Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Behavioral classes
Ductile polymer
Brittle polymer
Elastomer
Comparison
400%
Testing of polymers
Test specimens
Testing variables
Test speeds
Test temperature
Environmental conditioning
In-vivo
Linear
Elastic models
Non-linear
Non-linear
Non
linear models
MISO modeling
Polymer elasto
elasto-plasticity
plasticity
35
30
Engineering S
Stress (MPa)
25
20
data
15
Plastic Point
10
5
0
0.0
5.0
10.0
Engineering Strain (%)
15.0
20.0
Comparing PC to Al
Non-linear
True Strain (% )
True Stre s s (M
M Pa)
True Strain (% )
Non-linear
Load (N)
L
600
400
200
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
time (sec)
extension
n (mm)
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
time (sec)
Non-linear
Residual extension
plas10
2.5
extension, mm
1.5
0.5
0
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
time, s
Non-linear
Non-linear
Non
linear elastic limit
35
stres
ss MPa
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
10
20
30
strain %
40
30
25
20
data
15
Plastic Point
10
5
0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Pragmatic elasto
elasto-plasticity
plasticity
Tru
ue Stress (MPa
a)
35
30
Model
25
Data
20
15
10
5
0
0.000
0.020
0.040
0.060
0.080
0.100
0.120
0.140
True Strain
Stress MPa
50
40
30
UTM1-39
UTM1
39.62
62-1
1
20
UTM1-39.62-2
10
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
Strain mm/mm
1.4
1.6
Measuring post
post-yield
yield stress
stress-strain
strain
180
160
140
120
100
80
1 mm GL
2 mm GL
60
4 mm GL
40
25 mm GL
50 mm GL
20
0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Modeling up to yield
Modeling post
post-yield
yield
Hyperelastic
Modeling Elastomers
Hyperelastic Testing
Hyperelastic
Tensile test
Tensile Test
Hyperelastic
Compressive test
Biaxial v.
v Compression Testing
300
250
Stress (psi)
200
150
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
strain (mm/mm)
0.5
0.6
Hyperelastic
Planar tension
Rubber Modeling
Hyperelastic
Volumetric Test
Volumetric data
Hyperelastic
Modeling strategy
Hyperelastic
Mullins effect
Hyperelastic
Conclusions
Effect of temperature
Properties and dependencies
change with temperature
Modulus
Ductile-brittle
transitions
Rate
R dependency
d
d
Data
D t you need
d is
i specific
ifi to
t your application
li ti
test exposed specimens instead of virgin material
UHMWPE: effect of in
in-vivo
vivo
Creep
Material under load will
flow over time
1E-07
G (Pa)
1E-08
1E+08
J (Pa-1)
1E+09
1E-09
1E+07
1E-07
1E-05
1E-03
1E-01
Time(s)
1E+01
1E+03
1E+05
1E-07
1E-05
1E-03
1E-01
Time (s)
1E+01
1E+03
1E+05
Visco elasticity
Visco-elasticity
In small strain (linear visco-elastic) situations
Applied strain (stress) is recoverable
A time-temperature
ti
t
t
correlation
l ti exists
it
Higher temperature = longer time
Lowering temperature = short time
Torsional Mode
Torsional DMA
Specimens
25 mm diam. Disc
Torsional (flex) bar
Data
G-G data
Shear stress relaxation
strengthening the materials core of manufacturing enterprises
Tension/Compression Mode
Dynamic Tensile m/c
Frequency: 0.01-200 Hz
Load: 0-250 N
Crosshead speed
p
0-3 m/s
Displacement: 12.7 mm
Temperature: -80 to 250C
Specimens
ASTM type V tensile bar
Compression cube (25mm depending on stiffness)
Data
E E (tensile loss/storage modulus)
Tensile relaxation modulus E f(t)
strengthening the materials core of manufacturing enterprises
PTFE master
master-curve
curve
Shift factors
Visco-elastic
Limitations
Creep Regimes
Primary
short time
Secondary
sustained uniform strain
Tertiary
y
localization and failure
Creep Modeling
Creep
p Strain vs. Time Fit to Time Hardeningg Model
5.0
cr
45
4.5
4.0
Strain
n (%)
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
1E-02
1E-01
1E+00
1E+01
1E+02
1E+03
Time (Hours)
C1
c2
c3
Can
C approximate:
i t
Worst case- use cross-flow data
Stress-strain
Stress
strain data
Coupling definitions
Cohesive Elements
Failure mode during the tear test (ASTM D624 Type C Specimen)
Higher modulus
Small strain to failure
Brittle
i l failure
f il
No post-yield behavior
Anisotropy
Material Testing
gate region
g
g
Test Specimens
ASTM D638Type V
Preparation
CNC from
f
plaque
l
CNC from part
Molded
Variability
processing
orientation
thickness
E1
E2
30
25
20
data
15
Plastic Point
10
5
0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
MAT 24 Plasticity
Discretize curve
Calculate EPS for each ES
EPSmax
S
> FAIL
A
(FAIL = element deletion strain)
Post-yield
Post
yield with necking
70
yield point
neck propagation
60
Strress MPa
50
40
necking starts
30
UTM1-39.62-1
20
UTM1-39.62-2
10
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
Strain mm/mm
1.4
1.6
LCSR
Capture model
independent
behavior
35
Tensile Stren
ngth (MPa)
40
30
25
20
15
data
Cow per Symonds
10
E ring
Eyring
5
0
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
Strain Rate(/s)
1.E+01
1.E+02
MAT 24 LCSR
LCSR-Eyring
Eyring
Eyring Model
Yield stress v. log strain rate is linear
Best form for plastics
MAT 19 Methodology
Determine elastic limit at
quasi-static strain rate
Use elastic limit for vonvon
Mises yield
Define failure
failure stress v. strain rate
table
Launch CAE
Modeler
Default autofit of
MAT_019 model
MAT 89 Ductile-brittle
Non-linear behavior
Failure depends on strain
rate
Can handle ductile-brittle
transitions
Uses stress-strain curve
Limited to shell elements
MAT 89 Methodology
Submit stress-strain
curve
Submit EMOD
Submit rate dependency
via LCSR-Eyring
Submit failure strain v.
strain rate via LCFAIL
MAT 89 Workings
Internally decompose quasi stress-strain curve
Use EMOD for von Mises limit
Rest of the curve is elastic
elastic-plastic
plastic
Rate dependency via LCSR
Failure
F il
via
i LCFAIL
Launch CAE
Modeler
Adding post
post-yield
yield data
Tuned MAT_089
MAT 089 model
Conclusions
Choice of material model depends on
material
test data
d
LS-DYNA
LS
DYNA Simulation
Comparison to experiment
60
50
limitation
LS-DYNA Simulation
Tensile Experiment
Stress (MPa)
40
MAT 24 Model
30
20
10
0
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Strain (mm/mm)
0.3
DIC Experiment
In closing...
closing
Do not oversimplify
Use self consistent data
Understand
d
d your material
i l data
d