BLE PT COOEC COOGEE Pros MILA FEED STUDY aoc ‘ CNOOC SES LTD. 24-5. 201 Ales 3D EXECUTION STRATEGY DOCUMENT NUMBER: MLA-SPM-206 REV] DATE DESCRIPTION PREPD [ cHK’D [ REV | EXM'D [ APPD | “B | 110505 | ISSSUED FOR COMMENTS woe | mea | ma | ore peal ¢ | 110317 | ISSUED FOR APPROVAL 1 Hel fata | ieee& enooeses itp. Mia reepsropy ‘TABLE OF CONTENT 1.0 SCOPE... 2.0 PURPOSE. nrccnneeeninninnnninnntin 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND ABBRIVEATIONS, 4.0 WORK FLOW ACTIVITY... 4A PROJECT SETUP... cnn 4.2. PDMS INSTRUCTION SETUP 4.3 DESIGN INPUT... 4.4 QUALITY CHECK....... 45 OUTPUT AND DELIVERABLES. 5.0 3D MODEL REVIEW....... 5.1 RESPONSIBILITY.......... 5.2. ATTENDANCE 5.3 PROCEDURE. 5.4 REPORT. rennnnnnen 5.5 FOLLOW-UP ACTIVITIES. 6.0 AS-BUILT 3D MODEL wee me D Hn eRe RHEE Pagezofe BML roo Se ee MLA-SPMEDO6RaY,Ce& cnooeses itp. Mita FEED STUDY 4.0 SCOPE ‘This specification describes the work flow activities and interfaces involved in the use of Plant Design Management System (herein after PDMS) modeling, check, deliverables and Model Review {for Mila-A platform. 20 PURPOSE ‘This specification defines EPC CONTRACTOR's PDMS Implementation Strategy how to utilize PDMS for engineering and construction. The major purposes of utilizing PDMS is to serve for Mila-A platform as a design tool and to achieve following: €) Interference Free Design among Disciplines b) High Quality Documentation +) Automatic Material Take-off 4) Consistency and Uniformity Design from Common Database e) Design Visualization for Virtual Review 4) Visualization for Constructabilty / Maintainabilty / Operabiity 4g) isometric drawing issue contro! 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND ABBRIVEATIONS. > PDMS (Plant Design Management Systerr ‘A proprietary 3D-CAD software package produced by AVEVA. Equipment, piping and structure modules are provided for inputting 3D model. The drawing and report modules are provided for data or document extraction > PDMS Model Three-dimensional Mila-A piatform established by POMS and presented for Model Review > Review Reality Name of 3D Model for PDMS visualization system > PDMS Catalogue POMS catalogue such as piping material, structural member and tables for PDMS model. > RDB Reference Data Base > SES CNOOC SES LTD. >» EPC CONTRACTOR The company awarded EPC contract. 4.0 WORK FLOW ACTIVITY PDMS utilization between disciplines is controlled by Project Engineering Manager. Paget BLE row: ee ae MLA-SPM.206Rev, C& enooeses i10. MILA FEED STUDY 4.4 PROJECT SETUP PDMS project RDB is set up according to the following information. 2) PDMS piping material specification files are generated based on piping material specification system, b) Component standard: ASME/ASTM/APUBS etc. ©) BranchiService limits/Assembly/Structure Standard profiles/Implied Items are set. 4.2, PDMS INSTRUCTION SETUP According to the plant layout and construction requirement, the past project's POMS experience and ‘project requirements, following instruction are set a) PDMS Modeting instruction (Including area and madel definition) b) Quality Control (Including interference check) 43 DESIGN INPUT P&ID, General Layout, Equipment drawing, 20 piping planning drawing etc, are the source of information to PDMS input a) Equipment General Layout will be a reference drawing for equipment modeling. Equipment is modeled in accordance with latest vender documents. Location and nozzles are checked through PDMS, reports with source dacuments, b) Piping 2D piping planning drawing, detail sketch, P&ID and RDB information will be the source of piping modeling. All input piping shall be checked in accordance with latest MLA-SPM-202, “Specification for Piping Materials”. Data consistency, latest instrument ( piping specialty information and vent / drain existence ete. will be checked ‘All pipe supports will be input into 3D model. And the each detail pipe support drawing will be extracted from PDMS and perfected by AutoCAD. ©) Steel Structures ‘The 30 steel structure main elements are input with X-STEEL and translated to PDMS. Other small elements such as handrails, Staircases, and ladders may be input directly with POMS. With the above combination, seamless data from steel fabrication to platform PDMS model are established and design / fabrication quality is kept at high level 4d) Electrical and Instrument Electrical and Instrument input is limited to Junction Box and Lighting fixture / Cable Tray below process deck, 2D electrical and instrument layouts will be the source of information for modeling, Instrument Cable Tray, panels, etc. are modeled for interference check and confirmation of operation / maintenance Pate BIB xo: COGS wom MLA.SPM206Rew.Ce enooceses 10. Mita eeeD sruby 44 QUALITY CHECK During design and madeling stage (3D Model Review), any problems will be checked in accordance with common quality check procedure and the result is reported to the related discipline engineers. Engineers can check such result then find solution and control status through 3D Model Review. 4.5 OUTPUT AND DELIVERABLES 2) lsometric drawing and MTO data ‘After Model Review and final QC check, isometric drawings are extracted from PDMS database. Extracted and issued line status is changed from unapproved to approved in POMS database to manage revision status. MTO data and isometric drawing data is synchronized and transferred to procurement and tracking system. Valves are taken off from P&ID in early stage. The first stage of piping material is taken off by conventional method due to relatively low accuracy of 3D model Final stage is taken off from PDMS database. ») Piping arrangement drawing, 2D Piping planning drawing will not be updated in detail design phase. Piping arrangement drawings will be extracted from PDMS, and perfected by AutoCAD. ©) Other drawing 20 Piping planning drawing will be utilized for some other drawing background and modified by 2D GAD system, 5.0 3D MODEL REVIEW ‘The purpose of 3D Mode! Review is to suppott the design verification process, confirm compliance with the Project Specification and check whether the design criteria have been observed with cegard to HSE, operability and maintainability. 84 RESPONSIBILITY > PM PM is responsible for organizing and scheduling 3D Model Review considering the overall project schedule. > Lead Assigned Engineer in Each Discipline (LAE) LAE is responsible for ensuring that the review is carried out for all area in accordance with the specified procedure and schedule, LAE is also responsible for ensuring that the preparation for review is property carried out, this procedure is satisfied, the schedule is ahead, all required participants are given the opportunity to review the model and the result of comments are promptly issued and followed up. 5.2 ATTENDANCE ‘3D Model Reviews will be proceeded with the following parties attendance. It will be organized by PEM a, PEM (CLIENT & CONTRACTOR) Sallie. b. Piping Engineer (CLIENT & CONTRACTOR) fulltime 6, Process Engineer (CLIENT & CONTRACTOR) on call d, Mechanical Engineer{CLIENT & CONTRACTOR) on call e. Instrument/ Electrical Engineer (CLIENT & CONTRACTOR] on call {Structure Engineer (CLIENT & CONTRACTOR) on call Pages FARMER coon COE enon MLA-SPM.206Rev..C& enooe ses itp. MILA FEED srupy {g. Operation Representative full time h. Safety Engineer(CLIENT & CONTRACTOR) full time CONTRACTOR's engineers attend the 3D Model Review to explain design philosophy, layout and arrangement for equipment, facilities and units. 5.3 PROCEDURE 3D Mode! Review is carried out on-screen basis with display sets, if necessary. Detail schedule is planned in accordance with project schedule and design progress. a) Internal 3D Model Review CONTRACTOR's Internal 3D Model Review is carried out among appropriate specialty engineers in advance of Joint 3D Model Review, using the check list and QC record shall be prepared prior to Joint 30 Model Review. After internal review, Joint 3D Model Review will be held. CONTRACTOR shall summarize the area where the specification or requirement can not be met by certain reasons and these area will be confirmed during Joint 3D review meeting if the deviations can be accepted. Attendance li a. PEM (CLIENT & CONTRACTOR) full time 'b. Piping Engineer (CLIENT & CONTRACTOR) full time 1. Process Engineer (CONTRACTOR) ‘on_call d. Mechanical Engineer (CONTRACTOR) ‘on_ call e.Instrumen_Electrical_Engineer_ _(CONTRACTOR) ‘on call f. ‘on_call 9. Safety Engineer (CONTRACTOR) full time b) Joint 3D Mode! Review Joint 3D Model Review wil be oficialy carried out two using Review Realty, Piping Planning Drawings and other study drawings. 1 Joint 30 model Review will be carried out at 60% detail design phase, 2" Joint 3D model Review will be carried out at 90% detail design phase. Attendance list a, PEM (CLIENT & CONTRACTOR) full time 'b. Piping Engineer (CLI i . Process Engineer(CLIENT & CONTRACTOR) ‘on_call d, Mechanical Engineer (CLIENT. RACTOR) call ¢. Instrument/ Electrical Engineef{CLIENT & CONTRACTOR) on call {, Structure Engineer(CLIENT & CONTRACTOR) ‘on_cali ‘a. Operation Representative full time h. Safety Engin Ht ‘OR iMime The following area will be confirmed at Joint 3D Model Review for all major items. - Safety ~ Accessibility ~ Operation - Space Allocation - Material Handling (Maintainabilty) Pageoat PBL rece COOEC woe MLA-SPM.206Rev.C& cnooe ses it. sma veep stuvy The key objectives to Joint 3D Model Review are to validate compliance with the project scope and standards and to canfirm the layout of piping and others. CLIENT and CONTI R shall agree on all reviewed comments at the end of Joint 3D Model Review. a) 1% Joint 30 Mode! Review 4 Model Review will represent 60% completion of the plant design of 3D model to optimize and verify the plant layout for major equipment and structures, The key objective to this 1* Joint 3D Model Review is to freeze the plant layout concept and to freeze the piping arrangement and structure design such as Equipment Layout and ‘Major Structure. b) 2% Joint 3D Model Review 2" Joint 3D Model Review will be carried out at the later stage of detail design. 2 Joint 3D. Model Review will represent 90% completion of the plant design of 3D model. The key objective of this Review is to confirm 60% Model Review comments and to finalize location of electrical and instrument items. tn order to manage the workshop effectively to complete within the allocated schedule, and moreover, in order to obtain the valuable outcome from the workshop, the following points need to be understood by everybody who is attending to the workshop. * 3D Model Review Operation and maintenance will cover the accessibility, space allocation and operability issues. In order to carry out the effective review, all attendee are requested to review the submitted Equipment Layout drawing , Piping Planning Drawing and Safety Access. drawing (2D Drawings) prior to the workshop. The review for Escape route shall be performed separately by Escape Route Plan issued in advance. Escape Route review in Soint Model Review will be limited to where some concem is observed. ‘+ 3D Model Review - material hand ‘The action items from the material handling review workshop will be used as a template, Both parties shall agree which equipment to be reviewed prior to the workshop. ‘* 3D Model Review - HAZOP / HAZID close out ‘The open item from HAZOP and HAZID, which needs the confirmation with 3D model will be discussed. ‘The purpose of the 3D revi n lowing items: + The area such as equipment layout / piping layout which can be reviewed in submitted 2D drawings. All attendee are requested to review submitted 2D drawings prior to the workshop. ‘+ The constructabilty issues, which can be reviewed from submitted 2D drawings. + The area such as piping stress / vibration design / engineering. These engineering has been / will be executed by the separate tools. ‘+ Crash point. The clash check will be performed prior to issue of Isometric Drawings. + Vender package shall be reviewed together with or separately from Joint 3D model review using 3D mode! prepared by vender. Page TaFE BLA ercoore CODEC roo MLA-SPM206Rev. C& cnooeses itp. Mina FEED stuDY 5.4 REPORT Agreed Model Review comments will be recorded on Comment Control Sheet and those records will be issued to CLIENT as a part of Minutes of Meeting (MOM). Whenever required, snap shot for commented item will be taken for secure understanding and agreement. 5.5 FOLLOW-UP ACTIVITIES CONTRACTOR ensures that all agreed comments have been correctly implemented on the mode! according to Comment Control Sheets. 6.0 AS-BUILT 3D MODEL As-built 3D model including reflection of modifications occurred in construction site shall be made and tumed over to CLIENT prior to completion of commissioning and performance testing Page Sof COGEC Poors, MLASSPM.206Rev. C