Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/15/S1/S6
PROCEEDINGS
Open Access
Abstract
Assessment of the periodontium has relied exclusively on a variety of physical measurements (e.g., attachment
level, probing depth, bone loss, mobility, recession, degree of inflammation, etc.) in relation to various case
definitions of periodontal disease. Periodontal health was often an afterthought and was simply defined as the
absence of the signs and symptoms of a periodontal disease. Accordingly, these strict and sometimes disparate
definitions of periodontal disease have resulted in an idealistic requirement of a pristine periodontium for
periodontal health, which makes us all diseased in one way or another. Furthermore, the consequence of not
having a realistic definition of health has resulted in potentially questionable recommendations. The aim of this
manuscript was to assess the biological, environmental, sociological, economic, educational and psychological
relationships that are germane to constructing a paradigm that defines periodontal health using a modified
wellness model. The paradigm includes four cardinal characteristics, i.e., 1) a functional dentition, 2) the painless
function of a dentition, 3) the stability of the periodontal attachment apparatus, and 4) the psychological and
social well-being of the individual. Finally, strategies and policies that advocate periodontal health were appraised.
Im not sick but Im not well,
and its a sin to live so well.
Flagpole Sitta, Harvey Danger
Introduction
Most people use the word health casually, in juxtaposition
to disease, with no frame of reference. Frequently used
terms associated with health include health benefits,
health promotion, health prevention, health care,
health insurance, and oral health, to name just a few.
Clearly, the word health means different things to different
people in different situations. An epidemiologist may use
mortality data to study the health of a population, the
economist may discuss the health of the economy as it
relates to sustainable GDP growth, the stressed-out dental
student may wonder whether the final examinations will
affect her health, most likely meaning her sanity, and periodontists are measuring attachment and bone levels when
seeking information about periodontal health. Obviously,
these professionals use the same word but with very different meanings. Etymologically, the word health was derived
* Correspondence: mariotti.3@osu.edu
Contributed equally
Division of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University,
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA
2015 Mariotti and Hefti This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/
publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Page 2 of 18
application of the natural health concept and define periodontal health as absence of any clinical signs of current
or past disease. The American Academy of Periodontology
(AAP) has defined health as The condition of a patient
when there is function without evidence of disease or
abnormality (AAP 2001). Applied exclusively to a periodontal framework, this definition prescribes absence of
signs and symptoms of gingival and destructive periodontal diseases, or any tissue status outside the normal range.
As a result, this idealistic requirement of a pristine periodontium makes us all diseased in one way or another.
One must ask if it is realistic to believe that periodontal
health is ever achievable, or are there more sensible and
evidence-based ways to view periodontal health? Considering the pretext for the natural concept of periodontal
health as quixotic, could a view considered similar to
health but different in scope, such as the concept of wellness, be beneficial? Wellness is considered a dynamic
process involving an individuals positive and enthusiastic
attitudes and behaviors that improve and ultimately maximize the quality of their life. Managing these feelings
requires a realistic appraisal of coping mechanisms,
autonomy concerns as well as understanding ones limitations. For example, a paraplegic can experience a state
of wellness without having the ability to physically walk.
Similar to wellness, illness is a highly personal state of
being; however, unlike wellness, it is a condition in which
the person feels unhealthy or ailing, and these feelings
may or may not be related to a disease. Therefore, wellness and illness should be considered anchor points on a
continuum reflecting a balance (or an imbalance) of
mind, body and spirit.
In regard to the periodontium, wellness would be a
dynamic state that varies from day-to-day. Each person
would have an individual interpretation of their level of
periodontal wellness (i.e., health), depending on personal
values and cultural orientations. Such a definition of
periodontal wellness is clearly different from the traditional biomedical approach (i.e., natural concept), which
defines periodontal health as a complete absence of
signs of disease. Using our current knowledge base as
well as cultural standards and values, the proposed definition of a healthy periodontium, in a state of wellness,
should include simple characteristics that are coherent
in allowing an individual to attain positive goals consistent with a positive quality of life (Figure 1). These simple characteristics of periodontal wellness would include
four cardinal components. They are the foundation for a
proposed periodontal health model that includes aspects
affecting the wellness-illness continuum.
Page 3 of 18
Page 4 of 18
Page 5 of 18
Figure 2 Three-Layer Periodontal Health Model (inner layer: directly contributing factors; middle layer: oral environment & systemic factors; outer
layer: personal factors).
gingival sulci (i.e., the narrow grooves between the gingival margin and the tooth surface). In the interproximal
space between teeth, the gingival sulcus takes on the
shape of a col that is covered by a thin, non-keratinized
epithelium. In the presence of bacterial biofilms and
inflammation, the (junctional/col) epithelium will proliferate and ulcerate, and the gingival sulcus may deepen
to form a gingival pocket or, given special circumstances, a periodontal pocket, the cardinal sign of periodontal diseases [11].
Cleaning interproximal spaces and proximal tooth surfaces is a challenge for most people. As a result, biofilms
can develop more easily on proximal surfaces near the
col, possibly leading to tissue injury and, sometimes, to
periodontal breakdown. Periodontal health can be
restored and maintained by the assistance of dental professionals who are equipped for removing plaque-retentive factors and potentially harmful biofilms from
difficult to access areas, for example in deep pockets [33].
Page 6 of 18
form of periodontitis that develops independently of clinical evidence of inflammation [16]. Further, the ability of a
clinician to use the inflammatory status of an individual to
predict future loss of attachment around teeth is poor
[37]. Therefore, the sole presence of inflammation does
not necessarily mean disease but rather, a physiologic
adaptation of healthy tissues to biological insults that are
regulated by the genome. To be sure, the chronic inflammatory mechanisms resulting from the relationship of
environment (e.g., diet, stress, bacteria) and genetics (e.g.,
specific mechanisms to restore homeostasis, gene expression in tissues, inflammatory response) create a complex
dynamic that does not include nor exclude inflammation
as an arbiter of health or disease.
Systemic health
Page 7 of 18
Genetics
Smoking
The most common changes to exclusively affect the periodontium result in the enlargement of gingival tissues
as a consequence of using an anticonvulsant (e.g.,
Page 8 of 18
The importance of personal oral hygiene to remove supragingival plaque has been the central paradigm of periodontal care. Considering that the major modifiable risk factor
for periodontal diseases is the dental bacterial biofilm, the
apt removal by the patient on a regular basis becomes
paramount [44]. Consequently, there has been considerable evidence that mechanical removal (e.g., tooth brushing, flossing) of the dental biofilm can dependably affect
stability of the periodontal tissues [33,79,80]. Properly performed oral hygiene requires highly motivated, skilled
individuals with sufficient dexterity, effective cleaning
devices, chemotherapeutic agents for plaque removal, and
appropriate oral hygiene instruction.
Occlusion
The relationship of occlusion to periodontal stability continues to be a conundrum resulting from numerous and
equivocal studies. Tooth mobility can result from a variety
Professional Care
The shared actions and beliefs that provide social contexts to define behavioral norms for relationships and a
proper lifestyle in a society often are referred to as culture. It would be anticipated that the traditions and customs of society play an important role in peoples health.
In other words, cultural differences influence the
response to disease symptoms, pursuit of medical care,
and perception of the health care team [90]. As a result,
all this affects how an individual will react and respond
Page 9 of 18
The economic and sociological measure of work experience, social position and economic influence formed by an
individuals income, education and occupation has been
recognized as the socioeconomic status of an individual or
family. Inequalities in socioeconomic status have been
considered a fundamental issue affecting health. It has
been shown that the higher the socioeconomic status of a
person, the better health, less disability, less disease and
longer life they will live [100]. Similar to medicine, there
are socioeconomic gradients in oral health. Inequalities
have been demonstrated in tooth retention [101], decay
[102], and restoration [103] as well as periodontal disease
[104-110]. The causal pathway by which socioeconomic
status improves systemic or periodontal health has not
been well established, considering that socioeconomic gradients in health are multifactorial and inter-related.
Page 10 of 18
Economy
What society values as essential for health may explain differences in healthcare policy priorities, services delivery,
healthcare utilization and outcomes [113-117]. In the first
place, the political values of a state will affect how health
care is provided. Regions that have a socialist government
aim to achieve equity in a redistributive social system with
generous benefits. The opposite is true for conservative
governments that aim to achieve equity in a merit-based
social system with benefits being compensated by the individual and not the state. Previous research has shown that
a regions political configuration is correlated to healthcare
system policy priorities [118-120]. Secondly, the value systems of health care professionals towards patients will
determine the health status of the individual. Overall, a
provider may achieve high value health care for a patient
that revolves around patient needs in an economically sustainable health care system [121]. The third piece of the
value system and perhaps the most important one is the
attitudes, beliefs and preferences of the patient. Moreover,
health care values of the patient provide direction in
choosing treatment options and designing interventions
specific for the individual [122].
Oral health literacy and knowledge
Approximately 40 percent of working age adult Americans visit the dentist on a yearly basis [129] and
although the reasons for utilization of dental services
are complex, one of the principal excuses for limited
utilization rates is the expense of dental care [130]. It
has been estimated that 44.2 percent of dental costs are
paid directly by the consumer, whereas only 10.3 percent of physician costs, 3.3 percent of hospital care cost,
and 26.8 percent of nursing-care expenses were paid
out-of-pocket [131-133]. Further, the projected average
Page 11 of 18
Page 12 of 18
periodontal health. The periodontal probes used in practice today are inapt to execute the proposed task. Probing
should be replaced with quantitative imaging techniques
that impress with excellent sensitivity and specificity, and
are fully compatible with future electronic patient
records. Efforts to treat periodontal disease should focus
on the four elements of the periodontal health model
with the goal to manage the disease process and re-establish health, always considering the patients needs and
wishes while avoiding over treatment.
Page 13 of 18
Page 14 of 18
Favorable Environment
Periodontal diagnostics
- attachment levels
Risk assessment
- questionnaire
- health history
Plaque control
- professional care
- home care
Periodontal maintenance
Periodontal diagnostics
- sensitive/specific
- predictive
Comprehensive risk assessment
- biomarkers
- systemic health
- bone density profile
- genetic markers
Personalized comprehensive biofilm management
Personalized periodontal maintenance
Lifestyle choices
- nutrition
- smoking cessation
- stress management
- systemic health
Oral health literacy and knowledge
Access to care
- dental insurance
Lifestyle choices
- nutrition
- smoking cessation
- stress management
- systemic health
Oral health literacy and knowledge
- e-media (apps, etc.)
- social media
- science cafe
Access to care
- dental insurance
- e-health record
- comprehensive health management
will involve tests that predict the decline of health leading to future periodontal destruction.
Page 15 of 18
Page 16 of 18
96. Ramos E, Rotimi C: The As, Gs, Cs, and Ts of health disparities. BMC Med
Genomics 2009, 2:29.
97. Higher education and income levels keys to better health, according to
annual report on nations health, [http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/
2012/p0516_higher_education.html].
98. Bayraktar G, Kurtulus I, Kazancioglu R, Bayramgurler I, Cintan S, Bural C,
Besler M, Trablus S, Issever H, Aysuna N, et al: Effect of educational level
on oral health in peritoneal and hemodialysis patients. Int J Dent 2009,
2009:159767.
99. Gundala R, Chava VK: Effect of lifestyle, education and socioeconomic
status on periodontal health. Contemp Clin Dent 2010, 1(1):23-26.
100. Demakakos P, Nazroo J, Breeze E, Marmot M: Socioeconomic status and
health: the role of subjective social status. Soc Sci Med 2008,
67(2):330-340.
101. Bernabe E, Marcenes W: Income inequality and tooth loss in the United
States. J Dent Res 2011, 90(6):724-729.
102. Edelstein BL, Chinn CH: Update on disparities in oral health and access to
dental care for Americas children. Acad Pediatr 2009, 9(6):415-419.
103. Bernabe E, Sheiham A, Sabbah W: Income, income inequality, dental
caries and dental care levels: an ecological study in rich countries. Caries
Res 2009, 43(4):294-301.
104. Borrell LN, Crawford ND: Social disparities in periodontitis among United
States adults 1999-2004. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008,
36(5):383-391.
105. Sabbah W, Tsakos G, Sheiham A, Watt RG: The effects of income and
education on ethnic differences in oral health: a study in US adults.
J Epidemiol Community Health 2009, 63(7):516-520.
106. Sabbah W, Tsakos G, Chandola T, Sheiham A, Watt RG: Social gradients in
oral and general health. J Dent Res 2007, 86(10):992-996.
107. Lopez R, Fernandez O, Jara G, Baelum V: Epidemiology of clinical
attachment loss in adolescents. J Periodontol 2001, 72(12):1666-1674.
108. Drury TF, Garcia I, Adesanya M: Socioeconomic disparities in adult oral
health in the United States. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999, 896:322-324.
109. Locker D, Clarke M, Murray H: Oral health status of Canadian-born and
immigrant adolescents in North York, Ontario. Community Dent Oral
Epidemiol 1998, 26(3):177-181.
110. Aass AM, Albandar J, Aasenden R, Tollefsen T, Gjermo P: Variation in
prevalence of radiographic alveolar bone loss in subgroups of 14-yearold schoolchildren in Oslo. J Clin Periodontol 1988, 15(2):130-133.
111. WHO: The World Health Report 2008: Primary Care Now More Than Ever,
May 22, 2009 edn. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
112. Kroneman MW, Maarse H, van der Zee J: Direct access in primary care
and patient satisfaction: a European study. Health Policy 2006, 76(1):72-79.
113. Arrindell WA, Steptoe A, Wardle J: Higher levels of state depression in
masculine than in feminine nations. Behav Res Ther 2003, 41(7):809-817.
114. Deschepper R, Grigoryan L, Lundborg CS, Hofstede G, Cohen J, Kelen GV,
Deliens L, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM: Are cultural dimensions relevant for
explaining cross-national differences in antibiotic use in Europe? BMC
Health Serv Res 2008, 8:123.
115. Erumban AAdJ S: Cross Country differences in ICT adoption: A
consequence of culture? J World Bus 2006, 41(4):302-314.
116. Ros CC, Groenewegen PP, Delnoij DM: All rights reserved, or can we just
copy? Cost sharing arrangements and characteristics of health care
systems. Health Policy 2000, 52(1):1-13.
117. Saltman RF J: European health care reform: analysis of current strategies.
Copenhague: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 1997.
118. Boerma WG: Local housing scheme and political preference as
conditions for the results of a health centre-stimulating policy in The
Netherlands. Health Policy 1989, 13(3):225-237.
119. Groenewegen PP: The shadow of the future: institutional change in
health care. Health Aff 1994, 13(5):137-148.
120. Tenbensel T, Eagle S, Ashton T: Comparing health policy agendas across
eleven high income countries: islands of difference in a sea of similarity.
Health Policy 2012, 106(1):29-36.
121. Porter ME: What is value in health care? N Eng J Med 2010,
363(26):2477-2481.
122. Brennan PF, Strombom I: Improving health care by understanding patient
preferences: the role of computer technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc
1998, 5(3):257-262.
123. Healthy People. 2010, [http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/data/default.
aspx].
Page 17 of 18
124. IOM: Oral Health Literacy. The National Academies Press; 2013.
125. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion, [http://www.iom.edu/
Reports/2004/Health-Literacy-A-Prescription-to-End-Confusion.aspx].
126. Yin HS, Johnson M, Mendelsohn AL, Abrams MA, Sanders LM, Dreyer BP:
The health literacy of parents in the United States: a nationally
representative study. Pediatrics 2009, 124(Suppl 3):S289-298.
127. Current Bibliographies in Medicine 2000-1: Health Literacy, [http://www.
nlm.nih.gov/archive/20061214/pubs/cbm/hliteracy.html].
128. Wehmeyer MM, Corwin CL, Guthmiller JM, Lee JY: The impact of oral
health literacy on periodontal health status. J Public Health Dent 2014,
74(1):80-87.
129. Vujicic M, Israelson H, Antoon J, Kiesling R, Paumier T, Zust M: A profession
in transition. J Am Dent Assoc 2014, 145(2):118-121.
130. The Costs of Dental Care and the Impact of Dental Insurance Coverage,
[http://www.rwjf.org/en/research-publications/find-rwjf-research/2009/04/
the-costs-of-dental-care-and-the-impact-of-dental-insurance-cove.html].
131. Hartman M, Martin A, McDonnell P, Catlin A: National health spending in
2007: slower drug spending contributes to lowest rate of overall growth
since 1998. Health Aff 2009, 28(1):246-261.
132. National health care expenditures projections: 2001-2011, [http://www.
cms.hhs.gov/statistics/nhe/projections-2001/proj2000.pdf].
133. Waldman HB, Chaudhry RA, Cinotti DA: Dentistry in time of recession. N Y
State Dent J 2009, 75(2):22-24.
134. The American Way of Dentistry. The oral cost spiral, [http://www.slate.
com/articles/life/the_american_way_of_dentistry/2009/09/
the_american_way_of_dentistry_2.html].
135. Quinn JM, Pascoe A, Wood W, Neal DT: Cant control yourself? Monitor
those bad habits. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2010, 36(4):499-511.
136. Webb TL, Sheeran P: Does changing behavioral intentions engender
behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol
Bull 2006, 132(2):249-268.
137. Imfeld T: Chewing gumfacts and fiction: a review of gum-chewing and
oral health. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1999, 10(3):405-419.
138. IOM: Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. The National
Academies Press; 2004.
139. Kutner MG E, Jin Y, Paulsen C: The Health Literacy of Americas Adults:
Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy.Department
of Education US 2006.
140. Teles RP, Teles FR: Antimicrobial agents used in the control of
periodontal biofilms: effective adjuncts to mechanical plaque control?
Braz Oral Res 2009, 23(Suppl 1):39-48.
141. Poklepovic T, Worthington HV, Johnson TM, Sambunjak D, Imai P,
Clarkson JE, Tugwell P: Interdental brushing for the prevention and
control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults. The Cochrane
Database Sys Rev 2013, 12:CD009857.
142. Berchier CE, Slot DE, Haps S, Van der Weijden GA: The efficacy of dental
floss in addition to a toothbrush on plaque and parameters of gingival
inflammation: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 2008, 6(4):265-279.
143. Genco RJ, Borgnakke WS: Risk factors for periodontal disease. Periodontol
2000 2013, 62(1):59-94.
144. Axelsson P: An introduction to risk prediction and preventive dentistry.
Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company, Inc; 1999.
145. Page RC, Martin J, Krall EA, Mancl L, Garcia R: Longitudinal validation of a
risk calculator for periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 2003,
30(9):819-827.
146. Axelsson P, Lindhe J: The significance of maintenance care in the
treatment of periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1981, 8(4):281-294.
147. Hancock EB: Periodontal diseases: prevention. Ann Periodontol 1996,
1(1):223-249.
148. Yarnall KS, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL: Family
physicians as team leaders: time to share the care. Prev Chronic Dis
2009, 6(2):A59.
149. Van der Ouderaa F, Cummins D: Delivery systems for agents in supraand subgingival plaque control. J Dent Res 1989, 68:1617-1624.
150. Yaacob M, Worthington HV, Deacon SA, Deery C, Walmsley AD,
Robinson PG, Glenny AM: Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral
health. The Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2014, 6:CD002281.
151. Gunsolley JC: A meta-analysis of six-month studies of antiplaque and
antigingivitis agents. J Am Dent Assoc 2006, 137(12):1649-1657.
152. Riley P, Lamont T: Triclosan/copolymer containing toothpastes for oral
health. The Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2013, 12:CD010514.
Page 18 of 18
153. Paraskevas S, van der Weijden GA: A review of the effects of stannous
fluoride on gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 2006, 33(1):1-13.
154. Ellwood RP, Worthington HV, Blinkhorn AS, Volpe AR, Davies RM: Effect of a
triclosan/copolymer dentifrice on the incidence of periodontal
attachment loss in adolescents. J Clin Periodontol 1998, 25(5):363-367.
155. Rosling B, Dahln G, Volpe A, Furuichi Y, Ramberg P, Lindhe J: Effect of
triclosan on the subgingival microbiota of periodontitis-susceptible
subjects. J Clin Periodontol 1997, 24(12):881-887.
156. Johannsen A, Susin C, Gustafsson A: Smoking and inflammation: evidence
for a synergistic role in chronic disease. Periodontol 2000 2014,
64(1):111-126.
157. Lalla E, Papapanou PN: Diabetes mellitus and periodontitis: a tale of two
common interrelated diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011, 7(12):738-748.
158. Schiavo JH: Oral health literacy in the dental office: the unrecognized
patient risk factor. J Dent Hyg 2011, 85(4):248-255.
159. Horowitz AM, Kleinman DV: Oral health literacy: the new imperative to
better oral health. Dent Clin North Am 2008, 52(2):333-344, vi.
160. Armitage GC: Periodontal diseases: diagnosis. Ann Periodontol 1996,
1(1):37-215.
161. Dunn HL: High-level wellness for man and society. Am J Public Health
Nation Health 1959, 49(6):786-792.
doi:10.1186/1472-6831-15-S1-S6
Cite this article as: Mariotti and Hefti: Defining periodontal health. BMC
Oral Health 2015 15(Suppl 1):S6.