Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
Introduction
II.
Facility Information
III.
Facility History
IV.
5-14
V.
Court Analysis
15-30
VI.
31-46
VII.
Desired Maintenance
A. Daily
B. Periodic
C. Annual
47-49
50
51-56
Report Information
Author: Ed Montecalvo
Company: Har-Tru Sports
Date: 7/2016
I. Introduction
This Court Analysis Survey was completed at the Longboat Key Public
Tennis Facility on July 17-18, 2016. Ed Montecalvo, Southeastern
Representative for Har-Tru Sports conducted the survey and site
analysis. Kay Thayer, Facility Manager (941-316-8367) requested the
analysis. Facility staff furnished some information in this report. The
rest was obtained through the survey inspection and research of Har-Tru
Sports records. All recommendations used herein are in accordance
with the ASBA (American Sports Builders Association) guidelines for
tennis courts.
Satellite Photo
Longboat Key Public Tennis Center
#4
#5
#6
#1
#2
#3
Court 1
Picture 2. Longboat Key Public Tennis Center courts 7-10.
Section IV
Conclusions & Recommendations
Where your tennis courts are in terms of the post construction life-cycle and how the
internal components have changed over the years will determine the type of work that
needs to be done.
The surface slope on courts 1-6 has flattened out substantially over the years, resulting in
extremely poor drainage, particularly on the last 38 of the (south) low ends of the courts.
The low ends of the courts stay wet for an extended period of time after a rain storm.
The sub-irrigation system does not function as originally designed. Some system
components do not function at all and the staff has done their best to devise clever ways
to compensate for the system failures.
Inconsistent surface thickness and compaction is resulting in uneven water distribution,
dead spots and poor drainage.
The fencing system is showing signs of deterioration.
These observations are commonly found in facilities this age. As facilities age out
beyond their normal life expectancy, long-range plans should be developed to update the
facility as needed.
Section A
Diagnosis & Recommendations
A-1.0 Diagnosis
Surface Slope
The 3 batteries of courts have different surface slopes ranging from 1
in every 35.71 to 1 in every 100. The correct slope and uniformity
of slope is important to maintain as it provides the necessary drainage
to shed excess rain water in a reasonable period of time. Surface
migration from the high to the low end of the courts has contributed
to the change in slope over time. As a result, the courts take longer
to drain as the slope continues to flatten out.
Current slope ranges from 1 in 35.71 to 1 in 100. The
recommended slope per ASBA guidelines is 1 in 24-40 for subirrigated courts and 1 in 24-30 for above-ground watered courts.
Courts 1-3 1.68 or 1 in every 100 sloped north-to-south.
Courts 4-6 1.68 or 1 in every 71.42 sloped north-to-south.
Courts 7-10 3.24 or 1 in every 35.71 north-to-south.
Curbing
Current slope ranges from 1 in 29.41 to 1 in 77. The
recommended slope per ASBA guidelines is 1 in 24-40 for subirrigated courts and 1 in 24-30 for above-ground watered courts.
Court 1-3
1.56 or 1 in every 77 north-to-south.
Court 4-6
2.16 or 1 in every 55.5 north-to-south.
Court 7-10 4.08 or 1 in every 29.41 north-to-south.
Picture 4. Surface migration & poor slope keeps courts wet longer.
7
Irrigation
Courts 1-6 are watered with the CalCap sub-irrigation system.
Courts 7-10 are watered with 6 sprinkler heads per court.
Biological Growth
There was minimal algae growth along the inside perimeters of the courts.
The staff does a consistent job with surface agitation to keep algae controlled
on the playing surface. Using a Gator Rake will aid in better surface agitation
to reduce the incidence of algae outside the playing surface.
Pictures 8 & 9. Algae growth and scale accumulation. The Har-Tru surfacing is fine under
the growth and scale deposits.
Maintenance Practices
The staff does a fine job maintaining the tennis courts given current
resources. With the exception of the Gator Rake, the staff has all the
proper tools necessary for maintaining the clay courts. The subirrigation system on courts 1-6 is preventing them from providing a
uniform playing surface in terms of even water distribution. The
unreliable performance of the system hampers efforts of providing a
uniformly damp surface, particularly during the summer and can result in
under and over-watered areas.
B- Conclusions
1.0 Surface Thickness & Compaction: Surface core testing was done in
over 30 locations on the tennis courts. We measured a wide variation of
Har-Tru surface thicknesses throughout the courts (see the attached maps)
as a result of long-term surface migration. The recommended Har-Tru
thickness is a uniform 1.00. Surface compaction is excessive and is
contributing to additional uneven water distribution in the high play areas of
the tennis courts, primarily from the base lines to the net lines. This is what
you would expect to find at a busy clay court facility.
2.0 Surface Slope and Drainage
We measured the existing surface slope on all 10 courts and found them to
be outside of ASBA specifications of 1 in every 24-30 for above-ground
watered courts and 1 in every 24-40 for sub-irrigated courts. The courts
are sloped in the ideal direction, north-to-south and end-to-end.
3.0 Sub-Base Conditions
We found a sand base layer thickness on each battery of courts that is
consistent with ASBA construction guide lines in terms of thickness and
gradation.
4.0 Irrigation System
The sub-irrigation system for courts 1-6 has aged-out beyond a level of
acceptable reliability and usefulness. There are areas on the courts where
the system is either under or over watering the clay. One lateral was found
to be flooding an area near the net on the north side of court 2. The subirrigation system should be discarded and replaced with an above-ground
irrigation system or a new sub-irrigation system.
The city should consider switching to well water since the tennis facility
currently pays a sewerage charge for unsewered water, inflating the cost of
water by the sewerage fee. The investment in a well system would pay for
itself in a reasonable period of time.
10
11
12
13
14
15
A-4.0
The following includes a list of goals and time tables based on the site visit.
These timetables can be used for short and long-term budgeting projects.
Subject
Deep scarify,
top dress &
laser grade
Annual top
dressing
Line Tape
replacement
Windscreens
Fencing
Tools &
Equipment
Description
Remove line tapes, deep scarify & laser
grade in additional surfacing to restore
planarity & 1 thickness. Sequence 1
battery of courts each year. Courts 1-3 in
year 1. Courts 4-6 in year 2. Courts 7-10
in year 3.
Annual surface reconditioning with 2-3 tons
of Har-Tru per court should be applied each
spring and fall.
Line Tapes should be pulled up every 2-3
years prior to top dressing. This will ensure
that lines are straight, tight and have no
surface material buildup on either side of
line tapes during the playing season.
Windscreens should be replaced every 3-5
years or as they start to fade, discolor and
get brittle.
Fencing should be painted or replaced as
needed. Keeping this project in a cycle will
help to eliminate a buildup of high
budgetary costs.
Keep drag brushes and hand tools in good
working condition is essential for
maintaining Har-Tru courts. Replacing worn
brushes, lute blades etc. will keep the tools
working properly.
Roller
Amenities
Schedule
3-year
sequence
Annually
2-3 years
Every
3-5 years
As Needed
Drag
Brushes,
Line Masters,
Lutes &
Aussies
Grease
annually &
perform
scheduled
preventative
maintenance
As Needed
16
Maintenance
Training
Annually
17
Section V
Court Analysis Section
Section B
B 1.0 Court Symptoms
Drainage, surface compaction, surface thickness, surface planarity, subirrigation system leaks and operation challenges associated with these
issues were the most obvious areas in need of attention.
Section C Geotechnical Information
Upon inspection of the surfaces the following was determined.
C-1.0 Slope
The recommended slope of the sub-irrigated courts is 1 in every
24-40 and 1 in every 24-30 for the conventional above-ground
watered courts.
Courts 1-3. Courts 1-3 are CalCap sub-irrigated courts sloped
north-to-south or end-to-end. The slope is inadequate and
inconsistent on all 3 courts. The variance in slope every 20
ranges between 1/8 and 7/16. The average slope of the courts
is 1.20 or 1 in every 100.
Court 4-6. Courts 4-6 are CalCap sub-irrigated courts sloped
north-to-south or end-to-end. The slope is inadequate and
inconsistent on all 3 courts. The variance in slope every 20
ranges between 0 and 9/16. The average slope of the courts is
1.68 or 1 in every 71.42.
Courts 7-10. Courts 7-10 are conventional above-ground
watered Har-Tru courts sloped north-to-south or end-to-end. The
slope is slightly inconsistent. The variance in slope every 20
ranges between 5/16 and 13/16. The average slope of the
courts is 3.36 or 1 in every 35.71.
Har-Tru courts are constructed on a slope of 1 in 24 to 40 in a
single plane. As the natural weather erosion processes of wind
and water act upon the surface of the court, the slope will be
slowly reduced as the particles of Har-Tru slowly migrate from the
high side to the low side of the court. Chart 1 illustrates both the
existing & recommended slope of the court surfaces and curbs.
19
Courts #
1-3
4-6
7-10
Surface Slope
1 in every 100
1 in every 71.42
1 in every 35.71
Curb Slope
1 in every 77
1 in every 55.5
1 in every 29.41
Recommended Slope
1 in every 24-40
1 in every 24-40
1 in every 24-30
Chart 1. Existing and recommended slope. Slope on courts 1-6 is seriously deficient.
C-2.0 Drainage
When it comes to drainage, the objective is to get water off the
courts in the best possible direction on a slope of 1 inch in 24 to 40.
The slope should be verified every 5-7 years and re-graded using laser
guided equipment when necessary.
In the event the facility would need to modify the drainage on the low
end of the courts in the future, the channel drains pictured below would
be an excellent means of controlling run-off. These drains can be
installed just inside the curb-line as illustrated below. They typically are
installed at court level and have dropouts periodically to direct the water
to a storm drain. The drains should be installed by a tennis court
contractor.
21
C-3.0 Silting
Silting is a deposit of finer particles of Har-Tru
that float on top of the water during a rain
storm and accumulate in low areas on the
court. Poor drainage can cause silting.
Ensuring the correct slope, drainage and
patching of low areas will keep silting from
occurring.
22
23
24
Pictures 22 & 23. Sub-irrigation system lines have been modified with automatic shut-off
sensors to improve system performance to a point.
Pictures 24 & 25. Sub-irrigation system moisture sensors have corroded and been replaced
with shut-off switches and timers.
25
D-4.0 Windscreen
The windscreens around the courts were in good condition with minimal
signs of wear. Windscreens should be replaced every 3-5 years.
D-5.0 Amenities
The amenities observed:
Item
Herringbone punched line tapes
Condition
Wearing condition
Rusting
Nets
Good condition
Windscreens
Good condition
Line Tapes
See Herringbone
the following punched
conclusions.
The
line tapes appear to be straight and tight but
in a state of wear. Line tapes should be removed each year prior to topdressing and replaced after top-dressing has occurred. This practice will
ensure the surface material does not build up around the court lines.
26
Net Posts
The Net Posts on all courts inspected were holding consistent net tension.
The posts should be cleaned and painted every year.
ASBA Specifications
Net Posts and Sleeves
Posts and post sleeves should be
set 42 apart for a doubles court,
measured from the center of
one post to the center of the
other. For tournament use, it is
recommended that a second set
of net post sleeves be supplied
33 (center to center) apart for
singles play. Posts should be set
plumb and true so as to support
the net at a height of 42 above
the court surface.
27
Nets
The nets on the tennis courts are in good condition with no holes or frayed areas.
See the instructions for tying the nets to the net post.
28
29
Section VI
Har-Tru Court Maps
Courts 1-3
30
31
5.54
5.54
40
5.54
5.53
5.53
20
5.55
40
5.535
20
MAP 1
0
0
60
5.605
5.6
60
5.57
5.57
5.58
5.605
5.61
5.63
5.67
80
5.56
5.575
5.58
5.6
5.63
5.65
5.63
Court 2
100
5.59
5.58
5.58
5.63
5.62
5.63
5.65
120
5.595
5.58
5.615
5.65
5.655
5.65
5.65
7/18/16
140
Court 1
5.57
5.605
5.61
5.61
5.62
80
5.62
5.65
5.62
5.63
5.635
100
120
Court 3
5.57
5.59
5.595
5.65
5.65
5.65
5.665
160
Elevations in Feet
5.6
5.62
5.64
5.67
5.69
5.52
5.53
5.54
5.55
5.56
5.57
5.58
5.59
5.6
5.61
5.62
5.63
5.64
5.65
5.66
5.67
5.68
32
5.6
0
0
5.535
20
5.55
40
60
5.62
80
MAP 2
0.12"
0.24"
0.36"
0.24"
0.12"
5.635
100
0.12"
120
5.53
20
5.53
5.54
5.605
5.61
5.62
5.63
5.54
5.57
5.605
5.61
5.62
5.65
60
5.57
5.57
5.58
5.605
5.61
5.63
5.67
80
5.56
5.575
5.58
5.6
5.63
5.65
5.63
Court 2
100
5.59
5.58
5.58
5.63
5.62
5.63
5.65
120
5.595
5.58
5.615
5.65
5.655
5.65
7/18/16
5.57
5.59
5.595
5.65
5.65
5.65
5.665
160
5.6
5.62
5.64
5.67
5.69
5.52
5.53
5.54
5.55
5.56
5.57
5.58
5.59
5.6
5.61
5.62
5.63
5.64
5.65
5.66
5.67
5.68
140
Court 1
5.65
5.54
40
Court 3
33
MAP 3
Court 3
7/18/16
Court 2
Court 1
5.52
5.53
5.54
5.55
5.56
5.57
5.58
5.59
5.6
5.61
5.62
5.63
5.64
5.65
5.66
5.67
5.68
34
20
40
60
80
100
120
MAP 4
5.605
5.6
5.53
5.535
5.53
20
5.54
40
5.54
5.57
5.605
5.61
5.62
5.65
60
5.57
5.57
5.58
5.605
5.61
5.63
5.67
80
5.56
1-3/4"
5.575
5.58
3/4"
5.6
5.63
5.65
5.63
1"
Court 2
100
5.59
5.58
5.58
5.63
5.62
5.63
5.65
120
1"
5.595
140
1-3/4"
5.58
5.615
1-1/4"
5.65
5.655
5.65
5.65
Court 1
7/18/16
1-3/4"
5.54
5.55
1"
1-1/2"
5.61
5.62
5.62
5.635
5.63
Court 3
5.57
5.59
5.595
5.65
5.65
5.65
5.665
160
5.52
5.53
5.54
5.55
5.56
5.57
5.58
5.59
5.6
5.61
5.62
5.63
5.64
5.65
5.66
5.67
5.68
5.6
5.62
5.64
5.67
5.69
35
MAP 5
Court 3
7/18/16
Court 2
Court 1
Courts 4-6
36
37
MAP 6
20
40
60
80
100
120
5.62
5.59
5.62
21
5.6
5.64
5.64
5.62
5.71
5.68
63
5.61
5.615
5.67
5.71
5.7
5.71
5.72
84
5.61
5.62
5.65
5.71
5.705
5.72
5.71
Court 5
105
5.61
5.62
5.65
5.69
5.705
5.71
5.72
126
5.57
5.58
5.65
5.69
5.71
5.71
5.72
Court 4
7/18/16
42
5.65
5.71
5.7
5.69
5.685
5.71
5.71
5.72
5.68
5.73
Court 6
5.58
5.64
5.7
5.73
5.76
Elevations in Feet
147
5.5
5.58
5.64
5.69
5.705
5.72
5.73
38
40
60
80
MAP 7
0.12"
20
0.48"
0.48"
0.12"
0.12"
100
0.12"
120
5.62
5.64
5.68
5.685
5.68
21
5.59
5.62
5.64
5.71
5.69
5.71
5.73
Court 6
63
5.61
5.615
5.67
5.71
5.7
5.71
5.72
84
5.61
5.62
5.65
5.71
5.705
5.72
5.71
105
5.61
5.62
5.65
5.69
5.705
5.71
5.72
7-18-16
126
5.57
5.58
5.65
5.69
5.71
5.71
147
5.5
5.58
5.64
5.69
5.705
5.72
5.73
5.58
5.64
5.7
5.73
5.76
Court 4
5.72
42
5.6
5.62
5.65
5.71
5.7
5.71
5.72
Court 5
5.5
5.52
5.54
5.56
5.58
5.6
5.62
5.64
5.66
5.68
5.7
5.72
5.74
39
MAP 8
Court 6
7-18-16
Court 5
Court 4
40
Courts 7-10
41
42
60
80
5.53
5.58
5.69
5.73
5.78
MAP 10
0.36"
20
0.72"
40
0.84"
0.48"
0.48"
100
0.48"
120
46
69
5.56
5.6
5.66
5.74
5.8
5.84
5.86
92
5.58
5.6
5.67
5.74
5.8
5.835
5.88
Court 9
115
5.6
5.68
5.74
5.79
5.84
138
5.58
5.625
5.685
5.75
5.82
5.84
5.86
Court 8
161
5.59
5.625
5.715
5.75
5.795
5.85
7/18/16
184
5.61
5.63
5.685
5.74
5.795
5.81
5.875
Court 7
5.62
5.68
5.73
5.79
5.8
5.86
207
5.595
Elevations in Feet
5.56
5.53
23
5.59
5.66
5.74
5.78
5.82
5.895
5.57
5.64
5.74
5.765
5.8
5.84
Court 10
5.62
5.665
5.73
5.77
5.83
5.88
5.86
5.84
5.82
5.8
5.78
5.76
5.74
5.72
5.7
5.68
5.66
5.64
5.62
5.6
5.58
5.56
5.54
5.52
5.5
43
60
80
5.53
5.58
5.69
5.73
5.78
MAP 11
0.36"
20
0.72"
40
0.84"
0.48"
0.48"
100
0.48"
120
46
5.56
5.53
23
5.59
5.66
5.74
5.78
5.82
5.895
5.57
5.64
5.74
5.765
5.8
5.84
Court 10
92
5.58
5.6
5.67
5.74
5.8
5.835
5.88
115
5.6
5.68
5.74
5.79
5.84
138
5.58
5.625
5.685
5.75
5.82
5.84
5.86
Court 8
161
5.59
5.625
5.715
5.75
5.795
5.85
7/18/16
69
5.56
5.6
5.66
5.74
5.8
5.84
5.86
Court 9
207
5.595
5.62
5.68
5.73
5.79
5.8
5.86
184
5.61
5.63
5.685
5.74
5.795
5.81
5.875
Court 7
5.62
5.665
5.73
5.77
5.83
5.88
5.86
5.84
5.82
5.8
5.78
5.76
5.74
5.72
5.7
5.68
5.66
5.64
5.62
5.6
5.58
5.56
5.54
5.52
5.5
44
MAP 12
Court 10
7/18/16
Court 9
Court 8
Court 7
45
5.74
5.69
5.57
5.53
23
5.53
1-1/8"
5.64
5.58
1-1/4"
5.765
5.8
1/2"
5.73
5.78
MAP 13
20
40
60
80
100
120
5.84
5.56
5.59
5.66
5.74
5.78
5.82
5.895
69
5.56
5.6
5.66
5.74
5.8
5.84
5.86
5.6
5.67
92
5.58
1-1/2"
3/4"
5.74
5.8
5.835
1"
5.88
Court 9
115
5.6
5.68
5.74
5.79
5.84
138
5.58
1-1/2"
5.625
5.685
1-1/2"
5.75
5.82
5.84
1"
5.86
Court 8
161
5.59
5.625
5.715
5.75
5.795
5.85
7/18/16
Court 7
184
5.61
1-3/4"
5.63
5.685
1"
5.74
5.795
5.81
7/8"
5.875
207
5.595
5.62
5.68
5.73
5.79
5.8
5.86
46
Court 10
5.62
5.665
5.73
5.77
5.83
46
MAP 14
20
40
60
80
100
120
System Hardware
23
46
Court 10
92
115
138
Court 8
161
7/18/16
Court 7
184
207
69
Court 9
Low PSI
Low Volume
Section VII
Court Maintenance
47
48
Note: A copy of the Har-Tru Maintenance Manual is included with your report for
your review.
49
Did you know, brushing your courts excessively can dry them
out?
Did you know, when algae problems occur on your clay courts,
you can spread the contamination by not discarding the
contaminate surface? Spreading the contaminated surface just
spreads the problem!
Section VIII
ASBA Specifications
Reconditioning Clay Courts
51
1.0
Definition
Fast dry is a porous tennis court surface material consisting of natural crushed stone,
brick, or tile, that is ground, screened, well graded, and may or may not be mixed with
a chemical binder to form a stable homogeneous mixture having an affinity for water.
2.0
Introduction
Periodic reconditioning is important to both the performance and life of a fast dry
tennis court. Proper maintenance, both daily and yearly, will maintain a tennis court in
good playing condition and extend the useful life of the court.
Reconditioning is the seasonal replacement of surfacing material lost due to play,
wind and water erosion.
3.0
General Requirements
An annual application of approximately 5 lbs./sq. yd. (2.8 kilos/sq. m.) of fast dry
surface material should be applied, depending on type of irrigation system, intensity of
play, and local climatic conditions. 5 lbs./sq. yd. (2.8 kilos/sq. m.) represents 2 tons
(1814.4 kilos) per court.
4.0
Procedure
A.
Preparation
In preparation for reconditioning, the fast dry court should be cleaned of debris,
groomed by brushing, and then rolled. The rolling insures the bonding of all
usable material. After rolling, the excess loose (dead) granules should be
gathered into piles and removed from the court. Extra care should be exercised
not to remove more material than necessary. If blowers are used, caution should
be exercised so as not to remove usable surface material.
The loose (dead) granules may be used at a later time as top dressing material
on bald, slick and wet areas and on subsurface irrigated fast dry courts.
B.
Location of Depressions
Depressions are generally located in the base line and in the service court areas.
Exact locations may be determined by circling areas retaining water after a rain,
as well as by stretching a string line in several directions and marking low areas.
C.
E.
F.
Top Dressing
After the loose dead material has been removed and the depressions filled and
compacted, appropriate top dressing material should be applied. Above ground
irrigated courts and subsurface irrigated courts may require different top
dressing materials. It may be advisable to contact a qualified tennis court
contractor or surface manufacturer to determine the appropriate material. A
fertilizer-type spreader may be used to apply the top dressing material in several
directions, brushing afterwards. If a spreader is not available, the fast dry top53
dressing material should be applied by spacing the bags evenly and spreading
the material as uniformly as possible. The newly applied surfacing should then
be brushed in several directions to insure a uniform distribution of the material.
The top-dressing material should be hand-watered with a fine spray and rolled.
All line tapes which have been removed should be reinstalled.
It may be necessary to brush, water and roll successively over several days to
insure a bonding of the top-dressing to the existing fast dry surface before
resuming play.
The same procedure should be repeated if additional applications are required.
Subsurface irrigated courts may require special procedures.
5.0
6.0
54
These Construction Guidelines are intended for use by architects, engineers, contractors, tennis court
and running track owners. Parties not experienced in tennis court or running track construction are
advised to consult a qualified contractor, consultant and/or design professional. Experienced
contractors, consultants and/or design professionals can be identified through the American Sports
Builders Association. Due to changing construction technology and techniques, only the most recent
version of these Guidelines should be used. Variances in climate, soil conditions, topography and other
factors may make these Guidelines unsuitable for certain projects.
Copyright 2003 by American Sports Builders Association. All Rights Reserved.
55
Our Vision
Developing Champions Around the World
56