Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ATTY. VILLASIS
UE-BRC
Evidence
1.
In a criminal case, the accused is entitled to an acquittal, unless his guilt is
shown
A. By preponderance of evidence
B. Beyond reasonable doubt
C. By circumstancial evidence
D. None of the above
2.
An extrajudicial confession made by an accused, shall not be sufficient
ground for conviction unless corroborated by evidence
A. Aliunde
B. Of corpus delicti
C. Substantial Evidence
D. That proves that the combination of all circumstances is such as to produce a
conviction beyond reasonable doubt.
3. The court may stop the introduction of further testimony upon any particular
point when the evidence upon it is already so full that more witnesses to the
same point cannot be reasonably expected to be additionally persuasive.
A. Probably true
B. False
C. Maybe
D. True based on Section 6 Rule 133 of the Rules on Evidence
4. Circumstancial evidence is sufficient, when
Criminal Procedure
2.
In a criminal case, any party may appeal from a judgment or final order,
unless the accused will be placed in
E. Double Jeopardy
F. Preliminary Investigation
G. Trial in absentia
H. Custodia legis
3.
If personal service of the copy of the notice of appeal cannot be made
upon the adverse party or his counsel, service may be done by
E. Registered mail
F. Substituted service
G. Publication
H. Private courier
3. An appeal may be taken within
E. 60 days from promulgation of judgment or from notice of the final order
appealed from.
F. 20 days from the promulgation of judgment or from notice of the final order
appealed from
G. 15 days from the promulgation of judgment or from notice of the final order
appealed from
D. None of the above
4. Appeal may be withdrawn before the record has been forwarded by the clerk
of court to the proper appellate court as provided in Section 8 Rule 122
E. True
F. False
G. Maybe, but im not sure
H. Probably false
5. A search warrant is an order in writing issued in the name of the People of the
Philippines, signed by a prosecutor, directed to a peace officer, commanding him
to search for personal property described therein and bring it before the court.
E. True
F. False
G. Partly true and partly false
H. Who cares
6. An application for search warrant shall be filed with the following:
E. Any court within whose territorial jurisdiction a crime was committed
F. At the option of the private complainant as provided in section 28 of RA 8282
G. For compelling reasons, stated in the application, any court within the judicial
region where the crime was committed if the place of the commission of the
crime is known, or any court within the judicial region where the warrant shall be
enforced.
H. All of the above
7. A search warrant may be issued for the search and seizure of personal
property:
E. Subject of the offense
B. Stolen or embezzeled and other proceeds, or fruits of the offense
C. Held in custodia legis
D. Used by the arrestees/surrenderees of oplan tokhang
8. A search warrant shall not issue except upon probable cause in connection with
one specific offenseto be personally examined by the prosecutor after
examination under oath and affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses in
the preliminary investigation and particularly describing the place to be searched
and things to be seized which may be anywhere in the Philippines
E. True
F. False
G. Partly true
H. Entirely false
9. A search warrant shall be valid for:
A. 10 days from its date.
B. 120 days from date of issue and shall be deemed automatically cancelled if the
peace officers have not made use of it
D. Not later than 60 days from issue of the search warrant
E. None of the above
11. No search of a house, room, or any other premises shall be made except in
the presence of the
G. Lawful Occupant
H. Any member of the family of the lawful occupant
I. Two witnesses of sufficient age and discretion residing in the same locality
J. Security personnel of the place
K. All of the above
2nd Batch
1.
2. The person who embezzled or alienates any of the money, goods, chattels
or effects of the deceased shall be liable for double the value of the
property sold, embezzled or alienated to be recovered for the benefit of
the:
a. Executor;
b. Administrator;
c. Administration;
d. Estate;
e.
State.
7. May the court extend the period of 15 days for the executor or
administrator to file the answer in any claim?
a. No, the period is non-extendible;
b. Yes, in its discretion;
c. Maybe.
a. Administration
b. Liquidation;
c. Succession
Criminal Procedure
Rule 116 to Rule 121
1.
Preliminary Investigation;
b. Arraignment;
c. Appraisal;
d. Confrontation.
2. Where the accused has been already been arraigned and subsequently the
information was substantially amended, the
a.
3. May arraignment of the accused be made after a case has been submitted
for decision?
a. No, as this procedural error was tantamount to a denial of his
constitutional right to be informed of the accusation against him;
b. No, as his subsequent arraignment did not cure the defect in the trial
proceedings as the trial court had not acquired jurisdiction over his
person;
c. Yes, as his arrest, not his arraignment, conferred on the trial court
jurisdiction over his person.
5. Courts should consider no ground other than those stated in the motion
to quash.
a. Yes, the rule is absolute;
b. Yes, except the ground of lack of jurisdiction over the offense charged;
c. Yes, except the ground of lack of jurisdiction over the person of the
accused.
7. The ______________ bind the parties, limit the trial to matters not disposed of
and control the course of the action during the trial, unless modified by
the court to prevent manifest injustice.
a. Preliminary Conference;
b. Pre-trial Brief;
c. Pre-Trial Order.
c. Judicial decree.
10. When does a motion for new trial or reconsideration be filed under the
Rules of Court?
a.
2. Leading question is one which assumes as true a fact not yet testified
to by the witness or contrary to that which he has previously stated
and is answerable by yes or no.
a.
False;
b. True;
c.
Within three (3) days after notice of the offer unless a different
period is fixed by the court.
c. Facilitator;
d. Mediator.
The counsel for the parties, can submit questions to the judge and
that the judge may, in his discretion, ask the child.
10. Under the Katarungang Pambarangay Law, the Lupon shall appoint any
member of the barangay who will act and serve as the secretary of the
lupon.
a. True;
b. False;
c. Maybe.
Marc Laurence R. Monterde
Multiple choice questions
Remedial Law Review 2
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
1. Habeas Corpus extends to
I. All cases of illegal confinement or detention
J. Rightful custody of any person from the person entitled thereto
K. Both A and B
L. Extra legal killings
4.
D) Proceed with the estate proceeding and assail the said decision later
during appeal to the Court of Appeals
Answer: A- Appointment of special administrator is an interlocutory
order
4. A is declared an administrator of the estate by the probate court. How do
you assail such appointment?
A) Petition for Certiorari under Rule 65 with a prayer for preliminary
injunction or TRO
B) Appeal the order declaring A as an administrator
C) File a motion to lift the order declaring A as special administrator
D) Proceed with the estate proceeding and assail the said decision later
during appeal to the Court of Appeals.
Answer: B- Appointment of a regular administrator is a final order
5. A died in Davao. He left no will. His heirs filed an intestate proceeding in
Manila. B, one of As children filed a motion to dismiss the petition on the
ground of lack of jurisdiction. The court granted the motion outright on
that ground.
A) The court erred in granting the motion to dismiss. It should have
dismissed the case on the ground of improper venue
B) The court was correct in granting the motion
C) The court should have heard the parties before making its decision
D) The court should have denied the motion
Answer: D- The rule on venue can be waived.
6. A is declared an administrator of the estate by the RTC probate court. B,
one of the deceased children filed a motion for reconsideration on the 14th
day of the period to file a motion for reconsideration or new trial, or
appeal the case. The said motion as denied by the court. As lawyer for B
you have
A) Fresh 15 days to file an appeal
B) 1 day remaining to file an appeal
C) Follow the Neypes ruling
D) Fresh 30 days to file an appeal
E) C and D
F) None of the above
G) A and C
A was charged with acts of lasciviousness. During trial, he was called upon
the witness stand to testify on his behalf. The prosecution objected
because he did not file his judicial affidavit. A invoked that it is his right to
be heard and that he should be allowed to testify. Rule on the matter.
A) The court should allow A to testify because of his Constitutional right
to be heard
B) The court should not allow A to testify because by not submitting his
judicial affidavit, he waived his right to testify because it served as his
direct testimony
C) The court should allow the filing of As Judicial Affidavit
D) The court should order the presentation of other evidence on behalf of
A
Answer: B- Sections 9 and 10 of the Judicial Affidavit Rule
Answer: B- Sec
10. B, the counsel for the defendant, failed to appear during the presentation
of C to testify with a judicial affidavit for A, the plaintiff of the case. Decide.
A) Declare that the defendant waived his right to confront by crossexamination C
B) Order the continuance of the trial
C) Have the defendant be declared in default
D) Rule the in favour of A because the defendant failed to defend his case
Answer: A
Criminal Procedure
Rule 110-115
1. A was stopped by a traffic enforcer. Before issuing the ticket for the traffic
violation, the enforcer searched the motorcycle driven by A. The traffic
enforcer found marijuana. A was charged with drug possession. A moved
that the evidence against him be declared inadmissible. The prosecutor, on
the other hand, opposed the said motion, and argued that the illegal
substance was a result from a valid arrest. Decide.
A) The marijuana is admissible because the search conducted by the
officer was preceded by a valid arrest
B) The marijuana is inadmissible because it resulted from an illegal search.
C) The traffic enforcer should be called to testify
D) The accused should be convicted
Answer: B- Traffic stop is not considered arrest, hence any search
conducted after such traffic stop, if without a search warrant, is illegal
2. A, a resident of Cebu, was recruited by B while she was in Manila to work
in Singapore as a factory worker. When A arrived in Singapore, she did not
worked there as factory worker but instead she worked as a domestic
helper where she was treated cruelly by her employer. This prompted her
to return to the Philippines. She approached you and asked where the case
should be filed.
A) In Cebu
B) In Manila
C) In Singapore
D) Where B resides
E) A or B
F) C or D
G) None of the above because POEA has jurisdiction over the case
Answer: E- The case should be filed where the victim resides or where
the crime was committed (place of recruitment) at the option of the
victim
3. A and B got married in Hong Kong through a notary public. After 10 years
of marriage, A, the husband, contracted a second marriage in Singapore. B
then filed a case of Bigamy against A. A then filed for a Petition for
Annulment of Marriage against A. A then moved to suspend the Bigamy
case on the ground of prejudicial question. If you were the judge for the
criminal case, you would
A) Suspend the proceeding because of prejudicial question
B) Deny the motion to suspend the trial and proceed with the trial
C) Dismiss the case
D) Order the prosecutor to investigate the parties for a possible collusion
Answer: C- The court has no jurisdiction over the case because the
crime was committed outside the Philippines. The court can dismiss the
case motu proprio for lack of jurisdiction
4. A committed slight physical injuries in Quezon City. Where should the
offended party file his complaint?
A) With the prosecutors office
B) Directly with the RTC
C) Directly with the MTC
D) With the DOJ
Answer A-Sec 1(b) Rule 112 ROC
5. A was charged with Theft and Murder in one information. The prosecutor
was able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that A committed both
crimes. If you were the judge, you would
A) Convict A of Theft only
B) Convict A of Murder only
C) Convict A of both crimes
D) Acquit A of the charges against him because there was a violation of
his Constitutional Right
Answer: C- If the accused fails to object to duplicitous information, he
may be convicted of as many offenses as there are charged.
6. A and B are married for 10 years. A, the husband, met C, young lovely lady,
while he was on a convention. A and C fell in love. B found out about their
illicit affair. She was furious at first but later on, she met D, a young
handsome man. B and D also fell in love. After some time A and B decided
to put into writing that no case should be filed against each other out of
their own illicit affairs. B got pregnant and when A learned about this, he
filed a complaint against B and with the prosecutors office. If you were the
prosecutor, you would
A) Dismiss the complaint
B) File the information in court
C) Have A present more evidence
Answer: A- Sec. 5 Rule110 ROC
7. You were charged with homicide. Which of the following is you immediate
remedy?
A) File a motion to quash the information
B) File a motion to supress evidence
C) File a motion to demurrer to evidence
D) Bail
Answer: D
8. A was charged with Homicide. For more than one year, the prosecutor has
not presented any evidence against him. If you are the lawyer for the A,
you would
A) File a motion to dismiss the case, invoking the Constitutional Right of
the speedy disposition of the case
B) File a motion to dismiss the case, invoking the Speedy Trial Act.
C) File a demurrer to evidence
D) File a motion to quash information
Answer: B. Note that letter A is also an acceptable answer but the
Speedy Trial Act is enacted to cater criminal cases which there were
failure to prosecute
9. Juan Dela Cruz was charged with violating B.P. 22. The court ordered the
case for mediation and judicial dispute resolution. May the court do so
considering that it is a criminal case?
A) No, because criminal case cannot be settled
B) Yes, but only with respect to the civil aspect of the case
C) Yes since violation of B.P.22 is more of a civil case
D) Yes since B.P. 22 is a special crime
Answer: B
10. A was charged with Slight Physical Injuries. He is in jail for 3 months now.
As his new lawyer, you would
A) File a motion to have A released
B) Apply for bail
C) File a motion to demurrer to evidence because his confinement in jail
exceeded that of the impossible penalty in Physical Injuries
D) File a motion to dismiss the case because he already served the
possible maximum impossible penalty
Answer: A- Sec. 16 Rule 114 ROC
Evidence
1. It is the ultimate fact or proposition sought to be established
A) Factum Probans
B) Factum Probandum
C) Best Evidence
D) Parol Evidence
Answer: B
2. It is the material evidencing the proposition
A) Factum Probans
B) Factum Probandum
C) Direct Evidence
D) Circumstantial Evidence
Answer: A
3. A was charged for Murder for killing X. B, witness for the prosecution,
testified that he saw A killed X. He also testified that he saw that A
removed the watch of X. The lawyer for A objected to the testimony with
respect to the removing of the watch. Is the lawyer correct?
A. No, the witness should be given the chance to testify on what he saw
B. No, the testimony is related to the incident
C. Yes, such testimony is not relevant
D. Yes, such testimony is prejudicial to his client
Answer: C- Evidence must be relevant to the issue and is not excluded
by law or by the rules. The getting of the watch is not relevant to the
crime of Murder. Answer is different if the crime charged is Robbery
with Homicide.
4. A is a kasambahay of B. One day, while B was away, A stole the Bs laptop
and sold it to their neighbour. B found out about it and A admitted to the
crime. B had A sign a confession with the neighbour as the witness. A was
subsequently charged with Qualified Theft. The signed confession was
later presented as evidence. As lawyer objected to the presentation of the
signed confession, arguing that any confession made by the accused is
inadmissible if not made in the presence of a competent counsel
preferably of his own choice. Decide
A) The confession should be declared inadmissible
B) The confession is admissible
C) The prosecution should present other evidence
D) The
Answer: B- Inadmissibility of extra judicial confession will only apply if
the confession was elicited by peace officers. The provisions of the Bill
of Rights will only apply against the government and not against
private individuals
5. A, B and C were arrested during a buy bust operation. The marked money
offered as evidence is
A) Testimonial Evidence
B) Autoptic Evidence
C) Best Evidence
D) Parol Evidence
Answer: B- Sec. 1 Rule 130 ROC
6. A, while driving along Roxas Blvd., hit and killed B. A was charged with
Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Homicide. Before the trial of the case, A
offered to compromise with the family of B. Is the offer of compromise
admissible in evidence as an implied admission of guilt against A?
A) Yes, criminal cases cannot be compromised
B) No, it cannot be admissible
C) Yes, an offer of compromise by the accused may be received in
evidence as an implied admission of guilt
D) No, the offer of compromise by the accused can be received in
evidence
Answer: B- Sec. 27 Rule 130 ROC
7. A and B are married. A, the husband, told B that he killed C, As boss at
work. A was never caught. After the dissolution of A and Bs marriage, B
went to the police and inform them what A did. A was subsequently
charged with Murder of C. The prosecution called B to testify against A.
As lawyer objected. Decide
A) B should be allowed to testify
B) A cannot testify against B because of privilege communication
C) A cannot testify against B because it is hearsay evidence only
D) A cannot testify against B because she has no personal knowledge of
the facts and circumstances of the case
Answer: B- Sec 24 Rule 130 ROC
8. A was found by B lying in a pool of his own blood. B asked A who did this
to him. A, using his lips, pointed to C. A then died. C was then charged for
the death of A. The dying declaration of A was presented in court as
evidence against C. C objected and argued that the pointing of lips
cannot be considered as a dying declaration and that the same should be
spoken. Decide.
A) The dying declaration should be admitted as evidencebecause it is not
limited to declaration only
B) The dying is inadmissible because it is not declared
C) It is admissible as res gestae
D) It is not admissible because it is hearsay
Answer: A Sec 37,Rule 130.Pp vs. Viovicente G.R. No. 118707
c.
d.
14. When are executors and administrators not accountable for debts due to
the estate?
e. When such debts are not yet due and demandable
f. When such debts remain uncollected without his fault
g. When such debts are not yet proven to be due to the deceased
h. When the executors and administrators are found to be unsuitable
15. What is the status of the acts before the revocation, resignation or removal
of an executor or an administrator?
e. Unenforceable
f. Invalid
g. Valid
h. Valid until annulled
16. What is not a ground for disallowing will?
e. If it was executed under duress, or the influence of fear, or threats
f. If it was procured by undue and improper pressure and influence, on
the part of the beneficiary, or of some other person for his benefit
g. If not executed and attested as required by law
h. If the testator was insane, or otherwise mentally incapable to make a
will, at the time of its execution
i. If there is an issue to the citizenship of the deceased at the time of
his death
17. Who has the right to retain whole estate to pay debts of the estate?
g. Spouse of the deceased
h. Heirs of the deceased
i. Executor and administrator
j. State
18. What should be included in the articles to be inventoried?
e. Wearing apparel of the surviving spouse and minor children
f. Conjugal home
g. The marriage bed and bedding
h. Such provisions and other articles as will necessarily be consumed in
the subsistence of the family of the deceased
19. What is the document prepared by the executor or administrator setting
forth the manner in which the estate of the deceased is to be distributed
among the heirs?
e. Letters testamentary
f. Letters of administration
g. Will
h. Project of Partition
20. When should the executor or administrator render an account?
f. Within 1 year from the time of receiving letters testamentary
administration
g. Within 2 years from the time of receiving letters testamentary
administration
h. Within 6 months from the time of receiving letters testamentary
administration
i. Within 9 months from the time of receiving letters testamentary
administration
or of
or of
or of
or of
Multiple Choice
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
1. Who among the following is COMPETENT to serve as an executor or
administrator?
a. Married women
b. Minor
c. Non-resident of the Philippines
d. In the opinion of the court unfit to execute the duties of the trust by
reason of conviction of an offense involving moral turpitude.
2. _____________ is appointed when there is delay in granting letters testamentary
or of administration by any cause including an appeal from the allowance or
disallowance of a will.
a. Executor
b. Administrator
c. Ancillary Administrator
d. Special Administrator
3. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a. If the testator asks for the allowance of his own will, notice shall be sent
only to his compulsory heirs.
b. It shall be presumed that the decedent left no debts if no creditor files
a petition for letters of administration within one (1) year after the death of
the decedent.
c. Subject to the right of appeal, allowance of the will shall be conclusive
as to its authenticity.
settlement of estate.
d. Two (2) years from the date of partition of the estate.
10. What is the duty of the custodian of a will after he knows of the testators
death?
a. The custodian should immediately file a Petition for Allowance of Will
and for Letters Testamentary with the will annexed.
b. The custodian shall deliver the will to the court having jurisdiction or to
the executor named in the will within twenty (20) days after he knows of
the testators death.
c. The custodian shall surrender the will to the heirs of the testator within
twenty (20) days after he knows of the testators death.
d. The custodian shall deliver the will to the court having jurisdiction or to
the executor named in the will within fifteen (15) days after he knows of
the testators death.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
1. Preliminary investigation is mandatory when the penalty imposed by law is
a. Six (6) years, one (1) month and one (1) day
b. Four (4) years, two (2) months and one (1) day
c. Four (4) years, one (1) month and two (2) days
d. Six (6) years, two (2) months and one (1) day
2. After the filing of the complaint or information in court without a preliminary
investigation, the accused may ask for a preliminary investigation within what
period?
a. Within five (5) days from the filing of the complaint or information in
court.
b. Within ten (10) days from the time the accused learns of the filing of
the complaint or information in court.
c. Within five (5) days from the time the accused learns of the filing of the
complaint or information in court.
d. Within five (5) days from the resolution of the investigating prosecutor.
3. Which of the following statements is INCORRECT?
a. Bail is not a bar to objections on illegal arrest, lack of or irregular
preliminary investigation.
b. Where the grant of bail is a matter of discretion, or the accused seeks to
be released on recognizance, the application may be filed only in the court
where the case is pending, on trial or appeal.
c. An arrest may be made on any day and at any time of the day or night.
d. No person under detention by legal process shall be released or
transferred except upon order of the court or when he is admitted to bail.
4. It is an undertaking constituted as lien on the real property given as security
a. Judges
b. Provincial or City Prosecutors and their assistants
c. National and Regional State Prosecutors
d. Other officers as may be authorized by law
Evidence
1. It is an admission, verbal or written, made by a party in the course of the
proceedings in the same case which does not require proof.
a. Confession
b. Admissions of a party
c. Judicial admissions
d. Adoptive Admission
2. The following are mandatory judicial notice except:
a. Existence and territorial extent of states
b. Matters which are of public knowledge
c. Laws of nature
d. Forms of government and symbols of nationality
3. Small Claims Action is commenced by
a. Filing a Complaint in a proper court
b. Filing a verified Statement of Claim in a proper court
c. Filing a Petition in a proper court
d. Filing an original Complaint in a proper court
4. _______________ is an order issued by the court directing or enjoining any
person or government agency to perform or desist from performing an act in
order to protect, preserve or rehabilitate the environment.
a. Environmental Protection Order (EPO)
b. Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)
c. Writ of Continuing Mandamus
d. Temporary Environmental Protection Order (TEPO)
5. Writ of continuing mandamus can be filed with the:
a. Regional Trial Court, Court of Appeals, Supreme Court
b. Supreme Court, Court of Appeals
c. Metropolitan Trial Court, Court of Appeals, Supreme Court
d. Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, Metropolitan Trial Court
6. Which of the following is NOT a requisite for a dying declaration to apply?
a. The death is imminent and the declarant is not conscious of that fact.
b. The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of
such death.
c. The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify
to.
d. The declaration is offered in a case wherein the declarants death is the
Answer: B- Sec. 9 Rule 116 of the Rules of Court states that; The
accused may, before arraignment, move for a bill of particulars to
enable him properly to plead and to prepare for trial. The motion shall
specify the alleged defects of the complaint or information and the
details desired.
2. The following are the things that the court should do if plea bargaining is
agreed upon, except;
A) Issue an order to that effect.
B) Continue hearing the case in criminal and civil aspect.
C) Proceed to receive evidence on the civil aspect of the case.
D) Render and promulgate judgment of conviction, including the civil
liability or damages duly established by the evidence presented.
ANSWER: B. Plea bargaining is encouraged because it leads to prompt and
final disposition of most criminal cases. If the court will continue hearing
the case, this contradicts the purpose of the law.
3. A, B and C, selling methamphetamines, were arrested during a buy bust
operation by the PDEA agents. They were charged for violating the
Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act. C, appearing to be the least guilty,
made a deal with the prosecutor to be a State Witness. The prosecutor
agreed to the deal and filed a motion to discharge C of the charges
against him and make him a State Witness. If you were the judge, would
you
A) Grant the motion to discharge C
B) Deny the motion to discharge C
C) Order the presentation of evidence before deciding the motion
D) Acquit C of the charge against him
Answer: B- Absolute necessity of Cs testimony is not needed to convict
all of the accused. The PDEA agents can testify to the fact that A, B and
C were in the business of selling dangerous drugs.
4. When should a motion to quash be filed?
A) Any time before judgement or final order
6. A, a married man, got married again with B in the United States. His first
wife learned about the subsequent marriage. A returned to the Philippines
but B stayed in the US. He was subsequently charged with Bigamy and
Concubinage while he was here. A was arraigned and he entered a plea of
not guilty. During the presentation of evidence in chief of the prosecutor,
A filed a motion to quash on the ground that two offenses were charged
in a single complaint. The prosecutor opposed the motion, arguing that
the motion to quash should have been filed before A was arraigned.
Decide the case
A)
B)
C)
D)
7.
Pedro, while driving along Roxas Blvd., hit a pedestrian resulting in the
latters death. He was charged with Reckless Imprudence Resulting in
Homicide before the Regional Trial Court. He filed a Motion to Quash on
the ground that the court has no jurisdiction over the offense. The trial
court denied the said motion. As the lawyer for Pedro, what is your
remedy?
A) File an appeal before the Court of Appeals
B) File a Motion for Reconsideration
C) File Petition for Certiorari
D) File a Petition for Prohibition
Answer: C- Denial of Motion to Quash is an interlocutory order and not
appealable. Remedy is Rule 65, Petition for Certiorari if there is grave
abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction
8. The grounds for the motion for new trial in criminal cases are the
following, except;
A) That errors of law have been committed during the trial.
B) That irregularities prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused
have been committed during the trial.
C) There are errors of law in the judgment which requires no further
proceedings.
D) New and material evidence has been discovered.
15 days
2 days
30 days
10 days
Answer: A- Fresh period. Neypes Ruling. The Courth has emphasized
that the period for appeal is not only within fifteen (15) days from
notice of judgment but also within fifteen (15) days from notice of the
final order appealed from. If a motion for reconsideration or motion for
new trial is denied, such denial is to be deemed as the final order. From
receipt of such notice of denial, the movant has fresh period within
which to appeal.
10. Mittimus is
A) A process issued by the court after conviction to carry out the final
judgement, commanding the clerk of court to hold the accused in
accordance with terms of the judgement.
B) A process issued by the court after conviction to carry out the final
judgement, commanding the prison warden to hold the accused in
accordance with terms of the judgement.
C) A process issued by the court after conviction to carry out the final
judgement, commanding the police to hold the accused in accordance
with terms of the judgement.
D) A process issued by the court after conviction to carry out the final
judgement, commanding the sheriff to hold the accused in accordance
with terms of the judgement.
Answer: B- It is the prison warden who has the duty to enforce the final
judgement of conviction.
5. A, the witness for the accused, B, was asked whether he knew that B had
the intention to kill C. A refused to answer the question. He invoked that
by answering the question, A would incriminate himself because it might
prove that there was conspiracy between him and B. Is As contention
correct?
A) Yes, by answering the question, it would reveal that there was a
conspiracy between him and B to kill C. He can invoke his right against
self-incrimination
B) No, the right against self-incrimination would not apply
C) No, A must answer all the questions asked of him
D) No, the questions asked of A is relevant to the issue in the case
Answer: B- There is no showing that there is conspiracy in this case.
Hence, he cannot invoke his right against self-incrimination
6. A witness may be impeached by the following modes, except;
A) By contradictory evidence
B) By evidence that his general reputation for truth, honesty, and integrity
is bad
C) By evidence that he has made at the other times statements
inconsistent with his present testimony
D) By enumerating in court specific wrongful acts he had committed.
ANSWER: D. A witness cannot be impeached by evidence of particular
wrongful acts except
evidence of his final conviction an offense as
disclosed by his examination or by the record of
judgment. Thus, the
witness cannot be impeached by enumerating in court specific wrongful
acts he had committed.
7. A is charged for Homicide for killing B. A interposed self-defense. Does the
prosecution still need to prove A guilt beyond reasonable doubt?
A) Yes, it is mandated by law and the rules
B) No, the burden of proof shifts to the accused to show that the killing
was legally justified
C) No, the accused already admitted to the crime
D) No, the quantum of proof needed is clear and convincing evidence
only
Answer B- People vs. Dagani G.R. No. 153875
8. As a general rule, opinion of a witness is not admissible, however, the
7. What do you call the proposal for the distribution of the hereditary estimates
and determines the persons entitled thereto? It is usually prepared and presented
to the court at the end part of the proceeding.
A.) Liquidation
B.) Notice of Partition
C.) Project of Partition
D.) Affidavit of Distribution and Partition
ANSWER: C. Project of Partition is the proposal for the distribution of the
hereditary estimates and determines the persons entitled thereto. Towards the
end of the proceeding in a petition for settlement of an estate, a project of
partition is usually prepared and presented to the court.
8. What is the basis of guardianship?
A.) Principle of Res Ipsa Loquitur
B.) Principle of Nationality
C.) Principle of Parens Patriae
D.) Domiciliary Theory
ANSWER: C. Where minors are involved, the State acts as parens patriae. It is the
duty of protecting the rights of persons or individuals who beacause of age or
incapacity are in an unfavorable position vis--vis other parties.
guardianship
proceedingsunder the rules of court. Where the ward is resident, the proceedings
shall be filed in the RTC in the province where such ward resides. If the ward
resides in a foreign country, the petition must be filed with the RTC of the
province where his property is situated.
10. The following are the grounds for removal of a trustee, except:
A.) The trustee is insane.
B.) The trustee is otherwise incapable of discharging the trust or is evidently
unsuitable to act as one.
C.) The trustee wasted or mismanaged the estate or failed for 30 days after it is
due to render an account or make a return.
D.) The removal appears essential in the interest of the petitioners.
ANSWER: C. these are some grounds for removal of a guardian not a trustee.
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
(For Questions 1 and 2, please consider the facts below)
Ronnie and Leila were college sweethearts. After they graduated from
college, they lost communication with each other. They met again after a few
years and were married in November 9, 2000. After four (4) years of marriage,
Ronnie showed his true colors. He was a drunkard and had a violent temper
which forced Leila, for fear of her personal safety, to leave their conjugal home
and live with her parents. A year later, Leila found employment as a website
developer in Finland, where she worked for ten (10) consecutive years. During the
whole duration of time that she worked abroad, Leila had absolutely no
communications with Ronnie, nor did she hear any news about him. While
working in Finland, Leila met and later on fell in love with Edgar.
On September 11, 2016, Leila filed a petition with the Regional Trial Court
(RTC) of Quezon City to declare Ronnie presumptively dead. Edgar had earlier
proposed to Leila and she was determined to marry him. The RTC of Quezon City
granted Leilas petition and declared Ronnie presumptively dead. Upon taking
heed of the decision, the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) filed a Notice of
Appeal with the RTC, stating that it was appealing the decision to the Court of
Appeals (CA).
1. Is a petition for Declaration of Presumptive Death a Special Proceeding?
a.) No, a petition for declaration of presumptive death is not a
special proceeding since it is not mentioned in the enumeration
special proceedings in Section 1, Rule 72.
of
due
a.) Yes, since it is the mandate of the OSG to appeal all decided
cases against the State.
b.) Yes, the OSG being the representative of the government must
given its day in court.
be
c.) No, the OSG having been given its opportunity to object during the
proceedings in the RTC is estopped from doing so.
d.) No, the judgment of the RTC in a petition for declaration of
presumptive death is immediately final and executory pursuant to Article
be appealed.
Answer: D. (Please see Article 247 of the Family Code and Republic vs.
Bermudez-Lorino, G.R. 160258, January 19, 2005)
3. It is the person named in a will who will administer the decedents estate and
carry out the provisions thereof.
a.) Administrator
b.) Executor
c.) Property Manager
d.) Testatrix
Answer: B.
4. Who is an Administrator?
a.) A person named in the will to administer the decedents
carry out the provisions thereof.
estate
and
b.) A person who survives the death of the decedent and who is
entitled to inherit from him.
c.) It is the person appointed by the court to administer the estate where
the decedent died intestate, or where the will was void and not
allowed
to
probate, or where no executor was named in the
will or the executor named
therein is incompetent, refuses the
trust, or fails to give a bond.
d.) The person to whom a legacy in a will is given.
Answer: C.
5. What do you mean by summary settlement of estates with small value?
a.) It is the procedure provided for in Rule 74 for the summary
settlement of estate (whether testate or intestate) whose gross
value
does not exceed P 10, 000. The Municipal Trial Court has
jurisdiction over a
petition for summary settlement.
b.) It is the procedure provided for in Rule 74 for the summary
deceased.
b.) When he has collected all the debts due to the estate.
c.) When letters testamentary or of administration are granted on
the
estate.
d.) When there has been publication regarding the fact of death
deceased.
of the
Karlo A. Concubierta
IV R. C. 2
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
1. The institution of the criminal action shall interrupt the period of prescription of
the offense charged.
a.) False
b.) True
c.) Incomplete statement
d.) None of the above
Answer: C. (Section 1, Rule 110. The institution of the criminal action shall
interrupt the period of prescription of the offense charged unless otherwise
provided in special laws)
2. No criminal action for defamation shall be brought except at the instance of
and upon a complaint filed by the _____
a.) Husband
b.) Offended spouse
c.) Wife
d.) Wife and husband if the case involves their child
Answer: B. (Section 5, Rule 110)
3. The prosecution of complaints for violation of special laws shall be governed by
____________
a.) Rules on Criminal Procedure
b.) Primarily by Rules on Criminal Procedure and suppletorily by
special laws
c.) Special laws
d.) Special laws and Rules on Criminal Procedure
Answer: C. (Section 5, Rule 110)
4. A person under detention shall be released or transferred when he is already
admitted to bail, or by order of the court.
a.) False
b.) True
c.) Incomplete Statement
d.) None of the above
Answer: B. (Section 3, Rule 114)
5. A person even if he is not a member of the Philippine bar, has the right to visit
and confer privately with the person arrested in the jail or any other place of
custody at any hour of the day or, of the night, provided _______________________.
a.) he is enrolled in law school and in his third year law.
b.) he was sent by the lawyer of the person arrested, duly
authorized through a special power written.
c.) he is a relative of the person arrested subject to reasonable
regulations.
d.) he/she has been specially summoned by the person arrested.
Answer: C. (Section 14, Rule 113)
6. A person charged with an offense punishable by reclusion perpetua can apply
for bail.
a.) Yes, if evidence of guilt is not strong.
b.) No, regardless of the stage of prosecution.
c.) Depending on the judge.
d.) Incomplete statement.
Answer: A. (Section 7, Rule 114)
7. If the accused is arrested in a place other than where the case is pending, bail
may also be filed with _____________.
a.) any Regional Trial Court of said place.
b.) any Metropolitan Trial Court.
c.) any Municipal Trial Judge.
d.) All of the above.
Answer: D. (Section 17, Rule 114)
8. Where the grant of bail is a matter of discretion, bail application may be filed
only in _____________.
a.) the court where the case is pending.
b.) the court where the case is on trial.
c.) the court where the case is on appeal.
d.) all of the above.
Answer: D. (Section 17 [b], Rule 114)
9. Since the right to a Preliminary Investigation is a personal right ____________.
a.) it can be waived in writing.
b.) it can be waived by non-appearance.
c.) it can be waived by failing to assert such right.
d.) all of the above.
Answer: D. (Section 1, Rule 112)
10. Absence of Preliminary Investigation invalidates the Information.
a.) False
b.) True
c.) The case will be dismissed.
d.) None of the above.
Answer: A. (Section 1, Rule 112)
Karlo A. Concubierta
IV R. C. 2
EVIDENCE
1. The following are the classifications of Evidence according to its nature or form,
EXCEPT:
a.) Documentary Evidence
b.) Object Evidence
c.) Circumstantial Evidence
the
2. Under R.A. No. 4200, the law prohibits the overhearing, intercepting, or
recording of private communications. However, where the exchange is not private
its tape recording is not prohibited.
a.) The statement is false.
b.) The statement is true.
c.)The statement is incorrect as R.A. No. 4200 is a different law.
d.)The statement is entirely wrong as R.A. No. 4200 does not exist.
Answer: B. (Republic Act No. 4200 or The Anti-Wire Tapping Act does
prohibit the recording of exchanges which is not private.)
not
the matter.
c. The statement is true.
d. The statement is non-sequitur.
Answer: C. (Ephemeral electronic communication refers to phone talks, text
messages, chatroom sessions, streaming audios and video, and other electronic
forms of communication the evidence of which is not recorded or retained.)
6. Acts not covered by the right against self-incrimination
a. Physical examination.
b. Fingerprinting.
c. Paraffin testing.
d. All of the above.
e. A and B.
Answer: D. (The principle against self-incrimination applies only to testimonial
compulsion. Hence, it is not applicable to the case
where a person is directed
to produce blood and other bodily
samples, or to submit to a physical
examination.)
7. The following may be considered as Business Entries, EXCEPT:
a.) Entries in books of account
b.) Entries in a log-book of a security guard
c.) Medical Certificates
d.) Entries in a bill of lading
Answer: C. (Section 43, Rule 130. Medical certificates which are issued
upon
the request of a patient and which certify that the patient is suffering from an
ailment or injury are hearsay unless the doctor who issued the certificate is
also presented in court.)
8. As mandated by the Judicial Affidavit Rule, the parties shall file with the court
and serve on the adverse party, personally or by licensed courier service, not later
than __ days before pre-trial or preliminary conference or the scheduled hearing
the judicial affidavits of their witnesses and the parties documentary or object
evidence.
a.) 5
b.) 15
c.) 3
d.) 10
Answer: A. (See Judicial Affidavit Rule, A.M. No. 12-8-8-SC)
9. In environmental cases, within what time should the defendant answer the
complaint?
a.) within five (5) days from receipt of Summons
b.) within ten (10) days from receipt of Summons
c.) within fifteen (15) days from receipt of Summons
d.) within thirty (30) days from receipt of Summons
Answer: C. (Please see Section 14 of A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC)
10. Under the 2016 Revised Rules of Procedure for Small Claims Cases as
Amended, the Plaintiff may join in a single statement of claim one or more
separate small claims against a defendant provided that the total amount
claimed, exclusive of interest and costs, does not exceed _____
a.) P 100, 000.00
b.) P 200, 000.00
c.) P 300, 000.00
d.) P 150, 000.00
Answer: B. (Section 8, A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC as amended December 8, 2015)
Special Proceedings
1. May a trustee be exempt from posting a bond?
a. No, because Section 5, Rule 98 used must and shall indicating that
the requirement is a mandatory one.
b. Yes, if the testator requested such exemption.
c. No, unless all persons interested in the trust, request such exemption.
d. Yes, if heirs of the testator order such exemption.
BASIS: The court may exempt a trustee appointed in the will from posting a
bond if the testator has directed or requested such exemption. The court may
exempt any trustee (whether appointed in the will or not) when all persons
beneficially interested in the trust, being of legal age, request such exemption.
(Section 5, Rule 98, Rules of Court)
2. May a guardian pay the debts of the ward?
a. Yes, every guardian must pay the ward's just debts out of the ward's real
estate.
b. Yes, every guardian must pay the ward's just debts out of the income of
his personal estate.
c. Yes, every guardian must pay the ward's just debts out of the ward's
property.
d. Yes, every guardian must pay the ward's just debts out of his
personal estate and the income of his real estate.
BASIS: Every guardian must pay the ward's just debts out of his personal estate
and the income of his real estate, if sufficient; if not, then out of his real estate
upon obtaining an order for the sale or encumbrance thereof. (Section 2, Rule
96, Rules of Court)
3. May the guardianship court under Section 2, Rule 96 of the Rules of Court
and Section 18 (c) of the Rule on Guardianship of Minors resolve the issue of title to
the property allegedly embezzled, concealed, or conveyed?
a. No, because such issue must be threshed out in a separate special civil
action.
b. Yes, because issues of title are incidental to a guardianship proceeding,
hence, it must be decided by the guardianship court.
c. Yes, if the ward's title to the property is clear and undisputable.
d. No, unless the ward, through his guardian, submits such issue to the
guardianship court
BASIS: While the guardianship court may issue an order directing a person
suspected of having embezzled, concealed or disposed of a ward's property to
appear for examination regarding such property, it may not resolve the issue of
title to the property because such an issue should be threshed out in a separate
ordinary action and not in a guardianship proceedings. EXCEPTION would be in a
case where the ward's title to the property is clear and indisputable in which case
the guardianship court may issue an order directing the delivery or return to the
guardian. (Paciente v. Dacuycoy, 114 SCRA 924)
4. Is a case study report required in guardianship?
a. Yes, it is required in proceedings for guardianship of incompetents.
separate action for a mere contingent claim. (Sheker v. Estate of Sheker, 2007)
7. Which of the following is not an instance when the heirs may sue for the
recovery of estate property during the pendency of probate proceedings?
a. If the administrator is unwilling to bring the suit.
b. If the executor is alleged to have participated in the act complained of
and he is made a party-defendant.
c. When letters testamentary have not yet been issued
d. If a creditor disposes of a property under his possession.
BASIS: Heirs may sue for the recovery of estate property during the pendency of
probate proceedings in the following instances: (a) If the executor/administrator
is unwilling or refuses to bring the suit; (b) if the executor/administrator is alleged
to have participated in the act complained of and he is made a party-defendant;
or (c) when letters testamentary or of administration have not yet been issued.
(Into v. Valle, 2005)
8. When and how do you appeal from an order of distribution?
a. An order of distribution is appealable within 15 days from notice by
filing a notice of appeal with the appellate court.
b. An order of distribution is appealable within 15 days from notice by
filing a notice of appeal with the probate court.
c. An order of distribution is appealable within 30 days from notice by
filing a notice of appeal and a record of appeal with the probate court.
d. An order of distribution is appealable within 30 days from notice by
filing a notice of appeal and a record of appeal with the trial court.
BASIS: An order of distribution is appealable within 30 days from notice by filing
a notice of appeal and a record of appeal with the probate court. This is because
the order of distribution involves multiple or separate appeals. The probate court
still needs to hold on to the original records since motions to file leave for tardy
claims may still be filed at any time before the entry of the order of distribution.
(Section 2, Rule 86 of the Rules of Court)
9. Who may not petition for the appointment of a guardian over the minor
or his property?
a. Any person interested in the minor's property, if the latter resides
outside of the Philippines
b. The boyfriend of the minor, on her behalf
c. The minor himself, if he is at least thirteen years old
Rules of Court)
that the reckoning period should commence to run from the time such private
counsel was actually notified of the order of provisional dismissal. When a party is
represented by a counsel, notices of all kinds emanating from the court should be
sent to the latter at his/her given address. (Co v. New Prosperity Plastic
Products, Inc., 2014; People v. Lacson, 2003; Section 8, Rule 117 of the Rules
of Court)
Trial Court (RTC) convicted him of murder on its finding that Chubby Cheeks could
not have committed robbery. Chubby Cheeks appealed to the Court of Appeals
which modified the judgment by convicting him of robbery with homicide. Is the
judgment of the Court of Appeals (CA) correct?
a. No, because there was a violation of Chubby Cheek's right against
double jeopardy.
b. No, because the appeal to CA was limited to his conviction for murder
and excluded his acquittal for robbery.
c. Yes, because appellant is deemed to have abandoned his right to
invoke the prohibition on double jeopardy since it became the duty of CA to
correct errors as may be found in the appealed judgment.
d. No, because error of judgment on the part of the RTC can no longer be
questioned on appeal.
BASIS: An appeal in a criminal case opens the entire case for review on any
question including one not raised by the parties. When an accused appeals from
the sentence of the trial court, he waives the constitutional safeguard against
double jeopardy and throws out the whole case open to the review of the
appellate court, which is then called upon to render such judgment as law and
justice dictate, whether favorable or unfavorable to the appellant. Thus, appellant
could not have been placed twice in jeopardy when the CA modified the ruling of
the RTC by finding him guilty of robbery with homicide as charged in the
Information instead of murder. (People v. Torres, 24 September 2014)
6. A petition for review of the resolution of prosecutor that is pending either
at the Department of Justice or the Office of the President is a ground for the
suspension of arraignment. What is the period of suspension?
a. Not exceeding 30 days from the filing of the petition with the reviewing
office.
b. Not exceeding 60 days from the filing of the petition with the
reviewing office.
c. Not exceeding 60 days from actual receipt of the reviewing officer.
d. Not exceeding 30 days from actual receipt of the reviewing officer.
BASIS: Upon motion by the proper party, the arraignment shall be suspended in
the following cases:
xxx
c) a petition for review of the resolution of the prosecutor is pending at either the
Department of Justice or the Office of the President; provided, that the period of
suspension shall not exceed 60 days counted from the filing of the petition with
the reviewing office. (Section 11, Rule 116, Rules of Court)
7. Which of the following is not true with respect to promulgation of
judgment?
a. Judgment may be promulgated by a judge who did not write the
decision provided that he is a judge of the court in which judgment was rendered.
b. When the judge is outside of the province, the judgment may be
promulgated by the Clerk of Court.
c. If the accused is detained in another province, the judgment may be
promulgated by any judge of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) having
jurisdiction over the place of detention upon request of the judge that
rendered the judgment.
d. If the conviction is for slight physical injury, judgment may be
pronounced in the presence of the accused's counsel.
BASIS: If the accused is confined or detained in another province or city, the
judgment may be promulgated by the executive judge of the Regional Trial Court
having jurisdiction over the place of confinement or detention upon request of
the court which rendered the judgment. (Section 6, Rule 120, Rules of Court)
8. Plea of not guilty shall be entered for the accused in the following
instances except one:
a. Accused pleads guilty and testified that he acted in self-defense.
b. Accused makes a conditional plea.
c. Accused refuses to plead but presents exculpatory evidence.
d. Accused refuses to plead.
BASIS: When the accused refuses to plead or makes a conditional plea, a plea of
not guilty shall be entered for him. When the accused pleads guilty but presents
exculpatory evidence, his plea shall be deemed withdrawn and a plea of not
guilty shall be entered for him. [Section 1(c)(d) Rule 116, Rules of Court]
9. The court may permit an improvident plea of guilty to be withdrawn and
be substituted by a plea of not guilty:
a. before judgment of conviction becomes final
b. thirty (30) days after arraignment
c. before promulgation of judgment
d. after arraignment but before trial.
BASIS: At any time before judgment of conviction becomes final, the court may
2. Which among the following is not a relief that may be granted under the
writ of kalikasan:
a. Directing the respondent entity to make periodic reports on the
execution of the final judgment.
b. Directing the respondent private person to rehabilitate the environment.
c. Directing the respondent government agency to award damages to
individual petitioners.
d. Directing the respondent private person to monitor strict compliance
with the decisions and orders of the court.
BASIS: Section 15, Rule 7, Part III of RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL CASES
The reliefs that may be granted under the writ are the following:
xxx
(e) Such other reliefs which relate to the right of the people to a balanced and
healthful ecology or to the protection, preservation, rehabilitation or restoration
of the environment, except the award of damages to individual petitioners.
3. Which of the following is a disputable presumption?
a. That a printed or published book, purporting to be printed or published
by a private authority, was so printed or published.
b. That a writing is truly dated and signed.
c. That an indorsement of a negotiable instrument was made before the
instrument was overdue at the place where the instrument is signed.
d. That private transactions have been fair and regular.
BASIS: Section 3 (p), Rule 131 of the Rules of Court.
The following presumptions are satisfactory if uncontradicted, but may be
contradicted and overcome by other evidence:
xxx
(p) That private transactions have been fair and regular
4. Under the Rule on Examination of Child Witness, a guardian ad litem:
a. shall have access to all reports, evaluations and records necessary to
effectively advocate for the child, including privileged communications.
b. can testify in any proceeding concerning any information,
statement or opinion received from the child in the course of serving as a
guardian ad litem if the court finds it necessary to promote the best
9. When shall the court render judgment denying or granting the privilege of
writ of kalikasan?
a. Within sixty (60) days from the time the petition is submitted for
decision.
b. Within sixty (60) days from the time a verified return is filed.
c. Within sixty (60) days from the time affidavits of witnesses and other
documentary and object evidence are presented in support of the defense of the
respondent.
d. Within sixty (60) days from receipt of the last pleading
BASIS: Within sixty (60) days from the time the petition is submitted for decision,
the court shall render judgment granting or denying the privilege of the writ of
kalikasan. (Section 15, Rule 7, Part III of RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL CASES)
10. Petitioner presented Chubster as its witness. Matt was in the courtroom
and he listened to Chubster's testimony. When Petitioner was about to present Matt
as its next witness, Respondent's counsel objected. May the trial court disallow the
presentation of Matt as witness?
a. Yes, because of the rule of exclusion and separation of witnesses under
Section 15, Rule 132.
b. Yes, because Matt heard the testimony of Chubster.
c. No, because the issue of the exclusion of the witness was not raised
in a timely manner.
d. Yes, because objection was timely raised by the respondent's counsel.
BASIS: On any trial or hearing, the judge may exclude from the court any witness
NOT at the time under examination, so that he may not hear the testimony of
other witnesses.
In Design Sources International v. Eristingcol (2014), the Supreme Court
held that without any prior order or at least a motion for exclusion from any of
the parties, a court cannot simply allow or disallow the presentation of a witness
solely on the ground that the latter heard the testimony of another witness. It is
the responsibility of the respondent's counsel to protect the interest of his client
during the presentation of other witnesses. If respondent actually believed that
Chubster's testimony would greatly affect that of Matt, then respondent's counsel
was clearly remiss in his duty to protect the interest of his client when he did not
raise the issue of exclusion of the witness in a timely manner.
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
1.Which action may not be commenced against an executor or
administrator of an estate?
A. Action to recover real property;
B. Action to recover personal property;
C. Action to recover damages for an injury to person or property;
D. Action to recover money or debt or interest thereon.
2. Mr. DD, a resident of San Jose, Nueva Ecija, died intestate leaving no heir
or any person entitled to the estate. After the escheat proceedings, the
court shall adjudge, that after the payment of all just debts, charges and
taxes,
A. the personal estate of the deceased shall be assigned to the poorest
municipality of the province where the deceased last resided.
B. the real estate of the deceased shall be assigned to the National
Government.
C. the real estate of the deceased shall be assigned to the municipality
where the same is situated (Sec. 3, Rule 91 of the Rules of Court).
D. None of the above.
6. The following are the instances when court may authorize sale,
mortgage, or other encumbrance of realty to pay debts and legacies
through personalty not exhausted; except:
A. If the deceased sold his real property to defraud creditors;
B. If personal estate is not sufficient to pay debts, expenses of
administration and legacies;
C. If the sale of personal estate may injure the business or other interests
of those interested in the estate;
D. If the testator has not made sufficient provision for the payment of such
debts, expenses, and legacies (Sec. 2, Rule 89 of the Rules of Court).
7. Which of the following instances is not the proper subject of escheat?
A. ill-gotten wealth;
B. Reversion proceedings;
C. Unclaimed Balances;
D. When a person dies intestate leaving no heir but leaving property in the
Philippines (Sec. 1, Rule 91 of the Rules of Court).
8. Incompetent includes the following, except:
C. The accused is not the one compelled to appear, but only the counsel
for the accused or the prosecutor during pre-trial conference.
D. To prevent manifest injustice, the pre-trial order may be modified by the
court only, upon its own initiative.
20. The following are the conditions to be met before an accused can be
discharged as a state witness, except:
A. Absolute necessity for the testimony of the accused whose discharge is
requested;
B. No other direct evidence available for the prosecution;
C. Testimony can be substantially corroborated in its material points;
D. Accused does not appear to be the least guilty.
EVIDENCE AND OTHER SPECIAL LAWS
21. Mr. AA was accused of raping a 17-yearold girl. Which of the following
is admissible?
A. Evidence offered by the accused to prove that the offended party
engaged in other sexual behavior.
B. Evidence offered by the accused that the offended party is a prostitute.
C. Evidence offered by the accused to prove the sexual predisposition of
the alleged victim.
D. Evidence of specific instances of sexual behavior of the offended party
to prove that a person other than the accused was the source of semen
found in the victims body (Sec. 30[b] of the Examination of Child
Witness Rule).
22. Merlin, an 8-year old boy gave a statement to the police describing
acts of the accused constituting child abuse as told to him by the
offended party, a 9-year old girl.
A. The statement cannot be admitted in evidence on hearsay grounds if
Merlin is not available for cross-examination.
B. The statement may be admitted in evidence even if not corroborated
because the statement was made by a child.
C. The statement is not admissible in a civil case.
D. The statement of Merlin is admissible even if he is unavailable provided
his statement is corroborated by other admissible evidence(Sec. 28 of
the Examination of Child Witness Rule).
23. When the issue in a case is the admissibility or evidentiary weight of an
electronic document, such matters may be established
c. Sometimes
d. Depends
2. What are the publication requirements in Cancellation or Correction
of Entries in the Civil Registry?
a. Once a week for 3 consecutive weeks
b. Once a week for 2 consecutive weeks
c. Once a week for 6 consecutive weeks
d. Once a week for 4 consecutive weeks
3. After hearing, the court may either dismiss the petition or issue an
Order granting the cancellation or correction prayed for. In either
case, a copy of the judgment shall be served upon the civil registrar
concerned who shall annotate the same in his record.
a. certified true copy
b. Xerox copy
c. photocopy
d. any of the above
4. Procedural requisites for the declaration of Absence.
a. Notice and Hearing
b. Notice
c. Hearing
d. Notice, Hearing and Publication
5. When should declaration of absence be filed?
a. 2 years
b. after 2 years
c. receipt of last news
d. upon knowledge
6. A family home may be filed by a verified petition with the RTC of
province or city where the property is:
a. located
b. residence of petitioner
c. address of the petitioner
d. domicile of the petitioner
7. In Special proceedings, the Office of the Civil Registry are represented
by:
a. OSG
b. PAO
c. Counsel de officio
d. IBP
8. Writ of Habeas Corpus shall extend to all cases of:
a. illegal confinement
b. deprived of his liberty
c. withheld of rightful custody
d. any of the above
9. The adopter may petition court for the rescission or revocation of
adoption on any of the following cases:
a. If adopted person has attempted against the life of adopter
b. When adopted minor has abandoned the home of the adopter for more
than three (3) years
c. When the adopted person has repudiated adoption;
d. When adopted person condones all the offenses of adopter.
10. The petition for hospitalization of insane person shall be filed
a. By the Director of Health Department;
b. By the Barangay Captain
c. By the Natural Parents
d. By the Adopter.
C. EVIDENCE (R-133-134s)
1. In civil cases, the party having the burden of proof must establish his
case by:
a. Preponderance of evidence
b. Substantial evidence
c. Proof beyond reasonable doubt
d. Any of the above
2. Rules on electronic evidence shall apply whenever electronic
document or electronic data message is offered or used in evidence.
a. Civil actions
b. Quasi- judicial
c. Administrative cases
d. Any of the above
3. Means sanctioned by law, of certain, in a judicial proceeding, the
truth respecting a matter of fact.
a. Evidence
b. best evidence
c. documentary evidence
d. any of the above
b. Nationality
c. Adoption
d. Legitimation
4. Where is the venue of the petition for commitment for hospitalization of
insane persons?
a. MTC of province where the person alleged to be insane is found
b. RTC of province where the person alleged to be insane is found
c. MTC of the city/municipality where the person alleged to be insane
is found
d. RTC of the city/municipality where the person alleged to be insane
is found
5. If the person is detained under the government authority and the illegality
of his detention is not patent from the petition for the writ, the court
issues the citation to the government officer having custody to show cause
why the writ of habeas corpus should not issue.
a. Preliminary citation
b. Peremtory writ
c. Habeas corpus
d. Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus
6. The following are requisites in petitions for habeas corpus involving
minors, EXCEPT:
a. That the petitioner has the right of custody over the minor
b. That the rightful custody of the minor is being withheld from the
petitioner by the respondent; and
c. That it is to the best interest of the minor concerned to be in the
custody of petitioner and not that of the respondent.
d. Respondent must file a verified answer within 5 days from the
service of summons and copy of the petition.
7. How many days to appeal the motion for reconsideration or new trial in a
habeas corpus in relation to minors?
a. 15 days
b. 20 days
c. 25 days
d. 30 days
c. Final Order
d. Summary Order
12. Statement 1: Appeal of Judgment must be perfected within 15 days from
promulgation.
Statement 2: Appeal of an Order must be perfected within 15 days from
notice of the final order.
a. True, True
b. True, False
c. False, True
d. False, False
13. The following are grounds for dismissal of appeal for abandonment or
failure to prosecute, EXCEPT:
a. Failure on the part of the appellant to file brief within the
reglementary period, except when he is presented by a counsel de
officio
b. Escape of the appellant from prison or confinement
c. When the appellant jumps bail
d. Non-flight of the appellant to a foreign county during the
pendency of the appeal
14. Where an appeal was dismissed for failure to file a brief on time and the
order of dismissal had already become final, the __________ appeal cannot
be retrieved by filling a motion for new trial.
a. Dismissal of appeal
b. Failure of Appeal
c. Lost Appeal
d. Abandoned Appeal
15. It is when the doubt or difference arises as to what the law is on a certain
state of facts. It must not involve an examination of the probative value of
the evidence presented by the litigants or any of them
a. Question of Fact
b. Question of Law
c. Question of Fact/Law
d. Question of Issues
16. It is when the doubt or difference arises as to the truth or the falsehood of
alleged facts.
a.
b.
c.
d.
Question of Fact
Question of Law
Question of Fact/Law
Question of Issues
17. An order in writing issued in the name of the People of the Philippines,
signed by a jugde and directed to a peace office, commanding him to
search for personal property described therein and bring it before the
court.
a. Search warrant
b. Warrant of arrest
c. Subpoena duces tecum
d. Subpoena ad testificandum
18. The following are kinds of personal property to be seized, EXCEPT:
a. Subject of the offense which must be owned by the perpetrator
b. Subject of the offense
c. Stolen or embezzled and other proceeds or fruits of the offense
d. The means used or intended to be used for committing an offense
19. Its object is either to determine the identity of a suspicious individual or to
maintain the status quo momentarily while to police officer seeks to obtain
more information. The officer may search the outer clothing of the person
in an attempt to discover weapons which might be used to assault him.
a. Plain View
b. Valid Consented Search
c. Immediate Control Test
d. Stop and Frisk
20. The following are remedies of party adversely affected by a search warrant,
EXCEPT:
a. Motion to quash the search warrant
b. Motion to suppress evidence
c. Replevin
d. Injunction
RULE 133 to 134, Writ of Amparo, Writ of Habeas Data, Clerical Error Act
and Paper Rule
21. A remedy available to any person whose right to privacy in life, liberty or
security is violated or threatened by unlawful act or omission of a public
official or employee, or of a private individual or entity engaged in the
gathering, collecting or storing of data or information regarding the
person, family, home and correspondence of the aggrieved party.
a. Writ of Habeas Data
b. Writ of Amparo
c. Writ of Habeas Corpus
d. Writ of Kalikasan
22. Typographical or clerical error under RA9048 that cannot be changed.
a. Age
b. Day and month in the date of birth
c. First name
d. Sex
23. Ground for impugning the decision granting the petition for change of
name under RA9048.
a. The basis used in changing the first name or nickname does not
fall under any of the grounds.
b. When the change will avoid confusion
c. When the change results as a legal consequence as in legitimation
d. Having continuously used and been known since childhood by a
Filipino name, unaware of her alien parentage
24. The court, justice or judge, upon verified motion and after due hearing,
may order any person in possession or control of a designated land or
other property, to permit entry for the purpose of inspecting, measuring,
surveying, or photographing the property or any relevant object or
operation thereon.
a. Temporary Protection order
b. Inspection order
c. Production order
d. Permanent protection order
25. The court, justice or judge, upon verified motion and after due hearing,
may order any person in possession, custody and control of any
designated documents, papers, books, accounts, letters, photographs,
objects or tangible things, or objects in digitized or electronic form, which
constitutes or contain evidence relevant to the petition or the return, to
6. It refers to the rule that the respondent must plead all his defenses in the
return. Failure to do so shall operate as a waiver of such defenses not therein
pleaded.
a. Omnibus-Waiver Rule
b. Best Interest Standard Rule
c. Paper Rule
d. Preliminary Citation
e. none of the above
7. Under Republic Act no. 10172, it refers to a mistake committed in the
performance of clerical work in writing, copying, transcribing or typing an entry in
the civil register that is harmless and innocuous, such as misspelled name or
misspelled place of birth, mistake in the entry of day and month in the date of
birth or the sex of the person or the like, which is visible to the eyes or obvious to
the understanding, and can be corrected or changed only by reference to other
existing record or records: Provided, however, That no correction must involve the
change of nationality, age, or status of the petitioner.
a. Clerical error
b. Change of First name
c. Change of nickname
d. Cancellation of entry in the Civil Registry
e. none of the above
8. Under Republic Act no. 9048, the following are the grounds for Change of First
Name or nick name, except:
a. The petitioner finds the first name or nickname to be ridiculous,
tainted with dishonor or extremely difficult to write or pronounce.
b. The change will avoid confusion.
c. The new first name or nickname has been habitually and
continuously used by the petitioner and he has been publicly known by that by
that first name or nickname in the community.
d. The change of first name or nick name is due to the fact that
the Civil Registry erred in entering the correct and real name.
e. None of the above.
9. The following may file an application for declaration of absence of a person,
except:
preliminary investigation, the DOJ filed the Information before the RTC indicting
all the police officers charged in the complaint. On the following day, the HPG
group of accused police officers filed an omnibus motion for judicial
determination of probable cause with a prayer to hold in abeyance the issuance
of warrants for their arrest. The RTC issued warrants of arrest against the SAF
officers but dismissed the case against the HPG officers for lack of probable
cause. Lilian moved for reconsideration of the dismissal but it was denied. For a
period of 112 days after receipt of the order of dismissal by the public prosecutor,
the OSG via Rule 65 filed a petition for certiorari before the CA alleging grave
abuse of discretion on the part of the RTC. The CA granted the petition, ruling
that the RTC gravely abused its discretion and thus ordered the issuance of
warrants of arrest against the HPG officers. Is Court of Appeals correct in granting
the OSGs petition for certiorari via Rule 65? (Cajipe vs. People, April 23, 2014)
a. No, considering that the RTC order of dismissal is final and
appealable, the CA erred when it granted the special civil action for
certiorari filed by the OSG via Rule 65.
b. Yes, Rule 65 is the proper remedy in this case.
c. No, Rule 65 should be filed to the Supreme Court.
d. Yes, CA did not erred in granting the special civil action.
e. None of the above.
4. The following are the nature of the personal properties to be seized under Rule
126, Section 3 of the Rules of Court, except:
a. Subject of the offense
b. Stolen or embezzled and other proceeds or fruits of the offense
c. The means used or intended to be used for committing an
offense.
d. All of the above.
e. None of the above.
5. It is justified on the ground that it is not practicable to secure a warrant
because the vehicle can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in
which the warrant must be sought.
a. Consented Search
b. Search of moving vehicle
c. Search incident to a lawful arrest
d. Check point
e. None of the above.
10. Appellant Efren Mateo was charged with ten counts of rape by his stepdaughter Imelda Mateo. During the trial, Imeldas testimonies regarding the rape
incident were inconsistent. She said in one occasion that incident of rape
happened inside her bedroom, but other times, she told the court that it
happened in their sala. She also told the court that the appellant would cover her
mouth but when asked again, she said that he did not. Despite the irreconcilable
testimony of the victim, the trial court found the accused guilty of the crime of
rape and sentenced him the penalty of reclusion perpetua. The Solicitor General
assails the factual findings of the trial and recommends an acquittal of the
appellant. Is the case directly appealable to Supreme Court? (PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES
VS.
MATEO
G.R. No. 147678-87, July 7, 2004)
a. No, it should follow the hierarchy of court.
b. Yes, Fundamental Law requires a mandatory review by the
Supreme Court of cases where the penalty imposed is reclusion perpetua, life
imprisonment, or death.
c. No, If only to ensure utmost circumspection before the
penalty of death, reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment is imposed, the
Court now deems it wise and compelling to provide in these cases a review
by the Court of Appeals before the case is elevated to the Supreme Court.
Where life and liberty are at stake, all possible avenues to determine his
guilt or innocence must be accorded an accused, and no case in the
evaluation of the facts can ever be overdone.
d. Yes, it is provided in the Rules.
e. None of the above.
2. Evidence of whatever description must yield to the extent that it conflicts with
admitted or clearly established facts. Thus courts give superior credit to witnesses
whose testimonies on material points are in accord with facts already established.
a. Substantial Evidence
b. Circumstantial Evidence
c. Preponderance of Evidence
d. Admitted Facts Rule
e. None of the above.
3. When a motion is based on facts not appearing of record the court may hear
the matter on affidavits or depositions presented by the respective parties, but
the court may direct that the matter be wholly or partially on oral testimony or
depositions.
a. Circumstantial Evidence
b. Proof beyond reasonable doubt
c. Evidence on motion
d. Extrajudicial confession
e. None of the above.
4. The siblings of James Balao, and Longid (petitioners), filed with the RTC of La
Trinidad, Benguet a Petition for the Issuance of a Writ of Amparo in favor of
James Balao who was abducted by unidentified armed men earlier. Named
respondents in the petition were then President GMA, Exec Sec Eduardo Ermita,
Defense Sec Gilberto Teodoro, Jr., ILG Secretary Ronaldo Puno, National Security
Adviser (NSA) Norberto Gonzales, AFP Chief of Staff Gen. Alexander . Yano, PNP
Police Director General Jesus Verzosa, among others. James M. Balao is a
Psychology and Economics graduate of the UP-Baguio. In 1984, he was among
those who founded the Cordillera Peoples Alliance (CPA), a coalition of NGOs
working for the cause of indigenous peoples in the Cordillera Region. According
to witnesses testimony, James was abducted by unidentified men, saying they
were policemen and were arresting him for a drugs case and then made to ride a
white van. Petitioners prayed for the issuance of a writ of amparo and likewise
prayed for (1) an inspection order for the inspection of at least 11 military and
police facilities which have been previously reported as detention centers for
activists abducted by military and police operatives; (2) a production order for all
documents that contain evidence relevant to the petition, particularly the Order
of Battle List and any record or dossier respondents have on James; and (3) a
witness protection order. The RTC issued the assailed judgment, disposing as
follows: issue a Writ of Amparo Ordering the respondents to (a) disclose where
James is detained or confined, (b) to release James considering his unlawful
detention since his abduction and (c) to cease and desist from further inflicting
harm upon his person; and deny the issuance of inspection order, production
order and witness protection order for failure of herein Petitioners to comply with
the stringent provisions on the Rule on the Writ of Amparo and substantiate the
same.
Is the totality of evidence satisfies the degree of proof required by the Amparo
Rule to establish an enforced disappearance? Decide.
a. No, the Rule on the Writ of Amparo was promulgated on October
24, 2007 amidst rising incidence of extralegal killings and enforced
disappearances.
b. Yes, totality of evidence satisfies the Amparo Rule.
c. No, it does not determine guilt nor pinpoint criminal
culpability for the disappearance, it determines responsibility, or at least
accountability, for the enforced disappearance [threats thereof or
extrajudicial killings] for purposes of imposing the appropriate remedies to
address the disappearance [or extrajudicial killings].
d. Yes, it is stated in the Rules.
e. None of the above.
5. It refers to killings committed without due process of law, i.e., without legal
safeguards or judicial proceedings.
a. Enforced Disappearances
b. Extra-legal Killings
c. Murder
d. Homicide
6. What is the burden of proof needed for the issuance of a writ of Habeas data?
a. Circumstantial evidence
b. Proof beyond reasonable doubt
c. Substantial evidence
d. Preponderance of evidence
e. None of the above.
7. This remedy is available to any person whose right to privacy in life, liberty or
security is violated or threatened by an unlawful act or omission of a public
under
the
David T. Tolentino
Remedial Law
Special Proceedings Rule 99 to 109
1. A filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus against her husband, B, to get from
him custody of their 5 year old son, C. The court granted the petition and
required B to turn over C to his mother. B sought reconsideration but the court
denied it. He filed a notice of appeal five days from receipt of the order denying
his motion for reconsideration. Did he file a timely notice of appeal?
A. No, since he filed it more than 2 days after receipt of the decision granting
the petition.
B. No, since he filed it more than 2 days after receipt of the order denying
his motion for reconsideration.
C. Yes, since he filed it within 15 days from receipt of the denial of his motion
for reconsideration.
D. Yes, since he filed it within 7 days from receipt of the denial of his motion
for reconsideration.
2. Angel Kubeta filed a petition to change his first name Angel. After the
required publication but before any opposition could be received, he filed a
notice of dismissal. The court confirmed the dismissal without prejudice. Five
days later, he filed another petition, this time to change his surname Kubeta.
Again, Angel filed a notice of dismissal after the publication. This time, however,
the court issued an order, confirming the dismissal of the case with prejudice. Is
the dismissal with prejudice correct?
A. Yes, since such dismissal with prejudice is mandatory.
B. No, since the rule on dismissal of action upon the plaintiffs notice does
not apply to special proceedings.
C. No, since change of name does not involve public interest and the rules
should be liberally construed.
D. Yes, since the rule on dismissal of action upon the plaintiffs notice applies
and the two cases involve a change in name.
3. A return of a writ of habeas corpus is considered prima facie evidence of the
cause of the detention if:
A.
B.
C.
D.
B.
C.
D.
E.
6. A search warrant may be issued for the search and seizure of personal
property, except:
A. Subject of the offense
B. Stolen or embezzled and other proceeds, or fruits of the offense
C. Future properties of the accused
D. Used or intended to be used as the means of committing an offense
7. The following are the requisites for issuing search warrant, except:
A. Based upon probable cause determined personally by the judge
himself
B. The determination of the existence of probable cause must be made
after examination by the judge of the complainant and the witnesses
he may produce
C. The books, documents or other things requested must appear prima
facie relevant to the issue subject of the controversy
D. It must particularly describe the place to be searched, and the persons
or things to be seized.
8. When the civil action is properly instituted in the criminal action as
provided in Rule 111, the offended party may have the property of the
accused attached as security for the satisfaction of any judgment that may
be recovered from the accused in the following cases, except:
A. When the accused admits the charge against him.
B. When the accused is about to abscond from the Philippines.
C. When the accused has concealed, removed, or disposed of his
property, or is about to do so.
D. When the criminal action is based on a claim for money or property
embezzled or fraudulently misapplied or converted to the use of the
accused who is a public officer, officer of a corporation, attorney, factor,
broker, agent, or clerk, in the course of his employment as such, or by
any other person in a fiduciary capacity, or for a willful violation of duty.
9. A search warrant shall be valid:
A. Sixty (60) days from its date. Thereafter it shall be void.
B. Thirty (30) days from its date. Thereafter it shall be void.
C. Ten (10) days from its date. Thereafter it shall be void.
D. None of the above.
10. The following are effects of appeal by any of several accused, except:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Evidence Rule 133 to 134, Writ of Amparo, Writ of Habeas Data, Clerical
Error, Paper Rule
1. What is the right correlation between a criminal action and a petition for Writ
of Amparo both arising from the same set of facts?
A. When the criminal action is filed after the Amparo petition, the latter shall
be dismissed.
B. The proceeding in an Amparo petition is criminal in nature.
C. No separate criminal action may be instituted after an Amparo petition is
filed.
D. When the criminal action is filed after the Amparo petition, the latter shall
be consolidated with the first.
2. Alex filed a petition for Writ of Amparo against Melba relative to his daughter
Tonis involuntary disappearance. Alex said that Melba was Tonis employer, who,
days before Toni disappeared, threatened to get rid of her at all costs. On the
other hand, Melba countered that she had nothing to do with Tonis
disappearance and that she took steps to ascertain Tonis whereabouts. What
is the quantum of evidence required to establish the parties respective claims?
A.
B.
C.
D.
3. The Regional Trial Court in which a petition for a Writ of Amparo is filed is the
one which has jurisdiction over the: (158)
A. Place of residence of the respondent or any of the respondents
B. Place of residence of the aggrieved party only
C. Place of residence of the petitioner who is not an aggrieved party
D. Place where the threat, act or omission was committed or any of its
elements occurred
4. A couple named their son Mario Torres. But a confused clerk at the hospital
registered his name as Maria Torres and his gender as female. The city civil
registrar has authority to:
A. Correct his name and gender
B. Correct his name but not his gender
C. Correct his gender but not his name
D. Indorse the case to court.
5. Circumstantial evidence is sufficient for conviction if, except:
A. There is more than one circumstance
B. The totality of evidence proves the fact in dispute
C. The combination of all circumstances is such as to produce a conviction
beyond reasonable doubt
D. The facts from which the inferences are derived are proven
6. The Equipoise Rule refers to:
A. Amount of evidence which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to
justify a conclusion.
B. Evidence which is of greater weight, or more convincing, than that which is
offered in opposition to it.
C. Falsus in Uno, Falsus in Omnibus
D. Where evidence of parties in a criminal case is evenly balanced, the
constitutional presumption of innocence should tilt the scales in favor of
the accused.
7. Under the Efficient Use of Paper Rule, the format and style of all pleadings,
motions, and similar papers intended for the court and quasi-judicial body's
consideration and action (court-bound papers) shall be written:
A. Single space with a 1.5 space between paragraphs, using an easily
readable font style of the party's choice, 14-size font, and on a 13-inch by
8.5-inch white bond paper
A. Any member of the immediate family, namely: the spouse, children and
parents of the aggrieved party.
B. Any ascendant, descendant or collateral relative of the aggrieved party
within the fourth civil degree of consanguinity or affinity.
C. Any concerned citizen, organization, association or institution, if there is no
known member of the immediate family or relative of the aggrieved party.
D. Any public officer or person in authority who has knowledge of the
circumstances of the case.
JAY P. MERCADO
REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW II
20160201150
Atty. Christian Villasis
MCQs in Special Proceedings
Writ of Amparo
Q1
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
the President of the Philippines, who is the Chief of Staff of the Armed
Forces of the Philippines for the alleged illegal arrest of Jonas and the
presence of actual threat of his right to life, liberty or property from such
illegal arrest and the presumption that he was already dead being a victim
of extrajudicial killing.
To file a Writ of Amparo against all who participated alone for the alleged
illegal arrest of Jonas detailed in the 9th Infantry Battalion of PA due to the
presence of threat of his right to life, liberty or property from such illegal
arrest and the presumption that he was already dead being a victim of
extrajudicial killing.
To file a Writ of Amparo against the detailed Commander of the 9 th
Infantry Battalion of PA for the alleged illegal arrest of Jonas and the
presence of actual threat of his right to life, liberty or property from
such illegal arrest and the presumption that he was already dead
being a victim of extrajudicial killing.
Habeas Data
Q2
Yes, her remedy is correct. Because Leilas right to life, liberty or property is
violated or threatened by an unlawful act or omission of her accuser by
exposing her alleged sex video.
Yes, her remedy is correct. Because mere pronouncements in Media
Conference that the accusers will expose her allege sex video is a
threatening act against Leilas right to life, liberty or privacy.
No, her remedy is not correct. Unless, her accusers who threatened to
expose her sex video are public official or employee or a private
individual or entity engaged in the gathering, collecting or storing of
data or information regarding the person, family, home and
correspondence of Leila.
No, her remedy is not correct. Her accuser is just threatening her to resign
from office in exchange with their false information with the public. She
must file a Libel case against these persons
Q3
Assuming Leilas remedy is the correct one, where should she file her
Petition?
A
B.
C
D
E
C
D
Paper Rule
Q5
Under the Efficient Use of Paper Rule the following margins and
prints should be followed
A left hand margin of 1.5 inches from the edge; an upper margin of
1.2 inches from the edge; a right hand margin of 1.0 inch from the
edge; and a lower margin of 1.0 inch from the edge. Every page must
be consecutively numbered.
A left hand margin of 1.5 inches from the edge; an upper margin of 1.5
inches from the edge; a right hand margin of 1.0 inch from the edge; and a
lower margin of 1.0 inch from the edge. Every page must be consecutively
numbered.
A left hand margin of 1.5 inches from the edge; an upper margin of 1.2
inches from the edge; a right hand margin of 1.2 inch from the edge; and a
lower margin of 1.0 inch from the edge. Every page must be consecutively
numbered.
A left hand margin of 1.5 inches from the edge; an upper margin of 1.2
inches from the edge; a right hand margin of 1.0 inch from the edge; and a
lower margin of 1.0 inch from the edge. Every page must be consecutively
numbered in letters.
Adoption
Q6
A
B
Q7
B
C
No, foreigner may not adopt under the Best Interest of the Minor rule.
Yes, provided his country has a diplomatic relations with the
Philippines, at least 27 years of age, and same qualifications for the
adopter in domestic adoption laws.
Yes, but with respect to a former Filipino only, who is permanently residing
abroad.]
Habeas Corpus
Q8
What exceptional circumstance should be present before a postconviction remedy of a Petition of Habeas Corpus is filed?
B
C
D
Absentees
Q9
A
B
C
D
Appeals
Q10
C
D
and proper permits parts of the estate as may not be affected by the
controversy or appeal to be distributed among the heirs, legatees or
devisees.
Obligation to pay the debts may be distributed as an advance distribution
pending appeal, provided that the debts are already due and demandable.
Advance Distribution of the properties of the decedent may be effected
pending appeal, provided a reasonable bond is posted by the
administrator/executor.
B
C
D
Q2
An appeal taken by one or more of several accused shall not affect those
who did not appeal, except in so far as the judgment of the appellate court
is favorable to the latter.
The appeal of the offended party from the civil aspect shall not affect the
criminal aspect of the judgment or order appealed from.
Upon perfection of the appeal, the execution of the judgment or final
order appealed from shall be stayed as to the appealing party.
All of the above.
A & C only.
B
C
D
E
Q3
B
C
D
Q4
A
B
C
D
Q5
It shall render and enter judgment imposing such penalty. The judgment
may be appealed to the Supreme Court by notice of appeal filed with the
Court of Appeals.
The Court shall render judgment but refrain from making an entry of
judgment and forthwith certified the case and elevate its entire
record to the Supreme Court for review.
The Court shall render judgment and forthwith certified the case and
elevate its entire record to the Supreme Court for review.
The court shall render judgment and the court will automatically elevate its
entire record to the Supreme Court for review.
C
D
Q6
B
C
D
Q7
A
B
C
D
Q8
To protect the persons near the place of the arrest from being harmed by
the person arrested, who might be armed with a concealed weapon and to
prevent the latter from destroying evidence within reached.
To protect the person arrested from being harmed by the arresting officer
to prevent the former from destroying evidence within reached.
To protect the arresting officer from being harmed by the person arrested,
who might be armed with a concealed weapon and to prevent the latter
from being escaped.
To protect the arresting officer from being harmed by the person
arrested, who might be armed with a concealed weapon and to
prevent the latter from destroying evidence within reached.
B
C
Q10
A
B
C
D
Valid Search.
Searche incidental to a lawful arrest.
Stop and Frisk Search.
Civilian Search.
MCQs in Evidence
Q1
A
B
C
D
Substantial Evidence
Clear and Convincing Evidence
Preponderance of Evidence
Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Q2
A
B
C
D
Q3
It is the state of the case which, after a comparison of all the evidence,
does not lead the judge to have in his mind, a moral certainty of the
truth of the charge. (Pp V Calma, 295 Scra 629)
A
B
C
D
Reasonable Doubt
Guilt of the accused
Uncertainty of Evidence
Weight and Sufficiency of Evidence
Q4
C
D
Q5
A
B
C
D
Q6
Preponderance of Evidence.
B
C
D
Substantial Evidence.
Clear and Convincing Evidence.
Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Q7
B
C
D
Q8
A
B
C
D
Preponderance of Evidence.
Substantial Evidence.
Clear and Convincing Evidence.
Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Q9
A
B
C
D
Preponderance of Evidence.
Substantial Evidence.
Clear and Convincing Evidence.
Guilt of Notary Public beyond reasonable doubt.
Q10
The Labor Code provides that an employer may terminate the services
of an employee for just cause and this must be supported by what
kind of evidence? (Tangko V. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co., G.R.
No 167622, Nov. 7, 2008)
B
C
D
Substantial Evidence.
Clear and Convincing Evidence.
Preponderance of Evidence.
MCQs OF RITA LIM SENO-OGBINAR
1. SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS (RULE 99-109)
1. A person desiring to adopt another or have the custody of minor shall
present his petition to the Court of First Instance of the province, or
the municipal or justice of the peace court of the city or municipality
(a) In which he domiciles
(b) In which he resides
(c) In which he works
(d) In which he transfers.
2. The petition for adoption shall contain the same allegations required
in a petition for guardianship, to wit except one:
(a) The jurisdictional facts
(b) The qualification of the adopter
(c) The identification of the testator
(d) The name, age and residence of the person to be adopted and of his
relatives or of the persons who have been under his care.
3. If the petition and consent filed are sufficient in form and substance,
the Court by an order reciting the purpose of the petition shall fix a
date and place for the hearing thereof which date shall
(a) Not be more than four (4) months after the entry of the order
(b) Not be more than three (3) months after the entry of the order
(c) Not be more than six (6) months after the entry of the order
(d) Not be more than two (2) months after the entry of the order.
4. A copy of the order of hearing shall be published before the hearing
at least once a week
(a) For two (2) successive weeks in some newspaper of general circulation
published in the province, as the Court shall deemed best.
(b) For three (3) successive weeks in some newspaper of general
circulation published in the province, as the Court shall deemed
best.
(c) For four (4) successive weeks in some newspaper of general circulation
published in the province, as the Court shall deemed best.
(d) For six (6) successive weeks in some newspaper of general circulation
published in the province, as the Court shall deemed best.
5. When husband and wife are divorced and living separately and apart
from each other, the question as to the care, custody and control of a
child or children of their marriage is brought
(a) Before the MTC
(b) Before the Court of Appeals
(c) Before the Regional Trial Court
(d) Before the Supreme Court
6. The reasons why the child should not be taken from its parents if
living parents should show cause that they do not commit the
following:
(a) Reason of long absence or legal or physical disability have abandoned
it;
(b) Can adequately support the child through vagrancy;
(c) Negligence or misconduct;
(d) Treat it with excessive harshness, give it corrupting orders, counsels or
examples allowing it to engage in begging to commit offenses against
the law.
7. For the best interest of the child, vagrant and abused children should
be removed from parents are harsh, maltreating and offending and
should ultimately place them to
(a) Suitable orphan asylum
(b) Benevolent society or person
(c) Childrens Home
(d) All of the above
8. The adopter may petition court for the rescission or revocation of
adoption on any of the following cases except:
e. If adopted person has attempted against the life of adopter
f. When adopted minor has abandoned the home of the adopter for
more than three (3) years
g. When the adopted person has repudiated adoption;
h. When adopted person condones all the offenses of adopter.
9. The Court in which the petition is filed shall issue an order requiring
the adverse party to answer the petition within
(a) Within ten (10) days
(b) Within five (5) days
(c) Within fifteen (15) days
(d) Within thirty (30) days from receipt of copy thereof.
10. The petition for hospitalization of insane person shall be filed
e. By the Director of Health
f. By the Barangay Captain
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
(d) Presenting at least one witness to testify on the contents of the private
document.
9. What is the extent of the cross-examination of a witness?
(a) To any matters relevant to the theory of the adverse partys case;
(b) To any matters relevant to all issues raised in the case;
(c) To any matters stated in the direct examination; to any matter
connected therewith; to test his accuracy, truthfulness and
freedom from interest, bias or the reverse; and to elicit all
important facts bearing upon the issue;
(d) To any matters covered only in the direct examination.
10. Is a carbon copy of a document regarded as original document under
the Best Evidence Rule?
(a) Yes. When an entry is repeated in the regular course of business, one
being copied from another at or near the time of the transaction, all
the entries are likewise equally regarded as original;
(b) Yes. When a document is in two or more copies executed at or
about the same time, with identical contents, all such copies are
equally regarded as originals;
(c) Yes. When the original document has been lost or destroyed or can
not be produced in court.
(d) Yes. When the original document is in the custody or under the
control of the adverse party and fails to produce it despite
reasonable notice.
for
the
appointment
of
an
Criminal Proceedings
1. Alex was charged with theft of an article worth P15, 000.00.
Upon being arraigned, he pleaded not guilty to the offense charged.
Thereafter, before trial commenced, he asked the court to allow him to
change his plea of not guilty to a plea of guilty but only to estafa involving
P5,000.00. Can the court allow Alex to change his plea?
A. Yes. Consent of Alex is required before a plea of guilty
B. No. A plea of guilty to a lesser offense may be allowed if the lesser offense is
necessarily included in the offense charged. Estafa involving P5,000.00 is not
necessarily included in theft of an article worth P15,000.00.
C. No. Because double jeopardy sets in.
D. Yes. It is the constitutional right of Alex to change his plea of not quilty to plea
of guilty, provided plea is made with the presence of his counsel and must be
made in writing.
2. What is the effect of absence of preliminary investigation?
A. It does not become a ground for a motion to quash the complaint or
information.
B. It does not affect the courts jurisdiction.
C. It does not impair the validity of the information or render it defective.
D. It does not justify the release of the respondent or nullify the warrant of arrest
against him.
E. All of the above
F. None of the above
3. What is meant by Res Judicata in Prison Grey?
A. The criminal counterpart of bar by former judgment or direct estoppel by
judgment.
B. the Scale of Justice shall tilt in favor of the accused.
C. We will not prosecute.
statement, it is not a ground for new trial because it makes a mockery of the
court and would place the investigation of truth at the mercy of unscrupulous
witness.
C. Recantation is the informal withdrawal of a witness of his prior statement, it is
not a ground for granting a new trial and is hardly given weight.
D. Recantation is the informal withdrawal of a witness of his prior statement, it is a
ground for new trial because it makes a mockery of the court and would place
the investigation of truth at the mercy of unscrupulous witness.
9. The following are the factors that the courts may consider in applying the
precautionary principle, except:
A. Threats to human life or health.
B. Inequity to present or future generations.
C. Prejudice to the environment without legal consideration of the environmental
rights of those affected.
D. Calls for the exercise of military precaution in the face of risk and uncertainty.
10. Which among the enumeration is a prohibited pleading under the Rules
of Procedure for Environmental Cases?
A. Motion to dismiss
B. Motion for extension of time to file return
C. Motion for postponement
D. Motion for a bill of particulars
E. None of the above
F. All of the above
REMEDIAL LAW II
Atty. Villasis
Lorina I. Bernardo
Rule 72-85
1. Which is not a special writ issued by the Supreme Court?
a. Writ of Kalikasan
b. Writ of Replevin
c. Writ of Habeas Corpus
d. Writ of Habeas Data
e. Writ of Amparao
Ans: B
2. Jurisdiction of estate of deceased persons in Metro Manila is within the
jurisdiction of MTC where the gross value of estate does not exceed _____;
otherwise, RTC.
a. 450,000
b.
c.
d.
e.
300,000
400,000
250,000
350,000
Ans: C
10. If no creditor files a petition for letters of administration within ___ years
after the death of the decedent, it is presumed that the estate left no
debts.
a. 2 years
b. 1 year
c. 3 years
d. 5 years
Ans: A
Rule 110-115
11. Preliminary investigation is required for: a) offenses where the penalty
prescribed by law is at least 4 years, 2 months, and 1 day; b) with a fine of
more than 6,000 pesos.
a. Both statements are true
b. Both statements are false
c. The first statement is true; the second statement is false
d. The first statement is false; the second statement is true
Ans: C
12. Injunction may be issued to restrain criminal prosecution
a. Yes. Criminal prosecution may be restrained or restrained by injunction.
b. No. Criminal prosecution may not be restrained due to public interest for
the protection of society.
c. Yes. It is allowable by law.
Ans: B
13. An information must be in writing, charging a person with an offense,
subscribed by the _______, and filed in court.
a. Prosecutor
b. Offended party
c. Defendants lawyer
d. Offender
Ans: A
14. _______ means the joinder of 2 or more separate and distinct offenses in
one and the same information or complaint.
a. Amendment
b. Complaint
c. Information
d. Rejoinder
e. Duplicity of offenses
Ans: E
15. The following are requisites of double jeopardy, except:
e. Recognizance
Ans: D
20. No bail may be allowed after final judgment.
A. True
B. False
Ans: B
Rule 128 - 130
21. ______ consists of writings or any material containing letters, words,
numbers, figures, symbols or other modes of written expressions offered
as proof of their contents.
a. Documentary evidence
b. Object Evidence
c. Material Evidence
d. Relevant Evidence
Ans: A
22. It refers to a mistake which happens when a party, having full knowledge
of the facts, comes to an erroneous conclusion as to their legal effect
a. Mistake of fact
b. Mistake of law
c. Palpable mistake
d. Negligence
Ans: B
23. Religious or political belief or interest in the outcome of the case or
conviction of the crime shall be a ground for disqualification. All persons
who can perceive and perceiving or can make known their perception to
others may be a witness.
a. Both statements are true
b. Both statements are false
c. The first statement is true; the second statement is false
d. The first statement is false; the second statement is true
Ans: D
24. The following are requisites for survivorship disqualification rules, except:
a. The witness is a party or assignor of a party to a case or persons in
whose behalf a case is prosecuted
b. The subject matter of the testimony refers to any matter of fact which
occurred before the death of such deceased person or before the
death of such deceased person or before he became of unsound mind
c. The action is against an executor or administrator or other
representative of a deceased person or of unsound mind.
d. The claim or subject matter is a claim against the executor.
Ans: D
25. Privileged communication includes the following, except:
a. Lawyer- Client
b. Teacher-Student
c. Husband-Wife
d. Priest-Penitent
Ans: B
26. The principle provides that the rights of a party cannot be prejudiced by
an act, declaration, or omission of another.
a. Res judicata
b. Double jeopardy
c. Res Inter Alios Acta Rule
d. Res Gestae
Ans: C
27. Trial once commenced shall continue from day to day as far as applicable
until terminated. It may be postponed for an unlimited amount of period
for a good cause.
a. Both statements are true
b. Both statements are false
c. The first statement is true; the second statement is false
d. The first statement is false; the second statement is true
Ans: C
28. Judgment becomes final in the following circumstances, except:
a. When the period for perfecting an appeal has lapsed
b. When the accused applies for probation
c. When the accused escapes or fleas
d. Where the sentence is totally or partially satisfied
Ans: C
29. The following are the requisites for a motion for new trial, except:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Written
Filed in court
Grounds must be stated
Notice must be given to the fiscal
If based on newly discovered evidence, it must be supported through
statement of witness made in open court
Ans: E
30. Within ___ days from the filing of the notice of appeal, the clerk of court
with whom the notice of appeal was filed must transmit to the clerk of
court of the appellate court the complete record of the case, together with
the notice.
a. 5
b. 10
c. 15
d. 30
Ans: A
PADUAL, JOSEPH C.
REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW II
ATTY. VILLASIS
MCQ
RULE 99-109
RULE 122-127
RULE 133-134
1) WRIT OF AMPARO
2) HABEAS OF DATA
3) CLERICAL ERROR ACT
4) PAPER RULE
RULE 99-109
1. Filed with the written consent to the adoption shall be;
A. signed by the child
B. signed by the childs spouse;
C. known living parents who is not insane;
D. none of the above.
ANSWER- A-C (RULE 99, SEC.3)
2. If the person to be adopted is of age, consent must be:
A.
B.
C.
D.
C. Writ Of Kalikasan
D. Writ Of Habeas Corpus
ANSWER (D) ILUSON VS. BUILDER, MAY 12, 2000
7. The writ of ____________shall extend to all cases of illegal confinement or
detention by which any person is deprived of his liberty, or by rightful custody of
any person is withheld from the person entitled thereto.
A. Habeas Data
B. Habeas Corpus
C. Kalikasan
D. Commitment
ANSWER (B) RULE 102, SEC. 1
8. When the name is ridiculous, dishonorable or extremely difficult to write or
pronounce is a ground for:
A. Petition for The Correction, Cancellation Of Entries
B. Change of First Name and Nickname and other Civil Entries
C. Petition for Change of Name
D. None of the Above
ANSWER (C) RULE 103
9. After the lapse of (2) yrs. from his disappearance without any news about the
absentee or from the receipt of the last news, or after (5) years in case the
absentee has left a person in change of the administration of his property is the
period required:
A.
B.
C.
D.
1. The significance of promulgation of judgment lies in the fact that the right to
_________ accrues only upon proper promulgation of judgment:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Warrant Of Arrest
Peremptory Writ
Search Warrant
Mittimus
Probable Cause
Jurisdiction
Criminal Offense
Jural Acts
10. A remedy when the criminal action is based on a claim for money or property
embezzled or fraudulently misapplied or converted to use of the accused etc.
A.
B.
C.
D.
Preliminary Injunction
Receivership
Delivery Of Personal Property
Attachment
1. The party having the burden of proof must establish his case by a preponderance
of evidence in:
A. Administrative Case
B. Appeal
C. Civil Case
D. Agrarian Case
ANSWER (C) (RULE 133, SEC 1)
2. Proof that does not mean such degree of proof, as excluding possibility of error,
procedures absolute certainly:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Offer Of Proof
Factum Probandum
Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Objection
3. Rules that states that all pleadings, motions and similar papers intended for the
court and quasi-judicial bodys consideration and action shall be written inter alia
, single space with a one-a-half space between paragraphs:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Katarungan Pambarangay
Judicial Affidavit Rule
Efficient Use Of Paper Rule
Rule Of Summary Procedures
Habeas Corpus
Habeas Data
Writ of Amparo
Writ of Kalikasan
A.
B.
C.
D.
Habeas Corpus
Habeas Data
Witness Protection Order
Temporary Protection Order
Preponderance Of Evidence
Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Substantial Evidence
Administrative Procedure
c. Dissolution of corporation
d. Adoption
Answer: Letter A
2) Which of the following statement is correct:
a. A petition for liquidation of an insolvent corporation is classified as
a special proceeding.
b. A petition for liquidation of an insolvent corporation is not filed as
an ordinary action.
c. Both statements are correct.
d. All statements are incorrect.
Answer: Letter A
3) Which of the following is not a mode of of settlement of estate of
deceased persons:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Answer: Letter D
Probate of will
Partition
Summary settlement of estate
Enforcement of contractual obligation of deceased in the estate
proceeding
Answer: Letter D
6) Ways of effecting extrajudicial partition:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Answer: Letter A
Answer: Letter B
8) Matters which the probate court is empowered to determine:
a) Whether the will was executed in accordance with the law of
the devisee
b) Whether or not the instrument offered is the last will and
testament of the decedent
c) Both a and b
d) None of the above
Answer: Letter B
9) Who may not administer the estate:
a) Executor
b) Special administrator
c) Administrator with a will annexed
d) Executor of any executor
Answer: Letter D
10) Not a restriction on the power of an administrator or executor:
a) Cannot acquire by purchase even at public or judicial auction
the property under administration
b) Can continue business of the deceased
Preliminary
Preliminary
Preliminary
Preliminary
statutory.
investigation
investigation
investigation
investigation
is
is
is
is
a constitutional right.
part of due process clause
not a personal right
not part of due process and is purely
Answer: Letter D
9) Mode of arrest:
a)
b)
c)
d)
By virtue of a warrant
Arrest without a warrant
A only.
A and B but under exceptional circumstances as may be
provided by statute.
Answer: Letter D
10) Bail is a matter of right:
Answer: Letter D
4) Object evidences are those addressed to the senses of the:
a) Accused
b) Complainant
c) Court
is sealed
is with the plaintiffs lawyer
was lost or destroyed or cannot be
has a duplicate copy.
Answer: Letter D
VILLAS, CRISELYN E.
Prof. Atty. Christian kit Villasis
January 9, 2016
MCQ
Rule 99-109
Rule 122-127
Rule 133-134
1) Writ of Amparo
2) Habeas of Data
3) Clerical Error Act
4) Paper Rule
RULE 99-109
11. The period of appeal in case of Writ of Habeas Corpus is:
E. Within twenty four (24) hours from notice of judgment and or Final
appealed from;
F. Within forty eight (48) hours from notice of judgment and or Final
appealed from;
G. Within twenty (20) hours from notice of judgment and or Final
appealed from;
H. Within seventy two (72) hours from notice of judgment and or Final
appealed from.
ANSWER: B (Rule 102 Habeas Corpus)
12. What is the Quantum of proof in Writ of Habeas Corpus:
E. Substantial evidence;
F. Preponderance of Evidence;
G. Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt;
Order
Order
Order
Order
ANSWER (A)
15. Which of the following is not a ground for rescission of Adoption:
E. Attempt on the life of the Adoptee;
F. Grave Misconduct;
G. Sexual Assault or Violence;
H. Repeated physical Violence and Verbal Maltreatment.
ANSWER (B)
16. The period within which to file a verified petition for rescission of Adoption.
E. Within ten (10) years from reaching the age of majority or after recovery
from incompetency.
F. Within five (5) years from reaching the age of majority or after recovery from
incompetency.
G. Within three (3) years from reaching the age of majority or after recovery
from incompetency.
H. Within One (1) year from reaching the age of majority or after recovery from
incompetency.
ANSWER (B)
17. The petition for Domestic Adoption shall be filed with the:
E. Where the adoptee resides;
F. Family Court of the province or city where the prospective adoptive parents
reside;
G. Where the Family Court is located;
H. Prospective adoptee has real property.
ANSWER (B)
18. Where to file (venue) petition for custody of minors and writ of habeas corpus in
relation thereto?
E. Within the Family Court of the province or city where the petitioner resides
or the minor may be found;
F. Within the Family Court of the province or city where the petitioner resides;
G. Within the Family Court of the province or city where the minor may be
found;
H. With the Family Court, Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court.
ANSWER (A)
19. The writ of habeas corpus may be granted by the following courts, except:
E.
F.
G.
H.
One of venue and the case may be dismissed for improper venue;
One of jurisdiction because in criminal case venue is jurisdictional;
The defect is waivable;
Motion to Quash will not lie because it is merely procedural.
ANSWER (B)
13. Which of the following is not a ground for a Motion to Quash:
E.
F.
G.
H.
That the court trying the case has no jurisdiction over the offense charged;
That it does not conform substantially to the prescribed form;
That the accused was denied preliminary investigation;
That the officer who filed the information had no authority to do so.
ANSWER (C)
15. When the accused is acquitted, what is the remedy of the prosecution:
E. Appeal;
F. Certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court on the ground of grave abuse
of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction;
G. Mandamus under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court;
H. Petition for Review under Rule 42;
ANSWER (B)
16. The validity of Search Warrant last for:
E. five (5) days from its date, thereafter it shall be void;
F. ten (10) days from its date, thereafter it shall be void ;
G. Fifteen (15) days from its date, thereafter it shall be void;
H. Twenty (20) days from its date, thereafter it shall be void.
ANSWER (B) Sec. 10 Rule 126 of the Rules of Court
17. Who determines probable cause in the issuance of search warrant?
E.
F.
G.
H.
Public Prosecutor;
Judge;
Other Officers as may be authorized by law;
National and Regional State Prosecutor.
ANSWER (B)
18. What is the quantum of evidence in a bail hearing:
E.
F.
G.
H.
Substantial Evidence
Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Clear and Convincing Evidence
Preponderance of Evidence
ANSWER (C)
19. ____________ is the detection and prosecutions of crimes are left to the
initiative of officials and agents of the law.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Accusatorial System
Inquisitorial System
Mixed Sytem
Warrant of Arrest
ANSWER (B)
20. A Complaint or Information must charged only one offense, except:
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
Complex Crime
Special Complex Crime
Delito Continuado
None of the above
All of the above
ANSWER (E)
RULE 133-134
E. Writ Of Amparo
F. Writ Of Habeas Data
G. Clerical Error Act
H. Paper Rule
11. Digong a police Officer apprehended two robbery suspects whom he convinced
during the investigation to go with him to the scene of the crime and show to
him the re-enactment on how the two suspects committed the crime. Is the
reenactment admissible in evidence?
E. Yes, since the re-enactment was voluntary.
F. No, since this amount to waiver of right to silence without the advice of their
counsel.
G. Yes, since the re-enactment was not accompanied by any Sinumpaang
Salaysay.
H. No, since the re-enactment is irrelevant evidence.
ANSWER (B)
12. To prove that Maine shoots her husband using agun, Juan testified that he heard
Alden running and shouting excitedly, Binaril daw ni Maine ang asawa nya!
Aldens declaration is:
E.
F.
G.
H.
ANSWER (B)
13. In Filing a petition for writ of habeas data, the payment of docket fees is:
E.
F.
G.
H.
14. Juan and Sisa named their son Crispin Estrella. But a confused clerk at the St.
Lukes hospital registered his name Crispina Estrella and his gender as Female.
The City Civil Registrar has the authority to?
E.
F.
G.
H.
Ten (10) working days from the date of notice of the adverse judgment.
Five (5) working days from the date of notice of the adverse judgment.
Fifteen (15) working days from the date of notice of the adverse judgment.
Three (3) working days from the date of notice of the adverse judgment.
Ten (10) days from the date of the issuance of the writ.
Seven (7) days from the date of the issuance of the writ.
Five (5) days from the date of the issuance of the writ.
Fifteen (15) days from the date of the issuance of the writ.
18. The date and time of summary hearing of the Writ of Habeas Data shall be
conducted not later than?
E.
F.
G.
H.
Fifteen (15) working days from the date of the issuance of the writ.
Seven (7) working days from the date of the issuance of the writ.
Five (5) working days from the date of the issuance of the writ.
Ten (10) working days from the date of the issuance of the writ.
Nationality
Age
Status
All of the above
None of the above
ANSWER (D)
20. __________ evidence which has a relation to the fact in issue as to induce belief
in its existence or non-existence; evidence which tends in any reasonable degree
to establish the probability or improbability of the fact in issue.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Material Evidence;
Competent Evidence;
Relevant Evidence
Circumstantial Evidence
ANSWER: (C)
TEJUCO, FELICE MAY, A
REMEDIAL LAW
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
1) ____________ is issued when a government officer has the person in his custody,
the illegality of which is not patent, to show cause why the writ of habeas corpus
should not issue
a) Peremptory Writ
b) Preliminary Citation
c) Writ of Amparo
6) In cancellation or correction of entries in the Civil Registry, the Civil Registar and
any person having or claiming any interest under the entry whose cancellation or
correction is sought may, within __________ from notice of the petition, or from
the last date of publication of such notice, file his petition
a) Thirty (30) days
b) Six (6) months
c) Fifteen (15) days
d) Twelve (12) months
7) Which of the following is appealable?
a) An Order directing the administrator to take action to recover the amount due to
the estate
b) An Order made in administration proceedings relating to inclusion or exclusion of
items or property in the inventory or executor or administrator
c) An Order appointing a Special Administrator
d) None of the above
8) Which of the following is not among the persons allowed to file a petition for
declaration of absence?
a) Spouse present
b) Relatives who will succeed by testacy
c) Heirs instituted in the will
d) Those who have over the property of the absentee some right subordinated to
the condition of his death
9) Who may file a petition for guardianship of incompetents?
a) Anyone interested in the estate of non-resident incompetent
b) Secretary of Department of Health in favor of an insane person who should be
hospitalized
c) Any relative, friend or other person on behalf of an incompetent who has no
parent or lawful guardian
a) Search Warrant
b) General Warrant
c) Warrant of Arrest
d) Scatter-shot Search Warrant
4) Which is not a requisite of personal examination by the Judge?
a) It is routinary or pro-forma
b) The examination must be under oath
c) It is done ex parte and may even be held in the secrecy of chambers
d) The Judge must examine the witnesses personally
5) The following are requisites of the Plainview doctrine, except:
a) The evidence was discovered inadvertently
b) There must have been a legal presence in the place where the search is made
c) The evidence is not apparently illegal and there is still a need for further
search to obtain the evidence
d) The discovery was by an officer with a right to be where he is
6) Which of the following is not a remedy against an unlawful search?
a) Certiorari
b) Replevin
c) Motion to Quash the Search Warrant
d) Appeal
7) The general rule is that the prosecution may not appeal a judgment of acquittal.
Which of the following is an exception to the general rule?
a) If the question is purely legal
b) If the dismissal is made with the implied consent of the accused
c) If the dismissal is not an acquittal or based upon consideration or the
evidence on merits
b) The facts from which the inference are derived are persuasive
c) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to prove a conviction
beyond reasonable doubt
d) The facts from which the inference are derived are proved
7) An extrajudicial confession made by the accused shall not be sufficient ground for
conviction, unless
a) There is moral certainty
b) Corroborated by evidence of corpus delict
c) a and b
d) None of the above
8) The following are matters that the court may consider in determining whether or
not there is preponderance of evidence, except
a) The taking of evidence quantitatively
b) The witnesses interest or want of interest and their personal credibility
c) All the facts and circumstances of the case
d) The witnesses manner of testifying, their intelligence, their means and
opportunity of knowing the facts to which they are testifying
9) _______________ is a form of out of court identification where the suspect alone
is brought face to face with the witnesses for identification
a) Mug shots
b) Line ups
c) Show ups
d) None of the above
10) When the defense of alibi is used it must be
a) Established by positive, clear and satisfying evidence
b) Established by mere demand
c) Established by absolute certainty
ROSELYN V. JACOB
REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW II
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS IN REMEDIAL LAW
A. SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
1. The venue of a petition for the escheat of the estate of a decedent who was a
resident of the Philippines is:
A. his residence at the time of his death.
B. the place of his death.
C. any of the places where his properties are located.
D. any of the places where he resides.
E. the place where he last resided.
ANSWER: (E), Section 1, Rule 91, Rules of Court
2. The venue of a Petition for Guardianship of a minor or incompetent who
resides in the Philippines is:
A. his residence.
B. the residence of the guardian.
C. the place where any of his properties is located.
D. anywhere in the Philippines.
ANSWER. (A), Section 1, Rule 92, Rules of Court
3.
The following are money claims mentioned in Section 5, Rule 86, Rules of
Court, except:
A. All claims for funeral expenses.
B. All claims for money against the decedent, arising from contract, express
or implied, whether the same be due, not due or contingent.
C. Expenses for the last sickness of the decedent.
D. Those arising from crime or quasi-delict.
E. Judgments for money against decedent.
ANSWER: (D); Section 5, Rule 86, Rules of Court. Not included in the
enumeration.
8. Based on the order of preference, in default of the parents or a court-appointed
guardian, who among these may be appointed as guardians?
A. The surviving grandparent and in case several grandparents survive, the
court shall select any of them taking into account all relevant considerations.
B. The oldest brother or sister of the minor, is over 21 years of age, unless
unfit or disqualified.
C. The actual custodian of the minor, who is over 21 years of age, unless
unfit or disqualified; and
D. Any other person, who in the sound discretion of the court would serve the
best interest of the minor.
ANSWER: (A), Section 6, A.M. No. 03-02-05-SC, May 01, 2003 (Rule on
Guardianship of Minors)
9. Which one is not a ground for removal of a guardian?
A. Insanity.
B. Incapability or unsuitability to discharge functions.
C. Wastage of mismanagement of the property of the ward.
D. Failure to render an account or make a return within thirty (30) days after
it was done.
E. Absconding.
ANSWER: (E), Section 24, Rule on Guardianship of Minors (A.M. No. 03-0205-SC, May 1, 2003)
10. The general rule is that claims against the estate must be filed within the time
in the notice to the creditors. The period shall not be
____________________ after the date of first publication.
A. One (1) year;
B. Two (2) years;
C. More than 12 months nor less than 6 months;
D. Three (3) years.
ANSWER; (C), Section 2, Rule 86
B. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
1. An accused may move for the suspension of his arraignment if:
A. There is no available public attorney.
B. A prejudicial question exists.
C.
motion for reconsideration is pending before the investigating prosecutor.
D. Accused is bonded and his bondsman failed to notify him of his scheduled
arraignment.
ANSWER. (B), Section 11, Rule 116, Rules of Court.
2. The provisional dismissal of offenses punishable by imprisonment not
exceeding six (6) years or a fine of any amount, or both shall become
permanent ________ after issuance of the order without the case having been
revived.
A. One (1) year
B. Two (2) years
C. Six (6) months
D. Three (3) years
ANSWER: (A), Section 8, Rule 117, Rules of Court.
3. Accused failed to appear at the promulgation of judgment without justifiable
cause. The judgment convicted the accused for slight physical injuries.
Judgment may therefore be promulgated in the following manner:
A. By the clerk of court in the presence of accused counsel.
B. By the clerk of court in the presence of a representative of accused.
C. By the reading of the judgment in the presence of the judge.
D. By entering the judgment into the criminal docket of the court.
ANSWER. (C), Section 6, Rule 120, Rules of Court.
4. After a plea of not guilty is entered the accused shall have ____ days to
prepare for trial.
6.
The court denied the demurrer to evidence which the accused filed with leave
of court. Hence, the accused:
A. Loses the right to present evidence.
B. Does not lose the right to present his evidence.
C. Can be compelled by the court to present his evidence.
D. Has the option whether to present or not his evidence.
ANSWER. (B), Section 23, Rule 119, Rules of Court.
C. EVIDENCE
The burden of proof
A. shifts one party to another.
B. never shifts one party to another.
C. is the same burden of evidence.
D. is ones theory of the case.
Answer: (D) ; Section 1, Rule 131, Rules of Court.
1.
2.
3. A witness is allowed to refer to a memorandum to refresh his memoryA. respecting a matter of law.
B. respecting the opinion of an expert witness.
C. respecting a matter of fact recorded by his superior.
D. respecting a matter of fact he recorded a long time ago.
ANSWER: (D); Section 16, Rule 132, Rules of Court.
4.
Under the Katarungang Pambarangay, any party to the dispute may, within
_______ days from the date of settlement, repudiate the same by filing with
the lupon chairman a statement to that effect sworn to before him, where the
consent is vitiated by fraud, violence, or intimidation. Such repudiation shall
be sufficient basis for the issuance of the certification for filing a complaint
as hereinabove provided.
A. Fifteen (15)
B. Twenty (20)
C. Ten (10)
D. Thirty (30)
ANSWER: (C), Section 418, The Local Government Code of the Philippines
(R.A. 7160).
8.
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
1. Which of the following is not correct:
c. Three Years
d. 6 months
10. The following are the powers and duties of special administrator,
except:
a. special administrator shall take possession and charge of the goods,
chattels, rights, credits, and estate of the deceased
b. Preserve the same for the executors or administrator afterwards
appointed, and for that purpose may commence and maintain suits as
administrator.
c. He may sell only such perishable and other property as the court
orders sold.
d. He may sell the goods and other property as the court ordered sold.
(Sec. 2, Rule 80)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
1. Which is not true? The offenses of seduction, abduction and acts of
lasciviousness shall not be prosecuted, except upon a complaint
filed by:
a. the offended party or her parents, grandparents, or guardians
b. the State if the offended party dies or becomes incapacitated before
filing the complaint and she has no known parents, grandparents, or
guardians
c. The Minor offended party who is capable and competent.
d. The Offended spouse. (Sec. 5, Rule 110)
2. A complaint or information is sufficient if it states the:
a. Designation of the offense given by the statute (Sec. 6, Rule 110)
b. Name of the witnesses
c. Precise date and time of the commission of the offense
d. Acts or omissions complained of as constituting the offense and the
qualifying and aggravating circumstances stated in the language used
in the statute.
3. When separate civil action is suspended?
a. If the criminal action is filed before the civil action has already been
instituted, the latter shall be suspended in whatever stage it may be
found before judgment on the merits.
b. If the criminal action is filed after the said civil action has already been
instituted, the latter shall be suspended in whatever stage it may be
found before judgment on the merits.(Sec. 2, Rule 111)
c. If the criminal action is filed concurrently with the civil action, the latter
shall be suspended in whatever stage it may be found before judgment
on the merits.
d. If the criminal action is filed after the civil action has already been
instituted, the latter shall be suspended in whatever stage it may be
found after judgment on the merits.
4. The following are the elements of prejudicial question, except:
a. Previously instituted criminal action involves an issue similar to the
issued raised the subsequent civil action and the resolution of such
issues determines whether or not the civil action may proceed.
b. Previously instituted criminal action involves an issue intimately related
to the issue raised in the subsequent civil action and the resolution of
such issue determines whether or not the civil action may proceed.
c. Previously instituted civil action involves an issue similar or intimately
related to the issue raised in the subsequent criminal action, and the
resolution of such issue determines whether or not the criminal action
may proceed. (Sec. 7, Rule 111)
d. Previously instituted civil action involves an issue similar or intimately
related to the issue raised in the preceding criminal action, and the
resolution of such issue determines whether or not the criminal action
may proceed.
5. Section 7 of Rule 112 provides that a preliminary investigation is
required to be conducted before the filing of a complaint or
information for an offense where the penalty prescribed by law is:
a. At least 4 years, 2 months and 1 day without regard to the fine (Sec.1,
Rule 112)
b. At least 4 years, 2 months and 1 day with regard to the fine
c. More than 4 years, 2 months and 1 day with regard to the fine
d. More than 4 years, 2 months and 1 day without regard to the fine
6. When may the RTC issue a warrant of arrest?
a. Within 10 days from the filing of the complaint of information (Sec. 6,
Rule 112)
b. Within 5 days from the filing of the complaint of information
c. Within 30 days from the filing of the complaint of information
d. Within 15 days from the filing of the complaint of information
7. When is warrant of arrest not necessary?
a. When a person is illegally arrested.
b. When the offense committed is penalized by imprisonment and fine.
c. When the accused is at large.
EVIDENCE
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
1. Judicial notice is mandatory when the subject matter:
a. Involves the existence and territorial extent of states (Sec.1 Rule 129).
b. Are of public knowledge, or are capable of unquestionable
demonstration.
c. Known to judges because of their judicial functions.
d. The court, on its own initiative, announce its intention to take judicial
notice of the matter.
2. When the subject inquiry is the contents of a document, no evidence
shall be admissible other than the original document itself, except:
a. When the original is a public record in the custody of a public officer or
is recorded in a public office. (Sec. 3, Rule 130)
b. When the original cannot be produced in court due to the fault of the
offeror.
c. When the original document is in the custody of the offeror and the
latter failed to produce the said document
d. When an entry is repeated in the regular courts of business, one being
copied form another at or near the time of the transaction.
JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT RULE
3. Judicial affidavit also applies to all criminal actions where:
a. The maximum of the imposable penalty does not exceed 6 years. (Sec.
9)
b. The maximum of the imposable penalty exceeds 6 years.
c. The maximum of the imposable penalty does not exceed 4 years
d. The maximum of the imposable penalty exceeds 4 years.
4. A party who fails to submit the required judicial affidavits and
exhibits on time shall:
a. Be deemed to have waived their submission. (Sec. 10)
b. Pay a fine of not less that P2,000 nor more than P6,000
c. Pay a fine of not less that P2,000 nor more than P5,000
d. Pay a fine of not less that P1,000 nor more than P6,000
RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CASES
5. The following are the prohibited pleadings or motions, except:
a. Motion for intervention (Sec. 1, Rule 2)
b. Motion to dismiss the complaint
c. Third party complaint
d. Reply and Rejoinder
9. The following are the recognized exceptions to the rule barring an appeal
from a judgment of acquittal of the accused, which is not?
a. When the prosecution is denied due process of law;
b. When the trial court commits grave abuse of discretion amounting to
lack or excess of jurisdiction in dismissing a criminal case by granting
the accused demurrer to evidence;
c. Failure of the appellant to pay the docket and other lawful fees as
provided in S5, R40 and S4, R41;
d. None of the above.
R 124 (Procedure in the Court of Appeals)
10. The clerk of court of the CA shall designate a counsel de oficio if it appears
from the record of the case as transmitted that:
a. The accused is confined in prison;
b. Is without counsel de parte on appeal;
c. Has signed the notice of appeal himself;
d. All of the above;
e. None of the above.
11. The CA has power to try cases and conduct hearings, receive evidence and
perform any and all acts necessary to resolve factual issues in cases:
a. Falling within its original jurisdiction;
b. Involving claims for damages arising from provisional remedies;
c. Where the court grants a new trial based only on the ground of newly
discovered evidence;
d. All of the above;
e. None of the above.
12. What is/are the scope of CAs judgment?
a. Reverse/affirm/modify the judgment;
b. Increase/reduce the penalty imposed by the trial court;
c. Remand the case to the RTC for new trial or retrial;
d. Dismiss the case;
e. All of the above;
f. None of the above.
13. At any time after the appeal from the lower court has been perfected and
before the judgment of the CA convicting the accused becomes final, the
accused may:
Arman M. Guingab Bar Refresher Course. (UE) Atty. Christian Kit Villasis
Rem 2. SY-2016-2017
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
1. What is not a money claim?
a. All claims against funeral expenses.
b. All claims for expenses of last sickness of the decedent.
c. All claims for damages arising from torts.
d. Judgment for money against the decedent.
Ans. C.
2. What is the exception in filing of the statute of non-claims?
a. Tardy Claim.
b. Special Claim.
c. Claimants.
d. Early Claims.
Ans. A.
3. May the Special Administrator issue a notice to creditors to file their money
claim?
a. No, because the special administrator is not empowered as such.
b. No, because a special administrator is not an executor.
c. Yes, it is within the power conferred by law.
d. Yes, because it the testator allows it.
Ans. A.
4. What is the prescriptive period of a tardy claim?
a. 10 years.
b. 12 years.
c. 5 years.
d. 1 year.
Ans. D.
5.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
1. May a plea of guilty be withdrawn and be substituted by a plea of not guilty?
a. No, since it is not provided for by the rules.
b. No, because it will violate the rule on against double jeopardy.
c. No, it will violated the right against self-incrimination.
d. Yes, if the plea of guilt was improvident and provided the judgment of
conviction has yet become final.
Ans. D.
2. As a rule, is the order sustaining the motion to quash a bar to another prosecution
for the same offense?
a. Yes, since it will constitute double jeopardy.
b. Yes, provided that it will be grounded on extinction of criminal liability.
c. Yes, as the court will see fit.
d. No, it is not a bar for the prosecution of another offense.
3. The prosecutor filed an information charging the accused with seduction. No
complaint was filed by the private offended party. What is the ground for the
motion to quash?
a. Lack of jurisdiction over the offense charged.
b. Lack of authority of the prosecutor.
c. The compliant does not conform to the prescribed form.
d. That the criminal complaint has already been extinguished.
Ans.A.
4. An accused was discharged to be a state witness against his co-accused in a case
of murder. May the accused be prosecuted later on for the same crime of murder?
a. Yes, it will not bar for future prosecution.
b. Yes, since it will not constitute double jeopardy.
c. No, since it will constitute as acquittal.
d. No, the discharged of a state witness operates as an acquittal provided the
accused will not refused to testify.
Ans. D.
5. X was acquitted of illegal fishing through the use of explosives. Subsequently a
charge of illegal possession of explosives involving the same explosives used in
the illegal fishing case was brought against X. May X invoke double jeopardy?
a. No, because it is not necessarily included in the same offense.
b. No, because X was not acquitted.
c. Yes, the second charge of illegal possession of explosives was necessarily
included or absorbed in the first charge.
d. Yes, because the does not prohibit the same.
Ans. C.
6. X stole 13 carabaos, 8 of which belonged to B and 5 to C. The theft happened at
the same plac and time. X was prosecuted and convicted for the theft of the 8
carabaos belonging to B. Subsequently, X was prosecuted for theft of the 5
carabaos belonging to C. May X invoke double jeopardy?
a. Yes. The second prosecution is for the same offense because the theft of the 8
carabaos is an integral part of the single crime of theft of all the carabaos.
b. No, it is a distinct crime.
c. No, one theft is separate and distinct from the others.
d. Yes, under the revised penal code.
Ans. A.
7. When is pre-trial not applicable?
a. Sandiganbayan.
b. Municipal Trial Court.
c. Regional Trial Court.
d. National Labor Relations Commission.
Ans. D.
8. What is the time limit within which the accussed must be brought to trial?
a. Within 30 days from the court acquire jurisdiction over the person of the
accused and trial shall commence within 30 days from the receipt of the pretrial order.
b. Within 60 days from the court acquire jurisdiction over the person of the
accused and trial shall commence within 30 days from the receipt of the pretrial order.
c. Within 30 days from the court acquire jurisdiction over the person of the
accused and trial shall commence within 60 days from the receipt of the pretrial order.
d. Within 60 days from the court acquire jurisdiction over the person of the
accused and trial shall commence within 60 days from the receipt of the pretrial order.
Ans. A.
9.
Who has the burden of proof in the motion to dismiss on ground of denial
right to speedy trial?
a. The accused.
b. The court.
c. The prosecutor.
d. The complainant
Ans. A.
10. What is the remedy where the accused is not brought within the time limit?
a. Violation of the right to speedy trial.
b. Violation of due process.
c. Violation of the right of the accused.
of
Evidence
1. How is the examination of a witness presented in a trial or a hearing done?
a. In chambers.
b. In open court.
c. In closed court.
d. During session.
Ans. B.
2. May a witness testify in a narrative form?
a. Yes, since it is allowed by the rules.
b. No, it must be done in a question and answer form.
c. No, since it is not allowed by the rules.
d. Yes, under exceptional circumstances.
Ans. B.
3. Is a witness obligated to answer the questions?
a. No, since it will violate his right against self-incrimination.
b. Yes, although his answer may tend to establish a claim against him.
c. No, since the witness can invoke his right to privacy.
d. Yes, under the law on obligations.
Ans. B
4. What does it mean of impeachment of a witness?
a. Means to question the witness.
b. Means to destroy the witness.
c. Means to establish that the witness is lying.
d. Means to destroy or to put in doubt the credibility of the witness and his
testimony.
Ans. D.
5. Is the evidence of good character admissible?
a. No, unless such character has been impeached.
b. No, it is inadmissible in evidence.
c. Yes, since it falls within the purview of object evidence.
d. Yes, because the rules of court allows the same.
Ans. A