Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background of Study
Peoples life in this world has norms or rules to control their activity. Some people
follow or obey that rules and the others are not. There will be a punishment for
them who do not obey it, but the punishment depends on what the bad acts are.
For example, someone who does steal act in the bus will get punishment from the
community when the victim realizes it, and they will hit the robber. The societies
do it because they know that robbing is not appropriate to the norm in their
environment. Thus, they who disobey the norms are categorized as social
deviation acts. Those acts are usually done by the teenager, adult or even children.
A kind of social deviations is juvenile delinquency, such as violence, alcohol
consumption, playing truant, and homicide.
Social deviations are a serious problem for society because most of the agent is a
teenager. Sometimes they are anxious with new things so they do it without
thinking the risk. A source showed that the amounts of juvenile crimes are higher
than the amounts of the adult delinquent. FBI reports that in 1992 in the United
States made nearly 2,3 (2.3) million arrests of the juvenile under the age of 18,
with 13% of all violent crimes and 23% of all property crimes being committed by
juveniles (OJJDP in Frick, 1998:3). Furthermore, the role of parents is important
to control their activity. Moreover, when it comes to children, parents still have a
chance to help the child development be better before that bad act will continue
until teenage or even adult.
Factors that make children or teenager do those crimes are environment and
family. For example, children were neglected or abused by parents, lack of control
in a family, get insulted from siblings, victims of a broken home, or live in a
worse environment that always do social deviation. Further, the ways adult give
the punishment to children are also important to child development because a
child will tend to do deviations if they get punishment continuously. Thus, it is not
only about schoolmate, playmate or teacher who have a significant role to create
individual do that crime but also it is about how the way of parents to
communicate or interact with their children.
Children and teenager who do social deviations are categorized as Conduct
Disorder. When it occurs in adults is called Antisocial Personality Disorder, it is as
mentioned by American Psychiatric Association (1994: 85), Conduct Disorder
may be diagnosed in individuals who are older than age 18 years, but whereas if
the criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder are not met. In some cases, they do
social deviation acts because of their character as an antisocial person. However, it
does not mean that all of the antisocial people are categorized as individual with
Conduct Disorder, but it is for an antisocial person who does the defiant behavior.
This situation is strengthened by Kristin Liabo statement (2007:13) who say that
Conduct Disorder is characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of
antisocial, aggressive, or defiant behavior. Sometimes, people with this disorder
get worse in unexpected object or situation, like a state of anxiety. Therefore, they
1.2
Research Questions
1.3
Research Purposes
Based on the research questions above, the purposes of this research are:
1.
about Kevin.
2. To know Kevins Defense Mechanisms to overcome it.
1.4
Research Significances
The result of this research is expected to inform and to give contribution as below:
1.4.1 Academically
a.
teenagers and adults about antisocial person acts that categorized as Conduct
Disorder, and it also shows how that person solve it.
b.
This research is expected to give more insight about general strain theory and
Practically
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
Literature review consists of theories used to get the answer to the research
question. Those supporting theories are the psychology of literature, theories
about Conduct Disorder, and Defense Mechanism. We Need to Talk about Kevin
novel is literary work which describes a psychological condition of the main
character who has a problem with his behavior. Thus, this chapter explained about
the definition of the psychology of literature and its application toward a literary
work. Then, Conduct Disorder theory is used to figure out the behaviors that
make the main character categorized as Conduct Disorder and Defense
Mechanism theory will use to comprehend the ways of the main character solve
and control his problems.
2.1
Psychology in Literature
will influence to what the character think, how they behave and what they said.
Therefore, the characters and their behavior are more important to be analyzed
than plot and action.
In addition, Roekhan mentions three approaches of the psychology of literature.
First is a textual approach which examines the characters psychological aspects
in literary work. The second one is a receptive-pragmatic approach which
examines the readers psychological aspect as the consumers of literary work who
are formed by the influence of the literary work they read and the process of
reader reception in enjoying literary works. The last is an expressive approach
which examines the authors psychological aspect when creating his work of
literature (Suwardi Endaswara, 2003:97-98). In brief, psychology of literature
defines about how to analyze psychoanalytical of literature based view of the
author, the character or the reader. If it focuses on the character, conflicts of the
character in literary works will be easy to explore. Further, this research used the
first approach, textual approach because the characters psychological aspects in
We Need to Talk about Kevin novel are likely found in behavior or characters
mind.
2.2
According to Harmon and Holman in Kaufman (2009: 154), there are three
methods of characterization, they are: explicit presentation which illustrated by
action, presentation that showed by emotion, and representation is the impact of
actions and emotions on the characters inner self. It is simply thing, this character
is a person who acts some actions or narration in novel, short story, film, or
drama.
Moreover, Mario Klarer states that the most important elements in literary works
are: plot (what happens?), characters (who acts?), narrative perspective (who sees
what?), setting (where and when do the events take place?) (2004: 14). An
individuals character is that persons collection of character traits and these can
be defined as relatively stable dispositions to think, feel, and behave in certain
ways in certain situations (Jonathan Webber, 2006:95).
In literature, a character defined as the authors creation, through the words, the
personality who takes on actions, thoughts, expressions, attitudes unique which
appropriate to that personality and consistent with it (Edgar V. Roberts in The
Unity of the Twelve 1990:166).
Sartre objects not to the idea that humans have characters which explain their
behavior, but their idea about the characters that determine their behavior (in
Jonathan Webber journal, 2006:101). It means that someone has character based
on their behavior so behavior influence what people will be. Thus, character
comes from behavior and it defines through the words, actions, thoughts,
expressions, and attitudes. Other elements in literary works are characterization.
Characterization is the manner to know a character that is presented in the story. It
is divided into two; direct and indirect characterization. Direct characterization is
the way of author shows the personality of the character. For example, Rita was
small and weak, but she had immense courage and independence. Indirect
characterization is the way of the writer shows things that reveal the personality of
the character. It can be seen by the actual speech of the character, what the
character is thinking or feeling, the characters actions, or how other people
respond to the character. For example: Im afraid to mount a horse, but I want to
try it, said Anggoro.
In addition, Albertine Minderop (2005:22) assumes that there are two methods in
characterization, they are telling and showing methods. The telling method is a
method which the author directly tells the reader what a character like. For
example, it uses narrator or the character. On the contrary, showing method is a
method of characterization in which the reader have to figure out for themselves
what the character is like through a characters thoughts, actions, choice or words,
ways of talking, and interactions with another character. Thus, in this method, the
readers can interpret and evaluate the character.
In the other hand, character is also influenced by behavior. Everyone has different
behavior, it can be good or bad (for example antisocial behavior). Those behaviors
depend on social or environmental factors. Thus, psychology is the way to know
what elements that makes it happen.
There are several ways to know more detail about antisocial behavior, such as
child-onset pathway, adolescent-onset pathway, and the delayed-onset pathway.
First, the child-onset pathway is antisocial behavior which starts in early
childhood and becomes more severe, frequent, and intense as the child grows
older. This is expressed in noncompliance, anger, irritability, discipline problems,
and temper tantrums that appear before the age of 3, worsened at the ages of 7-10
and become established antisocial behavior by the ages of 11-13. Second, the
adolescent-onset pathway begins suddenly from ages 12-18 without prior history
of behavior problems with high levels of aggression. These children usually come
from less dysfunctional families. At Last, the delayed-onset pathway usually does
not exhibit behavioral problems until adolescence (Clarke, 2011:79). In this
research, the child-onset pathway used to analyze antisocial behavior of the main
character.
Moreover, antisocial behavior is divided into two forms: overt and covert. Overt
antisocial behaviors include physical aggression, violence, and assault. Covert
antisocial behaviors include theft, playing truant, and lying. In overt, families of
children and youth often manifest coercive act while in covert is poor child
monitoring (Hinshaw in Clarke, 2011: 78). It makes children with covert
antisocial behavior tend to hide their acts from family that may children or youth
pretend to be an obedient person when they are with family.
This behavior is categorized as mental illness because individuals cannot control
themselves, thus it is caused by internal and external factors; family and
environment. Usually, the cause of mental illness comes from the result of two
factors: genetic physiologic inheritance and the effect of the family environment
on the child during infancy and childhood (Barry, 2002:109). Furthermore, parents
should take several times to accompany children in order to know how their
development is. If they do abnormal behavior, parents can stop it before that
behavior continues until adult. Finally, when the antisocial behavior occurs in
children is called Conduct Disorder while in adults are categorized as Antisocial
Personality Disorder.
The serious antisocial behavior usually occurs in children in the context of
Conduct Disorders or in adults as a prominent feature of personality disorders
(Herpertz in Clarke, 2011:77).
2.4
Conduct Disorder
Conduct Disorder is a behavioral disorder that evolves over time. Children with
this disorder behave in an aggressive manner toward others and violate the rights
of others. It occurs to someone under age of 18 years. In the fourth edition of
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV; American
Psychiatric Association, 1994: 90-91), Conduct Disorder is a repetitive and
persistent pattern of behavior to break the rule or norm in society, for example,
they hurt someone feeling, fight, humiliate, or even kill others.
People with Conduct Disorder will show three or more criteria in the past 12
months and at least they have one criterion appears in the past 6 months. Those
criteria are included in four item, they are; aggression to people and animals,
destruction of property, deceitfulness or theft, and serious violations of rules.
Besides, the definition of aggression to people and animals include bullies,
threatens, intimidates others, and physical fights. Sometimes it uses a weapon that
can cause serious physical harm to others. It also has been physically cruel to
people or animals, has stolen while confronting a victim, and has forced someone
into sexual activity. Another criterion of person with Conduct Disorder is
destruction of property, which content has deliberately engaged in fire setting with
the intention to cause serious damage and has deliberately destroyed others'
property. The other criterion is deceitfulness or theft, like distracting someone
else's house, building, or car, and stealing items of nontrivial value without
confronting a victim. Last criteria are serious violations of rules that contain
individual often stays out at night despite parental prohibitions (beginning before
age 13), run away from home overnight at least twice (or once without returning
for a lengthy period), and often playing truant beginning before age 13 (Frick,
1998:23).
Conduct Disorder may occur because of environment or family who make them
do those acts. Some factors which can contribute to Conduct Disorder are: chaotic
home environment, child abuse, negligence, lack of supportive environment, poor
social attachments, presence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, parental
factors: (prevalence of hostility, resentment, and bitterness between parents,
parental psychopathology and substance abuse, parents who themselves are the
products of abusive homes, and parental unemployment (Barry, 2002: 341).
In particular circumstance, those factors are divided into individual, family,
school, and protective factors. First, individual factor appears because of
characteristics of individual who do antisocial behavior. Antisocial behavior is an
act when a person does not want to gather with others. He or she stays away from
other people and is not interested in making conversation. That person always
does some activities like watching television or movie by himself / herself
individually and is not interested in discussing with others because they are more
comfortable when he or she is alone. They just will talk with someone who is
close to them. Thus, person with Conduct Disorder usually has these problems,
they are uncontrolled temperament, neurological abnormalities, delayed motor
developments, intellectual ability, reading difficulties, hyperactivity, slow heart
rate and poor scores on neuropsychological tests of memory (Moffitt in Liabo,
2007:25). Those problems are caused by something wrong with their behavior.
Behavioral problems are often seen in relation to a childs temperament. In this
also takes crucial problem that makes children be antisocial person especially
mothers health. Mothers physical illness is a predictor of later delinquency,
whilst the same relationship is not seen in of fathers health (Liabo, 2007:25). The
condition of mother gives more influence to child than father which there is a
strong relationship between mother depression and later antisocial behavior
(Richman, Stevenson and Graham in Liabo 2007:25).
The third factor is school. Each school has its own policy, it also has the rule to
punish their students. The school will give some punishments to students who do
bad things such as fighting, bullying, and playing truant. The worst thing is when
school takes decision to suspend or even expel them; it will make students get
more violence than before. It is because they do not have other places that can
control them. Schools that categorize pupils as deviant and failures, ignore
repeated playing truant and suspend or expel the most difficult students contribute
to the development of violent behavior (Marshall and Watt in Liabo, 2007:26).
Bullying behavior connected with aggression. In this point, if a student bullies to
others, she/he relates to delinquent behavior (Van der Wal in Liabo, 2007:26).
The last factor is protective factors. It is about how parents react to children or
teenager with deviate behavior. Children will be more aggressive when parents
give them more punishment. On the contrary, children will decrease their upset
behavior when parents also decrease the punishment. When some of the risk
factors identified above are reversed, they present as protective factors. For
example, low level of parental physical punishment of young offenders has been
associated with lowering the risk that the offending behavior persists into
adulthood (Stouthamer- Loeber in Liabo, 2007: 28).
From those criteria and factors, people with Conduct Disorder also have anxiety
feelings from unexpected object or situation. They sometimes find protection to
against what they do. This protection called as Defense Mechanism.
2.5
Defense Mechanism
situations which people seem unable to face reality or admit an obvious truth.
Distortion used to reduce anxiety and find an emotional comfort.
Second, immature Defense Mechanisms include acting out, avoidance, projection,
and regression. Acting out is the individual handling their problem by engaging in
actions rather than reflecting internal feeling. Avoidance is refusing to deal with
unpleasant objects or situations.
Acting out is the individual copes with stress by engaging in actions rather than
reflecting upon internal feelings. Avoidance is refusing to deal with or encounter
unpleasant objects or situations. Projection occurs when a person is unable to
acknowledge his or her own thoughts or feelings and attribute them to others.
Regression occurs when the mind is unable to tolerate severe intrapsychic or
environmental stress (Barry, 2002:177).
Defense
Mechanisms
include
displacement,
identification,
her manager. Rationalization is the way to find a good reason to hide the real
situation. For example, Nina said to her teacher that it was raining, when her
teacher asking her about the reason for coming late. In fact, Nina oversleeps.
Repression is the way to reduce the anxiety from feeling of frustration or internal
conflict. For example, Arifin dreams about his beloved girl who will die because
of accident. Then, he solves his anxiety to think that it was just a dream. Reaction
Formation is the way to behave the opposite manner when he or she cannot accept
something that may come from his or her experience. For example, a boy who has
corporal punishment may feel angry with the teacher, but when the teacher enters
the class he is very polite to the teacher.
Fourth, mature Defense Mechanisms contain altruism, anticipation, humor,
sublimation, and suppression. It used by the healthy mature mind when it is under
minimal stress.
Altruism is defense to satisfy ones own needs into the wish to meet the needs of
others. Anticipation is a defense by which a person intellectually and emotionally
acknowledges an upcoming situation that is expected to provoke anxiety. Humor
is a defense used when a person cannot fully tolerate a difficult situation. In
sublimation, a repressed urge or desire is expressed in a socially acceptable or
useful way. Suppression is a defense that is similar to repression; it stores thoughts
or memories in the subconscious mind where they are easily retrievable (Barry,
2002:179).
In short term, anticipation is defense that use to prevent something that may threat
person, it makes him or her less stressful when the event that expects to provoke
anxiety to come. Sublimation is the way to change the unwanted things to positive
ways. Humor is person ways to use joke to amuse her or himself. It is a good way
because it will not damage her or himself and even others.
This research will not take all of those kinds of Defense Mechanisms. It just will
use one or more from narcissistic, immature, neurotic, or mature Defense
Mechanism.
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHOD
This chapter is going to discuss several issues related to research method. This
research uses qualitative method. Several steps that are related to the research
method are: collecting the data, technique for collecting data, and technique for
data analysis. Collecting the data is the process to collect sources of data that are
related to the research. The technique of collecting data is the way for collecting
the appropriate data. Finally, technique for data analysis discusses the steps to
analyze the data.
3.1
Research Method
Source of Data
The source of data in this research used two kinds of sources, they are primary
and secondary data.
3.2.1
Primary Data
The primary data is novel by Lionel Shriver entitled We Need to Talk about
Kevin. This novel published in 2003. From this novel, some evidence from
dialogues and narratives related to the Conduct Disorder and Defense Mechanism
will take to analyze the research.
3.2.2
Secondary Data
The other source and references will be used to support the research are secondary
data. It will be taken from books, journal, essays, the internet, film, and articles
associated with psychological approach, Conduct Disorder, and Defense
Mechanism theory. In the film, which has the same title with the novel, the image
of the character and the story was needed to help illustrate the plot of the novel.
3.4
Data Analysis
Data analysis is a process of organizing and putting the data. In this part,
descriptive qualitative method applied to analyze the data. In analyzing data, it
started to sort the behavior of Kevin by reading We Need to Talk about Kevin.
Then, the data sorted was reread to separate between significant data from
insignificant data. The significant data include specific information about
antisocial behavior, Conduct Disorder and Defense Mechanism theory which its
forms are words, phrases, and sentences. The insignificant data were reduced.
Next, the significant data examined according to its context and related theory,
some quotations related to Conduct Disorder and Defense Mechanism were taken
and analyzed.
CHAPTER IV
DISCUSSION
In this chapter, the results of the data analysis are presented. The way to
answer problem that is mentioned in chapter 1 by collecting and processing the
data. This step of answering is important to figure out the problem of the main
character and at which he solves is presented as Conduct Disorder and Defense
Mechanism portrayed in Lionel Shrivers We Need to Talk about Kevin. The steps
will be presented into two sub-chapters, they are disorder issue of the main
character and the way he overcomes the disorder with defense mechanism.
There are some characters in the novel and the main character is Kevin
who always makes some troubles. The other characters are his mother and teacher
as the witnesses who knew Kevins odd things. In the novel, the story was applied
in indirect characterization. Its proved from the statement:
So we [Eva and Kevin] stared at each other in silence.
Kevin's expression was placid. It still displayed remnants of
resolution, but determination was already sliding to the
quiet, self-satisfied complacency of a job well done. His
eyes [Kevin] were strangely clearunperturbed, almost
peacefuland I [Eva] recognized their pellucidity from that
morning, though breakfast already seemed ten years past.
This was the stranger-son, the boy who dropped his corny,
shuffling disguise of I [Eva] mean and I [Eva] guess for the
plumb carriage and lucidity of a man with a mission.
(Shriver, 2003: 446)
The evidence shows Kevins description through another character, Eva. It
talks about his expression and feeling. The word Kevin's expression was placid
and His eyes [Kevin] were strangely clearunperturbed, almost peacefuland I
[Eva] recognized their pellucidity from that morning, though breakfast already
seemed ten years past. described characterization of Kevin as a person who lack
of empathy after he killed eleven people. Hence, evidence comes from another
character; Dana Rocco, his teacher. She explained about characterization of Kevin
through Kevins action. And he [Kevin] rebels by doing everything he's [Kevin]
supposed to. It's very clever. But I [Dana Rocco] look in his eyes [Kevin], and
he's [Kevin] raging. Why?" (Shriver, 2003: 391). This quotation proved that
Kevin does not have any respect to others. It is in line with Jonathans idea that
indirect characterization shows personality of the character through the actual
speech of the character, what the character thinking or feeling, the characters
actions, or how other people respond to the character (Jonathan Webber journal,
2006:101).
Disorder issue as the first sub-chapter describes Conduct Disorder which
was drawn in Kevins behavior as the main character in the novel. Then, Defense
Mechanisms as the second sub-chapter explains Kevins behavior the way he
overcomes his anxiety. Further discussion of those sub-chapters are discussed
below.
(Shriver, 2003: 14). Eva wrote the letter to his husband whom she wanted to
tell her thought, feeling and experience about Kevin.
One symptoms of individual with Conduct Disorder is destruction of
property. Eva found one of those symptoms on Kevins acts and those acts are
discussed below.
I [Eva] refrained from adding, like the way you [Kevin]
ruined my [Eva] favorite caftan, that's part of your [Kevin]
personality. (Shriver, 2003: 183)
That paragraph told about Kevin who destructed a caftan, his mother
favorite thing. The bolded word showed that Kevin acted was one kind of his
characters. That condition occurs when Kevin asked about the meaning of
personality. It was on Evas room when she made her own room to create
special art of maps.
The countries the maps signified, but he [Kevin] did
understand that they signified something to me [Eva].
(Shriver, 2003: 182)
Kevin left nothing to my [Eva] deduction: He [Kevin] was
still draining the last of the red ink into the barrel of his
[Kevin] squirt gun. Just as he'd [Kevin] posed in the process
of retrieving the gun from the top of our kitchen cabinet, he
[Kevin] seemed to have saved this last tablespoon for my
[Eva] arrival. He [Kevin] was standing on my [Eva] study
chair, bent in concentration; he [Kevin] did not even look
up. The filling hole was small, and though he [Kevin] was
pouring intently, my [Eva] burnished oak desk was awash in
spatter. His [Kevin] hands were drenched.
"Now," he [Kevin] announced quietly, "it's special."
(Shriver, 2003: 184-185)
Based on the evidence above, Kevin broke Muffet, his classmate, tea
set. The word of it wasnt any ordinary tea set and little handle with
care mean that they are important thing. Muffet even did not want it to break
by handling it carefully. In the other hand, Kevin broke it deliberately. It
showed with the word dropped it on the floor. As the characters of
individual with Conduct Disorder, Kevin did it without any remorse, this
proved with the evidenced below.
"How would she [Miss Fabricant] know?" He [Kevin]
yawned.
"How would you [Kevin] feel, kiddo, if you [Kevin] had
something that you [Kevin] cared about more than anything,
and you [Kevin] brought it to show to the class, and then
someone smashed it?"
"Like what?" he [Kevin] asked, innocence tinged with selfcongratulation. (Shriver, 2003: 213)
I [Eva] clutched at ancient history. "Remember your
[Kevin] squirt gun?"
He [Kevin] shrugged.
"Remember when Mommer lost her temper, and stamped on
it, and it broke?"
"You [Kevin] didn't like that, did you [Kevin]?"
"I [Kevin] didn't care," said Kevin. (Shriver, 2003: 215)
The bolded word showed that Kevin was bored with the topic and he
wasnt interested in it. It also could be meant that he has no remorseless from
something he did because he did not care about it. It is supported with
American Psychiatric Association (APA) stated that individuals with Conduct
Disorder might be lack appropriate feelings of guilt or remorse (APA DSMIV, 1994: 87). The second statement, which explained about Kevin who broke
his mother maps, occurred in three years old means that he was in preschool.
It is supported with the statement of White in Liabo stated that having
behavior problem at preschool age has been identified as the single best
prediction of later antisocial behavior (Liabo, 2007 : 22).
However, it was just Eva who realized Kevins behavior was different
from other children. Shriver explained it by the way Kevin responded to
Evas question with innocence and self congratulation and it included on
Evas letter. The way Kevin showed that he was good boy in front of his
father was not making his father suspicious. This way later made Eva said
Getting stuck with Dad the Dupe (Shriver, 2009: 410) because Kevin
always made a success of untruth statement. Another characteristic of
antisocial behavior is lying that explained as covert antisocial behavior, which
a bad result of covert antisocial behavior is continually existing in individual
until adolescent (Hinshaw in Clarke, 2011:78).
cruel to people. In these criteria, Shriver drew on other characters like Eva,
the waitress, Kevins teacher and Celia (Kevins little sister) in order to prove
the readers about how Kevins relationship and his environments were
displayed on his behavior.
even into adulthood (Frick, 1998: 16). Some bullies showed by Kevin are
following below.
way Kevin mocked the waitress spontaneously, and the waitress drew on
intimidated person. In contrast, Kevins father said that let it go because it just
children acted and they will give Kevin advice when he is adult. From that
conversation, Kevin showed as an individual with Conduct Disorder, which
includes in aggressive behavior when he mocked others. He did not have any
remorseless to do that, it captured in expression nyenyenye when his mother
warned it. It supported with American Psychiatric Association stated that
individuals with Conduct Disorder might be callous and lack appropriate
feelings of guilt or remorse (American Psychiatric Association DSM IV,
1994: 87).
The second evidence below strengthens the statement that Kevin did
verbal bullying to his mother when she warned him and even in every his
mother talk. The way he answered or imitated his mother statements by
mockery is categorized as person who could not respect to others.
"ALL right, Kevin. But remember: You [Kevin] only get to
sit like an adult if you [Kevin] act like one."
"NYEE nyee, nyeh nyeh. Nyeh nyeh-wyee-nyeh: Nyeh
nyehnyeh nyehnyeh nyeh-nyeh nyeh nyeh-nyeh nyeh-nyeh
nyee nyeh nyeh."With waltzing mockery, he [Kevin] had
captured my [Eva] stern cadence and preachy inflection
with such perfect pitch that he [Kevin] might have a future
singing covers as a lounge singer. "Cut it out, Kevin." I
[Eva] tried to sound offhand.
"Nye-nye nyee,nye nye!"
I [Eva] turned to you [Franklin]. "How long has this been
going on?"
"Nyeh nyeh nyeh NYEE nyeh nyeh-nyeh nyeh?"
"A month? It's a phase. He'll [Kevin] grow out of it."
"Nyeh nyeh? Nyeh-nyeh nyeee. Nyeh nyeh nyeh-nyehnyeh."
"I [Eva] can't wait," I [Eva] said... (Shriver, 2003: 147-148)
From that situation, Shriver tried to present the conflict between parents
and children. A child who did not respect his parents, to a mother in this case,
and how mother responded to it. However, Shriver also created a character of
mother who did not want her child to be worst in the future. It proved with the
statement, Hell grow out of it. Its in line with an American Psychiatric
Association that stated individual with Childhood-Onset Type usually have
some symptoms that meet full criteria for Conduct Disorder prior to puberty
(American Psychiatric Association DSM IV, 1994: 86). Unfortunately,
Kevins behavior in bullying act made him to be someone who like to irritate
others.
In other situation, Shriver displayed other Kevins behavior in different
places; in school. The aim of this may show the relationship among Kevin,
friends and his teacher. The example of Kevin with criteria of Conduct
Disorder showed as he was fourteen years old. Kevin did bullying activity to
his teacher. Eva knew it from Dana Rocco, Kevins teacher, who complained
about Kevins behavior. Dana declared that she was not the one who felt there
was an odd thing on Kevins behavior, yet other teachers also felt the same. In
this part, Shriver tried to convince the readers about Kevins wrong behavior
through another characters, Dana Rocco and other teachers.
The third evidence below shows an example of Kevin when he hurt his
teacher feeling by humiliating her in front of other students. This kind of
bullying is categorized as social bullying which he used to mock his teacher
by asking question that he knew the answered earlier.
Kevin. However, in the end of the story, Eva knew that it was really Kevin
fault.
"What is that?" I [Eva] asked. "What have you [Kevin] got
there?"
With a small, crafty smile, he [Kevin] opened his palm,
displaying his talisman with the shy pride of a boy with his
prize shooting marble. I [Eva] stood up so quickly that my
chair clattered backward onto the floor. It isn't often that
when you [Eva] look at an object, it looks back.
The fact that Celia's glass eye has remained out of my
[Eva] sight since can only mean (Shriver, 2003: 461).
From that scene, the readers knew that the characterization of Kevin hid
the actual story which means that he lied and lack of empathy. Moreover, that
statement also evidenced that Kevin did aggressive behavior to his sister. He
broke Celias eye with pour the Liquid-Plumr on his fourteen years old. Its in
line with American Psychiatric Association (APA) that stated an individual
over age 18 years, a diagnosis of Conduct Disorder can be given only if the
criteria are not fit to Antisocial Personality Disorder (APA DSM IV, 1994:
90). By this, diagnosis of individuals with Conduct Disorder gives to
individuals under age 18 years. Hence, Kevin did it without any guilty feeling
which proved by the word crafty smile. It is appropriate with the criteria of
Conduct Disorder which person with this disorder may feelings guilty or
remorse (American Psychiatric Association DSM IV, 1994: 87).
good relationship to others in his school. From that cases, Dana Rocco, as his
teacher and victim shout him to stop that act but Kevin kept doing it. It was in
line with symptoms of individual with Conduct Disorder that he or she often
argues with adults (Liabo, 2007: 101). Therefore, those acts proved that the
characterization of Kevin lied continuously, egoist, temper tantrum, and cruel.
It's surprisingly difficult to kill people with a crossbow.
Kevin knew that. And so he waited.
When at last at 5:40 a security guard jingled by to lock up,
was dismayed by the Kryptonite, and peeked through the
crack of the door to see red, Kevin waited. When the police
arrived with those massive but useless cutters (which the
chain merely dented) and at length were driven to secure an
electric metal saw that shrieked and spit sparksall of
which took timeKevin put his feet up on the alcove rail
and waited. (Shriver, 2003: 444)
So we [Kevin and Eva] stared at each other in silence.
Kevin's expression was placid. It still displayed remnants of
resolution, but determination was already sliding to the
quiet, self-satisfied complacency of a job well done. His
eyes were strangely clearunperturbed, almost peaceful
and I [Eva] recognized their pellucidity from that morning,
though breakfast already seemed ten years past. This was
the stranger-son, the boy who dropped his corny, shuffling
disguise of I [Eva] mean and I guess for the plumb carriage
and lucidity of a man with a mission. (Shriver, 2003: 446)
The statements explained about Kevin behavior that was cold-hearted.
The words It's surprisingly difficult to kill people with a crossbow. Kevin
knew that. And so he waited proved that Kevin is person who lack of
empathy, he did it to make sure that his victims totally hurt and would die. It
was appropriate with characteristic of Conduct Disorder that may have little
empathy and little concern for the feelings, wishes, and well-being of others
(American Psychiatric Association DSM IV, 1994: 87). Then, Shriver
play with. In fact, Kevin could not accept it. Thus, he stole precious photo of
her mother.
4.3.2. Intellectualization
acting as if he did it for other interest instead showed that it caused by conflict
between Kevin and his mother. Its in line with Straker (2000: 3) statement
that intellectualization is a 'flight into reason', where the person avoids
uncomfortable emotions by focusing on facts and logic.
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
5.1. Conclusion
Based on data analysis, there are two criteria of Kevin behavior
categorized as individual with Conduct Disorder portrayed on We Need to
Talk about Kevin. The first is the destruction of property. For this behavior,
there are two terms of Kevin actions that are described. The actions are
destructing his mother maps and his friends tea set. The action of destructing
his mother maps did by Kevin when he was six years old. He did it because
of hatred from something that makes his mother happy. Hence, he did it to
make his mother got angry. Another destruction of property is breaking his
friends tea set. This behavior did when Kevin was six years old. He did it
because of hatred of his friends collection. Muffet, his friend, collecting his
tea set and bringing in school then Kevin broke her precious teacup. Then, the
second criterion of behavior that is conducted by Kevins Conduct Disorder is
aggression to people. These behaviors like bullying, forcing someone to
sexual activity and doing cruel actions. Bullying action is Kevin behavior to
heart others feeling through mockery and humiliation which it is including on
verbal bullying. In this case, the victims are a waitress, his mother, and
teacher. He mocks his waitress face in front of others buyers, mocks his
mother with said nyenyenye when he dislike with the topic, and he
humiliates his teacher in front of other students by giving the question that he
knew the answer before. Forcing someone to sexual activity is Kevin action
did in front of his mother deliberately. It shows when he was laugh after his
mother knew what Kevin did. Doing cruel action is Kevin behavior to hurt
others physically like lost his sisters eye and kill eleven people. At first, he
made his father accuse his mother did it then at the end of the story he admit
to his mother with giving it to her as a gift. Another cruel action is kill eleven
people which he did it without any guilty. Those victims are his schoolmates,
a teacher, a cafeteria, his father, and sister. He did it on his fifteen, two days
before he was sixteen which it was like an individual with Conduct Disorder
that he or she is under eighteen years old.
There are two types of Defense Mechanism portrayed in the novel. The
first is displacement. This self-defense used by Kevin to repress his anger to
other people or objects instead of his mother as source problem. The objects
that became the target of Kevin are crayons and photo. It occurs when his
mother told him about having a new sibling, Kevin dislike it and he broke the
crayons. He also tore the precious photo of his mother on the day the birth of
his sister. In school, Kevin showed his anger with expression and rebels
anything which it proved by Dana Rocco complained to his mother. In fact, it
was his anger at his mother. He prefers to kill eleven others to explode his
anger as his revenge to his mother than did a physical action to her. The
second Defense Mechanism of Kevin is intellectualization. This self-defense
described through expression and utterance. In the expression, Kevin tried to
hide his feeling with logic things. This logic thing was seen on the way he
talked about news interest and teenage crimes instead of his hurt feeling to his
mother. In utterance, he also denies about having a bad relationship with his
mother with talked about her experience in some countries and achievement.
5.2. Suggestion
For the readers, reading We Need to Talk about Kevin gives information
and education about the behavior of children, child development, and selfdefense. It helps them understand and takes preventative to their children
before do the worst thing like kill action. For the further research, We Need to
Talk about Kevin novel can analyze with the sociology of literature. The
character of Kevin, teenager who turns to be killer, is like the real story that it
was Columbine massacre.
Synopsis
Eva was an owner of AWAP Company and she loved traveling to another country.
In 37 years old, she married with Franklin. Two years later, she had baby namely
Kevin. At first, she did not want to have baby because it forced her to stay at
home all day and made her bored or will take her freedom to enjoy life. In the
other hand, Franklin really wanted to have a child, so Eva forced to born her child.
For that reason, Eva still consumed alcohol and drugs when she was a child. In
her childbirth, her baby, Kevin did not want to take mother breast. He kept staying
away from his mother. He just wanted to be carried by his father. If Franklin
worked, Kevin will cry all day when he was with his mother. Otherwise, he never
showed his crying in front of his father.
When Kevin was six years old, he still used diaper everywhere. As time went by,
Eva tried to love Kevin, but he showed the opposite. He used to make his mother
angry, like he would not eat when his mother saw or around him, spoiled maps of
his mother that he knew that it was important for her, played possum in math that
actually he knew it well and even mocked at his mother. In his environment,
Kevin ever got trouble with his friends. For example, when he played with his
next door, his friend rode a bicycle then fell and it almost made him died. His
fathers friend expected that Kevin hurt him with seeking a way to damage that
bicycle because there was no problem with the bicycle before and Kevin was the
only one who accompanied his friend. In school, his Friend ever cried with odd
condition and his mothers friend expected that it was Kevin fault because he was
the one who found in scene of action.
Kevin took advantages of Lenny, the only of his friend, to be obedient for all of
Kevin wanted. They ever did a bad act in the middle of road like put stone and
brick. On that case, Kevin lies to his father that it was Lenny idea. Next day, Eva
heard what they were talking. In fact, that incident was actually Kevin idea and
they were planning it before.
In his school, Kevins friend saw him as strange person because he always wore a
screwy fashion from others, like tiny-clothes fashion and narrow jeans. Kevins
teacher disliked him because Kevin did some bad acts to them, such as he ever
humiliates Ms. Rocco, in front of the class when he asked difficult question that
his teacher could not answer it but he knew the answer before. He broke teachers
favorite tea set of Miss Fabricant. He also ever made his teacher discharged
because Kevin lies about drama lesson. Kevin made the wrong story about what
Ms. Pagorsky taught and others believed on him. From that case, Ms. Pagorsky
discharged.
Kevin had a sister namely Celia. She was cute girl and careful on things that she
loved. One day, Celia lost her hamster. Eva and Franklin look for hamster
everywhere but they could not find it. Eva thought that it might Kevin manner
because Celia would not let the cage opened and she said that they played together
before. Next day, Celia got an accident which it made her lost her eye. Franklin
accused that it was Eva fault but Eva believed that it was Kevin fault because she
put the cleaner squid away from Celia. She was not tall enough to got it. Kevin
was there and he was the first person who called doctor. In the end of the story,
Eva knew that it was really Kevin way to hurt Celia because he gave her a gift;
Celias eye.
In
home,
Kevin
liked
watching
something
related
to
decapitations,