Globalization is a process of interaction and integration among the people,
companies, and governments of different nations, a process driven by international trade and investment and aided by information technology. This process has effects on the environment, on culture, on political systems, on economic development and prosperity, and on human physical well-being in societies around the world. Globalization is not new, though. For thousands of years, peopleand, later, corporationshave been buying from and selling to each other in lands at great distances, such as through the famed Silk Road across Central Asia that connected China and Europe during the Middle Ages. Likewise, for centuries, people and corporations have invested in enterprises in other countries. In fact, many of the features of the current wave of globalization are similar to those prevailing before the outbreak of the First World War in 1914. Globalization is deeply controversial, however. Proponents of globalization argue that it allows poor countries and their citizens to develop economically and raise their standards of living, while opponents of globalization claim that the creation of an unfettered international free market has benefited multinational corporations in the Western world at the expense of local enterprises, local cultures, and common people. Resistance to globalization has therefore taken shape both at a popular and at a governmental level as people and governments try to manage the flow of capital, labor, goods, and ideas that constitute the current wave of globalization.
What is the connection of Globalization to the OBE?
Globalization is actually an IMF-WB doctrine that focuses on 3 primary agreements privatization, liberalization, and deregulation. It's none other than the process of keeping the world in line with the consensus in Washington. In the near future, United States engineers and architects can practice their professions anywhere in the world, including the Philippines, and Filipinos could also practice their professions in the US without barriers whatsoever. As if theres now an equal playing field in the practice of every profession. In this regard, the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) has introduced the outcome-based education (OBE) in orienting and in evaluating the kind of education that will be implemented in the country. In the United States, for instance, Obama pronounced that the government will stop subsidizing schools that are not producing good results. Some observers said that the program centers around a rating system that will encourage colleges to do more with less. Federal funding for institutions will be tied to institutions ranking. They are talking about job readiness, fast-tracking into the workforce, and flexible scheduling. But as noted by some analysts, politicians are not talking about enriching education with diverse subject matter, time to engage in critical thinking, or participation in political, cultural, and intellectual life outside the classroom in a campus setting. They are actually talking about skills-based classes that provide the training and certification that used to be provided on the job. This set up takes away from corporations the cost of training workers and places it on the back of the students. That is why subjects like Filipino will be side-tracked to a K-to-12
curriculum, giving way to the internationalization of the courses that is, to
give more importance to English course in college which will be the standard language in the global market.