Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Valerie R. Berner MOTS, Jacolyn A. Hudson MOTS, Leah L. Norcross MOTS, Rachel T. Pins MOTS,
Jordan M. Pulliam MOTS, Audrey L. White MOTS, & Christine K. Urish, PhD, OTR/L, BCMH, FAOTA
LITERATURE REVIEW
Dunn created the Model of Sensory Processing in order to
METHODS
Participants & Recruitment
Adults (18 years or older) with at least one tattoo were
recruited through tattoo shops and flyers within the IA/IL
area. Information was also posted on social media sites that
led to a variety of participants across the United States. This
study included 53 participants consisting of 29 females and
24 males.
Instruments
Once individuals agreed to participate they completed the
following:
A survey developed by researchers to address demographic
information, employment, and sensory and tattoo experiences
A body diagram to document tattooed areas
Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (AASP)
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
PASSIVE
RESPONSE TO
STIMULI
ACTIVE
RESPONSE TO
STIMULI
2
LOW
REGISTRATION
33.13*
SENSATION
SEEKING
50.57*
4
SENSORY
SENSITIVITY
36.02*
SENSATION
AVOIDING
38.25*
* Mean Score Results
Range of Scores
Considered Similar
to Most People
LOW
REGISTRATION
SENSATION
SEEKING
SENSORY
SENSITIVITY
SENSATION
AVOIDING
24 - 35
43 - 56
26 - 41
27 - 41
Occupations
Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, Media
Business
Laborer
Food Prep, Serving
Education, Training, Library
Protective Services
Healthcare Practitioners and Support
Unemployment
Personal Care, Service
Visible
7
7
5
4
3
3
2
2
1
Not Visible
0
6
1
1
3
0
3
2
3
Outlets
Sensory Results
Twenty participants reported no
The AASP revealed the following number of
alternative outlets to getting tattoos
participants in the similar to most category:
Low Registration: n = 26
Sensation Seeking: n = 32
Alternative Outlets
Sensory Sensitivity: n = 31
Changing appearance (body building/
Sensation Avoiding: n = 32
piercings)
Artistic expression (writing, drawing,
Sensations felt during tattooing:
painting)
Pain: n = 42
Relaxation: n = 17
Tattoo Coverage
Anxiety, stress, or tension: n = 22
1 9 Compartments: n = 42
Burning, hot, or sweaty: n = 11
10 18 Compartments: n = 8
19 27 Compartments: n = 3
FURTHER RESEARCH
Needed within this emerging practice area to expand
knowledge base on adult sensory needs
Develop specific inclusion criteria and a more focused
research question
Utilize a more suitable sensory assessment
REFERENCES
Brown, C., Tollefson, N., Dunn, W., Cromwell, R., & Filion, D. (2001).
The adult sensory profile: Measuring patterns of sensory processing.
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 75-82. Philadelphia, PA:
F.A. Davis Company
Burgess, M., & Clark, L. (2010). Do the savage origins of tattoos cast
a prejudicial shadow on contemporary tattooed individuals?
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(3), 746-764. doi:10.1111/
j.1559-1816.2010.00596.x
Dean, D.H. (2011). Young adult perception of visible tattoos on white
collar service provider. Young Consumers, 12(3), 254-264.
doi:10.1108/17473611111163304
Engel-Yeger, B., & Dunn, W. (2011b). The relationship between sensory
processing difficulties and anxiety level of healthy adults. British Journal
of Occupational Therapy, 74(5), 210-216. doi:10.4276/03080221
1X13046730116407
Roberti, J. W., Storch, E. A., & Bravata, E. A. (2003). Sensation seeking,
exposure to psychosocial stressors and body modifications in a college
population. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(2004),
1167-1177. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.020
Swanger, N. (2005). Visible body modification (VBM): Evidence from
human resource managers and recruiters and the effects on
employment. Hospitality Management, 25, 154-158. doi:10.1016/
j.ijhm.2004.12.004