You are on page 1of 1

The response to the first assumption will be situation under mutual mistake.

Actually, conduction of both parties and no meeting of the minds led to the
unpleasant result. Certainly, it should be base for granting rescission of the contract
at the request of either party. Seems clear, Yoda has gotten not the required car at
the end of deal due to 1) carelessness and error by Darth; 2) no reasonable care
about the car that was being sold to him.
The response to the second assumption will be case under knowingly made
misstatement. Darth should have known about the real fuel consumption of the car
he sold and about conditions are required by Yoda. Despite these facts Darth acted
fraudulently by selling car gets 10 miles per gallon of gasoline and telling instead
real information untrue statement.
All in all, Yoda should have acted with reasonable care manner and
independently found out all the information about the car he had wanted to buy
before making a purchase.

You might also like