Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CASE STUDY
2
ABSTRACT:
This study involves discovering the effects of learning approaches
on the academic achievement of students. The aspects explored are the
different theories to learning and how effective the approaches are to the
total intellectual development of each student.
This has been done through conducting an interview with students
and teachers. Each student answered sets of questions about learning
theories such as cognitivism, constructivism, intelligence theory, social
learning theory and behaviorism. As the result of the interviews, it shows
that some theories are not effective in some learning styles of some
students.
Learning theories can be used to the most effective ways when it is
maximize through integrating to other theories.
INTRODUCTION:
This study will tackle about the different learning approaches that
are being used in the Social studies Class and its effects on the academic
achievement of Grade 11 Social Studies Economics students of Child
Development and Guidance Center (CDGC). It involves learning theories of
Behaviorism, Social Learning, Intelligence, Cognitive and Constructivist
(Constructivism). These learning theories are conceptual frameworks
describing how information is absorbed, process and retain during the
learning. The said theories are all play the part in how understanding
acquired or changed and knowledge and skills retained. These theories
CASE STUDY
3
are reviewed assessed and examined its relevance and uses to prove its
effectiveness in developing and strengthening the principles applied in
learning.
The result of this study will contribute to the benefits of teachers
and learners, considering that Social Study plays an important role of the
development of society. Analyzing the implication of learning theories in
the student class performance particularly in Social Studies Economics
class will guide the educator to understand and evaluate the learning
practices and strategies of the learners and its effect on their intellectual
growth. This will give feedback to the teacher on how to design
appropriate instructions that fits with the learning style of each student.
Thus, Identifying teaching-learning events and practices will redound for
the improvement of learning outcomes through the inclusion and
application of theories.
THEORETICAL BACKDROP
Cognitivism Approach
In cognitivism, through simplification and standardization, the
information to be learned is divided up into systems, creating a systemic
map in which the mind will access in order to make learning, recalling and
retaining information better. (Ertmer and Newby, 2013).
One application of a cognitive learning theory is the use of
mnemonic devices. Mnemonics is a systematic manner of grouping and
organizing of information in order to create a system that would otherwise
CASE STUDY
4
not be there. Its main purpose is to make a concept or set of concepts
easy to commit to memory and easy to recall from memory. A relevant
study made use of a specific mnemonic device, the Method of Loci,
indicated a significant increase in comprehension, ability and speed of
recall. Also a significant number of the respondents continued to use the
mnemonic device beyond the study. (Qureshi et al, 2013).
Another study geared towards the use of mnemonic devices showed
an increase of 77% in test scores when mnemonics were applied. It not
only affected test scores but also significantly improved learners recall,
retention and motivation in additional learning. (Lloyd and Abbey, 2009).
Visual aids in cognitive thinking and development supports the
process of digesting information better. By modifying the content in a
manner suitable to their level of comprehension, the students learn better
and faster. Visual aids allow for conceptual scaffolding, allowing the
learner to gain access to higher unlearned information to the already
existing base of knowledge in them. (Ramirez Garcia, 2011) .
Teacher instruction, live demonstration and visual examples are
some of the ways of integrating the knowledge to a learner through a
cognitive approach. Furthermore, by doing more intellectual processes
such as having a group discussion and further discussing the topic beyond
the basic definitions puts emphasis on the involvement of the learner and
therefore assists the cognitive approach of learning. (Ertmer and Newby,
2013).
CASE STUDY
5
Social Learning Approach
This study attempts to investigate if students and their teacher of
Social Studies, acknowledge the value and importance of classmates and
colleagues as a source of learning.
CASE STUDY
6
it! Therefore, if the school environment has effectively organized an
influential active, positive and harmonious learning ambience, the low
self-efficacy students and also the teacher will be encouraged to dismiss
complacency and mediocrity to improve performance.
Behaviorist Approach
According to Watson, J.B. (1913) behaviorism is observable and can
be correlated with other observable events. Thus, it is primarily a
measurable aspect of human behavior. The learning process, according to
Behaviorism, places the educator in a primary role wherein he adjusts the
learner's behavior and directs learning through drill and practice, through
habit-breaking, and punishment/reward.
Operant conditioning refers to any active behavior that operates
upon the environment to generate consequences (Skinner, 1953).
Behaviorism focuses on the importance of the consequences of those
performances
and contends
that
responses
that
are
followed
by
to
Reinforcement
taking
and
an
active
punishment
role
in
are
key
discovering
components
environment.
of
operant
CASE STUDY
7
their Social Studies subject recitation, the childs feelings of humiliation
may ultimately be replaced by a fear of participating in the recitation.
Behaviors can also be modified through a process of shaping. This
process
involves
the
presentation
of
reinforcement
after
closer
This is clearly
always
includes
escape
behavior
and
is
appropriately
Intelligence Approach
Intelligence and its complexity keeps on leading a number of
respected researchers over the years in this field to exploratory studies,
discoveries, significant findings and formulating diverse theories on
Intelligence and its relationship to learning.
According to Yekovich F.
CASE STUDY
8
In this study, the focus will be on the following five (5) major
theories related to Intelligence - Concepts of Intelligence; Nurture vs.
Nature;
Intelligence
Quotient;
Emotional
Quotient
and
Multiple
Intelligences.
The Theory of Nature vs. Nurture is very controversial throughout
the history of mankind. The individuals belief about intelligence, is being
intelligent an inborn ability, in an individuals genes or is it develop by
various environmental factors. Intelligence Quotient (IQ) Theory is based
on the Binet and Simon intelligence test and Emotional Quotient (EQ)
Theory developed by Daniel Goleman (1995). However, these two (2)
mentioned
theories
have
been
debated
and
subjected
to
strong
(9)
kinds
Interpersonal,
of
Intelligence
(Gardner,
Mathematical-Logical,
1999).
Verbal-Linguistic,
Intrapersonal,Musical,
Naturalist,
CASE STUDY
9
Constructivism Approach
Constructivism Theory is constructing the childs own understand
and knowledge through experiential learning and reflecting on those
experiences. It is related to the prior knowledge and can change or
disregard the new information. Constructivism approach in the classroom
creates an active learning because it encourages students to use active
techniques such as experiments, solve real word problems to create more
knowledge and reflect about these activities. Students able to understand
and construct from preexisting conceptions and guides the task to address
them and build them. Piaget (1977) asserts that learning occurs by an
active construction of meaning, rather than by passive recipient.
As Coburn (1993) wrote, constructivist theory lends itself readily to
practical application.
According to constructivist, teachers encourage students to assess their
knowledge through thorough questioning and implement strategies.
Teachers facilitate them to acquire knowledge through the concept of
scaffolding, zone of proximal development and more knowledgeable other.
Vygostky emphasized that community plays a central role in making a
meaning process.
In fact, constructivism able the student to engage to apply their
existing knowledge and real-world experience, learning to hypothesize,
validate the theories and making conclusions. On the other hand, a
collaborative learning is a process of interaction that is mediated by the
CASE STUDY
10
teacher. Teachers guided them through effective directed questions and
clarification of concepts and information.
The best way to interpret constructivism approach in the classroom
is by observing examples at work, speaking and collaborating with other
and trying it and applying it in real world situation.
KEY QUESTIONS:
Cognitivism Approach
1. How do cognitive tools such as graphic organizers and mnemonic
devices affect students learning abilities?
2. How does engaging critical thinking skills affect students learning?
Social Learning Approach
1. Do the teacher create meaningful social activities for students that
promote social learning?
2. Does the teacher as a social model for students, feel supported by
colleagues, school administrators and the community?
3. Do the students acknowledge that they can learn from their peers?
4. Do the students recognize the teacher as a model and motivator for
learning?
Behaviorism Approach
CASE STUDY
11
1. What is the role of rewards and punishments and how do teachers
govern the behavioral aspect of the students towards having an
effective learning environment?
2. What are the strategies in managing and providing students a
desirable learning behavior to actively participate in their social
studies subject?
Intelligence Approach
1. What are the kinds of intelligences both the teacher and the
learners exhibit and practice in the Social Studies class setting?
2. What are the similarities and differences of the learners when it
comes to the extent of applying the Intelligence theories involved
in their learning?
3. How effective are the influences of these significant Intelligence
Theories in the students learning?
4. What are the key factors the teacher and the students want to
develop to achieve progress in the students learning in the Social
Studies educational setting?
Constructivism Approach
1. What are the range of activities that the Economics teacher
presented to his students to construct critical thinking skills or tacit
knowledge?
2. How does the teacher perceive constructivism approach towards her
lecture?
CASE STUDY
12
3. How do majority of the students participate in the classroom
activities?
4. What efforts facilitate Constructivism?
Concept/
Principle:
What worked
didnt
believe
that
mnemonics
was
Explanation
Prediction
[Mnemonics]
do
so
by
making
CASE STUDY
13
associations between items to learn and items that are
already stored in long-term memory. Mnemonics
also force one to pay attention to relevant features of
the
material, and to process the material more deeply
than by
simply rehearsing it. (Quereshi et al, 2013)
It is recommended that the teacher introduce and
experiment with a few mnemonic devices that will
Recommendation
It
is
also
recommended
that
the
Learning Event 2
Concept/
Principle:
What worked
and
dioramas
in
presenting
lessons
to
Explanation
Prediction
CASE STUDY
14
to year level. Visual aids to be used in class should be
studied and selected carefully to accommodate the
Recommendation
Learning Event 3
through questions
that require
critical
thinking skills
Concept/
Principle:
What worked
Information Processing
The teacher evaluates the students comprehension
through
essay-type
discussions
However some
What didnt work
application
of
quizzes,
students
these
reporting
have
concepts
and
class
problem
with
through
an
essay
Prediction
organize
existing
knowledge
and
in
relate
new
memory.
information
This
process
to
is
CASE STUDY
15
Recommendation
Learning Event 4
Concept/
Principle:
What worked
to
make
the
best
of
the
learning
Prediction
Recommendation
CASE STUDY
16
I dont want to work in a group that will let me do all the work or not
because I am introverted or what but because I realized I needed to make
quality work alone especially now that we are only a step closer to
college and because I concentrate better when Im alone than in a
group. In contrast to the views of the students, group projects enable
students to develop skills important for the professional world (Caruso &
Woolley, 2008; Mannix& Neale, 2005) and to college success (Astin, 1997;
Tinto, 1998; National Survey of Student Engagement, 2006). A properly
guided group work, can solicit diverse important skills of learning for
students including: confront complex tasks by dividing the parts of the
problem
into
steps
and
tasks
among
the
members,
articulate
learn
in
group
discussions,
majority
Concept/
Principle:
What worked
What didnt
work
with
others
through
CASE STUDY
17
According to the Social Theory of Learning by Albert
Bandura, young children learn not only through the
transmission of knowledge by adults but also by
observing the environment and the individuals
Explanation
Prediction
Recommendatio
n
CASE STUDY
18
In the social learning theory, it is said that most likely observers will
give their attention most often to models similar to themselves. In
particular, this study attempted to verify if differences in the interests and
hobbies of the students will be a hindrance to observe or listen to
perceived dissimilar personalities.
From the results of the interview, all of the respondents have
expressed their desire to try to communicate with peers who have
different interests and hobbies. As quoted from students I try to
communicate, I try to know them firstif Im not the type they want to
be with then I guess I have limited chance to get to talk with them or
spend time with them but I would try, even the anti- social student
Eugenio said I try my best to somehow be the same wavelength as them
. And one particular student dismissed altogether that personal
differences can affect social learning as quoted from her/him Its not hard
to relate to them. You just have to listen and understand their interests,
when you do comprehend it, you might not recognize that you have taken
a liking to it already.
Learning Event
2
Concept/
Principle:
What worked
What didnt
work
CASE STUDY
19
According to the theory of social cognitive, learning
always take place and cannot be separated from a
Explanation
activities.
essence,
In
he
studied
how
social
through
the
guided
distribution
of
knowledgeable students.
The students having a positive insight regarding
interpersonal relationships are to the benefit of the
teacher
who
can
establish
productive
and
Recommendatio
CASE STUDY
20
find it very difficult because I get distracted very easily if Im not in
school. The effects of outside forces which affect the learning processes
are shared by both the behavioral and social learning theories wherein
visible change in behavior can be perceived and measured. In relation to
social learning theory, the social environment where a student is
supposed to observe and imitate actions can be shaped by the school by
creating conducive to learning environments. With regard to the teacher
as an element of the social environment, most students acknowledge the
teacher as motivating factor to study as quoted:they challenge our skills
in every way they can, and I find her effective because I learned
something new everytime we discuss in school. A teacher who is seen as
a motivator to learning will most likely be emulated by the students and
also serves as a builder of self -efficacy.
Learning Event
3
Concept/
Principle:
The school has a conducive learning environment
What worked
What didnt
motivating factor.
A student claimed that: some of them make a
work
Explanation
behavior
as
learned
from
the
CASE STUDY
21
learning. In educational context, the adults in
school, friends and most especially the teacher is
seen as the model to imitate
If the teacher of Social Studies is seen as a
motivator to study and is effective as a teacher,
Prediction
Recommendatio
effective
motivator
to
study,
the
pedagogical
Concept/
school.
Social
Principle:
What worked
Cognitive
through
the
sense
of
CASE STUDY
22
of the school such as school paper, varsity team,
math club, dance troupe and digital arts.
Social values are learned from the subject of Social
Studies
A particular student Eugenio, has no involvement in
What didnt
work
Explanation
Prediction
acknowledged,
then
most
likely
students
will
Recommendatio
surpassed difficulties.
It is recommended to continually analyze the
CASE STUDY
23
interests of the students and promote involvement
in various clubs. For the particular student Eugenio,
it is highly recommended to encourage him to
learning
can
be
influenced
by
the
environment
through
CASE STUDY
24
subject of Social Studies are considered as models of behavior : I strive to
follow in heroes footsteps and to avoid wrong choices.
Learning Event
Concept/
by students.
Modeling, Observational Learning
Principle:
All students observe the actions of the smartest in
the class to which one confessed that he/she will
What worked
What didnt
work
models of behavior.
The smartest of the class is always perceived as
grades conscious instead of being an achiever.
In social learning, successes of the modeling
process are defined by four steps namely: attention,
Explanation
Prediction
Recommendatio
effective.
The teacher must emphasize high grades as a
CASE STUDY
25
of the smart peer is rightfully motivated and
rewarded, observing students will most likely follow
the study habits of the smart student.
Collaborative Learning, Peer Teaching, Brainstorming
The teacher acknowledges the importance of creating meaningful
group activities for students to have opportunities of social cognitive
learning. Direct interactions during class discussions are encouraged and
contrary opinions are welcome different opposite opinions are welcomed,
makes it even more interesting . Also to solicit innovative and
constructive ideas beyond learning outcomes prescribed, brainstorming is
suggested by the teacher as an effective tool.
Concept/
Principle:
As the teacher acknowledges the importance of
What worked
What didnt
work
Related to the concept of social cognitive theory ,
Explanation
Prediction
CASE STUDY
26
students to interact and observe more their peers.
To implement the collaborative learning and peer
Recommendatio
Principle:
The school faculty has an open door policy for the
What worked
CASE STUDY
27
The teacher relies on own self for teaching though
interested
to
share
teaching
practices
with
work
seminars
for
professional
development
is
in
any
organizations
or
community
services.
Self- Efficacy is a persons belief in his/her capacity
Explanation
Prediction
Recommendatio
situation.
The teacher has expressed an interest to share
recommended
to
the
teacher
to
be
CASE STUDY
28
learners skill.
Behaviorist Theory
Based on their social studies teacher, during class discussion,
students who actively participate and cooperate receive praises and
recognitions. In contrary, students who regularly miss the discussion and
shows undesirable behavior were being called their attention and
sometimes, send out of the classroom as their punishments. Moreover,
most students who failed to meet the deadline usually take the risks and
its consequences due to their unnecessary actions. Furthermore, in terms
of group activities, members who does not contribute usually they talk to
them and for some degree, they might face the consequences like
removing from the group if necessary.
Learning Event
1
Concept/
punishment.
Operant Conditioning
Principle:
Teachers imposed rewards for students desirable
behavior inside the classroom; on the other hand,
What worked
What didnt
work
Explanation
students
reflect
on
reinforcement
desired
response,
in
which,
positive
CASE STUDY
29
contrary, a negative reinforcement is the result of
undesirable behavior, thus, providing consequences
towards
the
individuals
untoward
behavior.
components
reinforcing,
and
of
punishment
operant
such
as
are
conditioning.
praising
or
key
Positive
rewarding,
participate,
for
instance
by
receiving
Recommendatio
implement
necessary
punishment
CASE STUDY
30
responding to their shaping behavior shows whenever they have group or
class activities wherein in a diverse class they deal with differences,
misunderstanding and conflicts with their classmates or group mates in
which, they established a positive behavioral response by talking with
them, having an open forum and accepting criticisms and opinions for
their own self-growth. On the other hand, some students tend to let go the
conflict and disagreement and they adjust and adapt with the situation.
Moreover, students shared positive behavior by giving inspirational
thoughts and advise with their fellow classmates to boost in studying
hard.
Learning Event
2
Concept/
Principle:
Teachers used shaping for student to engage in a
What worked
What didnt
work
Explanation
Prediction
behavior
to
demonstrate
or
task
by
of
the
reinforcing
desired
successful
behavior
approximations
Recommendatio
behavior.
Teachers should know the mechanisms to manage
CASE STUDY
31
and create safe and nurturing classroom climates.
Teachers should focus more time, attention, and
energy on acknowledging responsible behavior than
on responding to misbehavior.
Social Studies teacher stresses the need to have consultation hours
to modify lessons for students who they identified needs special attention.
With this teachers can provide appropriate assistance for the students. In
terms of dealing with students who displays consistent behavioral
problems, teachers gives specific action and consequences based upon
the behavior exhibited by the student. They also do necessary action for
student who confided important information about the class activity or
exam. On the other hand, being optimistic and having self-confidence is
the way of students in maintaining positive attitude when they experience
difficult situation in the class.
Learning Event
3
Concept/
Principle:
Teachers way of using association to provide
What worked
What didnt
work
CASE STUDY
32
Classical conditioning theory involves learning a
new behavior via the process of association. In
simple terms two stimuli are linked together to
Explanation
an
involuntary
response;
and
is
Recommendatio
n
Learning Event
4
Concept/
CASE STUDY
33
Principle:
The student learns to cope with the use of behavior
What worked
What didnt
work
Explanation
an
undesirable
consequence
from
the
removal
of
unpleasant
emotions.
Thus,
Recommendatio
Thus, teachers
CASE STUDY
34
In this vignette, the teacher interview provide vital information
about what Multiple Intelligences theory actually mean to the teacher,
how the Intelligence variations in which the learners utilized to fit into
their learning ways, the identification of the varieties and the extent of
application of Multiple Intelligences the teacher is aware that her students
have and the perspectives and class observations of the teacher on how
the students Multiple Intelligences (MI) vary and mostly exhibit in the
Social Studies subject. The following interpretation and analysis of data for
Teacher Interview is based solely on the answers and written statements
of the Social Studies-Economics teacher. (Please see attached TeacherInterview Questionnaires on Appendix __).
Learning Event
1
Concept/
Principle:
The teacher identifies and perceives students as
learners that have intelligence variations, for her
they are individual learners; she notated a key
factor in her response in one of the questions about
What worked
Response:
differences
and
assessment
of
Students
cannot
their
have
make
intelligences
individual
a
general
based
on
CASE STUDY
35
ways of learning and solving problems. Gardner
proposed this groundbreaking theory, which
suggests people have different strengths and
exhibit multiple kinds of Intelligences. He listed nine
(9) kinds of Intelligence (Gardner, 1999).
Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence
Mathematical-Logical Intelligence
Musical Intelligence
Visual-Spatial Intelligence
Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence
Interpersonal Intelligence
Intrapersonal Intelligence
Naturalist Intelligence
Existential Intelligence
Multiple Intelligences Theory claims that each
Prediction
Recommendatio
Learning Event
Concept/
setting.
Interpersonal Intelligence
CASE STUDY
36
Principle:
The
teacher
identified
the
similarities
of
the
smart.
They
relate
well
with
their
Prediction
Recommendatio
n
engaged
students
learning
process
Concept/
setting.
Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence
Principle:
Logical-Mathematical Intelligence
CASE STUDY
37
Students have different learning styles so thus their
intelligence also differs from one another. Some
What worked
What didnt
work
Word
smart
(Verbal-Linguistic),
according
to
and
thinking
abstractly
about
Logical-
Recommendatio
students Verbal Linguistic Intelligence and LogicalMathematical Intelligence, since these are the best
ways students can improve their learning ways.
Narrative
In this vignette, this report presents the findings of the Student Interview
that consists of a series of and student structured questionnaires for
CASE STUDY
38
Intelligence Theories in the Social Studies class educational setting. .The
rationale behind the interview analysis of the study was to provide more
contextualized and more in-depth insights into how the the students
perceive the identification, thorough understanding and the extent of the
application of Intelligence Theories in their own process of learning
engagement. Whereas the Teacher-Student Interview Questionnaires
provided information about the five (5) Major Theories related to
Intelligence. (Please see attached Theoretical Background).
Learning Event # 1
Students as individual learners identified they possess their own
multiplicity of intelligence.
CONCEPT OR PRINCIPLE(s)
phrase/ word
CASE STUDY
39
Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence
Mathematical-Logical
Intelligence
Musical Intelligence
Visual-Spatial Intelligence
Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence
Interpersonal Intelligence
Intrapersonal Intelligence
Naturalist Intelligence
Existential Intelligence
Recommendation(s)
1-2 sentences
___________________________________
CASE STUDY
40
Learning Event #2
Students identified their individual belief about intelligence, is being
intelligent an inborn ability or in an individuals genes or is it
develop by various environmental factors.
CONCEPT OR PRINCIPLE(s)
phrase/ word
NURTURE VS.NATURE
CASE STUDY
41
Recommendation(s)
1-2 sentences
___________________________________
Learning Event # 3
The quantity of learners was identified who are those who have the
perspective wherein Intelligence can be measured, by determining
the number of students who are willing to take or have taken the
Intelligence and Emotional Quotient Test. These two theories are
mainly focusing on the notion where intelligence can be measured.
CONCEPT OR PRINCIPLE(s)
phrase/ word
CASE STUDY
42
CASE STUDY
43
Recommendation(s)
1-2 sentences
___________________________________
Constructivism
In this vignette, the teacher evaluates her students through giving
essay questions. She gives situational problems to the students. On the
other hand, students answered and constructed their answers in applying
real life situations. The teacher conducts oral recitations and probe more
CASE STUDY
44
questions for clarifications. However, some of the students easily give up
if they dont know the answer even if the teacher is not saying You have
a wrong answer. The teacher tries to ask more questions until the
student gets the right one. The teacher does not encourage the students
to memorize statements or words without understanding them.
Learning Event
1
Concept/
Principle:
Teachers type of questioning is through essay
What worked
What didnt
work
In
constructivist
classroom,
learning
is
ideas,
with
and
knowledge
already
formulated
understandings.
is
the
raw
material
This
for
knowledge,
previous
the
new
environments
Constructivism claims that each learner constructs
knowledge individually and socially. The "glue" that
holds
the
constructs
together
is
meaning.
CASE STUDY
45
Recommendatio
Learning Event
2
Concept/
Principle:
What worked
What didnt
work
Explanation
Prediction
Recommendatio
learners.
The teacher might use other alternative to let the
methodology includes explaining the topic first and divide the students
into groups to discuss what she had explained. She also like oral
recitations and students are active in answering it. Students like group
work activities so to enhance their critical thinking with regards to subject
matter. Both the teacher and students commented that if the group
CASE STUDY
46
members are all active participants it makes their learning fruitful.In
addition, the teacher said, I will tutor students who did not able to
understand the lesson after or during the class.
Learning
discussions
wherein
Concept/
another.
Learning is active
students
collaborate
one
Principle:
What worked
Engagement of students in discussion and lectures.
What
didnt Some students are passive learners. They just
work
Explanation
Prediction
active
learning
was
not
lecturing,
not
Recommendatio
students.
Learning
3
Concept/
CASE STUDY
47
Principle:
What worked
What
didnt
work
According to constructivism, the student becomes
the center of attention. Learning revolves around
them and uses their personal skills and level to
Explanation
drive
the
Therefore,
lesson
the
use
progression
of
tutors
and
or
content.
peers
in
Prediction
utilize
problem-solving,
self-monitoring,
and
than group works. Both the teacher and learner perceived that passive
learners usually dont contribute well. On a positive note, learners
perceived it as a way for them to explore and express their own ideas by
reflecting their own experiences and understand towards Economics. They
think that it will let them grasp more informations and concepts in their
own words. The teacher probe more questions whenever she is not
satisfied with the answer so that she can extract more information.
Learning
CASE STUDY
48
4
Concept/
activity.
Learning is reflective.
Principle:
Activities such as immersion provided by the
What worked
and awareness.
didnt Lack of materials to use during reflection stage or
What
work
assessment.
Students control their own learning process, and
they
lead
the
way
by
reflecting
on
their
on
his
or
her
prior
knowledge
and
it
was
learned
is
really
important.
Recommendatio
collaborate with their classmates because it they can learn from each
other. The teacher divides the topic into sub-parts and each part is given
CASE STUDY
49
to a group. They need to discuss it and after learning it. The group will
discuss it to the class. The learning product is precious if all members are
participating one another.
Learning
Event
5
Concept/
Principle:
What worked
Students do group discussions.
What
didnt There are passive learners.
work
In constructivism, students learn about learning not
only through themselves but also from their peers.
When students learn something from their peers,
Explanation
place
students,
through
teachers,
interactions
and
the
with
other
world-at-large.
only
personal
knowledge
understandings as well.
but
shared
If Piaget focused on
checking
each
group
development.
Try
to
CASE STUDY
50
encourage passive learners.
In this vignette, teachers activity in achieving in relating the
present discussion is to immerse the students in a real life situation. The
teacher believes that associating the lesson into application will basically
give the students high critical thinking skills. For example, students are
exposing actual scenario by going to supermarket and public market to
compare each prices and goods.
Learning
6
Concept/
Principle:
What worked
What
didnt
work
Students have ideas that they may later see were
invalid, incorrect, or insufficient to explain new
Explanation
integration
teaching
takes
of
into
knowledge.
account
Constructivist
students'
current
CASE STUDY
51
Recommendatio
n
Teacher
proposed
yearly
field
trip
of
This vignette talks about the teacher who uses games, contests,
role-playing, film-showing, AVP and creative projects in presenting the
lesson. She also applies field work, survey and actual selling to let the
student more involve in their learning process. Students were able to
engage more in learning Economics. Students also verify that aside from
books, they also used Internet, books in the library, and printed references
to earn more information in answering activities.
Learning
7
Concept/
Principle:
What worked
What
didnt
work
According to cultural constructivists, those tools are
Explanation
actual
use
by
changing
one's
skills,
Recommendatio
constructivism learning.
Teacher should inform students what specific site
CASE STUDY
52
ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSIONS:
Cognitivist Theory
The students favor the use of mnemonic devices for class discussion
however the teacher considers the students grade level and insists on
leaving them to search for a method that works for them. Additionally, the
teacher doesnt agree on the use of mnemonic devices in class as she
believes that Economics shouldnt be memorized but understood.
On the other hand, the students have no strong preference to the use of
visual aids for class while the teacher insists on students improved
comprehension when it is used. In lieu of this, the students much prefer a
longer and better discussion on the subject with more active involvement
from the students.
As cognitive tools, mnemonics is the preferred method of the
students but for the teacher, she prefers the use of visual aids instead.
The teachers preferred style of teaching is leaned more towards
association wherein the teacher states that the aim is "to relate [the]
present lesson with practical application in daily living." She also applies
immersion in her teaching that provides, in her words, exposure to actual
scenarios where economics concepts apply [such as] field work, survey
and actual selling.
Both parties agree with the engaging of critical thinking skills for
studying Economics. They both agree on the use and application of essaytype quizzes, exams and discussions. The discussions access higher order
thinking and is the most used means of discussion.
CASE STUDY
53
Furthermore, the student has metacognitive awareness regarding their
preferences with regards to learning environments and techniques. The
teacher has not acknowledged these preferences and insists on her own
methods of instruction.
CASE STUDY
54
to foster a more dynamic, active and collaborative learning in the
classroom. However, there are factors which seem to affect the selfefficacy of the teacher though supported in some ways by the parents and
principal. In addition, professional teacher development is not sufficiently
supported and fostered and faculty meetings
collaborative practice among colleagues for in fact,
Behaviorist Theory
Behavioral approach plays a vital role in the formulation of the
learning process inside the learning environment. The teacher gives
rewards like for instance, through incentives or recognitions to boost
students confidence and to continue to actively participate and cooperate
in their social studies subject. Through positive reinforcement, students
will be reactive to its positive condition to take actively in the learning
process. On the other hand, teacher implements negative reinforcement
to students undesirable behavior like for instance, based from the
interview, she sends out students to the classroom as one of her
punishment
for
their
misbehavior.
Moreover,
through
positive
CASE STUDY
55
Furthermore, the teacher used behavioral strategies in managing
students desirable behavior. For instance, based from the interview, she
use to acknowledge her students through praises or recognitions
whenever they exhibit a favorable behavior. More so, to further boost
actively students participation, teachers must allocate time in focusing to
the positive behavior and allow an opportunity for the students to explore
the learning process. In contrary, by addressing to students misbehavior,
teacher should give her students an opportunity to explain his side and
implement the rules and procedures with consistency.
Intelligence Theory
The study findings of the Teacher-Student Interview suggest and reveal
that the series of teacher structured questionnaires and student structured
questionnaires for Intelligence Theories given to the Social Studies class teacher
and students. The teacher and the students gave rich answers to reflect upon
the learning ways learners have based on the interrelated concepts and theories
focusing on the Intelligence factors involve in the learning process. As proven by
Howard Gardner in his theory of Multiple Intelligences both the teacher and the
students identified and perceived that each learner in the class have intelligence
variations, students are individual learners and they are aware of the kinds of
intelligences that each one exhibits. The study showed students have different
learning styles so thus their intelligence also differs from one another. Some
students are good in performance tasks and some are good in written task. Some
are word smart and others are number smart. Word smart (Verbal-Linguistic),
according to Gardner (1999) are students who possess this learning style learn
best through reading, writing, listening, and speaking. Verbal students absorb
CASE STUDY
56
information by engaging with reading materials and by discussing and debating
ideas. Logic smart (Logical-Mathematical), are students who exhibit this type
of intelligence learning by classifying, categorizing, and thinking abstractly about
patterns, relationships, and numbers. Additionally, it is identified the similarities
of the students intelligence according is most of them are people smart. This
shows how collaboration is effectively applied in the students learning process
particularly in a Social Studies class setting. People smart (Interpersonal)
according to Gardner (1999) are those who learn through relating to others by
sharing, comparing, and cooperating. Interpersonal learners can make excellent
group leaders and team players. The most challenging and easier part of the
learning process were raised as well on the interview, these are key factors to
determine the effectiveness of the theories applied in students learning. The
specified topics which require analytical/critical thinking and application skills are
challenging, however the general information and basic concepts are easier to
discuss for and easier to learn by the students. In achieving progress in the
students way of learning in the Economics class setting it showed how learning
is explicitly connected with intelligences students need to enhance and utilize in
their learning which according to the study - the Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence,
Logical-Mathematical Intelligence and Interpersonal Intelligence should be the
key factors that students should develop in their learning.
Constructivist
The findings reveal that teacher and students engages learning
activities such as peer collaboration through group discussion, writing
using essay type of questions, immersion activities to provide guidance
and support to learners as they participate in task-related, social
interactions, and intellectual development of students in Economics class.
CASE STUDY
57
The researcher discovers that the teacher crafted and perceived
constructivism approach towards her lectures. She expands her lesson
through (1) scaffolding, (2) aiming active participation of students in a
group, (3) established a social environment interaction to make the
learning Economics essential and meaningful and (4) more knowledgeable
other.
On the other hand, majority of the students involve in seeking
understanding of Economics class through peer collaboration, immersion
activities, answering essays, using alternative resources such as internet,
journals and references in the library.
The efforts given in view of constructivism are created through motivation,
self-reflection and tutoring.
This research showed that teacher sought increase of students
skills to develop classroom community and her views of of learnercenteredness as essential to teaching (Graham,1997), and the ability to
engage in learning environment. The teacher realized the importance of
active in-depth learning wherein Economics students collaborated and
took ownership for their learning.
CASE STUDY
58
constructivist approach
styles. And based from the assessment of the students, the most effective
approach is cognitive- constructivist. There is a contradiction between the
teachers and students feedbacks regarding the most effective approach
for teaching the students and the approach that best develop the learning
style of the students. The data shows that the students are certain with
the cognitive- constructivist approach to be the most effective in their
learning style, and the teachers constructivist approach is fairly effective.
The lack of teachers socialization, collaboration and interaction with
the students are the factors that greatly affect the effectiveness of the
teaching approaches to the types of learners.
Recommendation
To make the learning more successful in Social Studies Economics
class, the recommendation of the group based on the data analysis and
conclusion are as follows:
Teachers should know the preferred learning style or the types of learners
in their Social Studies Economics class for them to design the effective
teaching instructions.
At the beginning of each school or academic year, pre-assessment should
be implemented and evaluation of the types of learners should be done in
able to categorize the students in each class.
Constructivist approach emphasizes collaboration between teacher
and students learning styles and approaches. The best way to fill in the
gap between student- teachers lack of socialization and interaction is the
CASE STUDY
59
application of collaborative and interactive activities that will enhance
learning.
Since some students are interpersonal (people smart) learner types,
cognitive- constructivist approach can be used to cater their learning
needs and style.
REFERENCES:
Qureshi, A., Rizvi, F., Syed, A., Shaheed, A., &Monzoor, H. (2013). The
method
of
loci
as
mnemonic
device
to
facilitate
learning
in
October
31,
2015
from
http://psychology.about.com/od/developmentalpsychology/a/sociallearnin
g.htm
CASE STUDY
60
Instructional Design. Org,
Retrieved
Social Learning
October
Theory (Albert
31,
Bandura).
2015
from
http://www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/social-learning.html
Ormrod, J. E. & Rice, F. P. (2003).Lifespan Development and Learning.
Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
Watson, J.B. &Rayner, R. (1920). Conditioned Emotional Reactions. Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 3, 1, pp. 114. Retrieved November 3, 2015
from LITTLE%20ALBERT.pdf
Standridge,
M.
(2002).Behaviorism.
In
M.
Orey
(Ed.),
Emerging
Perspectives on Learning,
Teaching
and
technology.
Retrieve
November
11,
2015
from
http://epltt.coe.uga.Edu/
&
Simon,
T.
(1916). The
development
of
intelligence
in
CASE STUDY
61
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence Reframed. Multiple intelligences for the
21st century, New York: Basic Books.
Goleman, D. (1998). Working With Emotional Intelligence.New York, NY.
Bantum Books
Harris, J. R. (1998). The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the
Way They Do The Free Press: New York
Mayer, J. D. &Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P.
Salovey& D. Sluyter Basic (Eds). Emotional Development and Emotional
Intelligence: Implications for Educators. New York: Books.
Minton, Henry L. (1988). Lewis M. Terman: Pioneer in Psychological
Testing. New York: New York University Press.
Spearman, C. (1904). General Intelligence Objectively Determined &
Measured, American Journal of Psychology
Yekovich, F. (1994).Current Issues in Research on Intelligence.ERIC/AE
Digest
[Online].http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed385605.html.
Chandhok, Lynn and Susan Karowska. "Constructivism as a Paradigm for
Teaching
and
Learning."Concept
to
Classroom.thirteen.org.
2004.
Web. <http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/inde
x.html>
http://www.teach-
nology.com/currenttrends/constructivism/and_technology/
CASE STUDY
62
Dougiamas,
Retrieved
M.
(1998,
November
November).
9,
from
2015,
journey
into
constructivism.
Dougiamas
Web
site:
http://dougiamas.com/writing/constructivism.html
Graham, P., Hudson-Ross, S., & McWhorter, P. (1997). Building nets:
Evolution of a collaborative inquiry community within a high school
English teacher education program. English Education, 29(2), 91-129.
APPENDICES:
Inteview Questionaire
Learner Interviews
I.
Intelligence
CASE STUDY
63
choices below which best represent your answers for each type of
intelligence you think you have.
(VP)Very poor
Good
(P) Poor
(VG) Very good
(F) Fair
(G)
CASE STUDY
64
4. Which type of Intelligences do you want to improve and develop?
Check and review the definition of each type of Intelligence in
Question Number five (5). Encircle your answers.
a. Word Smart
b. Logic Smart
Smart
d. Music Smart
e. Body Smart
f. People Smart
h. Nature Smart
c.
Picture
g.
Self-Smart
c.
Picture
g.
Self-Smart
7.
CASE STUDY
65
If youve not taken any IQ Test, what will make you try and take the
Intelligence Quotient (IQ) test in the future?
8. What are the results of the Emotional Quotient (EQ) Test youve
taken before and how did it affect the way
you see yourself and
your emotional intelligence?
If youve not taken any EQ Test, what will make you try and take the
Emotional Quotient (EQ) test in the future?
10.
What are some good ways your teacher can do to improve
your intelligence and learning ways as a student in your Social
Studies class? Share your ideas and suggestions.
CASE STUDY
66
11.
What are some good ways you can personally do to improve
your intelligence and learning ways as a student in your Social
Studies class? Share your ideas and suggestions.
II.
Behaviorism
2. Describe a situation wherein you took the responsibility that was not
assigned to you but needed to be done. What did you do?
CASE STUDY
67
6. Given you are working in a group, how will you keep being open for
constructive criticism from your classmates/group mates?
7. Tell me about a time that you inspired your classmate to work hard
to do a good job. How did you do it?
10.
Describe a situation when you successfully communicated
with your classmate who did not personally like you.
III.
Cognitivism
CASE STUDY
68
1. What steps do you take when you are having a hard time
memorizing or understanding Economics concepts?
CASE STUDY
69
6. How does your Economics teacher engage you in critical thinking
with regards to discussing Economics concepts in the classroom?
10.
IV.
Constructivism
CASE STUDY
70
2. What method of group work is effective for you in learning
Economics?
a. The teacher will discuss the lesson first and then divide us into
groups to further discuss what the teacher explained. After the
group discussion, we will answer the teachers questions.
b. The teacher will give us different parts to learn and then after
studying it, we will discuss it in front of the class.
c. Other?
Specify
your
own:
__________________________________________________________________
_
6. What do you do/say when your teacher asks the same question to
you?
CASE STUDY
71
7. How do you deal with your teacher when you dont know the answer
of the question?
8. How long will it take for you to answer your teachers question such
as oral recitation, essay and etc.?
10.
How do you clarify things you did not understand about the
lesson? Is it directly to your teacher or to your group mates? Why?
11.
What are other sources do you use when you study Economics
or during group discussion? (e.g. computers, certain websites,
books)
V.
Social Learning
CASE STUDY
72
2. How do you relate with classmates and friends who do not share
your same interests and hobbies? Explain your answer.
7. What do you think of the most intelligent of the class, do you think
you should follow everything she/he does to have high grades?
Explain your answer.
CASE STUDY
73
9. From your subject of Social Studies, what values have you learned?
How did you learn these values from the teacher?
10.
Name the Organization/Club/Group that you are currently
actively involved:
Prepared by:
Abel Alvarez Jr
Pamela Bandola
Eileen Campos
Dalia Hernando
Jean Magsino
Elaine Medillo
RizchellePriagula
Jared Valenzuela
TEACHER INTERVIEW
CASE STUDY
74
I.
Intelligence
Evaluate
the
following
type
of
Intelligences your students have and mostly
exercise in your Social Studies class. Determine
the
general
level
of
your
students
intelligences.
CASE STUDY
75
_______________Visual-Spatial (Picture Smart) These people learn best by
drawing or visualizing things using the minds eye. Visual people learn the
most from pictures, diagrams, and other visual aids.
_______________Auditory-Musical (Music Smart) Students who are music
smart learn using rhythm or melody, especially by singing or listening to
music.
_______________Bodily-Kinesthetic (Body Smart) Body-smart individuals
learn best through touch and movement. These people are best at
processing information through the body. Sometimes kinesthetic learners
work best standing up and moving rather than sitting still.
_______________Interpersonal (People Smart) Those who are people smart
learn through relating to others by sharing, comparing, and cooperating.
Interpersonal learners can make excellent group leaders and team
players.
_______________Intrapersonal (Self Smart) Intrapersonal-intelligent people
learn best by working alone and setting individual goals. Intrapersonal
learners are not necessarily shy; they are independent and organized.
_______________Naturalistic (Nature Smart) Naturalistics learn by working
with nature. Naturalistic students enjoy learning about living things and
natural events. They may excel in the sciences and be very passionate
about environmental issues.
4. From the list of multiple intelligences defined above which type of
Intelligences do you think will be most helpful for your students
learning in your Social Studies class? Why?
6. As a Social Studies teacher what are the different ways you use to
identify and monitor your students learning preferences?
CASE STUDY
76
8. What parts of the learning process are more challenging for you and
your students? Which parts of the learning process are easier for
you and your students?
10.
How does your definition and understanding of intelligence
influence your teaching practice?
11.
II.
Behaviorism
appear
CASE STUDY
77
3. How do you deal with a student who regularly misses school or your
class?
CASE STUDY
78
8. Describe an experience where you identified a students special
needs (e.g. remedial class, make up class, etc.) and modified the
lesson for that individual.
9. How have you dealt with situations where students have confided
important information about the class activity or exams?
10.
What steps would you follow to deal with a student who
displays consistent behavioral problems in the class?
III.
Cognitivism
1. How do you deal with students who have a hard time memorizing
Economics concepts?
CASE STUDY
79
CASE STUDY
80
10.
IV.
Constructivism
I explain the topic and then divide the students into group to
discuss what I have explained. Then I ask each group member
to answer my question.
b.
c.
Other?
Specify
own_____________________________________________________
your
CASE STUDY
81
6. What do you do when you are not satisfied with your students
answer?
7. How do you deal with your student when he/she answers the
question incorrectly?
9. What kind of relation should a student should have with real life
situation? Why?
a. The task should have close relationship with real life.
b. The task may or may not have relationship with real life.
c. The task should be from the book
CASE STUDY
82
10.
How do you deal with student/s who cannot easily understand
the topic?
11.
12.
What kind of resources should be provided for students during
group work?
13.
What are other tools that you use during lectures and
discussions?
V.
Social Learning
CASE STUDY
83
you incorporate these methods or strategies in your classroom
instruction?
6. Do you think you should meet with the parents of your students or
you think they should be the one to call you? Elaborate your answer.
CASE STUDY
84
9.
10.
What do you suggest to improve the school environment to
make it more conducive to learning?
11.
Name the Organization / Groups / Community Services /Clubs
you are currently actively involved.
CASE STUDY
85
Prepared by:
Abel Alvarez Jr
Pamela Bandola
Eileen Campos
Dalia Hernando
Jean Magsino
Elaine Medillo
RizchellePriagula
Jared Valenzuela