shall require the following

lemma

If a system of differential equations

dxr jdt =
is

(r=l,

2, ..., ri)

(r=l,

2, ...,n),

transformed by change of variables into another system

dyr /dt=Yr

then

8
-5

r=1 c

where

denotes the Jacobian


o

To prove

this,

2
r=1

(aSi

xz

. . .

xn )

we have
xr

r=l dx r \ k=l

dy k
3

5
3

-^ifc

/fc=l

_
-

v
-"

^-<

=i 3=1 k=i

y(v

oxr

In this expression the coefficient of

J.

fc

k dxA
--^Y
=
h

d* x

>-

r
^
dy.,dyk

dYk /dy

is

^ ^,

,.=i doo r

of

Yk

which

is

zero

dyk

different from, or
Also 3y,/9a?r = A rs /D,
equal to, k.
denotes the minor of dxr/dys in the determinant
so the coefficient
in the above expression, which is

or unity according as s

where

dys dyk l

is

^l rs

=l s=l

Hamiltonian Systems and

278

may

[CH.

be written

- ?
~

or

T8

r =i s ri

5(^1, #2,

dys dy
1 8Z)
y: ^

or

We

dyk

have therefore

dxr _

I
r =i

| ajj

dx r

Yk

k= i

k=l dy k

dyk

which establishes the lemma.

Now

in the original

problem write

d IT

Ci x*

/y/>

ci A

and consider the change of variables from

by the lemma, we have

so the quantity

M, which

M
satisfies

is

a solution of the equation

dt

the equation
8

/XA

All
a

which shews that the expression

the perfect differential of some function of xn and


theorem of the Last Multiplier.
is

Boltzmann and Larmor s hydrodynamical representation of

The theorem
siderations.

For

a;

the

this establishes the

Last Multiplier.

of the Last Multiplier may also be made apparent by physical con


simplicity we shall take the number of variables to be three, so that the

differential equations

may

be written

dx dy
~
U
V

_ dz
W*

where

(u,

v,

279

their Integral- Invariants

119, 120]

w) are given functions of

z)

(#, y,

and the

last

multiplier

satisfies

the equation

+ ^(Mv} + ^
(Mw) = 0.
x
oz
3# (Mu)
dy
j-

This equation shews that in the hydrodynamical problem of the steady motion of
a fluid in which (u, v, w} are the velocity-components at the point (#, ?/, z), the equation of
is taken as the density of the fluid at the point (#, y, z}.
continuity is satisfied when

Now

let

(f)

(.v,

=C

y, z)

be an integral of the differential equations; then the flow will take place between the
thus we can consider separately the flow in the
surfaces represented by this equation
two-dimensional sheet between consecutive surfaces C and (7+8(7. The flow through the
;

gap between any two given points P and Q on C must be the same whatever be the
arc joining P and Q across which it is estimated and since the flow across arcs PR and RQ
together is the same as that across PQ, we see that the flow across an arc joining P and Q
:

must be

expressible in the form

So

f(Q) -f(P).

r the (variable) thickness of the sheet, so that r

denotes the velocity-component perpendicular to

if

Mrds

so that

is

we have

ds,

the perfect differential of a function of position.

that this expression can be written in the form

M
is

ds denotes an element of this arc, and


~
2
+ (90/9z) 2 } * 8C, and
(B</8?/)

if

= {(d^/dx) 2 +

a perfect differential

this is the

(v

dx

MSC(vdx- u

But it is easily seen


and consequently

dy)/(d<t>/dz) ;

u dy}
last multiplier for the case

theorem of the

con

sidered.

We

readily find for

ds the value
dz

$y

<f>x

so the

4>z

theorem really states that

an

is

equation

dx

dy

(f) x

dz

ID

integrating factor

= 0.

w
<>

(t>y

This, as was remarked by Appell (Comptes Rendus, CLV. (1912), p. 878),


form of the theorem of the Last Multiplier.

Derivation of an integral

120.

from two

is

a symmetrical

multipliers.

of the partial
and
Suppose now that two distinct solutions
equation of the last multiplier have been obtained, so that
/
I

**\

-rr

(X

"

f/T*

...

-rr

ulT

-i

C/-A

1
1

til*

fi

differential

o ~y

^ ~v~
QA.Q

~v~

+X n ~-U +X ^GF/ losrJ/+^


-TV

-r-r

+
+ X.,^uSC

of the

C-^- n

o ~v
J\

= 0,
+ ^r-f + ... +^-- + ^G3C
J

()

,.

(jQC

and
3

tr

d\
^OX

HT

3^1

9^2

dX n

dX
-- =

OXn

OX

0.

Hamiltonian Systems and

280

[CH.

Subtracting these equations, we have

-3

but this

is

the condition that the equation

(M/N) =

log
shall

constant

be an integral of the system


Ct/tX/i

C&W2

X^

-3T 2

Ct t/

\AjJU

jj,

Xn

.A.

and we have therefore the theorem that the quotient of two last multipliers of
a system of differential equations is an integral of the system.
The reader who

is

acquainted with the theory of infinitesimal transformations will be

able to prove without difficulty that

if

the equation

Y f

admits the infinitesimal transformations

then the reciprocal of the determinant

A-l

At,

A. n

A.

ll

^12

ln

fen

is

a last multiplier.

Application of the last multiplier

121.
single

known

to

Hamiltonian systems

use of

integral.

If the system of differential equations considered

we have

evidently

^dXr /dxr = 0,

and consequently

is

a Hamiltonian system,
is a solution of the

M= 1

partial differential equation

which determines the

last multiplier

so the last

multiplier of a Hamiltonian system of equations is unity.


From this result we can deduce a theorem which enables us to integrate
completely any conservative holonomic dynamical system with two degrees of

freedom when one integral

is

known

in addition to the integral of energy.

Let the system be

and in addition

V(q l} q pi, pz)


follows that
2

^2i

= ^h =

djf

d_H

dpi

dp2

be known.
1

9 (Pi.

dp 2
~

fit

_dH _dH
dqj.

to the integral of

dpl

From

(dH

dq2

energy H (q

I}

q 2 PI, PZ)
,

h, let

an integral

the theorem of the last multiplier

dH

constant

it

is

another integral

where, in the integrand,

replaced by

their values in terms of q 1

integrals

and

But

V= c

if

for

281

their Integral- Invariants

120, 121]

be
2 are supposed to
obtained from the known

p and p
l

and
<?

V.

H= h

we suppose that the result of solving the equations


p and p is represented by the equations

and

then we have identically


"""

dpi dc

dp 2 dc

dc

dp 2 dc

and therefore
df2

dH/dp,

8/1

dc

dc~d(V,H),

_-dH/dPl
d(V, H}
d(p ,p2 )

p2 )

so the theorem of the last multiplier can be expressed by the statement that

is

an integral.

This result leads directly to the theorem already mentioned, which


be thus stated * If in the dynamical system defined by the equations

may

dq r

_dH

dt
the integral

denotes

Pidq

+p

any
2 dq 2

dpr _

dH

dt

dp r

H (q

o\

c
1} q 2
(q^., q%, PI, PZ)
p l p^ h, and if
then
the
the
not
time,
integral
expression
involving
where p-^ and p2 have the values found from these integrals,

of energy

is

other
,

of a function 6 (g n q2
integrals of the system are
is

dqr

the exact differential

7\fi

^dc

h,

c)

and

the

remaining

o/3

constant,

and

-j

dh

=t+

constant.

This amounts to saying that if any singly-infinite family of orbits is


selected (e.g. the orbits which issue from a point qi = ct 1} q2 = 2 ) which have
*

This theorem

is

really

an application

of the

well-known method for the solution of a

partial differential equation of the first order, the equations of the

dynamical system being

As a dynamical
the partial differential equation.
theorem, it was published for a simple case (motion of a single particle) by Jacobi in 1836
(Comptes Eendus, in. p. 59), and for the general case given here by Poisson in 1837 (J. de M.
the equations of the characteristics of

n. p. 317)

and Liouville

in 1840 (J. de

M.

v.

p. 351).

Hamiltonian Systems and

282

[CH.

the same energy, so that to any point (ft, q2 ) there correspond definite values
of p and p.2 (namely the values of p l and p 2 corresponding to the orbit which
passes through the point q l} q 2 and belongs to the family), then the value of
l

the integral

and

(fto, #20)

p dq

+p

and F =

dq 2 taken along any arc joining two definite points

independent of the arc chosen.

(q u , q 21 ) is

To complete the

proof,

we have on

differentiating the equations

H=h

c,

dpi 9ft

9ft

9/>

9ft

and consequently
9(F,

#)
d similarlv
iri

But

since

V= c

is

an

^-

9 gi

ft

3F.

3F
3F.
+ ^- q* + v- P =
9
2

ga )

.ST)

0,

dp,^

g2

(
9 (ft, Pi)

--r=0,
^T)

+ 3(F,
^7
,

9 (ft, PS)

M-^ =

and therefore

_PI

9pi

8(F,

or

we have

integral,

3F.

#)

9(F,

_
- 3(p

9/;

0.

oft

9ft

This equation shews that fidq +f2 dq2 is the perfect differential of some
h, c): and the result derived above from the theory of the
l

function 6 (q ly q2
last multiplier

Moreover,

shews that d&/dc

constant

is

an

integral.

we have

and therefore

3F

3F,
5

dq

-7.

3(F, //)
9

But obtaining
we have

9/1/3 A

(p a PI)
,

and df2/dh in the same way as

found,

dh

3(F,

J3

df2
9A

3(F,

9/l/9c

and

3/a/3c

were

their Integral- Invariants

121, 122]

dt

Consequently
or

?)f

283

PI/*

~j dq

-f

dq.2 ,

= W + constant,
JTT

on

which completes the proof of the theorem.


In the problem of two centres of gravitation ( 53), if (r, /) denote the
the angles formed by r, / with the
}

Example.

radii vectores to the centres of force, and (d, 6


line joining the centres of force, obtain the

integral

r 2 r 2 0ff

- 2c (p cos 6

+/* cos d

= constant,

and hence complete the solution by the above theorem.


122.

whose

Integral-invariants

order

is

to

equal

the

order

of the

system.

The theory of the last multiplier of a system of differential equations is


connected with that of the integral-invariants whose order is
equal to the
order of the system.
doc

Let

where (Z n

Z)

...,

k)

of (d, c2

integral-invariant,

(c l5 c 2

ck }

..., a*, t).

MQX, ox,,

6xk

where

a function of the variables.

is

be any set of constants of integration of these


equations,
..., xk ) can be expressed in terms
Then we have

.I[

>

\ Oj

G2

and therefore the condition of


integral-invariancy

~JI

dt

M 8(^,^2,
^~

"

is

...,xk y\

dt

8(c 1(

c 2) ..., ck )

M r=l

or
dt

C l , c 2 , ...
..., a

d(c1}

.,,...,
.

= i CXr

which shews that

*)

by solving the equations, (x l} xz

so that,

(r = 1 - i

fff
...
JJJ

may be an

are given functions of (xl} xz ..., xk


t), be a system
and let us find the condition which must

of ordinary differential equations


be satisfied in order that

Let

~s

M must be a last multiplier of the system of equations.

Hamiltonian Systems and

284

[CH.

This result gives immediately the theorem that for a dynamical system
is determined by the equations

whose motion

dt~dp
where

is

any function of

an integral-invariant
theorem is of importance

is

...,

qn

dq r

p p
lt

...,

pn

For a system with two degrees of freedom,

Example.

Shew

dt~

t),

the expression

This
since in this case unity is a last multiplier.
in the applications of dynamics to thermodynamics.

solved for

(q 1} q 2

dpr__dH

_?)H

dq,.

p take the form

h,

to, Pi, Ps,

when

the energy-integral

A)+_pt = 0.

which correspond

that, for trajectories

let

to the

same value of the constant

of

energy, the quantity

is

independent of

and

also of the choice of coordinates

and hence shew that the


motion

trajectories of the problem can be represented as the stream-lines in the steady


of a fluid whose density is

Redaction of differential equations

123.

Another question
applied

is

to

the following

to the

Lagrangian form.

which the theory of the last multiplier can be


To find under what conditions a given system of

ordinary differential equations of the second order

is

equivalent to a Lagrangian system

dL

d /dL\

jlla-H-5
dt
\dq r j
dq r
where

is

a function of (q lt q2

,..,

-0

q n q l} q2
,

(r=l,

...,

qn

2, ..., w),

t).

two systems are equivalent, the equations

If these

^
k =i

3- o

\oqr dq k

<ik

oqr dq k

Qk
z }
/

+ ^-5.

dq r dt

(r

1, 2,

n)

dq r

must evidently reduce to identities when the quantities qk are replaced by


the expressions fk and therefore the required condition is that a function L
;

shall exist satisfying the simultaneous partial differential equations

00

dqr ot

where

(q lt q2

...,

(r

= l,
i

2, ..., n),

dqr

q n ,qi,qz, ...,q n ,t) are regarded as the independent variables.

When

285

their Integral-Invariants

122-124]

= 1,

the question can be solved in terms of the last multiplier.

For the equation

satisfied

by

then

is

_
dqdq*

dq*

dq

dqdt

from which we have


_

_ ~

dq\dq

and therefore

if

we

~
f-.
/

write d 2L/dq 2

dq \dqdq

= M,

the function

dM

-but this

is

dqj

dqdt

the equation

satisfies

/%

the equation defining the last multiplier

of the system of

equations

and therefore wAen w

1,

/<e

determination of the function

reduces

to the

determination of the last multiplier of the system.

Case in which the kinetic energy is quadratic in the velocities.


the most important case is that in which each of the functions
fr
of a part Fr which is homogeneous and of the second degree in (q^, 2 ..., n ) and
j
q

124.

When
consists

n>l,

a part Gr which does not involve (j 1} j2


the equations

j0) an d

>

qr =

Fr +O

it is

required to determine whether

r =l,

2,

...,)

are equivalent to a system

dT
7

where T

homogeneous and of the second degree in (j h j2


-,?) and also involves the
2
-, ?), and (&,
..., $ ) are functions of (g- 1? j 2
.... q n ) only.

is

variables (^, ^ 2

The value

of

is

ft

clearly not dependent on (6 1


?

consider the problem in which (G 1} 6r 2


a function T such that the equations

...,

ir

6r M .)

^j

..., 6- n ),

are zero,

i.e.

and therefore we can

the problem of finding

= Fr

(r=l,2, ...,)

are equivalent to the system

dT

d /dT
The condition

for this is the existence of a function

T satisfying the

partial differential

equations
"

Since

k is

<

homogeneous, we have 2 qs dFk /dqs = 2Fk and therefore


,

8=1

(r=1

*>

Hamiltonian Systems and

286
But

[OH.

we have

since dF/dq r is homogeneous,

and therefore
k

The equations

to be satisfied

T may

by
1

--

"=\

9j r

3^

consequently be written

n v*
fiF^
tiT
k UJ

dT _f\
UJ

(PT
u
L

T?

/.

cT\
or

~*

cq r Vfc=t 9yg dqk j

s =\

k= i Oq r dqk

9^9^ + 9T\
r rr

2 5

(r=1

"

%)

and evidently these may be replaced by the equations

dFt dT

i 2 ~-^
*k=i o^-^k

,1,

dT

+ 9~ =0

(r=l,

2, ...,

).

?r

that if the system of equations


Thus, writing/,, for (Fr + G r ), we have the theorem

qr

r consists of

w/tere

a part which

part which does not involve the

is

=fr

(r=l,

homogeneous of degree two in


is

velocities,

reducible to the

2,

...,),

the velocities

and a

form

then

must

be

an

integral of the system

+ ^O
il^pl
k= idq dq
dq

(,.1,

2,

...,).

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
In the problem of two centres of gravitation, the distance between the centres of
and the semi-major axes of the two conies which pass through the moving
and
have their foci at the centre of force are (q l q z }. Writing
particle
1.

force is 2c,

of motion are

shew that the equations

dqr
F-

= ^oH

a<

where

and

/ni

2.

JT"

and

/u 2

ojo,.

dp r =
-T
a^

(>H

d^

r=

,
l>

_.

2),

are constants.

Shew that

j f jj
extended over the \n (n-l) combinations of the indices i and j,
where the summation
is an integral-invariant of any Hamiltonian system in which (qi, q 2 ..., q nt Pi, p^, ..., p n )
is

are the variables.

(Poincare.)

287

their Integral-Invariants

x]
3.

In the problem defined by the equations

dqr_dff^

dpr__dl[

dt~3p r

dqr

H= q

where

pl

2
q2 p 2 a?i +

bat

f)a

shew that

dt~

bq<?,

= constant

?i
is

an integral

121 obtain the two remaining integrals

and hence by the theorem of

(q^z

constant,

(log qi = t + constant.
4.

If

a last multiplier of a system of differential equations

is

dx-i

of which the equation


zi

is

known

shew that

and

integral,

indicate that

if

_ dx n _ dx

_ d.r2 _
A2

xn x = Constant

>

an accent annexed to a function of # l5 #2 ..., acn x is used to


in the function by its values found from this integral,
,

M /(cf/cxn

is

a last multiplier of the reduced system

dxn _i

dxn

-=-,=... =

If QI

xn has been replaced

dx,

5.

An

Constant, 6 2

= Constant,

...,

dx

=-7-

= Constant

6n

(Jacobi.)

are a set of integrals of the

equations

dx

shew that
is

dxz

dx

8(^,^ 2

0(X 1 #2

dxn

...,^)

---i

*)

a last multiplier.

Let

6.

(iii,

u2

...,

u n ) be n dependent variables, and let Tj,


denned by the equations

/2

...,

/ be a

set of

linear differential expressions

k=l
If (vi,v z ,

...,

v n ) are functions of

such that

an exact differential, shew that the functions (vj, v 2 , ..., vn ) satisfy a set of n linear
differential equations, which will be called the system adjoint to the system of linear
is

differential equations

7r

(r=l,

2,

...,).

If J ^. denotes the expression


1

where

is

any given function of

(q l

j2

>

>

?>

?i>

?2>

>

qn

shew that the system

linear differential equations

is

adjoint to

Shew

itself.

that the converse of this latter theorem

is

also true.

(Hirsch.)

of

CHAPTER XI
THE TRANSFORMATION-THEORY OF DYNAMICS
125.

We

Hamilton s Characteristic Function and Contact-Transformations.


have seen* that the integration of a dynamical system which is

by quadratures can generally be effected by transforming it into


another dynamical system with fewer degrees of freedom.
We shall in
the present chapter investigate the general theory which underlies this
soluble

procedure, and, indeed, underlies the solution of

all

dynamical systems.

memoir on
in
Hamilton
which
was
to
the
Irish
optics,
Royal
Academy by
presented
the
there
introduced
were
afterwards
transferred
their
1824f
principles
by

The

origin of the

method

to be found in a celebrated

is

discoverer to the field of dynamics.

In order to follow Hamilton s thought, we must refer to the connexion


between dynamics and optics a connexion which is perhaps less obvious in
our day than in his, when the corpuscular theory of light was still widely
If a ray of light traverses an optically heterogeneous but isotropic
held.
refractive index at any point (a?, y, z} being
the path of
be determined by Fermat s Principle J, namely that the integral

medium, the
a ray

may

JJL,

(x, y, z)

ds

has a stationary value when the integration is taken along the actual ray
joining two given terminal points, as compared with neighbouring paths
joining them. If on the other hand we consider the motion of a free particle

mass in a conservative field of force where its potential energy is


and its constant of energy is h, the path of the particle may be
(IK, y, z},
determined by the Principle of Least Action ( 100), which in this case asserts
of unit
<b

that the integral


ff

i*

has a stationary value for the actual trajectory as compared with neighbouring
Comparing these two statements, we

paths joining the same terminal points.


*

Cf.

Chapter

III,

38-42.

t Trans. E. Irish Acad. xv. (1828), p. 69; xvi. (1830), pp. 4, 93; xvn. (1837), p.
J Cf. ray History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, pp. 9-10, 102-3.

1.

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

125]

289

see that the trajectories of the particle in the dynamical problem are the
same as the paths of the rays in the optical problem, provided a suitable

correspondence
*-<*-*

up between the potential-energy function

set

is

in the one case

and the

refractive index in the other.

In the corpuscular theory of

light, this was regarded as furnishing the


of
the
explanation
optical phenomena, the ray of light being conceived as
a procession of
But the statement in itself is
rapidly-moving corpuscles.

true whatever
supplies a
This idea

When
different

the

be

hypothesis regarding light

adopted

and therefore

it

means
is

of connecting dynamics with the undulatory


hypothesis.
the starting-point of Hamilton s theory.

the undulatory hypothesis is adopted, we have the choice of two


methods of discussing the propagation of light mathematically
:

The

to consider rays, the second is to consider


wave-fronts.
latter method, which was introduced
by Huygens in 1690, may be
first

is

thus

explained.

it

Consider a wave-front, or locus of disturbance in an optical medium, as


Each element
t, having the form of a surface

exists at a definite instant

<r.

of this wave-front

may be regarded as the source of a secondary wave,


outwards
from it
so that at a subsequent instant t
the
propagated
disturbance originating in any point (x y, z) of the original wave-front will
extend over a surface. To obtain the equation of this surface, we observe
;

medium from an arbitrary


another arbitrary point (x y z ) depends only on the six
quantities (x, y, z, x y z) let it be denoted by V(x, y, z, x, y z }.
This
function V(x, y, z, x y z } was called by Hamilton the characteristic
function
for the medium in
A disturbance which originates at a point
question.
that the time taken by light to travel through the
(x, y, z} to

point

(x,

(x,

the original wave-front at the instant t will therefore at the


over the surface whose equation in the coordinates

z} of

y,

instant

extend
is

V(x,y,z, x ,y ,z

-t

(1).

Now

according to the principle of wave-propagation laid down by


Huygens, the wave-front which represents the whole disturbance at the
instant t is the envelope of the
secondary waves which arise from the
various elements of the original wave-front.

Call this

new wave-front 2;

and denote the direction-cosines of the normal to the wave-front


at
(x, y, z) by (I, m, n), and the direction-cosines of the normal to the wavefront 2 at the corresponding
point* (x, y z } by (V, m n ): these are the
<r

from

The point
(x, y, z}

W.

D.

(x
y z ) is said to correspond to (x,
touches the envelope S at (x y z ).
,

y, z) if

the secondary wave propagated

19

[OH. xi

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

290

z ) and (x, y, z) respectively, since in


Then since
to the wave-front*.
normal
an isotropic medium the ray is
V
to
2 is the envelope of the surfaces
points on a, the
corresponding

direction-cosines of the rays at (x, y

equation

dV

-=- doc

dx

must be

satisfied

by

all

dV, dV,
+ -^- dy + -^- dz = Q
i

dz

dy
values

those

the

of

to
correspond to directions in the tangent-plane

relation

ldx

ratios
a-,

i.e.

dx dy
which
:

dz which

satisfy the

+ mdy + ndz = 0.

Hence we have

1^? = 1LF = 1 8F

dx

dy

(2)

n dz

of the normal to the


Moreover, since (I m, n) are the direction-cosines
have
we
z
the
),
surface F at
point (x, y,
,

=
dx

Now

dy

n dz

a ray of light which passes through the point (x, y, z) in the direction
at time t passes through the point (x, y /) in the direction (I m, n )
1

m, n)
at time
(I,

and equations

(1), (2), (3),

together with the equation

p + m +n
/a

/2

=l

................................. (4),

z
are six equations, from which we can determine the six quantities (x y
behaviour
the
these
Thus
equations
by
I
m, n) in terms of (x, y, z, I, m, n).
in the medium is completely specified in terms of the single
,

of rays of

light

function V(x,

y, z,

x, y

}.

It will

be observed that they are not

differential

but that they give directly, in the integrated form, the changes in
equations,
after a finite interval of propagation through the medium.
any system of rays
in optics depend on the deter
It is evident therefore that all problems
function
s
characteristic
Hamilton
V(x,y,z, x ,y ,z } for the
of
mination
optical

medium

or system of

media through which the rays

pass.

the point of view of Pure Mathematics, we regard the change from


of variables (x, y z I m, n ),
the set of variables (x, y, z, I, m, n) to the set
to the surfaces 2, as
surfaces
the
from
or (to express it geometrically)
be
to
is
thus
regarded as determining a
a transformation. The function
into a new surface 2.
surface
transformation of space which changes any
a
touch at
point, the corresponding
It is evident that if two surfaces a and
on this
transformed surfaces 2 and 2 also touch at the corresponding point

From

<r

<r

</

account the transformation has been called by

Thus any function V(x,

y, z,

x, y

defines

S.

Lie a contact-transformation.

a contact-transformation, which

For simplicity we are supposing that the medium, though optically heterogeneous,
medium.
Hamilton considered also the more general case of a crystalline
isotropic.
*

is

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

125]

transforms any wave-front


a-

by propagation

<r

into the wave-front

medium

through the

which

291

derived

is

in the interval of time

from

t.

A simple example of a contact-transformation is the well-known geometrical trans


formation known as reciprocation. In order to find the reciprocal of any given surface
with respect to a given surface, we correlate to every point (#, y, z) on
a plane, namely
o>

<r

the polar plane of (x, y\ z) with respect to the quadric. When the point (x, y, z) takes all
possible positions on the surface a, the plane envelopes a surface 2, which is the reciprocal
of a-. The transformation from o- to 2 is evidently a contact-transformation.
In this
case Hamilton s function
(

v*

linear with respect to (x, y,

is

and

z)

also with respect to

}
)

Proceeding now with Hamilton

problem, equations (2) and (3)

may be

written

Kl

dV =

ox

= *m
8F

\1H

^,

8F =
-^r-f

Ml

where K and \ are quantities not as yet determined.


For the equations may be written
readily found.

dV =
Now
increase

K(ldx

oz

oy

+ mdy + ndz) +

They can however be

+ m dy + n dz )

\(l dx

(5).

by proceeding a small distance ds along the ray at (x, y z }, we


But if the
by the time which light takes to travel along ds
,

units are so chosen that the velocity of light in free aether

is

unity, then

the velocity of light in the medium at (x, y z) is 1/X, where fjf denotes
the refractive index at this point. Thus the time taken by light to describe
,

ds

is

[ids

or p!

(I

+m +
2

-}

ds

or //

this with equation (5), we see that


denotes the refractive index at (x, y,

(I

A.

dx

//,

+ m dy + n dz

Thus Hamilton

z}.

).

Similarly K
s

Comparing
where p

JJL,

general formula

becomes

dV = p
If

we

(I

+ m dy +

dx

n dz

(Idx

/j,

+ mdy + ndz).

write
fjd

/Jim

fin

77,

yt/,7

fji

m =v

/j!n

"

this takes the form

The

quantities (f, 77, ), (


??
) were called by Hamilton the components
normal
slowness
of
of propagation of the wave at (x, y, z) and (x y z)
,

respectively.

Consider now the particular case in which the interval of time (t 1)


a- and 2 of the same wave-front is
very small

between the two positions

192

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

292
denote

by A. In
Write

it

the

this case

contact-transformation

is

[OH. xi
said to be

infinitesimal.

=-MtAf,

7/=77

(6)

= + wA,

v&t,

WA*

V=
Then equation

............... (7).
j

becomes

dW.At = (J; + u&t) (dx + da A) + 0? + v&t) (dy + dp A)


+ (f + wA) (ek + dy A) -vjdy= u&tdx + v&tdy + w&tdz + %dda. + rjAtd/3 +
dW = udx + vdy + wdz + %da.+ qd/3 + %dy,
d (go. + ?7/3 + 7
udx vdy wdz.
W) = otdj; + /3dtj + yd
.

<&c

%dz

%Atd<y,

or
or

Thus

if

we denote the

function fa

expressed as a function of x, y,

z,

g,

dH=adt; + ftdrj +

Now

+ rj/3 + 7

TF by iT, and suppose

we have

f,

77,

yd^udx

evidently, from (7), in the limit u

wdz

vdy

becomes

d~
dt

............... (8).

a becomes

dx
-y,

dt

etc.

Thus we have
dx

,.,

dy

dz

-..,

-.

so the rates of increase of the six variables (x, y,

dn

z,

%,

- dt
)

77,

-.

are given

by the

equations

dx_

dH

dy_

dt

dt

dH
drj

dz_
dt

d_H

/m

(Ph
dt

dx

dt

dy

dt

dz

a Hamiltonian system of equations, such as occurs in dynamics.


it may be regarded as representing an in
finitesimal contact-transformation, that is to say, the motion of a wave-front
from one position to a position indefinitely near it. The integrals of this
Hamiltonian system are the equations (1), (2), (3), (4) above they represent
a finite contact- transformation, that is to say, the motion of a wave-front
from one position to the position which it acquires after a finite interval of
and

this is

Our

investigation shews that

Thus we see how by using the ideas of the undulatory theory of light,
Hamilton was able to obtain an integrated form for the differential equations
of dynamics, depending on a single unknown function.
time.

126.

Contact-transformations in space of any number of dimensions.

The

rest of the present chapter will be concerned with the application of


Hamilton s ideas, described in the preceding article, to the general case of a

dynamical system with any number of degrees of freedom, and the connexion

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

125, 126]

of the results with certain theorems

due

to

293

Lagrange, Poisson,

and

Pfaff,

Jacobi.

We

shall

define a contact-transformation in w-dimensional space,

first

this purpose a generalisation of equation (6) of the last


q2 ..., q n p^ p.2 ...,p n ) be a set of 2/i variables, and let

for

using

Let (q 1}

article.

2/i other variables which are defined in terms of them


by 2n equations.
If the equations connecting the two sets of variables are such that the

be

differential

form

+ P. dQ +

PidQj

+ Pn dQ n -

...

when expressed

p^ - p dq
2

- p n dq n

...

in terms of (qlt q2 ..., q n ,pi, PZ,


p n ) and their differ
the
differential
of
a
of
function
entials,
perfect
(q 1} q 2 ..., q n p l p 2 ..., p n ),
then the change from the set of variables (q l q.2 ..., q n p 1} p2 ..., p n ) to the

is,

other set (Q 1}
It

Q2

...,

Qn

P P
1?

be observed that this

may

is

...,

Pn

called a contact-transformation.

) is

form from the definition which

different in

is

most

convenient when contact-transformations are studied with a view to their applications in


geometry and in the theory of partial differential equations the latter definition may be
:

stated thus
?2,

(?i>

a contact-transformation

qn ,Pi,Pn,

-,

-,

Pn,

another

to

z)

a transformation from a set of (2w+l) variables

is

set

(# l5

@2

...,

Qn

P P
l5

Pn

...,

Z},

for

which the equation

dZ- PdQ - P2 dQ2 -... - Pn dQn = p (dz-p dq -p2 dq 2 - ... -p n dqn


l

where p denotes some function of

is satisfied,

(q 1

q2

...,

qn

p lt p z

...,

pn

z).

If the n variables (Q ly Q2 ..., Qn ) are functions of


(q lt q2 ..., q n ) only,
the contact-transformation from the variables (q 1} q 2 ..., qn p l ..., p n ) to the
variables (Q 1 Q2
n ) is called an extended point-transformation,
Qn 1}
,

. . .

. . .

the equations which connect (q 1} q 2 .... q n ) with (Q l}


case said to define a point-transformation.
,

From

the definition

it is

...,

Q n } being

in this

clear that the result of performing two contactis to obtain a


change of variables which is itself

transformations in succession
a contact-transformation.
(?!,

>

<?2>

q n ,pi,

>p

n)

It is also evident that if the transformation


to

(Qi,Q

...,Q n PI,
,

..,

Pn

is

from

a contact-trans

P P

formation, then the transformation from (Q n Q2 ..., Qn


1}
2
n ) to
...,
is
also
a
this
is
z
n
(qi,q
,q ,pi,p2, --^Pn)
contact-transformation;
generally
,

expressed by saying that the inverse of a contact-transformation is a contactThis, together with the foregoing, shews that contact-trans
transformation.

formations possess the group-property.


Example

is

1.

Shew that the transformation

a contact-transformation.

defined by the equations

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

294

[CH. xi

In this case we have

PdQ -pdq = (2qfi sin p {(2q) ~^cospdq- (2qfi siupdp} -p dq


= d(q sinp cos p qp),
which

a perfect differential.

is

Example

2.

Shew

that the transformation


1

is

a contact-transformation.
3.

Example

Shew that the transformation

(P= 2(1+2^ cos p) q^ sin p,


is

a contact-transformation.

We

shall

now

obtain the

explicit analytical expression of a contact-

transformation.

Let the transformation from variables (q 1} q 2


q n p ..., p n ) to variables
Pn } be a contact-transformation, so that
Qn, P\,
,

(Qi) Qz,

r=l

where

dW

From
(qi, q*,

is

(P r dQ r -p r dqr ) =

a complete differential.

the equations which define (Q lt


,

",

qn ,pi

pn)

it

maybe

possible to

...,

Qn

eliminate(P 1

1}

...,

Pn in terms of
Pn p
pn

. . .

completely, so as to obtain one or more relations between the variables

(Qn Qa
let

the

number

flrtei, 2,, -., q n

Qn,

>

of such relations be
,

k,

Qn

qi,

and

let

qn )

them be denoted by

Q) =

....

(r=l,

2, ..., A)... (A).

The meaning of these relations may be illustrated by reverting to the geometrical


theory of contact-transformations in ordinary three-dimensional space, when there are
three cases to consider
:

(a)

There

may

be only a single relation between the

Q(x,y,

When

s,

new and

old coordinates, say

x ,y /)=0.
,

are given, this equation, regarded as the locus of a point (a/, y z


represents a surface so that each point (#, y, z) is transformed into a surface, which we
may call an Q-surface and any arbitrary surface is transformed into a surface 2 which
(#, y, 2)

~),

<r

the envelope of the Q-surfaces corresponding to the individual points of


125.
general case, and is the only one we considered in
is

(/3)

There

may be two relations


Q : (as, y, 2, x y
,

If (x, y,
(x, y, z)

is

er.

This

is

the

of this kind, say


z")

= 0,

Q2

y,

*,

/,

=0.

are given, these two equations in (a/, y , z ) represent a curve


transformed into a curve, which we may call a .fiT-curve and
z]

so each point

any arbitrary

surface cr is transformed into a surface 2 which


sponding to the individual points of cr.

There

(y)

y,

flj (a?,

in

295

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

12(>]

be three relations of this kind, say

may
z,

the envelope of the .ff-curves corre

is

x y
,

= 0,

O 2 (x,

y,

x y

z,

= 0,

Q 3 (.r,

y,

z,

x y
,

= 0,

which case each point (x, y, z) is transformed into a point (x y z }, and any arbitrary
cr is transformed into a surface 2 which is the locus of the points corresponding to
,

surface

the individual points of

cr.

Since the variations (dq lf dqz

dq n dQ lt

...,

2 (P r dQ r - p r dqr ) =

dW

...,

dQ n )

in the equation

r=l

are conditioned only

by the relations

(r=l,

2, ...,&),

we must have

dW

where (X^Xg,
q
equations to

.of (q

l}

an,

is a function
undetermined multipliers and where
are (2n + k)
and
The
n
(B)
..., Q ).
Q,, Q
equations (A)
determine the (2/i + k) quantities

...,

...,Xt ) are

qn

(Qi,

in terms of (q lt

qn

Qn,

. . .

Xi, ..., Xfc)

These equations

p n ).

Pn>

PI>

may therefore

be

regarded

as explicitly formulating the contact-transformation, in terms of the functions


(W, i( n.2 ..., n&) which characterise the transformation.

Conversely,
(<?i,

?2

>

if (

qn, Qi,

W,

-..,

n H
if

Qn),

(Qi,

-,

are denned in terms of (q l q2


,

9TF

? =-^

n4

dq r

n,

Qn, Pi,
...,

an,-

qn

...

-- Xi ^an,
dq r

any (k +
and if

are

where k ^

..-,

p 1}

...,

+X
...

Pn, X 1;

1) functions of the variables

...,

fc

p n ) by the equations*

90
fc

an,
X -r-

Vr

-L

Z
>

,
)>

dq r

* These
equations were first given in Jacobi s Vorlesungen iiber Dijnamik (1866), p. 470, where
their utility in the transformation of partial differential equations of the first order (to which
of contact-transdynamical problems can be reduced) was indicated. Their place in the theory

formations was pointed out by Lie.

The Transformation- Theory of Dynamics

296
then

the

transformation

Pn

...,

1}

from

(q lt q z

Q2

(Q 1}

...,

Qn

the expression

for

to

q n Pi, ...,p w )

...,

a contact -transformation

) is

[CH. xi

2 (P r dQr -p r dq r )

r=l

dW, and

becomes, in virtue of these equations,

Q = (Zq)k~

If

Example.

TF= Q

...

- F$2 )* - q arccos

(<2qk

a contact-transformation.

is

The bilinear covariant of a general

Now

let (x 1}

x2

#) be any

...,

a perfect differential.

so that the transformation from (^ p} to ($, P)

127.

is

cosp,

P= dW
where

so

set of

differential form.

and consider a

variables,

differential

form

X dx
l

where (X J}
kind

is

...,

Xn

+ X dx2 +
2

+ X n dasn

. . .

denote any functions of

(x\,oc z ,

called a Pfaff s expression* in the variables (x1}

..,#); a form of this


xz ..., xn ). Let this
,

expression be denoted by 0&, and write

where 8
8dd

is

d6$

= & (X dx + X doc + 4- X n dx n ) d (X 8^ + X 8x +
= 8X dx + + 8X n dxn + X 8dx + ... + Xn 8dxn
l

. . .

Using the

relations

dX r
-=

dx +... +

dX r

OX-^

8x1

8dxr = d8x

are independent, and replacing

X n Sxn

X d8x
l

...

Xn d8xn

which exist since the variations d and 8

r>

by

6x 1

-^

...

OX-

dX ~
+ -^-r oxn

respectively,

OXji

we have

dXn 8xn

...

dX-r

dx n

dX r 8Xr

(]Xfi

dX

d0s= 2

8dd

where

Then we have

the symbol of an independent set of increments.

y denotes the quantity dX{/dxj

Let (y-i, 2/2 ..., yn ) be a new


transformation let the
some
by
,

dXj/dxj.

set of variables derived


differential

from (x lt

x.2 , ...,

xn }

form when expressed in terms of

these variables be
Fjefyi
* Pfaff s celebrated

+ Y dy2 +
2

...

+ Yn dy n

memoir on these expressions was presented

Abhandl. Akad. der Wiss. 1814-15,

p. 76.

to the Berlin

Academy

in 1815

The Transformation- Theory of Dynamics

126-128]

297

- dJ}/3y< be denoted by by. Then since the


the quantity
86
dd
has
d
s
expression
obviously the same value whatever be the variables
in terms of which it is
expressed, we have
and

let

9P</<?$

2 S
i

=l

j=l

The expression taydxi&K)

= 1 j = i bijdyibyj.

on account of this equation, called the

is,

bilinear covariant of the form

= 2 S

ctijdtCiSxj

dxr

The conditions for a contact-transformation


expressed by means of

128.

the bilinear covariant.


(Qi, Qz,

Qn

PI,

.-.,

Pn

be variables connected with (q lt q2

...,

n
<ln,pi,

-.ipn) by a contact transformation, so that

by an exact

r=l

P dQ
r

r=i

differs

from

differential.

It is clear

from the last article that the bilinear covariant of a differential


not affected by the addition of an exact differential to the
form, since
it
depends only on the quantities dX ifoxj - bX}fixi which are all zero when
the form is an exact differential: and we have shewn that the bilinear
form

is

covariant of a form

transformed by any transformation into the bilinear


It follows that the bilinear co variants of

is

covariant of the transformed form.


n

the forms

r=l

n
r

dQ r and 2 p r dq r
r=l

are equal,

^(8P dQ,-dP

8Q r ) = 2

so that if the
transformation
(qi,q^, ...,qn ,pi,
is

i.e.

that

(8p r dqr

-dqr 8p

from
...,^)

to

(Q l} Qz

...,

Qn ,P

a contact-transformation, the expression


n

2
r=l
is

(8p r dq r

dqr 8p r )

invariant under the transformation.


Example.

we have

r );

For the transformation denned by the equations

Q = (2q)* k~

4 cos

rfP-(2g)~ijt*sin

^cospdjz

....

Pn

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

298
By

multiplication

[OH. xi

we have
2

dP8Q-8PdQ=-sin*p(d<28p-8qdp)+cos p(dp8g-8pdq)

= dp8q

8pdq,

and consequently the transformation

a contact-transformation.

is

The conditions for a contact-transformation in terms of Lagranges

129.

bracket- expressions.

We

shall

now

give another form to the conditions that a transformation


n)
Qn 1
p n ) to variables (Qlt Q 2

from variables (q l} q 2
q n p lt
may be a contact-transformation.
,

. . .

. .

. .

If (q l q^, ...,q n ,pi, ...,p n ) are any functions of two variables (u, v) (and
possibly of any number of other variables), the expression
,

r
(dq tyr

r =i

is

called a

symbol
If

dpr

dqA

du dv )

\du dv

Lagranges bracket-expression*, and

usually denoted by the

is

[u, v].

now

(Qi, Qz,

(q 1} q%,

Qn, PI,

-,

p l}

2
r=l

we can

(dp r q r

Bp r dq r )

dp r by

replace

and similarly

for

the other quantities

2
r=l

(dpr &qr

- Bp r dq r ) = S
k,

we thus
[u k

obtain, on collecting terms,

u{] (diii8u k

- Suidu k

is
,

taken over

(&, Q

2>

...,

n>

1}

...,

Pn)

is

pairs of

all

Pn)--

if the transformation from the variables (q l} q 2

to the variables

),

where the summation on the right-hand side


variables (uk Ui) in the set (Q 1} Qz ..., Qn PI,

But

2n variables

...,p n ) are any functions of


Pn), then in the expression
qn

...,

qn, PI,

>

a contact-transformation,

Pn)

we

have

I (dp^r -

r=l

Bprdq,)

= I (dP r SQr - 8Pr dQr

),

r=l

this holds for all types of variation 8 and d of the quantities


with the above equation, we have therefore

and

i,P t ] =

0,

[Qi,

&] =

[Q*,P*]=0
[Qi,

PJ=1

=
(i,k

comparing

(i,k

= I,

2,

l,2,

...,

i$k),

(t- 1,2,

...,>

Lagrange, Mem. de VInstitut de France, ann^e 1808: reprinted Oeuvres,

vi. p.

..,),

713.

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

128-130]
These

regarded as partial differential equations which must be

be

may

by (qlt q2

satisfied

299

...,

qn

...,p n ), considered as functions of

p 1}

Q, ...,Q,

(Qi,

in order that the transformation

a contact-transformation.

from

PI, ...,Pn )

one set of variables to the other

may

be

These equations represent in an explicit form the

conditions implied in the invariance of the expression

Poisson

130.

We

shall

8p r dq r ).

(dp r Sq r

r=\

s bracket-expressions.

next introduce another class of bracket-expressions which are

intimately connected with those of Lagrange.


If u and v are any two functions of a set of variables
(q 1} q 2
Pi,
Pn), the expression

...,

qn

/8w

I
is called

the Poisson

du

dv_

dp r

r =i\dq r

dp r

dv_

dqj

denoted by the symbol

...,

between the Poisson-brackets (u r u s )


,

connexion we shall

We

now

investigate.

2 (,,,)[,..]- 2 2 I

Now

(2?t*-lS
dpi

t=\i=ij=i \oqi dpi

multiply out the right-hand side, remembering that


o
t=i oqi

are each zero if

$ j and unity

ou t
if i

t=l

=j

du dPj

^
2

^
t=ioqidu

du t d

t=l dpi d

are each zero

^
S

and

pi

and that
.

the equation becomes


%?

\ r

-i

(%, w,) [n

t>

t=i

and consequently

wj

2n

2
t=i

(w t u r ) [u t , Ug]
,

when r ^

s,

2n

while

<=i

(w t

wr )

[w

<t

M,.]

have

t=\

is

some connexion
and the Lagrange-brackets [u r us ]

this

and

um ) are 2n independent functions of the


so that conversely (q1} q2
q n p lf
pn )

variables (q l} q2
g n plt ..., p n ),
are functions of (u 1} u.2 ..., u 2n ).
There will evidently be
.

v,

(u, v).

Suppose now that (u 1} u 2


,

u and

bracket-expression* of the functions

= 1.
,

Poisson, Journal d$ VEcole poly tech. vin. (Cahier 15), (1809), p. 266.

The Transformation Theory of Dynamics

300

But these are the conditions which must be

[CH. XT

satisfied in order that the

two determinants
!,

[u2

[U 2n

u^

[u 2

M,]

...

u zn \

\_U 2n

U-^ J

and

[U lt U2n ]

(U 2

U2n \

(^Ui

U2 )

...

\U2n

Uvn)

(U 2n

U2 )

may be reciprocal, i.e. that any element in the one should be equal to the
minor of the corresponding element in the other, divided by this latter
determinant the product of the two determinants being unity and thus the
connexion between the Lagrange-brackets and the Poisson-brackets is expressed
by the fact that the determinants formed from them are reciprocal.
;

Example

1.

Example

2.

of (?D

<?2,

>

If /,

-..,

where the summation

^2>

are functions of (/l5

be

...,

qz

fk

),

...,

qn p1
,

...,

p n \ shew

that

which in turn are functions

p), shew that

taken over

let
>

(Q lt

c[n,p\,

...,

Qn

-,pn)>

satisfied in order that the

may

f2

(j t

all

combinations

fr f

s bracket-expressions.

Now
(^i)

is

any three functions of

The conditions for a contact-transformation expressed by means of

131.

Poisson

If F,

$n,Pi,

^ are

<,

lt

we

shall

(Pi, Pj)

are expressed

may

= 0,

denote 2 n functions of 2n variables

shew that

the conditions

which must be

one set of variables to the other


be written in the form

from

(Qi, Qj]

(, j

129 that the conditions

for

1, 2,

n),

a contact-transformation

by the equations
f

[Pi, Pj]

Hence the

Pn

transformation

a contact-transformation

For we have seen in

...,

= 0,

[Q {

Qj]

relations

=0

(i,

1, 2,

.,

n),

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

130-132]

of the last article

301

become

while the relations


2n

the theorem

is

(ut,

u r }[u

so that the Poisson-brackets of


variables are equal.
2.

nr]

thus established.

Example 1. If (Qlt Q2 ..., Qn Pl} ...,


by a contact-transformation, shew that

Example

If

Pn

are connected with ( gi


,q 2 ...,q n Plt
,

any two functions


*

(&,..., Q n

and

^ with respect

are given functions of

( ?1

?2>

to the

..., ?(l ,

ft

two

...,

Pn )

sets of

...,p n \

and

satisfy the partial differential equations

(Qr,

^ )=

(r,=l,

2,

...,),

shew that % other functions (Plt P2 ..., Pn ) can be found such that the transformation
from ( ?] ?2 ..., ?n Pl ;;. f
plt ..., pw ) is a contact-trans
2
pn ) to (^
..., Q n
,

formation.

132.

/Lj e

TAe sub-groups of Mathieu transformations and extended


point-

Iran sformations.
If within a group of transformations there exists a set of transformations
such that the result of
performing in succession two transformations of the
set is always equivalent to a transformation which also
belongs to the set, this
set of transformations

is said to form a
sub-group of the group.
of
the
of
contact-transformations
sub-group
general group
constituted by those transformations for which the
equation

S
r=l
is satisfied.

They

Pr dQ =
r

is

evidently

2 p r dq r

r=l

These transformations have been studied


by Mathieu*.

are essentially the

transformations in

(ft,

g- 2

same as the transformations

...,

?n Pl ,...,p n
,

)"

by

called

"

homogeneous contact-

Lie.

In this case, we see from 126 that


(&, Q 9 ..., Q n plf ..., n ) are to be
obtained by eliminating (\ l} \ 2 ..., \ k from the
)
(2n + k) equations
,

Journal de Math. xix. (1874),

p. 265.

[CH. xi

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

302

From the form of these equations it is evident that if (p j} p2 ...,p n ) are


each multiplied by any quantity //., the effect is to multiply (P 1} P2 ..., n )
must be homogeneous of the first
each by yu,; and therefore (Pj, P2 ...,
?l )
,

degree (though not necessarily integral) in (p 1}

pz

...,p n ).

sub-group within the group of Mathieu transformations is constituted


by those transformations for Avhich (P P2 .. P n ) are not only homogeneous
of the first degree in (p l} p2 ...,p n ) but also integral, i.e. linear, in them; so
that we have equations of the form
: ,

Pr = 2
k=\

p k frk (q 1} q2 ,..., qn )

(r=l,2,

. .

n}.

Substituting in the equation


n

P dQ
r

r=l

r=

l*

to zero the coefficient of p k

and equating

= 0,

rdgv
,

we have

(fcl,

dq k
r=l

so
(<?!,

qz

qn ) are functions of (Q 1}

...,

frk

Q2

Qn )

...,

only,

= dqk/dQr

2, ...,n),

and
(r,

k=l,2,

..., n).

kind are obtained by assigning


It follows that transformations of
n arbitrary relations connecting the variables (q l} q2 ..., qn ) with the variables
this

(Qi,

Q 2,

Qn),

and then determining (P lf

P = I
r

k=l

...,Pn )from the equations

(r=l,

Pt j2*
V^r

These transformations are extended point-transformations


n

Example.

r=l

P*S^=

133.

n
2
r=l

O0r

S hewtha,t

We

Pr dQr =

If

p r dqr
n

2, ...,n).

126).

dPr

lf*^-

"

Infinitesimal contact-transformations.
shall

now

consider transformations

in

which the new variables

Pn) differ from the original variables (q 1} q2 ... q n


n
p l} ...,p ) by quantities which are infinitesimal. Let these differences be
denoted by (&q lt Ag 2 ..., A# &p lt ..., Ap n ), where
(Qi, $2,

>

Qn, PI,

->

and A^

is

n>

an arbitrary infinitesimal constant

Qr =

qr

+ &q r =qr +

so that

<f>

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

132, 133]

and the transformation

Now

is

303

by the functions

specified

suppose that the transformation

Then

a contact-transformation.

is

we have
r=l

where

is

some function

(P r dQ r -p r dq r ) =

of (q l}

q.2

...,

q n p lt

pn )

....

or

2
>=!

or

It is evident that the function

W=

U&t, where

?7 is

must contain

some function of

(^ :

qz

...,

qn

as a factor

...,

lt

p n ), the

writing

equation

becomes

Hence we have
M
/

r=l

r=l

= -dK(q 1}

q2

...,q n ,p ly ...,p n ) say,

and therefore

Thus

/te

mos<

general infinitesimal contact-transformation

defined by the

is

equations

where

is

an arbitrary function of

(q 1} q z

...,

qn

arbitrary infinitesimal quantity independent of (q 1}

The increment
ments

(q 1} q

...,

in

qn

...,p n }

p lt

q.2

qn

and

...,p n ),
...,

p 1}

...,

is

an

p w ).

..., q n p 1} ...., p n ) when its argu


are subjected to this transformation is

any function f(q lt q z

p 1}

_
r

dp r dq

or

on this account the Poisson-bracket (/, K) is said to be the symbol of the


most general infinitesimal transformation of the infinite group which consists
of

all

contact-transformations of the

2??,

variables (q 1}

q.2

...,

qn

p lt

...,p n ).

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

304

mew

The resulting new

134.

[CH. xi

of dynamics.

established in the last article enables us to extend to

The theorem

all

conservative holonomic dynamical systems, whatever be the number of degrees


125 for
of freedom, the conception which was formulated at the end of

For the motion

certain simple systems.

is

expressed

109) by equations of

the type

dqr
j-

dt

and from the

dff
__

dp r

dp r

dt

_ dH

fB

1 2

n)

dqr

we can

interpret these equations as


implying that the transformation from the values of the variables at time t
to their values at time t + dt is an infinitesimal contact-transformation.
The
last article it follows that

whole course of a dynamical system can thus be regarded as the gradual selfunfolding of a contact-transformation. This result is really a generalisation
of the statement that the paths of the rays in a pencil of light can be specified
by the gradual propagation of a wave-front. Taken in conjunction with

the group-property of contact-transformations,

it

is

the foundation of the

transformation-theory of dynamical systems.

From

this it is evident that if (q 1} q 2

in a dynamical system, and


values at some selected epoch

(a

l>

ot 2

qn

...,

...,

a.

...,p n ) are the variables


are their respective

p lf

{3 1} ..., /3 n )

t
t Q the
equations which express (q qz
qn
a
in
of
which
terms
constitute
the
@
n
...,
lt
2
n
1}
...,
j3
(a
t) (and
Pn)
PI,
solution of the differential equations of motion) express a contact-transforma
tion from (!, or2 ..., ctn &, ..., /3 n ) to (q 1} q 3 ..., q n p lf ...,p n ); in this t is
,

l ,

>

. . .

regarded merely as a parameter occurring in the equations which define the


transformation.

Helmholtz

135.

s reciprocal theorem.

Since the values of the variables (q l} q.2 ..., q n p lt ..., p n ) of a dynamical


system at time t are derivable by a contact-transformation from their values
,

(!,

cr

2)

...,

an

at time

fi l; ..., fin)

we have (128)

where the symbols A and 8 refer to increments arrived at by passages from


a given orbit to two different adjacent orbits respectively.

Now
orbit

suppose that 8 refers to the increments obtained in passing to that


is defined by the values

which

at time

which

is

(!,

and

let

...,

&,

/3 2 , ...,

refer to the

&._!,

+S@

ftr+i,

>

fin)

increment obtained in passing to that orbit

defined by the values


(q l} qt

>

...,q n ,pi,

-, PS-I, PS

&Ps>

PS+I,

Pn)

The Transformation- Theory of Dynamics

134-136]
at time

,;

305

then the above equation becomes


&ps&qs=-8/3,-ky>;

the increment in

so

/3 1; ..., /3/--1, /3 r+1

...,

qs due to an increment in /3r (when a l cr2 ..., a n


fi n are not varied) is equal to the increment (with sign
,

reversed) in a r corresponding to an increment in. p s (when qi,q 2 ...,q n ,pi,


JOg-i, PS+-L,
p n are not varied) equal to the previous increment in /3 r
,

.,

This result can for many systems be physically interpreted, as was


observed by Helmholfcz*; for a small impulse applied to a system can be
conveniently measured by the resulting change in one of the momenta

p n and

the change in a r due to a change in p g can be realised in the


reversed motion, i.e. the motion which starts from some given
position with
each of the velocities corresponding to that position changed in
sign, so that
(p-i,

...

),

the subsequent history of the system is the same as its previous


history, but
performed in reverse order. We can therefore state the theorem broadly
thus the change produced in any interval by a small initial impulse
of any
:

type in the coordinate of

any other (or of the same) type, in the direct motion,


equal
change produced in the same interval of the reversed motion in
the coordinate of the first type by an equal small initial
impulse of the
to the

is

second type\.
Example. In elliptic motion under a centre of force in the centre, if a small velocity
8v in the direction of the normal be communicated to the particle as it is
passing through
either extremity of the major axis, shew that the tangential deviation
produced after
a quarter-period
velocity

8v,

is

p.

"dtf,

communicated

where

period an equal normal deviation

136.

Jacobi

into another

It

p.~

the constant of force.

minor

Shew

axis,

also that a tangential

produces after a quarter-

dv.

(Lamb.)

theorem on the transformation of a given dynamical system

dynamical system.

appears from

116 that

equations

dq r
-nr
dt
is

is

/*

at the extremity of the

if

Hamiltonian system of

= dH
^,

dp r
dt

dp r

differential

dH

=-3dq

(r=l,

2, ...,

w)

transformed by change of variables, the system of differential equations so


still have the Hamiltonian form

obtained will

dPr__dK

dQr_dK_
dt
dPr
provided the new variables (Q l}

is

an integral-invariant
*

Journal

t Cf.

w. D.

Q2

dt
...,

Qn

"**

dQr
ly

...,

Pn

are such that

(relative or absolute) of the original system.


fiir

Lamb,

Math.

c.

(1886).

Proc. Loud. Math. Soc. xix. (1898), p. 144.

20

The Transformation- Theory of Dynamics

306

kind

transformation of this

considered,

i.e.

it

in general,

is,

the

to

special

[on. xi

problem

given Hamiltonian system into another


will not necessarily transform any other arbitrarily

transforms the

Hamiltonian system, but it


Hamiltonian system

chosen

into a Hamiltonian system.


Among these
transformations however are included transformations which have the pro

perty of conserving the Hamiltonian form of any dynamical system to which


they may be applied these may be obtained in the following way.
:

We

have seen (115) that

a relative integral-invariant of any Hamiltonian system. Let (Q l}


PL ..., n ) be a set of 2n variables obtained from (q lt q 2 ..., q n
by a contact-transformation, so that

is

dQrr=l

r=\

dW

where

may

Qn

...,

...,p n )

p r dq r =
The equations which

denotes an exact differential.

transformation

p 1}

involve the time, so that (Q 1}

...,

Q P
n

define the
...,

1}

Pn

are

but in the variation denoted by d


functions of (q l q z
., q n ,pi,
Pn,
if t is supposed to
in this equation the time is not supposed to be varied
vary, the equation becomes
,

>

dQ r - 2 p r dq r =

U denotes

where

dW+ Udt,

r=l

r=l

some function of the

variables.

Now

the variation denoted by S in the integral-invariant is a variation


from a point of one orbit to the contemporaneous point of an adjacent orbit

if

therefore

we regard the

variables as functions of (a l

a2

...,

a 2n

t),

where

of
..., a 2n ) are the constants of integration which occur in the solution
the equations of motion, the variation & is one in which (a 1} a 2 ..., a 2n ) are
varied but t is not varied we have consequently, as a special case of the last

(a 1} a 2

equation,

SQr- 2 p r Bqr =8W,


r=l

r=l
r

and therefore

i
r

&Qr

J }=!
is

so the transformed system of differential


which (Q 1( Qz ..., Qn P1} ..., Pn ) are taken as dependent
have the Hamiltonian form and can be written

a relative integral-invariant

equations,

in

variables, will

dPI ~__ dK

dQr_dK_
dt

where

is

~dPr

some function of (Q lt Q2

dt
,

...,

Qn

dQr
,

Pi,

...,

Pn

t).

The Transformation-Theory of Dynamics

136, 137]

307

Hence a contact-transformation of the variables (q lt q2 ..., qn


Pn}
of any dynamical system conserves the Hamiltotiian form of the equations of
,

In the case of an ordinary

the system*.

system, in which (Q1}


contact-transformation

Shew

Example.

is

...,

"change

of

variables"

are functions of (q lt q 2

Qn )

in the

...,

>

T>\->

dynamical

qn ) only, the

merely an extended point-transformation.

that the contact-transformation defined by the equations


q

= (2#)4 k ~ * cos

p = 2Q)% kt

P,

sin P,

changes the system

dq__3H_

dp =

dff

di~dp

dt

dg

H = \(p* + k q*\
z

where
into the system

dQ_dK dP__dK_
~dt~dP
where

dQ

"dt~

K=kQ.

137.

Representation of a dynamical problem by a differential form.

The reason for the importance of contact-transformations in connexion


with dynamical problems is more clearly seen by the introduction of a certain
differential form which is invariantively related to the problem.
Let any
be

form with (2n

differential

we have seen

127) that

its bilinear

independent variables (X, x2

1)

...,

covariant

+ l 2w+l

ddSaS

where a tj denotes the quantity (dXi/dxj


the form.

If

we equate

dXj/dxi), is invariantively related to


to zero the coefficients of Sx 1} Sx2 ..., Bx^^, we
,

obtain the system of (2?i+l) equations

Since the determinant of the quantities a fj is skew-symmetric and of odd


and these equations are therefore mutually compatible.
They are known as the first Pfaff s system of equations corresponding to the

order, it is zero,

differential form

2
r=l

dxr and from the mode of their formation are


,

variantively connected with it


made, the new variables (yl} y2
#2n+i)>

and

if

the differential

that

any change of variables is


..., y m+1 ) being given functions of (ar,, x2
...,
form be changed by this transformation to
;

2
This important theorem was

is

r=l
*

to say, if

in-

first

Yr dy

given by Jacobi, Comptes Rendus,

v. (1837), p. 61.

202

The Transformation- Theory of Dynamics

308

2n+l

and

if

& fl cfa/;

0,

be the

b^dyi

then this system

is

b ii2n+l dyi

F ety

ii

in the

(2n+

of

dxi

now

Consider

= 0,

qn

r,

Ui Z dxi

= 0,

;,

2?i+i

c^i

= 0.

the special differential form

1) variables (g 1} q 2
>

equivalent to the system

2n+l

qn

...,

p lt

...,

pn

t),

where

is

any function

quantities a^, we
Pn,
Pfaff s system of differential equations of this differential

Forming the corresponding

t).

>

>

P\>

find that the first

form

...,

t=i

(ft,

0,

Pfaff s system derived from the differential form

first

^=1

1=1

[OH. xi

is

dp r

dt

;r

(r

dH U = A
-^dt

dq r

= 1,

(r=I,

()

2,

n\

2, ..., n),

dp r
t

~^di

Of these the

last

equation

is

a consequence of the others

and therefore the

system of equations can be written

dqr

dH

dt

dpr

-*

dp r
*

^^

dH

dt

.
/

iv*

IV

7?

dq r

but these are the equations of motion of a dynamical system in which the
It follows that the dynamical system whose
Hamiltonian function is H.
is invariantively connected with the differential
Hamiltoniah function is

form

__

Pidqi

inasmuch as
variables

(x

differential

which

is

+p

the equations of
l

x2

...,

x 2n

T)

dq2

...

+p n dqn

Udt,

motion of the dynamical system, in terms of any


whatever, are

the first

Pfaff s

system of the

form

derived from the form

Pidyi+ptdqt
by the transformation
variables (xlt

x2

from

..., x^,, T).

...

Hdt

+p n dq n

the variables (q lt q2

...,

q n p\,
,

-,pn ,t}

to the

The Hamiltonian function of the transformed equations.

138.

The

309

The Transformation- Theory of Dynamics

137, 138]

result of the last article furnishes another proof of the

theorem that

the equations of dynamics

_ dH

dq r
dt

dp r

conserve the Hamiltonian form under

and moreover

>Pn),

qn>Pi>

K of the system

it

dp,.

dH

dt

dq r

119

contact-transformations of (q l ,q.2 ...,


enables us to find the Hamiltonian function
all

thus obtained,

=
~df
For

(r

~dQ r

~dT~~

dPr

= l,2,...,n).

the contact-transformation be defined by the equations

let

(r

an

-, y~\

-i

an 2
~T~

,,

A>

where (n^

From

...,

dgv

an,
Xj-=

.*.

J_

A, ..., n),

(ral,

2. .... n).

^7*
>

d^

Pr dQ

identically

dq r + ^~r

2 I-

2 Xs 2

dQr }

(-5-^

which

in

<ferH

all

the variables,

are changed)

o
j
^ D j/a
Z
p r dqr = i Jr r d(^r -f

27
p
w

dqr

V"

7/^
Pr dQ
r
7^

/
I

ac

--_

TT 7j
= 2
Hdt

JTIT
4
a
(r + z

Jj

"

a TF
V

HTT

^ ^X
2
s

-_-

The

.-.

d v/

and hence (the symbol d denoting a variation


t,

k}

an*
A,

a^,.

we have

r=l

including

n,, TF) are any functions of the variables (q 1} q

these equations

p.r dq.r

X2 ^

u(/,.

an 2

an,
X;

-T-

.-.

U*%r

(j/j.

=1

perfect differential

does not affect the

dW

&

on the right-hand side can be neglected,


and

Pfaff s system of the differential form


hence the contact-transformation transforms the si/stem of equations

since

it

first

da^ =
to the

ciH

X.

^.

system
~
7~/

dt

where

dpr^_d_H

r\

T\

dP r

K=H

^~"

^^

dt

^
ot

K being supposed expressed in terms of (Q

2 X
x= i
lt

^s /-^

dQ r

Q2

-^
dt

...,

Qn

1}

...,

Pnt

t).

>.

/fr /.

The Transformation- Theory of Dynamics

310

Transformations in which the independent variable

139.

The

the whole set of (2n

1) variables (ql} q2

PI,

Qn>

>

>

qn

...,

p l}

, . .

pn

t)to

new

variables

Pn, T} by which any Hamiltonian system

dqr _
=
~dt
is

changed.

137 also enables us to determine those transformations of

result of

(Qi, Qz,

is

[OH. xi

dH

dp r

dp r

~dt

dH

_
=

~dq^

transformed into a system of the Hamiltonian form

dK
~dT~~dQr

dPr _

dQr _dK

dT~dPr

For

same thing

this is the

which change the

as finding the transformations

form

differential

+p

Pidq-t

where the variables

(q ly q 2

dq.2

...,

p lt

n>

...+ p n dqn

pn

...,

hdt,

are

A)

t,

equation

H(qi,

qt,

>

qn Pi,

t)

"-,pn,

connected by the

0,

into the differential form

dQ

-f

dQ +

where the variables (Q 1} Q 2

+ P n dQ n + kdT +

Qn, PI, PZ,

a perfect differential,

Pn, T,

connected by

k). are

the relation

p lt

But any contact-transformations


...,p n h) to new variables (Q l} Q
,

of the (In
2

Qn

...,

-\-

T,

2) variables (q 1} q2 ..., q n t,
n k) will satisfy
lf
3
...,
,

P P

when

the transformation has been assigned, the function


obtained by substituting in the equation

this condition

q*, ...,

q n ,pi, ...,p n

t
>

is

the values of (q ly q2 ..., q t, p 1} ...,p n h} as functions of (Q lt ..., Qn T,


Pj, ...,
n k), and then solving this equation for k, so that it takes the form
,

n>

K(Q Q
l}

Qn

...,

15

...,

7l

T)

+ k = 0;

the required transformations are thereby completely determined.

New formulation

140.

We

have seen

of the integration-problem.

137) that

dynamical system
dqr

new

which

is

any change of variables

= 3H

dt

the

if

dpr

differential equations will be the


derived from

Pidq!

by the transformation.

+p

dq2 +

==
~

...

made

in the

_dH

dt

dp r

is

dq r
first

+ pn dqn

Pfaff s system of the form

Hdt

The Transformation- Theory of Dynamics

139, 140]

Supposing that a transformation

which
the

becomes

variables,

P,dQ,

dT

where

found, defined by a set of equations

such that the above differential form, when expressed in terms of

is

new

is

311

(Qi, Qz,

the

is

Pn

dQ.

...+

differential

perfect

Qn, PI,

+P

t);

the

Pn dQn - dT,
some function of the

of

corresponding

first

Pfaff s

variables

of

system

is

equations

dQr = 0,

dPr =

(r-

1, 2, .... n),

and the integrals of these equations are

Qr =

P = Constant

Constant,

(r

1, 2,

n)

so the equations
qr=<l>r(Qi>Q...,Q n

,P

...,Pn,t}}\
l

constitute the solution


of the

Qn, PI,

Pn

dynamical system, when the quantities (Q 1; Q 2


are regarded as 2n arbitrary constants
of integration.

...,

The integration-problem is thus reduced to the determination


of a trans
formation for which the last term of the differential form becomes a perfect
differential.

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
1.

Shew that the transformation denned by the equations

= arctan

- arctan

P =\ arctan %L
2

a contact-transformation, and that it reduces the


dynamical system whose Hamiltonian
z
z
2
z
function is ^(pi 2
to the
z + \~ qi +\whose Hamiltonian
i
is

+p

function
2.

is

Qz

If (# 1?

!i

q.

dynamical system

x2

..., x.2n )

denote any functions of (q lt

-,

? n Pi,
>

./>),

an d

if

moreover a mn denotes dXml dxn - d nfixm D denotes the determinant formed of the
quantities amn A ik denotes the minor of a ik in D, divided by D, and u and v denote
arbitrary functions of the variables, shew that
if

8v

CU

The Transformation- Theory of Dynamics

312

Shew that

3.

for

any Hamiltonian system the


f

j j ...J8q

and

lff...J8Q

8q 2 ...8q n 8p l ...8p n

8Q2

...8Qn 8P l ...8P n

4.

xi

integral -invariants

extended over corresponding domains, are equal if (qi, q 2 ..., q n


are connected by a contact-transformation.
Qn, A;
(Qit
$2>

[OH.

Pi>

Pn) and

P")

Prove that the contact-transformation denned by the equations

= Xj

"(24k)

cos ^i + X2~

(2^2)

cos

Ai

= -X!~4 (2i)4 cos P +\ ~^ (2$a)"oosP|,


l

=
changes the system
dq_r
o?

dpr =

= dH_

_<W

dt

9pr

dq r

where
into the system

dQr _dK
dt~dP~r

dPr _
>

tt

dt~~dQr

where

JT-X^+X^,.
the original system.
Integrate this system, and hence integrate

(r=1

2)

CHAPTER

XII

PROPERTIES OF THE INTEGRALS OF DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS


Reduction of the order of a Hamiltonian system by use of the integral

141.

of energy.

We

have shewn in
42 how the Lagrangian equations of motion of a
conservative holoiiomic system can be reduced in order by use of the integral
of energy of the system.
shall require the corresponding theorem for

We

the equations of motion in their Hamiltonian form

this

may be

obtained as

follows.

Consider a dynamical system with n degrees of freedom for which the


Hamiltonian function
does not involve the time explicitly, so that

H+h=0,
where A

is

a constant,

is

the integral of energy of the system.

Let this equation be solved

The

differential

where the variables


equation
p.2 dq 2

+p

so that it can be written

+ p^dq. +
2

...+ p n dqn

is

hdt,

(qlt q2 ..., q
PI, p. ..., p n h, t) are connected by the
the differential form can therefore be written

dq 3 +

...

where we can regard

But the

p lt

form associated with the system


Pidq^

last

the variable

for

n>

2>

+p n dq n + hdt- K (p p
2

(q

1}

...,

qn p.2
,

..,

pn

...,

h, t)

pn

dqi

d
dq l

dp r

= d^K
dh

dp r = dK
d~ ~i
r
dq

q,, ...,

as the

differential equations corresponding to this

dqr dK
-r~ = ^

q n h) dq lt

(2n+

form are

1) variables.
(

(r=2,

137)
3, ...,

ri),

dq

dk_
~
dq l

The last pair of equations can be separated from the rest of the system,
since the first
2) equations do not involve t, and h is a constant.
(2>i

314

Properties of the Integrals of

The original

[CH.

xu

can therefore be replaced by the reduced

differential equations

system

dqr_dK
7

dq
which has only (n
This result

is

~\

dK

dp r
dq

dp r

">

"

/)

dq r

of freedom.

1) degrees

equivalent to that obtained in

42, as can be

shewn by

direct transformation.

Example.

Consider the system


dt

a being a constant

which

dt

~dp r

where

dqr

these are easily seen to be the equations of motion of a particle

attracted to a fixed point with a force varying as the inverse cube of the distance
and q 1 are respectively the radius vector and vectorial angle of the particle referred to
the centre of force.
is

<?2

Writing

H=

h,

and applying the theorem given above, the equations reduce

system
dq<2_dK
~~

dp.2

dq l

dqi

dp 2

to the

dK

dq 2

where

K=

Since
does not involve q lt the equation
Constant
system, and we can therefore perform the same process again

is
:

an integral of this last


- k, we have

writing

and the system reduces to the single equation

ddL

the integral of which (supposing

If follows from

equations

This

Hamilton s partial

is

is

the equation, in polar coordinates, of the orbit

differential equation.

138 that

if

a contact-transformation defined by the

Pp = dW

Pr

-dQ r

where

-- *

q./

/u<

where e is an arbitrary constant.


described by the particle.
142.

ok

dq z

^~r

~T

= dW
Tqr

denotes a given function of (q 1}

q.2 ,

(r- 1,2,
...,

qn

Qlt Q

...,

...,),

Qn

t),

performed on the variables of a dynamical system defined by the equations

dqr_m
dt~

dpr

dpr __dH
~dt

dqr

is

315

Dynamical Systems

141, 142]
the resulting system

is

dQr = dK
dP r
dt

dK
-dQ r

dPr =
>

~di

K=H + dW/dt.

where
If the function

is zero,

the system will be said to be transformed into


is a
will be zero, provided
the function

Now

the equilibrium-problem.
function such that
*\

ft
i.e.

variables (5^
provided TF, considered as a function of the
the partial differential equation

^2,

,
<?n>

0>

satisfies

dW
^t+ H( qi

dW

dW dW
q2 ,...,

qn

,^,

^-,...,

\
=

-,*J
?

associated with the


partial differential equation
in 1834*, being the
Hamilton
was
published by
given dynamical system.
extension to dynamics of the partial differential equation which he had

This

called

is

Hamilton

It

discovered ten years previously in connexion with optics.


solution con

i.e. a
Suppose that a complete integral of this equation,
is known.
additive
to
the
in
addition
constant,
constants
n
arbitrary
taining
Let (a,, 2 ..., w ) be these arbitrary constants, so that the solution can be
written
i,
8
0; and perform on the original
(q ly qz ..., q n
dynamical system the contact-transformation from the variables (q ly qz ...,q n
"

"

<*

>

Pi,...,

pn )

to variables (a x a2
,

Since

new system

so that

(a,,

. .

a n fr
,

&,

),

defined by the equations

Hamilton s equation, the Hamiltonian function of the


and consequently the equations of the system are

satisfies
is zero,

...,

an

/8i, ..., y3 M )

are constant throughout the motion.

It

follows that if
denotes a complete integral of Hamilton s partial differential
equation, containing n arbitrary constants (a 1} a2 ..., y n ), then the equations
,

dW
^ = -^
r

*>

= dW
Wr

^=1

W
>

dynamical problem, since they express the variables


in terms of t and 2n arbitrary constants (a lt o2 ..., ctn

constitute the solution of the


>

(<7i></2>

cLn,p\,

"-,pn)

Phil. Trans. 1834, p. 247; ibid. 1835, p. 95.

316
&,

Properties of the Integrals of


.

/3 M )*.

.
,

of freedom

is

In this

made

equation of the
It

way the

to

first

depend

[CH.

xn

solution of any dynamical system with n degrees


on the solution of a single partial differential

order in (n 4-1) independent variables.

should however be observed that the converse of this theorem

namely the theorem

that the solution of a partial differential equation such as Hamilton s depends on the
solution of a set of ordinary differential equations (the differential equations of the
characteristics), which in this case are of the Hamiltouian form, had been discovered by
Pfaff and Cauchy (completing the earlier work of Lagrange and Monge) before Hamilton
and Jacobi approached the subject from the dynamical side.
On the use that can be made of an incomplete integral of Hamilton s partial differential
equation (i.e. one containing less than n arbitrary constants besides the additive constant),
cf.

Lehmann-Filhes, Astr. Nach. CLXV. (1904),


It

may

be rioted that Hamilton

stands to non-holonomic systems

col.

209.

s partial differential

equation

is

an extension to such systems,

for

not applicable as
cf.

it

Quanjel, Palermo

Rendiconti, xxn. (1906), p. 263.

The integration of Hamilton s equation by separation of variables is discussed


F. A. Ball Acqua, Math. Aftn. LXVI. (1908), p. 398.

by

Consider the system

Example.

dq

_3H

dp ~
=

"

dt

_3H

dt

dp

~dq

where
IT
jf=fc>-,
g

and

is

fj.

The Hamilton s equation corresponding

a constant.

a complete integral of this equation

to this system is

may

be found in the following way.

Assume

W-fW+tte),
where / and

are functions of their respective arguments

0=/

(0

2
H4>

(2)}

then we have

-F/?-

This equation can be satisfied by writing

where

a is a constant

which gives

/ (0 = 1*1 a,

(?)

- (2,ia)* arcsin (gr/a)* + {^q (a - ?)/a}*


arcsin
+ {fyq (a - ?)/a}*.

TF= fMt/a + (2/xa)*

(g/a)*

solution of the original problem is therefore given by the equations /3=


=
d
p
Wfdq, where a and /3 are the two constants of integration.

The

143.

Hamilton s integral as a

solution of

Hamilton s partial

differential

equation.

There are an

infinite

differential equation
*

This theorem

pp. 60, 161.

is

of complete integrals of Hamilton s partial


each one of them furnishes a contact-transformation

number

and

due to Jacobi, Crelle

J.

xxvu. (1837),

p.

97 and Liouviltfs J. in. (1837),

317

Dynamical Systems

142, 143]

from the variables (q^, q2 ...,q n ,p 1 ...,p n ) of the dynamical system to


variables (j, or 2 .., n @ lt ..., /3 n ), (the transformation involving t}, such
that the equations of motion of the system when expressed in terms of
,

(oij,

-,

>

n>

fii,

-,

the quantities (a l

i.e.

/3 W )
,

become the equations of the equilibrium-problem,

0%, ...,

an

..., /3 n )

fti,

are constants.

number of transformations there^is one of special


in
which the quantities (a l a2 ..., a n /3 X ..., /3 n ) are
that
interest; namely
the initial values of (q 1} q z ..., q n p lt ..., p n ) respectively, i.e. their values at
this infinite

Among

taken as an epoch from which the motion is estimated. In


this case we can find in an explicit form the corresponding complete integral

a time

of

which

Hamilton

is

partial differential equation.

For consider Hamilton

integral

(99)
Ldt,

where

L denotes

the kinetic potential of the system.


Suppose that & denotes
S
small
8a
a variation due to
2
...,
n Sfti, ..., 8/3 n ) in the initial
changes (S^,
,

conditions.

Then

99)

we have

Ldt= I (p r 8q,.-l3 r S

B [

r=l

Jtv

ft

It follows that if the quantity

Ldt,

when the

integration

is

performed,

be expressed in terms of (q l} q2 ...,qn a ly ...,a n t), (we suppose this possible,


i.e. we assume that it is not
possible to eliminate (/3 1 /3 2 ..., /3n p ly ... p n )
from the relations connecting ( 1} ..., an ^, ..., fi n q ly ..., qn p l} ...,p n ), so
,

between (q1} ..., qn a lt ..., a n )) and if the function thus


obtained (which Hamilton called the Principal Function) be denoted by
W(q l} q 2 ..., q n a 1; ..., a n t), then we shall have

as to obtain relations

^__

9JF_
and therefore*

the transformation

(q lt q 2
ifs

...,

q n PI,
,

from

pn )

to

(a jt a 2

...,

an

{3 lt ..., /9 n )

a contact-transformation, and the integral of the kinetic potential

is the

determining function of the transformation.


*

Hamilton. Phil. Trans. 1834, p. 307 ibid. 1835, p. 95. In his earliest dynamical investiga
Hamilton used a "characteristic function" strictly analogous to the characteristic function
;

tions,

which he had employed with such success in optics this function being the Action integral,
expressed in terms of the final and initial coordinates. He found however that this function,
when employed in dynamics, involved the constant of energy, and so substituted for it the
"principal function" described above.
:

Properties of the Integrals of

318
Also

[CH.

xn

we have

dW = dW
dt

LT =

or

I frWdqr

r= i dq r dt

dt

V r r
+ 2,
p q
=i

ot

or
OL

and therefore

the integral of the kinetic potential satisfies the equation

dW
M
which

is

Hamilton

Example.
(qi, ?2,

Let

?M

partial differential equation.

(a l5

Pi,

-,

a2

...,

an

ft,

dq,.

from

the

dpJ1==

relations

values (at time

_dH

dt

dpr

initial

(r

connecting

(aj,

a2

let

denote Hamilton

= l,

ft,

On,

...,

is

and

of

2, ..., w).

dqr

possible to eliminate (ft, ft, ..., ft,


-, ?n, Pi,
P)
2,
(?i,
that a number (say m) of distinct relations exist between (q lt q 2
these be solved for (a ls a 2 , ..., a,), so as to take the form
ifc

fo)

dynamical system represented by the

in the

= cH

dt

be the

ft ( )

...,

Pn) respectively,

equations

Suppose that

dW

dW

jo n
...,

...,

ft) with

...,pn) entirely, so
..., a n ) ; let

q n a l5
,

s integral

Ft

I
for the

system, expressed in terms of

(q^,

qz

qn

...,

o?n + i,

Establish the

<*n)-

equations

Pr =

where

(Xi,

X2 ,

...,

X m ) are arbitrary

9F
--

5
da
r

^ A*
fc=1

B/^
o

9a r

and shew that the function

W=V+

2 X t /t
fc=i

is

an integral of the partial

144.

TAe

connexion

differential equation

of integrals

urith

transformations

infinitesimal

admitted by the system.

Let

r
dq
-

= dH-

dp r =
;

- dH
x

(r

..

1, 2, ... ,

n)

319

Dynamical Systems

143, 144]

be the equations of any dynamical system, and


0(?i,

921

q n Pi, -~,pn,
,

denote any integral of the system

we

<)

let

= Constant

shew that the knowledge of

shall

this

integral enables us to find a particular solution of the variational equations


(

H2).

For the variational equation


d
-T7

dt

oq r

= d*H
.

,.

o<fr

j.*

for 8q r is

&H

_
J

o<?

&H

djjj
*

j.

j."

j.

...

+~

&H
-

j.

j.

*"

6 n

j.~ *

but we have
8 2 zz

9 2 /i

80

dq n dp,- dp n

dqidp r dpi
3,

A;=I

ct0
9/>r

"

dp k 80
rfi

9p

80

dpidp r

dq^

ftli

fc

ct

80 \

d^ V8p r /

dt

-/z

80

3p n dp r dq n

fc=i

S^A;/

rf<

82

^ ?)H

80 \

dqjc

",

90\
9^/

8 2 /z

80

9?* 9pt9p r

dJJ

k=idpk dqkdpr

90\

\dp r )

1 f?^

d V8pr/

and hence the variational equations

for (Sq 1} Bq2

...,

8qn ) are satisfied by the

values

where

e is

a small constant.

Similarly the variational equations for


(Spi,

Sp 2)

...,

8p B )

can be shewn to be satisfied by these values

e is

a small constant and

is

and hence

the equations

an integral of the original equations,

constitute a solution of the variational equations.

This result can evidently be stated in the form The infinitesimal contacttransformation of the variables (q^ q 3 ..., qn p lt ...,p n ), which is defined
by
the equations
:

transforms any orbit into an adjacent orbit, and therefore transforms the
whole family of orbits into itself. Adopting the
language of the grouptheory, we say that the dynamical system admits this infinitesimal contacttransformation. We have therefore the theorem that
a
integrals

of

dynamical

320

Properties of the Integrals of

and contact-transformations which change


substantially the same thing; any integral
system,

&,

4>(qi>

"-,

q n Pi,
,

",

Pn,

[CH.

xn

the system into itself, are

Constant

corresponds to an infinitesimal transformation whose symbol


Poisson-bracket (
f ).

the

is

133)

(f>,

It will be observed that the ignoration of coordinates arises from the particular
case of this theorem in which the integral is p,. = Constant, where q r is the ignorable
coordinate the corresponding transformation is that which changes q r without changing
;

of the other variables.

any

Poisson

145.

s theorem.

The last result leads to a theorem discovered by Poisson* in 1809, by


means of which it is possible to construct from two known integrals of a
dynamical system a third expression which is constant along any trajectory of
the system, and which therefore (when it proves to be independent of the
integrals already

known) furnishes a new

Let

0(?i

and

-\Jr

?2,

(q-i,

</

>

...,

q n P\,
,

integral of the system.


,

Pn,

t)

q n PI, --^Pn,
,

Constant

= Constant

denote the two integrals which are supposed known. Consider the in
contact-transformation whose symbol is the Poisson-bracket

finitesimal
(/,

-v/r)

since ty

adjacent

is

an integral, this

144) transforms every orbit into an

orbit.

The increment

of the function

under this transformation

<

is e
(</>,

-v/r),

has constant values


is an integral,
where e is a small constant; but since
-v/r)
along the original orbit and along the adjacent orbit: the value of
must therefore be constant throughout the motion. We thus have Poisson s
<

<f>

(</>,

and ty are two integrals of the system, the Poisson-bracket


constant throughout the motion.

theorem, that if
is
-v^)

(<f),

If

A/T),

(<,

(f>

which

is

a function of the variables (q lt q 2

...,

qn

} ,

...,

pn

t),

does not reduce to merely zero or a constant, and if moreover it is not


^r and such other integrals as are already known,
expressible in terms of
(/>,

then the equation


(</>,

constitutes

The

how Poisson s theorem can be applied


when two integrals are already known.

Mec. Anal. (1853)

the extension of Poisson

cf.

to obtain

new

p. 260.

given by Bertrand in Note VII to the third edition of


Oeuvres de Lagrange, t. xi. p. 484.

discussion of this theorem

Lagrange

On

Constant

following example will shew

Journal de VEcole polyt. vin. (1809),

a new integral of the system^.

integrals of a dynamical system

-^r)

is

theorem

to

Soc. math, de France, xxxvn. (1909), p. 120.

non-holonomic systems,

cf.

Dautheville, Bull, de la

321

Dynamical Systems

144-146]

Consider the motion of a particle of unit mass, whose rectangular coordinates are
?2, &) and whose components of velocity are (p l p.2 , p 3 ), which is free to move
in space under the influence of a centre of force at the
The integrals of angular
origin.
momentum about two of the axes are
(?!>

ps ?2

- 5 3j2 = Constant,
r

i~

and

\% = Constant.

Let these be taken as the two known integrals


which is

and

\^

</>

the Poisson-bracket

(<,

\//-),

r=l

becomes in this case

PWi-fcft!
and

in fact, the equation


i

is

= Constant

another integral of the motion, being the integral of angular

momentum

about the

third axis.

The constancy of Lagrange

146.

The theorem

s bracket-expressions.

of Poisson has, as

might be expected, an analogue

in the

theory of Lagrange s bracket-expressions.

u r = 0r

Let

(r=l,

2, ...,

2n)

denote 2n integrals of a dynamical system with n


degrees of freedom, con
stituting the complete solution of the problem: the quantities u r being given
functions of the variables (q lt q2 ..., q n p lt
...,p n t], and the quantities ar
,

being arbitrary constants.


(<fc,

q2

...,

Lagrange

as

q n ,pi, --^Pn)

By means
functions

bracket-expressions [ar
quantities (a 1} a 2 ..., am ).

of these equations we can


express
of (a 1; az ... a2n t), and form the
,

a,],

where a r and a s are any two of the

Since the transformation from the variables


(q 1} q 2 ..., q n p 1} ...,p n ) at
t to their values at time t+ dt is a
contact-transformation, we have (128)
,

time

d
at r= i

where the symbols

and

B refer to

independent displacements from one

If now we take the


trajectory to an adjacent trajectory.
symbol
to a variation in which a t
is
the rest of the quantities
varied,
only

(a lt a2

...,

to refer

a 2n )

.remaining unchanged, and take 8 to refer to a variation in which a} only


varied, the last equation becomes

d 3 /dq r dp r
dt r= i\daidaj
w. D.

dqr dp r \

dajdaj
21

is

322

Properties of the Integrals of

or
-^

[a {

=
,

[on.

xn

0,

cij]

which shews that the Lagrange-bracket [a;, a,-] has a constant value during the
motion along any trajectory; this theorem was given by Lagrange in 1808.

Lagrange
integrals

Lagrange
147.

s result,

unlike Poisson

we have

for

know

to

all

does not enable us to find any new


the integrals before we can form the

s,

bracket-expressions.

Involution-systems.

Let (u l} u2

...,

u r } denote r functions of 2n independent variables


(?l, ?2,

if it is possible

q n ,Pi,

,Pn)\

to express all the Poisson-brackets

(iii,

(wj.Mg, ...,u r ), the functions (u lt u2 ...,ur ) are said to form


Any function of (u lt u.2 ..., u r ) belongs to this group.
,

uk )
a,

as functions of

function-group*.

If the quantities (uit n^} are all zero, the functions (u 1} u 2


to be in involution, or to form

Now
v

...,

u r } are said

suppose that (i/ u 2 ...,w,-) are functions in involution: and let


and w =
be any two equations which are consequences of the
>

equations

we

an involution-system.

shall

shew that

For since (u lt

and

u.2 , ...,

u^

= 0,

satisfy the relation (v,

M2

= 0,

ur

w)

= 0.

u r ) are in involution, each of the equations


M,

0,

u2

0,

ur

admits each of the r infinitesimal transformations whose symbols are


(

"

I,/), (W 2 ,/),

(Mr,/)5

and consequently the equation v = 0, being a consequence of these equations,


must also admit these transformations that is to say, we have
;

)=0

("*,

(k

l, 2, ...,*),

and therefore each of the equations


ii!

= 0,

u2

0,

ur

admits the infinitesimal transformation whose symbol


equation

equation

w=
w=

is

(v,f).

Since the

a consequence of these equations, it follows that the


must also admit this transformation, and therefore we have
is

(v, iv}

which establishes the

= 0,

result.
*

Lie, Math. Ann.

vm.

(1875). p. 215.

323

Dynamical Systems

146-148]
Hence we

see that if(u 1} uy


v

u r ) are in involution, and the equations

...,

= 0,

v.2

0,

vr

ur

= 0,

are consequences of the equations


M,

then the functions (v lt v2

u2 =

0,

0,

v r ) are in involution.

...,

when half

Solution of a dynamical problem

148.

known.

the integrals are

for systems with two degrees of freedom


to
extended
121 can now be
in
systems with any number of degrees of
stated * If n distinct integrals
thus
The theorem may be
freedom.

The

which was established

result

<f>r(qi,q*.

where (a 1} a 2

...,

>~,p

t)=a r

(r=l,

2, ..., n),

a n ) are arbitrary constants, are known for the dynamical

system

dq r
~TT

dt

q n ,Pi,

>

= dH
^

dp,._
~
IT
dt

>

Opr

~~

dH

"-5

"
>

dq r

and if the
>Pn,t),
.,q n
any given function of (q 1; q.2
are in involution, then on solving these integrals for
functions (^,02,
as
them in the form
so
to
obtain
ipn)
(p\,lh,
where

is

,pi>

>

<f>n)

Pr=fr(qi,

and

substituting (/i,/2

-.

q-

n>

...,/n) respectively

p dq
l

+p

the latter expression becomes

dV(q lt

dqt

q^

...,

for (p

i,

a2

On,

,p.2

(r

= l,

2, ...,

n)

...,pn) in the expression

Hdt,

differential

qn

+p n dq n

...

a perfect

^2,

...,

denoting

an

it

by

t),

remaining integrals of the system are

the

=6,

^
oa
r

where

(b l} 6 2

>

follows

<f)i-a lt

a.2 ,

...,

are in involution,

<

Pifi, p^-f*,

=0

(r, S

|i-M=0
dq
dq

or

it

>

fn are

pn

and therefore
(Pr ~fr, PS ~fs)

This theorem

well-knosvn

2, ...,n),

<f>.

last article that the functions

by the

= l,

b n ) are arbitrary constants.

For since the functions


in involution,

(r

method

of the first order.

is

1, 2,

n\

(r,-l,2,...,n>

essentially the application to

Hamilton

partial differential equation of the

Complete Integral of a non-linear partial differential equation


As a dynamical theorem it is due to Liouville, Journal de Math. xx. (1855),

for finding a

p. 137.

212

324

Properties of the Integrals of

xn

[CH.

dH _ dp r _ dfr
dt

dq r

dt

= dA + |

M^i

s-i dq s dt

dt

= dfr + | df.dH^
dt
s =i

tyr dp s

and consequently

= _d_H _ I dHdf^

dfr
dt

dq r

=idp s dq r

_dH,
dq r

where H^ stands

H when expressed in terms of the arguments

for the function


(?1,

?2

?n,

i,

ni 0-

>

The equations

_
dqr

shew that
is

/i

rfg-j

dt

dq s

+/ dq
2

...

dq r

+f

H^dt

n dqn

the perfect differential of some function V (q lt


first part of the theorem.

q^, ...,

qn

0,1,

an

t)

which establishes the


If

now

d V =f dq
l

+/ dq +
2

...

W da

+fn dq n - H^dt +*2 r

r.

In this equation replace the quantities a r by their values


obtain an identity in (q l} q2 ..., q n PI, p%,
,p n i), namely
,

dV

dV- 2 ^

d(f) r

=p

dq

cf) r

we thus

+p

dq 2 +

...

+p n dq n -

where on the left-hand side of the equation we suppose that in

dV
x

V with

the symbol d denote the total differential of the function


we have therefore

respect to all its arguments,

the quantities (a ly a z

...,

a n ) are replaced by their values

(<>!,

dV

and

...,

0n).

</>

\) \AJ-f

This equation shews that the differential form


Pidqi

when expressed

+p

dq^+

...

+ p n dqn

in terms of the variables

Hdt,

(q l}

q.

2>

...,

qn

,
<}>i,

<f>z,

0n,

t),

takes the form

and hence the

differential equations of the original dynamical


to
the
first Pfaff s
equivalent
system of this differential form,

(d

=
V/da r )

0,

d(f>

(r

problem are

namely

1, 2,

. .

n).

325

Dynamical Systems

148, 149]

The expressions dV/dar are therefore constant throughout the motion,


the equations
dV/da r
where

br

(r=l,

i.e.

2, ..., n),

new

(b lt
arbitrary constants, are integrals of the system
this completes the proof of the theorem.
b2

...

b n ) are

Example. In the motion of a body under no forces with one point fixed, let ($, $,
denote the three Eulerian angles which specify the position of the body relative to any
fixed axes
at the fixed point, (.4, J5, (7) the principal moments of inertia of the
body at the fixed point, a the constant of energy, a t the angular momentum about
-v|/-)

OXYZ

the fixed axis OZ, and a 2 the angular

and

plane:

let

(# n

l5

momentum about

denote 37730,

^)

dT/d<j>,

the normal to the invariable

dT/d^

respectively.

the

Obtain

equations
Q

=arctan

{(

2
i

- #i 2 ) /a i}

Hence shew that

9d
is

the perfect differential of a function

F,

and that the remaining

integrals of the

system are

oV
9^~
where

6,

37

97

^"*

a^T

"*

&i, 6 2 are arbitrary constants.

(Siacci.)

Levi-Civita s theorem.

149.

Levi-Civita* has established a connexion between the integrals of a


dynamical system and certain families of particular solutions of the equations
of motion.

Consider

Let

q
coordinates
2

(<?!,

The

a system in which some of the coordinates are ignorable.


the non-ignorable
-, q n )
m
q ) be the ignorable and (q m +i,
and let L denote the kinetic potential.
first

...,

integrals corresponding to the ignorable coordinates are

dL/dq r

Constant

(r=l,

2, ..., ra),

and corresponding to these integrals there exists a class of particular solutions


of the system, namely those steady motions ( 83) in which (q l} q 2 ..., q m )
have constant values which can be chosen arbitrarily, while (q m
qm+z,
qn)
have constant values which are determined by the equations
,

+i>

dLjdq r
there are

oo

2in

=0

(?

=m +

of these particular solutions, since the

* Bend, dell Ace. del

Lined,

x. (1901), p. 3.

1,

m + 2,

. . .

n);

constant values of

Cf. Burgatti, ibid. xi. (1902), p. 309.

Properties of the Integrals of

326

xn

[CH.

q m ) can be arbitrarily
The theorem of Levi-Civita, to the consideration of which we
assigned.
shall now proceed, may be regarded as an extension of this result.
(q lt

...,

q m ) and the

values of

initial

dH

dq r

dH

dp r

l = ay/

Let

(qi, q-2

*"-3

-%*.

be the equations of motion of a dynamical system, the function


supposed not to involve the time explicitly.

Let

F (q ,qt,...,q n ,p ,...,pn = Q
of m relations, which when solved
r

be a system
the form

Pr=fr(qi,

q*,

(r

q n ,p m +i,

>

Pn)

for

(r

(p 1} p

= 1,

H being

m)

1, 2, ...,
2

.)

...(A)

...,p m )

2, ...,

take

m)...(A

1 ),

and which are invariant relations with respect to the Hamiltonian system,
i.e. which are such that if we differentiate the relations (Aj) with respect
to t, we obtain relations which are satisfied identically in virtue of the
These
equations and of the equations (Aj) themselves.
of
as
a
the
invariant relations include,
particular case, integrals
system
in this case, they will involve arbitrary constants.
Hamiltonian

Since the relations (A x ) are invariant relations, we have

_
dH_df
- ~T7r--$
*
o
dt

dqr

dfrdH
~
5

j= m +\opjoqj

| dfr
*
-5

dH
V

*>

*
>

"^^

j-\oqjOp)

and writing

Tf}=

(F,

S
/-*-

becomes

this

this

equation

(Pi,p2>

Moreover,

among

an identity when for each of the


substitute the corresponding function r

becomes

,pm) we

we

suppose that the relations (A) or (Aj) are in involution


This condition is expressed by the equations

shall

themselves.

!;-!
Let

by

i*"-

c--- 1.2,

K denote the function obtained from H on replacing

their values (/i,/2

...,.).

..(2).

(p 1}

...,

jo 2 ,

pm )

...,/m ), so that

3F = 8^_

and

quantities

dp r

~dp

5T

"a

8/7

.~idp,d

--- ^

^~

(r

1, 2, ...

m)

...(4).

Dynamical Systems

149J

From

(3)

we have
[H, fr \

and combining

f)ff

[K,

fr}+^~
!/, /.}
*=i wf*

now shew

shall

+ {H,fr

},

pm+2

Pm+i,

pn

q lt

d fdK\
and

d fdE\

dt(ty,J

dt(dq r )

.,

?)

(r

i.e.

have from the Hamiltonian


equations

_
(BK\ ~

/7/
57T I
dt
\oq r /
I

and

(5) gives

f
"

1
(

dq r )

-^ ^
^T
g=l oq r dq

on differentiation,
using (B),

=
5T"

>/*f

now taking account

of (B),

we have from

(3)

___

-__
9?r

and hence equations


dt

dp

(6)

(2),

*=i9p, dq

become

dps ldpr dqs

i^r^
.r, dp. ldq r dqs

dpr

>

= 1,

that

(r=m + l,m

are zero in virtue of


equations (A), (B), (1), (2), (3), (4), (5).

1, 2,

and using

invariant with respect to the Hamiltonian


equations,

We

m),

we obtain

that the system of equations

Pr =fr

is

(r

with (4) we have

this

Substituting in (1) this value ofdH/dq r


the equations

We

327

2,

. . .

Properties of the Integrals of

[CH.

xn

or by (7),

dK\

d /dK\

.
= 0,

jrU

which proves that the system of equations (A) and (B)


respect to the Hamiltonian equations.

Now

from the equations (A) and (B),

let

invariant with

the variables

,pn, q m +i,

(PI, Pa,

is

qn )

be determined in terms of (qlt qz ..., qm ): from the invariant character of


(A) and (B) it follows that on substituting these values in the Hamiltonian
,

independent equations, namely those which


express (dqjdt, dq 2 /dt, ..., dqm /dt) in terms of (q lt q z ...,qm), the others being
and the general solution of this system, which will
identically satisfied

we

equations,

obtain

shall

oo m particular solutions of the


arbitrary constants, will give
Hamiltonian equations. The solution of this system can, by making use
of the integral of energy, be reduced to that of a system of order (m
1)

contain

and thus we obtain Levi-Civita s theorem, which can be thus stated To any
set of TO invariant relations of a Hamiltonian system, which are in involution,
m
there corresponds a family of oo
particular solutions of the Hamiltonian
:

system, whose determination depends on the integration of a system of order

(m -

1).

If the invariant relations (A) are integrals of the system, they will contain

integrals of a
arbitrary constants and hence to a set of
Hamiltonian system, which are in involution, there corresponds in general
a family of oo 2m particular solutions of the system, which are obtained by

another set of

integrating a system of order


Example.

(m

1).

For the dynamical system defined by the Hamiltonian function

H= qi pi - q p
2

- aqi 2 + bq^,

shew that the Levi-Civita particular solutions corresponding to the integral


~
= Constant
(Pi

bqz)lq\

are given by the equations


2i

where

150.

We

is

= 0,

qz

= e~ t+f

Pl

= ae~ t+e

p,

= be~ t+e

an arbitrary constant.

Systems which possess integrals linear in the momenta.


shall

now proceed

to the consideration

of systems

which possess

integrals of certain special kinds.

Suppose that a dynamical system, expressed by the equations


dqr

_dH

~df-dp r

dpr

dt~

dH
dqr

.!,*.....>

329

Dynamical Systems

149, 150]
has an integral which

is

fipi

where (fi,f2

+f

p n ),

...,

say

+fnp n = Constant,

p<t

..,/) are given functions of (qi,q2

and homogeneous in (p 1} p2

linear

...,qn).

Consider the system of equations


dq\

_ dq n

_dq*_
=

7T~7

which
its

is

of order

(??

"/.

!); suppose that the (n

Qr (qi,
and

let

q?,

qn )= Constant

which constitute

(r=l,

2, ...,

1);

be a function defined by the equation

Qn

where in the integrand the variables


by their values in terms of (q lt Q 1}
is

1) integrals

solution are

(q2

Q2

q3

...,

...,

q n ) are supposed replaced


before the integration

Qn-i)

carried out.

Then

if

the variables change in such a way that (Qx Q 2 ...,


varies, it follows from the above equation that
,

Q M _j) remain

constant and Q n

_ dqn _ j n

dqi_d<h_

f
/i
so that if (Q 1}

which

((?!,

q2

...,

**

*<ln

>

Jn

/2

Q n ) are regarded as a set of new variables in terms of


can
be expressed, we shall have
qn )
...,

Suppose then that we consider the contact-transformation which


extension of the point-transformation from the variables (q 1} q 2
variables (Q lt Q2
-,
2
Qn), so that the new variables (P l}
,

defined

the

qn ) to the
n ) are

...,

132) by the equations

Pr =

i^|f
O^r

(r

*=1

By

..,,
,

is

this transformation the differential equations of the


new set of Hamiltonian equations

= l,

2, ...,n).

dynamical system

are changed into a

dP r _J>K

dQr_
dt

dPr

dt

bQ r

and the known integral becomes

Pn = Constant.
Since

dPn /dt = 0, we

n explicitly

have dK/BQ n

and thus we obtain the

0, so

the function

result that

K does not involve

when a dynamical system

330

Properties of the Integrals of

possesses an integral which is linear

[CH.

and homogeneous in (p lt p2

..,

p n ),

xn

there

a point-transformation, from the variables (q l} q.2 ..., q n ) to new variables


Qn), which is such that the transformed Hamiltonian function
does not involve Q n
The system as transformed possesses therefore an
exists
(Qi>

Qs>

>

we have the theorem that the only dynamical


which
systems
possess integrals linear in the momenta are those which possess
ignorable coordinates, or which can be transformed by an extended pointtransformation into systems which possess ignorable coordinates.
ignorable

coordinate, and

The converse

of this theorem

is

evidently true.

This result might have been foreseen from the theorem


?2,

-,

144) that

if

= Constant

q n ,Pi, --,Pn,

an integral of the system, then the differential equations of motion admit the
For when is linear and homogeneous
infinitesimal transformation wr hose symbol is
/ ).

is

(<,

(f>

if
in (p l , pi, ..., p n }, this transformation is ($ 132) an extended point-transformation
this point-transformation is transformed by change of variables so as to have the symbol
:

df/3Qn

Qn explicitly.

now

Considering
of a

Hamiltonian function of the equations after transformation

clear that the

it is

cannot involve

kinetic

in particular

energy T(q l} q2

...,

systems whose kinetic potential consists


qn

q l}

...,

q n)

which

quadratic in the

is

q n ) which is
an
we
in
order
that
see
that
of
the
velocities,
integral linear in
independent
the velocities may exist the system must possess an ignorable coordinate,
or must be transformable by a point-transformation into a system which
velocities (q l} q2

...,

and a potential energy

qn )

V(q-i, q 2

But in either case the functions T and


possesses an ignorable coordinate.
evidently admit the same infinitesimal transformation, namely the trans
formation which,

when

the coordinates are so chosen that one of

them

is

the

ignorable coordinate, consists in increasing the ignorable coordinate by a


small quantity and leaving the other coordinates and the velocities unaltered ;
and conversely, if T and
admit the same infinitesimal transformation, then

there exists an integral linear in the velocities.

Levy

This result

is

known

as

theorem, having been published by Levy* in 1878.

Example

1.

Shew that

if

the differential equations of motion of a particle admit an


momentum, the line of action of the force must

integral linear in the components of


belong to a linear complex.
(Cerruti, Collect, math, in
p.

mem. D. Chelini

cf.

P. Grossi,

Palermo Rend. xxiv.

(1907),

25.)

Example

2.

If the equations

<

"

Comptes Rendus, LXXXVI.

(,-!,*...,

2 2 a
T=% i=lk=l

where

ik

qiq k , and where (ft,

Q.2 , ...,

Q n a u a 12
,

...,

a mi ) are given functions

?)) possess an integral of the form

f
(?i>

331

Dynamical Systems

150, 151]

?2>

Cl qi + C2 q 2 + ... + Cn q n + C= Constant,
where (C l C.2 ..., Cn C) are functions of (q 1} q%, ..., qn ), shew that it
one of its positions
displace an invariable system in one direction from any
defined by the form
,

is

possible to

in the space

Sn

i=l k=l

Shew that

for this a necessary

sufficient condition is that the ds 2

and

formed in such a way that one of the variables becomes absent from the

can be trans

coefficients.

and Levy.)

(Cerruti

Determination of the forces acting on a system for which an


integral is known.
151.

Before proceeding to discuss systems which possess integrals quadratic


we shall obtain a result due to Bertrand*, namely that

in the velocities,
in the

motion of a dynamical system of given constitution,

for

which however

the acting forces are unknown (it being supposed that the forces depend
of application, and not on the
solely on the coordinates of their points
discover
the
we
can
unknown forces provided one
of
these
velocities
points),
integral

must

is

Moreover, this integral cannot be chosen at random, but

known.

satisfy certain conditions.

Let (q1} q*,, ..., q n ) be the n independent coordinates of the system, T the
kinetic energy, and (Q 1} Q2 ..., Q n ) the unknown forces, which are supposed
to depend only on (qi,q 2
qn) so the equations of motion are
,

d idT\\
dt \dq r

Let
<(?i>

?2,

be an integral of the system

qn

8T
dT

= Qr
)-^9o,

#1,

>

qn,

(r=l,

2, ..., n).

t)= Constant

on differentiating

it,

we have

Substituting in this equation for (q ly q2 ..., q n ) their values as given by


the equations of motion, we have a relation involving (Q ly Q.2 ..., Q n ) linearly.
,

This relation, as
all

of which

it

contains only the quantities (q lt q2

we can

...,

assign arbitrary independent values,

q n q i9
,

we can therefore differentiate it with respect to (q l} q2


n new equations which, likewise containing (Q1} Q2 ..., Q n )
The
suffice in general to determine these unknown quantities.
,

Journal de Math,

(i)

xvn. (1852), p. 121.

...,

qn

>

t},

to

must be an identity:
..., q n ), and so form
linearly, will

integral will

Properties of the Integrals of

332
relate to

an actual system only when these values of (Q lf

[CH.

...,

Qn )

xn

satisfy

the equation

the cases in which the equations for the determination of (Q Q ..., Qn) are
not independent, so that (Q 1} Q2
Qn) are indeterminate, are those in
which the integral is common to several distinct dynamical problems.
} ,

to

Example. If an integral of the equations of motion of a point


two different problems, shew that it is of the form
F(<fi,

2>

>

x, y,

t}

in a plane is

common

= Constant,

coordinates and $ is the derivate with respect to t of


(x, y) are rectangular
a function $ (x, y) which, equated to a constant, represents the equations of a set

where

of straight lines.

152.

(Bertrand.)

the case

to

Application

in
possess an integral quadratic

whose equations of motion

of a particle
the velocities.

let it be required to find the


application of Bertrand s method,
in
order that the equations of
nature of the potential energy function
motion of a particle which is free to move in a plane under the action of

As an

conservative forces,
M

dv

y~
/it

da;

._

dv

___

dy

may possess an integral (other than the integral of energy) of the form
= Constant,
Ptf + Qxy + Rif + Sy+Tx+

where P,

Q,

R, 8, T,

K are functions of x and

y.

Differentiating the last equation, and substituting


equations of motion, we have

^~
n /..8F
-Q
*
I

^.
y x T~

dxj

dy

dx J

\dy

^-

.8F

.dV\

<fc

for

^
dx

8F ^8F =
dK
dK
+ -^-y-Sj--T^
^-x
r
ox
oes
dy
dy

x and y from the

-Kdy

/A

Equating

to zero the

dx

from which
integral

where

terms of the third degree in x and

dR
- =

dP
=0,

dP
0,

dy

^
dy

.................................... (A).

-_- = 0,
+ dQ
-

ox

dQ + dR =
^
^ox

y,

we have

U,

dy

in the
readily deduced that the terms of the second degree

it is

must have the form


(ay"

by

(a, 6,

c,

c)
,

x 2 + (ax2

+ b x + c } y- + (- 2axy - b y -bx + Cj) xy,

c^ are constants.

333

Dynamical Systems

151, 152]

terms of the second degree in x and y in equation

to zero the

Equating
(A), we have

(jCC

^jOC

C/7/

(J

from these equations we deduce

T = - my +

8 = mx + p,
where (m, p,

q,

q} are constants.

Equating

to zero the

terms independent of x and y in (A), we have

dV,

(mx + p)-

or

97
d

This equation shews that if (m, p, q) are different from zero, the force is
directed to a fixed centre of force, whose coordinates are
p/m and qfm we
shall exclude this simple particular case, and hence it follows that the con
stants (m, p, q) must each be zero, so that the integral contains no terms of
the first degree in x, y.
;

Equating

to zero the

terms linear in x and y in (A), we have

2P

8F
dV
---~

ox

Q
v

+r

oy

dK
-z.

ox

-0w,

Differentiating the former of these equations with respect to y, and the


latter with respect to x,

and equating the two values of

d*K

thus obtained,

we have
-

dxdy

dx dy

and replacing P,

Q,

dy*

dx dy

dxdy

dy dy

by their values as found above, we have

87

dx

Darboux* has shewn that

97
dy

this partial differential equation for the function

can be integrated in the following way.


*

dx

Archives Neerlandaises,

(ii) vi.

p.

371 (1901).

334

Properties of the Integrals of

[CH.

xn

Excluding the particular case in which the constant a is zero, we can


always by change of axes reduce the given integral to the simpler form
2

^ (xy

yx)

+ ex +
2

K = Constant,

which amounts to supposing that

tt

if

moreover we replace

i,

= 0,

d = 0;

= 0,

by ^c the

partial differential equation for

becomes
(y

To

~x +c

integrate this equation,

dV

dV

- 3a?3-0.
+ 3y
y =.

5-31
cxdy

dx

we form the

dy

differential

equation of the

characteristics
2

xy (dy

- dx-) + (x -y - c ) dxdy = 0.
2

2
z
equation we take x and y as new variables,
equation: we thus find that its integral is

If in this

Clairaut

(7?^

+ 1 ) (mx

x2

y-

a2

-c

now

0,

a simple change of notation, we

By

<-

a2

becomes a

denotes the arbitrary constant.


can write this integral in the form

where

me =

it

This form puts in evidence the


curves of the partial differential
interesting fact that the characteristic

where the arbitrary constant

is

a.

equation are two families of confocal conies.

Taking then as new variables a and


ellipses and hyperbolas, so that
* = ?,

the parameters of the confocal

y^^-c^^-F)}*,
C

it is

/3

known from the general theory

that the partial differential equation will

take the form


d

da.
oaofi
d/3

where

variables

B aree

and

we

+ B^ =
A^
da
"

functions of a and

y3

in fact,

0,

on performing the change of

find

which can be immediately integrated, giving

are arbitrary functions of their arguments. It follows that the


the
motion of a particle in a plane, under the action of conservative
cases
only
of

where /and

<

335

Dynamical Systems

152, 153]

which possess an integral quadratic in the velocities other than the


integral of energy, are those for which the potential energy has the form

forces,

/(a)

- $ (0)

-?T05-.
where

a.

and

/3

are the parameters of confocal ellipses and hyperbolas.

Since by differentiation

the kinetic energy

we have

is

T= A (V - P)
#
2

and an inspection of the forms of T and F shews that these problems are
of
Liouvilles class ( 43), and are therefore integrable by quadratures.
153.

General dynamical systems possessing integrals quadratic in the

The complete determination

velocities.

of the explicit form of the

most general dynamical system


whose equations of motion possess an integral quadratic in the velocities (in addition
to the integral of energy) has not yet been effected.
It is obvious from
43 that all
dynamical systems which are of Liouville s type, or which are reducible to this type by a
point- transformation, possess such integrals : and several more extended types have been
determined *.

Example

Let

(&, I

(q k )

be n 2 functions depending solely on the arguments indicated, and

4>=

=1

n)

2,

. . .

(1=1,

2,

...,%)

let

W *H

fc=i

denote the determinant formed by these functions.


dynamical system is reducible to the form

and the potential energy

but also (n

1)

is

zero, there exists

Shew

that

if

the kinetic energy of a

not only the integral of energy,

other integrals, homogeneous and of the second


degree in the velocities,

namely
1

A-^f*
where

(a 1( a 2 ,

...,

an)

are arbitrary constants:

""

(*

and that the problem

quadratures.

Example

= 2,
is

3,

...,),

soluble

by

(Stackel.)
2.

Let the equations of motion of a dynamical


system with two degrees of

freedom be

d
where
*

Cf. G. di Pirro,

Annali di Mat. xxiv. (1896),

p. 315.

Properties of the Integrals of

336
and

are

(a, A, 6)

any functions

integral

of the coordinates (q, q 2 )

and

[on.

let this

system possess an

a q^ + 2A J! j 2 + & ?22 = Constant,

the equation of energy, where ( , A 6 ) are


quadratic in the velocities and distinct from
2
2
If A and A denote (afc-A ) and (a & -A ) respectively,
functions of the coordinates.
,

and

if

Jl
where

<?/

_A\

(o jji

+ Zh ft qj + b q^\

stands for dq r jdf, shew that the equations

,-

at \cq r /
define the
of motion,

oq r

same relations between the coordinates (g^, q?) as the original equations
and that one set of equations can be transformed to the other by the trans

formation

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
1.

dynamical system

denned by

is

its

kinetic energy

ni

(where $

in

denotes the determinant

which the elements of the th

$ w ), and by

its

$21

$22

nl

$2rc

......

line are functions of q k only,

and $ w denotes the minor of

potential energy

*
*

^ = ^11

where

and the quantity

\^ fc

denotes a function of q k only.

Shew

that a complete integral of the

Hamilton-Jacobi equation

i=U
where
2.

is

(a 1? a 2 , ..., a,t )

{a 1

$ + a 2 $j 2 + ...+a n
il

are arbitrary constants.

(Goursat.)

If

an integral of a dynamical system which possesses an integral of energy, shew that

= Constant,
-^
ct

*f

OT

= Constant,

etc.,

are also integrals.

337

Dynamical Systems

xii]

3.

system of equations

A r(qi,

?2,

= Br(3li

?2,

-jf=

q n PI,

-,

-,?*,

(r=l,

d{
such that

is

an

if

and

<

-v|/-

S n.l

2,

...,n)

jn,

l,

are any two integrals whatever, the Poisson-bracket

(<,

is

*//)

also

Shew that the equations must have the Hamiltonian form

integral.

dH
~dt~~dgr

dff

dqr

dp r _

~di-ty r

(Korkine.)
If

4.

= Constant,

at

>

g n,^!,

an

also

...,

/3 fc

= Constant,

shew that

/>),

A,,...,

is

a*-

= Constant,
/3 2

integrals of a Hamiltonian system of differential equations, the variables being

are
e any 2
?2,

...,

= Constant,

a2

& = Constant,
!)

= Constant,

A*

p^

oqx k

?A 2

O?AI

p\ k
(Laurent.)

integral.

Let the expression

5.

f
[JZi. /z.),

....

:B(^,^...,^
-n

-..
uJ

2r

)
r

-5-7

i-l<K*Ui

where HI,

...,

n are

functions of the nv variables

be called a Poisson-bracket of the nth order.


A
^n, ^12,
n 2, -,
yn, Vi-2,
,i/h V
!

denotes

all

^2t,

where

*<)

xji (j=l,

G2

If G\,
AV>

(h

...,

2, ...,

Ghv

+ k = ri),

are

and

il,

Ai>

2, ...,

i>)

functions of

if

the Poisson-brackets formed from every n functions G, shew that

represents the necessary and sufficient conditions that the functions

yt = F*t(xn,

#12,

Xkv",

2,

i,

arising from the equations


<?

shall satisfy the

-,

6.
(.r,

y)

A
is

in

P (F n
t

move

>

is

/(#, y\ the total energy being

h.

=1

obtained when

2, ...,

order

we

replace h of the
(Albeggiani.)

mass whose coordinates

in a plane

(i=l,
first

by as many y s.

particle of unit

free to

2
!>

simultaneous partial differential equations of the

where Pi(y h F} denotes the expression which


functions

(*

(i>hv)

referred to fixed rectangular axes are

under forces derivable from a potential-energy function

Shew that

if

the orthogonal trajectories of the curves

82 \

W. D.

+ 5~~9 lg {*/(*!
I

ayy

y)}

Constant
22

338

Properties of the Integrals of Dynamical Systems [en.

xn

are orbits, the differential equations of motion of the particle possess an integral linear and
homogeneous in the velocities (#, y).
7.

The equations

of motion of a free system of

^
If

particles are

=X

(s=l,

2,

...,3m).

an integral exists of the form


3m

fx -

Ct

are functions of A^,

#2

where

/i,

/2

...,

/3m

2
=1

= Constant,
>

>

^sm? an(*

C* is

a constant, shew that this

integral can be written

3n

3m

2
s=l

.r 8

2
r,

of ,.

(.,.

- xrXg)

Ct = Constant,

s=l

where the quantities ks and a rg are constants.

(Pennacchietti.)

Two particles move on a surface under the action of different forces depending
if their differential equations of motion have in
their respective positions
on
only
common an integral independent of the time, shew that the surface is applicable on
8.

a surface of revolution.

(Bertrand.)

CHAPTER

XIII

THE REDUCTION OF THE PROBLEM OF THREE BODIES


154.

Introduction.

The most celebrated


of Three Bodies, and

of

may

all dynamical
problems
be enunciated as follows

is

known

as the Problem

Three particles attract each other according to the Newtonian law, so that
between each pair of particles there is an attractive force which is proportional
product of the masses of the particles and the inverse square of their
distance apart: they are free to move in space, and are initially supposed to be
moving in any given manner ; to determine their subsequent motion.
to the

The practical importance of this problem arises from its applications to


Celestial Mechanics
the bodies which constitute the solar system attract
:

each other according to the Newtonian law, and (as they have
approximately
the form of spheres, whose dimensions are very small
compared with the
distances which separate them) it is usual to consider the
problem of deter
their
motion
in
an
ideal
in
which
the
are replaced by
bodies
form,
mining
of
masses
to
the
masses
of
the
particles
equal
respective bodies and occupying
the positions of their centres of gravity*.

The problem

of three bodies cannot be solved in finite terms

of any of the functions at


present known to analysis.
stimulated research to such an extent, that since the

by means

This difficulty has


year 1750 over 800

memoirs, many of them bearing the names of the greatest mathematicians,


have been published on the subject f
In the present chapter, we shall discuss
.

the

known

integrals of the system and their application to the reduction of


the problem to a dynamical
problem with a lesser number of degrees of

freedom.
The motions of the bodies relative to their centres of gravity (in the consideration of which
and shapes of course cannot be neglected) are discussed separately, e.g. in the Theory
Precession and Nutation.
In some cases however (e.g. in the Theory of the Satellites of the

their sizes
of

Major Planets) the oblateness of one of the bodies exercises so great an


cannot be divided in this way.
t For the history of the

effect,

that the problem

Problem of Three Bodies,

cf. A. Gautier, Essai historique sur le


1817) B. Grant, History of Physical Astronomy from the earliest
ages to the middle of the nineteenth century (London, 1852)
E. T. Whittaker, Report on the
progress of the solution of the Problem of Three Bodies (Brit. Ass. Bep. 1899, p. 121)
and
E. 0. Lovett, Quart. Journ. Math. XLII. (1911), p. 252, who discusses the memoirs of the
period
1898-1908.

probleme des

trois corps (Paris,

222

The Reduction of

340
The

155.

denote the three particles,

their

(TIB,

and

let (q lt q 2 q 3 ), (q 4

si>

^12)

tively.

T=

m,

the potential energy


is therefore

m m. r

is

m.2

- m.m,

The equations

m
{(q,

their masses,

and

is

w,w a

is

Tc

mmr^
l

where k2

suppose the units so chosen that

shall

m^m^r^

becomes

so that this attraction

3)

we

the force of attraction between m^ and

constant of attraction

fixed rectangular axes Oxyz,


be the coordinates of P, Q, R, respec

q 5 q6 ), (q 7 qs q 9 ),
kinetic energy of the system
,

The

m m

(ra 1;

Take any

mutual distances.

xm

of the problem.

differential equations

Let P, Q,

[CH.

the

12

is

the

is

unity,
and the corresponding term in
potential energy of the system

The

&

3 ??z 1

-q

7}

(q s

- q*)* +

(q6

-q

9)

- qj* + (q - qj + (q, - q )-} *


- qJ + (q -q ) +(q -q Y}~^
"

{(q 7

{(q,

of motion of the system are

m k q = -dV/dq
r

where k denotes the integer part of ^


9 differential equations, each of the 2nd

(r

(r=l,

2).

order,

2, ...,9),

This system consists of

and the system

is

therefore

of order 18.

mk q r = p

Writing

H= r=S

and

(r

_
~

2,

9),

-g^+V,
2mjc

the equations take the Hamiltonian form

dq r
~r,

at

and these are a

_ oH
^
dp r

It

j7

at

_ ~ oE
~~r~

1
">

9h

oq r

set of 18 differential equations, each of the 1st order, for the

determination of the variables (q

which

dp r
j

l>

q.2 ,

...,q a ,pi,p2,

,^9)-

was shewn by Lagrange* that this system can be reduced to a system


That a reduction of this kind must be possible
is only of the 6th order.

may be

seen from the following considerations.

In the

first place,

since no forces act except the

mutual attractions of the

*
Eecueil des pieces qui ont remporte les prix de I Acad. de Paris, ix. (1772). Lagrange of
course did not reduce the system to the Hamiltonian form. Cf. Boblin, Kongl. Sv. Vet.-Handl.

XLII. (1907),

No.

9, for

an improved Lagrangiau reduction.

Problem of Three Bodies

155]

particles, the centre of gravity of the

uniform velocity.

This fact

is

341

system moves in a straight line with

expressed by the 6 integrals

m q - (p,
+ m q- + m q - (p +p +p
+ m. q + m q - (p +p +p
3

8)

9) t

=a
=a

where a lt a.2 ..., a6 are constants. It may be


expected that the use of these
integrals will enable us to depress the equations of motion from the 18th to
the 12th order.
,

In the second place, the


angular momentum of the three bodies round
each of the coordinate axes is constant
throughout the motion. This fact
is

analytically expressed
qiP-2

where

by the equations

q-2pi

-qp +qp q p = a,,


p
q p + q p,
q p = 03,
=a
+
p4
qp
qp
qp

q^p*

a8) a9 are constants. By use of these three


integrals we may
to
be able to depress further the
expect
equations of motion from the
12th to the 9th order. But when one of the coordinates which
define the
a-,

position of the system is taken to be the azimuth


of one of the bodies
with respect to some fixed axis
the
axis
of
and
the
other coordinates
(say
z\
define the position of the
relative
to
the
this
system
plane
<

azimuth,
having
an ignorable coordinate, and
consequently the corre
sponding integral (which is one of the integrals of angular momentum
above-mentioned) can be used to depress the order of the
system by two
units the equations of motion can
therefore, as a matter of fact, be reduced
the coordinate

<

is

in this

This
way to the 8th order.
Lagrange s memoir already cited) was
1843, and

is

Lastly,

fact
first

(though contained implicity in


explicitly noticed by Jacobi* in

generally referred to as the elimination of the

it

is

two units as in
time.
So finally

nodes."

possible again to depress the order of the equations


by
42, by using the integral of
energy and eliminating the
the equations

of motion

may

be reduced to

6th order.
*

a system of

the

Journ. fiir Math. xxvi.

From the point of view of the theory of Partial Differential


p. 115.
express the matter by saying that the integrals of angular momentum
give
rise to an
involution-system, consisting of two functions which are in involution with each other
and with
and hence the Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential
with 6
Equations, we

may

equation

independent

variables can be reduced to a


partial differential equation with 6 - 2 or 4 independent variables
this will be the Hamilton-Jacobi
partial differential equation for the reduced system.

The Reduction of

342

the

[CH.

xm

Jacobi s equation.
156.
number of free particles in space, which
Jacobi*, in considering the motion of any
Newtonian
the
to
law, has introduced the function
other
each
attract
according
1

i,

m t and m, are the masses of two typical particles of the system, r^ is the distance
is the total mass of the particles, and the summation is extended
between them at time t,
over all pairs of particles in the system. This function, which has been used in researches
of the system, will be called Jacobi s function and denoted by the
the

where

concerning

symbol

stability

*.

be the
We shall suppose the centre of gravity of the system to be at rest ; let (#,-, yf
coordinates of the particle m t referred to fixed rectangular axes with the centre of gravity
The kinetic energy of the system is
as origin.
,

r=Umi (#,*+&* +

z>)

**),

and consequently we have

= (2?H;) X 2m; (X

(2ii) x 2 nii X?

But

(^m x

t}

=2m

% (x

%)

2
,

i,3

where the summation on the right-hand side is extended over every pair of particles in the
= in virtue of the properties of the centre of gravity.
system and we have S.m xi Q,
:

Thus we have

T=

^
*-

"

2 TO^- {(*

- %) 2 + (& - &) a + & -

2
>)

i,j

^,3

where v^ denotes the velocity of the particle


In the same way we can shew that

TOJ

relative to ?ny

V being
If now F denotes the potential energy of the system, the arbitrary constant in
determined by the condition that V is to be zero when the particles are at infinitely great
distances from each other, we have
m * my
s

F=-

The equations

of motion of the particle

IJ

1,1

are

8F

8F

8F

w=-^,

**-- 5.

**-~5,

z f respectively, add them, and sum for all the


Multiply these equations by # f y {
- 1 in the variables, we thus
F
is
since
homogeneous of degree
particles of the system
,

obtain
27/1;

faSt+ytifi +

z i Zi)

=
>

2m

or

or

i (

^
This

is

called Jacobi s equation.


*

Vorlesungen

iiber

Dyn.,

p. 22.

Problem of Three Bodies

156, 157]
Reduction

157.

343

12th order, by use of the integrals of motion of the

to the

centre of gravity.

We

now proceed

to carry out the reductions which have been


that
it is possible to retain the Hamiltonian form
appear
of the equations throughout all the transformations.
shall

described*.

It will

Taking the equations of motion of the Problem of Three Bodies in the


form obtained in
155,

dpr__W

dqr_dH
dt

we have

dt

dp r

dq r

reduce this system from the 18th to the 12th order,


by use
of the integrals of motion of the centre of
For
this
gravity.
purpose we
perform on the variables the contact-transformation defined by the equations
first to

dW

W = p.q,

where

+ p q + p.q +p q + p + p q + (p, + p + p
+ (P* + ps + Ps) qs + (p + p +p ) q
2

q<?

7)

Interpreting these equations, it is easily seen that


q2 q s
coordinates of
1 relative to
s
(?/, qs qs } are the coordinates of
to ra3 (q 7 q8 q) are the coordinates of
s
(pi, p 2 ,p 3 ) are the
(<?/,

of

momentum

of wi lf

(/>/,

p p
f

differential equations

dt

where, on substitution of the

[PiP*

are the
relative

momentum

now become

= a#
"

dp r

new

of the system.

138)

,_ 1,4.
12 ..,),

rfp/__w
dt~

^qr

variables for the old,

+ P*P* + P* P* + \Pi* + \ Ps +
2

"

3>p

we have

-p

(pS

+p

- ?/

K?/
The

components
are the components of momentum of w 2 and

components of

<%

(P?, PS Pa) are the

The

q7

contact- transformation used in

157 is due to Poincare, C.R. cxxin. (1896) that used


due to the author, and was originally published in the first edition of this work
(1904).
It appears worthy of note from the fact that it is an extended
point-transformation, which shews
that the reduction could be performed on the equations in their Lagrangian
(as opposed to their
;

in

158

is

Hamiltonian) form, by pure point-transformations. The second transformation in the alternative


Another reduction of the Problem of
160) is not an extended point-transfurmation.

reduction

Three Bodies can be constructed from the standpoint of Lie s Theory of


Involution-systems and
Distinguished Functions cf. Lie, Math. Ann. vin. p. 282. Cf. also Woronetz, Bull. Univ.
:

Kief,

1907,

and

Levi-Civita, Atti del R. 1st. Veiieto, LXXIV. (1915), p. 907.

The Reduction of

344
Since

(//,

coordinates

q s q 9 are altogether absent from


the corresponding integrals are

p = Constant,

can without

loss of generality

xm

[CH.

H, they are ignorable

p = Constant,

We

the

p = Constant.
9

suppose these constants of integration

to be zero, as this only means that the centre of gravity of the system is
taken to be at rest the reduced kinetic potential obtained by ignoration of
:

coordinates will therefore be derived from the unreduced kinetic potential


by replacing p 7 p 8 p 9 by zero, and the new Harniltonian function will be
,

derived from

H in the same way.

The system of

the 12th order, to

of three bodies have

which the

now

been reduced,
equations of motion of the problem
therefore be written (suppressing the accents to the letters)

r__

r__
dt

dt

dp r

may

_
dqr

where

[q*
{(q,

- qtf + (9, - g

2
5)

+ (q 3

This system possesses an integral of energy,

H = Constant,

and three integrals of angular momentum, namely

where

A A A
l}

158.

are constants.

Reduction

momentum and

to

the

8th

order, by use of the

integrals

of angular

elimination of the nodes.

The system of the 12th order obtained in the last article must now be
reduced to the 8th order, by using the three integrals of angular momentum
and by eliminating the nodes. This may be done in the following way.
Apply

to

the

variables

equations
q

the

denned

contact-transformation

= dW

dW

^ = Wr
/

Wr

by the

1C*

/\

(r=l>2,...,6),

where

W =Pi

(<?/

+P* (q-A

cos ql
cos qs

~ q*
-q
4

cos qt sin q s
cos g/sin q s

It is readily seen that the

follows

)
)

+p

+p

new

(g/ sin q,
(q 3 sin q s

+q
+q

cos q6 cos qs
cos g6 cos q 5

+p q
) +p qt
)

sin qt

sin qg

f
.

variables can be interpreted physically as

Problem of Three Bodies

157, 158]

345

In addition to the fixed axes Oxyz, take a new set of moving axes Ox y z
is to be the intersection or node of the
plane Oxy with the plane of the
three bodies, Oy is to be a line perpendicular to this in the plane of the

Ox

three bodies, and Oz

is

to

Then

be normal to the plane of the three bodies.

relative to axes drawn through ??? 3 parallel


q^) are the coordinates of
to Ox Oy
(q3 q) are the coordinates of m.2 relative to the same axes
qs
(<?/,

the angle between Ox and


and p 2 are the components of

is

p and p
p and ps
3

Ox

the angle between Oz and Oz


q
momentum of m relative to the axes Ox
is

p{
Oy

are the components of momentum of


2 relative to the same axes
are the angular momenta of the system relative to the axes Oz
;

and Ox respectively.

The equations

of motion in terms of the

"

where, on substitution in

variables are

dt

dp r

dq r

H of the new variables

Pi

V*

IB

^* *

for

j.

*"

we have

the old,

* a*

./.

j.

j.*>

cosec qt

+p, qt

_o

K Pi fc )8

^V + PS ?/ -

/>/&

+j3 5 ^2 cosec g/
r

~1

PiP
L

+P

-jf>

(q-2

q3

q 5 does not occur in

corresponding integral

) tfa

cot ?/

+ ^sV}

qi q* )

- Pi qi + p

-- T-, ^

-Pa qi + Pa q* - P* q) q*

NOW

p4

q\qi)

is

138)

dp^__dj[

dq^JbH_
dt

new

qt

H, and

- pt q,

is

cot qa

qs cot q K

+p

q 4 cosec q9

+ p, q

cosec q

+p

+p

therefore an ignorable coordinate

q3

the

is

PS

= k,

where

A;

is

a constant.

The equation dq /dt = dH/dk can be integrated by a simple quadrature


when the rest of the equations of motion have been integrated the equations
a

and p 5 will therefore


system of the 10th order
for q 5

fall

=
where

is to
/>/

p =
s

(r

be replaced by the constant k wherever

We have now
(namely

out of the system, which thus reduces to the

k)

made use
and

it

1,2, 3, 4, 6),

occurs in H.

of one of the three


integrals of angular momentum
the elimination of the nodes
when the other two
:

The Redaction of

34(3

momentum

integrals of angular

the

xm

[CH.

are expressed in terms of the

new

variables,

they become

- pi q + Pt qs - p q*) sin q cosec q - k sin ?


- jpsV) cos & cosec + ^ cos ?
-pi q* +Ko

(pa qi

(pz qi

The

?"

values of the constants

axes Oxyz

we

shall choose the axis

momentum

of the system, so that

the special

a;?/-

cos

qs=Ai,

=^

sin ?

depend on the position of the fixed

J. 2

Oz

to be the line of resultant angular


and z are zero
l
69) the constants

(cf.

plane thus introduced

The two

system.

and

J.!

+ P*
+P

cot q
cot q

called the invariable plane of the

is

equations then give

last

k cos

- Pi

=p*qi

(/

p.

+^V - #V

q.2

0.

These equations determine

and p a

q<?

in terms of the other variables,

and

so can be regarded as replacing the equations

dq

_ dH

dpi _

9-ff

"

dt

"

dt

dp 6

d</

The system thus becomes

in the system.

dq r

_dH

dt

~dpr

<W

"

=
~

_d#

dt

rr-12^4^

dq r

where

H = V2m

+ 2m_
/
3

^_
(q q*

j/

-p*qi

q*

q l q,

+ ps q*

^V) cot

(?

& cosec

& cosec ^6

^ cosec

W}

t,
4
.

cot q 6

q*-Pa qi +ps q* -pt qs)

{(Pi

fl

4 /

iV - pi qi + ps q* - Piq-t) cot ^ +

and where, after


its

the derivates of

H have been formed, q

to

is

be replaced by

value found from the equation

k cos qt

Now
in

let

then

= pi qi - pfq* + pfq* - p-iq.

be the function obtained when this value of q6 is substituted


denotes any one of the variables g/, q 2 q3 q t p^, p2 p3 p4

if s

we have

=
~
ds

ds

dq6

ds

Problem of Three Bodies

158, 159]

But

since

p =
K

0,

we have dH/dq =
ds

/>

therefore

fa

we can make the substitution

in other words,

for q6 in

H before forming the

and thus (suppressing the .accents)

the equations of motion of


H;
Three
are
Bodies
reduced
to
the
of
system of the 8th order

derivates of

Problem

the

= 0, and

347

dqr

_ dff

dt

dH

dp r _
dt

dp r

dq r

where

*"

"

T^

,-

mm
2

(q^

+ qf)

mm

+ q% )
2

(q^

the

{(<?i

qs )

+ (q

q4 J

have simple physical interpretations


quantities occurring in
is
twice
the
area of the triangle formed by the bodies: and
qiq4 )

2m
is

Many of the
thus (q z q

mm

mm

moment

(/

/I

of inertia of the three bodies about the line in which the

plane of the bodies meets the invariable

plane through their centre of

gravity.

H differs from the value of H when k

It is also to be noted that this value of


terms which do not involve the variables
p

l ,

p.2 ,

p3 p i
,

is

zero

by

these terms in k can therefore be

regarded as part of the potential energy, and we can say that the system differs from the
corresponding system for which k is zero only by certain modifications in the potential
It may easily be shewn that when k is zero the motion takes
energy.
place in a plane.

159.

Reduction

to the Qth order.

The equations of motion can now be reduced further from the 8th to the
6th order, by making use of the
integral of energy

H = Constant,
and eliminating the time. The theorem of 141 shews that in
performing
Hamiltonian form of the differential equations can be

this reduction the

conserved.

As the

be given here in

actual reduction

is

not required subsequently,

it will

not

detail.

The Hamiltonian system of

the 6th order thus obtained is, in the


present
our
the
ultimate
reduced form of the equations of motion
of
knowledge,
of
the general Problem
of Three Bodies.

state

The Reduction of

348

[CH.

xin

Alternative reduction of the problem from the 18th to the 6th order.

160.

We

the

of the general problem of three


give another reduction*
bodies to a Ilarailtonian system of the 6th order.
shall

now

Let the original Hamiltonian system of equations of motion


be transformed by the contact-transformation

155)

where

W = Pi

(q*

~ ft) + p*

nil

(ft

^2

- ft) + P*

(ft

- ft)

The integrals of motion of the centre


of the new variables, can be written

when expressed

of gravity,

= q* = q* =p? = p* = p* =

in terms

qr

and consequently the transformed system

new

pressing the accents in the


dqr
dt

>

only of the 12th order: sup

is

variables, it is

= dH

dp^

_<^_

dt

dp r

(r=l,2,...,6),

dqr

where

H =~ (p? + pf + P/) +

2~~,

+ P? + Pe2 ) -

(PS

-f

m.2 (qf

+ q, +
2

q/}

~
\2

*M

2
.

+ m,/

?4
t

i"

*t<2

variables may be interpreted physically in the following way


Then (q lt q2 q s ) are the
the
centre of gravity of m, and
be
2

The new
Let

Due

to

Kadau, Annales de

Ec. Norm. Sup.

v. (1868), p. 311.

Problem of Three Bodies

160]

projections of m^n^ on the fixed axes, and (g4


of
Further
3 on the axes.

q5

349

qs ) are the projections

Gm

^=Pr

and

(r-1,2,3),

l*

(r4,5,6).

^=pr

The new Hamiltonian system clearly represents the equations of motion


of two particles, one of mass p at a point whose coordinates are (q lt q2
q3 \
and the other of mass /* at a point whose coordinates are (g^, q q6 ); these
,

s>

supposed to move freely in space under the action of forces


derivable from a potential energy represented by the terms in
which
are independent of the ps.
have therefore replaced the Problem of
particles being

We

Three Bodies by the problem of two bodies moving under this system of
forces.
This reduction, though substantially contained in Jacobi s* paper of
1843, was first explicitly stated by Bertrandf in 1852.

We
plane

suppose the axes so chosen that the plane of xy is the invariable


the motion of the particles fj, and fjf, i.e. so that the angular

shall

for

momentum

of these particles about

line in the plane

any

Oxy

is zero.

Let the Hamiltonian system of the 12th order be transformed by the


is defined by the equations

contact-transformation which

^=
where

W = (p
+

dW

= dW

0-^-V-X

Wr

sin qs

+p

cos g5

q^ cos q3

+ q,

sin q3 {(p 2 cos q s

-p

(p s sin qs

+p

cos qs

q2 cos qt

+q

sin qt {(p s cos q*

-p

sin q,

sin qt

)*

+p

2
3

}%

+ p^

The new

variables are easily seen to have the following physical inter


is the length of the radius vector from the
qi
pretations
origin to the
the radius from the origin to
is
particle //,, q.,
q3 is the angle between
:

<//

and the intersection (or node) of the invariable plane with the plane through
two consecutive positions of q^ (which we shall call the plane of instantaneous
motion of /A), 4 is the angle between q.2 and the node of the invariable
plane
on the plane of instantaneous motion of pf, q^ is the angle between Ox
and the former of these nodes, q^ is the angle between Ox and the latter of
</

these nodes, pS is pq\,p is ^ q^ps is the angular momentum of p round


the origin, pl is the angular momentum of /// round the origin, ps is the
angular momentum of /A round the normal at the origin to the invariable
plane,

and p s

is

the angular

The equations

momentum

of motion in their

of

/A

round the same

new form

are

line.

138)

__dH
_
dt
Journal fur Math. xxvi.

"

dp r
p. 115.

dt

dqr
f Journal de math. xvn. p. 393.

The Reduction of

350

the

[CH.

supposed expressed in terms of the new variables.


system be transformed by the contact-transformation

where

Let this

is

dW

pr=

dW

(r

**57

W"

xm

"

6)>

where

W=

q*"

- p* ) +

(p*

The equations

pi

qi

q*"p*

q*"p*

+ qt p*.

now become

of motion

dqr

+# ) +

(p*

<i

dt

dH

dPr

-_dH

"_
"

"

dt

~3q r

as may be seen either by expressing


does not involve q 6
in terms of the new variables, or by observing that q
depends on the
while
none
of
coordinates
the
other
of
the
axis
chosen
Ox,
position
arbitrarily

But

",

"

fi

depend on

"

p6
where

A;

We

this quantity.

is

=-

have therefore

dH/dq,"

= 0,

p =
"

so

k,

this is really one of the three integrals of angular


Substituting k for p6 in H, the equation

a constant

"

momentum.

q 6 "=dH/dk

can be integrated by a quadrature when the rest of the equations have been
so the equations for p 6 and q 6 can be separated from the system,
solved
which reduces to the 10th order system
"

"

"

_
~

dqr
dt

We

have

still

to use the

these, when expressed


represented by

~dp7"

two remaining integrals of angular

in terms of the

= 90,

"

25

new

is

_,

momentum

variables, are readily found to be

Jcp 5 "=p s "*-pr-;

no arbitrary constants of integration enter, owing to the

xy

"

dq r

dt"

fact that the plane of

the invariable plane.

The system may

therefore be replaced by these two equations and the

equations
"

dq r

_ dH

dfr"

3#

"

"dt

"

where, in this last

set,

qs

dt

~dpr"

dq r

can be replaced by 90 before the derivates of


"

2
2
have been formed, and p 5 is to be replaced by (p3
p4 )/k after the
denote the function derived from
Let
have been formed.
derivates of
and
let s denote any one of the
for p 5
substitution
this
making
"

"

by

variables

",

q",

#>",

qa

",

q",

p",

8^ _ 877

p",

dH

pa

",

dp,"

p"

= dH

then we have
.
.

dp,"

"

ds

ds

dp &

ds

ds

ds

= dH
ds

Problem of Three Bodies

160, 161]

and

it is

therefore allowable to substitute for

H before the derivates of

in

p"

351

have been formed. The equations of motion are thus reduced to a system
of the 8th order, which (suppressing the accents) may be written in the form

dt

dt

dp r

dq r

where, effecting in

H the transformations which have been indicated, we have

H-

(p

(p*

1)

kz -p,?-p?

2ra 2 <j/

1
""*-

-- smg smg*
.

2m! ft g a

~m<,m s

-\q^+m

---p,--p
^--^2

Mcosftcosft

l + m^\

(*

5*-

sin ft sin ft

2p,pt

+7

**J

The equations of motion may further be reduced to a system


6th order by the method of 141, using the integral of energy

Constant

As the reduction

and eliminating the time.

of the

is

not required subsequently,

it

be given in detail here.

will not

The problem of three bodies in a plane.

161.

The motion of the three particles may be supposed to take place in a


plane, instead of in three-dimensional space; this will obviously happen if the
directions of the initial velocities of the bodies are in the plane of the bodies.
This case

is

known

as the problem of three bodies in a plane


we shall
motion to a Hamiltonian system of
:

now proceed

to reduce the equations of


the lowest possible order.

Let
(</!,

(^5.

q z ) be the coordinates of

the coordinates of
<7e)

of the motion;
^

(r + 1).

and

1}

referred to

q 4 ) the coordinates of ??? 2 and


any
Oy in the plane
(q 3

fixed axes Ox,

pr = m k qr) where k

let

The equations

denotes the greatest integer in


155)

of motion are (as in

dqr_*ff
dt

dpr

dpr__dH
dt~

l, -,..., Oj,

dq r

where

^~to +jtf)+0tf+i* H(^


f

- tfj) +
2

g3

These equations

will

- ft) ~ - M! wi a
2

(ft

{(q,

now be reduced from the 12th

- q Y + (ft - g )
3

"

2
}

to the 8th order,

by

Perform on the
using the four integrals of motion of the centre of gravity.
variables the contact-transformation defined
by the equations

dW

dW

The Reduction of

352

the

[OH.

xm

where

W=p q
l

+p

2 q*

+ pq + P*q* + (Pi+P* +P*) ft + (P* + P* +P) ti


a

lt is easily seen that


Wg parallel to the

(<//,

through

relative to

the same

are the coordinates of

ft )

and (p 6

are the components of

of the system.

in | 157, the equations for


5
q 6 p 5 pi disappear from the system
in the new variables) the equations of motion
accents
the
(suppressing

As
and

relative to axes

original axes, (pf, p.2 )


the components of momentum of

momentum

2
fixed axes, (q a qf) are the coordinates of
the
relative
to
of
coordinates
the
are
3
axes, (q s q )
1} (p 3
are the components of momentum of
p t ) are

<?

reduce to the system of the 8th order,

dq r

= 9#

dt

ty

dH
Wr

dp r _
-dl-

where

mm
2

+ ft )
2

(q/

~?

- m,m, (q? + q

)~

h*

{(?i

?s)

+ (q* ~ qtf]

"

an ignorable coordinate,
Next, we shall shew that this system possesses
which will make possible a further reduction through two units.
Perform on the system the contact-transformation defined by the equa
tions

dW

^ = Wr

dW

^Wr

where

W = ptfi

cos qt

+p

qi

sinqS+ps (qj cos q4

- q sm ^ ) + P* (ft
a

sin q t

+ ft cos g/).

of this transformation is as follows g/ is the


physical interpretation
are the projections of 2 3 on, and perpendicular to,
distance
1
s
ft and qi
m z l and the axis of x pi is the component
between
the
is
3
1
angle
q4
of momentum
of momentum of
3 m,
1 along
p* and p 3 are the components
is
the
and
to
t
angular momentum
p
of m.2 parallel and perpendicular

The

mm

mw

mm

m.^

of the system.

The
become

differential equations,

when expressed

"

dt

dp r

in terms of the

new

variables,

dt

where

-\f*v

~w
ik

-*7+rt~*.

an ignorable coordinate the corre


this can be interpreted as
a constant
The equation q4 = dH/dpi
of the system.

not contained in H,
= k, where k
integral is p 4

Since qt

sponding

353

Problem of Three Bodies

161, 162]
is

is

it

is

the integral of angular momentum


can be integrated by a quadrature when the rest of the equations have been
and
disappear from the system.
integrated and thus the equations for p t
the equations can therefore
Suppressing the accents on the new variables,
be written
;

<?/

qr

dt

Pr

= __

dt

dp r

(r

= l,2,

3),

dqr

where

H-

<?,

-#)

2
-I-

9s

a system of the 6th order


it can be reduced to the 4th order by
the process of
141, making use of the integral of energy and eliminating

This

is

the time.

The

162.

restricted

problem of three

bodies.

special case of the problem of three bodies, which has occupied a


place in recent researches, is the restricted problem of three bodies ;

Another

prominent
this may be enunciated as follows

bodies $ and J revolve round their centre of gravity, 0, in circular


A third body P,
under the influence of their mutual attraction.

Two
orbits,

without mass

(i.e.

their motion),

such that

moves

of three bodies

is

to

it is

attracted by S and J, but does not influence


as 8 and
the restricted problem

same plane

in the

</;

determine the motion of the body P, which

is

generally

called the planetoid.

Let

and

Take any

be the masses of

8 and

J,

m,

m.2

SP

JP

and write

fixed rectangular axes

OX, OF, through 0, in the plane of the


be
the
motion let (X, Y)
coordinates, and (U, V) the components of velocity,
of P.
The equations of motion are
:

dt*~dX
or in the

dt

\v.

atr

d7

dH

dt

dv

H= % (U
D.

~dY

Hamiltonian form,

dX = dH
where

dt*

dV__3H

<W__dH
dt"

dx

~dt~

ar

+ 7 ) - F.
s

23

The Reduction of

354

[OH.

but also of
and
a function not only of
of
the
an
Constant is not
system.
integral

Since

H=

the

is

t,

Perform on the variables the contact-transformation which

xm

the equation

denned by

is

the equations

_3E
_^W_
V _3W
=
=
Xv _dW
dx
~3V
~dU
dy
cos
=
sin
nt
+
W V (x cos nt y sin nt) +V(ae
nt),
y

where

and n

is

the angular velocity of 8J.

dx

_dK
~

eft

8wT

du

fy

I (u

+ n (uy -vx)-F;

x and y are the coordinates of the planetoid referred


OJ as axis of as, and a line perpendicular to this through
is now a function of x and y only, so K does not involve t

at once seen that

moving

line

as axis of y.

to the

explicitly,

and

K = Constant

an integral of the system

called the Jacobian integral* of the restricted

it is

problem of three bodies.


Another form of the equations of motion
last

_dK

dW
K = H - -^
=

is

dv
=
dt~

dx

~di

~dv

~dt

_dK

=
~

<fy_c_K
~~

where (138)

it is

The equations become

obtained by applying to the

is

system the contact-transformation

= dW

y=

p
W>

W=q

where

The new

variables

3W

dW

-^>

(u cos qz

^^

P2

+ v sin q

= dW

2 ).

be defined directly by the equations

may

and the equations of motion become


dq-r

_ dH
~

~dt

dp,.

H=

where

Another formf

is

dW
Pr=Wr

W =p
*

dt

=12)

dqr

+ ~ -

np 2

- F.

obtained by applying to these equations the contact-

transformation

where

(pc

_ _ dH

dp,. =

q2

\P,

A u^n
-(P^-P^}

dv

"

p7*\)
Pl

Jacobi, Comptes Rendus, in. (1836), p. 59.


la Mec. Celeste.
Adopted by Poincare in his Kouvelles methodes de

^
.

-,

dW
2

/.
j

^^Wr

Problem of Three Bodies

162]

where u denotes a current variable of integration.

355

These equations may be

written

p.
J

g/=arccos-i

and

it

is

2(7

-^ +

easily seen that

~4*

is

Q \*
- -^Vj

its

#2

=a -arccos
2

mean anomaly

the

<?/

would describe about a

it

projected from
is

2
2

which

ellipse

J)/

of the planetoid in the


body of unit mass at 0, if

fixed

instantaneous position with

its

instantaneous velocity

the longitude of the apse of this ellipse, measured from

-e )p,
2

where a

OJ; p

is a*,

q2

and

the semi-major axis and e is the


eccentricity of
this ellipse.
= Constant is an integral
does not involve t explicitly, so
of the equations of motion, which are now

is

{.(!

is

dt
If

we take the sum

denote these masses by

= aff

dq^

~dp

3ff

dp r

"

~dT~~

dq?

1}

2^

8 and J to be the unit of mass, and


and p respectively, we have

of the masses of
1

/u,

~SP
This

is

an analytic function of p^,

with the period


suppose p to be

2?r.

zero];

11

1\
Thus

which is periodic in qf and q2


p2 q, qa
Moreover, to find the term independent of fj, in H, we
since SP now becomes q lt we have

discarding the accents, the equations of motion of the restricted


may be taken in the form

finally,

problem of three bodies

dqr

_ dH

dt ~~dp r

where

while

dpr _
~dt~~

dH
~3^

H can be expanded as a power-series in p in the form

H H
lt

...

are periodic in q 1

The equations

and q 2 with
,

of this 4th order


system

may

the period 2?r.

be reduced to a Hamiltonian
= Constant and elimina

system of the second order by use of the integral


tion of the time, as in
141.

232

*The Reduction of the

356

problem of n

[CH.

xm

163.

Extension

Many

of the transformations which have been used in the present chapter


problem of three bodies can be extended so as to

to the

bodies.

in the reduction of the

apply to the general problem of n bodies which attract each other according
to the Newtonian law.
In their original form, the equations of motion of
the n bodies constitute a system of the 6?ith order this can be reduced to
;

12)th order, by using the six integrals of motion of the centre of


gravity, the three integrals of angular momentum, the integral of energy, the
elimination of the time, and the elimination of the nodes.

the (Qn

The reduction has been performed by


p.

T. L. Bennett, Mess, of Math. (2) xxxiv. (1904),

113.

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
1.

If in the

problem of three bodies the units are so chosen that the energy integral
2

i(vi

1111
---

+ V+*V) =

?*23

where r 12

+r +r
3l

12

Vi and v 2 and if r is a
shew that the greatest possible value of the angular momentum of the

the distance between the bodies whose velocities are

is

positive constant,

system about

its

is

centre of gravity

is

f\

2r.

(Camb. Math. Tripos, Part

1893.)

I,

2.
In the problem of three bodies, let * be Jacobi s function, let Q be the angle
between any fixed line in the invariable plane and the node of the plane of the three bodies
on the invariable plane, let i be the inclination of the plane of the three bodies to the in
be the area of the triangle formed by the three bodies. Shew that
variable plane, and let
77

dQ,

j_

"*

<fc

di

n*

dt

where k

is

the angular

momentum

of the system round the normal to the invariable

(De Gasparis.)

plane.

Let the problem of three bodies be replaced by the problem of two bodies p. and /*
160 let qi and q 2 be the distances of p. and p. from the origin let q 3 and q 4 be
the angles made by q l and 2 respectively with the intersection of the plane through the
bodies and the invariable plane let p and p 2 denote pqi and pf q-2 respectively and let p3
and
be the components of angular momentum of p. and p. respectively, in the plane
3.

as in

<?

pi

through the bodies and the

origin.

dq r
di
where

H= Constant

is

Shew

that the equations of motion

_dH
tyS

the integral of energy.

dp r _

may

be written

dff
}

~di~~dq r
(Bour.)

357

Problem of Three Bodies

163J

Apply the contact-transformation defined by the equations

4.

qi = {(V*
92

+ (?5 - ?8) 2 + (26 - ?9) 2 }*,


2
+
2

= {(?7 -

?7)
<?i)

(<?

=m

26)

+m

=
"

&i (?i

Pr = s
A;=0

(where

stands for

V^l

and

+ iq$ + b 2 (g-4 + t

X-

(r-0,

1, 8, ..., 8),

O^r

i,

&
s>

i>

^2, b s

c l5 c 2 , c 3

are any nine constants which

satisfy the equations

a1
to the

+2 + =
3

^1

+ ^2 + ^3 = 0,

^ + 02 + 03 = 0,

Hamiltonian system of the 18th order which

a 2 &3-a 3 & 2 =l),

155) determines the motion of the

three bodies.

Shew

that the integrals of motion of the centre of gravity are


q&

Shew
zero,

further that

when the

q-i

= q = p& = PI =pa =

invariable plane

and that the integral of angular

is

taken as plane of xy, the variable p5 is


the normal to the invariable plane

momentum round

is

p i qi

where k

=k,

is

a constant.

Hence shew that the equations reduce to the 8th order system

dq,!_dff
~dt~-ty?

dpr _
~dt~

dff

fy?

where

Reduce this to a system of the 6th order, by the theorem of

141.

(Bruns.)

CHAPTER XIV
THE THEOREMS OF BRUNS AND POINCARE
Bruns theorem.

164.

Statement of the theorem.

(i)

We

155) that the problem of three bodies possesses 10 known


the
six integrals of motion of the centre of gravity, the
integrals namely
three integrals of angular momentum, and the integral of energy these are

have seen

generally called the classical integrals of the problem.


algebraic integral, i.e. is of the form
/(<7i,

<?2,

.,

q 9 ,Pi,P*>

->

Pa,

Each of them

is

an

t)= Constant,

where / is an algebraic function of the coordinates


and of t.

(q 1} q2

-,^9)

$9, PI,

Efforts have frequently been made to obtain other algebraic integrals of


the problem of three bodies independent of these (i.e. not formed by combina
tions of them), but without success; and in 1887 Bruns* shewed that no

such new algebraic integrals exist

in other words, the classical integrals are


problem of three bodies.

the only independent algebraic integrals of the

It may be remarked + that the non-existence of algebraic integrals does not necessarily
imply great complexity in a system. One of the simplest of differential equations, namely
the linear differential equation with constant coefficients

has no algebraic integral except when

^i//n 2 is

-^ =

integral

a rational number, in which case the

first

Constant

can be transformed into an algebraic integral.


(ii)

Expression of an integral in terms of the essential coordinates of the

problem.

We

shall

now proceed

to a proof of

integrals which do not involve

Bruns

result, considering first those

explicitly.

* Berichte der
Kgl. Sachs. Ges. der Wiss. 1887, pp. 1, 55

Ada

Math.

Forsyth, Theory of Differential Equations, Vol. in. (1900), Ch. xvn.


t Cf. K. Bohlin, Astron. lakttagelser och Unders. a Sfockholms Observ.

xi.

p.

Cf. also

25.

ix. (1908),

1.

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

164]

The equations

of motion of the problem

may

359

160) be written in the

form

_dH

dqr

dH
Wr

dp r _
~dt~

W-fa
where

H=T-U,
T=

+ p + P^ +

2P

(P

5?

^ + p ^ + P^

)-*

+q

q6 )

+
\

_m

We

shall write

/,

(m + m )
2

m
yu, 5

//, 6

=
y

T=

so that

Let the coordinates of the three bodies be (g/, g/,


and let mk qr = p r where k denotes the greatest
the integrals whose existence
(qi

<

where a

(g/, q s

q6

(g/,

),

integer contained in
to
discuss
are of the form
propose

we

q*,

-,

q 9 Pi,
,

gg
(r

g/),

+ 2)

p 9 ) = a,
an algebraic function of

an arbitrary constant and


is
its
The
formulae
of
160
enable
us
to
the
variables
arguments.
express
q*,
qLp\,
,p&) as linear functions of (qlt q2 ..., q 6 p 1} ..., p 6 ): we
shall therefore, on
making these substitutions in the integral, obtain an
is

(j>

(<?/,

equation
/(?i, q2
If the integral
gravity,

/ will

<

is

evidently reduce to a constant


.

An

q,pi, ...,p 6 )=a

integral

..................... (2).

of the integrals of motion of the centre of

compounded

function of the variables (q1}


existence of integrals, such as
(iii)

-..,

if not,

We

q6 p
p s ).
of the equations
l

. . .

(2),

must involve

the

will

be an algebraic

have to enquire into the

(1).

momenta.

W e shall first shew that an integral such as (2) must involve


T

quantities p,

i.e. it

For suppose,

if

cannot be a function of

(5-^

...,

6)

some of the

only.

possible, that the integral, say

does not involve (p lt

p.2

...,

Q_

6 ).

j.

Differentiating with respect to

df

_ 4 d/jy

t,

we have

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

360

[CH. xiv

and therefore the equations

J^r =

(r~l,2,

...,6)

dq

must be
so

satisfied identically; that

is,

does not involve (q l} q2

...,

q6 ), and

a mere constant.

is

Only one irrationality can occur in the integral.


As the mutual distances of the bodies are irrational functions of
function of these
q6 } the function U will be an irrational
(q lt g 2j
it is easily
three
mutual
of
the
s
the
sum
variables.
distances,
Denoting by
seen that the mutual distances can be expressed as rational functions of the
(iv)

seven quantities (q l} q 2
in the

q6 s); in other words, the irrationalities involved


all capable of being expressed by means of the

...,

mutual distances are

irrationality of s

function of (q 1}

Now

we may

q.2

q6

...,

variables (q 1} ...,q s ,pi,

expressed as a rational

is

s).

the function

therefore suppose that

algebraic, but not necessarily rational, in the

is

...,

6)

let

the equation (2) be rationalised, and let


powers of a, so that it becomes
w~ 2

the resulting equation be arranged in

+ am -

am

1
(f) l

(q l ,q,, ...,qe ,pi,

...,

p )+a
6

(gi,

2
</>

</>m(?i,

9s, PI, ...,p*)

>

...,q 6 ,pi,

...,2> 6 )

...

...(3),

If this
fan are rational functions of (q lt ..., qK p lt ..., p6 ).
fa, fa,
is reducible in the variables (q lt ..., q 6 p lt ..., p 6 s}, i.e. if it can be
equation
into other equations, each of the form

where

>

decomposed
~
a + a ^(q
1

,...,q 6 ,p l ,...,p

e>

s)

...

+ ^i(q

,...,q 6 ,p 1 ,...,p 6 ,s)

= 0... (4),

are rational functions of (q


q p lt
p6 s), then one
of these last equations will give the value of a which corresponds to equation

where

ty z

l ,

fi ,

>|r

equation instead of (3). As the type of


the type represented by (3) as a
equation represented by (4)
be
a
to
we
shall
given by an equation of the form (4),
suppose
particular case,

and we

(2),

shall consider this

includes

irreducible in (q 1}

...,

qs p lt

...,

p6

s).

Differentiating with respect to t, and using equations


al
+ a^(^,H) + ... + (^ ,H)
l

where

(ty r

We

H}

(^H}

we have

(5),

denotes as usual the Poisson-bracket of tyr and H.

shall first

functions of (q 1}

suppose that the expressions

...,

l}

(5) have one or more

and

(1),

are not

p s),
common roots
...,

a,

(//>,

all

H}, which are rational

zero.

Then equations

and consequently equation

(4)

(4) is

and
reducible in (q 1} 2
Pe, *); but this equation is irreducible,
q&, PI,
are
all
and
the
is
this
therefore
inadmissible,
quantities (-v/rr H}
hypothesis
>

<?

zero.

This implies that

all

the coefficients (^r

in equation (4)
can be com
hence the integral
l

ifr

2>

..., tyi)

are integrals of the equations (1): and


pounded algebraically from other integrals, which are rational functions of

(?i,

...,%

Pi,

,&>*)-

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

164]

Expression of the integral as a quotient of two real polynomials.

(v)

We

need therefore henceforth only consider integrals of the type


?,... q,pi, ...,p,s)

=a

..................... (6),

where /is a rational function of the arguments indicated. The form of /can
be further restricted by the following observation. If in the equations of
motion we replace qr p r t by qr k2 pr k~ and tk3 respectively, where k is any
l

constant, the equations are unaltered.

made

in equation (6), this equation


be.

If therefore these substitutions are

must

still

be an integral of the system,

whatever k may

Now /

its arguments
it can therefore be ex
two functions, each of which is a polynomial in

a rational function of

is

pressed as the quotient of

When

in these polynomials we replace q r p r s


the
function / will (on multiplying its
sk-, respectively,
and
denominator
an
numerator
by
appropriate power of k) take the form
(qi, $2,

>

2
by q r k

df/dt

PI,

p r k~

where (A
is

(?e>

zero,

>P<>>

s )-

lt

...,

q)

are polynomials in (q 1}

qe

...,

p lt

...,p 6

s).

Since

we have

"f^Efr*-**

f
Now

is

/7 4
U/-iln

=
(q+p +
dt
it is

~A,

powers of k in this

/-77?
.

LLJJn

dB

dA,

dB,

dB

5,^
a
8

l) equations are equivalent to the


_

from which

and therefore

dA

"

arbitrary, so the coefficients of successive

equation must be zero

These

dt

A p ~dT

system

5g

~dt

evident that each of the quantities

rfi

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

362

[OH.

xiv

an integral and thus we have the result that any integral such as f can
compounded from other integrals, which are of the form

is

be

6r 1? G.z is a polynomial in its arguments, and is


a
merely multiplied by
power of k when the variables qr p r s are replaced
2
We need therefore only consider integrals of
k~
sk2
k
respectively by qr
pr

where each of the functions

this form.

It

may

further be observed that the functions

of generality, be taken to be free from imaginaries.


the real and imaginary parts of an integral

and G2 may, without loss


For if P and iQ denote

P + iQ = Constant,
dP

we have

-jat

.,

-~ = 0,
+ i.dQ
.

..

,,

identically.

ctu

Since the differential equations are free from imaginaries, it follows that
dP/dt and dQ/dt are free from imaginaries and so dP/dt and dQ/dt must be
zero separately.
Hence
and Q are themselves integrals, and every complex
:

We

integral can be compounded from real integrals.


forth assume that Gi/G z is free from imaginaries.

Derivation of integrals

(vi)

hence

numerator and denominator of the

the

from

shall therefore

quotient.

the case that the function GI is resoluble into a product of


irresoluble polynomials in (p lt p2 ...,p6 ), the coefficients in these polynomials
It

may be

q,
being rational functions of (qlt q 2
suppose that it is repeated A, times in
,

factors of

When G

G
is

1}

so that

irreducible,

G^^ X
we

T^\TT}

have GI

shall of course

The equation

be such a polynomial, and


and let x denote the remaining

Let

s).

= ty,

and % =

1.

at \Cr 2 /
1 d-y
\dilr
-r -TT H----JT
vr

dt

dt

dG 2 =

TT
JT
G2 dt

U,

dG.2

Now

(p 1} ...,p 6 ),
factor in

in
polynomial in (p lt ...,p 6 ), and -v/r is also polynomial
of order less by unity than the order of d-ty/dt.
Also, ty has no

d^fr/dt is

common with G2

Hence we

or %.

dG

\G

dt

see that

dx
dt

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

164]

must be a polynomial
by co then we have

in (p

...,

of order unity

p 6 ),

363

denote this polynomial

It

of

. . .

an equation of this kind.

factors of

G by

the equations they satisfy be

let

JL^-

then we have

dG

where
(ft,

Denote the various

so that

i/r",

and

be shewn in the same way that each of the other irreducible factors

may

satisfies

"

dty

<ty

"

dt

d^r"

a polynomial in (p lt ..., p e ), of order unity, and rational in


Thus G! satisfies the equation
...,q ,s).
is

&>

dG =
l

and therefore

GJGz

(since

an

is

integral),

also satisfies the equation

~dt~

As

and

l
2 satisfy the same differential equation, we shall in future use
to denote either of them: so 9 is a real
polynomial in (p 1} ...,p 6 ft, ...,q G ,s),
,

which

Now

2
2
by qr k p r k~\ sk

respectively

o><.

merely multiplied by a power of k when

is
<f>

m=

~I

9
we

9=

the equation

satisfies

~TT

ac

ft.,

pr

are replaced

since

= ^ T

1~

9 V^ft- A
^~
when
this
by
r =i

>

opr oqr /

3
substitution is made. It follows
multiplied
that &) cannot contain a term independent of (p lf ...,p 6 ), since such a term
would be multiplied by an even power of &;
is therefore of the form

see that

&>

is

&>

where each of the quantities w r


(ft,

is

homogeneous of degree

in the quantities

...,?,).
Further,

one of the terms in

let

be of order
</>

n in

(ft, ...,

order n

&

in (ft,

power of k

s),

...,

while another term


<?

s):

is

m in (p
m in

of order

lt

,p 6 ) and of order
(p l} ...,p 6 ) and of

..

since these terms are multiplied

when the above

substitution

is

by the same

made, we have

m + 2n = m + 2ri,
so

m m

is

an even number.

Hence
</>

can be arranged in the form

The Theorems of Brans and Poincare

364

[CH. xiv

denotes the terms of highest order in (p lt ..., p6 ), 2 denotes terms


by two units in (p ...,p s ) than these, and so on: and each of

where

<.

</>

of order

less

the quantities
(pi,"-,

We

and

Pe)

<f)

also in (#1

now shew

shall

a polynomial in (p l} ...,p s q l} ...,q K

is

qt

homogeneous

s),

in

s}.

that when

does not involve

s,

<

can be made into an

</>

integral by multiplying

For suppose that

by an appropriate rational function of(ql9

it

does not involve

...,

<?).

the equation

s:

</>

tty

-+ -+

or

gives,

......

wxp!

+wp
2

4- ...

ft

on equating the terms of highest degree in (p

I p,.^0=

r=l

Now

may

<^>

>

l>

...,p 6 ),

^r oq r

contain

as a factor

in order to take account of this case,

does not contain p6 as a factor, and where as a


where
k
= 0, $ =$
in the
for
have
k
case
we
Substituting p6
may
special
differential equation, it becomes
write

p<f

<f)

<f>

<j>o

<

<j>

which do not involve j; 6 equating the


Let
denote those terms in
terms which do not involve p 6 on the two sides of this equation, we have
"

<

^>

It

may be

this case

"

that

is
</>

a mere function of q lt q 2 ...,q K say equal to


,

R;

in

we have

3R
~^ =

a) r

RD

(r

= 1,
n

-\

2, ..., o)

/ardjV

or

fji r

a) r

(/n.r

d^g

Supposing next that


involve

it
"

<f>

may
= p^fa

"

where

(r

l, 2, ..., o),

1, 2, ..., 5).

_.

C/g r

a>

r)

(/*&))

(r, s

c;^

does involve some of the quantities (p 1} ...,p 5 ),


to take account of this case, we write

a factor:

as

"

<

XI
o

and therefore

1 9^2
= -^^-

"

<

becomes

r=\

does not involve p 5 as a factor.

The equation now

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

164]
iv

365

"

which do not involve p 5 equating the


denote the terms in $
terms which do not involve p s on the two sides of this equation, we have
Let

<

r=l

Oq r

f^r

Proceeding in this way, we ultimately arrive at the alternatives, that


either

or else a function ty exists, which


geneous in q l} ..., q 6 and also in p l}

is

mere powers of p and p2 and which


l

Now

a^

fr

dq-2

3^

/MI

let

+1

w =
l

and p 2

The

quantities a,

l+l

"^

W1 =

>

d^j

db

7
/A 2 o

0^2

last equation,

are polynomials in (q 1}

b, c, ...

on the two sides of the

da

I
--

fra

common

2>

the differential equation

= apj + bp + cp^p.* +
ty

equating coefficients of p^
we have

satisfies

polynomial in q lf ..., q 6 PI, p homo


and is free from any factors which are

q.2 , ...,

q 6 ): they

may have

polynomial factor Q, so that

a
Let

-v//

a Q,

= a pj -f

so that

= b Q,

etc.

&X + c p^ps +
-^r

Q\Jr

Then
/

ft

)
(

Q/AJ 9g 1

^j

Ji

where
Pi/*i

The
)

wz

say,
1

^ p/- + 2 -g- =
2

3^

y^

-\/

9g 2

(&>!

p +
1

2 } i/r

a>,p.

left-hand side of this equation is a polynomial in (c^, q.2 ..., q K


if a/ contains 9^ then tw/ contains a
or some factor of it, as
,

this

factor.

tut

a denominator.

But

2 j5 2

da

&>!

so

Pi,pz)

+ 6)

Hence

ty

must contain a

or

some

factor of

inconsistent with the supposition that a, b


Hence a cannot involve q
and therefore
is

is zero.

&>/

...

it,

as a factor.

have no

is zero.

common
Similarly

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

366
rp,
Thus

&>,

and therefore
which

dQ

dQ

^r-

-7^

to 2

^
d

the same as the alternative previously noted

is

[CH. xiv

so this equation

is

true in any case.

we can shew

Similarly

in general that

<

^-^.OM*X

and hence we may write

where

is

some

rational function of (q 1} q 2

q6 ).

...,

Thus we have

p +

a} 1

o)^p 2

...

co 6

4 pr
p = Z=
-

pr

].

>

dR

1
-p ~
"

^(?r

r = l .R

d
(/>

dt

^ = Constant.

and therefore

Thus

can 6e transformed into

<

3gV

appropriate rational function of q lt

q.2

constant,
...,

q6

by multiplying

it

namely 1/.R; which

by an
the

is

required result.
If therefore the terms

in
</>

and

of (q\,

G
^2.

G and
l

G.2

do not involve

s,

we can transform

into integrals, by multiplying them by appropriate rational functions


a nd hence, if it can be shewn that the terms
in G 1 and G2
9e)
<

>

we

have the result that any algebraic integral of


the problem of three bodies can be compounded from integrals which are
polynomial in (p lt p 2 ...,p 6 ) and rational in q 1} q2 ..., q6 s.
do not involve

s,

shall

Proof that

(vii)

The

We

<f>

case in which

shall

<

does not involve the irrationality

involves s

is

s.

not included in the above investigation.

however now proceed to shew that no

real function

<

which

satisfies

an equation

can involve

not involve

s,

and hence that the functions


</>

so that the above result

is

occurring in our problem do

quite general.

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

164]

367

For suppose that a function


exists, which involves s and satisfies the
above differential equation. When the 8 values of s are substituted suc
take a number of distinct values let these values be
n will
cessively in
<

<

<f>

denoted by

>

<$><>

</>

they satisfy equations of the form


"

r - Q
p
^
- - d(f)
=
2,

r=l Pr 3q r

where
<<>

a/,

fa",

p r4
2,

to

9o

o>

when the

respectively are substituted in

",
<f>

Let

4>

-5

r=l Pr fyr

are the values of

...

= a)

d(f>

>

values of s corresponding to

it.

"....

<>

Then we have
|

<f>o"

fyr

//i

&)+&>

4- ...

mQ,
where

a linear function of (pi,p 2


of
functions
(q 1} q 2 ..., q6 ).
II is

...,p6 ), the coefficients being rational

Now
(q lf q z

So we

O, from the manner of

its

formation,

is

a rational function of

...,qK ), not involving s and it is clearly a polynomial in (p lt p 2 ...,p s ).


can apply to
the results already obtained, which shew that (on
:

<l>

by some rational function of q lt q 2

multiplying
therefore that

This

is

<f>

satisfies

...,

g e)

is

zero,

and

the equation

a partial differential equation for

<&

there are 6 independent

and 5 independent solutions can at once be found, namely the

variables,

quantities

f^
V Pi

-fc&V ., (Ml
\ Pi
(**/

_^|
PK

It follows that

3>

is

a function

only of the quantities

,,P,

Now
are

the factors of

<I>

differ

used in their formation

....p..

from each other only in that different roots s


so when such a relation exists between

q 6 ) that two of these roots s become equal to each other, then


= be regarded
will become equal to each other
two factors of
hence if
as an equation in jo 1} at least two roots will become
equal to each other.
(<?!,

q2

...,

When

this relation
f(<h,

exists

<l>

between
,

...,

q-2,

...,

9)

(q 1 ,q 2 ... q6 ), we shall therefore


6 will each be zero.

3<f>/9p

have d^/dp^

= 0; and similarly

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

368
Since

<E>

is

Pi

equivalent to
of the equations

is

<t>

in

homogeneous

<I>

94>/8pj

H Pi o

->

so

(p 1} p 2

<&

= 0,

I-

+p

xiv

p 6 ), the equation

.,

[CH.

does not constitute an equation independent


,

d<&/dp 6

0.

If small variations are given to the variables which satisfy the equation
= 0, their increments are connected by the equation

2
r=1

but

if (q lt

?..,

?6 Pi,
,

Pe) satisfy the equations

d$>/dp r

0, this

equation

becomes
6

and

this relation

between the increments 8^ r must therefore be equivalent

to

the relation

df

2 f-Bq r =0.
r
r=i
oq

Hence the equations

are consequences of the equations

we have

(for sets of values

d<$/dp r

of q lt q2

...,

q,

and

lt

so,

...,

since

p 6 which

7) r

3<J)

g~

is zero,

satisfy these

equations)

The equations f=

r
and 2 ^

~=

are therefore algebraically derivable

r=1

from the equations 94>/3p r = 0. Now the actual values of (g^. ...,g6 ) are
of no importance in this algebraical elimination; so we can replace q r by
we see that the equations
pr) in a11 tne equations: and thus

l+

t.

...,,+,. 8,

r=1 /^ dty

are algebraical consequences of the equations

ft)

7\
3>

(q lt ...,q 8 ,p 1 , ...,p 6

)-

^T

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

164]

Hence the

result of eliminating

369

between the equations

AH

must be an algebraic combination of the equations

(r=l,

Now

one such algebraic combination of these equations


<(?!,

...,q 6 ,p!, ...,#,)

2, ...,6).

is

= ();

can be derived by multiplying the equations by (p l ..., ps ) in turn, and


it is the eliminant which has just been
adding them. We shall shew that
for it

mentioned.

For

let

the eliminant in question be denoted by


6

then the equation

/axir
U i .

5-

r =i

must be a combination

8g r
-

V3gr

of the equations

r=l o

and

1#a

+ i

.-

Since the latter equation involves

combination

The
for
is

<J>

and

so

8,,

Si,

we

8^ +

see that

it

S(

= 0.

cannot enter into the

we have

found
identity of these equations with those which have already been
are equivalent. Hence
and

shews that the equations

^=

<!>=

<t>=

the eliminant of the equations

and
3*

Now

which are the conditions that the


equation for s may have equal roots, can easily be written down and this
and hence, by
result enables us then to find all possible polynomials
the equations

f(q lt

q2

^e)

0,

<1>,

factorisation of
w. D.

<J>,

to find all possible polynomials

</>.

24

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

370
The eight

[OH. xiv

+r

roots s are the eight values of the expression

r^r

where r 1} r2 r3 denote the mutual distances: so we may have two roots


equal as a result of any one of the equations
,

?i

r2

0,

= 0,

r3

0,

The equation

rx

rz

r3

r3

r 1}

i\

r.2

r3

r.2

1\

= 0.

gives
<tf

+ q^ + q:? =

0;

and the eliminant of

+p

=
so the value of

<I>

arising in this connexion

yu-3

2
3

t\

=0

&

8-fi

fc&Y

is

7x2

this expression is not resoluble into real factors,


can arise from this source.
nomials

and therefore no

real poly

</>

similar result can be deduced in connexion with the equations r 2

and r 3

0.

Consider next the equation

r,

r3

can be written in the form

it

-I

1,

m7T

9* M* M.
in
f/tj

2 ( 9l gr 4

or

"T~

fit s

+ ?2 ^ + ?
5

?6 )

\* ^1

^
//tj ~|

Replacing
to

5-,.

by

(q r

+ prt/f^r),

2 (q l9t

+ q*q + q
5

q 6)

+^+

q*)

= 0.

and forming the discriminant with respect

of the equation thus obtained,

^T^2 (?!

^^

we
(ft"

find

+? +

^1^4-- --^2^5-- --P


,

_,

m +m~(
l

o~r

^2

This expansion cannot be factorised into polynomials


can arise from this source.
--ipe), so no functions

</>

{p\,P-2,

^>

If

o"i~

\/j, l

pf/)

linear

in

The Theorems of Brims and Poincare


Similarly

may be shewn

it

with the equations rs

rr r
,

that no polynomials

=+

rz

</>

371

can arise in connexion

Lastly, the rationalised form of the equations

r2

1\
2

is

(r3

When

i\ is zero,

- r? +

r3

r*}*

=
4 rfa*

this case reduces to that

= 0.

which was

last discussed

since the polynomial


is not resoluble in this
special case,
resoluble in the general case.
<l>

Thus

finally,

no real polynomials

involving

s,

can

it

and

cannot be

exist.

Summarising the results obtained hitherto, we have shewn that any


algebraic integral of the differential equations, which does not involve t, is
an algebraic function of integrals
each of which can be written in the
</>,

form
<f>0

+
</>2

</>4

where
is a
homogeneous polynomial in the variables
and a homogeneous algebraic function of the variables
<

p, say of
q,

degree
say of degree

k,
I

homogeneous polynomial in the variables p, of degree (k - 2), and


a homogeneous algebraic function of the variables
q, of degree (1);
4 is
a homogeneous polynomial in the variables
- 4), and a
p, of degree (k
homogeneous algebraic function of the variables q, of degree (I 2) and
</>

is

<

so on.

Proof that
of angular momentum.
(viii)

We

is

</>

shall

a function only of

the

momenta and

the integrals

now proceed to shew that an integral


characterised by these
an algebraic function of the classical
integrals.
<f>,

properties,

is

The equation
or

g-o,
at
gives on replacing

<f>

by

<

4-

<

+$ +

_ ^
r

and equating terms of equal degree,

r
,

h 5

=\oq r Hr

**

~~

dp,

dq,.

~r

r=l
_

dqr

242

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

372
The

first

of these equations

is

[CH. xiv

a linear partial differential equation for

<

which can at once be solved, and gives

=/ (P P
2

<

p =

where

be

4>

<

=/

3/2

we have

/-

8<f>

pi, Pz,

p),

---

PrQl

/Ltj

fj, r

9
^
A o,

<V

(i

ft,

...

01.
..., fi\

PI,

P*

PS, ...,P s ,pi, ...,p),

r
+ 42 aF dq
d<b

where g r =

^"

frPr +
,

dq
or

in terms of the variables

(ft,P2

Qrpl

"r

Let the expression of

r~-2

^r

Mi 8

we have

Integrating

so there can

be no logarithmic terms in ^Xdq ly where

X=

S ^-

If

expressed in terms of q lt

...,

,Pi>

>

._

8Pr

denotes the expression of

U
,

in terms of the variables

pi, ...,

we have
-

The terms
now seen

so the

in

^-rj

(r

>

1)

and

which may give

rise to

5^5

logarithmic terms in

to be

terms which

may be

logarithmic in

Vdqt
* +

Xdq^

are

r=2 = 2 9

Xdq^

are

The Theorems of Brims and Poincare

164]

Now V

sum

is

(A + Bq + Cq^y-

of three terms, each of the form

we have

Taking each of these terms separately,


of the last expression
Pr

9/0

for the

(7

p r ps

85

.....

Q yvcn n
V>Olll

2<7o,

<ML

Thus

for

dB

8/0
tZ- - p,

>

each of the fractions (A

+ Bq + Cq^^, we must

for

the

of these fractions,

first

have

r=2

Now

2Cq,

arcsm
fl,rr.sin

./A,

namely (q^ + q.* +

q/)~^,

we have

so the first of the three equations will be

r=2

8P2
or (since

/i x

yu. 2

and on solving

8P

yu, 3 )

this equation

Pi, P*,

-,

we

Pe, P*,

see that

P (p^
s

a function of

is

p^qt),

Since the three expressions (A + Bq1


three quantities (q, 2 + q2 2 + qs 2 ), (q.q. +

and

(p^qs

psqt).

Gq^) are linear functions of the

q^ + q.q,),

*
(qt + qf + q,*), we can for
our present purpose replace them by these three
quantities so the second
expression (A + Bq^ + Gq^) may be taken to be (q^4 + q 2 q 5 + q3 q K }, or
:

(/iP
PI

/J,p t

PP1

?i

P^q\\ ff^Ps

fftP2
I

\ pi

so for this expression

Pi

I \

Pi

/^PsQi\
,

fjfp l

we have
2

Pi

VPS

Pi*

if^Ps
I

PaQi\ /AtPfih^
1

Pi

transcendental part

arcsm

V-

373

pi

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

374

and the corresponding equation

is

P.

The

third expression (.4

0*i

/*

0-* 5

[OH. xiv

+ .B^ + Cijj*) may

...(B).

/*
2

be taken to be
<?

-f

qs

+ q*~

the corresponding equation proves to be the same as equation (A), and may
We have therefore only to consider equations
consequently be neglected.

(A) and (B)

simplifying (B) by

means

may be

of (A), they

- P,

+ P-2

Pi

written

+P

these equations are obviously algebraically independent and the Jacobian


conditions of existence are satisfied identically for them, since the coefficients
;

r)f

of the derivates

^ do

These two equations

not involve the quantities P.

therefore form a complete system, with 5 independent variables


2 = 3 independent solutions, and
so there must be 5
5
6

P P
,

P P P

solution will be a function of these three solutions

and of

p p
lt

any other
2

...,p

.
ti

It is easily verified that three independent solutions are


2

+P

p6

-Pp
6

+P p -P p
6

or

q3 p 2

M = q^ - q,p

where

+qp -qp
+ q p, - q,p
s

and the three equations

L=

Constant,

M = Constant, N = Constant
We

have
are the three integrals of angular momentum of the system.
therefore the result that
L,
M,
N,
2
K
ly
function of
p p ...,p only.
<

(ix)

is

<

<,

lt

a function of T, L, M, N.

when expressed in terms of


p p2 ..., ps it is clear that $
We shall write
M, N, pi, ..., p6
Since

nomial in
L,

that

Proof

..., q 6 p 1} ...,p 6 is a poly


a polynomial in its arguments

q l q2
,

is

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

164]
so

we have

<^.

and the equation for/2

where

p l}

F,.
,

= | |G
r =i
r

<fe

= | 8G

atf

9p

37 5

W.

r= i 9p r 9gv

is

stands for dU/dqr supposed expressed in terms of q lt


We have therefore
,

....

P,

Pi r=l &
r

=
^a/h

9F

V+

,-tapr

Pi

where the symbol


expression (A

indicates

summation over the three values of the

+ Bq + Cqf).
l

Now the term %(P ..., P p ...,p ) cannot give rise to terms involving
+
(^4
Bq + Cqi ) in the denominator so the quantities multiplying each of
the expressions (A + Bq^ + Cq^ must themselves have the same character
2)

1}

as

<

(<?!>

they must be polynomial in (p lt

i-e.

$6,

<?2>

dG
]

Pi 9/i

g
W

PI,

We

,pz)-

/dG

must be a polynomial
q lt ..., J6 ).
Taking
becomes

in

dG\

(p^

first

2
or (omitting a factor

dB
dP r

/a)

6)

when expressed

in terms of

...,

A+

2gl

95
9P r

dA

9^1

"*

^gp;

4 Cgl

9P;

B ~^AC
2

HrpidpJ

r^2\9p r

...,

see therefore that the expression

p \ when expressed
fi

%+

Cqf = q* +

q.2

in terms of

(j9 u

+q

expression

2
3

this

...,p 6

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

376

[CH. xiv

- dG

or

Pi oft

^^
last fraction must therefore represent a polynomial in
denominator must be a factor of the numerator.

The
so the
>.-

IS

ow n
G

(dG
U--

PiP? dG\
S*-=
an d

f^G
---

Vdp2

topiop!/

\dp s

r ua polynomiali in L,
M, N, so

is

p p

...,

are polynomials in Z, -/If, J\r and involve q lt q2 q3 only by means of L, M,


in which case the denominator
so either they contain no terms in q lt q z q s
of
a
factor
the
numerator
or
be
else
cannot
they contain some terms free
,

from q lt qz q 3
,

which case also the denominator cannot be a

in

The condition can

numerator.

8^ _ Pi Pa
p2 pi

dp 2

factor of the

therefore only be satisfied by supposing that

8^ _ Pip 3 3G =
/x 3 ^ dp

dp 3

dpj.

As might be expected from

considerations of symmetry, the conditions

arising from the other sets of values of A, B,

dG

give

dG

fi.pr

fc-l&fc~

4,5,6).

The function G
a complete

therefore satisfies these five equations, which are


evidently
system of five independent equations with six

independent

and consequently possess only one independent solution;


solution is easily found to be
variables,

=i ^,
2/,

The function G therefore involves (p


and since G is polynomial in (p lt ...,
l ,

this

or

6 ),

T.

only by means of the expression

e)

it

must

also

be polynomial in

T.

the expressions (L, M,


involve (q lt ..., q6 ) and

..., q 6 ), and also in (p l} p 2


...,p 9 ), and
are
each
linear
in (q l ..., q 6 ), while
does not
N)
is of degree 2 in
(p lt ..., p 6 ), it is clear that if T is

involved in

must be

Since

is

homogeneous

at
<f>

all, it

in (q lt q2

as a factor

= h(L M,
t

<f>

where h
(x)

is

a homogeneous polynomial in

so

N)T
its

we can
m

write

arguments.

Deduction of Brims theorem, for integrals which do not involve

The equation which determines the function fz

is

t.

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

164]

But we have

KWKWW
p dT

dp,

PJ.

dp,

and therefore

/ = %(P
2

...,

N)

,p lt ...,p.)-mh(L, M,

T->

U.

Thus

The

integral

namely

can therefore be compounded from two other


integrals,

<

the integral h(L, M, N}(T- U) m which


the classical integrals,

and 2 the integral $

= x (P

<

& = fc - m(
0; =

But

compounded from

where
-f

<

</

</>

and

is itself

^+

P p
6

1}

lf

+
.

. . .

p 6 ),

h (L, M,

^"

?^2)

N) T~* U*,
h

(L>

N) Tm

M>

-3
U3>

an integral of the same character as


except that its highest
of order two degrees less in (p lt ...,p6 ) than the
highest term,

is
((>

<f>,

term,
,

<f>

Now we

of
<j).

<f>

is

have shewn that

<

integrals together with the integral

<

can be compounded from the classical


can be compounded
Similarly
.

<

from the classical integrals together with an


integral
character as
but is of order less by four units than

<"

<,

Proceeding in this way,

we

see that
(f>

integrals together with an integral


(n
is of order
unity or zero. If

(n)
<

<l>M=<l>

we must evidently have & = 0;

in the variables p.

can be compounded of the classical


whose order in (p l} ...,_p6 ) is either

unity in (p lt

>

<

which has the same

<

...,

p 6 ) then

w=h(L,M, N)T

in the equation

n is
in this case, therefore,
compounded of
n
the classical integrals. If
is of order zero in
is a function
it
(p lt ..., p6 ),
of (q l
but
we
have
G
shewn
that
such integrals do not exist
q ) only
already
and so in any case
can be compounded
from the classical
>

<<

>

</><

. . .

algebraically
Hence we have Bruns theorem, that every algebraic
integrals.
integral of
the differential equations of the
problem of three bodies, which does not involve
</>

the time, can be


integrals.

compounded by purely algebraic processes from

the classical

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

378

Extension of Bruns result

(xi)

[CH. xiv

which involve the time.

to integrals

We now

of
proceed to consider those algebraic integrals of the problem
three bodies which involve the time explicitly.

purpose we shall take the equations of motion as a system ( 155)


of the 18th order: we have therefore to investigate integrals of the form

For

where

this

/ is

an algebraic function of

arguments, and a

its

is

a constant.

Let the last


The function
is not necessarily rational in its arguments.
it may be
that
equation be rationalised, so far as the variable t is concerned, so

arranged in the form


am + a m
(q l ..., q
^(f>

+ a m ~ ^(q^
+ m (qi,
2

p lt

...,p 9

t)

>

<t>

where the functions

are rational functions of

<

q^p,, ...,p 9

.,.,

t)

q,pi,

>#,

...

o,

<)

and algebraic functions of

may be supposed
p
p
cannot be factorised into other equations which
are of lower degree in a and are rational in t for if it is reducible, we can
factors which corresponds to
suppose it replaced by that one of its irreducible

their other

arguments

irreducible in

t, i.e.

(q

lt

such that

l}

This equation

9 ).

it

the original equation

f= a.

Differentiating with respect to


d

a^

Now

we have

t,

p + a^ ^ +

...

at

dt

0.

at

in terms of (g lf q a ..., 9
the quantities
r /dt, when expressed
the
so
that
of
t
functions
rational
are
previous equation would
p lt ...,p ,t),
be reducible in t if this equation did not vanish identically. It follows that
<?

this equation does vanish identically

The expressions
integral

d<f>

<f)

that

is,

are therefore themselves integrals: and hence the


which are rational
other integrals

can be compounded

from

<j),

and algebraic functions of (q lt ...,


be resolved into factors
Let such an integral

functions of

q^ypi,

,pa)-

linear in

<

so that

it

may

be written

where (P,^!,^,...,^,*^!,...,^*) are algebraic functions of (q 1}


Since this expression is an integral, we have
1 d-t

[~

+T
Pdt^^^A

-ri ~77

m>i

~
~ d(pi\
"+- +

dt)^

{-

ni^if

*
T"

^t-<}>

k {

a<p]f\
37"

dtJ

~4

n^

-.

t-^\
IT,

...,q 9 ,pi,

~
dt)

ni

dt J

,&)

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

164]

Wh (<>!,

f -f

//), ..., (tyi,

if

,,

acedb y

their ralues

.....

eft

cfa

eft

are re P

must become an identity: but

this equation

H),

if

happen only

i.e.

* f -1

379

(P

*>

this can

at

each of the expressions

P,

t
-</>!,

t- $ 2

...,

t-

fa, t-yjr lt

...,

t-^i

Hence am/
an integral.
problem of three bodies
which involves t can be compounded (1) of algebraic integrals which do not involve
algebraic integral of the

is

and

of the form

(2) of integrals

==

t
(f>

ivhere

is
<f>

Now

Constant,

an algebraic function of (q lt

it is

known

<>>

...,

q9 PI,
,

...,> 9 ).

that

i_^gi

fr!M? = Constant

^1+^4+^7
an integral hence any algebraic integral of the problem, which involves
can be compounded of
is

(1)

algebraic integrals which do not involve

(2)

integrals of the form

t,

_ miqi
where

<

(3)

is

an algebraic function of (q 1}

...,

q 9 p^,
,

...,

9)

and

the classical integral

_
But the

?fti9i

and (2) are algebraic integrals which do


and hence, by the result already obtained, they are

integrals in classes (1)

not involve the time

combinations of the classical integrals.

Thus

finally every algebraic integral

problem of three bodies, whether

from

it

of the differential equations of the

involves the time or not, can be

compounded

the classical integrals.

Bruns theorem has been extended by Painleve*, who has shewn that every integral of
the problem of n bodies which involves the velocities algebraically (whether the coordinates
are involved algebraically or not) is a combination of the classical integrals.
*

Bull. Astr. xv. (1898), p. 81.

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

380

Poincare

165.

We

shall

[CH. xiv

theorem.

next establish another theorem on the non-existence of a certain

which is in many respects


type of integrals in the problem of three bodies,
in
1889
was
discovered
and
of
Bruns,
by Poincare*.
analogous to that
The equations of motion of the

(i)

problem of three

restricted

bodies.

In the restricted problem of three bodies, the equations of motion of the


planetoid can ( 162) be written in the form

_ dH

dq r
dt

dp

H=H

where

dt

H H
l

...

2p^~

(r=l,

2),

dq r

+ p.H + fj?H +
1

and

_ _ dH

dp r

...,

UP 2

are periodic in q ly q2 with period


,

27r.

The Hessian

in the proof
evidently zero as this circumstance would prove inconvenient
of Poincare s theorem, we shall modify the form of the equations so as to obtain

is

a system for which the corresponding Hessian

Write

= K,

and

is

not zero.

let

H = h be the integral of energy

dq r

1 dK
= oi
o

~rr

dt

2h

1 dK
dp r =
~JT
~~o7^~
2h
dt

>

then we have
a\
v. ***.*)*
,

-\

oq r

dp,-

therefore, taking a new function


equal to K/2h, we can write the
differential equations of the restricted problem of three bodies in the form

and

dqr

where

for sufficiently

= _dH

dpr

= dH^

dt

dt

dp r

small values of

/*,

=l

2}

dqr

H can be expanded as a power-series

in the parameter n,

and
the Hessian of
period

is

not

now

zero,

and

(H

...)

are periodic in q lt q2 with


,

2?r.

Acta Math. xm. (1890),

p.

259; Xouv. Meth. de la Mec. Gel.

i.

(1892), p. 233.

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

165]

Statement of Poincare

(ii)

Let

381

s theorem.

which

is one-valued and
which
do not exceed
p
q.,,
a certain limit, and for values of p and p 2 which form a domain D, which
is periodic with
may be as small as we please and suppose that
respect to
and
the
2?r.
Under
these
conditions the function
can
q
qz having
period

denote a function of (q

<3>

p 1} p

q^,

: ,

and

regular for all real values of q 1

2,

JJL)

for values of

<J>

<f>

be expanded as a power-series in

/j,,

say

where
^, 2 ... are one-valued analytic functions of (q1} qz ,pi,p^), periodic
in ^ and q 2
Poincare s theorem is that no integral of the restricted problem
three
bodies
exists (except the Jacobian integral of energy and integrals
of
<I>

<I>

equivalent to

it),

which

of the form

is

4>

= Constant,

The proof which follows is applicable


whose
any dynamical system
equations of motion are of the same type as
those of the restricted problem of three bodies.
wliere

is

<J>

a function of

this character.

to

The necessary and


integral

is

sufficient

condition that

Constant

may be an

expressed by the vanishing of the Poisson-bracket (H,

and therefore

(H

<I>

<I>)

so that

0,

0r ,4g+(jr,,t)-a
a

Proof that

(iii)

We

shall first

^>

**

not a function of

shew that

relation of the form

cannot be a function of

4>

O = ty (H

For suppose a

From

the equation
we have on solving for p l an equation of the form p^ = 6 (H
be a one-valued function of its arguments unless dHo/dp^

domain D.

Replacing p by
have an equation of the form

and as

its

to exist.

value 6 in the function

^>

H = H (p
,

is

(q 1}

2 ),

lt

and B

p2 )

will

zero in the
q^,p-i,p^),

we

a one-valued function of

its arguments ty will be a one-valued


but by hypothesis, the function ty depends only
on
It follows that ^r is a one-valued function of
so long as the
variables pi,pz remain in the domain D, and
is
not zero in D
provided ^H^fdp^
or more generally provided one of the derivates
and
dH /dp 2 is not
dH^/dp!
4>

is

function of (q lt q z

H ,p );
2

zero in D, a condition which

is
Since t/r is
evidently satisfied in general.
a one-valued function, the equation -/r (H) = Constant will be a one-valued
- -v/r (H) = Constant
integral of the differential equations, and therefore
will also be a one-valued
integral, and will be expansible as a power-series
<

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

382
in

fj,

we

it will

moreover be divisible by

//,,

since

ty

4>

(#)

[CH. xiv
If then

is zero.

write

- ^ (H) = p

<X>

the equation

the function

= Constant

<!>

be a one-valued analytic integral

be a function of

will not in general

<I>

will

writing

however

if

it is

we perform the same operation

again, thus arriving at a third


whose
one-valued analytic integral,
part independent of /A will not in general
and so on. It is evident that in this way we shall
be a function of

function of

ultimately obtain an integral which does not reduce to a function of


is a function of H, in which case the two integrals
is zero, unless
IJL
<$>

H when
H and
<I>

are not distinct.

which is one-valued and analytic


an integral
is a function of
we can
and distinct from H, but which is such that
from
it another integral, of the same character but such that
derive
always
If,

therefore, there exists

<

<l>

it

does not reduce to a function of

always suppose that


(iv)

Proof that

<&

Am

m^

co-factor of

Am

HI j,

cannot involve the variables q 1}

can therefore

<?,.

it is

periodic in

i,i

are positive or negative integers, i denotes v


1, the
are functions of p 1} p z and
represents the exponential
,

Since

does not involve q 1} q 2 we have


,

ill.-)

-Q)
/dq r

d3>

dp 2

dq,

= 2 im r A m m
m,

dp,

But we have

We

= 2 A
,

quantities

vanishes.

4>

where m, and

<

we

when p

not a function of

involves the variables q, q 2 then since


can write

If the function

these variables

is

<E>

so

%,

oq*

the equation

(H

4>

m-i

becomes
*

dPl

and

therefore (as this equation is

ij

-=-

dp,

Hence we must have

an identity)

=
+m dpj
2

0.

either

A mi ,mo =

or

>idHo/dpi

+ m dH
2

(l

fdp 2

but the latter alternative is possible only when m, and m 2 are both zero, or
It follows that all
is zero, which is not the case.
when the Hessian of
does not
and consequently
are zero, except A 0t
the coefficients A m

<I>

)OTo

involve the variables q, and q z

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

165]

Proof

(v)

the result of

is inconsistent ivith

in the general case.

(iii)

Consider

of a one-valued integral

that the existence

383

now

the equation

As

dp r dqr

4>

be expanded in series

and

and

C^,^

m.,

2 Bm mn m r
2

mi ,m,

OT,,m 2

or (since this equation

This equation

p and p2 which

^=i
dq
r

4
2 a^a^
r 5 -=-^

2 B

d
t,

"

m^m.,

^n mrS,

2 m,

(
\r-l

=
^)
Op

0,

r/

an identity)

p p
l}

and therefore

for values of

satisfy the equation

dH.
--^

f-

W1 2

opi

dH =
^r
0,
3jp 2

either

B m,

m2

or
>

9^o/3^i

values such that

m>t

9^0/3^2

Bm ^ m becomes
m dH /dp + m dH fdp = 0.

shall say that a coefficient

is

"^

2 C

m,^)
Opr/

<1

we must have

valid for all values of

is

,2

r=l dp r dq r

(V=l
is

2 Cm
Wi>w

Bm

a^a^ =

9^
-

r =i 9jo r

becomes

We

so the equation

say,

are positive or negative integers, and the coefficients


have therefore
depend only on p lt p 2

dqr

As

^=i

We

= 2 B

! ,

dpr dqr

ei(m iqi + m , q ,)

2 B
m,

where

r !Ti

and
are periodic with respect to q 1} q2
they can
of the form

the functions

= 0.

secular

when pj,p2 have

a given function, the coefficients

Bm

>m

are given.

In the general

case of dynamical systems


expressed by differential equations of the kind we
are considering, no one of these coefficients will vanish when it becomes
secular,

and we

shall take this case first:

so that the equation

is

=
x d^o/dp, + m^ d
/dp2
a consequence of the equation
l dffo/dp, + m 2 dH
/dp

Now

let

k-i,

k.2

be two integers

such that the equation

= 0.

suppose that we give to p^ and

values

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

384

that

1 k

+m k
z

m dH /dp + m dH /dp

expression

m-!

so the Jacobian

dH fdp

is zero,

d(H

dH jdp

and

<

)/3

0>

(p 1} p2 )

and consequently

+ m2

BOo/a^j

Comparing these two equations,

is zero.

xiv

can find an infinite number of pairs of integers m lt m., such


and for each of these systems of integers the
is zero:

We

is satisfied.

[CH.

d$>

/dp2

we have

zero for all values of

is

p p2
lt

Thus

are commensurable with each other.

in

for

which

any domain,

however small, there are an infinite number of systems of values of p lt p 2 for


which this Jacobian is zero as the Jacobian is a continuous function, it must
must be a function of
therefore vanish identically, and consequently
in
what
was
But this is contrary to
(iii), and therefore the funda
proved
:

<J>

must be erroneous
mental assumption as to the existence of the integral
that is, the Harniltonian equations possess no one-valued analytic integral
<&

other than

becomes

H=

h,

Removal of
have now

vanishes

indices

(raj

when

and (m/,

2)

becomes

it

m vanishes when

it

on the

coefficients

which at

We

secular.

least

.
mi>

one of the coefficients

two pairs of

shall say that

?n/) belong to the same class when they satisfy the


and that in this case the coefficients Bm ^ m and

belong to the same

<

wij

the restrictions

to consider the case in

mj/m/ = ra /m

relation

secular.

(vi)

We

Bm

provided no one of the coefficients

class.

,m<2

We

shew that the

shall first

result obtained in (v) as to the non-existence

true provided that in each of the classes there is at


coefficient
least one
m m which does not vanish on becoming secular. For
is zero, but the coefficient
that the coefficient
m m is not

of one- valued integrals

is

zero.

B ^

B^^

suppose

If pi,
i

have values such that

W 3H

and although the

/dp2

0,

relation n^

m-i dH ftpi + m dH /dp


2

3<&

= cannot be inferred from


/dp 2
can be inferred from the latter the proof is

/9.Pi

d3>

mj/w 2

= X-

domain,

let
lt ra 2
completely defined by the ratio of the indices
which
for
indices
of
C
the
class
be
commensurable number, and let

a class

X be any

we have

and consequently

the former of these equations, it


in other respects the same as in (v).

Now

is zero,

is

We

shall say for brevity that this class


or is in this domain, if a set of values of p l}

domain such that

dH
--

A, ^r

9//o
1-

_ nV.

G
p
2

belongs to a given
can be found in this

The Theorems of Bruns and Poincare

165]

We

shall

which

small,

which not

all

385

shew that the theorem

is still true if in
every domain B, however
contained in D, there are an infinite number of classes for
the coefficients of the class vanish when they become secular.
is

For take any

set of values of

p ,p 2 such that
l

dH
-

A.

3/f

A, is

_ U.

op*

9pi

Suppose that

we have

for these values

commensurable, and that

for the class

which corresponds

to this value of X, all the coefficients of the class do not vanish

when they

become secular the preceding reasoning then applies to this set of values,
and so for these values of p and p2 the Jacobian d(H
)/3(p 1} p. } is zero.
But, by hypothesis, there exists in every domain 8, however small, which is
:

4>

contained in D, an infinite number of such sets of values of p lt p 2


The
Jacobian consequently vanishes at all points of D, and therefore O is a func
tion of
so, as before, there exists no one- valued integral distinct from
.

Deduction of Poincare" s theorem.


In the four preceding sections, we have considered equations of the
type

(vii)

dqr_dH
dt

which

in

dpr ~_
dt

dp r

dH
dq r

H can be expanded in the form


H
H H

where the Hessian of


Q with respect to p^ and p 2 is not zero,
does not
involve q and q2 and
... are
functions
of
and
lt
2
we have
periodic
q lt q2
shewn that no integral of these equations exists which is distinct from the
equation of energy and is one-valued and regular for all real values of q and
q2 for values of /* which do not exceed a certain limit, and for values of p and
p z which form a domain D; provided that in every domain, however small,
l

contained in D, there are an infinite number of ratios


m^m^ for which not
the corresponding coefficients Bm m vanish when
they become secular.
^

all

This result can be applied at once to the restricted


problem of three
bodies for we have seen in (i) that the
of
motion
in this problem
equations
are of the character specified, and on
the
function
H^ by actual
determining
:

expansion we find that the last condition

is satisfied.

Poincare s theorem

is

thus established.
Poincare s theorem establishes the non-existence of integrals
uniform with respect to
Keplerian variables, which implies uniformity in the neighbourhood of all the tra
This however does not exclude the
jectories which have the same osculating ellipse.
the

existence of integrals which are uniform in

domains of a

different character.

Cf. Levi-

Civita, Acta Math. xxx. (1905), p. 305.

cf.

The theorem has been extended by


Nouv. Meth. de la Mec. Cel. i. p. 253

Poincare"

it

to the general problem of three bodies


,

(1900), p. 1699.

w.

D.

has also been extended by Painleve C.R. cxxx.


25

CHAPTER XV
THE GENERAL THEORY OF ORBITS
Introduction.

166.

We

shall

now

and disposition of the


pass to the study of the general form
For simplicity we shall in the present chapter

orbits of dynamical systems.

motion of a particle which is free to move in a plane


under the action of conservative forces, but many of the results obtained can
be readily extended to more general dynamical systems.

chiefly consider the

been observed ( 104) that the determination of the motion


two degrees of freedom under the action of conservative
with
of a particle
to
the problem of finding the geodesies on a surface with
forces is reducible
It has already

a given line-element; an account of the properties of geodesies might


therefore be regarded as falling within the scope of the discussion.
Many of
these properties are however of no importance for our present purpose and
as the theory of geodesies is fully treated in many works on Differential
:

which are of general


Geometry, we shall only consider those theorems
dynamical

The
orbits

interest.

have been obtained hitherto relate to periodic


principal results which
of a given orbit (especially of a periodic
to
the
stability
167-171),

with respect to small displacements from it (


172-176), and to the
i.e. the question
to
the
with
of
orbits
time,
a
of
respect
given group
stability
the lapse of a
after
character
their
orbits
the
how
far
as to
general
orbit)

preserve

very great time


167.

177-179).

Periodic solutions.

Great interest has attached in recent years to the investigation of those


motion of dynamical systems in which the same con
particular modes of
figuration of the system

is

so that the
repeated at regular intervals of time,

motion is purely periodic. Such modes of motion are called periodic solutions.
The term periodic solution is also used in cases where a relative rather than

an absolute configuration
three bodies, a solution

is

is

periodically repeated:
said to be periodic if the

thus in the problem of


mutual distances of the

The General Theory of Orbits

166-168]

387

bodies are

periodic functions of the time, although the bodies may not


have
the same orientation at the end of a period as at its
necessarily

beginning.

Considering specially the motion of a particle in a plane or on a fixed


smooth surface under the action of conservative forces, it is evident that a
family of periodic orbits will exist in the neighbourhood of each position of
stable equilibrium of the particle, namely the orbits
corresponding to the
normal vibrations of the particle about this equilibrium position. If the
position of equilibrium is unstable, it may happen that the periods of both
the modes of normal vibration are
imaginary, in which case no periodic orbits
exist in the

vibration

vicinity,

is real,

these orbits will evidently however be unstable, whereas the


neighbourhood of the position of stable equilibrium are stable.

periodic orbits
orbits in the

168.

or_that the period of one of the modes of normal


real normal vibrations give a family of

which case these

in

Poincare

normal variables for a known periodic

The equations which


pressed in a

define a periodic orbit are

form due to Poincare

orbit.

most conveniently ex

*.

Let the motion of the dynamical system considered be defined


by the
equations
dq,
dt

where the function


fc

= dH

dpr__dH
=
dt

dpr

dqr

H does not involve the time

=
0l(0>

?2=<k(0>

Pl

explicitly

P*

^l(t)>

and

let

= fa(i)

be the equations which define a known


There
periodic orbit of this system.
is clearly no loss of
if
we
generality
suppose the coordinates (q l} q2 p^ p 2 ) to
be such that after the lapse of a
period the variables q lt qz p resume their
,

initial values,

while

p.2

increases

From these equations


be written in the form

so that the functions 6 1}

0.2

by

2?r.

can be eliminated

let

6S have the period

the result of the elimination

2-rr.

Perform on the system the contact-transformation defined


by the equations

where
(

8*

(,)-

Nouvelles Methodes de la Mec. Cel. n. p. 369.

252

The General Theory of Orbits

388
The equations

Q,

xv

of this transformation can be written

- 9, - *. (ft) +

The equations

[en.

{*

ft (ft))

- *3 (ft)}

fft

new

of motion of the dynamical system, in terms of the

variables, are

dPr

dt

0&

dt

and from the above equations of transformation

now

solution is

it is

evident that the periodic

defined by the equations

Q = 0,
1

Q,

= 0,

P=
1

0,"

P =f
2

(0-

This form of the equations of the orbit will be called Poincare s

normal form.

orbits.
for the discovery of periodic
We shall now shew that the existence and position of periodic orbits can
the
be determined by a theorem* analogous to those theorems which furnish
roots of an algebraic equation by considerations depending on
position of the
We shall for simplicity
the sign of expressions connected with the equation.
considered to be that of the motion of a
suppose the dynamical problem
mass in a plane under the action of conservative forces: the
particle of unit
result can be extended to more general systems without difficulty!-

169.

criterion

of the particle at time t, referred to any fixed


y} be the coordinates
and let V(x, y) be its potential energy function,
rectangular axes in the plane,
of
the
so that
energy is
equation

Let

(as,

l(#+f)+V(a>,y)=K,

where h

The

is

the constant of energy.

differential equations of

motion of the particle form a system of the

fourth order, and their general solution consequently involves four arbitrary
One of these constants is, however, merely the constant additive
constants.

which determines the epoch in the orbit, so there are only


This triple infinity of orbits can be arranged in
distinct orbits.

to

t,

oo

really

sets,

each

those orbits for


containing a double infinity of orbits, by associating together
of oo 2 orbits
set
a
h
such
which the constant of energy has the same value
:

Cf. A. Signorini, Rend. d. Lincei,


186.
Whittaker, Monthly Notices R.A.S. LXII. (1902), p.
xxi.
Rend. d. Palermo, xxxin. (1912), p. 187; L. Tonelli, Rend. d. Lincei,

xxi. (1912), p. 36;

(1912), pp. 251, 332.


of three bodies,
f For the extension to the restricted problem
LXII. (1902), p. 346.

cf.

Monthly Notices R.A.S.

The General Theory of Orbits

168, 169]

may

389

be defined analytically by the principle of least action

that the orbit between two given points (x


the value of the expression

and (xly

y^) is

namely

100),

make

such as to

stationary as compared with other curves joining the given terminal points

Oo,

?/ )

and

(>,,

2/ a )*.

Consider any simple closed curve C in the plane of xy and let another
simple closed curve G be drawn, enclosing C and differing only slightly from
it.
We may regard as defined by an equation of the form
;

C"

where 8p is the normal distance between the curves C and C (measured out
wards from C, and consequently always positive) and 7 is the inclination of
this normal distance to the axis of x.
Then if / be the value of the integral

when the

integration is taken round the curve C, and if / + 81 denote the


value of the same integral when the integration is taken round the curve

C"

(so that the

symbol 8 denotes an increment obtained in passing from

to

),

we have

81=

{(dxf

+ (dy)^

8 [h

V(x, y)}?

{h

V(x, y)}? 8 {(dx?

But we have

- i a rr/
{A- V(x,
i

and

8 {(dxf

where p

is

(dy}

8F
M-*/
I
cos

y}\

= 8p.dy =

^j-

9F
y-

sin

V,,
)
8p,

{(dx?

the radius of curvature of the curve

at the point (x, y).

Thus we have
S/=f{(<fe)+(dy)}*{A-r^^
J
This equation shews that

if

ox

oy }

the quantity

h-V(x,y}
-- A cos 7l dV
-- * sin 7T dV
^
-7=r-

Following Painleve, Liouville

which have the same constant

dx

s Journal, x.
(1894), it
of energy a natural family.

dy
is

customary

to call a family of orbits

The General Theory of Orbits

390

[OH.

xv

81 is negative, and so the integral I has


negative at all points of C, then
curve
when
its value diminished
surrounding C and adjacent to C is
any
of
taken instead of C as the path
integration.
is

Now
C,

h-V

*
2

cos 7

Then, in the same way,

is positive.

diminished when any simple

taken instead of

is

3F

When,

D
we

therefore,

-,.--

D,

curve
suppose that another simple closed
all points of D the quantity

can be drawn enclosing

and such that at

it

dV\

+ sin 7 ^r

dy/

can be shewn that the integral /

closed curve

enclosed by

and adjacent

is

to

as the path of integration.

consider the aggregate of

all

simple closed curves

which is assumed to
situated in the ring-shaped space bounded by C and
that the curve
is
clear
it
function
of
the
no
contain
V(x, y)
singularity
coincide
cannot
or
be
C
and
cannot
of
I
value
D,
which furnishes the least

There exist, therefore, among the


for which the
one or more curves
simple closed curves of this aggregate,
does
value of / is less than for all other curves of the aggregate. Since

with

or

for

any part of

its

length.

it follows, that the


C or
along any part of its length,
are all members of the aggregate in question, and hence
curves adjacent to
furnishes a stationary value of / as compared with all the
that the curve
is therefore an orbit in the dynamical
The curve
to
it.
curves adjacent
theorem: // one dosed curve be
at
the
arrived
We have thus
system.
the
enclosed by another closed curve, and if
quantity

not coincide with

h-V(x,y)
v
?-

i cos

dV
7* -~dx

8F

* sin 7 -rdy

be negative at all points of the inner curve and positive at all points of the outer
the two curves there exists a periodic
curve, then in the ring-shaped space between
orbit of the

dynamical system, for which the constant of energy

quantity

h-V(x,y)
^
- i cos
.

"

dV
7 ^ox

\ sin 7

is h.

As

the

dV
-5-

dy

can be calculated immediately for every point on the curves C and D, de


function and the curves
pending as it does only on the potential-energy
themselves, this result furnishes a means of detecting the presence of periodic
orbits.

170.

We

Lagranges
shall

now

three particles.

consider specially certain periodic solutions of the problem

of three bodies.

useful

summary

of theorems relating to families of periodic orbits in the restricted


K. Moulton, Proc. Inter. Cong, of Math. Cambridge,
is given by

problem of three bodies


1912,

II.

p. 182.

The General Theory of Orbits

169, 170]
The
Proc. L.

and

relation of periodic orbits to orbits of ejection

same

the bodies occupy in the same position at the

M.

391
which two of

collision, in

studied by Moulton,

is

time,

S. (2), xi. (1912), p. 367.

category of non-plane periodic orbits in the problem of three bodies


Pavanini, Annali di Mat. (3), xin. (1906), p. 179.

is

discussed by

Let the equations of motion of the problem be taken in the reduced form
obtained in 160, and let us first enquire whether these equations admit of a
particular solution in which the mutual distances of the bodies are invariable
throughout the motion.

The mutual distances

are

--2m2 ftft/ cos q^ cos q, ---k -p --pf


sin q
m +m \
2p p,
2

11

<7i

-\Q

(*~

sin o 4

*/

k -p --pf
2m o go/
-sm ft sin aft\ +
cos
cos ft ---gW*
* + m
+ m,\ ft
)
2,
2

and

it

follows that, in the particular solution considered, the quantities

k -p-sin sin
--ft
^
^
2

and cos

ft,

ft,

ft

p<?

cos ft

must be constant, and hence the functions U, dU/dq^ dU/dq 2 must be constant,
~
where U= ^m m 2 r12
l

The equations

= ft = dH
=p
5
.

9^i

shew that p and


l

p.2

p.
= 03 = dH
^=^,
2

1
,

3^2

/*

must be permanently

zero

A*

while the equations

shew that p3 and p 4 must be constant.


Moreover, the equations

A=

.
/>

a#

aff
= -^-,

0=^4 = -^

3ft

3ft

shew that the expressions


3
a

C S ?4

9ft
fj

and
are zero, so

-- __
W*2

cos ft cos o4
^
3ft \

yj^

2 ^.^
2
^J

^4

sin o, sin

2jo 3 p 4

we have

-&
= cot ft tan ft = ^Pi + ^
2

tan ^ 3 cot

ft

*ppt
and therefore
or

2
p* + ^ 4

-^ =+

^ = (/

2p 3 p 4
2

,3

p4 )

2
,

The General Theory of Orbits

392

[en.

xv

an equation which shews that the instantaneous planes of motion of the


bodies
and // coincide with the plane through these bodies and the origin

fj,

in other words, the motion of


the

motion of

m m m
1

and

//,

//

takes place in a plane

and therefore

takes place in a plane.

It follows that, the centre of gravity


of the system being supposed at
ra
we
shall
denote by P, Q, R) must move
the
2
3
rest,
(which
particles

m^ m

in circular orbits

We

round 0.

have now to see

if

such a motion

is

possible.

One

condition which must obviously be satisfied is that the resultant


attraction of any two of the particles on the third must act in the line joining

the third particle to the centre of gravity. This condition is satisfied if the
If they are not in a
three particles are in the same straight line.
straight
line, it

gives
*ffl

sin

But

since

is

PRO = ^~-

sin

ra 2 sin

we

we have

PRO _~ sin QPR _


~ QR
QRO sin PQR P

PR = QR

combined with the preceding equation gives

this

find

similar equations.

the centre of gravity of the particles,

m
and

QRO, and two

sin

similarly

PR = PQ.

Hence

either the bodies

must

be collinear, or else the triangle

formed by

them must be equilateral.


Considering

the collinear case, let the distances of the bodies from


(measured positively in the same direction) be a l} a.,,

first

their centre of gravity

as respectively: we

which does not lessen


2
s
suppose that a l
Since the force acting on P must be that
corresponding to circular motion round 0, we have
shall

<a

<a

the generality of the discussion.

n?a

where n
n

a2

is

(a s

a 2 )~

+ k)

where & denotes the


is

(a2

+ n^ (a

these equations

rn^fc {(1

This

we

PQR
na =m

aj)~

and similarly

2
a^"

ni 3 (a s

i)~

the angular velocity of the line

From

(a s

o^)"

+m

(a 3

a 2 )~2

readily find

- 1] + ma (1 + k) (& 2

a2 )/(a 2

ratio (as

a quintic equation in

k,

1)

+ m,

[k

- (1 + k) = 0,
3

a-^.

with real

coefficients.

Since the left-hand

side of the equation is negative when k is zero, and positive when k = + oo


there is at least one positive real root; such a root determines uniquely real

values for the ratios a 1 :a 2 :a3

be completely determined.

and

if

is

given, the distances a lt a z a3 can

It follows that there are

an

infinite

number of

solutions of the problem of three bodies, in which the bodies remain always in a
straight line at constant distances from each other ; the straight line rotates

393

The General Theory of Orbits

170]

uniformly, and when

its

angular velocity has been (arbitrarily) assigned, the

the bodies are determinate.

mutual distances of

of
Considering next the equilateral case, let a be the length of one side
Since
the triangle formed by the bodies, and let n be its angular velocity.
to a circular orbit round 0,
the force acting on
3 is that which corresponds

we have

a?

cos

PRO + ~
a

cos

QRO = n*

OR,

a condition which reduces to

relating to the motion of Q and of R reduce to the same


and
hence
a motion of the kind indicated is possible, provided n
equation:
and a are connected by this relation. Hence there are an infinite number of

The conditions

solutions of the problem of three bodies, in which the triangle formed by the
bodies remains equilateral and of constant size, and rotates uniformly in the
plane of the motion: the angular velocity of its rotation can be arbitrarily

assigned,

and

the size

of the triangle

is

then determinate.

particular types of motion which have now been found will be


Lagrange s collinear particles and Lagrange s equidistant particles

The two
called

respectively*.
after Lagrange s discovery, its interest was sup
to
be
But in 1906 a new minor planet, 588 Achilles,
theoretical.
posed
purely
was found to have a mean distance equal to that of Jupiter and it was soon

For more than a century

realised that the Sun, Jupiter, and Achilles constitute, approximately at any
rate, an example of the Lagrangian equilateral- triangular configuration.

Shortly afterwards came the discovery of three other Asteroids, 617 Patroclus,
624 Hector, and 659 Nestor, which are in the same caset- Of this "Trojan
Patroclus is in longitude Jupiter
60, and the other three in longi
group,"
tude Jupiter + 60.
Example. Shew that particular solutions of the problem of three bodies exist, in which
the bodies are always collinear or always equidistant, although the mutual distances are
not constant but are periodic functions of the time.

These are evidently periodic solutions of the problem,


as a limiting case.
*

They were discovered by Lagrange

in

1772

and include Lagrange s

Oeuvres de Lagrange,

vi.

p.

particles

229.

For

references to extensions of these results to the problem of n bodies, cf. my article iu the
Encyklopadie d. math. Wiss. vi. 2, 12, p. 529; to the papers there mentioned may be added

E. 0. Lovett, Annali di Mat. (3), xi. (1904), p. 1 W. R. Longley, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.
(1907), p. 324, and F. R. Moulton, Annals of Math. xn. (1910), p. 1.
;

t Cf. F. J. Linders, Arkiv for Mat.

iv.

(1908), No. 20.

xm.

The General Theory of Orbits

394
171.

Stability of

Lagrange s

particles

[CH.

xv

periodic orbits in the vicinity.

It has been observed (


167) that in the neighbourhood of any configuration of stable
equilibrium or steady motion there exists in general a family of periodic solutions, namely
the normal vibrations about the position of equilibrium or steady motion. We shall now

apply this idea to the case of the Lagrange s-particle solution of the restricted problem of
three bodies, and thereby obtain certain families of periodic orbits of the planetoid.

be the bodies of finite mass, m 1 and m 2 their masses,


their centre of
n the angular velocity of SJ, x and y the coordinates of the planetoid P when
taken as origin and OJ as axis of x.
The equations of motion of the planetoid

S and J

Let

gravity,
is

are

162)

d^_ dJK

dy_dK

du_ _dK

dv__

~di~du

~di~~dv

~di~~dx

dt~

K=\(u z + v*) + n (uy

where
Let

(a,

denote the values of

b)

(x,

sidered, so that for the collinea,r case

a = ^(m l

m2

The values
na

l/(m l +

2 ),

=\

*J%1,

vx)

_%&
8y

-mi/SP m 2 /JP.

y) in the position of relative equilibrium con


6 = 0, and for the equidistant case we have

we have

where

denotes the distance SJ, so that

46)

of u, v in the position of relative equilibrium are easily seen to be

nb and

respectively.

# = a+,

Write

where

77,

6,

<p

b+

rj,

u=nb +

are supposed to be small quantities

Q,

= na +

(f>,

neglecting a constant term,

we have

On expanding and retaining only terms of the second order in the small quantities,
obtain an expression for
with which the equations for the vibrations about relative
equilibrium can be formed we shall for definiteness consider vibrations about the equi

we

distant configuration

The equations

in this case the expression for

K becomes

of motion are

dK

dK

~W

~W

dK

dK

*--frj-

~3|~

Solving these equations in the manner described in Chapter VII,


is 27T/X, where X is a root of the equation

we

find that the period

of a normal vibration

X 4 - n*\* + (*i - #) n* = 0, where k =

The two values

~ ^2
(f i

with the other.


of

is

mi + m 2

by this equation will be positive provided they are real, since


2
and they will be real provided 4 (f J & 2 )
27 mj ra 2
1, or (wij + ?n 2 )
satisfied provided one of the masses S, J is sufficiently large compared
:

<

When
first

>

two families of periodic orbits


equidistant configuration of relative equilibrium : the
2
approximation, STT/XJ and 27r/X 2 where X^ and X 2 are the roots of the
this condition is satisfied, there exist

the planetoid in the vicinity

periods are, to a
2
equation in X ,

of X 2 given

s positive

a relation which

of

its

The General Theory of Orbits

171, 172]

395

similar discussion leads to the result that the collinearLagrange s-particle configurations
are unstable; but the equation for the periods of normal modes of vibration has always one
real root, and consequently in the neighbourhood of a position of relative equilibrium of the
planetoid on the line SJ there exists a family of unstable periodic orbits*.

Example. Shew that, for one of the modes of normal vibration of the planetoid in the
in
vicinity of the equidistant configuration, the constant of relative energy is greater than
the configuration of relative equilibrium, while for the other mode the constant is less than
in the configuration of relative equilibrium.

The differential equation of the normal displacement from an

172.

We

(Charlier.)

shall

now proceed

orbit.

to consider the stability of orbits in general.

Suppose that some particular solution of the motion of a particle of unit


mass in a plane, under the action of forces derived from a given potential
energy function V, is known and consider a solution which is immediately
adjacent to this known solution, and for which the constant of energy has
;

the same value.

Let

P and

Q be

orbits respectively at time

and
arc

let

PN = NQ = u;
,

OP =

a, arc

the orbit at P.

Draw

t.

let

=
ON = so s
We shall regard the
a-

s,

orbit as specified

The

known and adjacent


QN perpendicular to the known orbit,
be a fixed origin on the known orbit let

the positions of the particle in the

and

p be the radius of curvature of


position of any point on the adjacent

by the quantities

let

(u, s).

when

kinetic energy of the particle

T=i^+i(l +
and

its

describing the adjacent orbit

W /p)2 * 2

is

Lagrangian equations of motion are therefore


,

ou

p/ p
2
u\+- s+..

/,

p)
these equations possess a

u\

)us
p/

known

/.,

integral,

M \2
1 H

s2

z
u\us
dp = -f
as

p/ p-

3F
-JT-

os

namely the integral of energy

+ V = h,

where h

is

a constant.

The

first

Lagrangian equation and the integral become

\\dujp

dp

+
\dudajp

\du

For further work on the subject of orbits in the neighbourhood of the Lagrange s-particle
cf. the memoirs referred to on page 530 of my article in the Encyjtlopadle, and also
Lovett, Astr. Nach. CLIX. (1902), p. 281 Stromgren, Astr. Nach. CLXVIII. (1905), p. 105; Moulton,
Math. Ann. LXXIII. (1912), p. 441.
solutions,

The General Theory of Orbits

396

[CH.

xv

Since

du

and
the two preceding equations become

Eliminating

fir),

(<T

we obtain the equation


2

f/9

or (taking s instead of

and

F\

So-

2
)

as the independent variable,

du

ds2

v ds ds

dv du

fl id
v2

this is the differential equation

and writing

v for

cr)

du2

of the adjacent orbit

From this equation we can at once deduce consequences relating to


For by Sturm s theorem*, if we have any
the stability of the known orbit.
differential equation of the form
d2u

where

range of values of t the quantity / (t) lies between two


a- and b-, then any solution u which is zero for
within the range will be zero again for some value t within the

for a certain

positive real quantities

a value

range, where

t )

(t

lies

between

ir/a

and

irjb,

provided the range

is

It follows that if the quantity


comprehend
2
2
2
2
known orbit, this orbit will
of
the
all
is
at
3v
points
/p
positive
(3 F/9w )p
it once will not diverge
which
intersects
orbit
be stable^, i.e. any adjacent
from it, but will intersect it again infinitely often. This expression
sufficiently large to

this interval.

greatly
can therefore be called the coefficient of stability for the orbit.

Cf. Darboux, Th. gen. des Surfaces, Vol. in.


172-176, all
f In the discussion of stability in

powers of the displacement above the

first

are

neglected in forming the differential equations of the adjacent orbits. The effect of the neglected
terms on the stability has been studied by Levi-Civita, Annali di Mat. v. (1901), p. 221, who has
found that the neglected terms give rise to instability in certain cases which appear to be stable

when only

first-order

number, where a

is

terms are considered

the characteristic exponent

this
(

happens when aT/2iri is a commensurable


and T is the period of the solution. Cf.

175)

also A. E. Cigala, Annali di Mat. xi. (1904), p. 67.

The General Theory of Orbits

172, 173]
173.

Korteweg

Suppose now

397

theorem.

known

orbit, with respect to which the normal


a
measured, is
displacement u
periodic orbit whose perimeter is S then if
= (s + nS),
u=
(s) is the equation of an adjacent orbit, it is evident that u

that the

is

<f>

<f>

where n

any integer, is also the equation of an adjacent orbit the orbits


represented by these two equations are in fact congruent, but the corresponding
tracing points are separated by one or more periods.
In any orbit adjacent to the known orbit let u n u n+1 u n+2 (where n is an
integer) denote respectively the normal displacements in the nth, (n+ l)th,
and (n + 2)th period, at the same place in the orbit, so that we can write
is

un =
where

<f>(s

+ (n-

u=

+ nS),

(s

<

u n+2

(f>(s

(n

1) S),

a solution of the equation

(s) is

<f>

u n+l

1) S),

d 2 u,

ds 2

v ds ds

dv du

(1 /9-F\
2
\v*\ du /,

Since u n u n+l u n+2 are three solutions of this linear differential equation,
they must satisfy a relation of the form
,

where k and

We

are independent of

k^

shall first

s.

shew that these constants k and & are independent of the


number n, so that they will be the same
x

choice of the adjacent orbit and of the


for any other set

um=

ty (s

For um

+ (m

u m+l

1) S),

ty (s

+ mS),

u m+2

= ty (s + (m + 1) $).

a linear function of the two solutions un and u n+1


say

is

and therefore on adding periods

to the

argument

s,

we have

But from the equations


==

Un+2

"

Un+i

"

Un

c^un ^ + c u n+s = k (c

we have

^n+3

u n+l

c 2 w n+2 )

fo

Un+2

"

"a

k t (du n

^n+i

>

+ c u n+l \
2

u m+2 = ku m+1 + k^u m)

and therefore

which shews that the constants occurring in the linear relation between
u m+z, u m+l

Next, we

same

are the

between u n+2 u n+l

un

those occurring in the linear relation

as

From

shall find the value of the constant k^.

d2 un
ds-

ds

F\

31

l*\8tt*/

p*)

dv du n
vds ds
1

[1 /S

dv du
~ -- n+l
n -L
/t-f-l

ds

ds

1 /9
If
~

"

~J~~

~^\

F\
n

the equations

The General Theory of Orbits

398

//S?/

un

we have

tt

tv 7)4-1

/-/^i

"1

/"/".I/

I//

-til

t-t t/

/Y J/
W/

xv

/7 II

IX/ I* *]

tlfr

[CH.

and hence, on integrating,


au n

un

as

Changing

s to s

+ S, we

au n+ i
j-

as

where

c is

a constant.

have

ds

ds

ds

^ ^71-t-l

fi i/
/ 7

cu n+l

+ k lUn )-

u n+1

di

rit i
wW/Tj.-^!

riii

IX/M/TJ,

^
,

^/c-^- .^-jg-J

dtO

a Wn+j
-

~dT

ds

We

1.
thus have the theorem* that if u n u n+l un+
denote the normal displacements in an orbit adjacent to a known periodic orbit
in three consecutive revolutions, the ratio k = (u n+2 + u n )/u n+1 has a constant

so that &i has the value

value, which is the

174.

same for

all

adjacent orbits.

The index of stability.

The constant

ratio

k= (u n +z+ u n )/un+1

where un u n+1 u n+2 are the normal


,

displacements from a periodic orbit in three consecutive revolutions, is called


the index of stability of the periodic orbit, for reasons which will now appear.

The nature

of the integral of the difference-equation


^n+2

depends, as

is

rCUn+i

~^~

Un

"

well known, on the reality or non-reality of the roots of the

quadratic equation

\*-k\ + I= 0,
2 or k
2.
depends on whether k
= 2 cosh a
Supposing first that k is positive and greater than 2, write k
a
a
then the roots of the quadratic are e and e~ and we know that two inde
pendent solutions of the difference-equation are of the form

i.e. it

>

<

as

u = e^

<f>

(s)

and

_as
"

tt (s),

are functions of s which have the period S


these functions so as to make the solutions u satisfy the equation

where

<

(s)

and

-v|r

(s)

d*u

+
TT
as
*

3
Idvdu (1/8 2 F\
~
4
j- -3-+ 11 T^
v as as
[& \ou* J

Korteweg, Wiener Sltzungsber. xcm. (1886).

choosing

The General Theory of Orbits

173, 174]

399

(which gives linear differential equations of the second order for the functions
and -vjr), we have two independent particular solutions of the latter equation
:

(f>

the general solution is a linear combination of these particular solutions, and


consequently the general equation of the orbits adjacent to the known orbit,
when k 2, is of the form
>

a*

u-K

where

and

Similarly

if

a*

*4>(*y

+ K e~~s + 0),
t

are arbitrary constants, and

writing k

2,

<

orbits adjacent to the

known

orbit

is

where
which

and

K^

and ^(s) have the period

a,

_os

(s)

<f>

K e~^^r (s\
z

2 are arbitrary constants, and where


the
satisfy
equations
l

S.

the general equation of the


of the same form
2 cosh

as

<j>(s)

and

$*

<f>

are functions of s

Next suppose that k


2
k
2
let k = 2 cos a.
In the
2, so that
same way we now find that the general equation of orbits adjacent to the
<

<

known

orbit is

where

K and A

<

are arbitrary constants and where

and
<f>

^r are functions of s

with the period S.

the

From these results important consequences relative


known periodic orbit can be deduced. For if k
2,
>

to the
stability of
it follows from the

character of the expressions obtained for u that the


divergence from the
and ^r have real zeros, the oscillation about it) becomes
periodic orbit (or if
<

continually greater as s increases while if k


2, the normal displacement
is represented by circular functions of real
will
arguments, and
;

<

consequently
obtain the theorem that a periodic orbit
is stable or not,
according as the associated index of stability is less or greater
(in absolute value) than two.

remain within fixed

limits.

We thus

The results of the present article agree with, and may be deduced
from, the theorem
that the general solution of a differential
equation of the type
(Pu

+ ((n +

2?rs

p
is

of the form

where

a, b are

period S.

Of.

cos

-- +

u = ae $

_+
47T

cos

\
.

+ be~ ^ (s),
C8

(s}

is a definite
constant, and $ and
Whittaker and Watson, Modern Analysis,
Chapter xix.

arbitrary constants, c

^ are

periodic with

400

The General Theory of Orbits

[CH.

xv

Example. Discuss the transitional case in which the index of stability has one of the
2 shewing that the equation of the
adjacent orbits is of one of the forms

values

u = KI
where

$ and

{<p

(s)

either have the period

>//

s\l/-

(s)}

+ K,,

\js

(s),

or satisfy the equations

and that the known orbit may be either stable or unstable.


175.

(Korteweg.)

Characteristic exponents.

The stability of types of motion of more general dynamical systems


may
be discussed by the aid of certain constants to which Poincare has
given the

name

characteristic exponents*.

Consider any set of differential equations

where (X^,

...,

2,

is

Xn

T in t

having a period

are functions of (a^, a?2 ..., xn } and possibly also of t,


and suppose that a periodic solution of these equations
,

known, defined by the equations

where

fa

(t

+ T) = fa (t)

In order to investigate solutions adjacent to

where (1,

equations

n) are

(i

this,

we

1, 2,

n).

write

supposed to be small, and are given by the variational

112)
7

fit
\Juv

^ ^

cjfc
,

K= 1

"^

rtf,
^

(^ ^

==

J-

.
>

n).

As these are linear differential equations, with coefficients periodic in the


independent variable t, it is known from the general theory of linear differential
equations that each of the variables & will be of the form

where the quantities S{k denote periodic functions of t with the period T, and
the n quantities ak are constants, which are called the characteristic exponents
of the periodic solution.
If
(fi,
*

all

&,

the characteristic exponents are purely imaginary, the functions


fn) can evidently be expressed as sums and products of purely

>

Ada

Math. xin. (1890), p. 1 ; Nouv. Meth. de la Mec. Gel. i. (1892). On the general problem
of stability the reader should consult the extensive memoir of A. Liapounoff , originally published
in 1892 by the

Toulouse

Math. Soc. of Kharkow, and translated into French by E. Davaux, Annales de

(2), ix. (1907), p.

203.

The General Theory of Orbits

174-176]

401

periodic terms; while this is evidently not the case if the characteristic
exponents are not all purely imaginary. Hence the condition for stability

of the periodic orbit

is

that all the characteristic exponents

must

be purely

imaginary.

We shall now find the equation which determines the characteristic


exponents of a given solution.
In one of the orbits adjacent to the given periodic orbit, let ({31} /32 ... @n )
initial values of (, %%, ...,
n ) and let /3j + fa be the value of
,

denote the

,-

after the lapse of a period.

As the

quantities (fa^faz, ...,fa n ) are one- valued


functions of (&, $,, ...,&), which are zero when (&, /3 2 ..., /3 n ) are all zero, we
,

have by Taylor s theorem (neglecting squares and products of

&, j82

@n )

If a k is one of the characteristic


exponents, one of the adjacent orbits will
be defined by equations of the form

and consequently a

set of values of

&

/3 2

@n exists for which the equations

(i=l,
are satisfied

2,

...,n)

the quantity a k must therefore be a root of the


equation in a

vfai

9^1
r

O.T
a
^- + l-e
OPi
-i

dfa2

9"^

Op 2
dfa 2

^-

f)ft

aT

T/ie characteristic
exponents are therefore the roots

9-^

of

this

determinantal

equation.

176.

When

Properties of the characteristic exponents.


t is

evident that

not contained explicitly in the functions


Xi

is

(X lt

X.,, ...,

Xn\

if

fa

(t)

a solution of the equations, then


e)

W. D.

26

it is

The General Theory of Orbits

402
is

where

also a solution,

xv

The equations

an arbitrary constant.

e is

[OH.

&-*(*+)

(t-1,2,...,*)

therefore define a particular solution of the variational equations; but as


a periodic function of t, it follows that the coeffi
d(j)i(t + e)/de is evidently
cient e akt reduces in this case to unity: and hence when t is not contained
characteristic
explicitly in the original differential equations, one of the

exponents of every periodic solution

is zero.

Suppose next that the system possesses an integral of the form

F (#!
where

x2

...,

a one-valued function of

is

In the notation of the

{</>>

for brevity

this equation

F (#;) is

(0)

x^ = Constant
x2

(oc^,

+ }=F
i

by

fa (0),

<j)

Jacobian

(0),

8(<f lf

,
(j>

i/r 2

W^
,

From
8

..., A/r, l )/a( /

&,

...,

zero

all

...,

=
must be

x.2 ,

the quantities (x1} cc2


these equations

etc.,

n (0).

0,

xn ).

Differentiating

dF/dx,

is

0,

is

...,

it

xn ) are to be replaced

follows that either the

zero, or else the quantities

= 0.

when

teW<

dF/dxn are
correct, we see that (since the origin of time

dF/dx,, dF/dx2
is

t.

+ &},

(0)

F (i

tez

x n ) and does not involve

we have

/3 fj

dFty + dFd+
Wi*
^m
where in dF/dx 1} dF/dx2

(</>;

written in place of

with respect to

...,

we have

last article,

F
where

If the latter alternative

arbitrary) the equations

dFldaen

of the periodic solution: this is evidently


the former alternative must be in general the

satisfied at all points

a very exceptional case, and


true one but when the Jacobian

the determinantal equation for the


aT
evidently satisfied by the value e =l, i.e. by

is zero,

characteristic exponents is
=
so that one of the characteristic exponents
:

is

zero.

Thus if

the

differential equations possess a one-valued integral, one of the characteristic

exponents

is zero.

A comparison of 173, 174 with the theory of characteristic


shews that in the motion of a particle in a plane under the
conservative forces, the characteristic exponents of any periodic
a is connected with
a), where the characteristic exponent
(0, 0, a,
of stability k and the period T by the equation
k
the orbit

is

2 cosh

aT

stable or unstable according as a

exponents
action

the index

is

of

orbit are

purely imaginary or not.

The General Theory of Orbits

176, 177]
Example

1.

If the differential equations

403

do not involve the time

explicitly,

and

possess p one-valued integrals /\, ...,


p which do not involve t, shew that either (p+l)
characteristic exponents are zero, or that all the determinants contained in the matrix

dF
(i

9^-

= l,

2,...,^;

= 1,2,

are zero at all points of the periodic solution considered.

...,),

(Poincare.)

If the differential equations form a Hamiltonian system, shew that the


Example
characteristic exponents of any periodic solution can be arranged in pairs, the exponents
2.

of each pair being equal in

Attractive

177.

magnitude but opposite

and

in sign.

(Poincare.)

a field of force.

repellent regions of

The general character of the motion of a conservative holonomic system


by a theorem which was given by Hadamard* in 1897. For
we
shall suppose that the system consists of a
simplicity,
particle of unit
which
is
free
move
on
a
to
smooth
surface
under
forces derivable
mass,
given
is

illustrated

from a potential energy function V; a similar result will readily be seen to


hold for more complex systems.

Let (u, v) be two parameters which specify the position of the particle on
the surface, and let the line-element on the surface be given by the equation
ds*

= Edu* + 2Fdudv +

where (E, F, G) are given functions of n and


particle

Gdv*

The

v.

kinetic energy of the

is

T = \ (Eu? +

2Fui>

Gtf},

and the Lagrangian equations of motion are

_
du

du

dt\du

dt\dv

.__
dv

dv

which can be written


du

-^

dv

du

du

-^

dv

du

dv
1

1
"

We

"

"\

~^

ff

"
ff
*

dv

if)uj

^
dv

~~~

1
*
~7
-

duj

have, by differentiation,

V=

T>

dV..
w
-^
du

dV..

+ -^+
dv
-y

37.
-~-

ou

dV
dv
_

-u +2
du
.,

Journ. de Math.

(5),

v,

^- uv + .

dudv

v.

dv*

in. p. 331.

262

The General Theory of Orbits

404

Substituting for

u and

their values from

[CH.

xv

the preceding equations,

we have

where

8F/ .,9^
+ -=^^3^
dv

^
z.

drG dG + * FF dG (*

dv

(
\

du

dv

ZF

ZG

ZG

dv

9tt

dv

dv

quantities occurring in this equation can be expressed in terms of


The principal deformation-co variants connected
deformation-covariants*.

The

with the surface whose line-element

is

given by the equation

= Edu- + ZFdudv +

ds*

Gdv"

are the differential parameters

f ) = (EG - F*r

A,

where

W = (EG - F*r

and

<

With

-fy

\B%&-F&& + % f}
dv dv

Bj

2F

du dv

+ G

are arbitrary functions of the variables u

this notation, the preceding equation

du

dv du/

\du dv

and

v.

becomes

Utilising the equation of energy

Eu + 2Fuv + Gv*=2(h2

V),

and observing that the expression


3>

Eu>

The

(u, v)

+ 2Fuv +

- d V/du)
(d V/dv,
E(d V/dvf 2F(d V/dv) (d V/du) + G(d V/du)
<

Gv*

definition of a deformation -covariant is given in the footnote

on page

111.

The General Theory of Orbits

177]

contains the quantity (udV/du

r=-A

vdV/dv) as a factor, we can write

8(-V)/_
1 (F>+

Al (F)

where \ and

yu,

405

+(XU + ^)F;

contain in their denominators only the quantity

and where I v denotes the expression


3>

we

readily find that

(d V/dv,

- dV/du)/(EG - F*)

I v can be expressed

in the form

Consider, on the orbit of the particle, a point at which


has a minimum
value at such a point
is zero and
is positive
as A, ( F) is essentially
positive (since the line-element of the surface is a positive definite form), it

follows that
zero,

i.e.

As
an

at

/F^O, the inequality becoming an equality only when A, (F)


an equilibrium-position of the particle.

F will

the particle describes any


trajectory, the function
number of successive maxima and minima (this

infinite

is

either have

the general case)


or (in exceptional cases) the function
will, after passing some point of the
orbit, vary continually in the same sense.
Suppose first that the former of
these alternatives

is

is the true one


then if we divide the given surface into
two regions, in which 7 r is positive and
negative respectively, it follows from
what has been proved above that the former of these
contains all the
:

regions
contains in general
an infinite number of distinct
of
the
each
of
finite
orbit,
parts
length whereas
in the other
region, for which I v is negative, the particle cannot remain per
points of the orbit at which

Fhas

minimum

value,

i.e. it

manently.
attractive

These two parts of the surface are on this account called the
and repellent regions. Each of these
regions exists in general, for

easily found that

any isolated point of the surface at which F is a mini


any point where stable equilibrium is possible) is in an attractive
region, and any point at which Fis a maximum is in a repellent region.
it is

mum

(i.e.

It is interesting to
compare this result with that which corresponds to it in the motion
of a particle with one degree of
freedom, e.g. a particle which is free to move on a curve
under the action of a force which
depends only on the position of the particle. In this case
the particle either
ultimately travels an indefinite distance in one direction or oscillates
about a position of stable equilibrium. The attractive
region, in motion with two degrees
of freedom, corresponds to the
position of stable equilibrium in motion with one degree of

freedom.

Consider next the alternative


supposition, namely that after some definite
F is always in the same sense. We shall suppose that
the surface has no infinite sheets and is
at all
and that
instant the variation of

regular

points,

an everywhere regular function of


position on the surface

Fis

so that, since the

The General Theory of Orbits

406
variation of
finite limit,

[CH.

xv

V is always in the same sense, V must tend toward some definite


V and V tending to the limit zero. Considering the equation

see that if A ( F) is not very small, X and /j, are finite and the last term
on the right-hand side of the equation is infinitesimal; and
consequently
either there exist values of t as large as we
please for which I v is positive (in
which case the part of the orbit described in the attractive
is of

we

region
length
But
greater than any assignable quantity) or else Aj(F) tends to zero.
Aj ( F) can be zero only when d V/du and d V/dv are zero if therefore (as is in
general the case) the surface possesses only a finite number of equilibrium
;

positions, the particle will tend to one of these positions, with a velocity
which tends to zero.
position of equilibrium thus

approached asymptotically

must be a
versed

is

for the asymptotic motion re


position of unstable equilibrium
a motion in which the particle, being
initially near the
:

equilibrium

position with a small velocity, does not remain in the neighbourhood of the
equilibrium position and this is inconsistent with the definition of stability.
;

Thus
follows

finally

If a

we obtain Hadamard s theorem, which may be

particle is free to

move on a surface which

is

stated as

everywhere regular

and has no

infinite sheets, the potential energy function being regular at all


points of the surface arid having only a finite number of maxima and minima
on it, either the part of the orbit described in the attractive region is
of length

greater than any assignable quantity, or else the orbit tends asymptotically
one of the positions of unstable equilibrium.

to

Example. If all values of t from - x to + oo are considered, shew that the particle must
be in the attractive region.

for part of its course

178.

Application of the energy integral

to the

problem of stability.
simple criterion for determining the character of a given form of motion
of a dynamical system is often furnished by the equation of
energy of the

Considering the case of a single particle of unit mass which moves


under the influence of forces derived from a potential energy

system.

in a plane

function V(x,

the equation of energy can be written

y),

+ y ) = h2

^(x-

Now

the branches of the curve V(x, y)

which [V(x, y)

V(x,y).

=h

separate the plane into regions

respectively positive and negative; but as (&-+y*)


an
orbit
for which the total energy is h can
essentially positive,
only exist in
the regions for which V(x, y)<h.
If then the particle is at any time in the
interior of a closed branch of the curve V(x,y} = h, it must
always remain
for

h] is

is

within this region.

The word

of motion in which the

and in
stable.

this sense

stability is often applied to characterise types

moving

we may say

particle

is

confined to certain limited regions,

that the motion of the particle in question

is

The General Theory of Orbits

177-179]

in

407

The above method has been used by Hill*, Bohlinf, and Darwin J, chiefly
connexion with the restricted problem of three bodies.
179.

Application of integral-invariants

The term

was applied

to investigations

of

stability.

to a system which, in
the lapse of time, returns infinitely often to positions indefinitely near to its original
It has been shewn by
position, the intervening oscillations being of any magnitude.
Poincare that the theory of integral-invariants may be applied to the discussion of Poisson
stability

by Poisson

in a different sense

stability.

Considering a system of .differential equations

for

which

I ... I

fta?&B

...

8x

an integral-invariant, we regard these equations as denning the trajectory in n dimen


sions of a point
whose coordinates are (xv #2 -., %)
If the trajectories have no
is

branches receding to an infinite distance from the origin, it may be shewn that if any small
region R is taken in the space, there exist trajectories which traverse II infinitely often
:

and, in fact, the probability that a trajectory issuing from a point of R does not traverse
this region infinitely often is zero, however small
may be. Poincare has given several
extensions of this method, and has shewn that under certain conditions it is applicable in

the restricted problem of three bodies.

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
1.

Shew

2.

that the motion of a particle in an ellipse under the influence of two fixed
Newtonian centres offeree is stable.
(Novikoff.)
is free to move in a
plane under the action of several
according to the Newtonian law of the inverse square of
denoting the resulting potential energy of the particle by V(x, y\ shew that

mass

particle of unit

centres of force which attract

the distance

it

the integral
I

1-

log {h

V (a-%

where the integration is taken over the interior of any periodic orbit for which the constant
of energy has the value h (the centres of force
being excluded from the field of integration

by small

circles of arbitrary infinitesimal radius),


enclosed by the orbit, diminished by two.
3.

equal to the number of centres of force


(Monthly Notices R.A.S. LXII. p. 186.)
Let a family of orbits in a plane be defined by a differential equation
is

where (#, y) are the current rectangular coordinates of a point on an orbit of the
family
and let 8n denote the normal distance from the point (,v, y) to some definite
orbit
;

adjacent

of the family.

Shew that 8n

Amer. J. Math.

i.

satisfies

the equation

f Acta Math.

(1878), p. 75.

+ Acta Math. xxi.


(1897), p. 99.
Poincare, Acta Math. xin. (1890), p. 67

x. (1887), p. 109.

Nouv. Meth. in. Ch. xxvu.

408

The General Theory of Orbits

where

r
fdy\
4 1 +
/=
-/

and

I-,

M( - 3$
^ + dy S0\
^-) + {(b(x,

-f-

[CH.

y)}

a variable defined by the gquation

is

dt

*:l

\dx
(Sheepshanks Astron. Exam.)

A particle moves under the influence of a repulsive force from a fixed centre shew
4.
that the path is always of a hyperbolic character, and never surrounds the centre of force
that the asymptotes do not pass through the centre in the cases when the work, which has
:

to be done against the force in order to bring the particle to its position from an infinite
distance, has a finite value but that when this work is infinitely great, the asymptotes
;

pass through the centre, and the duration of the whole motion

may

be

finite.

(Schouten.)
5.
Shew that in the motion of a particle on a fixed smooth surface under the influence
of gravity, the curve of separation between the attractive and repellent regions of the
surface is formed by the apparent horizontal contour of the surface, together with the locus

of points at which an asymptotic direction

is

horizontal.

moves freely in space under the influence of two Newtonian centres of


shew that when its constant of energy is negative, it describes a spiral curve
round the line joining the centres, remaining within a tubular region bounded by two
ellipsoids of rotation and two hyperboloids of rotation, whose foci are the centres of force
and that when the constant of energy is zero or positive, the particle describes a spiral
path within a region which is bounded by an ellipsoid and two infinite sheets of hyper
boloids of the same confocal system.
(Bonacini.)
6.

particle

attraction

The necessary and sufficient condition in order that a two-parameter family of


7.
curves defined by a differential equation
y"=<i>(x,y,

may

/)

be a system of orbits with the same constant of energy

shall

be a linear homogeneous perfect differential.

The

is

that

potential energy

is

then a

constant multiple of

.-*f(8-&)*

(P. Frank.)

In the motion of a particle in a plane under forces which depend only on its position,
8.
a one-parameter family of trajectories is obtained by starting particles at a given point in a
given direction with all possible velocities. Shew that the locus of the foci of the osculating
parabolas is a circle passing through the point. If the initial direction is now varied, shew
that the locus of the centres of the oo 1 circles obtained is a conic having the given point
as focus and if the forces are conservative, this degenerates into a straight line counted
:

twice.
9.

In order that a system of oc 5 space-curves, of which x 1 pass through every point


may be identifiable with the system of trajectories of a particle in an

in every direction,

arbitrary positional field of force, it


should have the following properties

is

necessary (but not sufficient) that the system

The

(a)

a pencil

that

2
curves passing through a given point form
osculating planes of the oo
the planes pass through a fixed direction.

is, all

The General Theory of Orbits

xv]

The osculating spheres

(/3)

direction form a pencil

of the

oc

409

curves passing through a given point in a given

their centres thus lie on a straight line.

10.
Shew that the on 2 curves of a natural family which meet any surface orthogonally
are orthogonal to oc 1 surfaces, that is, form a normal congruence.
(The surfaces in
question are the surfaces of equal Action.)
(Hamilton.)

Shew

11.

10 belongs exclusively to natural

that the property referred to in Ex.

families.

In order that a family of

12.

oc 4

curves in space

two properties are necessary and

orbits,

sufficient, viz.

may

constitute a natural family of

If the osculating circles of those curves of the family which pass through a given
are constructed at that point, they have a second point
in common, and thus

(a)

point

form a bundle.

Consequently, three of the circles in such a bundle have four-point contact


with the corresponding curves.
(/3)

These three hyperosculating

circles will

be mutually orthogonal.

13.
The only point-transformations which convert every natural family into a natural
family are those belonging to the conformal group.

[Examples

8, 9, 11, 12,

13 above are taken from memoirs by E. Kasner in the Trans

actions of the Amer. Math. Soc., 1906-1909.


For further work in this direction the reader
is referred to Professor Kasner s Princeton
Colloquium lectures on Differential Geometric

Aspects of Dynamics.]
14.

Two

sets of oo

a certain conservative
particle considered as

y)
that
(x,

when the

curves in a plane, which form an orthogonal system, are orbits in


If U denote the Action at any point (x, y~] of a

field of force.

moving on one

of the first set of orbits, and


denote the Action at
moving on one of the second set of orbits, shew

particle is considered as

U and V are conjugate functions


U= constant, V constant, are identical

of x-

and y

and that the families of curves

with the orbits.


(P. G. Tait

and K. Ogura.)

CHAPTER XVI

The need for

180.

Poincares

We

which converge for

series

all

values of the

time;

series.

have already observed

32) that the differential equations of motion

of a dynamical system can be solved in terms of series of


ascending powers
of the time measured from some fixed epoch
these series converge in
;

within some definite circle of convergence in the


-plane, and consequently will not furnish the values of the coordinates
except for a limited interval of time. By means of the process of analytic
general for values of

continuation* it would be possible to derive from these series successive sets


of other power-series, which would converge for values of the time outside this
interval but the process of continuation is too cumbrous to be of much use
;

in practice, and the series thus derived give no insight into the
general
character of the motion, or indication of the remote future of the system.
The efforts of investigators have therefore been directed to the problem of

expressing the coordinates of a dynamical system by means of expansions


which converge for all values of the time. One method of achieving this
is to apply a transformation to the
-plane.
Assuming that the
motion of the system is always regular (i.e. that there are no collisions or
other discontinuities, and that the coordinates are always finite), there will be
no singularities of the system at points on the real axis in the -plane, and

result j-

the divergence of the power-series in t


1
after a certain interval of time
must therefore be due to the existence of singularities of the solution in the
finite part of the -plane but not on the real axis.
Suppose that the singu
larity

and

which is nearest to the real axis is at a distance h from the


T be a new variable defined by the equation
t

~t =

band which extends

log 1

to a distance h

-plane evidently corresponds


*

I+T

2h
7T

real axis

let

on either side of the real axis

to the interior of the circle

Whittaker and Watson, Modern Analysis, 5


t Due to Poincare, Acta Math. iv. (1884), p. 211.
Of.

5.

JT

=1

in the

in

the

411

Integration by Trigonometric Series

180, 181]

the coordinates of the dynamical system are therefore regular


r-plane
functions of T at all points in the interior of this circle, and consequently
within
they can be expressed as power-series in the variable T, convergent
for all real values of T
this circle.
These series will therefore
;

converge

between

and

1, i.e.

for all real values of

these series are valid for

between

oc

and

oc

Thus

all values of the time.

181.

The regularisation of

In the

last article

the

we made the

Problem of Three Bodies.

reservation that there are to be no collisions

or other discontinuities for real values of

t.

The importance

of collisions in

the mathematical theory of the Problem of Three Bodies was first indicated
by Painleve *, who shewed that the motion of the bodies is regular (i.e. their
coordinates are holomorphic functions of t) for all time, provided the initial
conditions are not such that after a finite interval of time two of the bodies

The

collide.

relations -which

must subsist between the

initial values of

the

may ultimately happen between two of


the three bodies have been discussed by Levi-Civitaf for the restricted problem
of three bodies (when there is one such relation) and by Bisconcini \ for the
general problem, when there are two relations these relations are analytic,
but they are expressed by somewhat complicated infinite series, and are not
variables in order that a collision

directly applicable except

and the

when the

interval of time

between the

initial instant

collision is sufficiently short.

considerable advance was

made when K.

F.

Sundman shewed

that the

a collision of two
singularity of the differential equations which corresponds to
of the bodies is not of an essential character, and that it may in fact be
removed altogether by making a suitable change of the independent variable
that is to say, it is possible to choose the variables which specify the motion,

and the independent variable, in such a way that the differential equations of
motion are regular even when two -of the three bodies occupy coincident
It is thus possible to obtain a real prolongation of the motion
positions
||.

after the collision IF: the coordinates can be specified for all values of the time t
oo to + oo
from
whether collisions take place or not and a positive lower
:

bound

can be assigned to the two greater of the mutual distances.

There

Lemons sur la theorie anal, des eq. diff ., Paris, 1897, p. 583.
f Annali di Mat. (3) ix. (1903), p. 1 ; Comptes Rendus, cxxxvi. (1903), pp. 82, 221.
* Acta Math. xxx.
Cf. also H. Block, Medd. fran Lunds Obs., Series n., No. 6
(1905), p. 49.
(1909); Arkivf. Mat. Astr. och Fys. v. (1909), No. 9.

Acta Math, xxxvi. (1912),

p.

105.

The

essential

features of the

work were

originally

published in Acta Societatis Sclent. Fennicae in 1906 and 1909.


Levi-Civita regularised the differential equations of the restricted problem of three bodies
by an elementary transformation in Acta Math. xxx. (1906), p. 306; and in a later paper, Rend,
d. Lincei, xxiv. (1915), p. 61, he extended this to the problem of three bodies in a plane.
||

If

The

variables can be expanded in ascending powers of (ti - 1)&, where


the orbits hare cusps at the point of impact.

instant of collision

ti

represents the

412

Integration by Trigonometric Series

xvi

[CH.

only one case of exception, namely when all three bodies collide simul
taneously but this can happen only in a very special type of motion, in which
all the constants of
angular momentum are zero together*.
is

Disregarding this case of triple

independent variable

where r

Sundman

collision,

new

introduced a

defined by the equation

r 1} rz denote the three mutual distances, and I is the lower bound


The coordinates of the bodies, and the time, are then

already mentioned.

holomorphic functions of

bounded by two
exists

within a band of finite breadth

2O

in the w-plane,

and on either side of it. There


a continuous one-to-one correspondence between the real values of t and
lines parallel to the real axis

the real values of w, so that


varies from
oo to + ac

when

varies from

oo

to

oo

likewise

Lastly,

Sundman

applied Poincare

transformation

I+T
= 2H,log8
,

iv

1-T

7T

in order to transform the

the plane of a
time, are

new

band

variable

now holomorphic

r.

in the w-plane into a circle of radius


unity in
The coordinates of the three bodies, and the

functions of T everywhere within the unit circle in

the r-plane and therefore they can be expanded as convergent series of powers
of T for all real values of the time, whether there are collisions or not the
case of triple collision alone being excepted.
:

182.

Trigonometric

series.

The

series discussed in the preceding articles are all


open to the objection
that they give no evident indication of the nature of the motion of the

system after the lapse of a great interval of time


the

they also throw no light on

number and character

in the

of the distinct types of motion which are possible


and the actual execution of the processes described is attended

problem
with great difficulties. Under these circumstances we are led to investigate
expansions of an altogether different type.
:

If in the solution of the problem of the simple


pendulum ( 44) we consider
the oscillatory type of motion, and replace the elliptic function by its ex
we have
pansion as a trigonometric series
,

27T

This

last fact

had been known

g4.-

~~

(2s-l)^(t-t )

to Weierstrass

cf.

Acta Math. xxxv.

p. 55.

The motion

is

then in one plane.

A simpler equation available in the restricted problem


Armellini, Comptes Rendus, CLVIII. (1914), p. 253.

t
G-.

J Cf. Whittaker and Watson, Modern Analysis,

22

6.

of three bodies

was given by

413

Integration by Trigonometric Series

181-183]

where 6 denotes the inclination of the pendulum to the vertical at time t


and t may be regarded as the two arbitrary constants of the solution, and
is a definite constant, while q denotes e~ vK IK where
is the
complete
to
K.
This
each
term of which
elliptic integral complementary
expansion,

/j,

a trigonometric function of t, is valid for all time.


Moreover, when the
constant q is not large, the first few terms of the series give a close approxi
mation to the motion for all values of t.
The circulatory type of motion
is

of the

same

pendulum may be

similarly expressed

by a trigonometric

series of the

general character.

Turning now to Celestial Mechanics, we find that series of trigonometric


terms have long been recognised as the most convenient method of
expressing

members

the coordinates of the

of the solar system

type
2tfn,,n 2

...,n fc

cos (nl 6l

n.2

62

-\-

...

these series are of the

+nk

k ),

where the summation is taken over positive and negative integer values of
% 1} nz ..., n k and 6 r is of the form \ r t + e r the quantities a, X, and e
being
constants.
Delaunay* shewed in 1860 that the coordinates of the moon can
be expressed in this way; Newcombf in 1874 obtained a similar result for
the coordinates of the planets, and several later writers J have
,

designed

processes for the solution of the general Problem of Three Bodies in this
form these processes are also applicable to other dynamical
systems whose
equations of motion are of a certain type resembling those of the Problem
of Three Bodies.
In the following articles we shall give a method which
is applicable to all dynamical
systems and leads to solutions in the form of
;

trigonometric series the method consists essentially, as will be seen, in the


repeated application of contact-transformations, which ultimately reduce the
problem to the equilibrium -problem.
:

Removal of terms of the first degree from the energy function


Consider then a dynamical system, whose equations of motion are
183.

dqr_dH
dt~dp r
where the energy function

The

dp r

__ dff

dt~~

1,2, ...,w),

dfr

H does not involve the time

explicitly.

algebraic solution of the 2n simultaneous equations


8

/=
dp r

will furnish in general


for the variables (q,, q.

0,

^=

(r-1,

oqr

one or more sets of values

2>

...,

q n ,p lt ...,p n );

(a,,

az

...,

*.,,)

a n b l} 62

and each of these

..., 6 n )

sets of values

Theorie du mouvement de la lune. Paris, 1860.


J e.g. Lindstedt, Tisserand, and Poincare.
Whittaker, Proc. Land. Math. Soc. xxxiv. (1902),

f Smithsonian Contributions, 1874.


p. 206.

414

Integration by Trigonometric Series

xvi

[OH.

will correspond to a form of equilibrium or (if the above equations are those
of a reduced system) steady motion of the system.

b n ) be selected
Let any one of these sets of values (a a2 ..., a n b 1} b 2
shall shew how to find expansions which represent the solution of the
problem when the motion is of a type terminated by this form of equilibrium
l

. .

we

Thus if the system considered were the simple pendulum,


or steady motion.
and the form of equilibrium chosen were that in which the pendulum hangs
which would
the motion is of the
represent the solution of the pendulum problem when

downwards

vertically

aim would be

at rest, our

to find series

oscillatory type.

Take then new

variables

equations
qr

ar

(q,

q2

qr

qn

...,

pS,

p r = b r +pr

by the

...,p n \ defined

(r

1,2,

n)

...,

the equations of motion become

dH
_

dqa r
7.

dt

and

"i

the

for sufficiently small values of

where

*>

/
)

">

ni
"/>

H can be

form
...,

denotes terms homogeneous of the kih degree in the variables

(qi, q*,

Since

variables the function

H=H + H + H. + H,+
l

dq r

new

series in the

7i

dt

dp,

expanded as a multiple power

dH

dpr
)

q n ,pi,

>

-,pn)-

does not contain any of the variables,

it

may be omitted and the


:

fact that the differential equations are satisfied when


q z ..., q n p, ..., p n )
vanish
should
are permanently zero requires that
l
identically. The expansion
which
with the terms
therefore
of
2
(suppressing the accents of
,

(<//,

the

begins

new

variables)

H.2

= ^2

be written in the form

may

(a rr g r

where

tt r s

+ 2b n qrp +
= asr,
c rs = c sr

2orS q r q s )

(c rr

pS

4-

2c n p r p,\

H H

If the terms
not necessarily equal to b sr
4 ,... were neglected
s
those
of a vibrational
become
would
the
with
in comparison
2
equations

but b n

is

problem (Chapter VII).


184.

We

Determination of the normal coordinates by a contact-transformation.

now apply

a contact-transformation to the system in order to


in fact, to obtain variables which correspond
2 in a simpler form *,
express
to normal coordinates for small vibrations of the system.
shall

*
In obtaining the transformation of this article a method is used which was suggested to the
author by Dr Bromwich, and which furnishes the transformation more directly than the method

originally devised.

415

Integration by Trigonometric Series

183, 184]

Consider the set of 2n equations

(r

~ 8aSr

z^

^dy r
syr = a

or

rl

x +
1

a rz x.2

J
U.A
o
lr x l + o.2r xz

+
+

x
.

*>

Xn

>

y^)-

y^>

>

+ a rn xn + n y^ +
\)

= l,2,...,w)

+ brn yn\
=
+ crn yn l(r l,2,...,n).

+ cn y +
)
we obtain for s the determinantal equation
which in 84 was denoted by f(s) =
we shall suppose that 2 is a positive
definite form, and (as in
84) we shall denote the roots of the equation
is 2
is n
the quantities s lt s. ... sn are all real, and for
isi,
...,
by
simplicity we shall suppose no two of them to be equal.
sx.r

On

j.7o x
nr n

...

solving these equations,

To each

root there will correspond a set of values for the ratios of the
.., xn y lt ..., y n }; let the set which correspond to the root
quantities (xl xz
,

be denoted by (y^, r x2 ..., fXn ry^,


is r be denoted by
spond to the root

is r

that

and

..., r y n ),

_,^2

(_,.#!,

the set which corre

let

...,

-rXn - ryi,
,

...,

-r

so
yn)>

we have

Multiply these equations by kxp and k yp respectively, add them, and


respect to p we thus obtain the equation

sum

with

n
\ jcp k yp

2,

is,.

= -H

yp )

ifKp r

(?% k),

where
1

\ i

/t/ )

ll ^*** i

-,

so that

k)

(r,

is

Ic^l

<~

^**3

jx-

*~

Jb"^2

K^\ T^^f

^H

"

""

symmetrically related to r and

Interchanging r and

k,

vQb]

jfc

Vi

r* Jt^- i t 1/i /

~T~

k.

we have

is k

(kXp

rXp kyp )

yp

(r,

k\

P=I
n

and therefore

(s r

+ sk ) ^
P=I

So, unless s r

+ sk

is zero,

(^

r yp

^xp

yp ) =

0.

we have
n
^~

-^

and consequently H (r, k)


=
and therefore
k yp

\.^^p kyj)

is

zero

if

p
sr

jPs

+ sk

is

zero,

-,-!/]>,

n
1S r

p=l

\rXp

ryp

r Xp

ryp)

"
\f>

**/

we have

^p = -rXp

Integration by Trigonometric Series


If

now we

n
~fr

{
7"

;2 1

new

define
V~T*1 6

>

variables
74

/ *2

((?/,

q2

q n PI,

...,

I"*//-

Pn) by the equations

/*

_-

lit

vr

Pr = tfr

and

and

if 8

J.

"i

denote any two independent modes of variation,

n).

evident

it is

2 (Sqi&p -

thai the coefficient of tar Ac* in

xvi

[CH.

2 (M - kyi - -&i

is

bqiSpi)

f yi),

1=1

which

zero

is

when

is

not equal to

terms except such as (Sq r &p,.

- ryi

(i-ici

-ri

Now

ryi)-

Thus 2 (Sqi&pi

k.

- Agv &p/), and

AqiSpi) contains no

the coefficient of this term

hitherto the actual values of

is

have not been

rXi, r yi

determined from their equations of definition

fixed, as only their ratios are

therefore choose their values so that

we may

2 O* - ryi - -M ryi) = 1

(r

i, 2,

n),

1=1

and then we

shall

have
n

&qi$pi)=

(8qi&pi

(Sq r

r=l

1=1

&p r

Agv Sp/),

Pn)
128) the transformation from the variables (ql} q 2 ...,qn PI,
to the variables (g/, q%, .... q n pi, ..., p n ) is a contact-transformation.
substitute for (q lt q 2 ..., q n plt ...,p n ) in terms of
2 we
Moreover, if in
so that

(q\>

->

q*>

qn, Pi,

Pn),

we obtain

H = r=l
2 H
2

H=

or

- r) qr pr

(r,

r=l

Now

sr q r

pr

q2
apply to the variables
transformation defined by the equations

...,

(<?/,

qn

PI,

dW
Pr

W=

where

As

all

...

variables

"

+ i ip

(p r

which gives

H H

"q

pn

the contact-

Ir

<n

^r

...,

~dqr

iis r q,

=i 2
r=l

"

(p r

+ sr

the transformations concerned

"

qr

2
).

have been

linear,

we

see that

be homogeneous polynomials of degrees 3, 4, ... in the new


and thus, omitting the accents, we have the result that the
will

equations of motion of the dynamical system have been brought

dq

dt

_m
~

dp r

dp_r__dH
~
dt

dq r

to

the

form

H= H + H + H

where

in which

417

Integration by Trigonometric Series

184, 185]

...,

a homogeneous polynomial of degree r in the variables, and in

r is

particular

H H

we neglect
... in
and
S)
4
2
comparison with
the
integrate
equations, the solution obtained will be identical with that
It is clear that if

found in
185.

84.

to the

Transformation

The system

now be

will

form of H.

trigonometric

further transformed

by applying

transformation from the variables (q lt q 2 ..., q n p^,


q*,
q n Pi,
p n ), defined by the equations
,

(<?/,

pn )

it

a contact-

to

new

1, 2,

variables

dW

W=

where

...,

to

S
|

r=l

dW

q r arcsm

so that

p r = (2sr q r ^ sin p r
The

qr

r )?

~$

sr

cos

pr

(r

).

"

dt

~dt

dp r

H = s^ + s

and now

(<2q

become

differential equations

where

q,

...

+H + H

sn q n

+...

an aggregate of terms which are


r denotes
homogeneous of
degree \r in the quantities qr and homogeneous of degree r in the
,

quantities cos_p/, ainp r

Since a product of powers of cos p r sin p r can be


expressed as a sum of
and cosines of angles of the form (n^pi + n 2 p.J + ... + n n n ), where
p
,

sines

n n have integer or zero values, it follows that


as the sum of a finite number of terms, each of the form
n 1} n 2

...,

"

tf^ft
where

...

and therefore
|

The

function
,

where

for

H
)H

is

.....

(n lPl

mn =

n x + nz

+n p +
2

r,
[

. .

nr

can be expressed

+ n n pn

...

^.

2m r

),

r.

thus expressed in the form

nin

/*

/*

olll

..

each term we have

% +
w. D.

L-Ub

+m +

m,

si

mn

qn

na

. . .

+ nn ^
|

2 (m,

-t-

m +
2

+ mn

),

418

Integration by Trigonometric Series

[CH.

and

clearly the series is absolutely convergent for all values of p^,


q2 ..., q n do not exceed certain limits of magnitude.
provided

p2 ..., pn
From the

absolute convergence

<?/,

xvi

follows that the order of the terms can be rearranged

it

any arbitrary way we shall suppose them so ordered that all the terms
+ ... + n n p n f are collected together, so
involving the same argument

in

that

n^

takes the form

where the coefficients a and b are functions of


q2
q n and the expansion
i
n
of
contains
no terms of order
or
b niy n ,...,n n
of a n ,n ,...,nn
qi,q2 ..., ^n
powers
extend
n
and
where
the
summations
lower than
^ + 2 + ... +\nn \\;
over all positive and negative integer and zero values of n 1} n 2 ..., nn except
,

<//,

the combination
?i x

= nz =

= n n = 0.

Moreover, the expansion of a 0j0 ,...,o (which will be called the non-periodic part
of H, the rest of the expansion being called the periodic part) begins with
the terms

MI + Ma +

+s

n<ln

these are the most important terms in H,


and,
g/, q2 ...,q n are small,
since they contribute terms independent of
q2
q n to the differential

when

<?/,

equations.

For convenience we shall often speak of g/, q2 ..., q n as "small," in order


to have a definite idea of the relative importance of the terms which occur.
It will be understood that q^, q^ ..., q n are not, however, infinitesimal, and
,

magnitude except so far as


ensure the convergence of the various series which are used.
in fact are not restricted at all in

To avoid unnecessary complexity, we

is

required to

shall ignore the terms

sin (n^pi + ... + n n pn}


S^.n,,
in
the same way as the terms
in H. as they are to be treated
...,

Sof n ,,n 2 ,...,,,

cos(n

p +
1

and their presence complicates, but does not

...

in

+ n n pn),
any important respect modify,

the later developments.

which the problem has now been brought may therefore be


stated as follows (suppressing the accents in the variables) The equations of

The form

to

motion are

aqrdH
dt

where

H=u

0(0 .....

+ 2a n

dpr

dp r
,

,...,

dt

(r=1;2)

..,.),

dqr

cos (n

p +
l

n2 p2

...

+ n n pn \

a are functions of q ,q2 ...,q n only ; moreover, the periodic


a term which
small compared with the non-periodic part a
...,o /
at least
has for argument (n p 1 + n 2 p 2 + ... +n n p n ) has its coefficient a ^, ...,

and

the coefficients

part of H

is

0)0>

ni>

of order ^

% +
,

the expansion

It follows

of a

n2

+ nn
j

in the small quantities q lt q2

begins with the terms

,o, ...,o

+s

(s l q i

from this that when the variables q lt q2

vary very slowly, while the variables p 1}


to the time.

Other types of motion which lead

186.

419

Integration by Trigonometric Series

185, 186]

q2

..,,

...,

qn

and

+ sn q n \

...

qn are small they

p n vary almost proportionally

...,

to

equations of the

same form.

The equations which have now been obtained have been shewn to be
applicable when the motion is of a type not far removed from a steady motion
or an equilibrium -configuration, e.g. the oscillatory motion of the
simple
pendulum, or those types of motion of the Problem of Three Bodies which
have been studied in
171.
But these equations may be shewn to be

applicable also to motion which is not of this character, and in particular to


motion such as that of the planets round the sun, or the moon round the

earth *.

For

the equations of motion of the Problem of Three Bodies be taken


160; and let the contact-transformation which is

let

in the form obtained in

defined by the equations

Pr

= dW
~,

r-~

oqr

be applied
or

(r

dq r

= l,2,3,4)

where

to this system,

-*
+

The new

--

77,

--

^r

I-

dq.

variables can be interpreted in the


following way.

Suppose that at
the forces acting on the
particle //, cease, except a force of
magnitude m^m^q^ directed to the origin and let a be the semi-major axis
and e the eccentricity of the ellipse described after this instant then
the instant

all

= it^m^a

q,

-e

q3

Further, if the lower limits of the integrals are suitably chosen, /?/+ q 3 is
the true anomaly of /* in its ellipse, and - 3 is the mean
p
anomaly. The
variables qj, q t

p 2 p^ stand in a corresponding relation


The equations of motion now take the form
,

dqr

_dH

W-fa"

to the particle

dH

dp;

(^

///.

= 1,2,3,4);

"9ff

when the particles w 2 and ra3 are supposed to be of small mass


compared with
Wj, and are describing orbits of a planetary character about
l} it is readily
found that
can be expanded in terms of the new variables in the form

H
H=

ao,o,o,o

2a, li)W2i , l3Fn4 cos (n^pf

Delaunay, Theorie de la Lune

+ n p2 + n p + n^

Tisserand, Annales de

),

Obs. de Paris, Memoires,

xvm.

(1885).

272

[cu. xvi

Integration by Trigonometric Series

420

q a q4 ) only, the summation


zero values of n lt w 2 n s ?i 4
and
extends over positive and negative integer
and the coefficient a 0)0)0)0 is much the most important part of the series. As
185, it
is of the same character as that obtained in
this expansion of

where the

coefficients

a are functions of

(qi, q,

method of solution given in

follows that the

motion of the planetary type or

either to

to

the following articles is applicable


motion of the type studied in 171.

Removal of a periodic term from H.

187.

We
effect of

which

will

the

system another contact-transformation,


this
be the removal of one of the periodic terms from

now apply

shall

to the

will further accentuate the feature already noted,

part of

is

much more important than

Let one of the periodic terms in


n,,n 2 ,...,nn

H=a

Write
so that

...,<>

R denotes the

in evidence the

Apply

...,.

cos

n n p n )-

+ n *P* +

+n

+ n ?P2 +
<XPi

rest of the periodic

arguments of which

to the

the periodic part*.

H be selected, say

cos ( n i.Pi
,,

terms of

we

suppose that

indicated.

^P^>

+R

>

when we wish to put


we shall write it

a function,

defined by the equations


system the contact-transformation

W = qfa + q

shall

is

<*,,...,

= dW

,_dW
where

namely that the non-periodic

p2 +

+ q n p n + f (?i

...

?2

?n 0)
,

a function, as yet undetermined, of the arguments


is now expressed by the equations

is

The problem

"

dt

dt

dp r

dq r

where
8/
)

-f-

and 6 and

means

~Q

...

qn

+ w-n o/j

are supposed to be expressed in terms of the

cos ^
)

new

"T"

variables

>

by

of the equations of transformation

df

"tf

Readers familiar with Celestial Mechanics will notice the analogy of this method with that
the idea is essentially
Delaunay s lunar theory: the analysis is different from Delaunay s, but
*

of

Hi

the same.

Integration by Trigonometric Series

186, 187]

The function/ is, as yet, undetermined and at our disposal. It will be


chosen so as to satisfy the condition that 6 shall identically disappear from
the expression
D, o, .... o

+ HI -

qn

nn
,

+
so that this quantity

is

n,,

...,

a function of
<?/,

a>

o,

~\f

+ MI

( qi

9a

...

,...,o(qi,qs,

g0

"r\f\

+ nn

qn

cos
j

,q n alone, say
)

></

Then the equation


9

9/

(*,

(
nn

.....

determines 9/730 in terms of

qi

<//,

3/

In

fig

<?

>

>

^n

+ n n 9A

.....

o,

o>

cos B

and cos

=a

8.

Suppose that the solution of this equation for f)f/d& is expressed in the
form of a series of cosines of multiples of 6 (which can be done, for instance,
so that

by successive approximation),
df
ov

^=
where

Now

c2

Cj,

0,0,.,.,0

is

condition that c
qi,

q-2,

>

qn

are

...

known

+ 2

c k cos kO,

k=i

functions of q^, q^,

qn

...,

a
0>0

.....

as yet undetermined, and is at our disposal.


to be zero; this determines a ,o,...,o as a

is

Impose the
function of

and, on substituting its value in the series for df/dO,

dffi8= I

ck

we have

cosk0,

k=i

c 3 ... are known functions of


q^
q2 ..., qn
Integrating
with
this equation
respect to 6, and for our purpose taking the constant of
integration to be zero, we have

where now

c 1} C 2

1 ^sin&tf.
/= t-i*
The equations denning the transformation now become

% 1 dc k
=p-r+ 2
75-7
k - lkd ^

Pr

qr =

ia \

Sin fvd

^
qr

nr

ck

kd

cos

-\i,

2
&,..., n)
ii).

k=--\

Multiply the

add them

first set

of these equations

writing

WiK +
1

we have

/V

=6+ 2
/I

-V*

*-

,-

"vie

/
I

n 2 p2

?h

5^5

+ w2

...

by n lt n z

+ nn p n =

OClf
,

...,

nn

respectively,

and

422

[OH. xvi

Integration by Trigonometric Series

Reversing this

we have

series,

=&+ S

known

dk

sin

ke\

of
Substituting this
q 2 ..., qn
of
become
value of d in the equations
transformation, they

where d 1} d 2

...

are

functions

<//,

sn
COS

where

the coefficients

all

Now,

9k are

Vk>

known

functions of

before the transformation, the function

g./,

<?/,

#>/

consisted of an aggregate

of terms of the type

R = 2a Wi

)OT2>

...

>TOB

cos (w^ PJ

+ mn p n )

found for (q 1} q ..., q n p\,


,pn) are
reduced
is
series
and
the
in
this
substituted
by replacing powers
expression,
and products of trigonometric functions of
p n by cosines of sums
p.?,
values which have been

when the

/>/,

of multiples of p, p,
of terms of the type
,

...,

R = 2a mi)Ml2)
where the

coefficients

pn

...

a are

it is

>Mn

clear that

an aggregate

will consist of

+m p +

cos (m^pi

known

2>

...

+ mn p n

functions of (#/, q^,

qn

...,

),

}-

We thus have the result (omitting the accents of the new variables) that
has been effected, the system is still expressed by a set
after the transformation
of equations of the

form
dq r
dt

where

H = a^o.-.o + Sa

dp r

dp r

dt

_dH

m,,

,,,...

cos
>Wn

~~

dH
i

x,

**

dq r

(m p +
l

p2 +

...

+ m n pn),

a are known functions of q 1} q2 ..., qn


Let us now review the whole effect of the transformation. The differential
as before; but from the
equations of motion have the same general form

and where

the coefficients

equation
Oo,o,...,o

a ni ,n

,...,n n

COS

(n^ +

?? 2

>

...

+ nn pn) =

,o,...,o

to its
we see that one term has been transferred from the periodic part of
is less important, in comparison
of
the
periodic part
non-periodic part

with the non-periodic part, than


188.

it

was before the transformation was made.

Removal of further periodic terms from H.

into the nonHaving now completed the absorption of this periodic term
of the new
terms
of
the
one
absorb
to
we
of
H,
periodic
proceed
periodic part
of
the same
a
the
into
repetition
non-periodic part, by
expansion of
the
enrich
can
In this way we
non-periodic part of
continually
process.

423

Integration by Trigonometric Series

187-189]

at the expense of the periodic part, and ultimately, after a number of


will become so
applications of the transformation, the periodic part of
an /3 1; /32
o
Let
that
it may be neglected.
l
2
...,
/3 n ) be
(a
insignificant
the variables at which we arrive as a result of the final transformation then

H
,

>

the equations of motion are


doi r

_ dH
=

~di

where H, consisting
(

1} a.2 ,

...,

of

__

dT~~

d@r

only

We

a n ) only.

dp r

its

dH
~^r

non-periodic

is

part,

function

*~/g*

-0,

(~1,

*,...,>.

which shews that the quantities a are constants, and the quantities
the form
ft,.

the quantities
(d,

cr

an)

...,

189.

e,.

is

of

have therefore

fji r

er

where a r

dH

(r

-^

oar

are arbitrary constants, and the part of

fi r

are of

ft

1, 2, ...

n);

independent of

-ST.

Reversion

to the original coordinates.

Having now solved the equations of motion in their final form, it remains
only to express the original coordinates of the dynamical system in terms of
the ultimate coordinates (a 1 a2 ..., an /3 l5 ..., (3 n ). Remembering that the
,

result of performing

any number

of contact-transformations in succession

a contact-transformation, it is easily seen that the variables (q 1} q.2


p lt ...,pn ) used at the end of 185 can be expressed in terms of ( 1( 2

/3]

/8 n )

...

by equations of the form

mn

where the

is

..., q n

coefficients

sn

a and

6 are functions of (a 1} a 2

....

a n ).

From this it follows that the variables (q^, q 2 ..., q n ,pi, --^Pn) of 183,
in terms of which the configuration of the dynamical system was originally
expressed, are obtained in the form of trigonometric series, proceeding in
,

sines

and cosines of sums of multiples of the n angles

angles are linear functions of the time, of the form

@i, /3 2

t
fj, r

..., {3 n .

er

These

the quantities

424
er
/j, r

[CH. xvi

Integration by Trigonometric Series

are n of the 2n arbitrary constants of the solution, while the quantities


are of the form

Pr

= -*.- +

S
*1, K 2

the coefficients

c kl ,*..., k n

i*

a*

n*

n
,

...

being independent of the constants of integration.

The

coefficients in the trigonometric series are functions of the arbitrary constants

(i,

n) only.

-,

The expansions thus obtained represent a family of solutions of the dynamical


system, the limiting member of the family being the position of equilibrium or
steady motion which was our starting-point.
187
189 to the
by applying the integration-process of
186, we obtain a solution of the Problem of
Three Bodies, when the motion is of the planetary type, in terms of trigono
Evidently

also,

equations of motion found in

metric series of the kind above specified.


For the further development of the theory of the present chapter, in connexion with
the Problem of Three Bodies, reference may be made to treatises on Celestial Mechanics
in particular, the second volume of Poincare s Nouvelles Methodes de la Mecanique Celeste
:

contains an account of several methods of deriving expansions, with a discussion of the


convergence of the series obtained. The most recent discussion of the subject will be found

by the present writer On the Adelphic Integral of


Nov. 1916).

in a paper

the Differential

Equations of

(Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin.,

Dynamics

MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES.
denote any function of the variables
system which possesses an integral of energy

Let

1.

<f>

H (qi, ?
let

%, a 2

instant

...,

=t

tities qi,
bi, ..., b n

<?

2,

>

?n>

Pi,

>

q^,

g2

...,

qn

p) = Constant

1 ,

...,

pn

of a dynamical

a n 6 1} ..., b n be the values of q lt q 2 ..., qn ,pi,


iPn respectively at the
and let {/, g} denote the value of the Poisson-bracket (/, g] when the quan
a
occurring in it are replaced respectively by 1? 2
P\i
,

<lni

>Pn

>

>

Shew that

2.

Shew that the dynamical system whose equations

dq_dH
~

^ =
~

dt

^t

dp

H=

where

J
%p<+

W
^

of motion are

_^
dq

IW,

possesses a family of solutions represented by the expansion (retaining only terms of order
less

than a 7 )
,

and

are arbitrary constants.

3a

/2a\4

p=-k+ ~

where

and

3a

+ f,

INDEX OF AUTHORS QUOTED


(The numbers refer

to the

pages.}

Abdank-Abakanowicz, B. 214
Albeggiani, M. L. 337
Amontons, G. 227
Appell, P. 73, 258, 279

Clebsch, A. 311

Armellini, G. 81, 412

Curtis, A.

Bennett, T. L. 356
Bernoulli, Daniel 62, 177, 186
John 62, 229

Dainelli, V. 96, 112, 114

Bertrand,

J.

88,

260, 320, 331, 332,

349
Bessel, F.

W.

91

Bisconcini, G. 411

Block, H. 411

B6cher, M. 183
Bohlin, K. 340, 358, 407

Boltzmann, L. 41, 278


Bonacini, C. 408
Bonnet, 0. 94
Bour, E. 356
Brell, H. 259

Conway, A. W. 26
Cotes, R. 83
Culverwell, E. P. 251

H.

97, 113

D Alembert,

J. le R. 177, 230
Acqua, F. A. 316
Darboux, G. 80, 109, 261, 333, 396
Darwin, Sir G. H. 407
Dautheville, S. 320
Davaux, E. 400
Delaunay, C. 413, 419, 420
Derriman, W. H. 118
Donkin, W. F. 264

Dall
338,

Dumas, G. 166
E. B. 210
Ende, H. 112

Elliott,

am

Euler, L.

2, 8, 9, 41, 72, 93, 97, 100, 117,


124, 127, 144, 177, 248

Bromwich, T. J. 414
de Brun, F. 166
Brims, H. 357, 358

Ferrers, X.

Burgatti, P. 69, 166, 325


Burnside, W. 3, 5

Flye Sainte-Marie, C. 174


Forster, W. 262

Cailler, C.

89

W. R. 118
Cauchy, A. L. 4, 124, 264, 316
Cayley, A. 9, 12, 115
Cerruti, V. 330, 331
Charlier, C. V. L. 395
Cassie,

M. 215

Ford, L. R. 12
Forsyth, A. R. 358
Fouret, G. 130

Frank, P. 408
Galilei, G.

62, 72, 99, 177

Christoflfel, E.

Chretien, H. 90
B. 39

de Gasparis, A. 356
Gauss, C. F. 9, 255
Gautier, A. 339
Gebbia, M. 174

Cigala, A. R. 396
Clairaut, A. C. 78

Glaisher, J. W. L. 80
Gorjatscheff, D. 166

Chasles, M. 4

426
Legendre, A. M. 81
Lehmann-Filhes, R. 316
Leibnitz, G. W. von 35
Leitinger, R, 256

Goursat, E. 262, 336


Grant, R. 339
Green, G. 38
Grinwis, C. H. 89

330

Grossi, P.

Hadamard,

J.

Levi-Civita, T. 90, 325, 343, 385, 396, 411

69,

403

Halphen, G. 5, 106
Hamel, G. 41

Levy, M. 330, 331


Liapounoff, A. M. 400
Lie, S. 275, 290, 295, 301, 322,
Linders, F. J. 393

Hamilton, Sir W. R.

3, 9, 55, 79, 246, 264,

288, 290, 315, 316, 323, 409


J. N. 102
Helmholtz, H. von 45, 55, 247, 305
Hertz, H. 255

Lindstedt, A. 413
Liouville, J. 67, 281, 323

R. 167

Hazzidakis,

Heun, K. 37
Hill, G.

W.

343

Lipschitz, R. 256

Longley, W. R. 393
Lovett, E. 0. 339, 393, 395

407

Hiltebeitel, A.

M. 99

Hirsch, A. 45, 287


Holder, 0. 249

Hoppe, R. 130
Husson, E. 166
Huygens, C. 62,

72, 99, 117

MacMillan, W. D. 85
Marcolongo, R. 166
Mathieu, E. 301
Maupertuis, P. L. N. de 248
Mayer, A. 45
R. 77

Mehmke,

Monge, G. 264, 316


Jacobi, C. G. J. 104, 144, 174, 251, 276, 281,
287, 295, 307, 316, 341, 342, 349, 354
Jordan, C. 179

Moulton, F. R. 106, 390, 391, 393, 395


Muth, P. 183

Joukovsky, N. Ill

Nanson, E.

Kasner, E. 409

Neumann,
Newcomb,

Kelvin, Lord (W. Thomson) 261

Newton,

Kepler, J. 60, 90

1,

88,

413

S.

Sir

I.

27, 29, 30, 47, 48, 59, 62, 77,

78, 82, 83, 86, 90, 103,

Kerkhoven-Wythoff, A. G. 222
Klein, F. 12, 193, 207
Kobb, G. 109
Koenigs, G.

183

J.

C. 116, 215, 239

229

Nicomedi, R. 112
Nobile, V. 82
Novikoff, P. M. 407

275

Kolosoff, G. 167

Korkine, A. 337
Korteweg, D. 398, 400
Kotter, F. 166
Kowalevski, N. 166
S. 164

Oekinghaus, E. 91
Ogura, K. 409
Olsson, 0. 166
Ostrogradsky, M. 264, 265
Painleve,

P.

70,

227, 262, 379, 385, 389,

411

Lagrange,

J.

L. 34, 38, 41, 50, 62, 91, 94,

97, 104, 156, 177, 183, 248, 264, 298, 316,

322, 340, 393


Laisant, C. A. 113

Lamb,

II.

203, 305

Lambert, J. H. 91
Lame, G. 104
Larmor, Sir J. 278
Laurent, H. 337
P. A. 198
Lazzarino, 0. 166

Pascal, E. 214

Pavanini, G. 391
Pennacchietti, G. 338
Pfaff, J. F. 264, 296, 307, 316
di Pirro, G. 335

Poincare, H. 203, 267, 286, 343, 354, 380,


385, 387, 400, 403, 407, 410, 413, 424
Poinsot, L. 2, 152

Poisson, S. D. 163, 230, 264, 281, 299, 320,

407
Puiseux, V. 106

Index of Authors Quoted


Quanjel, J. 316

427

Sundman, K.

F. 411, 412
Sylvester, J. J. 184

Radau, R. 348
Rayleigh, Lord 230, 261
Resal, H. 115

Rodrigues, O.

Tait, P. G. 409

Taylor, Brook 177


Tchapligine, S. A. 166, 167

3,

Routh, E. J. 55
Rueb, A. S. 144

Thomson, W.,

Salkowski, E. 109
Scheffler, H. 255

Tonelli, L.

Schenkl, E. 256
Schoute, P. H. 85
Schouten, G. 408
Segner,

J.

see

Kelvin, Lord

Tisserand, F. 419
Tissot, A. 104

388

Vierkandt, A. 215
J. 23
Voss, A. 249

von Vieth,

A. 124

Siacci, F. 21, 24, 154, 174, 230,

325

Wallis, J. 48, 234

Signorini, A. 388

Wassmuth, A. 256

Sommerfeld, A. 193

Weber, W. 45
Weierstrass, K. 183, 197, 412
Whewell, W. 78

Stackel, P. 109, 166, 335


Stader, J. F. 81
Stekloff, V. 166

Stokes, Sir G. G. 271


Stromgren, E. 395

Sturm,
Suchar,

J.
I.

C. F.

80

396

Whittaker, E. T. 64, 339, 343, 388, 393, 407,


413, 424

Woronetz, P. 221, 343


Wren, Sir C. 48, 234

INDEX OF TERMS EMPLOYED


(The numbers refer

to

the pages,

where the term occurs for the

in the book or

is

Absolute integral-invariants, 271

Chasles theorem, 4
ChristofFel s symbol, 39
Classical integrals, 358

Admit, to

Law

of,

(a transformation),

time

defined.}

Acceleration, 14
Actio Agentis, 30

Action, Least, 248


Action and Reaction,
Adjoint systems, 287

first

29

Coefficient of friction, 227


of stability, 396

319

Collinear Lagrange s particles, 392


Collision, orbits of, 391

Angles, Eulerian, 9

Collisions,

Angular Momentum, Integral of, 59


Anomaly, true, eccentric, and mean, 89

Components of momentum, 48

Aphelion, 86
Apocentre, 85

Appell s equations, 258


Apse, 86
Attractive regions of a

of force, 403

field

Axes

of inertia, principal, 124


Axis of rotation, instantaneous, 2

234

of a vector, 14
Conjugate point, 252
Conservation of angular momentum, 59
of energy, 62
of momentum, 59
Conservative forces, 38
Constraint, 255

Contact-transformation, 290, 293

Azimuth, 19

homogeneous, 301
infinitesimal,

Bernoulli s principle, 186

Bertrand

theorem on

292,

302
determination

of

forces, 331

impulses, 260

Continuation, analytic, 410


Coordinates of a dynamical system, 32
elliptic, 97

Bilinear covariant, 297

ignorable or cyclic, 54
normal or principal, 181

Boltzmann-Larmor representation of the


Last Multiplier, 278

Bonnet s theorem, 94
Bracket-expressions, Lagrange s, 298
Poisson

s,

299

Brims theorem, 358

quasi-, 42
Cotes spirals, 83
Covariant, bilinear, 297
,,
deformation-, 111
Curvature, Least, 255
Cyclic coordinates, 54

Canonical form of equations of motion, 264

Cayley-Klein parameters, 12
Central forces, 77
Centre of rotation, instantaneous, 3

Definite quadratic form, 36

Centrifugal forces, 41
Characteristic exponents, 400

Density, 117

function, 289

Deformation-covariant, 111, 404


Degrees of freedom, 34
Differential form, 296

parameters, 111

429

Index of Terms Employed


Displacement,

Frictional systems, 227

possible, 33

Function, dissipation-, 231

Hamilton

Dissipation-function, 231

Dissipative systems, 226


Distance, mean, 87

s characteristic,

289

principal, 317

Hamiltonian, 265
Jacobi s, 342

Divisors, elementary, 183

Function-group, 322
Eccentric anomaly, 89
Ejection, orbits of, 391

Elementary

Gauss

Elimination of the nodes, 341


Ellipsoid of gyration, 124
of inertia, 124
momenta!, 124

Group, function-, 322


Group-property, 293
Gyration, ellipsoid of, 124
radius of, 118

Elliptic coordinates, 97

Energy, integral

of.

principle, 255

Geodesies, 254
Gravity, 27

divisors, 183

Gyroscopic terms, 195

62

Kinetic, 35

Hadamard s theorem, 406

Potential, 38

Equations, Appell

s,

258

Pfaffs system of, 307


Hamilton s, of motion, 263

first

partial

differential,

315
Jacobi

s,

342

Lagrangian, 37
in

quasi

coordi

nates, 43

with undetermined
multipliers, 213

Halphen s theorem,
Hamilton s partial

5
differential

equation,

315
,,

principle, 246

theorem, 79
Hamiltonian form of equations of motion,
264
function, 265

Herpolhode, 154
Hertz s principle, 255
Holonomic, 33

variational, 268
Equidistant Lagrange s particles, 393
Equilibrium-configuration, 177

Homogeneous contact-transformations, 301


Homography, 12

Equilibrium-problem, 315
Equimomental bodies, 117

Ignorable coordinates, 54

Eulerian angles, 9

Impact, 234
Impulse, 49
Impulsive motion. 48
Index of stability, 398
Inelastic bodies, 234
Inertia, ellipsoid of, 124

Exponents, characteristic, 400

Extended point-transformations, 293


External forces, 32, 37
Field of force, 30

Ignoration of coordinates, 56

moment

conservative, 38
parallel,

93

First PfaflPs system, 307


Fixity, 26

Fixtures, sudden, 169


Flux of a vector, 14

Focus, kinetic, 252


Force, 29
Forces, central, 77

arid

product

117

302
Initial motions,

45

Instability, 186, 193, 203, 396


Instantaneous axis of rotation, 2

centre of rotation, 3
Integral of a dynamical system, 53

momentum, 59

centrifugal, 41

of angular

external and molecular, 32, 37

358
of energy, 62
Jacobian, 354

Form, differential, 296


Freedom, degrees of, 34

of,

principal axes of, 124


Infinitesimal contact-transformations, 292,

classical,

Index of Terms Employed


Mean

Integral of momentum, 58
of a system of equations, 53
Integral-invariants, 268

absolute

and

distance, 87

motion, 88
Meridian plane, 18
Molecular forces, 32
Moment of a force, 30
,,

relative,

271
Invariable line and plane, 144, 346

of inertia, 117

,,

Invariant relations, 326


Invariants, integral, 268

Moinental

ellipsoid,

124

Momentum, 48

Inverse of a transformation, 293

angular, 59

Involution, 322

corresponding to a coordinate,
54

Isoperimetrical systems, 267

integral

Jacobi s equation, 342


function, 342

of,

58

Motion, impulsive, 48
initial, 45

Jacobian integral, 354


Joukovsky s theorem, 107

mean, 88
steady, 193
Multiplier, Last, 277

Kinematics, 1
Kinetic energy, 35

Natural family of

focus, 252

389

orbits,

systems, 57

,,
potential, 38
Kineto-statics, 37

Newton

Koenigs and Lie s theorem, 275


Korteweg s theorem, 397
Kowalevski s top, 164

Node, 349
Nodes, elimination of the, 341
Non-holonomic, 33

s theorem on revolving
Newtonian law, 86

Normal
Lagrange s bracket-expressions, 298
equations, 34
with
undetermined
multipliers, 213
of impulsive motion,

50

coordinates, 181
vibrations, 186, 195

Orbit, 78
periodic, 386
Order of an integral-invariant, 268
,,

forquasi-coordinates,

of a system, 52

Oscillation, centre of, 132

43
three particles, 393

Parallel fields of force, 93

Lagrangian function, 39
Lambert s theorem, 91

Larmor-Boltzmann

representation

Last Multiplier, 278


Last Multiplier, 277
Law of Action and Reaction, 29
Newtonian, 86
Least Action, 248
Curvature or Constraint, 255
Levi-Civita s theorem, 325
Levy s theorem, 330
Lie and Koenigs theorem, 275
Liouville s type, systems of, 67
Localised vectors, 15

Mass, 28

Mathieu transformations, 301


Mean anomaly, 89

Parameters, Cayley-Klein, 11
differential,

of

orbits,

the

Euler

s,

111

Particle, 27

Particles, Lagrange s, 393


Pendulum, simple, 72

spherical, 104

Perfect roughness, 31
Pericentre, 85
Perihelion, 86

Perihelion-constant, 87
Period, 73
Periodic solutions or orbits, 386

time, 87
Pfaff s expression, 296
,,
system of equations, 307

Pitch of a screw, 5
Plane, invariable, 346

83

Index of Terms Employed


Rodrigues and Hamilton
Rotation about a line, 1

Planetoid, 353

Poincare
Poinsot

normal variables, 387


theorem, 380

s representation,

of,

Rough, 31

Screw displacement, 5
Similarity in dynamical systems, 47
Sleeping top, 206

Smooth, 31
Spherical pendulum, 104

Kinetic, 38
,,
involving the velocities, 44
Principal axes of inertia, 124
coordinates, 181

top, 159
Spirals, Cotes , 83

Stability of equilibrium, 186


of orbits, 396, 407
of steady motion, 193

function, 317
moments of inertia, 124

Hamilton s, 246

396
398
secular, 203
Steady motion, 163, 193
Sub-group, 301
Sudden fixture, 169
coefficient of,

of Least Action, 248


of Least Curvature or Constraint,

255

,,

of,

centre

Possible displacement, 33
Potential energy, 38

,,

theorem, 3

point, 1

Polhode, 154

Principle,

instantaneous axis

152

Point-transformation, 293
Poisson s bracket-expressions, 299
stability, 407
theorem, 320

,,

431

of Relativity, 26
of Superposition of Vibrations,

186

of,

Superposition of vibrations, 186


Surface-density, 118

Problem of Three Bodies, 339


in a plane, 351
restricted,

index

353

Product of inertia, 116


Prolongation of motion after a collision, 411

Suspension, centre of, 132


Sylvester s theorem, 183
Symbol, Christoffel s, 39
of

an infinitesimal transformation,

303
Quadratures, problems soluble by, 54
Quantitas Motus, 48
Quasi-coordinates, 41

Quaternions, 9

Radius of gyration, 118


Rayleigh s dissipation-function, 230
Reaction, law of Action and, 29
Reciprocal theorem, Helmholtz s, 304

System, adjoint, 287


Systems, dissipative, 226
frictional, 227
involution-, 322
isoperimetrical, 267
Pfaff s, 307

Thomson s theorem, 261


Three Bodies, Problem

Reciprocation, 291

integral-invariants, 271
Relativity, principle of, 26
Repellent regions of field of force, 403
Resistance of air, 229

Restricted problem of three bodies, 353


Resultant of vectors, 14

Reversed

forces, 47

motion, 305
Revolving orbits, 83
Rigid, 1, 32

339
in a plane, 351

Regularisatiori, 411

Relations, invariant, 326


Relative velocity, 14

of,

restricted,

Time, 27
periodic, 87

Top, 155

Kowalevski

s,

164

sleeping, 206
spherical, 159

Trajectory, 78, 245

Transformation, contact-, 290, 293


Mathieu s, 301
Poincare s, 410
point-, 293
Translation,

353

Index of Terms Employed

432

Trojan group of asteroids, 393


True anomaly, 89

Velocity, corresponding to a coordinate, 33

Vibrations about equilibrium, 177


steady motion, 193
normal, 186, 195

Two

centres of gravitation, 97
Type, Liouville s, 67

of dissipative systems, 232


of non-holonomic systems, 221

Unstable, 186, 193, 203, 396

Virtual work, 264


Variational equations, 268
Vector, localised, 15

Vis Matrix, 29
Vis Viva, 35

Vectors, 13
Velocity, 14, 33

Wave-fronts, 289

Weber s law

angular, 15
relative, 14

CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED BY

of attraction, 45

Work, 30

j.

B.

PEACE, M.A., AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS

KClUKN

TO

Astronomy Mathematics/Statistics Computer Science Library


1

00 Evans

PERIOD

4-M
ALL

642-3381

Hall

BOOKS MAY

Hr-i-Hi

BE RECALLED AFTER 7

DAYS

DUE AS STAMPED BELOW

I*?
^

GOT

1997

121996
APR121998
a

QCT

..

JUN

8 1998

is

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY

FORM NO.

DD3,

/83

BERKELEY,
Berkeley

CA 94720

You might also like